2023-07-11 14:16:24,229 INFO  [main] hbase.HBaseClassTestRule(94): Test class org.apache.hadoop.hbase.master.balancer.TestBalancerDecision timeout: 13 mins
2023-07-11 14:16:24,536 WARN  [Time-limited test] impl.MetricsConfig(128): Cannot locate configuration: tried hadoop-metrics2-hbase.properties,hadoop-metrics2.properties
2023-07-11 14:16:24,650 INFO  [Time-limited test] metrics.MetricRegistriesLoader(60): Loaded MetricRegistries class org.apache.hadoop.hbase.metrics.impl.MetricRegistriesImpl
2023-07-11 14:16:24,707 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1082): slop=0.0, systemTablesOnMaster=false
2023-07-11 14:16:24,714 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(253): Loaded config; maxSteps=1000000, runMaxSteps=false, stepsPerRegion=800, maxRunningTime=30000, isByTable=false, CostFunctions=[RegionCountSkewCostFunction, PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction, MoveCostFunction, RackLocalityCostFunction, TableSkewCostFunction, RegionReplicaHostCostFunction, RegionReplicaRackCostFunction, ReadRequestCostFunction, WriteRequestCostFunction, MemStoreSizeCostFunction, StoreFileCostFunction] , sum of multiplier of cost functions = 0.0 etc.
2023-07-11 14:16:24,727 INFO  [Time-limited test] hbase.ResourceChecker(147): before: master.balancer.TestBalancerDecision#testBalancerDecisions Thread=12, OpenFileDescriptor=263, MaxFileDescriptor=60000, SystemLoadAverage=544, ProcessCount=170, AvailableMemoryMB=8352
2023-07-11 14:16:24,729 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1082): slop=0.0, systemTablesOnMaster=false
2023-07-11 14:16:24,759 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(253): Loaded config; maxSteps=1000000, runMaxSteps=false, stepsPerRegion=800, maxRunningTime=30000, isByTable=false, CostFunctions=[RegionCountSkewCostFunction, PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction, MoveCostFunction, RackLocalityCostFunction, TableSkewCostFunction, RegionReplicaHostCostFunction, RegionReplicaRackCostFunction, ReadRequestCostFunction, WriteRequestCostFunction, MemStoreSizeCostFunction, StoreFileCostFunction] , sum of multiplier of cost functions = 0.0 etc.
2023-07-11 14:16:24,759 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1082): slop=0.0, systemTablesOnMaster=false
2023-07-11 14:16:24,759 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(253): Loaded config; maxSteps=1000000, runMaxSteps=false, stepsPerRegion=800, maxRunningTime=30000, isByTable=true, CostFunctions=[RegionCountSkewCostFunction, PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction, MoveCostFunction, RackLocalityCostFunction, TableSkewCostFunction, RegionReplicaHostCostFunction, RegionReplicaRackCostFunction, ReadRequestCostFunction, WriteRequestCostFunction, MemStoreSizeCostFunction, StoreFileCostFunction] , sum of multiplier of cost functions = 0.0 etc.
2023-07-11 14:16:24,782 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table0
2023-07-11 14:16:24,783 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table5
2023-07-11 14:16:24,783 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table4
2023-07-11 14:16:24,783 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table3
2023-07-11 14:16:24,783 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table2
2023-07-11 14:16:24,784 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1
2023-07-11 14:16:24,784 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table0
2023-07-11 14:16:24,784 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table9
2023-07-11 14:16:24,784 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table8
2023-07-11 14:16:24,784 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table7
2023-07-11 14:16:24,784 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table6
2023-07-11 14:16:24,785 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1
2023-07-11 14:16:24,793 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1965637113=0, srv2127019193=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:24,795 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:24,796 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:24,796 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:24,801 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:24,801 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table0
2023-07-11 14:16:24,801 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1965637113=0, srv2127019193=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:24,802 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:24,802 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:24,802 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:24,802 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table0) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:24,804 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1
2023-07-11 14:16:24,804 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv669261841=1, srv125755132=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:24,804 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:24,804 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:24,805 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:24,805 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:24,805 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table0
2023-07-11 14:16:24,806 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv669261841=1, srv125755132=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:24,806 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:24,806 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:24,806 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:24,807 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table0) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:24,808 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1
2023-07-11 14:16:24,808 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1167947751=0, srv818258745=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:24,808 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:24,809 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:24,809 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:24,809 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:24,809 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table0
2023-07-11 14:16:24,810 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1167947751=0, srv818258745=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:24,810 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:24,810 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:24,810 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:24,811 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table0) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:24,812 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table2
2023-07-11 14:16:24,812 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv2244141=0, srv412781398=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:24,812 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:24,813 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:24,813 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:24,813 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table2) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:24,813 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1
2023-07-11 14:16:24,814 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv2244141=0, srv412781398=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:24,814 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:24,814 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:24,814 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:24,815 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:24,815 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table0
2023-07-11 14:16:24,815 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv2244141=0, srv412781398=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:24,815 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:24,816 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:24,816 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:24,816 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table0) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:24,817 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table3
2023-07-11 14:16:24,817 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv73106329=1, srv2068322924=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:24,818 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:24,818 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:24,818 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:24,818 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table3) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:24,818 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table2
2023-07-11 14:16:24,819 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv73106329=1, srv2068322924=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:24,819 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:24,819 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:24,819 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:24,819 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table2) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:24,820 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1
2023-07-11 14:16:24,820 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv73106329=1, srv2068322924=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:24,820 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:24,820 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:24,821 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:24,821 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:24,821 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table0
2023-07-11 14:16:24,821 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv73106329=1, srv2068322924=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:24,822 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:24,822 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:24,822 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:24,822 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table0) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:24,823 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table0
2023-07-11 14:16:24,823 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv941570999=1, srv1338231397=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:24,823 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:24,824 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:24,824 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:24,824 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table0) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:24,824 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table0
2023-07-11 14:16:24,825 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv154495036=0, srv1954014908=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:24,825 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:24,825 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:24,825 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:24,826 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table0) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:24,826 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table5
2023-07-11 14:16:24,827 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv774804236=1, srv1431914465=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:24,827 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:24,827 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:24,828 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:24,828 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table5) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:24,828 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table4
2023-07-11 14:16:24,828 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv774804236=1, srv1431914465=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:24,829 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:24,829 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:24,829 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:24,829 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table4) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:24,829 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table3
2023-07-11 14:16:24,829 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv774804236=1, srv1431914465=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:24,830 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:24,830 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:24,830 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:24,831 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table3) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:24,831 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table2
2023-07-11 14:16:24,831 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv774804236=1, srv1431914465=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:24,831 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:24,831 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:24,831 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:24,832 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table2) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:24,832 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1
2023-07-11 14:16:24,832 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv774804236=1, srv1431914465=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:24,832 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:24,832 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:24,832 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:24,832 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:24,833 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table0
2023-07-11 14:16:24,833 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv774804236=1, srv1431914465=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:24,833 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:24,833 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:24,833 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:24,833 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table0) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:24,833 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table9
2023-07-11 14:16:24,834 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv774804236=1, srv1431914465=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:24,834 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:24,834 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:24,834 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:24,834 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table9) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:24,834 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table8
2023-07-11 14:16:24,834 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv774804236=1, srv1431914465=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:24,835 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:24,835 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:24,835 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:24,835 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table8) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:24,835 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table7
2023-07-11 14:16:24,835 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv774804236=1, srv1431914465=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:24,835 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:24,835 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:24,836 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:24,836 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table7) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:24,836 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table6
2023-07-11 14:16:24,836 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv774804236=1, srv1431914465=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:24,836 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:24,836 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:24,836 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:24,837 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table6) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:24,946 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1380
2023-07-11 14:16:24,946 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv857331976=1, srv2053058706=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:24,947 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:24,947 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:24,947 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:24,947 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1380) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:24,947 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1381
2023-07-11 14:16:24,947 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv857331976=1, srv2053058706=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:24,947 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:24,948 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:24,948 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:24,948 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1381) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:24,948 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table880
2023-07-11 14:16:24,948 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv857331976=1, srv2053058706=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:24,948 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:24,948 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:24,948 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:24,948 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table880) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:24,949 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1140
2023-07-11 14:16:24,949 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv857331976=1, srv2053058706=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:24,949 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:24,949 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:24,949 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:24,949 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1140) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:24,949 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1382
2023-07-11 14:16:24,949 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv857331976=1, srv2053058706=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:24,950 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:24,950 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:24,950 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:24,950 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1382) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:24,950 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table881
2023-07-11 14:16:24,950 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv857331976=1, srv2053058706=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:24,950 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:24,950 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:24,950 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:24,951 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table881) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:24,951 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1141
2023-07-11 14:16:24,951 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv857331976=1, srv2053058706=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:24,951 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:24,951 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:24,951 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:24,951 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1141) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:24,951 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1383
2023-07-11 14:16:24,952 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv857331976=1, srv2053058706=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:24,952 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:24,952 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:24,952 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:24,952 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1383) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:24,952 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table640
2023-07-11 14:16:24,952 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv857331976=1, srv2053058706=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:24,952 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:24,952 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:24,952 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:24,953 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table640) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:24,953 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table882
2023-07-11 14:16:24,953 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv857331976=1, srv2053058706=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:24,953 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:24,953 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:24,953 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:24,953 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table882) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:24,953 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1142
2023-07-11 14:16:24,954 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv857331976=1, srv2053058706=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:24,954 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:24,954 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:24,954 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:24,954 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1142) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:24,954 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1384
2023-07-11 14:16:24,954 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv857331976=1, srv2053058706=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:24,954 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:24,954 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:24,954 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:24,955 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1384) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:24,955 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table641
2023-07-11 14:16:24,955 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv857331976=1, srv2053058706=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:24,955 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:24,955 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:24,955 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:24,955 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table641) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:24,955 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table883
2023-07-11 14:16:24,955 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv857331976=1, srv2053058706=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:24,956 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:24,956 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:24,956 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:24,956 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table883) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:24,956 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1143
2023-07-11 14:16:24,956 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv857331976=1, srv2053058706=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:24,956 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:24,956 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:24,956 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:24,957 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1143) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:24,957 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1385
2023-07-11 14:16:24,957 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv857331976=1, srv2053058706=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:24,957 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:24,957 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:24,957 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:24,957 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1385) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:24,957 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table400
2023-07-11 14:16:24,957 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv857331976=1, srv2053058706=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:24,957 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:24,958 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:24,958 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:24,958 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table400) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:24,958 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table642
2023-07-11 14:16:24,958 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv857331976=1, srv2053058706=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:24,958 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:24,958 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:24,958 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:24,958 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table642) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:24,958 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table884
2023-07-11 14:16:24,959 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv857331976=1, srv2053058706=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:24,959 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:24,959 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:24,959 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:24,959 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table884) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:24,959 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1144
2023-07-11 14:16:24,959 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv857331976=1, srv2053058706=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:24,959 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:24,959 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:24,959 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:24,960 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1144) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:24,960 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1386
2023-07-11 14:16:24,960 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv857331976=1, srv2053058706=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:24,960 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:24,960 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:24,960 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:24,960 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1386) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:24,960 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table401
2023-07-11 14:16:24,960 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv857331976=1, srv2053058706=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:24,961 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:24,961 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:24,961 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:24,961 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table401) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:24,961 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table643
2023-07-11 14:16:24,961 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv857331976=1, srv2053058706=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:24,961 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:24,961 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:24,961 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:24,962 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table643) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:24,962 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table885
2023-07-11 14:16:24,962 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv857331976=1, srv2053058706=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:24,962 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:24,962 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:24,962 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:24,962 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table885) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:24,962 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1145
2023-07-11 14:16:24,962 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv857331976=1, srv2053058706=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:24,962 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:24,963 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:24,963 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:24,963 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1145) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:24,963 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1387
2023-07-11 14:16:24,963 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv857331976=1, srv2053058706=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:24,963 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:24,963 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:24,963 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:24,964 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1387) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:24,964 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table402
2023-07-11 14:16:24,964 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv857331976=1, srv2053058706=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:24,964 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:24,964 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:24,964 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:24,964 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table402) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:24,964 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table644
2023-07-11 14:16:24,964 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv857331976=1, srv2053058706=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:24,965 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:24,965 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:24,965 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:24,965 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table644) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:24,965 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table886
2023-07-11 14:16:24,965 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv857331976=1, srv2053058706=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:24,965 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:24,965 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:24,965 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:24,966 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table886) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:24,966 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table403
2023-07-11 14:16:24,966 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv857331976=1, srv2053058706=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:24,966 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:24,966 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:24,966 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:24,966 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table403) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:24,966 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table645
2023-07-11 14:16:24,966 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv857331976=1, srv2053058706=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:24,966 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:24,967 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:24,967 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:24,967 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table645) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:24,967 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table887
2023-07-11 14:16:24,967 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv857331976=1, srv2053058706=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:24,968 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:24,968 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:24,968 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:24,968 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table887) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:24,968 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table404
2023-07-11 14:16:24,968 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv857331976=1, srv2053058706=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:24,968 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:24,968 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:24,968 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:24,969 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table404) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:24,969 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table646
2023-07-11 14:16:24,969 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv857331976=1, srv2053058706=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:24,969 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:24,969 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:24,969 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:24,969 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table646) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:24,970 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table888
2023-07-11 14:16:24,970 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv857331976=1, srv2053058706=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:24,970 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:24,970 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:24,970 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:24,970 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table888) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:24,970 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table405
2023-07-11 14:16:24,970 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv857331976=1, srv2053058706=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:24,971 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:24,971 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:24,971 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:24,971 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table405) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:24,971 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table647
2023-07-11 14:16:24,971 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv857331976=1, srv2053058706=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:24,971 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:24,971 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:24,971 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:24,972 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table647) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:24,972 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table889
2023-07-11 14:16:24,972 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv857331976=1, srv2053058706=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:24,972 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:24,972 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:24,972 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:24,972 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table889) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:24,972 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table406
2023-07-11 14:16:24,973 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv857331976=1, srv2053058706=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:24,973 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:24,973 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:24,973 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:24,973 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table406) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:24,973 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table648
2023-07-11 14:16:24,974 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv857331976=1, srv2053058706=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:24,974 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:24,974 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:24,974 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:24,974 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table648) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:24,974 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table407
2023-07-11 14:16:24,975 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv857331976=1, srv2053058706=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:24,975 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:24,975 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:24,975 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:24,975 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table407) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:24,975 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table649
2023-07-11 14:16:24,975 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv857331976=1, srv2053058706=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:24,976 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:24,976 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:24,976 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:24,976 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table649) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:24,976 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table408
2023-07-11 14:16:24,976 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv857331976=1, srv2053058706=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:24,976 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:24,976 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:24,976 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:24,976 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table408) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:24,977 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table409
2023-07-11 14:16:24,977 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv857331976=1, srv2053058706=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:24,977 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:24,977 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:24,977 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:24,977 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table409) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:24,977 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1146
2023-07-11 14:16:24,977 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv857331976=1, srv2053058706=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:24,977 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:24,977 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:24,978 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:24,978 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1146) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:24,978 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1388
2023-07-11 14:16:24,978 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv857331976=1, srv2053058706=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:24,978 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:24,978 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:24,978 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:24,978 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1388) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:24,978 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1147
2023-07-11 14:16:24,978 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv857331976=1, srv2053058706=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:24,978 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:24,979 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:24,979 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:24,979 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1147) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:24,979 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1389
2023-07-11 14:16:24,979 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv857331976=1, srv2053058706=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:24,979 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:24,979 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:24,979 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:24,979 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1389) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:24,979 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1148
2023-07-11 14:16:24,979 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv857331976=1, srv2053058706=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:24,979 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:24,980 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:24,980 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:24,980 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1148) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:24,980 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1149
2023-07-11 14:16:24,980 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv857331976=1, srv2053058706=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:24,980 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:24,980 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:24,980 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:24,980 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1149) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:24,980 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1370
2023-07-11 14:16:24,980 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv857331976=1, srv2053058706=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:24,981 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:24,981 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:24,981 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:24,981 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1370) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:24,981 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1371
2023-07-11 14:16:24,981 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv857331976=1, srv2053058706=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:24,981 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:24,981 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:24,981 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:24,981 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1371) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:24,981 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table870
2023-07-11 14:16:24,982 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv857331976=1, srv2053058706=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:24,982 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:24,982 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:24,982 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:24,982 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table870) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:24,982 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1130
2023-07-11 14:16:24,982 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv857331976=1, srv2053058706=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:24,982 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:24,982 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:24,982 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:24,983 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1130) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:24,983 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1372
2023-07-11 14:16:24,983 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv857331976=1, srv2053058706=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:24,983 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:24,983 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:24,983 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:24,983 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1372) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:24,983 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table871
2023-07-11 14:16:24,983 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv857331976=1, srv2053058706=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:24,983 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:24,984 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:24,984 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:24,984 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table871) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:24,984 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1131
2023-07-11 14:16:24,984 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv857331976=1, srv2053058706=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:24,984 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:24,984 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:24,984 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:24,985 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1131) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:24,985 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1373
2023-07-11 14:16:24,985 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv857331976=1, srv2053058706=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:24,985 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:24,985 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:24,985 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:24,985 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1373) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:24,985 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table630
2023-07-11 14:16:24,985 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv857331976=1, srv2053058706=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:24,986 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:24,986 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:24,986 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:24,986 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table630) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:24,986 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table872
2023-07-11 14:16:24,986 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv857331976=1, srv2053058706=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:24,986 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:24,986 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:24,986 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:24,986 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table872) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:24,986 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1132
2023-07-11 14:16:24,987 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv857331976=1, srv2053058706=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:24,987 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:24,987 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:24,987 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:24,987 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1132) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:24,987 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1374
2023-07-11 14:16:24,987 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv857331976=1, srv2053058706=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:24,987 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:24,987 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:24,988 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:24,988 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1374) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:24,988 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table631
2023-07-11 14:16:24,988 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv857331976=1, srv2053058706=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:24,988 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:24,988 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:24,988 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:24,988 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table631) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:24,989 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table873
2023-07-11 14:16:24,989 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv857331976=1, srv2053058706=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:24,989 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:24,989 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:24,989 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:24,989 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table873) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:24,989 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1133
2023-07-11 14:16:24,989 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv857331976=1, srv2053058706=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:24,989 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:24,989 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:24,989 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:24,989 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1133) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:24,990 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1375
2023-07-11 14:16:24,990 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv857331976=1, srv2053058706=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:24,990 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:24,990 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:24,990 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:24,990 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1375) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:24,990 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table632
2023-07-11 14:16:24,990 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv857331976=1, srv2053058706=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:24,990 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:24,990 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:24,990 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:24,990 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table632) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:24,991 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table874
2023-07-11 14:16:24,991 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv857331976=1, srv2053058706=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:24,991 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:24,991 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:24,991 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:24,991 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table874) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:24,991 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1134
2023-07-11 14:16:24,991 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv857331976=1, srv2053058706=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:24,991 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:24,991 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:24,991 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:24,992 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1134) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:24,992 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1376
2023-07-11 14:16:24,992 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv857331976=1, srv2053058706=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:24,992 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:24,992 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:24,992 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:24,992 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1376) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:24,992 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table633
2023-07-11 14:16:24,992 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv857331976=1, srv2053058706=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:24,992 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:24,993 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:24,993 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:24,993 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table633) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:24,993 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table875
2023-07-11 14:16:24,993 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv857331976=1, srv2053058706=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:24,993 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:24,993 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:24,993 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:24,993 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table875) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:24,993 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table634
2023-07-11 14:16:24,993 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv857331976=1, srv2053058706=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:24,994 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:24,994 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:24,994 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:24,994 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table634) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:24,994 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table876
2023-07-11 14:16:24,994 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv857331976=1, srv2053058706=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:24,994 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:24,994 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:24,994 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:24,994 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table876) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:24,994 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table635
2023-07-11 14:16:24,994 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv857331976=1, srv2053058706=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:24,995 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:24,995 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:24,995 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:24,995 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table635) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:24,995 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table877
2023-07-11 14:16:24,995 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv857331976=1, srv2053058706=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:24,995 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:24,995 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:24,995 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:24,995 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table877) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:24,995 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table636
2023-07-11 14:16:24,995 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv857331976=1, srv2053058706=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:24,996 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:24,996 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:24,996 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:24,996 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table636) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:24,996 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table878
2023-07-11 14:16:24,996 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv857331976=1, srv2053058706=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:24,996 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:24,996 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:24,996 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:24,996 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table878) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:24,996 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table637
2023-07-11 14:16:24,997 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv857331976=1, srv2053058706=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:24,997 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:24,997 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:24,997 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:24,997 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table637) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:24,997 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table879
2023-07-11 14:16:24,997 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv857331976=1, srv2053058706=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:24,998 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:24,998 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:24,998 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:24,998 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table879) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:24,998 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table638
2023-07-11 14:16:24,998 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv857331976=1, srv2053058706=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:24,999 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:24,999 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:24,999 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:24,999 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table638) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:24,999 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table639
2023-07-11 14:16:24,999 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv857331976=1, srv2053058706=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:24,999 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,000 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,000 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,000 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table639) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,000 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1135
2023-07-11 14:16:25,000 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv857331976=1, srv2053058706=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,000 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,000 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,001 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,001 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1135) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,001 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1377
2023-07-11 14:16:25,001 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv857331976=1, srv2053058706=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,001 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,001 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,002 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,002 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1377) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,002 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1136
2023-07-11 14:16:25,002 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv857331976=1, srv2053058706=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,002 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,002 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,002 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,003 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1136) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,003 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1378
2023-07-11 14:16:25,003 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv857331976=1, srv2053058706=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,003 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,003 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,003 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,003 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1378) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,003 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1137
2023-07-11 14:16:25,004 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv857331976=1, srv2053058706=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,004 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,004 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,004 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,004 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1137) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,004 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1379
2023-07-11 14:16:25,004 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv857331976=1, srv2053058706=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,005 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,005 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,005 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,005 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1379) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,005 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1138
2023-07-11 14:16:25,005 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv857331976=1, srv2053058706=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,005 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,005 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,005 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,005 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1138) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,005 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1139
2023-07-11 14:16:25,005 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv857331976=1, srv2053058706=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,006 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,006 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,006 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,006 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1139) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,006 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table660
2023-07-11 14:16:25,006 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv857331976=1, srv2053058706=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,006 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,006 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,006 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,006 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table660) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,006 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1360
2023-07-11 14:16:25,006 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv857331976=1, srv2053058706=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,006 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,007 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,007 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,007 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1360) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,007 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table661
2023-07-11 14:16:25,007 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv857331976=1, srv2053058706=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,007 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,007 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,007 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,008 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table661) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,008 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1361
2023-07-11 14:16:25,008 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv857331976=1, srv2053058706=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,008 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,008 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,008 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,008 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1361) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,008 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table420
2023-07-11 14:16:25,008 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv857331976=1, srv2053058706=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,008 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,008 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,008 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,009 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table420) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,009 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table662
2023-07-11 14:16:25,009 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv857331976=1, srv2053058706=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,009 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,009 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,009 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,009 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table662) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,009 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1120
2023-07-11 14:16:25,009 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv857331976=1, srv2053058706=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,009 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,009 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,009 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,009 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1120) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,010 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1362
2023-07-11 14:16:25,010 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv857331976=1, srv2053058706=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,010 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,010 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,010 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,010 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1362) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,010 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table421
2023-07-11 14:16:25,010 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv857331976=1, srv2053058706=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,010 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,010 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,010 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,010 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table421) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,010 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table663
2023-07-11 14:16:25,011 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv857331976=1, srv2053058706=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,011 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,011 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,011 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,011 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table663) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,011 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1121
2023-07-11 14:16:25,011 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv857331976=1, srv2053058706=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,011 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,011 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,011 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,011 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1121) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,011 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1363
2023-07-11 14:16:25,012 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv857331976=1, srv2053058706=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,012 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,012 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,012 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,012 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1363) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,012 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table422
2023-07-11 14:16:25,012 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv857331976=1, srv2053058706=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,012 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,012 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,012 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,013 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table422) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,013 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table664
2023-07-11 14:16:25,013 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv857331976=1, srv2053058706=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,013 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,013 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,013 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,013 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table664) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,013 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1122
2023-07-11 14:16:25,013 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv857331976=1, srv2053058706=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,013 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,013 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,014 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,014 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1122) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,014 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1364
2023-07-11 14:16:25,014 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv857331976=1, srv2053058706=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,014 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,014 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,014 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,014 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1364) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,014 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table423
2023-07-11 14:16:25,014 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv857331976=1, srv2053058706=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,014 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,014 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,014 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,015 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table423) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,015 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table665
2023-07-11 14:16:25,015 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv857331976=1, srv2053058706=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,015 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,015 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,015 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,015 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table665) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,015 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1123
2023-07-11 14:16:25,015 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv857331976=1, srv2053058706=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,015 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,015 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,015 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,015 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1123) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,015 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1365
2023-07-11 14:16:25,016 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv857331976=1, srv2053058706=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,016 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,016 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,016 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,016 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1365) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,016 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table424
2023-07-11 14:16:25,016 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv857331976=1, srv2053058706=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,016 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,016 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,016 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,016 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table424) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,016 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table666
2023-07-11 14:16:25,016 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv857331976=1, srv2053058706=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,016 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,017 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,017 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,017 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table666) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,017 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table425
2023-07-11 14:16:25,017 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv857331976=1, srv2053058706=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,017 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,017 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,017 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,017 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table425) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,017 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table667
2023-07-11 14:16:25,017 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv857331976=1, srv2053058706=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,017 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,017 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,017 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,018 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table667) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,018 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table426
2023-07-11 14:16:25,018 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv857331976=1, srv2053058706=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,018 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,018 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,018 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,018 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table426) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,018 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table668
2023-07-11 14:16:25,018 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv857331976=1, srv2053058706=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,018 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,018 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,018 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,018 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table668) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,018 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table427
2023-07-11 14:16:25,019 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv857331976=1, srv2053058706=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,019 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,019 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,019 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,019 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table427) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,019 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table669
2023-07-11 14:16:25,019 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv857331976=1, srv2053058706=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,019 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,019 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,019 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,019 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table669) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,019 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table428
2023-07-11 14:16:25,019 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv857331976=1, srv2053058706=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,020 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,020 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,020 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,020 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table428) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,020 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table429
2023-07-11 14:16:25,020 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv857331976=1, srv2053058706=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,020 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,020 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,020 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,020 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table429) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,020 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1124
2023-07-11 14:16:25,020 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv857331976=1, srv2053058706=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,021 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,021 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,021 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,021 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1124) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,021 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1366
2023-07-11 14:16:25,021 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv857331976=1, srv2053058706=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,021 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,021 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,022 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,022 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1366) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,022 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1125
2023-07-11 14:16:25,022 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv857331976=1, srv2053058706=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,022 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,022 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,022 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,023 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1125) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,023 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1367
2023-07-11 14:16:25,023 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv857331976=1, srv2053058706=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,023 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,023 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,023 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,024 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1367) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,024 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1126
2023-07-11 14:16:25,024 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv857331976=1, srv2053058706=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,024 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,024 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,024 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,025 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1126) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,025 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1368
2023-07-11 14:16:25,025 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv857331976=1, srv2053058706=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,025 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,025 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,025 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,025 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1368) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,025 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1127
2023-07-11 14:16:25,026 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv857331976=1, srv2053058706=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,026 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,026 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,026 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,026 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1127) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,026 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1369
2023-07-11 14:16:25,026 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv857331976=1, srv2053058706=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,027 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,027 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,027 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,027 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1369) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,027 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1128
2023-07-11 14:16:25,027 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv857331976=1, srv2053058706=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,027 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,028 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,028 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,028 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1128) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,028 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1129
2023-07-11 14:16:25,028 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv857331976=1, srv2053058706=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,028 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,028 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,028 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,029 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1129) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,029 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table890
2023-07-11 14:16:25,029 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv857331976=1, srv2053058706=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,029 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,029 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,029 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,029 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table890) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,030 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table891
2023-07-11 14:16:25,030 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv857331976=1, srv2053058706=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,030 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,030 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,030 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,030 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table891) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,030 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table650
2023-07-11 14:16:25,031 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv857331976=1, srv2053058706=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,031 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,031 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,031 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,031 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table650) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,031 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table892
2023-07-11 14:16:25,031 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv857331976=1, srv2053058706=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,032 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,032 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,032 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,032 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table892) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,032 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1350
2023-07-11 14:16:25,032 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv857331976=1, srv2053058706=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,032 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,033 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,033 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,033 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1350) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,033 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table651
2023-07-11 14:16:25,033 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv857331976=1, srv2053058706=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,033 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,033 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,033 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,034 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table651) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,034 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table893
2023-07-11 14:16:25,034 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv857331976=1, srv2053058706=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,034 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,034 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,034 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,034 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table893) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,035 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1351
2023-07-11 14:16:25,035 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv857331976=1, srv2053058706=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,035 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,035 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,035 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,035 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1351) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,035 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table410
2023-07-11 14:16:25,036 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv857331976=1, srv2053058706=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,036 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,036 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,036 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,036 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table410) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,036 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table652
2023-07-11 14:16:25,036 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv857331976=1, srv2053058706=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,037 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,037 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,037 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,037 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table652) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,037 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table894
2023-07-11 14:16:25,037 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv857331976=1, srv2053058706=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,037 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,037 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,038 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,038 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table894) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,038 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1110
2023-07-11 14:16:25,038 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv857331976=1, srv2053058706=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,039 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,039 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,039 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,039 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1110) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,039 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1352
2023-07-11 14:16:25,040 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv857331976=1, srv2053058706=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,040 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,040 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,040 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,040 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1352) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,040 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table411
2023-07-11 14:16:25,040 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv857331976=1, srv2053058706=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,041 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,041 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,041 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,041 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table411) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,041 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table653
2023-07-11 14:16:25,041 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv857331976=1, srv2053058706=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,041 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,042 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,042 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,042 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table653) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,042 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table895
2023-07-11 14:16:25,042 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv857331976=1, srv2053058706=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,042 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,042 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,042 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,043 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table895) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,043 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1111
2023-07-11 14:16:25,043 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv857331976=1, srv2053058706=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,043 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,043 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,043 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,043 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1111) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,043 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1353
2023-07-11 14:16:25,044 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv857331976=1, srv2053058706=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,044 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,044 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,044 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,044 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1353) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,044 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table412
2023-07-11 14:16:25,044 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv857331976=1, srv2053058706=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,045 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,045 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,045 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,045 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table412) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,045 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table654
2023-07-11 14:16:25,045 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv857331976=1, srv2053058706=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,045 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,046 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,046 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,046 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table654) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,046 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table896
2023-07-11 14:16:25,046 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv857331976=1, srv2053058706=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,046 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,046 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,046 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,047 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table896) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,047 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1112
2023-07-11 14:16:25,047 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv857331976=1, srv2053058706=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,047 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,047 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,047 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,047 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1112) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,047 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1354
2023-07-11 14:16:25,048 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv857331976=1, srv2053058706=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,048 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,048 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,048 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,048 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1354) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,048 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table413
2023-07-11 14:16:25,048 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv857331976=1, srv2053058706=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,049 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,049 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,049 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,049 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table413) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,049 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table655
2023-07-11 14:16:25,050 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv857331976=1, srv2053058706=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,050 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,050 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,050 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,050 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table655) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,050 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table897
2023-07-11 14:16:25,050 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv857331976=1, srv2053058706=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,050 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,051 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,051 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,051 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table897) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,051 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table414
2023-07-11 14:16:25,051 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv857331976=1, srv2053058706=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,051 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,051 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,051 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,052 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table414) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,052 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table656
2023-07-11 14:16:25,052 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv857331976=1, srv2053058706=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,052 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,052 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,052 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,052 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table656) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,053 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table898
2023-07-11 14:16:25,053 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv857331976=1, srv2053058706=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,053 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,053 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,053 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,053 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table898) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,053 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table415
2023-07-11 14:16:25,053 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv857331976=1, srv2053058706=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,054 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,054 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,054 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,054 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table415) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,054 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table657
2023-07-11 14:16:25,054 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv857331976=1, srv2053058706=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,054 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,054 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,054 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,055 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table657) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,055 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table899
2023-07-11 14:16:25,055 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv857331976=1, srv2053058706=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,055 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,055 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,055 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,055 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table899) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,056 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table416
2023-07-11 14:16:25,056 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv857331976=1, srv2053058706=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,056 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,056 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,056 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,056 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table416) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,056 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table658
2023-07-11 14:16:25,057 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv857331976=1, srv2053058706=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,057 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,057 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,057 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,057 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table658) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,057 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table417
2023-07-11 14:16:25,057 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv857331976=1, srv2053058706=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,057 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,058 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,058 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,058 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table417) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,058 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table659
2023-07-11 14:16:25,058 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv857331976=1, srv2053058706=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,058 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,058 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,058 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,059 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table659) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,059 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table418
2023-07-11 14:16:25,059 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv857331976=1, srv2053058706=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,059 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,059 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,059 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,060 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table418) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,060 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table419
2023-07-11 14:16:25,060 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv857331976=1, srv2053058706=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,060 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,060 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,060 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,060 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table419) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,060 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1113
2023-07-11 14:16:25,060 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv857331976=1, srv2053058706=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,060 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,060 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,060 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,061 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1113) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,061 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1355
2023-07-11 14:16:25,061 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv857331976=1, srv2053058706=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,061 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,061 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,061 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,061 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1355) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,061 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1114
2023-07-11 14:16:25,061 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv857331976=1, srv2053058706=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,061 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,061 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,061 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,061 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1114) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,062 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1356
2023-07-11 14:16:25,062 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv857331976=1, srv2053058706=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,062 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,062 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,062 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,062 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1356) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,062 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1115
2023-07-11 14:16:25,062 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv857331976=1, srv2053058706=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,062 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,062 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,063 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,063 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1115) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,063 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1357
2023-07-11 14:16:25,063 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv857331976=1, srv2053058706=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,063 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,063 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,063 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,063 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1357) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,063 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1116
2023-07-11 14:16:25,063 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv857331976=1, srv2053058706=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,063 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,063 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,063 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,064 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1116) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,064 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1358
2023-07-11 14:16:25,064 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv857331976=1, srv2053058706=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,064 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,064 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,064 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,064 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1358) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,064 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1117
2023-07-11 14:16:25,064 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv857331976=1, srv2053058706=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,064 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,064 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,064 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,064 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1117) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,064 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1359
2023-07-11 14:16:25,065 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv857331976=1, srv2053058706=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,065 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,065 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,065 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,065 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1359) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,065 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1118
2023-07-11 14:16:25,065 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv857331976=1, srv2053058706=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,065 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,065 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,065 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,065 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1118) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,065 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1119
2023-07-11 14:16:25,065 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv857331976=1, srv2053058706=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,065 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,066 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,066 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,066 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1119) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,066 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1182
2023-07-11 14:16:25,066 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv857331976=1, srv2053058706=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,066 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,066 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,066 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,066 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1182) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,066 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1183
2023-07-11 14:16:25,066 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv857331976=1, srv2053058706=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,066 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,066 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,066 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,067 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1183) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,067 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1184
2023-07-11 14:16:25,067 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv857331976=1, srv2053058706=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,067 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,067 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,067 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,067 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1184) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,067 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1185
2023-07-11 14:16:25,067 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv857331976=1, srv2053058706=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,067 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,067 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,067 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,067 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1185) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,067 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1186
2023-07-11 14:16:25,068 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv857331976=1, srv2053058706=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,068 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,068 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,068 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,068 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1186) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,068 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1187
2023-07-11 14:16:25,068 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv857331976=1, srv2053058706=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,068 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,068 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,068 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,069 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1187) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,069 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table840
2023-07-11 14:16:25,069 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv857331976=1, srv2053058706=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,069 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,069 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,069 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,069 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table840) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,069 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1188
2023-07-11 14:16:25,069 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv857331976=1, srv2053058706=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,069 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,069 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,069 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,069 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1188) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,069 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table841
2023-07-11 14:16:25,070 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv857331976=1, srv2053058706=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,070 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,070 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,070 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,070 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table841) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,070 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1189
2023-07-11 14:16:25,070 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv857331976=1, srv2053058706=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,070 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,070 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,070 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,070 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1189) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,070 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table600
2023-07-11 14:16:25,070 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv857331976=1, srv2053058706=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,071 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,071 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,071 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,071 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table600) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,071 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table842
2023-07-11 14:16:25,071 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv857331976=1, srv2053058706=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,071 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,071 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,071 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,071 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table842) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,071 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table601
2023-07-11 14:16:25,071 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv857331976=1, srv2053058706=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,072 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,072 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,072 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,072 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table601) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,072 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table843
2023-07-11 14:16:25,072 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv857331976=1, srv2053058706=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,072 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,072 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,072 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,072 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table843) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,072 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table602
2023-07-11 14:16:25,072 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv857331976=1, srv2053058706=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,073 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,073 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,073 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,073 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table602) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,073 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table844
2023-07-11 14:16:25,073 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv857331976=1, srv2053058706=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,073 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,073 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,073 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,073 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table844) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,073 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table603
2023-07-11 14:16:25,073 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv857331976=1, srv2053058706=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,073 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,073 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,073 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,074 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table603) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,074 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table845
2023-07-11 14:16:25,074 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv857331976=1, srv2053058706=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,074 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,074 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,074 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,074 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table845) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,074 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table604
2023-07-11 14:16:25,074 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv857331976=1, srv2053058706=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,074 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,074 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,074 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,074 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table604) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,074 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table846
2023-07-11 14:16:25,075 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv857331976=1, srv2053058706=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,075 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,075 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,075 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,075 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table846) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,075 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table605
2023-07-11 14:16:25,075 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv857331976=1, srv2053058706=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,075 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,075 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,076 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,076 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table605) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,076 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table847
2023-07-11 14:16:25,076 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv857331976=1, srv2053058706=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,076 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,076 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,076 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,076 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table847) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,077 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table606
2023-07-11 14:16:25,077 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv857331976=1, srv2053058706=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,077 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,077 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,077 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,077 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table606) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,077 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table848
2023-07-11 14:16:25,077 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv857331976=1, srv2053058706=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,077 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,078 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,078 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,078 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table848) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,078 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1180
2023-07-11 14:16:25,078 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv857331976=1, srv2053058706=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,078 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,078 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,078 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,078 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1180) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,078 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table607
2023-07-11 14:16:25,078 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv857331976=1, srv2053058706=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,079 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,079 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,079 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,079 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table607) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,079 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table849
2023-07-11 14:16:25,079 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv857331976=1, srv2053058706=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,079 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,079 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,079 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,079 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table849) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,079 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1181
2023-07-11 14:16:25,079 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv857331976=1, srv2053058706=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,079 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,079 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,079 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,079 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1181) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,079 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table608
2023-07-11 14:16:25,079 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv857331976=1, srv2053058706=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,080 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,080 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,080 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,080 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table608) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,080 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table609
2023-07-11 14:16:25,080 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv857331976=1, srv2053058706=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,080 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,080 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,080 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,080 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table609) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,080 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1171
2023-07-11 14:16:25,080 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv857331976=1, srv2053058706=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,080 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,080 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,080 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,081 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1171) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,081 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1172
2023-07-11 14:16:25,081 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv857331976=1, srv2053058706=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,081 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,081 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,081 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,081 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1172) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,081 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1173
2023-07-11 14:16:25,081 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv857331976=1, srv2053058706=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,081 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,081 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,081 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,081 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1173) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,081 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1174
2023-07-11 14:16:25,081 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv857331976=1, srv2053058706=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,082 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,082 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,082 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,082 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1174) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,082 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1175
2023-07-11 14:16:25,082 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv857331976=1, srv2053058706=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,082 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,082 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,082 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,082 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1175) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,082 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1176
2023-07-11 14:16:25,082 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv857331976=1, srv2053058706=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,082 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,083 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,083 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,083 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1176) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,083 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1177
2023-07-11 14:16:25,083 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv857331976=1, srv2053058706=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,083 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,083 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,083 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,083 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1177) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,083 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table830
2023-07-11 14:16:25,083 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv857331976=1, srv2053058706=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,083 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,083 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,083 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,083 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table830) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,083 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1178
2023-07-11 14:16:25,084 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv857331976=1, srv2053058706=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,084 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,084 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,084 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,084 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1178) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,084 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table831
2023-07-11 14:16:25,084 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv857331976=1, srv2053058706=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,084 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,084 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,084 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,084 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table831) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,084 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table832
2023-07-11 14:16:25,084 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv857331976=1, srv2053058706=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,084 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,084 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,084 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,085 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table832) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,085 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table833
2023-07-11 14:16:25,085 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv857331976=1, srv2053058706=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,085 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,085 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,085 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,085 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table833) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,085 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table834
2023-07-11 14:16:25,085 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv857331976=1, srv2053058706=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,085 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,085 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,085 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,085 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table834) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,085 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table835
2023-07-11 14:16:25,085 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv857331976=1, srv2053058706=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,085 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,086 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,086 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,086 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table835) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,086 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table836
2023-07-11 14:16:25,086 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv857331976=1, srv2053058706=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,086 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,086 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,086 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,086 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table836) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,086 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table837
2023-07-11 14:16:25,086 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv857331976=1, srv2053058706=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,086 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,086 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,086 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,086 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table837) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,086 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table838
2023-07-11 14:16:25,087 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv857331976=1, srv2053058706=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,087 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,087 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,087 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,087 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table838) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,087 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1170
2023-07-11 14:16:25,087 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv857331976=1, srv2053058706=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,087 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,087 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,087 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,087 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1170) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,088 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table839
2023-07-11 14:16:25,088 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv857331976=1, srv2053058706=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,088 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,088 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,088 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,088 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table839) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,088 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1179
2023-07-11 14:16:25,088 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv857331976=1, srv2053058706=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,089 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,089 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,089 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,089 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1179) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,089 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1160
2023-07-11 14:16:25,089 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv857331976=1, srv2053058706=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,089 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,089 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,089 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,090 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1160) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,090 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1161
2023-07-11 14:16:25,090 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv857331976=1, srv2053058706=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,090 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,090 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,090 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,090 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1161) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,091 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1162
2023-07-11 14:16:25,091 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv857331976=1, srv2053058706=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,091 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,091 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,091 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,091 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1162) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,091 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1163
2023-07-11 14:16:25,091 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv857331976=1, srv2053058706=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,092 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,092 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,092 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,092 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1163) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,092 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table860
2023-07-11 14:16:25,092 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv857331976=1, srv2053058706=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,092 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,092 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,092 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,093 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table860) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,093 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1164
2023-07-11 14:16:25,093 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv857331976=1, srv2053058706=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,093 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,093 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,093 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,093 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1164) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,093 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table861
2023-07-11 14:16:25,094 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv857331976=1, srv2053058706=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,094 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,094 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,094 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,094 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table861) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,094 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1165
2023-07-11 14:16:25,094 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv857331976=1, srv2053058706=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,094 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,094 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,094 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,095 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1165) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,095 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table620
2023-07-11 14:16:25,095 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv857331976=1, srv2053058706=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,095 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,095 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,095 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,095 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table620) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,095 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table862
2023-07-11 14:16:25,096 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv857331976=1, srv2053058706=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,096 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,096 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,096 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,096 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table862) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,096 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1166
2023-07-11 14:16:25,096 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv857331976=1, srv2053058706=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,096 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,096 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,096 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,097 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1166) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,097 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table621
2023-07-11 14:16:25,097 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv857331976=1, srv2053058706=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,097 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,097 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,097 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,097 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table621) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,097 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table863
2023-07-11 14:16:25,098 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv857331976=1, srv2053058706=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,098 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,098 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,098 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,098 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table863) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,098 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1167
2023-07-11 14:16:25,098 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv857331976=1, srv2053058706=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,098 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,098 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,098 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,099 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1167) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,099 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table622
2023-07-11 14:16:25,099 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv857331976=1, srv2053058706=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,099 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,099 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,099 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,099 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table622) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,099 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table864
2023-07-11 14:16:25,099 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv857331976=1, srv2053058706=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,099 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,099 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,100 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,100 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table864) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,100 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table623
2023-07-11 14:16:25,100 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv857331976=1, srv2053058706=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,100 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,100 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,100 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,100 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table623) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,100 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table865
2023-07-11 14:16:25,100 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv857331976=1, srv2053058706=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,100 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,100 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,100 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,101 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table865) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,101 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table624
2023-07-11 14:16:25,101 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv857331976=1, srv2053058706=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,101 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,101 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,101 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,101 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table624) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,101 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table866
2023-07-11 14:16:25,101 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv857331976=1, srv2053058706=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,101 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,101 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,101 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,101 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table866) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,101 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table625
2023-07-11 14:16:25,101 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv857331976=1, srv2053058706=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,102 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,102 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,102 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,102 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table625) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,102 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table867
2023-07-11 14:16:25,102 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv857331976=1, srv2053058706=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,102 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,102 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,102 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,102 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table867) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,102 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table626
2023-07-11 14:16:25,102 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv857331976=1, srv2053058706=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,102 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,102 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,102 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,103 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table626) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,103 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table868
2023-07-11 14:16:25,103 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv857331976=1, srv2053058706=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,103 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,103 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,103 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,103 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table868) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,103 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table627
2023-07-11 14:16:25,103 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv857331976=1, srv2053058706=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,103 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,103 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,104 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,104 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table627) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,104 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table869
2023-07-11 14:16:25,104 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv857331976=1, srv2053058706=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,104 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,104 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,104 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,105 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table869) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,105 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table628
2023-07-11 14:16:25,105 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv857331976=1, srv2053058706=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,105 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,105 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,105 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,105 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table628) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,105 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table629
2023-07-11 14:16:25,106 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv857331976=1, srv2053058706=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,106 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,106 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,106 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,106 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table629) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,106 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1168
2023-07-11 14:16:25,106 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv857331976=1, srv2053058706=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,106 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,106 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,106 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,107 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1168) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,107 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1169
2023-07-11 14:16:25,107 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv857331976=1, srv2053058706=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,107 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,107 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,107 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,107 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1169) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,107 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1391
2023-07-11 14:16:25,107 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv857331976=1, srv2053058706=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,107 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,107 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,107 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,108 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1391) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,108 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1150
2023-07-11 14:16:25,108 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv857331976=1, srv2053058706=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,108 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,108 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,108 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,108 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1150) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,108 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1392
2023-07-11 14:16:25,108 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv857331976=1, srv2053058706=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,108 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,108 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,108 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,108 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1392) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,108 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1151
2023-07-11 14:16:25,109 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv857331976=1, srv2053058706=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,109 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,109 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,109 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,109 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1151) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,109 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1393
2023-07-11 14:16:25,109 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv857331976=1, srv2053058706=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,109 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,109 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,109 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,109 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1393) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,109 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1152
2023-07-11 14:16:25,109 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv857331976=1, srv2053058706=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,109 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,109 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,109 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,110 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1152) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,110 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1394
2023-07-11 14:16:25,110 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv857331976=1, srv2053058706=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,110 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,110 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,110 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,110 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1394) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,110 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1153
2023-07-11 14:16:25,110 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv857331976=1, srv2053058706=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,110 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,110 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,110 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,110 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1153) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,110 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1395
2023-07-11 14:16:25,110 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv857331976=1, srv2053058706=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,110 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,111 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,111 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,111 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1395) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,111 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table850
2023-07-11 14:16:25,111 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv857331976=1, srv2053058706=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,111 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,111 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,111 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,111 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table850) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,111 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1154
2023-07-11 14:16:25,111 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv857331976=1, srv2053058706=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,111 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,111 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,112 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,112 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1154) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,112 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1396
2023-07-11 14:16:25,112 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv857331976=1, srv2053058706=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,112 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,112 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,112 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,112 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1396) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,113 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table851
2023-07-11 14:16:25,113 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv857331976=1, srv2053058706=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,113 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,113 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,113 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,113 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table851) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,113 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1155
2023-07-11 14:16:25,113 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv857331976=1, srv2053058706=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,113 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,113 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,114 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,114 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1155) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,114 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1397
2023-07-11 14:16:25,114 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv857331976=1, srv2053058706=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,114 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,114 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,114 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,114 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1397) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,114 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table610
2023-07-11 14:16:25,114 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv857331976=1, srv2053058706=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,114 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,114 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,114 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,114 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table610) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,115 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table852
2023-07-11 14:16:25,115 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv857331976=1, srv2053058706=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,115 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,115 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,115 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,115 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table852) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,115 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1156
2023-07-11 14:16:25,115 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv857331976=1, srv2053058706=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,115 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,115 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,115 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,116 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1156) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,116 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1398
2023-07-11 14:16:25,116 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv857331976=1, srv2053058706=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,116 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,116 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,116 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,116 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1398) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,116 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table611
2023-07-11 14:16:25,116 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv857331976=1, srv2053058706=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,116 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,116 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,116 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,116 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table611) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,116 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table853
2023-07-11 14:16:25,116 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv857331976=1, srv2053058706=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,116 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,117 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,117 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,117 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table853) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,117 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table612
2023-07-11 14:16:25,117 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv857331976=1, srv2053058706=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,117 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,117 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,117 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,117 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table612) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,117 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table854
2023-07-11 14:16:25,117 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv857331976=1, srv2053058706=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,117 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,117 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,117 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,117 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table854) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,117 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table613
2023-07-11 14:16:25,118 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv857331976=1, srv2053058706=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,118 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,118 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,118 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,118 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table613) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,118 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table855
2023-07-11 14:16:25,118 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv857331976=1, srv2053058706=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,118 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,118 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,118 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,118 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table855) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,118 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table614
2023-07-11 14:16:25,118 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv857331976=1, srv2053058706=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,118 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,118 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,118 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,119 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table614) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,119 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table856
2023-07-11 14:16:25,119 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv857331976=1, srv2053058706=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,119 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,119 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,119 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,119 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table856) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,119 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table615
2023-07-11 14:16:25,119 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv857331976=1, srv2053058706=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,119 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,119 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,119 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,119 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table615) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,119 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table857
2023-07-11 14:16:25,119 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv857331976=1, srv2053058706=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,119 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,120 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,120 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,120 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table857) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,120 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table616
2023-07-11 14:16:25,120 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv857331976=1, srv2053058706=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,120 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,120 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,120 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,120 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table616) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,120 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table858
2023-07-11 14:16:25,120 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv857331976=1, srv2053058706=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,120 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,120 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,120 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,121 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table858) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,121 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table617
2023-07-11 14:16:25,121 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv857331976=1, srv2053058706=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,121 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,121 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,121 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,121 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table617) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,121 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table859
2023-07-11 14:16:25,121 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv857331976=1, srv2053058706=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,121 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,121 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,121 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,122 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table859) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,122 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table618
2023-07-11 14:16:25,122 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv857331976=1, srv2053058706=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,122 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,122 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,122 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,122 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table618) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,122 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1390
2023-07-11 14:16:25,122 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv857331976=1, srv2053058706=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,122 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,122 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,122 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,122 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1390) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,122 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table619
2023-07-11 14:16:25,122 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv857331976=1, srv2053058706=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,122 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,122 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,122 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,123 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table619) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,123 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1157
2023-07-11 14:16:25,123 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv857331976=1, srv2053058706=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,123 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,123 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,123 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,123 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1157) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,123 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1399
2023-07-11 14:16:25,123 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv857331976=1, srv2053058706=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,123 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,123 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,123 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,123 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1399) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,123 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1158
2023-07-11 14:16:25,123 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv857331976=1, srv2053058706=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,123 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,123 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,123 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,124 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1158) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,124 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1159
2023-07-11 14:16:25,124 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv857331976=1, srv2053058706=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,124 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,124 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,124 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,124 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1159) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,124 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table240
2023-07-11 14:16:25,124 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv857331976=1, srv2053058706=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,124 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,124 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,124 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,124 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table240) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,124 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table482
2023-07-11 14:16:25,124 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv857331976=1, srv2053058706=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,125 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,125 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,125 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,125 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table482) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,125 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table241
2023-07-11 14:16:25,125 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv857331976=1, srv2053058706=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,125 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,125 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,125 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,125 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table241) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,125 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table483
2023-07-11 14:16:25,125 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv857331976=1, srv2053058706=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,125 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,125 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,125 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,125 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table483) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,125 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table242
2023-07-11 14:16:25,126 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv857331976=1, srv2053058706=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,126 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,126 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,126 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,126 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table242) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,126 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table484
2023-07-11 14:16:25,126 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv857331976=1, srv2053058706=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,126 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,126 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,126 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,126 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table484) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,126 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table243
2023-07-11 14:16:25,126 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv857331976=1, srv2053058706=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,126 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,126 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,126 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,126 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table243) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,127 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table485
2023-07-11 14:16:25,127 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv857331976=1, srv2053058706=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,127 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,127 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,127 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,127 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table485) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,127 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table244
2023-07-11 14:16:25,127 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv857331976=1, srv2053058706=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,127 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,127 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,127 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,127 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table244) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,127 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table486
2023-07-11 14:16:25,128 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv857331976=1, srv2053058706=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,128 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,128 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,128 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,128 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table486) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,128 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table245
2023-07-11 14:16:25,128 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv857331976=1, srv2053058706=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,128 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,128 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,128 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,128 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table245) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,128 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table487
2023-07-11 14:16:25,128 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv857331976=1, srv2053058706=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,129 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,129 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,129 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,129 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table487) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,129 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table246
2023-07-11 14:16:25,129 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv857331976=1, srv2053058706=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,129 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,129 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,129 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,130 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table246) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,130 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table488
2023-07-11 14:16:25,130 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv857331976=1, srv2053058706=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,130 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,130 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,130 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,130 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table488) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,130 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table247
2023-07-11 14:16:25,130 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv857331976=1, srv2053058706=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,130 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,130 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,131 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,131 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table247) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,131 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table489
2023-07-11 14:16:25,131 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv857331976=1, srv2053058706=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,131 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,131 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,131 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,131 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table489) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,131 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table248
2023-07-11 14:16:25,131 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv857331976=1, srv2053058706=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,132 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,132 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,132 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,132 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table248) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,132 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table249
2023-07-11 14:16:25,132 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv857331976=1, srv2053058706=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,132 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,132 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,132 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,132 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table249) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,133 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1308
2023-07-11 14:16:25,133 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv857331976=1, srv2053058706=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,133 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,133 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,133 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,133 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1308) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,133 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1309
2023-07-11 14:16:25,133 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv857331976=1, srv2053058706=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,133 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,133 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,133 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,134 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1309) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,134 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1300
2023-07-11 14:16:25,134 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv857331976=1, srv2053058706=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,134 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,134 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,134 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,134 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1300) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,134 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1301
2023-07-11 14:16:25,134 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv857331976=1, srv2053058706=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,134 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,134 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,134 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,134 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1301) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,135 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1302
2023-07-11 14:16:25,135 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv857331976=1, srv2053058706=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,135 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,135 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,135 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,135 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1302) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,135 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1303
2023-07-11 14:16:25,135 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv857331976=1, srv2053058706=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,135 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,135 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,135 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,135 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1303) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,135 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1304
2023-07-11 14:16:25,135 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv857331976=1, srv2053058706=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,135 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,135 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,135 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,135 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1304) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,135 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table490
2023-07-11 14:16:25,136 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv857331976=1, srv2053058706=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,136 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,136 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,136 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,136 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table490) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,136 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1305
2023-07-11 14:16:25,136 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv857331976=1, srv2053058706=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,136 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,136 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,136 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,136 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1305) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,136 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table491
2023-07-11 14:16:25,136 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv857331976=1, srv2053058706=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,136 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,136 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,136 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,136 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table491) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,136 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1306
2023-07-11 14:16:25,137 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv857331976=1, srv2053058706=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,137 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,137 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,137 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,137 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1306) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,137 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table250
2023-07-11 14:16:25,137 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv857331976=1, srv2053058706=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,137 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,137 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,137 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,137 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table250) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,137 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table492
2023-07-11 14:16:25,137 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv857331976=1, srv2053058706=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,137 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,137 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,137 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,137 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table492) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,137 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1307
2023-07-11 14:16:25,137 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv857331976=1, srv2053058706=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,138 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,138 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,138 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,138 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1307) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,138 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table471
2023-07-11 14:16:25,138 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv857331976=1, srv2053058706=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,138 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,138 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,138 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,138 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table471) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,138 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table230
2023-07-11 14:16:25,138 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv857331976=1, srv2053058706=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,138 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,138 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,139 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,139 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table230) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,139 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table472
2023-07-11 14:16:25,139 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv857331976=1, srv2053058706=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,139 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,139 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,139 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,139 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table472) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,139 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table231
2023-07-11 14:16:25,140 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv857331976=1, srv2053058706=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,140 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,140 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,140 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,140 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table231) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,140 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table473
2023-07-11 14:16:25,140 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv857331976=1, srv2053058706=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,140 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,140 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,140 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,141 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table473) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,141 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table232
2023-07-11 14:16:25,141 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv857331976=1, srv2053058706=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,141 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,141 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,141 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,141 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table232) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,142 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table474
2023-07-11 14:16:25,142 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv857331976=1, srv2053058706=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,142 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,142 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,142 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,142 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table474) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,142 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table233
2023-07-11 14:16:25,142 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv857331976=1, srv2053058706=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,142 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,142 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,143 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,143 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table233) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,143 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table475
2023-07-11 14:16:25,143 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv857331976=1, srv2053058706=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,143 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,143 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,143 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,143 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table475) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,143 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table234
2023-07-11 14:16:25,144 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv857331976=1, srv2053058706=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,144 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,144 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,144 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,144 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table234) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,144 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table476
2023-07-11 14:16:25,144 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv857331976=1, srv2053058706=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,144 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,144 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,144 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,145 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table476) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,145 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table235
2023-07-11 14:16:25,145 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv857331976=1, srv2053058706=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,145 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,145 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,145 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,145 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table235) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,145 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table477
2023-07-11 14:16:25,145 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv857331976=1, srv2053058706=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,145 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,146 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,146 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,146 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table477) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,146 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table236
2023-07-11 14:16:25,146 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv857331976=1, srv2053058706=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,146 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,146 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,146 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,146 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table236) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,146 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table478
2023-07-11 14:16:25,146 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv857331976=1, srv2053058706=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,147 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,147 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,147 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,147 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table478) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,147 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table237
2023-07-11 14:16:25,147 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv857331976=1, srv2053058706=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,147 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,147 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,147 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,148 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table237) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,148 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table479
2023-07-11 14:16:25,148 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv857331976=1, srv2053058706=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,148 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,148 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,148 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,148 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table479) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,148 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table238
2023-07-11 14:16:25,148 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv857331976=1, srv2053058706=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,148 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,148 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,149 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,149 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table238) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,149 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table239
2023-07-11 14:16:25,149 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv857331976=1, srv2053058706=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,149 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,149 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,149 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,149 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table239) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,149 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table480
2023-07-11 14:16:25,149 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv857331976=1, srv2053058706=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,150 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,150 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,150 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,150 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table480) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,150 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table481
2023-07-11 14:16:25,150 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv857331976=1, srv2053058706=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,150 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,150 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,150 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,150 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table481) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,151 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table262
2023-07-11 14:16:25,151 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv857331976=1, srv2053058706=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,151 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,151 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,151 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,151 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table262) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,151 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table263
2023-07-11 14:16:25,151 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv857331976=1, srv2053058706=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,151 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,151 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,151 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,151 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table263) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,151 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table264
2023-07-11 14:16:25,151 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv857331976=1, srv2053058706=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,152 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,152 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,152 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,152 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table264) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,152 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table265
2023-07-11 14:16:25,152 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv857331976=1, srv2053058706=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,152 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,152 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,152 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,152 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table265) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,152 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table266
2023-07-11 14:16:25,152 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv857331976=1, srv2053058706=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,152 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,152 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,152 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,152 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table266) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,152 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table267
2023-07-11 14:16:25,152 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv857331976=1, srv2053058706=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,153 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,153 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,153 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,153 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table267) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,153 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table268
2023-07-11 14:16:25,153 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv857331976=1, srv2053058706=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,153 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,153 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,153 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,153 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table268) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,153 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table269
2023-07-11 14:16:25,153 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv857331976=1, srv2053058706=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,153 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,153 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,153 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,154 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table269) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,154 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table270
2023-07-11 14:16:25,154 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv857331976=1, srv2053058706=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,154 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,154 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,154 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,154 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table270) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,154 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table271
2023-07-11 14:16:25,154 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv857331976=1, srv2053058706=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,154 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,154 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,154 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,154 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table271) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,154 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table272
2023-07-11 14:16:25,154 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv857331976=1, srv2053058706=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,154 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,154 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,154 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,155 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table272) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,155 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table251
2023-07-11 14:16:25,155 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv857331976=1, srv2053058706=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,155 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,155 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,155 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,155 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table251) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,155 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table493
2023-07-11 14:16:25,155 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv857331976=1, srv2053058706=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,155 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,155 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,155 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,155 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table493) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,155 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table252
2023-07-11 14:16:25,155 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv857331976=1, srv2053058706=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,155 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,155 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,155 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,155 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table252) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,155 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table494
2023-07-11 14:16:25,156 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv857331976=1, srv2053058706=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,156 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,156 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,156 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,156 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table494) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,156 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table253
2023-07-11 14:16:25,156 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv857331976=1, srv2053058706=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,156 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,156 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,156 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,156 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table253) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,157 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table495
2023-07-11 14:16:25,157 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv857331976=1, srv2053058706=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,157 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,157 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,157 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,157 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table495) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,157 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table254
2023-07-11 14:16:25,157 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv857331976=1, srv2053058706=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,157 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,157 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,157 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,158 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table254) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,158 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table496
2023-07-11 14:16:25,158 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv857331976=1, srv2053058706=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,158 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,158 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,158 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,158 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table496) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,158 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table255
2023-07-11 14:16:25,158 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv857331976=1, srv2053058706=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,158 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,158 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,158 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,158 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table255) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,158 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table497
2023-07-11 14:16:25,158 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv857331976=1, srv2053058706=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,158 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,158 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,158 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,159 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table497) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,159 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table256
2023-07-11 14:16:25,159 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv857331976=1, srv2053058706=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,159 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,159 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,159 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,159 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table256) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,159 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table498
2023-07-11 14:16:25,159 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv857331976=1, srv2053058706=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,159 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,159 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,159 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,159 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table498) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,159 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table257
2023-07-11 14:16:25,159 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv857331976=1, srv2053058706=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,159 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,159 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,159 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,160 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table257) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,160 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table499
2023-07-11 14:16:25,160 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv857331976=1, srv2053058706=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,160 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,160 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,160 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,160 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table499) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,160 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table258
2023-07-11 14:16:25,160 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv857331976=1, srv2053058706=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,160 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,160 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,160 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,160 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table258) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,160 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table259
2023-07-11 14:16:25,160 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv857331976=1, srv2053058706=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,161 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,161 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,161 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,161 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table259) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,161 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table260
2023-07-11 14:16:25,161 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv857331976=1, srv2053058706=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,161 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,161 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,161 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,161 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table260) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,161 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table261
2023-07-11 14:16:25,161 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv857331976=1, srv2053058706=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,161 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,161 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,161 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,161 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table261) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,161 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table680
2023-07-11 14:16:25,161 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv857331976=1, srv2053058706=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,162 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,162 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,162 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,162 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table680) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,162 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table681
2023-07-11 14:16:25,162 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv857331976=1, srv2053058706=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,162 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,162 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,162 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,162 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table681) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,162 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table440
2023-07-11 14:16:25,162 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv857331976=1, srv2053058706=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,162 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,162 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,162 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,162 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table440) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,162 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table682
2023-07-11 14:16:25,162 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv857331976=1, srv2053058706=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,163 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,163 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,163 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,163 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table682) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,163 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table441
2023-07-11 14:16:25,163 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv857331976=1, srv2053058706=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,163 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,163 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,163 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,163 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table441) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,163 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table683
2023-07-11 14:16:25,163 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv857331976=1, srv2053058706=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,163 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,163 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,163 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,163 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table683) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,163 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table200
2023-07-11 14:16:25,163 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv857331976=1, srv2053058706=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,163 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,163 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,164 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,164 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table200) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,164 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table442
2023-07-11 14:16:25,164 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv857331976=1, srv2053058706=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,164 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,164 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,164 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,164 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table442) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,164 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table684
2023-07-11 14:16:25,164 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv857331976=1, srv2053058706=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,164 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,164 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,164 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,164 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table684) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,164 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1340
2023-07-11 14:16:25,164 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv857331976=1, srv2053058706=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,164 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,164 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,164 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,165 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1340) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,165 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table201
2023-07-11 14:16:25,165 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv857331976=1, srv2053058706=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,165 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,165 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,165 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,165 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table201) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,165 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table443
2023-07-11 14:16:25,165 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv857331976=1, srv2053058706=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,165 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,165 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,165 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,165 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table443) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,165 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table685
2023-07-11 14:16:25,165 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv857331976=1, srv2053058706=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,165 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,165 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,165 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,165 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table685) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,165 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1341
2023-07-11 14:16:25,166 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv857331976=1, srv2053058706=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,166 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,166 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,166 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,166 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1341) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,166 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table202
2023-07-11 14:16:25,166 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv857331976=1, srv2053058706=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,166 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,166 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,166 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,166 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table202) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,166 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table444
2023-07-11 14:16:25,166 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv857331976=1, srv2053058706=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,166 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,166 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,166 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,166 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table444) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,166 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table686
2023-07-11 14:16:25,166 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv857331976=1, srv2053058706=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,166 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,167 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,167 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,167 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table686) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,167 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1100
2023-07-11 14:16:25,167 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv857331976=1, srv2053058706=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,167 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,167 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,167 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,167 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1100) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,167 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1342
2023-07-11 14:16:25,167 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv857331976=1, srv2053058706=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,167 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,167 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,167 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,167 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1342) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,167 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table203
2023-07-11 14:16:25,168 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv857331976=1, srv2053058706=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,168 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,168 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,168 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,168 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table203) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,168 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table445
2023-07-11 14:16:25,168 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv857331976=1, srv2053058706=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,168 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,168 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,168 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,168 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table445) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,168 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table687
2023-07-11 14:16:25,168 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv857331976=1, srv2053058706=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,168 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,168 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,168 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,168 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table687) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,168 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1101
2023-07-11 14:16:25,168 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv857331976=1, srv2053058706=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,169 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,169 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,169 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,169 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1101) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,169 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1343
2023-07-11 14:16:25,169 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv857331976=1, srv2053058706=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,169 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,169 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,169 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,169 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1343) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,169 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table204
2023-07-11 14:16:25,169 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv857331976=1, srv2053058706=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,169 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,169 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,169 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,169 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table204) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,169 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table446
2023-07-11 14:16:25,169 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv857331976=1, srv2053058706=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,169 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,169 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,170 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,170 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table446) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,170 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table688
2023-07-11 14:16:25,170 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv857331976=1, srv2053058706=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,170 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,170 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,170 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,170 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table688) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,170 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table205
2023-07-11 14:16:25,170 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv857331976=1, srv2053058706=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,170 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,170 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,170 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,170 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table205) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,170 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table447
2023-07-11 14:16:25,170 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv857331976=1, srv2053058706=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,170 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,170 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,170 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,171 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table447) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,171 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table689
2023-07-11 14:16:25,171 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv857331976=1, srv2053058706=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,171 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,171 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,171 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,171 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table689) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,171 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table206
2023-07-11 14:16:25,171 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv857331976=1, srv2053058706=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,171 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,171 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,171 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,171 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table206) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,171 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table448
2023-07-11 14:16:25,171 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv857331976=1, srv2053058706=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,171 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,171 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,172 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,172 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table448) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,172 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table207
2023-07-11 14:16:25,172 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv857331976=1, srv2053058706=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,172 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,172 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,172 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,172 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table207) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,172 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table449
2023-07-11 14:16:25,172 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv857331976=1, srv2053058706=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,172 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,172 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,172 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,172 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table449) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,172 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table208
2023-07-11 14:16:25,172 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv857331976=1, srv2053058706=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,172 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,172 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,172 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,173 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table208) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,173 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table209
2023-07-11 14:16:25,173 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv857331976=1, srv2053058706=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,173 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,173 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,173 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,173 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table209) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,173 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1102
2023-07-11 14:16:25,173 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv857331976=1, srv2053058706=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,173 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,173 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,173 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,173 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1102) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,173 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1344
2023-07-11 14:16:25,173 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv857331976=1, srv2053058706=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,173 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,173 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,173 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,174 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1344) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,174 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1103
2023-07-11 14:16:25,174 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv857331976=1, srv2053058706=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,174 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,174 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,174 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,174 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1103) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,174 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1345
2023-07-11 14:16:25,174 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv857331976=1, srv2053058706=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,174 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,174 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,174 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,174 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1345) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,174 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1104
2023-07-11 14:16:25,174 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv857331976=1, srv2053058706=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,174 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,174 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,174 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,174 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1104) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,175 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1346
2023-07-11 14:16:25,175 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv857331976=1, srv2053058706=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,175 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,175 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,175 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,175 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1346) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,175 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1105
2023-07-11 14:16:25,175 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv857331976=1, srv2053058706=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,175 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,175 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,175 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,175 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1105) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,175 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1347
2023-07-11 14:16:25,175 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv857331976=1, srv2053058706=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,175 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,175 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,175 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,175 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1347) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,175 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1106
2023-07-11 14:16:25,175 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv857331976=1, srv2053058706=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,176 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,176 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,176 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,176 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1106) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,176 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1348
2023-07-11 14:16:25,176 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv857331976=1, srv2053058706=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,176 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,176 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,176 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,176 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1348) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,176 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1107
2023-07-11 14:16:25,176 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv857331976=1, srv2053058706=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,176 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,176 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,176 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,176 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1107) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,176 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1349
2023-07-11 14:16:25,176 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv857331976=1, srv2053058706=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,176 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,176 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,177 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,177 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1349) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,177 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1108
2023-07-11 14:16:25,177 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv857331976=1, srv2053058706=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,177 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,177 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,177 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,177 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1108) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,177 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table690
2023-07-11 14:16:25,177 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv857331976=1, srv2053058706=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,177 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,177 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,177 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,178 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table690) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,178 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1109
2023-07-11 14:16:25,178 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv857331976=1, srv2053058706=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,178 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,178 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,178 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,178 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1109) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,178 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table670
2023-07-11 14:16:25,178 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv857331976=1, srv2053058706=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,178 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,178 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,178 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,178 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table670) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,178 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table671
2023-07-11 14:16:25,178 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv857331976=1, srv2053058706=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,178 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,178 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,178 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,178 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table671) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,178 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table430
2023-07-11 14:16:25,178 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv857331976=1, srv2053058706=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,179 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,179 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,179 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,179 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table430) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,179 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table672
2023-07-11 14:16:25,179 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv857331976=1, srv2053058706=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,179 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,179 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,179 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,179 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table672) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,179 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table431
2023-07-11 14:16:25,179 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv857331976=1, srv2053058706=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,179 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,179 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,179 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,179 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table431) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,179 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table673
2023-07-11 14:16:25,179 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv857331976=1, srv2053058706=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,179 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,179 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,179 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,180 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table673) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,180 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table432
2023-07-11 14:16:25,180 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv857331976=1, srv2053058706=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,180 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,180 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,180 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,180 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table432) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,180 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table674
2023-07-11 14:16:25,180 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv857331976=1, srv2053058706=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,180 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,180 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,180 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,180 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table674) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,180 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1330
2023-07-11 14:16:25,180 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv857331976=1, srv2053058706=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,180 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,180 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,180 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,180 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1330) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,180 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table433
2023-07-11 14:16:25,180 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv857331976=1, srv2053058706=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,181 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,181 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,181 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,181 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table433) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,181 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table675
2023-07-11 14:16:25,181 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv857331976=1, srv2053058706=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,181 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,181 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,181 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,181 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table675) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,181 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1331
2023-07-11 14:16:25,181 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv857331976=1, srv2053058706=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,181 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,181 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,181 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,181 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1331) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,181 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table434
2023-07-11 14:16:25,181 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv857331976=1, srv2053058706=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,181 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,181 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,181 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,182 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table434) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,182 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table676
2023-07-11 14:16:25,182 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv857331976=1, srv2053058706=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,182 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,182 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,182 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,182 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table676) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,182 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1332
2023-07-11 14:16:25,182 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv857331976=1, srv2053058706=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,182 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,182 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,182 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,182 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1332) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,182 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table435
2023-07-11 14:16:25,182 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv857331976=1, srv2053058706=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,182 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,182 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,182 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,182 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table435) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,182 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table677
2023-07-11 14:16:25,183 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv857331976=1, srv2053058706=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,183 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,183 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,183 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,183 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table677) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,183 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table436
2023-07-11 14:16:25,183 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv857331976=1, srv2053058706=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,183 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,183 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,183 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,183 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table436) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,183 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table678
2023-07-11 14:16:25,183 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv857331976=1, srv2053058706=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,183 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,183 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,183 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,183 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table678) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,183 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table437
2023-07-11 14:16:25,183 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv857331976=1, srv2053058706=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,183 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,183 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,183 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,184 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table437) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,184 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table679
2023-07-11 14:16:25,184 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv857331976=1, srv2053058706=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,184 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,184 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,184 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,184 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table679) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,184 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table438
2023-07-11 14:16:25,184 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv857331976=1, srv2053058706=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,184 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,184 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,184 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,184 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table438) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,184 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table439
2023-07-11 14:16:25,184 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv857331976=1, srv2053058706=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,184 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,184 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,184 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,184 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table439) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,184 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1333
2023-07-11 14:16:25,185 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv857331976=1, srv2053058706=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,185 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,185 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,185 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,185 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1333) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,185 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1334
2023-07-11 14:16:25,185 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv857331976=1, srv2053058706=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,185 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,185 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,185 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,185 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1334) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,185 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1335
2023-07-11 14:16:25,185 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv857331976=1, srv2053058706=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,185 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,185 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,185 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,185 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1335) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,185 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1336
2023-07-11 14:16:25,185 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv857331976=1, srv2053058706=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,185 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,185 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,186 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,186 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1336) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,186 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1337
2023-07-11 14:16:25,186 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv857331976=1, srv2053058706=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,186 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,186 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,186 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,186 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1337) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,186 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1338
2023-07-11 14:16:25,186 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv857331976=1, srv2053058706=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,186 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,186 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,186 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,187 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1338) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,187 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1339
2023-07-11 14:16:25,187 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv857331976=1, srv2053058706=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,187 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,187 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,187 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,187 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1339) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,187 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table460
2023-07-11 14:16:25,187 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv857331976=1, srv2053058706=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,187 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,187 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,187 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,187 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table460) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,187 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table461
2023-07-11 14:16:25,187 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv857331976=1, srv2053058706=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,187 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,187 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,187 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,187 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table461) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,187 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table220
2023-07-11 14:16:25,187 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv857331976=1, srv2053058706=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,188 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,188 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,188 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,188 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table220) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,188 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table462
2023-07-11 14:16:25,188 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv857331976=1, srv2053058706=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,188 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,188 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,188 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,188 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table462) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,188 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table221
2023-07-11 14:16:25,188 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv857331976=1, srv2053058706=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,188 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,188 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,188 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,188 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table221) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,188 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table463
2023-07-11 14:16:25,188 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv857331976=1, srv2053058706=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,188 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,188 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,189 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,189 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table463) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,189 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table222
2023-07-11 14:16:25,189 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv857331976=1, srv2053058706=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,189 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,189 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,189 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,189 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table222) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,189 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table464
2023-07-11 14:16:25,189 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv857331976=1, srv2053058706=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,189 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,189 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,189 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,189 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table464) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,189 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table223
2023-07-11 14:16:25,189 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv857331976=1, srv2053058706=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,189 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,189 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,189 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,190 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table223) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,190 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table465
2023-07-11 14:16:25,190 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv857331976=1, srv2053058706=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,190 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,190 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,190 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,190 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table465) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,190 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table224
2023-07-11 14:16:25,190 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv857331976=1, srv2053058706=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,190 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,190 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,190 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,190 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table224) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,190 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table466
2023-07-11 14:16:25,190 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv857331976=1, srv2053058706=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,190 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,190 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,190 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,190 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table466) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,190 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1320
2023-07-11 14:16:25,190 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv857331976=1, srv2053058706=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,191 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,191 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,191 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,191 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1320) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,191 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table225
2023-07-11 14:16:25,191 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv857331976=1, srv2053058706=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,191 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,191 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,191 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,191 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table225) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,191 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table467
2023-07-11 14:16:25,191 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv857331976=1, srv2053058706=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,191 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,191 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,191 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,191 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table467) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,191 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1321
2023-07-11 14:16:25,191 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv857331976=1, srv2053058706=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,191 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,191 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,191 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,192 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1321) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,192 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table226
2023-07-11 14:16:25,192 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv857331976=1, srv2053058706=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,192 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,192 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,192 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,192 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table226) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,192 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table468
2023-07-11 14:16:25,192 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv857331976=1, srv2053058706=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,192 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,192 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,192 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,192 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table468) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,192 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table227
2023-07-11 14:16:25,192 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv857331976=1, srv2053058706=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,192 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,193 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,193 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,193 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table227) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,193 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table469
2023-07-11 14:16:25,193 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv857331976=1, srv2053058706=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,193 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,193 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,193 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,193 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table469) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,193 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table228
2023-07-11 14:16:25,193 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv857331976=1, srv2053058706=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,193 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,193 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,193 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,193 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table228) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,193 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table229
2023-07-11 14:16:25,193 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv857331976=1, srv2053058706=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,193 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,193 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,193 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,194 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table229) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,194 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1322
2023-07-11 14:16:25,194 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv857331976=1, srv2053058706=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,194 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,194 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,194 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,194 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1322) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,194 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1323
2023-07-11 14:16:25,194 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv857331976=1, srv2053058706=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,194 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,194 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,194 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,194 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1323) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,194 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1324
2023-07-11 14:16:25,194 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv857331976=1, srv2053058706=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,194 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,194 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,194 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,194 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1324) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,195 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1325
2023-07-11 14:16:25,195 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv857331976=1, srv2053058706=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,195 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,195 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,195 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,195 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1325) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,195 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1326
2023-07-11 14:16:25,195 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv857331976=1, srv2053058706=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,195 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,195 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,195 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,195 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1326) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,195 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1327
2023-07-11 14:16:25,195 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv857331976=1, srv2053058706=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,195 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,195 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,195 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,195 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1327) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,195 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1328
2023-07-11 14:16:25,196 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv857331976=1, srv2053058706=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,196 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,196 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,196 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,196 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1328) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,196 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table470
2023-07-11 14:16:25,196 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv857331976=1, srv2053058706=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,196 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,196 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,196 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,196 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table470) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,196 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1329
2023-07-11 14:16:25,196 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv857331976=1, srv2053058706=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,196 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,196 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,197 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,197 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1329) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,197 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table691
2023-07-11 14:16:25,197 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv857331976=1, srv2053058706=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,197 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,197 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,197 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,197 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table691) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,197 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table450
2023-07-11 14:16:25,197 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv857331976=1, srv2053058706=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,197 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,197 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,197 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,197 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table450) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,197 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table692
2023-07-11 14:16:25,197 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv857331976=1, srv2053058706=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,197 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,197 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,197 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,197 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table692) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,197 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table451
2023-07-11 14:16:25,198 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv857331976=1, srv2053058706=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,198 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,198 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,198 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,198 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table451) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,198 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table693
2023-07-11 14:16:25,198 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv857331976=1, srv2053058706=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,198 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,198 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,198 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,198 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table693) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,198 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table210
2023-07-11 14:16:25,198 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv857331976=1, srv2053058706=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,198 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,198 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,198 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,198 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table210) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,198 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table452
2023-07-11 14:16:25,198 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv857331976=1, srv2053058706=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,198 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,198 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,198 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,199 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table452) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,199 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table694
2023-07-11 14:16:25,199 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv857331976=1, srv2053058706=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,199 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,199 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,199 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,199 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table694) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,199 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table211
2023-07-11 14:16:25,199 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv857331976=1, srv2053058706=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,199 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,199 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,199 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,199 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table211) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,199 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table453
2023-07-11 14:16:25,199 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv857331976=1, srv2053058706=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,199 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,199 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,199 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,199 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table453) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,199 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table695
2023-07-11 14:16:25,199 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv857331976=1, srv2053058706=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,199 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,200 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,200 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,200 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table695) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,200 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table212
2023-07-11 14:16:25,200 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv857331976=1, srv2053058706=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,200 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,200 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,200 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,200 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table212) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,200 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table454
2023-07-11 14:16:25,200 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv857331976=1, srv2053058706=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,200 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,200 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,200 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,200 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table454) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,200 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table696
2023-07-11 14:16:25,200 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv857331976=1, srv2053058706=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,200 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,200 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,200 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,201 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table696) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,201 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table213
2023-07-11 14:16:25,201 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv857331976=1, srv2053058706=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,201 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,201 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,201 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,201 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table213) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,201 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table455
2023-07-11 14:16:25,201 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv857331976=1, srv2053058706=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,201 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,201 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,201 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,201 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table455) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,201 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table697
2023-07-11 14:16:25,201 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv857331976=1, srv2053058706=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,201 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,201 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,201 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,201 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table697) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,201 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table214
2023-07-11 14:16:25,201 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv857331976=1, srv2053058706=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,202 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,202 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,202 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,202 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table214) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,202 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table456
2023-07-11 14:16:25,202 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv857331976=1, srv2053058706=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,202 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,202 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,202 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,202 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table456) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,202 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table698
2023-07-11 14:16:25,202 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv857331976=1, srv2053058706=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,202 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,202 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,202 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,202 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table698) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,202 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1310
2023-07-11 14:16:25,202 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv857331976=1, srv2053058706=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,202 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,202 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,203 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,203 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1310) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,203 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table215
2023-07-11 14:16:25,203 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv857331976=1, srv2053058706=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,203 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,203 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,203 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,203 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table215) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,203 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table457
2023-07-11 14:16:25,203 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv857331976=1, srv2053058706=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,203 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,203 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,203 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,203 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table457) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,203 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table699
2023-07-11 14:16:25,203 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv857331976=1, srv2053058706=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,203 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,203 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,203 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,203 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table699) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,203 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table216
2023-07-11 14:16:25,203 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv857331976=1, srv2053058706=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,204 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,204 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,204 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,204 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table216) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,204 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table458
2023-07-11 14:16:25,204 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv857331976=1, srv2053058706=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,204 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,204 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,204 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,204 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table458) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,204 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table217
2023-07-11 14:16:25,204 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv857331976=1, srv2053058706=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,204 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,204 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,204 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,204 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table217) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,204 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table459
2023-07-11 14:16:25,204 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv857331976=1, srv2053058706=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,204 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,204 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,205 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,205 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table459) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,205 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table218
2023-07-11 14:16:25,205 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv857331976=1, srv2053058706=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,205 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,205 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,205 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,205 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table218) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,205 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table219
2023-07-11 14:16:25,205 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv857331976=1, srv2053058706=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,205 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,205 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,205 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,206 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table219) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,206 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1319
2023-07-11 14:16:25,206 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv857331976=1, srv2053058706=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,206 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,206 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,206 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,206 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1319) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,206 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1311
2023-07-11 14:16:25,206 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv857331976=1, srv2053058706=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,206 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,206 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,206 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,206 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1311) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,206 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1312
2023-07-11 14:16:25,206 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv857331976=1, srv2053058706=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,206 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,206 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,206 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,206 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1312) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,206 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1313
2023-07-11 14:16:25,206 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv857331976=1, srv2053058706=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,206 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,207 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,207 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,207 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1313) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,207 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1314
2023-07-11 14:16:25,207 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv857331976=1, srv2053058706=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,207 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,207 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,207 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,207 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1314) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,207 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1315
2023-07-11 14:16:25,207 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv857331976=1, srv2053058706=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,207 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,207 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,207 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,207 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1315) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,207 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1316
2023-07-11 14:16:25,207 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv857331976=1, srv2053058706=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,207 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,207 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,207 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,207 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1316) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,207 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1317
2023-07-11 14:16:25,207 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv857331976=1, srv2053058706=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,208 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,208 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,208 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,208 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1317) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,208 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1318
2023-07-11 14:16:25,208 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv857331976=1, srv2053058706=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,208 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,208 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,208 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,208 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1318) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,208 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table196
2023-07-11 14:16:25,208 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv857331976=1, srv2053058706=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,208 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,208 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,208 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,208 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table196) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,208 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table197
2023-07-11 14:16:25,208 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv857331976=1, srv2053058706=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,208 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,208 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,208 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,209 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table197) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,209 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table198
2023-07-11 14:16:25,209 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv857331976=1, srv2053058706=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,209 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,209 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,209 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,209 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table198) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,209 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table199
2023-07-11 14:16:25,209 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv857331976=1, srv2053058706=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,209 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,209 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,209 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,209 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table199) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,209 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table163
2023-07-11 14:16:25,209 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv857331976=1, srv2053058706=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,209 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,209 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,210 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,210 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table163) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,210 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table164
2023-07-11 14:16:25,210 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv857331976=1, srv2053058706=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,210 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,210 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,210 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,210 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table164) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,210 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table165
2023-07-11 14:16:25,210 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv857331976=1, srv2053058706=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,210 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,210 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,210 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,210 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table165) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,210 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table166
2023-07-11 14:16:25,210 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv857331976=1, srv2053058706=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,210 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,210 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,210 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,210 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table166) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,210 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table167
2023-07-11 14:16:25,211 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv857331976=1, srv2053058706=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,211 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,211 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,211 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,211 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table167) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,211 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table168
2023-07-11 14:16:25,211 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv857331976=1, srv2053058706=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,211 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,211 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,211 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,211 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table168) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,211 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table169
2023-07-11 14:16:25,211 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv857331976=1, srv2053058706=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,211 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,211 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,211 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,211 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table169) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,211 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table170
2023-07-11 14:16:25,211 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv857331976=1, srv2053058706=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,211 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,211 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,211 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,212 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table170) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,212 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table171
2023-07-11 14:16:25,212 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv857331976=1, srv2053058706=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,212 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,212 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,212 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,212 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table171) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,212 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table172
2023-07-11 14:16:25,212 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv857331976=1, srv2053058706=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,212 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,212 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,212 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,212 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table172) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,212 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table173
2023-07-11 14:16:25,212 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv857331976=1, srv2053058706=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,212 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,212 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,212 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,212 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table173) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,212 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table152
2023-07-11 14:16:25,212 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv857331976=1, srv2053058706=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,213 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,213 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,213 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,213 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table152) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,213 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table394
2023-07-11 14:16:25,213 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv857331976=1, srv2053058706=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,213 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,213 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,213 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,213 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table394) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,213 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table153
2023-07-11 14:16:25,213 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv857331976=1, srv2053058706=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,213 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,213 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,213 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,213 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table153) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,213 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table395
2023-07-11 14:16:25,213 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv857331976=1, srv2053058706=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,213 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,213 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,213 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,214 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table395) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,214 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table154
2023-07-11 14:16:25,214 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv857331976=1, srv2053058706=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,214 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,214 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,214 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,214 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table154) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,214 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table396
2023-07-11 14:16:25,214 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv857331976=1, srv2053058706=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,214 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,214 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,214 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,215 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table396) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,215 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table155
2023-07-11 14:16:25,215 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv857331976=1, srv2053058706=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,215 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,215 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,215 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,215 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table155) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,215 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table397
2023-07-11 14:16:25,215 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv857331976=1, srv2053058706=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,215 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,215 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,215 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,215 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table397) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,215 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table156
2023-07-11 14:16:25,215 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv857331976=1, srv2053058706=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,215 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,215 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,215 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,215 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table156) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,215 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table398
2023-07-11 14:16:25,215 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv857331976=1, srv2053058706=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,215 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,216 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,216 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,216 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table398) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,216 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table157
2023-07-11 14:16:25,216 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv857331976=1, srv2053058706=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,216 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,216 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,216 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,216 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table157) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,216 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table399
2023-07-11 14:16:25,216 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv857331976=1, srv2053058706=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,216 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,216 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,216 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,216 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table399) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,216 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table158
2023-07-11 14:16:25,216 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv857331976=1, srv2053058706=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,216 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,216 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,216 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,216 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table158) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,216 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table159
2023-07-11 14:16:25,217 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv857331976=1, srv2053058706=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,217 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,217 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,217 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,217 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table159) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,217 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table160
2023-07-11 14:16:25,217 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv857331976=1, srv2053058706=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,217 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,217 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,217 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,217 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table160) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,217 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table161
2023-07-11 14:16:25,217 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv857331976=1, srv2053058706=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,217 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,217 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,217 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,217 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table161) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,217 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table162
2023-07-11 14:16:25,217 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv857331976=1, srv2053058706=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,217 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,217 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,217 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,218 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table162) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,218 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table185
2023-07-11 14:16:25,218 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv857331976=1, srv2053058706=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,218 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,218 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,218 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,218 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table185) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,218 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table186
2023-07-11 14:16:25,218 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv857331976=1, srv2053058706=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,218 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,218 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,218 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,218 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table186) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,218 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table187
2023-07-11 14:16:25,218 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv857331976=1, srv2053058706=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,218 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,218 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,218 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,218 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table187) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,218 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table188
2023-07-11 14:16:25,218 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv857331976=1, srv2053058706=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,218 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,219 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,219 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,219 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table188) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,219 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table189
2023-07-11 14:16:25,219 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv857331976=1, srv2053058706=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,219 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,219 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,219 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,219 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table189) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,219 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table190
2023-07-11 14:16:25,219 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv857331976=1, srv2053058706=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,219 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,219 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,219 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,219 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table190) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,219 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table191
2023-07-11 14:16:25,219 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv857331976=1, srv2053058706=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,219 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,219 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,219 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,219 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table191) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,219 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table192
2023-07-11 14:16:25,220 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv857331976=1, srv2053058706=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,220 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,220 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,220 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,220 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table192) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,220 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table193
2023-07-11 14:16:25,220 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv857331976=1, srv2053058706=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,220 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,220 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,220 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,220 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table193) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,220 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table194
2023-07-11 14:16:25,220 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv857331976=1, srv2053058706=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,220 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,220 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,220 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,220 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table194) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,220 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table195
2023-07-11 14:16:25,220 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv857331976=1, srv2053058706=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,220 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,220 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,220 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,221 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table195) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,221 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table174
2023-07-11 14:16:25,221 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv857331976=1, srv2053058706=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,221 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,221 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,221 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,221 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table174) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,221 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table175
2023-07-11 14:16:25,221 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv857331976=1, srv2053058706=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,221 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,221 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,221 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,221 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table175) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,221 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table176
2023-07-11 14:16:25,221 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv857331976=1, srv2053058706=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,221 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,221 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,221 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,221 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table176) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,221 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table177
2023-07-11 14:16:25,221 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv857331976=1, srv2053058706=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,222 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,222 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,222 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,222 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table177) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,222 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table178
2023-07-11 14:16:25,222 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv857331976=1, srv2053058706=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,222 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,222 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,222 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,222 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table178) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,222 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table179
2023-07-11 14:16:25,222 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv857331976=1, srv2053058706=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,222 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,222 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,222 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,222 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table179) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,222 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table180
2023-07-11 14:16:25,222 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv857331976=1, srv2053058706=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,222 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,222 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,222 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,223 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table180) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,223 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table181
2023-07-11 14:16:25,223 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv857331976=1, srv2053058706=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,223 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,223 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,223 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,223 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table181) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,223 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table182
2023-07-11 14:16:25,223 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv857331976=1, srv2053058706=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,223 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,223 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,223 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,223 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table182) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,224 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table183
2023-07-11 14:16:25,224 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv857331976=1, srv2053058706=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,224 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,224 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,224 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,224 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table183) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,224 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table184
2023-07-11 14:16:25,224 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv857331976=1, srv2053058706=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,224 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,224 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,224 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,224 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table184) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,224 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table800
2023-07-11 14:16:25,224 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv857331976=1, srv2053058706=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,224 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,224 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,224 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,224 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table800) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,224 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table801
2023-07-11 14:16:25,224 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv857331976=1, srv2053058706=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,224 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,224 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,225 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,225 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table801) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,225 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table802
2023-07-11 14:16:25,225 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv857331976=1, srv2053058706=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,225 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,225 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,225 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,225 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table802) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,225 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table803
2023-07-11 14:16:25,225 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv857331976=1, srv2053058706=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,225 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,225 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,225 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,225 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table803) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,225 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table804
2023-07-11 14:16:25,225 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv857331976=1, srv2053058706=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,225 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,225 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,225 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,225 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table804) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,225 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table805
2023-07-11 14:16:25,225 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv857331976=1, srv2053058706=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,226 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,226 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,226 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,226 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table805) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,226 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table806
2023-07-11 14:16:25,226 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv857331976=1, srv2053058706=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,226 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,226 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,226 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,226 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table806) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,226 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table807
2023-07-11 14:16:25,226 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv857331976=1, srv2053058706=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,226 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,226 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,226 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,227 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table807) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,227 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table808
2023-07-11 14:16:25,227 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv857331976=1, srv2053058706=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,227 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,227 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,227 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,227 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table808) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,227 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table809
2023-07-11 14:16:25,227 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv857331976=1, srv2053058706=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,227 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,227 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,227 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,227 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table809) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,227 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table820
2023-07-11 14:16:25,227 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv857331976=1, srv2053058706=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,227 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,227 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,227 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,227 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table820) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,228 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table821
2023-07-11 14:16:25,228 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv857331976=1, srv2053058706=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,228 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,228 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,228 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,228 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table821) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,228 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table822
2023-07-11 14:16:25,228 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv857331976=1, srv2053058706=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,228 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,228 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,228 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,228 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table822) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,228 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table823
2023-07-11 14:16:25,228 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv857331976=1, srv2053058706=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,228 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,228 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,228 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,228 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table823) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,228 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table824
2023-07-11 14:16:25,229 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv857331976=1, srv2053058706=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,229 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,229 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,229 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,229 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table824) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,229 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table825
2023-07-11 14:16:25,229 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv857331976=1, srv2053058706=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,229 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,229 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,229 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,229 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table825) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,229 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table826
2023-07-11 14:16:25,229 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv857331976=1, srv2053058706=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,229 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,229 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,229 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,229 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table826) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,229 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table827
2023-07-11 14:16:25,229 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv857331976=1, srv2053058706=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,229 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,230 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,230 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,230 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table827) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,230 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table828
2023-07-11 14:16:25,230 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv857331976=1, srv2053058706=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,230 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,230 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,230 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,230 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table828) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,230 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table829
2023-07-11 14:16:25,230 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv857331976=1, srv2053058706=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,230 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,230 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,230 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,230 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table829) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,230 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1193
2023-07-11 14:16:25,230 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv857331976=1, srv2053058706=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,230 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,230 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,230 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,231 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1193) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,231 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1194
2023-07-11 14:16:25,231 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv857331976=1, srv2053058706=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,231 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,231 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,231 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,231 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1194) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,231 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1195
2023-07-11 14:16:25,231 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv857331976=1, srv2053058706=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,231 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,231 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,231 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,231 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1195) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,231 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1196
2023-07-11 14:16:25,231 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv857331976=1, srv2053058706=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,231 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,231 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,231 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,231 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1196) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,232 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1197
2023-07-11 14:16:25,232 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv857331976=1, srv2053058706=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,232 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,232 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,232 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,232 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1197) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,232 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1198
2023-07-11 14:16:25,232 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv857331976=1, srv2053058706=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,232 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,232 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,232 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,232 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1198) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,232 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1199
2023-07-11 14:16:25,232 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv857331976=1, srv2053058706=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,232 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,232 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,232 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,233 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1199) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,233 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table810
2023-07-11 14:16:25,233 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv857331976=1, srv2053058706=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,233 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,233 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,233 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,233 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table810) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,233 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table811
2023-07-11 14:16:25,233 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv857331976=1, srv2053058706=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,233 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,233 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,233 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,233 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table811) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,234 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table812
2023-07-11 14:16:25,234 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv857331976=1, srv2053058706=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,234 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,234 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,234 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,234 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table812) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,234 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table813
2023-07-11 14:16:25,234 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv857331976=1, srv2053058706=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,234 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,234 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,234 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,234 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table813) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,234 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table814
2023-07-11 14:16:25,234 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv857331976=1, srv2053058706=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,234 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,234 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,234 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,234 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table814) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,234 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1190
2023-07-11 14:16:25,235 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv857331976=1, srv2053058706=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,235 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,235 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,235 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,235 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1190) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,235 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table815
2023-07-11 14:16:25,235 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv857331976=1, srv2053058706=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,235 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,235 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,235 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,235 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table815) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,235 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1191
2023-07-11 14:16:25,235 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv857331976=1, srv2053058706=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,235 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,235 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,235 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,235 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1191) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,235 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table816
2023-07-11 14:16:25,235 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv857331976=1, srv2053058706=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,235 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,236 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,236 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,236 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table816) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,236 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1192
2023-07-11 14:16:25,236 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv857331976=1, srv2053058706=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,236 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,236 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,236 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,236 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1192) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,236 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table817
2023-07-11 14:16:25,236 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv857331976=1, srv2053058706=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,236 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,236 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,236 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,236 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table817) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,236 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table818
2023-07-11 14:16:25,236 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv857331976=1, srv2053058706=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,236 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,236 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,236 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,237 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table818) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,237 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table819
2023-07-11 14:16:25,237 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv857331976=1, srv2053058706=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,237 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,237 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,237 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,237 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table819) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,237 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1260
2023-07-11 14:16:25,237 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv857331976=1, srv2053058706=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,237 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,237 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,237 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,237 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1260) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,237 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1261
2023-07-11 14:16:25,237 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv857331976=1, srv2053058706=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,237 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,237 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,237 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,237 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1261) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,237 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table760
2023-07-11 14:16:25,238 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv857331976=1, srv2053058706=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,238 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,238 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,238 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,238 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table760) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,238 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1020
2023-07-11 14:16:25,238 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv857331976=1, srv2053058706=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,238 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,238 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,238 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,238 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1020) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,238 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1262
2023-07-11 14:16:25,238 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv857331976=1, srv2053058706=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,238 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,238 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,238 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,238 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1262) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,238 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table761
2023-07-11 14:16:25,238 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv857331976=1, srv2053058706=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,238 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,238 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,238 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,239 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table761) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,239 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1021
2023-07-11 14:16:25,239 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv857331976=1, srv2053058706=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,239 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,239 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,239 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,239 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1021) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,239 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1263
2023-07-11 14:16:25,239 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv857331976=1, srv2053058706=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,239 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,239 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,239 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,239 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1263) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,239 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table520
2023-07-11 14:16:25,239 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv857331976=1, srv2053058706=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,239 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,239 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,239 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,239 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table520) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,239 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table762
2023-07-11 14:16:25,239 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv857331976=1, srv2053058706=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,240 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,240 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,240 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,240 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table762) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,240 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1022
2023-07-11 14:16:25,240 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv857331976=1, srv2053058706=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,240 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,240 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,240 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,240 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1022) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,240 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1264
2023-07-11 14:16:25,240 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv857331976=1, srv2053058706=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,240 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,240 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,240 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,240 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1264) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,240 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table521
2023-07-11 14:16:25,240 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv857331976=1, srv2053058706=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,240 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,240 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,240 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,240 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table521) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,240 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table763
2023-07-11 14:16:25,241 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv857331976=1, srv2053058706=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,241 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,241 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,241 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,241 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table763) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,241 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1023
2023-07-11 14:16:25,241 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv857331976=1, srv2053058706=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,241 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,241 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,241 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,241 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1023) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,241 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1265
2023-07-11 14:16:25,241 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv857331976=1, srv2053058706=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,241 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,241 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,241 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,241 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1265) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,241 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table522
2023-07-11 14:16:25,241 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv857331976=1, srv2053058706=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,241 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,241 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,241 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,242 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table522) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,242 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table764
2023-07-11 14:16:25,242 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv857331976=1, srv2053058706=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,242 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,242 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,242 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,242 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table764) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,242 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1024
2023-07-11 14:16:25,242 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv857331976=1, srv2053058706=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,242 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,242 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,242 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,242 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1024) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,243 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1266
2023-07-11 14:16:25,243 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv857331976=1, srv2053058706=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,243 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,243 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,243 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,243 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1266) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,243 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table523
2023-07-11 14:16:25,243 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv857331976=1, srv2053058706=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,243 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,243 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,243 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,243 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table523) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,243 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table765
2023-07-11 14:16:25,243 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv857331976=1, srv2053058706=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,243 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,243 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,243 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,243 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table765) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,243 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table524
2023-07-11 14:16:25,243 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv857331976=1, srv2053058706=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,243 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,243 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,243 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,244 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table524) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,244 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table766
2023-07-11 14:16:25,244 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv857331976=1, srv2053058706=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,244 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,244 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,244 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,244 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table766) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,244 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table525
2023-07-11 14:16:25,244 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv857331976=1, srv2053058706=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,244 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,244 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,244 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,244 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table525) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,244 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table767
2023-07-11 14:16:25,244 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv857331976=1, srv2053058706=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,244 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,244 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,244 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,244 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table767) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,244 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table526
2023-07-11 14:16:25,244 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv857331976=1, srv2053058706=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,244 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,245 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,245 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,245 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table526) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,245 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table768
2023-07-11 14:16:25,245 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv857331976=1, srv2053058706=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,245 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,245 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,245 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,245 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table768) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,245 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table527
2023-07-11 14:16:25,245 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv857331976=1, srv2053058706=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,245 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,245 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,245 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,245 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table527) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,245 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table769
2023-07-11 14:16:25,245 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv857331976=1, srv2053058706=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,245 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,245 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,245 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,245 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table769) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,245 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table528
2023-07-11 14:16:25,245 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv857331976=1, srv2053058706=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,246 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,246 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,246 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,246 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table528) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,246 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table529
2023-07-11 14:16:25,246 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv857331976=1, srv2053058706=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,246 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,246 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,246 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,246 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table529) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,246 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table90
2023-07-11 14:16:25,246 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv857331976=1, srv2053058706=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,246 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,246 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,246 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,246 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table90) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,246 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table91
2023-07-11 14:16:25,246 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv857331976=1, srv2053058706=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,246 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,246 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,246 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,246 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table91) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,246 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table92
2023-07-11 14:16:25,247 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv857331976=1, srv2053058706=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,247 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,247 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,247 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,247 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table92) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,247 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table93
2023-07-11 14:16:25,247 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv857331976=1, srv2053058706=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,247 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,247 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,247 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,247 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table93) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,247 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1025
2023-07-11 14:16:25,247 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv857331976=1, srv2053058706=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,247 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,247 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,247 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,247 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1025) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,247 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1267
2023-07-11 14:16:25,247 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv857331976=1, srv2053058706=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,247 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,247 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,248 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,248 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1267) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,248 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table94
2023-07-11 14:16:25,248 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv857331976=1, srv2053058706=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,248 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,248 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,248 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,248 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table94) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,248 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1026
2023-07-11 14:16:25,248 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv857331976=1, srv2053058706=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,248 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,248 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,248 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,248 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1026) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,248 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1268
2023-07-11 14:16:25,248 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv857331976=1, srv2053058706=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,248 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,248 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,248 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,248 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1268) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,248 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table95
2023-07-11 14:16:25,248 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv857331976=1, srv2053058706=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,249 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,249 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,249 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,249 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table95) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,249 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1027
2023-07-11 14:16:25,249 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv857331976=1, srv2053058706=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,249 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,249 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,249 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,249 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1027) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,249 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1269
2023-07-11 14:16:25,249 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv857331976=1, srv2053058706=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,249 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,249 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,249 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,249 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1269) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,249 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table96
2023-07-11 14:16:25,249 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv857331976=1, srv2053058706=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,249 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,249 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,249 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,249 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table96) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,250 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1028
2023-07-11 14:16:25,250 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv857331976=1, srv2053058706=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,250 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,250 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,250 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,250 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1028) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,250 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table97
2023-07-11 14:16:25,250 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv857331976=1, srv2053058706=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,250 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,250 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,250 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,250 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table97) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,250 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1029
2023-07-11 14:16:25,250 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv857331976=1, srv2053058706=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,250 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,250 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,250 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,250 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1029) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,250 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table98
2023-07-11 14:16:25,251 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv857331976=1, srv2053058706=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,251 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,251 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,251 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,251 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table98) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,251 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table99
2023-07-11 14:16:25,251 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv857331976=1, srv2053058706=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,251 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,251 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,251 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,251 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table99) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,251 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table990
2023-07-11 14:16:25,251 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv857331976=1, srv2053058706=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,251 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,251 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,251 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,251 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table990) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,251 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1250
2023-07-11 14:16:25,252 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv857331976=1, srv2053058706=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,252 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,252 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,252 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,252 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1250) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,252 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table991
2023-07-11 14:16:25,252 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv857331976=1, srv2053058706=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,252 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,252 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,252 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,252 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table991) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,252 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1251
2023-07-11 14:16:25,252 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv857331976=1, srv2053058706=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,252 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,252 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,252 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,252 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1251) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,252 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table750
2023-07-11 14:16:25,252 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv857331976=1, srv2053058706=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,252 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,252 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,252 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,253 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table750) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,253 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table992
2023-07-11 14:16:25,253 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv857331976=1, srv2053058706=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,253 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,253 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,253 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,253 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table992) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,253 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1010
2023-07-11 14:16:25,253 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv857331976=1, srv2053058706=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,253 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,253 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,253 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,253 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1010) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,253 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1252
2023-07-11 14:16:25,253 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv857331976=1, srv2053058706=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,253 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,253 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,253 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,253 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1252) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,253 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table751
2023-07-11 14:16:25,253 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv857331976=1, srv2053058706=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,253 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,254 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,254 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,254 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table751) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,254 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table993
2023-07-11 14:16:25,254 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv857331976=1, srv2053058706=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,254 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,254 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,254 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,254 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table993) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,254 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1011
2023-07-11 14:16:25,254 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv857331976=1, srv2053058706=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,254 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,254 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,254 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,254 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1011) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,254 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1253
2023-07-11 14:16:25,254 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv857331976=1, srv2053058706=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,254 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,254 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,254 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,254 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1253) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,254 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table510
2023-07-11 14:16:25,254 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv857331976=1, srv2053058706=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,255 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,255 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,255 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,255 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table510) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,255 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table752
2023-07-11 14:16:25,255 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv857331976=1, srv2053058706=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,255 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,255 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,255 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,255 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table752) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,255 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table994
2023-07-11 14:16:25,255 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv857331976=1, srv2053058706=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,255 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,255 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,255 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,255 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table994) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,255 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1012
2023-07-11 14:16:25,255 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv857331976=1, srv2053058706=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,255 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,255 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,255 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,255 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1012) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,255 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1254
2023-07-11 14:16:25,256 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv857331976=1, srv2053058706=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,256 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,256 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,256 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,256 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1254) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,256 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table511
2023-07-11 14:16:25,256 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv857331976=1, srv2053058706=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,256 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,256 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,256 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,256 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table511) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,256 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table753
2023-07-11 14:16:25,256 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv857331976=1, srv2053058706=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,256 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,256 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,256 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,256 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table753) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,256 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table995
2023-07-11 14:16:25,256 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv857331976=1, srv2053058706=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,256 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,256 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,256 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,257 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table995) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,257 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1013
2023-07-11 14:16:25,257 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv857331976=1, srv2053058706=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,257 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,257 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,257 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,257 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1013) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,257 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1255
2023-07-11 14:16:25,257 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv857331976=1, srv2053058706=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,257 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,257 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,257 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,257 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1255) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,257 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table512
2023-07-11 14:16:25,257 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv857331976=1, srv2053058706=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,257 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,257 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,257 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,257 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table512) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,257 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table754
2023-07-11 14:16:25,257 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv857331976=1, srv2053058706=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,257 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,257 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,258 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,258 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table754) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,258 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table996
2023-07-11 14:16:25,258 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv857331976=1, srv2053058706=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,258 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,258 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,258 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,258 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table996) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,258 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table513
2023-07-11 14:16:25,258 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv857331976=1, srv2053058706=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,258 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,258 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,258 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,258 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table513) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,258 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table755
2023-07-11 14:16:25,258 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv857331976=1, srv2053058706=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,258 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,258 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,258 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,258 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table755) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,258 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table997
2023-07-11 14:16:25,258 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv857331976=1, srv2053058706=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,258 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,259 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,259 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,259 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table997) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,259 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table514
2023-07-11 14:16:25,259 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv857331976=1, srv2053058706=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,259 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,259 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,259 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,259 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table514) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,259 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table756
2023-07-11 14:16:25,259 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv857331976=1, srv2053058706=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,259 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,259 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,259 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,259 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table756) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,260 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table998
2023-07-11 14:16:25,260 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv857331976=1, srv2053058706=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,260 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,260 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,260 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,260 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table998) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,260 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table515
2023-07-11 14:16:25,260 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv857331976=1, srv2053058706=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,260 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,260 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,260 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,260 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table515) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,260 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table757
2023-07-11 14:16:25,260 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv857331976=1, srv2053058706=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,260 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,260 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,260 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,260 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table757) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,260 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table999
2023-07-11 14:16:25,260 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv857331976=1, srv2053058706=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,260 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,260 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,261 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,261 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table999) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,261 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table516
2023-07-11 14:16:25,261 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv857331976=1, srv2053058706=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,261 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,261 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,261 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,261 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table516) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,261 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table758
2023-07-11 14:16:25,261 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv857331976=1, srv2053058706=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,261 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,261 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,261 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,261 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table758) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,261 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table517
2023-07-11 14:16:25,261 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv857331976=1, srv2053058706=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,261 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,261 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,261 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,261 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table517) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,261 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table759
2023-07-11 14:16:25,261 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv857331976=1, srv2053058706=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,262 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,262 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,262 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,262 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table759) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,262 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table518
2023-07-11 14:16:25,262 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv857331976=1, srv2053058706=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,262 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,262 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,262 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,262 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table518) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,262 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table519
2023-07-11 14:16:25,262 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv857331976=1, srv2053058706=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,262 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,262 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,262 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,262 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table519) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,262 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table80
2023-07-11 14:16:25,262 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv857331976=1, srv2053058706=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,262 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,262 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,262 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,263 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table80) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,263 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table81
2023-07-11 14:16:25,263 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv857331976=1, srv2053058706=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,263 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,263 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,263 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,263 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table81) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,263 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table82
2023-07-11 14:16:25,263 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv857331976=1, srv2053058706=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,263 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,263 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,263 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,263 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table82) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,263 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1014
2023-07-11 14:16:25,263 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv857331976=1, srv2053058706=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,263 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,263 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,263 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,263 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1014) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,263 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1256
2023-07-11 14:16:25,263 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv857331976=1, srv2053058706=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,263 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,263 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,264 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,264 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1256) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,264 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table83
2023-07-11 14:16:25,264 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv857331976=1, srv2053058706=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,264 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,264 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,264 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,264 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table83) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,264 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1015
2023-07-11 14:16:25,264 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv857331976=1, srv2053058706=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,264 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,264 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,264 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,264 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1015) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,264 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1257
2023-07-11 14:16:25,264 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv857331976=1, srv2053058706=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,264 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,264 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,264 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,264 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1257) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,264 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table84
2023-07-11 14:16:25,264 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv857331976=1, srv2053058706=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,265 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,265 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,265 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,265 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table84) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,265 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1016
2023-07-11 14:16:25,265 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv857331976=1, srv2053058706=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,265 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,265 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,265 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,265 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1016) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,265 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1258
2023-07-11 14:16:25,265 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv857331976=1, srv2053058706=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,265 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,265 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,265 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,265 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1258) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,265 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table85
2023-07-11 14:16:25,265 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv857331976=1, srv2053058706=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,265 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,265 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,265 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,265 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table85) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,265 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1017
2023-07-11 14:16:25,266 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv857331976=1, srv2053058706=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,266 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,266 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,266 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,266 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1017) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,266 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1259
2023-07-11 14:16:25,266 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv857331976=1, srv2053058706=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,266 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,266 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,266 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,266 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1259) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,266 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table86
2023-07-11 14:16:25,266 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv857331976=1, srv2053058706=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,266 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,266 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,266 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,266 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table86) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,266 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1018
2023-07-11 14:16:25,266 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv857331976=1, srv2053058706=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,266 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,266 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,266 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,266 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1018) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,267 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table87
2023-07-11 14:16:25,267 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv857331976=1, srv2053058706=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,267 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,267 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,267 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,267 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table87) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,267 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1019
2023-07-11 14:16:25,267 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv857331976=1, srv2053058706=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,267 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,267 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,267 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,267 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1019) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,267 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table88
2023-07-11 14:16:25,267 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv857331976=1, srv2053058706=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,267 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,267 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,267 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,267 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table88) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,267 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table89
2023-07-11 14:16:25,267 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv857331976=1, srv2053058706=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,267 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,268 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,268 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,268 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table89) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,268 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table79
2023-07-11 14:16:25,268 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv857331976=1, srv2053058706=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,268 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,268 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,268 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,268 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table79) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,268 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table780
2023-07-11 14:16:25,268 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv857331976=1, srv2053058706=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,268 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,268 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,268 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,268 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table780) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,269 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table781
2023-07-11 14:16:25,269 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv857331976=1, srv2053058706=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,269 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,269 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,269 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,269 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table781) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,269 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table540
2023-07-11 14:16:25,269 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv857331976=1, srv2053058706=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,269 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,269 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,269 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,269 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table540) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,269 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table782
2023-07-11 14:16:25,269 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv857331976=1, srv2053058706=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,269 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,269 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,269 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,269 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table782) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,269 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1240
2023-07-11 14:16:25,269 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv857331976=1, srv2053058706=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,269 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,269 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,270 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,270 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1240) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,270 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table541
2023-07-11 14:16:25,270 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv857331976=1, srv2053058706=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,270 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,270 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,270 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,270 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table541) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,270 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table783
2023-07-11 14:16:25,270 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv857331976=1, srv2053058706=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,270 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,270 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,270 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,270 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table783) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,270 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1241
2023-07-11 14:16:25,270 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv857331976=1, srv2053058706=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,270 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,270 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,270 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,270 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1241) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,270 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table300
2023-07-11 14:16:25,271 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv857331976=1, srv2053058706=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,271 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,271 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,271 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,271 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table300) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,271 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table542
2023-07-11 14:16:25,271 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv857331976=1, srv2053058706=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,271 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,271 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,271 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,271 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table542) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,271 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table784
2023-07-11 14:16:25,271 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv857331976=1, srv2053058706=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,271 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,271 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,271 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,271 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table784) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,271 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1000
2023-07-11 14:16:25,271 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv857331976=1, srv2053058706=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,271 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,271 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,271 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,271 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1000) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,272 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1242
2023-07-11 14:16:25,272 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv857331976=1, srv2053058706=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,272 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,272 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,272 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,272 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1242) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,272 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table301
2023-07-11 14:16:25,272 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv857331976=1, srv2053058706=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,272 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,272 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,272 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,272 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table301) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,272 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table543
2023-07-11 14:16:25,272 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv857331976=1, srv2053058706=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,272 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,272 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,272 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,272 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table543) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,272 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table785
2023-07-11 14:16:25,272 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv857331976=1, srv2053058706=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,272 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,272 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,272 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,273 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table785) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,273 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1001
2023-07-11 14:16:25,273 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv857331976=1, srv2053058706=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,273 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,273 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,273 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,273 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1001) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,273 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1243
2023-07-11 14:16:25,273 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv857331976=1, srv2053058706=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,273 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,273 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,273 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,273 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1243) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,273 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table302
2023-07-11 14:16:25,273 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv857331976=1, srv2053058706=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,273 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,273 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,273 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,273 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table302) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,273 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table544
2023-07-11 14:16:25,273 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv857331976=1, srv2053058706=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,273 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,273 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,274 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,274 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table544) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,274 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table786
2023-07-11 14:16:25,274 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv857331976=1, srv2053058706=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,274 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,274 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,274 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,274 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table786) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,274 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1002
2023-07-11 14:16:25,274 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv857331976=1, srv2053058706=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,274 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,274 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,274 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,274 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1002) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,274 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1244
2023-07-11 14:16:25,274 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv857331976=1, srv2053058706=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,274 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,274 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,274 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,274 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1244) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,274 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table303
2023-07-11 14:16:25,274 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv857331976=1, srv2053058706=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,275 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,275 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,275 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,275 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table303) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,275 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table545
2023-07-11 14:16:25,275 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv857331976=1, srv2053058706=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,275 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,275 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,275 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,275 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table545) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,275 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table787
2023-07-11 14:16:25,275 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv857331976=1, srv2053058706=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,275 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,275 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,275 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,275 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table787) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,275 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table304
2023-07-11 14:16:25,275 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv857331976=1, srv2053058706=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,275 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,275 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,275 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,275 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table304) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,275 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table546
2023-07-11 14:16:25,276 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv857331976=1, srv2053058706=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,276 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,276 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,276 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,276 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table546) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,276 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table788
2023-07-11 14:16:25,276 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv857331976=1, srv2053058706=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,276 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,276 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,276 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,276 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table788) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,276 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table305
2023-07-11 14:16:25,276 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv857331976=1, srv2053058706=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,276 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,276 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,276 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,277 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table305) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,277 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table547
2023-07-11 14:16:25,277 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv857331976=1, srv2053058706=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,277 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,277 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,277 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,277 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table547) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,277 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table789
2023-07-11 14:16:25,277 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv857331976=1, srv2053058706=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,277 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,277 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,277 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,277 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table789) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,277 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table306
2023-07-11 14:16:25,277 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv857331976=1, srv2053058706=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,277 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,277 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,277 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,277 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table306) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,277 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table548
2023-07-11 14:16:25,278 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv857331976=1, srv2053058706=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,278 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,278 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,278 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,278 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table548) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,278 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table307
2023-07-11 14:16:25,278 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv857331976=1, srv2053058706=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,278 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,278 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,278 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,278 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table307) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,278 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table549
2023-07-11 14:16:25,278 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv857331976=1, srv2053058706=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,278 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,278 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,278 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,278 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table549) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,278 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table308
2023-07-11 14:16:25,278 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv857331976=1, srv2053058706=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,278 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,278 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,278 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,279 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table308) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,279 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table309
2023-07-11 14:16:25,279 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv857331976=1, srv2053058706=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,279 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,279 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,279 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,279 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table309) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,279 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table70
2023-07-11 14:16:25,279 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv857331976=1, srv2053058706=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,279 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,279 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,279 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,279 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table70) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,279 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table71
2023-07-11 14:16:25,279 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv857331976=1, srv2053058706=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,279 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,279 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,279 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,279 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table71) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,279 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1003
2023-07-11 14:16:25,279 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv857331976=1, srv2053058706=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,279 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,279 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,280 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,280 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1003) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,280 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1245
2023-07-11 14:16:25,280 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv857331976=1, srv2053058706=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,280 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,280 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,280 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,280 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1245) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,280 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table72
2023-07-11 14:16:25,280 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv857331976=1, srv2053058706=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,280 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,280 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,280 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,280 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table72) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,280 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1004
2023-07-11 14:16:25,280 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv857331976=1, srv2053058706=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,280 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,280 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,280 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,280 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1004) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,280 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1246
2023-07-11 14:16:25,280 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv857331976=1, srv2053058706=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,281 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,281 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,281 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,281 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1246) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,281 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table73
2023-07-11 14:16:25,281 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv857331976=1, srv2053058706=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,281 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,281 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,281 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,281 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table73) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,281 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1005
2023-07-11 14:16:25,281 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv857331976=1, srv2053058706=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,281 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,281 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,281 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,281 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1005) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,281 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1247
2023-07-11 14:16:25,281 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv857331976=1, srv2053058706=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,281 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,281 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,281 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,281 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1247) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,282 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table74
2023-07-11 14:16:25,282 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv857331976=1, srv2053058706=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,282 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,282 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,282 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,282 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table74) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,282 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1006
2023-07-11 14:16:25,282 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv857331976=1, srv2053058706=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,282 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,282 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,282 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,282 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1006) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,282 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1248
2023-07-11 14:16:25,282 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv857331976=1, srv2053058706=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,282 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,282 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,282 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,282 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1248) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,282 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table75
2023-07-11 14:16:25,282 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv857331976=1, srv2053058706=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,282 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,282 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,282 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,283 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table75) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,283 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1007
2023-07-11 14:16:25,283 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv857331976=1, srv2053058706=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,283 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,283 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,283 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,283 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1007) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,283 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1249
2023-07-11 14:16:25,283 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv857331976=1, srv2053058706=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,283 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,283 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,283 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,283 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1249) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,283 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table76
2023-07-11 14:16:25,283 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv857331976=1, srv2053058706=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,283 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,283 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,283 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,283 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table76) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,283 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1008
2023-07-11 14:16:25,283 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv857331976=1, srv2053058706=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,283 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,283 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,283 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,284 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1008) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,284 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table77
2023-07-11 14:16:25,284 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv857331976=1, srv2053058706=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,284 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,284 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,284 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,284 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table77) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,284 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1009
2023-07-11 14:16:25,284 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv857331976=1, srv2053058706=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,284 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,284 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,284 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,284 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1009) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,284 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table78
2023-07-11 14:16:25,284 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv857331976=1, srv2053058706=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,284 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,284 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,284 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,284 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table78) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,284 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table68
2023-07-11 14:16:25,285 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv857331976=1, srv2053058706=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,285 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,285 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,285 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,285 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table68) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,285 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table69
2023-07-11 14:16:25,285 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv857331976=1, srv2053058706=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,285 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,285 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,285 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,285 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table69) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,285 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table770
2023-07-11 14:16:25,285 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv857331976=1, srv2053058706=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,285 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,286 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,286 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,286 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table770) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,286 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table771
2023-07-11 14:16:25,286 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv857331976=1, srv2053058706=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,286 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,286 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,286 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,286 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table771) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,286 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table530
2023-07-11 14:16:25,286 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv857331976=1, srv2053058706=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,286 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,286 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,286 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,286 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table530) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,286 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table772
2023-07-11 14:16:25,286 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv857331976=1, srv2053058706=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,286 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,286 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,286 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,286 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table772) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,286 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1230
2023-07-11 14:16:25,287 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv857331976=1, srv2053058706=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,287 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,287 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,287 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,287 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1230) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,287 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table531
2023-07-11 14:16:25,287 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv857331976=1, srv2053058706=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,287 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,287 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,287 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,287 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table531) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,287 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table773
2023-07-11 14:16:25,287 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv857331976=1, srv2053058706=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,287 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,287 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,287 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,287 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table773) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,287 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1231
2023-07-11 14:16:25,287 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv857331976=1, srv2053058706=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,287 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,287 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,287 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,287 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1231) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,288 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table532
2023-07-11 14:16:25,288 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv857331976=1, srv2053058706=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,288 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,288 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,288 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,288 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table532) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,288 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table774
2023-07-11 14:16:25,288 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv857331976=1, srv2053058706=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,288 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,288 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,288 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,288 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table774) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,288 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1232
2023-07-11 14:16:25,288 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv857331976=1, srv2053058706=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,288 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,288 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,288 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,288 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1232) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,288 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table533
2023-07-11 14:16:25,288 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv857331976=1, srv2053058706=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,288 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,288 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,288 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,289 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table533) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,289 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table775
2023-07-11 14:16:25,289 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv857331976=1, srv2053058706=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,289 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,289 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,289 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,289 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table775) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,289 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1233
2023-07-11 14:16:25,289 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv857331976=1, srv2053058706=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,289 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,289 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,289 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,289 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1233) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,289 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table534
2023-07-11 14:16:25,289 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv857331976=1, srv2053058706=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,289 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,289 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,289 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,289 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table534) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,289 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table776
2023-07-11 14:16:25,289 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv857331976=1, srv2053058706=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,289 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,289 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,290 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,290 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table776) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,290 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table535
2023-07-11 14:16:25,290 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv857331976=1, srv2053058706=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,290 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,290 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,290 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,290 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table535) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,290 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table777
2023-07-11 14:16:25,290 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv857331976=1, srv2053058706=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,290 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,290 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,290 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,290 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table777) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,290 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table536
2023-07-11 14:16:25,290 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv857331976=1, srv2053058706=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,290 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,290 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,290 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,290 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table536) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,290 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table778
2023-07-11 14:16:25,290 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv857331976=1, srv2053058706=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,290 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,291 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,291 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,291 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table778) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,291 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table537
2023-07-11 14:16:25,291 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv857331976=1, srv2053058706=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,291 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,291 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,291 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,291 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table537) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,291 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table779
2023-07-11 14:16:25,291 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv857331976=1, srv2053058706=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,291 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,291 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,291 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,291 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table779) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,291 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table538
2023-07-11 14:16:25,291 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv857331976=1, srv2053058706=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,291 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,291 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,291 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,291 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table538) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,291 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table539
2023-07-11 14:16:25,291 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv857331976=1, srv2053058706=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,291 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,292 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,292 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,292 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table539) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,292 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table60
2023-07-11 14:16:25,292 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv857331976=1, srv2053058706=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,292 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,292 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,292 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,292 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table60) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,292 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1234
2023-07-11 14:16:25,292 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv857331976=1, srv2053058706=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,292 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,292 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,292 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,292 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1234) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,292 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table61
2023-07-11 14:16:25,292 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv857331976=1, srv2053058706=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,292 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,292 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,292 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,292 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table61) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,292 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1235
2023-07-11 14:16:25,293 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv857331976=1, srv2053058706=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,293 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,293 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,293 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,293 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1235) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,293 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table62
2023-07-11 14:16:25,293 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv857331976=1, srv2053058706=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,293 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,293 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,293 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,293 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table62) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,293 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1236
2023-07-11 14:16:25,293 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv857331976=1, srv2053058706=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,293 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,293 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,293 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,293 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1236) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,294 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table63
2023-07-11 14:16:25,294 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv857331976=1, srv2053058706=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,294 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,294 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,294 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,294 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table63) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,294 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1237
2023-07-11 14:16:25,294 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv857331976=1, srv2053058706=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,294 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,294 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,294 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,294 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1237) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,294 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table64
2023-07-11 14:16:25,294 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv857331976=1, srv2053058706=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,294 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,294 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,294 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,294 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table64) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,295 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1238
2023-07-11 14:16:25,295 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv857331976=1, srv2053058706=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,295 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,295 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,295 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,295 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1238) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,295 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table65
2023-07-11 14:16:25,295 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv857331976=1, srv2053058706=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,295 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,295 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,295 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,295 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table65) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,295 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1239
2023-07-11 14:16:25,295 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv857331976=1, srv2053058706=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,295 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,295 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,295 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,295 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1239) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,295 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table66
2023-07-11 14:16:25,295 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv857331976=1, srv2053058706=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,296 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,296 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,296 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,296 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table66) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,296 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table67
2023-07-11 14:16:25,296 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv857331976=1, srv2053058706=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,296 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,296 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,296 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,296 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table67) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,296 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1061
2023-07-11 14:16:25,296 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv857331976=1, srv2053058706=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,296 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,296 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,296 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,296 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1061) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,296 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1062
2023-07-11 14:16:25,296 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv857331976=1, srv2053058706=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,296 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,296 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,297 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,297 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1062) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,297 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1063
2023-07-11 14:16:25,297 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv857331976=1, srv2053058706=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,297 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,297 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,297 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,297 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1063) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,297 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1064
2023-07-11 14:16:25,297 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv857331976=1, srv2053058706=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,297 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,297 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,297 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,297 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1064) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,297 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1065
2023-07-11 14:16:25,297 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv857331976=1, srv2053058706=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,297 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,297 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,297 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,298 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1065) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,298 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table960
2023-07-11 14:16:25,298 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv857331976=1, srv2053058706=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,298 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,298 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,298 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,298 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table960) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,298 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1066
2023-07-11 14:16:25,298 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv857331976=1, srv2053058706=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,298 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,298 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,298 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,298 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1066) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,298 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table961
2023-07-11 14:16:25,298 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv857331976=1, srv2053058706=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,298 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,298 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,298 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,299 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table961) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,299 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1067
2023-07-11 14:16:25,299 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv857331976=1, srv2053058706=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,299 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,299 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,299 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,299 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1067) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,299 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table720
2023-07-11 14:16:25,299 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv857331976=1, srv2053058706=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,299 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,299 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,299 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,299 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table720) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,299 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table962
2023-07-11 14:16:25,299 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv857331976=1, srv2053058706=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,299 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,299 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,299 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,299 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table962) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,300 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1068
2023-07-11 14:16:25,300 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv857331976=1, srv2053058706=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,300 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,300 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,300 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,300 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1068) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,300 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table721
2023-07-11 14:16:25,300 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv857331976=1, srv2053058706=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,300 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,300 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,300 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,300 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table721) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,300 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table963
2023-07-11 14:16:25,300 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv857331976=1, srv2053058706=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,300 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,300 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,300 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,300 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table963) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,300 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table722
2023-07-11 14:16:25,300 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv857331976=1, srv2053058706=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,301 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,301 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,301 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,301 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table722) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,301 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table964
2023-07-11 14:16:25,301 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv857331976=1, srv2053058706=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,301 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,301 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,301 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,301 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table964) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,301 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table723
2023-07-11 14:16:25,301 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv857331976=1, srv2053058706=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,301 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,301 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,301 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,301 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table723) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,301 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table965
2023-07-11 14:16:25,301 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv857331976=1, srv2053058706=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,301 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,302 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,302 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,302 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table965) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,302 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table724
2023-07-11 14:16:25,302 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv857331976=1, srv2053058706=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,302 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,302 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,302 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,302 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table724) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,302 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table966
2023-07-11 14:16:25,302 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv857331976=1, srv2053058706=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,302 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,302 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,302 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,302 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table966) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,302 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table725
2023-07-11 14:16:25,302 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv857331976=1, srv2053058706=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,302 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,302 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,302 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,303 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table725) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,303 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table967
2023-07-11 14:16:25,303 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv857331976=1, srv2053058706=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,303 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,303 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,303 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,303 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table967) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,303 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table726
2023-07-11 14:16:25,303 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv857331976=1, srv2053058706=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,303 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,303 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,303 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,303 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table726) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,304 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table968
2023-07-11 14:16:25,304 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv857331976=1, srv2053058706=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,304 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,304 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,304 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,304 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table968) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,304 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table727
2023-07-11 14:16:25,304 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv857331976=1, srv2053058706=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,304 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,304 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,304 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,304 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table727) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,304 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table969
2023-07-11 14:16:25,304 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv857331976=1, srv2053058706=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,304 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,304 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,304 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,304 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table969) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,305 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table728
2023-07-11 14:16:25,305 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv857331976=1, srv2053058706=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,305 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,305 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,305 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,305 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table728) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,305 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1060
2023-07-11 14:16:25,305 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv857331976=1, srv2053058706=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,305 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,305 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,305 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,305 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1060) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,305 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table729
2023-07-11 14:16:25,305 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv857331976=1, srv2053058706=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,305 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,305 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,305 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,305 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table729) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,306 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1069
2023-07-11 14:16:25,306 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv857331976=1, srv2053058706=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,306 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,306 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,306 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,306 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1069) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,306 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1050
2023-07-11 14:16:25,306 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv857331976=1, srv2053058706=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,306 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,306 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,306 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,306 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1050) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,306 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1292
2023-07-11 14:16:25,306 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv857331976=1, srv2053058706=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,306 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,306 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,306 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,306 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1292) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,306 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1051
2023-07-11 14:16:25,306 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv857331976=1, srv2053058706=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,307 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,307 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,307 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,307 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1051) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,307 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1293
2023-07-11 14:16:25,307 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv857331976=1, srv2053058706=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,307 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,307 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,307 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,307 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1293) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,307 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1052
2023-07-11 14:16:25,307 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv857331976=1, srv2053058706=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,307 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,307 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,307 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,307 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1052) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,307 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1294
2023-07-11 14:16:25,307 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv857331976=1, srv2053058706=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,307 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,307 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,308 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,308 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1294) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,308 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1053
2023-07-11 14:16:25,308 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv857331976=1, srv2053058706=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,308 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,308 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,308 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,308 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1053) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,308 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1295
2023-07-11 14:16:25,308 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv857331976=1, srv2053058706=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,308 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,308 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,308 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,308 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1295) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,308 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1054
2023-07-11 14:16:25,308 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv857331976=1, srv2053058706=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,308 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,308 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,308 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,309 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1054) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,309 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1296
2023-07-11 14:16:25,309 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv857331976=1, srv2053058706=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,309 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,309 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,309 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,309 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1296) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,309 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1055
2023-07-11 14:16:25,309 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv857331976=1, srv2053058706=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,309 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,309 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,309 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,309 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1055) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,309 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1297
2023-07-11 14:16:25,309 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv857331976=1, srv2053058706=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,309 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,309 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,309 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,309 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1297) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,310 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table950
2023-07-11 14:16:25,310 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv857331976=1, srv2053058706=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,310 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,310 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,310 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,310 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table950) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,310 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1056
2023-07-11 14:16:25,310 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv857331976=1, srv2053058706=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,310 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,310 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,310 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,310 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1056) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,310 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1298
2023-07-11 14:16:25,310 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv857331976=1, srv2053058706=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,310 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,310 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,310 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,310 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1298) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,310 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table951
2023-07-11 14:16:25,310 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv857331976=1, srv2053058706=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,311 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,311 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,311 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,311 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table951) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,311 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1057
2023-07-11 14:16:25,311 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv857331976=1, srv2053058706=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,311 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,311 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,311 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,311 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1057) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,311 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1299
2023-07-11 14:16:25,311 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv857331976=1, srv2053058706=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,311 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,311 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,311 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,311 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1299) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,311 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table710
2023-07-11 14:16:25,311 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv857331976=1, srv2053058706=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,311 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,311 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,311 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,312 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table710) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,312 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table952
2023-07-11 14:16:25,312 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv857331976=1, srv2053058706=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,312 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,312 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,312 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,312 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table952) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,312 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table711
2023-07-11 14:16:25,312 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv857331976=1, srv2053058706=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,312 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,312 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,312 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,312 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table711) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,312 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table953
2023-07-11 14:16:25,312 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv857331976=1, srv2053058706=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,312 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,312 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,312 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,313 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table953) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,313 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table712
2023-07-11 14:16:25,313 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv857331976=1, srv2053058706=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,313 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,313 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,313 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,313 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table712) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,313 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table954
2023-07-11 14:16:25,313 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv857331976=1, srv2053058706=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,313 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,313 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,313 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,314 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table954) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,314 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table713
2023-07-11 14:16:25,314 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv857331976=1, srv2053058706=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,314 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,314 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,314 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,314 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table713) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,314 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table955
2023-07-11 14:16:25,314 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv857331976=1, srv2053058706=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,314 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,314 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,314 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,314 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table955) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,314 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table714
2023-07-11 14:16:25,314 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv857331976=1, srv2053058706=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,314 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,314 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,314 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,314 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table714) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,315 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table956
2023-07-11 14:16:25,315 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv857331976=1, srv2053058706=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,315 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,315 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,315 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,315 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table956) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,315 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table715
2023-07-11 14:16:25,315 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv857331976=1, srv2053058706=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,315 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,315 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,315 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,315 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table715) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,315 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table957
2023-07-11 14:16:25,315 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv857331976=1, srv2053058706=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,315 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,315 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,315 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,315 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table957) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,315 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table716
2023-07-11 14:16:25,315 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv857331976=1, srv2053058706=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,316 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,316 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,316 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,316 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table716) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,316 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table958
2023-07-11 14:16:25,316 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv857331976=1, srv2053058706=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,316 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,316 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,316 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,316 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table958) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,316 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1290
2023-07-11 14:16:25,316 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv857331976=1, srv2053058706=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,316 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,316 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,316 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,316 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1290) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,316 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table717
2023-07-11 14:16:25,316 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv857331976=1, srv2053058706=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,316 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,316 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,316 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,316 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table717) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,316 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table959
2023-07-11 14:16:25,317 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv857331976=1, srv2053058706=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,317 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,317 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,317 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,317 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table959) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,317 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1291
2023-07-11 14:16:25,317 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv857331976=1, srv2053058706=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,317 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,317 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,317 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,317 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1291) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,317 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table718
2023-07-11 14:16:25,317 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv857331976=1, srv2053058706=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,317 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,317 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,317 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,317 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table718) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,317 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table719
2023-07-11 14:16:25,317 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv857331976=1, srv2053058706=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,317 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,317 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,317 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,317 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table719) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,318 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1058
2023-07-11 14:16:25,318 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv857331976=1, srv2053058706=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,318 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,318 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,318 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,318 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1058) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,318 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1059
2023-07-11 14:16:25,318 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv857331976=1, srv2053058706=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,318 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,318 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,318 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,318 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1059) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,318 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1281
2023-07-11 14:16:25,318 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv857331976=1, srv2053058706=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,318 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,318 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,318 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,318 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1281) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,318 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1040
2023-07-11 14:16:25,318 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv857331976=1, srv2053058706=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,318 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,318 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,318 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,318 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1040) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,319 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1282
2023-07-11 14:16:25,319 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv857331976=1, srv2053058706=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,319 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,319 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,319 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,319 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1282) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,319 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1041
2023-07-11 14:16:25,319 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv857331976=1, srv2053058706=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,319 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,319 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,319 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,319 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1041) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,319 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1283
2023-07-11 14:16:25,319 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv857331976=1, srv2053058706=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,319 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,319 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,319 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,319 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1283) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,319 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table980
2023-07-11 14:16:25,319 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv857331976=1, srv2053058706=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,319 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,319 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,320 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,320 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table980) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,320 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1042
2023-07-11 14:16:25,320 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv857331976=1, srv2053058706=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,320 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,320 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,320 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,320 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1042) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,320 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1284
2023-07-11 14:16:25,320 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv857331976=1, srv2053058706=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,320 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,320 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,320 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,320 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1284) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,320 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table981
2023-07-11 14:16:25,320 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv857331976=1, srv2053058706=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,320 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,320 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,320 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,320 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table981) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,320 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1043
2023-07-11 14:16:25,320 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv857331976=1, srv2053058706=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,320 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,320 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,321 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,321 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1043) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,321 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1285
2023-07-11 14:16:25,321 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv857331976=1, srv2053058706=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,321 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,321 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,321 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,321 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1285) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,321 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table740
2023-07-11 14:16:25,321 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv857331976=1, srv2053058706=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,321 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,321 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,321 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,321 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table740) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,322 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table982
2023-07-11 14:16:25,322 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv857331976=1, srv2053058706=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,322 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,322 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,322 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,322 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table982) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,322 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1044
2023-07-11 14:16:25,322 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv857331976=1, srv2053058706=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,322 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,322 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,322 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,322 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1044) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,322 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1286
2023-07-11 14:16:25,322 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv857331976=1, srv2053058706=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,322 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,323 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,323 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,323 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1286) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,323 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table741
2023-07-11 14:16:25,323 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv857331976=1, srv2053058706=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,323 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,323 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,323 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,323 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table741) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,323 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table983
2023-07-11 14:16:25,323 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv857331976=1, srv2053058706=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,323 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,323 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,323 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,323 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table983) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,323 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1045
2023-07-11 14:16:25,323 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv857331976=1, srv2053058706=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,323 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,323 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,323 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,323 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1045) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,323 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1287
2023-07-11 14:16:25,324 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv857331976=1, srv2053058706=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,324 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,324 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,324 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,324 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1287) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,324 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table500
2023-07-11 14:16:25,324 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv857331976=1, srv2053058706=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,324 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,324 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,324 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,324 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table500) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,324 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table742
2023-07-11 14:16:25,324 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv857331976=1, srv2053058706=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,324 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,324 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,324 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,324 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table742) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,324 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table984
2023-07-11 14:16:25,324 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv857331976=1, srv2053058706=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,324 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,324 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,324 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,324 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table984) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,325 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1046
2023-07-11 14:16:25,325 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv857331976=1, srv2053058706=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,325 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,325 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,325 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,325 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1046) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,325 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1288
2023-07-11 14:16:25,325 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv857331976=1, srv2053058706=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,325 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,325 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,325 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,325 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1288) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,325 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table501
2023-07-11 14:16:25,325 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv857331976=1, srv2053058706=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,325 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,325 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,325 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,325 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table501) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,325 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table743
2023-07-11 14:16:25,325 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv857331976=1, srv2053058706=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,325 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,325 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,325 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,326 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table743) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,326 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table985
2023-07-11 14:16:25,326 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv857331976=1, srv2053058706=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,326 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,326 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,326 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,326 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table985) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,326 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table502
2023-07-11 14:16:25,326 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv857331976=1, srv2053058706=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,326 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,326 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,326 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,326 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table502) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,326 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table744
2023-07-11 14:16:25,326 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv857331976=1, srv2053058706=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,326 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,326 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,326 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,326 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table744) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,326 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table986
2023-07-11 14:16:25,326 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv857331976=1, srv2053058706=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,326 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,326 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,326 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,327 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table986) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,327 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table503
2023-07-11 14:16:25,327 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv857331976=1, srv2053058706=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,327 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,327 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,327 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,327 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table503) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,327 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table745
2023-07-11 14:16:25,327 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv857331976=1, srv2053058706=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,327 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,327 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,327 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,327 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table745) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,327 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table987
2023-07-11 14:16:25,327 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv857331976=1, srv2053058706=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,327 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,327 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,327 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,327 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table987) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,327 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table504
2023-07-11 14:16:25,327 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv857331976=1, srv2053058706=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,327 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,327 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,327 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,327 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table504) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,328 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table746
2023-07-11 14:16:25,328 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv857331976=1, srv2053058706=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,328 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,328 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,328 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,328 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table746) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,328 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table988
2023-07-11 14:16:25,328 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv857331976=1, srv2053058706=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,328 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,328 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,328 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,328 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table988) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,328 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table505
2023-07-11 14:16:25,328 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv857331976=1, srv2053058706=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,328 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,328 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,328 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,328 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table505) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,328 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table747
2023-07-11 14:16:25,328 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv857331976=1, srv2053058706=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,328 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,328 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,328 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,329 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table747) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,329 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table989
2023-07-11 14:16:25,329 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv857331976=1, srv2053058706=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,329 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,329 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,329 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,329 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table989) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,329 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table506
2023-07-11 14:16:25,329 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv857331976=1, srv2053058706=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,329 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,329 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,329 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,329 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table506) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,329 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table748
2023-07-11 14:16:25,329 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv857331976=1, srv2053058706=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,329 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,329 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,329 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,329 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table748) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,329 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table507
2023-07-11 14:16:25,329 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv857331976=1, srv2053058706=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,329 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,329 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,329 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,330 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table507) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,330 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table749
2023-07-11 14:16:25,330 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv857331976=1, srv2053058706=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,330 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,330 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,330 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,330 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table749) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,330 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table508
2023-07-11 14:16:25,330 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv857331976=1, srv2053058706=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,330 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,330 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,330 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,330 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table508) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,330 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1280
2023-07-11 14:16:25,330 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv857331976=1, srv2053058706=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,330 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,330 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,331 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,331 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1280) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,331 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table509
2023-07-11 14:16:25,331 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv857331976=1, srv2053058706=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,331 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,331 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,331 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,331 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table509) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,331 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1047
2023-07-11 14:16:25,331 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv857331976=1, srv2053058706=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,331 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,331 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,331 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,331 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1047) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,331 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1289
2023-07-11 14:16:25,331 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv857331976=1, srv2053058706=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,331 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,331 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,331 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,331 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1289) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,332 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1048
2023-07-11 14:16:25,332 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv857331976=1, srv2053058706=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,332 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,332 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,332 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,332 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1048) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,332 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1049
2023-07-11 14:16:25,332 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv857331976=1, srv2053058706=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,332 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,332 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,332 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,332 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1049) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,332 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1270
2023-07-11 14:16:25,332 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv857331976=1, srv2053058706=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,332 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,332 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,332 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,332 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1270) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,332 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1271
2023-07-11 14:16:25,332 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv857331976=1, srv2053058706=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,332 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,332 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,332 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,332 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1271) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,333 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1030
2023-07-11 14:16:25,333 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv857331976=1, srv2053058706=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,333 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,333 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,333 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,333 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1030) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,333 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1272
2023-07-11 14:16:25,333 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv857331976=1, srv2053058706=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,333 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,333 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,333 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,333 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1272) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,333 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1031
2023-07-11 14:16:25,333 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv857331976=1, srv2053058706=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,333 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,333 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,333 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,333 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1031) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,333 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1273
2023-07-11 14:16:25,333 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv857331976=1, srv2053058706=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,333 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,333 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,333 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,333 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1273) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,334 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table970
2023-07-11 14:16:25,334 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv857331976=1, srv2053058706=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,334 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,334 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,334 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,334 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table970) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,334 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1032
2023-07-11 14:16:25,334 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv857331976=1, srv2053058706=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,334 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,334 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,334 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,334 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1032) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,334 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1274
2023-07-11 14:16:25,334 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv857331976=1, srv2053058706=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,334 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,334 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,334 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,334 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1274) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,334 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table971
2023-07-11 14:16:25,334 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv857331976=1, srv2053058706=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,334 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,334 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,334 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,334 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table971) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,335 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1033
2023-07-11 14:16:25,335 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv857331976=1, srv2053058706=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,335 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,335 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,335 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,335 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1033) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,335 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1275
2023-07-11 14:16:25,335 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv857331976=1, srv2053058706=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,335 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,335 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,335 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,335 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1275) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,335 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table730
2023-07-11 14:16:25,335 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv857331976=1, srv2053058706=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,335 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,335 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,335 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,335 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table730) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,335 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table972
2023-07-11 14:16:25,335 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv857331976=1, srv2053058706=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,335 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,335 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,335 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,335 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table972) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,336 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1034
2023-07-11 14:16:25,336 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv857331976=1, srv2053058706=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,336 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,336 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,336 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,336 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1034) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,336 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1276
2023-07-11 14:16:25,336 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv857331976=1, srv2053058706=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,336 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,336 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,336 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,336 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1276) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,336 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table731
2023-07-11 14:16:25,336 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv857331976=1, srv2053058706=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,336 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,336 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,336 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,336 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table731) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,336 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table973
2023-07-11 14:16:25,336 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv857331976=1, srv2053058706=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,336 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,336 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,336 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,336 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table973) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,337 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1035
2023-07-11 14:16:25,337 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv857331976=1, srv2053058706=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,337 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,337 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,337 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,337 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1035) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,337 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1277
2023-07-11 14:16:25,337 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv857331976=1, srv2053058706=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,337 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,337 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,337 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,337 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1277) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,337 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table732
2023-07-11 14:16:25,337 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv857331976=1, srv2053058706=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,337 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,337 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,337 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,337 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table732) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,337 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table974
2023-07-11 14:16:25,337 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv857331976=1, srv2053058706=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,337 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,337 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,337 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,338 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table974) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,338 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table733
2023-07-11 14:16:25,338 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv857331976=1, srv2053058706=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,338 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,338 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,338 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,338 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table733) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,338 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table975
2023-07-11 14:16:25,338 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv857331976=1, srv2053058706=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,338 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,338 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,338 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,338 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table975) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,338 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table734
2023-07-11 14:16:25,338 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv857331976=1, srv2053058706=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,338 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,338 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,338 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,339 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table734) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,339 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table976
2023-07-11 14:16:25,339 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv857331976=1, srv2053058706=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,339 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,339 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,339 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,339 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table976) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,339 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table735
2023-07-11 14:16:25,339 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv857331976=1, srv2053058706=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,339 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,339 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,339 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,339 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table735) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,339 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table977
2023-07-11 14:16:25,339 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv857331976=1, srv2053058706=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,339 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,339 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,339 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,339 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table977) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,340 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table736
2023-07-11 14:16:25,340 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv857331976=1, srv2053058706=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,340 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,340 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,340 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,340 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table736) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,340 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table978
2023-07-11 14:16:25,340 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv857331976=1, srv2053058706=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,340 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,340 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,340 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,340 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table978) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,340 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table737
2023-07-11 14:16:25,340 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv857331976=1, srv2053058706=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,340 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,340 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,340 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,340 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table737) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,340 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table979
2023-07-11 14:16:25,340 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv857331976=1, srv2053058706=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,340 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,340 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,341 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,341 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table979) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,341 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table738
2023-07-11 14:16:25,341 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv857331976=1, srv2053058706=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,341 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,341 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,341 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,341 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table738) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,341 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table739
2023-07-11 14:16:25,341 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv857331976=1, srv2053058706=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,341 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,341 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,341 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,341 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table739) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,341 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1036
2023-07-11 14:16:25,341 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv857331976=1, srv2053058706=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,341 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,341 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,341 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,341 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1036) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,341 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1278
2023-07-11 14:16:25,341 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv857331976=1, srv2053058706=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,341 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,342 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,342 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,342 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1278) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,342 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1037
2023-07-11 14:16:25,342 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv857331976=1, srv2053058706=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,342 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,342 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,342 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,342 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1037) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,342 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1279
2023-07-11 14:16:25,342 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv857331976=1, srv2053058706=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,342 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,342 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,342 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,342 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1279) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,342 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1038
2023-07-11 14:16:25,342 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv857331976=1, srv2053058706=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,342 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,342 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,342 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,342 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1038) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,342 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1039
2023-07-11 14:16:25,342 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv857331976=1, srv2053058706=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,343 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,343 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,343 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,343 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1039) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,343 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table13
2023-07-11 14:16:25,343 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv857331976=1, srv2053058706=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,343 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,343 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,343 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,343 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table13) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,343 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table361
2023-07-11 14:16:25,343 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv857331976=1, srv2053058706=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,343 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,343 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,343 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,343 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table361) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,343 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table14
2023-07-11 14:16:25,343 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv857331976=1, srv2053058706=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,343 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,343 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,343 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,343 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table14) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,343 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table120
2023-07-11 14:16:25,343 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv857331976=1, srv2053058706=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,344 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,344 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,344 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,344 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table120) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,344 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table362
2023-07-11 14:16:25,344 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv857331976=1, srv2053058706=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,344 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,344 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,344 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,344 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table362) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,344 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table15
2023-07-11 14:16:25,344 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv857331976=1, srv2053058706=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,344 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,344 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,344 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,344 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table15) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,344 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table121
2023-07-11 14:16:25,344 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv857331976=1, srv2053058706=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,344 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,344 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,344 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,344 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table121) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,344 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table363
2023-07-11 14:16:25,344 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv857331976=1, srv2053058706=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,345 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,345 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,345 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,345 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table363) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,345 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table16
2023-07-11 14:16:25,345 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv857331976=1, srv2053058706=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,345 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,345 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,345 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,345 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table16) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,345 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table122
2023-07-11 14:16:25,345 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv857331976=1, srv2053058706=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,345 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,345 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,345 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,345 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table122) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,345 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table364
2023-07-11 14:16:25,345 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv857331976=1, srv2053058706=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,345 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,345 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,345 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,345 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table364) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,346 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table17
2023-07-11 14:16:25,346 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv857331976=1, srv2053058706=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,346 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,346 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,346 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,346 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table17) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,346 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table123
2023-07-11 14:16:25,346 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv857331976=1, srv2053058706=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,346 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,346 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,346 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,346 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table123) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,346 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table365
2023-07-11 14:16:25,346 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv857331976=1, srv2053058706=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,346 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,346 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,346 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,346 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table365) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,346 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table18
2023-07-11 14:16:25,346 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv857331976=1, srv2053058706=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,346 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,346 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,347 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,347 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table18) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,347 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table124
2023-07-11 14:16:25,347 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv857331976=1, srv2053058706=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,347 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,347 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,347 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,347 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table124) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,347 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table366
2023-07-11 14:16:25,347 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv857331976=1, srv2053058706=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,347 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,347 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,347 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,347 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table366) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,348 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table19
2023-07-11 14:16:25,348 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv857331976=1, srv2053058706=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,348 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,348 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,348 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,348 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table19) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,348 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table125
2023-07-11 14:16:25,348 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv857331976=1, srv2053058706=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,348 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,348 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,348 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,348 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table125) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,348 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table367
2023-07-11 14:16:25,348 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv857331976=1, srv2053058706=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,348 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,348 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,348 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,348 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table367) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,348 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table126
2023-07-11 14:16:25,348 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv857331976=1, srv2053058706=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,348 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,348 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,348 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,348 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table126) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,349 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table368
2023-07-11 14:16:25,349 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv857331976=1, srv2053058706=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,349 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,349 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,349 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,349 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table368) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,349 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1420
2023-07-11 14:16:25,349 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv857331976=1, srv2053058706=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,349 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,349 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,349 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,349 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1420) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,349 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table127
2023-07-11 14:16:25,349 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv857331976=1, srv2053058706=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,349 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,349 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,349 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,349 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table127) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,349 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table369
2023-07-11 14:16:25,349 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv857331976=1, srv2053058706=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,349 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,349 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,349 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,350 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table369) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,350 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table128
2023-07-11 14:16:25,350 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv857331976=1, srv2053058706=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,350 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,350 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,350 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,350 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table128) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,350 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table129
2023-07-11 14:16:25,350 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv857331976=1, srv2053058706=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,350 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,350 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,350 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,350 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table129) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,350 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1429
2023-07-11 14:16:25,350 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv857331976=1, srv2053058706=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,350 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,350 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,350 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,350 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1429) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,350 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1421
2023-07-11 14:16:25,350 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv857331976=1, srv2053058706=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,350 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,350 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,350 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,351 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1421) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,351 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1422
2023-07-11 14:16:25,351 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv857331976=1, srv2053058706=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,351 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,351 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,351 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,351 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1422) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,351 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1423
2023-07-11 14:16:25,351 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv857331976=1, srv2053058706=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,351 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,351 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,351 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,351 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1423) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,351 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1424
2023-07-11 14:16:25,351 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv857331976=1, srv2053058706=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,351 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,351 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,351 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,351 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1424) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,351 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1425
2023-07-11 14:16:25,351 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv857331976=1, srv2053058706=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,351 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,351 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,351 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,352 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1425) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,352 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table10
2023-07-11 14:16:25,352 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv857331976=1, srv2053058706=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,352 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,352 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,352 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,352 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table10) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,352 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1426
2023-07-11 14:16:25,352 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv857331976=1, srv2053058706=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,352 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,352 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,352 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,352 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1426) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,352 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table11
2023-07-11 14:16:25,352 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv857331976=1, srv2053058706=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,352 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,352 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,352 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,352 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table11) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,352 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table370
2023-07-11 14:16:25,352 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv857331976=1, srv2053058706=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,352 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,352 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,352 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,353 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table370) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,353 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1427
2023-07-11 14:16:25,353 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv857331976=1, srv2053058706=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,353 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,353 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,353 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,353 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1427) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,353 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table12
2023-07-11 14:16:25,353 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv857331976=1, srv2053058706=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,353 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,353 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,353 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,353 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table12) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,353 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table371
2023-07-11 14:16:25,353 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv857331976=1, srv2053058706=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,353 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,353 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,353 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,353 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table371) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,353 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1428
2023-07-11 14:16:25,353 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv857331976=1, srv2053058706=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,353 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,353 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,353 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,354 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1428) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,354 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table350
2023-07-11 14:16:25,354 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv857331976=1, srv2053058706=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,354 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,354 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,354 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,354 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table350) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,354 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table592
2023-07-11 14:16:25,354 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv857331976=1, srv2053058706=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,354 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,354 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,354 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,354 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table592) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,354 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table351
2023-07-11 14:16:25,354 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv857331976=1, srv2053058706=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,354 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,354 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,354 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,354 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table351) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,354 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table593
2023-07-11 14:16:25,354 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv857331976=1, srv2053058706=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,354 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,354 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,354 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,355 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table593) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,355 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table110
2023-07-11 14:16:25,355 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv857331976=1, srv2053058706=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,355 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,355 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,355 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,355 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table110) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,355 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table352
2023-07-11 14:16:25,355 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv857331976=1, srv2053058706=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,355 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,355 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,355 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,355 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table352) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,355 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table594
2023-07-11 14:16:25,355 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv857331976=1, srv2053058706=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,356 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,356 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,356 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,356 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table594) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,356 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table111
2023-07-11 14:16:25,356 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv857331976=1, srv2053058706=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,356 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,356 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,356 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,356 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table111) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,356 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table353
2023-07-11 14:16:25,356 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv857331976=1, srv2053058706=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,356 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,356 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,356 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,356 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table353) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,356 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table595
2023-07-11 14:16:25,356 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv857331976=1, srv2053058706=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,356 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,356 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,356 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,356 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table595) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,356 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table112
2023-07-11 14:16:25,357 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv857331976=1, srv2053058706=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,357 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,357 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,357 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,357 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table112) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,357 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table354
2023-07-11 14:16:25,357 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv857331976=1, srv2053058706=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,357 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,357 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,357 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,357 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table354) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,357 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table596
2023-07-11 14:16:25,357 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv857331976=1, srv2053058706=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,357 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,357 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,357 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,357 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table596) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,357 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table113
2023-07-11 14:16:25,357 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv857331976=1, srv2053058706=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,357 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,357 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,357 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,358 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table113) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,358 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table355
2023-07-11 14:16:25,358 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv857331976=1, srv2053058706=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,358 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,358 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,358 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,358 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table355) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,358 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table597
2023-07-11 14:16:25,358 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv857331976=1, srv2053058706=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,358 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,358 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,358 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,358 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table597) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,358 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table114
2023-07-11 14:16:25,358 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv857331976=1, srv2053058706=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,358 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,358 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,358 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,358 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table114) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,358 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table356
2023-07-11 14:16:25,358 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv857331976=1, srv2053058706=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,358 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,358 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,358 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,359 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table356) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,359 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table598
2023-07-11 14:16:25,359 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv857331976=1, srv2053058706=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,359 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,359 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,359 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,359 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table598) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,359 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table115
2023-07-11 14:16:25,359 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv857331976=1, srv2053058706=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,359 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,359 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,359 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,359 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table115) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,359 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table357
2023-07-11 14:16:25,359 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv857331976=1, srv2053058706=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,359 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,359 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,359 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,359 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table357) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,359 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table599
2023-07-11 14:16:25,359 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv857331976=1, srv2053058706=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,359 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,360 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,360 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,360 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table599) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,360 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table116
2023-07-11 14:16:25,360 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv857331976=1, srv2053058706=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,360 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,360 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,360 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,360 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table116) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,360 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table358
2023-07-11 14:16:25,360 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv857331976=1, srv2053058706=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,360 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,360 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,360 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,360 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table358) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,360 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table117
2023-07-11 14:16:25,360 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv857331976=1, srv2053058706=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,360 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,360 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,360 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,360 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table117) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,360 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table359
2023-07-11 14:16:25,360 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv857331976=1, srv2053058706=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,361 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,361 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,361 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,361 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table359) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,361 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table118
2023-07-11 14:16:25,361 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv857331976=1, srv2053058706=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,361 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,361 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,361 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,361 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table118) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,361 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table119
2023-07-11 14:16:25,361 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv857331976=1, srv2053058706=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,361 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,361 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,361 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,361 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table119) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,361 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1418
2023-07-11 14:16:25,361 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv857331976=1, srv2053058706=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,361 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,361 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,361 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,361 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1418) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,361 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1419
2023-07-11 14:16:25,362 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv857331976=1, srv2053058706=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,362 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,362 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,362 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,362 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1419) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,362 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1410
2023-07-11 14:16:25,362 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv857331976=1, srv2053058706=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,362 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,362 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,362 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,362 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1410) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,362 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1411
2023-07-11 14:16:25,362 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv857331976=1, srv2053058706=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,362 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,362 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,362 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,362 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1411) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,362 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1412
2023-07-11 14:16:25,362 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv857331976=1, srv2053058706=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,362 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,362 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,362 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,362 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1412) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,362 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1413
2023-07-11 14:16:25,363 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv857331976=1, srv2053058706=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,363 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,363 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,363 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,363 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1413) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,363 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1414
2023-07-11 14:16:25,363 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv857331976=1, srv2053058706=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,363 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,363 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,363 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,363 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1414) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,363 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1415
2023-07-11 14:16:25,363 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv857331976=1, srv2053058706=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,363 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,363 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,363 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,363 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1415) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,363 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1416
2023-07-11 14:16:25,363 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv857331976=1, srv2053058706=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,364 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,364 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,364 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,364 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1416) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,364 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table360
2023-07-11 14:16:25,364 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv857331976=1, srv2053058706=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,364 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,364 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,364 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,364 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table360) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,364 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1417
2023-07-11 14:16:25,364 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv857331976=1, srv2053058706=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,364 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,364 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,364 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,364 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1417) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,364 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table141
2023-07-11 14:16:25,364 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv857331976=1, srv2053058706=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,365 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,365 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,365 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,365 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table141) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,365 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table383
2023-07-11 14:16:25,365 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv857331976=1, srv2053058706=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,365 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,365 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,365 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,365 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table383) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,365 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table142
2023-07-11 14:16:25,365 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv857331976=1, srv2053058706=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,365 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,365 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,365 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,365 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table142) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,365 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table384
2023-07-11 14:16:25,365 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv857331976=1, srv2053058706=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,365 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,365 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,365 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,366 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table384) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,366 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table143
2023-07-11 14:16:25,366 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv857331976=1, srv2053058706=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,366 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,366 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,366 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,366 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table143) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,366 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table385
2023-07-11 14:16:25,366 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv857331976=1, srv2053058706=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,366 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,366 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,366 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,366 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table385) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,366 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table144
2023-07-11 14:16:25,366 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv857331976=1, srv2053058706=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,366 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,366 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,366 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,366 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table144) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,366 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table386
2023-07-11 14:16:25,366 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv857331976=1, srv2053058706=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,366 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,366 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,366 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,367 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table386) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,367 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table145
2023-07-11 14:16:25,367 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv857331976=1, srv2053058706=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,367 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,367 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,367 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,367 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table145) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,367 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table387
2023-07-11 14:16:25,367 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv857331976=1, srv2053058706=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,367 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,367 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,367 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,367 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table387) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,367 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table146
2023-07-11 14:16:25,367 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv857331976=1, srv2053058706=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,367 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,367 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,367 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,367 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table146) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,367 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table388
2023-07-11 14:16:25,367 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv857331976=1, srv2053058706=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,367 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,367 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,367 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,368 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table388) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,368 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table147
2023-07-11 14:16:25,368 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv857331976=1, srv2053058706=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,368 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,368 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,368 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,368 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table147) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,368 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table389
2023-07-11 14:16:25,368 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv857331976=1, srv2053058706=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,368 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,368 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,368 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,368 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table389) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,368 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table148
2023-07-11 14:16:25,368 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv857331976=1, srv2053058706=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,368 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,368 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,368 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,368 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table148) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,368 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table149
2023-07-11 14:16:25,368 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv857331976=1, srv2053058706=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,368 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,368 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,369 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,369 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table149) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,369 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table5
2023-07-11 14:16:25,369 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv857331976=1, srv2053058706=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,369 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,369 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,369 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,369 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table5) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,369 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1407
2023-07-11 14:16:25,369 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv857331976=1, srv2053058706=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,369 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,369 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,369 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,369 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1407) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,369 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table4
2023-07-11 14:16:25,369 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv857331976=1, srv2053058706=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,369 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,369 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,369 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,369 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table4) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,369 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1408
2023-07-11 14:16:25,369 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv857331976=1, srv2053058706=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,370 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,370 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,370 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,370 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1408) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,370 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table3
2023-07-11 14:16:25,370 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv857331976=1, srv2053058706=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,370 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,370 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,370 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,370 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table3) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,370 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1409
2023-07-11 14:16:25,370 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv857331976=1, srv2053058706=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,370 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,370 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,370 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,370 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1409) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,370 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table2
2023-07-11 14:16:25,370 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv857331976=1, srv2053058706=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,371 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,371 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,371 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,371 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table2) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,371 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,371 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv857331976=1, srv2053058706=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,371 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,371 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,371 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,371 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,371 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,371 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv857331976=1, srv2053058706=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,371 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,371 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,371 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,371 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table0) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,371 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1400
2023-07-11 14:16:25,371 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv857331976=1, srv2053058706=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,371 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,371 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,371 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,371 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1400) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,371 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1401
2023-07-11 14:16:25,371 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv857331976=1, srv2053058706=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,371 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,372 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,372 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,372 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1401) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,372 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1402
2023-07-11 14:16:25,372 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv857331976=1, srv2053058706=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,372 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,372 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,372 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,372 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1402) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,372 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table9
2023-07-11 14:16:25,372 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv857331976=1, srv2053058706=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,372 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,372 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,372 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,373 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table9) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,373 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table390
2023-07-11 14:16:25,373 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv857331976=1, srv2053058706=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,373 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,373 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,373 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,373 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table390) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,373 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1403
2023-07-11 14:16:25,373 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv857331976=1, srv2053058706=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,373 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,373 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,373 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,373 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1403) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,373 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table8
2023-07-11 14:16:25,373 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv857331976=1, srv2053058706=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,373 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,373 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,373 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,373 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table8) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,373 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table391
2023-07-11 14:16:25,373 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv857331976=1, srv2053058706=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,374 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,374 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,374 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,374 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table391) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,374 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1404
2023-07-11 14:16:25,374 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv857331976=1, srv2053058706=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,374 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,374 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,374 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,374 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1404) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,374 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table7
2023-07-11 14:16:25,374 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv857331976=1, srv2053058706=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,374 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,374 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,374 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,374 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table7) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,374 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table150
2023-07-11 14:16:25,375 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv857331976=1, srv2053058706=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,375 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,375 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,375 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,375 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table150) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,375 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table392
2023-07-11 14:16:25,375 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv857331976=1, srv2053058706=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,375 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,375 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,375 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,375 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table392) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,375 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1405
2023-07-11 14:16:25,375 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv857331976=1, srv2053058706=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,375 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,375 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,375 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,375 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1405) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,375 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table6
2023-07-11 14:16:25,375 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv857331976=1, srv2053058706=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,375 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,375 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,375 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,375 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table6) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,375 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table151
2023-07-11 14:16:25,376 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv857331976=1, srv2053058706=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,376 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,376 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,376 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,376 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table151) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,376 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table393
2023-07-11 14:16:25,376 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv857331976=1, srv2053058706=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,376 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,376 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,376 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,376 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table393) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,376 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1406
2023-07-11 14:16:25,376 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv857331976=1, srv2053058706=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,376 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,376 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,376 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,376 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1406) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,376 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table130
2023-07-11 14:16:25,376 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv857331976=1, srv2053058706=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,377 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,377 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,377 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,377 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table130) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,377 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table372
2023-07-11 14:16:25,377 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv857331976=1, srv2053058706=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,377 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,377 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,377 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,377 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table372) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,377 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table131
2023-07-11 14:16:25,377 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv857331976=1, srv2053058706=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,377 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,377 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,377 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,377 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table131) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,377 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table373
2023-07-11 14:16:25,377 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv857331976=1, srv2053058706=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,377 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,377 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,377 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,378 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table373) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,378 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table132
2023-07-11 14:16:25,378 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv857331976=1, srv2053058706=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,378 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,378 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,378 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,378 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table132) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,378 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table374
2023-07-11 14:16:25,378 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv857331976=1, srv2053058706=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,378 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,378 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,378 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,378 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table374) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,378 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table133
2023-07-11 14:16:25,378 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv857331976=1, srv2053058706=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,378 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,378 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,378 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,378 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table133) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,378 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table375
2023-07-11 14:16:25,378 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv857331976=1, srv2053058706=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,378 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,378 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,378 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,379 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table375) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,379 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table134
2023-07-11 14:16:25,379 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv857331976=1, srv2053058706=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,379 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,379 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,379 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,379 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table134) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,379 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table376
2023-07-11 14:16:25,379 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv857331976=1, srv2053058706=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,379 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,379 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,379 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,379 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table376) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,379 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table135
2023-07-11 14:16:25,379 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv857331976=1, srv2053058706=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,379 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,379 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,379 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,379 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table135) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,379 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table377
2023-07-11 14:16:25,379 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv857331976=1, srv2053058706=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,379 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,379 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,379 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,380 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table377) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,380 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table136
2023-07-11 14:16:25,380 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv857331976=1, srv2053058706=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,380 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,380 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,380 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,380 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table136) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,380 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table378
2023-07-11 14:16:25,380 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv857331976=1, srv2053058706=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,380 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,380 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,380 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,380 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table378) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,380 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table137
2023-07-11 14:16:25,380 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv857331976=1, srv2053058706=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,380 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,380 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,380 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,380 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table137) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,380 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table379
2023-07-11 14:16:25,380 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv857331976=1, srv2053058706=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,380 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,380 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,380 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,381 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table379) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,381 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table138
2023-07-11 14:16:25,381 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv857331976=1, srv2053058706=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,381 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,381 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,381 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,381 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table138) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,381 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table139
2023-07-11 14:16:25,381 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv857331976=1, srv2053058706=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,381 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,381 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,381 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,381 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table139) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,382 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table380
2023-07-11 14:16:25,382 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv857331976=1, srv2053058706=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,382 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,382 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,382 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,382 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table380) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,382 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table381
2023-07-11 14:16:25,382 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv857331976=1, srv2053058706=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,382 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,382 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,382 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,382 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table381) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,382 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table140
2023-07-11 14:16:25,382 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv857331976=1, srv2053058706=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,382 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,382 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,382 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,382 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table140) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,382 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table382
2023-07-11 14:16:25,382 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv857331976=1, srv2053058706=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,382 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,382 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,382 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,382 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table382) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,383 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table57
2023-07-11 14:16:25,383 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv857331976=1, srv2053058706=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,383 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,383 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,383 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,383 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table57) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,383 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table58
2023-07-11 14:16:25,383 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv857331976=1, srv2053058706=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,383 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,383 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,383 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,383 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table58) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,383 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table560
2023-07-11 14:16:25,383 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv857331976=1, srv2053058706=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,383 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,383 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,383 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,383 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table560) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,383 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table59
2023-07-11 14:16:25,383 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv857331976=1, srv2053058706=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,383 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,383 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,383 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,383 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table59) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,384 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table561
2023-07-11 14:16:25,384 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv857331976=1, srv2053058706=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,384 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,384 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,384 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,384 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table561) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,384 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table320
2023-07-11 14:16:25,384 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv857331976=1, srv2053058706=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,384 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,384 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,384 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,384 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table320) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,384 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table562
2023-07-11 14:16:25,384 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv857331976=1, srv2053058706=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,384 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,384 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,384 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,384 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table562) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,384 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table321
2023-07-11 14:16:25,384 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv857331976=1, srv2053058706=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,384 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,384 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,384 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,384 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table321) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,385 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table563
2023-07-11 14:16:25,385 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv857331976=1, srv2053058706=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,385 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,385 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,385 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,385 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table563) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,385 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table322
2023-07-11 14:16:25,385 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv857331976=1, srv2053058706=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,385 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,385 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,385 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,385 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table322) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,385 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table564
2023-07-11 14:16:25,385 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv857331976=1, srv2053058706=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,385 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,385 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,385 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,385 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table564) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,385 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1220
2023-07-11 14:16:25,385 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv857331976=1, srv2053058706=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,385 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,385 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,385 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,385 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1220) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,386 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table323
2023-07-11 14:16:25,386 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv857331976=1, srv2053058706=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,386 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,386 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,386 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,386 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table323) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,386 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table565
2023-07-11 14:16:25,386 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv857331976=1, srv2053058706=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,386 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,386 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,386 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,386 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table565) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,386 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1221
2023-07-11 14:16:25,386 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv857331976=1, srv2053058706=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,386 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,386 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,386 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,386 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1221) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,386 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table324
2023-07-11 14:16:25,386 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv857331976=1, srv2053058706=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,386 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,386 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,386 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,386 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table324) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,386 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table566
2023-07-11 14:16:25,387 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv857331976=1, srv2053058706=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,387 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,387 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,387 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,387 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table566) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,387 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1222
2023-07-11 14:16:25,387 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv857331976=1, srv2053058706=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,387 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,387 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,387 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,387 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1222) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,387 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table325
2023-07-11 14:16:25,387 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv857331976=1, srv2053058706=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,387 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,387 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,387 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,387 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table325) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,387 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table567
2023-07-11 14:16:25,387 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv857331976=1, srv2053058706=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,387 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,387 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,387 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,387 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table567) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,387 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table326
2023-07-11 14:16:25,388 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv857331976=1, srv2053058706=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,388 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,388 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,388 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,388 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table326) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,388 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table568
2023-07-11 14:16:25,388 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv857331976=1, srv2053058706=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,388 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,388 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,388 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,388 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table568) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,388 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table327
2023-07-11 14:16:25,388 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv857331976=1, srv2053058706=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,388 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,388 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,388 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,388 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table327) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,388 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table569
2023-07-11 14:16:25,388 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv857331976=1, srv2053058706=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,388 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,388 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,388 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,388 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table569) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,388 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table328
2023-07-11 14:16:25,388 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv857331976=1, srv2053058706=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,389 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,389 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,389 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,389 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table328) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,389 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table329
2023-07-11 14:16:25,389 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv857331976=1, srv2053058706=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,389 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,389 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,389 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,389 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table329) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,389 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1223
2023-07-11 14:16:25,389 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv857331976=1, srv2053058706=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,389 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,389 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,390 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,390 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1223) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,390 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table50
2023-07-11 14:16:25,390 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv857331976=1, srv2053058706=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,390 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,390 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,390 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,390 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table50) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,390 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1224
2023-07-11 14:16:25,390 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv857331976=1, srv2053058706=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,390 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,390 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,390 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,390 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1224) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,390 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table51
2023-07-11 14:16:25,390 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv857331976=1, srv2053058706=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,390 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,390 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,390 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,390 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table51) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,390 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1225
2023-07-11 14:16:25,390 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv857331976=1, srv2053058706=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,390 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,390 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,391 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,391 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1225) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,391 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table52
2023-07-11 14:16:25,391 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv857331976=1, srv2053058706=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,391 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,391 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,391 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,391 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table52) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,391 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1226
2023-07-11 14:16:25,391 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv857331976=1, srv2053058706=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,391 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,391 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,391 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,391 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1226) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,391 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table53
2023-07-11 14:16:25,391 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv857331976=1, srv2053058706=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,391 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,391 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,391 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,391 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table53) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,391 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1227
2023-07-11 14:16:25,391 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv857331976=1, srv2053058706=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,392 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,392 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,392 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,392 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1227) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,392 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table54
2023-07-11 14:16:25,392 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv857331976=1, srv2053058706=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,392 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,392 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,392 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,392 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table54) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,392 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1228
2023-07-11 14:16:25,392 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv857331976=1, srv2053058706=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,392 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,392 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,392 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,392 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1228) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,392 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table55
2023-07-11 14:16:25,392 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv857331976=1, srv2053058706=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,392 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,392 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,392 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,393 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table55) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,393 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1229
2023-07-11 14:16:25,393 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv857331976=1, srv2053058706=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,393 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,393 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,393 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,393 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1229) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,393 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table56
2023-07-11 14:16:25,393 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv857331976=1, srv2053058706=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,393 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,393 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,393 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,393 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table56) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,393 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table46
2023-07-11 14:16:25,393 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv857331976=1, srv2053058706=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,393 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,393 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,393 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,393 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table46) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,393 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table790
2023-07-11 14:16:25,393 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv857331976=1, srv2053058706=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,393 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,393 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,394 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,394 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table790) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,394 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table47
2023-07-11 14:16:25,394 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv857331976=1, srv2053058706=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,394 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,394 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,394 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,394 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table47) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,394 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table791
2023-07-11 14:16:25,394 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv857331976=1, srv2053058706=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,394 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,394 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,394 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,394 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table791) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,394 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table48
2023-07-11 14:16:25,394 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv857331976=1, srv2053058706=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,394 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,394 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,394 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,394 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table48) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,394 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table550
2023-07-11 14:16:25,394 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv857331976=1, srv2053058706=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,394 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,394 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,395 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,395 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table550) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,395 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table792
2023-07-11 14:16:25,395 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv857331976=1, srv2053058706=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,395 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,395 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,395 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,395 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table792) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,395 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table49
2023-07-11 14:16:25,395 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv857331976=1, srv2053058706=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,395 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,395 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,395 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,395 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table49) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,395 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table551
2023-07-11 14:16:25,395 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv857331976=1, srv2053058706=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,395 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,395 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,395 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,395 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table551) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,395 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table793
2023-07-11 14:16:25,395 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv857331976=1, srv2053058706=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,395 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,395 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,396 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,396 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table793) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,396 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table310
2023-07-11 14:16:25,396 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv857331976=1, srv2053058706=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,396 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,396 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,396 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,396 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table310) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,396 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table552
2023-07-11 14:16:25,396 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv857331976=1, srv2053058706=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,396 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,396 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,396 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,396 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table552) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,396 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table794
2023-07-11 14:16:25,396 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv857331976=1, srv2053058706=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,396 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,396 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,396 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,396 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table794) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,396 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table311
2023-07-11 14:16:25,396 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv857331976=1, srv2053058706=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,396 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,396 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,397 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,397 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table311) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,397 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table553
2023-07-11 14:16:25,397 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv857331976=1, srv2053058706=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,397 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,397 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,397 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,397 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table553) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,397 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table795
2023-07-11 14:16:25,397 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv857331976=1, srv2053058706=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,397 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,397 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,397 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,397 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table795) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,397 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table312
2023-07-11 14:16:25,398 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv857331976=1, srv2053058706=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,398 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,398 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,398 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,398 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table312) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,398 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table554
2023-07-11 14:16:25,398 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv857331976=1, srv2053058706=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,398 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,398 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,398 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,398 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table554) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,398 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table796
2023-07-11 14:16:25,398 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv857331976=1, srv2053058706=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,398 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,398 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,398 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,398 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table796) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,398 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1210
2023-07-11 14:16:25,398 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv857331976=1, srv2053058706=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,398 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,398 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,398 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,398 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1210) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,398 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table313
2023-07-11 14:16:25,399 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv857331976=1, srv2053058706=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,399 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,399 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,399 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,399 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table313) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,399 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table555
2023-07-11 14:16:25,399 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv857331976=1, srv2053058706=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,399 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,399 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,399 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,399 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table555) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,399 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table797
2023-07-11 14:16:25,399 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv857331976=1, srv2053058706=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,399 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,399 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,399 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,399 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table797) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,399 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1211
2023-07-11 14:16:25,399 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv857331976=1, srv2053058706=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,399 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,399 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,399 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,399 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1211) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,399 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table314
2023-07-11 14:16:25,399 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv857331976=1, srv2053058706=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,400 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,400 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,400 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,400 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table314) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,400 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table556
2023-07-11 14:16:25,400 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv857331976=1, srv2053058706=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,400 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,400 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,400 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,400 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table556) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,400 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table798
2023-07-11 14:16:25,400 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv857331976=1, srv2053058706=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,400 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,400 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,400 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,400 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table798) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,400 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table315
2023-07-11 14:16:25,400 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv857331976=1, srv2053058706=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,400 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,400 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,400 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,400 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table315) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,400 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table557
2023-07-11 14:16:25,400 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv857331976=1, srv2053058706=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,401 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,401 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,401 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,401 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table557) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,401 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table799
2023-07-11 14:16:25,401 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv857331976=1, srv2053058706=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,401 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,401 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,401 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,401 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table799) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,401 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table316
2023-07-11 14:16:25,401 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv857331976=1, srv2053058706=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,401 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,401 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,401 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,401 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table316) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,401 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table558
2023-07-11 14:16:25,401 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv857331976=1, srv2053058706=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,401 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,401 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,401 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,401 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table558) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,401 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table317
2023-07-11 14:16:25,401 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv857331976=1, srv2053058706=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,402 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,402 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,402 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,402 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table317) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,402 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table559
2023-07-11 14:16:25,402 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv857331976=1, srv2053058706=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,402 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,402 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,402 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,402 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table559) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,402 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table318
2023-07-11 14:16:25,402 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv857331976=1, srv2053058706=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,402 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,402 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,402 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,402 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table318) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,402 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table319
2023-07-11 14:16:25,402 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv857331976=1, srv2053058706=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,402 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,402 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,402 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,402 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table319) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,402 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1212
2023-07-11 14:16:25,403 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv857331976=1, srv2053058706=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,403 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,403 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,403 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,403 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1212) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,403 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1213
2023-07-11 14:16:25,403 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv857331976=1, srv2053058706=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,403 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,403 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,403 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,403 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1213) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,403 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table40
2023-07-11 14:16:25,403 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv857331976=1, srv2053058706=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,403 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,403 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,403 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,403 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table40) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,403 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1214
2023-07-11 14:16:25,403 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv857331976=1, srv2053058706=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,403 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,403 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,403 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,403 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1214) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,403 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table41
2023-07-11 14:16:25,403 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv857331976=1, srv2053058706=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,404 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,404 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,404 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,404 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table41) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,404 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1215
2023-07-11 14:16:25,404 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv857331976=1, srv2053058706=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,404 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,404 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,404 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,404 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1215) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,404 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table42
2023-07-11 14:16:25,404 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv857331976=1, srv2053058706=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,404 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,404 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,404 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,404 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table42) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,404 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1216
2023-07-11 14:16:25,404 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv857331976=1, srv2053058706=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,404 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,404 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,404 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,404 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1216) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,404 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table43
2023-07-11 14:16:25,405 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv857331976=1, srv2053058706=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,405 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,405 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,405 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,405 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table43) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,405 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1217
2023-07-11 14:16:25,405 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv857331976=1, srv2053058706=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,405 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,405 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,405 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,405 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1217) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,405 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table44
2023-07-11 14:16:25,405 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv857331976=1, srv2053058706=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,405 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,405 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,405 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,406 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table44) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,406 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1218
2023-07-11 14:16:25,406 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv857331976=1, srv2053058706=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,406 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,406 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,406 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,406 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1218) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,406 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table45
2023-07-11 14:16:25,406 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv857331976=1, srv2053058706=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,406 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,406 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,406 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,406 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table45) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,406 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1219
2023-07-11 14:16:25,406 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv857331976=1, srv2053058706=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,406 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,406 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,406 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,406 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1219) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,406 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table35
2023-07-11 14:16:25,406 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv857331976=1, srv2053058706=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,406 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,407 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,407 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,407 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table35) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,407 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table581
2023-07-11 14:16:25,407 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv857331976=1, srv2053058706=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,407 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,407 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,407 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,407 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table581) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,407 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table36
2023-07-11 14:16:25,407 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv857331976=1, srv2053058706=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,407 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,407 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,407 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,407 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table36) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,407 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table340
2023-07-11 14:16:25,407 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv857331976=1, srv2053058706=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,407 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,407 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,407 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,407 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table340) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,407 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table582
2023-07-11 14:16:25,407 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv857331976=1, srv2053058706=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,407 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,408 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,408 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,408 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table582) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,408 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table37
2023-07-11 14:16:25,408 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv857331976=1, srv2053058706=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,408 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,408 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,408 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,408 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table37) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,408 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table341
2023-07-11 14:16:25,408 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv857331976=1, srv2053058706=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,408 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,408 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,408 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,408 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table341) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,408 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table583
2023-07-11 14:16:25,408 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv857331976=1, srv2053058706=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,408 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,408 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,408 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,408 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table583) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,408 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table38
2023-07-11 14:16:25,408 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv857331976=1, srv2053058706=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,408 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,409 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,409 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,409 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table38) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,409 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table100
2023-07-11 14:16:25,409 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv857331976=1, srv2053058706=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,409 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,409 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,409 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,409 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table100) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,409 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table342
2023-07-11 14:16:25,409 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv857331976=1, srv2053058706=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,409 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,409 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,409 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,409 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table342) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,409 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table584
2023-07-11 14:16:25,409 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv857331976=1, srv2053058706=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,409 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,409 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,409 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,409 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table584) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,409 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table39
2023-07-11 14:16:25,409 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv857331976=1, srv2053058706=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,409 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,410 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,410 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,410 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table39) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,410 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table101
2023-07-11 14:16:25,410 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv857331976=1, srv2053058706=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,410 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,410 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,410 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,410 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table101) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,410 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table343
2023-07-11 14:16:25,410 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv857331976=1, srv2053058706=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,410 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,410 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,410 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,410 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table343) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,410 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table585
2023-07-11 14:16:25,410 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv857331976=1, srv2053058706=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,410 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,410 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,410 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,410 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table585) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,410 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table102
2023-07-11 14:16:25,410 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv857331976=1, srv2053058706=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,411 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,411 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,411 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,411 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table102) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,411 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table344
2023-07-11 14:16:25,411 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv857331976=1, srv2053058706=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,411 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,411 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,411 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,411 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table344) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,411 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table586
2023-07-11 14:16:25,411 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv857331976=1, srv2053058706=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,411 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,411 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,411 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,411 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table586) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,411 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table103
2023-07-11 14:16:25,411 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv857331976=1, srv2053058706=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,411 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,411 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,411 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,411 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table103) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,411 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table345
2023-07-11 14:16:25,411 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv857331976=1, srv2053058706=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,412 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,412 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,412 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,412 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table345) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,412 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table587
2023-07-11 14:16:25,412 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv857331976=1, srv2053058706=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,412 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,412 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,412 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,412 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table587) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,412 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table104
2023-07-11 14:16:25,412 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv857331976=1, srv2053058706=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,412 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,412 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,412 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,412 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table104) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,412 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table346
2023-07-11 14:16:25,412 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv857331976=1, srv2053058706=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,412 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,412 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,412 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,413 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table346) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,413 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table588
2023-07-11 14:16:25,413 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv857331976=1, srv2053058706=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,413 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,413 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,413 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,413 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table588) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,413 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1200
2023-07-11 14:16:25,413 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv857331976=1, srv2053058706=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,413 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,413 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,413 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,413 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1200) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,413 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table105
2023-07-11 14:16:25,413 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv857331976=1, srv2053058706=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,413 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,413 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,413 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,413 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table105) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,414 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table347
2023-07-11 14:16:25,414 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv857331976=1, srv2053058706=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,414 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,414 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,414 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,414 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table347) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,414 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table589
2023-07-11 14:16:25,414 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv857331976=1, srv2053058706=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,414 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,414 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,414 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,414 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table589) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,414 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table106
2023-07-11 14:16:25,414 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv857331976=1, srv2053058706=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,414 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,414 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,414 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,414 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table106) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,414 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table348
2023-07-11 14:16:25,414 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv857331976=1, srv2053058706=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,415 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,415 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,415 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,415 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table348) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,415 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table107
2023-07-11 14:16:25,415 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv857331976=1, srv2053058706=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,415 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,415 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,415 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,415 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table107) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,415 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table349
2023-07-11 14:16:25,415 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv857331976=1, srv2053058706=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,415 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,415 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,415 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,415 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table349) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,415 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table108
2023-07-11 14:16:25,415 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv857331976=1, srv2053058706=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,415 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,415 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,415 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,415 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table108) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,415 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table109
2023-07-11 14:16:25,415 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv857331976=1, srv2053058706=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,415 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,416 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,416 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,416 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table109) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,416 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1209
2023-07-11 14:16:25,416 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv857331976=1, srv2053058706=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,416 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,416 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,416 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,416 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1209) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,416 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1201
2023-07-11 14:16:25,416 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv857331976=1, srv2053058706=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,416 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,416 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,416 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,416 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1201) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,416 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1202
2023-07-11 14:16:25,416 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv857331976=1, srv2053058706=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,416 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,416 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,416 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,416 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1202) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,416 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1203
2023-07-11 14:16:25,416 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv857331976=1, srv2053058706=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,416 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,417 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,417 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,417 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1203) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,417 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table30
2023-07-11 14:16:25,417 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv857331976=1, srv2053058706=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,417 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,417 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,417 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,417 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table30) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,417 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1204
2023-07-11 14:16:25,417 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv857331976=1, srv2053058706=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,417 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,417 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,417 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,417 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1204) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,417 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table31
2023-07-11 14:16:25,417 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv857331976=1, srv2053058706=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,417 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,417 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,417 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,417 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table31) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,417 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1205
2023-07-11 14:16:25,417 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv857331976=1, srv2053058706=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,418 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,418 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,418 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,418 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1205) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,418 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table32
2023-07-11 14:16:25,418 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv857331976=1, srv2053058706=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,418 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,418 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,418 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,418 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table32) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,418 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1206
2023-07-11 14:16:25,418 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv857331976=1, srv2053058706=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,418 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,418 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,418 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,418 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1206) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,418 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table33
2023-07-11 14:16:25,418 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv857331976=1, srv2053058706=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,418 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,418 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,418 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,418 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table33) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,418 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table590
2023-07-11 14:16:25,418 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv857331976=1, srv2053058706=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,418 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,419 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,419 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,419 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table590) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,419 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1207
2023-07-11 14:16:25,419 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv857331976=1, srv2053058706=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,419 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,419 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,419 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,419 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1207) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,419 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table34
2023-07-11 14:16:25,419 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv857331976=1, srv2053058706=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,419 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,419 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,419 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,419 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table34) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,419 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table591
2023-07-11 14:16:25,419 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv857331976=1, srv2053058706=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,419 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,419 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,419 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,419 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table591) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,419 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1208
2023-07-11 14:16:25,419 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv857331976=1, srv2053058706=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,420 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,420 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,420 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,420 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1208) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,420 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table24
2023-07-11 14:16:25,420 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv857331976=1, srv2053058706=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,420 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,420 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,420 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,420 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table24) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,420 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table570
2023-07-11 14:16:25,420 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv857331976=1, srv2053058706=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,420 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,420 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,420 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,420 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table570) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,420 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table25
2023-07-11 14:16:25,420 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv857331976=1, srv2053058706=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,420 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,420 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,420 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,420 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table25) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,420 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table571
2023-07-11 14:16:25,420 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv857331976=1, srv2053058706=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,420 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,421 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,421 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,421 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table571) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,421 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table26
2023-07-11 14:16:25,421 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv857331976=1, srv2053058706=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,421 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,421 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,421 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,421 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table26) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,421 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table330
2023-07-11 14:16:25,421 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv857331976=1, srv2053058706=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,421 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,421 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,421 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,421 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table330) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,421 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table572
2023-07-11 14:16:25,421 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv857331976=1, srv2053058706=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,421 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,421 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,422 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,422 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table572) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,422 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table27
2023-07-11 14:16:25,422 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv857331976=1, srv2053058706=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,422 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,422 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,422 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,422 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table27) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,422 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table331
2023-07-11 14:16:25,422 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv857331976=1, srv2053058706=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,422 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,422 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,422 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,422 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table331) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,422 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table573
2023-07-11 14:16:25,422 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv857331976=1, srv2053058706=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,422 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,422 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,422 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,423 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table573) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,423 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table28
2023-07-11 14:16:25,423 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv857331976=1, srv2053058706=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,423 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,423 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,423 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,423 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table28) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,423 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table332
2023-07-11 14:16:25,423 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv857331976=1, srv2053058706=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,423 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,423 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,423 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,423 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table332) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,423 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table574
2023-07-11 14:16:25,423 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv857331976=1, srv2053058706=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,423 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,423 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,423 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,423 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table574) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,423 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table29
2023-07-11 14:16:25,423 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv857331976=1, srv2053058706=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,423 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,423 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,423 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,424 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table29) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,424 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table333
2023-07-11 14:16:25,424 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv857331976=1, srv2053058706=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,424 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,424 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,424 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,424 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table333) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,424 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table575
2023-07-11 14:16:25,424 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv857331976=1, srv2053058706=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,424 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,424 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,424 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,424 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table575) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,424 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table334
2023-07-11 14:16:25,424 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv857331976=1, srv2053058706=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,424 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,424 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,424 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,424 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table334) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,424 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table576
2023-07-11 14:16:25,424 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv857331976=1, srv2053058706=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,424 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,424 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,424 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,425 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table576) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,425 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1430
2023-07-11 14:16:25,425 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv857331976=1, srv2053058706=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,425 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,425 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,425 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,425 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1430) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,425 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table335
2023-07-11 14:16:25,425 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv857331976=1, srv2053058706=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,425 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,425 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,425 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,425 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table335) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,425 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table577
2023-07-11 14:16:25,425 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv857331976=1, srv2053058706=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,425 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,425 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,425 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,425 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table577) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,425 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1431
2023-07-11 14:16:25,425 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv857331976=1, srv2053058706=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,425 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,425 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,425 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,426 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1431) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,426 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table336
2023-07-11 14:16:25,426 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv857331976=1, srv2053058706=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,426 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,426 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,426 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,426 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table336) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,426 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table578
2023-07-11 14:16:25,426 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv857331976=1, srv2053058706=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,426 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,426 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,426 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,426 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table578) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,426 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table337
2023-07-11 14:16:25,426 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv857331976=1, srv2053058706=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,426 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,426 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,426 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,426 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table337) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,426 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table579
2023-07-11 14:16:25,426 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv857331976=1, srv2053058706=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,426 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,426 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,426 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,427 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table579) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,427 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table338
2023-07-11 14:16:25,427 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv857331976=1, srv2053058706=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,427 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,427 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,427 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,427 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table338) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,427 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table339
2023-07-11 14:16:25,427 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv857331976=1, srv2053058706=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,427 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,427 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,427 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,427 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table339) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,427 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table20
2023-07-11 14:16:25,427 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv857331976=1, srv2053058706=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,427 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,427 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,427 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,427 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table20) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,427 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table21
2023-07-11 14:16:25,427 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv857331976=1, srv2053058706=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,427 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,427 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,427 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,428 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table21) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,428 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table22
2023-07-11 14:16:25,428 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv857331976=1, srv2053058706=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,428 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,428 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,428 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,428 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table22) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,428 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table23
2023-07-11 14:16:25,428 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv857331976=1, srv2053058706=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,428 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,428 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,428 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,428 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table23) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,428 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table580
2023-07-11 14:16:25,428 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv857331976=1, srv2053058706=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,428 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,428 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,428 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,428 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table580) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,428 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table284
2023-07-11 14:16:25,428 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv857331976=1, srv2053058706=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,428 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,428 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,428 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,429 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table284) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,429 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table285
2023-07-11 14:16:25,429 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv857331976=1, srv2053058706=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,429 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,429 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,429 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,429 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table285) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,429 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table286
2023-07-11 14:16:25,429 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv857331976=1, srv2053058706=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,429 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,429 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,429 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,429 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table286) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,429 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table287
2023-07-11 14:16:25,429 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv857331976=1, srv2053058706=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,429 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,429 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,429 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,429 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table287) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,429 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table288
2023-07-11 14:16:25,430 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv857331976=1, srv2053058706=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,430 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,430 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,430 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,430 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table288) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,430 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table289
2023-07-11 14:16:25,430 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv857331976=1, srv2053058706=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,430 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,430 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,430 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,430 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table289) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,430 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table290
2023-07-11 14:16:25,430 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv857331976=1, srv2053058706=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,430 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,430 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,430 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,430 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table290) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,430 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table291
2023-07-11 14:16:25,431 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv857331976=1, srv2053058706=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,431 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,431 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,431 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,431 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table291) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,431 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table292
2023-07-11 14:16:25,431 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv857331976=1, srv2053058706=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,431 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,431 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,431 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,431 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table292) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,431 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table293
2023-07-11 14:16:25,431 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv857331976=1, srv2053058706=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,431 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,431 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,431 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,431 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table293) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,431 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table294
2023-07-11 14:16:25,431 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv857331976=1, srv2053058706=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,431 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,431 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,431 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,431 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table294) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,431 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table273
2023-07-11 14:16:25,431 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv857331976=1, srv2053058706=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,432 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,432 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,432 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,432 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table273) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,432 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table274
2023-07-11 14:16:25,432 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv857331976=1, srv2053058706=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,432 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,432 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,432 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,432 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table274) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,432 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table275
2023-07-11 14:16:25,432 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv857331976=1, srv2053058706=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,432 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,432 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,432 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,432 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table275) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,432 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table276
2023-07-11 14:16:25,432 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv857331976=1, srv2053058706=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,432 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,432 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,432 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,432 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table276) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,432 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table277
2023-07-11 14:16:25,432 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv857331976=1, srv2053058706=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,433 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,433 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,433 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,433 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table277) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,433 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table278
2023-07-11 14:16:25,433 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv857331976=1, srv2053058706=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,433 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,433 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,433 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,433 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table278) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,433 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table279
2023-07-11 14:16:25,433 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv857331976=1, srv2053058706=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,433 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,433 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,433 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,433 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table279) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,433 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table280
2023-07-11 14:16:25,433 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv857331976=1, srv2053058706=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,433 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,433 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,433 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,433 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table280) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,433 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table281
2023-07-11 14:16:25,433 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv857331976=1, srv2053058706=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,434 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,434 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,434 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,434 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table281) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,434 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table282
2023-07-11 14:16:25,434 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv857331976=1, srv2053058706=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,434 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,434 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,434 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,434 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table282) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,434 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table283
2023-07-11 14:16:25,434 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv857331976=1, srv2053058706=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,434 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,434 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,434 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,434 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table283) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,434 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table295
2023-07-11 14:16:25,434 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv857331976=1, srv2053058706=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,434 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,434 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,434 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,434 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table295) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,434 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table296
2023-07-11 14:16:25,434 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv857331976=1, srv2053058706=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,434 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,435 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,435 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,435 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table296) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,435 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table297
2023-07-11 14:16:25,435 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv857331976=1, srv2053058706=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,435 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,435 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,435 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,435 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table297) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,435 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table298
2023-07-11 14:16:25,435 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv857331976=1, srv2053058706=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,435 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,435 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,435 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,435 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table298) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,435 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table299
2023-07-11 14:16:25,435 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv857331976=1, srv2053058706=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,435 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,435 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,435 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,435 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table299) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,435 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table920
2023-07-11 14:16:25,435 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv857331976=1, srv2053058706=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,435 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,436 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,436 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,436 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table920) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,436 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table921
2023-07-11 14:16:25,436 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv857331976=1, srv2053058706=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,436 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,436 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,436 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,436 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table921) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,436 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table922
2023-07-11 14:16:25,436 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv857331976=1, srv2053058706=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,436 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,436 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,436 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,436 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table922) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,436 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table923
2023-07-11 14:16:25,436 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv857331976=1, srv2053058706=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,436 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,436 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,436 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,436 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table923) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,436 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table924
2023-07-11 14:16:25,436 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv857331976=1, srv2053058706=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,436 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,437 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,437 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,437 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table924) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,437 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table925
2023-07-11 14:16:25,437 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv857331976=1, srv2053058706=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,437 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,437 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,437 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,437 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table925) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,437 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table926
2023-07-11 14:16:25,437 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv857331976=1, srv2053058706=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,437 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,437 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,437 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,437 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table926) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,437 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table927
2023-07-11 14:16:25,437 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv857331976=1, srv2053058706=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,437 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,437 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,437 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,438 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table927) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,438 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table928
2023-07-11 14:16:25,438 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv857331976=1, srv2053058706=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,438 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,438 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,438 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,438 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table928) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,438 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table929
2023-07-11 14:16:25,438 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv857331976=1, srv2053058706=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,438 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,438 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,438 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,438 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table929) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,438 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1094
2023-07-11 14:16:25,438 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv857331976=1, srv2053058706=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,438 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,438 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,438 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,438 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1094) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,439 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1095
2023-07-11 14:16:25,439 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv857331976=1, srv2053058706=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,439 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,439 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,439 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,439 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1095) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,439 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1096
2023-07-11 14:16:25,439 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv857331976=1, srv2053058706=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,439 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,439 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,439 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,439 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1096) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,439 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1097
2023-07-11 14:16:25,439 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv857331976=1, srv2053058706=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,439 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,439 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,439 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,439 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1097) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,439 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1098
2023-07-11 14:16:25,439 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv857331976=1, srv2053058706=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,439 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,439 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,439 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,440 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1098) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,440 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1099
2023-07-11 14:16:25,440 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv857331976=1, srv2053058706=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,440 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,440 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,440 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,440 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1099) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,440 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table910
2023-07-11 14:16:25,440 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv857331976=1, srv2053058706=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,440 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,440 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,440 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,440 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table910) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,440 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table911
2023-07-11 14:16:25,440 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv857331976=1, srv2053058706=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,440 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,440 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,440 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,440 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table911) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,440 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table912
2023-07-11 14:16:25,440 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv857331976=1, srv2053058706=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,440 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,440 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,440 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,440 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table912) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,441 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1090
2023-07-11 14:16:25,441 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv857331976=1, srv2053058706=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,441 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,441 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,441 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,441 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1090) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,441 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table913
2023-07-11 14:16:25,441 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv857331976=1, srv2053058706=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,441 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,441 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,441 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,441 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table913) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,441 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1091
2023-07-11 14:16:25,441 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv857331976=1, srv2053058706=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,441 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,441 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,441 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,441 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1091) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,441 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table914
2023-07-11 14:16:25,441 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv857331976=1, srv2053058706=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,441 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,441 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,441 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,441 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table914) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,442 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1092
2023-07-11 14:16:25,442 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv857331976=1, srv2053058706=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,442 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,442 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,442 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,442 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1092) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,442 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table915
2023-07-11 14:16:25,442 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv857331976=1, srv2053058706=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,442 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,442 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,442 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,442 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table915) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,442 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1093
2023-07-11 14:16:25,442 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv857331976=1, srv2053058706=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,442 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,442 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,442 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,442 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1093) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,442 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table916
2023-07-11 14:16:25,442 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv857331976=1, srv2053058706=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,442 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,442 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,442 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,442 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table916) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,442 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table917
2023-07-11 14:16:25,443 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv857331976=1, srv2053058706=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,443 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,443 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,443 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,443 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table917) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,443 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table918
2023-07-11 14:16:25,443 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv857331976=1, srv2053058706=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,443 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,443 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,443 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,443 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table918) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,443 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table919
2023-07-11 14:16:25,443 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv857331976=1, srv2053058706=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,443 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,443 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,443 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,443 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table919) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,443 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1083
2023-07-11 14:16:25,443 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv857331976=1, srv2053058706=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,443 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,443 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,443 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,443 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1083) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,443 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1084
2023-07-11 14:16:25,443 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv857331976=1, srv2053058706=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,444 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,444 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,444 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,444 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1084) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,444 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1085
2023-07-11 14:16:25,444 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv857331976=1, srv2053058706=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,444 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,444 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,444 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,444 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1085) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,444 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1086
2023-07-11 14:16:25,444 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv857331976=1, srv2053058706=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,444 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,444 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,444 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,444 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1086) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,444 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1087
2023-07-11 14:16:25,444 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv857331976=1, srv2053058706=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,444 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,444 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,444 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,444 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1087) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,444 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1088
2023-07-11 14:16:25,444 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv857331976=1, srv2053058706=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,445 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,445 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,445 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,445 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1088) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,445 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1089
2023-07-11 14:16:25,445 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv857331976=1, srv2053058706=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,445 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,445 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,445 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,445 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1089) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,445 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table940
2023-07-11 14:16:25,445 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv857331976=1, srv2053058706=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,445 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,445 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,445 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,445 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table940) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,445 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table941
2023-07-11 14:16:25,445 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv857331976=1, srv2053058706=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,445 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,445 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,446 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,446 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table941) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,446 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table700
2023-07-11 14:16:25,446 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv857331976=1, srv2053058706=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,446 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,446 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,446 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,446 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table700) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,446 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table942
2023-07-11 14:16:25,446 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv857331976=1, srv2053058706=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,446 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,446 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,446 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,446 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table942) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,446 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table701
2023-07-11 14:16:25,446 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv857331976=1, srv2053058706=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,446 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,446 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,446 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,447 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table701) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,447 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table943
2023-07-11 14:16:25,447 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv857331976=1, srv2053058706=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,447 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,447 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,447 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,447 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table943) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,447 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table702
2023-07-11 14:16:25,447 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv857331976=1, srv2053058706=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,447 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,447 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,447 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,447 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table702) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,447 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table944
2023-07-11 14:16:25,447 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv857331976=1, srv2053058706=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,447 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,447 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,447 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,447 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table944) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,447 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table703
2023-07-11 14:16:25,447 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv857331976=1, srv2053058706=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,447 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,447 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,447 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,447 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table703) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,448 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table945
2023-07-11 14:16:25,448 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv857331976=1, srv2053058706=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,448 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,448 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,448 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,448 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table945) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,448 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table704
2023-07-11 14:16:25,448 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv857331976=1, srv2053058706=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,448 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,448 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,448 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,448 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table704) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,448 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table946
2023-07-11 14:16:25,448 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv857331976=1, srv2053058706=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,448 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,448 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,448 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,448 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table946) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,448 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1080
2023-07-11 14:16:25,448 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv857331976=1, srv2053058706=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,448 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,448 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,448 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,448 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1080) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,449 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table705
2023-07-11 14:16:25,449 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv857331976=1, srv2053058706=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,449 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,449 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,449 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,449 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table705) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,449 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table947
2023-07-11 14:16:25,449 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv857331976=1, srv2053058706=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,449 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,449 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,449 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,449 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table947) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,449 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1081
2023-07-11 14:16:25,449 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv857331976=1, srv2053058706=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,449 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,449 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,449 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,449 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1081) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,449 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table706
2023-07-11 14:16:25,449 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv857331976=1, srv2053058706=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,449 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,449 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,449 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,449 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table706) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,450 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table948
2023-07-11 14:16:25,450 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv857331976=1, srv2053058706=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,450 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,450 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,450 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,450 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table948) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,450 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1082
2023-07-11 14:16:25,450 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv857331976=1, srv2053058706=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,450 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,450 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,450 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,450 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1082) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,450 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table707
2023-07-11 14:16:25,450 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv857331976=1, srv2053058706=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,450 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,450 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,450 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,450 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table707) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,450 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table949
2023-07-11 14:16:25,450 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv857331976=1, srv2053058706=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,450 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,450 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,450 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,450 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table949) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,451 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table708
2023-07-11 14:16:25,451 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv857331976=1, srv2053058706=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,451 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,451 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,451 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,451 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table708) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,451 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table709
2023-07-11 14:16:25,451 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv857331976=1, srv2053058706=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,451 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,451 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,451 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,451 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table709) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,451 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1072
2023-07-11 14:16:25,451 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv857331976=1, srv2053058706=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,451 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,451 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,451 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,451 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1072) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,451 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1073
2023-07-11 14:16:25,451 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv857331976=1, srv2053058706=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,451 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,451 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,451 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,451 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1073) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,451 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1074
2023-07-11 14:16:25,452 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv857331976=1, srv2053058706=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,452 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,452 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,452 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,452 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1074) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,452 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1075
2023-07-11 14:16:25,452 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv857331976=1, srv2053058706=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,452 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,452 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,452 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,452 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1075) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,452 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1076
2023-07-11 14:16:25,452 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv857331976=1, srv2053058706=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,452 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,452 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,452 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,452 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1076) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,452 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1077
2023-07-11 14:16:25,452 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv857331976=1, srv2053058706=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,452 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,452 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,452 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,452 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1077) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,452 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1078
2023-07-11 14:16:25,453 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv857331976=1, srv2053058706=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,453 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,453 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,453 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,453 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1078) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,453 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1079
2023-07-11 14:16:25,453 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv857331976=1, srv2053058706=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,453 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,453 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,453 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,453 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1079) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,453 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table930
2023-07-11 14:16:25,453 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv857331976=1, srv2053058706=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,453 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,453 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,453 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,453 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table930) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,453 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table931
2023-07-11 14:16:25,453 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv857331976=1, srv2053058706=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,454 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,454 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,454 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,454 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table931) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,454 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table932
2023-07-11 14:16:25,454 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv857331976=1, srv2053058706=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,454 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,454 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,454 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,454 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table932) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,454 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table933
2023-07-11 14:16:25,454 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv857331976=1, srv2053058706=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,454 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,454 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,454 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,454 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table933) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,454 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table934
2023-07-11 14:16:25,454 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv857331976=1, srv2053058706=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,454 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,454 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,454 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,455 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table934) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,455 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table935
2023-07-11 14:16:25,455 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv857331976=1, srv2053058706=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,455 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,455 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,455 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,455 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table935) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,455 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table936
2023-07-11 14:16:25,455 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv857331976=1, srv2053058706=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,455 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,455 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,455 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,455 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table936) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,455 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1070
2023-07-11 14:16:25,455 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv857331976=1, srv2053058706=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,455 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,455 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,455 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,455 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1070) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,455 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table937
2023-07-11 14:16:25,455 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv857331976=1, srv2053058706=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,455 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,455 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,455 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,455 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table937) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,456 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1071
2023-07-11 14:16:25,456 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv857331976=1, srv2053058706=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,456 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,456 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,456 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,456 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1071) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,456 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table938
2023-07-11 14:16:25,456 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv857331976=1, srv2053058706=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,456 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,456 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,456 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,456 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table938) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,456 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table939
2023-07-11 14:16:25,456 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv857331976=1, srv2053058706=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,456 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,456 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,456 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,456 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table939) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,456 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table900
2023-07-11 14:16:25,456 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv857331976=1, srv2053058706=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,456 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,457 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,457 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,457 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table900) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,457 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table901
2023-07-11 14:16:25,457 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv857331976=1, srv2053058706=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,457 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,457 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,457 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,457 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table901) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,457 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table902
2023-07-11 14:16:25,457 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv857331976=1, srv2053058706=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,457 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,457 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,457 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,457 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table902) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,457 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table903
2023-07-11 14:16:25,457 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv857331976=1, srv2053058706=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,457 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,457 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,457 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,457 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table903) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,457 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table904
2023-07-11 14:16:25,457 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv857331976=1, srv2053058706=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,458 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,458 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,458 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,458 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table904) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,458 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table905
2023-07-11 14:16:25,458 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv857331976=1, srv2053058706=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,458 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,458 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,458 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,458 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table905) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,458 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table906
2023-07-11 14:16:25,458 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv857331976=1, srv2053058706=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,458 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,458 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,458 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,458 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table906) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,458 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table907
2023-07-11 14:16:25,458 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv857331976=1, srv2053058706=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,458 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,458 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,458 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,458 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table907) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,458 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table908
2023-07-11 14:16:25,458 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv857331976=1, srv2053058706=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,458 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,459 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,459 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,459 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table908) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,459 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table909
2023-07-11 14:16:25,459 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv857331976=1, srv2053058706=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,459 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,459 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,459 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,459 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table909) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,459 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table13
2023-07-11 14:16:25,460 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1452078163=0, srv281428232=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,460 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,460 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,460 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,460 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table13) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,460 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table14
2023-07-11 14:16:25,460 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1452078163=0, srv281428232=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,460 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,460 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,460 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,460 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table14) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,460 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table15
2023-07-11 14:16:25,460 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1452078163=0, srv281428232=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,460 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,460 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,460 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,460 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table15) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,460 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table16
2023-07-11 14:16:25,460 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1452078163=0, srv281428232=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,460 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,460 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,461 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,461 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table16) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,461 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table17
2023-07-11 14:16:25,461 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1452078163=0, srv281428232=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,461 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,461 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,461 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,461 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table17) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,461 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table18
2023-07-11 14:16:25,461 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1452078163=0, srv281428232=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,461 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,461 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,461 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,461 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table18) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,461 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table19
2023-07-11 14:16:25,461 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1452078163=0, srv281428232=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,461 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,461 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,461 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,461 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table19) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,461 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table50
2023-07-11 14:16:25,461 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1452078163=0, srv281428232=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,461 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,462 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,462 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,462 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table50) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,462 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table51
2023-07-11 14:16:25,462 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1452078163=0, srv281428232=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,462 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,462 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,462 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,462 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table51) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,462 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table52
2023-07-11 14:16:25,462 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1452078163=0, srv281428232=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,462 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,462 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,462 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,462 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table52) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,462 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table10
2023-07-11 14:16:25,463 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1452078163=0, srv281428232=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,463 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,463 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,463 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,463 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table10) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,463 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table11
2023-07-11 14:16:25,463 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1452078163=0, srv281428232=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,463 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,463 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,463 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,463 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table11) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,463 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table12
2023-07-11 14:16:25,463 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1452078163=0, srv281428232=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,463 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,463 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,463 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,464 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table12) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,464 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table46
2023-07-11 14:16:25,464 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1452078163=0, srv281428232=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,464 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,464 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,464 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,464 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table46) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,464 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table47
2023-07-11 14:16:25,464 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1452078163=0, srv281428232=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,464 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,464 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,464 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,464 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table47) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,464 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table48
2023-07-11 14:16:25,464 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1452078163=0, srv281428232=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,464 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,464 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,464 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,464 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table48) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,464 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table49
2023-07-11 14:16:25,465 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1452078163=0, srv281428232=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,465 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,465 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,465 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,465 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table49) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,465 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table40
2023-07-11 14:16:25,465 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1452078163=0, srv281428232=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,465 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,465 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,465 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,465 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table40) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,465 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table41
2023-07-11 14:16:25,465 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1452078163=0, srv281428232=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,465 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,465 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,465 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,465 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table41) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,465 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table42
2023-07-11 14:16:25,465 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1452078163=0, srv281428232=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,465 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,466 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,466 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,466 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table42) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,466 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table43
2023-07-11 14:16:25,466 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1452078163=0, srv281428232=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,466 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,466 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,466 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,466 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table43) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,466 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table44
2023-07-11 14:16:25,466 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1452078163=0, srv281428232=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,466 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,466 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,466 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,466 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table44) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,466 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table45
2023-07-11 14:16:25,466 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1452078163=0, srv281428232=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,466 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,466 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,466 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,466 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table45) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,467 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table35
2023-07-11 14:16:25,467 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1452078163=0, srv281428232=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,467 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,467 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,467 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,467 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table35) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,467 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table36
2023-07-11 14:16:25,467 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1452078163=0, srv281428232=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,467 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,467 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,467 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,467 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table36) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,467 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table37
2023-07-11 14:16:25,467 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1452078163=0, srv281428232=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,467 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,467 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,467 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,467 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table37) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,467 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table38
2023-07-11 14:16:25,467 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1452078163=0, srv281428232=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,468 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,468 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,468 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,468 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table38) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,468 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table39
2023-07-11 14:16:25,468 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1452078163=0, srv281428232=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,468 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,468 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,468 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,468 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table39) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,468 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table5
2023-07-11 14:16:25,468 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1452078163=0, srv281428232=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,468 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,468 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,468 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,468 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table5) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,468 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table4
2023-07-11 14:16:25,468 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1452078163=0, srv281428232=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,468 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,468 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,468 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,469 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table4) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,469 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table3
2023-07-11 14:16:25,469 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1452078163=0, srv281428232=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,469 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,469 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,469 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,469 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table3) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,469 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table2
2023-07-11 14:16:25,469 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1452078163=0, srv281428232=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,469 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,469 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,469 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,469 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table2) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,469 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,469 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1452078163=0, srv281428232=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,469 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,469 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,469 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,469 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,469 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,470 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1452078163=0, srv281428232=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,470 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,470 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,470 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,470 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table0) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,470 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table30
2023-07-11 14:16:25,470 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1452078163=0, srv281428232=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,470 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,470 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,470 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,470 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table30) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,470 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table9
2023-07-11 14:16:25,470 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1452078163=0, srv281428232=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,470 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,470 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,470 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,470 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table9) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,470 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table31
2023-07-11 14:16:25,470 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1452078163=0, srv281428232=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,470 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,470 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,471 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,471 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table31) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,471 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table8
2023-07-11 14:16:25,471 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1452078163=0, srv281428232=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,471 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,471 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,471 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,471 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table8) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,471 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table32
2023-07-11 14:16:25,471 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1452078163=0, srv281428232=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,471 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,471 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,471 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,471 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table32) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,471 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table7
2023-07-11 14:16:25,471 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1452078163=0, srv281428232=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,471 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,471 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,471 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,471 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table7) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,472 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table33
2023-07-11 14:16:25,472 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1452078163=0, srv281428232=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,472 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,472 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,472 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,472 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table33) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,472 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table6
2023-07-11 14:16:25,472 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1452078163=0, srv281428232=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,472 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,472 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,472 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,472 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table6) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,472 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table34
2023-07-11 14:16:25,472 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1452078163=0, srv281428232=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,473 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,473 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,473 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,473 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table34) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,473 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table24
2023-07-11 14:16:25,473 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1452078163=0, srv281428232=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,473 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,473 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,473 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,473 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table24) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,473 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table25
2023-07-11 14:16:25,473 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1452078163=0, srv281428232=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,473 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,473 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,473 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,473 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table25) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,473 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table26
2023-07-11 14:16:25,473 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1452078163=0, srv281428232=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,473 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,473 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,473 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,473 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table26) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,473 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table27
2023-07-11 14:16:25,474 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1452078163=0, srv281428232=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,474 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,474 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,474 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,474 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table27) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,474 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table28
2023-07-11 14:16:25,474 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1452078163=0, srv281428232=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,474 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,474 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,474 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,474 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table28) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,474 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table29
2023-07-11 14:16:25,474 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1452078163=0, srv281428232=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,474 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,474 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,474 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,474 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table29) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,474 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table20
2023-07-11 14:16:25,474 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1452078163=0, srv281428232=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,474 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,474 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,474 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,474 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table20) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,474 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table21
2023-07-11 14:16:25,475 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1452078163=0, srv281428232=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,475 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,475 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,475 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,475 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table21) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,475 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table22
2023-07-11 14:16:25,475 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1452078163=0, srv281428232=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,475 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,475 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,475 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,475 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table22) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,475 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table23
2023-07-11 14:16:25,475 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1452078163=0, srv281428232=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,475 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,475 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,475 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,475 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table23) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,475 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,475 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1483823593=0, srv1497950370=1, srv702571675=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,476 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,476 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,476 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:25,476 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=3, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,476 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,476 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,476 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1483823593=0, srv1497950370=1, srv702571675=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,476 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,476 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,476 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:25,476 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=3, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,476 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table0) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,476 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table2
2023-07-11 14:16:25,476 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv547780089=2, srv1265140911=0, srv1634363535=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,476 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,476 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,476 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:25,476 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=3, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,476 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table2) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,477 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,477 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv547780089=2, srv1265140911=0, srv1634363535=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,477 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,477 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,477 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:25,477 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=3, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,477 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,477 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,477 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv547780089=2, srv1265140911=0, srv1634363535=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,477 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,477 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,477 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:25,477 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=3, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,477 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table0) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,477 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,477 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1268800858=1, srv818350368=2, srv125026=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,477 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,477 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,477 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:25,477 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=3, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,478 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,478 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,478 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1268800858=1, srv818350368=2, srv125026=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,478 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,478 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,478 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:25,478 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=3, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,478 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table0) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,478 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table2
2023-07-11 14:16:25,478 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv2066947037=0, srv509567086=2, srv360897012=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,478 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,478 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,478 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:25,478 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=3, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,478 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table2) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,478 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,478 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv2066947037=0, srv509567086=2, srv360897012=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,478 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,478 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,478 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:25,478 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=3, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,479 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,479 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,479 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv2066947037=0, srv509567086=2, srv360897012=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,479 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,479 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,479 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:25,479 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=3, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,479 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table0) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,479 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table3
2023-07-11 14:16:25,479 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv864569421=2, srv1094929308=0, srv282832655=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,479 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,479 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,479 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:25,479 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=3, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,479 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table3) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,479 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table2
2023-07-11 14:16:25,479 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv864569421=2, srv1094929308=0, srv282832655=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,479 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,479 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,479 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:25,479 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=3, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,480 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table2) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,480 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,480 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv864569421=2, srv1094929308=0, srv282832655=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,480 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,480 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,480 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:25,480 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=3, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,480 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,480 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,480 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv864569421=2, srv1094929308=0, srv282832655=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,480 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,480 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,480 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:25,480 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=3, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,480 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table0) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,480 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table13
2023-07-11 14:16:25,480 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv163235864=0, srv554994078=1, srv928443846=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,480 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,480 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,481 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:25,481 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=3, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,481 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table13) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,481 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table14
2023-07-11 14:16:25,481 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv163235864=0, srv554994078=1, srv928443846=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,481 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,481 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,481 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:25,481 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=3, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,481 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table14) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,481 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table15
2023-07-11 14:16:25,481 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv163235864=0, srv554994078=1, srv928443846=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,481 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,481 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,481 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:25,481 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=3, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,481 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table15) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,481 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table16
2023-07-11 14:16:25,482 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv163235864=0, srv554994078=1, srv928443846=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,482 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,482 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,482 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:25,482 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=3, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,482 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table16) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,482 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table17
2023-07-11 14:16:25,482 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv163235864=0, srv554994078=1, srv928443846=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,482 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,482 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,482 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:25,482 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=3, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,482 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table17) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,482 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table18
2023-07-11 14:16:25,482 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv163235864=0, srv554994078=1, srv928443846=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,482 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,482 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,482 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:25,482 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=3, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,482 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table18) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,483 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table19
2023-07-11 14:16:25,483 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv163235864=0, srv554994078=1, srv928443846=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,483 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,483 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,483 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:25,483 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=3, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,483 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table19) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,483 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table5
2023-07-11 14:16:25,483 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv163235864=0, srv554994078=1, srv928443846=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,483 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,483 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,483 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:25,483 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=3, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,483 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table5) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,483 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table4
2023-07-11 14:16:25,483 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv163235864=0, srv554994078=1, srv928443846=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,483 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,483 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,483 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:25,483 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=3, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,483 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table4) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,483 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table3
2023-07-11 14:16:25,483 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv163235864=0, srv554994078=1, srv928443846=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,483 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,483 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,484 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:25,484 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=3, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,484 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table3) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,484 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table2
2023-07-11 14:16:25,484 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv163235864=0, srv554994078=1, srv928443846=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,484 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,484 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,484 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:25,484 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=3, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,484 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table2) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,484 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,484 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv163235864=0, srv554994078=1, srv928443846=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,484 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,484 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,484 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:25,484 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=3, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,484 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,484 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,484 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv163235864=0, srv554994078=1, srv928443846=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,484 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,484 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,484 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:25,484 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=3, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,485 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table0) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,485 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table9
2023-07-11 14:16:25,485 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv163235864=0, srv554994078=1, srv928443846=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,485 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,485 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,485 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:25,485 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=3, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,485 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table9) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,485 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table8
2023-07-11 14:16:25,485 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv163235864=0, srv554994078=1, srv928443846=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,485 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,485 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,485 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:25,485 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=3, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,485 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table8) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,485 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table10
2023-07-11 14:16:25,485 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv163235864=0, srv554994078=1, srv928443846=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,485 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,485 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,485 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:25,485 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=3, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,485 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table10) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,485 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table7
2023-07-11 14:16:25,486 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv163235864=0, srv554994078=1, srv928443846=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,486 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,486 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,486 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:25,486 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=3, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,486 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table7) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,486 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table11
2023-07-11 14:16:25,486 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv163235864=0, srv554994078=1, srv928443846=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,486 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,486 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,486 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:25,486 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=3, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,486 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table11) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,486 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table6
2023-07-11 14:16:25,486 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv163235864=0, srv554994078=1, srv928443846=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,486 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,486 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,486 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:25,486 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=3, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,486 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table6) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,486 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table12
2023-07-11 14:16:25,486 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv163235864=0, srv554994078=1, srv928443846=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,486 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,486 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,486 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:25,487 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=3, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,487 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table12) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,487 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table2
2023-07-11 14:16:25,487 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1801162997=2, srv1099247817=0, srv1386629196=1, srv540353747=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,487 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,487 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,487 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:25,487 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:25,487 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=4, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,487 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table2) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,487 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,487 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1801162997=2, srv1099247817=0, srv1386629196=1, srv540353747=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,487 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,487 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,487 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:25,487 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:25,487 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=4, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,487 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,487 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,487 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1801162997=2, srv1099247817=0, srv1386629196=1, srv540353747=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,487 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,488 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,488 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:25,488 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:25,488 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=4, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,488 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table0) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,488 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table3
2023-07-11 14:16:25,488 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv541252322=2, srv575852539=3, srv1253189857=0, srv1723187800=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,488 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,488 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,488 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:25,488 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:25,488 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=4, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,488 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table3) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,488 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table2
2023-07-11 14:16:25,488 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv541252322=2, srv575852539=3, srv1253189857=0, srv1723187800=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,488 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,488 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,488 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:25,488 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:25,488 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=4, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,488 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table2) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,488 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,489 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv541252322=2, srv575852539=3, srv1253189857=0, srv1723187800=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,489 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,489 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,489 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:25,489 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:25,489 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=4, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,489 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,489 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,489 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv541252322=2, srv575852539=3, srv1253189857=0, srv1723187800=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,489 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,489 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,489 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:25,489 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:25,489 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=4, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,489 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table0) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,489 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table4
2023-07-11 14:16:25,489 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv683966246=3, srv612648871=2, srv1001587485=0, srv1882575997=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,489 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,489 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,490 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:25,490 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:25,490 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=4, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,490 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table4) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,490 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table3
2023-07-11 14:16:25,490 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv683966246=3, srv612648871=2, srv1001587485=0, srv1882575997=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,490 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,490 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,490 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:25,490 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:25,490 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=4, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,490 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table3) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,490 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table2
2023-07-11 14:16:25,490 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv683966246=3, srv612648871=2, srv1001587485=0, srv1882575997=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,490 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,490 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,490 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:25,490 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:25,490 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=4, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,490 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table2) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,490 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,491 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv683966246=3, srv612648871=2, srv1001587485=0, srv1882575997=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,491 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,491 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,491 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:25,491 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:25,491 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=4, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,491 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,491 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,491 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv683966246=3, srv612648871=2, srv1001587485=0, srv1882575997=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,491 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,491 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,491 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:25,491 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:25,491 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=4, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,491 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table0) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,492 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table5
2023-07-11 14:16:25,492 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1222582144=0, srv565050688=2, srv2111948038=1, srv876559704=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,492 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,492 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,492 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:25,492 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:25,492 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=4, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,492 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table5) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,492 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table4
2023-07-11 14:16:25,492 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1222582144=0, srv565050688=2, srv2111948038=1, srv876559704=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,492 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,492 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,492 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:25,492 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:25,492 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=4, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,492 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table4) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,492 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table3
2023-07-11 14:16:25,492 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1222582144=0, srv565050688=2, srv2111948038=1, srv876559704=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,492 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,492 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,492 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:25,493 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:25,493 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=4, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,493 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table3) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,493 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table2
2023-07-11 14:16:25,493 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1222582144=0, srv565050688=2, srv2111948038=1, srv876559704=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,493 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,493 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,493 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:25,493 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:25,493 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=4, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,493 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table2) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,493 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,493 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1222582144=0, srv565050688=2, srv2111948038=1, srv876559704=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,493 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,493 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,493 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:25,493 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:25,493 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=4, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,493 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,493 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,493 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1222582144=0, srv565050688=2, srv2111948038=1, srv876559704=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,493 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,493 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,493 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:25,494 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:25,494 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=4, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,494 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table0) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,494 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table5
2023-07-11 14:16:25,494 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv37941354=2, srv1447386744=0, srv2033069181=1, srv738794835=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,494 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,494 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,494 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:25,494 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:25,494 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=4, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,494 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table5) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,494 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table4
2023-07-11 14:16:25,494 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv37941354=2, srv1447386744=0, srv2033069181=1, srv738794835=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,494 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,494 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,494 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:25,494 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:25,494 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=4, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,494 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table4) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,494 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table3
2023-07-11 14:16:25,495 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv37941354=2, srv1447386744=0, srv2033069181=1, srv738794835=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,495 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,495 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,495 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:25,495 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:25,495 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=4, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,495 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table3) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,495 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table2
2023-07-11 14:16:25,495 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv37941354=2, srv1447386744=0, srv2033069181=1, srv738794835=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,495 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,495 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,495 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:25,495 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:25,495 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=4, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,495 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table2) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,495 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,495 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv37941354=2, srv1447386744=0, srv2033069181=1, srv738794835=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,495 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,495 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,495 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:25,495 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:25,495 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=4, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,495 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,495 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,495 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv37941354=2, srv1447386744=0, srv2033069181=1, srv738794835=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,496 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,496 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,496 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:25,496 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:25,496 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=4, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,496 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table0) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,496 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table5
2023-07-11 14:16:25,496 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv705766335=3, srv507141390=2, srv1055746225=0, srv1863466133=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,496 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,496 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,496 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:25,496 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:25,496 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=4, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,496 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table5) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,496 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table4
2023-07-11 14:16:25,496 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv705766335=3, srv507141390=2, srv1055746225=0, srv1863466133=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,496 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,496 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,496 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:25,496 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:25,496 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=4, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,497 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table4) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,497 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table3
2023-07-11 14:16:25,497 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv705766335=3, srv507141390=2, srv1055746225=0, srv1863466133=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,497 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,497 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,497 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:25,497 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:25,497 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=4, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,497 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table3) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,497 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table2
2023-07-11 14:16:25,497 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv705766335=3, srv507141390=2, srv1055746225=0, srv1863466133=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,497 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,497 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,497 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:25,497 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:25,497 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=4, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,497 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table2) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,497 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,497 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv705766335=3, srv507141390=2, srv1055746225=0, srv1863466133=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,497 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,497 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,497 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:25,497 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:25,497 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=4, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,498 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,498 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,498 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv705766335=3, srv507141390=2, srv1055746225=0, srv1863466133=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,498 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,498 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,498 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:25,498 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:25,498 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=4, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,498 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table0) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,498 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table5
2023-07-11 14:16:25,498 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv303806686=2, srv458735235=3, srv1257655628=0, srv1710340772=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,498 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,498 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,498 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:25,498 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:25,498 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=4, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,498 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table5) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,498 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table4
2023-07-11 14:16:25,498 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv303806686=2, srv458735235=3, srv1257655628=0, srv1710340772=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,498 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,498 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,498 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:25,499 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:25,499 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=4, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,499 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table4) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,499 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table3
2023-07-11 14:16:25,499 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv303806686=2, srv458735235=3, srv1257655628=0, srv1710340772=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,499 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,499 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,499 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:25,499 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:25,499 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=4, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,499 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table3) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,499 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table2
2023-07-11 14:16:25,499 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv303806686=2, srv458735235=3, srv1257655628=0, srv1710340772=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,499 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,499 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,499 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:25,499 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:25,499 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=4, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,499 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table2) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,499 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,499 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv303806686=2, srv458735235=3, srv1257655628=0, srv1710340772=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,499 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,499 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,499 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:25,499 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:25,500 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=4, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,500 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,500 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,500 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv303806686=2, srv458735235=3, srv1257655628=0, srv1710340772=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,500 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,500 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,500 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:25,500 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:25,500 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=4, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,500 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table0) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,500 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table5
2023-07-11 14:16:25,501 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1165898002=0, srv1590179439=1, srv175755279=2, srv611335129=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,501 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,501 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,501 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:25,501 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:25,501 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=4, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,501 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table5) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,501 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table4
2023-07-11 14:16:25,501 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1165898002=0, srv1590179439=1, srv175755279=2, srv611335129=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,501 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,501 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,501 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:25,501 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:25,501 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=4, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,501 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table4) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,501 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table3
2023-07-11 14:16:25,501 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1165898002=0, srv1590179439=1, srv175755279=2, srv611335129=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,501 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,501 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,501 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:25,501 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:25,502 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=4, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,502 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table3) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,502 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table2
2023-07-11 14:16:25,502 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1165898002=0, srv1590179439=1, srv175755279=2, srv611335129=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,502 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,502 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,502 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:25,502 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:25,502 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=4, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,502 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table2) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,502 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,502 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1165898002=0, srv1590179439=1, srv175755279=2, srv611335129=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,502 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,502 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,502 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:25,502 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:25,502 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=4, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,502 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,502 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,502 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1165898002=0, srv1590179439=1, srv175755279=2, srv611335129=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,502 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,502 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,502 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:25,503 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:25,503 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=4, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,503 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table0) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,503 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table6
2023-07-11 14:16:25,503 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1165898002=0, srv1590179439=1, srv175755279=2, srv611335129=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,503 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,503 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,503 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:25,503 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:25,503 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=4, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,503 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table6) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,503 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table5
2023-07-11 14:16:25,503 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv910064539=3, srv1961618219=1, srv2082680340=2, srv1191348726=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,503 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,503 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,503 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:25,503 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:25,504 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=4, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,504 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table5) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,504 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table4
2023-07-11 14:16:25,504 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv910064539=3, srv1961618219=1, srv2082680340=2, srv1191348726=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,504 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,504 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,504 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:25,504 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:25,504 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=4, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,504 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table4) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,504 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table3
2023-07-11 14:16:25,504 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv910064539=3, srv1961618219=1, srv2082680340=2, srv1191348726=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,504 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,504 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,504 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:25,504 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:25,504 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=4, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,504 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table3) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,504 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table2
2023-07-11 14:16:25,504 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv910064539=3, srv1961618219=1, srv2082680340=2, srv1191348726=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,504 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,504 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,504 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:25,505 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:25,505 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=4, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,505 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table2) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,505 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,505 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv910064539=3, srv1961618219=1, srv2082680340=2, srv1191348726=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,505 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,505 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,505 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:25,505 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:25,505 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=4, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,505 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,505 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,505 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv910064539=3, srv1961618219=1, srv2082680340=2, srv1191348726=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,505 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,505 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,505 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:25,505 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:25,505 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=4, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,505 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table0) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,505 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table7
2023-07-11 14:16:25,505 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv910064539=3, srv1961618219=1, srv2082680340=2, srv1191348726=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,505 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,505 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,505 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:25,506 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:25,506 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=4, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,506 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table7) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,506 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table6
2023-07-11 14:16:25,506 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv910064539=3, srv1961618219=1, srv2082680340=2, srv1191348726=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,506 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,506 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,506 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:25,506 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:25,506 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=4, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,506 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table6) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,506 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table5
2023-07-11 14:16:25,506 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv211280421=2, srv48555132=3, srv1323537218=1, srv1241354225=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,506 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,506 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,506 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:25,506 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:25,506 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=4, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,506 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table5) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,507 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table4
2023-07-11 14:16:25,507 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv211280421=2, srv48555132=3, srv1323537218=1, srv1241354225=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,507 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,507 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,507 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:25,507 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:25,507 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=4, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,507 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table4) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,507 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table3
2023-07-11 14:16:25,507 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv211280421=2, srv48555132=3, srv1323537218=1, srv1241354225=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,507 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,507 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,507 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:25,507 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:25,507 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=4, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,507 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table3) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,507 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table2
2023-07-11 14:16:25,507 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv211280421=2, srv48555132=3, srv1323537218=1, srv1241354225=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,507 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,507 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,507 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:25,507 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:25,507 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=4, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,507 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table2) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,507 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,507 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv211280421=2, srv48555132=3, srv1323537218=1, srv1241354225=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,508 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,508 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,508 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:25,508 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:25,508 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=4, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,508 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,508 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,508 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv211280421=2, srv48555132=3, srv1323537218=1, srv1241354225=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,508 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,508 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,508 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:25,508 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:25,508 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=4, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,508 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table0) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,508 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table6
2023-07-11 14:16:25,508 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv211280421=2, srv48555132=3, srv1323537218=1, srv1241354225=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,508 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,508 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,508 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:25,509 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:25,509 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=4, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,509 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table6) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,509 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table3
2023-07-11 14:16:25,509 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv63588219=3, srv1140746589=1, srv68596720=4, srv1022637102=0, srv632596015=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,509 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,509 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,509 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:25,509 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:25,509 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:25,509 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=5, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,509 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table3) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,509 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table2
2023-07-11 14:16:25,509 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv63588219=3, srv1140746589=1, srv68596720=4, srv1022637102=0, srv632596015=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,509 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,509 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,509 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:25,510 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:25,510 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:25,510 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=5, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,510 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table2) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,510 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,510 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv63588219=3, srv1140746589=1, srv68596720=4, srv1022637102=0, srv632596015=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,510 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,510 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,510 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:25,510 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:25,510 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:25,510 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=5, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,510 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,510 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,510 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv63588219=3, srv1140746589=1, srv68596720=4, srv1022637102=0, srv632596015=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,510 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,510 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,510 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:25,511 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:25,511 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:25,511 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=5, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,511 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table0) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,546 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1380
2023-07-11 14:16:25,546 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1687925324=1, srv405099745=3, srv1439028200=0, srv1697037617=2, srv507737371=4, srv679978762=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,547 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,547 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,547 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:25,547 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:25,547 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:25,547 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:25,547 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,547 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1380) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,547 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1381
2023-07-11 14:16:25,547 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1687925324=1, srv405099745=3, srv1439028200=0, srv1697037617=2, srv507737371=4, srv679978762=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,547 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,547 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,547 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:25,547 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:25,547 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:25,547 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:25,547 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,547 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1381) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,547 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table880
2023-07-11 14:16:25,547 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1687925324=1, srv405099745=3, srv1439028200=0, srv1697037617=2, srv507737371=4, srv679978762=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,547 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,547 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,547 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:25,547 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:25,548 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:25,548 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:25,548 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,548 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table880) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,548 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1140
2023-07-11 14:16:25,548 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1687925324=1, srv405099745=3, srv1439028200=0, srv1697037617=2, srv507737371=4, srv679978762=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,548 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,548 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,548 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:25,548 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:25,548 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:25,548 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:25,548 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,548 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1140) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,548 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1382
2023-07-11 14:16:25,548 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1687925324=1, srv405099745=3, srv1439028200=0, srv1697037617=2, srv507737371=4, srv679978762=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,548 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,548 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,548 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:25,548 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:25,548 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:25,548 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:25,548 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,548 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1382) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,549 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table881
2023-07-11 14:16:25,549 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1687925324=1, srv405099745=3, srv1439028200=0, srv1697037617=2, srv507737371=4, srv679978762=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,549 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,549 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,549 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:25,549 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:25,549 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:25,549 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:25,549 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,549 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table881) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,549 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1141
2023-07-11 14:16:25,549 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1687925324=1, srv405099745=3, srv1439028200=0, srv1697037617=2, srv507737371=4, srv679978762=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,549 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,549 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,549 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:25,549 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:25,549 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:25,549 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:25,549 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,549 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1141) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,549 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1383
2023-07-11 14:16:25,549 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1687925324=1, srv405099745=3, srv1439028200=0, srv1697037617=2, srv507737371=4, srv679978762=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,549 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,550 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,550 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:25,550 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:25,550 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:25,550 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:25,550 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,550 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1383) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,550 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table640
2023-07-11 14:16:25,550 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1687925324=1, srv405099745=3, srv1439028200=0, srv1697037617=2, srv507737371=4, srv679978762=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,550 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,550 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,550 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:25,550 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:25,550 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:25,550 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:25,550 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,550 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table640) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,550 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table882
2023-07-11 14:16:25,550 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1687925324=1, srv405099745=3, srv1439028200=0, srv1697037617=2, srv507737371=4, srv679978762=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,550 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,550 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,551 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:25,551 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:25,551 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:25,551 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:25,551 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,551 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table882) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,551 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1142
2023-07-11 14:16:25,551 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1687925324=1, srv405099745=3, srv1439028200=0, srv1697037617=2, srv507737371=4, srv679978762=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,551 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,551 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,551 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:25,551 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:25,551 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:25,551 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:25,551 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,551 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1142) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,551 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1384
2023-07-11 14:16:25,551 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1687925324=1, srv405099745=3, srv1439028200=0, srv1697037617=2, srv507737371=4, srv679978762=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,551 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,551 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,551 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:25,551 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:25,551 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:25,551 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:25,552 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,552 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1384) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,552 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table641
2023-07-11 14:16:25,552 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1687925324=1, srv405099745=3, srv1439028200=0, srv1697037617=2, srv507737371=4, srv679978762=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,552 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,552 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,552 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:25,552 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:25,552 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:25,552 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:25,552 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,552 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table641) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,552 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table883
2023-07-11 14:16:25,552 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1687925324=1, srv405099745=3, srv1439028200=0, srv1697037617=2, srv507737371=4, srv679978762=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,552 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,552 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,552 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:25,552 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:25,552 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:25,552 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:25,552 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,552 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table883) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,552 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1143
2023-07-11 14:16:25,552 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1687925324=1, srv405099745=3, srv1439028200=0, srv1697037617=2, srv507737371=4, srv679978762=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,553 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,553 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,553 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:25,553 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:25,553 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:25,553 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:25,553 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,553 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1143) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,553 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1385
2023-07-11 14:16:25,553 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1687925324=1, srv405099745=3, srv1439028200=0, srv1697037617=2, srv507737371=4, srv679978762=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,553 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,553 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,553 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:25,553 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:25,553 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:25,553 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:25,553 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,553 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1385) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,553 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table400
2023-07-11 14:16:25,553 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1687925324=1, srv405099745=3, srv1439028200=0, srv1697037617=2, srv507737371=4, srv679978762=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,553 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,553 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,553 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:25,553 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:25,553 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:25,554 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:25,554 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,554 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table400) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,554 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table642
2023-07-11 14:16:25,554 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1687925324=1, srv405099745=3, srv1439028200=0, srv1697037617=2, srv507737371=4, srv679978762=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,554 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,554 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,554 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:25,554 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:25,554 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:25,554 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:25,554 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,554 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table642) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,554 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table884
2023-07-11 14:16:25,554 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1687925324=1, srv405099745=3, srv1439028200=0, srv1697037617=2, srv507737371=4, srv679978762=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,554 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,554 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,554 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:25,554 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:25,554 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:25,554 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:25,554 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,554 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table884) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,554 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1144
2023-07-11 14:16:25,554 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1687925324=1, srv405099745=3, srv1439028200=0, srv1697037617=2, srv507737371=4, srv679978762=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,555 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,555 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,555 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:25,555 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:25,555 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:25,555 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:25,555 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,555 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1144) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,555 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1386
2023-07-11 14:16:25,555 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1687925324=1, srv405099745=3, srv1439028200=0, srv1697037617=2, srv507737371=4, srv679978762=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,555 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,555 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,555 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:25,555 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:25,555 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:25,555 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:25,555 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,555 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1386) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,555 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table401
2023-07-11 14:16:25,555 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1687925324=1, srv405099745=3, srv1439028200=0, srv1697037617=2, srv507737371=4, srv679978762=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,555 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,555 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,555 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:25,555 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:25,556 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:25,556 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:25,556 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,556 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table401) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,556 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table643
2023-07-11 14:16:25,556 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1687925324=1, srv405099745=3, srv1439028200=0, srv1697037617=2, srv507737371=4, srv679978762=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,556 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,556 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,556 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:25,556 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:25,556 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:25,556 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:25,556 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,557 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table643) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,557 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table885
2023-07-11 14:16:25,557 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1687925324=1, srv405099745=3, srv1439028200=0, srv1697037617=2, srv507737371=4, srv679978762=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,557 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,557 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,557 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:25,557 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:25,557 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:25,557 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:25,557 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,557 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table885) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,557 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1145
2023-07-11 14:16:25,557 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1687925324=1, srv405099745=3, srv1439028200=0, srv1697037617=2, srv507737371=4, srv679978762=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,557 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,557 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,557 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:25,557 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:25,557 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:25,557 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:25,557 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,557 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1145) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,557 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1387
2023-07-11 14:16:25,557 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1687925324=1, srv405099745=3, srv1439028200=0, srv1697037617=2, srv507737371=4, srv679978762=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,557 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,558 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,558 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:25,558 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:25,558 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:25,558 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:25,558 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,558 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1387) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,558 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table402
2023-07-11 14:16:25,558 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1687925324=1, srv405099745=3, srv1439028200=0, srv1697037617=2, srv507737371=4, srv679978762=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,558 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,558 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,558 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:25,558 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:25,558 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:25,558 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:25,558 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,558 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table402) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,558 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table644
2023-07-11 14:16:25,558 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1687925324=1, srv405099745=3, srv1439028200=0, srv1697037617=2, srv507737371=4, srv679978762=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,558 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,558 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,558 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:25,558 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:25,558 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:25,558 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:25,559 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,559 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table644) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,559 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table886
2023-07-11 14:16:25,559 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1687925324=1, srv405099745=3, srv1439028200=0, srv1697037617=2, srv507737371=4, srv679978762=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,559 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,559 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,559 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:25,559 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:25,559 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:25,559 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:25,559 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,559 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table886) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,559 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table403
2023-07-11 14:16:25,559 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1687925324=1, srv405099745=3, srv1439028200=0, srv1697037617=2, srv507737371=4, srv679978762=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,559 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,559 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,559 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:25,559 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:25,559 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:25,559 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:25,559 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,559 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table403) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,559 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table645
2023-07-11 14:16:25,559 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1687925324=1, srv405099745=3, srv1439028200=0, srv1697037617=2, srv507737371=4, srv679978762=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,560 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,560 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,560 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:25,560 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:25,560 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:25,560 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:25,560 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,560 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table645) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,560 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table887
2023-07-11 14:16:25,560 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1687925324=1, srv405099745=3, srv1439028200=0, srv1697037617=2, srv507737371=4, srv679978762=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,560 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,560 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,560 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:25,560 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:25,560 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:25,560 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:25,560 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,560 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table887) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,560 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table404
2023-07-11 14:16:25,560 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1687925324=1, srv405099745=3, srv1439028200=0, srv1697037617=2, srv507737371=4, srv679978762=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,560 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,560 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,560 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:25,560 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:25,560 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:25,560 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:25,561 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,561 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table404) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,561 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table646
2023-07-11 14:16:25,561 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1687925324=1, srv405099745=3, srv1439028200=0, srv1697037617=2, srv507737371=4, srv679978762=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,561 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,561 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,561 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:25,561 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:25,561 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:25,561 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:25,561 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,561 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table646) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,561 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table888
2023-07-11 14:16:25,561 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1687925324=1, srv405099745=3, srv1439028200=0, srv1697037617=2, srv507737371=4, srv679978762=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,561 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,561 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,561 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:25,561 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:25,561 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:25,561 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:25,561 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,561 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table888) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,561 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table405
2023-07-11 14:16:25,561 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1687925324=1, srv405099745=3, srv1439028200=0, srv1697037617=2, srv507737371=4, srv679978762=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,562 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,562 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,562 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:25,562 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:25,562 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:25,562 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:25,562 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,562 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table405) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,562 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table647
2023-07-11 14:16:25,562 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1687925324=1, srv405099745=3, srv1439028200=0, srv1697037617=2, srv507737371=4, srv679978762=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,562 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,562 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,562 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:25,562 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:25,562 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:25,562 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:25,562 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,562 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table647) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,562 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table889
2023-07-11 14:16:25,562 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1687925324=1, srv405099745=3, srv1439028200=0, srv1697037617=2, srv507737371=4, srv679978762=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,562 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,562 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,562 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:25,562 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:25,562 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:25,562 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:25,563 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,563 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table889) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,563 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table406
2023-07-11 14:16:25,563 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1687925324=1, srv405099745=3, srv1439028200=0, srv1697037617=2, srv507737371=4, srv679978762=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,563 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,563 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,563 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:25,563 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:25,563 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:25,563 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:25,563 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,563 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table406) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,563 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table648
2023-07-11 14:16:25,563 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1687925324=1, srv405099745=3, srv1439028200=0, srv1697037617=2, srv507737371=4, srv679978762=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,563 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,563 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,563 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:25,563 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:25,563 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:25,563 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:25,563 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,563 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table648) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,563 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table407
2023-07-11 14:16:25,563 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1687925324=1, srv405099745=3, srv1439028200=0, srv1697037617=2, srv507737371=4, srv679978762=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,563 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,564 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,564 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:25,564 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:25,564 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:25,564 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:25,564 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,564 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table407) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,564 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table649
2023-07-11 14:16:25,564 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1687925324=1, srv405099745=3, srv1439028200=0, srv1697037617=2, srv507737371=4, srv679978762=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,564 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,564 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,564 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:25,564 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:25,564 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:25,564 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:25,564 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,564 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table649) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,564 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table408
2023-07-11 14:16:25,564 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1687925324=1, srv405099745=3, srv1439028200=0, srv1697037617=2, srv507737371=4, srv679978762=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,564 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,564 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,564 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:25,565 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:25,565 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:25,565 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:25,565 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,565 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table408) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,565 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table409
2023-07-11 14:16:25,565 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1687925324=1, srv405099745=3, srv1439028200=0, srv1697037617=2, srv507737371=4, srv679978762=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,565 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,565 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,565 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:25,565 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:25,565 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:25,565 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:25,565 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,565 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table409) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,565 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1146
2023-07-11 14:16:25,565 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1687925324=1, srv405099745=3, srv1439028200=0, srv1697037617=2, srv507737371=4, srv679978762=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,566 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,566 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,566 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:25,566 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:25,566 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:25,566 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:25,566 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,566 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1146) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,566 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1388
2023-07-11 14:16:25,566 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1687925324=1, srv405099745=3, srv1439028200=0, srv1697037617=2, srv507737371=4, srv679978762=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,566 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,566 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,566 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:25,566 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:25,566 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:25,566 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:25,566 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,566 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1388) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,566 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1147
2023-07-11 14:16:25,567 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1687925324=1, srv405099745=3, srv1439028200=0, srv1697037617=2, srv507737371=4, srv679978762=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,567 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,567 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,567 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:25,567 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:25,567 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:25,567 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:25,567 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,567 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1147) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,567 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1389
2023-07-11 14:16:25,567 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1687925324=1, srv405099745=3, srv1439028200=0, srv1697037617=2, srv507737371=4, srv679978762=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,567 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,567 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,567 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:25,567 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:25,567 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:25,567 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:25,567 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,567 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1389) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,567 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1148
2023-07-11 14:16:25,567 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1687925324=1, srv405099745=3, srv1439028200=0, srv1697037617=2, srv507737371=4, srv679978762=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,567 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,567 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,568 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:25,568 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:25,568 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:25,568 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:25,568 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,568 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1148) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,568 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1149
2023-07-11 14:16:25,568 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1687925324=1, srv405099745=3, srv1439028200=0, srv1697037617=2, srv507737371=4, srv679978762=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,568 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,568 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,568 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:25,568 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:25,568 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:25,568 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:25,568 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,568 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1149) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,568 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1370
2023-07-11 14:16:25,568 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1687925324=1, srv405099745=3, srv1439028200=0, srv1697037617=2, srv507737371=4, srv679978762=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,568 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,568 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,568 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:25,568 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:25,568 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:25,568 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:25,568 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,569 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1370) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,569 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1371
2023-07-11 14:16:25,569 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1687925324=1, srv405099745=3, srv1439028200=0, srv1697037617=2, srv507737371=4, srv679978762=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,569 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,569 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,569 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:25,569 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:25,569 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:25,569 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:25,569 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,569 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1371) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,569 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table870
2023-07-11 14:16:25,569 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1687925324=1, srv405099745=3, srv1439028200=0, srv1697037617=2, srv507737371=4, srv679978762=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,569 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,569 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,569 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:25,569 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:25,569 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:25,569 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:25,569 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,569 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table870) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,569 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1130
2023-07-11 14:16:25,569 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1687925324=1, srv405099745=3, srv1439028200=0, srv1697037617=2, srv507737371=4, srv679978762=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,570 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,570 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,570 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:25,570 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:25,570 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:25,570 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:25,570 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,570 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1130) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,570 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1372
2023-07-11 14:16:25,570 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1687925324=1, srv405099745=3, srv1439028200=0, srv1697037617=2, srv507737371=4, srv679978762=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,570 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,570 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,570 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:25,570 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:25,570 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:25,570 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:25,570 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,570 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1372) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,570 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table871
2023-07-11 14:16:25,570 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1687925324=1, srv405099745=3, srv1439028200=0, srv1697037617=2, srv507737371=4, srv679978762=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,570 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,570 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,570 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:25,570 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:25,570 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:25,570 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:25,570 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,571 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table871) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,571 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1131
2023-07-11 14:16:25,571 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1687925324=1, srv405099745=3, srv1439028200=0, srv1697037617=2, srv507737371=4, srv679978762=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,571 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,571 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,571 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:25,571 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:25,571 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:25,571 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:25,571 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,571 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1131) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,571 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1373
2023-07-11 14:16:25,571 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1687925324=1, srv405099745=3, srv1439028200=0, srv1697037617=2, srv507737371=4, srv679978762=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,571 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,571 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,571 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:25,571 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:25,571 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:25,571 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:25,571 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,571 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1373) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,571 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table630
2023-07-11 14:16:25,571 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1687925324=1, srv405099745=3, srv1439028200=0, srv1697037617=2, srv507737371=4, srv679978762=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,572 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,572 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,572 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:25,572 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:25,572 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:25,572 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:25,572 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,572 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table630) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,572 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table872
2023-07-11 14:16:25,572 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1687925324=1, srv405099745=3, srv1439028200=0, srv1697037617=2, srv507737371=4, srv679978762=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,572 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,572 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,572 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:25,572 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:25,572 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:25,572 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:25,572 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,572 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table872) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,572 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1132
2023-07-11 14:16:25,572 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1687925324=1, srv405099745=3, srv1439028200=0, srv1697037617=2, srv507737371=4, srv679978762=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,572 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,572 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,572 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:25,572 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:25,572 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:25,573 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:25,573 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,573 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1132) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,573 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1374
2023-07-11 14:16:25,573 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1687925324=1, srv405099745=3, srv1439028200=0, srv1697037617=2, srv507737371=4, srv679978762=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,573 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,573 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,573 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:25,573 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:25,573 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:25,573 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:25,573 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,573 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1374) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,573 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table631
2023-07-11 14:16:25,573 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1687925324=1, srv405099745=3, srv1439028200=0, srv1697037617=2, srv507737371=4, srv679978762=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,573 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,573 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,573 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:25,573 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:25,573 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:25,573 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:25,573 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,573 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table631) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,573 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table873
2023-07-11 14:16:25,573 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1687925324=1, srv405099745=3, srv1439028200=0, srv1697037617=2, srv507737371=4, srv679978762=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,574 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,574 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,574 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:25,574 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:25,574 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:25,574 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:25,574 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,574 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table873) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,574 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1133
2023-07-11 14:16:25,574 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1687925324=1, srv405099745=3, srv1439028200=0, srv1697037617=2, srv507737371=4, srv679978762=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,574 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,574 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,574 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:25,574 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:25,574 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:25,574 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:25,574 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,574 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1133) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,574 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1375
2023-07-11 14:16:25,574 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1687925324=1, srv405099745=3, srv1439028200=0, srv1697037617=2, srv507737371=4, srv679978762=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,574 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,574 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,574 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:25,574 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:25,574 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:25,574 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:25,575 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,575 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1375) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,575 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table632
2023-07-11 14:16:25,575 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1687925324=1, srv405099745=3, srv1439028200=0, srv1697037617=2, srv507737371=4, srv679978762=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,575 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,575 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,575 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:25,575 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:25,575 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:25,575 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:25,575 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,575 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table632) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,575 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table874
2023-07-11 14:16:25,576 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1687925324=1, srv405099745=3, srv1439028200=0, srv1697037617=2, srv507737371=4, srv679978762=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,576 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,576 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,576 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:25,576 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:25,576 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:25,576 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:25,576 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,576 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table874) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,576 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1134
2023-07-11 14:16:25,576 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1687925324=1, srv405099745=3, srv1439028200=0, srv1697037617=2, srv507737371=4, srv679978762=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,576 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,576 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,576 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:25,576 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:25,576 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:25,576 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:25,576 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,576 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1134) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,576 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1376
2023-07-11 14:16:25,576 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1687925324=1, srv405099745=3, srv1439028200=0, srv1697037617=2, srv507737371=4, srv679978762=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,576 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,576 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,576 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:25,577 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:25,577 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:25,577 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:25,577 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,577 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1376) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,577 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table633
2023-07-11 14:16:25,577 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1687925324=1, srv405099745=3, srv1439028200=0, srv1697037617=2, srv507737371=4, srv679978762=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,577 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,577 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,577 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:25,577 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:25,577 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:25,577 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:25,577 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,577 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table633) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,577 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table875
2023-07-11 14:16:25,577 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1687925324=1, srv405099745=3, srv1439028200=0, srv1697037617=2, srv507737371=4, srv679978762=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,577 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,577 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,577 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:25,577 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:25,577 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:25,577 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:25,577 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,578 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table875) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,578 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table634
2023-07-11 14:16:25,578 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1687925324=1, srv405099745=3, srv1439028200=0, srv1697037617=2, srv507737371=4, srv679978762=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,578 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,578 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,578 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:25,578 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:25,578 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:25,578 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:25,578 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,578 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table634) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,578 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table876
2023-07-11 14:16:25,578 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1687925324=1, srv405099745=3, srv1439028200=0, srv1697037617=2, srv507737371=4, srv679978762=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,578 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,578 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,578 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:25,578 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:25,578 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:25,578 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:25,578 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,578 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table876) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,578 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table635
2023-07-11 14:16:25,578 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1687925324=1, srv405099745=3, srv1439028200=0, srv1697037617=2, srv507737371=4, srv679978762=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,578 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,579 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,579 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:25,579 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:25,579 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:25,579 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:25,579 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,579 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table635) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,579 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table877
2023-07-11 14:16:25,579 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1687925324=1, srv405099745=3, srv1439028200=0, srv1697037617=2, srv507737371=4, srv679978762=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,579 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,579 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,579 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:25,579 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:25,579 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:25,579 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:25,579 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,579 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table877) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,579 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table636
2023-07-11 14:16:25,579 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1687925324=1, srv405099745=3, srv1439028200=0, srv1697037617=2, srv507737371=4, srv679978762=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,579 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,579 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,579 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:25,579 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:25,579 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:25,579 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:25,579 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,579 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table636) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,580 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table878
2023-07-11 14:16:25,580 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1687925324=1, srv405099745=3, srv1439028200=0, srv1697037617=2, srv507737371=4, srv679978762=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,580 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,580 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,580 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:25,580 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:25,580 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:25,580 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:25,580 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,580 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table878) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,580 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table637
2023-07-11 14:16:25,580 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1687925324=1, srv405099745=3, srv1439028200=0, srv1697037617=2, srv507737371=4, srv679978762=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,580 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,580 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,580 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:25,580 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:25,580 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:25,580 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:25,580 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,580 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table637) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,580 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table879
2023-07-11 14:16:25,580 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1687925324=1, srv405099745=3, srv1439028200=0, srv1697037617=2, srv507737371=4, srv679978762=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,580 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,580 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,581 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:25,581 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:25,581 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:25,581 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:25,581 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,581 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table879) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,581 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table638
2023-07-11 14:16:25,581 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1687925324=1, srv405099745=3, srv1439028200=0, srv1697037617=2, srv507737371=4, srv679978762=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,581 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,581 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,581 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:25,581 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:25,581 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:25,581 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:25,581 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,581 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table638) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,581 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table639
2023-07-11 14:16:25,581 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1687925324=1, srv405099745=3, srv1439028200=0, srv1697037617=2, srv507737371=4, srv679978762=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,581 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,581 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,581 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:25,581 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:25,581 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:25,581 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:25,582 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,582 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table639) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,582 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1135
2023-07-11 14:16:25,582 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1687925324=1, srv405099745=3, srv1439028200=0, srv1697037617=2, srv507737371=4, srv679978762=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,582 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,582 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,582 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:25,582 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:25,582 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:25,582 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:25,582 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,582 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1135) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,582 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1377
2023-07-11 14:16:25,582 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1687925324=1, srv405099745=3, srv1439028200=0, srv1697037617=2, srv507737371=4, srv679978762=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,582 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,582 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,582 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:25,582 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:25,582 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:25,582 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:25,582 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,582 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1377) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,582 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1136
2023-07-11 14:16:25,582 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1687925324=1, srv405099745=3, srv1439028200=0, srv1697037617=2, srv507737371=4, srv679978762=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,582 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,583 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,583 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:25,583 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:25,583 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:25,583 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:25,583 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,583 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1136) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,583 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1378
2023-07-11 14:16:25,583 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1687925324=1, srv405099745=3, srv1439028200=0, srv1697037617=2, srv507737371=4, srv679978762=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,583 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,583 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,583 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:25,583 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:25,583 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:25,583 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:25,583 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,583 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1378) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,583 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1137
2023-07-11 14:16:25,583 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1687925324=1, srv405099745=3, srv1439028200=0, srv1697037617=2, srv507737371=4, srv679978762=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,583 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,583 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,583 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:25,583 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:25,583 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:25,583 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:25,583 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,584 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1137) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,584 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1379
2023-07-11 14:16:25,584 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1687925324=1, srv405099745=3, srv1439028200=0, srv1697037617=2, srv507737371=4, srv679978762=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,584 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,584 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,584 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:25,584 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:25,584 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:25,584 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:25,584 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,584 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1379) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,584 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1138
2023-07-11 14:16:25,584 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1687925324=1, srv405099745=3, srv1439028200=0, srv1697037617=2, srv507737371=4, srv679978762=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,584 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,584 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,584 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:25,584 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:25,584 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:25,585 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:25,585 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,585 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1138) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,585 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1139
2023-07-11 14:16:25,585 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1687925324=1, srv405099745=3, srv1439028200=0, srv1697037617=2, srv507737371=4, srv679978762=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,585 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,585 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,585 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:25,585 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:25,585 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:25,585 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:25,585 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,585 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1139) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,585 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table660
2023-07-11 14:16:25,585 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1687925324=1, srv405099745=3, srv1439028200=0, srv1697037617=2, srv507737371=4, srv679978762=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,585 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,585 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,585 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:25,585 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:25,585 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:25,585 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:25,585 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,586 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table660) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,586 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1360
2023-07-11 14:16:25,586 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1687925324=1, srv405099745=3, srv1439028200=0, srv1697037617=2, srv507737371=4, srv679978762=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,586 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,586 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,586 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:25,586 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:25,586 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:25,586 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:25,586 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,586 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1360) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,586 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table661
2023-07-11 14:16:25,586 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1687925324=1, srv405099745=3, srv1439028200=0, srv1697037617=2, srv507737371=4, srv679978762=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,586 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,586 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,586 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:25,586 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:25,586 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:25,586 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:25,586 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,586 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table661) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,586 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1361
2023-07-11 14:16:25,586 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1687925324=1, srv405099745=3, srv1439028200=0, srv1697037617=2, srv507737371=4, srv679978762=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,586 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,586 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,587 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:25,587 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:25,587 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:25,587 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:25,587 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,587 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1361) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,587 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table420
2023-07-11 14:16:25,587 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1687925324=1, srv405099745=3, srv1439028200=0, srv1697037617=2, srv507737371=4, srv679978762=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,587 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,587 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,587 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:25,587 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:25,587 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:25,587 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:25,587 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,587 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table420) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,587 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table662
2023-07-11 14:16:25,587 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1687925324=1, srv405099745=3, srv1439028200=0, srv1697037617=2, srv507737371=4, srv679978762=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,587 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,587 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,587 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:25,587 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:25,587 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:25,587 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:25,587 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,587 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table662) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,588 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1120
2023-07-11 14:16:25,588 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1687925324=1, srv405099745=3, srv1439028200=0, srv1697037617=2, srv507737371=4, srv679978762=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,588 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,588 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,588 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:25,588 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:25,588 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:25,588 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:25,588 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,588 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1120) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,588 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1362
2023-07-11 14:16:25,588 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1687925324=1, srv405099745=3, srv1439028200=0, srv1697037617=2, srv507737371=4, srv679978762=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,588 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,588 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,588 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:25,588 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:25,588 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:25,588 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:25,588 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,588 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1362) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,588 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table421
2023-07-11 14:16:25,588 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1687925324=1, srv405099745=3, srv1439028200=0, srv1697037617=2, srv507737371=4, srv679978762=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,588 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,588 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,588 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:25,589 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:25,589 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:25,589 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:25,589 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,589 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table421) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,589 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table663
2023-07-11 14:16:25,589 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1687925324=1, srv405099745=3, srv1439028200=0, srv1697037617=2, srv507737371=4, srv679978762=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,589 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,589 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,589 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:25,589 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:25,589 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:25,589 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:25,589 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,589 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table663) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,589 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1121
2023-07-11 14:16:25,589 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1687925324=1, srv405099745=3, srv1439028200=0, srv1697037617=2, srv507737371=4, srv679978762=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,589 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,589 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,589 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:25,589 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:25,589 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:25,589 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:25,589 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,589 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1121) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,590 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1363
2023-07-11 14:16:25,590 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1687925324=1, srv405099745=3, srv1439028200=0, srv1697037617=2, srv507737371=4, srv679978762=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,590 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,590 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,590 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:25,590 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:25,590 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:25,590 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:25,590 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,590 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1363) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,590 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table422
2023-07-11 14:16:25,590 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1687925324=1, srv405099745=3, srv1439028200=0, srv1697037617=2, srv507737371=4, srv679978762=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,590 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,590 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,590 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:25,590 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:25,590 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:25,590 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:25,590 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,590 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table422) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,590 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table664
2023-07-11 14:16:25,590 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1687925324=1, srv405099745=3, srv1439028200=0, srv1697037617=2, srv507737371=4, srv679978762=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,590 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,590 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,590 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:25,591 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:25,591 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:25,591 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:25,591 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,591 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table664) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,591 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1122
2023-07-11 14:16:25,591 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1687925324=1, srv405099745=3, srv1439028200=0, srv1697037617=2, srv507737371=4, srv679978762=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,591 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,591 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,591 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:25,591 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:25,591 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:25,591 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:25,591 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,591 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1122) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,591 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1364
2023-07-11 14:16:25,591 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1687925324=1, srv405099745=3, srv1439028200=0, srv1697037617=2, srv507737371=4, srv679978762=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,591 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,591 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,591 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:25,591 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:25,591 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:25,591 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:25,591 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,591 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1364) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,591 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table423
2023-07-11 14:16:25,592 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1687925324=1, srv405099745=3, srv1439028200=0, srv1697037617=2, srv507737371=4, srv679978762=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,592 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,592 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,592 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:25,592 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:25,592 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:25,592 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:25,592 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,592 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table423) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,592 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table665
2023-07-11 14:16:25,592 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1687925324=1, srv405099745=3, srv1439028200=0, srv1697037617=2, srv507737371=4, srv679978762=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,592 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,592 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,592 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:25,592 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:25,592 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:25,592 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:25,592 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,592 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table665) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,592 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1123
2023-07-11 14:16:25,592 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1687925324=1, srv405099745=3, srv1439028200=0, srv1697037617=2, srv507737371=4, srv679978762=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,592 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,592 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,592 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:25,592 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:25,593 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:25,593 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:25,593 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,593 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1123) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,593 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1365
2023-07-11 14:16:25,593 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1687925324=1, srv405099745=3, srv1439028200=0, srv1697037617=2, srv507737371=4, srv679978762=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,593 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,593 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,593 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:25,593 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:25,593 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:25,593 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:25,593 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,593 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1365) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,593 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table424
2023-07-11 14:16:25,593 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1687925324=1, srv405099745=3, srv1439028200=0, srv1697037617=2, srv507737371=4, srv679978762=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,593 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,594 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,594 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:25,594 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:25,594 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:25,594 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:25,594 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,594 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table424) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,594 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table666
2023-07-11 14:16:25,594 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1687925324=1, srv405099745=3, srv1439028200=0, srv1697037617=2, srv507737371=4, srv679978762=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,594 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,594 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,594 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:25,594 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:25,594 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:25,594 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:25,594 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,594 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table666) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,594 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table425
2023-07-11 14:16:25,594 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1687925324=1, srv405099745=3, srv1439028200=0, srv1697037617=2, srv507737371=4, srv679978762=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,594 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,594 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,595 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:25,595 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:25,595 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:25,595 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:25,595 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,595 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table425) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,595 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table667
2023-07-11 14:16:25,595 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1687925324=1, srv405099745=3, srv1439028200=0, srv1697037617=2, srv507737371=4, srv679978762=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,595 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,595 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,595 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:25,595 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:25,595 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:25,595 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:25,595 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,595 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table667) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,595 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table426
2023-07-11 14:16:25,595 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1687925324=1, srv405099745=3, srv1439028200=0, srv1697037617=2, srv507737371=4, srv679978762=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,595 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,595 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,595 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:25,595 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:25,595 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:25,595 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:25,595 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,596 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table426) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,596 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table668
2023-07-11 14:16:25,596 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1687925324=1, srv405099745=3, srv1439028200=0, srv1697037617=2, srv507737371=4, srv679978762=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,596 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,596 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,596 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:25,596 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:25,596 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:25,596 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:25,596 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,596 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table668) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,596 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table427
2023-07-11 14:16:25,596 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1687925324=1, srv405099745=3, srv1439028200=0, srv1697037617=2, srv507737371=4, srv679978762=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,596 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,596 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,596 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:25,596 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:25,596 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:25,596 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:25,596 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,596 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table427) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,596 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table669
2023-07-11 14:16:25,596 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1687925324=1, srv405099745=3, srv1439028200=0, srv1697037617=2, srv507737371=4, srv679978762=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,596 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,597 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,597 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:25,597 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:25,597 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:25,597 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:25,597 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,597 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table669) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,597 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table428
2023-07-11 14:16:25,597 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1687925324=1, srv405099745=3, srv1439028200=0, srv1697037617=2, srv507737371=4, srv679978762=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,597 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,597 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,597 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:25,597 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:25,597 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:25,597 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:25,597 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,597 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table428) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,597 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table429
2023-07-11 14:16:25,597 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1687925324=1, srv405099745=3, srv1439028200=0, srv1697037617=2, srv507737371=4, srv679978762=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,597 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,597 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,597 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:25,597 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:25,597 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:25,598 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:25,598 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,598 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table429) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,598 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1124
2023-07-11 14:16:25,598 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1687925324=1, srv405099745=3, srv1439028200=0, srv1697037617=2, srv507737371=4, srv679978762=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,598 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,598 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,598 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:25,598 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:25,598 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:25,598 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:25,598 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,598 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1124) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,598 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1366
2023-07-11 14:16:25,598 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1687925324=1, srv405099745=3, srv1439028200=0, srv1697037617=2, srv507737371=4, srv679978762=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,598 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,598 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,598 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:25,598 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:25,598 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:25,598 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:25,598 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,598 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1366) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,598 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1125
2023-07-11 14:16:25,599 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1687925324=1, srv405099745=3, srv1439028200=0, srv1697037617=2, srv507737371=4, srv679978762=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,599 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,599 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,599 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:25,599 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:25,599 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:25,599 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:25,599 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,599 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1125) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,599 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1367
2023-07-11 14:16:25,599 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1687925324=1, srv405099745=3, srv1439028200=0, srv1697037617=2, srv507737371=4, srv679978762=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,599 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,599 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,599 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:25,599 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:25,599 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:25,599 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:25,599 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,599 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1367) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,599 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1126
2023-07-11 14:16:25,599 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1687925324=1, srv405099745=3, srv1439028200=0, srv1697037617=2, srv507737371=4, srv679978762=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,599 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,599 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,599 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:25,599 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:25,599 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:25,599 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:25,600 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,600 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1126) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,600 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1368
2023-07-11 14:16:25,600 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1687925324=1, srv405099745=3, srv1439028200=0, srv1697037617=2, srv507737371=4, srv679978762=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,600 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,600 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,600 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:25,600 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:25,600 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:25,600 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:25,600 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,600 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1368) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,600 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1127
2023-07-11 14:16:25,600 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1687925324=1, srv405099745=3, srv1439028200=0, srv1697037617=2, srv507737371=4, srv679978762=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,600 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,600 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,600 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:25,600 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:25,600 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:25,600 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:25,600 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,600 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1127) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,600 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1369
2023-07-11 14:16:25,600 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1687925324=1, srv405099745=3, srv1439028200=0, srv1697037617=2, srv507737371=4, srv679978762=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,600 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,601 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,601 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:25,601 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:25,601 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:25,601 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:25,601 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,601 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1369) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,601 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1128
2023-07-11 14:16:25,601 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1687925324=1, srv405099745=3, srv1439028200=0, srv1697037617=2, srv507737371=4, srv679978762=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,601 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,601 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,601 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:25,601 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:25,601 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:25,601 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:25,601 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,601 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1128) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,601 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1129
2023-07-11 14:16:25,601 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1687925324=1, srv405099745=3, srv1439028200=0, srv1697037617=2, srv507737371=4, srv679978762=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,601 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,601 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,601 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:25,601 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:25,601 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:25,601 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:25,602 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,602 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1129) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,602 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table890
2023-07-11 14:16:25,602 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1687925324=1, srv405099745=3, srv1439028200=0, srv1697037617=2, srv507737371=4, srv679978762=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,602 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,602 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,602 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:25,602 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:25,602 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:25,602 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:25,602 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,602 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table890) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,602 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table891
2023-07-11 14:16:25,602 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1687925324=1, srv405099745=3, srv1439028200=0, srv1697037617=2, srv507737371=4, srv679978762=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,602 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,602 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,602 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:25,602 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:25,602 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:25,602 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:25,602 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,602 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table891) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,603 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table650
2023-07-11 14:16:25,603 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1687925324=1, srv405099745=3, srv1439028200=0, srv1697037617=2, srv507737371=4, srv679978762=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,603 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,603 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,603 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:25,603 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:25,603 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:25,603 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:25,603 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,603 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table650) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,603 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table892
2023-07-11 14:16:25,603 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1687925324=1, srv405099745=3, srv1439028200=0, srv1697037617=2, srv507737371=4, srv679978762=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,603 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,603 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,603 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:25,603 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:25,603 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:25,603 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:25,604 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,604 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table892) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,604 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1350
2023-07-11 14:16:25,604 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1687925324=1, srv405099745=3, srv1439028200=0, srv1697037617=2, srv507737371=4, srv679978762=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,604 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,604 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,604 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:25,604 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:25,604 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:25,604 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:25,604 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,604 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1350) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,604 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table651
2023-07-11 14:16:25,604 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1687925324=1, srv405099745=3, srv1439028200=0, srv1697037617=2, srv507737371=4, srv679978762=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,604 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,604 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,604 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:25,604 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:25,604 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:25,604 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:25,604 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,604 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table651) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,604 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table893
2023-07-11 14:16:25,604 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1687925324=1, srv405099745=3, srv1439028200=0, srv1697037617=2, srv507737371=4, srv679978762=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,605 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,605 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,605 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:25,605 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:25,605 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:25,605 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:25,605 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,605 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table893) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,605 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1351
2023-07-11 14:16:25,605 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1687925324=1, srv405099745=3, srv1439028200=0, srv1697037617=2, srv507737371=4, srv679978762=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,605 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,605 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,605 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:25,605 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:25,605 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:25,605 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:25,605 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,605 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1351) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,605 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table410
2023-07-11 14:16:25,605 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1687925324=1, srv405099745=3, srv1439028200=0, srv1697037617=2, srv507737371=4, srv679978762=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,605 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,605 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,605 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:25,605 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:25,606 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:25,606 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:25,606 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,606 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table410) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,606 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table652
2023-07-11 14:16:25,606 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1687925324=1, srv405099745=3, srv1439028200=0, srv1697037617=2, srv507737371=4, srv679978762=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,606 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,606 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,606 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:25,606 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:25,606 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:25,606 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:25,606 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,606 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table652) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,606 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table894
2023-07-11 14:16:25,606 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1687925324=1, srv405099745=3, srv1439028200=0, srv1697037617=2, srv507737371=4, srv679978762=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,606 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,606 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,606 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:25,606 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:25,606 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:25,606 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:25,606 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,606 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table894) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,606 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1110
2023-07-11 14:16:25,607 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1687925324=1, srv405099745=3, srv1439028200=0, srv1697037617=2, srv507737371=4, srv679978762=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,607 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,607 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,607 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:25,607 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:25,607 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:25,607 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:25,607 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,607 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1110) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,607 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1352
2023-07-11 14:16:25,607 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1687925324=1, srv405099745=3, srv1439028200=0, srv1697037617=2, srv507737371=4, srv679978762=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,607 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,607 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,607 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:25,607 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:25,607 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:25,607 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:25,607 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,607 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1352) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,607 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table411
2023-07-11 14:16:25,607 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1687925324=1, srv405099745=3, srv1439028200=0, srv1697037617=2, srv507737371=4, srv679978762=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,607 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,607 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,607 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:25,607 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:25,608 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:25,608 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:25,608 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,608 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table411) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,608 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table653
2023-07-11 14:16:25,608 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1687925324=1, srv405099745=3, srv1439028200=0, srv1697037617=2, srv507737371=4, srv679978762=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,608 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,608 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,608 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:25,608 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:25,608 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:25,608 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:25,608 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,608 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table653) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,608 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table895
2023-07-11 14:16:25,608 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1687925324=1, srv405099745=3, srv1439028200=0, srv1697037617=2, srv507737371=4, srv679978762=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,608 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,608 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,608 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:25,608 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:25,608 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:25,608 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:25,608 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,608 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table895) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,608 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1111
2023-07-11 14:16:25,608 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1687925324=1, srv405099745=3, srv1439028200=0, srv1697037617=2, srv507737371=4, srv679978762=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,609 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,609 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,609 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:25,609 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:25,609 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:25,609 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:25,609 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,609 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1111) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,609 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1353
2023-07-11 14:16:25,609 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1687925324=1, srv405099745=3, srv1439028200=0, srv1697037617=2, srv507737371=4, srv679978762=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,609 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,609 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,609 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:25,609 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:25,609 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:25,609 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:25,609 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,609 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1353) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,609 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table412
2023-07-11 14:16:25,609 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1687925324=1, srv405099745=3, srv1439028200=0, srv1697037617=2, srv507737371=4, srv679978762=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,609 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,609 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,609 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:25,609 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:25,609 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:25,610 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:25,610 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,610 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table412) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,610 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table654
2023-07-11 14:16:25,610 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1687925324=1, srv405099745=3, srv1439028200=0, srv1697037617=2, srv507737371=4, srv679978762=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,610 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,610 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,610 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:25,610 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:25,610 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:25,610 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:25,610 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,610 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table654) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,610 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table896
2023-07-11 14:16:25,610 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1687925324=1, srv405099745=3, srv1439028200=0, srv1697037617=2, srv507737371=4, srv679978762=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,610 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,610 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,610 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:25,610 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:25,610 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:25,610 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:25,610 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,610 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table896) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,610 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1112
2023-07-11 14:16:25,610 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1687925324=1, srv405099745=3, srv1439028200=0, srv1697037617=2, srv507737371=4, srv679978762=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,611 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,611 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,611 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:25,611 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:25,611 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:25,611 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:25,611 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,611 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1112) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,611 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1354
2023-07-11 14:16:25,611 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1687925324=1, srv405099745=3, srv1439028200=0, srv1697037617=2, srv507737371=4, srv679978762=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,611 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,611 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,611 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:25,611 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:25,611 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:25,611 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:25,611 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,611 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1354) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,611 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table413
2023-07-11 14:16:25,611 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1687925324=1, srv405099745=3, srv1439028200=0, srv1697037617=2, srv507737371=4, srv679978762=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,611 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,611 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,611 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:25,611 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:25,612 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:25,612 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:25,612 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,612 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table413) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,612 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table655
2023-07-11 14:16:25,612 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1687925324=1, srv405099745=3, srv1439028200=0, srv1697037617=2, srv507737371=4, srv679978762=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,612 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,612 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,612 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:25,612 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:25,612 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:25,612 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:25,612 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,612 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table655) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,612 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table897
2023-07-11 14:16:25,613 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1687925324=1, srv405099745=3, srv1439028200=0, srv1697037617=2, srv507737371=4, srv679978762=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,613 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,613 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,613 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:25,613 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:25,613 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:25,613 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:25,613 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,613 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table897) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,613 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table414
2023-07-11 14:16:25,613 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1687925324=1, srv405099745=3, srv1439028200=0, srv1697037617=2, srv507737371=4, srv679978762=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,613 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,613 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,613 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:25,613 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:25,613 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:25,613 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:25,613 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,613 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table414) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,613 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table656
2023-07-11 14:16:25,613 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1687925324=1, srv405099745=3, srv1439028200=0, srv1697037617=2, srv507737371=4, srv679978762=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,613 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,613 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,613 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:25,614 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:25,614 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:25,614 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:25,614 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,614 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table656) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,614 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table898
2023-07-11 14:16:25,614 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1687925324=1, srv405099745=3, srv1439028200=0, srv1697037617=2, srv507737371=4, srv679978762=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,614 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,614 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,614 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:25,614 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:25,614 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:25,614 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:25,614 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,614 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table898) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,614 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table415
2023-07-11 14:16:25,614 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1687925324=1, srv405099745=3, srv1439028200=0, srv1697037617=2, srv507737371=4, srv679978762=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,614 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,614 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,614 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:25,614 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:25,614 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:25,614 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:25,614 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,614 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table415) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,615 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table657
2023-07-11 14:16:25,615 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1687925324=1, srv405099745=3, srv1439028200=0, srv1697037617=2, srv507737371=4, srv679978762=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,615 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,615 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,615 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:25,615 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:25,615 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:25,615 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:25,615 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,615 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table657) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,615 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table899
2023-07-11 14:16:25,615 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1687925324=1, srv405099745=3, srv1439028200=0, srv1697037617=2, srv507737371=4, srv679978762=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,615 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,615 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,615 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:25,615 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:25,615 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:25,615 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:25,615 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,615 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table899) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,615 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table416
2023-07-11 14:16:25,615 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1687925324=1, srv405099745=3, srv1439028200=0, srv1697037617=2, srv507737371=4, srv679978762=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,615 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,615 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,615 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:25,616 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:25,616 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:25,616 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:25,616 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,616 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table416) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,616 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table658
2023-07-11 14:16:25,616 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1687925324=1, srv405099745=3, srv1439028200=0, srv1697037617=2, srv507737371=4, srv679978762=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,616 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,616 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,616 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:25,616 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:25,616 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:25,616 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:25,616 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,616 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table658) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,616 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table417
2023-07-11 14:16:25,616 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1687925324=1, srv405099745=3, srv1439028200=0, srv1697037617=2, srv507737371=4, srv679978762=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,616 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,616 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,616 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:25,616 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:25,616 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:25,616 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:25,616 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,616 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table417) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,617 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table659
2023-07-11 14:16:25,617 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1687925324=1, srv405099745=3, srv1439028200=0, srv1697037617=2, srv507737371=4, srv679978762=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,617 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,617 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,617 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:25,617 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:25,617 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:25,617 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:25,617 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,617 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table659) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,617 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table418
2023-07-11 14:16:25,617 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1687925324=1, srv405099745=3, srv1439028200=0, srv1697037617=2, srv507737371=4, srv679978762=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,617 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,617 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,617 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:25,617 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:25,617 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:25,617 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:25,617 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,617 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table418) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,617 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table419
2023-07-11 14:16:25,617 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1687925324=1, srv405099745=3, srv1439028200=0, srv1697037617=2, srv507737371=4, srv679978762=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,617 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,617 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,618 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:25,618 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:25,618 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:25,618 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:25,618 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,618 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table419) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,618 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1113
2023-07-11 14:16:25,618 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1687925324=1, srv405099745=3, srv1439028200=0, srv1697037617=2, srv507737371=4, srv679978762=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,618 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,618 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,618 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:25,618 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:25,618 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:25,618 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:25,618 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,618 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1113) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,618 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1355
2023-07-11 14:16:25,618 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1687925324=1, srv405099745=3, srv1439028200=0, srv1697037617=2, srv507737371=4, srv679978762=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,618 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,618 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,618 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:25,618 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:25,618 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:25,618 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:25,618 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,618 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1355) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,619 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1114
2023-07-11 14:16:25,619 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1687925324=1, srv405099745=3, srv1439028200=0, srv1697037617=2, srv507737371=4, srv679978762=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,619 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,619 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,619 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:25,619 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:25,619 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:25,619 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:25,619 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,619 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1114) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,619 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1356
2023-07-11 14:16:25,619 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1687925324=1, srv405099745=3, srv1439028200=0, srv1697037617=2, srv507737371=4, srv679978762=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,619 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,619 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,619 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:25,619 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:25,619 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:25,619 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:25,619 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,619 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1356) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,619 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1115
2023-07-11 14:16:25,619 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1687925324=1, srv405099745=3, srv1439028200=0, srv1697037617=2, srv507737371=4, srv679978762=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,619 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,619 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,619 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:25,620 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:25,620 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:25,620 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:25,620 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,620 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1115) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,620 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1357
2023-07-11 14:16:25,620 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1687925324=1, srv405099745=3, srv1439028200=0, srv1697037617=2, srv507737371=4, srv679978762=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,620 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,620 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,620 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:25,620 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:25,620 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:25,620 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:25,620 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,620 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1357) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,620 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1116
2023-07-11 14:16:25,620 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1687925324=1, srv405099745=3, srv1439028200=0, srv1697037617=2, srv507737371=4, srv679978762=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,620 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,620 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,620 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:25,620 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:25,620 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:25,620 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:25,620 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,620 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1116) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,620 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1358
2023-07-11 14:16:25,621 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1687925324=1, srv405099745=3, srv1439028200=0, srv1697037617=2, srv507737371=4, srv679978762=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,621 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,621 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,621 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:25,621 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:25,621 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:25,621 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:25,621 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,621 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1358) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,621 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1117
2023-07-11 14:16:25,621 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1687925324=1, srv405099745=3, srv1439028200=0, srv1697037617=2, srv507737371=4, srv679978762=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,621 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,621 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,621 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:25,621 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:25,621 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:25,622 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:25,622 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,622 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1117) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,622 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1359
2023-07-11 14:16:25,622 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1687925324=1, srv405099745=3, srv1439028200=0, srv1697037617=2, srv507737371=4, srv679978762=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,622 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,622 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,622 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:25,622 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:25,622 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:25,622 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:25,622 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,622 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1359) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,622 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1118
2023-07-11 14:16:25,622 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1687925324=1, srv405099745=3, srv1439028200=0, srv1697037617=2, srv507737371=4, srv679978762=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,622 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,622 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,622 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:25,622 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:25,622 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:25,622 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:25,622 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,622 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1118) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,623 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1119
2023-07-11 14:16:25,623 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1687925324=1, srv405099745=3, srv1439028200=0, srv1697037617=2, srv507737371=4, srv679978762=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,623 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,623 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,623 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:25,623 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:25,623 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:25,623 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:25,623 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,623 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1119) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,623 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1182
2023-07-11 14:16:25,623 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1687925324=1, srv405099745=3, srv1439028200=0, srv1697037617=2, srv507737371=4, srv679978762=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,623 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,623 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,623 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:25,623 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:25,623 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:25,623 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:25,623 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,623 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1182) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,623 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1183
2023-07-11 14:16:25,623 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1687925324=1, srv405099745=3, srv1439028200=0, srv1697037617=2, srv507737371=4, srv679978762=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,623 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,623 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,623 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:25,623 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:25,624 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:25,624 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:25,624 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,624 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1183) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,624 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1184
2023-07-11 14:16:25,624 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1687925324=1, srv405099745=3, srv1439028200=0, srv1697037617=2, srv507737371=4, srv679978762=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,624 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,624 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,624 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:25,624 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:25,624 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:25,624 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:25,624 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,624 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1184) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,624 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1185
2023-07-11 14:16:25,624 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1687925324=1, srv405099745=3, srv1439028200=0, srv1697037617=2, srv507737371=4, srv679978762=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,624 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,624 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,624 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:25,624 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:25,624 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:25,624 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:25,624 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,624 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1185) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,625 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1186
2023-07-11 14:16:25,625 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1687925324=1, srv405099745=3, srv1439028200=0, srv1697037617=2, srv507737371=4, srv679978762=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,625 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,625 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,625 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:25,625 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:25,625 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:25,625 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:25,625 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,625 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1186) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,625 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1187
2023-07-11 14:16:25,625 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1687925324=1, srv405099745=3, srv1439028200=0, srv1697037617=2, srv507737371=4, srv679978762=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,625 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,625 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,625 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:25,625 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:25,625 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:25,625 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:25,625 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,625 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1187) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,625 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table840
2023-07-11 14:16:25,625 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1687925324=1, srv405099745=3, srv1439028200=0, srv1697037617=2, srv507737371=4, srv679978762=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,625 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,625 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,625 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:25,626 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:25,626 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:25,626 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:25,626 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,626 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table840) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,626 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1188
2023-07-11 14:16:25,626 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1687925324=1, srv405099745=3, srv1439028200=0, srv1697037617=2, srv507737371=4, srv679978762=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,626 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,626 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,626 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:25,626 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:25,626 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:25,626 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:25,626 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,626 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1188) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,626 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table841
2023-07-11 14:16:25,626 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1687925324=1, srv405099745=3, srv1439028200=0, srv1697037617=2, srv507737371=4, srv679978762=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,626 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,626 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,626 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:25,626 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:25,626 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:25,626 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:25,626 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,626 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table841) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,626 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1189
2023-07-11 14:16:25,627 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1687925324=1, srv405099745=3, srv1439028200=0, srv1697037617=2, srv507737371=4, srv679978762=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,627 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,627 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,627 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:25,627 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:25,627 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:25,627 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:25,627 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,627 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1189) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,627 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table600
2023-07-11 14:16:25,627 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1687925324=1, srv405099745=3, srv1439028200=0, srv1697037617=2, srv507737371=4, srv679978762=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,627 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,627 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,627 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:25,627 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:25,627 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:25,627 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:25,627 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,627 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table600) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,627 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table842
2023-07-11 14:16:25,627 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1687925324=1, srv405099745=3, srv1439028200=0, srv1697037617=2, srv507737371=4, srv679978762=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,627 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,627 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,627 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:25,627 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:25,627 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:25,627 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:25,628 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,628 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table842) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,628 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table601
2023-07-11 14:16:25,628 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1687925324=1, srv405099745=3, srv1439028200=0, srv1697037617=2, srv507737371=4, srv679978762=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,628 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,628 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,628 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:25,628 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:25,628 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:25,628 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:25,628 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,628 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table601) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,628 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table843
2023-07-11 14:16:25,628 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1687925324=1, srv405099745=3, srv1439028200=0, srv1697037617=2, srv507737371=4, srv679978762=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,628 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,628 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,628 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:25,628 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:25,628 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:25,628 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:25,628 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,628 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table843) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,628 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table602
2023-07-11 14:16:25,628 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1687925324=1, srv405099745=3, srv1439028200=0, srv1697037617=2, srv507737371=4, srv679978762=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,628 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,629 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,629 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:25,629 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:25,629 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:25,629 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:25,629 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,629 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table602) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,629 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table844
2023-07-11 14:16:25,629 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1687925324=1, srv405099745=3, srv1439028200=0, srv1697037617=2, srv507737371=4, srv679978762=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,629 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,629 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,629 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:25,629 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:25,629 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:25,629 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:25,629 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,629 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table844) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,629 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table603
2023-07-11 14:16:25,629 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1687925324=1, srv405099745=3, srv1439028200=0, srv1697037617=2, srv507737371=4, srv679978762=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,629 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,629 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,629 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:25,629 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:25,629 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:25,629 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:25,630 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,630 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table603) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,630 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table845
2023-07-11 14:16:25,630 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1687925324=1, srv405099745=3, srv1439028200=0, srv1697037617=2, srv507737371=4, srv679978762=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,630 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,630 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,630 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:25,630 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:25,630 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:25,630 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:25,630 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,630 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table845) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,630 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table604
2023-07-11 14:16:25,630 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1687925324=1, srv405099745=3, srv1439028200=0, srv1697037617=2, srv507737371=4, srv679978762=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,630 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,630 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,630 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:25,631 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:25,631 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:25,631 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:25,631 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,631 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table604) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,631 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table846
2023-07-11 14:16:25,631 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1687925324=1, srv405099745=3, srv1439028200=0, srv1697037617=2, srv507737371=4, srv679978762=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,631 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,631 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,631 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:25,631 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:25,631 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:25,631 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:25,631 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,631 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table846) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,631 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table605
2023-07-11 14:16:25,631 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1687925324=1, srv405099745=3, srv1439028200=0, srv1697037617=2, srv507737371=4, srv679978762=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,631 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,631 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,631 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:25,631 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:25,632 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:25,632 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:25,632 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,632 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table605) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,632 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table847
2023-07-11 14:16:25,632 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1687925324=1, srv405099745=3, srv1439028200=0, srv1697037617=2, srv507737371=4, srv679978762=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,632 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,632 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,632 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:25,632 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:25,632 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:25,632 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:25,632 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,632 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table847) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,632 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table606
2023-07-11 14:16:25,632 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1687925324=1, srv405099745=3, srv1439028200=0, srv1697037617=2, srv507737371=4, srv679978762=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,632 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,632 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,632 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:25,632 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:25,632 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:25,632 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:25,632 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,632 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table606) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,632 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table848
2023-07-11 14:16:25,632 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1687925324=1, srv405099745=3, srv1439028200=0, srv1697037617=2, srv507737371=4, srv679978762=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,633 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,633 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,633 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:25,633 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:25,633 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:25,633 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:25,633 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,633 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table848) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,633 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1180
2023-07-11 14:16:25,633 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1687925324=1, srv405099745=3, srv1439028200=0, srv1697037617=2, srv507737371=4, srv679978762=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,633 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,633 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,633 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:25,633 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:25,633 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:25,633 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:25,633 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,633 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1180) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,633 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table607
2023-07-11 14:16:25,633 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1687925324=1, srv405099745=3, srv1439028200=0, srv1697037617=2, srv507737371=4, srv679978762=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,633 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,633 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,633 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:25,633 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:25,633 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:25,633 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:25,634 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,634 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table607) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,634 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table849
2023-07-11 14:16:25,634 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1687925324=1, srv405099745=3, srv1439028200=0, srv1697037617=2, srv507737371=4, srv679978762=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,634 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,634 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,634 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:25,634 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:25,634 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:25,634 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:25,634 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,634 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table849) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,634 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1181
2023-07-11 14:16:25,634 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1687925324=1, srv405099745=3, srv1439028200=0, srv1697037617=2, srv507737371=4, srv679978762=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,634 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,634 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,634 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:25,634 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:25,634 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:25,634 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:25,634 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,634 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1181) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,634 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table608
2023-07-11 14:16:25,634 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1687925324=1, srv405099745=3, srv1439028200=0, srv1697037617=2, srv507737371=4, srv679978762=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,635 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,635 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,635 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:25,635 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:25,635 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:25,635 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:25,635 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,635 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table608) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,635 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table609
2023-07-11 14:16:25,635 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1687925324=1, srv405099745=3, srv1439028200=0, srv1697037617=2, srv507737371=4, srv679978762=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,635 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,635 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,635 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:25,635 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:25,635 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:25,635 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:25,635 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,635 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table609) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,635 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1171
2023-07-11 14:16:25,635 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1687925324=1, srv405099745=3, srv1439028200=0, srv1697037617=2, srv507737371=4, srv679978762=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,635 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,635 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,635 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:25,635 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:25,635 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:25,635 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:25,635 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,636 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1171) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,636 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1172
2023-07-11 14:16:25,636 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1687925324=1, srv405099745=3, srv1439028200=0, srv1697037617=2, srv507737371=4, srv679978762=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,636 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,636 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,636 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:25,636 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:25,636 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:25,636 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:25,636 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,636 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1172) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,636 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1173
2023-07-11 14:16:25,636 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1687925324=1, srv405099745=3, srv1439028200=0, srv1697037617=2, srv507737371=4, srv679978762=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,636 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,636 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,636 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:25,636 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:25,636 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:25,636 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:25,636 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,636 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1173) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,636 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1174
2023-07-11 14:16:25,636 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1687925324=1, srv405099745=3, srv1439028200=0, srv1697037617=2, srv507737371=4, srv679978762=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,636 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,636 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,637 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:25,637 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:25,637 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:25,637 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:25,637 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,637 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1174) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,637 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1175
2023-07-11 14:16:25,637 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1687925324=1, srv405099745=3, srv1439028200=0, srv1697037617=2, srv507737371=4, srv679978762=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,637 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,637 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,637 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:25,637 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:25,637 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:25,637 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:25,637 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,637 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1175) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,637 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1176
2023-07-11 14:16:25,637 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1687925324=1, srv405099745=3, srv1439028200=0, srv1697037617=2, srv507737371=4, srv679978762=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,637 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,637 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,637 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:25,637 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:25,637 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:25,637 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:25,638 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,638 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1176) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,638 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1177
2023-07-11 14:16:25,638 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1687925324=1, srv405099745=3, srv1439028200=0, srv1697037617=2, srv507737371=4, srv679978762=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,638 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,638 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,638 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:25,638 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:25,638 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:25,638 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:25,638 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,638 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1177) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,638 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table830
2023-07-11 14:16:25,638 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1687925324=1, srv405099745=3, srv1439028200=0, srv1697037617=2, srv507737371=4, srv679978762=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,638 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,638 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,638 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:25,638 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:25,638 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:25,638 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:25,638 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,638 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table830) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,638 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1178
2023-07-11 14:16:25,638 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1687925324=1, srv405099745=3, srv1439028200=0, srv1697037617=2, srv507737371=4, srv679978762=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,638 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,639 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,639 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:25,639 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:25,639 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:25,639 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:25,639 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,639 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1178) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,639 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table831
2023-07-11 14:16:25,639 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1687925324=1, srv405099745=3, srv1439028200=0, srv1697037617=2, srv507737371=4, srv679978762=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,639 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,639 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,639 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:25,639 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:25,639 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:25,639 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:25,639 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,639 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table831) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,639 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table832
2023-07-11 14:16:25,639 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1687925324=1, srv405099745=3, srv1439028200=0, srv1697037617=2, srv507737371=4, srv679978762=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,640 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,640 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,640 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:25,640 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:25,640 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:25,640 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:25,640 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,640 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table832) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,640 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table833
2023-07-11 14:16:25,640 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1687925324=1, srv405099745=3, srv1439028200=0, srv1697037617=2, srv507737371=4, srv679978762=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,640 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,640 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,640 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:25,640 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:25,640 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:25,640 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:25,640 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,640 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table833) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,640 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table834
2023-07-11 14:16:25,640 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1687925324=1, srv405099745=3, srv1439028200=0, srv1697037617=2, srv507737371=4, srv679978762=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,641 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,641 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,641 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:25,641 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:25,641 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:25,641 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:25,641 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,641 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table834) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,641 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table835
2023-07-11 14:16:25,641 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1687925324=1, srv405099745=3, srv1439028200=0, srv1697037617=2, srv507737371=4, srv679978762=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,641 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,641 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,641 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:25,641 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:25,641 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:25,641 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:25,641 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,641 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table835) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,641 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table836
2023-07-11 14:16:25,641 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1687925324=1, srv405099745=3, srv1439028200=0, srv1697037617=2, srv507737371=4, srv679978762=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,641 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,641 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,641 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:25,641 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:25,641 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:25,641 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:25,642 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,642 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table836) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,642 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table837
2023-07-11 14:16:25,642 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1687925324=1, srv405099745=3, srv1439028200=0, srv1697037617=2, srv507737371=4, srv679978762=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,642 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,642 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,642 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:25,642 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:25,642 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:25,642 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:25,642 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,642 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table837) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,642 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table838
2023-07-11 14:16:25,642 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1687925324=1, srv405099745=3, srv1439028200=0, srv1697037617=2, srv507737371=4, srv679978762=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,642 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,642 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,642 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:25,642 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:25,642 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:25,642 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:25,642 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,642 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table838) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,642 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1170
2023-07-11 14:16:25,642 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1687925324=1, srv405099745=3, srv1439028200=0, srv1697037617=2, srv507737371=4, srv679978762=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,642 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,642 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,643 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:25,643 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:25,643 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:25,643 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:25,643 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,643 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1170) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,643 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table839
2023-07-11 14:16:25,643 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1687925324=1, srv405099745=3, srv1439028200=0, srv1697037617=2, srv507737371=4, srv679978762=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,643 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,643 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,643 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:25,643 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:25,643 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:25,643 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:25,643 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,643 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table839) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,643 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1179
2023-07-11 14:16:25,643 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1687925324=1, srv405099745=3, srv1439028200=0, srv1697037617=2, srv507737371=4, srv679978762=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,643 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,643 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,643 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:25,643 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:25,643 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:25,643 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:25,643 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,643 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1179) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,644 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1160
2023-07-11 14:16:25,644 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1687925324=1, srv405099745=3, srv1439028200=0, srv1697037617=2, srv507737371=4, srv679978762=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,644 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,644 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,644 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:25,644 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:25,644 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:25,644 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:25,644 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,644 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1160) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,644 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1161
2023-07-11 14:16:25,644 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1687925324=1, srv405099745=3, srv1439028200=0, srv1697037617=2, srv507737371=4, srv679978762=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,644 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,644 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,644 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:25,644 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:25,644 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:25,644 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:25,644 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,644 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1161) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,644 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1162
2023-07-11 14:16:25,644 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1687925324=1, srv405099745=3, srv1439028200=0, srv1697037617=2, srv507737371=4, srv679978762=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,644 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,644 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,644 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:25,644 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:25,645 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:25,645 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:25,645 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,645 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1162) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,645 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1163
2023-07-11 14:16:25,645 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1687925324=1, srv405099745=3, srv1439028200=0, srv1697037617=2, srv507737371=4, srv679978762=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,645 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,645 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,645 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:25,645 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:25,645 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:25,645 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:25,645 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,645 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1163) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,645 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table860
2023-07-11 14:16:25,645 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1687925324=1, srv405099745=3, srv1439028200=0, srv1697037617=2, srv507737371=4, srv679978762=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,645 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,645 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,645 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:25,645 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:25,645 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:25,645 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:25,645 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,645 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table860) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,645 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1164
2023-07-11 14:16:25,645 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1687925324=1, srv405099745=3, srv1439028200=0, srv1697037617=2, srv507737371=4, srv679978762=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,646 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,646 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,646 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:25,646 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:25,646 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:25,646 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:25,646 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,646 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1164) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,646 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table861
2023-07-11 14:16:25,646 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1687925324=1, srv405099745=3, srv1439028200=0, srv1697037617=2, srv507737371=4, srv679978762=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,646 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,646 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,646 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:25,646 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:25,646 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:25,646 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:25,646 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,646 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table861) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,646 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1165
2023-07-11 14:16:25,646 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1687925324=1, srv405099745=3, srv1439028200=0, srv1697037617=2, srv507737371=4, srv679978762=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,646 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,646 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,646 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:25,646 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:25,646 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:25,646 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:25,647 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,647 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1165) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,647 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table620
2023-07-11 14:16:25,647 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1687925324=1, srv405099745=3, srv1439028200=0, srv1697037617=2, srv507737371=4, srv679978762=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,647 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,647 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,647 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:25,647 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:25,647 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:25,647 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:25,647 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,647 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table620) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,647 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table862
2023-07-11 14:16:25,647 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1687925324=1, srv405099745=3, srv1439028200=0, srv1697037617=2, srv507737371=4, srv679978762=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,647 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,647 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,647 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:25,647 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:25,647 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:25,647 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:25,647 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,647 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table862) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,647 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1166
2023-07-11 14:16:25,647 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1687925324=1, srv405099745=3, srv1439028200=0, srv1697037617=2, srv507737371=4, srv679978762=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,647 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,648 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,648 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:25,648 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:25,648 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:25,648 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:25,648 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,648 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1166) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,648 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table621
2023-07-11 14:16:25,648 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1687925324=1, srv405099745=3, srv1439028200=0, srv1697037617=2, srv507737371=4, srv679978762=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,648 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,648 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,648 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:25,648 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:25,648 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:25,648 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:25,648 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,648 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table621) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,648 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table863
2023-07-11 14:16:25,648 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1687925324=1, srv405099745=3, srv1439028200=0, srv1697037617=2, srv507737371=4, srv679978762=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,648 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,649 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,649 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:25,649 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:25,649 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:25,649 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:25,649 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,649 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table863) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,649 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1167
2023-07-11 14:16:25,649 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1687925324=1, srv405099745=3, srv1439028200=0, srv1697037617=2, srv507737371=4, srv679978762=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,649 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,649 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,649 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:25,649 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:25,649 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:25,649 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:25,649 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,649 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1167) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,649 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table622
2023-07-11 14:16:25,649 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1687925324=1, srv405099745=3, srv1439028200=0, srv1697037617=2, srv507737371=4, srv679978762=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,649 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,650 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,650 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:25,650 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:25,650 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:25,650 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:25,650 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,650 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table622) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,650 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table864
2023-07-11 14:16:25,650 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1687925324=1, srv405099745=3, srv1439028200=0, srv1697037617=2, srv507737371=4, srv679978762=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,650 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,650 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,650 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:25,650 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:25,650 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:25,650 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:25,650 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,650 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table864) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,650 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table623
2023-07-11 14:16:25,650 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1687925324=1, srv405099745=3, srv1439028200=0, srv1697037617=2, srv507737371=4, srv679978762=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,650 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,650 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,650 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:25,650 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:25,650 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:25,650 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:25,650 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,651 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table623) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,651 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table865
2023-07-11 14:16:25,651 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1687925324=1, srv405099745=3, srv1439028200=0, srv1697037617=2, srv507737371=4, srv679978762=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,651 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,651 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,651 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:25,651 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:25,651 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:25,651 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:25,651 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,651 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table865) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,651 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table624
2023-07-11 14:16:25,651 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1687925324=1, srv405099745=3, srv1439028200=0, srv1697037617=2, srv507737371=4, srv679978762=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,651 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,651 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,651 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:25,651 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:25,651 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:25,651 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:25,651 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,651 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table624) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,651 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table866
2023-07-11 14:16:25,651 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1687925324=1, srv405099745=3, srv1439028200=0, srv1697037617=2, srv507737371=4, srv679978762=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,651 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,651 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,651 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:25,652 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:25,652 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:25,652 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:25,652 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,652 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table866) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,652 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table625
2023-07-11 14:16:25,652 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1687925324=1, srv405099745=3, srv1439028200=0, srv1697037617=2, srv507737371=4, srv679978762=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,652 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,652 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,652 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:25,652 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:25,652 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:25,652 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:25,652 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,652 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table625) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,652 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table867
2023-07-11 14:16:25,652 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1687925324=1, srv405099745=3, srv1439028200=0, srv1697037617=2, srv507737371=4, srv679978762=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,652 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,652 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,652 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:25,652 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:25,652 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:25,652 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:25,652 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,652 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table867) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,652 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table626
2023-07-11 14:16:25,653 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1687925324=1, srv405099745=3, srv1439028200=0, srv1697037617=2, srv507737371=4, srv679978762=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,653 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,653 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,653 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:25,653 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:25,653 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:25,653 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:25,653 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,653 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table626) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,653 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table868
2023-07-11 14:16:25,653 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1687925324=1, srv405099745=3, srv1439028200=0, srv1697037617=2, srv507737371=4, srv679978762=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,653 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,653 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,653 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:25,653 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:25,653 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:25,653 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:25,653 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,653 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table868) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,653 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table627
2023-07-11 14:16:25,653 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1687925324=1, srv405099745=3, srv1439028200=0, srv1697037617=2, srv507737371=4, srv679978762=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,653 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,653 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,653 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:25,653 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:25,653 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:25,654 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:25,654 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,654 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table627) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,654 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table869
2023-07-11 14:16:25,654 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1687925324=1, srv405099745=3, srv1439028200=0, srv1697037617=2, srv507737371=4, srv679978762=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,654 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,654 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,654 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:25,654 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:25,654 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:25,654 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:25,654 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,654 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table869) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,654 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table628
2023-07-11 14:16:25,654 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1687925324=1, srv405099745=3, srv1439028200=0, srv1697037617=2, srv507737371=4, srv679978762=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,654 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,654 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,654 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:25,654 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:25,654 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:25,654 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:25,654 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,654 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table628) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,654 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table629
2023-07-11 14:16:25,654 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1687925324=1, srv405099745=3, srv1439028200=0, srv1697037617=2, srv507737371=4, srv679978762=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,655 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,655 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,655 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:25,655 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:25,655 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:25,655 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:25,655 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,655 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table629) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,655 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1168
2023-07-11 14:16:25,655 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1687925324=1, srv405099745=3, srv1439028200=0, srv1697037617=2, srv507737371=4, srv679978762=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,655 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,655 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,655 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:25,655 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:25,655 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:25,655 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:25,655 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,655 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1168) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,655 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1169
2023-07-11 14:16:25,655 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1687925324=1, srv405099745=3, srv1439028200=0, srv1697037617=2, srv507737371=4, srv679978762=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,655 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,655 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,655 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:25,655 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:25,655 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:25,655 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:25,655 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,656 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1169) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,656 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1391
2023-07-11 14:16:25,656 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1687925324=1, srv405099745=3, srv1439028200=0, srv1697037617=2, srv507737371=4, srv679978762=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,656 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,656 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,656 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:25,656 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:25,656 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:25,656 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:25,656 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,656 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1391) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,656 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1150
2023-07-11 14:16:25,656 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1687925324=1, srv405099745=3, srv1439028200=0, srv1697037617=2, srv507737371=4, srv679978762=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,656 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,656 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,656 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:25,656 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:25,656 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:25,656 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:25,656 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,656 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1150) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,656 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1392
2023-07-11 14:16:25,656 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1687925324=1, srv405099745=3, srv1439028200=0, srv1697037617=2, srv507737371=4, srv679978762=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,656 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,656 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,656 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:25,657 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:25,657 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:25,657 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:25,657 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,657 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1392) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,657 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1151
2023-07-11 14:16:25,657 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1687925324=1, srv405099745=3, srv1439028200=0, srv1697037617=2, srv507737371=4, srv679978762=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,657 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,657 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,657 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:25,657 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:25,657 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:25,657 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:25,657 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,657 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1151) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,657 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1393
2023-07-11 14:16:25,657 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1687925324=1, srv405099745=3, srv1439028200=0, srv1697037617=2, srv507737371=4, srv679978762=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,657 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,658 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,658 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:25,658 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:25,658 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:25,658 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:25,658 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,658 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1393) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,658 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1152
2023-07-11 14:16:25,658 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1687925324=1, srv405099745=3, srv1439028200=0, srv1697037617=2, srv507737371=4, srv679978762=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,658 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,658 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,658 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:25,658 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:25,658 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:25,658 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:25,658 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,658 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1152) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,658 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1394
2023-07-11 14:16:25,658 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1687925324=1, srv405099745=3, srv1439028200=0, srv1697037617=2, srv507737371=4, srv679978762=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,658 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,658 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,659 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:25,659 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:25,659 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:25,659 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:25,659 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,659 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1394) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,659 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1153
2023-07-11 14:16:25,659 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1687925324=1, srv405099745=3, srv1439028200=0, srv1697037617=2, srv507737371=4, srv679978762=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,659 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,659 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,659 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:25,659 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:25,659 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:25,659 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:25,659 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,659 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1153) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,659 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1395
2023-07-11 14:16:25,659 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1687925324=1, srv405099745=3, srv1439028200=0, srv1697037617=2, srv507737371=4, srv679978762=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,659 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,659 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,659 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:25,659 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:25,659 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:25,659 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:25,659 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,659 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1395) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,659 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table850
2023-07-11 14:16:25,660 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1687925324=1, srv405099745=3, srv1439028200=0, srv1697037617=2, srv507737371=4, srv679978762=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,660 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,660 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,660 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:25,660 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:25,660 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:25,660 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:25,660 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,660 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table850) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,660 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1154
2023-07-11 14:16:25,660 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1687925324=1, srv405099745=3, srv1439028200=0, srv1697037617=2, srv507737371=4, srv679978762=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,660 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,660 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,660 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:25,660 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:25,660 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:25,660 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:25,660 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,660 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1154) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,660 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1396
2023-07-11 14:16:25,660 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1687925324=1, srv405099745=3, srv1439028200=0, srv1697037617=2, srv507737371=4, srv679978762=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,660 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,660 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,660 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:25,660 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:25,660 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:25,661 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:25,661 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,661 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1396) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,661 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table851
2023-07-11 14:16:25,661 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1687925324=1, srv405099745=3, srv1439028200=0, srv1697037617=2, srv507737371=4, srv679978762=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,661 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,661 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,661 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:25,661 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:25,661 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:25,661 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:25,661 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,661 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table851) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,661 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1155
2023-07-11 14:16:25,661 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1687925324=1, srv405099745=3, srv1439028200=0, srv1697037617=2, srv507737371=4, srv679978762=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,661 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,661 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,661 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:25,661 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:25,661 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:25,661 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:25,661 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,661 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1155) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,661 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1397
2023-07-11 14:16:25,661 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1687925324=1, srv405099745=3, srv1439028200=0, srv1697037617=2, srv507737371=4, srv679978762=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,662 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,662 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,662 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:25,662 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:25,662 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:25,662 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:25,662 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,662 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1397) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,662 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table610
2023-07-11 14:16:25,662 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1687925324=1, srv405099745=3, srv1439028200=0, srv1697037617=2, srv507737371=4, srv679978762=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,662 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,662 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,662 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:25,662 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:25,662 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:25,662 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:25,662 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,662 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table610) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,662 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table852
2023-07-11 14:16:25,662 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1687925324=1, srv405099745=3, srv1439028200=0, srv1697037617=2, srv507737371=4, srv679978762=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,662 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,662 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,662 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:25,662 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:25,662 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:25,662 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:25,662 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,663 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table852) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,663 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1156
2023-07-11 14:16:25,663 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1687925324=1, srv405099745=3, srv1439028200=0, srv1697037617=2, srv507737371=4, srv679978762=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,663 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,663 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,663 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:25,663 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:25,663 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:25,663 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:25,663 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,663 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1156) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,663 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1398
2023-07-11 14:16:25,663 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1687925324=1, srv405099745=3, srv1439028200=0, srv1697037617=2, srv507737371=4, srv679978762=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,663 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,663 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,663 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:25,663 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:25,663 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:25,663 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:25,663 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,663 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1398) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,663 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table611
2023-07-11 14:16:25,663 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1687925324=1, srv405099745=3, srv1439028200=0, srv1697037617=2, srv507737371=4, srv679978762=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,663 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,663 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,663 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:25,664 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:25,664 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:25,664 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:25,664 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,664 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table611) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,664 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table853
2023-07-11 14:16:25,664 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1687925324=1, srv405099745=3, srv1439028200=0, srv1697037617=2, srv507737371=4, srv679978762=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,664 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,664 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,664 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:25,664 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:25,664 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:25,664 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:25,664 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,664 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table853) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,664 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table612
2023-07-11 14:16:25,664 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1687925324=1, srv405099745=3, srv1439028200=0, srv1697037617=2, srv507737371=4, srv679978762=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,664 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,664 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,664 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:25,664 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:25,664 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:25,664 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:25,664 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,664 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table612) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,665 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table854
2023-07-11 14:16:25,665 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1687925324=1, srv405099745=3, srv1439028200=0, srv1697037617=2, srv507737371=4, srv679978762=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,665 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,665 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,665 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:25,665 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:25,665 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:25,665 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:25,665 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,665 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table854) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,665 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table613
2023-07-11 14:16:25,665 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1687925324=1, srv405099745=3, srv1439028200=0, srv1697037617=2, srv507737371=4, srv679978762=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,665 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,665 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,665 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:25,665 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:25,665 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:25,665 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:25,665 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,665 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table613) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,665 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table855
2023-07-11 14:16:25,665 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1687925324=1, srv405099745=3, srv1439028200=0, srv1697037617=2, srv507737371=4, srv679978762=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,665 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,665 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,665 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:25,665 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:25,666 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:25,666 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:25,666 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,666 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table855) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,666 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table614
2023-07-11 14:16:25,666 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1687925324=1, srv405099745=3, srv1439028200=0, srv1697037617=2, srv507737371=4, srv679978762=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,666 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,666 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,666 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:25,666 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:25,666 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:25,666 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:25,666 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,666 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table614) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,666 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table856
2023-07-11 14:16:25,666 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1687925324=1, srv405099745=3, srv1439028200=0, srv1697037617=2, srv507737371=4, srv679978762=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,666 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,666 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,666 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:25,667 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:25,667 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:25,667 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:25,667 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,667 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table856) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,667 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table615
2023-07-11 14:16:25,667 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1687925324=1, srv405099745=3, srv1439028200=0, srv1697037617=2, srv507737371=4, srv679978762=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,667 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,667 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,667 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:25,667 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:25,667 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:25,667 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:25,667 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,667 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table615) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,667 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table857
2023-07-11 14:16:25,667 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1687925324=1, srv405099745=3, srv1439028200=0, srv1697037617=2, srv507737371=4, srv679978762=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,667 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,667 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,667 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:25,667 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:25,667 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:25,667 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:25,668 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,668 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table857) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,668 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table616
2023-07-11 14:16:25,668 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1687925324=1, srv405099745=3, srv1439028200=0, srv1697037617=2, srv507737371=4, srv679978762=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,668 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,668 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,668 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:25,668 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:25,668 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:25,668 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:25,668 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,668 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table616) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,668 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table858
2023-07-11 14:16:25,668 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1687925324=1, srv405099745=3, srv1439028200=0, srv1697037617=2, srv507737371=4, srv679978762=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,668 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,668 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,668 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:25,668 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:25,668 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:25,668 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:25,668 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,668 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table858) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,668 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table617
2023-07-11 14:16:25,668 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1687925324=1, srv405099745=3, srv1439028200=0, srv1697037617=2, srv507737371=4, srv679978762=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,668 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,669 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,669 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:25,669 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:25,669 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:25,669 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:25,669 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,669 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table617) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,669 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table859
2023-07-11 14:16:25,669 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1687925324=1, srv405099745=3, srv1439028200=0, srv1697037617=2, srv507737371=4, srv679978762=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,669 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,669 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,669 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:25,669 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:25,669 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:25,669 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:25,669 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,669 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table859) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,669 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table618
2023-07-11 14:16:25,669 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1687925324=1, srv405099745=3, srv1439028200=0, srv1697037617=2, srv507737371=4, srv679978762=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,669 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,669 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,669 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:25,669 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:25,669 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:25,669 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:25,669 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,670 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table618) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,670 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1390
2023-07-11 14:16:25,670 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1687925324=1, srv405099745=3, srv1439028200=0, srv1697037617=2, srv507737371=4, srv679978762=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,670 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,670 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,670 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:25,670 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:25,670 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:25,670 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:25,670 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,670 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1390) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,670 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table619
2023-07-11 14:16:25,670 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1687925324=1, srv405099745=3, srv1439028200=0, srv1697037617=2, srv507737371=4, srv679978762=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,670 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,670 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,670 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:25,670 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:25,670 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:25,670 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:25,670 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,670 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table619) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,670 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1157
2023-07-11 14:16:25,670 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1687925324=1, srv405099745=3, srv1439028200=0, srv1697037617=2, srv507737371=4, srv679978762=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,670 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,670 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,671 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:25,671 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:25,671 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:25,671 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:25,671 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,671 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1157) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,671 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1399
2023-07-11 14:16:25,671 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1687925324=1, srv405099745=3, srv1439028200=0, srv1697037617=2, srv507737371=4, srv679978762=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,671 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,671 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,671 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:25,671 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:25,671 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:25,671 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:25,671 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,671 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1399) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,671 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1158
2023-07-11 14:16:25,671 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1687925324=1, srv405099745=3, srv1439028200=0, srv1697037617=2, srv507737371=4, srv679978762=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,671 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,671 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,671 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:25,671 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:25,671 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:25,671 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:25,671 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,671 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1158) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,672 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1159
2023-07-11 14:16:25,672 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1687925324=1, srv405099745=3, srv1439028200=0, srv1697037617=2, srv507737371=4, srv679978762=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,672 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,672 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,672 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:25,672 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:25,672 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:25,672 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:25,672 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,672 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1159) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,672 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table240
2023-07-11 14:16:25,672 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1687925324=1, srv405099745=3, srv1439028200=0, srv1697037617=2, srv507737371=4, srv679978762=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,672 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,672 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,672 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:25,672 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:25,672 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:25,672 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:25,672 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,672 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table240) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,672 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table482
2023-07-11 14:16:25,672 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1687925324=1, srv405099745=3, srv1439028200=0, srv1697037617=2, srv507737371=4, srv679978762=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,672 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,672 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,673 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:25,673 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:25,673 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:25,673 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:25,673 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,673 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table482) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,673 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table241
2023-07-11 14:16:25,673 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1687925324=1, srv405099745=3, srv1439028200=0, srv1697037617=2, srv507737371=4, srv679978762=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,673 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,673 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,673 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:25,673 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:25,673 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:25,673 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:25,673 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,673 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table241) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,673 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table483
2023-07-11 14:16:25,673 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1687925324=1, srv405099745=3, srv1439028200=0, srv1697037617=2, srv507737371=4, srv679978762=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,673 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,673 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,673 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:25,673 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:25,673 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:25,673 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:25,674 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,674 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table483) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,674 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table242
2023-07-11 14:16:25,674 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1687925324=1, srv405099745=3, srv1439028200=0, srv1697037617=2, srv507737371=4, srv679978762=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,674 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,674 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,674 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:25,674 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:25,674 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:25,674 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:25,674 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,674 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table242) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,674 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table484
2023-07-11 14:16:25,674 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1687925324=1, srv405099745=3, srv1439028200=0, srv1697037617=2, srv507737371=4, srv679978762=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,674 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,674 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,674 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:25,674 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:25,674 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:25,674 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:25,674 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,674 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table484) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,674 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table243
2023-07-11 14:16:25,674 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1687925324=1, srv405099745=3, srv1439028200=0, srv1697037617=2, srv507737371=4, srv679978762=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,675 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,675 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,675 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:25,675 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:25,675 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:25,675 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:25,675 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,675 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table243) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,675 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table485
2023-07-11 14:16:25,675 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1687925324=1, srv405099745=3, srv1439028200=0, srv1697037617=2, srv507737371=4, srv679978762=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,675 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,675 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,675 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:25,675 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:25,675 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:25,675 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:25,675 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,675 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table485) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,675 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table244
2023-07-11 14:16:25,675 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1687925324=1, srv405099745=3, srv1439028200=0, srv1697037617=2, srv507737371=4, srv679978762=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,676 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,676 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,676 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:25,676 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:25,676 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:25,676 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:25,676 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,676 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table244) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,676 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table486
2023-07-11 14:16:25,676 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1687925324=1, srv405099745=3, srv1439028200=0, srv1697037617=2, srv507737371=4, srv679978762=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,676 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,676 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,676 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:25,676 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:25,676 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:25,676 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:25,676 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,676 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table486) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,677 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table245
2023-07-11 14:16:25,677 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1687925324=1, srv405099745=3, srv1439028200=0, srv1697037617=2, srv507737371=4, srv679978762=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,677 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,677 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,677 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:25,677 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:25,677 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:25,677 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:25,677 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,677 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table245) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,677 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table487
2023-07-11 14:16:25,677 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1687925324=1, srv405099745=3, srv1439028200=0, srv1697037617=2, srv507737371=4, srv679978762=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,677 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,677 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,677 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:25,677 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:25,677 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:25,677 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:25,677 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,678 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table487) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,678 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table246
2023-07-11 14:16:25,678 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1687925324=1, srv405099745=3, srv1439028200=0, srv1697037617=2, srv507737371=4, srv679978762=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,678 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,678 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,678 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:25,678 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:25,678 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:25,678 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:25,678 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,678 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table246) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,678 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table488
2023-07-11 14:16:25,678 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1687925324=1, srv405099745=3, srv1439028200=0, srv1697037617=2, srv507737371=4, srv679978762=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,678 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,678 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,678 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:25,678 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:25,678 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:25,678 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:25,678 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,678 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table488) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,678 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table247
2023-07-11 14:16:25,678 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1687925324=1, srv405099745=3, srv1439028200=0, srv1697037617=2, srv507737371=4, srv679978762=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,678 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,679 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,679 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:25,679 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:25,679 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:25,679 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:25,679 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,679 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table247) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,679 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table489
2023-07-11 14:16:25,679 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1687925324=1, srv405099745=3, srv1439028200=0, srv1697037617=2, srv507737371=4, srv679978762=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,679 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,679 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,679 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:25,679 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:25,679 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:25,679 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:25,679 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,679 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table489) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,679 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table248
2023-07-11 14:16:25,679 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1687925324=1, srv405099745=3, srv1439028200=0, srv1697037617=2, srv507737371=4, srv679978762=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,679 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,679 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,679 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:25,679 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:25,679 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:25,679 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:25,679 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,680 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table248) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,680 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table249
2023-07-11 14:16:25,680 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1687925324=1, srv405099745=3, srv1439028200=0, srv1697037617=2, srv507737371=4, srv679978762=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,680 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,680 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,680 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:25,680 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:25,680 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:25,680 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:25,680 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,680 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table249) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,680 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1308
2023-07-11 14:16:25,680 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1687925324=1, srv405099745=3, srv1439028200=0, srv1697037617=2, srv507737371=4, srv679978762=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,680 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,680 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,680 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:25,680 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:25,680 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:25,680 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:25,680 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,680 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1308) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,680 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1309
2023-07-11 14:16:25,680 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1687925324=1, srv405099745=3, srv1439028200=0, srv1697037617=2, srv507737371=4, srv679978762=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,680 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,681 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,681 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:25,681 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:25,681 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:25,681 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:25,681 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,681 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1309) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,681 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1300
2023-07-11 14:16:25,681 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1687925324=1, srv405099745=3, srv1439028200=0, srv1697037617=2, srv507737371=4, srv679978762=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,681 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,681 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,681 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:25,681 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:25,681 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:25,681 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:25,681 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,681 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1300) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,681 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1301
2023-07-11 14:16:25,681 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1687925324=1, srv405099745=3, srv1439028200=0, srv1697037617=2, srv507737371=4, srv679978762=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,681 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,681 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,681 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:25,681 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:25,681 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:25,681 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:25,681 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,682 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1301) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,682 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1302
2023-07-11 14:16:25,682 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1687925324=1, srv405099745=3, srv1439028200=0, srv1697037617=2, srv507737371=4, srv679978762=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,682 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,682 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,682 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:25,682 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:25,682 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:25,682 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:25,682 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,682 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1302) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,682 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1303
2023-07-11 14:16:25,682 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1687925324=1, srv405099745=3, srv1439028200=0, srv1697037617=2, srv507737371=4, srv679978762=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,682 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,682 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,682 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:25,682 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:25,682 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:25,682 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:25,682 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,682 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1303) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,682 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1304
2023-07-11 14:16:25,682 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1687925324=1, srv405099745=3, srv1439028200=0, srv1697037617=2, srv507737371=4, srv679978762=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,682 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,682 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,682 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:25,683 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:25,683 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:25,683 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:25,683 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,683 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1304) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,683 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table490
2023-07-11 14:16:25,683 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1687925324=1, srv405099745=3, srv1439028200=0, srv1697037617=2, srv507737371=4, srv679978762=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,683 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,683 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,683 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:25,683 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:25,683 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:25,683 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:25,683 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,683 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table490) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,683 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1305
2023-07-11 14:16:25,683 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1687925324=1, srv405099745=3, srv1439028200=0, srv1697037617=2, srv507737371=4, srv679978762=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,683 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,683 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,683 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:25,683 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:25,683 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:25,683 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:25,683 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,683 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1305) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,683 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table491
2023-07-11 14:16:25,684 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1687925324=1, srv405099745=3, srv1439028200=0, srv1697037617=2, srv507737371=4, srv679978762=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,684 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,684 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,684 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:25,684 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:25,684 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:25,684 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:25,684 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,684 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table491) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,684 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1306
2023-07-11 14:16:25,684 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1687925324=1, srv405099745=3, srv1439028200=0, srv1697037617=2, srv507737371=4, srv679978762=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,684 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,684 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,684 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:25,684 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:25,684 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:25,684 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:25,684 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,684 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1306) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,684 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table250
2023-07-11 14:16:25,684 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1687925324=1, srv405099745=3, srv1439028200=0, srv1697037617=2, srv507737371=4, srv679978762=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,684 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,684 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,685 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:25,685 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:25,685 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:25,685 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:25,685 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,685 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table250) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,685 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table492
2023-07-11 14:16:25,685 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1687925324=1, srv405099745=3, srv1439028200=0, srv1697037617=2, srv507737371=4, srv679978762=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,685 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,685 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,685 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:25,685 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:25,685 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:25,685 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:25,685 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,685 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table492) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,686 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1307
2023-07-11 14:16:25,686 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1687925324=1, srv405099745=3, srv1439028200=0, srv1697037617=2, srv507737371=4, srv679978762=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,686 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,686 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,686 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:25,686 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:25,686 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:25,686 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:25,686 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,686 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1307) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,686 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table471
2023-07-11 14:16:25,686 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1687925324=1, srv405099745=3, srv1439028200=0, srv1697037617=2, srv507737371=4, srv679978762=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,686 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,686 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,686 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:25,686 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:25,686 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:25,686 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:25,686 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,686 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table471) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,686 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table230
2023-07-11 14:16:25,686 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1687925324=1, srv405099745=3, srv1439028200=0, srv1697037617=2, srv507737371=4, srv679978762=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,686 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,686 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,687 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:25,687 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:25,687 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:25,687 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:25,687 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,687 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table230) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,687 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table472
2023-07-11 14:16:25,687 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1687925324=1, srv405099745=3, srv1439028200=0, srv1697037617=2, srv507737371=4, srv679978762=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,687 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,687 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,687 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:25,687 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:25,687 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:25,687 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:25,687 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,687 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table472) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,687 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table231
2023-07-11 14:16:25,687 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1687925324=1, srv405099745=3, srv1439028200=0, srv1697037617=2, srv507737371=4, srv679978762=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,687 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,687 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,687 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:25,687 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:25,687 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:25,687 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:25,687 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,688 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table231) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,688 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table473
2023-07-11 14:16:25,688 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1687925324=1, srv405099745=3, srv1439028200=0, srv1697037617=2, srv507737371=4, srv679978762=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,688 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,688 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,688 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:25,688 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:25,688 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:25,688 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:25,688 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,688 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table473) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,688 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table232
2023-07-11 14:16:25,688 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1687925324=1, srv405099745=3, srv1439028200=0, srv1697037617=2, srv507737371=4, srv679978762=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,688 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,688 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,688 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:25,688 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:25,688 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:25,688 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:25,688 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,688 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table232) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,688 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table474
2023-07-11 14:16:25,688 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1687925324=1, srv405099745=3, srv1439028200=0, srv1697037617=2, srv507737371=4, srv679978762=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,688 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,688 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,689 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:25,689 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:25,689 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:25,689 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:25,689 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,689 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table474) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,689 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table233
2023-07-11 14:16:25,689 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1687925324=1, srv405099745=3, srv1439028200=0, srv1697037617=2, srv507737371=4, srv679978762=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,689 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,689 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,689 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:25,689 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:25,689 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:25,689 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:25,689 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,689 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table233) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,689 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table475
2023-07-11 14:16:25,689 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1687925324=1, srv405099745=3, srv1439028200=0, srv1697037617=2, srv507737371=4, srv679978762=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,689 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,689 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,689 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:25,689 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:25,689 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:25,689 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:25,690 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,690 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table475) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,690 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table234
2023-07-11 14:16:25,690 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1687925324=1, srv405099745=3, srv1439028200=0, srv1697037617=2, srv507737371=4, srv679978762=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,690 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,690 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,690 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:25,690 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:25,690 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:25,690 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:25,690 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,690 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table234) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,690 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table476
2023-07-11 14:16:25,690 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1687925324=1, srv405099745=3, srv1439028200=0, srv1697037617=2, srv507737371=4, srv679978762=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,690 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,690 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,690 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:25,690 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:25,690 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:25,690 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:25,690 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,690 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table476) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,690 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table235
2023-07-11 14:16:25,690 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1687925324=1, srv405099745=3, srv1439028200=0, srv1697037617=2, srv507737371=4, srv679978762=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,691 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,691 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,691 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:25,691 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:25,691 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:25,691 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:25,691 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,691 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table235) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,691 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table477
2023-07-11 14:16:25,691 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1687925324=1, srv405099745=3, srv1439028200=0, srv1697037617=2, srv507737371=4, srv679978762=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,691 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,691 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,691 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:25,691 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:25,691 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:25,691 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:25,691 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,691 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table477) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,691 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table236
2023-07-11 14:16:25,691 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1687925324=1, srv405099745=3, srv1439028200=0, srv1697037617=2, srv507737371=4, srv679978762=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,691 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,691 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,691 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:25,691 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:25,691 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:25,692 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:25,692 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,692 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table236) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,692 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table478
2023-07-11 14:16:25,692 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1687925324=1, srv405099745=3, srv1439028200=0, srv1697037617=2, srv507737371=4, srv679978762=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,692 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,692 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,692 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:25,692 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:25,692 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:25,692 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:25,692 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,692 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table478) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,692 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table237
2023-07-11 14:16:25,692 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1687925324=1, srv405099745=3, srv1439028200=0, srv1697037617=2, srv507737371=4, srv679978762=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,692 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,692 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,692 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:25,692 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:25,692 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:25,692 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:25,692 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,692 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table237) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,692 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table479
2023-07-11 14:16:25,692 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1687925324=1, srv405099745=3, srv1439028200=0, srv1697037617=2, srv507737371=4, srv679978762=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,693 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,693 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,693 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:25,693 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:25,693 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:25,693 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:25,693 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,693 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table479) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,693 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table238
2023-07-11 14:16:25,693 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1687925324=1, srv405099745=3, srv1439028200=0, srv1697037617=2, srv507737371=4, srv679978762=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,693 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,693 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,693 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:25,693 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:25,693 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:25,693 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:25,693 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,693 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table238) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,693 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table239
2023-07-11 14:16:25,693 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1687925324=1, srv405099745=3, srv1439028200=0, srv1697037617=2, srv507737371=4, srv679978762=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,693 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,693 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,693 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:25,693 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:25,693 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:25,694 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:25,694 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,694 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table239) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,694 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table480
2023-07-11 14:16:25,694 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1687925324=1, srv405099745=3, srv1439028200=0, srv1697037617=2, srv507737371=4, srv679978762=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,694 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,694 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,694 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:25,694 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:25,694 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:25,694 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:25,694 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,694 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table480) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,694 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table481
2023-07-11 14:16:25,694 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1687925324=1, srv405099745=3, srv1439028200=0, srv1697037617=2, srv507737371=4, srv679978762=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,694 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,694 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,695 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:25,695 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:25,695 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:25,695 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:25,695 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,695 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table481) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,695 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table262
2023-07-11 14:16:25,695 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1687925324=1, srv405099745=3, srv1439028200=0, srv1697037617=2, srv507737371=4, srv679978762=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,695 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,695 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,695 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:25,695 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:25,695 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:25,695 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:25,695 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,695 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table262) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,695 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table263
2023-07-11 14:16:25,695 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1687925324=1, srv405099745=3, srv1439028200=0, srv1697037617=2, srv507737371=4, srv679978762=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,695 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,695 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,695 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:25,695 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:25,696 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:25,696 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:25,696 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,696 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table263) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,696 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table264
2023-07-11 14:16:25,696 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1687925324=1, srv405099745=3, srv1439028200=0, srv1697037617=2, srv507737371=4, srv679978762=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,696 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,696 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,696 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:25,696 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:25,696 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:25,696 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:25,696 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,696 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table264) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,696 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table265
2023-07-11 14:16:25,696 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1687925324=1, srv405099745=3, srv1439028200=0, srv1697037617=2, srv507737371=4, srv679978762=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,696 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,696 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,696 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:25,696 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:25,696 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:25,696 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:25,696 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,697 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table265) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,697 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table266
2023-07-11 14:16:25,697 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1687925324=1, srv405099745=3, srv1439028200=0, srv1697037617=2, srv507737371=4, srv679978762=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,697 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,697 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,697 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:25,697 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:25,697 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:25,697 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:25,697 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,697 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table266) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,697 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table267
2023-07-11 14:16:25,697 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1687925324=1, srv405099745=3, srv1439028200=0, srv1697037617=2, srv507737371=4, srv679978762=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,697 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,697 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,697 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:25,697 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:25,697 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:25,697 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:25,697 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,697 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table267) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,697 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table268
2023-07-11 14:16:25,697 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1687925324=1, srv405099745=3, srv1439028200=0, srv1697037617=2, srv507737371=4, srv679978762=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,697 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,698 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,698 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:25,698 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:25,698 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:25,698 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:25,698 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,698 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table268) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,698 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table269
2023-07-11 14:16:25,698 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1687925324=1, srv405099745=3, srv1439028200=0, srv1697037617=2, srv507737371=4, srv679978762=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,698 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,698 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,698 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:25,698 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:25,698 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:25,698 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:25,698 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,698 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table269) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,698 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table270
2023-07-11 14:16:25,698 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1687925324=1, srv405099745=3, srv1439028200=0, srv1697037617=2, srv507737371=4, srv679978762=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,698 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,698 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,698 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:25,698 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:25,698 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:25,698 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:25,698 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,699 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table270) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,699 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table271
2023-07-11 14:16:25,699 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1687925324=1, srv405099745=3, srv1439028200=0, srv1697037617=2, srv507737371=4, srv679978762=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,699 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,699 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,699 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:25,699 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:25,699 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:25,699 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:25,699 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,699 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table271) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,699 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table272
2023-07-11 14:16:25,699 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1687925324=1, srv405099745=3, srv1439028200=0, srv1697037617=2, srv507737371=4, srv679978762=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,699 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,699 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,699 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:25,699 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:25,699 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:25,699 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:25,699 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,699 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table272) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,699 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table251
2023-07-11 14:16:25,699 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1687925324=1, srv405099745=3, srv1439028200=0, srv1697037617=2, srv507737371=4, srv679978762=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,699 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,700 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,700 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:25,700 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:25,700 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:25,700 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:25,700 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,700 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table251) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,700 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table493
2023-07-11 14:16:25,700 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1687925324=1, srv405099745=3, srv1439028200=0, srv1697037617=2, srv507737371=4, srv679978762=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,700 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,700 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,700 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:25,700 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:25,700 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:25,700 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:25,700 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,700 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table493) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,700 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table252
2023-07-11 14:16:25,700 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1687925324=1, srv405099745=3, srv1439028200=0, srv1697037617=2, srv507737371=4, srv679978762=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,700 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,700 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,700 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:25,700 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:25,700 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:25,700 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:25,701 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,701 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table252) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,701 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table494
2023-07-11 14:16:25,701 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1687925324=1, srv405099745=3, srv1439028200=0, srv1697037617=2, srv507737371=4, srv679978762=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,701 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,701 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,701 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:25,701 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:25,701 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:25,701 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:25,701 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,701 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table494) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,701 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table253
2023-07-11 14:16:25,701 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1687925324=1, srv405099745=3, srv1439028200=0, srv1697037617=2, srv507737371=4, srv679978762=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,701 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,701 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,701 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:25,701 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:25,701 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:25,701 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:25,701 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,701 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table253) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,701 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table495
2023-07-11 14:16:25,701 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1687925324=1, srv405099745=3, srv1439028200=0, srv1697037617=2, srv507737371=4, srv679978762=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,702 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,702 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,702 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:25,702 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:25,702 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:25,702 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:25,702 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,702 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table495) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,702 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table254
2023-07-11 14:16:25,702 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1687925324=1, srv405099745=3, srv1439028200=0, srv1697037617=2, srv507737371=4, srv679978762=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,702 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,702 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,702 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:25,702 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:25,702 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:25,702 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:25,702 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,702 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table254) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,702 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table496
2023-07-11 14:16:25,702 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1687925324=1, srv405099745=3, srv1439028200=0, srv1697037617=2, srv507737371=4, srv679978762=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,702 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,702 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,702 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:25,702 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:25,702 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:25,702 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:25,702 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,703 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table496) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,703 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table255
2023-07-11 14:16:25,703 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1687925324=1, srv405099745=3, srv1439028200=0, srv1697037617=2, srv507737371=4, srv679978762=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,703 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,703 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,703 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:25,703 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:25,703 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:25,703 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:25,703 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,703 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table255) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,703 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table497
2023-07-11 14:16:25,703 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1687925324=1, srv405099745=3, srv1439028200=0, srv1697037617=2, srv507737371=4, srv679978762=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,703 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,703 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,703 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:25,703 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:25,703 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:25,703 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:25,703 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,703 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table497) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,704 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table256
2023-07-11 14:16:25,704 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1687925324=1, srv405099745=3, srv1439028200=0, srv1697037617=2, srv507737371=4, srv679978762=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,704 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,704 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,704 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:25,704 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:25,704 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:25,704 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:25,704 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,704 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table256) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,704 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table498
2023-07-11 14:16:25,704 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1687925324=1, srv405099745=3, srv1439028200=0, srv1697037617=2, srv507737371=4, srv679978762=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,704 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,704 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,704 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:25,704 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:25,704 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:25,704 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:25,705 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,705 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table498) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,705 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table257
2023-07-11 14:16:25,705 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1687925324=1, srv405099745=3, srv1439028200=0, srv1697037617=2, srv507737371=4, srv679978762=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,705 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,705 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,705 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:25,705 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:25,705 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:25,705 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:25,705 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,705 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table257) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,705 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table499
2023-07-11 14:16:25,705 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1687925324=1, srv405099745=3, srv1439028200=0, srv1697037617=2, srv507737371=4, srv679978762=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,705 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,705 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,705 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:25,705 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:25,705 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:25,705 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:25,705 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,705 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table499) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,706 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table258
2023-07-11 14:16:25,706 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1687925324=1, srv405099745=3, srv1439028200=0, srv1697037617=2, srv507737371=4, srv679978762=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,706 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,706 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,706 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:25,706 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:25,706 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:25,706 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:25,706 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,706 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table258) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,706 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table259
2023-07-11 14:16:25,706 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1687925324=1, srv405099745=3, srv1439028200=0, srv1697037617=2, srv507737371=4, srv679978762=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,706 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,706 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,706 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:25,706 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:25,706 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:25,706 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:25,706 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,706 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table259) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,706 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table260
2023-07-11 14:16:25,706 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1687925324=1, srv405099745=3, srv1439028200=0, srv1697037617=2, srv507737371=4, srv679978762=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,706 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,706 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,706 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:25,707 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:25,707 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:25,707 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:25,707 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,707 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table260) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,707 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table261
2023-07-11 14:16:25,707 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1687925324=1, srv405099745=3, srv1439028200=0, srv1697037617=2, srv507737371=4, srv679978762=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,707 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,707 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,707 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:25,707 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:25,707 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:25,707 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:25,707 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,707 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table261) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,707 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table680
2023-07-11 14:16:25,707 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1687925324=1, srv405099745=3, srv1439028200=0, srv1697037617=2, srv507737371=4, srv679978762=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,707 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,707 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,707 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:25,707 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:25,707 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:25,707 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:25,707 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,707 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table680) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,708 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table681
2023-07-11 14:16:25,708 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1687925324=1, srv405099745=3, srv1439028200=0, srv1697037617=2, srv507737371=4, srv679978762=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,708 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,708 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,708 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:25,708 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:25,708 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:25,708 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:25,708 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,708 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table681) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,708 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table440
2023-07-11 14:16:25,708 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1687925324=1, srv405099745=3, srv1439028200=0, srv1697037617=2, srv507737371=4, srv679978762=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,708 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,708 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,708 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:25,708 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:25,708 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:25,708 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:25,708 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,708 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table440) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,708 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table682
2023-07-11 14:16:25,708 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1687925324=1, srv405099745=3, srv1439028200=0, srv1697037617=2, srv507737371=4, srv679978762=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,708 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,708 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,708 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:25,709 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:25,709 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:25,709 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:25,709 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,709 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table682) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,709 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table441
2023-07-11 14:16:25,709 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1687925324=1, srv405099745=3, srv1439028200=0, srv1697037617=2, srv507737371=4, srv679978762=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,709 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,709 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,709 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:25,709 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:25,709 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:25,709 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:25,709 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,709 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table441) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,709 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table683
2023-07-11 14:16:25,709 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1687925324=1, srv405099745=3, srv1439028200=0, srv1697037617=2, srv507737371=4, srv679978762=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,709 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,709 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,709 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:25,709 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:25,709 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:25,709 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:25,709 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,709 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table683) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,709 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table200
2023-07-11 14:16:25,710 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1687925324=1, srv405099745=3, srv1439028200=0, srv1697037617=2, srv507737371=4, srv679978762=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,710 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,710 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,710 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:25,710 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:25,710 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:25,710 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:25,710 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,710 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table200) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,710 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table442
2023-07-11 14:16:25,710 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1687925324=1, srv405099745=3, srv1439028200=0, srv1697037617=2, srv507737371=4, srv679978762=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,710 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,710 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,710 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:25,710 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:25,710 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:25,710 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:25,710 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,710 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table442) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,710 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table684
2023-07-11 14:16:25,710 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1687925324=1, srv405099745=3, srv1439028200=0, srv1697037617=2, srv507737371=4, srv679978762=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,710 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,710 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,710 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:25,710 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:25,711 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:25,711 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:25,711 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,711 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table684) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,711 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1340
2023-07-11 14:16:25,711 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1687925324=1, srv405099745=3, srv1439028200=0, srv1697037617=2, srv507737371=4, srv679978762=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,711 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,711 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,711 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:25,711 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:25,711 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:25,711 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:25,711 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,711 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1340) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,711 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table201
2023-07-11 14:16:25,711 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1687925324=1, srv405099745=3, srv1439028200=0, srv1697037617=2, srv507737371=4, srv679978762=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,711 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,711 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,711 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:25,711 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:25,711 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:25,711 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:25,711 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,711 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table201) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,711 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table443
2023-07-11 14:16:25,711 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1687925324=1, srv405099745=3, srv1439028200=0, srv1697037617=2, srv507737371=4, srv679978762=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,712 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,712 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,712 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:25,712 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:25,712 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:25,712 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:25,712 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,712 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table443) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,712 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table685
2023-07-11 14:16:25,712 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1687925324=1, srv405099745=3, srv1439028200=0, srv1697037617=2, srv507737371=4, srv679978762=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,712 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,712 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,712 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:25,712 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:25,712 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:25,712 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:25,712 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,712 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table685) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,712 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1341
2023-07-11 14:16:25,712 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1687925324=1, srv405099745=3, srv1439028200=0, srv1697037617=2, srv507737371=4, srv679978762=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,712 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,712 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,712 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:25,712 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:25,712 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:25,712 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:25,713 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,713 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1341) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,713 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table202
2023-07-11 14:16:25,713 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1687925324=1, srv405099745=3, srv1439028200=0, srv1697037617=2, srv507737371=4, srv679978762=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,713 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,713 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,713 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:25,713 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:25,713 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:25,713 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:25,713 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,713 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table202) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,713 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table444
2023-07-11 14:16:25,714 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1687925324=1, srv405099745=3, srv1439028200=0, srv1697037617=2, srv507737371=4, srv679978762=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,714 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,714 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,714 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:25,714 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:25,714 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:25,714 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:25,714 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,714 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table444) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,714 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table686
2023-07-11 14:16:25,714 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1687925324=1, srv405099745=3, srv1439028200=0, srv1697037617=2, srv507737371=4, srv679978762=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,714 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,714 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,714 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:25,714 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:25,714 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:25,714 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:25,714 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,714 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table686) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,714 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1100
2023-07-11 14:16:25,714 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1687925324=1, srv405099745=3, srv1439028200=0, srv1697037617=2, srv507737371=4, srv679978762=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,714 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,714 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,714 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:25,714 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:25,715 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:25,715 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:25,715 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,715 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1100) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,715 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1342
2023-07-11 14:16:25,715 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1687925324=1, srv405099745=3, srv1439028200=0, srv1697037617=2, srv507737371=4, srv679978762=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,715 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,715 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,715 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:25,715 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:25,715 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:25,715 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:25,715 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,715 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1342) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,715 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table203
2023-07-11 14:16:25,715 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1687925324=1, srv405099745=3, srv1439028200=0, srv1697037617=2, srv507737371=4, srv679978762=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,715 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,715 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,715 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:25,715 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:25,715 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:25,715 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:25,715 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,715 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table203) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,715 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table445
2023-07-11 14:16:25,716 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1687925324=1, srv405099745=3, srv1439028200=0, srv1697037617=2, srv507737371=4, srv679978762=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,716 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,716 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,716 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:25,716 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:25,716 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:25,716 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:25,716 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,716 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table445) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,716 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table687
2023-07-11 14:16:25,716 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1687925324=1, srv405099745=3, srv1439028200=0, srv1697037617=2, srv507737371=4, srv679978762=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,716 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,716 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,716 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:25,716 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:25,716 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:25,716 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:25,716 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,716 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table687) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,716 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1101
2023-07-11 14:16:25,716 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1687925324=1, srv405099745=3, srv1439028200=0, srv1697037617=2, srv507737371=4, srv679978762=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,716 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,716 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,716 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:25,716 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:25,716 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:25,717 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:25,717 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,717 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1101) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,717 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1343
2023-07-11 14:16:25,717 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1687925324=1, srv405099745=3, srv1439028200=0, srv1697037617=2, srv507737371=4, srv679978762=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,717 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,717 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,717 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:25,717 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:25,717 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:25,717 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:25,717 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,717 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1343) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,717 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table204
2023-07-11 14:16:25,717 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1687925324=1, srv405099745=3, srv1439028200=0, srv1697037617=2, srv507737371=4, srv679978762=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,717 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,717 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,717 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:25,717 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:25,717 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:25,717 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:25,717 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,717 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table204) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,717 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table446
2023-07-11 14:16:25,717 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1687925324=1, srv405099745=3, srv1439028200=0, srv1697037617=2, srv507737371=4, srv679978762=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,718 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,718 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,718 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:25,718 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:25,718 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:25,718 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:25,718 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,718 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table446) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,718 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table688
2023-07-11 14:16:25,718 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1687925324=1, srv405099745=3, srv1439028200=0, srv1697037617=2, srv507737371=4, srv679978762=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,718 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,718 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,718 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:25,718 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:25,718 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:25,718 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:25,718 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,718 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table688) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,718 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table205
2023-07-11 14:16:25,718 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1687925324=1, srv405099745=3, srv1439028200=0, srv1697037617=2, srv507737371=4, srv679978762=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,718 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,718 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,718 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:25,718 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:25,718 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:25,718 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:25,718 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,719 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table205) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,719 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table447
2023-07-11 14:16:25,719 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1687925324=1, srv405099745=3, srv1439028200=0, srv1697037617=2, srv507737371=4, srv679978762=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,719 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,719 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,719 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:25,719 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:25,719 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:25,719 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:25,719 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,719 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table447) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,719 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table689
2023-07-11 14:16:25,719 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1687925324=1, srv405099745=3, srv1439028200=0, srv1697037617=2, srv507737371=4, srv679978762=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,719 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,719 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,719 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:25,719 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:25,719 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:25,719 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:25,719 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,719 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table689) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,719 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table206
2023-07-11 14:16:25,719 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1687925324=1, srv405099745=3, srv1439028200=0, srv1697037617=2, srv507737371=4, srv679978762=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,719 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,720 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,720 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:25,720 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:25,720 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:25,720 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:25,720 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,720 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table206) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,720 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table448
2023-07-11 14:16:25,720 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1687925324=1, srv405099745=3, srv1439028200=0, srv1697037617=2, srv507737371=4, srv679978762=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,720 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,720 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,720 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:25,720 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:25,720 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:25,720 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:25,720 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,720 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table448) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,720 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table207
2023-07-11 14:16:25,720 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1687925324=1, srv405099745=3, srv1439028200=0, srv1697037617=2, srv507737371=4, srv679978762=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,721 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,721 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,721 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:25,721 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:25,721 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:25,721 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:25,721 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,721 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table207) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,721 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table449
2023-07-11 14:16:25,721 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1687925324=1, srv405099745=3, srv1439028200=0, srv1697037617=2, srv507737371=4, srv679978762=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,721 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,721 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,721 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:25,721 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:25,722 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:25,722 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:25,722 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,722 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table449) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,722 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table208
2023-07-11 14:16:25,722 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1687925324=1, srv405099745=3, srv1439028200=0, srv1697037617=2, srv507737371=4, srv679978762=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,722 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,722 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,722 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:25,722 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:25,722 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:25,722 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:25,722 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,722 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table208) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,722 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table209
2023-07-11 14:16:25,722 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1687925324=1, srv405099745=3, srv1439028200=0, srv1697037617=2, srv507737371=4, srv679978762=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,722 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,722 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,722 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:25,722 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:25,722 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:25,722 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:25,722 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,722 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table209) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,723 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1102
2023-07-11 14:16:25,723 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1687925324=1, srv405099745=3, srv1439028200=0, srv1697037617=2, srv507737371=4, srv679978762=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,723 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,723 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,723 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:25,723 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:25,723 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:25,723 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:25,723 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,723 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1102) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,723 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1344
2023-07-11 14:16:25,723 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1687925324=1, srv405099745=3, srv1439028200=0, srv1697037617=2, srv507737371=4, srv679978762=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,723 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,723 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,723 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:25,723 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:25,724 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:25,724 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:25,724 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,724 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1344) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,724 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1103
2023-07-11 14:16:25,724 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1687925324=1, srv405099745=3, srv1439028200=0, srv1697037617=2, srv507737371=4, srv679978762=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,724 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,724 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,724 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:25,724 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:25,724 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:25,724 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:25,724 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,724 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1103) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,724 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1345
2023-07-11 14:16:25,724 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1687925324=1, srv405099745=3, srv1439028200=0, srv1697037617=2, srv507737371=4, srv679978762=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,724 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,724 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,724 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:25,724 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:25,724 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:25,724 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:25,724 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,724 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1345) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,724 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1104
2023-07-11 14:16:25,725 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1687925324=1, srv405099745=3, srv1439028200=0, srv1697037617=2, srv507737371=4, srv679978762=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,725 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,725 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,725 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:25,725 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:25,725 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:25,725 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:25,725 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,725 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1104) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,725 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1346
2023-07-11 14:16:25,725 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1687925324=1, srv405099745=3, srv1439028200=0, srv1697037617=2, srv507737371=4, srv679978762=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,725 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,725 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,725 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:25,725 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:25,725 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:25,725 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:25,725 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,725 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1346) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,725 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1105
2023-07-11 14:16:25,725 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1687925324=1, srv405099745=3, srv1439028200=0, srv1697037617=2, srv507737371=4, srv679978762=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,725 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,725 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,725 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:25,725 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:25,725 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:25,725 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:25,726 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,726 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1105) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,726 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1347
2023-07-11 14:16:25,726 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1687925324=1, srv405099745=3, srv1439028200=0, srv1697037617=2, srv507737371=4, srv679978762=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,726 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,726 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,726 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:25,726 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:25,726 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:25,726 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:25,726 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,726 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1347) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,726 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1106
2023-07-11 14:16:25,726 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1687925324=1, srv405099745=3, srv1439028200=0, srv1697037617=2, srv507737371=4, srv679978762=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,726 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,726 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,726 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:25,726 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:25,726 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:25,726 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:25,727 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,727 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1106) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,727 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1348
2023-07-11 14:16:25,727 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1687925324=1, srv405099745=3, srv1439028200=0, srv1697037617=2, srv507737371=4, srv679978762=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,727 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,727 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,727 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:25,727 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:25,727 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:25,727 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:25,727 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,727 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1348) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,727 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1107
2023-07-11 14:16:25,727 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1687925324=1, srv405099745=3, srv1439028200=0, srv1697037617=2, srv507737371=4, srv679978762=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,727 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,727 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,727 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:25,727 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:25,727 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:25,727 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:25,727 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,727 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1107) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,727 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1349
2023-07-11 14:16:25,727 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1687925324=1, srv405099745=3, srv1439028200=0, srv1697037617=2, srv507737371=4, srv679978762=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,727 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,727 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,728 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:25,728 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:25,728 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:25,728 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:25,728 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,728 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1349) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,728 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1108
2023-07-11 14:16:25,728 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1687925324=1, srv405099745=3, srv1439028200=0, srv1697037617=2, srv507737371=4, srv679978762=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,728 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,728 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,728 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:25,728 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:25,728 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:25,728 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:25,728 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,728 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1108) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,728 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table690
2023-07-11 14:16:25,728 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1687925324=1, srv405099745=3, srv1439028200=0, srv1697037617=2, srv507737371=4, srv679978762=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,728 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,728 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,728 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:25,728 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:25,728 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:25,728 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:25,728 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,728 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table690) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,729 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1109
2023-07-11 14:16:25,729 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1687925324=1, srv405099745=3, srv1439028200=0, srv1697037617=2, srv507737371=4, srv679978762=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,729 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,729 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,729 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:25,729 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:25,729 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:25,729 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:25,729 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,729 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1109) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,729 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table670
2023-07-11 14:16:25,729 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1687925324=1, srv405099745=3, srv1439028200=0, srv1697037617=2, srv507737371=4, srv679978762=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,729 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,729 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,729 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:25,729 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:25,729 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:25,729 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:25,729 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,729 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table670) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,729 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table671
2023-07-11 14:16:25,729 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1687925324=1, srv405099745=3, srv1439028200=0, srv1697037617=2, srv507737371=4, srv679978762=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,729 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,729 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,729 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:25,729 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:25,729 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:25,730 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:25,730 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,730 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table671) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,730 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table430
2023-07-11 14:16:25,730 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1687925324=1, srv405099745=3, srv1439028200=0, srv1697037617=2, srv507737371=4, srv679978762=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,730 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,730 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,730 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:25,730 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:25,730 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:25,730 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:25,730 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,730 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table430) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,730 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table672
2023-07-11 14:16:25,730 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1687925324=1, srv405099745=3, srv1439028200=0, srv1697037617=2, srv507737371=4, srv679978762=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,730 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,730 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,730 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:25,730 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:25,730 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:25,730 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:25,730 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,730 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table672) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,730 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table431
2023-07-11 14:16:25,730 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1687925324=1, srv405099745=3, srv1439028200=0, srv1697037617=2, srv507737371=4, srv679978762=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,731 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,731 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,731 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:25,731 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:25,731 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:25,731 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:25,731 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,731 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table431) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,731 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table673
2023-07-11 14:16:25,731 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1687925324=1, srv405099745=3, srv1439028200=0, srv1697037617=2, srv507737371=4, srv679978762=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,731 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,731 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,731 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:25,731 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:25,731 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:25,731 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:25,731 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,731 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table673) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,731 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table432
2023-07-11 14:16:25,731 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1687925324=1, srv405099745=3, srv1439028200=0, srv1697037617=2, srv507737371=4, srv679978762=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,731 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,731 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,731 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:25,731 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:25,731 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:25,731 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:25,731 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,732 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table432) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,732 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table674
2023-07-11 14:16:25,732 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1687925324=1, srv405099745=3, srv1439028200=0, srv1697037617=2, srv507737371=4, srv679978762=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,732 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,732 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,732 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:25,732 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:25,732 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:25,732 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:25,732 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,732 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table674) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,732 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1330
2023-07-11 14:16:25,732 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1687925324=1, srv405099745=3, srv1439028200=0, srv1697037617=2, srv507737371=4, srv679978762=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,732 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,732 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,733 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:25,733 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:25,733 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:25,733 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:25,733 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,733 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1330) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,733 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table433
2023-07-11 14:16:25,733 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1687925324=1, srv405099745=3, srv1439028200=0, srv1697037617=2, srv507737371=4, srv679978762=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,733 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,733 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,733 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:25,733 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:25,733 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:25,733 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:25,733 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,733 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table433) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,733 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table675
2023-07-11 14:16:25,733 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1687925324=1, srv405099745=3, srv1439028200=0, srv1697037617=2, srv507737371=4, srv679978762=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,733 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,733 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,733 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:25,733 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:25,733 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:25,733 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:25,733 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,733 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table675) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,734 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1331
2023-07-11 14:16:25,734 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1687925324=1, srv405099745=3, srv1439028200=0, srv1697037617=2, srv507737371=4, srv679978762=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,734 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,734 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,734 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:25,734 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:25,734 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:25,734 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:25,734 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,734 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1331) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,734 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table434
2023-07-11 14:16:25,734 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1687925324=1, srv405099745=3, srv1439028200=0, srv1697037617=2, srv507737371=4, srv679978762=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,734 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,734 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,734 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:25,734 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:25,734 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:25,734 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:25,734 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,734 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table434) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,734 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table676
2023-07-11 14:16:25,734 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1687925324=1, srv405099745=3, srv1439028200=0, srv1697037617=2, srv507737371=4, srv679978762=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,734 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,734 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,734 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:25,734 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:25,735 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:25,735 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:25,735 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,735 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table676) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,735 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1332
2023-07-11 14:16:25,735 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1687925324=1, srv405099745=3, srv1439028200=0, srv1697037617=2, srv507737371=4, srv679978762=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,735 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,735 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,735 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:25,735 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:25,735 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:25,735 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:25,735 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,735 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1332) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,735 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table435
2023-07-11 14:16:25,735 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1687925324=1, srv405099745=3, srv1439028200=0, srv1697037617=2, srv507737371=4, srv679978762=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,735 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,735 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,735 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:25,735 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:25,735 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:25,735 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:25,735 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,735 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table435) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,735 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table677
2023-07-11 14:16:25,735 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1687925324=1, srv405099745=3, srv1439028200=0, srv1697037617=2, srv507737371=4, srv679978762=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,736 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,736 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,736 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:25,736 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:25,736 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:25,736 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:25,736 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,736 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table677) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,736 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table436
2023-07-11 14:16:25,736 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1687925324=1, srv405099745=3, srv1439028200=0, srv1697037617=2, srv507737371=4, srv679978762=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,736 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,736 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,736 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:25,736 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:25,736 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:25,736 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:25,736 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,736 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table436) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,736 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table678
2023-07-11 14:16:25,736 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1687925324=1, srv405099745=3, srv1439028200=0, srv1697037617=2, srv507737371=4, srv679978762=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,736 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,736 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,736 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:25,736 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:25,736 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:25,736 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:25,736 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,737 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table678) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,737 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table437
2023-07-11 14:16:25,737 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1687925324=1, srv405099745=3, srv1439028200=0, srv1697037617=2, srv507737371=4, srv679978762=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,737 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,737 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,737 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:25,737 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:25,737 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:25,737 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:25,737 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,737 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table437) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,737 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table679
2023-07-11 14:16:25,737 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1687925324=1, srv405099745=3, srv1439028200=0, srv1697037617=2, srv507737371=4, srv679978762=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,737 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,737 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,737 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:25,737 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:25,737 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:25,737 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:25,737 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,737 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table679) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,737 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table438
2023-07-11 14:16:25,737 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1687925324=1, srv405099745=3, srv1439028200=0, srv1697037617=2, srv507737371=4, srv679978762=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,738 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,738 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,738 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:25,738 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:25,738 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:25,738 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:25,738 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,738 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table438) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,738 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table439
2023-07-11 14:16:25,738 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1687925324=1, srv405099745=3, srv1439028200=0, srv1697037617=2, srv507737371=4, srv679978762=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,738 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,738 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,738 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:25,738 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:25,738 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:25,738 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:25,738 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,738 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table439) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,738 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1333
2023-07-11 14:16:25,738 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1687925324=1, srv405099745=3, srv1439028200=0, srv1697037617=2, srv507737371=4, srv679978762=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,738 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,738 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,738 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:25,738 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:25,738 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:25,738 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:25,738 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,739 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1333) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,739 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1334
2023-07-11 14:16:25,739 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1687925324=1, srv405099745=3, srv1439028200=0, srv1697037617=2, srv507737371=4, srv679978762=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,739 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,739 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,739 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:25,739 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:25,739 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:25,739 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:25,739 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,739 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1334) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,739 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1335
2023-07-11 14:16:25,739 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1687925324=1, srv405099745=3, srv1439028200=0, srv1697037617=2, srv507737371=4, srv679978762=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,739 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,739 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,739 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:25,739 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:25,739 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:25,739 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:25,739 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,739 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1335) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,739 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1336
2023-07-11 14:16:25,739 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1687925324=1, srv405099745=3, srv1439028200=0, srv1697037617=2, srv507737371=4, srv679978762=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,739 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,740 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,740 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:25,740 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:25,740 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:25,740 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:25,740 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,740 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1336) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,740 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1337
2023-07-11 14:16:25,740 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1687925324=1, srv405099745=3, srv1439028200=0, srv1697037617=2, srv507737371=4, srv679978762=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,740 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,740 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,740 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:25,740 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:25,740 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:25,740 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:25,740 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,740 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1337) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,740 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1338
2023-07-11 14:16:25,740 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1687925324=1, srv405099745=3, srv1439028200=0, srv1697037617=2, srv507737371=4, srv679978762=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,740 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,740 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,740 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:25,740 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:25,740 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:25,740 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:25,740 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,740 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1338) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,741 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1339
2023-07-11 14:16:25,741 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1687925324=1, srv405099745=3, srv1439028200=0, srv1697037617=2, srv507737371=4, srv679978762=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,741 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,741 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,741 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:25,741 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:25,741 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:25,741 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:25,741 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,741 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1339) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,741 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table460
2023-07-11 14:16:25,741 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1687925324=1, srv405099745=3, srv1439028200=0, srv1697037617=2, srv507737371=4, srv679978762=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,741 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,741 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,741 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:25,742 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:25,742 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:25,742 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:25,742 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,742 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table460) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,742 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table461
2023-07-11 14:16:25,742 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1687925324=1, srv405099745=3, srv1439028200=0, srv1697037617=2, srv507737371=4, srv679978762=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,742 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,742 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,742 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:25,742 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:25,742 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:25,742 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:25,742 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,742 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table461) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,742 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table220
2023-07-11 14:16:25,742 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1687925324=1, srv405099745=3, srv1439028200=0, srv1697037617=2, srv507737371=4, srv679978762=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,742 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,742 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,742 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:25,742 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:25,742 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:25,742 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:25,742 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,742 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table220) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,742 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table462
2023-07-11 14:16:25,743 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1687925324=1, srv405099745=3, srv1439028200=0, srv1697037617=2, srv507737371=4, srv679978762=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,743 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,743 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,743 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:25,743 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:25,743 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:25,743 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:25,743 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,743 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table462) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,743 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table221
2023-07-11 14:16:25,743 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1687925324=1, srv405099745=3, srv1439028200=0, srv1697037617=2, srv507737371=4, srv679978762=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,743 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,743 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,743 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:25,743 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:25,743 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:25,743 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:25,743 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,743 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table221) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,744 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table463
2023-07-11 14:16:25,744 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1687925324=1, srv405099745=3, srv1439028200=0, srv1697037617=2, srv507737371=4, srv679978762=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,744 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,744 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,744 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:25,744 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:25,744 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:25,744 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:25,744 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,744 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table463) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,744 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table222
2023-07-11 14:16:25,744 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1687925324=1, srv405099745=3, srv1439028200=0, srv1697037617=2, srv507737371=4, srv679978762=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,744 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,744 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,744 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:25,744 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:25,744 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:25,744 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:25,744 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,744 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table222) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,745 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table464
2023-07-11 14:16:25,745 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1687925324=1, srv405099745=3, srv1439028200=0, srv1697037617=2, srv507737371=4, srv679978762=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,745 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,745 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,745 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:25,745 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:25,745 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:25,745 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:25,745 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,745 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table464) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,745 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table223
2023-07-11 14:16:25,745 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1687925324=1, srv405099745=3, srv1439028200=0, srv1697037617=2, srv507737371=4, srv679978762=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,745 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,745 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,745 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:25,745 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:25,745 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:25,745 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:25,745 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,745 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table223) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,745 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table465
2023-07-11 14:16:25,745 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1687925324=1, srv405099745=3, srv1439028200=0, srv1697037617=2, srv507737371=4, srv679978762=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,745 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,745 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,745 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:25,746 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:25,746 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:25,746 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:25,746 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,746 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table465) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,746 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table224
2023-07-11 14:16:25,746 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1687925324=1, srv405099745=3, srv1439028200=0, srv1697037617=2, srv507737371=4, srv679978762=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,746 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,746 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,746 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:25,746 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:25,746 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:25,746 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:25,746 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,746 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table224) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,746 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table466
2023-07-11 14:16:25,746 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1687925324=1, srv405099745=3, srv1439028200=0, srv1697037617=2, srv507737371=4, srv679978762=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,746 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,746 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,746 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:25,746 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:25,746 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:25,746 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:25,746 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,746 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table466) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,746 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1320
2023-07-11 14:16:25,747 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1687925324=1, srv405099745=3, srv1439028200=0, srv1697037617=2, srv507737371=4, srv679978762=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,747 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,747 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,747 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:25,747 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:25,747 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:25,747 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:25,747 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,747 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1320) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,747 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table225
2023-07-11 14:16:25,747 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1687925324=1, srv405099745=3, srv1439028200=0, srv1697037617=2, srv507737371=4, srv679978762=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,747 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,747 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,747 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:25,747 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:25,747 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:25,747 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:25,747 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,747 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table225) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,747 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table467
2023-07-11 14:16:25,747 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1687925324=1, srv405099745=3, srv1439028200=0, srv1697037617=2, srv507737371=4, srv679978762=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,747 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,747 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,747 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:25,747 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:25,747 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:25,748 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:25,748 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,748 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table467) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,748 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1321
2023-07-11 14:16:25,748 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1687925324=1, srv405099745=3, srv1439028200=0, srv1697037617=2, srv507737371=4, srv679978762=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,748 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,748 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,748 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:25,748 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:25,748 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:25,748 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:25,748 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,748 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1321) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,748 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table226
2023-07-11 14:16:25,748 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1687925324=1, srv405099745=3, srv1439028200=0, srv1697037617=2, srv507737371=4, srv679978762=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,748 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,748 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,748 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:25,748 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:25,748 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:25,748 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:25,748 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,748 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table226) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,748 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table468
2023-07-11 14:16:25,748 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1687925324=1, srv405099745=3, srv1439028200=0, srv1697037617=2, srv507737371=4, srv679978762=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,749 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,749 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,749 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:25,749 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:25,749 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:25,749 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:25,749 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,749 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table468) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,749 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table227
2023-07-11 14:16:25,749 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1687925324=1, srv405099745=3, srv1439028200=0, srv1697037617=2, srv507737371=4, srv679978762=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,749 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,749 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,749 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:25,749 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:25,749 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:25,749 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:25,749 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,749 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table227) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,749 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table469
2023-07-11 14:16:25,749 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1687925324=1, srv405099745=3, srv1439028200=0, srv1697037617=2, srv507737371=4, srv679978762=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,749 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,749 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,749 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:25,749 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:25,749 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:25,749 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:25,749 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,750 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table469) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,750 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table228
2023-07-11 14:16:25,750 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1687925324=1, srv405099745=3, srv1439028200=0, srv1697037617=2, srv507737371=4, srv679978762=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,750 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,750 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,750 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:25,750 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:25,750 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:25,750 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:25,750 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,750 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table228) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,750 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table229
2023-07-11 14:16:25,750 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1687925324=1, srv405099745=3, srv1439028200=0, srv1697037617=2, srv507737371=4, srv679978762=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,750 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,750 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,750 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:25,750 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:25,751 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:25,751 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:25,751 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,751 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table229) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,751 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1322
2023-07-11 14:16:25,751 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1687925324=1, srv405099745=3, srv1439028200=0, srv1697037617=2, srv507737371=4, srv679978762=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,751 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,751 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,751 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:25,751 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:25,751 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:25,751 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:25,751 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,751 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1322) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,751 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1323
2023-07-11 14:16:25,751 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1687925324=1, srv405099745=3, srv1439028200=0, srv1697037617=2, srv507737371=4, srv679978762=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,751 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,751 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,751 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:25,751 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:25,751 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:25,751 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:25,751 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,751 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1323) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,752 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1324
2023-07-11 14:16:25,752 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1687925324=1, srv405099745=3, srv1439028200=0, srv1697037617=2, srv507737371=4, srv679978762=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,752 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,752 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,752 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:25,752 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:25,752 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:25,752 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:25,752 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,752 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1324) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,752 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1325
2023-07-11 14:16:25,752 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1687925324=1, srv405099745=3, srv1439028200=0, srv1697037617=2, srv507737371=4, srv679978762=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,752 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,752 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,752 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:25,752 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:25,752 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:25,752 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:25,752 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,752 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1325) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,752 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1326
2023-07-11 14:16:25,752 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1687925324=1, srv405099745=3, srv1439028200=0, srv1697037617=2, srv507737371=4, srv679978762=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,752 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,752 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,752 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:25,752 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:25,753 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:25,753 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:25,753 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,753 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1326) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,753 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1327
2023-07-11 14:16:25,753 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1687925324=1, srv405099745=3, srv1439028200=0, srv1697037617=2, srv507737371=4, srv679978762=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,753 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,753 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,753 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:25,753 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:25,753 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:25,753 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:25,753 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,753 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1327) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,753 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1328
2023-07-11 14:16:25,753 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1687925324=1, srv405099745=3, srv1439028200=0, srv1697037617=2, srv507737371=4, srv679978762=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,753 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,753 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,753 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:25,753 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:25,753 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:25,753 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:25,753 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,753 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1328) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,753 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table470
2023-07-11 14:16:25,753 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1687925324=1, srv405099745=3, srv1439028200=0, srv1697037617=2, srv507737371=4, srv679978762=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,754 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,754 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,754 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:25,754 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:25,754 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:25,754 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:25,754 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,754 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table470) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,754 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1329
2023-07-11 14:16:25,754 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1687925324=1, srv405099745=3, srv1439028200=0, srv1697037617=2, srv507737371=4, srv679978762=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,754 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,754 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,754 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:25,754 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:25,754 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:25,754 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:25,754 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,754 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1329) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,754 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table691
2023-07-11 14:16:25,754 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1687925324=1, srv405099745=3, srv1439028200=0, srv1697037617=2, srv507737371=4, srv679978762=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,754 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,754 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,754 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:25,754 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:25,754 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:25,754 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:25,754 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,755 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table691) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,755 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table450
2023-07-11 14:16:25,755 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1687925324=1, srv405099745=3, srv1439028200=0, srv1697037617=2, srv507737371=4, srv679978762=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,755 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,755 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,755 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:25,755 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:25,755 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:25,755 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:25,755 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,755 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table450) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,755 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table692
2023-07-11 14:16:25,755 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1687925324=1, srv405099745=3, srv1439028200=0, srv1697037617=2, srv507737371=4, srv679978762=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,755 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,755 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,755 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:25,755 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:25,755 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:25,755 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:25,755 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,755 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table692) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,755 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table451
2023-07-11 14:16:25,755 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1687925324=1, srv405099745=3, srv1439028200=0, srv1697037617=2, srv507737371=4, srv679978762=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,755 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,755 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,755 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:25,756 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:25,756 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:25,756 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:25,756 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,756 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table451) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,756 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table693
2023-07-11 14:16:25,756 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1687925324=1, srv405099745=3, srv1439028200=0, srv1697037617=2, srv507737371=4, srv679978762=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,756 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,756 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,756 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:25,756 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:25,756 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:25,756 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:25,756 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,756 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table693) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,756 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table210
2023-07-11 14:16:25,756 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1687925324=1, srv405099745=3, srv1439028200=0, srv1697037617=2, srv507737371=4, srv679978762=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,756 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,756 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,756 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:25,756 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:25,756 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:25,756 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:25,756 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,756 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table210) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,757 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table452
2023-07-11 14:16:25,757 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1687925324=1, srv405099745=3, srv1439028200=0, srv1697037617=2, srv507737371=4, srv679978762=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,757 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,757 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,757 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:25,757 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:25,757 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:25,757 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:25,757 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,757 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table452) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,757 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table694
2023-07-11 14:16:25,757 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1687925324=1, srv405099745=3, srv1439028200=0, srv1697037617=2, srv507737371=4, srv679978762=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,757 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,757 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,757 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:25,757 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:25,757 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:25,757 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:25,757 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,757 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table694) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,757 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table211
2023-07-11 14:16:25,757 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1687925324=1, srv405099745=3, srv1439028200=0, srv1697037617=2, srv507737371=4, srv679978762=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,757 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,757 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,757 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:25,758 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:25,758 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:25,758 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:25,758 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,758 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table211) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,758 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table453
2023-07-11 14:16:25,758 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1687925324=1, srv405099745=3, srv1439028200=0, srv1697037617=2, srv507737371=4, srv679978762=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,758 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,758 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,758 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:25,758 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:25,758 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:25,758 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:25,758 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,758 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table453) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,758 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table695
2023-07-11 14:16:25,758 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1687925324=1, srv405099745=3, srv1439028200=0, srv1697037617=2, srv507737371=4, srv679978762=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,758 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,758 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,758 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:25,758 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:25,758 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:25,758 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:25,758 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,758 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table695) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,758 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table212
2023-07-11 14:16:25,759 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1687925324=1, srv405099745=3, srv1439028200=0, srv1697037617=2, srv507737371=4, srv679978762=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,759 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,759 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,759 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:25,759 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:25,759 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:25,759 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:25,759 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,759 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table212) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,759 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table454
2023-07-11 14:16:25,759 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1687925324=1, srv405099745=3, srv1439028200=0, srv1697037617=2, srv507737371=4, srv679978762=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,759 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,759 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,759 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:25,759 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:25,759 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:25,760 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:25,760 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,760 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table454) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,760 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table696
2023-07-11 14:16:25,760 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1687925324=1, srv405099745=3, srv1439028200=0, srv1697037617=2, srv507737371=4, srv679978762=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,760 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,760 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,760 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:25,760 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:25,760 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:25,760 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:25,760 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,760 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table696) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,760 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table213
2023-07-11 14:16:25,760 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1687925324=1, srv405099745=3, srv1439028200=0, srv1697037617=2, srv507737371=4, srv679978762=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,760 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,760 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,760 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:25,760 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:25,760 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:25,760 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:25,760 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,761 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table213) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,761 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table455
2023-07-11 14:16:25,761 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1687925324=1, srv405099745=3, srv1439028200=0, srv1697037617=2, srv507737371=4, srv679978762=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,761 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,761 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,761 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:25,761 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:25,761 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:25,761 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:25,761 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,761 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table455) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,761 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table697
2023-07-11 14:16:25,761 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1687925324=1, srv405099745=3, srv1439028200=0, srv1697037617=2, srv507737371=4, srv679978762=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,761 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,761 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,761 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:25,761 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:25,761 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:25,761 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:25,761 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,761 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table697) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,761 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table214
2023-07-11 14:16:25,761 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1687925324=1, srv405099745=3, srv1439028200=0, srv1697037617=2, srv507737371=4, srv679978762=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,761 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,761 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,761 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:25,762 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:25,762 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:25,762 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:25,762 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,762 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table214) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,762 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table456
2023-07-11 14:16:25,762 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1687925324=1, srv405099745=3, srv1439028200=0, srv1697037617=2, srv507737371=4, srv679978762=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,762 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,762 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,762 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:25,762 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:25,762 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:25,762 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:25,762 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,762 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table456) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,762 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table698
2023-07-11 14:16:25,762 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1687925324=1, srv405099745=3, srv1439028200=0, srv1697037617=2, srv507737371=4, srv679978762=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,762 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,762 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,762 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:25,762 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:25,762 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:25,762 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:25,762 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,762 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table698) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,762 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1310
2023-07-11 14:16:25,763 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1687925324=1, srv405099745=3, srv1439028200=0, srv1697037617=2, srv507737371=4, srv679978762=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,763 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,763 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,763 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:25,763 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:25,763 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:25,763 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:25,763 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,763 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1310) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,763 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table215
2023-07-11 14:16:25,763 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1687925324=1, srv405099745=3, srv1439028200=0, srv1697037617=2, srv507737371=4, srv679978762=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,763 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,763 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,763 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:25,763 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:25,763 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:25,763 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:25,763 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,763 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table215) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,763 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table457
2023-07-11 14:16:25,763 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1687925324=1, srv405099745=3, srv1439028200=0, srv1697037617=2, srv507737371=4, srv679978762=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,763 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,763 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,763 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:25,763 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:25,763 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:25,764 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:25,764 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,764 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table457) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,764 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table699
2023-07-11 14:16:25,764 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1687925324=1, srv405099745=3, srv1439028200=0, srv1697037617=2, srv507737371=4, srv679978762=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,764 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,764 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,764 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:25,764 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:25,764 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:25,764 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:25,764 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,764 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table699) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,764 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table216
2023-07-11 14:16:25,764 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1687925324=1, srv405099745=3, srv1439028200=0, srv1697037617=2, srv507737371=4, srv679978762=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,764 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,764 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,764 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:25,764 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:25,764 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:25,764 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:25,764 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,764 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table216) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,764 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table458
2023-07-11 14:16:25,764 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1687925324=1, srv405099745=3, srv1439028200=0, srv1697037617=2, srv507737371=4, srv679978762=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,765 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,765 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,765 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:25,765 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:25,765 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:25,765 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:25,765 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,765 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table458) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,765 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table217
2023-07-11 14:16:25,765 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1687925324=1, srv405099745=3, srv1439028200=0, srv1697037617=2, srv507737371=4, srv679978762=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,765 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,765 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,765 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:25,765 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:25,765 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:25,765 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:25,765 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,765 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table217) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,765 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table459
2023-07-11 14:16:25,765 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1687925324=1, srv405099745=3, srv1439028200=0, srv1697037617=2, srv507737371=4, srv679978762=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,765 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,765 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,765 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:25,765 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:25,765 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:25,765 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:25,766 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,766 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table459) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,766 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table218
2023-07-11 14:16:25,766 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1687925324=1, srv405099745=3, srv1439028200=0, srv1697037617=2, srv507737371=4, srv679978762=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,766 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,766 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,766 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:25,766 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:25,766 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:25,766 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:25,766 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,766 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table218) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,766 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table219
2023-07-11 14:16:25,766 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1687925324=1, srv405099745=3, srv1439028200=0, srv1697037617=2, srv507737371=4, srv679978762=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,766 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,766 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,766 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:25,766 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:25,766 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:25,766 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:25,766 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,766 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table219) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,766 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1319
2023-07-11 14:16:25,766 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1687925324=1, srv405099745=3, srv1439028200=0, srv1697037617=2, srv507737371=4, srv679978762=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,766 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,767 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,767 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:25,767 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:25,767 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:25,767 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:25,767 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,767 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1319) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,767 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1311
2023-07-11 14:16:25,767 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1687925324=1, srv405099745=3, srv1439028200=0, srv1697037617=2, srv507737371=4, srv679978762=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,767 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,767 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,767 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:25,767 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:25,767 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:25,767 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:25,767 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,767 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1311) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,767 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1312
2023-07-11 14:16:25,767 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1687925324=1, srv405099745=3, srv1439028200=0, srv1697037617=2, srv507737371=4, srv679978762=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,767 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,767 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,767 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:25,767 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:25,767 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:25,767 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:25,767 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,768 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1312) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,768 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1313
2023-07-11 14:16:25,768 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1687925324=1, srv405099745=3, srv1439028200=0, srv1697037617=2, srv507737371=4, srv679978762=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,768 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,768 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,768 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:25,768 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:25,768 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:25,768 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:25,768 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,768 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1313) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,768 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1314
2023-07-11 14:16:25,768 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1687925324=1, srv405099745=3, srv1439028200=0, srv1697037617=2, srv507737371=4, srv679978762=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,768 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,768 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,768 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:25,768 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:25,768 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:25,769 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:25,769 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,769 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1314) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,769 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1315
2023-07-11 14:16:25,769 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1687925324=1, srv405099745=3, srv1439028200=0, srv1697037617=2, srv507737371=4, srv679978762=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,769 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,769 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,769 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:25,769 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:25,769 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:25,769 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:25,769 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,769 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1315) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,769 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1316
2023-07-11 14:16:25,769 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1687925324=1, srv405099745=3, srv1439028200=0, srv1697037617=2, srv507737371=4, srv679978762=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,769 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,769 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,769 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:25,769 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:25,769 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:25,769 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:25,769 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,769 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1316) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,770 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1317
2023-07-11 14:16:25,770 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1687925324=1, srv405099745=3, srv1439028200=0, srv1697037617=2, srv507737371=4, srv679978762=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,770 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,770 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,770 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:25,770 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:25,770 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:25,770 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:25,770 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,770 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1317) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,770 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1318
2023-07-11 14:16:25,770 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1687925324=1, srv405099745=3, srv1439028200=0, srv1697037617=2, srv507737371=4, srv679978762=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,770 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,770 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,770 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:25,770 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:25,770 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:25,770 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:25,770 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,770 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1318) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,770 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table196
2023-07-11 14:16:25,770 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1687925324=1, srv405099745=3, srv1439028200=0, srv1697037617=2, srv507737371=4, srv679978762=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,770 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,770 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,770 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:25,770 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:25,771 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:25,771 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:25,771 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,771 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table196) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,771 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table197
2023-07-11 14:16:25,771 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1687925324=1, srv405099745=3, srv1439028200=0, srv1697037617=2, srv507737371=4, srv679978762=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,771 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,771 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,771 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:25,771 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:25,771 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:25,771 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:25,771 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,771 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table197) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,771 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table198
2023-07-11 14:16:25,771 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1687925324=1, srv405099745=3, srv1439028200=0, srv1697037617=2, srv507737371=4, srv679978762=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,771 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,771 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,771 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:25,771 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:25,771 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:25,771 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:25,771 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,771 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table198) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,771 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table199
2023-07-11 14:16:25,772 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1687925324=1, srv405099745=3, srv1439028200=0, srv1697037617=2, srv507737371=4, srv679978762=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,772 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,772 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,772 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:25,772 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:25,772 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:25,772 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:25,772 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,772 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table199) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,772 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table163
2023-07-11 14:16:25,772 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1687925324=1, srv405099745=3, srv1439028200=0, srv1697037617=2, srv507737371=4, srv679978762=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,772 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,772 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,772 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:25,772 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:25,772 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:25,772 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:25,772 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,772 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table163) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,772 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table164
2023-07-11 14:16:25,772 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1687925324=1, srv405099745=3, srv1439028200=0, srv1697037617=2, srv507737371=4, srv679978762=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,772 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,772 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,772 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:25,772 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:25,772 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:25,773 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:25,773 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,773 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table164) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,773 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table165
2023-07-11 14:16:25,773 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1687925324=1, srv405099745=3, srv1439028200=0, srv1697037617=2, srv507737371=4, srv679978762=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,773 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,773 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,773 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:25,773 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:25,773 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:25,773 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:25,773 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,773 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table165) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,773 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table166
2023-07-11 14:16:25,773 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1687925324=1, srv405099745=3, srv1439028200=0, srv1697037617=2, srv507737371=4, srv679978762=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,773 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,773 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,773 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:25,773 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:25,773 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:25,773 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:25,773 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,773 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table166) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,773 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table167
2023-07-11 14:16:25,774 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1687925324=1, srv405099745=3, srv1439028200=0, srv1697037617=2, srv507737371=4, srv679978762=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,774 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,774 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,774 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:25,774 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:25,774 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:25,774 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:25,774 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,774 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table167) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,774 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table168
2023-07-11 14:16:25,774 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1687925324=1, srv405099745=3, srv1439028200=0, srv1697037617=2, srv507737371=4, srv679978762=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,774 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,774 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,774 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:25,774 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:25,774 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:25,774 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:25,774 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,774 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table168) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,774 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table169
2023-07-11 14:16:25,774 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1687925324=1, srv405099745=3, srv1439028200=0, srv1697037617=2, srv507737371=4, srv679978762=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,774 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,774 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,774 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:25,775 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:25,775 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:25,775 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:25,775 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,775 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table169) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,775 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table170
2023-07-11 14:16:25,775 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1687925324=1, srv405099745=3, srv1439028200=0, srv1697037617=2, srv507737371=4, srv679978762=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,775 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,775 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,775 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:25,775 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:25,775 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:25,775 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:25,775 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,775 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table170) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,775 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table171
2023-07-11 14:16:25,775 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1687925324=1, srv405099745=3, srv1439028200=0, srv1697037617=2, srv507737371=4, srv679978762=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,775 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,775 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,775 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:25,775 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:25,775 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:25,775 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:25,775 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,775 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table171) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,775 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table172
2023-07-11 14:16:25,776 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1687925324=1, srv405099745=3, srv1439028200=0, srv1697037617=2, srv507737371=4, srv679978762=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,776 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,776 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,776 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:25,776 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:25,776 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:25,776 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:25,776 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,776 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table172) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,776 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table173
2023-07-11 14:16:25,776 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1687925324=1, srv405099745=3, srv1439028200=0, srv1697037617=2, srv507737371=4, srv679978762=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,776 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,776 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,776 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:25,776 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:25,776 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:25,776 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:25,776 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,776 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table173) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,776 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table152
2023-07-11 14:16:25,776 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1687925324=1, srv405099745=3, srv1439028200=0, srv1697037617=2, srv507737371=4, srv679978762=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,776 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,776 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,776 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:25,776 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:25,776 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:25,777 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:25,777 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,777 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table152) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,777 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table394
2023-07-11 14:16:25,777 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1687925324=1, srv405099745=3, srv1439028200=0, srv1697037617=2, srv507737371=4, srv679978762=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,777 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,777 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,777 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:25,777 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:25,777 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:25,777 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:25,777 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,777 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table394) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,777 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table153
2023-07-11 14:16:25,777 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1687925324=1, srv405099745=3, srv1439028200=0, srv1697037617=2, srv507737371=4, srv679978762=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,777 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,777 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,777 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:25,778 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:25,778 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:25,778 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:25,778 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,778 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table153) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,778 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table395
2023-07-11 14:16:25,778 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1687925324=1, srv405099745=3, srv1439028200=0, srv1697037617=2, srv507737371=4, srv679978762=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,778 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,778 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,778 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:25,778 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:25,778 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:25,778 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:25,778 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,778 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table395) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,778 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table154
2023-07-11 14:16:25,778 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1687925324=1, srv405099745=3, srv1439028200=0, srv1697037617=2, srv507737371=4, srv679978762=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,778 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,778 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,778 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:25,778 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:25,778 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:25,778 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:25,779 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,779 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table154) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,779 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table396
2023-07-11 14:16:25,779 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1687925324=1, srv405099745=3, srv1439028200=0, srv1697037617=2, srv507737371=4, srv679978762=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,779 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,779 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,779 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:25,779 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:25,779 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:25,779 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:25,779 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,779 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table396) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,779 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table155
2023-07-11 14:16:25,779 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1687925324=1, srv405099745=3, srv1439028200=0, srv1697037617=2, srv507737371=4, srv679978762=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,779 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,779 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,779 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:25,779 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:25,779 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:25,779 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:25,779 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,779 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table155) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,779 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table397
2023-07-11 14:16:25,779 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1687925324=1, srv405099745=3, srv1439028200=0, srv1697037617=2, srv507737371=4, srv679978762=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,780 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,780 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,780 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:25,780 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:25,780 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:25,780 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:25,780 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,780 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table397) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,780 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table156
2023-07-11 14:16:25,780 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1687925324=1, srv405099745=3, srv1439028200=0, srv1697037617=2, srv507737371=4, srv679978762=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,780 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,780 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,780 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:25,780 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:25,780 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:25,780 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:25,780 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,780 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table156) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,780 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table398
2023-07-11 14:16:25,780 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1687925324=1, srv405099745=3, srv1439028200=0, srv1697037617=2, srv507737371=4, srv679978762=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,780 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,780 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,780 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:25,780 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:25,780 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:25,781 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:25,781 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,781 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table398) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,781 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table157
2023-07-11 14:16:25,781 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1687925324=1, srv405099745=3, srv1439028200=0, srv1697037617=2, srv507737371=4, srv679978762=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,781 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,781 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,781 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:25,781 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:25,781 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:25,781 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:25,781 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,781 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table157) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,781 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table399
2023-07-11 14:16:25,781 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1687925324=1, srv405099745=3, srv1439028200=0, srv1697037617=2, srv507737371=4, srv679978762=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,781 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,781 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,781 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:25,781 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:25,781 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:25,781 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:25,781 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,781 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table399) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,781 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table158
2023-07-11 14:16:25,782 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1687925324=1, srv405099745=3, srv1439028200=0, srv1697037617=2, srv507737371=4, srv679978762=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,782 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,782 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,782 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:25,782 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:25,782 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:25,782 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:25,782 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,782 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table158) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,782 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table159
2023-07-11 14:16:25,782 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1687925324=1, srv405099745=3, srv1439028200=0, srv1697037617=2, srv507737371=4, srv679978762=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,782 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,782 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,782 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:25,782 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:25,782 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:25,782 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:25,782 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,782 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table159) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,782 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table160
2023-07-11 14:16:25,782 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1687925324=1, srv405099745=3, srv1439028200=0, srv1697037617=2, srv507737371=4, srv679978762=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,782 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,782 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,782 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:25,782 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:25,782 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:25,782 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:25,783 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,783 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table160) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,783 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table161
2023-07-11 14:16:25,783 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1687925324=1, srv405099745=3, srv1439028200=0, srv1697037617=2, srv507737371=4, srv679978762=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,783 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,783 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,783 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:25,783 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:25,783 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:25,783 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:25,783 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,783 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table161) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,783 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table162
2023-07-11 14:16:25,783 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1687925324=1, srv405099745=3, srv1439028200=0, srv1697037617=2, srv507737371=4, srv679978762=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,783 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,783 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,783 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:25,783 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:25,783 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:25,783 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:25,783 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,783 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table162) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,783 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table185
2023-07-11 14:16:25,783 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1687925324=1, srv405099745=3, srv1439028200=0, srv1697037617=2, srv507737371=4, srv679978762=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,783 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,784 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,784 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:25,784 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:25,784 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:25,784 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:25,784 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,784 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table185) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,784 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table186
2023-07-11 14:16:25,784 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1687925324=1, srv405099745=3, srv1439028200=0, srv1697037617=2, srv507737371=4, srv679978762=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,784 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,784 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,784 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:25,784 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:25,784 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:25,784 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:25,784 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,784 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table186) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,784 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table187
2023-07-11 14:16:25,784 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1687925324=1, srv405099745=3, srv1439028200=0, srv1697037617=2, srv507737371=4, srv679978762=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,784 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,784 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,784 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:25,784 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:25,784 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:25,784 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:25,784 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,785 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table187) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,785 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table188
2023-07-11 14:16:25,785 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1687925324=1, srv405099745=3, srv1439028200=0, srv1697037617=2, srv507737371=4, srv679978762=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,785 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,785 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,785 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:25,785 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:25,785 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:25,785 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:25,785 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,785 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table188) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,785 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table189
2023-07-11 14:16:25,785 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1687925324=1, srv405099745=3, srv1439028200=0, srv1697037617=2, srv507737371=4, srv679978762=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,785 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,785 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,785 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:25,785 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:25,785 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:25,785 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:25,785 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,785 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table189) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,785 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table190
2023-07-11 14:16:25,785 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1687925324=1, srv405099745=3, srv1439028200=0, srv1697037617=2, srv507737371=4, srv679978762=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,785 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,785 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,786 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:25,786 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:25,786 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:25,786 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:25,786 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,786 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table190) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,786 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table191
2023-07-11 14:16:25,786 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1687925324=1, srv405099745=3, srv1439028200=0, srv1697037617=2, srv507737371=4, srv679978762=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,786 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,786 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,786 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:25,786 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:25,786 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:25,786 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:25,786 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,786 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table191) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,786 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table192
2023-07-11 14:16:25,786 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1687925324=1, srv405099745=3, srv1439028200=0, srv1697037617=2, srv507737371=4, srv679978762=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,786 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,786 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,787 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:25,787 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:25,787 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:25,787 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:25,787 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,787 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table192) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,787 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table193
2023-07-11 14:16:25,787 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1687925324=1, srv405099745=3, srv1439028200=0, srv1697037617=2, srv507737371=4, srv679978762=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,787 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,787 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,787 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:25,787 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:25,787 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:25,787 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:25,787 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,787 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table193) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,787 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table194
2023-07-11 14:16:25,787 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1687925324=1, srv405099745=3, srv1439028200=0, srv1697037617=2, srv507737371=4, srv679978762=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,787 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,787 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,787 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:25,787 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:25,788 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:25,788 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:25,788 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,788 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table194) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,788 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table195
2023-07-11 14:16:25,788 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1687925324=1, srv405099745=3, srv1439028200=0, srv1697037617=2, srv507737371=4, srv679978762=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,788 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,788 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,788 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:25,788 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:25,788 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:25,788 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:25,788 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,788 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table195) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,788 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table174
2023-07-11 14:16:25,788 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1687925324=1, srv405099745=3, srv1439028200=0, srv1697037617=2, srv507737371=4, srv679978762=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,788 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,788 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,788 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:25,788 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:25,788 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:25,788 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:25,788 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,788 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table174) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,788 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table175
2023-07-11 14:16:25,789 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1687925324=1, srv405099745=3, srv1439028200=0, srv1697037617=2, srv507737371=4, srv679978762=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,789 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,789 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,789 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:25,789 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:25,789 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:25,789 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:25,789 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,789 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table175) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,789 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table176
2023-07-11 14:16:25,789 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1687925324=1, srv405099745=3, srv1439028200=0, srv1697037617=2, srv507737371=4, srv679978762=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,789 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,789 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,789 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:25,789 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:25,789 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:25,789 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:25,789 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,789 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table176) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,789 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table177
2023-07-11 14:16:25,789 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1687925324=1, srv405099745=3, srv1439028200=0, srv1697037617=2, srv507737371=4, srv679978762=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,789 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,789 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,789 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:25,789 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:25,789 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:25,790 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:25,790 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,790 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table177) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,790 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table178
2023-07-11 14:16:25,790 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1687925324=1, srv405099745=3, srv1439028200=0, srv1697037617=2, srv507737371=4, srv679978762=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,790 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,790 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,790 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:25,790 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:25,790 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:25,790 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:25,790 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,790 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table178) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,790 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table179
2023-07-11 14:16:25,790 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1687925324=1, srv405099745=3, srv1439028200=0, srv1697037617=2, srv507737371=4, srv679978762=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,790 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,790 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,790 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:25,790 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:25,790 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:25,790 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:25,790 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,790 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table179) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,790 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table180
2023-07-11 14:16:25,790 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1687925324=1, srv405099745=3, srv1439028200=0, srv1697037617=2, srv507737371=4, srv679978762=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,791 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,791 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,791 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:25,791 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:25,791 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:25,791 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:25,791 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,791 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table180) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,791 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table181
2023-07-11 14:16:25,791 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1687925324=1, srv405099745=3, srv1439028200=0, srv1697037617=2, srv507737371=4, srv679978762=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,791 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,791 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,791 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:25,791 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:25,791 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:25,791 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:25,791 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,791 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table181) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,791 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table182
2023-07-11 14:16:25,791 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1687925324=1, srv405099745=3, srv1439028200=0, srv1697037617=2, srv507737371=4, srv679978762=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,791 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,791 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,791 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:25,791 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:25,791 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:25,791 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:25,792 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,792 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table182) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,792 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table183
2023-07-11 14:16:25,792 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1687925324=1, srv405099745=3, srv1439028200=0, srv1697037617=2, srv507737371=4, srv679978762=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,792 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,792 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,792 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:25,792 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:25,792 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:25,792 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:25,792 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,792 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table183) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,792 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table184
2023-07-11 14:16:25,792 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1687925324=1, srv405099745=3, srv1439028200=0, srv1697037617=2, srv507737371=4, srv679978762=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,792 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,792 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,792 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:25,792 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:25,792 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:25,792 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:25,792 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,792 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table184) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,792 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table800
2023-07-11 14:16:25,792 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1687925324=1, srv405099745=3, srv1439028200=0, srv1697037617=2, srv507737371=4, srv679978762=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,792 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,793 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,793 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:25,793 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:25,793 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:25,793 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:25,793 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,793 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table800) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,793 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table801
2023-07-11 14:16:25,793 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1687925324=1, srv405099745=3, srv1439028200=0, srv1697037617=2, srv507737371=4, srv679978762=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,793 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,793 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,793 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:25,793 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:25,793 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:25,793 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:25,793 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,793 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table801) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,793 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table802
2023-07-11 14:16:25,793 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1687925324=1, srv405099745=3, srv1439028200=0, srv1697037617=2, srv507737371=4, srv679978762=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,793 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,793 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,793 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:25,793 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:25,793 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:25,793 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:25,793 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,793 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table802) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,794 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table803
2023-07-11 14:16:25,794 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1687925324=1, srv405099745=3, srv1439028200=0, srv1697037617=2, srv507737371=4, srv679978762=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,794 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,794 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,794 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:25,794 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:25,794 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:25,794 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:25,794 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,794 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table803) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,794 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table804
2023-07-11 14:16:25,794 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1687925324=1, srv405099745=3, srv1439028200=0, srv1697037617=2, srv507737371=4, srv679978762=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,794 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,794 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,794 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:25,794 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:25,794 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:25,794 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:25,794 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,794 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table804) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,794 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table805
2023-07-11 14:16:25,794 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1687925324=1, srv405099745=3, srv1439028200=0, srv1697037617=2, srv507737371=4, srv679978762=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,794 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,794 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,794 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:25,794 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:25,794 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:25,795 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:25,795 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,795 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table805) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,795 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table806
2023-07-11 14:16:25,795 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1687925324=1, srv405099745=3, srv1439028200=0, srv1697037617=2, srv507737371=4, srv679978762=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,795 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,795 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,795 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:25,795 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:25,795 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:25,795 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:25,795 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,795 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table806) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,795 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table807
2023-07-11 14:16:25,795 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1687925324=1, srv405099745=3, srv1439028200=0, srv1697037617=2, srv507737371=4, srv679978762=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,795 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,795 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,795 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:25,795 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:25,796 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:25,796 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:25,796 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,796 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table807) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,796 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table808
2023-07-11 14:16:25,796 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1687925324=1, srv405099745=3, srv1439028200=0, srv1697037617=2, srv507737371=4, srv679978762=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,796 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,796 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,796 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:25,796 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:25,796 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:25,796 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:25,796 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,796 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table808) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,796 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table809
2023-07-11 14:16:25,796 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1687925324=1, srv405099745=3, srv1439028200=0, srv1697037617=2, srv507737371=4, srv679978762=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,796 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,796 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,796 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:25,796 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:25,796 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:25,796 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:25,796 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,797 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table809) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,797 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table820
2023-07-11 14:16:25,797 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1687925324=1, srv405099745=3, srv1439028200=0, srv1697037617=2, srv507737371=4, srv679978762=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,797 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,797 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,797 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:25,797 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:25,797 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:25,797 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:25,797 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,797 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table820) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,797 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table821
2023-07-11 14:16:25,797 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1687925324=1, srv405099745=3, srv1439028200=0, srv1697037617=2, srv507737371=4, srv679978762=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,797 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,797 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,797 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:25,797 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:25,797 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:25,797 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:25,797 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,797 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table821) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,797 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table822
2023-07-11 14:16:25,797 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1687925324=1, srv405099745=3, srv1439028200=0, srv1697037617=2, srv507737371=4, srv679978762=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,797 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,797 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,797 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:25,798 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:25,798 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:25,798 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:25,798 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,798 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table822) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,798 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table823
2023-07-11 14:16:25,798 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1687925324=1, srv405099745=3, srv1439028200=0, srv1697037617=2, srv507737371=4, srv679978762=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,798 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,798 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,798 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:25,798 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:25,798 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:25,798 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:25,798 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,798 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table823) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,798 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table824
2023-07-11 14:16:25,798 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1687925324=1, srv405099745=3, srv1439028200=0, srv1697037617=2, srv507737371=4, srv679978762=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,798 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,798 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,798 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:25,798 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:25,798 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:25,798 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:25,798 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,798 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table824) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,798 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table825
2023-07-11 14:16:25,798 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1687925324=1, srv405099745=3, srv1439028200=0, srv1697037617=2, srv507737371=4, srv679978762=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,799 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,799 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,799 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:25,799 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:25,799 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:25,799 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:25,799 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,799 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table825) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,799 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table826
2023-07-11 14:16:25,799 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1687925324=1, srv405099745=3, srv1439028200=0, srv1697037617=2, srv507737371=4, srv679978762=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,799 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,799 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,799 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:25,799 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:25,799 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:25,799 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:25,799 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,799 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table826) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,799 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table827
2023-07-11 14:16:25,799 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1687925324=1, srv405099745=3, srv1439028200=0, srv1697037617=2, srv507737371=4, srv679978762=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,799 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,799 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,799 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:25,799 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:25,799 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:25,799 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:25,799 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,800 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table827) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,800 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table828
2023-07-11 14:16:25,800 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1687925324=1, srv405099745=3, srv1439028200=0, srv1697037617=2, srv507737371=4, srv679978762=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,800 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,800 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,800 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:25,800 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:25,800 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:25,800 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:25,800 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,800 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table828) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,800 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table829
2023-07-11 14:16:25,800 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1687925324=1, srv405099745=3, srv1439028200=0, srv1697037617=2, srv507737371=4, srv679978762=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,800 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,800 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,800 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:25,800 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:25,800 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:25,800 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:25,800 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,800 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table829) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,800 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1193
2023-07-11 14:16:25,800 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1687925324=1, srv405099745=3, srv1439028200=0, srv1697037617=2, srv507737371=4, srv679978762=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,800 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,800 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,800 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:25,801 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:25,801 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:25,801 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:25,801 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,801 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1193) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,801 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1194
2023-07-11 14:16:25,801 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1687925324=1, srv405099745=3, srv1439028200=0, srv1697037617=2, srv507737371=4, srv679978762=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,801 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,801 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,801 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:25,801 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:25,801 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:25,801 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:25,801 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,801 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1194) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,801 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1195
2023-07-11 14:16:25,801 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1687925324=1, srv405099745=3, srv1439028200=0, srv1697037617=2, srv507737371=4, srv679978762=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,801 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,801 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,801 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:25,801 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:25,801 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:25,801 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:25,801 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,801 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1195) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,801 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1196
2023-07-11 14:16:25,802 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1687925324=1, srv405099745=3, srv1439028200=0, srv1697037617=2, srv507737371=4, srv679978762=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,802 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,802 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,802 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:25,802 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:25,802 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:25,802 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:25,802 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,802 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1196) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,802 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1197
2023-07-11 14:16:25,802 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1687925324=1, srv405099745=3, srv1439028200=0, srv1697037617=2, srv507737371=4, srv679978762=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,802 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,802 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,802 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:25,802 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:25,802 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:25,802 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:25,802 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,802 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1197) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,802 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1198
2023-07-11 14:16:25,802 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1687925324=1, srv405099745=3, srv1439028200=0, srv1697037617=2, srv507737371=4, srv679978762=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,802 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,802 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,802 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:25,802 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:25,802 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:25,802 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:25,803 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,803 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1198) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,803 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1199
2023-07-11 14:16:25,803 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1687925324=1, srv405099745=3, srv1439028200=0, srv1697037617=2, srv507737371=4, srv679978762=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,803 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,803 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,803 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:25,803 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:25,803 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:25,803 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:25,803 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,803 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1199) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,803 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table810
2023-07-11 14:16:25,803 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1687925324=1, srv405099745=3, srv1439028200=0, srv1697037617=2, srv507737371=4, srv679978762=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,803 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,803 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,803 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:25,803 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:25,803 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:25,803 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:25,803 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,803 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table810) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,803 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table811
2023-07-11 14:16:25,803 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1687925324=1, srv405099745=3, srv1439028200=0, srv1697037617=2, srv507737371=4, srv679978762=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,803 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,804 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,804 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:25,804 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:25,804 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:25,804 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:25,804 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,804 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table811) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,804 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table812
2023-07-11 14:16:25,804 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1687925324=1, srv405099745=3, srv1439028200=0, srv1697037617=2, srv507737371=4, srv679978762=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,804 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,804 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,804 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:25,804 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:25,804 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:25,804 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:25,804 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,805 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table812) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,805 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table813
2023-07-11 14:16:25,805 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1687925324=1, srv405099745=3, srv1439028200=0, srv1697037617=2, srv507737371=4, srv679978762=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,805 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,805 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,805 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:25,805 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:25,805 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:25,805 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:25,805 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,805 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table813) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,805 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table814
2023-07-11 14:16:25,805 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1687925324=1, srv405099745=3, srv1439028200=0, srv1697037617=2, srv507737371=4, srv679978762=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,805 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,805 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,805 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:25,805 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:25,805 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:25,805 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:25,805 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,805 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table814) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,805 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1190
2023-07-11 14:16:25,805 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1687925324=1, srv405099745=3, srv1439028200=0, srv1697037617=2, srv507737371=4, srv679978762=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,805 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,805 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,806 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:25,806 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:25,806 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:25,806 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:25,806 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,806 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1190) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,806 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table815
2023-07-11 14:16:25,806 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1687925324=1, srv405099745=3, srv1439028200=0, srv1697037617=2, srv507737371=4, srv679978762=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,806 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,806 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,806 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:25,806 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:25,806 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:25,806 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:25,806 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,806 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table815) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,806 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1191
2023-07-11 14:16:25,806 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1687925324=1, srv405099745=3, srv1439028200=0, srv1697037617=2, srv507737371=4, srv679978762=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,806 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,806 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,806 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:25,806 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:25,806 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:25,806 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:25,806 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,806 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1191) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,807 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table816
2023-07-11 14:16:25,807 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1687925324=1, srv405099745=3, srv1439028200=0, srv1697037617=2, srv507737371=4, srv679978762=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,807 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,807 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,807 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:25,807 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:25,807 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:25,807 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:25,807 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,807 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table816) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,807 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1192
2023-07-11 14:16:25,807 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1687925324=1, srv405099745=3, srv1439028200=0, srv1697037617=2, srv507737371=4, srv679978762=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,807 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,807 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,807 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:25,807 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:25,807 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:25,807 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:25,807 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,807 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1192) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,807 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table817
2023-07-11 14:16:25,807 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1687925324=1, srv405099745=3, srv1439028200=0, srv1697037617=2, srv507737371=4, srv679978762=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,807 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,807 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,807 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:25,807 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:25,807 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:25,808 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:25,808 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,808 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table817) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,808 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table818
2023-07-11 14:16:25,808 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1687925324=1, srv405099745=3, srv1439028200=0, srv1697037617=2, srv507737371=4, srv679978762=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,808 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,808 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,808 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:25,808 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:25,808 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:25,808 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:25,808 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,808 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table818) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,808 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table819
2023-07-11 14:16:25,808 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1687925324=1, srv405099745=3, srv1439028200=0, srv1697037617=2, srv507737371=4, srv679978762=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,808 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,808 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,808 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:25,808 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:25,808 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:25,808 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:25,808 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,808 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table819) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,808 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1260
2023-07-11 14:16:25,808 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1687925324=1, srv405099745=3, srv1439028200=0, srv1697037617=2, srv507737371=4, srv679978762=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,808 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,809 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,809 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:25,809 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:25,809 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:25,809 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:25,809 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,809 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1260) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,809 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1261
2023-07-11 14:16:25,809 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1687925324=1, srv405099745=3, srv1439028200=0, srv1697037617=2, srv507737371=4, srv679978762=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,809 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,809 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,809 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:25,809 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:25,809 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:25,809 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:25,809 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,809 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1261) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,809 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table760
2023-07-11 14:16:25,809 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1687925324=1, srv405099745=3, srv1439028200=0, srv1697037617=2, srv507737371=4, srv679978762=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,809 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,809 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,809 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:25,809 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:25,809 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:25,809 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:25,809 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,810 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table760) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,810 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1020
2023-07-11 14:16:25,810 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1687925324=1, srv405099745=3, srv1439028200=0, srv1697037617=2, srv507737371=4, srv679978762=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,810 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,810 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,810 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:25,810 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:25,810 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:25,810 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:25,810 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,810 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1020) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,810 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1262
2023-07-11 14:16:25,810 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1687925324=1, srv405099745=3, srv1439028200=0, srv1697037617=2, srv507737371=4, srv679978762=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,810 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,810 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,810 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:25,810 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:25,810 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:25,810 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:25,810 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,810 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1262) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,810 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table761
2023-07-11 14:16:25,810 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1687925324=1, srv405099745=3, srv1439028200=0, srv1697037617=2, srv507737371=4, srv679978762=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,810 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,810 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,810 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:25,811 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:25,811 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:25,811 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:25,811 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,811 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table761) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,811 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1021
2023-07-11 14:16:25,811 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1687925324=1, srv405099745=3, srv1439028200=0, srv1697037617=2, srv507737371=4, srv679978762=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,811 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,811 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,811 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:25,811 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:25,811 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:25,811 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:25,811 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,811 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1021) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,811 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1263
2023-07-11 14:16:25,811 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1687925324=1, srv405099745=3, srv1439028200=0, srv1697037617=2, srv507737371=4, srv679978762=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,811 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,811 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,811 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:25,811 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:25,811 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:25,811 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:25,811 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,811 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1263) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,811 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table520
2023-07-11 14:16:25,811 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1687925324=1, srv405099745=3, srv1439028200=0, srv1697037617=2, srv507737371=4, srv679978762=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,812 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,812 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,812 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:25,812 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:25,812 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:25,812 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:25,812 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,812 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table520) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,812 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table762
2023-07-11 14:16:25,812 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1687925324=1, srv405099745=3, srv1439028200=0, srv1697037617=2, srv507737371=4, srv679978762=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,812 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,812 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,812 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:25,812 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:25,812 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:25,812 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:25,812 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,812 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table762) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,812 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1022
2023-07-11 14:16:25,812 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1687925324=1, srv405099745=3, srv1439028200=0, srv1697037617=2, srv507737371=4, srv679978762=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,812 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,812 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,812 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:25,812 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:25,812 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:25,812 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:25,813 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,813 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1022) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,813 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1264
2023-07-11 14:16:25,813 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1687925324=1, srv405099745=3, srv1439028200=0, srv1697037617=2, srv507737371=4, srv679978762=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,813 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,813 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,813 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:25,813 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:25,813 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:25,813 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:25,813 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,813 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1264) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,813 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table521
2023-07-11 14:16:25,813 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1687925324=1, srv405099745=3, srv1439028200=0, srv1697037617=2, srv507737371=4, srv679978762=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,813 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,813 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,814 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:25,814 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:25,814 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:25,814 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:25,814 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,814 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table521) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,814 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table763
2023-07-11 14:16:25,814 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1687925324=1, srv405099745=3, srv1439028200=0, srv1697037617=2, srv507737371=4, srv679978762=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,814 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,814 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,814 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:25,814 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:25,814 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:25,814 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:25,814 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,814 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table763) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,814 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1023
2023-07-11 14:16:25,814 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1687925324=1, srv405099745=3, srv1439028200=0, srv1697037617=2, srv507737371=4, srv679978762=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,814 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,814 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,814 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:25,814 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:25,814 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:25,814 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:25,814 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,814 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1023) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,815 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1265
2023-07-11 14:16:25,815 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1687925324=1, srv405099745=3, srv1439028200=0, srv1697037617=2, srv507737371=4, srv679978762=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,815 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,815 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,815 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:25,815 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:25,815 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:25,815 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:25,815 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,815 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1265) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,815 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table522
2023-07-11 14:16:25,815 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1687925324=1, srv405099745=3, srv1439028200=0, srv1697037617=2, srv507737371=4, srv679978762=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,815 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,815 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,815 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:25,815 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:25,815 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:25,815 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:25,815 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,815 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table522) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,815 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table764
2023-07-11 14:16:25,815 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1687925324=1, srv405099745=3, srv1439028200=0, srv1697037617=2, srv507737371=4, srv679978762=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,815 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,815 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,815 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:25,815 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:25,815 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:25,816 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:25,816 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,816 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table764) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,816 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1024
2023-07-11 14:16:25,816 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1687925324=1, srv405099745=3, srv1439028200=0, srv1697037617=2, srv507737371=4, srv679978762=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,816 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,816 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,816 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:25,816 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:25,816 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:25,816 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:25,816 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,816 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1024) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,816 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1266
2023-07-11 14:16:25,816 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1687925324=1, srv405099745=3, srv1439028200=0, srv1697037617=2, srv507737371=4, srv679978762=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,816 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,816 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,816 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:25,816 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:25,816 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:25,816 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:25,816 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,816 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1266) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,816 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table523
2023-07-11 14:16:25,816 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1687925324=1, srv405099745=3, srv1439028200=0, srv1697037617=2, srv507737371=4, srv679978762=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,816 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,817 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,817 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:25,817 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:25,817 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:25,817 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:25,817 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,817 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table523) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,817 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table765
2023-07-11 14:16:25,817 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1687925324=1, srv405099745=3, srv1439028200=0, srv1697037617=2, srv507737371=4, srv679978762=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,817 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,817 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,817 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:25,817 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:25,817 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:25,817 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:25,817 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,817 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table765) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,817 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table524
2023-07-11 14:16:25,817 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1687925324=1, srv405099745=3, srv1439028200=0, srv1697037617=2, srv507737371=4, srv679978762=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,817 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,817 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,817 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:25,817 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:25,817 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:25,817 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:25,817 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,818 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table524) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,818 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table766
2023-07-11 14:16:25,818 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1687925324=1, srv405099745=3, srv1439028200=0, srv1697037617=2, srv507737371=4, srv679978762=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,818 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,818 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,818 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:25,818 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:25,818 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:25,818 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:25,818 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,818 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table766) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,818 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table525
2023-07-11 14:16:25,818 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1687925324=1, srv405099745=3, srv1439028200=0, srv1697037617=2, srv507737371=4, srv679978762=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,818 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,818 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,818 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:25,818 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:25,818 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:25,818 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:25,818 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,818 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table525) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,818 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table767
2023-07-11 14:16:25,818 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1687925324=1, srv405099745=3, srv1439028200=0, srv1697037617=2, srv507737371=4, srv679978762=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,818 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,818 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,818 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:25,818 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:25,819 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:25,819 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:25,819 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,819 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table767) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,819 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table526
2023-07-11 14:16:25,819 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1687925324=1, srv405099745=3, srv1439028200=0, srv1697037617=2, srv507737371=4, srv679978762=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,819 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,819 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,819 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:25,819 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:25,819 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:25,819 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:25,819 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,819 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table526) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,819 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table768
2023-07-11 14:16:25,819 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1687925324=1, srv405099745=3, srv1439028200=0, srv1697037617=2, srv507737371=4, srv679978762=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,819 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,819 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,819 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:25,819 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:25,819 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:25,819 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:25,819 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,819 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table768) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,819 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table527
2023-07-11 14:16:25,819 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1687925324=1, srv405099745=3, srv1439028200=0, srv1697037617=2, srv507737371=4, srv679978762=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,820 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,820 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,820 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:25,820 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:25,820 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:25,820 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:25,820 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,820 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table527) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,820 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table769
2023-07-11 14:16:25,820 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1687925324=1, srv405099745=3, srv1439028200=0, srv1697037617=2, srv507737371=4, srv679978762=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,820 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,820 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,820 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:25,820 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:25,820 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:25,820 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:25,820 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,820 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table769) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,820 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table528
2023-07-11 14:16:25,820 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1687925324=1, srv405099745=3, srv1439028200=0, srv1697037617=2, srv507737371=4, srv679978762=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,820 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,820 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,820 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:25,820 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:25,820 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:25,820 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:25,820 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,821 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table528) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,821 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table529
2023-07-11 14:16:25,821 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1687925324=1, srv405099745=3, srv1439028200=0, srv1697037617=2, srv507737371=4, srv679978762=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,821 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,821 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,821 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:25,821 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:25,821 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:25,821 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:25,821 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,821 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table529) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,821 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table90
2023-07-11 14:16:25,821 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1687925324=1, srv405099745=3, srv1439028200=0, srv1697037617=2, srv507737371=4, srv679978762=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,821 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,821 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,821 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:25,821 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:25,821 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:25,821 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:25,821 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,821 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table90) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,822 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table91
2023-07-11 14:16:25,822 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1687925324=1, srv405099745=3, srv1439028200=0, srv1697037617=2, srv507737371=4, srv679978762=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,822 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,822 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,822 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:25,822 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:25,822 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:25,822 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:25,822 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,822 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table91) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,822 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table92
2023-07-11 14:16:25,822 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1687925324=1, srv405099745=3, srv1439028200=0, srv1697037617=2, srv507737371=4, srv679978762=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,822 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,822 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,822 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:25,822 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:25,822 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:25,822 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:25,822 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,822 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table92) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,823 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table93
2023-07-11 14:16:25,823 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1687925324=1, srv405099745=3, srv1439028200=0, srv1697037617=2, srv507737371=4, srv679978762=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,823 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,823 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,823 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:25,823 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:25,823 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:25,823 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:25,823 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,823 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table93) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,823 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1025
2023-07-11 14:16:25,823 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1687925324=1, srv405099745=3, srv1439028200=0, srv1697037617=2, srv507737371=4, srv679978762=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,823 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,823 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,823 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:25,823 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:25,823 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:25,823 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:25,823 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,823 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1025) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,823 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1267
2023-07-11 14:16:25,823 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1687925324=1, srv405099745=3, srv1439028200=0, srv1697037617=2, srv507737371=4, srv679978762=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,823 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,823 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,823 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:25,823 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:25,824 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:25,824 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:25,824 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,824 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1267) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,824 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table94
2023-07-11 14:16:25,824 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1687925324=1, srv405099745=3, srv1439028200=0, srv1697037617=2, srv507737371=4, srv679978762=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,824 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,824 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,824 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:25,824 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:25,824 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:25,824 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:25,824 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,824 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table94) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,824 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1026
2023-07-11 14:16:25,824 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1687925324=1, srv405099745=3, srv1439028200=0, srv1697037617=2, srv507737371=4, srv679978762=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,824 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,824 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,824 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:25,824 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:25,824 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:25,824 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:25,824 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,824 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1026) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,824 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1268
2023-07-11 14:16:25,824 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1687925324=1, srv405099745=3, srv1439028200=0, srv1697037617=2, srv507737371=4, srv679978762=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,825 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,825 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,825 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:25,825 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:25,825 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:25,825 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:25,825 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,825 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1268) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,825 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table95
2023-07-11 14:16:25,825 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1687925324=1, srv405099745=3, srv1439028200=0, srv1697037617=2, srv507737371=4, srv679978762=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,825 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,825 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,825 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:25,825 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:25,825 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:25,825 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:25,825 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,825 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table95) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,825 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1027
2023-07-11 14:16:25,825 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1687925324=1, srv405099745=3, srv1439028200=0, srv1697037617=2, srv507737371=4, srv679978762=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,825 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,825 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,825 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:25,825 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:25,825 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:25,825 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:25,826 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,826 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1027) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,826 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1269
2023-07-11 14:16:25,826 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1687925324=1, srv405099745=3, srv1439028200=0, srv1697037617=2, srv507737371=4, srv679978762=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,826 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,826 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,826 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:25,826 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:25,826 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:25,826 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:25,826 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,826 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1269) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,826 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table96
2023-07-11 14:16:25,826 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1687925324=1, srv405099745=3, srv1439028200=0, srv1697037617=2, srv507737371=4, srv679978762=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,826 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,826 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,826 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:25,826 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:25,826 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:25,826 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:25,826 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,826 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table96) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,826 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1028
2023-07-11 14:16:25,826 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1687925324=1, srv405099745=3, srv1439028200=0, srv1697037617=2, srv507737371=4, srv679978762=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,826 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,827 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,827 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:25,827 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:25,827 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:25,827 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:25,827 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,827 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1028) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,827 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table97
2023-07-11 14:16:25,827 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1687925324=1, srv405099745=3, srv1439028200=0, srv1697037617=2, srv507737371=4, srv679978762=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,827 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,827 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,827 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:25,827 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:25,827 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:25,827 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:25,827 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,827 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table97) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,827 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1029
2023-07-11 14:16:25,827 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1687925324=1, srv405099745=3, srv1439028200=0, srv1697037617=2, srv507737371=4, srv679978762=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,827 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,827 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,827 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:25,827 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:25,827 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:25,827 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:25,827 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,828 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1029) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,828 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table98
2023-07-11 14:16:25,828 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1687925324=1, srv405099745=3, srv1439028200=0, srv1697037617=2, srv507737371=4, srv679978762=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,828 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,828 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,828 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:25,828 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:25,828 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:25,828 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:25,828 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,828 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table98) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,828 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table99
2023-07-11 14:16:25,828 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1687925324=1, srv405099745=3, srv1439028200=0, srv1697037617=2, srv507737371=4, srv679978762=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,828 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,828 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,828 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:25,828 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:25,828 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:25,828 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:25,828 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,828 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table99) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,828 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1490
2023-07-11 14:16:25,828 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1687925324=1, srv405099745=3, srv1439028200=0, srv1697037617=2, srv507737371=4, srv679978762=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,829 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,829 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,829 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:25,829 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:25,829 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:25,829 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:25,829 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,829 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1490) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,829 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1491
2023-07-11 14:16:25,829 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1687925324=1, srv405099745=3, srv1439028200=0, srv1697037617=2, srv507737371=4, srv679978762=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,829 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,829 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,829 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:25,829 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:25,829 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:25,829 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:25,830 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,830 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1491) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,830 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table990
2023-07-11 14:16:25,830 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1687925324=1, srv405099745=3, srv1439028200=0, srv1697037617=2, srv507737371=4, srv679978762=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,830 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,830 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,830 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:25,830 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:25,830 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:25,830 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:25,830 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,830 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table990) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,830 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1250
2023-07-11 14:16:25,830 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1687925324=1, srv405099745=3, srv1439028200=0, srv1697037617=2, srv507737371=4, srv679978762=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,830 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,831 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,831 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:25,831 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:25,831 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:25,831 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:25,831 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,831 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1250) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,831 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1492
2023-07-11 14:16:25,831 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1687925324=1, srv405099745=3, srv1439028200=0, srv1697037617=2, srv507737371=4, srv679978762=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,831 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,831 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,831 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:25,831 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:25,831 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:25,831 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:25,831 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,832 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1492) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,832 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table991
2023-07-11 14:16:25,832 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1687925324=1, srv405099745=3, srv1439028200=0, srv1697037617=2, srv507737371=4, srv679978762=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,832 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,832 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,832 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:25,832 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:25,832 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:25,832 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:25,832 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,832 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table991) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,832 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1251
2023-07-11 14:16:25,833 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1687925324=1, srv405099745=3, srv1439028200=0, srv1697037617=2, srv507737371=4, srv679978762=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,833 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,833 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,833 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:25,833 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:25,833 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:25,833 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:25,833 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,833 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1251) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,833 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1493
2023-07-11 14:16:25,833 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1687925324=1, srv405099745=3, srv1439028200=0, srv1697037617=2, srv507737371=4, srv679978762=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,833 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,833 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,833 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:25,833 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:25,834 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:25,834 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:25,834 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,834 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1493) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,834 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table750
2023-07-11 14:16:25,834 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1687925324=1, srv405099745=3, srv1439028200=0, srv1697037617=2, srv507737371=4, srv679978762=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,834 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,834 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,834 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:25,834 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:25,834 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:25,834 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:25,834 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,834 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table750) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,834 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table992
2023-07-11 14:16:25,835 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1687925324=1, srv405099745=3, srv1439028200=0, srv1697037617=2, srv507737371=4, srv679978762=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,835 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,835 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,835 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:25,835 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:25,835 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:25,835 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:25,835 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,835 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table992) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,835 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1010
2023-07-11 14:16:25,835 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1687925324=1, srv405099745=3, srv1439028200=0, srv1697037617=2, srv507737371=4, srv679978762=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,835 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,835 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,835 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:25,835 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:25,836 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:25,836 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:25,836 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,836 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1010) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,836 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1252
2023-07-11 14:16:25,836 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1687925324=1, srv405099745=3, srv1439028200=0, srv1697037617=2, srv507737371=4, srv679978762=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,836 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,836 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,836 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:25,836 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:25,836 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:25,836 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:25,836 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,836 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1252) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,836 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1494
2023-07-11 14:16:25,837 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1687925324=1, srv405099745=3, srv1439028200=0, srv1697037617=2, srv507737371=4, srv679978762=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,837 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,837 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,837 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:25,837 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:25,837 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:25,837 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:25,837 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,837 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1494) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,837 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table751
2023-07-11 14:16:25,837 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1687925324=1, srv405099745=3, srv1439028200=0, srv1697037617=2, srv507737371=4, srv679978762=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,837 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,837 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,837 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:25,837 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:25,837 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:25,838 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:25,838 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,838 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table751) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,838 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table993
2023-07-11 14:16:25,838 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1687925324=1, srv405099745=3, srv1439028200=0, srv1697037617=2, srv507737371=4, srv679978762=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,838 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,838 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,838 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:25,838 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:25,838 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:25,838 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:25,838 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,838 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table993) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,838 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1011
2023-07-11 14:16:25,838 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1687925324=1, srv405099745=3, srv1439028200=0, srv1697037617=2, srv507737371=4, srv679978762=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,839 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,839 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,839 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:25,839 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:25,839 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:25,839 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:25,839 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,839 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1011) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,839 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1253
2023-07-11 14:16:25,839 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1687925324=1, srv405099745=3, srv1439028200=0, srv1697037617=2, srv507737371=4, srv679978762=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,839 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,839 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,839 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:25,839 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:25,839 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:25,839 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:25,840 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,840 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1253) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,840 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1495
2023-07-11 14:16:25,840 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1687925324=1, srv405099745=3, srv1439028200=0, srv1697037617=2, srv507737371=4, srv679978762=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,840 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,840 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,840 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:25,840 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:25,840 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:25,840 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:25,840 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,840 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1495) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,840 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table510
2023-07-11 14:16:25,840 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1687925324=1, srv405099745=3, srv1439028200=0, srv1697037617=2, srv507737371=4, srv679978762=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,841 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,841 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,841 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:25,841 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:25,841 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:25,841 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:25,841 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,841 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table510) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,841 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table752
2023-07-11 14:16:25,841 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1687925324=1, srv405099745=3, srv1439028200=0, srv1697037617=2, srv507737371=4, srv679978762=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,841 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,841 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,841 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:25,841 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:25,841 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:25,841 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:25,842 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,842 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table752) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,842 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table994
2023-07-11 14:16:25,842 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1687925324=1, srv405099745=3, srv1439028200=0, srv1697037617=2, srv507737371=4, srv679978762=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,842 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,842 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,842 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:25,842 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:25,842 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:25,842 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:25,842 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,842 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table994) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,842 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1012
2023-07-11 14:16:25,842 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1687925324=1, srv405099745=3, srv1439028200=0, srv1697037617=2, srv507737371=4, srv679978762=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,842 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,843 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,843 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:25,843 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:25,843 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:25,843 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:25,843 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,843 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1012) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,843 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1254
2023-07-11 14:16:25,843 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1687925324=1, srv405099745=3, srv1439028200=0, srv1697037617=2, srv507737371=4, srv679978762=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,843 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,843 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,843 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:25,843 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:25,843 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:25,843 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:25,844 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,844 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1254) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,844 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1496
2023-07-11 14:16:25,844 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1687925324=1, srv405099745=3, srv1439028200=0, srv1697037617=2, srv507737371=4, srv679978762=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,844 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,844 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,844 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:25,844 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:25,844 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:25,844 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:25,844 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,844 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1496) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,844 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table511
2023-07-11 14:16:25,844 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1687925324=1, srv405099745=3, srv1439028200=0, srv1697037617=2, srv507737371=4, srv679978762=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,844 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,844 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,844 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:25,845 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:25,845 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:25,845 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:25,845 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,845 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table511) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,845 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table753
2023-07-11 14:16:25,845 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1687925324=1, srv405099745=3, srv1439028200=0, srv1697037617=2, srv507737371=4, srv679978762=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,845 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,845 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,845 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:25,845 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:25,845 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:25,845 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:25,845 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,845 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table753) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,845 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table995
2023-07-11 14:16:25,845 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1687925324=1, srv405099745=3, srv1439028200=0, srv1697037617=2, srv507737371=4, srv679978762=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,845 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,846 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,846 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:25,846 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:25,846 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:25,846 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:25,846 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,846 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table995) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,846 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1013
2023-07-11 14:16:25,846 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1687925324=1, srv405099745=3, srv1439028200=0, srv1697037617=2, srv507737371=4, srv679978762=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,846 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,846 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,846 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:25,846 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:25,846 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:25,846 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:25,846 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,847 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1013) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,847 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1255
2023-07-11 14:16:25,847 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1687925324=1, srv405099745=3, srv1439028200=0, srv1697037617=2, srv507737371=4, srv679978762=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,847 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,847 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,847 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:25,847 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:25,847 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:25,847 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:25,847 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,847 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1255) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,847 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1497
2023-07-11 14:16:25,847 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1687925324=1, srv405099745=3, srv1439028200=0, srv1697037617=2, srv507737371=4, srv679978762=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,847 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,847 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,848 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:25,848 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:25,848 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:25,848 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:25,848 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,848 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1497) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,848 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table512
2023-07-11 14:16:25,848 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1687925324=1, srv405099745=3, srv1439028200=0, srv1697037617=2, srv507737371=4, srv679978762=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,848 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,848 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,848 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:25,848 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:25,848 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:25,848 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:25,848 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,848 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table512) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,848 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table754
2023-07-11 14:16:25,848 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1687925324=1, srv405099745=3, srv1439028200=0, srv1697037617=2, srv507737371=4, srv679978762=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,848 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,848 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,849 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:25,849 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:25,849 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:25,849 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:25,849 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,849 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table754) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,849 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table996
2023-07-11 14:16:25,849 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1687925324=1, srv405099745=3, srv1439028200=0, srv1697037617=2, srv507737371=4, srv679978762=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,849 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,849 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,849 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:25,849 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:25,849 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:25,849 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:25,849 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,849 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table996) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,849 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table513
2023-07-11 14:16:25,849 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1687925324=1, srv405099745=3, srv1439028200=0, srv1697037617=2, srv507737371=4, srv679978762=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,850 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,850 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,850 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:25,850 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:25,850 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:25,850 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:25,850 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,850 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table513) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,850 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table755
2023-07-11 14:16:25,850 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1687925324=1, srv405099745=3, srv1439028200=0, srv1697037617=2, srv507737371=4, srv679978762=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,850 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,850 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,850 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:25,850 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:25,850 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:25,850 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:25,851 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,851 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table755) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,851 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table997
2023-07-11 14:16:25,851 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1687925324=1, srv405099745=3, srv1439028200=0, srv1697037617=2, srv507737371=4, srv679978762=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,851 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,851 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,851 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:25,851 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:25,851 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:25,851 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:25,851 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,851 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table997) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,851 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table514
2023-07-11 14:16:25,851 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1687925324=1, srv405099745=3, srv1439028200=0, srv1697037617=2, srv507737371=4, srv679978762=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,851 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,851 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,852 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:25,852 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:25,852 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:25,852 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:25,852 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,852 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table514) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,852 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table756
2023-07-11 14:16:25,852 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1687925324=1, srv405099745=3, srv1439028200=0, srv1697037617=2, srv507737371=4, srv679978762=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,852 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,852 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,852 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:25,852 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:25,852 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:25,852 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:25,852 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,852 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table756) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,852 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table998
2023-07-11 14:16:25,852 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1687925324=1, srv405099745=3, srv1439028200=0, srv1697037617=2, srv507737371=4, srv679978762=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,852 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,852 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,852 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:25,852 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:25,852 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:25,853 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:25,853 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,853 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table998) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,853 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table515
2023-07-11 14:16:25,853 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1687925324=1, srv405099745=3, srv1439028200=0, srv1697037617=2, srv507737371=4, srv679978762=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,853 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,853 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,853 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:25,853 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:25,853 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:25,853 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:25,853 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,853 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table515) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,853 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table757
2023-07-11 14:16:25,853 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1687925324=1, srv405099745=3, srv1439028200=0, srv1697037617=2, srv507737371=4, srv679978762=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,853 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,854 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,854 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:25,854 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:25,854 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:25,854 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:25,854 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,854 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table757) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,854 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table999
2023-07-11 14:16:25,854 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1687925324=1, srv405099745=3, srv1439028200=0, srv1697037617=2, srv507737371=4, srv679978762=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,854 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,854 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,854 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:25,854 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:25,854 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:25,854 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:25,854 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,854 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table999) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,854 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table516
2023-07-11 14:16:25,854 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1687925324=1, srv405099745=3, srv1439028200=0, srv1697037617=2, srv507737371=4, srv679978762=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,854 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,855 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,855 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:25,855 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:25,855 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:25,855 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:25,855 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,855 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table516) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,855 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table758
2023-07-11 14:16:25,855 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1687925324=1, srv405099745=3, srv1439028200=0, srv1697037617=2, srv507737371=4, srv679978762=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,855 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,855 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,855 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:25,855 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:25,855 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:25,855 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:25,855 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,855 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table758) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,855 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table517
2023-07-11 14:16:25,855 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1687925324=1, srv405099745=3, srv1439028200=0, srv1697037617=2, srv507737371=4, srv679978762=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,855 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,855 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,855 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:25,855 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:25,855 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:25,856 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:25,856 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,856 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table517) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,856 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table759
2023-07-11 14:16:25,856 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1687925324=1, srv405099745=3, srv1439028200=0, srv1697037617=2, srv507737371=4, srv679978762=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,856 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,856 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,856 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:25,856 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:25,856 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:25,856 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:25,856 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,856 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table759) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,856 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table518
2023-07-11 14:16:25,856 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1687925324=1, srv405099745=3, srv1439028200=0, srv1697037617=2, srv507737371=4, srv679978762=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,856 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,856 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,856 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:25,856 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:25,856 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:25,856 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:25,856 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,856 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table518) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,857 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table519
2023-07-11 14:16:25,857 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1687925324=1, srv405099745=3, srv1439028200=0, srv1697037617=2, srv507737371=4, srv679978762=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,857 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,857 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,857 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:25,857 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:25,857 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:25,857 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:25,857 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,857 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table519) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,857 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table80
2023-07-11 14:16:25,857 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1687925324=1, srv405099745=3, srv1439028200=0, srv1697037617=2, srv507737371=4, srv679978762=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,857 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,857 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,857 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:25,857 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:25,857 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:25,857 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:25,857 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,857 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table80) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,858 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table81
2023-07-11 14:16:25,858 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1687925324=1, srv405099745=3, srv1439028200=0, srv1697037617=2, srv507737371=4, srv679978762=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,858 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,858 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,858 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:25,858 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:25,858 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:25,858 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:25,858 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,858 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table81) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,858 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table82
2023-07-11 14:16:25,858 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1687925324=1, srv405099745=3, srv1439028200=0, srv1697037617=2, srv507737371=4, srv679978762=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,858 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,858 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,858 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:25,858 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:25,858 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:25,858 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:25,858 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,859 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table82) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,859 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1014
2023-07-11 14:16:25,859 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1687925324=1, srv405099745=3, srv1439028200=0, srv1697037617=2, srv507737371=4, srv679978762=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,859 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,859 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,859 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:25,859 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:25,859 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:25,859 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:25,859 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,859 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1014) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,859 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1256
2023-07-11 14:16:25,859 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1687925324=1, srv405099745=3, srv1439028200=0, srv1697037617=2, srv507737371=4, srv679978762=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,859 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,859 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,859 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:25,859 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:25,859 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:25,859 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:25,859 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,859 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1256) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,859 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1498
2023-07-11 14:16:25,859 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1687925324=1, srv405099745=3, srv1439028200=0, srv1697037617=2, srv507737371=4, srv679978762=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,859 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,859 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,859 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:25,860 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:25,860 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:25,860 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:25,860 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,860 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1498) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,860 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table83
2023-07-11 14:16:25,860 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1687925324=1, srv405099745=3, srv1439028200=0, srv1697037617=2, srv507737371=4, srv679978762=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,860 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,860 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,860 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:25,860 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:25,860 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:25,860 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:25,860 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,860 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table83) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,860 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1015
2023-07-11 14:16:25,860 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1687925324=1, srv405099745=3, srv1439028200=0, srv1697037617=2, srv507737371=4, srv679978762=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,860 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,860 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,860 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:25,860 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:25,860 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:25,860 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:25,860 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,860 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1015) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,861 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1257
2023-07-11 14:16:25,861 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1687925324=1, srv405099745=3, srv1439028200=0, srv1697037617=2, srv507737371=4, srv679978762=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,861 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,861 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,861 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:25,861 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:25,861 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:25,861 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:25,861 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,861 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1257) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,861 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1499
2023-07-11 14:16:25,861 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1687925324=1, srv405099745=3, srv1439028200=0, srv1697037617=2, srv507737371=4, srv679978762=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,861 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,861 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,861 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:25,861 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:25,861 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:25,861 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:25,861 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,861 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1499) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,861 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table84
2023-07-11 14:16:25,861 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1687925324=1, srv405099745=3, srv1439028200=0, srv1697037617=2, srv507737371=4, srv679978762=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,861 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,861 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,861 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:25,861 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:25,861 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:25,862 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:25,862 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,862 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table84) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,862 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1016
2023-07-11 14:16:25,862 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1687925324=1, srv405099745=3, srv1439028200=0, srv1697037617=2, srv507737371=4, srv679978762=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,862 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,862 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,862 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:25,862 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:25,862 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:25,862 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:25,862 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,862 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1016) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,862 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1258
2023-07-11 14:16:25,862 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1687925324=1, srv405099745=3, srv1439028200=0, srv1697037617=2, srv507737371=4, srv679978762=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,862 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,862 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,862 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:25,862 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:25,862 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:25,862 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:25,862 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,862 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1258) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,862 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table85
2023-07-11 14:16:25,862 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1687925324=1, srv405099745=3, srv1439028200=0, srv1697037617=2, srv507737371=4, srv679978762=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,863 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,863 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,863 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:25,863 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:25,863 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:25,863 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:25,863 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,863 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table85) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,863 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1017
2023-07-11 14:16:25,863 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1687925324=1, srv405099745=3, srv1439028200=0, srv1697037617=2, srv507737371=4, srv679978762=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,863 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,863 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,863 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:25,863 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:25,863 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:25,863 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:25,863 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,863 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1017) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,863 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1259
2023-07-11 14:16:25,863 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1687925324=1, srv405099745=3, srv1439028200=0, srv1697037617=2, srv507737371=4, srv679978762=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,863 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,863 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,863 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:25,863 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:25,863 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:25,863 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:25,863 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,864 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1259) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,864 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table86
2023-07-11 14:16:25,864 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1687925324=1, srv405099745=3, srv1439028200=0, srv1697037617=2, srv507737371=4, srv679978762=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,864 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,864 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,864 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:25,864 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:25,864 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:25,864 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:25,864 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,864 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table86) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,864 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1018
2023-07-11 14:16:25,864 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1687925324=1, srv405099745=3, srv1439028200=0, srv1697037617=2, srv507737371=4, srv679978762=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,864 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,864 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,864 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:25,864 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:25,864 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:25,864 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:25,864 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,864 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1018) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,864 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table87
2023-07-11 14:16:25,864 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1687925324=1, srv405099745=3, srv1439028200=0, srv1697037617=2, srv507737371=4, srv679978762=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,864 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,864 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,864 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:25,865 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:25,865 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:25,865 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:25,865 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,865 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table87) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,865 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1019
2023-07-11 14:16:25,865 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1687925324=1, srv405099745=3, srv1439028200=0, srv1697037617=2, srv507737371=4, srv679978762=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,865 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,865 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,865 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:25,865 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:25,865 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:25,865 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:25,865 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,865 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1019) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,865 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table88
2023-07-11 14:16:25,865 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1687925324=1, srv405099745=3, srv1439028200=0, srv1697037617=2, srv507737371=4, srv679978762=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,865 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,865 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,865 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:25,865 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:25,865 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:25,865 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:25,865 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,865 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table88) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,866 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table89
2023-07-11 14:16:25,866 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1687925324=1, srv405099745=3, srv1439028200=0, srv1697037617=2, srv507737371=4, srv679978762=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,866 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,866 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,866 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:25,866 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:25,866 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:25,866 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:25,866 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,866 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table89) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,866 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table79
2023-07-11 14:16:25,866 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1687925324=1, srv405099745=3, srv1439028200=0, srv1697037617=2, srv507737371=4, srv679978762=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,866 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,866 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,866 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:25,866 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:25,866 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:25,866 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:25,866 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,866 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table79) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,866 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table780
2023-07-11 14:16:25,867 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1687925324=1, srv405099745=3, srv1439028200=0, srv1697037617=2, srv507737371=4, srv679978762=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,867 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,867 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,867 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:25,867 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:25,867 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:25,867 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:25,867 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,867 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table780) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,867 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1480
2023-07-11 14:16:25,867 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1687925324=1, srv405099745=3, srv1439028200=0, srv1697037617=2, srv507737371=4, srv679978762=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,867 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,867 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,867 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:25,867 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:25,867 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:25,867 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:25,867 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,867 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1480) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,867 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table781
2023-07-11 14:16:25,867 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1687925324=1, srv405099745=3, srv1439028200=0, srv1697037617=2, srv507737371=4, srv679978762=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,867 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,867 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,867 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:25,867 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:25,868 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:25,868 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:25,868 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,868 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table781) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,868 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1481
2023-07-11 14:16:25,868 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1687925324=1, srv405099745=3, srv1439028200=0, srv1697037617=2, srv507737371=4, srv679978762=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,868 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,868 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,868 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:25,868 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:25,868 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:25,868 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:25,868 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,868 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1481) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,868 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table540
2023-07-11 14:16:25,868 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1687925324=1, srv405099745=3, srv1439028200=0, srv1697037617=2, srv507737371=4, srv679978762=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,868 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,868 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,868 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:25,868 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:25,868 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:25,868 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:25,868 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,868 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table540) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,868 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table782
2023-07-11 14:16:25,868 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1687925324=1, srv405099745=3, srv1439028200=0, srv1697037617=2, srv507737371=4, srv679978762=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,869 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,869 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,869 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:25,869 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:25,869 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:25,869 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:25,869 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,869 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table782) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,869 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1240
2023-07-11 14:16:25,869 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1687925324=1, srv405099745=3, srv1439028200=0, srv1697037617=2, srv507737371=4, srv679978762=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,869 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,869 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,869 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:25,869 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:25,869 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:25,869 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:25,869 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,869 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1240) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,869 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1482
2023-07-11 14:16:25,869 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1687925324=1, srv405099745=3, srv1439028200=0, srv1697037617=2, srv507737371=4, srv679978762=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,869 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,869 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,869 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:25,869 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:25,869 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:25,869 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:25,869 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,870 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1482) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,870 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table541
2023-07-11 14:16:25,870 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1687925324=1, srv405099745=3, srv1439028200=0, srv1697037617=2, srv507737371=4, srv679978762=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,870 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,870 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,870 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:25,870 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:25,870 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:25,870 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:25,870 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,870 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table541) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,870 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table783
2023-07-11 14:16:25,870 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1687925324=1, srv405099745=3, srv1439028200=0, srv1697037617=2, srv507737371=4, srv679978762=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,870 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,870 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,870 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:25,870 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:25,870 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:25,870 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:25,870 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,870 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table783) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,870 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1241
2023-07-11 14:16:25,870 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1687925324=1, srv405099745=3, srv1439028200=0, srv1697037617=2, srv507737371=4, srv679978762=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,870 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,870 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,871 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:25,871 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:25,871 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:25,871 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:25,871 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,871 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1241) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,871 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1483
2023-07-11 14:16:25,871 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1687925324=1, srv405099745=3, srv1439028200=0, srv1697037617=2, srv507737371=4, srv679978762=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,871 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,871 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,871 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:25,871 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:25,871 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:25,871 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:25,871 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,871 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1483) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,871 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table300
2023-07-11 14:16:25,871 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1687925324=1, srv405099745=3, srv1439028200=0, srv1697037617=2, srv507737371=4, srv679978762=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,871 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,871 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,871 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:25,871 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:25,871 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:25,871 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:25,871 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,871 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table300) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,872 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table542
2023-07-11 14:16:25,872 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1687925324=1, srv405099745=3, srv1439028200=0, srv1697037617=2, srv507737371=4, srv679978762=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,872 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,872 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,872 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:25,872 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:25,872 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:25,872 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:25,872 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,872 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table542) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,872 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table784
2023-07-11 14:16:25,872 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1687925324=1, srv405099745=3, srv1439028200=0, srv1697037617=2, srv507737371=4, srv679978762=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,872 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,872 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,872 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:25,872 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:25,872 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:25,872 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:25,872 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,872 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table784) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,872 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1000
2023-07-11 14:16:25,872 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1687925324=1, srv405099745=3, srv1439028200=0, srv1697037617=2, srv507737371=4, srv679978762=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,872 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,872 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,872 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:25,872 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:25,872 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:25,873 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:25,873 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,873 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1000) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,873 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1242
2023-07-11 14:16:25,873 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1687925324=1, srv405099745=3, srv1439028200=0, srv1697037617=2, srv507737371=4, srv679978762=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,873 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,873 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,873 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:25,873 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:25,873 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:25,873 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:25,873 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,873 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1242) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,873 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1484
2023-07-11 14:16:25,873 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1687925324=1, srv405099745=3, srv1439028200=0, srv1697037617=2, srv507737371=4, srv679978762=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,873 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,873 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,873 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:25,873 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:25,873 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:25,873 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:25,873 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,873 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1484) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,873 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table301
2023-07-11 14:16:25,873 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1687925324=1, srv405099745=3, srv1439028200=0, srv1697037617=2, srv507737371=4, srv679978762=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,874 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,874 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,874 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:25,874 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:25,874 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:25,874 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:25,874 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,874 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table301) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,874 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table543
2023-07-11 14:16:25,874 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1687925324=1, srv405099745=3, srv1439028200=0, srv1697037617=2, srv507737371=4, srv679978762=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,874 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,874 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,874 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:25,874 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:25,874 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:25,874 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:25,874 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,874 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table543) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,874 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table785
2023-07-11 14:16:25,874 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1687925324=1, srv405099745=3, srv1439028200=0, srv1697037617=2, srv507737371=4, srv679978762=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,874 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,874 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,874 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:25,874 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:25,874 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:25,874 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:25,874 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,875 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table785) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,875 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1001
2023-07-11 14:16:25,875 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1687925324=1, srv405099745=3, srv1439028200=0, srv1697037617=2, srv507737371=4, srv679978762=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,875 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,875 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,875 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:25,875 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:25,875 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:25,875 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:25,875 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,875 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1001) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,875 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1243
2023-07-11 14:16:25,875 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1687925324=1, srv405099745=3, srv1439028200=0, srv1697037617=2, srv507737371=4, srv679978762=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,875 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,875 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,875 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:25,875 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:25,875 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:25,875 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:25,875 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,875 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1243) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,876 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1485
2023-07-11 14:16:25,876 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1687925324=1, srv405099745=3, srv1439028200=0, srv1697037617=2, srv507737371=4, srv679978762=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,876 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,876 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,876 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:25,876 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:25,876 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:25,876 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:25,876 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,876 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1485) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,876 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table302
2023-07-11 14:16:25,876 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1687925324=1, srv405099745=3, srv1439028200=0, srv1697037617=2, srv507737371=4, srv679978762=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,876 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,876 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,876 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:25,876 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:25,876 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:25,876 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:25,876 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,876 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table302) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,876 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table544
2023-07-11 14:16:25,876 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1687925324=1, srv405099745=3, srv1439028200=0, srv1697037617=2, srv507737371=4, srv679978762=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,876 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,876 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,876 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:25,877 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:25,877 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:25,877 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:25,877 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,877 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table544) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,877 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table786
2023-07-11 14:16:25,877 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1687925324=1, srv405099745=3, srv1439028200=0, srv1697037617=2, srv507737371=4, srv679978762=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,877 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,877 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,877 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:25,877 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:25,877 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:25,877 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:25,877 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,877 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table786) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,877 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1002
2023-07-11 14:16:25,877 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1687925324=1, srv405099745=3, srv1439028200=0, srv1697037617=2, srv507737371=4, srv679978762=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,877 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,877 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,877 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:25,877 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:25,877 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:25,877 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:25,877 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,877 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1002) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,878 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1244
2023-07-11 14:16:25,878 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1687925324=1, srv405099745=3, srv1439028200=0, srv1697037617=2, srv507737371=4, srv679978762=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,878 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,878 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,878 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:25,878 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:25,878 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:25,878 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:25,878 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,878 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1244) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,878 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1486
2023-07-11 14:16:25,878 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1687925324=1, srv405099745=3, srv1439028200=0, srv1697037617=2, srv507737371=4, srv679978762=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,878 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,878 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,878 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:25,878 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:25,878 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:25,878 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:25,878 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,878 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1486) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,878 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table303
2023-07-11 14:16:25,878 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1687925324=1, srv405099745=3, srv1439028200=0, srv1697037617=2, srv507737371=4, srv679978762=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,878 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,878 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,878 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:25,878 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:25,878 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:25,879 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:25,879 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,879 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table303) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,879 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table545
2023-07-11 14:16:25,879 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1687925324=1, srv405099745=3, srv1439028200=0, srv1697037617=2, srv507737371=4, srv679978762=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,879 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,879 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,879 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:25,879 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:25,879 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:25,879 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:25,879 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,879 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table545) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,879 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table787
2023-07-11 14:16:25,879 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1687925324=1, srv405099745=3, srv1439028200=0, srv1697037617=2, srv507737371=4, srv679978762=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,879 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,879 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,879 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:25,879 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:25,879 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:25,879 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:25,879 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,879 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table787) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,879 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table304
2023-07-11 14:16:25,879 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1687925324=1, srv405099745=3, srv1439028200=0, srv1697037617=2, srv507737371=4, srv679978762=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,879 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,880 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,880 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:25,880 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:25,880 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:25,880 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:25,880 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,880 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table304) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,880 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table546
2023-07-11 14:16:25,880 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1687925324=1, srv405099745=3, srv1439028200=0, srv1697037617=2, srv507737371=4, srv679978762=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,880 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,880 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,880 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:25,880 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:25,880 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:25,880 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:25,880 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,880 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table546) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,880 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table788
2023-07-11 14:16:25,880 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1687925324=1, srv405099745=3, srv1439028200=0, srv1697037617=2, srv507737371=4, srv679978762=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,880 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,880 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,880 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:25,880 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:25,880 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:25,881 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:25,881 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,881 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table788) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,881 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table305
2023-07-11 14:16:25,881 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1687925324=1, srv405099745=3, srv1439028200=0, srv1697037617=2, srv507737371=4, srv679978762=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,881 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,881 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,881 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:25,881 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:25,881 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:25,881 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:25,881 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,881 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table305) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,881 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table547
2023-07-11 14:16:25,881 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1687925324=1, srv405099745=3, srv1439028200=0, srv1697037617=2, srv507737371=4, srv679978762=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,881 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,881 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,881 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:25,881 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:25,881 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:25,881 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:25,881 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,881 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table547) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,881 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table789
2023-07-11 14:16:25,881 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1687925324=1, srv405099745=3, srv1439028200=0, srv1697037617=2, srv507737371=4, srv679978762=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,882 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,882 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,882 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:25,882 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:25,882 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:25,882 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:25,882 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,882 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table789) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,882 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table306
2023-07-11 14:16:25,882 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1687925324=1, srv405099745=3, srv1439028200=0, srv1697037617=2, srv507737371=4, srv679978762=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,882 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,882 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,882 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:25,882 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:25,882 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:25,882 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:25,882 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,882 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table306) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,882 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table548
2023-07-11 14:16:25,882 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1687925324=1, srv405099745=3, srv1439028200=0, srv1697037617=2, srv507737371=4, srv679978762=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,882 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,882 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,882 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:25,882 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:25,882 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:25,882 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:25,882 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,883 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table548) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,883 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table307
2023-07-11 14:16:25,883 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1687925324=1, srv405099745=3, srv1439028200=0, srv1697037617=2, srv507737371=4, srv679978762=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,883 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,883 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,883 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:25,883 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:25,883 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:25,883 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:25,883 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,883 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table307) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,883 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table549
2023-07-11 14:16:25,883 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1687925324=1, srv405099745=3, srv1439028200=0, srv1697037617=2, srv507737371=4, srv679978762=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,883 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,883 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,883 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:25,883 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:25,883 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:25,883 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:25,883 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,883 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table549) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,883 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table308
2023-07-11 14:16:25,883 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1687925324=1, srv405099745=3, srv1439028200=0, srv1697037617=2, srv507737371=4, srv679978762=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,883 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,883 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,884 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:25,884 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:25,884 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:25,884 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:25,884 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,884 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table308) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,884 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table309
2023-07-11 14:16:25,884 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1687925324=1, srv405099745=3, srv1439028200=0, srv1697037617=2, srv507737371=4, srv679978762=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,884 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,884 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,884 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:25,884 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:25,884 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:25,884 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:25,884 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,884 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table309) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,884 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table70
2023-07-11 14:16:25,884 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1687925324=1, srv405099745=3, srv1439028200=0, srv1697037617=2, srv507737371=4, srv679978762=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,884 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,884 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,885 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:25,885 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:25,885 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:25,885 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:25,885 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,885 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table70) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,885 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table71
2023-07-11 14:16:25,885 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1687925324=1, srv405099745=3, srv1439028200=0, srv1697037617=2, srv507737371=4, srv679978762=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,885 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,885 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,885 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:25,885 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:25,885 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:25,885 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:25,885 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,885 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table71) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,885 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1003
2023-07-11 14:16:25,885 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1687925324=1, srv405099745=3, srv1439028200=0, srv1697037617=2, srv507737371=4, srv679978762=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,885 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,885 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,885 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:25,885 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:25,885 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:25,885 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:25,885 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,886 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1003) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,886 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1245
2023-07-11 14:16:25,886 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1687925324=1, srv405099745=3, srv1439028200=0, srv1697037617=2, srv507737371=4, srv679978762=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,886 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,886 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,886 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:25,886 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:25,886 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:25,886 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:25,886 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,886 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1245) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,886 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1487
2023-07-11 14:16:25,886 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1687925324=1, srv405099745=3, srv1439028200=0, srv1697037617=2, srv507737371=4, srv679978762=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,886 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,886 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,886 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:25,886 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:25,886 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:25,886 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:25,886 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,886 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1487) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,886 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table72
2023-07-11 14:16:25,886 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1687925324=1, srv405099745=3, srv1439028200=0, srv1697037617=2, srv507737371=4, srv679978762=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,886 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,886 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,886 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:25,887 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:25,887 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:25,887 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:25,887 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,887 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table72) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,887 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1004
2023-07-11 14:16:25,887 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1687925324=1, srv405099745=3, srv1439028200=0, srv1697037617=2, srv507737371=4, srv679978762=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,887 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,887 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,887 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:25,887 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:25,887 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:25,887 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:25,887 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,887 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1004) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,887 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1246
2023-07-11 14:16:25,887 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1687925324=1, srv405099745=3, srv1439028200=0, srv1697037617=2, srv507737371=4, srv679978762=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,887 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,887 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,887 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:25,887 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:25,887 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:25,887 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:25,887 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,887 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1246) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,887 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1488
2023-07-11 14:16:25,887 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1687925324=1, srv405099745=3, srv1439028200=0, srv1697037617=2, srv507737371=4, srv679978762=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,888 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,888 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,888 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:25,888 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:25,888 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:25,888 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:25,888 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,888 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1488) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,888 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table73
2023-07-11 14:16:25,888 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1687925324=1, srv405099745=3, srv1439028200=0, srv1697037617=2, srv507737371=4, srv679978762=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,888 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,888 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,888 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:25,888 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:25,888 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:25,888 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:25,888 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,888 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table73) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,888 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1005
2023-07-11 14:16:25,888 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1687925324=1, srv405099745=3, srv1439028200=0, srv1697037617=2, srv507737371=4, srv679978762=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,888 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,888 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,888 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:25,888 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:25,888 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:25,888 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:25,889 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,889 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1005) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,889 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1247
2023-07-11 14:16:25,889 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1687925324=1, srv405099745=3, srv1439028200=0, srv1697037617=2, srv507737371=4, srv679978762=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,889 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,889 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,889 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:25,889 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:25,889 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:25,889 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:25,889 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,889 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1247) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,889 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1489
2023-07-11 14:16:25,889 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1687925324=1, srv405099745=3, srv1439028200=0, srv1697037617=2, srv507737371=4, srv679978762=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,889 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,889 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,889 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:25,889 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:25,889 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:25,889 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:25,889 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,889 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1489) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,889 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table74
2023-07-11 14:16:25,889 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1687925324=1, srv405099745=3, srv1439028200=0, srv1697037617=2, srv507737371=4, srv679978762=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,889 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,889 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,890 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:25,890 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:25,890 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:25,890 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:25,890 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,890 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table74) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,890 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1006
2023-07-11 14:16:25,890 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1687925324=1, srv405099745=3, srv1439028200=0, srv1697037617=2, srv507737371=4, srv679978762=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,890 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,890 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,890 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:25,890 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:25,890 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:25,890 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:25,890 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,890 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1006) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,890 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1248
2023-07-11 14:16:25,890 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1687925324=1, srv405099745=3, srv1439028200=0, srv1697037617=2, srv507737371=4, srv679978762=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,890 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,890 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,890 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:25,890 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:25,890 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:25,890 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:25,890 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,890 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1248) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,891 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table75
2023-07-11 14:16:25,891 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1687925324=1, srv405099745=3, srv1439028200=0, srv1697037617=2, srv507737371=4, srv679978762=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,891 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,891 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,891 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:25,891 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:25,891 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:25,891 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:25,891 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,891 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table75) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,891 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1007
2023-07-11 14:16:25,891 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1687925324=1, srv405099745=3, srv1439028200=0, srv1697037617=2, srv507737371=4, srv679978762=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,891 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,891 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,891 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:25,891 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:25,891 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:25,891 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:25,891 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,891 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1007) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,891 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1249
2023-07-11 14:16:25,891 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1687925324=1, srv405099745=3, srv1439028200=0, srv1697037617=2, srv507737371=4, srv679978762=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,891 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,891 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,891 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:25,891 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:25,891 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:25,892 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:25,892 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,892 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1249) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,892 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table76
2023-07-11 14:16:25,892 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1687925324=1, srv405099745=3, srv1439028200=0, srv1697037617=2, srv507737371=4, srv679978762=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,892 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,892 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,892 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:25,892 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:25,892 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:25,892 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:25,892 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,892 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table76) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,892 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1008
2023-07-11 14:16:25,892 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1687925324=1, srv405099745=3, srv1439028200=0, srv1697037617=2, srv507737371=4, srv679978762=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,892 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,892 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,892 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:25,892 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:25,892 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:25,892 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:25,892 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,892 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1008) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,893 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table77
2023-07-11 14:16:25,893 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1687925324=1, srv405099745=3, srv1439028200=0, srv1697037617=2, srv507737371=4, srv679978762=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,893 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,893 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,893 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:25,893 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:25,893 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:25,893 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:25,893 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,893 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table77) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,893 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1009
2023-07-11 14:16:25,893 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1687925324=1, srv405099745=3, srv1439028200=0, srv1697037617=2, srv507737371=4, srv679978762=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,893 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,893 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,893 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:25,893 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:25,893 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:25,893 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:25,893 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,893 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1009) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,893 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table78
2023-07-11 14:16:25,893 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1687925324=1, srv405099745=3, srv1439028200=0, srv1697037617=2, srv507737371=4, srv679978762=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,893 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,894 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,894 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:25,894 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:25,894 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:25,894 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:25,894 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,894 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table78) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,894 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table68
2023-07-11 14:16:25,894 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1687925324=1, srv405099745=3, srv1439028200=0, srv1697037617=2, srv507737371=4, srv679978762=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,894 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,894 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,894 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:25,894 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:25,894 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:25,894 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:25,894 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,894 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table68) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,894 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table69
2023-07-11 14:16:25,894 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1687925324=1, srv405099745=3, srv1439028200=0, srv1697037617=2, srv507737371=4, srv679978762=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,894 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,894 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,894 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:25,894 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:25,894 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:25,894 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:25,894 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,895 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table69) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,895 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table770
2023-07-11 14:16:25,895 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1687925324=1, srv405099745=3, srv1439028200=0, srv1697037617=2, srv507737371=4, srv679978762=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,895 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,895 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,895 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:25,895 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:25,895 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:25,895 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:25,895 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,895 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table770) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,895 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1470
2023-07-11 14:16:25,895 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1687925324=1, srv405099745=3, srv1439028200=0, srv1697037617=2, srv507737371=4, srv679978762=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,895 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,895 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,895 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:25,895 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:25,895 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:25,895 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:25,895 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,895 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1470) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,895 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table771
2023-07-11 14:16:25,895 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1687925324=1, srv405099745=3, srv1439028200=0, srv1697037617=2, srv507737371=4, srv679978762=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,895 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,895 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,895 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:25,895 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:25,896 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:25,896 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:25,896 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,896 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table771) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,896 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1471
2023-07-11 14:16:25,896 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1687925324=1, srv405099745=3, srv1439028200=0, srv1697037617=2, srv507737371=4, srv679978762=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,896 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,896 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,896 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:25,896 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:25,896 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:25,896 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:25,896 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,896 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1471) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,896 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table530
2023-07-11 14:16:25,896 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1687925324=1, srv405099745=3, srv1439028200=0, srv1697037617=2, srv507737371=4, srv679978762=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,896 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,896 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,896 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:25,896 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:25,896 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:25,896 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:25,896 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,896 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table530) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,896 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table772
2023-07-11 14:16:25,896 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1687925324=1, srv405099745=3, srv1439028200=0, srv1697037617=2, srv507737371=4, srv679978762=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,897 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,897 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,897 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:25,897 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:25,897 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:25,897 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:25,897 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,897 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table772) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,897 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1230
2023-07-11 14:16:25,897 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1687925324=1, srv405099745=3, srv1439028200=0, srv1697037617=2, srv507737371=4, srv679978762=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,897 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,897 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,897 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:25,897 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:25,897 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:25,897 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:25,897 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,897 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1230) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,897 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1472
2023-07-11 14:16:25,897 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1687925324=1, srv405099745=3, srv1439028200=0, srv1697037617=2, srv507737371=4, srv679978762=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,897 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,897 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,897 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:25,897 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:25,897 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:25,897 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:25,897 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,898 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1472) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,898 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table531
2023-07-11 14:16:25,898 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1687925324=1, srv405099745=3, srv1439028200=0, srv1697037617=2, srv507737371=4, srv679978762=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,898 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,898 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,898 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:25,898 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:25,898 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:25,898 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:25,898 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,898 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table531) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,898 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table773
2023-07-11 14:16:25,898 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1687925324=1, srv405099745=3, srv1439028200=0, srv1697037617=2, srv507737371=4, srv679978762=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,898 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,898 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,898 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:25,898 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:25,898 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:25,898 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:25,898 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,898 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table773) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,898 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1231
2023-07-11 14:16:25,898 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1687925324=1, srv405099745=3, srv1439028200=0, srv1697037617=2, srv507737371=4, srv679978762=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,898 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,898 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,898 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:25,899 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:25,899 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:25,899 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:25,899 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,899 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1231) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,899 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1473
2023-07-11 14:16:25,899 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1687925324=1, srv405099745=3, srv1439028200=0, srv1697037617=2, srv507737371=4, srv679978762=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,899 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,899 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,899 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:25,899 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:25,899 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:25,899 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:25,899 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,899 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1473) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,899 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table532
2023-07-11 14:16:25,899 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1687925324=1, srv405099745=3, srv1439028200=0, srv1697037617=2, srv507737371=4, srv679978762=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,899 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,899 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,899 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:25,899 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:25,899 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:25,899 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:25,899 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,899 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table532) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,899 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table774
2023-07-11 14:16:25,899 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1687925324=1, srv405099745=3, srv1439028200=0, srv1697037617=2, srv507737371=4, srv679978762=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,900 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,900 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,900 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:25,900 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:25,900 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:25,900 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:25,900 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,900 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table774) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,900 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1232
2023-07-11 14:16:25,900 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1687925324=1, srv405099745=3, srv1439028200=0, srv1697037617=2, srv507737371=4, srv679978762=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,900 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,900 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,900 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:25,900 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:25,900 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:25,900 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:25,900 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,900 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1232) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,900 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1474
2023-07-11 14:16:25,900 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1687925324=1, srv405099745=3, srv1439028200=0, srv1697037617=2, srv507737371=4, srv679978762=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,900 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,900 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,900 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:25,900 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:25,900 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:25,900 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:25,900 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,901 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1474) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,901 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table533
2023-07-11 14:16:25,901 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1687925324=1, srv405099745=3, srv1439028200=0, srv1697037617=2, srv507737371=4, srv679978762=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,901 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,901 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,901 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:25,901 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:25,901 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:25,901 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:25,901 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,901 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table533) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,901 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table775
2023-07-11 14:16:25,901 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1687925324=1, srv405099745=3, srv1439028200=0, srv1697037617=2, srv507737371=4, srv679978762=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,901 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,901 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,901 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:25,901 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:25,901 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:25,901 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:25,901 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,901 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table775) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,902 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1233
2023-07-11 14:16:25,902 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1687925324=1, srv405099745=3, srv1439028200=0, srv1697037617=2, srv507737371=4, srv679978762=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,902 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,902 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,902 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:25,902 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:25,902 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:25,902 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:25,902 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,902 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1233) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,902 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1475
2023-07-11 14:16:25,902 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1687925324=1, srv405099745=3, srv1439028200=0, srv1697037617=2, srv507737371=4, srv679978762=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,902 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,902 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,902 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:25,902 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:25,902 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:25,902 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:25,902 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,902 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1475) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,902 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table534
2023-07-11 14:16:25,902 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1687925324=1, srv405099745=3, srv1439028200=0, srv1697037617=2, srv507737371=4, srv679978762=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,902 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,902 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,902 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:25,902 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:25,903 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:25,903 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:25,903 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,903 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table534) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,903 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table776
2023-07-11 14:16:25,903 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1687925324=1, srv405099745=3, srv1439028200=0, srv1697037617=2, srv507737371=4, srv679978762=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,903 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,903 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,903 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:25,903 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:25,903 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:25,903 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:25,903 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,903 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table776) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,903 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table535
2023-07-11 14:16:25,903 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1687925324=1, srv405099745=3, srv1439028200=0, srv1697037617=2, srv507737371=4, srv679978762=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,903 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,903 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,903 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:25,903 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:25,903 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:25,903 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:25,903 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,903 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table535) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,903 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table777
2023-07-11 14:16:25,903 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1687925324=1, srv405099745=3, srv1439028200=0, srv1697037617=2, srv507737371=4, srv679978762=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,903 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,904 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,904 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:25,904 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:25,904 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:25,904 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:25,904 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,904 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table777) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,904 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table536
2023-07-11 14:16:25,904 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1687925324=1, srv405099745=3, srv1439028200=0, srv1697037617=2, srv507737371=4, srv679978762=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,904 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,904 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,904 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:25,904 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:25,904 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:25,904 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:25,904 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,904 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table536) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,904 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table778
2023-07-11 14:16:25,904 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1687925324=1, srv405099745=3, srv1439028200=0, srv1697037617=2, srv507737371=4, srv679978762=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,904 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,904 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,904 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:25,904 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:25,904 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:25,904 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:25,904 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,905 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table778) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,905 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table537
2023-07-11 14:16:25,905 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1687925324=1, srv405099745=3, srv1439028200=0, srv1697037617=2, srv507737371=4, srv679978762=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,905 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,905 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,905 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:25,905 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:25,905 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:25,905 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:25,905 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,905 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table537) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,905 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table779
2023-07-11 14:16:25,905 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1687925324=1, srv405099745=3, srv1439028200=0, srv1697037617=2, srv507737371=4, srv679978762=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,905 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,905 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,905 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:25,905 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:25,905 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:25,905 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:25,905 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,905 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table779) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,905 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table538
2023-07-11 14:16:25,905 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1687925324=1, srv405099745=3, srv1439028200=0, srv1697037617=2, srv507737371=4, srv679978762=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,905 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,905 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,905 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:25,905 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:25,906 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:25,906 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:25,906 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,906 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table538) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,906 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table539
2023-07-11 14:16:25,906 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1687925324=1, srv405099745=3, srv1439028200=0, srv1697037617=2, srv507737371=4, srv679978762=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,906 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,906 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,906 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:25,906 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:25,906 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:25,906 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:25,906 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,906 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table539) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,906 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table60
2023-07-11 14:16:25,906 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1687925324=1, srv405099745=3, srv1439028200=0, srv1697037617=2, srv507737371=4, srv679978762=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,906 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,906 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,906 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:25,906 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:25,906 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:25,906 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:25,906 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,906 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table60) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,906 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1234
2023-07-11 14:16:25,906 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1687925324=1, srv405099745=3, srv1439028200=0, srv1697037617=2, srv507737371=4, srv679978762=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,907 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,907 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,907 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:25,907 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:25,907 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:25,907 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:25,907 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,907 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1234) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,907 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1476
2023-07-11 14:16:25,907 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1687925324=1, srv405099745=3, srv1439028200=0, srv1697037617=2, srv507737371=4, srv679978762=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,907 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,907 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,907 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:25,907 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:25,907 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:25,907 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:25,907 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,907 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1476) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,907 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table61
2023-07-11 14:16:25,907 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1687925324=1, srv405099745=3, srv1439028200=0, srv1697037617=2, srv507737371=4, srv679978762=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,907 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,907 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,907 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:25,907 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:25,907 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:25,907 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:25,907 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,908 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table61) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,908 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1235
2023-07-11 14:16:25,908 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1687925324=1, srv405099745=3, srv1439028200=0, srv1697037617=2, srv507737371=4, srv679978762=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,908 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,908 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,908 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:25,908 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:25,908 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:25,908 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:25,908 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,908 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1235) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,908 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1477
2023-07-11 14:16:25,908 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1687925324=1, srv405099745=3, srv1439028200=0, srv1697037617=2, srv507737371=4, srv679978762=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,908 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,908 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,908 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:25,908 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:25,908 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:25,908 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:25,908 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,908 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1477) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,908 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table62
2023-07-11 14:16:25,908 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1687925324=1, srv405099745=3, srv1439028200=0, srv1697037617=2, srv507737371=4, srv679978762=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,908 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,908 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,909 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:25,909 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:25,909 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:25,909 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:25,909 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,909 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table62) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,909 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1236
2023-07-11 14:16:25,909 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1687925324=1, srv405099745=3, srv1439028200=0, srv1697037617=2, srv507737371=4, srv679978762=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,909 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,909 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,909 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:25,909 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:25,909 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:25,909 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:25,909 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,909 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1236) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,909 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1478
2023-07-11 14:16:25,909 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1687925324=1, srv405099745=3, srv1439028200=0, srv1697037617=2, srv507737371=4, srv679978762=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,909 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,909 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,909 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:25,909 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:25,909 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:25,909 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:25,909 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,909 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1478) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,910 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table63
2023-07-11 14:16:25,910 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1687925324=1, srv405099745=3, srv1439028200=0, srv1697037617=2, srv507737371=4, srv679978762=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,910 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,910 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,910 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:25,910 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:25,910 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:25,910 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:25,910 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,910 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table63) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,910 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1237
2023-07-11 14:16:25,910 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1687925324=1, srv405099745=3, srv1439028200=0, srv1697037617=2, srv507737371=4, srv679978762=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,910 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,910 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,910 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:25,910 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:25,910 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:25,910 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:25,910 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,910 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1237) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,910 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1479
2023-07-11 14:16:25,910 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1687925324=1, srv405099745=3, srv1439028200=0, srv1697037617=2, srv507737371=4, srv679978762=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,911 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,911 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,911 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:25,911 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:25,911 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:25,911 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:25,911 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,911 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1479) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,911 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table64
2023-07-11 14:16:25,911 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1687925324=1, srv405099745=3, srv1439028200=0, srv1697037617=2, srv507737371=4, srv679978762=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,911 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,911 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,911 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:25,911 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:25,911 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:25,911 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:25,911 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,911 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table64) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,911 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1238
2023-07-11 14:16:25,911 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1687925324=1, srv405099745=3, srv1439028200=0, srv1697037617=2, srv507737371=4, srv679978762=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,911 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,911 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,911 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:25,911 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:25,911 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:25,911 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:25,911 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,912 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1238) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,912 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table65
2023-07-11 14:16:25,912 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1687925324=1, srv405099745=3, srv1439028200=0, srv1697037617=2, srv507737371=4, srv679978762=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,912 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,912 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,912 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:25,912 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:25,912 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:25,912 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:25,912 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,912 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table65) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,912 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1239
2023-07-11 14:16:25,912 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1687925324=1, srv405099745=3, srv1439028200=0, srv1697037617=2, srv507737371=4, srv679978762=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,912 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,912 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,912 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:25,912 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:25,912 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:25,912 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:25,912 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,912 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1239) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,912 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table66
2023-07-11 14:16:25,912 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1687925324=1, srv405099745=3, srv1439028200=0, srv1697037617=2, srv507737371=4, srv679978762=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,912 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,912 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,912 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:25,913 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:25,913 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:25,913 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:25,913 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,913 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table66) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,913 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table67
2023-07-11 14:16:25,913 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1687925324=1, srv405099745=3, srv1439028200=0, srv1697037617=2, srv507737371=4, srv679978762=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,913 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,913 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,913 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:25,913 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:25,913 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:25,913 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:25,913 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,913 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table67) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,913 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1061
2023-07-11 14:16:25,913 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1687925324=1, srv405099745=3, srv1439028200=0, srv1697037617=2, srv507737371=4, srv679978762=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,913 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,913 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,913 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:25,913 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:25,913 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:25,913 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:25,913 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,913 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1061) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,914 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1062
2023-07-11 14:16:25,914 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1687925324=1, srv405099745=3, srv1439028200=0, srv1697037617=2, srv507737371=4, srv679978762=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,914 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,914 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,914 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:25,914 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:25,914 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:25,914 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:25,914 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,914 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1062) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,914 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1063
2023-07-11 14:16:25,914 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1687925324=1, srv405099745=3, srv1439028200=0, srv1697037617=2, srv507737371=4, srv679978762=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,914 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,914 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,914 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:25,914 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:25,914 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:25,914 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:25,914 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,914 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1063) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,914 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1064
2023-07-11 14:16:25,914 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1687925324=1, srv405099745=3, srv1439028200=0, srv1697037617=2, srv507737371=4, srv679978762=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,914 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,914 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,914 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:25,914 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:25,914 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:25,915 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:25,915 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,915 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1064) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,915 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1065
2023-07-11 14:16:25,915 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1687925324=1, srv405099745=3, srv1439028200=0, srv1697037617=2, srv507737371=4, srv679978762=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,915 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,915 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,915 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:25,915 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:25,915 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:25,915 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:25,915 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,915 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1065) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,915 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table960
2023-07-11 14:16:25,915 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1687925324=1, srv405099745=3, srv1439028200=0, srv1697037617=2, srv507737371=4, srv679978762=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,915 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,915 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,915 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:25,915 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:25,915 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:25,915 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:25,915 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,915 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table960) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,915 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1066
2023-07-11 14:16:25,915 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1687925324=1, srv405099745=3, srv1439028200=0, srv1697037617=2, srv507737371=4, srv679978762=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,915 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,915 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,916 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:25,916 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:25,916 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:25,916 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:25,916 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,916 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1066) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,916 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table961
2023-07-11 14:16:25,916 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1687925324=1, srv405099745=3, srv1439028200=0, srv1697037617=2, srv507737371=4, srv679978762=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,916 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,916 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,916 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:25,916 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:25,916 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:25,916 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:25,916 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,916 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table961) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,916 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1067
2023-07-11 14:16:25,916 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1687925324=1, srv405099745=3, srv1439028200=0, srv1697037617=2, srv507737371=4, srv679978762=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,916 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,916 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,916 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:25,916 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:25,916 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:25,916 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:25,916 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,916 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1067) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,917 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table720
2023-07-11 14:16:25,917 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1687925324=1, srv405099745=3, srv1439028200=0, srv1697037617=2, srv507737371=4, srv679978762=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,917 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,917 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,917 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:25,917 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:25,917 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:25,917 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:25,917 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,917 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table720) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,917 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table962
2023-07-11 14:16:25,917 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1687925324=1, srv405099745=3, srv1439028200=0, srv1697037617=2, srv507737371=4, srv679978762=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,917 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,917 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,917 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:25,917 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:25,917 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:25,917 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:25,917 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,917 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table962) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,917 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1068
2023-07-11 14:16:25,917 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1687925324=1, srv405099745=3, srv1439028200=0, srv1697037617=2, srv507737371=4, srv679978762=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,917 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,917 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,917 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:25,917 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:25,917 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:25,918 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:25,918 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,918 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1068) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,918 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table721
2023-07-11 14:16:25,918 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1687925324=1, srv405099745=3, srv1439028200=0, srv1697037617=2, srv507737371=4, srv679978762=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,918 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,918 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,918 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:25,918 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:25,918 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:25,918 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:25,918 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,918 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table721) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,918 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table963
2023-07-11 14:16:25,918 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1687925324=1, srv405099745=3, srv1439028200=0, srv1697037617=2, srv507737371=4, srv679978762=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,918 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,918 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,918 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:25,918 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:25,918 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:25,918 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:25,918 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,919 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table963) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,919 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table722
2023-07-11 14:16:25,919 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1687925324=1, srv405099745=3, srv1439028200=0, srv1697037617=2, srv507737371=4, srv679978762=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,919 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,919 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,919 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:25,919 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:25,919 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:25,919 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:25,919 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,919 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table722) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,919 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table964
2023-07-11 14:16:25,919 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1687925324=1, srv405099745=3, srv1439028200=0, srv1697037617=2, srv507737371=4, srv679978762=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,919 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,919 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,919 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:25,919 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:25,919 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:25,919 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:25,919 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,919 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table964) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,919 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table723
2023-07-11 14:16:25,919 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1687925324=1, srv405099745=3, srv1439028200=0, srv1697037617=2, srv507737371=4, srv679978762=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,919 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,919 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,919 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:25,920 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:25,920 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:25,920 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:25,920 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,920 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table723) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,920 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table965
2023-07-11 14:16:25,920 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1687925324=1, srv405099745=3, srv1439028200=0, srv1697037617=2, srv507737371=4, srv679978762=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,920 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,920 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,920 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:25,920 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:25,920 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:25,920 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:25,920 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,920 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table965) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,920 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table724
2023-07-11 14:16:25,920 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1687925324=1, srv405099745=3, srv1439028200=0, srv1697037617=2, srv507737371=4, srv679978762=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,920 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,920 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,920 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:25,920 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:25,920 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:25,920 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:25,920 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,920 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table724) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,920 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table966
2023-07-11 14:16:25,921 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1687925324=1, srv405099745=3, srv1439028200=0, srv1697037617=2, srv507737371=4, srv679978762=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,921 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,921 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,921 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:25,921 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:25,921 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:25,921 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:25,921 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,921 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table966) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,921 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table725
2023-07-11 14:16:25,921 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1687925324=1, srv405099745=3, srv1439028200=0, srv1697037617=2, srv507737371=4, srv679978762=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,921 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,921 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,921 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:25,921 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:25,921 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:25,921 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:25,922 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,922 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table725) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,922 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table967
2023-07-11 14:16:25,922 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1687925324=1, srv405099745=3, srv1439028200=0, srv1697037617=2, srv507737371=4, srv679978762=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,922 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,922 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,922 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:25,922 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:25,922 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:25,922 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:25,922 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,922 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table967) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,922 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table726
2023-07-11 14:16:25,922 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1687925324=1, srv405099745=3, srv1439028200=0, srv1697037617=2, srv507737371=4, srv679978762=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,922 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,922 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,922 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:25,922 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:25,922 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:25,922 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:25,922 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,922 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table726) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,922 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table968
2023-07-11 14:16:25,922 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1687925324=1, srv405099745=3, srv1439028200=0, srv1697037617=2, srv507737371=4, srv679978762=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,922 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,922 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,923 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:25,923 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:25,923 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:25,923 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:25,923 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,923 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table968) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,923 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table727
2023-07-11 14:16:25,923 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1687925324=1, srv405099745=3, srv1439028200=0, srv1697037617=2, srv507737371=4, srv679978762=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,923 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,923 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,923 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:25,923 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:25,923 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:25,923 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:25,923 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,923 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table727) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,923 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table969
2023-07-11 14:16:25,923 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1687925324=1, srv405099745=3, srv1439028200=0, srv1697037617=2, srv507737371=4, srv679978762=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,923 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,923 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,923 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:25,923 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:25,923 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:25,923 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:25,923 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,923 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table969) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,923 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table728
2023-07-11 14:16:25,924 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1687925324=1, srv405099745=3, srv1439028200=0, srv1697037617=2, srv507737371=4, srv679978762=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,924 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,924 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,924 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:25,924 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:25,924 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:25,924 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:25,924 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,924 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table728) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,924 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1060
2023-07-11 14:16:25,924 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1687925324=1, srv405099745=3, srv1439028200=0, srv1697037617=2, srv507737371=4, srv679978762=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,924 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,924 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,924 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:25,924 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:25,924 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:25,924 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:25,924 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,924 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1060) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,924 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table729
2023-07-11 14:16:25,924 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1687925324=1, srv405099745=3, srv1439028200=0, srv1697037617=2, srv507737371=4, srv679978762=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,924 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,924 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,924 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:25,924 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:25,924 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:25,925 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:25,925 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,925 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table729) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,925 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1069
2023-07-11 14:16:25,925 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1687925324=1, srv405099745=3, srv1439028200=0, srv1697037617=2, srv507737371=4, srv679978762=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,925 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,925 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,925 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:25,925 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:25,925 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:25,925 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:25,925 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,925 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1069) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,925 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1050
2023-07-11 14:16:25,925 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1687925324=1, srv405099745=3, srv1439028200=0, srv1697037617=2, srv507737371=4, srv679978762=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,925 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,925 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,925 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:25,925 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:25,925 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:25,925 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:25,925 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,925 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1050) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,925 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1292
2023-07-11 14:16:25,925 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1687925324=1, srv405099745=3, srv1439028200=0, srv1697037617=2, srv507737371=4, srv679978762=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,925 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,926 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,926 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:25,926 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:25,926 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:25,926 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:25,926 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,926 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1292) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,926 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1051
2023-07-11 14:16:25,926 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1687925324=1, srv405099745=3, srv1439028200=0, srv1697037617=2, srv507737371=4, srv679978762=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,926 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,926 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,926 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:25,926 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:25,926 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:25,926 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:25,926 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,926 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1051) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,926 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1293
2023-07-11 14:16:25,926 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1687925324=1, srv405099745=3, srv1439028200=0, srv1697037617=2, srv507737371=4, srv679978762=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,926 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,926 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,926 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:25,926 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:25,926 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:25,926 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:25,926 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,926 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1293) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,927 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1052
2023-07-11 14:16:25,927 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1687925324=1, srv405099745=3, srv1439028200=0, srv1697037617=2, srv507737371=4, srv679978762=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,927 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,927 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,927 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:25,927 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:25,927 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:25,927 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:25,927 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,927 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1052) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,927 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1294
2023-07-11 14:16:25,927 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1687925324=1, srv405099745=3, srv1439028200=0, srv1697037617=2, srv507737371=4, srv679978762=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,927 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,927 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,927 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:25,927 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:25,927 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:25,927 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:25,927 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,927 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1294) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,927 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1053
2023-07-11 14:16:25,928 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1687925324=1, srv405099745=3, srv1439028200=0, srv1697037617=2, srv507737371=4, srv679978762=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,928 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,928 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,928 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:25,928 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:25,928 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:25,928 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:25,928 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,928 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1053) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,928 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1295
2023-07-11 14:16:25,928 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1687925324=1, srv405099745=3, srv1439028200=0, srv1697037617=2, srv507737371=4, srv679978762=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,928 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,928 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,928 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:25,928 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:25,928 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:25,928 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:25,928 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,928 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1295) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,928 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1054
2023-07-11 14:16:25,928 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1687925324=1, srv405099745=3, srv1439028200=0, srv1697037617=2, srv507737371=4, srv679978762=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,928 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,928 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,928 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:25,928 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:25,928 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:25,928 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:25,929 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,929 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1054) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,929 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1296
2023-07-11 14:16:25,929 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1687925324=1, srv405099745=3, srv1439028200=0, srv1697037617=2, srv507737371=4, srv679978762=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,929 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,929 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,929 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:25,929 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:25,929 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:25,929 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:25,929 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,929 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1296) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,929 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1055
2023-07-11 14:16:25,929 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1687925324=1, srv405099745=3, srv1439028200=0, srv1697037617=2, srv507737371=4, srv679978762=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,929 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,929 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,929 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:25,929 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:25,929 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:25,929 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:25,929 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,929 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1055) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,929 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1297
2023-07-11 14:16:25,929 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1687925324=1, srv405099745=3, srv1439028200=0, srv1697037617=2, srv507737371=4, srv679978762=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,929 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,929 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,930 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:25,930 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:25,930 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:25,930 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:25,930 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,930 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1297) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,930 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table950
2023-07-11 14:16:25,930 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1687925324=1, srv405099745=3, srv1439028200=0, srv1697037617=2, srv507737371=4, srv679978762=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,930 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,930 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,930 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:25,930 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:25,930 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:25,930 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:25,930 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,930 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table950) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,930 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1056
2023-07-11 14:16:25,930 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1687925324=1, srv405099745=3, srv1439028200=0, srv1697037617=2, srv507737371=4, srv679978762=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,930 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,930 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,930 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:25,930 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:25,930 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:25,930 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:25,930 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,930 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1056) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,931 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1298
2023-07-11 14:16:25,931 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1687925324=1, srv405099745=3, srv1439028200=0, srv1697037617=2, srv507737371=4, srv679978762=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,931 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,931 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,931 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:25,931 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:25,931 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:25,931 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:25,931 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,931 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1298) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,931 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table951
2023-07-11 14:16:25,931 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1687925324=1, srv405099745=3, srv1439028200=0, srv1697037617=2, srv507737371=4, srv679978762=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,931 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,931 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,931 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:25,931 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:25,931 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:25,931 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:25,931 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,931 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table951) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,931 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1057
2023-07-11 14:16:25,931 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1687925324=1, srv405099745=3, srv1439028200=0, srv1697037617=2, srv507737371=4, srv679978762=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,931 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,931 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,931 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:25,931 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:25,931 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:25,931 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:25,932 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,932 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1057) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,932 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1299
2023-07-11 14:16:25,932 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1687925324=1, srv405099745=3, srv1439028200=0, srv1697037617=2, srv507737371=4, srv679978762=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,932 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,932 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,932 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:25,932 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:25,932 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:25,932 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:25,932 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,932 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1299) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,932 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table710
2023-07-11 14:16:25,932 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1687925324=1, srv405099745=3, srv1439028200=0, srv1697037617=2, srv507737371=4, srv679978762=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,932 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,932 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,932 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:25,932 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:25,932 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:25,932 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:25,932 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,932 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table710) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,932 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table952
2023-07-11 14:16:25,932 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1687925324=1, srv405099745=3, srv1439028200=0, srv1697037617=2, srv507737371=4, srv679978762=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,932 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,932 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,933 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:25,933 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:25,933 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:25,933 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:25,933 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,933 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table952) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,933 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table711
2023-07-11 14:16:25,933 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1687925324=1, srv405099745=3, srv1439028200=0, srv1697037617=2, srv507737371=4, srv679978762=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,933 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,933 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,933 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:25,933 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:25,933 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:25,933 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:25,933 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,933 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table711) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,933 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table953
2023-07-11 14:16:25,933 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1687925324=1, srv405099745=3, srv1439028200=0, srv1697037617=2, srv507737371=4, srv679978762=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,933 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,933 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,933 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:25,933 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:25,933 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:25,933 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:25,933 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,933 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table953) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,934 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table712
2023-07-11 14:16:25,934 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1687925324=1, srv405099745=3, srv1439028200=0, srv1697037617=2, srv507737371=4, srv679978762=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,934 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,934 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,934 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:25,934 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:25,934 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:25,934 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:25,934 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,934 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table712) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,934 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table954
2023-07-11 14:16:25,934 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1687925324=1, srv405099745=3, srv1439028200=0, srv1697037617=2, srv507737371=4, srv679978762=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,934 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,934 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,934 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:25,934 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:25,934 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:25,934 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:25,934 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,934 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table954) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,934 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table713
2023-07-11 14:16:25,934 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1687925324=1, srv405099745=3, srv1439028200=0, srv1697037617=2, srv507737371=4, srv679978762=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,934 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,934 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,934 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:25,934 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:25,934 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:25,935 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:25,935 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,935 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table713) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,935 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table955
2023-07-11 14:16:25,935 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1687925324=1, srv405099745=3, srv1439028200=0, srv1697037617=2, srv507737371=4, srv679978762=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,935 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,935 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,935 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:25,935 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:25,935 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:25,935 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:25,935 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,935 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table955) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,935 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table714
2023-07-11 14:16:25,935 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1687925324=1, srv405099745=3, srv1439028200=0, srv1697037617=2, srv507737371=4, srv679978762=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,935 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,935 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,935 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:25,935 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:25,935 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:25,935 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:25,935 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,935 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table714) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,935 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table956
2023-07-11 14:16:25,936 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1687925324=1, srv405099745=3, srv1439028200=0, srv1697037617=2, srv507737371=4, srv679978762=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,936 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,936 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,936 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:25,936 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:25,936 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:25,936 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:25,936 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,936 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table956) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,936 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table715
2023-07-11 14:16:25,936 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1687925324=1, srv405099745=3, srv1439028200=0, srv1697037617=2, srv507737371=4, srv679978762=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,936 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,936 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,936 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:25,936 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:25,936 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:25,936 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:25,936 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,936 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table715) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,936 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table957
2023-07-11 14:16:25,936 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1687925324=1, srv405099745=3, srv1439028200=0, srv1697037617=2, srv507737371=4, srv679978762=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,936 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,936 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,936 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:25,936 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:25,937 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:25,937 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:25,937 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,937 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table957) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,937 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table716
2023-07-11 14:16:25,937 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1687925324=1, srv405099745=3, srv1439028200=0, srv1697037617=2, srv507737371=4, srv679978762=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,937 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,937 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,937 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:25,937 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:25,937 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:25,937 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:25,937 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,937 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table716) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,937 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table958
2023-07-11 14:16:25,937 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1687925324=1, srv405099745=3, srv1439028200=0, srv1697037617=2, srv507737371=4, srv679978762=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,937 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,937 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,937 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:25,937 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:25,937 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:25,937 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:25,937 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,937 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table958) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,937 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1290
2023-07-11 14:16:25,938 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1687925324=1, srv405099745=3, srv1439028200=0, srv1697037617=2, srv507737371=4, srv679978762=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,938 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,938 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,938 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:25,938 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:25,938 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:25,938 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:25,938 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,938 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1290) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,938 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table717
2023-07-11 14:16:25,938 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1687925324=1, srv405099745=3, srv1439028200=0, srv1697037617=2, srv507737371=4, srv679978762=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,938 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,938 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,938 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:25,938 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:25,938 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:25,938 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:25,938 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,938 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table717) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,938 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table959
2023-07-11 14:16:25,938 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1687925324=1, srv405099745=3, srv1439028200=0, srv1697037617=2, srv507737371=4, srv679978762=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,938 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,938 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,938 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:25,938 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:25,938 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:25,939 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:25,939 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,939 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table959) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,939 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1291
2023-07-11 14:16:25,939 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1687925324=1, srv405099745=3, srv1439028200=0, srv1697037617=2, srv507737371=4, srv679978762=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,939 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,939 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,939 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:25,939 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:25,939 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:25,939 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:25,939 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,939 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1291) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,939 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table718
2023-07-11 14:16:25,939 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1687925324=1, srv405099745=3, srv1439028200=0, srv1697037617=2, srv507737371=4, srv679978762=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,939 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,939 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,939 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:25,939 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:25,939 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:25,939 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:25,939 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,939 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table718) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,939 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table719
2023-07-11 14:16:25,939 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1687925324=1, srv405099745=3, srv1439028200=0, srv1697037617=2, srv507737371=4, srv679978762=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,939 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,939 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,940 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:25,940 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:25,940 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:25,940 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:25,940 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,940 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table719) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,940 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1058
2023-07-11 14:16:25,940 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1687925324=1, srv405099745=3, srv1439028200=0, srv1697037617=2, srv507737371=4, srv679978762=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,940 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,940 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,940 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:25,940 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:25,940 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:25,940 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:25,940 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,940 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1058) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,940 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1059
2023-07-11 14:16:25,940 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1687925324=1, srv405099745=3, srv1439028200=0, srv1697037617=2, srv507737371=4, srv679978762=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,940 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,940 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,940 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:25,940 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:25,940 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:25,940 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:25,940 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,940 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1059) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,941 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1281
2023-07-11 14:16:25,941 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1687925324=1, srv405099745=3, srv1439028200=0, srv1697037617=2, srv507737371=4, srv679978762=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,941 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,941 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,941 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:25,941 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:25,941 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:25,941 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:25,941 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,941 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1281) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,941 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1040
2023-07-11 14:16:25,941 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1687925324=1, srv405099745=3, srv1439028200=0, srv1697037617=2, srv507737371=4, srv679978762=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,941 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,941 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,941 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:25,941 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:25,941 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:25,941 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:25,941 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,941 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1040) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,941 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1282
2023-07-11 14:16:25,941 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1687925324=1, srv405099745=3, srv1439028200=0, srv1697037617=2, srv507737371=4, srv679978762=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,941 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,941 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,941 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:25,941 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:25,941 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:25,942 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:25,942 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,942 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1282) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,942 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1041
2023-07-11 14:16:25,942 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1687925324=1, srv405099745=3, srv1439028200=0, srv1697037617=2, srv507737371=4, srv679978762=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,942 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,942 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,942 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:25,942 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:25,942 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:25,942 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:25,942 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,942 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1041) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,942 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1283
2023-07-11 14:16:25,942 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1687925324=1, srv405099745=3, srv1439028200=0, srv1697037617=2, srv507737371=4, srv679978762=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,942 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,942 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,942 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:25,942 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:25,942 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:25,942 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:25,942 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,942 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1283) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,942 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table980
2023-07-11 14:16:25,942 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1687925324=1, srv405099745=3, srv1439028200=0, srv1697037617=2, srv507737371=4, srv679978762=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,942 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,943 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,943 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:25,943 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:25,943 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:25,943 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:25,943 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,943 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table980) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,943 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1042
2023-07-11 14:16:25,943 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1687925324=1, srv405099745=3, srv1439028200=0, srv1697037617=2, srv507737371=4, srv679978762=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,943 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,943 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,943 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:25,943 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:25,943 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:25,943 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:25,943 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,943 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1042) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,943 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1284
2023-07-11 14:16:25,943 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1687925324=1, srv405099745=3, srv1439028200=0, srv1697037617=2, srv507737371=4, srv679978762=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,943 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,943 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,943 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:25,943 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:25,943 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:25,943 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:25,943 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,943 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1284) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,944 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table981
2023-07-11 14:16:25,944 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1687925324=1, srv405099745=3, srv1439028200=0, srv1697037617=2, srv507737371=4, srv679978762=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,944 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,944 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,944 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:25,944 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:25,944 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:25,944 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:25,944 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,944 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table981) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,944 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1043
2023-07-11 14:16:25,944 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1687925324=1, srv405099745=3, srv1439028200=0, srv1697037617=2, srv507737371=4, srv679978762=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,944 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,944 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,944 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:25,944 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:25,944 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:25,944 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:25,944 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,944 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1043) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,944 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1285
2023-07-11 14:16:25,945 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1687925324=1, srv405099745=3, srv1439028200=0, srv1697037617=2, srv507737371=4, srv679978762=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,945 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,945 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,945 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:25,945 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:25,945 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:25,945 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:25,945 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,945 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1285) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,945 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table740
2023-07-11 14:16:25,945 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1687925324=1, srv405099745=3, srv1439028200=0, srv1697037617=2, srv507737371=4, srv679978762=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,945 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,945 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,945 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:25,945 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:25,945 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:25,945 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:25,945 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,945 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table740) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,945 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table982
2023-07-11 14:16:25,945 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1687925324=1, srv405099745=3, srv1439028200=0, srv1697037617=2, srv507737371=4, srv679978762=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,945 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,945 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,945 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:25,945 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:25,945 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:25,946 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:25,946 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,946 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table982) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,946 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1044
2023-07-11 14:16:25,946 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1687925324=1, srv405099745=3, srv1439028200=0, srv1697037617=2, srv507737371=4, srv679978762=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,946 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,946 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,946 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:25,946 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:25,946 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:25,946 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:25,946 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,946 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1044) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,946 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1286
2023-07-11 14:16:25,946 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1687925324=1, srv405099745=3, srv1439028200=0, srv1697037617=2, srv507737371=4, srv679978762=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,946 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,946 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,946 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:25,946 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:25,946 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:25,946 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:25,946 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,947 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1286) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,947 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table741
2023-07-11 14:16:25,947 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1687925324=1, srv405099745=3, srv1439028200=0, srv1697037617=2, srv507737371=4, srv679978762=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,947 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,947 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,947 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:25,947 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:25,947 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:25,947 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:25,947 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,947 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table741) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,947 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table983
2023-07-11 14:16:25,947 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1687925324=1, srv405099745=3, srv1439028200=0, srv1697037617=2, srv507737371=4, srv679978762=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,947 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,947 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,947 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:25,947 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:25,947 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:25,947 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:25,947 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,947 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table983) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,947 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1045
2023-07-11 14:16:25,947 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1687925324=1, srv405099745=3, srv1439028200=0, srv1697037617=2, srv507737371=4, srv679978762=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,947 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,947 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,948 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:25,948 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:25,948 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:25,948 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:25,948 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,948 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1045) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,948 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1287
2023-07-11 14:16:25,948 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1687925324=1, srv405099745=3, srv1439028200=0, srv1697037617=2, srv507737371=4, srv679978762=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,948 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,948 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,948 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:25,948 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:25,948 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:25,948 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:25,948 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,948 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1287) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,948 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table500
2023-07-11 14:16:25,948 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1687925324=1, srv405099745=3, srv1439028200=0, srv1697037617=2, srv507737371=4, srv679978762=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,948 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,948 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,948 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:25,948 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:25,948 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:25,948 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:25,948 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,948 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table500) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,949 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table742
2023-07-11 14:16:25,949 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1687925324=1, srv405099745=3, srv1439028200=0, srv1697037617=2, srv507737371=4, srv679978762=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,949 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,949 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,949 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:25,949 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:25,949 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:25,949 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:25,949 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,949 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table742) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,949 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table984
2023-07-11 14:16:25,949 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1687925324=1, srv405099745=3, srv1439028200=0, srv1697037617=2, srv507737371=4, srv679978762=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,949 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,949 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,949 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:25,949 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:25,949 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:25,949 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:25,949 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,949 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table984) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,949 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1046
2023-07-11 14:16:25,949 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1687925324=1, srv405099745=3, srv1439028200=0, srv1697037617=2, srv507737371=4, srv679978762=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,949 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,949 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,949 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:25,949 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:25,950 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:25,950 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:25,950 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,950 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1046) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,950 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1288
2023-07-11 14:16:25,950 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1687925324=1, srv405099745=3, srv1439028200=0, srv1697037617=2, srv507737371=4, srv679978762=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,950 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,950 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,950 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:25,950 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:25,950 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:25,950 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:25,950 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,950 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1288) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,950 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table501
2023-07-11 14:16:25,950 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1687925324=1, srv405099745=3, srv1439028200=0, srv1697037617=2, srv507737371=4, srv679978762=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,950 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,950 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,950 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:25,950 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:25,950 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:25,950 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:25,950 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,950 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table501) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,950 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table743
2023-07-11 14:16:25,950 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1687925324=1, srv405099745=3, srv1439028200=0, srv1697037617=2, srv507737371=4, srv679978762=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,950 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,951 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,951 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:25,951 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:25,951 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:25,951 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:25,951 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,951 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table743) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,951 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table985
2023-07-11 14:16:25,951 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1687925324=1, srv405099745=3, srv1439028200=0, srv1697037617=2, srv507737371=4, srv679978762=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,951 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,951 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,951 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:25,951 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:25,951 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:25,951 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:25,951 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,951 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table985) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,951 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table502
2023-07-11 14:16:25,951 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1687925324=1, srv405099745=3, srv1439028200=0, srv1697037617=2, srv507737371=4, srv679978762=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,951 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,951 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,951 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:25,951 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:25,951 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:25,951 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:25,951 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,951 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table502) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,952 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table744
2023-07-11 14:16:25,952 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1687925324=1, srv405099745=3, srv1439028200=0, srv1697037617=2, srv507737371=4, srv679978762=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,952 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,952 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,952 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:25,952 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:25,952 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:25,952 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:25,952 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,952 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table744) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,952 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table986
2023-07-11 14:16:25,952 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1687925324=1, srv405099745=3, srv1439028200=0, srv1697037617=2, srv507737371=4, srv679978762=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,952 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,952 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,952 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:25,952 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:25,952 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:25,952 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:25,952 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,952 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table986) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,952 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table503
2023-07-11 14:16:25,952 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1687925324=1, srv405099745=3, srv1439028200=0, srv1697037617=2, srv507737371=4, srv679978762=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,952 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,952 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,952 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:25,952 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:25,952 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:25,953 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:25,953 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,953 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table503) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,953 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table745
2023-07-11 14:16:25,953 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1687925324=1, srv405099745=3, srv1439028200=0, srv1697037617=2, srv507737371=4, srv679978762=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,953 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,953 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,953 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:25,953 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:25,953 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:25,953 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:25,953 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,953 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table745) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,953 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table987
2023-07-11 14:16:25,953 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1687925324=1, srv405099745=3, srv1439028200=0, srv1697037617=2, srv507737371=4, srv679978762=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,953 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,953 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,953 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:25,953 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:25,953 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:25,953 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:25,954 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,954 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table987) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,954 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table504
2023-07-11 14:16:25,954 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1687925324=1, srv405099745=3, srv1439028200=0, srv1697037617=2, srv507737371=4, srv679978762=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,954 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,954 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,954 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:25,954 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:25,954 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:25,954 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:25,954 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,954 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table504) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,954 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table746
2023-07-11 14:16:25,954 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1687925324=1, srv405099745=3, srv1439028200=0, srv1697037617=2, srv507737371=4, srv679978762=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,954 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,954 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,954 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:25,954 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:25,954 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:25,954 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:25,954 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,954 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table746) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,954 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table988
2023-07-11 14:16:25,954 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1687925324=1, srv405099745=3, srv1439028200=0, srv1697037617=2, srv507737371=4, srv679978762=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,954 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,954 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,955 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:25,955 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:25,955 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:25,955 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:25,955 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,955 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table988) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,955 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table505
2023-07-11 14:16:25,955 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1687925324=1, srv405099745=3, srv1439028200=0, srv1697037617=2, srv507737371=4, srv679978762=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,955 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,955 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,955 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:25,955 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:25,955 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:25,955 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:25,955 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,955 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table505) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,955 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table747
2023-07-11 14:16:25,955 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1687925324=1, srv405099745=3, srv1439028200=0, srv1697037617=2, srv507737371=4, srv679978762=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,955 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,955 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,955 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:25,955 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:25,955 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:25,955 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:25,955 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,955 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table747) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,955 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table989
2023-07-11 14:16:25,956 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1687925324=1, srv405099745=3, srv1439028200=0, srv1697037617=2, srv507737371=4, srv679978762=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,956 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,956 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,956 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:25,956 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:25,956 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:25,956 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:25,956 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,956 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table989) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,956 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table506
2023-07-11 14:16:25,956 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1687925324=1, srv405099745=3, srv1439028200=0, srv1697037617=2, srv507737371=4, srv679978762=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,956 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,956 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,956 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:25,956 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:25,956 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:25,956 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:25,956 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,956 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table506) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,956 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table748
2023-07-11 14:16:25,956 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1687925324=1, srv405099745=3, srv1439028200=0, srv1697037617=2, srv507737371=4, srv679978762=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,956 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,956 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,956 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:25,956 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:25,956 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:25,956 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:25,957 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,957 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table748) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,957 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table507
2023-07-11 14:16:25,957 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1687925324=1, srv405099745=3, srv1439028200=0, srv1697037617=2, srv507737371=4, srv679978762=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,957 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,957 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,957 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:25,957 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:25,957 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:25,957 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:25,957 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,957 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table507) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,957 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table749
2023-07-11 14:16:25,957 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1687925324=1, srv405099745=3, srv1439028200=0, srv1697037617=2, srv507737371=4, srv679978762=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,957 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,957 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,957 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:25,957 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:25,957 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:25,957 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:25,957 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,957 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table749) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,957 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table508
2023-07-11 14:16:25,957 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1687925324=1, srv405099745=3, srv1439028200=0, srv1697037617=2, srv507737371=4, srv679978762=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,957 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,957 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,958 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:25,958 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:25,958 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:25,958 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:25,958 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,958 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table508) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,958 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1280
2023-07-11 14:16:25,958 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1687925324=1, srv405099745=3, srv1439028200=0, srv1697037617=2, srv507737371=4, srv679978762=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,958 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,958 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,958 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:25,958 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:25,958 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:25,958 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:25,958 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,958 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1280) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,958 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table509
2023-07-11 14:16:25,958 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1687925324=1, srv405099745=3, srv1439028200=0, srv1697037617=2, srv507737371=4, srv679978762=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,958 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,958 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,958 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:25,958 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:25,958 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:25,958 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:25,958 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,958 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table509) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,958 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1047
2023-07-11 14:16:25,959 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1687925324=1, srv405099745=3, srv1439028200=0, srv1697037617=2, srv507737371=4, srv679978762=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,959 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,959 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,959 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:25,959 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:25,959 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:25,959 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:25,959 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,959 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1047) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,959 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1289
2023-07-11 14:16:25,959 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1687925324=1, srv405099745=3, srv1439028200=0, srv1697037617=2, srv507737371=4, srv679978762=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,959 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,959 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,959 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:25,959 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:25,959 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:25,959 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:25,959 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,959 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1289) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,959 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1048
2023-07-11 14:16:25,959 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1687925324=1, srv405099745=3, srv1439028200=0, srv1697037617=2, srv507737371=4, srv679978762=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,959 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,959 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,959 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:25,959 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:25,959 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:25,959 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:25,960 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,960 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1048) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,960 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1049
2023-07-11 14:16:25,960 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1687925324=1, srv405099745=3, srv1439028200=0, srv1697037617=2, srv507737371=4, srv679978762=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,960 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,960 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,960 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:25,960 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:25,960 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:25,960 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:25,960 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,960 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1049) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,960 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1270
2023-07-11 14:16:25,960 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1687925324=1, srv405099745=3, srv1439028200=0, srv1697037617=2, srv507737371=4, srv679978762=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,960 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,960 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,960 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:25,960 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:25,960 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:25,960 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:25,960 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,960 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1270) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,960 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1271
2023-07-11 14:16:25,960 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1687925324=1, srv405099745=3, srv1439028200=0, srv1697037617=2, srv507737371=4, srv679978762=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,960 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,960 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,961 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:25,961 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:25,961 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:25,961 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:25,961 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,961 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1271) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,961 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1030
2023-07-11 14:16:25,961 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1687925324=1, srv405099745=3, srv1439028200=0, srv1697037617=2, srv507737371=4, srv679978762=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,961 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,961 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,961 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:25,961 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:25,961 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:25,961 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:25,961 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,961 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1030) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,961 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1272
2023-07-11 14:16:25,961 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1687925324=1, srv405099745=3, srv1439028200=0, srv1697037617=2, srv507737371=4, srv679978762=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,961 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,961 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,961 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:25,961 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:25,962 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:25,962 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:25,962 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,962 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1272) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,962 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1031
2023-07-11 14:16:25,962 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1687925324=1, srv405099745=3, srv1439028200=0, srv1697037617=2, srv507737371=4, srv679978762=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,962 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,962 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,962 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:25,962 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:25,962 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:25,962 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:25,962 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,962 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1031) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,962 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1273
2023-07-11 14:16:25,962 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1687925324=1, srv405099745=3, srv1439028200=0, srv1697037617=2, srv507737371=4, srv679978762=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,962 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,962 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,962 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:25,962 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:25,962 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:25,962 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:25,962 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,962 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1273) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,962 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table970
2023-07-11 14:16:25,962 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1687925324=1, srv405099745=3, srv1439028200=0, srv1697037617=2, srv507737371=4, srv679978762=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,963 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,963 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,963 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:25,963 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:25,963 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:25,963 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:25,963 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,963 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table970) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,963 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1032
2023-07-11 14:16:25,963 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1687925324=1, srv405099745=3, srv1439028200=0, srv1697037617=2, srv507737371=4, srv679978762=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,963 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,963 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,963 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:25,963 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:25,963 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:25,963 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:25,963 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,963 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1032) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,963 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1274
2023-07-11 14:16:25,963 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1687925324=1, srv405099745=3, srv1439028200=0, srv1697037617=2, srv507737371=4, srv679978762=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,963 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,963 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,963 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:25,963 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:25,963 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:25,963 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:25,963 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,964 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1274) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,964 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table971
2023-07-11 14:16:25,964 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1687925324=1, srv405099745=3, srv1439028200=0, srv1697037617=2, srv507737371=4, srv679978762=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,964 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,964 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,964 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:25,964 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:25,964 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:25,964 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:25,964 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,964 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table971) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,964 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1033
2023-07-11 14:16:25,964 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1687925324=1, srv405099745=3, srv1439028200=0, srv1697037617=2, srv507737371=4, srv679978762=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,964 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,964 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,964 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:25,964 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:25,964 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:25,964 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:25,964 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,964 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1033) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,964 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1275
2023-07-11 14:16:25,964 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1687925324=1, srv405099745=3, srv1439028200=0, srv1697037617=2, srv507737371=4, srv679978762=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,964 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,964 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,964 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:25,965 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:25,965 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:25,965 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:25,965 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,965 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1275) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,965 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table730
2023-07-11 14:16:25,965 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1687925324=1, srv405099745=3, srv1439028200=0, srv1697037617=2, srv507737371=4, srv679978762=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,965 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,965 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,965 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:25,965 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:25,965 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:25,965 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:25,965 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,965 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table730) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,965 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table972
2023-07-11 14:16:25,965 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1687925324=1, srv405099745=3, srv1439028200=0, srv1697037617=2, srv507737371=4, srv679978762=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,965 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,965 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,965 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:25,965 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:25,965 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:25,965 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:25,965 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,965 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table972) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,965 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1034
2023-07-11 14:16:25,966 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1687925324=1, srv405099745=3, srv1439028200=0, srv1697037617=2, srv507737371=4, srv679978762=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,966 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,966 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,966 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:25,966 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:25,966 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:25,966 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:25,966 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,966 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1034) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,966 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1276
2023-07-11 14:16:25,966 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1687925324=1, srv405099745=3, srv1439028200=0, srv1697037617=2, srv507737371=4, srv679978762=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,966 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,966 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,966 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:25,966 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:25,966 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:25,966 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:25,966 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,966 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1276) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,966 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table731
2023-07-11 14:16:25,966 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1687925324=1, srv405099745=3, srv1439028200=0, srv1697037617=2, srv507737371=4, srv679978762=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,966 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,966 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,966 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:25,966 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:25,966 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:25,966 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:25,967 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,967 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table731) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,967 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table973
2023-07-11 14:16:25,967 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1687925324=1, srv405099745=3, srv1439028200=0, srv1697037617=2, srv507737371=4, srv679978762=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,967 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,967 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,967 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:25,967 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:25,967 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:25,967 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:25,967 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,967 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table973) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,967 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1035
2023-07-11 14:16:25,967 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1687925324=1, srv405099745=3, srv1439028200=0, srv1697037617=2, srv507737371=4, srv679978762=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,967 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,967 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,967 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:25,967 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:25,967 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:25,967 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:25,967 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,967 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1035) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,967 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1277
2023-07-11 14:16:25,967 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1687925324=1, srv405099745=3, srv1439028200=0, srv1697037617=2, srv507737371=4, srv679978762=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,967 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,967 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,968 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:25,968 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:25,968 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:25,968 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:25,968 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,968 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1277) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,968 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table732
2023-07-11 14:16:25,968 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1687925324=1, srv405099745=3, srv1439028200=0, srv1697037617=2, srv507737371=4, srv679978762=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,968 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,968 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,968 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:25,968 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:25,968 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:25,968 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:25,968 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,968 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table732) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,968 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table974
2023-07-11 14:16:25,968 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1687925324=1, srv405099745=3, srv1439028200=0, srv1697037617=2, srv507737371=4, srv679978762=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,968 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,968 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,968 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:25,968 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:25,968 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:25,968 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:25,968 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,968 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table974) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,968 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table733
2023-07-11 14:16:25,969 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1687925324=1, srv405099745=3, srv1439028200=0, srv1697037617=2, srv507737371=4, srv679978762=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,969 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,969 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,969 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:25,969 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:25,969 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:25,969 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:25,969 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,969 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table733) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,969 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table975
2023-07-11 14:16:25,969 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1687925324=1, srv405099745=3, srv1439028200=0, srv1697037617=2, srv507737371=4, srv679978762=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,969 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,969 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,969 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:25,969 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:25,969 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:25,969 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:25,969 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,969 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table975) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,969 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table734
2023-07-11 14:16:25,969 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1687925324=1, srv405099745=3, srv1439028200=0, srv1697037617=2, srv507737371=4, srv679978762=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,969 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,969 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,969 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:25,969 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:25,969 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:25,969 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:25,970 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,970 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table734) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,970 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table976
2023-07-11 14:16:25,970 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1687925324=1, srv405099745=3, srv1439028200=0, srv1697037617=2, srv507737371=4, srv679978762=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,970 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,970 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,970 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:25,970 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:25,970 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:25,970 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:25,970 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,970 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table976) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,970 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table735
2023-07-11 14:16:25,970 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1687925324=1, srv405099745=3, srv1439028200=0, srv1697037617=2, srv507737371=4, srv679978762=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,970 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,970 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,970 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:25,970 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:25,970 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:25,970 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:25,970 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,970 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table735) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,971 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table977
2023-07-11 14:16:25,971 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1687925324=1, srv405099745=3, srv1439028200=0, srv1697037617=2, srv507737371=4, srv679978762=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,971 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,971 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,971 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:25,971 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:25,971 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:25,971 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:25,971 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,971 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table977) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,971 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table736
2023-07-11 14:16:25,971 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1687925324=1, srv405099745=3, srv1439028200=0, srv1697037617=2, srv507737371=4, srv679978762=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,971 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,971 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,971 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:25,971 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:25,971 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:25,971 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:25,971 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,971 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table736) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,971 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table978
2023-07-11 14:16:25,971 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1687925324=1, srv405099745=3, srv1439028200=0, srv1697037617=2, srv507737371=4, srv679978762=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,971 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,971 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,971 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:25,971 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:25,971 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:25,972 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:25,972 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,972 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table978) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,972 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table737
2023-07-11 14:16:25,972 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1687925324=1, srv405099745=3, srv1439028200=0, srv1697037617=2, srv507737371=4, srv679978762=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,972 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,972 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,972 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:25,972 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:25,972 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:25,972 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:25,972 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,972 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table737) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,972 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table979
2023-07-11 14:16:25,972 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1687925324=1, srv405099745=3, srv1439028200=0, srv1697037617=2, srv507737371=4, srv679978762=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,972 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,972 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,972 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:25,972 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:25,972 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:25,972 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:25,972 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,972 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table979) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,972 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table738
2023-07-11 14:16:25,972 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1687925324=1, srv405099745=3, srv1439028200=0, srv1697037617=2, srv507737371=4, srv679978762=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,972 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,973 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,973 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:25,973 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:25,973 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:25,973 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:25,973 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,973 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table738) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,973 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table739
2023-07-11 14:16:25,973 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1687925324=1, srv405099745=3, srv1439028200=0, srv1697037617=2, srv507737371=4, srv679978762=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,973 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,973 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,973 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:25,973 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:25,973 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:25,973 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:25,973 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,973 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table739) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,973 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1036
2023-07-11 14:16:25,973 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1687925324=1, srv405099745=3, srv1439028200=0, srv1697037617=2, srv507737371=4, srv679978762=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,973 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,973 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,973 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:25,973 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:25,973 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:25,973 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:25,973 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,974 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1036) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,974 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1278
2023-07-11 14:16:25,974 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1687925324=1, srv405099745=3, srv1439028200=0, srv1697037617=2, srv507737371=4, srv679978762=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,974 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,974 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,974 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:25,974 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:25,974 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:25,974 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:25,974 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,974 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1278) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,974 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1037
2023-07-11 14:16:25,974 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1687925324=1, srv405099745=3, srv1439028200=0, srv1697037617=2, srv507737371=4, srv679978762=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,974 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,974 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,974 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:25,974 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:25,974 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:25,974 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:25,974 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,974 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1037) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,974 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1279
2023-07-11 14:16:25,974 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1687925324=1, srv405099745=3, srv1439028200=0, srv1697037617=2, srv507737371=4, srv679978762=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,974 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,974 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,974 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:25,974 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:25,975 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:25,975 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:25,975 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,975 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1279) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,975 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1038
2023-07-11 14:16:25,975 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1687925324=1, srv405099745=3, srv1439028200=0, srv1697037617=2, srv507737371=4, srv679978762=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,975 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,975 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,975 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:25,975 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:25,975 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:25,975 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:25,975 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,975 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1038) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,975 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1039
2023-07-11 14:16:25,975 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1687925324=1, srv405099745=3, srv1439028200=0, srv1697037617=2, srv507737371=4, srv679978762=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,975 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,975 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,975 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:25,975 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:25,975 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:25,975 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:25,975 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,975 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1039) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,975 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table13
2023-07-11 14:16:25,975 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1687925324=1, srv405099745=3, srv1439028200=0, srv1697037617=2, srv507737371=4, srv679978762=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,975 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,976 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,976 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:25,976 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:25,976 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:25,976 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:25,976 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,976 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table13) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,976 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table361
2023-07-11 14:16:25,976 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1687925324=1, srv405099745=3, srv1439028200=0, srv1697037617=2, srv507737371=4, srv679978762=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,976 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,976 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,976 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:25,976 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:25,976 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:25,976 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:25,976 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,976 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table361) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,976 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table14
2023-07-11 14:16:25,976 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1687925324=1, srv405099745=3, srv1439028200=0, srv1697037617=2, srv507737371=4, srv679978762=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,976 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,976 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,976 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:25,976 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:25,976 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:25,976 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:25,977 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,977 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table14) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,977 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table120
2023-07-11 14:16:25,977 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1687925324=1, srv405099745=3, srv1439028200=0, srv1697037617=2, srv507737371=4, srv679978762=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,977 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,977 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,977 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:25,977 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:25,977 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:25,977 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:25,977 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,977 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table120) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,977 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table362
2023-07-11 14:16:25,977 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1687925324=1, srv405099745=3, srv1439028200=0, srv1697037617=2, srv507737371=4, srv679978762=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,977 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,977 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,977 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:25,977 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:25,977 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:25,977 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:25,977 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,977 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table362) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,977 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table15
2023-07-11 14:16:25,977 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1687925324=1, srv405099745=3, srv1439028200=0, srv1697037617=2, srv507737371=4, srv679978762=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,978 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,978 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,978 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:25,978 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:25,978 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:25,978 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:25,978 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,978 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table15) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,978 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table121
2023-07-11 14:16:25,978 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1687925324=1, srv405099745=3, srv1439028200=0, srv1697037617=2, srv507737371=4, srv679978762=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,978 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,978 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,978 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:25,978 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:25,978 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:25,978 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:25,978 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,978 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table121) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,978 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table363
2023-07-11 14:16:25,978 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1687925324=1, srv405099745=3, srv1439028200=0, srv1697037617=2, srv507737371=4, srv679978762=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,978 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,978 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,979 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:25,979 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:25,979 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:25,979 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:25,979 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,979 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table363) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,979 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table16
2023-07-11 14:16:25,979 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1687925324=1, srv405099745=3, srv1439028200=0, srv1697037617=2, srv507737371=4, srv679978762=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,979 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,979 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,979 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:25,979 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:25,979 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:25,979 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:25,979 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,979 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table16) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,979 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table122
2023-07-11 14:16:25,979 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1687925324=1, srv405099745=3, srv1439028200=0, srv1697037617=2, srv507737371=4, srv679978762=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,979 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,979 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,979 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:25,979 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:25,979 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:25,979 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:25,979 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,980 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table122) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,980 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table364
2023-07-11 14:16:25,980 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1687925324=1, srv405099745=3, srv1439028200=0, srv1697037617=2, srv507737371=4, srv679978762=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,980 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,980 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,980 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:25,980 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:25,980 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:25,980 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:25,980 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,980 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table364) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,980 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table17
2023-07-11 14:16:25,980 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1687925324=1, srv405099745=3, srv1439028200=0, srv1697037617=2, srv507737371=4, srv679978762=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,980 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,980 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,980 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:25,980 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:25,980 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:25,980 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:25,980 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,980 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table17) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,980 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table123
2023-07-11 14:16:25,980 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1687925324=1, srv405099745=3, srv1439028200=0, srv1697037617=2, srv507737371=4, srv679978762=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,980 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,980 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,980 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:25,981 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:25,981 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:25,981 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:25,981 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,981 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table123) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,981 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table365
2023-07-11 14:16:25,981 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1687925324=1, srv405099745=3, srv1439028200=0, srv1697037617=2, srv507737371=4, srv679978762=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,981 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,981 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,981 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:25,981 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:25,981 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:25,981 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:25,981 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,981 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table365) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,981 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table18
2023-07-11 14:16:25,981 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1687925324=1, srv405099745=3, srv1439028200=0, srv1697037617=2, srv507737371=4, srv679978762=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,981 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,981 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,981 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:25,981 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:25,981 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:25,981 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:25,981 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,981 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table18) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,981 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table124
2023-07-11 14:16:25,982 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1687925324=1, srv405099745=3, srv1439028200=0, srv1697037617=2, srv507737371=4, srv679978762=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,982 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,982 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,982 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:25,982 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:25,982 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:25,982 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:25,982 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,982 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table124) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,982 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table366
2023-07-11 14:16:25,982 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1687925324=1, srv405099745=3, srv1439028200=0, srv1697037617=2, srv507737371=4, srv679978762=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,982 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,982 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,982 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:25,982 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:25,982 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:25,982 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:25,982 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,982 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table366) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,982 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table19
2023-07-11 14:16:25,982 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1687925324=1, srv405099745=3, srv1439028200=0, srv1697037617=2, srv507737371=4, srv679978762=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,982 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,982 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,982 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:25,982 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:25,982 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:25,983 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:25,983 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,983 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table19) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,983 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table125
2023-07-11 14:16:25,983 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1687925324=1, srv405099745=3, srv1439028200=0, srv1697037617=2, srv507737371=4, srv679978762=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,983 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,983 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,983 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:25,983 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:25,983 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:25,983 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:25,983 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,983 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table125) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,983 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table367
2023-07-11 14:16:25,983 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1687925324=1, srv405099745=3, srv1439028200=0, srv1697037617=2, srv507737371=4, srv679978762=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,983 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,983 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,983 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:25,983 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:25,983 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:25,983 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:25,983 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,983 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table367) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,983 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table126
2023-07-11 14:16:25,983 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1687925324=1, srv405099745=3, srv1439028200=0, srv1697037617=2, srv507737371=4, srv679978762=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,984 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,984 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,984 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:25,984 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:25,984 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:25,984 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:25,984 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,984 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table126) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,984 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table368
2023-07-11 14:16:25,984 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1687925324=1, srv405099745=3, srv1439028200=0, srv1697037617=2, srv507737371=4, srv679978762=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,984 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,984 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,984 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:25,984 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:25,984 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:25,984 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:25,984 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,984 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table368) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,984 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1420
2023-07-11 14:16:25,984 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1687925324=1, srv405099745=3, srv1439028200=0, srv1697037617=2, srv507737371=4, srv679978762=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,984 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,984 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,984 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:25,984 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:25,984 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:25,984 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:25,984 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,985 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1420) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,985 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table127
2023-07-11 14:16:25,985 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1687925324=1, srv405099745=3, srv1439028200=0, srv1697037617=2, srv507737371=4, srv679978762=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,985 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,985 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,985 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:25,985 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:25,985 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:25,985 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:25,985 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,985 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table127) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,985 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table369
2023-07-11 14:16:25,985 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1687925324=1, srv405099745=3, srv1439028200=0, srv1697037617=2, srv507737371=4, srv679978762=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,985 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,985 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,985 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:25,985 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:25,985 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:25,985 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:25,985 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,985 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table369) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,985 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table128
2023-07-11 14:16:25,985 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1687925324=1, srv405099745=3, srv1439028200=0, srv1697037617=2, srv507737371=4, srv679978762=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,985 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,985 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,986 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:25,986 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:25,986 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:25,986 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:25,986 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,986 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table128) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,986 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table129
2023-07-11 14:16:25,986 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1687925324=1, srv405099745=3, srv1439028200=0, srv1697037617=2, srv507737371=4, srv679978762=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,986 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,986 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,986 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:25,986 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:25,986 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:25,986 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:25,986 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,986 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table129) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,986 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1429
2023-07-11 14:16:25,986 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1687925324=1, srv405099745=3, srv1439028200=0, srv1697037617=2, srv507737371=4, srv679978762=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,986 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,986 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,986 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:25,986 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:25,986 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:25,986 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:25,986 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,986 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1429) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,986 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1421
2023-07-11 14:16:25,987 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1687925324=1, srv405099745=3, srv1439028200=0, srv1697037617=2, srv507737371=4, srv679978762=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,987 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,987 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,987 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:25,987 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:25,987 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:25,987 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:25,987 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,987 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1421) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,987 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1422
2023-07-11 14:16:25,987 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1687925324=1, srv405099745=3, srv1439028200=0, srv1697037617=2, srv507737371=4, srv679978762=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,987 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,987 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,987 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:25,987 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:25,987 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:25,987 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:25,987 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,987 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1422) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,987 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1423
2023-07-11 14:16:25,987 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1687925324=1, srv405099745=3, srv1439028200=0, srv1697037617=2, srv507737371=4, srv679978762=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,988 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,988 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,988 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:25,988 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:25,988 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:25,988 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:25,988 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,988 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1423) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,988 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1424
2023-07-11 14:16:25,988 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1687925324=1, srv405099745=3, srv1439028200=0, srv1697037617=2, srv507737371=4, srv679978762=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,988 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,988 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,988 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:25,988 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:25,988 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:25,988 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:25,988 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,988 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1424) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,988 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1425
2023-07-11 14:16:25,988 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1687925324=1, srv405099745=3, srv1439028200=0, srv1697037617=2, srv507737371=4, srv679978762=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,988 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,988 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,988 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:25,988 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:25,988 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:25,988 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:25,989 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,989 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1425) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,989 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table10
2023-07-11 14:16:25,989 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1687925324=1, srv405099745=3, srv1439028200=0, srv1697037617=2, srv507737371=4, srv679978762=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,989 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,989 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,989 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:25,989 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:25,989 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:25,989 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:25,989 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,989 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table10) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,989 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1426
2023-07-11 14:16:25,989 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1687925324=1, srv405099745=3, srv1439028200=0, srv1697037617=2, srv507737371=4, srv679978762=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,989 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,989 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,989 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:25,989 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:25,989 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:25,989 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:25,989 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,989 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1426) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,989 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table11
2023-07-11 14:16:25,989 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1687925324=1, srv405099745=3, srv1439028200=0, srv1697037617=2, srv507737371=4, srv679978762=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,989 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,989 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,990 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:25,990 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:25,990 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:25,990 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:25,990 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,990 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table11) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,990 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table370
2023-07-11 14:16:25,990 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1687925324=1, srv405099745=3, srv1439028200=0, srv1697037617=2, srv507737371=4, srv679978762=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,990 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,990 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,990 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:25,990 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:25,990 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:25,990 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:25,990 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,990 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table370) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,990 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1427
2023-07-11 14:16:25,990 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1687925324=1, srv405099745=3, srv1439028200=0, srv1697037617=2, srv507737371=4, srv679978762=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,990 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,990 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,990 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:25,990 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:25,990 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:25,990 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:25,990 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,990 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1427) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,991 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table12
2023-07-11 14:16:25,991 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1687925324=1, srv405099745=3, srv1439028200=0, srv1697037617=2, srv507737371=4, srv679978762=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,991 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,991 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,991 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:25,991 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:25,991 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:25,991 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:25,991 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,991 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table12) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,991 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table371
2023-07-11 14:16:25,991 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1687925324=1, srv405099745=3, srv1439028200=0, srv1697037617=2, srv507737371=4, srv679978762=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,991 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,991 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,991 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:25,991 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:25,991 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:25,991 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:25,991 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,991 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table371) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,991 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1428
2023-07-11 14:16:25,991 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1687925324=1, srv405099745=3, srv1439028200=0, srv1697037617=2, srv507737371=4, srv679978762=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,991 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,991 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,991 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:25,991 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:25,991 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:25,992 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:25,992 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,992 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1428) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,992 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table350
2023-07-11 14:16:25,992 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1687925324=1, srv405099745=3, srv1439028200=0, srv1697037617=2, srv507737371=4, srv679978762=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,992 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,992 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,992 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:25,992 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:25,992 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:25,992 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:25,992 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,992 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table350) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,992 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table592
2023-07-11 14:16:25,992 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1687925324=1, srv405099745=3, srv1439028200=0, srv1697037617=2, srv507737371=4, srv679978762=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,992 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,992 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,992 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:25,992 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:25,992 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:25,992 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:25,992 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,992 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table592) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,992 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table351
2023-07-11 14:16:25,992 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1687925324=1, srv405099745=3, srv1439028200=0, srv1697037617=2, srv507737371=4, srv679978762=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,993 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,993 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,993 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:25,993 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:25,993 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:25,993 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:25,993 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,993 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table351) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,993 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table593
2023-07-11 14:16:25,993 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1687925324=1, srv405099745=3, srv1439028200=0, srv1697037617=2, srv507737371=4, srv679978762=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,993 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,993 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,993 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:25,993 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:25,993 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:25,993 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:25,993 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,993 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table593) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,993 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table110
2023-07-11 14:16:25,993 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1687925324=1, srv405099745=3, srv1439028200=0, srv1697037617=2, srv507737371=4, srv679978762=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,993 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,993 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,993 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:25,993 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:25,993 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:25,993 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:25,993 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,994 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table110) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,994 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table352
2023-07-11 14:16:25,994 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1687925324=1, srv405099745=3, srv1439028200=0, srv1697037617=2, srv507737371=4, srv679978762=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,994 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,994 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,994 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:25,994 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:25,994 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:25,994 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:25,994 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,994 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table352) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,994 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table594
2023-07-11 14:16:25,994 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1687925324=1, srv405099745=3, srv1439028200=0, srv1697037617=2, srv507737371=4, srv679978762=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,994 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,994 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,994 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:25,994 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:25,994 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:25,994 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:25,994 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,994 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table594) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,994 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table111
2023-07-11 14:16:25,994 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1687925324=1, srv405099745=3, srv1439028200=0, srv1697037617=2, srv507737371=4, srv679978762=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,994 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,994 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,994 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:25,995 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:25,995 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:25,995 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:25,995 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,995 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table111) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,995 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table353
2023-07-11 14:16:25,995 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1687925324=1, srv405099745=3, srv1439028200=0, srv1697037617=2, srv507737371=4, srv679978762=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,995 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,995 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,995 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:25,995 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:25,995 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:25,995 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:25,995 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,995 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table353) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,995 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table595
2023-07-11 14:16:25,995 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1687925324=1, srv405099745=3, srv1439028200=0, srv1697037617=2, srv507737371=4, srv679978762=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,995 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,995 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,995 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:25,995 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:25,995 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:25,995 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:25,995 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,995 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table595) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,996 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table112
2023-07-11 14:16:25,996 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1687925324=1, srv405099745=3, srv1439028200=0, srv1697037617=2, srv507737371=4, srv679978762=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,996 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,996 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,996 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:25,996 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:25,996 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:25,996 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:25,996 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,996 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table112) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,996 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table354
2023-07-11 14:16:25,996 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1687925324=1, srv405099745=3, srv1439028200=0, srv1697037617=2, srv507737371=4, srv679978762=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,996 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,996 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,996 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:25,996 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:25,996 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:25,996 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:25,996 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,996 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table354) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,996 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table596
2023-07-11 14:16:25,996 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1687925324=1, srv405099745=3, srv1439028200=0, srv1697037617=2, srv507737371=4, srv679978762=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,997 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,997 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,997 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:25,997 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:25,997 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:25,997 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:25,997 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,997 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table596) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,997 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table113
2023-07-11 14:16:25,997 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1687925324=1, srv405099745=3, srv1439028200=0, srv1697037617=2, srv507737371=4, srv679978762=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,997 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,997 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,997 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:25,997 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:25,997 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:25,997 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:25,997 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,997 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table113) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,997 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table355
2023-07-11 14:16:25,997 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1687925324=1, srv405099745=3, srv1439028200=0, srv1697037617=2, srv507737371=4, srv679978762=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,997 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,997 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,997 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:25,997 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:25,997 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:25,997 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:25,998 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,998 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table355) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,998 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table597
2023-07-11 14:16:25,998 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1687925324=1, srv405099745=3, srv1439028200=0, srv1697037617=2, srv507737371=4, srv679978762=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,998 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,998 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,998 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:25,998 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:25,998 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:25,998 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:25,998 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,998 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table597) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,998 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table114
2023-07-11 14:16:25,998 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1687925324=1, srv405099745=3, srv1439028200=0, srv1697037617=2, srv507737371=4, srv679978762=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,998 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,998 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,998 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:25,998 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:25,998 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:25,998 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:25,998 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,998 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table114) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,998 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table356
2023-07-11 14:16:25,998 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1687925324=1, srv405099745=3, srv1439028200=0, srv1697037617=2, srv507737371=4, srv679978762=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,998 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,999 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,999 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:25,999 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:25,999 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:25,999 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:25,999 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,999 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table356) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,999 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table598
2023-07-11 14:16:25,999 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1687925324=1, srv405099745=3, srv1439028200=0, srv1697037617=2, srv507737371=4, srv679978762=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,999 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,999 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,999 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:25,999 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:25,999 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:25,999 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:25,999 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,999 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table598) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:25,999 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table115
2023-07-11 14:16:25,999 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1687925324=1, srv405099745=3, srv1439028200=0, srv1697037617=2, srv507737371=4, srv679978762=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:25,999 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:25,999 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,999 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:25,999 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:25,999 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:25,999 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:25,999 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:25,999 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table115) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,000 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table357
2023-07-11 14:16:26,000 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1687925324=1, srv405099745=3, srv1439028200=0, srv1697037617=2, srv507737371=4, srv679978762=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,000 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,000 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,000 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,000 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,000 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,000 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,000 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,000 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table357) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,000 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table599
2023-07-11 14:16:26,000 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1687925324=1, srv405099745=3, srv1439028200=0, srv1697037617=2, srv507737371=4, srv679978762=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,000 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,000 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,000 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,000 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,000 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,000 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,000 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,000 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table599) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,000 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table116
2023-07-11 14:16:26,000 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1687925324=1, srv405099745=3, srv1439028200=0, srv1697037617=2, srv507737371=4, srv679978762=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,001 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,001 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,001 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,001 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,001 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,001 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,001 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,001 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table116) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,001 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table358
2023-07-11 14:16:26,001 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1687925324=1, srv405099745=3, srv1439028200=0, srv1697037617=2, srv507737371=4, srv679978762=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,001 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,001 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,001 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,001 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,001 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,001 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,001 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,001 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table358) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,001 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table117
2023-07-11 14:16:26,001 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1687925324=1, srv405099745=3, srv1439028200=0, srv1697037617=2, srv507737371=4, srv679978762=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,001 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,001 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,001 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,001 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,001 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,001 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,002 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,002 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table117) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,002 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table359
2023-07-11 14:16:26,002 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1687925324=1, srv405099745=3, srv1439028200=0, srv1697037617=2, srv507737371=4, srv679978762=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,002 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,002 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,002 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,002 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,002 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,002 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,002 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,002 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table359) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,002 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table118
2023-07-11 14:16:26,002 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1687925324=1, srv405099745=3, srv1439028200=0, srv1697037617=2, srv507737371=4, srv679978762=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,002 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,002 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,002 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,002 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,002 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,002 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,002 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,002 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table118) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,002 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table119
2023-07-11 14:16:26,002 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1687925324=1, srv405099745=3, srv1439028200=0, srv1697037617=2, srv507737371=4, srv679978762=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,002 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,003 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,003 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,003 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,003 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,003 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,003 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,003 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table119) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,003 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1418
2023-07-11 14:16:26,003 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1687925324=1, srv405099745=3, srv1439028200=0, srv1697037617=2, srv507737371=4, srv679978762=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,003 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,003 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,003 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,003 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,003 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,003 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,003 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,003 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1418) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,003 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1419
2023-07-11 14:16:26,003 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1687925324=1, srv405099745=3, srv1439028200=0, srv1697037617=2, srv507737371=4, srv679978762=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,003 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,003 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,003 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,003 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,003 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,003 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,003 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,004 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1419) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,004 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1410
2023-07-11 14:16:26,004 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1687925324=1, srv405099745=3, srv1439028200=0, srv1697037617=2, srv507737371=4, srv679978762=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,004 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,004 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,004 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,004 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,004 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,004 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,004 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,004 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1410) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,004 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1411
2023-07-11 14:16:26,004 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1687925324=1, srv405099745=3, srv1439028200=0, srv1697037617=2, srv507737371=4, srv679978762=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,004 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,004 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,004 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,004 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,004 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,004 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,004 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,004 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1411) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,004 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1412
2023-07-11 14:16:26,005 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1687925324=1, srv405099745=3, srv1439028200=0, srv1697037617=2, srv507737371=4, srv679978762=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,005 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,005 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,005 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,005 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,005 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,005 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,005 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,005 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1412) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,005 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1413
2023-07-11 14:16:26,005 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1687925324=1, srv405099745=3, srv1439028200=0, srv1697037617=2, srv507737371=4, srv679978762=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,005 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,005 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,005 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,005 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,005 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,005 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,005 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,005 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1413) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,005 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1414
2023-07-11 14:16:26,005 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1687925324=1, srv405099745=3, srv1439028200=0, srv1697037617=2, srv507737371=4, srv679978762=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,005 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,005 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,005 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,005 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,006 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,006 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,006 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,006 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1414) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,006 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1415
2023-07-11 14:16:26,006 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1687925324=1, srv405099745=3, srv1439028200=0, srv1697037617=2, srv507737371=4, srv679978762=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,006 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,006 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,006 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,006 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,006 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,006 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,006 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,006 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1415) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,006 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1416
2023-07-11 14:16:26,006 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1687925324=1, srv405099745=3, srv1439028200=0, srv1697037617=2, srv507737371=4, srv679978762=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,006 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,006 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,006 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,006 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,006 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,006 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,006 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,006 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1416) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,006 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table360
2023-07-11 14:16:26,006 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1687925324=1, srv405099745=3, srv1439028200=0, srv1697037617=2, srv507737371=4, srv679978762=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,007 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,007 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,007 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,007 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,007 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,007 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,007 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,007 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table360) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,007 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1417
2023-07-11 14:16:26,007 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1687925324=1, srv405099745=3, srv1439028200=0, srv1697037617=2, srv507737371=4, srv679978762=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,007 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,007 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,007 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,007 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,007 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,007 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,007 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,007 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1417) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,007 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table141
2023-07-11 14:16:26,007 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1687925324=1, srv405099745=3, srv1439028200=0, srv1697037617=2, srv507737371=4, srv679978762=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,007 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,007 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,007 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,007 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,007 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,007 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,007 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,008 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table141) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,008 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table383
2023-07-11 14:16:26,008 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1687925324=1, srv405099745=3, srv1439028200=0, srv1697037617=2, srv507737371=4, srv679978762=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,008 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,008 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,008 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,008 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,008 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,008 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,008 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,008 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table383) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,008 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table142
2023-07-11 14:16:26,008 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1687925324=1, srv405099745=3, srv1439028200=0, srv1697037617=2, srv507737371=4, srv679978762=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,008 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,008 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,008 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,008 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,008 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,008 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,008 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,008 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table142) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,008 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table384
2023-07-11 14:16:26,008 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1687925324=1, srv405099745=3, srv1439028200=0, srv1697037617=2, srv507737371=4, srv679978762=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,008 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,008 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,009 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,009 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,009 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,009 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,009 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,009 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table384) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,009 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table143
2023-07-11 14:16:26,009 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1687925324=1, srv405099745=3, srv1439028200=0, srv1697037617=2, srv507737371=4, srv679978762=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,009 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,009 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,009 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,009 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,009 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,009 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,009 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,009 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table143) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,009 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table385
2023-07-11 14:16:26,009 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1687925324=1, srv405099745=3, srv1439028200=0, srv1697037617=2, srv507737371=4, srv679978762=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,009 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,009 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,009 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,009 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,009 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,009 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,009 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,010 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table385) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,010 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table144
2023-07-11 14:16:26,010 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1687925324=1, srv405099745=3, srv1439028200=0, srv1697037617=2, srv507737371=4, srv679978762=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,010 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,010 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,010 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,010 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,010 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,010 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,010 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,010 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table144) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,010 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table386
2023-07-11 14:16:26,010 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1687925324=1, srv405099745=3, srv1439028200=0, srv1697037617=2, srv507737371=4, srv679978762=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,010 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,010 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,010 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,010 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,010 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,010 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,010 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,010 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table386) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,010 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table145
2023-07-11 14:16:26,010 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1687925324=1, srv405099745=3, srv1439028200=0, srv1697037617=2, srv507737371=4, srv679978762=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,010 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,010 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,010 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,010 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,011 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,011 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,011 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,011 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table145) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,011 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table387
2023-07-11 14:16:26,011 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1687925324=1, srv405099745=3, srv1439028200=0, srv1697037617=2, srv507737371=4, srv679978762=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,011 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,011 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,011 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,011 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,011 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,011 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,011 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,011 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table387) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,011 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table146
2023-07-11 14:16:26,011 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1687925324=1, srv405099745=3, srv1439028200=0, srv1697037617=2, srv507737371=4, srv679978762=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,011 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,011 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,011 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,011 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,011 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,011 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,011 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,011 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table146) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,011 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table388
2023-07-11 14:16:26,011 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1687925324=1, srv405099745=3, srv1439028200=0, srv1697037617=2, srv507737371=4, srv679978762=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,012 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,012 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,012 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,012 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,012 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,012 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,012 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,012 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table388) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,012 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table147
2023-07-11 14:16:26,012 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1687925324=1, srv405099745=3, srv1439028200=0, srv1697037617=2, srv507737371=4, srv679978762=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,012 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,012 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,012 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,012 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,012 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,012 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,012 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,012 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table147) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,012 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table389
2023-07-11 14:16:26,012 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1687925324=1, srv405099745=3, srv1439028200=0, srv1697037617=2, srv507737371=4, srv679978762=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,012 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,012 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,012 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,012 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,012 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,013 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,013 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,013 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table389) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,013 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table148
2023-07-11 14:16:26,013 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1687925324=1, srv405099745=3, srv1439028200=0, srv1697037617=2, srv507737371=4, srv679978762=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,013 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,013 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,013 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,013 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,013 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,013 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,013 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,013 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table148) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,013 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table149
2023-07-11 14:16:26,013 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1687925324=1, srv405099745=3, srv1439028200=0, srv1697037617=2, srv507737371=4, srv679978762=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,013 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,013 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,013 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,013 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,013 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,013 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,013 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,014 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table149) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,014 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,014 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1687925324=1, srv405099745=3, srv1439028200=0, srv1697037617=2, srv507737371=4, srv679978762=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,014 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,014 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,014 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,014 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,014 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,014 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,014 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,014 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table5) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,014 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1407
2023-07-11 14:16:26,014 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1687925324=1, srv405099745=3, srv1439028200=0, srv1697037617=2, srv507737371=4, srv679978762=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,014 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,014 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,014 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,014 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,014 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,014 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,014 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,014 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1407) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,014 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,014 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1687925324=1, srv405099745=3, srv1439028200=0, srv1697037617=2, srv507737371=4, srv679978762=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,014 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,014 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,015 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,015 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,015 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,015 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,015 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,015 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table4) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,015 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1408
2023-07-11 14:16:26,015 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1687925324=1, srv405099745=3, srv1439028200=0, srv1697037617=2, srv507737371=4, srv679978762=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,015 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,015 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,015 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,015 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,015 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,015 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,015 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,015 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1408) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,015 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,015 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1687925324=1, srv405099745=3, srv1439028200=0, srv1697037617=2, srv507737371=4, srv679978762=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,015 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,015 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,015 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,015 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,016 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,016 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,016 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,016 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table3) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,016 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1409
2023-07-11 14:16:26,016 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1687925324=1, srv405099745=3, srv1439028200=0, srv1697037617=2, srv507737371=4, srv679978762=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,016 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,016 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,016 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,016 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,016 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,016 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,016 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,016 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1409) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,016 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,016 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1687925324=1, srv405099745=3, srv1439028200=0, srv1697037617=2, srv507737371=4, srv679978762=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,016 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,016 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,016 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,016 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,016 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,016 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,016 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,016 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table2) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,016 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,017 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1687925324=1, srv405099745=3, srv1439028200=0, srv1697037617=2, srv507737371=4, srv679978762=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,017 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,017 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,017 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,017 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,017 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,017 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,017 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,017 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,017 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,017 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1687925324=1, srv405099745=3, srv1439028200=0, srv1697037617=2, srv507737371=4, srv679978762=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,017 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,017 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,017 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,017 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,017 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,017 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,017 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,017 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table0) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,017 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1400
2023-07-11 14:16:26,017 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1687925324=1, srv405099745=3, srv1439028200=0, srv1697037617=2, srv507737371=4, srv679978762=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,017 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,017 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,017 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,017 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,017 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,018 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,018 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,018 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1400) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,018 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1401
2023-07-11 14:16:26,018 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1687925324=1, srv405099745=3, srv1439028200=0, srv1697037617=2, srv507737371=4, srv679978762=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,018 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,018 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,018 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,018 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,018 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,018 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,018 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,018 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1401) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,018 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1402
2023-07-11 14:16:26,018 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1687925324=1, srv405099745=3, srv1439028200=0, srv1697037617=2, srv507737371=4, srv679978762=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,018 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,018 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,018 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,018 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,018 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,018 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,018 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,018 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1402) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,018 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table9
2023-07-11 14:16:26,018 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1687925324=1, srv405099745=3, srv1439028200=0, srv1697037617=2, srv507737371=4, srv679978762=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,018 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,019 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,019 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,019 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,019 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,019 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,019 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,019 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table9) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,019 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table390
2023-07-11 14:16:26,019 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1687925324=1, srv405099745=3, srv1439028200=0, srv1697037617=2, srv507737371=4, srv679978762=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,019 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,019 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,019 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,019 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,019 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,019 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,019 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,019 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table390) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,019 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1403
2023-07-11 14:16:26,019 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1687925324=1, srv405099745=3, srv1439028200=0, srv1697037617=2, srv507737371=4, srv679978762=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,019 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,019 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,019 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,019 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,019 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,019 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,019 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,020 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1403) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,020 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table8
2023-07-11 14:16:26,020 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1687925324=1, srv405099745=3, srv1439028200=0, srv1697037617=2, srv507737371=4, srv679978762=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,020 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,020 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,020 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,020 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,020 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,020 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,020 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,020 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table8) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,020 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table391
2023-07-11 14:16:26,020 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1687925324=1, srv405099745=3, srv1439028200=0, srv1697037617=2, srv507737371=4, srv679978762=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,020 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,020 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,020 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,020 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,020 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,020 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,020 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,020 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table391) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,020 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1404
2023-07-11 14:16:26,020 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1687925324=1, srv405099745=3, srv1439028200=0, srv1697037617=2, srv507737371=4, srv679978762=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,020 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,020 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,020 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,021 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,021 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,021 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,021 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,021 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1404) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,021 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table7
2023-07-11 14:16:26,021 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1687925324=1, srv405099745=3, srv1439028200=0, srv1697037617=2, srv507737371=4, srv679978762=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,021 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,021 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,021 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,021 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,021 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,021 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,021 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,021 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table7) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,021 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table150
2023-07-11 14:16:26,021 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1687925324=1, srv405099745=3, srv1439028200=0, srv1697037617=2, srv507737371=4, srv679978762=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,021 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,021 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,021 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,021 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,021 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,021 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,021 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,021 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table150) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,022 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table392
2023-07-11 14:16:26,022 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1687925324=1, srv405099745=3, srv1439028200=0, srv1697037617=2, srv507737371=4, srv679978762=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,022 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,022 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,022 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,022 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,022 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,022 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,022 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,022 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table392) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,022 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1405
2023-07-11 14:16:26,022 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1687925324=1, srv405099745=3, srv1439028200=0, srv1697037617=2, srv507737371=4, srv679978762=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,022 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,022 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,022 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,022 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,022 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,022 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,022 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,022 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1405) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,022 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table6
2023-07-11 14:16:26,022 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1687925324=1, srv405099745=3, srv1439028200=0, srv1697037617=2, srv507737371=4, srv679978762=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,023 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,023 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,023 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,023 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,023 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,023 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,023 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,023 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table6) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,023 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table151
2023-07-11 14:16:26,023 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1687925324=1, srv405099745=3, srv1439028200=0, srv1697037617=2, srv507737371=4, srv679978762=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,023 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,023 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,023 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,023 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,023 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,023 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,023 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,023 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table151) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,023 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table393
2023-07-11 14:16:26,023 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1687925324=1, srv405099745=3, srv1439028200=0, srv1697037617=2, srv507737371=4, srv679978762=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,023 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,023 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,023 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,023 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,023 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,023 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,024 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,024 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table393) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,024 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1406
2023-07-11 14:16:26,024 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1687925324=1, srv405099745=3, srv1439028200=0, srv1697037617=2, srv507737371=4, srv679978762=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,024 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,024 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,024 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,024 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,024 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,024 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,024 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,024 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1406) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,024 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table130
2023-07-11 14:16:26,024 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1687925324=1, srv405099745=3, srv1439028200=0, srv1697037617=2, srv507737371=4, srv679978762=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,024 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,024 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,024 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,024 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,024 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,024 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,024 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,024 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table130) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,024 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table372
2023-07-11 14:16:26,024 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1687925324=1, srv405099745=3, srv1439028200=0, srv1697037617=2, srv507737371=4, srv679978762=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,024 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,025 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,025 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,025 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,025 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,025 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,025 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,025 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table372) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,025 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table131
2023-07-11 14:16:26,025 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1687925324=1, srv405099745=3, srv1439028200=0, srv1697037617=2, srv507737371=4, srv679978762=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,025 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,025 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,025 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,025 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,025 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,025 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,025 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,025 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table131) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,025 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table373
2023-07-11 14:16:26,025 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1687925324=1, srv405099745=3, srv1439028200=0, srv1697037617=2, srv507737371=4, srv679978762=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,025 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,025 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,025 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,025 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,025 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,025 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,025 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,026 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table373) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,026 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table132
2023-07-11 14:16:26,026 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1687925324=1, srv405099745=3, srv1439028200=0, srv1697037617=2, srv507737371=4, srv679978762=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,026 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,026 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,026 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,026 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,026 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,026 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,026 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,026 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table132) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,026 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table374
2023-07-11 14:16:26,026 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1687925324=1, srv405099745=3, srv1439028200=0, srv1697037617=2, srv507737371=4, srv679978762=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,026 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,026 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,026 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,026 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,026 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,026 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,026 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,026 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table374) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,026 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table133
2023-07-11 14:16:26,026 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1687925324=1, srv405099745=3, srv1439028200=0, srv1697037617=2, srv507737371=4, srv679978762=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,026 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,026 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,027 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,027 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,027 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,027 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,027 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,027 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table133) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,027 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table375
2023-07-11 14:16:26,027 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1687925324=1, srv405099745=3, srv1439028200=0, srv1697037617=2, srv507737371=4, srv679978762=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,027 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,027 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,027 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,027 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,027 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,027 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,027 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,027 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table375) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,027 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table134
2023-07-11 14:16:26,027 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1687925324=1, srv405099745=3, srv1439028200=0, srv1697037617=2, srv507737371=4, srv679978762=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,027 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,027 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,027 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,027 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,027 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,027 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,027 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,027 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table134) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,028 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table376
2023-07-11 14:16:26,028 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1687925324=1, srv405099745=3, srv1439028200=0, srv1697037617=2, srv507737371=4, srv679978762=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,028 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,028 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,028 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,028 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,028 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,028 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,028 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,028 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table376) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,028 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table135
2023-07-11 14:16:26,028 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1687925324=1, srv405099745=3, srv1439028200=0, srv1697037617=2, srv507737371=4, srv679978762=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,028 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,028 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,028 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,028 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,028 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,028 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,028 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,028 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table135) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,028 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table377
2023-07-11 14:16:26,028 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1687925324=1, srv405099745=3, srv1439028200=0, srv1697037617=2, srv507737371=4, srv679978762=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,028 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,028 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,028 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,029 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,029 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,029 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,029 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,029 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table377) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,029 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table136
2023-07-11 14:16:26,029 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1687925324=1, srv405099745=3, srv1439028200=0, srv1697037617=2, srv507737371=4, srv679978762=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,029 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,029 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,029 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,029 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,029 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,029 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,029 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,029 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table136) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,029 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table378
2023-07-11 14:16:26,029 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1687925324=1, srv405099745=3, srv1439028200=0, srv1697037617=2, srv507737371=4, srv679978762=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,029 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,029 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,029 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,029 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,029 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,029 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,029 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,029 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table378) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,029 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table137
2023-07-11 14:16:26,030 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1687925324=1, srv405099745=3, srv1439028200=0, srv1697037617=2, srv507737371=4, srv679978762=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,030 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,030 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,030 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,030 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,030 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,030 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,030 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,030 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table137) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,030 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table379
2023-07-11 14:16:26,030 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1687925324=1, srv405099745=3, srv1439028200=0, srv1697037617=2, srv507737371=4, srv679978762=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,030 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,030 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,030 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,030 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,030 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,030 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,030 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,030 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table379) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,030 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table138
2023-07-11 14:16:26,030 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1687925324=1, srv405099745=3, srv1439028200=0, srv1697037617=2, srv507737371=4, srv679978762=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,030 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,030 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,030 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,030 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,030 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,031 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,031 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,031 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table138) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,031 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table139
2023-07-11 14:16:26,031 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1687925324=1, srv405099745=3, srv1439028200=0, srv1697037617=2, srv507737371=4, srv679978762=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,031 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,031 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,031 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,031 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,031 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,031 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,031 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,031 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table139) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,031 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table380
2023-07-11 14:16:26,031 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1687925324=1, srv405099745=3, srv1439028200=0, srv1697037617=2, srv507737371=4, srv679978762=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,031 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,031 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,031 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,031 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,031 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,031 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,032 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,032 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table380) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,032 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table381
2023-07-11 14:16:26,032 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1687925324=1, srv405099745=3, srv1439028200=0, srv1697037617=2, srv507737371=4, srv679978762=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,032 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,032 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,032 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,032 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,032 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,032 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,032 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,032 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table381) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,032 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table140
2023-07-11 14:16:26,032 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1687925324=1, srv405099745=3, srv1439028200=0, srv1697037617=2, srv507737371=4, srv679978762=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,032 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,032 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,032 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,032 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,032 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,032 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,032 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,032 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table140) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,032 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table382
2023-07-11 14:16:26,032 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1687925324=1, srv405099745=3, srv1439028200=0, srv1697037617=2, srv507737371=4, srv679978762=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,032 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,033 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,033 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,033 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,033 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,033 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,033 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,033 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table382) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,033 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table57
2023-07-11 14:16:26,033 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1687925324=1, srv405099745=3, srv1439028200=0, srv1697037617=2, srv507737371=4, srv679978762=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,033 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,033 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,038 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,039 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,039 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,039 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,039 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,039 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table57) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,039 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table58
2023-07-11 14:16:26,039 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1687925324=1, srv405099745=3, srv1439028200=0, srv1697037617=2, srv507737371=4, srv679978762=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,039 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,039 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,039 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,039 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,039 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,039 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,040 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,040 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table58) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,040 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table560
2023-07-11 14:16:26,040 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1687925324=1, srv405099745=3, srv1439028200=0, srv1697037617=2, srv507737371=4, srv679978762=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,040 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,040 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,040 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,040 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,040 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,040 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,040 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,040 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table560) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,040 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table59
2023-07-11 14:16:26,041 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1687925324=1, srv405099745=3, srv1439028200=0, srv1697037617=2, srv507737371=4, srv679978762=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,041 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,041 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,041 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,041 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,041 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,041 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,041 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,041 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table59) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,041 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table561
2023-07-11 14:16:26,041 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1687925324=1, srv405099745=3, srv1439028200=0, srv1697037617=2, srv507737371=4, srv679978762=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,041 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,041 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,041 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,042 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,042 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,042 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,042 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,042 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table561) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,042 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table320
2023-07-11 14:16:26,042 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1687925324=1, srv405099745=3, srv1439028200=0, srv1697037617=2, srv507737371=4, srv679978762=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,042 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,042 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,042 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,042 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,042 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,042 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,043 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,043 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table320) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,043 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table562
2023-07-11 14:16:26,043 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1687925324=1, srv405099745=3, srv1439028200=0, srv1697037617=2, srv507737371=4, srv679978762=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,043 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,043 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,043 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,043 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,043 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,043 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,043 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,043 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table562) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,043 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1460
2023-07-11 14:16:26,043 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1687925324=1, srv405099745=3, srv1439028200=0, srv1697037617=2, srv507737371=4, srv679978762=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,043 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,044 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,044 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,044 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,044 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,044 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,044 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,044 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1460) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,044 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table321
2023-07-11 14:16:26,044 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1687925324=1, srv405099745=3, srv1439028200=0, srv1697037617=2, srv507737371=4, srv679978762=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,044 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,044 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,044 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,044 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,044 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,044 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,044 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,044 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table321) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,044 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table563
2023-07-11 14:16:26,044 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1687925324=1, srv405099745=3, srv1439028200=0, srv1697037617=2, srv507737371=4, srv679978762=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,045 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,045 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,045 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,045 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,045 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,045 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,045 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,045 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table563) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,045 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1461
2023-07-11 14:16:26,045 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1687925324=1, srv405099745=3, srv1439028200=0, srv1697037617=2, srv507737371=4, srv679978762=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,045 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,045 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,045 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,045 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,045 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,045 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,045 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,045 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1461) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,045 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table322
2023-07-11 14:16:26,045 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1687925324=1, srv405099745=3, srv1439028200=0, srv1697037617=2, srv507737371=4, srv679978762=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,045 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,045 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,046 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,046 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,046 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,046 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,046 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,046 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table322) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,046 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table564
2023-07-11 14:16:26,046 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1687925324=1, srv405099745=3, srv1439028200=0, srv1697037617=2, srv507737371=4, srv679978762=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,046 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,046 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,046 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,046 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,046 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,046 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,046 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,046 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table564) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,047 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1220
2023-07-11 14:16:26,047 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1687925324=1, srv405099745=3, srv1439028200=0, srv1697037617=2, srv507737371=4, srv679978762=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,047 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,047 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,047 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,047 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,047 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,047 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,047 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,047 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1220) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,047 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1462
2023-07-11 14:16:26,047 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1687925324=1, srv405099745=3, srv1439028200=0, srv1697037617=2, srv507737371=4, srv679978762=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,047 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,047 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,047 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,048 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,048 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,048 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,048 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,048 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1462) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,048 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table323
2023-07-11 14:16:26,048 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1687925324=1, srv405099745=3, srv1439028200=0, srv1697037617=2, srv507737371=4, srv679978762=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,048 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,048 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,048 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,048 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,048 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,048 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,048 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,049 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table323) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,049 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table565
2023-07-11 14:16:26,049 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1687925324=1, srv405099745=3, srv1439028200=0, srv1697037617=2, srv507737371=4, srv679978762=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,049 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,049 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,049 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,049 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,049 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,049 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,049 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,049 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table565) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,049 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1221
2023-07-11 14:16:26,050 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1687925324=1, srv405099745=3, srv1439028200=0, srv1697037617=2, srv507737371=4, srv679978762=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,050 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,050 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,050 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,050 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,050 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,050 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,050 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,050 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1221) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,050 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1463
2023-07-11 14:16:26,050 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1687925324=1, srv405099745=3, srv1439028200=0, srv1697037617=2, srv507737371=4, srv679978762=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,050 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,050 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,050 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,051 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,051 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,051 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,051 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,051 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1463) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,051 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table324
2023-07-11 14:16:26,051 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1687925324=1, srv405099745=3, srv1439028200=0, srv1697037617=2, srv507737371=4, srv679978762=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,051 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,051 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,051 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,051 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,051 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,051 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,051 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,051 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table324) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,052 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table566
2023-07-11 14:16:26,052 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1687925324=1, srv405099745=3, srv1439028200=0, srv1697037617=2, srv507737371=4, srv679978762=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,052 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,052 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,052 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,052 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,052 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,052 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,052 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,052 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table566) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,052 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1222
2023-07-11 14:16:26,052 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1687925324=1, srv405099745=3, srv1439028200=0, srv1697037617=2, srv507737371=4, srv679978762=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,052 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,052 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,052 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,053 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,053 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,053 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,053 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,053 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1222) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,053 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1464
2023-07-11 14:16:26,053 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1687925324=1, srv405099745=3, srv1439028200=0, srv1697037617=2, srv507737371=4, srv679978762=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,053 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,053 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,053 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,053 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,053 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,053 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,053 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,054 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1464) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,054 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table325
2023-07-11 14:16:26,054 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1687925324=1, srv405099745=3, srv1439028200=0, srv1697037617=2, srv507737371=4, srv679978762=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,054 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,054 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,054 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,054 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,054 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,054 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,054 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,054 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table325) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,054 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table567
2023-07-11 14:16:26,054 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1687925324=1, srv405099745=3, srv1439028200=0, srv1697037617=2, srv507737371=4, srv679978762=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,054 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,054 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,055 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,055 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,055 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,055 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,055 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,055 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table567) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,055 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table326
2023-07-11 14:16:26,055 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1687925324=1, srv405099745=3, srv1439028200=0, srv1697037617=2, srv507737371=4, srv679978762=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,055 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,055 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,055 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,055 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,055 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,055 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,055 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,056 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table326) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,056 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table568
2023-07-11 14:16:26,056 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1687925324=1, srv405099745=3, srv1439028200=0, srv1697037617=2, srv507737371=4, srv679978762=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,056 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,056 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,056 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,056 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,056 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,056 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,056 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,056 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table568) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,056 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table327
2023-07-11 14:16:26,056 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1687925324=1, srv405099745=3, srv1439028200=0, srv1697037617=2, srv507737371=4, srv679978762=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,056 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,057 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,057 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,057 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,057 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,057 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,057 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,057 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table327) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,057 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table569
2023-07-11 14:16:26,057 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1687925324=1, srv405099745=3, srv1439028200=0, srv1697037617=2, srv507737371=4, srv679978762=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,057 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,057 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,057 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,057 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,058 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,058 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,058 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,058 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table569) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,058 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table328
2023-07-11 14:16:26,058 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1687925324=1, srv405099745=3, srv1439028200=0, srv1697037617=2, srv507737371=4, srv679978762=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,058 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,058 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,058 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,058 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,058 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,058 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,058 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,058 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table328) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,058 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table329
2023-07-11 14:16:26,059 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1687925324=1, srv405099745=3, srv1439028200=0, srv1697037617=2, srv507737371=4, srv679978762=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,059 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,059 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,059 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,059 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,059 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,059 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,059 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,059 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table329) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,059 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1223
2023-07-11 14:16:26,059 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1687925324=1, srv405099745=3, srv1439028200=0, srv1697037617=2, srv507737371=4, srv679978762=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,059 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,059 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,059 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,059 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,060 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,060 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,060 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,060 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1223) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,060 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1465
2023-07-11 14:16:26,060 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1687925324=1, srv405099745=3, srv1439028200=0, srv1697037617=2, srv507737371=4, srv679978762=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,060 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,060 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,060 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,060 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,060 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,060 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,060 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,060 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1465) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,060 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table50
2023-07-11 14:16:26,061 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1687925324=1, srv405099745=3, srv1439028200=0, srv1697037617=2, srv507737371=4, srv679978762=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,061 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,061 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,061 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,061 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,061 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,061 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,061 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,061 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table50) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,061 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1224
2023-07-11 14:16:26,061 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1687925324=1, srv405099745=3, srv1439028200=0, srv1697037617=2, srv507737371=4, srv679978762=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,061 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,061 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,061 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,061 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,062 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,062 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,062 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,062 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1224) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,062 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1466
2023-07-11 14:16:26,062 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1687925324=1, srv405099745=3, srv1439028200=0, srv1697037617=2, srv507737371=4, srv679978762=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,062 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,062 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,062 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,062 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,062 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,062 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,062 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,062 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1466) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,062 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table51
2023-07-11 14:16:26,062 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1687925324=1, srv405099745=3, srv1439028200=0, srv1697037617=2, srv507737371=4, srv679978762=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,063 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,063 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,063 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,063 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,063 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,063 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,063 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,063 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table51) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,063 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1225
2023-07-11 14:16:26,063 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1687925324=1, srv405099745=3, srv1439028200=0, srv1697037617=2, srv507737371=4, srv679978762=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,063 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,063 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,063 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,063 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,063 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,064 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,064 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,064 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1225) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,064 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1467
2023-07-11 14:16:26,064 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1687925324=1, srv405099745=3, srv1439028200=0, srv1697037617=2, srv507737371=4, srv679978762=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,064 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,064 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,064 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,064 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,064 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,064 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,064 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,065 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1467) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,065 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table52
2023-07-11 14:16:26,065 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1687925324=1, srv405099745=3, srv1439028200=0, srv1697037617=2, srv507737371=4, srv679978762=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,065 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,065 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,065 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,065 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,065 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,065 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,065 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,065 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table52) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,066 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1226
2023-07-11 14:16:26,066 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1687925324=1, srv405099745=3, srv1439028200=0, srv1697037617=2, srv507737371=4, srv679978762=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,066 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,066 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,066 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,066 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,066 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,066 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,066 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,066 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1226) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,066 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1468
2023-07-11 14:16:26,066 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1687925324=1, srv405099745=3, srv1439028200=0, srv1697037617=2, srv507737371=4, srv679978762=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,066 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,066 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,067 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,067 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,067 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,067 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,067 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,067 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1468) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,067 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table53
2023-07-11 14:16:26,067 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1687925324=1, srv405099745=3, srv1439028200=0, srv1697037617=2, srv507737371=4, srv679978762=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,067 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,067 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,067 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,067 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,067 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,068 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,068 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,068 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table53) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,068 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1227
2023-07-11 14:16:26,068 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1687925324=1, srv405099745=3, srv1439028200=0, srv1697037617=2, srv507737371=4, srv679978762=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,068 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,068 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,068 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,068 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,068 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,068 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,068 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,068 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1227) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,068 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1469
2023-07-11 14:16:26,068 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1687925324=1, srv405099745=3, srv1439028200=0, srv1697037617=2, srv507737371=4, srv679978762=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,069 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,069 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,069 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,069 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,069 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,069 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,069 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,069 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1469) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,069 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table54
2023-07-11 14:16:26,069 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1687925324=1, srv405099745=3, srv1439028200=0, srv1697037617=2, srv507737371=4, srv679978762=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,069 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,069 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,069 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,069 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,069 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,070 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,070 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,070 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table54) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,070 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1228
2023-07-11 14:16:26,070 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1687925324=1, srv405099745=3, srv1439028200=0, srv1697037617=2, srv507737371=4, srv679978762=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,070 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,070 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,070 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,070 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,070 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,070 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,070 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,070 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1228) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,070 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table55
2023-07-11 14:16:26,070 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1687925324=1, srv405099745=3, srv1439028200=0, srv1697037617=2, srv507737371=4, srv679978762=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,071 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,071 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,071 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,071 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,071 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,071 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,071 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,071 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table55) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,071 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1229
2023-07-11 14:16:26,071 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1687925324=1, srv405099745=3, srv1439028200=0, srv1697037617=2, srv507737371=4, srv679978762=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,071 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,071 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,071 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,071 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,071 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,071 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,072 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,072 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1229) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,072 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table56
2023-07-11 14:16:26,072 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1687925324=1, srv405099745=3, srv1439028200=0, srv1697037617=2, srv507737371=4, srv679978762=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,072 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,072 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,072 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,072 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,072 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,072 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,072 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,072 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table56) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,072 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table46
2023-07-11 14:16:26,073 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1687925324=1, srv405099745=3, srv1439028200=0, srv1697037617=2, srv507737371=4, srv679978762=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,073 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,073 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,073 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,073 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,073 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,073 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,073 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,073 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table46) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,073 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table790
2023-07-11 14:16:26,073 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1687925324=1, srv405099745=3, srv1439028200=0, srv1697037617=2, srv507737371=4, srv679978762=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,073 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,073 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,073 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,074 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,074 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,074 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,074 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,074 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table790) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,074 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table47
2023-07-11 14:16:26,074 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1687925324=1, srv405099745=3, srv1439028200=0, srv1697037617=2, srv507737371=4, srv679978762=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,074 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,074 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,074 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,074 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,074 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,074 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,074 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,075 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table47) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,075 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table791
2023-07-11 14:16:26,075 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1687925324=1, srv405099745=3, srv1439028200=0, srv1697037617=2, srv507737371=4, srv679978762=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,075 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,075 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,075 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,075 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,075 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,075 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,075 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,075 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table791) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,075 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table48
2023-07-11 14:16:26,075 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1687925324=1, srv405099745=3, srv1439028200=0, srv1697037617=2, srv507737371=4, srv679978762=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,076 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,076 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,076 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,076 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,076 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,076 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,076 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,076 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table48) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,076 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table550
2023-07-11 14:16:26,076 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1687925324=1, srv405099745=3, srv1439028200=0, srv1697037617=2, srv507737371=4, srv679978762=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,076 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,076 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,076 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,076 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,076 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,077 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,077 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,077 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table550) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,077 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table792
2023-07-11 14:16:26,077 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1687925324=1, srv405099745=3, srv1439028200=0, srv1697037617=2, srv507737371=4, srv679978762=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,077 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,077 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,077 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,077 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,077 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,077 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,077 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,078 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table792) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,078 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table49
2023-07-11 14:16:26,078 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1687925324=1, srv405099745=3, srv1439028200=0, srv1697037617=2, srv507737371=4, srv679978762=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,078 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,078 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,078 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,078 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,078 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,078 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,078 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,078 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table49) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,078 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table551
2023-07-11 14:16:26,078 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1687925324=1, srv405099745=3, srv1439028200=0, srv1697037617=2, srv507737371=4, srv679978762=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,078 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,078 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,078 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,079 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,079 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,079 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,079 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,079 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table551) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,079 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table793
2023-07-11 14:16:26,079 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1687925324=1, srv405099745=3, srv1439028200=0, srv1697037617=2, srv507737371=4, srv679978762=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,079 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,079 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,079 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,079 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,079 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,079 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,079 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,080 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table793) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,080 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table310
2023-07-11 14:16:26,080 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1687925324=1, srv405099745=3, srv1439028200=0, srv1697037617=2, srv507737371=4, srv679978762=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,080 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,080 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,080 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,080 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,080 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,080 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,080 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,080 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table310) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,081 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table552
2023-07-11 14:16:26,081 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1687925324=1, srv405099745=3, srv1439028200=0, srv1697037617=2, srv507737371=4, srv679978762=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,081 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,081 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,081 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,081 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,081 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,081 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,081 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,081 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table552) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,081 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table794
2023-07-11 14:16:26,081 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1687925324=1, srv405099745=3, srv1439028200=0, srv1697037617=2, srv507737371=4, srv679978762=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,082 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,082 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,082 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,082 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,082 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,082 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,082 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,082 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table794) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,082 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1450
2023-07-11 14:16:26,082 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1687925324=1, srv405099745=3, srv1439028200=0, srv1697037617=2, srv507737371=4, srv679978762=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,082 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,082 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,082 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,082 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,082 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,083 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,083 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,083 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1450) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,083 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table311
2023-07-11 14:16:26,083 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1687925324=1, srv405099745=3, srv1439028200=0, srv1697037617=2, srv507737371=4, srv679978762=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,083 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,083 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,083 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,083 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,083 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,083 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,083 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,083 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table311) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,083 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table553
2023-07-11 14:16:26,084 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1687925324=1, srv405099745=3, srv1439028200=0, srv1697037617=2, srv507737371=4, srv679978762=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,084 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,084 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,084 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,084 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,084 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,084 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,084 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,084 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table553) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,084 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table795
2023-07-11 14:16:26,084 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1687925324=1, srv405099745=3, srv1439028200=0, srv1697037617=2, srv507737371=4, srv679978762=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,084 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,084 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,084 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,084 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,085 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,085 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,085 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,085 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table795) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,085 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1451
2023-07-11 14:16:26,085 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1687925324=1, srv405099745=3, srv1439028200=0, srv1697037617=2, srv507737371=4, srv679978762=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,085 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,085 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,085 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,085 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,085 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,085 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,085 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,085 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1451) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,085 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table312
2023-07-11 14:16:26,085 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1687925324=1, srv405099745=3, srv1439028200=0, srv1697037617=2, srv507737371=4, srv679978762=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,086 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,086 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,086 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,086 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,086 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,086 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,086 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,086 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table312) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,086 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table554
2023-07-11 14:16:26,086 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1687925324=1, srv405099745=3, srv1439028200=0, srv1697037617=2, srv507737371=4, srv679978762=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,086 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,086 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,086 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,086 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,086 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,086 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,086 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,086 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table554) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,086 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table796
2023-07-11 14:16:26,086 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1687925324=1, srv405099745=3, srv1439028200=0, srv1697037617=2, srv507737371=4, srv679978762=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,086 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,086 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,086 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,086 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,086 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,086 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,086 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,087 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table796) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,087 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1210
2023-07-11 14:16:26,087 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1687925324=1, srv405099745=3, srv1439028200=0, srv1697037617=2, srv507737371=4, srv679978762=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,087 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,087 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,087 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,087 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,087 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,087 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,087 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,087 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1210) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,087 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1452
2023-07-11 14:16:26,087 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1687925324=1, srv405099745=3, srv1439028200=0, srv1697037617=2, srv507737371=4, srv679978762=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,087 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,087 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,087 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,087 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,087 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,087 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,087 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,087 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1452) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,087 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table313
2023-07-11 14:16:26,087 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1687925324=1, srv405099745=3, srv1439028200=0, srv1697037617=2, srv507737371=4, srv679978762=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,087 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,087 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,087 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,088 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,088 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,088 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,088 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,088 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table313) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,088 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table555
2023-07-11 14:16:26,088 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1687925324=1, srv405099745=3, srv1439028200=0, srv1697037617=2, srv507737371=4, srv679978762=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,088 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,088 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,088 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,088 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,088 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,088 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,088 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,088 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table555) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,088 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table797
2023-07-11 14:16:26,088 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1687925324=1, srv405099745=3, srv1439028200=0, srv1697037617=2, srv507737371=4, srv679978762=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,088 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,088 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,088 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,088 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,088 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,088 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,088 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,088 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table797) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,088 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1211
2023-07-11 14:16:26,089 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1687925324=1, srv405099745=3, srv1439028200=0, srv1697037617=2, srv507737371=4, srv679978762=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,089 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,089 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,089 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,089 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,089 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,089 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,089 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,089 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1211) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,089 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1453
2023-07-11 14:16:26,089 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1687925324=1, srv405099745=3, srv1439028200=0, srv1697037617=2, srv507737371=4, srv679978762=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,089 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,089 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,089 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,089 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,089 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,089 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,089 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,089 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1453) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,089 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table314
2023-07-11 14:16:26,089 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1687925324=1, srv405099745=3, srv1439028200=0, srv1697037617=2, srv507737371=4, srv679978762=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,089 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,089 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,089 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,089 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,089 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,090 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,090 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,090 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table314) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,090 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table556
2023-07-11 14:16:26,090 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1687925324=1, srv405099745=3, srv1439028200=0, srv1697037617=2, srv507737371=4, srv679978762=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,090 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,090 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,090 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,090 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,090 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,090 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,090 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,090 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table556) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,090 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table798
2023-07-11 14:16:26,090 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1687925324=1, srv405099745=3, srv1439028200=0, srv1697037617=2, srv507737371=4, srv679978762=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,090 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,090 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,090 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,090 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,090 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,090 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,090 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,090 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table798) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,090 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table315
2023-07-11 14:16:26,090 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1687925324=1, srv405099745=3, srv1439028200=0, srv1697037617=2, srv507737371=4, srv679978762=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,090 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,090 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,091 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,091 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,091 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,091 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,091 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,091 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table315) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,091 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table557
2023-07-11 14:16:26,091 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1687925324=1, srv405099745=3, srv1439028200=0, srv1697037617=2, srv507737371=4, srv679978762=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,091 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,091 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,091 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,091 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,091 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,091 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,091 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,091 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table557) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,091 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table799
2023-07-11 14:16:26,091 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1687925324=1, srv405099745=3, srv1439028200=0, srv1697037617=2, srv507737371=4, srv679978762=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,091 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,091 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,091 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,091 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,092 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,092 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,092 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,092 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table799) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,092 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table316
2023-07-11 14:16:26,092 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1687925324=1, srv405099745=3, srv1439028200=0, srv1697037617=2, srv507737371=4, srv679978762=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,092 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,092 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,092 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,092 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,092 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,092 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,092 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,092 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table316) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,092 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table558
2023-07-11 14:16:26,092 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1687925324=1, srv405099745=3, srv1439028200=0, srv1697037617=2, srv507737371=4, srv679978762=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,092 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,092 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,092 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,092 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,092 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,092 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,092 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,092 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table558) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,092 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table317
2023-07-11 14:16:26,093 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1687925324=1, srv405099745=3, srv1439028200=0, srv1697037617=2, srv507737371=4, srv679978762=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,093 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,093 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,093 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,093 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,093 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,093 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,093 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,093 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table317) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,093 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table559
2023-07-11 14:16:26,093 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1687925324=1, srv405099745=3, srv1439028200=0, srv1697037617=2, srv507737371=4, srv679978762=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,093 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,093 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,093 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,093 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,093 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,093 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,093 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,093 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table559) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,093 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table318
2023-07-11 14:16:26,093 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1687925324=1, srv405099745=3, srv1439028200=0, srv1697037617=2, srv507737371=4, srv679978762=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,093 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,093 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,093 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,093 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,093 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,094 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,094 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,094 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table318) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,094 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table319
2023-07-11 14:16:26,094 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1687925324=1, srv405099745=3, srv1439028200=0, srv1697037617=2, srv507737371=4, srv679978762=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,094 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,094 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,094 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,094 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,094 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,094 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,094 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,094 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table319) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,094 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1212
2023-07-11 14:16:26,094 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1687925324=1, srv405099745=3, srv1439028200=0, srv1697037617=2, srv507737371=4, srv679978762=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,094 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,094 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,094 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,094 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,094 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,094 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,094 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,094 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1212) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,094 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1454
2023-07-11 14:16:26,094 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1687925324=1, srv405099745=3, srv1439028200=0, srv1697037617=2, srv507737371=4, srv679978762=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,094 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,094 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,095 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,095 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,095 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,095 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,095 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,095 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1454) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,095 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1213
2023-07-11 14:16:26,095 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1687925324=1, srv405099745=3, srv1439028200=0, srv1697037617=2, srv507737371=4, srv679978762=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,095 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,095 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,095 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,095 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,095 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,095 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,095 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,095 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1213) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,095 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1455
2023-07-11 14:16:26,095 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1687925324=1, srv405099745=3, srv1439028200=0, srv1697037617=2, srv507737371=4, srv679978762=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,095 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,095 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,095 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,095 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,095 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,095 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,095 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,095 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1455) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,096 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table40
2023-07-11 14:16:26,096 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1687925324=1, srv405099745=3, srv1439028200=0, srv1697037617=2, srv507737371=4, srv679978762=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,096 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,096 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,096 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,096 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,096 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,096 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,096 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,096 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table40) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,096 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1214
2023-07-11 14:16:26,096 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1687925324=1, srv405099745=3, srv1439028200=0, srv1697037617=2, srv507737371=4, srv679978762=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,096 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,096 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,096 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,096 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,096 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,096 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,096 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,096 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1214) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,096 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1456
2023-07-11 14:16:26,096 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1687925324=1, srv405099745=3, srv1439028200=0, srv1697037617=2, srv507737371=4, srv679978762=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,096 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,096 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,096 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,096 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,096 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,097 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,097 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,097 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1456) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,097 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table41
2023-07-11 14:16:26,097 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1687925324=1, srv405099745=3, srv1439028200=0, srv1697037617=2, srv507737371=4, srv679978762=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,097 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,097 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,097 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,097 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,097 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,097 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,097 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,097 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table41) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,097 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1215
2023-07-11 14:16:26,097 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1687925324=1, srv405099745=3, srv1439028200=0, srv1697037617=2, srv507737371=4, srv679978762=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,097 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,097 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,097 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,097 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,097 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,097 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,097 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,097 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1215) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,097 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1457
2023-07-11 14:16:26,097 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1687925324=1, srv405099745=3, srv1439028200=0, srv1697037617=2, srv507737371=4, srv679978762=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,098 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,098 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,098 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,098 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,098 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,098 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,098 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,098 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1457) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,098 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table42
2023-07-11 14:16:26,098 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1687925324=1, srv405099745=3, srv1439028200=0, srv1697037617=2, srv507737371=4, srv679978762=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,098 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,098 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,098 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,098 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,098 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,098 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,098 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,098 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table42) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,098 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1216
2023-07-11 14:16:26,098 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1687925324=1, srv405099745=3, srv1439028200=0, srv1697037617=2, srv507737371=4, srv679978762=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,098 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,098 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,098 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,098 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,098 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,098 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,098 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,099 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1216) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,099 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1458
2023-07-11 14:16:26,099 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1687925324=1, srv405099745=3, srv1439028200=0, srv1697037617=2, srv507737371=4, srv679978762=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,099 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,099 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,099 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,099 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,099 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,099 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,099 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,099 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1458) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,099 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table43
2023-07-11 14:16:26,099 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1687925324=1, srv405099745=3, srv1439028200=0, srv1697037617=2, srv507737371=4, srv679978762=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,099 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,099 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,099 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,099 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,099 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,099 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,099 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,099 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table43) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,099 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1217
2023-07-11 14:16:26,099 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1687925324=1, srv405099745=3, srv1439028200=0, srv1697037617=2, srv507737371=4, srv679978762=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,099 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,099 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,099 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,099 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,100 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,100 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,100 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,100 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1217) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,100 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1459
2023-07-11 14:16:26,100 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1687925324=1, srv405099745=3, srv1439028200=0, srv1697037617=2, srv507737371=4, srv679978762=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,100 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,100 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,100 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,100 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,100 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,100 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,100 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,100 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1459) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,100 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table44
2023-07-11 14:16:26,100 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1687925324=1, srv405099745=3, srv1439028200=0, srv1697037617=2, srv507737371=4, srv679978762=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,100 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,100 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,100 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,100 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,100 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,100 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,101 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,101 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table44) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,101 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1218
2023-07-11 14:16:26,101 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1687925324=1, srv405099745=3, srv1439028200=0, srv1697037617=2, srv507737371=4, srv679978762=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,101 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,101 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,101 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,101 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,101 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,101 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,101 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,101 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1218) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,101 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table45
2023-07-11 14:16:26,101 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1687925324=1, srv405099745=3, srv1439028200=0, srv1697037617=2, srv507737371=4, srv679978762=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,101 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,101 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,101 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,101 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,101 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,101 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,101 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,101 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table45) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,101 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1219
2023-07-11 14:16:26,101 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1687925324=1, srv405099745=3, srv1439028200=0, srv1697037617=2, srv507737371=4, srv679978762=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,101 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,102 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,102 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,102 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,102 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,102 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,102 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,102 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1219) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,102 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table35
2023-07-11 14:16:26,102 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1687925324=1, srv405099745=3, srv1439028200=0, srv1697037617=2, srv507737371=4, srv679978762=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,102 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,102 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,102 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,102 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,102 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,102 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,102 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,102 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table35) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,102 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table581
2023-07-11 14:16:26,102 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1687925324=1, srv405099745=3, srv1439028200=0, srv1697037617=2, srv507737371=4, srv679978762=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,102 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,102 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,102 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,102 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,102 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,102 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,102 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,102 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table581) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,103 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table36
2023-07-11 14:16:26,103 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1687925324=1, srv405099745=3, srv1439028200=0, srv1697037617=2, srv507737371=4, srv679978762=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,103 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,103 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,103 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,103 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,103 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,103 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,103 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,103 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table36) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,103 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table340
2023-07-11 14:16:26,103 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1687925324=1, srv405099745=3, srv1439028200=0, srv1697037617=2, srv507737371=4, srv679978762=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,103 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,103 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,103 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,103 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,103 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,103 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,103 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,103 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table340) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,103 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table582
2023-07-11 14:16:26,103 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1687925324=1, srv405099745=3, srv1439028200=0, srv1697037617=2, srv507737371=4, srv679978762=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,103 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,103 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,103 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,103 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,104 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,104 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,104 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,104 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table582) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,104 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table37
2023-07-11 14:16:26,104 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1687925324=1, srv405099745=3, srv1439028200=0, srv1697037617=2, srv507737371=4, srv679978762=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,104 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,104 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,104 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,104 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,104 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,104 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,104 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,104 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table37) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,104 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table341
2023-07-11 14:16:26,104 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1687925324=1, srv405099745=3, srv1439028200=0, srv1697037617=2, srv507737371=4, srv679978762=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,104 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,104 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,104 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,104 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,104 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,104 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,104 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,104 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table341) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,104 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table583
2023-07-11 14:16:26,105 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1687925324=1, srv405099745=3, srv1439028200=0, srv1697037617=2, srv507737371=4, srv679978762=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,105 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,105 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,105 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,105 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,105 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,105 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,105 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,105 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table583) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,105 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table38
2023-07-11 14:16:26,105 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1687925324=1, srv405099745=3, srv1439028200=0, srv1697037617=2, srv507737371=4, srv679978762=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,105 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,105 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,105 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,105 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,105 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,105 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,105 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,105 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table38) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,105 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table100
2023-07-11 14:16:26,105 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1687925324=1, srv405099745=3, srv1439028200=0, srv1697037617=2, srv507737371=4, srv679978762=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,105 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,105 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,105 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,105 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,105 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,106 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,106 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,106 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table100) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,106 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table342
2023-07-11 14:16:26,106 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1687925324=1, srv405099745=3, srv1439028200=0, srv1697037617=2, srv507737371=4, srv679978762=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,106 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,106 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,106 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,106 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,106 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,106 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,106 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,106 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table342) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,106 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table584
2023-07-11 14:16:26,106 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1687925324=1, srv405099745=3, srv1439028200=0, srv1697037617=2, srv507737371=4, srv679978762=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,106 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,106 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,106 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,106 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,106 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,106 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,106 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,106 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table584) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,106 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table39
2023-07-11 14:16:26,106 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1687925324=1, srv405099745=3, srv1439028200=0, srv1697037617=2, srv507737371=4, srv679978762=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,106 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,107 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,107 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,107 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,107 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,107 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,107 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,107 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table39) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,107 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table101
2023-07-11 14:16:26,107 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1687925324=1, srv405099745=3, srv1439028200=0, srv1697037617=2, srv507737371=4, srv679978762=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,107 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,107 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,107 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,107 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,107 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,107 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,107 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,107 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table101) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,107 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table343
2023-07-11 14:16:26,107 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1687925324=1, srv405099745=3, srv1439028200=0, srv1697037617=2, srv507737371=4, srv679978762=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,107 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,107 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,107 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,107 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,107 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,107 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,107 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,108 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table343) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,108 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table585
2023-07-11 14:16:26,108 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1687925324=1, srv405099745=3, srv1439028200=0, srv1697037617=2, srv507737371=4, srv679978762=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,108 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,108 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,108 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,108 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,108 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,108 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,108 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,108 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table585) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,108 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table102
2023-07-11 14:16:26,108 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1687925324=1, srv405099745=3, srv1439028200=0, srv1697037617=2, srv507737371=4, srv679978762=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,108 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,108 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,108 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,108 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,108 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,108 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,108 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,108 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table102) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,108 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table344
2023-07-11 14:16:26,109 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1687925324=1, srv405099745=3, srv1439028200=0, srv1697037617=2, srv507737371=4, srv679978762=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,109 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,109 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,109 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,109 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,109 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,109 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,109 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,109 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table344) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,109 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table586
2023-07-11 14:16:26,109 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1687925324=1, srv405099745=3, srv1439028200=0, srv1697037617=2, srv507737371=4, srv679978762=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,109 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,109 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,109 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,109 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,109 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,109 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,109 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,109 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table586) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,109 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1440
2023-07-11 14:16:26,109 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1687925324=1, srv405099745=3, srv1439028200=0, srv1697037617=2, srv507737371=4, srv679978762=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,109 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,109 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,109 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,109 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,110 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,110 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,110 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,110 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1440) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,110 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table103
2023-07-11 14:16:26,110 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1687925324=1, srv405099745=3, srv1439028200=0, srv1697037617=2, srv507737371=4, srv679978762=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,110 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,110 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,110 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,110 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,110 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,110 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,110 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,110 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table103) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,110 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table345
2023-07-11 14:16:26,110 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1687925324=1, srv405099745=3, srv1439028200=0, srv1697037617=2, srv507737371=4, srv679978762=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,110 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,110 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,110 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,110 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,110 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,110 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,110 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,110 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table345) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,110 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table587
2023-07-11 14:16:26,110 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1687925324=1, srv405099745=3, srv1439028200=0, srv1697037617=2, srv507737371=4, srv679978762=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,111 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,111 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,111 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,111 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,111 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,111 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,111 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,111 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table587) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,111 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1441
2023-07-11 14:16:26,111 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1687925324=1, srv405099745=3, srv1439028200=0, srv1697037617=2, srv507737371=4, srv679978762=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,111 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,111 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,111 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,111 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,111 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,111 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,111 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,111 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1441) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,111 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table104
2023-07-11 14:16:26,111 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1687925324=1, srv405099745=3, srv1439028200=0, srv1697037617=2, srv507737371=4, srv679978762=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,111 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,111 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,111 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,111 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,111 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,111 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,111 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,112 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table104) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,112 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table346
2023-07-11 14:16:26,112 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1687925324=1, srv405099745=3, srv1439028200=0, srv1697037617=2, srv507737371=4, srv679978762=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,112 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,112 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,112 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,112 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,112 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,112 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,112 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,112 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table346) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,112 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table588
2023-07-11 14:16:26,112 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1687925324=1, srv405099745=3, srv1439028200=0, srv1697037617=2, srv507737371=4, srv679978762=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,112 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,112 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,112 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,112 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,112 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,112 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,112 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,112 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table588) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,112 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1200
2023-07-11 14:16:26,112 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1687925324=1, srv405099745=3, srv1439028200=0, srv1697037617=2, srv507737371=4, srv679978762=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,112 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,112 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,112 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,113 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,113 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,113 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,113 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,113 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1200) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,113 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1442
2023-07-11 14:16:26,113 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1687925324=1, srv405099745=3, srv1439028200=0, srv1697037617=2, srv507737371=4, srv679978762=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,113 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,113 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,113 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,113 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,113 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,113 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,113 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,113 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1442) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,113 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table105
2023-07-11 14:16:26,113 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1687925324=1, srv405099745=3, srv1439028200=0, srv1697037617=2, srv507737371=4, srv679978762=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,113 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,113 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,113 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,113 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,113 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,113 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,113 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,113 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table105) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,113 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table347
2023-07-11 14:16:26,114 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1687925324=1, srv405099745=3, srv1439028200=0, srv1697037617=2, srv507737371=4, srv679978762=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,114 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,114 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,114 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,114 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,114 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,114 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,114 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,114 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table347) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,114 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table589
2023-07-11 14:16:26,114 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1687925324=1, srv405099745=3, srv1439028200=0, srv1697037617=2, srv507737371=4, srv679978762=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,114 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,114 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,114 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,114 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,114 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,114 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,114 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,114 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table589) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,114 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table106
2023-07-11 14:16:26,114 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1687925324=1, srv405099745=3, srv1439028200=0, srv1697037617=2, srv507737371=4, srv679978762=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,114 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,114 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,114 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,114 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,114 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,114 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,115 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,115 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table106) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,115 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table348
2023-07-11 14:16:26,115 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1687925324=1, srv405099745=3, srv1439028200=0, srv1697037617=2, srv507737371=4, srv679978762=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,115 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,115 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,115 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,115 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,115 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,115 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,115 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,115 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table348) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,115 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table107
2023-07-11 14:16:26,115 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1687925324=1, srv405099745=3, srv1439028200=0, srv1697037617=2, srv507737371=4, srv679978762=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,115 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,115 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,115 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,115 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,115 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,115 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,115 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,115 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table107) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,115 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table349
2023-07-11 14:16:26,115 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1687925324=1, srv405099745=3, srv1439028200=0, srv1697037617=2, srv507737371=4, srv679978762=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,115 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,116 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,116 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,116 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,116 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,116 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,116 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,116 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table349) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,116 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table108
2023-07-11 14:16:26,116 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1687925324=1, srv405099745=3, srv1439028200=0, srv1697037617=2, srv507737371=4, srv679978762=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,116 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,116 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,116 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,116 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,116 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,116 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,116 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,116 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table108) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,116 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table109
2023-07-11 14:16:26,116 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1687925324=1, srv405099745=3, srv1439028200=0, srv1697037617=2, srv507737371=4, srv679978762=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,116 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,116 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,116 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,116 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,116 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,117 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,117 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,117 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table109) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,117 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1209
2023-07-11 14:16:26,117 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1687925324=1, srv405099745=3, srv1439028200=0, srv1697037617=2, srv507737371=4, srv679978762=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,117 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,117 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,117 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,117 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,117 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,117 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,117 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,117 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1209) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,117 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1201
2023-07-11 14:16:26,117 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1687925324=1, srv405099745=3, srv1439028200=0, srv1697037617=2, srv507737371=4, srv679978762=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,117 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,117 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,117 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,117 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,117 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,117 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,117 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,118 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1201) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,118 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1443
2023-07-11 14:16:26,118 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1687925324=1, srv405099745=3, srv1439028200=0, srv1697037617=2, srv507737371=4, srv679978762=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,118 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,118 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,118 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,118 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,118 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,118 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,118 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,118 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1443) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,118 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1202
2023-07-11 14:16:26,118 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1687925324=1, srv405099745=3, srv1439028200=0, srv1697037617=2, srv507737371=4, srv679978762=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,118 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,118 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,118 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,118 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,118 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,118 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,118 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,118 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1202) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,118 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1444
2023-07-11 14:16:26,118 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1687925324=1, srv405099745=3, srv1439028200=0, srv1697037617=2, srv507737371=4, srv679978762=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,118 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,118 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,119 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,119 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,119 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,119 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,119 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,119 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1444) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,119 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1203
2023-07-11 14:16:26,119 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1687925324=1, srv405099745=3, srv1439028200=0, srv1697037617=2, srv507737371=4, srv679978762=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,119 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,119 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,119 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,119 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,119 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,119 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,119 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,119 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1203) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,119 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1445
2023-07-11 14:16:26,119 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1687925324=1, srv405099745=3, srv1439028200=0, srv1697037617=2, srv507737371=4, srv679978762=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,119 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,119 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,119 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,119 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,119 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,119 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,119 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,119 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1445) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,120 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table30
2023-07-11 14:16:26,120 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1687925324=1, srv405099745=3, srv1439028200=0, srv1697037617=2, srv507737371=4, srv679978762=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,120 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,120 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,120 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,120 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,120 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,120 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,120 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,120 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table30) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,120 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1204
2023-07-11 14:16:26,120 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1687925324=1, srv405099745=3, srv1439028200=0, srv1697037617=2, srv507737371=4, srv679978762=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,120 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,120 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,120 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,120 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,120 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,120 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,120 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,120 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1204) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,120 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1446
2023-07-11 14:16:26,120 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1687925324=1, srv405099745=3, srv1439028200=0, srv1697037617=2, srv507737371=4, srv679978762=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,120 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,120 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,120 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,120 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,121 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,121 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,121 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,121 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1446) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,121 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table31
2023-07-11 14:16:26,121 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1687925324=1, srv405099745=3, srv1439028200=0, srv1697037617=2, srv507737371=4, srv679978762=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,121 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,121 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,121 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,121 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,121 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,121 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,121 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,121 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table31) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,121 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1205
2023-07-11 14:16:26,121 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1687925324=1, srv405099745=3, srv1439028200=0, srv1697037617=2, srv507737371=4, srv679978762=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,121 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,121 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,121 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,121 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,121 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,121 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,121 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,121 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1205) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,121 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1447
2023-07-11 14:16:26,121 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1687925324=1, srv405099745=3, srv1439028200=0, srv1697037617=2, srv507737371=4, srv679978762=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,122 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,122 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,122 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,122 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,122 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,122 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,122 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,122 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1447) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,122 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table32
2023-07-11 14:16:26,122 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1687925324=1, srv405099745=3, srv1439028200=0, srv1697037617=2, srv507737371=4, srv679978762=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,122 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,122 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,122 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,122 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,122 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,122 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,122 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,122 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table32) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,122 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1206
2023-07-11 14:16:26,122 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1687925324=1, srv405099745=3, srv1439028200=0, srv1697037617=2, srv507737371=4, srv679978762=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,122 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,122 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,122 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,122 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,122 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,122 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,122 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,123 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1206) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,123 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1448
2023-07-11 14:16:26,123 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1687925324=1, srv405099745=3, srv1439028200=0, srv1697037617=2, srv507737371=4, srv679978762=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,123 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,123 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,123 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,123 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,123 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,123 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,123 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,123 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1448) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,123 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table33
2023-07-11 14:16:26,123 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1687925324=1, srv405099745=3, srv1439028200=0, srv1697037617=2, srv507737371=4, srv679978762=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,123 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,123 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,123 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,123 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,123 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,123 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,123 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,123 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table33) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,123 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table590
2023-07-11 14:16:26,123 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1687925324=1, srv405099745=3, srv1439028200=0, srv1697037617=2, srv507737371=4, srv679978762=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,123 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,123 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,123 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,123 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,124 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,124 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,124 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,124 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table590) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,124 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1207
2023-07-11 14:16:26,124 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1687925324=1, srv405099745=3, srv1439028200=0, srv1697037617=2, srv507737371=4, srv679978762=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,124 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,124 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,124 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,124 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,124 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,124 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,124 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,124 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1207) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,124 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1449
2023-07-11 14:16:26,124 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1687925324=1, srv405099745=3, srv1439028200=0, srv1697037617=2, srv507737371=4, srv679978762=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,124 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,124 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,124 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,124 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,124 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,124 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,124 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,124 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1449) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,124 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table34
2023-07-11 14:16:26,124 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1687925324=1, srv405099745=3, srv1439028200=0, srv1697037617=2, srv507737371=4, srv679978762=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,125 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,125 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,125 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,125 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,125 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,125 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,125 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,125 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table34) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,125 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table591
2023-07-11 14:16:26,125 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1687925324=1, srv405099745=3, srv1439028200=0, srv1697037617=2, srv507737371=4, srv679978762=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,125 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,125 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,125 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,125 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,125 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,125 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,125 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,125 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table591) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,125 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1208
2023-07-11 14:16:26,125 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1687925324=1, srv405099745=3, srv1439028200=0, srv1697037617=2, srv507737371=4, srv679978762=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,125 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,125 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,125 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,125 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,125 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,125 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,125 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,126 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1208) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,126 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table24
2023-07-11 14:16:26,126 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1687925324=1, srv405099745=3, srv1439028200=0, srv1697037617=2, srv507737371=4, srv679978762=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,126 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,126 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,126 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,126 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,126 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,126 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,126 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,126 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table24) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,126 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table570
2023-07-11 14:16:26,126 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1687925324=1, srv405099745=3, srv1439028200=0, srv1697037617=2, srv507737371=4, srv679978762=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,126 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,126 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,126 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,126 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,126 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,126 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,126 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,126 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table570) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,126 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table25
2023-07-11 14:16:26,127 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1687925324=1, srv405099745=3, srv1439028200=0, srv1697037617=2, srv507737371=4, srv679978762=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,127 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,127 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,127 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,127 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,127 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,127 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,127 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,127 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table25) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,127 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table571
2023-07-11 14:16:26,127 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1687925324=1, srv405099745=3, srv1439028200=0, srv1697037617=2, srv507737371=4, srv679978762=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,127 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,127 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,127 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,127 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,127 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,127 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,127 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,127 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table571) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,127 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table26
2023-07-11 14:16:26,127 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1687925324=1, srv405099745=3, srv1439028200=0, srv1697037617=2, srv507737371=4, srv679978762=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,127 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,127 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,127 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,127 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,127 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,127 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,128 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,128 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table26) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,128 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table330
2023-07-11 14:16:26,128 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1687925324=1, srv405099745=3, srv1439028200=0, srv1697037617=2, srv507737371=4, srv679978762=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,128 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,128 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,128 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,128 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,128 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,128 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,128 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,128 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table330) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,128 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table572
2023-07-11 14:16:26,128 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1687925324=1, srv405099745=3, srv1439028200=0, srv1697037617=2, srv507737371=4, srv679978762=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,128 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,128 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,128 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,128 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,128 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,128 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,128 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,128 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table572) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,128 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table27
2023-07-11 14:16:26,128 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1687925324=1, srv405099745=3, srv1439028200=0, srv1697037617=2, srv507737371=4, srv679978762=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,128 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,129 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,129 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,129 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,129 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,129 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,129 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,129 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table27) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,129 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table331
2023-07-11 14:16:26,129 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1687925324=1, srv405099745=3, srv1439028200=0, srv1697037617=2, srv507737371=4, srv679978762=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,129 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,129 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,129 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,129 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,129 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,129 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,129 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,129 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table331) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,129 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table573
2023-07-11 14:16:26,129 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1687925324=1, srv405099745=3, srv1439028200=0, srv1697037617=2, srv507737371=4, srv679978762=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,129 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,129 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,129 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,129 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,129 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,129 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,129 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,130 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table573) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,130 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table28
2023-07-11 14:16:26,130 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1687925324=1, srv405099745=3, srv1439028200=0, srv1697037617=2, srv507737371=4, srv679978762=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,130 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,130 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,130 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,130 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,130 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,130 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,130 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,130 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table28) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,130 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table332
2023-07-11 14:16:26,130 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1687925324=1, srv405099745=3, srv1439028200=0, srv1697037617=2, srv507737371=4, srv679978762=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,130 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,130 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,130 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,130 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,131 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,131 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,131 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,131 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table332) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,131 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table574
2023-07-11 14:16:26,131 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1687925324=1, srv405099745=3, srv1439028200=0, srv1697037617=2, srv507737371=4, srv679978762=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,131 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,131 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,131 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,131 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,131 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,131 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,131 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,131 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table574) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,131 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table29
2023-07-11 14:16:26,131 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1687925324=1, srv405099745=3, srv1439028200=0, srv1697037617=2, srv507737371=4, srv679978762=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,131 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,131 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,131 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,132 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,132 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,132 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,132 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,132 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table29) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,132 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table333
2023-07-11 14:16:26,132 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1687925324=1, srv405099745=3, srv1439028200=0, srv1697037617=2, srv507737371=4, srv679978762=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,132 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,132 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,132 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,132 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,132 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,132 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,132 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,132 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table333) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,132 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table575
2023-07-11 14:16:26,132 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1687925324=1, srv405099745=3, srv1439028200=0, srv1697037617=2, srv507737371=4, srv679978762=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,132 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,132 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,132 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,132 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,132 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,132 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,132 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,132 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table575) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,133 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table334
2023-07-11 14:16:26,133 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1687925324=1, srv405099745=3, srv1439028200=0, srv1697037617=2, srv507737371=4, srv679978762=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,133 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,133 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,133 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,133 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,133 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,133 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,133 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,133 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table334) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,133 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table576
2023-07-11 14:16:26,133 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1687925324=1, srv405099745=3, srv1439028200=0, srv1697037617=2, srv507737371=4, srv679978762=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,133 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,133 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,133 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,133 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,133 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,133 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,133 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,133 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table576) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,133 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1430
2023-07-11 14:16:26,133 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1687925324=1, srv405099745=3, srv1439028200=0, srv1697037617=2, srv507737371=4, srv679978762=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,133 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,133 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,133 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,133 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,134 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,134 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,134 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,134 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1430) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,134 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table335
2023-07-11 14:16:26,134 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1687925324=1, srv405099745=3, srv1439028200=0, srv1697037617=2, srv507737371=4, srv679978762=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,134 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,134 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,134 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,134 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,134 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,134 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,134 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,134 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table335) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,134 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table577
2023-07-11 14:16:26,134 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1687925324=1, srv405099745=3, srv1439028200=0, srv1697037617=2, srv507737371=4, srv679978762=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,134 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,134 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,134 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,134 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,134 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,134 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,134 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,134 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table577) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,134 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1431
2023-07-11 14:16:26,134 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1687925324=1, srv405099745=3, srv1439028200=0, srv1697037617=2, srv507737371=4, srv679978762=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,134 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,135 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,135 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,135 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,135 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,135 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,135 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,135 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1431) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,135 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table336
2023-07-11 14:16:26,135 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1687925324=1, srv405099745=3, srv1439028200=0, srv1697037617=2, srv507737371=4, srv679978762=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,135 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,135 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,135 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,135 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,135 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,135 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,135 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,135 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table336) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,135 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table578
2023-07-11 14:16:26,135 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1687925324=1, srv405099745=3, srv1439028200=0, srv1697037617=2, srv507737371=4, srv679978762=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,135 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,135 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,135 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,136 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,136 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,136 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,136 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,136 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table578) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,136 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table337
2023-07-11 14:16:26,136 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1687925324=1, srv405099745=3, srv1439028200=0, srv1697037617=2, srv507737371=4, srv679978762=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,136 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,136 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,136 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,136 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,136 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,136 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,136 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,136 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table337) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,136 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table579
2023-07-11 14:16:26,136 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1687925324=1, srv405099745=3, srv1439028200=0, srv1697037617=2, srv507737371=4, srv679978762=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,136 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,136 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,136 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,136 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,136 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,136 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,136 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,136 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table579) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,136 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table338
2023-07-11 14:16:26,137 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1687925324=1, srv405099745=3, srv1439028200=0, srv1697037617=2, srv507737371=4, srv679978762=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,137 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,137 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,137 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,137 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,137 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,137 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,137 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,137 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table338) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,137 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table339
2023-07-11 14:16:26,137 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1687925324=1, srv405099745=3, srv1439028200=0, srv1697037617=2, srv507737371=4, srv679978762=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,137 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,137 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,137 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,137 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,137 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,137 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,137 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,137 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table339) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,137 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1432
2023-07-11 14:16:26,137 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1687925324=1, srv405099745=3, srv1439028200=0, srv1697037617=2, srv507737371=4, srv679978762=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,137 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,137 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,137 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,138 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,138 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,138 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,138 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,138 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1432) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,138 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1433
2023-07-11 14:16:26,138 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1687925324=1, srv405099745=3, srv1439028200=0, srv1697037617=2, srv507737371=4, srv679978762=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,138 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,138 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,138 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,138 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,138 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,138 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,138 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,138 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1433) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,138 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1434
2023-07-11 14:16:26,138 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1687925324=1, srv405099745=3, srv1439028200=0, srv1697037617=2, srv507737371=4, srv679978762=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,138 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,138 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,138 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,138 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,138 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,138 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,138 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,138 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1434) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,138 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1435
2023-07-11 14:16:26,139 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1687925324=1, srv405099745=3, srv1439028200=0, srv1697037617=2, srv507737371=4, srv679978762=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,139 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,139 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,139 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,139 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,139 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,139 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,139 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,139 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1435) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,139 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table20
2023-07-11 14:16:26,139 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1687925324=1, srv405099745=3, srv1439028200=0, srv1697037617=2, srv507737371=4, srv679978762=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,139 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,139 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,139 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,139 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,139 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,139 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,139 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,139 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table20) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,139 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1436
2023-07-11 14:16:26,139 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1687925324=1, srv405099745=3, srv1439028200=0, srv1697037617=2, srv507737371=4, srv679978762=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,139 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,139 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,139 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,139 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,139 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,139 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,140 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,140 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1436) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,140 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table21
2023-07-11 14:16:26,140 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1687925324=1, srv405099745=3, srv1439028200=0, srv1697037617=2, srv507737371=4, srv679978762=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,140 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,140 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,140 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,140 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,140 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,140 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,140 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,140 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table21) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,140 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1437
2023-07-11 14:16:26,140 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1687925324=1, srv405099745=3, srv1439028200=0, srv1697037617=2, srv507737371=4, srv679978762=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,140 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,140 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,140 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,140 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,140 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,140 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,140 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,140 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1437) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,140 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table22
2023-07-11 14:16:26,140 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1687925324=1, srv405099745=3, srv1439028200=0, srv1697037617=2, srv507737371=4, srv679978762=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,140 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,140 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,141 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,141 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,141 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,141 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,141 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,141 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table22) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,141 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1438
2023-07-11 14:16:26,141 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1687925324=1, srv405099745=3, srv1439028200=0, srv1697037617=2, srv507737371=4, srv679978762=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,141 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,141 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,141 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,141 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,141 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,141 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,141 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,141 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1438) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,141 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table23
2023-07-11 14:16:26,141 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1687925324=1, srv405099745=3, srv1439028200=0, srv1697037617=2, srv507737371=4, srv679978762=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,141 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,141 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,141 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,141 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,141 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,141 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,141 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,141 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table23) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,142 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table580
2023-07-11 14:16:26,142 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1687925324=1, srv405099745=3, srv1439028200=0, srv1697037617=2, srv507737371=4, srv679978762=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,142 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,142 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,142 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,142 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,142 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,142 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,142 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,142 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table580) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,142 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1439
2023-07-11 14:16:26,142 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1687925324=1, srv405099745=3, srv1439028200=0, srv1697037617=2, srv507737371=4, srv679978762=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,142 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,142 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,142 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,142 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,142 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,142 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,142 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,142 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1439) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,142 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table284
2023-07-11 14:16:26,142 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1687925324=1, srv405099745=3, srv1439028200=0, srv1697037617=2, srv507737371=4, srv679978762=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,142 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,142 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,142 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,142 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,142 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,143 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,143 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,143 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table284) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,143 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table285
2023-07-11 14:16:26,143 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1687925324=1, srv405099745=3, srv1439028200=0, srv1697037617=2, srv507737371=4, srv679978762=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,143 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,143 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,143 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,143 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,143 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,143 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,143 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,143 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table285) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,143 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table286
2023-07-11 14:16:26,143 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1687925324=1, srv405099745=3, srv1439028200=0, srv1697037617=2, srv507737371=4, srv679978762=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,143 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,143 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,143 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,143 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,143 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,143 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,143 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,143 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table286) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,144 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table287
2023-07-11 14:16:26,144 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1687925324=1, srv405099745=3, srv1439028200=0, srv1697037617=2, srv507737371=4, srv679978762=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,144 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,144 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,144 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,144 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,144 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,144 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,144 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,144 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table287) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,144 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table288
2023-07-11 14:16:26,144 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1687925324=1, srv405099745=3, srv1439028200=0, srv1697037617=2, srv507737371=4, srv679978762=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,144 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,144 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,144 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,144 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,144 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,144 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,144 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,144 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table288) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,144 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table289
2023-07-11 14:16:26,144 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1687925324=1, srv405099745=3, srv1439028200=0, srv1697037617=2, srv507737371=4, srv679978762=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,144 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,144 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,144 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,145 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,145 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,145 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,145 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,145 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table289) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,145 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table290
2023-07-11 14:16:26,145 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1687925324=1, srv405099745=3, srv1439028200=0, srv1697037617=2, srv507737371=4, srv679978762=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,145 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,145 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,145 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,145 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,145 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,145 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,145 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,145 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table290) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,145 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table291
2023-07-11 14:16:26,145 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1687925324=1, srv405099745=3, srv1439028200=0, srv1697037617=2, srv507737371=4, srv679978762=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,145 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,145 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,145 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,145 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,145 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,145 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,145 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,145 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table291) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,146 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table292
2023-07-11 14:16:26,146 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1687925324=1, srv405099745=3, srv1439028200=0, srv1697037617=2, srv507737371=4, srv679978762=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,146 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,146 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,146 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,146 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,146 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,146 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,146 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,146 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table292) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,146 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table293
2023-07-11 14:16:26,146 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1687925324=1, srv405099745=3, srv1439028200=0, srv1697037617=2, srv507737371=4, srv679978762=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,146 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,146 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,146 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,146 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,146 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,146 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,146 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,146 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table293) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,146 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table294
2023-07-11 14:16:26,146 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1687925324=1, srv405099745=3, srv1439028200=0, srv1697037617=2, srv507737371=4, srv679978762=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,146 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,146 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,146 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,146 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,146 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,147 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,147 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,147 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table294) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,147 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table273
2023-07-11 14:16:26,147 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1687925324=1, srv405099745=3, srv1439028200=0, srv1697037617=2, srv507737371=4, srv679978762=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,147 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,147 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,147 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,147 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,147 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,147 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,147 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,147 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table273) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,147 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table274
2023-07-11 14:16:26,147 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1687925324=1, srv405099745=3, srv1439028200=0, srv1697037617=2, srv507737371=4, srv679978762=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,147 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,147 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,147 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,147 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,147 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,147 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,147 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,147 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table274) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,147 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table275
2023-07-11 14:16:26,147 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1687925324=1, srv405099745=3, srv1439028200=0, srv1697037617=2, srv507737371=4, srv679978762=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,147 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,148 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,148 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,148 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,148 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,148 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,148 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,148 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table275) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,148 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table276
2023-07-11 14:16:26,148 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1687925324=1, srv405099745=3, srv1439028200=0, srv1697037617=2, srv507737371=4, srv679978762=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,148 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,148 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,148 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,148 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,148 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,148 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,148 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,148 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table276) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,148 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table277
2023-07-11 14:16:26,148 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1687925324=1, srv405099745=3, srv1439028200=0, srv1697037617=2, srv507737371=4, srv679978762=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,148 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,148 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,148 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,148 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,148 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,148 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,148 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,149 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table277) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,149 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table278
2023-07-11 14:16:26,149 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1687925324=1, srv405099745=3, srv1439028200=0, srv1697037617=2, srv507737371=4, srv679978762=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,149 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,149 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,149 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,149 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,149 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,149 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,149 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,149 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table278) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,149 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table279
2023-07-11 14:16:26,149 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1687925324=1, srv405099745=3, srv1439028200=0, srv1697037617=2, srv507737371=4, srv679978762=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,149 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,149 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,149 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,149 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,149 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,149 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,149 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,149 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table279) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,149 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table280
2023-07-11 14:16:26,149 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1687925324=1, srv405099745=3, srv1439028200=0, srv1697037617=2, srv507737371=4, srv679978762=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,149 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,149 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,150 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,150 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,150 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,150 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,150 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,150 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table280) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,150 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table281
2023-07-11 14:16:26,150 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1687925324=1, srv405099745=3, srv1439028200=0, srv1697037617=2, srv507737371=4, srv679978762=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,150 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,150 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,150 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,150 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,150 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,150 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,150 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,150 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table281) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,150 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table282
2023-07-11 14:16:26,150 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1687925324=1, srv405099745=3, srv1439028200=0, srv1697037617=2, srv507737371=4, srv679978762=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,150 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,151 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,151 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,151 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,151 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,151 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,151 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,151 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table282) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,151 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table283
2023-07-11 14:16:26,151 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1687925324=1, srv405099745=3, srv1439028200=0, srv1697037617=2, srv507737371=4, srv679978762=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,151 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,151 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,151 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,151 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,151 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,151 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,151 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,151 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table283) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,151 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table295
2023-07-11 14:16:26,151 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1687925324=1, srv405099745=3, srv1439028200=0, srv1697037617=2, srv507737371=4, srv679978762=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,151 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,151 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,151 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,151 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,151 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,151 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,151 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,152 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table295) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,152 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table296
2023-07-11 14:16:26,152 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1687925324=1, srv405099745=3, srv1439028200=0, srv1697037617=2, srv507737371=4, srv679978762=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,152 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,152 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,152 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,152 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,152 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,152 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,152 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,152 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table296) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,152 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table297
2023-07-11 14:16:26,152 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1687925324=1, srv405099745=3, srv1439028200=0, srv1697037617=2, srv507737371=4, srv679978762=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,152 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,152 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,152 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,152 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,152 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,152 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,152 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,152 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table297) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,152 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table298
2023-07-11 14:16:26,153 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1687925324=1, srv405099745=3, srv1439028200=0, srv1697037617=2, srv507737371=4, srv679978762=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,153 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,153 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,153 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,153 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,153 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,153 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,153 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,153 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table298) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,153 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table299
2023-07-11 14:16:26,153 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1687925324=1, srv405099745=3, srv1439028200=0, srv1697037617=2, srv507737371=4, srv679978762=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,153 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,153 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,153 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,153 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,153 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,153 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,153 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,153 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table299) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,153 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table920
2023-07-11 14:16:26,153 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1687925324=1, srv405099745=3, srv1439028200=0, srv1697037617=2, srv507737371=4, srv679978762=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,153 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,153 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,153 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,153 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,153 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,154 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,154 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,154 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table920) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,154 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table921
2023-07-11 14:16:26,154 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1687925324=1, srv405099745=3, srv1439028200=0, srv1697037617=2, srv507737371=4, srv679978762=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,154 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,154 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,154 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,154 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,154 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,154 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,154 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,154 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table921) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,154 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table922
2023-07-11 14:16:26,154 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1687925324=1, srv405099745=3, srv1439028200=0, srv1697037617=2, srv507737371=4, srv679978762=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,154 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,154 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,154 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,154 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,154 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,154 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,154 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,154 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table922) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,154 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table923
2023-07-11 14:16:26,154 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1687925324=1, srv405099745=3, srv1439028200=0, srv1697037617=2, srv507737371=4, srv679978762=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,154 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,155 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,155 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,155 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,155 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,155 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,155 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,155 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table923) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,155 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table924
2023-07-11 14:16:26,155 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1687925324=1, srv405099745=3, srv1439028200=0, srv1697037617=2, srv507737371=4, srv679978762=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,155 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,155 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,155 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,155 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,155 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,155 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,155 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,155 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table924) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,155 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table925
2023-07-11 14:16:26,155 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1687925324=1, srv405099745=3, srv1439028200=0, srv1697037617=2, srv507737371=4, srv679978762=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,155 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,155 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,155 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,155 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,155 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,155 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,155 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,155 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table925) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,156 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table926
2023-07-11 14:16:26,156 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1687925324=1, srv405099745=3, srv1439028200=0, srv1697037617=2, srv507737371=4, srv679978762=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,156 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,156 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,156 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,156 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,156 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,156 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,156 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,156 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table926) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,156 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table927
2023-07-11 14:16:26,156 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1687925324=1, srv405099745=3, srv1439028200=0, srv1697037617=2, srv507737371=4, srv679978762=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,156 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,156 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,156 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,156 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,156 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,156 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,156 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,156 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table927) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,156 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table928
2023-07-11 14:16:26,156 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1687925324=1, srv405099745=3, srv1439028200=0, srv1697037617=2, srv507737371=4, srv679978762=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,156 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,156 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,156 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,156 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,156 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,157 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,157 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,157 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table928) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,157 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table929
2023-07-11 14:16:26,157 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1687925324=1, srv405099745=3, srv1439028200=0, srv1697037617=2, srv507737371=4, srv679978762=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,157 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,157 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,157 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,157 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,157 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,157 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,157 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,157 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table929) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,157 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1094
2023-07-11 14:16:26,157 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1687925324=1, srv405099745=3, srv1439028200=0, srv1697037617=2, srv507737371=4, srv679978762=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,157 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,157 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,157 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,157 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,157 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,157 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,157 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,157 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1094) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,157 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1095
2023-07-11 14:16:26,157 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1687925324=1, srv405099745=3, srv1439028200=0, srv1697037617=2, srv507737371=4, srv679978762=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,158 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,158 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,158 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,158 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,158 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,158 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,158 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,158 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1095) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,158 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1096
2023-07-11 14:16:26,158 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1687925324=1, srv405099745=3, srv1439028200=0, srv1697037617=2, srv507737371=4, srv679978762=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,158 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,158 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,158 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,158 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,158 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,158 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,158 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,158 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1096) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,158 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1097
2023-07-11 14:16:26,158 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1687925324=1, srv405099745=3, srv1439028200=0, srv1697037617=2, srv507737371=4, srv679978762=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,158 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,158 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,158 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,158 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,158 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,158 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,158 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,158 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1097) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,159 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1098
2023-07-11 14:16:26,159 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1687925324=1, srv405099745=3, srv1439028200=0, srv1697037617=2, srv507737371=4, srv679978762=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,159 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,159 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,159 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,159 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,159 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,159 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,159 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,159 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1098) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,159 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1099
2023-07-11 14:16:26,159 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1687925324=1, srv405099745=3, srv1439028200=0, srv1697037617=2, srv507737371=4, srv679978762=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,159 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,159 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,159 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,159 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,159 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,159 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,159 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,159 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1099) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,159 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table910
2023-07-11 14:16:26,159 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1687925324=1, srv405099745=3, srv1439028200=0, srv1697037617=2, srv507737371=4, srv679978762=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,159 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,159 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,159 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,159 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,159 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,160 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,160 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,160 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table910) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,160 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table911
2023-07-11 14:16:26,160 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1687925324=1, srv405099745=3, srv1439028200=0, srv1697037617=2, srv507737371=4, srv679978762=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,160 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,160 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,160 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,160 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,160 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,160 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,160 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,160 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table911) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,160 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table912
2023-07-11 14:16:26,160 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1687925324=1, srv405099745=3, srv1439028200=0, srv1697037617=2, srv507737371=4, srv679978762=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,160 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,160 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,160 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,160 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,160 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,160 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,160 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,160 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table912) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,160 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1090
2023-07-11 14:16:26,160 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1687925324=1, srv405099745=3, srv1439028200=0, srv1697037617=2, srv507737371=4, srv679978762=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,160 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,161 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,161 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,161 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,161 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,161 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,161 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,161 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1090) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,161 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table913
2023-07-11 14:16:26,161 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1687925324=1, srv405099745=3, srv1439028200=0, srv1697037617=2, srv507737371=4, srv679978762=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,161 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,161 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,161 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,161 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,161 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,161 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,161 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,161 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table913) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,161 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1091
2023-07-11 14:16:26,161 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1687925324=1, srv405099745=3, srv1439028200=0, srv1697037617=2, srv507737371=4, srv679978762=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,161 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,161 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,161 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,161 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,162 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,162 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,162 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,162 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1091) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,162 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table914
2023-07-11 14:16:26,162 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1687925324=1, srv405099745=3, srv1439028200=0, srv1697037617=2, srv507737371=4, srv679978762=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,162 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,162 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,162 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,162 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,162 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,162 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,162 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,162 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table914) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,162 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1092
2023-07-11 14:16:26,162 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1687925324=1, srv405099745=3, srv1439028200=0, srv1697037617=2, srv507737371=4, srv679978762=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,162 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,162 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,162 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,162 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,162 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,162 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,162 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,162 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1092) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,162 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table915
2023-07-11 14:16:26,162 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1687925324=1, srv405099745=3, srv1439028200=0, srv1697037617=2, srv507737371=4, srv679978762=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,162 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,163 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,163 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,163 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,163 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,163 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,163 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,163 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table915) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,163 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1093
2023-07-11 14:16:26,163 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1687925324=1, srv405099745=3, srv1439028200=0, srv1697037617=2, srv507737371=4, srv679978762=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,163 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,163 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,163 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,163 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,163 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,163 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,163 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,163 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1093) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,163 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table916
2023-07-11 14:16:26,163 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1687925324=1, srv405099745=3, srv1439028200=0, srv1697037617=2, srv507737371=4, srv679978762=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,163 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,163 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,163 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,163 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,163 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,163 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,163 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,163 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table916) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,164 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table917
2023-07-11 14:16:26,164 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1687925324=1, srv405099745=3, srv1439028200=0, srv1697037617=2, srv507737371=4, srv679978762=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,164 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,164 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,164 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,164 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,164 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,164 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,164 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,164 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table917) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,164 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table918
2023-07-11 14:16:26,164 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1687925324=1, srv405099745=3, srv1439028200=0, srv1697037617=2, srv507737371=4, srv679978762=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,164 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,164 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,164 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,164 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,164 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,164 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,164 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,164 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table918) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,164 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table919
2023-07-11 14:16:26,164 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1687925324=1, srv405099745=3, srv1439028200=0, srv1697037617=2, srv507737371=4, srv679978762=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,164 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,164 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,164 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,164 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,164 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,165 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,165 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,165 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table919) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,165 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1083
2023-07-11 14:16:26,165 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1687925324=1, srv405099745=3, srv1439028200=0, srv1697037617=2, srv507737371=4, srv679978762=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,165 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,165 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,165 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,165 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,165 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,165 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,165 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,165 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1083) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,165 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1084
2023-07-11 14:16:26,165 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1687925324=1, srv405099745=3, srv1439028200=0, srv1697037617=2, srv507737371=4, srv679978762=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,165 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,165 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,165 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,165 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,165 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,165 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,165 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,165 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1084) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,165 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1085
2023-07-11 14:16:26,165 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1687925324=1, srv405099745=3, srv1439028200=0, srv1697037617=2, srv507737371=4, srv679978762=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,165 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,166 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,166 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,166 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,166 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,166 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,166 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,166 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1085) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,166 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1086
2023-07-11 14:16:26,166 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1687925324=1, srv405099745=3, srv1439028200=0, srv1697037617=2, srv507737371=4, srv679978762=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,166 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,166 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,166 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,166 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,166 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,166 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,166 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,166 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1086) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,166 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1087
2023-07-11 14:16:26,166 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1687925324=1, srv405099745=3, srv1439028200=0, srv1697037617=2, srv507737371=4, srv679978762=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,166 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,166 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,166 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,166 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,166 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,166 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,166 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,167 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1087) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,167 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1088
2023-07-11 14:16:26,167 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1687925324=1, srv405099745=3, srv1439028200=0, srv1697037617=2, srv507737371=4, srv679978762=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,167 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,167 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,167 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,167 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,167 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,167 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,167 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,167 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1088) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,167 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1089
2023-07-11 14:16:26,167 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1687925324=1, srv405099745=3, srv1439028200=0, srv1697037617=2, srv507737371=4, srv679978762=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,167 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,167 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,167 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,167 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,167 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,167 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,167 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,167 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1089) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,167 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table940
2023-07-11 14:16:26,167 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1687925324=1, srv405099745=3, srv1439028200=0, srv1697037617=2, srv507737371=4, srv679978762=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,167 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,167 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,167 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,167 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,168 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,168 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,168 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,168 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table940) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,168 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table941
2023-07-11 14:16:26,168 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1687925324=1, srv405099745=3, srv1439028200=0, srv1697037617=2, srv507737371=4, srv679978762=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,168 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,168 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,168 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,168 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,168 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,168 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,168 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,168 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table941) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,168 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table700
2023-07-11 14:16:26,168 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1687925324=1, srv405099745=3, srv1439028200=0, srv1697037617=2, srv507737371=4, srv679978762=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,168 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,168 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,168 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,168 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,168 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,168 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,168 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,168 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table700) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,168 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table942
2023-07-11 14:16:26,168 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1687925324=1, srv405099745=3, srv1439028200=0, srv1697037617=2, srv507737371=4, srv679978762=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,169 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,169 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,169 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,169 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,169 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,169 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,169 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,169 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table942) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,169 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table701
2023-07-11 14:16:26,169 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1687925324=1, srv405099745=3, srv1439028200=0, srv1697037617=2, srv507737371=4, srv679978762=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,169 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,169 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,169 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,169 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,169 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,169 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,169 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,169 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table701) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,169 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table943
2023-07-11 14:16:26,169 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1687925324=1, srv405099745=3, srv1439028200=0, srv1697037617=2, srv507737371=4, srv679978762=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,169 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,169 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,169 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,169 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,170 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,170 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,170 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,170 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table943) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,170 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table702
2023-07-11 14:16:26,170 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1687925324=1, srv405099745=3, srv1439028200=0, srv1697037617=2, srv507737371=4, srv679978762=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,170 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,170 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,170 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,170 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,170 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,170 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,170 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,170 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table702) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,170 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table944
2023-07-11 14:16:26,170 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1687925324=1, srv405099745=3, srv1439028200=0, srv1697037617=2, srv507737371=4, srv679978762=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,170 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,170 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,170 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,170 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,170 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,170 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,170 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,171 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table944) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,171 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table703
2023-07-11 14:16:26,171 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1687925324=1, srv405099745=3, srv1439028200=0, srv1697037617=2, srv507737371=4, srv679978762=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,171 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,171 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,171 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,171 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,171 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,171 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,171 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,171 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table703) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,171 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table945
2023-07-11 14:16:26,171 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1687925324=1, srv405099745=3, srv1439028200=0, srv1697037617=2, srv507737371=4, srv679978762=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,171 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,172 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,172 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,172 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,172 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,172 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,172 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,172 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table945) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,172 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table704
2023-07-11 14:16:26,172 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1687925324=1, srv405099745=3, srv1439028200=0, srv1697037617=2, srv507737371=4, srv679978762=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,172 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,172 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,172 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,172 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,172 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,172 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,173 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,173 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table704) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,173 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table946
2023-07-11 14:16:26,173 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1687925324=1, srv405099745=3, srv1439028200=0, srv1697037617=2, srv507737371=4, srv679978762=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,173 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,173 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,173 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,173 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,173 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,173 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,173 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,173 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table946) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,173 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1080
2023-07-11 14:16:26,173 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1687925324=1, srv405099745=3, srv1439028200=0, srv1697037617=2, srv507737371=4, srv679978762=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,173 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,173 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,173 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,174 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,174 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,174 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,174 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,174 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1080) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,174 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table705
2023-07-11 14:16:26,174 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1687925324=1, srv405099745=3, srv1439028200=0, srv1697037617=2, srv507737371=4, srv679978762=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,174 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,174 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,174 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,174 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,174 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,174 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,174 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,174 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table705) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,174 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table947
2023-07-11 14:16:26,174 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1687925324=1, srv405099745=3, srv1439028200=0, srv1697037617=2, srv507737371=4, srv679978762=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,174 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,174 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,174 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,174 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,174 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,174 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,174 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,174 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table947) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,174 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1081
2023-07-11 14:16:26,174 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1687925324=1, srv405099745=3, srv1439028200=0, srv1697037617=2, srv507737371=4, srv679978762=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,175 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,175 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,175 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,175 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,175 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,175 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,175 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,175 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1081) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,175 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table706
2023-07-11 14:16:26,175 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1687925324=1, srv405099745=3, srv1439028200=0, srv1697037617=2, srv507737371=4, srv679978762=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,175 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,175 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,175 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,175 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,175 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,175 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,175 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,175 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table706) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,175 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table948
2023-07-11 14:16:26,175 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1687925324=1, srv405099745=3, srv1439028200=0, srv1697037617=2, srv507737371=4, srv679978762=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,175 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,175 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,175 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,175 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,175 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,175 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,175 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,176 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table948) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,176 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1082
2023-07-11 14:16:26,176 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1687925324=1, srv405099745=3, srv1439028200=0, srv1697037617=2, srv507737371=4, srv679978762=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,176 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,176 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,176 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,176 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,176 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,176 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,176 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,176 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1082) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,176 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table707
2023-07-11 14:16:26,176 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1687925324=1, srv405099745=3, srv1439028200=0, srv1697037617=2, srv507737371=4, srv679978762=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,176 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,176 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,176 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,176 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,176 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,176 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,176 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,176 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table707) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,176 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table949
2023-07-11 14:16:26,176 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1687925324=1, srv405099745=3, srv1439028200=0, srv1697037617=2, srv507737371=4, srv679978762=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,176 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,176 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,176 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,177 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,177 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,177 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,177 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,177 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table949) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,177 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table708
2023-07-11 14:16:26,177 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1687925324=1, srv405099745=3, srv1439028200=0, srv1697037617=2, srv507737371=4, srv679978762=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,177 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,177 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,177 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,177 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,177 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,177 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,177 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,177 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table708) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,177 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table709
2023-07-11 14:16:26,177 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1687925324=1, srv405099745=3, srv1439028200=0, srv1697037617=2, srv507737371=4, srv679978762=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,177 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,177 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,177 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,177 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,177 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,177 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,177 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,177 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table709) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,177 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1072
2023-07-11 14:16:26,178 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1687925324=1, srv405099745=3, srv1439028200=0, srv1697037617=2, srv507737371=4, srv679978762=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,178 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,178 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,178 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,178 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,178 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,178 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,178 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,178 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1072) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,178 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1073
2023-07-11 14:16:26,178 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1687925324=1, srv405099745=3, srv1439028200=0, srv1697037617=2, srv507737371=4, srv679978762=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,178 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,178 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,178 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,178 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,178 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,178 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,178 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,178 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1073) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,178 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1074
2023-07-11 14:16:26,178 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1687925324=1, srv405099745=3, srv1439028200=0, srv1697037617=2, srv507737371=4, srv679978762=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,178 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,178 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,178 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,178 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,178 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,178 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,179 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,179 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1074) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,179 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1075
2023-07-11 14:16:26,179 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1687925324=1, srv405099745=3, srv1439028200=0, srv1697037617=2, srv507737371=4, srv679978762=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,179 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,179 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,179 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,179 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,179 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,179 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,179 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,179 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1075) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,179 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1076
2023-07-11 14:16:26,179 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1687925324=1, srv405099745=3, srv1439028200=0, srv1697037617=2, srv507737371=4, srv679978762=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,179 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,179 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,179 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,179 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,179 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,179 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,179 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,179 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1076) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,179 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1077
2023-07-11 14:16:26,180 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1687925324=1, srv405099745=3, srv1439028200=0, srv1697037617=2, srv507737371=4, srv679978762=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,180 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,180 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,180 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,180 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,180 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,180 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,180 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,180 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1077) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,180 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1078
2023-07-11 14:16:26,180 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1687925324=1, srv405099745=3, srv1439028200=0, srv1697037617=2, srv507737371=4, srv679978762=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,180 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,180 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,180 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,180 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,180 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,180 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,180 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,180 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1078) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,180 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1079
2023-07-11 14:16:26,180 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1687925324=1, srv405099745=3, srv1439028200=0, srv1697037617=2, srv507737371=4, srv679978762=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,180 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,180 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,180 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,180 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,180 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,181 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,181 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,181 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1079) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,181 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table930
2023-07-11 14:16:26,181 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1687925324=1, srv405099745=3, srv1439028200=0, srv1697037617=2, srv507737371=4, srv679978762=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,181 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,181 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,181 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,181 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,181 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,181 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,181 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,181 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table930) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,181 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table931
2023-07-11 14:16:26,181 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1687925324=1, srv405099745=3, srv1439028200=0, srv1697037617=2, srv507737371=4, srv679978762=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,181 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,181 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,181 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,181 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,181 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,181 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,181 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,181 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table931) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,181 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table932
2023-07-11 14:16:26,181 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1687925324=1, srv405099745=3, srv1439028200=0, srv1697037617=2, srv507737371=4, srv679978762=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,181 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,182 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,182 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,182 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,182 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,182 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,182 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,182 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table932) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,182 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table933
2023-07-11 14:16:26,182 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1687925324=1, srv405099745=3, srv1439028200=0, srv1697037617=2, srv507737371=4, srv679978762=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,182 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,182 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,182 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,182 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,182 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,182 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,182 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,182 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table933) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,182 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table934
2023-07-11 14:16:26,182 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1687925324=1, srv405099745=3, srv1439028200=0, srv1697037617=2, srv507737371=4, srv679978762=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,182 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,182 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,182 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,182 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,182 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,182 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,182 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,182 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table934) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,183 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table935
2023-07-11 14:16:26,183 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1687925324=1, srv405099745=3, srv1439028200=0, srv1697037617=2, srv507737371=4, srv679978762=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,183 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,183 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,183 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,183 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,183 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,183 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,183 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,183 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table935) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,183 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table936
2023-07-11 14:16:26,183 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1687925324=1, srv405099745=3, srv1439028200=0, srv1697037617=2, srv507737371=4, srv679978762=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,183 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,183 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,183 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,183 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,183 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,183 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,183 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,183 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table936) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,183 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1070
2023-07-11 14:16:26,183 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1687925324=1, srv405099745=3, srv1439028200=0, srv1697037617=2, srv507737371=4, srv679978762=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,183 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,183 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,183 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,183 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,183 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,184 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,184 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,184 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1070) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,184 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table937
2023-07-11 14:16:26,184 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1687925324=1, srv405099745=3, srv1439028200=0, srv1697037617=2, srv507737371=4, srv679978762=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,184 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,184 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,184 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,184 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,184 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,184 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,184 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,184 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table937) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,184 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1071
2023-07-11 14:16:26,184 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1687925324=1, srv405099745=3, srv1439028200=0, srv1697037617=2, srv507737371=4, srv679978762=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,184 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,184 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,184 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,184 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,184 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,184 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,184 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,184 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1071) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,184 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table938
2023-07-11 14:16:26,184 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1687925324=1, srv405099745=3, srv1439028200=0, srv1697037617=2, srv507737371=4, srv679978762=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,184 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,185 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,185 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,185 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,185 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,185 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,185 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,185 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table938) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,185 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table939
2023-07-11 14:16:26,185 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1687925324=1, srv405099745=3, srv1439028200=0, srv1697037617=2, srv507737371=4, srv679978762=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,185 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,185 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,185 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,185 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,185 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,185 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,185 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,185 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table939) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,185 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table900
2023-07-11 14:16:26,185 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1687925324=1, srv405099745=3, srv1439028200=0, srv1697037617=2, srv507737371=4, srv679978762=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,185 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,185 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,185 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,185 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,185 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,185 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,185 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,186 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table900) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,186 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table901
2023-07-11 14:16:26,186 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1687925324=1, srv405099745=3, srv1439028200=0, srv1697037617=2, srv507737371=4, srv679978762=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,186 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,186 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,186 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,186 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,186 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,186 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,186 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,186 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table901) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,186 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table902
2023-07-11 14:16:26,186 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1687925324=1, srv405099745=3, srv1439028200=0, srv1697037617=2, srv507737371=4, srv679978762=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,186 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,186 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,186 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,186 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,186 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,186 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,186 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,186 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table902) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,186 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table903
2023-07-11 14:16:26,186 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1687925324=1, srv405099745=3, srv1439028200=0, srv1697037617=2, srv507737371=4, srv679978762=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,186 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,186 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,187 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,187 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,187 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,187 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,187 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,187 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table903) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,187 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table904
2023-07-11 14:16:26,187 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1687925324=1, srv405099745=3, srv1439028200=0, srv1697037617=2, srv507737371=4, srv679978762=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,187 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,187 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,187 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,187 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,187 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,187 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,187 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,187 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table904) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,187 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table905
2023-07-11 14:16:26,187 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1687925324=1, srv405099745=3, srv1439028200=0, srv1697037617=2, srv507737371=4, srv679978762=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,187 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,187 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,187 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,187 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,187 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,187 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,187 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,187 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table905) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,188 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table906
2023-07-11 14:16:26,188 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1687925324=1, srv405099745=3, srv1439028200=0, srv1697037617=2, srv507737371=4, srv679978762=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,188 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,188 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,188 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,188 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,188 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,188 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,188 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,188 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table906) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,188 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table907
2023-07-11 14:16:26,188 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1687925324=1, srv405099745=3, srv1439028200=0, srv1697037617=2, srv507737371=4, srv679978762=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,188 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,188 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,188 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,188 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,188 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,188 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,188 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,188 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table907) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,188 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table908
2023-07-11 14:16:26,188 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1687925324=1, srv405099745=3, srv1439028200=0, srv1697037617=2, srv507737371=4, srv679978762=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,188 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,188 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,189 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,189 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,189 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,189 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,189 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,189 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table908) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,189 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table909
2023-07-11 14:16:26,189 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1687925324=1, srv405099745=3, srv1439028200=0, srv1697037617=2, srv507737371=4, srv679978762=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,189 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,189 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,189 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,189 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,189 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,189 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,189 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,189 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table909) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,222 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1380
2023-07-11 14:16:26,222 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv603922701=4, srv147651029=0, srv2136239425=2, srv2118521717=1, srv886850468=5, srv233916608=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,222 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,222 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,222 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,222 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,222 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,222 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,222 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,222 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1380) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,223 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1381
2023-07-11 14:16:26,223 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv603922701=4, srv147651029=0, srv2136239425=2, srv2118521717=1, srv886850468=5, srv233916608=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,223 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,223 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,223 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,223 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,223 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,223 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,223 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,223 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1381) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,223 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table880
2023-07-11 14:16:26,223 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv603922701=4, srv147651029=0, srv2136239425=2, srv2118521717=1, srv886850468=5, srv233916608=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,223 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,223 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,224 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,224 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,224 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,224 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,224 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,224 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table880) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,224 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1140
2023-07-11 14:16:26,224 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv603922701=4, srv147651029=0, srv2136239425=2, srv2118521717=1, srv886850468=5, srv233916608=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,224 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,224 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,224 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,224 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,224 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,224 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,224 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,225 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1140) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,225 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1382
2023-07-11 14:16:26,225 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv603922701=4, srv147651029=0, srv2136239425=2, srv2118521717=1, srv886850468=5, srv233916608=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,225 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,225 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,225 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,225 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,225 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,225 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,225 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,225 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1382) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,225 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table881
2023-07-11 14:16:26,225 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv603922701=4, srv147651029=0, srv2136239425=2, srv2118521717=1, srv886850468=5, srv233916608=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,226 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,226 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,226 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,226 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,226 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,226 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,226 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,226 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table881) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,226 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1141
2023-07-11 14:16:26,226 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv603922701=4, srv147651029=0, srv2136239425=2, srv2118521717=1, srv886850468=5, srv233916608=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,226 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,226 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,226 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,226 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,226 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,226 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,227 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,227 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1141) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,227 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1383
2023-07-11 14:16:26,227 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv603922701=4, srv147651029=0, srv2136239425=2, srv2118521717=1, srv886850468=5, srv233916608=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,227 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,227 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,227 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,227 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,227 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,227 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,227 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,227 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1383) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,227 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table640
2023-07-11 14:16:26,227 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv603922701=4, srv147651029=0, srv2136239425=2, srv2118521717=1, srv886850468=5, srv233916608=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,228 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,228 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,228 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,228 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,228 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,228 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,228 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,228 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table640) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,228 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table882
2023-07-11 14:16:26,228 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv603922701=4, srv147651029=0, srv2136239425=2, srv2118521717=1, srv886850468=5, srv233916608=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,228 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,228 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,228 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,228 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,228 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,229 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,229 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,229 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table882) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,229 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1142
2023-07-11 14:16:26,229 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv603922701=4, srv147651029=0, srv2136239425=2, srv2118521717=1, srv886850468=5, srv233916608=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,229 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,229 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,229 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,229 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,229 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,229 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,229 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,230 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1142) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,230 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1384
2023-07-11 14:16:26,230 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv603922701=4, srv147651029=0, srv2136239425=2, srv2118521717=1, srv886850468=5, srv233916608=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,230 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,230 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,230 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,230 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,230 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,230 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,230 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,230 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1384) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,230 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table641
2023-07-11 14:16:26,230 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv603922701=4, srv147651029=0, srv2136239425=2, srv2118521717=1, srv886850468=5, srv233916608=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,230 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,231 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,231 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,231 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,231 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,231 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,231 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,231 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table641) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,231 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table883
2023-07-11 14:16:26,231 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv603922701=4, srv147651029=0, srv2136239425=2, srv2118521717=1, srv886850468=5, srv233916608=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,231 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,231 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,231 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,231 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,231 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,231 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,232 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,232 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table883) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,232 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1143
2023-07-11 14:16:26,232 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv603922701=4, srv147651029=0, srv2136239425=2, srv2118521717=1, srv886850468=5, srv233916608=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,232 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,232 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,232 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,232 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,232 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,232 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,232 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,232 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1143) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,232 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1385
2023-07-11 14:16:26,232 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv603922701=4, srv147651029=0, srv2136239425=2, srv2118521717=1, srv886850468=5, srv233916608=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,232 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,233 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,233 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,233 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,233 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,233 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,233 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,233 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1385) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,233 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table400
2023-07-11 14:16:26,233 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv603922701=4, srv147651029=0, srv2136239425=2, srv2118521717=1, srv886850468=5, srv233916608=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,233 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,233 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,233 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,233 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,233 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,234 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,234 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,234 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table400) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,234 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table642
2023-07-11 14:16:26,234 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv603922701=4, srv147651029=0, srv2136239425=2, srv2118521717=1, srv886850468=5, srv233916608=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,234 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,234 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,234 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,234 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,234 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,234 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,234 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,234 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table642) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,235 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table884
2023-07-11 14:16:26,235 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv603922701=4, srv147651029=0, srv2136239425=2, srv2118521717=1, srv886850468=5, srv233916608=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,235 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,235 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,235 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,235 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,235 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,235 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,235 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,235 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table884) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,235 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1144
2023-07-11 14:16:26,235 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv603922701=4, srv147651029=0, srv2136239425=2, srv2118521717=1, srv886850468=5, srv233916608=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,236 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,236 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,236 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,236 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,236 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,236 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,236 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,236 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1144) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,236 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1386
2023-07-11 14:16:26,236 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv603922701=4, srv147651029=0, srv2136239425=2, srv2118521717=1, srv886850468=5, srv233916608=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,236 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,236 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,236 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,236 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,236 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,237 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,237 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,237 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1386) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,237 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table401
2023-07-11 14:16:26,237 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv603922701=4, srv147651029=0, srv2136239425=2, srv2118521717=1, srv886850468=5, srv233916608=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,237 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,237 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,237 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,237 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,237 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,237 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,237 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,237 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table401) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,237 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table643
2023-07-11 14:16:26,238 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv603922701=4, srv147651029=0, srv2136239425=2, srv2118521717=1, srv886850468=5, srv233916608=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,238 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,238 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,238 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,238 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,238 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,238 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,238 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,238 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table643) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,238 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table885
2023-07-11 14:16:26,238 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv603922701=4, srv147651029=0, srv2136239425=2, srv2118521717=1, srv886850468=5, srv233916608=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,238 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,238 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,238 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,238 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,239 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,239 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,239 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,239 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table885) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,239 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1145
2023-07-11 14:16:26,239 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv603922701=4, srv147651029=0, srv2136239425=2, srv2118521717=1, srv886850468=5, srv233916608=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,239 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,239 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,239 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,239 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,239 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,239 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,239 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,239 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1145) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,239 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1387
2023-07-11 14:16:26,240 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv603922701=4, srv147651029=0, srv2136239425=2, srv2118521717=1, srv886850468=5, srv233916608=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,240 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,240 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,240 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,240 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,240 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,240 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,240 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,240 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1387) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,240 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table402
2023-07-11 14:16:26,240 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv603922701=4, srv147651029=0, srv2136239425=2, srv2118521717=1, srv886850468=5, srv233916608=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,240 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,240 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,240 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,241 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,241 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,241 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,241 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,241 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table402) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,241 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table644
2023-07-11 14:16:26,241 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv603922701=4, srv147651029=0, srv2136239425=2, srv2118521717=1, srv886850468=5, srv233916608=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,241 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,241 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,241 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,241 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,241 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,241 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,241 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,241 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table644) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,242 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table886
2023-07-11 14:16:26,242 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv603922701=4, srv147651029=0, srv2136239425=2, srv2118521717=1, srv886850468=5, srv233916608=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,242 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,242 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,242 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,242 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,242 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,242 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,242 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,242 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table886) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,242 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table403
2023-07-11 14:16:26,242 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv603922701=4, srv147651029=0, srv2136239425=2, srv2118521717=1, srv886850468=5, srv233916608=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,242 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,242 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,243 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,243 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,243 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,243 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,243 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,243 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table403) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,243 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table645
2023-07-11 14:16:26,243 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv603922701=4, srv147651029=0, srv2136239425=2, srv2118521717=1, srv886850468=5, srv233916608=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,243 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,243 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,243 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,243 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,243 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,243 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,243 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,244 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table645) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,244 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table887
2023-07-11 14:16:26,244 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv603922701=4, srv147651029=0, srv2136239425=2, srv2118521717=1, srv886850468=5, srv233916608=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,244 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,244 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,244 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,244 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,244 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,244 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,244 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,244 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table887) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,244 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table404
2023-07-11 14:16:26,244 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv603922701=4, srv147651029=0, srv2136239425=2, srv2118521717=1, srv886850468=5, srv233916608=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,244 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,244 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,245 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,245 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,245 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,245 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,245 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,245 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table404) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,245 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table646
2023-07-11 14:16:26,245 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv603922701=4, srv147651029=0, srv2136239425=2, srv2118521717=1, srv886850468=5, srv233916608=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,245 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,245 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,245 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,245 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,245 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,245 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,245 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,246 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table646) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,246 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table888
2023-07-11 14:16:26,246 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv603922701=4, srv147651029=0, srv2136239425=2, srv2118521717=1, srv886850468=5, srv233916608=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,246 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,246 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,246 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,246 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,246 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,246 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,246 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,246 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table888) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,246 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table405
2023-07-11 14:16:26,246 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv603922701=4, srv147651029=0, srv2136239425=2, srv2118521717=1, srv886850468=5, srv233916608=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,247 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,247 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,247 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,247 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,247 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,247 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,247 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,247 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table405) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,247 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table647
2023-07-11 14:16:26,247 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv603922701=4, srv147651029=0, srv2136239425=2, srv2118521717=1, srv886850468=5, srv233916608=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,247 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,247 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,247 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,247 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,247 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,248 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,248 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,248 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table647) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,248 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table889
2023-07-11 14:16:26,248 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv603922701=4, srv147651029=0, srv2136239425=2, srv2118521717=1, srv886850468=5, srv233916608=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,248 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,248 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,248 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,248 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,248 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,248 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,248 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,248 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table889) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,248 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table406
2023-07-11 14:16:26,249 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv603922701=4, srv147651029=0, srv2136239425=2, srv2118521717=1, srv886850468=5, srv233916608=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,249 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,249 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,249 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,249 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,249 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,249 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,249 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,249 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table406) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,249 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table648
2023-07-11 14:16:26,249 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv603922701=4, srv147651029=0, srv2136239425=2, srv2118521717=1, srv886850468=5, srv233916608=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,249 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,249 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,249 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,249 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,250 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,250 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,250 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,250 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table648) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,250 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table407
2023-07-11 14:16:26,250 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv603922701=4, srv147651029=0, srv2136239425=2, srv2118521717=1, srv886850468=5, srv233916608=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,250 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,250 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,250 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,250 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,250 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,251 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,251 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,251 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table407) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,251 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table649
2023-07-11 14:16:26,251 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv603922701=4, srv147651029=0, srv2136239425=2, srv2118521717=1, srv886850468=5, srv233916608=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,251 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,251 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,251 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,251 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,251 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,251 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,251 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,251 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table649) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,251 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table408
2023-07-11 14:16:26,252 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv603922701=4, srv147651029=0, srv2136239425=2, srv2118521717=1, srv886850468=5, srv233916608=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,252 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,252 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,252 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,252 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,252 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,252 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,252 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,252 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table408) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,252 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table409
2023-07-11 14:16:26,252 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv603922701=4, srv147651029=0, srv2136239425=2, srv2118521717=1, srv886850468=5, srv233916608=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,252 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,252 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,252 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,253 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,253 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,253 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,253 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,253 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table409) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,253 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1146
2023-07-11 14:16:26,253 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv603922701=4, srv147651029=0, srv2136239425=2, srv2118521717=1, srv886850468=5, srv233916608=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,253 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,253 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,253 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,253 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,253 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,253 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,253 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,253 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1146) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,254 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1388
2023-07-11 14:16:26,254 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv603922701=4, srv147651029=0, srv2136239425=2, srv2118521717=1, srv886850468=5, srv233916608=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,254 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,254 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,254 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,254 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,254 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,254 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,254 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,254 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1388) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,254 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1147
2023-07-11 14:16:26,254 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv603922701=4, srv147651029=0, srv2136239425=2, srv2118521717=1, srv886850468=5, srv233916608=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,254 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,254 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,254 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,254 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,254 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,255 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,255 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,255 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1147) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,255 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1389
2023-07-11 14:16:26,255 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv603922701=4, srv147651029=0, srv2136239425=2, srv2118521717=1, srv886850468=5, srv233916608=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,255 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,255 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,255 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,255 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,255 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,255 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,255 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,255 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1389) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,255 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1148
2023-07-11 14:16:26,255 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv603922701=4, srv147651029=0, srv2136239425=2, srv2118521717=1, srv886850468=5, srv233916608=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,256 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,256 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,256 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,256 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,256 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,256 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,256 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,256 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1148) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,256 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1149
2023-07-11 14:16:26,256 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv603922701=4, srv147651029=0, srv2136239425=2, srv2118521717=1, srv886850468=5, srv233916608=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,256 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,256 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,256 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,256 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,256 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,256 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,257 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,257 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1149) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,257 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1370
2023-07-11 14:16:26,257 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv603922701=4, srv147651029=0, srv2136239425=2, srv2118521717=1, srv886850468=5, srv233916608=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,257 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,257 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,257 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,257 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,257 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,257 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,257 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,257 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1370) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,257 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1371
2023-07-11 14:16:26,257 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv603922701=4, srv147651029=0, srv2136239425=2, srv2118521717=1, srv886850468=5, srv233916608=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,257 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,258 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,258 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,258 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,258 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,258 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,258 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,258 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1371) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,258 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table870
2023-07-11 14:16:26,258 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv603922701=4, srv147651029=0, srv2136239425=2, srv2118521717=1, srv886850468=5, srv233916608=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,258 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,258 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,258 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,258 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,258 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,258 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,258 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,259 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table870) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,259 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1130
2023-07-11 14:16:26,259 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv603922701=4, srv147651029=0, srv2136239425=2, srv2118521717=1, srv886850468=5, srv233916608=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,259 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,259 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,259 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,259 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,259 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,259 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,259 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,259 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1130) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,259 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1372
2023-07-11 14:16:26,259 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv603922701=4, srv147651029=0, srv2136239425=2, srv2118521717=1, srv886850468=5, srv233916608=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,259 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,259 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,259 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,260 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,260 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,260 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,260 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,260 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1372) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,260 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table871
2023-07-11 14:16:26,260 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv603922701=4, srv147651029=0, srv2136239425=2, srv2118521717=1, srv886850468=5, srv233916608=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,260 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,260 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,260 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,260 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,260 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,260 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,260 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,260 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table871) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,261 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1131
2023-07-11 14:16:26,261 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv603922701=4, srv147651029=0, srv2136239425=2, srv2118521717=1, srv886850468=5, srv233916608=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,261 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,261 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,261 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,261 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,261 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,261 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,261 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,261 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1131) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,261 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1373
2023-07-11 14:16:26,261 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv603922701=4, srv147651029=0, srv2136239425=2, srv2118521717=1, srv886850468=5, srv233916608=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,261 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,261 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,261 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,262 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,262 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,262 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,262 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,262 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1373) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,262 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table630
2023-07-11 14:16:26,262 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv603922701=4, srv147651029=0, srv2136239425=2, srv2118521717=1, srv886850468=5, srv233916608=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,262 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,262 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,262 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,262 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,262 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,262 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,262 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,263 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table630) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,263 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table872
2023-07-11 14:16:26,263 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv603922701=4, srv147651029=0, srv2136239425=2, srv2118521717=1, srv886850468=5, srv233916608=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,263 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,263 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,263 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,263 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,263 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,263 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,263 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,263 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table872) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,263 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1132
2023-07-11 14:16:26,263 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv603922701=4, srv147651029=0, srv2136239425=2, srv2118521717=1, srv886850468=5, srv233916608=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,263 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,263 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,263 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,264 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,264 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,264 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,264 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,264 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1132) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,264 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1374
2023-07-11 14:16:26,264 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv603922701=4, srv147651029=0, srv2136239425=2, srv2118521717=1, srv886850468=5, srv233916608=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,264 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,264 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,264 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,264 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,264 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,264 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,264 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,264 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1374) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,265 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table631
2023-07-11 14:16:26,265 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv603922701=4, srv147651029=0, srv2136239425=2, srv2118521717=1, srv886850468=5, srv233916608=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,265 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,265 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,265 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,265 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,265 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,265 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,265 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,265 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table631) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,265 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table873
2023-07-11 14:16:26,265 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv603922701=4, srv147651029=0, srv2136239425=2, srv2118521717=1, srv886850468=5, srv233916608=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,266 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,266 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,266 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,266 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,266 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,266 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,266 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,266 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table873) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,266 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1133
2023-07-11 14:16:26,266 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv603922701=4, srv147651029=0, srv2136239425=2, srv2118521717=1, srv886850468=5, srv233916608=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,266 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,266 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,266 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,266 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,266 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,266 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,267 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,267 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1133) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,267 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1375
2023-07-11 14:16:26,267 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv603922701=4, srv147651029=0, srv2136239425=2, srv2118521717=1, srv886850468=5, srv233916608=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,267 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,267 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,267 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,267 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,267 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,267 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,267 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,267 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1375) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,267 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table632
2023-07-11 14:16:26,267 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv603922701=4, srv147651029=0, srv2136239425=2, srv2118521717=1, srv886850468=5, srv233916608=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,267 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,267 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,268 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,268 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,268 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,268 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,268 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,268 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table632) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,268 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table874
2023-07-11 14:16:26,268 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv603922701=4, srv147651029=0, srv2136239425=2, srv2118521717=1, srv886850468=5, srv233916608=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,268 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,268 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,268 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,268 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,268 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,268 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,268 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,269 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table874) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,269 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1134
2023-07-11 14:16:26,269 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv603922701=4, srv147651029=0, srv2136239425=2, srv2118521717=1, srv886850468=5, srv233916608=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,269 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,269 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,269 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,269 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,269 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,269 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,269 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,269 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1134) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,269 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1376
2023-07-11 14:16:26,269 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv603922701=4, srv147651029=0, srv2136239425=2, srv2118521717=1, srv886850468=5, srv233916608=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,269 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,270 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,270 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,270 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,270 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,270 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,270 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,270 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1376) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,270 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table633
2023-07-11 14:16:26,270 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv603922701=4, srv147651029=0, srv2136239425=2, srv2118521717=1, srv886850468=5, srv233916608=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,270 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,270 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,270 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,270 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,270 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,270 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,270 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,270 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table633) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,271 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table875
2023-07-11 14:16:26,271 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv603922701=4, srv147651029=0, srv2136239425=2, srv2118521717=1, srv886850468=5, srv233916608=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,271 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,271 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,271 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,271 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,271 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,271 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,271 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,271 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table875) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,271 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table634
2023-07-11 14:16:26,271 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv603922701=4, srv147651029=0, srv2136239425=2, srv2118521717=1, srv886850468=5, srv233916608=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,271 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,271 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,271 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,271 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,272 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,272 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,272 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,272 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table634) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,272 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table876
2023-07-11 14:16:26,272 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv603922701=4, srv147651029=0, srv2136239425=2, srv2118521717=1, srv886850468=5, srv233916608=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,272 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,272 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,272 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,272 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,272 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,272 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,272 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,272 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table876) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,273 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table635
2023-07-11 14:16:26,273 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv603922701=4, srv147651029=0, srv2136239425=2, srv2118521717=1, srv886850468=5, srv233916608=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,273 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,273 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,273 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,273 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,273 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,273 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,273 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,273 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table635) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,273 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table877
2023-07-11 14:16:26,273 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv603922701=4, srv147651029=0, srv2136239425=2, srv2118521717=1, srv886850468=5, srv233916608=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,273 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,273 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,273 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,273 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,273 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,274 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,274 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,274 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table877) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,274 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table636
2023-07-11 14:16:26,274 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv603922701=4, srv147651029=0, srv2136239425=2, srv2118521717=1, srv886850468=5, srv233916608=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,274 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,274 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,274 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,274 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,274 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,274 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,274 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,274 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table636) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,274 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table878
2023-07-11 14:16:26,274 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv603922701=4, srv147651029=0, srv2136239425=2, srv2118521717=1, srv886850468=5, srv233916608=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,275 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,275 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,275 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,275 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,275 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,275 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,275 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,275 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table878) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,275 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table637
2023-07-11 14:16:26,275 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv603922701=4, srv147651029=0, srv2136239425=2, srv2118521717=1, srv886850468=5, srv233916608=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,275 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,275 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,275 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,275 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,275 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,276 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,276 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,276 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table637) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,276 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table879
2023-07-11 14:16:26,276 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv603922701=4, srv147651029=0, srv2136239425=2, srv2118521717=1, srv886850468=5, srv233916608=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,276 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,276 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,276 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,276 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,276 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,276 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,276 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,276 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table879) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,276 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table638
2023-07-11 14:16:26,276 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv603922701=4, srv147651029=0, srv2136239425=2, srv2118521717=1, srv886850468=5, srv233916608=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,277 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,277 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,277 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,277 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,277 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,277 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,277 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,277 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table638) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,277 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table639
2023-07-11 14:16:26,277 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv603922701=4, srv147651029=0, srv2136239425=2, srv2118521717=1, srv886850468=5, srv233916608=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,277 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,277 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,277 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,277 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,278 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,278 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,278 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,278 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table639) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,278 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1135
2023-07-11 14:16:26,278 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv603922701=4, srv147651029=0, srv2136239425=2, srv2118521717=1, srv886850468=5, srv233916608=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,278 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,278 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,278 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,278 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,278 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,278 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,278 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,278 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1135) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,278 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1377
2023-07-11 14:16:26,279 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv603922701=4, srv147651029=0, srv2136239425=2, srv2118521717=1, srv886850468=5, srv233916608=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,279 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,279 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,279 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,279 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,279 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,279 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,279 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,279 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1377) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,279 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1136
2023-07-11 14:16:26,279 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv603922701=4, srv147651029=0, srv2136239425=2, srv2118521717=1, srv886850468=5, srv233916608=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,279 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,280 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,280 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,280 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,280 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,280 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,280 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,280 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1136) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,280 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1378
2023-07-11 14:16:26,280 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv603922701=4, srv147651029=0, srv2136239425=2, srv2118521717=1, srv886850468=5, srv233916608=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,280 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,280 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,280 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,280 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,280 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,280 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,281 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,281 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1378) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,281 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1137
2023-07-11 14:16:26,281 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv603922701=4, srv147651029=0, srv2136239425=2, srv2118521717=1, srv886850468=5, srv233916608=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,281 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,281 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,281 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,281 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,281 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,281 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,281 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,281 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1137) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,281 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1379
2023-07-11 14:16:26,281 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv603922701=4, srv147651029=0, srv2136239425=2, srv2118521717=1, srv886850468=5, srv233916608=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,282 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,282 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,282 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,282 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,282 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,282 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,282 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,282 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1379) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,282 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1138
2023-07-11 14:16:26,282 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv603922701=4, srv147651029=0, srv2136239425=2, srv2118521717=1, srv886850468=5, srv233916608=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,282 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,282 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,282 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,282 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,282 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,283 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,283 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,283 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1138) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,283 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1139
2023-07-11 14:16:26,283 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv603922701=4, srv147651029=0, srv2136239425=2, srv2118521717=1, srv886850468=5, srv233916608=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,283 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,283 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,283 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,283 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,283 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,283 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,283 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,283 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1139) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,283 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table660
2023-07-11 14:16:26,283 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv603922701=4, srv147651029=0, srv2136239425=2, srv2118521717=1, srv886850468=5, srv233916608=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,284 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,284 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,284 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,284 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,284 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,284 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,284 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,284 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table660) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,284 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1360
2023-07-11 14:16:26,284 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv603922701=4, srv147651029=0, srv2136239425=2, srv2118521717=1, srv886850468=5, srv233916608=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,284 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,284 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,284 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,284 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,284 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,285 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,285 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,285 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1360) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,285 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table661
2023-07-11 14:16:26,285 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv603922701=4, srv147651029=0, srv2136239425=2, srv2118521717=1, srv886850468=5, srv233916608=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,285 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,285 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,285 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,285 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,285 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,285 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,285 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,285 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table661) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,285 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1361
2023-07-11 14:16:26,285 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv603922701=4, srv147651029=0, srv2136239425=2, srv2118521717=1, srv886850468=5, srv233916608=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,286 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,286 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,286 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,286 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,286 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,286 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,286 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,286 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1361) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,286 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table420
2023-07-11 14:16:26,286 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv603922701=4, srv147651029=0, srv2136239425=2, srv2118521717=1, srv886850468=5, srv233916608=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,286 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,286 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,286 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,286 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,286 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,287 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,287 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,287 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table420) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,287 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table662
2023-07-11 14:16:26,287 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv603922701=4, srv147651029=0, srv2136239425=2, srv2118521717=1, srv886850468=5, srv233916608=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,287 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,287 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,287 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,287 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,287 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,287 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,287 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,287 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table662) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,287 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1120
2023-07-11 14:16:26,288 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv603922701=4, srv147651029=0, srv2136239425=2, srv2118521717=1, srv886850468=5, srv233916608=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,288 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,288 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,288 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,288 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,288 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,288 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,288 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,288 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1120) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,288 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1362
2023-07-11 14:16:26,288 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv603922701=4, srv147651029=0, srv2136239425=2, srv2118521717=1, srv886850468=5, srv233916608=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,288 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,288 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,288 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,288 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,289 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,289 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,289 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,289 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1362) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,289 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table421
2023-07-11 14:16:26,289 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv603922701=4, srv147651029=0, srv2136239425=2, srv2118521717=1, srv886850468=5, srv233916608=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,289 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,289 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,289 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,289 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,289 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,289 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,289 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,289 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table421) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,290 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table663
2023-07-11 14:16:26,290 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv603922701=4, srv147651029=0, srv2136239425=2, srv2118521717=1, srv886850468=5, srv233916608=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,290 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,290 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,290 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,290 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,290 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,290 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,290 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,290 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table663) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,290 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1121
2023-07-11 14:16:26,290 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv603922701=4, srv147651029=0, srv2136239425=2, srv2118521717=1, srv886850468=5, srv233916608=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,290 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,290 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,290 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,291 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,291 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,291 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,291 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,291 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1121) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,291 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1363
2023-07-11 14:16:26,291 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv603922701=4, srv147651029=0, srv2136239425=2, srv2118521717=1, srv886850468=5, srv233916608=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,291 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,291 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,291 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,291 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,291 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,291 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,291 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,291 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1363) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,292 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table422
2023-07-11 14:16:26,292 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv603922701=4, srv147651029=0, srv2136239425=2, srv2118521717=1, srv886850468=5, srv233916608=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,292 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,292 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,292 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,292 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,292 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,292 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,292 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,292 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table422) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,292 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table664
2023-07-11 14:16:26,292 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv603922701=4, srv147651029=0, srv2136239425=2, srv2118521717=1, srv886850468=5, srv233916608=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,292 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,292 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,293 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,293 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,293 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,293 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,293 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,293 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table664) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,293 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1122
2023-07-11 14:16:26,293 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv603922701=4, srv147651029=0, srv2136239425=2, srv2118521717=1, srv886850468=5, srv233916608=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,293 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,293 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,293 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,293 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,293 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,293 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,293 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,294 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1122) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,294 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1364
2023-07-11 14:16:26,294 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv603922701=4, srv147651029=0, srv2136239425=2, srv2118521717=1, srv886850468=5, srv233916608=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,294 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,294 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,294 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,294 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,294 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,294 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,294 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,294 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1364) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,295 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table423
2023-07-11 14:16:26,295 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv603922701=4, srv147651029=0, srv2136239425=2, srv2118521717=1, srv886850468=5, srv233916608=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,295 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,295 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,295 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,295 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,295 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,295 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,295 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,295 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table423) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,295 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table665
2023-07-11 14:16:26,295 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv603922701=4, srv147651029=0, srv2136239425=2, srv2118521717=1, srv886850468=5, srv233916608=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,295 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,295 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,296 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,296 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,296 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,296 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,296 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,296 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table665) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,296 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1123
2023-07-11 14:16:26,296 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv603922701=4, srv147651029=0, srv2136239425=2, srv2118521717=1, srv886850468=5, srv233916608=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,296 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,296 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,296 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,296 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,296 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,296 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,296 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,297 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1123) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,297 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1365
2023-07-11 14:16:26,297 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv603922701=4, srv147651029=0, srv2136239425=2, srv2118521717=1, srv886850468=5, srv233916608=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,297 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,297 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,297 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,297 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,297 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,297 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,297 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,297 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1365) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,297 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table424
2023-07-11 14:16:26,297 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv603922701=4, srv147651029=0, srv2136239425=2, srv2118521717=1, srv886850468=5, srv233916608=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,297 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,298 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,298 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,298 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,298 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,298 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,298 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,298 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table424) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,298 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table666
2023-07-11 14:16:26,298 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv603922701=4, srv147651029=0, srv2136239425=2, srv2118521717=1, srv886850468=5, srv233916608=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,298 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,298 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,298 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,298 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,298 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,298 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,299 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,299 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table666) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,299 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table425
2023-07-11 14:16:26,299 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv603922701=4, srv147651029=0, srv2136239425=2, srv2118521717=1, srv886850468=5, srv233916608=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,299 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,299 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,299 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,299 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,299 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,299 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,299 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,299 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table425) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,299 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table667
2023-07-11 14:16:26,299 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv603922701=4, srv147651029=0, srv2136239425=2, srv2118521717=1, srv886850468=5, srv233916608=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,300 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,300 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,300 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,300 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,300 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,300 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,300 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,300 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table667) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,300 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table426
2023-07-11 14:16:26,300 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv603922701=4, srv147651029=0, srv2136239425=2, srv2118521717=1, srv886850468=5, srv233916608=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,300 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,300 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,300 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,300 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,300 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,301 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,301 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,301 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table426) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,301 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table668
2023-07-11 14:16:26,301 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv603922701=4, srv147651029=0, srv2136239425=2, srv2118521717=1, srv886850468=5, srv233916608=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,301 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,301 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,301 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,301 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,301 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,301 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,301 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,301 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table668) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,301 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table427
2023-07-11 14:16:26,302 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv603922701=4, srv147651029=0, srv2136239425=2, srv2118521717=1, srv886850468=5, srv233916608=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,302 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,302 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,302 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,302 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,302 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,302 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,302 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,302 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table427) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,302 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table669
2023-07-11 14:16:26,302 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv603922701=4, srv147651029=0, srv2136239425=2, srv2118521717=1, srv886850468=5, srv233916608=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,302 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,302 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,302 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,303 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,303 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,303 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,303 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,303 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table669) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,303 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table428
2023-07-11 14:16:26,303 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv603922701=4, srv147651029=0, srv2136239425=2, srv2118521717=1, srv886850468=5, srv233916608=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,303 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,303 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,303 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,303 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,303 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,303 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,303 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,304 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table428) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,304 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table429
2023-07-11 14:16:26,304 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv603922701=4, srv147651029=0, srv2136239425=2, srv2118521717=1, srv886850468=5, srv233916608=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,304 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,304 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,304 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,304 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,304 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,304 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,304 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,304 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table429) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,304 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1124
2023-07-11 14:16:26,304 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv603922701=4, srv147651029=0, srv2136239425=2, srv2118521717=1, srv886850468=5, srv233916608=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,304 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,305 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,305 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,305 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,305 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,305 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,305 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,305 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1124) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,305 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1366
2023-07-11 14:16:26,305 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv603922701=4, srv147651029=0, srv2136239425=2, srv2118521717=1, srv886850468=5, srv233916608=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,305 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,305 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,305 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,305 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,305 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,305 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,306 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,306 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1366) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,306 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1125
2023-07-11 14:16:26,306 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv603922701=4, srv147651029=0, srv2136239425=2, srv2118521717=1, srv886850468=5, srv233916608=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,306 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,306 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,306 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,306 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,306 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,306 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,306 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,306 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1125) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,306 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1367
2023-07-11 14:16:26,306 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv603922701=4, srv147651029=0, srv2136239425=2, srv2118521717=1, srv886850468=5, srv233916608=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,307 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,307 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,307 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,307 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,307 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,307 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,307 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,307 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1367) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,307 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1126
2023-07-11 14:16:26,307 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv603922701=4, srv147651029=0, srv2136239425=2, srv2118521717=1, srv886850468=5, srv233916608=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,307 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,307 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,307 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,307 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,307 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,307 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,308 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,308 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1126) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,308 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1368
2023-07-11 14:16:26,308 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv603922701=4, srv147651029=0, srv2136239425=2, srv2118521717=1, srv886850468=5, srv233916608=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,308 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,308 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,308 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,308 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,308 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,308 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,308 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,308 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1368) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,308 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1127
2023-07-11 14:16:26,308 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv603922701=4, srv147651029=0, srv2136239425=2, srv2118521717=1, srv886850468=5, srv233916608=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,309 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,309 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,309 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,309 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,309 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,309 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,309 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,309 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1127) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,309 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1369
2023-07-11 14:16:26,309 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv603922701=4, srv147651029=0, srv2136239425=2, srv2118521717=1, srv886850468=5, srv233916608=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,309 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,309 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,309 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,309 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,309 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,310 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,310 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,310 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1369) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,310 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1128
2023-07-11 14:16:26,310 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv603922701=4, srv147651029=0, srv2136239425=2, srv2118521717=1, srv886850468=5, srv233916608=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,310 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,310 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,310 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,310 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,310 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,310 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,310 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,311 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1128) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,311 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1129
2023-07-11 14:16:26,311 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv603922701=4, srv147651029=0, srv2136239425=2, srv2118521717=1, srv886850468=5, srv233916608=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,311 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,311 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,311 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,311 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,311 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,311 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,311 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,311 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1129) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,311 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table890
2023-07-11 14:16:26,311 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv603922701=4, srv147651029=0, srv2136239425=2, srv2118521717=1, srv886850468=5, srv233916608=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,311 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,312 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,312 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,312 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,312 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,312 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,312 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,312 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table890) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,312 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table891
2023-07-11 14:16:26,312 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv603922701=4, srv147651029=0, srv2136239425=2, srv2118521717=1, srv886850468=5, srv233916608=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,312 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,312 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,312 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,312 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,312 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,312 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,313 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,313 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table891) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,313 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table650
2023-07-11 14:16:26,313 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv603922701=4, srv147651029=0, srv2136239425=2, srv2118521717=1, srv886850468=5, srv233916608=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,313 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,313 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,313 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,313 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,313 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,313 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,313 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,313 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table650) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,313 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table892
2023-07-11 14:16:26,313 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv603922701=4, srv147651029=0, srv2136239425=2, srv2118521717=1, srv886850468=5, srv233916608=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,314 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,314 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,314 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,314 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,314 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,314 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,314 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,314 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table892) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,314 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1350
2023-07-11 14:16:26,314 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv603922701=4, srv147651029=0, srv2136239425=2, srv2118521717=1, srv886850468=5, srv233916608=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,314 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,314 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,314 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,314 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,314 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,315 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,315 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,315 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1350) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,315 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table651
2023-07-11 14:16:26,315 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv603922701=4, srv147651029=0, srv2136239425=2, srv2118521717=1, srv886850468=5, srv233916608=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,315 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,315 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,315 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,315 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,315 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,315 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,315 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,315 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table651) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,315 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table893
2023-07-11 14:16:26,316 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv603922701=4, srv147651029=0, srv2136239425=2, srv2118521717=1, srv886850468=5, srv233916608=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,316 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,316 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,316 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,316 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,316 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,316 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,316 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,316 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table893) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,316 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1351
2023-07-11 14:16:26,316 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv603922701=4, srv147651029=0, srv2136239425=2, srv2118521717=1, srv886850468=5, srv233916608=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,316 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,316 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,316 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,316 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,317 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,317 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,317 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,317 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1351) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,317 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table410
2023-07-11 14:16:26,317 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv603922701=4, srv147651029=0, srv2136239425=2, srv2118521717=1, srv886850468=5, srv233916608=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,317 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,317 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,317 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,317 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,317 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,317 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,317 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,317 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table410) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,318 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table652
2023-07-11 14:16:26,318 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv603922701=4, srv147651029=0, srv2136239425=2, srv2118521717=1, srv886850468=5, srv233916608=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,318 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,318 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,318 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,318 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,318 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,318 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,318 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,318 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table652) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,318 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table894
2023-07-11 14:16:26,318 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv603922701=4, srv147651029=0, srv2136239425=2, srv2118521717=1, srv886850468=5, srv233916608=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,318 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,318 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,318 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,319 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,319 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,319 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,319 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,319 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table894) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,319 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1110
2023-07-11 14:16:26,319 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv603922701=4, srv147651029=0, srv2136239425=2, srv2118521717=1, srv886850468=5, srv233916608=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,319 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,319 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,319 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,319 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,319 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,319 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,319 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,319 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1110) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,320 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1352
2023-07-11 14:16:26,320 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv603922701=4, srv147651029=0, srv2136239425=2, srv2118521717=1, srv886850468=5, srv233916608=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,320 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,320 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,320 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,320 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,320 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,320 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,320 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,320 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1352) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,320 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table411
2023-07-11 14:16:26,320 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv603922701=4, srv147651029=0, srv2136239425=2, srv2118521717=1, srv886850468=5, srv233916608=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,320 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,320 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,321 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,321 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,321 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,321 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,321 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,321 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table411) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,321 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table653
2023-07-11 14:16:26,321 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv603922701=4, srv147651029=0, srv2136239425=2, srv2118521717=1, srv886850468=5, srv233916608=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,321 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,321 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,321 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,321 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,321 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,321 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,321 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,322 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table653) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,322 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table895
2023-07-11 14:16:26,322 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv603922701=4, srv147651029=0, srv2136239425=2, srv2118521717=1, srv886850468=5, srv233916608=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,322 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,322 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,322 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,322 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,322 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,322 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,322 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,322 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table895) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,322 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1111
2023-07-11 14:16:26,322 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv603922701=4, srv147651029=0, srv2136239425=2, srv2118521717=1, srv886850468=5, srv233916608=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,322 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,322 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,323 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,323 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,323 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,323 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,323 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,323 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1111) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,323 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1353
2023-07-11 14:16:26,323 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv603922701=4, srv147651029=0, srv2136239425=2, srv2118521717=1, srv886850468=5, srv233916608=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,323 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,323 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,323 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,323 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,323 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,323 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,323 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,323 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1353) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,324 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table412
2023-07-11 14:16:26,324 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv603922701=4, srv147651029=0, srv2136239425=2, srv2118521717=1, srv886850468=5, srv233916608=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,324 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,324 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,324 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,324 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,324 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,324 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,324 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,324 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table412) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,324 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table654
2023-07-11 14:16:26,324 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv603922701=4, srv147651029=0, srv2136239425=2, srv2118521717=1, srv886850468=5, srv233916608=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,324 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,324 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,324 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,325 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,325 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,325 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,325 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,325 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table654) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,325 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table896
2023-07-11 14:16:26,325 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv603922701=4, srv147651029=0, srv2136239425=2, srv2118521717=1, srv886850468=5, srv233916608=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,325 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,325 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,325 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,325 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,325 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,325 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,325 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,325 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table896) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,325 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1112
2023-07-11 14:16:26,325 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv603922701=4, srv147651029=0, srv2136239425=2, srv2118521717=1, srv886850468=5, srv233916608=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,325 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,325 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,325 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,326 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,326 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,326 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,326 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,326 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1112) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,326 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1354
2023-07-11 14:16:26,326 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv603922701=4, srv147651029=0, srv2136239425=2, srv2118521717=1, srv886850468=5, srv233916608=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,326 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,326 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,326 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,326 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,326 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,326 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,326 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,326 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1354) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,326 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table413
2023-07-11 14:16:26,326 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv603922701=4, srv147651029=0, srv2136239425=2, srv2118521717=1, srv886850468=5, srv233916608=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,327 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,327 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,327 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,327 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,327 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,327 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,327 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,327 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table413) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,327 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table655
2023-07-11 14:16:26,327 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv603922701=4, srv147651029=0, srv2136239425=2, srv2118521717=1, srv886850468=5, srv233916608=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,327 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,327 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,327 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,327 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,327 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,327 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,328 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,328 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table655) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,328 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table897
2023-07-11 14:16:26,328 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv603922701=4, srv147651029=0, srv2136239425=2, srv2118521717=1, srv886850468=5, srv233916608=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,328 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,328 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,328 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,328 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,328 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,328 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,328 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,328 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table897) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,328 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table414
2023-07-11 14:16:26,328 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv603922701=4, srv147651029=0, srv2136239425=2, srv2118521717=1, srv886850468=5, srv233916608=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,329 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,329 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,329 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,329 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,329 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,329 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,329 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,329 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table414) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,329 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table656
2023-07-11 14:16:26,329 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv603922701=4, srv147651029=0, srv2136239425=2, srv2118521717=1, srv886850468=5, srv233916608=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,329 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,329 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,329 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,329 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,330 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,330 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,330 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,330 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table656) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,330 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table898
2023-07-11 14:16:26,330 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv603922701=4, srv147651029=0, srv2136239425=2, srv2118521717=1, srv886850468=5, srv233916608=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,330 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,330 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,330 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,330 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,330 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,330 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,330 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,330 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table898) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,331 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table415
2023-07-11 14:16:26,331 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv603922701=4, srv147651029=0, srv2136239425=2, srv2118521717=1, srv886850468=5, srv233916608=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,331 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,331 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,331 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,331 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,331 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,331 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,331 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,331 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table415) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,331 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table657
2023-07-11 14:16:26,331 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv603922701=4, srv147651029=0, srv2136239425=2, srv2118521717=1, srv886850468=5, srv233916608=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,331 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,331 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,331 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,332 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,332 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,332 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,332 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,332 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table657) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,332 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table899
2023-07-11 14:16:26,332 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv603922701=4, srv147651029=0, srv2136239425=2, srv2118521717=1, srv886850468=5, srv233916608=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,332 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,332 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,332 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,332 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,332 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,332 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,332 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,332 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table899) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,333 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table416
2023-07-11 14:16:26,333 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv603922701=4, srv147651029=0, srv2136239425=2, srv2118521717=1, srv886850468=5, srv233916608=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,333 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,333 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,333 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,333 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,333 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,333 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,333 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,333 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table416) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,333 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table658
2023-07-11 14:16:26,333 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv603922701=4, srv147651029=0, srv2136239425=2, srv2118521717=1, srv886850468=5, srv233916608=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,333 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,333 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,334 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,334 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,334 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,334 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,334 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,334 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table658) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,334 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table417
2023-07-11 14:16:26,334 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv603922701=4, srv147651029=0, srv2136239425=2, srv2118521717=1, srv886850468=5, srv233916608=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,334 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,334 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,334 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,334 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,334 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,334 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,334 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,335 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table417) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,335 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table659
2023-07-11 14:16:26,335 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv603922701=4, srv147651029=0, srv2136239425=2, srv2118521717=1, srv886850468=5, srv233916608=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,335 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,335 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,335 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,335 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,335 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,335 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,335 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,335 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table659) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,335 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table418
2023-07-11 14:16:26,335 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv603922701=4, srv147651029=0, srv2136239425=2, srv2118521717=1, srv886850468=5, srv233916608=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,335 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,336 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,336 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,336 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,336 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,336 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,336 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,336 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table418) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,336 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table419
2023-07-11 14:16:26,336 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv603922701=4, srv147651029=0, srv2136239425=2, srv2118521717=1, srv886850468=5, srv233916608=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,336 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,336 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,336 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,336 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,336 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,336 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,337 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,337 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table419) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,337 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1113
2023-07-11 14:16:26,337 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv603922701=4, srv147651029=0, srv2136239425=2, srv2118521717=1, srv886850468=5, srv233916608=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,337 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,337 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,337 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,337 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,337 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,337 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,337 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,337 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1113) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,337 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1355
2023-07-11 14:16:26,337 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv603922701=4, srv147651029=0, srv2136239425=2, srv2118521717=1, srv886850468=5, srv233916608=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,338 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,338 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,338 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,338 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,338 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,338 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,338 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,338 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1355) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,338 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1114
2023-07-11 14:16:26,338 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv603922701=4, srv147651029=0, srv2136239425=2, srv2118521717=1, srv886850468=5, srv233916608=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,338 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,338 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,338 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,338 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,338 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,339 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,339 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,339 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1114) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,339 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1356
2023-07-11 14:16:26,339 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv603922701=4, srv147651029=0, srv2136239425=2, srv2118521717=1, srv886850468=5, srv233916608=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,339 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,339 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,339 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,339 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,339 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,339 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,339 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,339 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1356) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,340 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1115
2023-07-11 14:16:26,340 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv603922701=4, srv147651029=0, srv2136239425=2, srv2118521717=1, srv886850468=5, srv233916608=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,340 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,340 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,340 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,340 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,340 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,340 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,340 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,340 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1115) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,340 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1357
2023-07-11 14:16:26,340 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv603922701=4, srv147651029=0, srv2136239425=2, srv2118521717=1, srv886850468=5, srv233916608=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,340 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,341 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,341 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,341 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,341 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,341 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,341 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,341 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1357) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,341 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1116
2023-07-11 14:16:26,341 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv603922701=4, srv147651029=0, srv2136239425=2, srv2118521717=1, srv886850468=5, srv233916608=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,341 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,341 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,341 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,341 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,341 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,341 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,342 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,342 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1116) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,342 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1358
2023-07-11 14:16:26,342 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv603922701=4, srv147651029=0, srv2136239425=2, srv2118521717=1, srv886850468=5, srv233916608=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,342 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,342 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,342 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,342 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,342 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,342 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,342 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,342 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1358) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,342 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1117
2023-07-11 14:16:26,342 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv603922701=4, srv147651029=0, srv2136239425=2, srv2118521717=1, srv886850468=5, srv233916608=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,343 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,343 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,343 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,343 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,343 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,343 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,343 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,343 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1117) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,343 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1359
2023-07-11 14:16:26,343 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv603922701=4, srv147651029=0, srv2136239425=2, srv2118521717=1, srv886850468=5, srv233916608=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,343 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,343 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,343 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,343 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,343 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,344 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,344 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,344 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1359) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,344 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1118
2023-07-11 14:16:26,344 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv603922701=4, srv147651029=0, srv2136239425=2, srv2118521717=1, srv886850468=5, srv233916608=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,344 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,344 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,344 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,344 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,344 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,344 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,344 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,344 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1118) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,344 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1119
2023-07-11 14:16:26,345 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv603922701=4, srv147651029=0, srv2136239425=2, srv2118521717=1, srv886850468=5, srv233916608=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,345 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,345 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,345 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,345 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,345 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,345 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,345 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,345 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1119) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,345 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1182
2023-07-11 14:16:26,345 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv603922701=4, srv147651029=0, srv2136239425=2, srv2118521717=1, srv886850468=5, srv233916608=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,345 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,345 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,345 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,345 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,346 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,346 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,346 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,346 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1182) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,346 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1183
2023-07-11 14:16:26,346 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv603922701=4, srv147651029=0, srv2136239425=2, srv2118521717=1, srv886850468=5, srv233916608=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,346 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,346 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,346 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,346 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,346 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,346 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,346 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,346 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1183) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,346 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1184
2023-07-11 14:16:26,347 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv603922701=4, srv147651029=0, srv2136239425=2, srv2118521717=1, srv886850468=5, srv233916608=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,347 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,347 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,347 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,347 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,347 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,347 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,347 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,347 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1184) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,347 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1185
2023-07-11 14:16:26,347 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv603922701=4, srv147651029=0, srv2136239425=2, srv2118521717=1, srv886850468=5, srv233916608=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,347 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,347 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,347 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,348 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,348 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,348 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,348 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,348 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1185) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,348 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1186
2023-07-11 14:16:26,348 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv603922701=4, srv147651029=0, srv2136239425=2, srv2118521717=1, srv886850468=5, srv233916608=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,348 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,348 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,348 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,348 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,348 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,348 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,348 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,348 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1186) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,349 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1187
2023-07-11 14:16:26,349 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv603922701=4, srv147651029=0, srv2136239425=2, srv2118521717=1, srv886850468=5, srv233916608=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,349 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,349 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,349 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,349 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,349 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,349 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,349 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,349 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1187) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,349 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table840
2023-07-11 14:16:26,349 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv603922701=4, srv147651029=0, srv2136239425=2, srv2118521717=1, srv886850468=5, srv233916608=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,349 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,349 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,350 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,350 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,350 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,350 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,350 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,350 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table840) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,350 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1188
2023-07-11 14:16:26,350 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv603922701=4, srv147651029=0, srv2136239425=2, srv2118521717=1, srv886850468=5, srv233916608=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,350 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,350 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,350 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,350 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,350 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,350 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,350 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,351 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1188) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,351 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table841
2023-07-11 14:16:26,351 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv603922701=4, srv147651029=0, srv2136239425=2, srv2118521717=1, srv886850468=5, srv233916608=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,351 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,351 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,351 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,351 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,351 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,351 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,351 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,351 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table841) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,351 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1189
2023-07-11 14:16:26,351 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv603922701=4, srv147651029=0, srv2136239425=2, srv2118521717=1, srv886850468=5, srv233916608=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,351 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,352 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,352 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,352 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,352 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,352 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,352 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,352 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1189) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,352 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table600
2023-07-11 14:16:26,352 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv603922701=4, srv147651029=0, srv2136239425=2, srv2118521717=1, srv886850468=5, srv233916608=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,352 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,352 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,352 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,352 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,352 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,352 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,352 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,353 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table600) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,353 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table842
2023-07-11 14:16:26,353 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv603922701=4, srv147651029=0, srv2136239425=2, srv2118521717=1, srv886850468=5, srv233916608=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,353 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,353 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,353 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,353 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,353 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,353 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,353 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,353 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table842) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,353 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table601
2023-07-11 14:16:26,353 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv603922701=4, srv147651029=0, srv2136239425=2, srv2118521717=1, srv886850468=5, srv233916608=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,354 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,354 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,354 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,354 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,354 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,354 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,354 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,354 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table601) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,354 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table843
2023-07-11 14:16:26,354 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv603922701=4, srv147651029=0, srv2136239425=2, srv2118521717=1, srv886850468=5, srv233916608=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,354 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,354 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,354 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,354 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,354 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,354 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,355 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,355 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table843) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,355 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table602
2023-07-11 14:16:26,355 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv603922701=4, srv147651029=0, srv2136239425=2, srv2118521717=1, srv886850468=5, srv233916608=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,355 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,355 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,355 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,355 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,355 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,355 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,355 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,355 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table602) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,356 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table844
2023-07-11 14:16:26,356 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv603922701=4, srv147651029=0, srv2136239425=2, srv2118521717=1, srv886850468=5, srv233916608=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,356 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,356 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,356 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,356 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,356 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,356 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,356 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,356 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table844) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,356 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table603
2023-07-11 14:16:26,356 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv603922701=4, srv147651029=0, srv2136239425=2, srv2118521717=1, srv886850468=5, srv233916608=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,356 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,356 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,356 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,357 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,357 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,357 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,357 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,357 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table603) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,357 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table845
2023-07-11 14:16:26,357 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv603922701=4, srv147651029=0, srv2136239425=2, srv2118521717=1, srv886850468=5, srv233916608=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,357 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,357 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,357 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,357 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,357 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,357 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,357 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,357 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table845) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,358 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table604
2023-07-11 14:16:26,358 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv603922701=4, srv147651029=0, srv2136239425=2, srv2118521717=1, srv886850468=5, srv233916608=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,358 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,358 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,358 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,358 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,358 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,358 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,358 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,358 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table604) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,358 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table846
2023-07-11 14:16:26,358 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv603922701=4, srv147651029=0, srv2136239425=2, srv2118521717=1, srv886850468=5, srv233916608=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,358 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,358 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,358 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,358 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,358 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,358 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,358 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,358 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table846) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,358 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table605
2023-07-11 14:16:26,358 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv603922701=4, srv147651029=0, srv2136239425=2, srv2118521717=1, srv886850468=5, srv233916608=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,358 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,358 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,358 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,358 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,359 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,359 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,359 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,359 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table605) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,359 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table847
2023-07-11 14:16:26,359 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv603922701=4, srv147651029=0, srv2136239425=2, srv2118521717=1, srv886850468=5, srv233916608=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,359 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,359 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,359 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,359 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,359 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,359 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,359 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,359 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table847) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,359 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table606
2023-07-11 14:16:26,359 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv603922701=4, srv147651029=0, srv2136239425=2, srv2118521717=1, srv886850468=5, srv233916608=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,359 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,359 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,359 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,359 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,359 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,359 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,359 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,359 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table606) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,359 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table848
2023-07-11 14:16:26,359 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv603922701=4, srv147651029=0, srv2136239425=2, srv2118521717=1, srv886850468=5, srv233916608=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,359 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,360 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,360 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,360 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,360 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,360 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,360 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,360 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table848) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,360 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1180
2023-07-11 14:16:26,360 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv603922701=4, srv147651029=0, srv2136239425=2, srv2118521717=1, srv886850468=5, srv233916608=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,360 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,360 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,360 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,360 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,360 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,360 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,360 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,360 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1180) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,360 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table607
2023-07-11 14:16:26,360 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv603922701=4, srv147651029=0, srv2136239425=2, srv2118521717=1, srv886850468=5, srv233916608=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,360 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,360 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,360 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,360 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,360 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,360 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,360 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,361 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table607) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,361 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table849
2023-07-11 14:16:26,361 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv603922701=4, srv147651029=0, srv2136239425=2, srv2118521717=1, srv886850468=5, srv233916608=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,361 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,361 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,361 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,361 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,361 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,361 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,361 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,361 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table849) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,361 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1181
2023-07-11 14:16:26,361 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv603922701=4, srv147651029=0, srv2136239425=2, srv2118521717=1, srv886850468=5, srv233916608=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,361 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,361 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,361 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,361 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,361 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,361 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,361 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,361 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1181) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,361 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table608
2023-07-11 14:16:26,361 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv603922701=4, srv147651029=0, srv2136239425=2, srv2118521717=1, srv886850468=5, srv233916608=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,361 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,361 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,361 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,361 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,362 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,362 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,362 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,362 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table608) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,362 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table609
2023-07-11 14:16:26,362 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv603922701=4, srv147651029=0, srv2136239425=2, srv2118521717=1, srv886850468=5, srv233916608=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,362 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,362 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,362 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,362 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,362 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,362 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,362 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,362 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table609) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,362 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1171
2023-07-11 14:16:26,362 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv603922701=4, srv147651029=0, srv2136239425=2, srv2118521717=1, srv886850468=5, srv233916608=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,362 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,362 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,362 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,362 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,362 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,362 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,362 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,362 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1171) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,362 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1172
2023-07-11 14:16:26,362 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv603922701=4, srv147651029=0, srv2136239425=2, srv2118521717=1, srv886850468=5, srv233916608=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,363 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,363 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,363 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,363 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,363 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,363 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,363 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,363 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1172) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,363 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1173
2023-07-11 14:16:26,363 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv603922701=4, srv147651029=0, srv2136239425=2, srv2118521717=1, srv886850468=5, srv233916608=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,363 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,363 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,363 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,363 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,363 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,363 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,363 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,363 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1173) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,363 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1174
2023-07-11 14:16:26,363 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv603922701=4, srv147651029=0, srv2136239425=2, srv2118521717=1, srv886850468=5, srv233916608=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,363 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,363 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,363 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,363 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,363 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,363 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,363 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,364 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1174) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,364 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1175
2023-07-11 14:16:26,364 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv603922701=4, srv147651029=0, srv2136239425=2, srv2118521717=1, srv886850468=5, srv233916608=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,364 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,364 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,364 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,364 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,364 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,364 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,364 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,364 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1175) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,364 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1176
2023-07-11 14:16:26,364 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv603922701=4, srv147651029=0, srv2136239425=2, srv2118521717=1, srv886850468=5, srv233916608=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,364 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,364 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,364 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,364 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,364 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,364 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,364 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,364 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1176) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,364 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1177
2023-07-11 14:16:26,364 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv603922701=4, srv147651029=0, srv2136239425=2, srv2118521717=1, srv886850468=5, srv233916608=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,365 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,365 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,365 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,365 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,365 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,365 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,365 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,365 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1177) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,365 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table830
2023-07-11 14:16:26,365 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv603922701=4, srv147651029=0, srv2136239425=2, srv2118521717=1, srv886850468=5, srv233916608=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,365 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,365 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,365 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,365 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,365 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,365 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,365 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,365 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table830) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,365 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1178
2023-07-11 14:16:26,365 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv603922701=4, srv147651029=0, srv2136239425=2, srv2118521717=1, srv886850468=5, srv233916608=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,366 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,366 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,366 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,366 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,366 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,366 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,366 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,366 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1178) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,366 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table831
2023-07-11 14:16:26,366 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv603922701=4, srv147651029=0, srv2136239425=2, srv2118521717=1, srv886850468=5, srv233916608=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,366 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,366 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,366 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,366 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,366 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,366 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,366 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,366 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table831) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,366 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table832
2023-07-11 14:16:26,366 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv603922701=4, srv147651029=0, srv2136239425=2, srv2118521717=1, srv886850468=5, srv233916608=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,366 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,366 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,366 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,366 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,366 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,366 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,366 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,367 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table832) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,367 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table833
2023-07-11 14:16:26,367 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv603922701=4, srv147651029=0, srv2136239425=2, srv2118521717=1, srv886850468=5, srv233916608=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,367 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,367 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,367 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,367 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,367 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,367 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,367 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,367 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table833) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,367 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table834
2023-07-11 14:16:26,367 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv603922701=4, srv147651029=0, srv2136239425=2, srv2118521717=1, srv886850468=5, srv233916608=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,367 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,367 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,367 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,367 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,367 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,367 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,367 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,367 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table834) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,367 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table835
2023-07-11 14:16:26,367 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv603922701=4, srv147651029=0, srv2136239425=2, srv2118521717=1, srv886850468=5, srv233916608=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,367 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,367 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,367 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,367 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,368 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,368 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,368 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,368 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table835) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,368 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table836
2023-07-11 14:16:26,368 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv603922701=4, srv147651029=0, srv2136239425=2, srv2118521717=1, srv886850468=5, srv233916608=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,368 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,368 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,368 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,368 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,368 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,368 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,368 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,368 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table836) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,368 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table837
2023-07-11 14:16:26,368 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv603922701=4, srv147651029=0, srv2136239425=2, srv2118521717=1, srv886850468=5, srv233916608=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,369 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,369 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,369 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,369 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,369 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,369 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,369 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,369 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table837) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,369 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table838
2023-07-11 14:16:26,369 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv603922701=4, srv147651029=0, srv2136239425=2, srv2118521717=1, srv886850468=5, srv233916608=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,369 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,369 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,369 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,369 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,369 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,370 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,370 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,370 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table838) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,370 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1170
2023-07-11 14:16:26,370 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv603922701=4, srv147651029=0, srv2136239425=2, srv2118521717=1, srv886850468=5, srv233916608=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,370 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,370 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,370 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,370 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,370 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,370 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,370 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,370 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1170) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,370 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table839
2023-07-11 14:16:26,370 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv603922701=4, srv147651029=0, srv2136239425=2, srv2118521717=1, srv886850468=5, srv233916608=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,371 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,371 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,371 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,371 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,371 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,371 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,371 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,371 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table839) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,371 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1179
2023-07-11 14:16:26,371 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv603922701=4, srv147651029=0, srv2136239425=2, srv2118521717=1, srv886850468=5, srv233916608=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,371 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,371 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,371 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,371 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,371 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,371 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,371 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,371 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1179) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,371 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1160
2023-07-11 14:16:26,371 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv603922701=4, srv147651029=0, srv2136239425=2, srv2118521717=1, srv886850468=5, srv233916608=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,371 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,371 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,371 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,371 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,371 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,372 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,372 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,372 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1160) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,372 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1161
2023-07-11 14:16:26,372 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv603922701=4, srv147651029=0, srv2136239425=2, srv2118521717=1, srv886850468=5, srv233916608=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,372 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,372 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,372 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,372 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,372 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,372 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,372 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,372 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1161) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,372 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1162
2023-07-11 14:16:26,372 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv603922701=4, srv147651029=0, srv2136239425=2, srv2118521717=1, srv886850468=5, srv233916608=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,372 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,372 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,372 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,372 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,372 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,372 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,372 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,372 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1162) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,372 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1163
2023-07-11 14:16:26,372 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv603922701=4, srv147651029=0, srv2136239425=2, srv2118521717=1, srv886850468=5, srv233916608=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,372 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,372 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,373 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,373 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,373 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,373 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,373 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,373 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1163) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,373 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table860
2023-07-11 14:16:26,373 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv603922701=4, srv147651029=0, srv2136239425=2, srv2118521717=1, srv886850468=5, srv233916608=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,373 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,373 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,373 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,373 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,373 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,373 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,373 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,373 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table860) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,373 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1164
2023-07-11 14:16:26,373 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv603922701=4, srv147651029=0, srv2136239425=2, srv2118521717=1, srv886850468=5, srv233916608=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,373 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,373 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,373 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,373 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,373 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,373 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,373 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,373 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1164) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,374 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table861
2023-07-11 14:16:26,374 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv603922701=4, srv147651029=0, srv2136239425=2, srv2118521717=1, srv886850468=5, srv233916608=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,374 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,374 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,374 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,374 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,374 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,374 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,374 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,374 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table861) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,374 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1165
2023-07-11 14:16:26,374 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv603922701=4, srv147651029=0, srv2136239425=2, srv2118521717=1, srv886850468=5, srv233916608=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,374 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,374 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,374 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,374 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,374 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,374 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,374 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,374 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1165) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,374 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table620
2023-07-11 14:16:26,374 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv603922701=4, srv147651029=0, srv2136239425=2, srv2118521717=1, srv886850468=5, srv233916608=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,375 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,375 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,375 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,375 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,375 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,375 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,375 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,375 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table620) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,375 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table862
2023-07-11 14:16:26,375 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv603922701=4, srv147651029=0, srv2136239425=2, srv2118521717=1, srv886850468=5, srv233916608=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,375 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,375 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,375 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,375 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,375 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,375 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,375 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,375 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table862) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,375 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1166
2023-07-11 14:16:26,375 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv603922701=4, srv147651029=0, srv2136239425=2, srv2118521717=1, srv886850468=5, srv233916608=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,375 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,375 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,376 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,376 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,376 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,376 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,376 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,376 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1166) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,376 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table621
2023-07-11 14:16:26,376 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv603922701=4, srv147651029=0, srv2136239425=2, srv2118521717=1, srv886850468=5, srv233916608=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,376 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,376 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,376 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,376 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,376 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,376 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,376 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,376 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table621) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,376 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table863
2023-07-11 14:16:26,376 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv603922701=4, srv147651029=0, srv2136239425=2, srv2118521717=1, srv886850468=5, srv233916608=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,376 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,376 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,376 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,376 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,376 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,376 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,376 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,376 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table863) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,377 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1167
2023-07-11 14:16:26,377 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv603922701=4, srv147651029=0, srv2136239425=2, srv2118521717=1, srv886850468=5, srv233916608=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,377 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,377 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,377 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,377 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,377 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,377 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,377 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,377 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1167) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,377 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table622
2023-07-11 14:16:26,377 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv603922701=4, srv147651029=0, srv2136239425=2, srv2118521717=1, srv886850468=5, srv233916608=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,377 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,377 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,377 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,377 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,377 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,377 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,377 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,377 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table622) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,377 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table864
2023-07-11 14:16:26,377 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv603922701=4, srv147651029=0, srv2136239425=2, srv2118521717=1, srv886850468=5, srv233916608=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,377 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,377 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,377 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,377 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,377 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,378 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,378 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,378 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table864) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,378 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table623
2023-07-11 14:16:26,378 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv603922701=4, srv147651029=0, srv2136239425=2, srv2118521717=1, srv886850468=5, srv233916608=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,378 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,378 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,378 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,378 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,378 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,378 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,378 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,378 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table623) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,378 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table865
2023-07-11 14:16:26,378 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv603922701=4, srv147651029=0, srv2136239425=2, srv2118521717=1, srv886850468=5, srv233916608=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,378 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,378 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,378 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,378 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,378 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,378 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,378 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,378 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table865) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,378 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table624
2023-07-11 14:16:26,378 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv603922701=4, srv147651029=0, srv2136239425=2, srv2118521717=1, srv886850468=5, srv233916608=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,378 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,378 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,379 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,379 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,379 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,379 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,379 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,379 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table624) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,379 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table866
2023-07-11 14:16:26,379 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv603922701=4, srv147651029=0, srv2136239425=2, srv2118521717=1, srv886850468=5, srv233916608=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,379 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,379 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,379 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,379 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,379 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,379 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,379 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,379 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table866) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,379 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table625
2023-07-11 14:16:26,379 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv603922701=4, srv147651029=0, srv2136239425=2, srv2118521717=1, srv886850468=5, srv233916608=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,379 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,379 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,379 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,379 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,379 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,379 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,379 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,379 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table625) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,379 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table867
2023-07-11 14:16:26,380 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv603922701=4, srv147651029=0, srv2136239425=2, srv2118521717=1, srv886850468=5, srv233916608=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,380 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,380 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,380 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,380 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,380 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,380 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,380 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,380 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table867) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,380 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table626
2023-07-11 14:16:26,380 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv603922701=4, srv147651029=0, srv2136239425=2, srv2118521717=1, srv886850468=5, srv233916608=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,380 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,380 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,380 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,380 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,380 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,380 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,380 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,380 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table626) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,380 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table868
2023-07-11 14:16:26,380 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv603922701=4, srv147651029=0, srv2136239425=2, srv2118521717=1, srv886850468=5, srv233916608=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,380 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,380 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,380 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,380 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,380 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,380 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,381 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,381 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table868) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,381 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table627
2023-07-11 14:16:26,381 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv603922701=4, srv147651029=0, srv2136239425=2, srv2118521717=1, srv886850468=5, srv233916608=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,381 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,381 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,381 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,381 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,381 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,381 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,381 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,381 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table627) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,381 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table869
2023-07-11 14:16:26,381 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv603922701=4, srv147651029=0, srv2136239425=2, srv2118521717=1, srv886850468=5, srv233916608=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,381 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,381 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,381 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,381 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,381 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,381 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,381 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,381 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table869) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,381 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table628
2023-07-11 14:16:26,381 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv603922701=4, srv147651029=0, srv2136239425=2, srv2118521717=1, srv886850468=5, srv233916608=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,381 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,381 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,382 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,382 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,382 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,382 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,382 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,382 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table628) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,382 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table629
2023-07-11 14:16:26,382 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv603922701=4, srv147651029=0, srv2136239425=2, srv2118521717=1, srv886850468=5, srv233916608=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,382 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,382 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,382 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,382 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,382 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,382 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,382 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,382 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table629) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,382 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1168
2023-07-11 14:16:26,382 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv603922701=4, srv147651029=0, srv2136239425=2, srv2118521717=1, srv886850468=5, srv233916608=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,382 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,382 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,382 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,382 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,382 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,382 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,382 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,382 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1168) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,383 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1169
2023-07-11 14:16:26,383 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv603922701=4, srv147651029=0, srv2136239425=2, srv2118521717=1, srv886850468=5, srv233916608=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,383 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,383 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,383 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,383 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,383 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,383 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,383 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,383 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1169) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,383 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1391
2023-07-11 14:16:26,383 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv603922701=4, srv147651029=0, srv2136239425=2, srv2118521717=1, srv886850468=5, srv233916608=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,383 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,384 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,384 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,384 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,384 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,384 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,384 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,384 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1391) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,384 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1150
2023-07-11 14:16:26,384 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv603922701=4, srv147651029=0, srv2136239425=2, srv2118521717=1, srv886850468=5, srv233916608=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,384 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,384 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,384 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,384 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,384 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,384 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,384 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,384 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1150) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,384 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1392
2023-07-11 14:16:26,384 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv603922701=4, srv147651029=0, srv2136239425=2, srv2118521717=1, srv886850468=5, srv233916608=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,384 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,384 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,385 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,385 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,385 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,385 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,385 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,385 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1392) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,385 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1151
2023-07-11 14:16:26,385 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv603922701=4, srv147651029=0, srv2136239425=2, srv2118521717=1, srv886850468=5, srv233916608=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,385 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,385 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,385 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,385 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,385 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,385 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,385 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,385 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1151) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,385 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1393
2023-07-11 14:16:26,385 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv603922701=4, srv147651029=0, srv2136239425=2, srv2118521717=1, srv886850468=5, srv233916608=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,385 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,385 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,385 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,385 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,385 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,385 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,385 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,385 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1393) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,386 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1152
2023-07-11 14:16:26,386 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv603922701=4, srv147651029=0, srv2136239425=2, srv2118521717=1, srv886850468=5, srv233916608=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,386 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,386 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,386 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,386 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,386 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,386 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,386 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,386 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1152) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,386 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1394
2023-07-11 14:16:26,386 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv603922701=4, srv147651029=0, srv2136239425=2, srv2118521717=1, srv886850468=5, srv233916608=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,386 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,386 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,386 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,386 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,386 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,386 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,386 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,386 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1394) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,386 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1153
2023-07-11 14:16:26,386 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv603922701=4, srv147651029=0, srv2136239425=2, srv2118521717=1, srv886850468=5, srv233916608=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,386 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,386 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,386 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,386 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,386 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,387 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,387 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,387 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1153) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,387 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1395
2023-07-11 14:16:26,387 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv603922701=4, srv147651029=0, srv2136239425=2, srv2118521717=1, srv886850468=5, srv233916608=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,387 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,387 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,387 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,387 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,387 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,387 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,387 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,387 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1395) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,387 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table850
2023-07-11 14:16:26,387 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv603922701=4, srv147651029=0, srv2136239425=2, srv2118521717=1, srv886850468=5, srv233916608=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,387 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,387 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,387 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,387 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,387 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,387 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,387 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,387 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table850) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,387 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1154
2023-07-11 14:16:26,387 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv603922701=4, srv147651029=0, srv2136239425=2, srv2118521717=1, srv886850468=5, srv233916608=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,387 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,387 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,388 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,388 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,388 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,388 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,388 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,388 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1154) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,388 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1396
2023-07-11 14:16:26,388 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv603922701=4, srv147651029=0, srv2136239425=2, srv2118521717=1, srv886850468=5, srv233916608=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,388 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,388 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,388 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,388 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,388 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,388 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,388 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,388 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1396) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,388 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table851
2023-07-11 14:16:26,388 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv603922701=4, srv147651029=0, srv2136239425=2, srv2118521717=1, srv886850468=5, srv233916608=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,388 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,388 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,388 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,388 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,388 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,388 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,388 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,388 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table851) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,389 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1155
2023-07-11 14:16:26,389 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv603922701=4, srv147651029=0, srv2136239425=2, srv2118521717=1, srv886850468=5, srv233916608=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,389 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,389 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,389 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,389 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,389 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,389 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,389 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,389 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1155) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,389 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1397
2023-07-11 14:16:26,389 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv603922701=4, srv147651029=0, srv2136239425=2, srv2118521717=1, srv886850468=5, srv233916608=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,389 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,389 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,389 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,389 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,389 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,389 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,389 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,389 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1397) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,389 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table610
2023-07-11 14:16:26,389 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv603922701=4, srv147651029=0, srv2136239425=2, srv2118521717=1, srv886850468=5, srv233916608=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,389 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,389 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,389 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,389 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,389 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,390 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,390 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,390 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table610) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,390 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table852
2023-07-11 14:16:26,390 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv603922701=4, srv147651029=0, srv2136239425=2, srv2118521717=1, srv886850468=5, srv233916608=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,390 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,390 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,390 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,390 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,390 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,390 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,390 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,390 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table852) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,390 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1156
2023-07-11 14:16:26,390 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv603922701=4, srv147651029=0, srv2136239425=2, srv2118521717=1, srv886850468=5, srv233916608=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,390 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,390 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,390 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,390 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,390 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,390 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,390 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,390 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1156) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,390 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1398
2023-07-11 14:16:26,390 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv603922701=4, srv147651029=0, srv2136239425=2, srv2118521717=1, srv886850468=5, srv233916608=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,390 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,390 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,391 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,391 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,391 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,391 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,391 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,391 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1398) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,391 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table611
2023-07-11 14:16:26,391 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv603922701=4, srv147651029=0, srv2136239425=2, srv2118521717=1, srv886850468=5, srv233916608=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,391 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,391 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,391 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,391 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,391 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,391 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,391 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,391 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table611) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,391 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table853
2023-07-11 14:16:26,391 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv603922701=4, srv147651029=0, srv2136239425=2, srv2118521717=1, srv886850468=5, srv233916608=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,391 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,391 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,391 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,391 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,391 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,391 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,391 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,391 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table853) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,391 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table612
2023-07-11 14:16:26,392 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv603922701=4, srv147651029=0, srv2136239425=2, srv2118521717=1, srv886850468=5, srv233916608=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,392 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,392 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,392 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,392 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,392 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,392 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,392 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,392 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table612) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,392 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table854
2023-07-11 14:16:26,392 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv603922701=4, srv147651029=0, srv2136239425=2, srv2118521717=1, srv886850468=5, srv233916608=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,392 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,392 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,392 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,392 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,392 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,392 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,392 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,393 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table854) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,393 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table613
2023-07-11 14:16:26,393 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv603922701=4, srv147651029=0, srv2136239425=2, srv2118521717=1, srv886850468=5, srv233916608=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,393 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,393 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,393 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,393 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,393 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,393 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,393 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,393 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table613) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,393 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table855
2023-07-11 14:16:26,393 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv603922701=4, srv147651029=0, srv2136239425=2, srv2118521717=1, srv886850468=5, srv233916608=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,393 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,393 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,393 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,393 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,393 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,393 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,393 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,393 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table855) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,393 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table614
2023-07-11 14:16:26,393 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv603922701=4, srv147651029=0, srv2136239425=2, srv2118521717=1, srv886850468=5, srv233916608=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,393 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,393 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,393 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,394 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,394 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,394 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,394 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,394 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table614) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,394 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table856
2023-07-11 14:16:26,394 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv603922701=4, srv147651029=0, srv2136239425=2, srv2118521717=1, srv886850468=5, srv233916608=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,394 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,394 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,394 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,394 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,394 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,394 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,394 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,394 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table856) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,394 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table615
2023-07-11 14:16:26,394 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv603922701=4, srv147651029=0, srv2136239425=2, srv2118521717=1, srv886850468=5, srv233916608=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,394 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,394 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,394 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,394 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,394 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,394 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,394 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,394 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table615) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,394 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table857
2023-07-11 14:16:26,394 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv603922701=4, srv147651029=0, srv2136239425=2, srv2118521717=1, srv886850468=5, srv233916608=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,395 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,395 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,395 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,395 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,395 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,395 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,395 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,395 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table857) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,395 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table616
2023-07-11 14:16:26,395 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv603922701=4, srv147651029=0, srv2136239425=2, srv2118521717=1, srv886850468=5, srv233916608=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,395 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,395 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,395 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,395 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,395 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,395 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,395 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,395 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table616) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,395 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table858
2023-07-11 14:16:26,395 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv603922701=4, srv147651029=0, srv2136239425=2, srv2118521717=1, srv886850468=5, srv233916608=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,395 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,395 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,395 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,395 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,395 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,395 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,395 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,396 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table858) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,396 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table617
2023-07-11 14:16:26,396 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv603922701=4, srv147651029=0, srv2136239425=2, srv2118521717=1, srv886850468=5, srv233916608=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,396 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,396 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,396 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,396 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,396 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,396 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,396 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,396 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table617) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,396 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table859
2023-07-11 14:16:26,396 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv603922701=4, srv147651029=0, srv2136239425=2, srv2118521717=1, srv886850468=5, srv233916608=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,396 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,396 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,396 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,396 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,396 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,396 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,396 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,396 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table859) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,396 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table618
2023-07-11 14:16:26,396 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv603922701=4, srv147651029=0, srv2136239425=2, srv2118521717=1, srv886850468=5, srv233916608=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,396 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,396 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,396 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,396 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,397 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,397 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,397 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,397 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table618) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,397 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1390
2023-07-11 14:16:26,397 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv603922701=4, srv147651029=0, srv2136239425=2, srv2118521717=1, srv886850468=5, srv233916608=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,397 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,397 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,397 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,397 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,397 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,397 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,397 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,397 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1390) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,397 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table619
2023-07-11 14:16:26,397 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv603922701=4, srv147651029=0, srv2136239425=2, srv2118521717=1, srv886850468=5, srv233916608=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,397 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,397 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,397 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,397 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,397 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,397 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,397 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,397 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table619) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,397 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1157
2023-07-11 14:16:26,397 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv603922701=4, srv147651029=0, srv2136239425=2, srv2118521717=1, srv886850468=5, srv233916608=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,398 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,398 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,398 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,398 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,398 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,398 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,398 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,398 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1157) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,398 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1399
2023-07-11 14:16:26,398 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv603922701=4, srv147651029=0, srv2136239425=2, srv2118521717=1, srv886850468=5, srv233916608=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,398 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,398 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,398 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,398 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,398 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,398 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,398 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,398 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1399) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,398 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1158
2023-07-11 14:16:26,398 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv603922701=4, srv147651029=0, srv2136239425=2, srv2118521717=1, srv886850468=5, srv233916608=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,398 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,398 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,398 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,398 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,398 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,398 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,398 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,399 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1158) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,399 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1159
2023-07-11 14:16:26,399 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv603922701=4, srv147651029=0, srv2136239425=2, srv2118521717=1, srv886850468=5, srv233916608=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,399 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,399 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,399 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,399 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,399 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,399 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,399 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,399 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1159) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,399 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table240
2023-07-11 14:16:26,399 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv603922701=4, srv147651029=0, srv2136239425=2, srv2118521717=1, srv886850468=5, srv233916608=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,399 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,399 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,399 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,399 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,399 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,399 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,399 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,399 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table240) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,399 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table482
2023-07-11 14:16:26,399 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv603922701=4, srv147651029=0, srv2136239425=2, srv2118521717=1, srv886850468=5, srv233916608=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,399 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,399 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,399 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,400 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,400 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,400 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,400 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,400 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table482) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,400 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table241
2023-07-11 14:16:26,400 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv603922701=4, srv147651029=0, srv2136239425=2, srv2118521717=1, srv886850468=5, srv233916608=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,400 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,400 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,400 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,400 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,400 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,400 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,400 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,400 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table241) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,400 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table483
2023-07-11 14:16:26,400 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv603922701=4, srv147651029=0, srv2136239425=2, srv2118521717=1, srv886850468=5, srv233916608=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,400 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,400 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,400 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,400 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,400 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,400 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,400 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,400 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table483) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,401 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table242
2023-07-11 14:16:26,401 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv603922701=4, srv147651029=0, srv2136239425=2, srv2118521717=1, srv886850468=5, srv233916608=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,401 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,401 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,401 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,401 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,401 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,401 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,401 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,401 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table242) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,401 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table484
2023-07-11 14:16:26,401 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv603922701=4, srv147651029=0, srv2136239425=2, srv2118521717=1, srv886850468=5, srv233916608=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,401 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,401 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,401 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,401 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,401 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,401 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,401 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,402 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table484) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,402 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table243
2023-07-11 14:16:26,402 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv603922701=4, srv147651029=0, srv2136239425=2, srv2118521717=1, srv886850468=5, srv233916608=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,402 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,402 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,402 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,402 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,402 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,402 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,402 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,402 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table243) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,402 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table485
2023-07-11 14:16:26,402 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv603922701=4, srv147651029=0, srv2136239425=2, srv2118521717=1, srv886850468=5, srv233916608=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,402 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,402 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,402 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,402 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,402 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,402 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,402 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,402 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table485) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,402 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table244
2023-07-11 14:16:26,402 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv603922701=4, srv147651029=0, srv2136239425=2, srv2118521717=1, srv886850468=5, srv233916608=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,402 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,402 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,403 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,403 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,403 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,403 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,403 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,403 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table244) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,403 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table486
2023-07-11 14:16:26,403 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv603922701=4, srv147651029=0, srv2136239425=2, srv2118521717=1, srv886850468=5, srv233916608=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,403 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,403 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,403 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,403 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,403 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,403 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,403 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,403 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table486) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,403 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table245
2023-07-11 14:16:26,403 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv603922701=4, srv147651029=0, srv2136239425=2, srv2118521717=1, srv886850468=5, srv233916608=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,403 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,403 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,403 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,403 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,403 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,403 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,403 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,403 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table245) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,404 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table487
2023-07-11 14:16:26,404 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv603922701=4, srv147651029=0, srv2136239425=2, srv2118521717=1, srv886850468=5, srv233916608=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,404 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,404 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,404 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,404 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,404 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,404 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,404 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,404 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table487) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,404 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table246
2023-07-11 14:16:26,404 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv603922701=4, srv147651029=0, srv2136239425=2, srv2118521717=1, srv886850468=5, srv233916608=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,404 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,404 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,404 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,404 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,404 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,404 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,404 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,404 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table246) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,404 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table488
2023-07-11 14:16:26,404 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv603922701=4, srv147651029=0, srv2136239425=2, srv2118521717=1, srv886850468=5, srv233916608=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,404 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,404 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,404 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,404 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,405 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,405 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,405 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,405 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table488) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,405 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table247
2023-07-11 14:16:26,405 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv603922701=4, srv147651029=0, srv2136239425=2, srv2118521717=1, srv886850468=5, srv233916608=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,405 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,405 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,405 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,405 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,405 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,405 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,405 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,405 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table247) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,405 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table489
2023-07-11 14:16:26,405 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv603922701=4, srv147651029=0, srv2136239425=2, srv2118521717=1, srv886850468=5, srv233916608=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,405 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,405 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,405 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,405 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,405 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,405 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,405 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,405 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table489) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,405 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table248
2023-07-11 14:16:26,405 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv603922701=4, srv147651029=0, srv2136239425=2, srv2118521717=1, srv886850468=5, srv233916608=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,406 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,406 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,406 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,406 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,406 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,406 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,406 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,406 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table248) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,406 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table249
2023-07-11 14:16:26,406 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv603922701=4, srv147651029=0, srv2136239425=2, srv2118521717=1, srv886850468=5, srv233916608=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,406 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,406 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,406 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,406 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,406 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,406 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,406 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,406 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table249) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,406 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1308
2023-07-11 14:16:26,406 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv603922701=4, srv147651029=0, srv2136239425=2, srv2118521717=1, srv886850468=5, srv233916608=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,406 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,406 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,406 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,406 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,406 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,406 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,406 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,407 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1308) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,407 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1309
2023-07-11 14:16:26,407 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv603922701=4, srv147651029=0, srv2136239425=2, srv2118521717=1, srv886850468=5, srv233916608=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,407 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,407 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,407 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,407 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,407 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,407 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,407 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,407 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1309) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,407 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1300
2023-07-11 14:16:26,407 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv603922701=4, srv147651029=0, srv2136239425=2, srv2118521717=1, srv886850468=5, srv233916608=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,407 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,407 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,407 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,407 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,407 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,407 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,407 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,407 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1300) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,407 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1301
2023-07-11 14:16:26,407 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv603922701=4, srv147651029=0, srv2136239425=2, srv2118521717=1, srv886850468=5, srv233916608=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,407 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,407 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,407 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,408 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,408 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,408 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,408 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,408 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1301) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,408 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1302
2023-07-11 14:16:26,408 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv603922701=4, srv147651029=0, srv2136239425=2, srv2118521717=1, srv886850468=5, srv233916608=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,408 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,408 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,408 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,408 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,408 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,408 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,408 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,408 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1302) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,408 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1303
2023-07-11 14:16:26,408 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv603922701=4, srv147651029=0, srv2136239425=2, srv2118521717=1, srv886850468=5, srv233916608=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,408 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,408 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,408 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,408 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,408 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,408 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,408 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,408 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1303) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,408 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1304
2023-07-11 14:16:26,408 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv603922701=4, srv147651029=0, srv2136239425=2, srv2118521717=1, srv886850468=5, srv233916608=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,409 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,409 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,409 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,409 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,409 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,409 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,409 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,409 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1304) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,409 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table490
2023-07-11 14:16:26,409 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv603922701=4, srv147651029=0, srv2136239425=2, srv2118521717=1, srv886850468=5, srv233916608=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,409 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,409 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,409 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,409 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,409 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,409 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,409 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,409 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table490) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,409 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1305
2023-07-11 14:16:26,409 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv603922701=4, srv147651029=0, srv2136239425=2, srv2118521717=1, srv886850468=5, srv233916608=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,409 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,409 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,410 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,410 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,410 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,410 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,410 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,410 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1305) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,410 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table491
2023-07-11 14:16:26,410 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv603922701=4, srv147651029=0, srv2136239425=2, srv2118521717=1, srv886850468=5, srv233916608=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,410 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,410 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,410 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,410 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,410 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,410 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,410 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,410 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table491) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,410 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1306
2023-07-11 14:16:26,410 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv603922701=4, srv147651029=0, srv2136239425=2, srv2118521717=1, srv886850468=5, srv233916608=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,410 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,410 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,410 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,410 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,410 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,411 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,411 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,411 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1306) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,411 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table250
2023-07-11 14:16:26,411 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv603922701=4, srv147651029=0, srv2136239425=2, srv2118521717=1, srv886850468=5, srv233916608=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,411 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,411 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,411 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,411 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,411 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,411 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,411 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,411 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table250) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,411 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table492
2023-07-11 14:16:26,411 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv603922701=4, srv147651029=0, srv2136239425=2, srv2118521717=1, srv886850468=5, srv233916608=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,411 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,411 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,411 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,411 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,411 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,411 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,411 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,411 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table492) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,411 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1307
2023-07-11 14:16:26,411 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv603922701=4, srv147651029=0, srv2136239425=2, srv2118521717=1, srv886850468=5, srv233916608=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,411 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,412 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,412 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,412 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,412 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,412 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,412 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,412 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1307) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,412 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table471
2023-07-11 14:16:26,412 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv603922701=4, srv147651029=0, srv2136239425=2, srv2118521717=1, srv886850468=5, srv233916608=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,412 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,412 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,412 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,412 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,412 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,412 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,412 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,412 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table471) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,412 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table230
2023-07-11 14:16:26,412 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv603922701=4, srv147651029=0, srv2136239425=2, srv2118521717=1, srv886850468=5, srv233916608=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,412 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,412 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,412 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,412 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,412 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,412 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,412 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,413 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table230) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,413 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table472
2023-07-11 14:16:26,413 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv603922701=4, srv147651029=0, srv2136239425=2, srv2118521717=1, srv886850468=5, srv233916608=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,413 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,413 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,413 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,413 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,413 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,413 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,413 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,413 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table472) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,413 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table231
2023-07-11 14:16:26,413 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv603922701=4, srv147651029=0, srv2136239425=2, srv2118521717=1, srv886850468=5, srv233916608=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,413 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,413 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,413 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,413 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,413 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,413 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,413 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,413 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table231) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,413 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table473
2023-07-11 14:16:26,413 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv603922701=4, srv147651029=0, srv2136239425=2, srv2118521717=1, srv886850468=5, srv233916608=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,413 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,413 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,414 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,414 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,414 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,414 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,414 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,414 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table473) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,414 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table232
2023-07-11 14:16:26,414 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv603922701=4, srv147651029=0, srv2136239425=2, srv2118521717=1, srv886850468=5, srv233916608=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,414 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,414 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,414 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,414 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,414 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,414 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,414 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,414 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table232) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,414 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table474
2023-07-11 14:16:26,414 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv603922701=4, srv147651029=0, srv2136239425=2, srv2118521717=1, srv886850468=5, srv233916608=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,414 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,414 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,414 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,414 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,414 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,414 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,414 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,414 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table474) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,415 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table233
2023-07-11 14:16:26,415 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv603922701=4, srv147651029=0, srv2136239425=2, srv2118521717=1, srv886850468=5, srv233916608=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,415 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,415 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,415 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,415 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,415 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,415 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,415 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,415 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table233) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,415 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table475
2023-07-11 14:16:26,415 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv603922701=4, srv147651029=0, srv2136239425=2, srv2118521717=1, srv886850468=5, srv233916608=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,415 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,415 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,415 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,415 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,415 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,415 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,415 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,415 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table475) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,415 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table234
2023-07-11 14:16:26,415 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv603922701=4, srv147651029=0, srv2136239425=2, srv2118521717=1, srv886850468=5, srv233916608=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,415 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,415 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,415 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,415 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,415 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,416 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,416 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,416 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table234) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,416 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table476
2023-07-11 14:16:26,416 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv603922701=4, srv147651029=0, srv2136239425=2, srv2118521717=1, srv886850468=5, srv233916608=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,416 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,416 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,416 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,416 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,416 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,416 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,416 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,416 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table476) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,416 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table235
2023-07-11 14:16:26,416 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv603922701=4, srv147651029=0, srv2136239425=2, srv2118521717=1, srv886850468=5, srv233916608=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,416 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,416 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,416 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,416 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,416 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,416 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,416 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,416 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table235) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,416 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table477
2023-07-11 14:16:26,416 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv603922701=4, srv147651029=0, srv2136239425=2, srv2118521717=1, srv886850468=5, srv233916608=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,417 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,417 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,417 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,417 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,417 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,417 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,417 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,417 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table477) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,417 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table236
2023-07-11 14:16:26,417 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv603922701=4, srv147651029=0, srv2136239425=2, srv2118521717=1, srv886850468=5, srv233916608=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,417 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,417 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,417 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,417 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,417 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,417 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,417 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,417 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table236) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,417 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table478
2023-07-11 14:16:26,417 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv603922701=4, srv147651029=0, srv2136239425=2, srv2118521717=1, srv886850468=5, srv233916608=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,417 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,417 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,417 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,417 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,417 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,417 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,418 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,418 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table478) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,418 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table237
2023-07-11 14:16:26,418 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv603922701=4, srv147651029=0, srv2136239425=2, srv2118521717=1, srv886850468=5, srv233916608=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,418 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,418 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,418 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,418 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,418 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,418 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,418 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,418 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table237) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,418 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table479
2023-07-11 14:16:26,418 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv603922701=4, srv147651029=0, srv2136239425=2, srv2118521717=1, srv886850468=5, srv233916608=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,418 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,418 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,418 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,418 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,418 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,418 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,419 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,419 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table479) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,419 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table238
2023-07-11 14:16:26,419 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv603922701=4, srv147651029=0, srv2136239425=2, srv2118521717=1, srv886850468=5, srv233916608=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,419 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,419 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,419 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,419 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,419 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,419 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,419 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,419 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table238) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,419 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table239
2023-07-11 14:16:26,419 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv603922701=4, srv147651029=0, srv2136239425=2, srv2118521717=1, srv886850468=5, srv233916608=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,419 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,419 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,419 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,419 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,419 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,419 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,419 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,419 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table239) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,419 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table480
2023-07-11 14:16:26,419 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv603922701=4, srv147651029=0, srv2136239425=2, srv2118521717=1, srv886850468=5, srv233916608=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,420 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,420 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,420 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,420 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,420 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,420 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,420 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,420 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table480) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,420 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table481
2023-07-11 14:16:26,420 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv603922701=4, srv147651029=0, srv2136239425=2, srv2118521717=1, srv886850468=5, srv233916608=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,420 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,420 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,420 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,420 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,420 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,420 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,420 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,420 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table481) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,420 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table262
2023-07-11 14:16:26,420 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv603922701=4, srv147651029=0, srv2136239425=2, srv2118521717=1, srv886850468=5, srv233916608=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,420 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,420 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,420 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,420 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,420 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,420 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,421 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,421 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table262) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,421 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table263
2023-07-11 14:16:26,421 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv603922701=4, srv147651029=0, srv2136239425=2, srv2118521717=1, srv886850468=5, srv233916608=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,421 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,421 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,421 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,421 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,421 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,421 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,421 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,421 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table263) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,421 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table264
2023-07-11 14:16:26,421 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv603922701=4, srv147651029=0, srv2136239425=2, srv2118521717=1, srv886850468=5, srv233916608=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,421 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,421 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,421 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,421 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,421 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,421 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,421 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,421 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table264) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,421 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table265
2023-07-11 14:16:26,421 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv603922701=4, srv147651029=0, srv2136239425=2, srv2118521717=1, srv886850468=5, srv233916608=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,421 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,422 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,422 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,422 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,422 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,422 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,422 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,422 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table265) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,422 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table266
2023-07-11 14:16:26,422 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv603922701=4, srv147651029=0, srv2136239425=2, srv2118521717=1, srv886850468=5, srv233916608=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,422 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,422 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,422 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,422 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,422 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,422 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,422 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,422 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table266) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,422 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table267
2023-07-11 14:16:26,422 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv603922701=4, srv147651029=0, srv2136239425=2, srv2118521717=1, srv886850468=5, srv233916608=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,422 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,422 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,422 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,422 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,422 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,422 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,422 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,423 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table267) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,423 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table268
2023-07-11 14:16:26,423 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv603922701=4, srv147651029=0, srv2136239425=2, srv2118521717=1, srv886850468=5, srv233916608=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,423 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,423 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,423 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,423 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,423 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,423 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,423 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,423 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table268) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,423 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table269
2023-07-11 14:16:26,423 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv603922701=4, srv147651029=0, srv2136239425=2, srv2118521717=1, srv886850468=5, srv233916608=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,423 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,423 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,423 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,423 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,423 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,423 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,423 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,423 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table269) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,423 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table270
2023-07-11 14:16:26,423 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv603922701=4, srv147651029=0, srv2136239425=2, srv2118521717=1, srv886850468=5, srv233916608=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,423 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,423 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,423 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,423 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,424 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,424 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,424 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,424 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table270) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,424 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table271
2023-07-11 14:16:26,424 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv603922701=4, srv147651029=0, srv2136239425=2, srv2118521717=1, srv886850468=5, srv233916608=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,424 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,424 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,424 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,424 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,424 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,424 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,424 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,424 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table271) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,424 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table272
2023-07-11 14:16:26,424 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv603922701=4, srv147651029=0, srv2136239425=2, srv2118521717=1, srv886850468=5, srv233916608=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,424 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,424 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,424 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,424 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,424 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,424 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,424 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,424 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table272) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,424 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table251
2023-07-11 14:16:26,424 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv603922701=4, srv147651029=0, srv2136239425=2, srv2118521717=1, srv886850468=5, srv233916608=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,425 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,425 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,425 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,425 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,425 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,425 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,425 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,425 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table251) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,425 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table493
2023-07-11 14:16:26,425 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv603922701=4, srv147651029=0, srv2136239425=2, srv2118521717=1, srv886850468=5, srv233916608=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,425 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,425 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,425 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,425 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,425 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,425 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,425 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,425 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table493) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,425 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table252
2023-07-11 14:16:26,425 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv603922701=4, srv147651029=0, srv2136239425=2, srv2118521717=1, srv886850468=5, srv233916608=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,425 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,425 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,425 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,425 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,425 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,425 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,426 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,426 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table252) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,426 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table494
2023-07-11 14:16:26,426 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv603922701=4, srv147651029=0, srv2136239425=2, srv2118521717=1, srv886850468=5, srv233916608=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,426 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,426 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,426 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,426 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,426 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,426 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,426 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,426 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table494) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,426 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table253
2023-07-11 14:16:26,426 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv603922701=4, srv147651029=0, srv2136239425=2, srv2118521717=1, srv886850468=5, srv233916608=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,426 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,426 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,426 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,426 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,426 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,426 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,426 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,426 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table253) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,426 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table495
2023-07-11 14:16:26,426 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv603922701=4, srv147651029=0, srv2136239425=2, srv2118521717=1, srv886850468=5, srv233916608=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,426 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,427 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,427 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,427 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,427 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,427 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,427 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,427 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table495) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,427 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table254
2023-07-11 14:16:26,427 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv603922701=4, srv147651029=0, srv2136239425=2, srv2118521717=1, srv886850468=5, srv233916608=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,427 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,427 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,427 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,427 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,427 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,427 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,427 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,427 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table254) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,427 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table496
2023-07-11 14:16:26,428 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv603922701=4, srv147651029=0, srv2136239425=2, srv2118521717=1, srv886850468=5, srv233916608=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,428 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,428 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,428 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,428 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,428 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,428 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,428 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,428 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table496) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,428 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table255
2023-07-11 14:16:26,428 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv603922701=4, srv147651029=0, srv2136239425=2, srv2118521717=1, srv886850468=5, srv233916608=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,428 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,428 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,428 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,428 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,428 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,428 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,428 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,428 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table255) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,428 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table497
2023-07-11 14:16:26,428 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv603922701=4, srv147651029=0, srv2136239425=2, srv2118521717=1, srv886850468=5, srv233916608=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,428 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,428 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,428 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,428 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,429 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,429 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,429 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,429 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table497) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,429 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table256
2023-07-11 14:16:26,429 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv603922701=4, srv147651029=0, srv2136239425=2, srv2118521717=1, srv886850468=5, srv233916608=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,429 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,429 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,429 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,429 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,429 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,429 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,429 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,429 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table256) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,429 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table498
2023-07-11 14:16:26,429 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv603922701=4, srv147651029=0, srv2136239425=2, srv2118521717=1, srv886850468=5, srv233916608=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,429 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,429 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,429 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,429 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,429 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,429 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,429 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,429 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table498) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,429 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table257
2023-07-11 14:16:26,429 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv603922701=4, srv147651029=0, srv2136239425=2, srv2118521717=1, srv886850468=5, srv233916608=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,430 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,430 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,430 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,430 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,430 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,430 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,430 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,430 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table257) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,430 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table499
2023-07-11 14:16:26,430 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv603922701=4, srv147651029=0, srv2136239425=2, srv2118521717=1, srv886850468=5, srv233916608=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,430 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,430 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,430 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,430 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,430 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,430 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,430 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,430 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table499) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,430 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table258
2023-07-11 14:16:26,430 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv603922701=4, srv147651029=0, srv2136239425=2, srv2118521717=1, srv886850468=5, srv233916608=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,430 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,430 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,430 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,430 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,430 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,430 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,430 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,431 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table258) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,431 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table259
2023-07-11 14:16:26,431 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv603922701=4, srv147651029=0, srv2136239425=2, srv2118521717=1, srv886850468=5, srv233916608=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,431 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,431 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,431 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,431 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,431 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,431 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,431 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,431 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table259) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,431 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table260
2023-07-11 14:16:26,431 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv603922701=4, srv147651029=0, srv2136239425=2, srv2118521717=1, srv886850468=5, srv233916608=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,431 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,431 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,431 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,431 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,431 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,431 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,431 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,431 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table260) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,431 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table261
2023-07-11 14:16:26,431 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv603922701=4, srv147651029=0, srv2136239425=2, srv2118521717=1, srv886850468=5, srv233916608=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,431 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,431 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,432 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,432 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,432 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,432 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,432 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,432 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table261) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,432 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table680
2023-07-11 14:16:26,432 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv603922701=4, srv147651029=0, srv2136239425=2, srv2118521717=1, srv886850468=5, srv233916608=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,432 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,432 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,432 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,432 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,432 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,432 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,432 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,432 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table680) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,432 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table681
2023-07-11 14:16:26,432 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv603922701=4, srv147651029=0, srv2136239425=2, srv2118521717=1, srv886850468=5, srv233916608=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,432 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,432 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,432 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,432 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,432 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,432 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,432 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,432 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table681) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,432 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table440
2023-07-11 14:16:26,433 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv603922701=4, srv147651029=0, srv2136239425=2, srv2118521717=1, srv886850468=5, srv233916608=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,433 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,433 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,433 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,433 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,433 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,433 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,433 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,433 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table440) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,433 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table682
2023-07-11 14:16:26,433 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv603922701=4, srv147651029=0, srv2136239425=2, srv2118521717=1, srv886850468=5, srv233916608=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,433 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,433 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,433 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,433 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,433 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,433 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,433 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,433 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table682) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,433 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table441
2023-07-11 14:16:26,433 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv603922701=4, srv147651029=0, srv2136239425=2, srv2118521717=1, srv886850468=5, srv233916608=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,433 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,433 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,433 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,433 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,433 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,434 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,434 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,434 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table441) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,434 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table683
2023-07-11 14:16:26,434 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv603922701=4, srv147651029=0, srv2136239425=2, srv2118521717=1, srv886850468=5, srv233916608=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,434 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,434 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,434 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,434 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,434 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,434 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,434 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,434 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table683) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,434 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table200
2023-07-11 14:16:26,434 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv603922701=4, srv147651029=0, srv2136239425=2, srv2118521717=1, srv886850468=5, srv233916608=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,434 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,434 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,434 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,434 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,434 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,434 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,434 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,434 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table200) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,434 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table442
2023-07-11 14:16:26,434 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv603922701=4, srv147651029=0, srv2136239425=2, srv2118521717=1, srv886850468=5, srv233916608=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,434 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,435 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,435 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,435 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,435 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,435 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,435 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,435 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table442) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,435 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table684
2023-07-11 14:16:26,435 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv603922701=4, srv147651029=0, srv2136239425=2, srv2118521717=1, srv886850468=5, srv233916608=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,435 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,435 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,435 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,435 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,435 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,435 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,435 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,435 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table684) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,435 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1340
2023-07-11 14:16:26,435 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv603922701=4, srv147651029=0, srv2136239425=2, srv2118521717=1, srv886850468=5, srv233916608=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,435 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,435 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,435 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,435 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,435 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,435 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,435 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,435 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1340) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,436 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table201
2023-07-11 14:16:26,436 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv603922701=4, srv147651029=0, srv2136239425=2, srv2118521717=1, srv886850468=5, srv233916608=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,436 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,436 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,436 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,436 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,436 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,436 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,436 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,436 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table201) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,436 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table443
2023-07-11 14:16:26,436 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv603922701=4, srv147651029=0, srv2136239425=2, srv2118521717=1, srv886850468=5, srv233916608=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,436 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,436 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,436 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,436 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,436 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,437 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,437 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,437 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table443) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,437 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table685
2023-07-11 14:16:26,437 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv603922701=4, srv147651029=0, srv2136239425=2, srv2118521717=1, srv886850468=5, srv233916608=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,437 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,437 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,437 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,437 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,437 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,437 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,437 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,437 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table685) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,437 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1341
2023-07-11 14:16:26,437 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv603922701=4, srv147651029=0, srv2136239425=2, srv2118521717=1, srv886850468=5, srv233916608=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,437 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,437 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,437 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,437 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,437 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,437 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,437 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,437 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1341) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,437 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table202
2023-07-11 14:16:26,437 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv603922701=4, srv147651029=0, srv2136239425=2, srv2118521717=1, srv886850468=5, srv233916608=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,437 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,438 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,438 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,438 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,438 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,438 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,438 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,438 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table202) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,438 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table444
2023-07-11 14:16:26,438 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv603922701=4, srv147651029=0, srv2136239425=2, srv2118521717=1, srv886850468=5, srv233916608=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,438 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,438 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,438 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,438 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,438 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,438 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,438 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,438 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table444) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,438 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table686
2023-07-11 14:16:26,438 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv603922701=4, srv147651029=0, srv2136239425=2, srv2118521717=1, srv886850468=5, srv233916608=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,438 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,438 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,438 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,438 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,438 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,438 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,438 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,438 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table686) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,439 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1100
2023-07-11 14:16:26,439 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv603922701=4, srv147651029=0, srv2136239425=2, srv2118521717=1, srv886850468=5, srv233916608=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,439 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,439 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,439 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,439 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,439 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,439 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,439 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,439 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1100) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,439 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1342
2023-07-11 14:16:26,439 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv603922701=4, srv147651029=0, srv2136239425=2, srv2118521717=1, srv886850468=5, srv233916608=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,439 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,439 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,440 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,440 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,440 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,440 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,440 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,440 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1342) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,440 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table203
2023-07-11 14:16:26,440 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv603922701=4, srv147651029=0, srv2136239425=2, srv2118521717=1, srv886850468=5, srv233916608=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,440 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,440 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,440 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,440 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,440 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,440 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,440 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,440 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table203) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,440 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table445
2023-07-11 14:16:26,440 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv603922701=4, srv147651029=0, srv2136239425=2, srv2118521717=1, srv886850468=5, srv233916608=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,440 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,440 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,440 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,440 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,440 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,440 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,440 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,440 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table445) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,441 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table687
2023-07-11 14:16:26,441 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv603922701=4, srv147651029=0, srv2136239425=2, srv2118521717=1, srv886850468=5, srv233916608=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,441 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,441 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,441 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,441 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,441 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,441 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,441 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,441 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table687) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,441 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1101
2023-07-11 14:16:26,441 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv603922701=4, srv147651029=0, srv2136239425=2, srv2118521717=1, srv886850468=5, srv233916608=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,441 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,441 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,441 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,441 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,441 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,441 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,441 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,441 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1101) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,441 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1343
2023-07-11 14:16:26,441 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv603922701=4, srv147651029=0, srv2136239425=2, srv2118521717=1, srv886850468=5, srv233916608=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,441 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,441 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,441 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,441 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,441 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,442 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,442 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,442 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1343) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,442 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table204
2023-07-11 14:16:26,442 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv603922701=4, srv147651029=0, srv2136239425=2, srv2118521717=1, srv886850468=5, srv233916608=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,442 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,442 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,442 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,442 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,442 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,442 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,442 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,442 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table204) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,442 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table446
2023-07-11 14:16:26,442 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv603922701=4, srv147651029=0, srv2136239425=2, srv2118521717=1, srv886850468=5, srv233916608=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,442 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,442 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,442 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,442 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,442 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,442 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,442 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,442 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table446) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,442 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table688
2023-07-11 14:16:26,442 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv603922701=4, srv147651029=0, srv2136239425=2, srv2118521717=1, srv886850468=5, srv233916608=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,442 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,443 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,443 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,443 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,443 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,443 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,443 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,443 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table688) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,443 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table205
2023-07-11 14:16:26,443 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv603922701=4, srv147651029=0, srv2136239425=2, srv2118521717=1, srv886850468=5, srv233916608=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,443 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,443 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,443 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,443 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,443 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,443 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,443 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,443 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table205) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,443 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table447
2023-07-11 14:16:26,443 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv603922701=4, srv147651029=0, srv2136239425=2, srv2118521717=1, srv886850468=5, srv233916608=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,443 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,443 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,443 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,443 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,443 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,443 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,443 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,444 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table447) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,444 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table689
2023-07-11 14:16:26,444 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv603922701=4, srv147651029=0, srv2136239425=2, srv2118521717=1, srv886850468=5, srv233916608=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,444 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,444 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,444 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,444 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,444 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,444 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,444 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,444 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table689) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,444 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table206
2023-07-11 14:16:26,444 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv603922701=4, srv147651029=0, srv2136239425=2, srv2118521717=1, srv886850468=5, srv233916608=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,444 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,444 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,444 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,444 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,444 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,444 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,444 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,444 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table206) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,444 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table448
2023-07-11 14:16:26,444 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv603922701=4, srv147651029=0, srv2136239425=2, srv2118521717=1, srv886850468=5, srv233916608=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,444 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,444 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,444 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,444 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,445 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,445 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,445 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,445 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table448) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,445 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table207
2023-07-11 14:16:26,445 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv603922701=4, srv147651029=0, srv2136239425=2, srv2118521717=1, srv886850468=5, srv233916608=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,445 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,445 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,445 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,445 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,445 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,445 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,445 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,445 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table207) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,445 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table449
2023-07-11 14:16:26,445 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv603922701=4, srv147651029=0, srv2136239425=2, srv2118521717=1, srv886850468=5, srv233916608=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,445 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,446 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,446 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,446 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,446 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,446 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,446 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,446 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table449) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,446 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table208
2023-07-11 14:16:26,446 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv603922701=4, srv147651029=0, srv2136239425=2, srv2118521717=1, srv886850468=5, srv233916608=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,447 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,447 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,447 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,447 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,447 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,447 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,447 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,447 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table208) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,447 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table209
2023-07-11 14:16:26,447 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv603922701=4, srv147651029=0, srv2136239425=2, srv2118521717=1, srv886850468=5, srv233916608=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,447 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,447 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,447 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,447 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,447 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,447 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,447 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,447 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table209) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,447 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1102
2023-07-11 14:16:26,448 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv603922701=4, srv147651029=0, srv2136239425=2, srv2118521717=1, srv886850468=5, srv233916608=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,448 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,448 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,448 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,448 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,448 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,448 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,448 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,448 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1102) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,448 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1344
2023-07-11 14:16:26,448 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv603922701=4, srv147651029=0, srv2136239425=2, srv2118521717=1, srv886850468=5, srv233916608=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,448 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,448 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,448 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,448 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,448 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,448 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,448 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,448 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1344) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,448 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1103
2023-07-11 14:16:26,448 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv603922701=4, srv147651029=0, srv2136239425=2, srv2118521717=1, srv886850468=5, srv233916608=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,448 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,448 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,448 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,448 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,448 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,448 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,449 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,449 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1103) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,449 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1345
2023-07-11 14:16:26,449 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv603922701=4, srv147651029=0, srv2136239425=2, srv2118521717=1, srv886850468=5, srv233916608=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,449 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,449 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,449 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,449 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,449 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,449 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,449 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,449 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1345) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,449 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1104
2023-07-11 14:16:26,449 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv603922701=4, srv147651029=0, srv2136239425=2, srv2118521717=1, srv886850468=5, srv233916608=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,449 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,449 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,449 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,449 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,449 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,449 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,449 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,449 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1104) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,449 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1346
2023-07-11 14:16:26,449 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv603922701=4, srv147651029=0, srv2136239425=2, srv2118521717=1, srv886850468=5, srv233916608=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,449 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,449 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,450 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,450 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,450 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,450 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,450 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,450 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1346) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,450 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1105
2023-07-11 14:16:26,450 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv603922701=4, srv147651029=0, srv2136239425=2, srv2118521717=1, srv886850468=5, srv233916608=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,450 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,450 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,450 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,450 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,450 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,450 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,450 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,450 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1105) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,450 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1347
2023-07-11 14:16:26,450 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv603922701=4, srv147651029=0, srv2136239425=2, srv2118521717=1, srv886850468=5, srv233916608=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,450 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,450 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,450 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,450 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,450 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,450 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,450 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,450 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1347) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,451 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1106
2023-07-11 14:16:26,451 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv603922701=4, srv147651029=0, srv2136239425=2, srv2118521717=1, srv886850468=5, srv233916608=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,451 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,451 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,451 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,451 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,451 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,451 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,451 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,451 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1106) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,451 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1348
2023-07-11 14:16:26,451 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv603922701=4, srv147651029=0, srv2136239425=2, srv2118521717=1, srv886850468=5, srv233916608=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,451 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,451 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,451 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,451 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,451 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,451 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,451 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,451 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1348) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,451 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1107
2023-07-11 14:16:26,451 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv603922701=4, srv147651029=0, srv2136239425=2, srv2118521717=1, srv886850468=5, srv233916608=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,451 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,451 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,451 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,451 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,451 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,451 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,452 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,452 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1107) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,452 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1349
2023-07-11 14:16:26,452 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv603922701=4, srv147651029=0, srv2136239425=2, srv2118521717=1, srv886850468=5, srv233916608=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,452 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,452 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,452 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,452 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,452 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,452 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,452 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,452 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1349) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,452 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1108
2023-07-11 14:16:26,452 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv603922701=4, srv147651029=0, srv2136239425=2, srv2118521717=1, srv886850468=5, srv233916608=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,452 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,452 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,452 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,452 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,452 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,452 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,452 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,452 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1108) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,452 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table690
2023-07-11 14:16:26,452 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv603922701=4, srv147651029=0, srv2136239425=2, srv2118521717=1, srv886850468=5, srv233916608=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,452 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,452 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,453 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,453 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,453 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,453 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,453 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,453 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table690) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,453 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1109
2023-07-11 14:16:26,453 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv603922701=4, srv147651029=0, srv2136239425=2, srv2118521717=1, srv886850468=5, srv233916608=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,453 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,453 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,453 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,453 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,453 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,453 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,453 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,453 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1109) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,453 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table670
2023-07-11 14:16:26,453 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv603922701=4, srv147651029=0, srv2136239425=2, srv2118521717=1, srv886850468=5, srv233916608=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,453 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,453 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,453 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,453 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,453 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,453 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,453 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,453 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table670) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,453 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table671
2023-07-11 14:16:26,454 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv603922701=4, srv147651029=0, srv2136239425=2, srv2118521717=1, srv886850468=5, srv233916608=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,454 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,454 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,454 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,454 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,454 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,454 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,454 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,454 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table671) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,454 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table430
2023-07-11 14:16:26,454 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv603922701=4, srv147651029=0, srv2136239425=2, srv2118521717=1, srv886850468=5, srv233916608=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,454 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,454 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,454 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,454 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,454 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,455 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,455 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,455 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table430) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,455 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table672
2023-07-11 14:16:26,455 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv603922701=4, srv147651029=0, srv2136239425=2, srv2118521717=1, srv886850468=5, srv233916608=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,455 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,455 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,455 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,455 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,455 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,455 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,455 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,455 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table672) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,455 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table431
2023-07-11 14:16:26,455 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv603922701=4, srv147651029=0, srv2136239425=2, srv2118521717=1, srv886850468=5, srv233916608=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,455 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,455 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,456 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,456 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,456 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,456 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,456 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,456 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table431) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,456 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table673
2023-07-11 14:16:26,456 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv603922701=4, srv147651029=0, srv2136239425=2, srv2118521717=1, srv886850468=5, srv233916608=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,456 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,456 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,456 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,456 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,456 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,456 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,456 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,456 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table673) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,456 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table432
2023-07-11 14:16:26,456 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv603922701=4, srv147651029=0, srv2136239425=2, srv2118521717=1, srv886850468=5, srv233916608=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,456 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,456 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,456 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,456 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,456 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,456 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,456 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,456 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table432) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,457 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table674
2023-07-11 14:16:26,457 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv603922701=4, srv147651029=0, srv2136239425=2, srv2118521717=1, srv886850468=5, srv233916608=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,457 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,457 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,457 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,457 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,457 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,457 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,457 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,457 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table674) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,457 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1330
2023-07-11 14:16:26,457 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv603922701=4, srv147651029=0, srv2136239425=2, srv2118521717=1, srv886850468=5, srv233916608=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,457 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,457 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,457 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,457 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,457 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,457 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,457 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,457 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1330) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,457 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table433
2023-07-11 14:16:26,457 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv603922701=4, srv147651029=0, srv2136239425=2, srv2118521717=1, srv886850468=5, srv233916608=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,457 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,457 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,457 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,457 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,457 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,458 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,458 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,458 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table433) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,458 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table675
2023-07-11 14:16:26,458 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv603922701=4, srv147651029=0, srv2136239425=2, srv2118521717=1, srv886850468=5, srv233916608=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,458 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,458 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,458 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,458 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,458 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,458 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,458 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,458 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table675) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,458 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1331
2023-07-11 14:16:26,458 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv603922701=4, srv147651029=0, srv2136239425=2, srv2118521717=1, srv886850468=5, srv233916608=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,458 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,458 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,458 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,458 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,458 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,458 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,458 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,458 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1331) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,458 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table434
2023-07-11 14:16:26,458 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv603922701=4, srv147651029=0, srv2136239425=2, srv2118521717=1, srv886850468=5, srv233916608=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,458 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,459 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,459 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,459 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,459 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,459 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,459 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,459 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table434) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,459 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table676
2023-07-11 14:16:26,459 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv603922701=4, srv147651029=0, srv2136239425=2, srv2118521717=1, srv886850468=5, srv233916608=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,459 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,459 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,459 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,459 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,459 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,459 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,459 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,459 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table676) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,459 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1332
2023-07-11 14:16:26,459 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv603922701=4, srv147651029=0, srv2136239425=2, srv2118521717=1, srv886850468=5, srv233916608=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,459 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,459 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,459 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,459 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,459 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,459 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,459 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,459 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1332) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,460 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table435
2023-07-11 14:16:26,460 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv603922701=4, srv147651029=0, srv2136239425=2, srv2118521717=1, srv886850468=5, srv233916608=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,460 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,460 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,460 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,460 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,460 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,460 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,460 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,460 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table435) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,460 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table677
2023-07-11 14:16:26,460 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv603922701=4, srv147651029=0, srv2136239425=2, srv2118521717=1, srv886850468=5, srv233916608=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,460 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,460 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,460 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,460 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,460 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,460 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,460 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,460 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table677) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,460 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table436
2023-07-11 14:16:26,460 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv603922701=4, srv147651029=0, srv2136239425=2, srv2118521717=1, srv886850468=5, srv233916608=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,460 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,460 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,460 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,460 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,461 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,461 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,461 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,461 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table436) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,461 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table678
2023-07-11 14:16:26,461 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv603922701=4, srv147651029=0, srv2136239425=2, srv2118521717=1, srv886850468=5, srv233916608=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,461 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,461 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,461 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,461 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,461 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,461 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,461 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,461 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table678) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,461 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table437
2023-07-11 14:16:26,461 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv603922701=4, srv147651029=0, srv2136239425=2, srv2118521717=1, srv886850468=5, srv233916608=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,461 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,461 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,461 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,461 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,461 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,461 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,461 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,461 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table437) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,461 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table679
2023-07-11 14:16:26,461 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv603922701=4, srv147651029=0, srv2136239425=2, srv2118521717=1, srv886850468=5, srv233916608=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,462 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,462 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,462 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,462 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,462 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,462 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,462 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,462 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table679) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,462 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table438
2023-07-11 14:16:26,462 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv603922701=4, srv147651029=0, srv2136239425=2, srv2118521717=1, srv886850468=5, srv233916608=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,462 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,462 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,462 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,462 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,462 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,462 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,462 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,462 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table438) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,462 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table439
2023-07-11 14:16:26,462 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv603922701=4, srv147651029=0, srv2136239425=2, srv2118521717=1, srv886850468=5, srv233916608=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,462 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,462 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,462 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,462 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,462 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,462 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,462 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,463 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table439) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,463 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1333
2023-07-11 14:16:26,463 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv603922701=4, srv147651029=0, srv2136239425=2, srv2118521717=1, srv886850468=5, srv233916608=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,463 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,463 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,463 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,463 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,463 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,463 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,463 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,463 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1333) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,463 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1334
2023-07-11 14:16:26,463 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv603922701=4, srv147651029=0, srv2136239425=2, srv2118521717=1, srv886850468=5, srv233916608=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,463 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,463 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,463 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,463 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,463 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,463 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,463 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,463 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1334) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,463 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1335
2023-07-11 14:16:26,463 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv603922701=4, srv147651029=0, srv2136239425=2, srv2118521717=1, srv886850468=5, srv233916608=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,464 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,464 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,464 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,464 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,464 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,464 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,464 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,464 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1335) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,464 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1336
2023-07-11 14:16:26,464 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv603922701=4, srv147651029=0, srv2136239425=2, srv2118521717=1, srv886850468=5, srv233916608=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,464 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,464 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,464 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,464 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,464 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,464 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,464 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,464 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1336) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,464 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1337
2023-07-11 14:16:26,464 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv603922701=4, srv147651029=0, srv2136239425=2, srv2118521717=1, srv886850468=5, srv233916608=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,464 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,465 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,465 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,465 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,465 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,465 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,465 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,465 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1337) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,465 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1338
2023-07-11 14:16:26,465 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv603922701=4, srv147651029=0, srv2136239425=2, srv2118521717=1, srv886850468=5, srv233916608=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,465 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,465 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,465 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,465 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,465 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,465 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,465 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,465 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1338) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,465 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1339
2023-07-11 14:16:26,465 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv603922701=4, srv147651029=0, srv2136239425=2, srv2118521717=1, srv886850468=5, srv233916608=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,465 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,465 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,465 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,465 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,465 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,465 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,465 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,465 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1339) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,466 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table460
2023-07-11 14:16:26,466 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv603922701=4, srv147651029=0, srv2136239425=2, srv2118521717=1, srv886850468=5, srv233916608=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,466 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,466 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,466 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,466 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,466 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,466 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,466 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,466 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table460) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,466 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table461
2023-07-11 14:16:26,466 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv603922701=4, srv147651029=0, srv2136239425=2, srv2118521717=1, srv886850468=5, srv233916608=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,466 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,466 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,466 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,466 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,466 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,466 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,466 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,466 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table461) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,466 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table220
2023-07-11 14:16:26,466 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv603922701=4, srv147651029=0, srv2136239425=2, srv2118521717=1, srv886850468=5, srv233916608=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,466 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,466 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,466 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,466 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,467 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,467 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,467 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,467 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table220) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,467 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table462
2023-07-11 14:16:26,467 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv603922701=4, srv147651029=0, srv2136239425=2, srv2118521717=1, srv886850468=5, srv233916608=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,467 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,467 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,467 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,467 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,467 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,467 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,467 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,467 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table462) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,467 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table221
2023-07-11 14:16:26,467 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv603922701=4, srv147651029=0, srv2136239425=2, srv2118521717=1, srv886850468=5, srv233916608=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,467 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,467 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,467 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,467 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,467 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,467 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,467 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,467 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table221) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,467 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table463
2023-07-11 14:16:26,467 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv603922701=4, srv147651029=0, srv2136239425=2, srv2118521717=1, srv886850468=5, srv233916608=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,468 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,468 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,468 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,468 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,468 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,468 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,468 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,468 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table463) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,468 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table222
2023-07-11 14:16:26,468 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv603922701=4, srv147651029=0, srv2136239425=2, srv2118521717=1, srv886850468=5, srv233916608=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,468 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,468 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,468 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,468 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,468 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,468 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,468 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,468 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table222) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,468 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table464
2023-07-11 14:16:26,468 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv603922701=4, srv147651029=0, srv2136239425=2, srv2118521717=1, srv886850468=5, srv233916608=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,468 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,468 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,468 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,468 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,468 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,468 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,469 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,469 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table464) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,469 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table223
2023-07-11 14:16:26,469 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv603922701=4, srv147651029=0, srv2136239425=2, srv2118521717=1, srv886850468=5, srv233916608=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,469 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,469 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,469 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,469 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,469 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,469 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,469 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,469 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table223) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,469 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table465
2023-07-11 14:16:26,469 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv603922701=4, srv147651029=0, srv2136239425=2, srv2118521717=1, srv886850468=5, srv233916608=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,469 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,469 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,469 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,469 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,469 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,469 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,469 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,469 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table465) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,469 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table224
2023-07-11 14:16:26,469 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv603922701=4, srv147651029=0, srv2136239425=2, srv2118521717=1, srv886850468=5, srv233916608=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,469 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,469 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,470 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,470 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,470 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,470 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,470 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,470 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table224) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,470 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table466
2023-07-11 14:16:26,470 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv603922701=4, srv147651029=0, srv2136239425=2, srv2118521717=1, srv886850468=5, srv233916608=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,470 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,470 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,470 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,470 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,470 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,470 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,470 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,470 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table466) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,470 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1320
2023-07-11 14:16:26,470 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv603922701=4, srv147651029=0, srv2136239425=2, srv2118521717=1, srv886850468=5, srv233916608=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,470 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,470 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,470 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,470 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,470 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,470 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,470 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,470 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1320) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,471 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table225
2023-07-11 14:16:26,471 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv603922701=4, srv147651029=0, srv2136239425=2, srv2118521717=1, srv886850468=5, srv233916608=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,471 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,471 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,471 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,471 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,471 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,471 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,471 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,471 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table225) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,471 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table467
2023-07-11 14:16:26,471 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv603922701=4, srv147651029=0, srv2136239425=2, srv2118521717=1, srv886850468=5, srv233916608=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,471 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,471 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,471 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,471 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,471 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,471 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,471 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,471 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table467) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,471 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1321
2023-07-11 14:16:26,471 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv603922701=4, srv147651029=0, srv2136239425=2, srv2118521717=1, srv886850468=5, srv233916608=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,471 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,471 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,472 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,472 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,472 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,472 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,472 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,472 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1321) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,472 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table226
2023-07-11 14:16:26,472 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv603922701=4, srv147651029=0, srv2136239425=2, srv2118521717=1, srv886850468=5, srv233916608=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,472 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,472 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,472 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,472 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,472 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,472 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,472 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,473 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table226) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,473 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table468
2023-07-11 14:16:26,473 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv603922701=4, srv147651029=0, srv2136239425=2, srv2118521717=1, srv886850468=5, srv233916608=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,473 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,473 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,473 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,473 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,473 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,473 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,473 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,473 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table468) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,474 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table227
2023-07-11 14:16:26,474 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv603922701=4, srv147651029=0, srv2136239425=2, srv2118521717=1, srv886850468=5, srv233916608=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,474 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,474 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,474 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,474 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,474 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,474 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,474 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,474 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table227) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,474 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table469
2023-07-11 14:16:26,474 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv603922701=4, srv147651029=0, srv2136239425=2, srv2118521717=1, srv886850468=5, srv233916608=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,474 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,474 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,474 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,474 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,475 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,475 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,475 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,475 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table469) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,475 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table228
2023-07-11 14:16:26,475 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv603922701=4, srv147651029=0, srv2136239425=2, srv2118521717=1, srv886850468=5, srv233916608=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,475 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,475 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,475 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,475 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,475 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,475 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,475 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,475 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table228) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,476 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table229
2023-07-11 14:16:26,476 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv603922701=4, srv147651029=0, srv2136239425=2, srv2118521717=1, srv886850468=5, srv233916608=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,476 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,476 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,476 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,476 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,476 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,476 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,476 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,476 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table229) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,476 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1322
2023-07-11 14:16:26,476 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv603922701=4, srv147651029=0, srv2136239425=2, srv2118521717=1, srv886850468=5, srv233916608=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,476 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,476 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,476 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,477 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,477 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,477 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,477 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,477 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1322) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,477 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1323
2023-07-11 14:16:26,477 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv603922701=4, srv147651029=0, srv2136239425=2, srv2118521717=1, srv886850468=5, srv233916608=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,477 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,477 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,477 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,477 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,477 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,477 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,477 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,477 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1323) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,478 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1324
2023-07-11 14:16:26,478 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv603922701=4, srv147651029=0, srv2136239425=2, srv2118521717=1, srv886850468=5, srv233916608=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,478 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,478 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,478 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,478 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,478 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,478 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,478 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,478 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1324) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,478 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1325
2023-07-11 14:16:26,478 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv603922701=4, srv147651029=0, srv2136239425=2, srv2118521717=1, srv886850468=5, srv233916608=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,478 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,478 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,478 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,479 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,479 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,479 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,479 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,479 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1325) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,479 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1326
2023-07-11 14:16:26,479 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv603922701=4, srv147651029=0, srv2136239425=2, srv2118521717=1, srv886850468=5, srv233916608=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,479 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,479 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,479 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,479 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,479 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,479 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,479 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,479 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1326) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,480 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1327
2023-07-11 14:16:26,480 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv603922701=4, srv147651029=0, srv2136239425=2, srv2118521717=1, srv886850468=5, srv233916608=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,480 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,480 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,480 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,480 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,480 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,480 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,480 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,480 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1327) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,480 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1328
2023-07-11 14:16:26,480 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv603922701=4, srv147651029=0, srv2136239425=2, srv2118521717=1, srv886850468=5, srv233916608=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,480 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,480 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,480 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,480 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,481 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,481 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,481 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,481 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1328) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,481 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table470
2023-07-11 14:16:26,481 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv603922701=4, srv147651029=0, srv2136239425=2, srv2118521717=1, srv886850468=5, srv233916608=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,482 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,482 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,482 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,482 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,482 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,482 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,482 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,482 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table470) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,482 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1329
2023-07-11 14:16:26,483 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv603922701=4, srv147651029=0, srv2136239425=2, srv2118521717=1, srv886850468=5, srv233916608=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,483 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,483 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,483 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,483 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,483 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,483 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,483 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,483 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1329) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,483 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table691
2023-07-11 14:16:26,483 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv603922701=4, srv147651029=0, srv2136239425=2, srv2118521717=1, srv886850468=5, srv233916608=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,483 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,483 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,483 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,484 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,484 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,484 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,484 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,484 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table691) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,484 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table450
2023-07-11 14:16:26,484 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv603922701=4, srv147651029=0, srv2136239425=2, srv2118521717=1, srv886850468=5, srv233916608=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,484 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,484 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,484 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,484 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,484 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,484 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,484 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,484 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table450) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,485 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table692
2023-07-11 14:16:26,485 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv603922701=4, srv147651029=0, srv2136239425=2, srv2118521717=1, srv886850468=5, srv233916608=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,485 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,485 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,485 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,485 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,485 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,485 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,485 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,485 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table692) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,485 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table451
2023-07-11 14:16:26,485 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv603922701=4, srv147651029=0, srv2136239425=2, srv2118521717=1, srv886850468=5, srv233916608=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,485 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,485 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,486 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,486 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,486 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,486 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,486 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,486 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table451) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,486 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table693
2023-07-11 14:16:26,486 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv603922701=4, srv147651029=0, srv2136239425=2, srv2118521717=1, srv886850468=5, srv233916608=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,486 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,486 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,486 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,486 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,486 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,486 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,486 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,487 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table693) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,487 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table210
2023-07-11 14:16:26,487 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv603922701=4, srv147651029=0, srv2136239425=2, srv2118521717=1, srv886850468=5, srv233916608=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,487 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,487 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,487 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,487 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,487 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,487 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,487 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,487 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table210) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,487 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table452
2023-07-11 14:16:26,487 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv603922701=4, srv147651029=0, srv2136239425=2, srv2118521717=1, srv886850468=5, srv233916608=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,488 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,488 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,488 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,488 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,488 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,488 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,488 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,488 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table452) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,488 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table694
2023-07-11 14:16:26,488 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv603922701=4, srv147651029=0, srv2136239425=2, srv2118521717=1, srv886850468=5, srv233916608=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,488 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,488 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,488 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,488 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,488 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,489 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,489 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,489 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table694) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,489 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table211
2023-07-11 14:16:26,489 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv603922701=4, srv147651029=0, srv2136239425=2, srv2118521717=1, srv886850468=5, srv233916608=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,489 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,489 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,489 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,489 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,489 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,489 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,489 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,490 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table211) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,490 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table453
2023-07-11 14:16:26,490 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv603922701=4, srv147651029=0, srv2136239425=2, srv2118521717=1, srv886850468=5, srv233916608=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,490 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,490 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,490 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,490 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,490 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,490 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,490 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,490 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table453) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,490 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table695
2023-07-11 14:16:26,490 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv603922701=4, srv147651029=0, srv2136239425=2, srv2118521717=1, srv886850468=5, srv233916608=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,490 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,491 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,491 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,491 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,491 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,491 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,491 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,491 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table695) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,491 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table212
2023-07-11 14:16:26,491 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv603922701=4, srv147651029=0, srv2136239425=2, srv2118521717=1, srv886850468=5, srv233916608=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,491 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,491 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,491 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,491 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,491 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,491 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,492 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,492 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table212) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,492 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table454
2023-07-11 14:16:26,492 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv603922701=4, srv147651029=0, srv2136239425=2, srv2118521717=1, srv886850468=5, srv233916608=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,492 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,492 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,492 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,492 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,492 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,492 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,492 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,492 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table454) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,492 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table696
2023-07-11 14:16:26,492 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv603922701=4, srv147651029=0, srv2136239425=2, srv2118521717=1, srv886850468=5, srv233916608=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,493 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,493 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,493 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,493 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,493 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,493 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,493 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,493 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table696) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,493 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table213
2023-07-11 14:16:26,493 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv603922701=4, srv147651029=0, srv2136239425=2, srv2118521717=1, srv886850468=5, srv233916608=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,493 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,493 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,493 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,493 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,493 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,494 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,494 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,494 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table213) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,494 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table455
2023-07-11 14:16:26,494 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv603922701=4, srv147651029=0, srv2136239425=2, srv2118521717=1, srv886850468=5, srv233916608=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,494 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,494 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,494 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,494 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,494 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,494 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,494 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,494 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table455) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,494 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table697
2023-07-11 14:16:26,494 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv603922701=4, srv147651029=0, srv2136239425=2, srv2118521717=1, srv886850468=5, srv233916608=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,495 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,495 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,495 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,495 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,495 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,495 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,495 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,495 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table697) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,495 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table214
2023-07-11 14:16:26,495 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv603922701=4, srv147651029=0, srv2136239425=2, srv2118521717=1, srv886850468=5, srv233916608=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,495 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,495 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,495 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,495 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,495 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,495 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,495 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,496 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table214) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,496 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table456
2023-07-11 14:16:26,496 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv603922701=4, srv147651029=0, srv2136239425=2, srv2118521717=1, srv886850468=5, srv233916608=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,496 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,496 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,496 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,496 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,496 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,496 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,496 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,496 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table456) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,496 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table698
2023-07-11 14:16:26,496 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv603922701=4, srv147651029=0, srv2136239425=2, srv2118521717=1, srv886850468=5, srv233916608=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,496 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,496 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,496 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,497 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,497 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,497 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,497 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,497 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table698) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,497 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1310
2023-07-11 14:16:26,497 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv603922701=4, srv147651029=0, srv2136239425=2, srv2118521717=1, srv886850468=5, srv233916608=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,497 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,497 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,497 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,497 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,497 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,497 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,497 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,497 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1310) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,497 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table215
2023-07-11 14:16:26,498 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv603922701=4, srv147651029=0, srv2136239425=2, srv2118521717=1, srv886850468=5, srv233916608=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,498 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,498 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,498 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,498 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,498 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,498 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,498 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,498 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table215) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,498 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table457
2023-07-11 14:16:26,498 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv603922701=4, srv147651029=0, srv2136239425=2, srv2118521717=1, srv886850468=5, srv233916608=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,498 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,498 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,498 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,498 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,499 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,499 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,499 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,499 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table457) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,499 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table699
2023-07-11 14:16:26,499 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv603922701=4, srv147651029=0, srv2136239425=2, srv2118521717=1, srv886850468=5, srv233916608=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,499 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,499 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,499 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,499 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,499 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,499 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,499 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,499 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table699) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,499 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table216
2023-07-11 14:16:26,500 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv603922701=4, srv147651029=0, srv2136239425=2, srv2118521717=1, srv886850468=5, srv233916608=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,500 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,500 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,500 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,500 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,500 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,500 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,500 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,500 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table216) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,500 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table458
2023-07-11 14:16:26,500 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv603922701=4, srv147651029=0, srv2136239425=2, srv2118521717=1, srv886850468=5, srv233916608=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,500 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,500 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,500 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,501 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,501 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,501 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,501 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,501 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table458) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,501 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table217
2023-07-11 14:16:26,501 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv603922701=4, srv147651029=0, srv2136239425=2, srv2118521717=1, srv886850468=5, srv233916608=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,501 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,501 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,501 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,501 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,501 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,501 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,501 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,501 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table217) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,502 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table459
2023-07-11 14:16:26,502 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv603922701=4, srv147651029=0, srv2136239425=2, srv2118521717=1, srv886850468=5, srv233916608=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,502 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,502 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,502 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,502 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,502 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,502 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,502 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,502 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table459) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,502 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table218
2023-07-11 14:16:26,502 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv603922701=4, srv147651029=0, srv2136239425=2, srv2118521717=1, srv886850468=5, srv233916608=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,502 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,502 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,502 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,502 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,503 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,503 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,503 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,503 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table218) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,503 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table219
2023-07-11 14:16:26,503 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv603922701=4, srv147651029=0, srv2136239425=2, srv2118521717=1, srv886850468=5, srv233916608=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,503 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,503 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,503 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,503 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,503 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,503 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,503 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,503 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table219) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,504 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1319
2023-07-11 14:16:26,504 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv603922701=4, srv147651029=0, srv2136239425=2, srv2118521717=1, srv886850468=5, srv233916608=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,504 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,504 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,504 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,504 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,504 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,504 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,504 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,504 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1319) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,504 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1311
2023-07-11 14:16:26,504 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv603922701=4, srv147651029=0, srv2136239425=2, srv2118521717=1, srv886850468=5, srv233916608=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,504 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,504 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,504 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,505 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,505 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,505 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,505 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,505 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1311) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,505 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1312
2023-07-11 14:16:26,505 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv603922701=4, srv147651029=0, srv2136239425=2, srv2118521717=1, srv886850468=5, srv233916608=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,505 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,505 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,505 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,505 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,505 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,505 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,505 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,505 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1312) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,506 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1313
2023-07-11 14:16:26,506 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv603922701=4, srv147651029=0, srv2136239425=2, srv2118521717=1, srv886850468=5, srv233916608=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,506 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,506 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,506 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,506 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,506 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,506 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,506 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,506 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1313) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,506 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1314
2023-07-11 14:16:26,506 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv603922701=4, srv147651029=0, srv2136239425=2, srv2118521717=1, srv886850468=5, srv233916608=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,506 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,506 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,506 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,506 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,507 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,507 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,507 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,507 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1314) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,507 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1315
2023-07-11 14:16:26,507 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv603922701=4, srv147651029=0, srv2136239425=2, srv2118521717=1, srv886850468=5, srv233916608=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,507 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,507 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,507 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,507 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,507 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,507 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,507 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,507 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1315) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,507 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1316
2023-07-11 14:16:26,507 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv603922701=4, srv147651029=0, srv2136239425=2, srv2118521717=1, srv886850468=5, srv233916608=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,508 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,508 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,508 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,508 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,508 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,508 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,508 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,508 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1316) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,508 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1317
2023-07-11 14:16:26,508 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv603922701=4, srv147651029=0, srv2136239425=2, srv2118521717=1, srv886850468=5, srv233916608=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,508 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,508 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,508 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,508 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,508 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,508 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,508 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,509 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1317) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,509 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1318
2023-07-11 14:16:26,509 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv603922701=4, srv147651029=0, srv2136239425=2, srv2118521717=1, srv886850468=5, srv233916608=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,509 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,509 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,509 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,509 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,509 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,509 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,509 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,509 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1318) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,509 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table196
2023-07-11 14:16:26,509 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv603922701=4, srv147651029=0, srv2136239425=2, srv2118521717=1, srv886850468=5, srv233916608=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,509 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,509 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,509 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,510 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,510 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,510 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,510 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,510 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table196) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,510 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table197
2023-07-11 14:16:26,510 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv603922701=4, srv147651029=0, srv2136239425=2, srv2118521717=1, srv886850468=5, srv233916608=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,510 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,510 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,510 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,510 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,510 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,510 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,510 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,510 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table197) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,511 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table198
2023-07-11 14:16:26,511 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv603922701=4, srv147651029=0, srv2136239425=2, srv2118521717=1, srv886850468=5, srv233916608=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,511 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,511 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,511 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,511 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,511 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,511 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,511 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,511 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table198) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,511 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table199
2023-07-11 14:16:26,511 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv603922701=4, srv147651029=0, srv2136239425=2, srv2118521717=1, srv886850468=5, srv233916608=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,511 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,511 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,512 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,512 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,512 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,512 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,512 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,512 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table199) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,512 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table163
2023-07-11 14:16:26,512 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv603922701=4, srv147651029=0, srv2136239425=2, srv2118521717=1, srv886850468=5, srv233916608=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,512 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,512 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,512 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,512 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,512 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,512 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,512 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,513 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table163) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,513 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table164
2023-07-11 14:16:26,513 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv603922701=4, srv147651029=0, srv2136239425=2, srv2118521717=1, srv886850468=5, srv233916608=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,513 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,513 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,513 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,513 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,513 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,513 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,513 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,513 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table164) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,513 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table165
2023-07-11 14:16:26,513 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv603922701=4, srv147651029=0, srv2136239425=2, srv2118521717=1, srv886850468=5, srv233916608=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,514 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,514 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,514 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,514 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,514 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,514 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,514 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,514 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table165) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,514 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table166
2023-07-11 14:16:26,514 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv603922701=4, srv147651029=0, srv2136239425=2, srv2118521717=1, srv886850468=5, srv233916608=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,514 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,514 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,514 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,514 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,514 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,515 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,515 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,515 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table166) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,515 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table167
2023-07-11 14:16:26,515 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv603922701=4, srv147651029=0, srv2136239425=2, srv2118521717=1, srv886850468=5, srv233916608=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,515 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,515 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,515 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,515 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,515 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,515 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,515 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,515 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table167) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,515 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table168
2023-07-11 14:16:26,515 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv603922701=4, srv147651029=0, srv2136239425=2, srv2118521717=1, srv886850468=5, srv233916608=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,516 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,516 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,516 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,516 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,516 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,516 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,516 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,516 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table168) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,516 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table169
2023-07-11 14:16:26,516 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv603922701=4, srv147651029=0, srv2136239425=2, srv2118521717=1, srv886850468=5, srv233916608=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,516 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,516 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,516 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,516 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,516 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,516 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,516 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,517 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table169) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,517 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table170
2023-07-11 14:16:26,517 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv603922701=4, srv147651029=0, srv2136239425=2, srv2118521717=1, srv886850468=5, srv233916608=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,517 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,517 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,517 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,517 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,517 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,517 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,517 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,517 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table170) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,517 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table171
2023-07-11 14:16:26,517 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv603922701=4, srv147651029=0, srv2136239425=2, srv2118521717=1, srv886850468=5, srv233916608=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,517 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,517 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,517 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,518 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,518 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,518 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,518 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,518 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table171) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,518 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table172
2023-07-11 14:16:26,518 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv603922701=4, srv147651029=0, srv2136239425=2, srv2118521717=1, srv886850468=5, srv233916608=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,518 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,518 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,518 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,518 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,518 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,518 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,519 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,519 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table172) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,519 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table173
2023-07-11 14:16:26,519 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv603922701=4, srv147651029=0, srv2136239425=2, srv2118521717=1, srv886850468=5, srv233916608=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,519 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,519 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,519 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,519 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,519 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,519 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,519 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,519 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table173) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,519 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table152
2023-07-11 14:16:26,519 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv603922701=4, srv147651029=0, srv2136239425=2, srv2118521717=1, srv886850468=5, srv233916608=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,520 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,520 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,520 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,520 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,520 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,520 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,520 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,520 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table152) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,520 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table394
2023-07-11 14:16:26,520 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv603922701=4, srv147651029=0, srv2136239425=2, srv2118521717=1, srv886850468=5, srv233916608=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,520 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,520 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,520 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,520 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,520 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,521 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,521 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,521 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table394) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,521 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table153
2023-07-11 14:16:26,521 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv603922701=4, srv147651029=0, srv2136239425=2, srv2118521717=1, srv886850468=5, srv233916608=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,521 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,521 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,521 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,521 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,521 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,521 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,521 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,521 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table153) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,521 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table395
2023-07-11 14:16:26,521 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv603922701=4, srv147651029=0, srv2136239425=2, srv2118521717=1, srv886850468=5, srv233916608=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,522 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,522 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,522 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,522 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,522 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,522 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,522 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,522 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table395) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,522 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table154
2023-07-11 14:16:26,522 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv603922701=4, srv147651029=0, srv2136239425=2, srv2118521717=1, srv886850468=5, srv233916608=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,522 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,522 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,522 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,522 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,522 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,522 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,522 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,523 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table154) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,523 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table396
2023-07-11 14:16:26,523 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv603922701=4, srv147651029=0, srv2136239425=2, srv2118521717=1, srv886850468=5, srv233916608=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,523 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,523 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,523 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,523 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,523 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,523 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,523 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,523 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table396) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,523 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table155
2023-07-11 14:16:26,523 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv603922701=4, srv147651029=0, srv2136239425=2, srv2118521717=1, srv886850468=5, srv233916608=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,523 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,523 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,523 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,524 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,524 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,524 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,524 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,524 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table155) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,524 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table397
2023-07-11 14:16:26,524 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv603922701=4, srv147651029=0, srv2136239425=2, srv2118521717=1, srv886850468=5, srv233916608=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,524 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,524 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,524 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,524 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,524 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,524 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,524 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,524 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table397) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,525 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table156
2023-07-11 14:16:26,525 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv603922701=4, srv147651029=0, srv2136239425=2, srv2118521717=1, srv886850468=5, srv233916608=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,525 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,525 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,525 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,525 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,525 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,525 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,525 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,525 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table156) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,525 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table398
2023-07-11 14:16:26,525 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv603922701=4, srv147651029=0, srv2136239425=2, srv2118521717=1, srv886850468=5, srv233916608=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,525 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,526 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,526 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,526 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,526 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,526 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,526 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,526 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table398) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,526 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table157
2023-07-11 14:16:26,526 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv603922701=4, srv147651029=0, srv2136239425=2, srv2118521717=1, srv886850468=5, srv233916608=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,526 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,526 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,526 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,526 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,526 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,526 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,526 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,527 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table157) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,527 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table399
2023-07-11 14:16:26,527 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv603922701=4, srv147651029=0, srv2136239425=2, srv2118521717=1, srv886850468=5, srv233916608=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,527 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,527 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,527 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,527 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,527 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,527 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,527 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,527 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table399) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,527 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table158
2023-07-11 14:16:26,527 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv603922701=4, srv147651029=0, srv2136239425=2, srv2118521717=1, srv886850468=5, srv233916608=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,527 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,527 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,527 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,528 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,528 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,528 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,528 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,528 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table158) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,528 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table159
2023-07-11 14:16:26,528 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv603922701=4, srv147651029=0, srv2136239425=2, srv2118521717=1, srv886850468=5, srv233916608=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,528 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,528 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,528 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,528 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,528 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,528 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,528 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,528 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table159) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,528 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table160
2023-07-11 14:16:26,529 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv603922701=4, srv147651029=0, srv2136239425=2, srv2118521717=1, srv886850468=5, srv233916608=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,529 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,529 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,529 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,529 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,529 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,529 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,529 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,529 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table160) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,529 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table161
2023-07-11 14:16:26,529 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv603922701=4, srv147651029=0, srv2136239425=2, srv2118521717=1, srv886850468=5, srv233916608=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,529 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,529 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,529 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,529 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,529 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,530 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,530 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,530 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table161) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,530 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table162
2023-07-11 14:16:26,530 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv603922701=4, srv147651029=0, srv2136239425=2, srv2118521717=1, srv886850468=5, srv233916608=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,530 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,530 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,530 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,530 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,530 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,530 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,530 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,530 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table162) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,530 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table185
2023-07-11 14:16:26,531 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv603922701=4, srv147651029=0, srv2136239425=2, srv2118521717=1, srv886850468=5, srv233916608=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,531 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,531 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,531 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,531 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,531 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,531 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,531 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,531 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table185) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,531 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table186
2023-07-11 14:16:26,531 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv603922701=4, srv147651029=0, srv2136239425=2, srv2118521717=1, srv886850468=5, srv233916608=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,531 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,531 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,531 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,532 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,532 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,532 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,532 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,532 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table186) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,532 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table187
2023-07-11 14:16:26,532 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv603922701=4, srv147651029=0, srv2136239425=2, srv2118521717=1, srv886850468=5, srv233916608=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,532 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,532 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,532 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,532 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,532 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,532 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,532 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,532 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table187) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,533 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table188
2023-07-11 14:16:26,533 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv603922701=4, srv147651029=0, srv2136239425=2, srv2118521717=1, srv886850468=5, srv233916608=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,533 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,533 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,533 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,533 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,533 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,533 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,533 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,533 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table188) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,533 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table189
2023-07-11 14:16:26,534 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv603922701=4, srv147651029=0, srv2136239425=2, srv2118521717=1, srv886850468=5, srv233916608=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,534 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,534 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,534 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,534 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,534 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,534 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,534 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,534 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table189) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,534 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table190
2023-07-11 14:16:26,534 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv603922701=4, srv147651029=0, srv2136239425=2, srv2118521717=1, srv886850468=5, srv233916608=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,534 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,534 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,535 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,535 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,535 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,535 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,535 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,535 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table190) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,535 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table191
2023-07-11 14:16:26,535 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv603922701=4, srv147651029=0, srv2136239425=2, srv2118521717=1, srv886850468=5, srv233916608=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,535 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,535 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,535 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,535 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,535 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,535 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,535 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,536 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table191) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,536 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table192
2023-07-11 14:16:26,536 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv603922701=4, srv147651029=0, srv2136239425=2, srv2118521717=1, srv886850468=5, srv233916608=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,536 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,536 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,536 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,536 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,536 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,536 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,536 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,536 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table192) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,536 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table193
2023-07-11 14:16:26,536 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv603922701=4, srv147651029=0, srv2136239425=2, srv2118521717=1, srv886850468=5, srv233916608=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,536 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,537 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,537 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,537 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,537 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,537 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,537 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,537 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table193) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,537 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table194
2023-07-11 14:16:26,537 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv603922701=4, srv147651029=0, srv2136239425=2, srv2118521717=1, srv886850468=5, srv233916608=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,537 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,537 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,537 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,537 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,537 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,537 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,538 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,538 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table194) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,538 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table195
2023-07-11 14:16:26,538 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv603922701=4, srv147651029=0, srv2136239425=2, srv2118521717=1, srv886850468=5, srv233916608=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,538 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,538 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,538 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,538 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,538 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,538 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,538 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,538 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table195) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,538 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table174
2023-07-11 14:16:26,538 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv603922701=4, srv147651029=0, srv2136239425=2, srv2118521717=1, srv886850468=5, srv233916608=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,539 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,539 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,539 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,539 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,539 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,539 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,539 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,539 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table174) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,539 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table175
2023-07-11 14:16:26,539 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv603922701=4, srv147651029=0, srv2136239425=2, srv2118521717=1, srv886850468=5, srv233916608=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,539 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,539 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,539 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,539 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,539 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,540 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,540 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,540 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table175) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,540 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table176
2023-07-11 14:16:26,540 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv603922701=4, srv147651029=0, srv2136239425=2, srv2118521717=1, srv886850468=5, srv233916608=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,540 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,540 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,540 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,540 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,540 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,540 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,540 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,540 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table176) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,540 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table177
2023-07-11 14:16:26,541 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv603922701=4, srv147651029=0, srv2136239425=2, srv2118521717=1, srv886850468=5, srv233916608=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,541 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,541 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,541 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,541 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,541 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,541 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,541 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,541 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table177) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,541 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table178
2023-07-11 14:16:26,541 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv603922701=4, srv147651029=0, srv2136239425=2, srv2118521717=1, srv886850468=5, srv233916608=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,541 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,541 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,541 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,541 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,542 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,542 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,542 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,542 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table178) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,542 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table179
2023-07-11 14:16:26,542 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv603922701=4, srv147651029=0, srv2136239425=2, srv2118521717=1, srv886850468=5, srv233916608=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,542 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,542 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,542 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,542 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,542 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,542 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,542 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,542 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table179) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,543 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table180
2023-07-11 14:16:26,543 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv603922701=4, srv147651029=0, srv2136239425=2, srv2118521717=1, srv886850468=5, srv233916608=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,543 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,543 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,543 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,543 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,543 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,543 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,543 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,543 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table180) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,543 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table181
2023-07-11 14:16:26,543 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv603922701=4, srv147651029=0, srv2136239425=2, srv2118521717=1, srv886850468=5, srv233916608=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,543 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,543 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,543 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,544 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,544 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,544 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,544 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,544 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table181) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,544 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table182
2023-07-11 14:16:26,544 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv603922701=4, srv147651029=0, srv2136239425=2, srv2118521717=1, srv886850468=5, srv233916608=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,544 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,544 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,544 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,544 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,544 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,544 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,544 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,545 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table182) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,545 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table183
2023-07-11 14:16:26,545 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv603922701=4, srv147651029=0, srv2136239425=2, srv2118521717=1, srv886850468=5, srv233916608=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,545 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,545 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,545 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,545 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,545 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,545 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,545 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,545 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table183) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,545 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table184
2023-07-11 14:16:26,545 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv603922701=4, srv147651029=0, srv2136239425=2, srv2118521717=1, srv886850468=5, srv233916608=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,545 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,545 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,546 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,546 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,546 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,546 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,546 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,546 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table184) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,546 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table800
2023-07-11 14:16:26,546 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv603922701=4, srv147651029=0, srv2136239425=2, srv2118521717=1, srv886850468=5, srv233916608=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,546 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,546 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,546 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,546 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,546 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,546 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,546 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,547 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table800) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,547 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table801
2023-07-11 14:16:26,547 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv603922701=4, srv147651029=0, srv2136239425=2, srv2118521717=1, srv886850468=5, srv233916608=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,547 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,547 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,547 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,547 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,547 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,547 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,547 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,547 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table801) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,547 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table802
2023-07-11 14:16:26,547 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv603922701=4, srv147651029=0, srv2136239425=2, srv2118521717=1, srv886850468=5, srv233916608=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,547 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,547 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,548 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,548 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,548 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,548 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,548 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,548 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table802) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,548 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table803
2023-07-11 14:16:26,548 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv603922701=4, srv147651029=0, srv2136239425=2, srv2118521717=1, srv886850468=5, srv233916608=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,548 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,548 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,548 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,548 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,549 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,549 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,549 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,549 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table803) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,549 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table804
2023-07-11 14:16:26,549 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv603922701=4, srv147651029=0, srv2136239425=2, srv2118521717=1, srv886850468=5, srv233916608=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,549 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,549 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,549 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,549 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,549 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,549 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,549 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,549 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table804) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,549 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table805
2023-07-11 14:16:26,550 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv603922701=4, srv147651029=0, srv2136239425=2, srv2118521717=1, srv886850468=5, srv233916608=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,550 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,550 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,550 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,550 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,550 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,550 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,550 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,550 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table805) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,550 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table806
2023-07-11 14:16:26,550 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv603922701=4, srv147651029=0, srv2136239425=2, srv2118521717=1, srv886850468=5, srv233916608=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,550 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,550 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,550 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,550 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,551 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,551 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,551 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,551 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table806) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,551 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table807
2023-07-11 14:16:26,551 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv603922701=4, srv147651029=0, srv2136239425=2, srv2118521717=1, srv886850468=5, srv233916608=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,551 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,551 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,551 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,551 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,551 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,551 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,551 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,551 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table807) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,551 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table808
2023-07-11 14:16:26,552 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv603922701=4, srv147651029=0, srv2136239425=2, srv2118521717=1, srv886850468=5, srv233916608=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,552 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,552 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,552 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,552 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,552 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,552 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,552 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,552 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table808) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,552 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table809
2023-07-11 14:16:26,552 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv603922701=4, srv147651029=0, srv2136239425=2, srv2118521717=1, srv886850468=5, srv233916608=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,552 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,552 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,552 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,552 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,553 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,553 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,553 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,553 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table809) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,553 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table820
2023-07-11 14:16:26,553 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv603922701=4, srv147651029=0, srv2136239425=2, srv2118521717=1, srv886850468=5, srv233916608=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,553 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,553 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,553 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,553 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,553 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,553 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,553 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,553 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table820) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,553 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table821
2023-07-11 14:16:26,554 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv603922701=4, srv147651029=0, srv2136239425=2, srv2118521717=1, srv886850468=5, srv233916608=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,554 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,554 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,554 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,554 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,554 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,554 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,554 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,554 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table821) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,554 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table822
2023-07-11 14:16:26,554 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv603922701=4, srv147651029=0, srv2136239425=2, srv2118521717=1, srv886850468=5, srv233916608=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,554 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,554 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,554 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,554 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,555 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,555 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,555 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,555 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table822) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,555 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table823
2023-07-11 14:16:26,555 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv603922701=4, srv147651029=0, srv2136239425=2, srv2118521717=1, srv886850468=5, srv233916608=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,555 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,555 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,555 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,555 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,555 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,555 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,555 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,555 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table823) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,555 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table824
2023-07-11 14:16:26,555 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv603922701=4, srv147651029=0, srv2136239425=2, srv2118521717=1, srv886850468=5, srv233916608=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,556 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,556 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,556 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,556 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,556 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,556 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,556 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,556 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table824) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,556 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table825
2023-07-11 14:16:26,556 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv603922701=4, srv147651029=0, srv2136239425=2, srv2118521717=1, srv886850468=5, srv233916608=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,556 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,556 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,556 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,556 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,556 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,557 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,557 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,557 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table825) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,557 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table826
2023-07-11 14:16:26,557 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv603922701=4, srv147651029=0, srv2136239425=2, srv2118521717=1, srv886850468=5, srv233916608=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,557 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,557 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,557 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,557 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,557 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,557 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,557 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,557 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table826) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,557 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table827
2023-07-11 14:16:26,558 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv603922701=4, srv147651029=0, srv2136239425=2, srv2118521717=1, srv886850468=5, srv233916608=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,558 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,558 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,558 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,558 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,558 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,558 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,558 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,558 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table827) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,558 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table828
2023-07-11 14:16:26,558 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv603922701=4, srv147651029=0, srv2136239425=2, srv2118521717=1, srv886850468=5, srv233916608=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,558 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,558 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,558 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,558 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,559 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,559 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,559 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,559 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table828) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,559 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table829
2023-07-11 14:16:26,559 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv603922701=4, srv147651029=0, srv2136239425=2, srv2118521717=1, srv886850468=5, srv233916608=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,559 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,559 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,559 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,559 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,559 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,559 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,559 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,559 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table829) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,559 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1193
2023-07-11 14:16:26,560 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv603922701=4, srv147651029=0, srv2136239425=2, srv2118521717=1, srv886850468=5, srv233916608=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,560 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,560 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,560 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,560 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,560 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,560 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,560 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,560 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1193) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,560 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1194
2023-07-11 14:16:26,560 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv603922701=4, srv147651029=0, srv2136239425=2, srv2118521717=1, srv886850468=5, srv233916608=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,560 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,560 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,560 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,560 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,561 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,561 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,561 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,561 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1194) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,561 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1195
2023-07-11 14:16:26,561 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv603922701=4, srv147651029=0, srv2136239425=2, srv2118521717=1, srv886850468=5, srv233916608=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,561 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,561 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,561 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,561 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,561 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,561 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,561 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,561 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1195) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,562 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1196
2023-07-11 14:16:26,562 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv603922701=4, srv147651029=0, srv2136239425=2, srv2118521717=1, srv886850468=5, srv233916608=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,562 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,562 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,562 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,562 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,562 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,562 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,562 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,562 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1196) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,562 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1197
2023-07-11 14:16:26,562 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv603922701=4, srv147651029=0, srv2136239425=2, srv2118521717=1, srv886850468=5, srv233916608=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,562 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,562 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,562 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,563 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,563 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,563 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,563 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,563 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1197) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,563 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1198
2023-07-11 14:16:26,563 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv603922701=4, srv147651029=0, srv2136239425=2, srv2118521717=1, srv886850468=5, srv233916608=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,563 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,563 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,563 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,563 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,563 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,564 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,564 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,564 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1198) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,564 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1199
2023-07-11 14:16:26,564 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv603922701=4, srv147651029=0, srv2136239425=2, srv2118521717=1, srv886850468=5, srv233916608=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,564 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,564 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,564 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,564 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,564 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,564 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,564 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,564 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1199) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,564 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table810
2023-07-11 14:16:26,565 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv603922701=4, srv147651029=0, srv2136239425=2, srv2118521717=1, srv886850468=5, srv233916608=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,565 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,565 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,565 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,565 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,565 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,565 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,565 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,565 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table810) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,565 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table811
2023-07-11 14:16:26,565 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv603922701=4, srv147651029=0, srv2136239425=2, srv2118521717=1, srv886850468=5, srv233916608=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,565 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,565 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,565 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,565 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,566 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,566 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,566 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,566 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table811) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,566 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table812
2023-07-11 14:16:26,566 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv603922701=4, srv147651029=0, srv2136239425=2, srv2118521717=1, srv886850468=5, srv233916608=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,566 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,566 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,566 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,566 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,566 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,566 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,566 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,566 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table812) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,566 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table813
2023-07-11 14:16:26,567 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv603922701=4, srv147651029=0, srv2136239425=2, srv2118521717=1, srv886850468=5, srv233916608=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,567 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,567 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,567 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,567 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,567 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,567 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,567 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,567 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table813) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,567 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table814
2023-07-11 14:16:26,567 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv603922701=4, srv147651029=0, srv2136239425=2, srv2118521717=1, srv886850468=5, srv233916608=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,567 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,567 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,567 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,567 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,568 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,568 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,568 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,568 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table814) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,568 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1190
2023-07-11 14:16:26,568 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv603922701=4, srv147651029=0, srv2136239425=2, srv2118521717=1, srv886850468=5, srv233916608=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,568 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,568 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,568 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,568 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,568 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,568 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,568 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,568 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1190) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,569 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table815
2023-07-11 14:16:26,569 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv603922701=4, srv147651029=0, srv2136239425=2, srv2118521717=1, srv886850468=5, srv233916608=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,569 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,569 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,569 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,569 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,569 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,569 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,569 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,569 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table815) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,569 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1191
2023-07-11 14:16:26,569 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv603922701=4, srv147651029=0, srv2136239425=2, srv2118521717=1, srv886850468=5, srv233916608=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,569 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,569 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,569 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,570 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,570 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,570 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,570 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,570 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1191) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,570 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table816
2023-07-11 14:16:26,570 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv603922701=4, srv147651029=0, srv2136239425=2, srv2118521717=1, srv886850468=5, srv233916608=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,570 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,570 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,570 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,570 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,570 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,570 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,570 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,570 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table816) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,571 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1192
2023-07-11 14:16:26,571 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv603922701=4, srv147651029=0, srv2136239425=2, srv2118521717=1, srv886850468=5, srv233916608=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,571 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,571 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,571 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,571 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,571 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,571 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,571 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,571 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1192) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,571 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table817
2023-07-11 14:16:26,571 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv603922701=4, srv147651029=0, srv2136239425=2, srv2118521717=1, srv886850468=5, srv233916608=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,571 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,571 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,571 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,572 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,572 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,572 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,572 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,572 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table817) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,572 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table818
2023-07-11 14:16:26,572 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv603922701=4, srv147651029=0, srv2136239425=2, srv2118521717=1, srv886850468=5, srv233916608=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,572 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,572 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,572 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,572 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,572 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,572 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,572 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,573 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table818) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,573 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table819
2023-07-11 14:16:26,573 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv603922701=4, srv147651029=0, srv2136239425=2, srv2118521717=1, srv886850468=5, srv233916608=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,573 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,573 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,573 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,573 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,573 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,573 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,573 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,573 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table819) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,573 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1260
2023-07-11 14:16:26,573 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv603922701=4, srv147651029=0, srv2136239425=2, srv2118521717=1, srv886850468=5, srv233916608=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,573 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,573 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,574 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,574 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,574 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,574 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,574 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,574 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1260) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,574 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1261
2023-07-11 14:16:26,574 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv603922701=4, srv147651029=0, srv2136239425=2, srv2118521717=1, srv886850468=5, srv233916608=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,574 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,574 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,574 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,574 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,574 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,574 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,574 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,575 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1261) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,575 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table760
2023-07-11 14:16:26,575 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv603922701=4, srv147651029=0, srv2136239425=2, srv2118521717=1, srv886850468=5, srv233916608=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,575 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,575 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,575 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,575 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,575 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,575 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,575 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,575 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table760) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,575 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1020
2023-07-11 14:16:26,575 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv603922701=4, srv147651029=0, srv2136239425=2, srv2118521717=1, srv886850468=5, srv233916608=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,575 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,575 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,576 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,576 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,576 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,576 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,576 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,576 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1020) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,576 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1262
2023-07-11 14:16:26,576 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv603922701=4, srv147651029=0, srv2136239425=2, srv2118521717=1, srv886850468=5, srv233916608=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,576 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,576 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,576 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,576 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,576 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,576 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,576 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,577 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1262) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,577 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table761
2023-07-11 14:16:26,577 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv603922701=4, srv147651029=0, srv2136239425=2, srv2118521717=1, srv886850468=5, srv233916608=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,577 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,577 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,577 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,577 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,577 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,577 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,577 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,577 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table761) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,577 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1021
2023-07-11 14:16:26,577 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv603922701=4, srv147651029=0, srv2136239425=2, srv2118521717=1, srv886850468=5, srv233916608=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,577 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,578 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,578 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,578 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,578 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,578 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,578 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,578 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1021) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,578 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1263
2023-07-11 14:16:26,578 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv603922701=4, srv147651029=0, srv2136239425=2, srv2118521717=1, srv886850468=5, srv233916608=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,578 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,578 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,579 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,579 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,579 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,579 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,579 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,579 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1263) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,579 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table520
2023-07-11 14:16:26,579 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv603922701=4, srv147651029=0, srv2136239425=2, srv2118521717=1, srv886850468=5, srv233916608=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,579 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,579 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,579 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,579 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,579 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,579 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,579 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,580 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table520) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,580 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table762
2023-07-11 14:16:26,580 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv603922701=4, srv147651029=0, srv2136239425=2, srv2118521717=1, srv886850468=5, srv233916608=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,580 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,580 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,580 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,580 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,580 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,580 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,580 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,580 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table762) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,580 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1022
2023-07-11 14:16:26,580 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv603922701=4, srv147651029=0, srv2136239425=2, srv2118521717=1, srv886850468=5, srv233916608=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,580 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,580 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,581 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,581 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,581 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,581 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,581 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,581 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1022) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,581 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1264
2023-07-11 14:16:26,581 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv603922701=4, srv147651029=0, srv2136239425=2, srv2118521717=1, srv886850468=5, srv233916608=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,581 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,581 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,581 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,581 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,581 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,581 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,581 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,582 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1264) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,582 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table521
2023-07-11 14:16:26,582 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv603922701=4, srv147651029=0, srv2136239425=2, srv2118521717=1, srv886850468=5, srv233916608=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,582 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,582 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,582 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,582 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,582 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,582 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,582 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,582 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table521) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,582 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table763
2023-07-11 14:16:26,582 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv603922701=4, srv147651029=0, srv2136239425=2, srv2118521717=1, srv886850468=5, srv233916608=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,582 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,583 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,583 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,583 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,583 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,583 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,583 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,583 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table763) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,583 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1023
2023-07-11 14:16:26,583 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv603922701=4, srv147651029=0, srv2136239425=2, srv2118521717=1, srv886850468=5, srv233916608=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,583 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,583 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,583 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,583 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,583 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,583 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,583 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,584 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1023) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,584 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1265
2023-07-11 14:16:26,584 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv603922701=4, srv147651029=0, srv2136239425=2, srv2118521717=1, srv886850468=5, srv233916608=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,584 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,584 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,584 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,584 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,584 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,584 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,584 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,584 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1265) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,584 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table522
2023-07-11 14:16:26,584 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv603922701=4, srv147651029=0, srv2136239425=2, srv2118521717=1, srv886850468=5, srv233916608=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,584 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,585 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,585 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,585 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,585 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,585 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,585 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,585 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table522) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,585 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table764
2023-07-11 14:16:26,585 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv603922701=4, srv147651029=0, srv2136239425=2, srv2118521717=1, srv886850468=5, srv233916608=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,585 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,585 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,585 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,585 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,585 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,585 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,586 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,586 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table764) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,586 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1024
2023-07-11 14:16:26,586 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv603922701=4, srv147651029=0, srv2136239425=2, srv2118521717=1, srv886850468=5, srv233916608=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,586 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,586 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,586 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,586 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,586 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,586 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,586 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,586 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1024) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,586 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1266
2023-07-11 14:16:26,586 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv603922701=4, srv147651029=0, srv2136239425=2, srv2118521717=1, srv886850468=5, srv233916608=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,586 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,587 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,587 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,587 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,587 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,587 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,587 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,587 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1266) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,587 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table523
2023-07-11 14:16:26,587 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv603922701=4, srv147651029=0, srv2136239425=2, srv2118521717=1, srv886850468=5, srv233916608=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,587 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,587 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,587 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,587 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,587 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,587 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,587 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,588 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table523) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,588 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table765
2023-07-11 14:16:26,588 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv603922701=4, srv147651029=0, srv2136239425=2, srv2118521717=1, srv886850468=5, srv233916608=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,588 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,588 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,588 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,588 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,588 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,588 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,588 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,588 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table765) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,588 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table524
2023-07-11 14:16:26,588 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv603922701=4, srv147651029=0, srv2136239425=2, srv2118521717=1, srv886850468=5, srv233916608=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,588 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,588 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,589 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,589 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,589 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,589 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,589 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,589 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table524) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,589 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table766
2023-07-11 14:16:26,589 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv603922701=4, srv147651029=0, srv2136239425=2, srv2118521717=1, srv886850468=5, srv233916608=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,589 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,589 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,589 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,589 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,589 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,589 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,589 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,590 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table766) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,590 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table525
2023-07-11 14:16:26,590 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv603922701=4, srv147651029=0, srv2136239425=2, srv2118521717=1, srv886850468=5, srv233916608=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,590 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,590 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,590 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,590 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,590 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,590 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,590 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,590 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table525) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,590 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table767
2023-07-11 14:16:26,590 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv603922701=4, srv147651029=0, srv2136239425=2, srv2118521717=1, srv886850468=5, srv233916608=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,590 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,590 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,591 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,591 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,591 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,591 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,591 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,591 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table767) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,591 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table526
2023-07-11 14:16:26,591 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv603922701=4, srv147651029=0, srv2136239425=2, srv2118521717=1, srv886850468=5, srv233916608=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,591 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,591 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,591 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,591 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,591 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,591 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,591 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,591 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table526) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,591 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table768
2023-07-11 14:16:26,591 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv603922701=4, srv147651029=0, srv2136239425=2, srv2118521717=1, srv886850468=5, srv233916608=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,591 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,591 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,591 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,591 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,591 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,591 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,591 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,592 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table768) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,592 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table527
2023-07-11 14:16:26,592 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv603922701=4, srv147651029=0, srv2136239425=2, srv2118521717=1, srv886850468=5, srv233916608=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,592 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,592 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,592 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,592 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,592 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,592 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,592 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,592 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table527) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,592 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table769
2023-07-11 14:16:26,592 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv603922701=4, srv147651029=0, srv2136239425=2, srv2118521717=1, srv886850468=5, srv233916608=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,592 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,592 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,592 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,592 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,592 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,592 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,592 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,593 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table769) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,593 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table528
2023-07-11 14:16:26,593 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv603922701=4, srv147651029=0, srv2136239425=2, srv2118521717=1, srv886850468=5, srv233916608=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,593 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,593 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,593 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,593 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,593 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,593 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,593 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,593 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table528) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,593 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table529
2023-07-11 14:16:26,593 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv603922701=4, srv147651029=0, srv2136239425=2, srv2118521717=1, srv886850468=5, srv233916608=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,593 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,593 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,593 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,593 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,593 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,593 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,593 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,593 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table529) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,593 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table90
2023-07-11 14:16:26,593 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv603922701=4, srv147651029=0, srv2136239425=2, srv2118521717=1, srv886850468=5, srv233916608=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,593 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,593 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,593 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,594 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,594 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,594 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,594 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,594 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table90) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,594 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table91
2023-07-11 14:16:26,594 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv603922701=4, srv147651029=0, srv2136239425=2, srv2118521717=1, srv886850468=5, srv233916608=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,594 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,594 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,594 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,594 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,594 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,594 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,594 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,594 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table91) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,594 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table92
2023-07-11 14:16:26,594 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv603922701=4, srv147651029=0, srv2136239425=2, srv2118521717=1, srv886850468=5, srv233916608=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,594 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,594 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,594 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,594 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,594 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,594 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,594 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,594 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table92) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,595 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table93
2023-07-11 14:16:26,595 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv603922701=4, srv147651029=0, srv2136239425=2, srv2118521717=1, srv886850468=5, srv233916608=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,595 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,595 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,595 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,595 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,595 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,595 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,595 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,595 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table93) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,595 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1025
2023-07-11 14:16:26,595 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv603922701=4, srv147651029=0, srv2136239425=2, srv2118521717=1, srv886850468=5, srv233916608=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,595 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,595 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,595 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,595 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,595 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,595 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,595 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,595 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1025) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,595 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1267
2023-07-11 14:16:26,595 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv603922701=4, srv147651029=0, srv2136239425=2, srv2118521717=1, srv886850468=5, srv233916608=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,595 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,595 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,595 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,595 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,595 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,596 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,596 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,596 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1267) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,596 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table94
2023-07-11 14:16:26,596 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv603922701=4, srv147651029=0, srv2136239425=2, srv2118521717=1, srv886850468=5, srv233916608=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,596 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,596 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,596 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,596 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,596 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,596 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,596 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,596 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table94) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,596 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1026
2023-07-11 14:16:26,596 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv603922701=4, srv147651029=0, srv2136239425=2, srv2118521717=1, srv886850468=5, srv233916608=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,596 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,596 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,596 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,596 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,596 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,596 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,596 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,596 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1026) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,596 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1268
2023-07-11 14:16:26,596 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv603922701=4, srv147651029=0, srv2136239425=2, srv2118521717=1, srv886850468=5, srv233916608=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,596 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,597 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,597 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,597 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,597 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,597 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,597 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,597 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1268) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,597 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table95
2023-07-11 14:16:26,597 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv603922701=4, srv147651029=0, srv2136239425=2, srv2118521717=1, srv886850468=5, srv233916608=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,597 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,597 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,597 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,597 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,597 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,597 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,597 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,597 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table95) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,597 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1027
2023-07-11 14:16:26,597 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv603922701=4, srv147651029=0, srv2136239425=2, srv2118521717=1, srv886850468=5, srv233916608=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,597 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,597 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,597 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,597 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,597 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,597 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,597 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,598 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1027) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,598 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1269
2023-07-11 14:16:26,598 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv603922701=4, srv147651029=0, srv2136239425=2, srv2118521717=1, srv886850468=5, srv233916608=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,598 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,598 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,598 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,598 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,598 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,598 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,598 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,598 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1269) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,598 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table96
2023-07-11 14:16:26,598 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv603922701=4, srv147651029=0, srv2136239425=2, srv2118521717=1, srv886850468=5, srv233916608=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,598 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,598 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,598 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,598 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,598 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,598 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,598 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,598 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table96) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,598 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1028
2023-07-11 14:16:26,598 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv603922701=4, srv147651029=0, srv2136239425=2, srv2118521717=1, srv886850468=5, srv233916608=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,598 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,598 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,598 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,598 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,599 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,599 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,599 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,599 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1028) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,599 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table97
2023-07-11 14:16:26,599 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv603922701=4, srv147651029=0, srv2136239425=2, srv2118521717=1, srv886850468=5, srv233916608=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,599 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,599 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,599 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,599 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,599 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,599 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,599 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,599 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table97) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,599 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1029
2023-07-11 14:16:26,599 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv603922701=4, srv147651029=0, srv2136239425=2, srv2118521717=1, srv886850468=5, srv233916608=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,599 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,599 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,599 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,599 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,599 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,599 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,599 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,599 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1029) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,599 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table98
2023-07-11 14:16:26,599 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv603922701=4, srv147651029=0, srv2136239425=2, srv2118521717=1, srv886850468=5, srv233916608=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,600 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,600 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,600 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,600 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,600 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,600 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,600 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,600 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table98) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,600 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table99
2023-07-11 14:16:26,600 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv603922701=4, srv147651029=0, srv2136239425=2, srv2118521717=1, srv886850468=5, srv233916608=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,600 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,600 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,600 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,600 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,600 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,600 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,600 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,600 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table99) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,600 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1490
2023-07-11 14:16:26,600 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv603922701=4, srv147651029=0, srv2136239425=2, srv2118521717=1, srv886850468=5, srv233916608=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,600 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,600 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,600 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,600 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,600 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,600 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,600 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,601 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1490) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,601 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1491
2023-07-11 14:16:26,601 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv603922701=4, srv147651029=0, srv2136239425=2, srv2118521717=1, srv886850468=5, srv233916608=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,601 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,601 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,601 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,601 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,601 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,601 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,601 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,601 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1491) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,601 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table990
2023-07-11 14:16:26,601 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv603922701=4, srv147651029=0, srv2136239425=2, srv2118521717=1, srv886850468=5, srv233916608=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,601 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,601 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,601 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,601 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,601 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,601 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,601 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,601 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table990) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,602 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1250
2023-07-11 14:16:26,602 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv603922701=4, srv147651029=0, srv2136239425=2, srv2118521717=1, srv886850468=5, srv233916608=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,602 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,602 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,602 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,602 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,602 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,602 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,602 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,602 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1250) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,602 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1492
2023-07-11 14:16:26,602 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv603922701=4, srv147651029=0, srv2136239425=2, srv2118521717=1, srv886850468=5, srv233916608=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,602 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,602 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,602 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,602 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,602 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,602 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,602 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,602 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1492) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,602 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table991
2023-07-11 14:16:26,602 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv603922701=4, srv147651029=0, srv2136239425=2, srv2118521717=1, srv886850468=5, srv233916608=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,602 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,602 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,602 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,602 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,603 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,603 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,603 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,603 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table991) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,603 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1251
2023-07-11 14:16:26,603 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv603922701=4, srv147651029=0, srv2136239425=2, srv2118521717=1, srv886850468=5, srv233916608=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,603 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,603 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,603 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,603 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,603 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,603 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,603 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,603 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1251) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,603 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1493
2023-07-11 14:16:26,603 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv603922701=4, srv147651029=0, srv2136239425=2, srv2118521717=1, srv886850468=5, srv233916608=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,603 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,603 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,603 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,603 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,603 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,603 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,603 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,603 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1493) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,603 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table750
2023-07-11 14:16:26,603 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv603922701=4, srv147651029=0, srv2136239425=2, srv2118521717=1, srv886850468=5, srv233916608=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,603 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,604 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,604 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,604 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,604 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,604 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,604 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,604 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table750) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,604 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table992
2023-07-11 14:16:26,604 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv603922701=4, srv147651029=0, srv2136239425=2, srv2118521717=1, srv886850468=5, srv233916608=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,604 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,604 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,604 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,604 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,604 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,604 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,604 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,604 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table992) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,604 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1010
2023-07-11 14:16:26,604 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv603922701=4, srv147651029=0, srv2136239425=2, srv2118521717=1, srv886850468=5, srv233916608=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,604 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,604 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,604 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,604 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,604 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,604 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,604 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,604 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1010) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,605 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1252
2023-07-11 14:16:26,605 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv603922701=4, srv147651029=0, srv2136239425=2, srv2118521717=1, srv886850468=5, srv233916608=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,605 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,605 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,605 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,605 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,605 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,605 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,605 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,605 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1252) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,605 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1494
2023-07-11 14:16:26,605 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv603922701=4, srv147651029=0, srv2136239425=2, srv2118521717=1, srv886850468=5, srv233916608=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,605 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,605 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,605 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,605 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,605 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,605 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,605 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,605 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1494) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,605 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table751
2023-07-11 14:16:26,605 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv603922701=4, srv147651029=0, srv2136239425=2, srv2118521717=1, srv886850468=5, srv233916608=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,605 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,605 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,605 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,605 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,605 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,606 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,606 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,606 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table751) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,606 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table993
2023-07-11 14:16:26,606 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv603922701=4, srv147651029=0, srv2136239425=2, srv2118521717=1, srv886850468=5, srv233916608=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,606 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,606 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,606 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,606 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,606 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,606 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,606 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,606 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table993) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,606 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1011
2023-07-11 14:16:26,606 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv603922701=4, srv147651029=0, srv2136239425=2, srv2118521717=1, srv886850468=5, srv233916608=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,606 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,606 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,606 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,606 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,606 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,606 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,606 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,606 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1011) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,606 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1253
2023-07-11 14:16:26,606 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv603922701=4, srv147651029=0, srv2136239425=2, srv2118521717=1, srv886850468=5, srv233916608=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,606 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,607 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,607 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,607 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,607 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,607 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,607 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,607 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1253) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,607 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1495
2023-07-11 14:16:26,607 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv603922701=4, srv147651029=0, srv2136239425=2, srv2118521717=1, srv886850468=5, srv233916608=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,607 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,607 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,607 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,607 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,607 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,607 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,607 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,607 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1495) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,607 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table510
2023-07-11 14:16:26,607 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv603922701=4, srv147651029=0, srv2136239425=2, srv2118521717=1, srv886850468=5, srv233916608=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,607 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,607 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,607 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,607 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,607 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,607 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,607 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,608 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table510) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,608 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table752
2023-07-11 14:16:26,608 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv603922701=4, srv147651029=0, srv2136239425=2, srv2118521717=1, srv886850468=5, srv233916608=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,608 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,608 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,608 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,608 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,608 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,608 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,608 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,608 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table752) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,608 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table994
2023-07-11 14:16:26,608 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv603922701=4, srv147651029=0, srv2136239425=2, srv2118521717=1, srv886850468=5, srv233916608=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,608 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,608 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,608 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,608 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,608 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,608 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,608 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,608 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table994) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,608 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1012
2023-07-11 14:16:26,608 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv603922701=4, srv147651029=0, srv2136239425=2, srv2118521717=1, srv886850468=5, srv233916608=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,608 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,608 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,608 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,608 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,609 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,609 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,609 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,609 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1012) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,609 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1254
2023-07-11 14:16:26,609 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv603922701=4, srv147651029=0, srv2136239425=2, srv2118521717=1, srv886850468=5, srv233916608=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,609 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,609 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,609 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,609 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,609 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,609 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,609 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,609 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1254) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,609 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1496
2023-07-11 14:16:26,609 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv603922701=4, srv147651029=0, srv2136239425=2, srv2118521717=1, srv886850468=5, srv233916608=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,609 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,609 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,609 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,609 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,609 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,609 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,610 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,610 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1496) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,610 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table511
2023-07-11 14:16:26,610 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv603922701=4, srv147651029=0, srv2136239425=2, srv2118521717=1, srv886850468=5, srv233916608=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,610 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,610 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,610 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,610 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,610 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,610 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,610 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,610 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table511) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,610 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table753
2023-07-11 14:16:26,610 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv603922701=4, srv147651029=0, srv2136239425=2, srv2118521717=1, srv886850468=5, srv233916608=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,610 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,610 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,610 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,610 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,610 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,610 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,610 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,610 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table753) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,610 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table995
2023-07-11 14:16:26,610 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv603922701=4, srv147651029=0, srv2136239425=2, srv2118521717=1, srv886850468=5, srv233916608=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,610 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,610 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,611 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,611 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,611 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,611 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,611 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,611 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table995) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,611 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1013
2023-07-11 14:16:26,611 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv603922701=4, srv147651029=0, srv2136239425=2, srv2118521717=1, srv886850468=5, srv233916608=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,611 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,611 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,611 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,611 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,611 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,611 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,611 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,611 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1013) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,611 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1255
2023-07-11 14:16:26,611 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv603922701=4, srv147651029=0, srv2136239425=2, srv2118521717=1, srv886850468=5, srv233916608=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,611 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,611 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,611 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,611 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,611 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,611 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,611 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,611 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1255) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,611 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1497
2023-07-11 14:16:26,612 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv603922701=4, srv147651029=0, srv2136239425=2, srv2118521717=1, srv886850468=5, srv233916608=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,612 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,612 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,612 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,612 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,612 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,612 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,612 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,612 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1497) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,612 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table512
2023-07-11 14:16:26,612 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv603922701=4, srv147651029=0, srv2136239425=2, srv2118521717=1, srv886850468=5, srv233916608=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,612 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,612 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,612 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,612 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,612 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,612 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,612 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,612 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table512) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,612 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table754
2023-07-11 14:16:26,612 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv603922701=4, srv147651029=0, srv2136239425=2, srv2118521717=1, srv886850468=5, srv233916608=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,612 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,612 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,612 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,612 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,612 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,612 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,613 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,613 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table754) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,613 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table996
2023-07-11 14:16:26,613 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv603922701=4, srv147651029=0, srv2136239425=2, srv2118521717=1, srv886850468=5, srv233916608=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,613 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,613 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,613 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,613 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,613 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,613 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,613 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,613 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table996) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,613 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table513
2023-07-11 14:16:26,613 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv603922701=4, srv147651029=0, srv2136239425=2, srv2118521717=1, srv886850468=5, srv233916608=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,613 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,613 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,613 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,613 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,613 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,613 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,613 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,613 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table513) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,613 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table755
2023-07-11 14:16:26,613 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv603922701=4, srv147651029=0, srv2136239425=2, srv2118521717=1, srv886850468=5, srv233916608=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,613 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,613 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,613 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,614 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,614 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,614 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,614 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,614 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table755) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,614 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table997
2023-07-11 14:16:26,614 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv603922701=4, srv147651029=0, srv2136239425=2, srv2118521717=1, srv886850468=5, srv233916608=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,614 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,614 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,614 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,614 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,614 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,614 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,614 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,614 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table997) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,614 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table514
2023-07-11 14:16:26,614 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv603922701=4, srv147651029=0, srv2136239425=2, srv2118521717=1, srv886850468=5, srv233916608=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,614 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,614 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,614 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,614 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,614 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,614 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,614 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,614 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table514) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,614 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table756
2023-07-11 14:16:26,614 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv603922701=4, srv147651029=0, srv2136239425=2, srv2118521717=1, srv886850468=5, srv233916608=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,615 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,615 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,615 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,615 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,615 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,615 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,615 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,615 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table756) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,615 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table998
2023-07-11 14:16:26,615 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv603922701=4, srv147651029=0, srv2136239425=2, srv2118521717=1, srv886850468=5, srv233916608=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,615 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,615 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,615 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,615 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,615 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,615 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,615 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,615 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table998) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,615 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table515
2023-07-11 14:16:26,615 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv603922701=4, srv147651029=0, srv2136239425=2, srv2118521717=1, srv886850468=5, srv233916608=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,615 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,615 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,615 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,615 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,615 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,615 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,615 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,616 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table515) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,616 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table757
2023-07-11 14:16:26,616 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv603922701=4, srv147651029=0, srv2136239425=2, srv2118521717=1, srv886850468=5, srv233916608=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,616 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,616 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,616 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,616 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,616 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,616 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,616 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,616 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table757) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,616 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table999
2023-07-11 14:16:26,616 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv603922701=4, srv147651029=0, srv2136239425=2, srv2118521717=1, srv886850468=5, srv233916608=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,616 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,616 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,616 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,616 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,616 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,616 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,616 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,616 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table999) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,616 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table516
2023-07-11 14:16:26,616 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv603922701=4, srv147651029=0, srv2136239425=2, srv2118521717=1, srv886850468=5, srv233916608=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,616 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,616 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,616 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,616 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,617 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,617 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,617 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,617 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table516) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,617 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table758
2023-07-11 14:16:26,617 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv603922701=4, srv147651029=0, srv2136239425=2, srv2118521717=1, srv886850468=5, srv233916608=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,617 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,617 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,617 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,617 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,617 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,617 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,617 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,617 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table758) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,617 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table517
2023-07-11 14:16:26,617 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv603922701=4, srv147651029=0, srv2136239425=2, srv2118521717=1, srv886850468=5, srv233916608=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,617 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,617 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,617 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,617 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,617 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,617 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,617 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,617 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table517) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,618 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table759
2023-07-11 14:16:26,618 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv603922701=4, srv147651029=0, srv2136239425=2, srv2118521717=1, srv886850468=5, srv233916608=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,618 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,618 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,618 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,618 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,618 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,618 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,618 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,618 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table759) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,618 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table518
2023-07-11 14:16:26,618 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv603922701=4, srv147651029=0, srv2136239425=2, srv2118521717=1, srv886850468=5, srv233916608=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,618 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,618 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,618 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,618 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,618 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,618 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,618 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,618 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table518) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,618 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table519
2023-07-11 14:16:26,618 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv603922701=4, srv147651029=0, srv2136239425=2, srv2118521717=1, srv886850468=5, srv233916608=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,618 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,619 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,619 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,619 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,619 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,619 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,619 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,619 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table519) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,619 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table80
2023-07-11 14:16:26,619 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv603922701=4, srv147651029=0, srv2136239425=2, srv2118521717=1, srv886850468=5, srv233916608=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,619 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,619 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,619 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,619 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,619 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,619 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,619 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,619 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table80) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,619 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table81
2023-07-11 14:16:26,619 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv603922701=4, srv147651029=0, srv2136239425=2, srv2118521717=1, srv886850468=5, srv233916608=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,619 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,619 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,619 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,619 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,619 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,619 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,619 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,620 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table81) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,620 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table82
2023-07-11 14:16:26,620 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv603922701=4, srv147651029=0, srv2136239425=2, srv2118521717=1, srv886850468=5, srv233916608=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,620 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,620 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,620 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,620 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,620 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,620 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,620 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,620 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table82) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,620 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1014
2023-07-11 14:16:26,620 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv603922701=4, srv147651029=0, srv2136239425=2, srv2118521717=1, srv886850468=5, srv233916608=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,620 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,620 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,620 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,620 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,620 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,620 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,620 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,620 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1014) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,620 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1256
2023-07-11 14:16:26,620 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv603922701=4, srv147651029=0, srv2136239425=2, srv2118521717=1, srv886850468=5, srv233916608=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,620 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,620 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,620 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,621 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,621 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,621 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,621 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,621 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1256) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,621 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1498
2023-07-11 14:16:26,621 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv603922701=4, srv147651029=0, srv2136239425=2, srv2118521717=1, srv886850468=5, srv233916608=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,621 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,621 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,621 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,621 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,621 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,621 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,621 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,621 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1498) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,621 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table83
2023-07-11 14:16:26,621 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv603922701=4, srv147651029=0, srv2136239425=2, srv2118521717=1, srv886850468=5, srv233916608=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,621 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,621 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,621 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,621 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,621 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,621 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,621 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,621 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table83) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,621 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1015
2023-07-11 14:16:26,622 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv603922701=4, srv147651029=0, srv2136239425=2, srv2118521717=1, srv886850468=5, srv233916608=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,622 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,622 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,622 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,622 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,622 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,622 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,622 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,622 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1015) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,622 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1257
2023-07-11 14:16:26,622 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv603922701=4, srv147651029=0, srv2136239425=2, srv2118521717=1, srv886850468=5, srv233916608=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,622 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,622 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,622 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,622 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,622 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,622 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,622 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,622 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1257) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,622 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1499
2023-07-11 14:16:26,622 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv603922701=4, srv147651029=0, srv2136239425=2, srv2118521717=1, srv886850468=5, srv233916608=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,622 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,622 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,622 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,622 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,622 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,622 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,622 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,623 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1499) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,623 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table84
2023-07-11 14:16:26,623 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv603922701=4, srv147651029=0, srv2136239425=2, srv2118521717=1, srv886850468=5, srv233916608=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,623 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,623 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,623 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,623 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,623 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,623 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,623 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,623 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table84) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,623 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1016
2023-07-11 14:16:26,623 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv603922701=4, srv147651029=0, srv2136239425=2, srv2118521717=1, srv886850468=5, srv233916608=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,623 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,623 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,623 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,623 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,623 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,623 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,623 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,623 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1016) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,623 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1258
2023-07-11 14:16:26,623 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv603922701=4, srv147651029=0, srv2136239425=2, srv2118521717=1, srv886850468=5, srv233916608=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,623 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,623 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,623 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,624 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,624 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,624 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,624 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,624 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1258) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,624 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table85
2023-07-11 14:16:26,624 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv603922701=4, srv147651029=0, srv2136239425=2, srv2118521717=1, srv886850468=5, srv233916608=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,624 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,624 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,624 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,624 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,624 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,624 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,624 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,624 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table85) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,624 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1017
2023-07-11 14:16:26,624 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv603922701=4, srv147651029=0, srv2136239425=2, srv2118521717=1, srv886850468=5, srv233916608=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,624 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,624 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,624 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,624 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,624 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,624 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,624 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,624 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1017) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,624 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1259
2023-07-11 14:16:26,625 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv603922701=4, srv147651029=0, srv2136239425=2, srv2118521717=1, srv886850468=5, srv233916608=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,625 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,625 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,625 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,625 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,625 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,625 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,625 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,625 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1259) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,625 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table86
2023-07-11 14:16:26,625 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv603922701=4, srv147651029=0, srv2136239425=2, srv2118521717=1, srv886850468=5, srv233916608=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,625 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,625 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,625 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,625 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,625 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,625 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,625 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,625 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table86) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,625 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1018
2023-07-11 14:16:26,625 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv603922701=4, srv147651029=0, srv2136239425=2, srv2118521717=1, srv886850468=5, srv233916608=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,625 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,625 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,625 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,625 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,625 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,625 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,626 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,626 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1018) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,626 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table87
2023-07-11 14:16:26,626 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv603922701=4, srv147651029=0, srv2136239425=2, srv2118521717=1, srv886850468=5, srv233916608=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,626 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,626 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,626 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,626 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,626 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,626 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,626 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,626 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table87) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,626 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1019
2023-07-11 14:16:26,626 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv603922701=4, srv147651029=0, srv2136239425=2, srv2118521717=1, srv886850468=5, srv233916608=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,626 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,626 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,626 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,626 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,626 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,626 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,626 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,627 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1019) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,627 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table88
2023-07-11 14:16:26,627 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv603922701=4, srv147651029=0, srv2136239425=2, srv2118521717=1, srv886850468=5, srv233916608=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,627 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,627 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,627 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,627 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,627 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,627 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,627 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,627 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table88) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,627 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table89
2023-07-11 14:16:26,627 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv603922701=4, srv147651029=0, srv2136239425=2, srv2118521717=1, srv886850468=5, srv233916608=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,627 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,627 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,627 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,627 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,627 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,627 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,627 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,627 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table89) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,627 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table79
2023-07-11 14:16:26,627 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv603922701=4, srv147651029=0, srv2136239425=2, srv2118521717=1, srv886850468=5, srv233916608=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,627 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,627 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,627 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,628 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,628 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,628 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,628 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,628 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table79) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,628 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table780
2023-07-11 14:16:26,628 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv603922701=4, srv147651029=0, srv2136239425=2, srv2118521717=1, srv886850468=5, srv233916608=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,628 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,628 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,628 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,628 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,628 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,628 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,628 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,628 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table780) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,628 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1480
2023-07-11 14:16:26,628 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv603922701=4, srv147651029=0, srv2136239425=2, srv2118521717=1, srv886850468=5, srv233916608=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,628 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,628 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,628 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,628 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,628 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,628 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,628 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,628 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1480) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,628 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table781
2023-07-11 14:16:26,629 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv603922701=4, srv147651029=0, srv2136239425=2, srv2118521717=1, srv886850468=5, srv233916608=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,629 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,629 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,629 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,629 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,629 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,629 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,629 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,629 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table781) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,629 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1481
2023-07-11 14:16:26,629 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv603922701=4, srv147651029=0, srv2136239425=2, srv2118521717=1, srv886850468=5, srv233916608=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,629 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,629 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,629 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,629 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,629 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,629 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,629 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,629 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1481) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,629 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table540
2023-07-11 14:16:26,629 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv603922701=4, srv147651029=0, srv2136239425=2, srv2118521717=1, srv886850468=5, srv233916608=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,629 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,629 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,629 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,629 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,629 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,629 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,630 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,630 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table540) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,630 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table782
2023-07-11 14:16:26,630 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv603922701=4, srv147651029=0, srv2136239425=2, srv2118521717=1, srv886850468=5, srv233916608=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,630 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,630 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,630 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,630 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,630 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,630 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,630 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,630 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table782) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,630 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1240
2023-07-11 14:16:26,630 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv603922701=4, srv147651029=0, srv2136239425=2, srv2118521717=1, srv886850468=5, srv233916608=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,630 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,630 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,630 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,630 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,630 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,630 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,630 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,630 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1240) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,630 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1482
2023-07-11 14:16:26,630 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv603922701=4, srv147651029=0, srv2136239425=2, srv2118521717=1, srv886850468=5, srv233916608=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,630 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,630 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,631 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,631 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,631 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,631 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,631 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,631 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1482) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,631 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table541
2023-07-11 14:16:26,631 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv603922701=4, srv147651029=0, srv2136239425=2, srv2118521717=1, srv886850468=5, srv233916608=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,631 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,631 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,631 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,631 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,631 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,631 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,631 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,631 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table541) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,631 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table783
2023-07-11 14:16:26,631 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv603922701=4, srv147651029=0, srv2136239425=2, srv2118521717=1, srv886850468=5, srv233916608=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,631 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,631 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,631 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,631 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,631 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,631 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,631 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,631 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table783) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,631 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1241
2023-07-11 14:16:26,631 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv603922701=4, srv147651029=0, srv2136239425=2, srv2118521717=1, srv886850468=5, srv233916608=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,632 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,632 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,632 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,632 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,632 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,632 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,632 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,632 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1241) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,632 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1483
2023-07-11 14:16:26,632 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv603922701=4, srv147651029=0, srv2136239425=2, srv2118521717=1, srv886850468=5, srv233916608=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,632 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,632 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,632 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,632 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,632 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,632 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,632 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,632 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1483) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,632 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table300
2023-07-11 14:16:26,632 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv603922701=4, srv147651029=0, srv2136239425=2, srv2118521717=1, srv886850468=5, srv233916608=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,632 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,632 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,632 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,632 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,632 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,632 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,633 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,633 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table300) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,633 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table542
2023-07-11 14:16:26,633 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv603922701=4, srv147651029=0, srv2136239425=2, srv2118521717=1, srv886850468=5, srv233916608=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,633 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,633 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,633 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,633 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,633 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,633 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,633 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,633 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table542) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,633 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table784
2023-07-11 14:16:26,633 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv603922701=4, srv147651029=0, srv2136239425=2, srv2118521717=1, srv886850468=5, srv233916608=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,633 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,633 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,633 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,633 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,633 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,633 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,633 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,633 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table784) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,633 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1000
2023-07-11 14:16:26,633 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv603922701=4, srv147651029=0, srv2136239425=2, srv2118521717=1, srv886850468=5, srv233916608=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,633 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,633 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,634 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,634 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,634 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,634 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,634 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,634 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1000) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,634 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1242
2023-07-11 14:16:26,634 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv603922701=4, srv147651029=0, srv2136239425=2, srv2118521717=1, srv886850468=5, srv233916608=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,634 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,634 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,634 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,634 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,634 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,634 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,634 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,634 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1242) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,634 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1484
2023-07-11 14:16:26,634 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv603922701=4, srv147651029=0, srv2136239425=2, srv2118521717=1, srv886850468=5, srv233916608=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,634 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,634 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,634 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,634 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,634 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,634 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,634 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,634 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1484) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,635 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table301
2023-07-11 14:16:26,635 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv603922701=4, srv147651029=0, srv2136239425=2, srv2118521717=1, srv886850468=5, srv233916608=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,635 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,635 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,635 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,635 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,635 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,635 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,635 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,635 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table301) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,635 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table543
2023-07-11 14:16:26,635 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv603922701=4, srv147651029=0, srv2136239425=2, srv2118521717=1, srv886850468=5, srv233916608=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,635 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,635 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,635 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,635 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,635 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,635 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,635 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,635 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table543) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,635 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table785
2023-07-11 14:16:26,635 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv603922701=4, srv147651029=0, srv2136239425=2, srv2118521717=1, srv886850468=5, srv233916608=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,636 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,636 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,636 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,636 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,636 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,636 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,636 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,636 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table785) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,636 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1001
2023-07-11 14:16:26,636 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv603922701=4, srv147651029=0, srv2136239425=2, srv2118521717=1, srv886850468=5, srv233916608=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,636 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,636 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,636 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,636 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,636 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,636 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,636 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,636 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1001) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,636 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1243
2023-07-11 14:16:26,636 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv603922701=4, srv147651029=0, srv2136239425=2, srv2118521717=1, srv886850468=5, srv233916608=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,636 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,636 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,636 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,636 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,636 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,636 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,636 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,637 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1243) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,637 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1485
2023-07-11 14:16:26,637 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv603922701=4, srv147651029=0, srv2136239425=2, srv2118521717=1, srv886850468=5, srv233916608=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,637 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,637 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,637 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,637 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,637 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,637 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,637 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,637 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1485) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,637 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table302
2023-07-11 14:16:26,637 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv603922701=4, srv147651029=0, srv2136239425=2, srv2118521717=1, srv886850468=5, srv233916608=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,637 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,637 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,637 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,637 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,637 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,637 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,637 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,637 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table302) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,637 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table544
2023-07-11 14:16:26,637 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv603922701=4, srv147651029=0, srv2136239425=2, srv2118521717=1, srv886850468=5, srv233916608=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,637 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,637 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,637 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,638 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,638 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,638 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,638 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,638 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table544) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,638 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table786
2023-07-11 14:16:26,638 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv603922701=4, srv147651029=0, srv2136239425=2, srv2118521717=1, srv886850468=5, srv233916608=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,638 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,638 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,638 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,638 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,638 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,638 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,638 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,638 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table786) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,638 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1002
2023-07-11 14:16:26,638 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv603922701=4, srv147651029=0, srv2136239425=2, srv2118521717=1, srv886850468=5, srv233916608=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,638 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,638 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,638 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,638 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,638 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,638 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,638 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,638 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1002) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,638 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1244
2023-07-11 14:16:26,638 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv603922701=4, srv147651029=0, srv2136239425=2, srv2118521717=1, srv886850468=5, srv233916608=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,639 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,639 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,639 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,639 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,639 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,639 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,639 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,639 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1244) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,639 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1486
2023-07-11 14:16:26,639 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv603922701=4, srv147651029=0, srv2136239425=2, srv2118521717=1, srv886850468=5, srv233916608=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,639 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,639 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,639 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,639 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,639 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,639 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,639 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,639 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1486) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,639 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table303
2023-07-11 14:16:26,639 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv603922701=4, srv147651029=0, srv2136239425=2, srv2118521717=1, srv886850468=5, srv233916608=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,639 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,639 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,639 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,639 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,639 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,639 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,639 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,640 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table303) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,640 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table545
2023-07-11 14:16:26,640 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv603922701=4, srv147651029=0, srv2136239425=2, srv2118521717=1, srv886850468=5, srv233916608=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,640 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,640 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,640 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,640 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,640 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,640 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,640 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,640 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table545) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,640 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table787
2023-07-11 14:16:26,640 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv603922701=4, srv147651029=0, srv2136239425=2, srv2118521717=1, srv886850468=5, srv233916608=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,640 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,640 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,640 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,640 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,640 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,640 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,640 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,640 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table787) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,640 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table304
2023-07-11 14:16:26,640 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv603922701=4, srv147651029=0, srv2136239425=2, srv2118521717=1, srv886850468=5, srv233916608=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,640 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,640 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,640 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,641 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,641 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,641 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,641 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,641 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table304) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,641 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table546
2023-07-11 14:16:26,641 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv603922701=4, srv147651029=0, srv2136239425=2, srv2118521717=1, srv886850468=5, srv233916608=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,641 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,641 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,641 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,641 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,641 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,641 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,641 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,641 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table546) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,641 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table788
2023-07-11 14:16:26,641 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv603922701=4, srv147651029=0, srv2136239425=2, srv2118521717=1, srv886850468=5, srv233916608=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,641 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,641 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,641 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,641 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,641 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,641 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,641 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,641 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table788) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,641 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table305
2023-07-11 14:16:26,642 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv603922701=4, srv147651029=0, srv2136239425=2, srv2118521717=1, srv886850468=5, srv233916608=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,642 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,642 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,642 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,642 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,642 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,642 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,642 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,642 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table305) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,642 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table547
2023-07-11 14:16:26,642 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv603922701=4, srv147651029=0, srv2136239425=2, srv2118521717=1, srv886850468=5, srv233916608=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,642 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,642 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,642 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,642 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,642 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,642 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,642 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,642 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table547) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,642 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table789
2023-07-11 14:16:26,642 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv603922701=4, srv147651029=0, srv2136239425=2, srv2118521717=1, srv886850468=5, srv233916608=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,642 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,642 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,642 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,642 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,642 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,642 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,643 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,643 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table789) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,643 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table306
2023-07-11 14:16:26,643 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv603922701=4, srv147651029=0, srv2136239425=2, srv2118521717=1, srv886850468=5, srv233916608=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,643 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,643 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,643 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,643 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,643 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,643 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,643 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,643 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table306) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,643 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table548
2023-07-11 14:16:26,643 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv603922701=4, srv147651029=0, srv2136239425=2, srv2118521717=1, srv886850468=5, srv233916608=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,643 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,643 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,643 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,643 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,643 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,643 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,643 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,643 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table548) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,644 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table307
2023-07-11 14:16:26,644 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv603922701=4, srv147651029=0, srv2136239425=2, srv2118521717=1, srv886850468=5, srv233916608=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,644 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,644 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,644 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,644 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,644 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,644 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,644 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,644 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table307) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,644 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table549
2023-07-11 14:16:26,644 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv603922701=4, srv147651029=0, srv2136239425=2, srv2118521717=1, srv886850468=5, srv233916608=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,644 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,644 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,644 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,644 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,644 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,644 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,644 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,644 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table549) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,644 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table308
2023-07-11 14:16:26,644 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv603922701=4, srv147651029=0, srv2136239425=2, srv2118521717=1, srv886850468=5, srv233916608=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,644 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,644 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,644 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,644 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,645 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,645 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,645 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,645 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table308) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,645 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table309
2023-07-11 14:16:26,645 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv603922701=4, srv147651029=0, srv2136239425=2, srv2118521717=1, srv886850468=5, srv233916608=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,645 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,645 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,645 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,645 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,645 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,645 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,645 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,645 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table309) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,645 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table70
2023-07-11 14:16:26,645 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv603922701=4, srv147651029=0, srv2136239425=2, srv2118521717=1, srv886850468=5, srv233916608=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,645 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,645 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,645 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,645 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,645 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,645 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,645 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,645 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table70) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,645 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table71
2023-07-11 14:16:26,646 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv603922701=4, srv147651029=0, srv2136239425=2, srv2118521717=1, srv886850468=5, srv233916608=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,646 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,646 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,646 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,646 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,646 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,646 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,646 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,646 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table71) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,646 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1003
2023-07-11 14:16:26,646 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv603922701=4, srv147651029=0, srv2136239425=2, srv2118521717=1, srv886850468=5, srv233916608=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,646 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,646 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,646 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,646 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,646 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,646 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,646 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,646 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1003) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,646 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1245
2023-07-11 14:16:26,646 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv603922701=4, srv147651029=0, srv2136239425=2, srv2118521717=1, srv886850468=5, srv233916608=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,646 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,646 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,646 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,646 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,646 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,646 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,647 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,647 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1245) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,647 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1487
2023-07-11 14:16:26,647 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv603922701=4, srv147651029=0, srv2136239425=2, srv2118521717=1, srv886850468=5, srv233916608=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,647 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,647 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,647 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,647 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,647 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,647 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,647 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,647 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1487) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,647 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table72
2023-07-11 14:16:26,647 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv603922701=4, srv147651029=0, srv2136239425=2, srv2118521717=1, srv886850468=5, srv233916608=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,647 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,647 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,647 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,647 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,647 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,647 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,647 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,647 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table72) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,647 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1004
2023-07-11 14:16:26,647 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv603922701=4, srv147651029=0, srv2136239425=2, srv2118521717=1, srv886850468=5, srv233916608=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,647 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,647 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,647 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,648 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,648 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,648 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,648 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,648 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1004) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,648 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1246
2023-07-11 14:16:26,648 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv603922701=4, srv147651029=0, srv2136239425=2, srv2118521717=1, srv886850468=5, srv233916608=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,648 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,648 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,648 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,648 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,648 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,648 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,648 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,648 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1246) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,648 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1488
2023-07-11 14:16:26,648 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv603922701=4, srv147651029=0, srv2136239425=2, srv2118521717=1, srv886850468=5, srv233916608=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,648 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,648 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,648 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,648 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,648 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,648 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,648 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,648 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1488) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,648 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table73
2023-07-11 14:16:26,649 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv603922701=4, srv147651029=0, srv2136239425=2, srv2118521717=1, srv886850468=5, srv233916608=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,649 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,649 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,649 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,649 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,649 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,649 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,649 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,649 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table73) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,649 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1005
2023-07-11 14:16:26,649 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv603922701=4, srv147651029=0, srv2136239425=2, srv2118521717=1, srv886850468=5, srv233916608=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,649 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,649 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,649 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,649 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,649 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,649 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,649 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,649 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1005) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,649 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1247
2023-07-11 14:16:26,649 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv603922701=4, srv147651029=0, srv2136239425=2, srv2118521717=1, srv886850468=5, srv233916608=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,649 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,649 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,649 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,649 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,649 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,649 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,650 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,650 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1247) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,650 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1489
2023-07-11 14:16:26,650 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv603922701=4, srv147651029=0, srv2136239425=2, srv2118521717=1, srv886850468=5, srv233916608=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,650 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,650 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,650 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,650 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,650 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,650 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,650 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,650 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1489) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,650 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table74
2023-07-11 14:16:26,650 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv603922701=4, srv147651029=0, srv2136239425=2, srv2118521717=1, srv886850468=5, srv233916608=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,650 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,650 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,650 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,650 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,650 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,650 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,650 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,650 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table74) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,650 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1006
2023-07-11 14:16:26,650 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv603922701=4, srv147651029=0, srv2136239425=2, srv2118521717=1, srv886850468=5, srv233916608=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,650 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,651 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,651 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,651 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,651 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,651 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,651 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,651 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1006) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,651 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1248
2023-07-11 14:16:26,651 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv603922701=4, srv147651029=0, srv2136239425=2, srv2118521717=1, srv886850468=5, srv233916608=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,651 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,651 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,651 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,651 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,651 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,651 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,651 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,651 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1248) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,651 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table75
2023-07-11 14:16:26,651 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv603922701=4, srv147651029=0, srv2136239425=2, srv2118521717=1, srv886850468=5, srv233916608=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,651 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,651 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,651 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,651 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,651 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,651 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,651 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,651 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table75) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,652 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1007
2023-07-11 14:16:26,652 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv603922701=4, srv147651029=0, srv2136239425=2, srv2118521717=1, srv886850468=5, srv233916608=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,652 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,652 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,652 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,652 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,652 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,652 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,652 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,652 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1007) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,652 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1249
2023-07-11 14:16:26,652 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv603922701=4, srv147651029=0, srv2136239425=2, srv2118521717=1, srv886850468=5, srv233916608=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,652 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,652 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,652 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,652 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,652 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,652 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,652 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,652 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1249) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,652 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table76
2023-07-11 14:16:26,652 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv603922701=4, srv147651029=0, srv2136239425=2, srv2118521717=1, srv886850468=5, srv233916608=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,653 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,653 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,653 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,653 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,653 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,653 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,653 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,653 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table76) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,653 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1008
2023-07-11 14:16:26,653 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv603922701=4, srv147651029=0, srv2136239425=2, srv2118521717=1, srv886850468=5, srv233916608=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,653 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,653 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,653 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,653 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,653 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,653 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,653 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,653 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1008) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,653 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table77
2023-07-11 14:16:26,653 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv603922701=4, srv147651029=0, srv2136239425=2, srv2118521717=1, srv886850468=5, srv233916608=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,653 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,653 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,653 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,653 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,653 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,653 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,653 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,654 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table77) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,654 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1009
2023-07-11 14:16:26,654 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv603922701=4, srv147651029=0, srv2136239425=2, srv2118521717=1, srv886850468=5, srv233916608=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,654 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,654 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,654 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,654 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,654 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,654 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,654 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,654 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1009) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,654 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table78
2023-07-11 14:16:26,654 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv603922701=4, srv147651029=0, srv2136239425=2, srv2118521717=1, srv886850468=5, srv233916608=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,654 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,654 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,654 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,654 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,654 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,654 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,654 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,654 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table78) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,654 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table68
2023-07-11 14:16:26,654 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv603922701=4, srv147651029=0, srv2136239425=2, srv2118521717=1, srv886850468=5, srv233916608=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,654 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,654 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,654 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,655 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,655 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,655 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,655 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,655 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table68) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,655 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table69
2023-07-11 14:16:26,655 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv603922701=4, srv147651029=0, srv2136239425=2, srv2118521717=1, srv886850468=5, srv233916608=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,655 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,655 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,655 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,655 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,655 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,655 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,655 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,655 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table69) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,655 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table770
2023-07-11 14:16:26,655 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv603922701=4, srv147651029=0, srv2136239425=2, srv2118521717=1, srv886850468=5, srv233916608=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,655 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,655 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,655 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,655 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,655 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,655 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,655 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,655 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table770) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,655 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1470
2023-07-11 14:16:26,656 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv603922701=4, srv147651029=0, srv2136239425=2, srv2118521717=1, srv886850468=5, srv233916608=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,656 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,656 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,656 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,656 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,656 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,656 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,656 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,656 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1470) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,656 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table771
2023-07-11 14:16:26,656 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv603922701=4, srv147651029=0, srv2136239425=2, srv2118521717=1, srv886850468=5, srv233916608=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,656 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,656 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,656 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,656 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,656 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,656 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,656 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,656 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table771) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,656 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1471
2023-07-11 14:16:26,656 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv603922701=4, srv147651029=0, srv2136239425=2, srv2118521717=1, srv886850468=5, srv233916608=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,656 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,656 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,656 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,656 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,656 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,656 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,656 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,657 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1471) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,657 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table530
2023-07-11 14:16:26,657 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv603922701=4, srv147651029=0, srv2136239425=2, srv2118521717=1, srv886850468=5, srv233916608=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,657 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,657 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,657 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,657 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,657 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,657 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,657 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,657 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table530) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,657 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table772
2023-07-11 14:16:26,657 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv603922701=4, srv147651029=0, srv2136239425=2, srv2118521717=1, srv886850468=5, srv233916608=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,657 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,657 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,657 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,657 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,657 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,657 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,657 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,657 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table772) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,657 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1230
2023-07-11 14:16:26,657 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv603922701=4, srv147651029=0, srv2136239425=2, srv2118521717=1, srv886850468=5, srv233916608=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,657 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,657 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,657 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,658 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,658 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,658 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,658 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,658 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1230) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,658 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1472
2023-07-11 14:16:26,658 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv603922701=4, srv147651029=0, srv2136239425=2, srv2118521717=1, srv886850468=5, srv233916608=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,658 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,658 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,658 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,658 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,658 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,658 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,658 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,658 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1472) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,658 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table531
2023-07-11 14:16:26,658 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv603922701=4, srv147651029=0, srv2136239425=2, srv2118521717=1, srv886850468=5, srv233916608=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,658 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,658 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,658 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,658 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,658 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,658 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,658 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,658 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table531) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,658 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table773
2023-07-11 14:16:26,659 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv603922701=4, srv147651029=0, srv2136239425=2, srv2118521717=1, srv886850468=5, srv233916608=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,659 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,659 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,659 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,659 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,659 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,659 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,659 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,659 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table773) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,659 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1231
2023-07-11 14:16:26,659 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv603922701=4, srv147651029=0, srv2136239425=2, srv2118521717=1, srv886850468=5, srv233916608=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,659 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,659 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,659 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,659 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,659 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,659 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,659 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,659 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1231) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,659 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1473
2023-07-11 14:16:26,659 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv603922701=4, srv147651029=0, srv2136239425=2, srv2118521717=1, srv886850468=5, srv233916608=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,659 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,659 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,659 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,659 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,659 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,659 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,659 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,660 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1473) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,660 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table532
2023-07-11 14:16:26,660 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv603922701=4, srv147651029=0, srv2136239425=2, srv2118521717=1, srv886850468=5, srv233916608=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,660 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,660 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,660 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,660 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,660 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,660 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,660 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,660 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table532) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,660 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table774
2023-07-11 14:16:26,660 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv603922701=4, srv147651029=0, srv2136239425=2, srv2118521717=1, srv886850468=5, srv233916608=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,660 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,660 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,660 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,660 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,660 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,660 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,660 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,660 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table774) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,660 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1232
2023-07-11 14:16:26,661 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv603922701=4, srv147651029=0, srv2136239425=2, srv2118521717=1, srv886850468=5, srv233916608=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,661 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,661 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,661 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,661 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,661 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,661 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,661 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,661 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1232) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,661 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1474
2023-07-11 14:16:26,661 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv603922701=4, srv147651029=0, srv2136239425=2, srv2118521717=1, srv886850468=5, srv233916608=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,661 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,661 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,661 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,661 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,661 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,661 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,661 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,661 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1474) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,669 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table533
2023-07-11 14:16:26,670 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv603922701=4, srv147651029=0, srv2136239425=2, srv2118521717=1, srv886850468=5, srv233916608=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,670 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,670 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,670 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,670 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,670 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,670 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,670 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,670 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table533) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,670 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table775
2023-07-11 14:16:26,670 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv603922701=4, srv147651029=0, srv2136239425=2, srv2118521717=1, srv886850468=5, srv233916608=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,670 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,670 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,670 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,670 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,670 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,670 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,670 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,670 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table775) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,670 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1233
2023-07-11 14:16:26,670 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv603922701=4, srv147651029=0, srv2136239425=2, srv2118521717=1, srv886850468=5, srv233916608=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,670 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,670 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,670 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,670 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,671 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,671 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,671 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,671 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1233) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,671 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1475
2023-07-11 14:16:26,671 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv603922701=4, srv147651029=0, srv2136239425=2, srv2118521717=1, srv886850468=5, srv233916608=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,671 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,671 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,671 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,671 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,671 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,671 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,671 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,671 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1475) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,671 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table534
2023-07-11 14:16:26,671 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv603922701=4, srv147651029=0, srv2136239425=2, srv2118521717=1, srv886850468=5, srv233916608=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,671 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,671 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,671 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,671 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,671 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,671 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,671 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,671 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table534) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,671 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table776
2023-07-11 14:16:26,671 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv603922701=4, srv147651029=0, srv2136239425=2, srv2118521717=1, srv886850468=5, srv233916608=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,671 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,672 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,672 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,672 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,672 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,672 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,672 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,672 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table776) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,672 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table535
2023-07-11 14:16:26,672 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv603922701=4, srv147651029=0, srv2136239425=2, srv2118521717=1, srv886850468=5, srv233916608=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,672 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,672 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,672 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,672 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,672 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,672 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,672 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,672 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table535) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,672 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table777
2023-07-11 14:16:26,672 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv603922701=4, srv147651029=0, srv2136239425=2, srv2118521717=1, srv886850468=5, srv233916608=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,672 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,672 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,672 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,672 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,672 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,672 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,672 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,672 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table777) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,673 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table536
2023-07-11 14:16:26,673 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv603922701=4, srv147651029=0, srv2136239425=2, srv2118521717=1, srv886850468=5, srv233916608=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,673 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,673 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,673 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,673 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,673 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,673 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,673 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,673 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table536) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,673 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table778
2023-07-11 14:16:26,673 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv603922701=4, srv147651029=0, srv2136239425=2, srv2118521717=1, srv886850468=5, srv233916608=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,673 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,673 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,673 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,673 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,673 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,673 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,673 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,673 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table778) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,673 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table537
2023-07-11 14:16:26,673 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv603922701=4, srv147651029=0, srv2136239425=2, srv2118521717=1, srv886850468=5, srv233916608=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,673 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,673 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,673 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,673 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,674 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,674 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,674 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,674 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table537) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,674 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table779
2023-07-11 14:16:26,674 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv603922701=4, srv147651029=0, srv2136239425=2, srv2118521717=1, srv886850468=5, srv233916608=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,674 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,674 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,674 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,674 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,674 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,674 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,674 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,674 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table779) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,674 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table538
2023-07-11 14:16:26,674 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv603922701=4, srv147651029=0, srv2136239425=2, srv2118521717=1, srv886850468=5, srv233916608=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,674 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,674 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,674 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,674 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,674 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,674 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,674 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,674 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table538) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,674 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table539
2023-07-11 14:16:26,674 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv603922701=4, srv147651029=0, srv2136239425=2, srv2118521717=1, srv886850468=5, srv233916608=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,674 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,675 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,675 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,675 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,675 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,675 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,675 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,675 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table539) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,675 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table60
2023-07-11 14:16:26,675 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv603922701=4, srv147651029=0, srv2136239425=2, srv2118521717=1, srv886850468=5, srv233916608=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,675 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,675 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,675 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,675 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,675 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,675 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,675 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,675 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table60) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,675 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1234
2023-07-11 14:16:26,675 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv603922701=4, srv147651029=0, srv2136239425=2, srv2118521717=1, srv886850468=5, srv233916608=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,675 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,675 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,675 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,675 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,675 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,675 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,675 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,675 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1234) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,676 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1476
2023-07-11 14:16:26,676 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv603922701=4, srv147651029=0, srv2136239425=2, srv2118521717=1, srv886850468=5, srv233916608=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,676 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,676 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,676 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,676 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,676 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,676 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,676 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,676 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1476) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,676 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table61
2023-07-11 14:16:26,676 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv603922701=4, srv147651029=0, srv2136239425=2, srv2118521717=1, srv886850468=5, srv233916608=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,676 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,676 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,676 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,676 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,676 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,676 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,676 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,676 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table61) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,676 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1235
2023-07-11 14:16:26,676 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv603922701=4, srv147651029=0, srv2136239425=2, srv2118521717=1, srv886850468=5, srv233916608=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,676 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,676 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,676 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,676 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,676 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,677 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,677 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,677 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1235) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,677 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1477
2023-07-11 14:16:26,677 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv603922701=4, srv147651029=0, srv2136239425=2, srv2118521717=1, srv886850468=5, srv233916608=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,677 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,677 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,677 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,677 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,677 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,677 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,677 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,677 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1477) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,677 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table62
2023-07-11 14:16:26,678 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv603922701=4, srv147651029=0, srv2136239425=2, srv2118521717=1, srv886850468=5, srv233916608=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,678 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,678 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,678 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,678 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,678 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,678 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,678 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,678 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table62) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,678 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1236
2023-07-11 14:16:26,678 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv603922701=4, srv147651029=0, srv2136239425=2, srv2118521717=1, srv886850468=5, srv233916608=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,678 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,678 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,678 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,678 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,678 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,678 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,678 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,678 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1236) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,678 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1478
2023-07-11 14:16:26,678 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv603922701=4, srv147651029=0, srv2136239425=2, srv2118521717=1, srv886850468=5, srv233916608=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,678 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,678 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,678 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,678 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,678 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,678 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,679 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,679 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1478) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,679 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table63
2023-07-11 14:16:26,679 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv603922701=4, srv147651029=0, srv2136239425=2, srv2118521717=1, srv886850468=5, srv233916608=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,679 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,679 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,679 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,679 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,679 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,679 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,679 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,679 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table63) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,679 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1237
2023-07-11 14:16:26,679 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv603922701=4, srv147651029=0, srv2136239425=2, srv2118521717=1, srv886850468=5, srv233916608=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,679 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,679 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,679 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,679 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,679 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,679 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,679 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,679 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1237) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,679 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1479
2023-07-11 14:16:26,679 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv603922701=4, srv147651029=0, srv2136239425=2, srv2118521717=1, srv886850468=5, srv233916608=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,679 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,679 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,679 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,680 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,680 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,680 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,680 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,680 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1479) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,680 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table64
2023-07-11 14:16:26,680 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv603922701=4, srv147651029=0, srv2136239425=2, srv2118521717=1, srv886850468=5, srv233916608=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,680 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,680 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,680 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,680 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,680 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,680 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,680 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,680 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table64) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,680 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1238
2023-07-11 14:16:26,680 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv603922701=4, srv147651029=0, srv2136239425=2, srv2118521717=1, srv886850468=5, srv233916608=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,680 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,680 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,680 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,680 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,680 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,680 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,680 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,680 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1238) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,680 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table65
2023-07-11 14:16:26,681 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv603922701=4, srv147651029=0, srv2136239425=2, srv2118521717=1, srv886850468=5, srv233916608=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,681 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,681 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,681 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,681 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,681 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,681 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,681 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,681 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table65) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,681 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1239
2023-07-11 14:16:26,681 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv603922701=4, srv147651029=0, srv2136239425=2, srv2118521717=1, srv886850468=5, srv233916608=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,681 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,681 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,681 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,681 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,681 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,681 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,681 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,681 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1239) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,681 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table66
2023-07-11 14:16:26,681 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv603922701=4, srv147651029=0, srv2136239425=2, srv2118521717=1, srv886850468=5, srv233916608=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,681 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,681 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,681 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,681 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,681 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,682 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,682 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,682 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table66) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,682 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table67
2023-07-11 14:16:26,682 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv603922701=4, srv147651029=0, srv2136239425=2, srv2118521717=1, srv886850468=5, srv233916608=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,682 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,682 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,682 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,682 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,682 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,682 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,682 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,682 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table67) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,682 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1061
2023-07-11 14:16:26,682 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv603922701=4, srv147651029=0, srv2136239425=2, srv2118521717=1, srv886850468=5, srv233916608=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,682 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,682 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,682 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,682 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,682 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,682 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,682 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,682 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1061) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,682 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1062
2023-07-11 14:16:26,682 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv603922701=4, srv147651029=0, srv2136239425=2, srv2118521717=1, srv886850468=5, srv233916608=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,682 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,682 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,683 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,683 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,683 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,683 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,683 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,683 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1062) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,683 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1063
2023-07-11 14:16:26,683 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv603922701=4, srv147651029=0, srv2136239425=2, srv2118521717=1, srv886850468=5, srv233916608=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,683 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,683 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,683 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,683 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,683 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,683 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,683 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,683 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1063) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,683 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1064
2023-07-11 14:16:26,683 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv603922701=4, srv147651029=0, srv2136239425=2, srv2118521717=1, srv886850468=5, srv233916608=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,683 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,683 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,683 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,683 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,683 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,683 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,683 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,683 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1064) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,683 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1065
2023-07-11 14:16:26,684 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv603922701=4, srv147651029=0, srv2136239425=2, srv2118521717=1, srv886850468=5, srv233916608=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,684 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,684 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,684 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,684 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,684 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,684 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,684 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,684 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1065) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,684 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table960
2023-07-11 14:16:26,684 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv603922701=4, srv147651029=0, srv2136239425=2, srv2118521717=1, srv886850468=5, srv233916608=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,684 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,684 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,684 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,684 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,684 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,684 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,684 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,684 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table960) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,684 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1066
2023-07-11 14:16:26,684 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv603922701=4, srv147651029=0, srv2136239425=2, srv2118521717=1, srv886850468=5, srv233916608=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,684 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,684 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,684 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,684 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,684 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,684 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,685 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,685 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1066) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,685 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table961
2023-07-11 14:16:26,685 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv603922701=4, srv147651029=0, srv2136239425=2, srv2118521717=1, srv886850468=5, srv233916608=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,685 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,685 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,685 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,685 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,685 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,685 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,685 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,685 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table961) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,685 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1067
2023-07-11 14:16:26,685 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv603922701=4, srv147651029=0, srv2136239425=2, srv2118521717=1, srv886850468=5, srv233916608=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,685 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,685 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,685 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,685 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,685 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,685 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,685 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,685 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1067) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,686 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table720
2023-07-11 14:16:26,686 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv603922701=4, srv147651029=0, srv2136239425=2, srv2118521717=1, srv886850468=5, srv233916608=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,686 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,686 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,686 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,686 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,686 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,686 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,686 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,686 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table720) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,686 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table962
2023-07-11 14:16:26,686 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv603922701=4, srv147651029=0, srv2136239425=2, srv2118521717=1, srv886850468=5, srv233916608=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,686 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,686 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,686 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,686 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,686 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,686 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,686 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,687 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table962) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,687 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1068
2023-07-11 14:16:26,687 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv603922701=4, srv147651029=0, srv2136239425=2, srv2118521717=1, srv886850468=5, srv233916608=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,687 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,687 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,687 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,687 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,687 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,687 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,687 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,687 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1068) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,687 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table721
2023-07-11 14:16:26,687 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv603922701=4, srv147651029=0, srv2136239425=2, srv2118521717=1, srv886850468=5, srv233916608=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,687 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,687 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,687 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,687 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,687 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,687 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,687 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,687 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table721) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,687 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table963
2023-07-11 14:16:26,687 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv603922701=4, srv147651029=0, srv2136239425=2, srv2118521717=1, srv886850468=5, srv233916608=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,687 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,687 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,687 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,687 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,688 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,688 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,688 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,688 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table963) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,688 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table722
2023-07-11 14:16:26,688 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv603922701=4, srv147651029=0, srv2136239425=2, srv2118521717=1, srv886850468=5, srv233916608=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,688 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,688 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,688 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,688 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,688 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,688 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,688 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,688 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table722) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,688 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table964
2023-07-11 14:16:26,688 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv603922701=4, srv147651029=0, srv2136239425=2, srv2118521717=1, srv886850468=5, srv233916608=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,688 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,688 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,688 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,688 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,688 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,688 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,688 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,688 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table964) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,688 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table723
2023-07-11 14:16:26,688 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv603922701=4, srv147651029=0, srv2136239425=2, srv2118521717=1, srv886850468=5, srv233916608=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,689 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,689 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,689 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,689 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,689 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,689 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,689 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,689 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table723) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,689 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table965
2023-07-11 14:16:26,689 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv603922701=4, srv147651029=0, srv2136239425=2, srv2118521717=1, srv886850468=5, srv233916608=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,689 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,689 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,689 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,689 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,689 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,689 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,689 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,689 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table965) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,689 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table724
2023-07-11 14:16:26,689 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv603922701=4, srv147651029=0, srv2136239425=2, srv2118521717=1, srv886850468=5, srv233916608=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,689 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,689 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,689 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,689 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,689 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,689 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,689 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,690 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table724) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,690 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table966
2023-07-11 14:16:26,690 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv603922701=4, srv147651029=0, srv2136239425=2, srv2118521717=1, srv886850468=5, srv233916608=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,690 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,690 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,690 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,690 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,690 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,690 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,690 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,690 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table966) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,690 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table725
2023-07-11 14:16:26,690 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv603922701=4, srv147651029=0, srv2136239425=2, srv2118521717=1, srv886850468=5, srv233916608=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,690 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,690 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,690 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,690 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,690 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,690 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,690 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,690 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table725) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,690 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table967
2023-07-11 14:16:26,690 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv603922701=4, srv147651029=0, srv2136239425=2, srv2118521717=1, srv886850468=5, srv233916608=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,690 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,690 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,690 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,690 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,691 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,691 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,691 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,691 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table967) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,691 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table726
2023-07-11 14:16:26,691 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv603922701=4, srv147651029=0, srv2136239425=2, srv2118521717=1, srv886850468=5, srv233916608=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,691 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,691 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,691 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,691 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,691 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,691 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,691 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,691 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table726) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,691 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table968
2023-07-11 14:16:26,691 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv603922701=4, srv147651029=0, srv2136239425=2, srv2118521717=1, srv886850468=5, srv233916608=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,691 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,691 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,691 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,691 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,691 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,691 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,691 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,691 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table968) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,691 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table727
2023-07-11 14:16:26,691 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv603922701=4, srv147651029=0, srv2136239425=2, srv2118521717=1, srv886850468=5, srv233916608=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,691 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,692 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,692 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,692 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,692 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,692 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,692 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,692 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table727) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,692 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table969
2023-07-11 14:16:26,692 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv603922701=4, srv147651029=0, srv2136239425=2, srv2118521717=1, srv886850468=5, srv233916608=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,692 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,692 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,692 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,692 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,692 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,692 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,692 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,692 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table969) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,692 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table728
2023-07-11 14:16:26,692 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv603922701=4, srv147651029=0, srv2136239425=2, srv2118521717=1, srv886850468=5, srv233916608=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,692 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,692 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,692 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,692 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,692 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,692 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,692 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,692 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table728) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,693 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1060
2023-07-11 14:16:26,693 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv603922701=4, srv147651029=0, srv2136239425=2, srv2118521717=1, srv886850468=5, srv233916608=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,693 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,693 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,693 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,693 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,693 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,693 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,693 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,693 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1060) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,693 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table729
2023-07-11 14:16:26,693 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv603922701=4, srv147651029=0, srv2136239425=2, srv2118521717=1, srv886850468=5, srv233916608=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,693 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,693 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,693 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,693 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,693 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,693 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,693 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,693 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table729) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,693 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1069
2023-07-11 14:16:26,693 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv603922701=4, srv147651029=0, srv2136239425=2, srv2118521717=1, srv886850468=5, srv233916608=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,693 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,693 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,693 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,693 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,693 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,694 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,694 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,694 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1069) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,694 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1050
2023-07-11 14:16:26,694 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv603922701=4, srv147651029=0, srv2136239425=2, srv2118521717=1, srv886850468=5, srv233916608=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,694 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,694 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,694 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,694 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,694 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,694 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,694 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,694 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1050) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,694 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1292
2023-07-11 14:16:26,694 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv603922701=4, srv147651029=0, srv2136239425=2, srv2118521717=1, srv886850468=5, srv233916608=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,694 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,694 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,694 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,694 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,694 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,694 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,695 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,695 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1292) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,695 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1051
2023-07-11 14:16:26,695 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv603922701=4, srv147651029=0, srv2136239425=2, srv2118521717=1, srv886850468=5, srv233916608=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,695 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,695 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,695 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,695 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,695 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,695 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,695 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,695 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1051) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,695 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1293
2023-07-11 14:16:26,695 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv603922701=4, srv147651029=0, srv2136239425=2, srv2118521717=1, srv886850468=5, srv233916608=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,695 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,695 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,695 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,695 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,695 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,695 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,695 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,695 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1293) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,695 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1052
2023-07-11 14:16:26,695 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv603922701=4, srv147651029=0, srv2136239425=2, srv2118521717=1, srv886850468=5, srv233916608=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,695 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,695 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,696 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,696 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,696 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,696 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,696 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,696 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1052) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,696 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1294
2023-07-11 14:16:26,696 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv603922701=4, srv147651029=0, srv2136239425=2, srv2118521717=1, srv886850468=5, srv233916608=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,696 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,696 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,696 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,696 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,696 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,696 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,696 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,696 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1294) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,696 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1053
2023-07-11 14:16:26,696 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv603922701=4, srv147651029=0, srv2136239425=2, srv2118521717=1, srv886850468=5, srv233916608=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,696 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,696 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,696 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,696 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,696 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,696 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,696 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,696 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1053) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,696 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1295
2023-07-11 14:16:26,697 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv603922701=4, srv147651029=0, srv2136239425=2, srv2118521717=1, srv886850468=5, srv233916608=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,697 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,697 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,697 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,697 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,697 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,697 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,697 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,697 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1295) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,697 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1054
2023-07-11 14:16:26,697 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv603922701=4, srv147651029=0, srv2136239425=2, srv2118521717=1, srv886850468=5, srv233916608=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,697 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,697 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,697 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,697 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,697 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,697 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,697 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,697 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1054) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,697 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1296
2023-07-11 14:16:26,697 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv603922701=4, srv147651029=0, srv2136239425=2, srv2118521717=1, srv886850468=5, srv233916608=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,697 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,697 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,697 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,697 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,697 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,697 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,698 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,698 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1296) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,698 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1055
2023-07-11 14:16:26,698 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv603922701=4, srv147651029=0, srv2136239425=2, srv2118521717=1, srv886850468=5, srv233916608=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,698 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,698 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,698 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,698 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,698 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,698 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,698 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,698 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1055) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,698 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1297
2023-07-11 14:16:26,698 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv603922701=4, srv147651029=0, srv2136239425=2, srv2118521717=1, srv886850468=5, srv233916608=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,698 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,698 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,698 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,698 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,698 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,698 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,698 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,698 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1297) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,698 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table950
2023-07-11 14:16:26,698 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv603922701=4, srv147651029=0, srv2136239425=2, srv2118521717=1, srv886850468=5, srv233916608=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,698 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,698 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,698 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,699 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,699 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,699 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,699 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,699 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table950) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,699 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1056
2023-07-11 14:16:26,699 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv603922701=4, srv147651029=0, srv2136239425=2, srv2118521717=1, srv886850468=5, srv233916608=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,699 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,699 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,699 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,699 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,699 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,699 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,699 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,699 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1056) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,699 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1298
2023-07-11 14:16:26,699 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv603922701=4, srv147651029=0, srv2136239425=2, srv2118521717=1, srv886850468=5, srv233916608=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,699 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,699 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,699 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,699 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,699 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,699 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,699 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,699 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1298) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,699 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table951
2023-07-11 14:16:26,699 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv603922701=4, srv147651029=0, srv2136239425=2, srv2118521717=1, srv886850468=5, srv233916608=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,700 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,700 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,700 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,700 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,700 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,700 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,700 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,700 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table951) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,700 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1057
2023-07-11 14:16:26,700 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv603922701=4, srv147651029=0, srv2136239425=2, srv2118521717=1, srv886850468=5, srv233916608=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,700 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,700 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,700 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,700 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,700 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,700 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,700 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,700 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1057) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,700 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1299
2023-07-11 14:16:26,700 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv603922701=4, srv147651029=0, srv2136239425=2, srv2118521717=1, srv886850468=5, srv233916608=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,700 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,700 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,700 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,700 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,700 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,700 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,700 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,701 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1299) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,701 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table710
2023-07-11 14:16:26,701 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv603922701=4, srv147651029=0, srv2136239425=2, srv2118521717=1, srv886850468=5, srv233916608=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,701 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,701 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,701 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,701 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,701 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,701 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,701 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,701 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table710) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,701 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table952
2023-07-11 14:16:26,701 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv603922701=4, srv147651029=0, srv2136239425=2, srv2118521717=1, srv886850468=5, srv233916608=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,701 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,701 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,701 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,701 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,701 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,701 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,701 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,701 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table952) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,701 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table711
2023-07-11 14:16:26,701 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv603922701=4, srv147651029=0, srv2136239425=2, srv2118521717=1, srv886850468=5, srv233916608=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,701 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,701 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,701 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,702 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,702 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,702 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,702 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,702 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table711) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,702 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table953
2023-07-11 14:16:26,702 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv603922701=4, srv147651029=0, srv2136239425=2, srv2118521717=1, srv886850468=5, srv233916608=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,702 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,702 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,702 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,702 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,702 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,702 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,702 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,702 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table953) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,702 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table712
2023-07-11 14:16:26,702 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv603922701=4, srv147651029=0, srv2136239425=2, srv2118521717=1, srv886850468=5, srv233916608=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,702 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,702 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,702 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,702 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,702 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,702 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,702 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,702 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table712) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,703 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table954
2023-07-11 14:16:26,703 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv603922701=4, srv147651029=0, srv2136239425=2, srv2118521717=1, srv886850468=5, srv233916608=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,703 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,703 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,703 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,703 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,703 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,703 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,703 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,703 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table954) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,703 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table713
2023-07-11 14:16:26,703 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv603922701=4, srv147651029=0, srv2136239425=2, srv2118521717=1, srv886850468=5, srv233916608=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,703 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,703 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,703 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,703 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,703 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,703 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,703 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,703 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table713) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,703 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table955
2023-07-11 14:16:26,703 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv603922701=4, srv147651029=0, srv2136239425=2, srv2118521717=1, srv886850468=5, srv233916608=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,703 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,704 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,704 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,704 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,704 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,704 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,704 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,704 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table955) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,704 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table714
2023-07-11 14:16:26,704 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv603922701=4, srv147651029=0, srv2136239425=2, srv2118521717=1, srv886850468=5, srv233916608=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,704 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,704 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,704 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,704 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,704 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,704 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,704 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,704 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table714) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,704 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table956
2023-07-11 14:16:26,704 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv603922701=4, srv147651029=0, srv2136239425=2, srv2118521717=1, srv886850468=5, srv233916608=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,704 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,704 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,704 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,704 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,704 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,704 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,704 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,704 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table956) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,705 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table715
2023-07-11 14:16:26,705 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv603922701=4, srv147651029=0, srv2136239425=2, srv2118521717=1, srv886850468=5, srv233916608=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,705 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,705 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,705 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,705 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,705 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,705 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,705 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,705 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table715) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,705 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table957
2023-07-11 14:16:26,705 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv603922701=4, srv147651029=0, srv2136239425=2, srv2118521717=1, srv886850468=5, srv233916608=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,705 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,705 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,705 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,705 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,705 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,705 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,705 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,705 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table957) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,705 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table716
2023-07-11 14:16:26,705 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv603922701=4, srv147651029=0, srv2136239425=2, srv2118521717=1, srv886850468=5, srv233916608=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,705 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,705 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,705 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,705 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,705 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,706 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,706 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,706 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table716) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,706 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table958
2023-07-11 14:16:26,706 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv603922701=4, srv147651029=0, srv2136239425=2, srv2118521717=1, srv886850468=5, srv233916608=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,706 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,706 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,706 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,706 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,706 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,706 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,706 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,706 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table958) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,706 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1290
2023-07-11 14:16:26,706 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv603922701=4, srv147651029=0, srv2136239425=2, srv2118521717=1, srv886850468=5, srv233916608=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,706 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,706 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,706 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,706 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,706 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,706 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,706 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,706 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1290) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,706 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table717
2023-07-11 14:16:26,706 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv603922701=4, srv147651029=0, srv2136239425=2, srv2118521717=1, srv886850468=5, srv233916608=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,706 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,707 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,707 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,707 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,707 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,707 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,707 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,707 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table717) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,707 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table959
2023-07-11 14:16:26,707 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv603922701=4, srv147651029=0, srv2136239425=2, srv2118521717=1, srv886850468=5, srv233916608=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,707 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,707 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,707 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,707 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,707 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,707 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,707 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,707 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table959) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,707 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1291
2023-07-11 14:16:26,707 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv603922701=4, srv147651029=0, srv2136239425=2, srv2118521717=1, srv886850468=5, srv233916608=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,707 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,707 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,707 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,707 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,707 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,707 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,707 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,707 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1291) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,708 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table718
2023-07-11 14:16:26,708 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv603922701=4, srv147651029=0, srv2136239425=2, srv2118521717=1, srv886850468=5, srv233916608=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,708 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,708 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,708 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,708 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,708 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,708 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,708 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,708 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table718) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,708 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table719
2023-07-11 14:16:26,708 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv603922701=4, srv147651029=0, srv2136239425=2, srv2118521717=1, srv886850468=5, srv233916608=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,708 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,708 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,708 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,708 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,708 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,708 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,708 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,708 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table719) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,708 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1058
2023-07-11 14:16:26,708 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv603922701=4, srv147651029=0, srv2136239425=2, srv2118521717=1, srv886850468=5, srv233916608=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,708 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,708 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,708 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,708 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,708 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,708 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,709 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,709 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1058) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,709 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1059
2023-07-11 14:16:26,709 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv603922701=4, srv147651029=0, srv2136239425=2, srv2118521717=1, srv886850468=5, srv233916608=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,709 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,709 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,709 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,709 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,709 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,709 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,709 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,709 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1059) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,709 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1281
2023-07-11 14:16:26,709 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv603922701=4, srv147651029=0, srv2136239425=2, srv2118521717=1, srv886850468=5, srv233916608=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,709 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,709 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,709 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,709 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,709 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,709 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,709 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,709 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1281) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,709 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1040
2023-07-11 14:16:26,709 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv603922701=4, srv147651029=0, srv2136239425=2, srv2118521717=1, srv886850468=5, srv233916608=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,709 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,709 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,710 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,710 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,710 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,710 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,710 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,710 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1040) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,710 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1282
2023-07-11 14:16:26,710 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv603922701=4, srv147651029=0, srv2136239425=2, srv2118521717=1, srv886850468=5, srv233916608=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,710 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,710 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,710 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,710 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,710 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,710 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,710 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,710 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1282) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,710 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1041
2023-07-11 14:16:26,710 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv603922701=4, srv147651029=0, srv2136239425=2, srv2118521717=1, srv886850468=5, srv233916608=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,710 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,710 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,710 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,710 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,710 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,710 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,710 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,710 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1041) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,710 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1283
2023-07-11 14:16:26,711 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv603922701=4, srv147651029=0, srv2136239425=2, srv2118521717=1, srv886850468=5, srv233916608=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,711 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,711 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,711 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,711 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,711 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,711 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,711 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,711 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1283) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,711 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table980
2023-07-11 14:16:26,711 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv603922701=4, srv147651029=0, srv2136239425=2, srv2118521717=1, srv886850468=5, srv233916608=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,711 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,711 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,711 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,711 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,711 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,711 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,711 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,711 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table980) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,711 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1042
2023-07-11 14:16:26,711 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv603922701=4, srv147651029=0, srv2136239425=2, srv2118521717=1, srv886850468=5, srv233916608=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,712 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,712 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,712 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,712 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,712 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,712 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,712 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,712 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1042) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,712 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1284
2023-07-11 14:16:26,712 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv603922701=4, srv147651029=0, srv2136239425=2, srv2118521717=1, srv886850468=5, srv233916608=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,712 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,712 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,712 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,712 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,712 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,712 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,712 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,712 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1284) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,712 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table981
2023-07-11 14:16:26,712 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv603922701=4, srv147651029=0, srv2136239425=2, srv2118521717=1, srv886850468=5, srv233916608=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,712 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,712 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,712 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,712 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,712 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,712 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,712 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,713 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table981) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,713 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1043
2023-07-11 14:16:26,713 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv603922701=4, srv147651029=0, srv2136239425=2, srv2118521717=1, srv886850468=5, srv233916608=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,713 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,713 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,713 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,713 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,713 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,713 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,713 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,713 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1043) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,713 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1285
2023-07-11 14:16:26,713 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv603922701=4, srv147651029=0, srv2136239425=2, srv2118521717=1, srv886850468=5, srv233916608=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,713 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,713 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,713 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,713 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,713 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,713 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,713 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,713 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1285) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,713 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table740
2023-07-11 14:16:26,713 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv603922701=4, srv147651029=0, srv2136239425=2, srv2118521717=1, srv886850468=5, srv233916608=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,713 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,713 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,713 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,713 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,714 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,714 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,714 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,714 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table740) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,714 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table982
2023-07-11 14:16:26,714 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv603922701=4, srv147651029=0, srv2136239425=2, srv2118521717=1, srv886850468=5, srv233916608=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,714 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,714 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,714 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,714 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,714 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,714 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,714 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,714 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table982) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,714 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1044
2023-07-11 14:16:26,714 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv603922701=4, srv147651029=0, srv2136239425=2, srv2118521717=1, srv886850468=5, srv233916608=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,714 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,714 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,714 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,714 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,714 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,714 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,714 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,714 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1044) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,714 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1286
2023-07-11 14:16:26,714 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv603922701=4, srv147651029=0, srv2136239425=2, srv2118521717=1, srv886850468=5, srv233916608=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,715 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,715 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,715 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,715 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,715 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,715 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,715 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,715 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1286) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,715 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table741
2023-07-11 14:16:26,715 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv603922701=4, srv147651029=0, srv2136239425=2, srv2118521717=1, srv886850468=5, srv233916608=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,715 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,715 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,715 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,715 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,715 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,715 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,715 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,715 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table741) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,715 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table983
2023-07-11 14:16:26,715 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv603922701=4, srv147651029=0, srv2136239425=2, srv2118521717=1, srv886850468=5, srv233916608=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,715 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,715 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,715 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,715 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,715 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,715 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,715 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,715 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table983) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,716 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1045
2023-07-11 14:16:26,716 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv603922701=4, srv147651029=0, srv2136239425=2, srv2118521717=1, srv886850468=5, srv233916608=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,716 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,716 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,716 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,716 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,716 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,716 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,716 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,716 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1045) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,716 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1287
2023-07-11 14:16:26,716 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv603922701=4, srv147651029=0, srv2136239425=2, srv2118521717=1, srv886850468=5, srv233916608=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,716 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,716 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,716 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,716 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,716 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,716 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,716 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,716 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1287) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,716 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table500
2023-07-11 14:16:26,716 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv603922701=4, srv147651029=0, srv2136239425=2, srv2118521717=1, srv886850468=5, srv233916608=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,716 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,716 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,716 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,716 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,716 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,717 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,717 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,717 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table500) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,717 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table742
2023-07-11 14:16:26,717 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv603922701=4, srv147651029=0, srv2136239425=2, srv2118521717=1, srv886850468=5, srv233916608=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,717 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,717 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,717 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,717 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,717 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,717 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,717 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,717 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table742) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,717 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table984
2023-07-11 14:16:26,717 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv603922701=4, srv147651029=0, srv2136239425=2, srv2118521717=1, srv886850468=5, srv233916608=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,717 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,717 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,717 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,717 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,717 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,717 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,717 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,717 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table984) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,717 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1046
2023-07-11 14:16:26,717 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv603922701=4, srv147651029=0, srv2136239425=2, srv2118521717=1, srv886850468=5, srv233916608=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,717 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,718 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,718 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,718 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,718 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,718 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,718 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,718 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1046) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,718 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1288
2023-07-11 14:16:26,718 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv603922701=4, srv147651029=0, srv2136239425=2, srv2118521717=1, srv886850468=5, srv233916608=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,718 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,718 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,718 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,718 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,718 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,718 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,718 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,718 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1288) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,718 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table501
2023-07-11 14:16:26,718 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv603922701=4, srv147651029=0, srv2136239425=2, srv2118521717=1, srv886850468=5, srv233916608=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,718 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,718 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,718 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,718 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,718 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,718 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,718 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,718 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table501) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,719 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table743
2023-07-11 14:16:26,719 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv603922701=4, srv147651029=0, srv2136239425=2, srv2118521717=1, srv886850468=5, srv233916608=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,719 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,719 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,719 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,719 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,719 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,719 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,719 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,719 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table743) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,719 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table985
2023-07-11 14:16:26,719 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv603922701=4, srv147651029=0, srv2136239425=2, srv2118521717=1, srv886850468=5, srv233916608=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,719 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,719 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,719 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,719 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,719 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,719 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,719 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,719 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table985) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,719 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table502
2023-07-11 14:16:26,719 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv603922701=4, srv147651029=0, srv2136239425=2, srv2118521717=1, srv886850468=5, srv233916608=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,720 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,720 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,720 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,720 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,720 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,720 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,720 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,720 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table502) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,720 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table744
2023-07-11 14:16:26,720 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv603922701=4, srv147651029=0, srv2136239425=2, srv2118521717=1, srv886850468=5, srv233916608=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,720 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,720 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,720 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,720 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,720 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,720 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,720 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,720 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table744) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,720 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table986
2023-07-11 14:16:26,720 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv603922701=4, srv147651029=0, srv2136239425=2, srv2118521717=1, srv886850468=5, srv233916608=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,720 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,720 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,720 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,720 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,720 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,720 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,721 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,721 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table986) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,721 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table503
2023-07-11 14:16:26,721 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv603922701=4, srv147651029=0, srv2136239425=2, srv2118521717=1, srv886850468=5, srv233916608=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,721 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,721 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,721 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,721 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,721 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,721 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,721 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,721 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table503) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,721 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table745
2023-07-11 14:16:26,721 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv603922701=4, srv147651029=0, srv2136239425=2, srv2118521717=1, srv886850468=5, srv233916608=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,721 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,721 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,721 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,721 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,721 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,721 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,721 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,721 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table745) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,721 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table987
2023-07-11 14:16:26,721 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv603922701=4, srv147651029=0, srv2136239425=2, srv2118521717=1, srv886850468=5, srv233916608=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,721 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,721 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,721 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,722 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,722 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,722 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,722 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,722 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table987) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,722 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table504
2023-07-11 14:16:26,722 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv603922701=4, srv147651029=0, srv2136239425=2, srv2118521717=1, srv886850468=5, srv233916608=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,722 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,722 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,722 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,722 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,722 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,722 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,722 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,722 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table504) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,722 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table746
2023-07-11 14:16:26,722 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv603922701=4, srv147651029=0, srv2136239425=2, srv2118521717=1, srv886850468=5, srv233916608=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,722 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,722 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,722 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,722 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,722 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,722 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,722 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,722 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table746) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,722 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table988
2023-07-11 14:16:26,722 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv603922701=4, srv147651029=0, srv2136239425=2, srv2118521717=1, srv886850468=5, srv233916608=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,723 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,723 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,723 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,723 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,723 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,723 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,723 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,723 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table988) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,723 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table505
2023-07-11 14:16:26,723 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv603922701=4, srv147651029=0, srv2136239425=2, srv2118521717=1, srv886850468=5, srv233916608=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,723 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,723 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,723 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,723 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,723 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,723 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,723 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,723 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table505) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,723 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table747
2023-07-11 14:16:26,723 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv603922701=4, srv147651029=0, srv2136239425=2, srv2118521717=1, srv886850468=5, srv233916608=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,723 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,723 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,723 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,723 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,723 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,723 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,723 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,724 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table747) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,724 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table989
2023-07-11 14:16:26,724 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv603922701=4, srv147651029=0, srv2136239425=2, srv2118521717=1, srv886850468=5, srv233916608=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,724 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,724 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,724 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,724 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,724 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,724 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,724 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,724 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table989) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,724 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table506
2023-07-11 14:16:26,724 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv603922701=4, srv147651029=0, srv2136239425=2, srv2118521717=1, srv886850468=5, srv233916608=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,724 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,724 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,724 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,724 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,724 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,724 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,724 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,724 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table506) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,724 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table748
2023-07-11 14:16:26,724 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv603922701=4, srv147651029=0, srv2136239425=2, srv2118521717=1, srv886850468=5, srv233916608=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,724 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,724 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,724 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,725 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,725 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,725 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,725 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,725 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table748) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,725 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table507
2023-07-11 14:16:26,725 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv603922701=4, srv147651029=0, srv2136239425=2, srv2118521717=1, srv886850468=5, srv233916608=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,725 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,725 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,725 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,725 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,725 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,725 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,725 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,725 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table507) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,725 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table749
2023-07-11 14:16:26,725 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv603922701=4, srv147651029=0, srv2136239425=2, srv2118521717=1, srv886850468=5, srv233916608=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,725 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,725 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,725 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,725 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,725 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,725 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,725 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,725 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table749) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,725 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table508
2023-07-11 14:16:26,725 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv603922701=4, srv147651029=0, srv2136239425=2, srv2118521717=1, srv886850468=5, srv233916608=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,726 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,726 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,726 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,726 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,726 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,726 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,726 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,726 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table508) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,726 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1280
2023-07-11 14:16:26,726 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv603922701=4, srv147651029=0, srv2136239425=2, srv2118521717=1, srv886850468=5, srv233916608=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,726 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,726 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,726 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,726 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,726 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,726 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,726 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,726 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1280) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,726 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table509
2023-07-11 14:16:26,726 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv603922701=4, srv147651029=0, srv2136239425=2, srv2118521717=1, srv886850468=5, srv233916608=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,726 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,726 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,726 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,726 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,726 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,726 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,726 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,727 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table509) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,727 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1047
2023-07-11 14:16:26,727 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv603922701=4, srv147651029=0, srv2136239425=2, srv2118521717=1, srv886850468=5, srv233916608=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,727 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,727 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,727 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,727 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,727 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,727 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,727 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,727 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1047) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,727 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1289
2023-07-11 14:16:26,727 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv603922701=4, srv147651029=0, srv2136239425=2, srv2118521717=1, srv886850468=5, srv233916608=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,727 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,727 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,727 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,727 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,727 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,727 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,727 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,727 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1289) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,727 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1048
2023-07-11 14:16:26,727 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv603922701=4, srv147651029=0, srv2136239425=2, srv2118521717=1, srv886850468=5, srv233916608=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,727 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,727 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,727 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,727 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,728 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,728 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,728 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,728 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1048) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,728 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1049
2023-07-11 14:16:26,728 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv603922701=4, srv147651029=0, srv2136239425=2, srv2118521717=1, srv886850468=5, srv233916608=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,728 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,728 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,728 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,728 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,728 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,728 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,728 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,728 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1049) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,728 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1270
2023-07-11 14:16:26,728 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv603922701=4, srv147651029=0, srv2136239425=2, srv2118521717=1, srv886850468=5, srv233916608=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,728 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,728 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,728 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,728 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,728 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,728 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,729 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,729 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1270) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,729 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1271
2023-07-11 14:16:26,729 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv603922701=4, srv147651029=0, srv2136239425=2, srv2118521717=1, srv886850468=5, srv233916608=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,729 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,729 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,729 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,729 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,729 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,729 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,729 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,729 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1271) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,729 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1030
2023-07-11 14:16:26,729 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv603922701=4, srv147651029=0, srv2136239425=2, srv2118521717=1, srv886850468=5, srv233916608=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,729 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,729 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,729 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,729 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,729 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,729 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,729 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,729 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1030) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,729 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1272
2023-07-11 14:16:26,729 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv603922701=4, srv147651029=0, srv2136239425=2, srv2118521717=1, srv886850468=5, srv233916608=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,729 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,729 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,730 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,730 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,730 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,730 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,730 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,730 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1272) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,730 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1031
2023-07-11 14:16:26,730 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv603922701=4, srv147651029=0, srv2136239425=2, srv2118521717=1, srv886850468=5, srv233916608=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,730 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,730 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,730 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,730 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,730 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,730 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,730 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,730 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1031) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,730 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1273
2023-07-11 14:16:26,730 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv603922701=4, srv147651029=0, srv2136239425=2, srv2118521717=1, srv886850468=5, srv233916608=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,730 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,730 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,730 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,730 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,730 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,730 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,730 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,730 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1273) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,730 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table970
2023-07-11 14:16:26,731 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv603922701=4, srv147651029=0, srv2136239425=2, srv2118521717=1, srv886850468=5, srv233916608=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,731 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,731 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,731 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,731 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,731 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,731 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,731 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,731 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table970) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,731 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1032
2023-07-11 14:16:26,731 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv603922701=4, srv147651029=0, srv2136239425=2, srv2118521717=1, srv886850468=5, srv233916608=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,731 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,731 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,731 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,731 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,731 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,731 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,731 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,731 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1032) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,731 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1274
2023-07-11 14:16:26,731 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv603922701=4, srv147651029=0, srv2136239425=2, srv2118521717=1, srv886850468=5, srv233916608=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,731 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,731 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,731 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,731 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,731 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,731 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,731 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,732 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1274) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,732 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table971
2023-07-11 14:16:26,732 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv603922701=4, srv147651029=0, srv2136239425=2, srv2118521717=1, srv886850468=5, srv233916608=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,732 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,732 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,732 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,732 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,732 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,732 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,732 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,732 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table971) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,732 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1033
2023-07-11 14:16:26,732 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv603922701=4, srv147651029=0, srv2136239425=2, srv2118521717=1, srv886850468=5, srv233916608=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,732 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,732 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,732 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,732 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,732 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,732 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,732 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,732 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1033) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,732 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1275
2023-07-11 14:16:26,732 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv603922701=4, srv147651029=0, srv2136239425=2, srv2118521717=1, srv886850468=5, srv233916608=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,732 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,732 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,732 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,733 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,733 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,733 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,733 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,733 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1275) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,733 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table730
2023-07-11 14:16:26,733 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv603922701=4, srv147651029=0, srv2136239425=2, srv2118521717=1, srv886850468=5, srv233916608=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,733 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,733 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,733 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,733 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,733 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,733 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,733 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,733 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table730) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,733 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table972
2023-07-11 14:16:26,733 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv603922701=4, srv147651029=0, srv2136239425=2, srv2118521717=1, srv886850468=5, srv233916608=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,733 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,733 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,733 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,733 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,733 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,733 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,733 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,733 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table972) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,733 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1034
2023-07-11 14:16:26,733 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv603922701=4, srv147651029=0, srv2136239425=2, srv2118521717=1, srv886850468=5, srv233916608=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,734 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,734 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,734 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,734 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,734 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,734 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,734 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,734 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1034) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,734 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1276
2023-07-11 14:16:26,734 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv603922701=4, srv147651029=0, srv2136239425=2, srv2118521717=1, srv886850468=5, srv233916608=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,734 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,734 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,734 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,734 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,734 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,734 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,734 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,734 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1276) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,734 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table731
2023-07-11 14:16:26,734 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv603922701=4, srv147651029=0, srv2136239425=2, srv2118521717=1, srv886850468=5, srv233916608=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,734 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,734 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,734 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,734 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,734 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,734 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,734 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,735 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table731) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,735 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table973
2023-07-11 14:16:26,735 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv603922701=4, srv147651029=0, srv2136239425=2, srv2118521717=1, srv886850468=5, srv233916608=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,735 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,735 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,735 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,735 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,735 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,735 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,735 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,735 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table973) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,735 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1035
2023-07-11 14:16:26,735 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv603922701=4, srv147651029=0, srv2136239425=2, srv2118521717=1, srv886850468=5, srv233916608=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,735 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,735 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,735 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,735 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,735 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,735 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,735 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,735 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1035) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,735 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1277
2023-07-11 14:16:26,735 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv603922701=4, srv147651029=0, srv2136239425=2, srv2118521717=1, srv886850468=5, srv233916608=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,735 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,735 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,735 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,735 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,736 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,736 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,736 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,736 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1277) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,736 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table732
2023-07-11 14:16:26,736 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv603922701=4, srv147651029=0, srv2136239425=2, srv2118521717=1, srv886850468=5, srv233916608=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,736 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,736 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,736 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,736 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,736 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,736 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,736 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,736 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table732) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,736 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table974
2023-07-11 14:16:26,736 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv603922701=4, srv147651029=0, srv2136239425=2, srv2118521717=1, srv886850468=5, srv233916608=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,736 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,736 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,736 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,736 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,736 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,736 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,736 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,737 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table974) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,737 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table733
2023-07-11 14:16:26,737 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv603922701=4, srv147651029=0, srv2136239425=2, srv2118521717=1, srv886850468=5, srv233916608=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,737 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,737 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,737 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,737 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,737 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,737 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,737 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,737 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table733) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,737 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table975
2023-07-11 14:16:26,737 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv603922701=4, srv147651029=0, srv2136239425=2, srv2118521717=1, srv886850468=5, srv233916608=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,737 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,737 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,737 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,737 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,737 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,737 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,737 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,737 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table975) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,737 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table734
2023-07-11 14:16:26,737 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv603922701=4, srv147651029=0, srv2136239425=2, srv2118521717=1, srv886850468=5, srv233916608=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,737 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,737 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,737 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,738 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,738 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,738 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,738 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,738 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table734) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,738 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table976
2023-07-11 14:16:26,738 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv603922701=4, srv147651029=0, srv2136239425=2, srv2118521717=1, srv886850468=5, srv233916608=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,738 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,738 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,738 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,738 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,738 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,738 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,738 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,738 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table976) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,738 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table735
2023-07-11 14:16:26,738 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv603922701=4, srv147651029=0, srv2136239425=2, srv2118521717=1, srv886850468=5, srv233916608=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,738 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,738 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,738 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,738 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,738 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,738 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,738 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,738 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table735) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,738 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table977
2023-07-11 14:16:26,738 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv603922701=4, srv147651029=0, srv2136239425=2, srv2118521717=1, srv886850468=5, srv233916608=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,739 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,739 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,739 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,739 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,739 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,739 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,739 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,739 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table977) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,739 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table736
2023-07-11 14:16:26,739 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv603922701=4, srv147651029=0, srv2136239425=2, srv2118521717=1, srv886850468=5, srv233916608=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,739 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,739 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,739 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,739 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,739 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,739 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,739 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,739 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table736) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,739 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table978
2023-07-11 14:16:26,739 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv603922701=4, srv147651029=0, srv2136239425=2, srv2118521717=1, srv886850468=5, srv233916608=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,739 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,739 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,739 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,739 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,739 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,739 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,739 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,740 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table978) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,740 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table737
2023-07-11 14:16:26,740 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv603922701=4, srv147651029=0, srv2136239425=2, srv2118521717=1, srv886850468=5, srv233916608=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,740 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,740 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,740 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,740 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,740 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,740 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,740 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,740 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table737) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,740 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table979
2023-07-11 14:16:26,740 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv603922701=4, srv147651029=0, srv2136239425=2, srv2118521717=1, srv886850468=5, srv233916608=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,740 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,740 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,740 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,740 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,740 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,740 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,740 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,740 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table979) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,740 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table738
2023-07-11 14:16:26,740 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv603922701=4, srv147651029=0, srv2136239425=2, srv2118521717=1, srv886850468=5, srv233916608=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,740 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,740 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,740 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,740 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,741 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,741 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,741 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,741 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table738) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,741 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table739
2023-07-11 14:16:26,741 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv603922701=4, srv147651029=0, srv2136239425=2, srv2118521717=1, srv886850468=5, srv233916608=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,741 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,741 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,741 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,741 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,741 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,741 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,741 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,741 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table739) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,741 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1036
2023-07-11 14:16:26,741 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv603922701=4, srv147651029=0, srv2136239425=2, srv2118521717=1, srv886850468=5, srv233916608=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,741 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,741 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,741 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,741 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,741 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,741 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,741 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,741 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1036) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,741 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1278
2023-07-11 14:16:26,741 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv603922701=4, srv147651029=0, srv2136239425=2, srv2118521717=1, srv886850468=5, srv233916608=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,742 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,742 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,742 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,742 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,742 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,742 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,742 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,742 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1278) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,742 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1037
2023-07-11 14:16:26,742 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv603922701=4, srv147651029=0, srv2136239425=2, srv2118521717=1, srv886850468=5, srv233916608=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,742 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,742 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,742 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,742 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,742 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,742 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,742 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,742 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1037) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,742 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1279
2023-07-11 14:16:26,742 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv603922701=4, srv147651029=0, srv2136239425=2, srv2118521717=1, srv886850468=5, srv233916608=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,742 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,742 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,742 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,742 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,742 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,742 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,742 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,743 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1279) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,743 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1038
2023-07-11 14:16:26,743 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv603922701=4, srv147651029=0, srv2136239425=2, srv2118521717=1, srv886850468=5, srv233916608=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,743 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,743 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,743 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,743 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,743 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,743 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,743 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,743 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1038) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,743 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1039
2023-07-11 14:16:26,743 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv603922701=4, srv147651029=0, srv2136239425=2, srv2118521717=1, srv886850468=5, srv233916608=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,743 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,743 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,743 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,743 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,743 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,743 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,743 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,743 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1039) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,743 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table13
2023-07-11 14:16:26,743 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv603922701=4, srv147651029=0, srv2136239425=2, srv2118521717=1, srv886850468=5, srv233916608=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,743 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,743 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,743 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,743 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,744 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,744 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,744 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,744 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table13) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,744 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table361
2023-07-11 14:16:26,744 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv603922701=4, srv147651029=0, srv2136239425=2, srv2118521717=1, srv886850468=5, srv233916608=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,744 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,744 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,744 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,744 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,744 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,744 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,744 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,744 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table361) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,744 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table14
2023-07-11 14:16:26,744 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv603922701=4, srv147651029=0, srv2136239425=2, srv2118521717=1, srv886850468=5, srv233916608=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,744 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,744 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,744 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,744 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,744 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,744 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,744 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,744 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table14) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,745 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table120
2023-07-11 14:16:26,745 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv603922701=4, srv147651029=0, srv2136239425=2, srv2118521717=1, srv886850468=5, srv233916608=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,745 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,745 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,745 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,745 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,745 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,745 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,745 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,745 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table120) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,745 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table362
2023-07-11 14:16:26,745 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv603922701=4, srv147651029=0, srv2136239425=2, srv2118521717=1, srv886850468=5, srv233916608=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,745 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,745 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,745 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,745 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,745 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,745 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,745 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,745 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table362) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,745 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table15
2023-07-11 14:16:26,745 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv603922701=4, srv147651029=0, srv2136239425=2, srv2118521717=1, srv886850468=5, srv233916608=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,746 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,746 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,746 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,746 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,746 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,746 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,746 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,746 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table15) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,746 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table121
2023-07-11 14:16:26,746 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv603922701=4, srv147651029=0, srv2136239425=2, srv2118521717=1, srv886850468=5, srv233916608=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,746 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,746 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,746 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,746 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,746 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,746 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,746 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,746 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table121) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,746 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table363
2023-07-11 14:16:26,746 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv603922701=4, srv147651029=0, srv2136239425=2, srv2118521717=1, srv886850468=5, srv233916608=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,746 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,746 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,746 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,746 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,746 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,746 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,747 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,747 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table363) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,747 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table16
2023-07-11 14:16:26,747 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv603922701=4, srv147651029=0, srv2136239425=2, srv2118521717=1, srv886850468=5, srv233916608=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,747 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,747 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,747 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,747 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,747 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,747 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,747 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,747 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table16) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,747 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table122
2023-07-11 14:16:26,747 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv603922701=4, srv147651029=0, srv2136239425=2, srv2118521717=1, srv886850468=5, srv233916608=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,747 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,747 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,747 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,747 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,747 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,747 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,747 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,747 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table122) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,747 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table364
2023-07-11 14:16:26,747 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv603922701=4, srv147651029=0, srv2136239425=2, srv2118521717=1, srv886850468=5, srv233916608=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,747 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,747 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,748 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,748 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,748 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,748 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,748 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,748 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table364) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,748 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table17
2023-07-11 14:16:26,748 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv603922701=4, srv147651029=0, srv2136239425=2, srv2118521717=1, srv886850468=5, srv233916608=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,748 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,748 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,748 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,748 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,748 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,748 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,748 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,748 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table17) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,748 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table123
2023-07-11 14:16:26,748 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv603922701=4, srv147651029=0, srv2136239425=2, srv2118521717=1, srv886850468=5, srv233916608=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,748 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,748 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,748 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,748 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,748 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,748 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,748 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,748 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table123) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,749 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table365
2023-07-11 14:16:26,749 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv603922701=4, srv147651029=0, srv2136239425=2, srv2118521717=1, srv886850468=5, srv233916608=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,749 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,749 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,749 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,749 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,749 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,749 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,749 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,749 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table365) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,749 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table18
2023-07-11 14:16:26,749 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv603922701=4, srv147651029=0, srv2136239425=2, srv2118521717=1, srv886850468=5, srv233916608=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,749 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,749 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,749 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,749 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,749 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,749 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,749 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,749 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table18) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,749 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table124
2023-07-11 14:16:26,749 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv603922701=4, srv147651029=0, srv2136239425=2, srv2118521717=1, srv886850468=5, srv233916608=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,749 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,749 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,749 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,749 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,749 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,750 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,750 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,750 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table124) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,750 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table366
2023-07-11 14:16:26,750 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv603922701=4, srv147651029=0, srv2136239425=2, srv2118521717=1, srv886850468=5, srv233916608=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,750 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,750 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,750 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,750 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,750 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,750 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,750 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,750 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table366) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,750 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table19
2023-07-11 14:16:26,750 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv603922701=4, srv147651029=0, srv2136239425=2, srv2118521717=1, srv886850468=5, srv233916608=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,750 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,750 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,750 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,750 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,750 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,750 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,750 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,750 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table19) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,750 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table125
2023-07-11 14:16:26,750 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv603922701=4, srv147651029=0, srv2136239425=2, srv2118521717=1, srv886850468=5, srv233916608=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,751 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,751 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,751 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,751 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,751 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,751 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,751 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,751 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table125) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,751 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table367
2023-07-11 14:16:26,751 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv603922701=4, srv147651029=0, srv2136239425=2, srv2118521717=1, srv886850468=5, srv233916608=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,751 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,751 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,751 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,751 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,751 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,751 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,751 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,751 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table367) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,751 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table126
2023-07-11 14:16:26,751 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv603922701=4, srv147651029=0, srv2136239425=2, srv2118521717=1, srv886850468=5, srv233916608=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,751 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,751 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,751 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,751 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,751 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,751 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,751 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,752 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table126) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,752 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table368
2023-07-11 14:16:26,752 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv603922701=4, srv147651029=0, srv2136239425=2, srv2118521717=1, srv886850468=5, srv233916608=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,752 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,752 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,752 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,752 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,752 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,752 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,752 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,752 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table368) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,752 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1420
2023-07-11 14:16:26,752 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv603922701=4, srv147651029=0, srv2136239425=2, srv2118521717=1, srv886850468=5, srv233916608=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,752 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,752 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,752 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,752 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,752 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,752 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,752 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,752 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1420) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,752 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table127
2023-07-11 14:16:26,752 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv603922701=4, srv147651029=0, srv2136239425=2, srv2118521717=1, srv886850468=5, srv233916608=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,752 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,752 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,752 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,753 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,753 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,753 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,753 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,753 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table127) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,753 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table369
2023-07-11 14:16:26,753 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv603922701=4, srv147651029=0, srv2136239425=2, srv2118521717=1, srv886850468=5, srv233916608=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,753 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,753 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,753 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,753 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,753 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,753 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,753 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,753 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table369) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,753 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table128
2023-07-11 14:16:26,753 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv603922701=4, srv147651029=0, srv2136239425=2, srv2118521717=1, srv886850468=5, srv233916608=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,753 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,753 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,753 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,753 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,754 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,754 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,754 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,754 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table128) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,754 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table129
2023-07-11 14:16:26,754 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv603922701=4, srv147651029=0, srv2136239425=2, srv2118521717=1, srv886850468=5, srv233916608=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,754 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,754 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,754 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,754 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,754 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,754 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,754 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,754 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table129) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,754 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1429
2023-07-11 14:16:26,754 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv603922701=4, srv147651029=0, srv2136239425=2, srv2118521717=1, srv886850468=5, srv233916608=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,754 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,754 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,754 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,754 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,754 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,754 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,754 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,754 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1429) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,754 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1421
2023-07-11 14:16:26,754 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv603922701=4, srv147651029=0, srv2136239425=2, srv2118521717=1, srv886850468=5, srv233916608=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,755 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,755 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,755 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,755 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,755 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,755 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,755 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,755 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1421) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,755 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1422
2023-07-11 14:16:26,755 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv603922701=4, srv147651029=0, srv2136239425=2, srv2118521717=1, srv886850468=5, srv233916608=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,755 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,755 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,755 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,755 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,755 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,755 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,755 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,755 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1422) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,755 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1423
2023-07-11 14:16:26,755 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv603922701=4, srv147651029=0, srv2136239425=2, srv2118521717=1, srv886850468=5, srv233916608=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,755 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,755 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,755 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,755 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,755 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,755 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,755 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,756 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1423) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,756 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1424
2023-07-11 14:16:26,756 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv603922701=4, srv147651029=0, srv2136239425=2, srv2118521717=1, srv886850468=5, srv233916608=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,756 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,756 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,756 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,756 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,756 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,756 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,756 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,756 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1424) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,756 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1425
2023-07-11 14:16:26,756 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv603922701=4, srv147651029=0, srv2136239425=2, srv2118521717=1, srv886850468=5, srv233916608=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,756 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,756 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,756 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,756 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,756 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,756 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,756 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,756 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1425) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,756 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table10
2023-07-11 14:16:26,756 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv603922701=4, srv147651029=0, srv2136239425=2, srv2118521717=1, srv886850468=5, srv233916608=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,756 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,756 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,757 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,757 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,757 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,757 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,757 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,757 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table10) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,757 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1426
2023-07-11 14:16:26,757 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv603922701=4, srv147651029=0, srv2136239425=2, srv2118521717=1, srv886850468=5, srv233916608=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,757 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,757 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,757 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,757 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,757 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,757 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,757 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,757 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1426) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,757 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table11
2023-07-11 14:16:26,757 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv603922701=4, srv147651029=0, srv2136239425=2, srv2118521717=1, srv886850468=5, srv233916608=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,757 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,757 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,758 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,758 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,758 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,758 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,758 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,758 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table11) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,758 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table370
2023-07-11 14:16:26,758 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv603922701=4, srv147651029=0, srv2136239425=2, srv2118521717=1, srv886850468=5, srv233916608=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,758 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,758 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,758 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,758 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,758 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,758 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,758 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,758 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table370) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,758 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1427
2023-07-11 14:16:26,758 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv603922701=4, srv147651029=0, srv2136239425=2, srv2118521717=1, srv886850468=5, srv233916608=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,758 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,758 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,758 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,758 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,758 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,758 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,758 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,758 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1427) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,759 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table12
2023-07-11 14:16:26,759 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv603922701=4, srv147651029=0, srv2136239425=2, srv2118521717=1, srv886850468=5, srv233916608=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,759 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,759 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,759 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,759 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,759 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,759 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,759 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,759 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table12) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,759 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table371
2023-07-11 14:16:26,759 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv603922701=4, srv147651029=0, srv2136239425=2, srv2118521717=1, srv886850468=5, srv233916608=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,759 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,759 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,759 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,759 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,759 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,759 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,759 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,759 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table371) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,759 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1428
2023-07-11 14:16:26,759 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv603922701=4, srv147651029=0, srv2136239425=2, srv2118521717=1, srv886850468=5, srv233916608=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,759 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,759 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,759 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,759 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,759 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,760 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,760 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,760 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1428) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,760 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table350
2023-07-11 14:16:26,760 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv603922701=4, srv147651029=0, srv2136239425=2, srv2118521717=1, srv886850468=5, srv233916608=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,760 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,760 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,760 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,760 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,760 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,760 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,760 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,760 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table350) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,760 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table592
2023-07-11 14:16:26,760 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv603922701=4, srv147651029=0, srv2136239425=2, srv2118521717=1, srv886850468=5, srv233916608=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,760 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,760 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,760 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,760 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,760 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,760 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,760 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,760 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table592) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,760 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table351
2023-07-11 14:16:26,760 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv603922701=4, srv147651029=0, srv2136239425=2, srv2118521717=1, srv886850468=5, srv233916608=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,760 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,761 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,761 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,761 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,761 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,761 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,761 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,761 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table351) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,761 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table593
2023-07-11 14:16:26,761 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv603922701=4, srv147651029=0, srv2136239425=2, srv2118521717=1, srv886850468=5, srv233916608=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,761 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,761 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,761 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,761 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,761 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,761 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,761 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,761 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table593) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,761 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table110
2023-07-11 14:16:26,761 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv603922701=4, srv147651029=0, srv2136239425=2, srv2118521717=1, srv886850468=5, srv233916608=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,761 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,761 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,761 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,761 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,761 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,761 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,761 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,762 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table110) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,762 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table352
2023-07-11 14:16:26,762 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv603922701=4, srv147651029=0, srv2136239425=2, srv2118521717=1, srv886850468=5, srv233916608=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,762 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,762 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,762 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,762 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,762 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,762 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,762 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,762 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table352) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,762 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table594
2023-07-11 14:16:26,762 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv603922701=4, srv147651029=0, srv2136239425=2, srv2118521717=1, srv886850468=5, srv233916608=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,762 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,762 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,762 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,762 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,762 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,762 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,762 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,762 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table594) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,762 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table111
2023-07-11 14:16:26,763 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv603922701=4, srv147651029=0, srv2136239425=2, srv2118521717=1, srv886850468=5, srv233916608=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,763 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,763 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,763 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,763 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,763 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,763 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,763 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,763 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table111) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,763 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table353
2023-07-11 14:16:26,763 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv603922701=4, srv147651029=0, srv2136239425=2, srv2118521717=1, srv886850468=5, srv233916608=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,763 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,763 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,763 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,763 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,763 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,763 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,763 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,763 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table353) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,763 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table595
2023-07-11 14:16:26,763 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv603922701=4, srv147651029=0, srv2136239425=2, srv2118521717=1, srv886850468=5, srv233916608=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,763 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,763 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,763 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,763 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,763 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,764 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,764 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,764 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table595) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,764 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table112
2023-07-11 14:16:26,764 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv603922701=4, srv147651029=0, srv2136239425=2, srv2118521717=1, srv886850468=5, srv233916608=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,764 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,764 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,764 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,764 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,764 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,764 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,764 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,764 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table112) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,764 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table354
2023-07-11 14:16:26,764 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv603922701=4, srv147651029=0, srv2136239425=2, srv2118521717=1, srv886850468=5, srv233916608=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,764 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,764 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,764 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,764 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,764 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,764 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,764 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,764 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table354) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,764 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table596
2023-07-11 14:16:26,764 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv603922701=4, srv147651029=0, srv2136239425=2, srv2118521717=1, srv886850468=5, srv233916608=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,764 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,765 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,765 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,765 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,765 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,765 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,765 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,765 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table596) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,765 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table113
2023-07-11 14:16:26,765 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv603922701=4, srv147651029=0, srv2136239425=2, srv2118521717=1, srv886850468=5, srv233916608=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,765 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,765 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,765 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,765 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,765 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,765 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,765 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,765 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table113) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,765 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table355
2023-07-11 14:16:26,765 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv603922701=4, srv147651029=0, srv2136239425=2, srv2118521717=1, srv886850468=5, srv233916608=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,765 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,765 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,765 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,765 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,765 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,765 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,765 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,766 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table355) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,766 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table597
2023-07-11 14:16:26,766 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv603922701=4, srv147651029=0, srv2136239425=2, srv2118521717=1, srv886850468=5, srv233916608=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,766 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,766 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,766 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,766 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,766 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,766 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,766 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,766 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table597) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,766 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table114
2023-07-11 14:16:26,766 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv603922701=4, srv147651029=0, srv2136239425=2, srv2118521717=1, srv886850468=5, srv233916608=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,766 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,766 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,766 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,766 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,766 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,766 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,766 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,766 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table114) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,766 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table356
2023-07-11 14:16:26,766 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv603922701=4, srv147651029=0, srv2136239425=2, srv2118521717=1, srv886850468=5, srv233916608=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,766 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,766 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,766 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,766 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,767 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,767 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,767 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,767 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table356) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,767 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table598
2023-07-11 14:16:26,767 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv603922701=4, srv147651029=0, srv2136239425=2, srv2118521717=1, srv886850468=5, srv233916608=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,767 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,767 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,767 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,767 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,767 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,767 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,767 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,767 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table598) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,767 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table115
2023-07-11 14:16:26,767 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv603922701=4, srv147651029=0, srv2136239425=2, srv2118521717=1, srv886850468=5, srv233916608=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,767 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,767 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,767 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,767 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,767 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,767 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,767 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,767 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table115) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,767 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table357
2023-07-11 14:16:26,767 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv603922701=4, srv147651029=0, srv2136239425=2, srv2118521717=1, srv886850468=5, srv233916608=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,768 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,768 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,768 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,768 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,768 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,768 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,768 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,768 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table357) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,768 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table599
2023-07-11 14:16:26,768 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv603922701=4, srv147651029=0, srv2136239425=2, srv2118521717=1, srv886850468=5, srv233916608=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,768 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,768 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,768 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,768 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,768 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,768 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,768 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,768 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table599) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,768 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table116
2023-07-11 14:16:26,768 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv603922701=4, srv147651029=0, srv2136239425=2, srv2118521717=1, srv886850468=5, srv233916608=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,768 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,768 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,768 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,768 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,768 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,768 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,768 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,769 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table116) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,769 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table358
2023-07-11 14:16:26,769 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv603922701=4, srv147651029=0, srv2136239425=2, srv2118521717=1, srv886850468=5, srv233916608=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,769 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,769 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,769 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,769 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,769 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,769 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,769 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,769 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table358) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,769 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table117
2023-07-11 14:16:26,769 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv603922701=4, srv147651029=0, srv2136239425=2, srv2118521717=1, srv886850468=5, srv233916608=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,769 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,769 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,769 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,769 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,769 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,769 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,769 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,769 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table117) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,769 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table359
2023-07-11 14:16:26,769 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv603922701=4, srv147651029=0, srv2136239425=2, srv2118521717=1, srv886850468=5, srv233916608=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,769 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,769 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,770 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,770 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,770 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,770 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,770 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,770 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table359) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,770 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table118
2023-07-11 14:16:26,770 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv603922701=4, srv147651029=0, srv2136239425=2, srv2118521717=1, srv886850468=5, srv233916608=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,770 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,770 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,770 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,770 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,770 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,770 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,770 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,770 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table118) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,770 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table119
2023-07-11 14:16:26,770 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv603922701=4, srv147651029=0, srv2136239425=2, srv2118521717=1, srv886850468=5, srv233916608=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,770 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,770 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,770 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,770 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,770 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,770 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,770 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,770 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table119) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,771 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1418
2023-07-11 14:16:26,771 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv603922701=4, srv147651029=0, srv2136239425=2, srv2118521717=1, srv886850468=5, srv233916608=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,771 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,771 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,771 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,771 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,771 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,771 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,771 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,771 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1418) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,771 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1419
2023-07-11 14:16:26,771 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv603922701=4, srv147651029=0, srv2136239425=2, srv2118521717=1, srv886850468=5, srv233916608=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,771 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,771 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,771 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,771 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,771 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,771 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,771 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,771 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1419) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,771 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1410
2023-07-11 14:16:26,771 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv603922701=4, srv147651029=0, srv2136239425=2, srv2118521717=1, srv886850468=5, srv233916608=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,771 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,772 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,772 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,772 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,772 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,772 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,772 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,772 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1410) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,772 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1411
2023-07-11 14:16:26,772 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv603922701=4, srv147651029=0, srv2136239425=2, srv2118521717=1, srv886850468=5, srv233916608=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,772 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,772 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,772 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,772 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,772 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,772 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,772 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,772 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1411) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,772 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1412
2023-07-11 14:16:26,772 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv603922701=4, srv147651029=0, srv2136239425=2, srv2118521717=1, srv886850468=5, srv233916608=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,772 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,772 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,772 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,772 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,772 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,772 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,772 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,772 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1412) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,773 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1413
2023-07-11 14:16:26,773 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv603922701=4, srv147651029=0, srv2136239425=2, srv2118521717=1, srv886850468=5, srv233916608=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,773 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,773 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,773 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,773 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,773 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,773 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,773 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,773 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1413) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,773 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1414
2023-07-11 14:16:26,773 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv603922701=4, srv147651029=0, srv2136239425=2, srv2118521717=1, srv886850468=5, srv233916608=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,773 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,773 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,773 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,773 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,773 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,773 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,773 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,773 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1414) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,773 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1415
2023-07-11 14:16:26,773 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv603922701=4, srv147651029=0, srv2136239425=2, srv2118521717=1, srv886850468=5, srv233916608=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,773 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,773 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,773 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,773 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,773 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,774 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,774 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,774 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1415) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,774 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1416
2023-07-11 14:16:26,774 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv603922701=4, srv147651029=0, srv2136239425=2, srv2118521717=1, srv886850468=5, srv233916608=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,774 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,774 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,774 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,774 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,774 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,774 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,774 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,774 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1416) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,774 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table360
2023-07-11 14:16:26,774 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv603922701=4, srv147651029=0, srv2136239425=2, srv2118521717=1, srv886850468=5, srv233916608=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,774 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,774 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,774 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,774 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,774 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,774 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,774 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,774 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table360) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,774 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1417
2023-07-11 14:16:26,774 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv603922701=4, srv147651029=0, srv2136239425=2, srv2118521717=1, srv886850468=5, srv233916608=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,774 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,775 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,775 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,775 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,775 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,775 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,775 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,775 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1417) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,775 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table141
2023-07-11 14:16:26,775 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv603922701=4, srv147651029=0, srv2136239425=2, srv2118521717=1, srv886850468=5, srv233916608=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,775 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,775 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,775 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,775 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,775 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,775 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,775 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,775 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table141) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,775 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table383
2023-07-11 14:16:26,775 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv603922701=4, srv147651029=0, srv2136239425=2, srv2118521717=1, srv886850468=5, srv233916608=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,775 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,775 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,775 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,775 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,775 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,775 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,775 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,775 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table383) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,776 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table142
2023-07-11 14:16:26,776 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv603922701=4, srv147651029=0, srv2136239425=2, srv2118521717=1, srv886850468=5, srv233916608=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,776 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,776 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,776 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,776 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,776 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,776 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,776 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,776 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table142) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,776 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table384
2023-07-11 14:16:26,776 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv603922701=4, srv147651029=0, srv2136239425=2, srv2118521717=1, srv886850468=5, srv233916608=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,776 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,776 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,776 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,776 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,776 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,776 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,776 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,776 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table384) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,776 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table143
2023-07-11 14:16:26,776 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv603922701=4, srv147651029=0, srv2136239425=2, srv2118521717=1, srv886850468=5, srv233916608=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,776 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,776 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,776 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,776 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,777 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,777 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,777 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,777 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table143) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,777 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table385
2023-07-11 14:16:26,777 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv603922701=4, srv147651029=0, srv2136239425=2, srv2118521717=1, srv886850468=5, srv233916608=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,777 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,777 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,777 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,777 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,777 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,777 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,777 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,777 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table385) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,777 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table144
2023-07-11 14:16:26,777 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv603922701=4, srv147651029=0, srv2136239425=2, srv2118521717=1, srv886850468=5, srv233916608=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,777 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,777 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,777 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,777 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,777 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,777 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,777 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,777 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table144) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,777 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table386
2023-07-11 14:16:26,778 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv603922701=4, srv147651029=0, srv2136239425=2, srv2118521717=1, srv886850468=5, srv233916608=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,778 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,778 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,778 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,778 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,778 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,778 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,778 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,778 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table386) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,778 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table145
2023-07-11 14:16:26,778 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv603922701=4, srv147651029=0, srv2136239425=2, srv2118521717=1, srv886850468=5, srv233916608=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,778 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,778 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,778 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,778 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,778 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,778 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,778 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,778 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table145) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,778 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table387
2023-07-11 14:16:26,778 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv603922701=4, srv147651029=0, srv2136239425=2, srv2118521717=1, srv886850468=5, srv233916608=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,778 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,778 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,778 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,778 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,778 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,778 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,779 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,779 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table387) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,779 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table146
2023-07-11 14:16:26,779 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv603922701=4, srv147651029=0, srv2136239425=2, srv2118521717=1, srv886850468=5, srv233916608=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,779 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,779 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,779 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,779 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,779 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,779 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,779 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,779 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table146) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,779 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table388
2023-07-11 14:16:26,779 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv603922701=4, srv147651029=0, srv2136239425=2, srv2118521717=1, srv886850468=5, srv233916608=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,779 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,779 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,779 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,779 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,779 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,779 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,779 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,779 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table388) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,780 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table147
2023-07-11 14:16:26,780 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv603922701=4, srv147651029=0, srv2136239425=2, srv2118521717=1, srv886850468=5, srv233916608=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,780 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,780 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,780 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,780 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,780 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,780 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,780 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,780 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table147) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,780 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table389
2023-07-11 14:16:26,780 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv603922701=4, srv147651029=0, srv2136239425=2, srv2118521717=1, srv886850468=5, srv233916608=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,780 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,780 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,780 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,780 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,780 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,780 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,780 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,780 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table389) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,780 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table148
2023-07-11 14:16:26,780 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv603922701=4, srv147651029=0, srv2136239425=2, srv2118521717=1, srv886850468=5, srv233916608=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,780 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,780 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,780 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,781 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,781 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,781 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,781 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,781 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table148) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,781 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table149
2023-07-11 14:16:26,781 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv603922701=4, srv147651029=0, srv2136239425=2, srv2118521717=1, srv886850468=5, srv233916608=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,781 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,781 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,781 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,781 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,781 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,781 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,781 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,781 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table149) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,781 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,781 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv603922701=4, srv147651029=0, srv2136239425=2, srv2118521717=1, srv886850468=5, srv233916608=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,781 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,781 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,781 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,781 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,781 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,781 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,781 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,781 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table5) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,781 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1407
2023-07-11 14:16:26,782 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv603922701=4, srv147651029=0, srv2136239425=2, srv2118521717=1, srv886850468=5, srv233916608=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,782 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,782 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,782 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,782 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,782 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,782 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,782 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,782 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1407) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,782 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,782 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv603922701=4, srv147651029=0, srv2136239425=2, srv2118521717=1, srv886850468=5, srv233916608=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,782 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,782 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,782 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,782 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,782 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,782 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,782 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,782 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table4) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,782 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1408
2023-07-11 14:16:26,782 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv603922701=4, srv147651029=0, srv2136239425=2, srv2118521717=1, srv886850468=5, srv233916608=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,782 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,782 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,782 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,782 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,782 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,782 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,783 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,783 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1408) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,783 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,783 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv603922701=4, srv147651029=0, srv2136239425=2, srv2118521717=1, srv886850468=5, srv233916608=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,783 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,783 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,783 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,783 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,783 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,783 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,783 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,783 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table3) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,783 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1409
2023-07-11 14:16:26,783 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv603922701=4, srv147651029=0, srv2136239425=2, srv2118521717=1, srv886850468=5, srv233916608=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,783 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,783 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,783 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,783 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,783 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,783 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,783 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,783 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1409) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,783 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,783 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv603922701=4, srv147651029=0, srv2136239425=2, srv2118521717=1, srv886850468=5, srv233916608=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,783 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,783 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,784 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,784 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,784 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,784 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,784 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,784 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table2) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,784 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,784 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv603922701=4, srv147651029=0, srv2136239425=2, srv2118521717=1, srv886850468=5, srv233916608=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,784 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,784 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,784 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,784 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,784 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,784 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,784 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,784 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,784 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,784 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv603922701=4, srv147651029=0, srv2136239425=2, srv2118521717=1, srv886850468=5, srv233916608=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,784 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,784 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,784 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,784 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,784 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,784 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,784 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,784 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table0) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,785 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1400
2023-07-11 14:16:26,785 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv603922701=4, srv147651029=0, srv2136239425=2, srv2118521717=1, srv886850468=5, srv233916608=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,785 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,785 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,785 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,785 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,785 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,785 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,785 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,785 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1400) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,785 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1401
2023-07-11 14:16:26,785 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv603922701=4, srv147651029=0, srv2136239425=2, srv2118521717=1, srv886850468=5, srv233916608=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,785 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,785 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,785 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,785 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,785 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,785 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,785 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,785 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1401) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,785 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1402
2023-07-11 14:16:26,785 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv603922701=4, srv147651029=0, srv2136239425=2, srv2118521717=1, srv886850468=5, srv233916608=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,785 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,785 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,785 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,785 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,785 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,786 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,786 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,786 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1402) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,786 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table9
2023-07-11 14:16:26,786 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv603922701=4, srv147651029=0, srv2136239425=2, srv2118521717=1, srv886850468=5, srv233916608=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,786 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,786 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,786 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,786 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,786 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,786 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,786 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,786 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table9) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,786 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table390
2023-07-11 14:16:26,786 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv603922701=4, srv147651029=0, srv2136239425=2, srv2118521717=1, srv886850468=5, srv233916608=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,786 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,786 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,786 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,786 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,786 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,786 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,786 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,786 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table390) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,786 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1403
2023-07-11 14:16:26,786 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv603922701=4, srv147651029=0, srv2136239425=2, srv2118521717=1, srv886850468=5, srv233916608=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,786 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,787 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,787 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,787 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,787 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,787 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,787 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,787 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1403) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,787 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table8
2023-07-11 14:16:26,787 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv603922701=4, srv147651029=0, srv2136239425=2, srv2118521717=1, srv886850468=5, srv233916608=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,787 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,787 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,787 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,787 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,787 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,787 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,787 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,787 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table8) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,787 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table391
2023-07-11 14:16:26,787 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv603922701=4, srv147651029=0, srv2136239425=2, srv2118521717=1, srv886850468=5, srv233916608=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,787 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,787 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,787 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,787 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,787 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,787 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,787 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,787 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table391) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,788 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1404
2023-07-11 14:16:26,788 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv603922701=4, srv147651029=0, srv2136239425=2, srv2118521717=1, srv886850468=5, srv233916608=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,788 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,788 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,788 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,788 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,788 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,788 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,788 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,788 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1404) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,788 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table7
2023-07-11 14:16:26,788 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv603922701=4, srv147651029=0, srv2136239425=2, srv2118521717=1, srv886850468=5, srv233916608=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,788 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,788 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,788 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,788 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,788 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,788 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,788 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,789 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table7) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,789 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table150
2023-07-11 14:16:26,789 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv603922701=4, srv147651029=0, srv2136239425=2, srv2118521717=1, srv886850468=5, srv233916608=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,789 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,789 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,789 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,789 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,789 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,789 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,789 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,789 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table150) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,789 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table392
2023-07-11 14:16:26,789 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv603922701=4, srv147651029=0, srv2136239425=2, srv2118521717=1, srv886850468=5, srv233916608=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,789 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,789 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,789 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,789 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,789 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,789 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,789 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,789 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table392) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,789 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1405
2023-07-11 14:16:26,789 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv603922701=4, srv147651029=0, srv2136239425=2, srv2118521717=1, srv886850468=5, srv233916608=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,789 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,789 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,789 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,790 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,790 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,790 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,790 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,790 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1405) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,790 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table6
2023-07-11 14:16:26,790 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv603922701=4, srv147651029=0, srv2136239425=2, srv2118521717=1, srv886850468=5, srv233916608=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,790 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,790 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,790 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,790 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,790 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,790 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,790 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,790 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table6) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,790 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table151
2023-07-11 14:16:26,790 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv603922701=4, srv147651029=0, srv2136239425=2, srv2118521717=1, srv886850468=5, srv233916608=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,790 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,790 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,790 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,790 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,790 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,790 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,790 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,790 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table151) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,790 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table393
2023-07-11 14:16:26,790 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv603922701=4, srv147651029=0, srv2136239425=2, srv2118521717=1, srv886850468=5, srv233916608=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,791 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,791 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,791 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,791 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,791 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,791 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,791 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,791 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table393) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,791 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1406
2023-07-11 14:16:26,791 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv603922701=4, srv147651029=0, srv2136239425=2, srv2118521717=1, srv886850468=5, srv233916608=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,791 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,791 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,791 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,791 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,791 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,791 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,791 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,791 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1406) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,791 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table130
2023-07-11 14:16:26,791 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv603922701=4, srv147651029=0, srv2136239425=2, srv2118521717=1, srv886850468=5, srv233916608=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,791 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,791 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,791 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,791 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,791 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,791 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,791 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,792 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table130) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,792 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table372
2023-07-11 14:16:26,792 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv603922701=4, srv147651029=0, srv2136239425=2, srv2118521717=1, srv886850468=5, srv233916608=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,792 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,792 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,792 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,792 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,792 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,792 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,792 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,792 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table372) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,792 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table131
2023-07-11 14:16:26,792 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv603922701=4, srv147651029=0, srv2136239425=2, srv2118521717=1, srv886850468=5, srv233916608=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,792 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,792 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,792 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,792 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,792 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,792 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,792 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,792 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table131) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,792 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table373
2023-07-11 14:16:26,792 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv603922701=4, srv147651029=0, srv2136239425=2, srv2118521717=1, srv886850468=5, srv233916608=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,792 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,792 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,793 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,793 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,793 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,793 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,793 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,793 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table373) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,793 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table132
2023-07-11 14:16:26,793 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv603922701=4, srv147651029=0, srv2136239425=2, srv2118521717=1, srv886850468=5, srv233916608=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,793 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,793 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,793 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,793 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,793 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,793 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,793 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,793 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table132) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,793 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table374
2023-07-11 14:16:26,793 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv603922701=4, srv147651029=0, srv2136239425=2, srv2118521717=1, srv886850468=5, srv233916608=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,793 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,793 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,793 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,793 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,793 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,793 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,793 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,794 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table374) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,794 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table133
2023-07-11 14:16:26,794 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv603922701=4, srv147651029=0, srv2136239425=2, srv2118521717=1, srv886850468=5, srv233916608=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,794 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,794 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,794 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,794 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,794 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,794 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,794 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,794 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table133) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,794 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table375
2023-07-11 14:16:26,794 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv603922701=4, srv147651029=0, srv2136239425=2, srv2118521717=1, srv886850468=5, srv233916608=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,794 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,794 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,794 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,794 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,794 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,794 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,794 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,794 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table375) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,794 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table134
2023-07-11 14:16:26,794 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv603922701=4, srv147651029=0, srv2136239425=2, srv2118521717=1, srv886850468=5, srv233916608=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,794 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,794 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,794 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,794 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,795 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,795 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,795 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,795 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table134) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,795 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table376
2023-07-11 14:16:26,795 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv603922701=4, srv147651029=0, srv2136239425=2, srv2118521717=1, srv886850468=5, srv233916608=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,795 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,795 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,795 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,795 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,795 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,795 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,795 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,795 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table376) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,795 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table135
2023-07-11 14:16:26,795 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv603922701=4, srv147651029=0, srv2136239425=2, srv2118521717=1, srv886850468=5, srv233916608=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,795 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,795 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,795 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,795 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,795 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,795 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,795 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,795 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table135) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,795 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table377
2023-07-11 14:16:26,795 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv603922701=4, srv147651029=0, srv2136239425=2, srv2118521717=1, srv886850468=5, srv233916608=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,796 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,796 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,796 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,796 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,796 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,796 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,796 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,796 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table377) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,796 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table136
2023-07-11 14:16:26,796 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv603922701=4, srv147651029=0, srv2136239425=2, srv2118521717=1, srv886850468=5, srv233916608=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,796 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,796 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,796 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,796 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,796 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,796 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,796 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,796 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table136) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,796 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table378
2023-07-11 14:16:26,796 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv603922701=4, srv147651029=0, srv2136239425=2, srv2118521717=1, srv886850468=5, srv233916608=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,797 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,797 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,797 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,797 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,797 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,797 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,797 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,797 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table378) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,797 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table137
2023-07-11 14:16:26,797 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv603922701=4, srv147651029=0, srv2136239425=2, srv2118521717=1, srv886850468=5, srv233916608=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,797 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,797 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,797 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,797 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,797 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,797 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,797 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,797 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table137) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,797 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table379
2023-07-11 14:16:26,797 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv603922701=4, srv147651029=0, srv2136239425=2, srv2118521717=1, srv886850468=5, srv233916608=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,797 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,797 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,797 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,797 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,797 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,797 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,798 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,798 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table379) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,798 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table138
2023-07-11 14:16:26,798 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv603922701=4, srv147651029=0, srv2136239425=2, srv2118521717=1, srv886850468=5, srv233916608=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,798 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,798 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,798 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,798 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,798 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,798 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,798 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,798 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table138) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,798 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table139
2023-07-11 14:16:26,798 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv603922701=4, srv147651029=0, srv2136239425=2, srv2118521717=1, srv886850468=5, srv233916608=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,798 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,798 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,798 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,798 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,798 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,798 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,798 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,798 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table139) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,798 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table380
2023-07-11 14:16:26,798 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv603922701=4, srv147651029=0, srv2136239425=2, srv2118521717=1, srv886850468=5, srv233916608=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,798 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,798 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,799 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,799 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,799 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,799 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,799 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,799 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table380) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,799 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table381
2023-07-11 14:16:26,799 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv603922701=4, srv147651029=0, srv2136239425=2, srv2118521717=1, srv886850468=5, srv233916608=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,799 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,799 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,799 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,799 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,799 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,799 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,799 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,799 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table381) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,799 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table140
2023-07-11 14:16:26,799 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv603922701=4, srv147651029=0, srv2136239425=2, srv2118521717=1, srv886850468=5, srv233916608=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,799 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,799 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,799 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,799 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,799 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,799 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,799 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,799 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table140) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,800 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table382
2023-07-11 14:16:26,800 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv603922701=4, srv147651029=0, srv2136239425=2, srv2118521717=1, srv886850468=5, srv233916608=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,800 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,800 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,800 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,800 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,800 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,800 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,800 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,800 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table382) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,800 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table57
2023-07-11 14:16:26,800 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv603922701=4, srv147651029=0, srv2136239425=2, srv2118521717=1, srv886850468=5, srv233916608=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,800 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,800 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,800 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,800 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,800 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,800 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,800 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,800 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table57) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,800 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table58
2023-07-11 14:16:26,800 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv603922701=4, srv147651029=0, srv2136239425=2, srv2118521717=1, srv886850468=5, srv233916608=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,800 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,800 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,800 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,800 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,801 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,801 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,801 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,801 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table58) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,801 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table560
2023-07-11 14:16:26,801 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv603922701=4, srv147651029=0, srv2136239425=2, srv2118521717=1, srv886850468=5, srv233916608=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,801 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,801 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,801 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,801 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,801 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,801 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,801 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,801 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table560) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,801 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table59
2023-07-11 14:16:26,801 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv603922701=4, srv147651029=0, srv2136239425=2, srv2118521717=1, srv886850468=5, srv233916608=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,801 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,801 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,801 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,801 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,801 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,801 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,801 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,801 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table59) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,801 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table561
2023-07-11 14:16:26,801 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv603922701=4, srv147651029=0, srv2136239425=2, srv2118521717=1, srv886850468=5, srv233916608=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,802 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,802 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,802 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,802 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,802 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,802 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,802 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,802 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table561) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,802 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table320
2023-07-11 14:16:26,802 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv603922701=4, srv147651029=0, srv2136239425=2, srv2118521717=1, srv886850468=5, srv233916608=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,802 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,802 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,802 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,802 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,802 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,802 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,802 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,802 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table320) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,802 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table562
2023-07-11 14:16:26,802 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv603922701=4, srv147651029=0, srv2136239425=2, srv2118521717=1, srv886850468=5, srv233916608=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,802 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,802 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,802 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,802 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,802 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,802 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,802 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,803 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table562) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,803 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1460
2023-07-11 14:16:26,803 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv603922701=4, srv147651029=0, srv2136239425=2, srv2118521717=1, srv886850468=5, srv233916608=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,803 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,803 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,803 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,803 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,803 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,803 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,803 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,803 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1460) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,803 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table321
2023-07-11 14:16:26,803 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv603922701=4, srv147651029=0, srv2136239425=2, srv2118521717=1, srv886850468=5, srv233916608=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,803 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,803 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,803 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,803 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,803 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,803 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,803 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,803 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table321) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,803 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table563
2023-07-11 14:16:26,803 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv603922701=4, srv147651029=0, srv2136239425=2, srv2118521717=1, srv886850468=5, srv233916608=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,803 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,803 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,803 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,803 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,804 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,804 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,804 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,804 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table563) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,804 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1461
2023-07-11 14:16:26,804 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv603922701=4, srv147651029=0, srv2136239425=2, srv2118521717=1, srv886850468=5, srv233916608=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,804 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,804 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,804 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,804 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,804 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,804 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,804 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,804 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1461) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,804 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table322
2023-07-11 14:16:26,804 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv603922701=4, srv147651029=0, srv2136239425=2, srv2118521717=1, srv886850468=5, srv233916608=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,804 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,804 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,804 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,804 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,804 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,804 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,804 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,804 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table322) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,804 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table564
2023-07-11 14:16:26,804 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv603922701=4, srv147651029=0, srv2136239425=2, srv2118521717=1, srv886850468=5, srv233916608=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,805 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,805 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,805 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,805 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,805 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,805 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,805 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,805 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table564) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,805 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1220
2023-07-11 14:16:26,805 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv603922701=4, srv147651029=0, srv2136239425=2, srv2118521717=1, srv886850468=5, srv233916608=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,805 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,805 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,805 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,805 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,805 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,805 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,805 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,805 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1220) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,805 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1462
2023-07-11 14:16:26,805 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv603922701=4, srv147651029=0, srv2136239425=2, srv2118521717=1, srv886850468=5, srv233916608=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,805 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,806 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,806 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,806 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,806 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,806 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,806 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,806 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1462) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,806 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table323
2023-07-11 14:16:26,806 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv603922701=4, srv147651029=0, srv2136239425=2, srv2118521717=1, srv886850468=5, srv233916608=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,806 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,806 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,806 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,806 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,806 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,806 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,806 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,806 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table323) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,806 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table565
2023-07-11 14:16:26,806 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv603922701=4, srv147651029=0, srv2136239425=2, srv2118521717=1, srv886850468=5, srv233916608=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,806 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,806 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,806 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,806 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,806 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,806 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,806 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,806 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table565) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,807 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1221
2023-07-11 14:16:26,807 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv603922701=4, srv147651029=0, srv2136239425=2, srv2118521717=1, srv886850468=5, srv233916608=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,807 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,807 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,807 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,807 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,807 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,807 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,807 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,807 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1221) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,807 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1463
2023-07-11 14:16:26,807 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv603922701=4, srv147651029=0, srv2136239425=2, srv2118521717=1, srv886850468=5, srv233916608=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,807 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,807 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,807 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,807 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,807 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,807 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,807 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,807 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1463) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,807 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table324
2023-07-11 14:16:26,807 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv603922701=4, srv147651029=0, srv2136239425=2, srv2118521717=1, srv886850468=5, srv233916608=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,807 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,807 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,807 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,807 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,807 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,808 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,808 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,808 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table324) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,808 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table566
2023-07-11 14:16:26,808 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv603922701=4, srv147651029=0, srv2136239425=2, srv2118521717=1, srv886850468=5, srv233916608=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,808 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,808 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,808 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,808 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,808 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,808 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,808 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,808 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table566) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,808 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1222
2023-07-11 14:16:26,808 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv603922701=4, srv147651029=0, srv2136239425=2, srv2118521717=1, srv886850468=5, srv233916608=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,808 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,808 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,808 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,808 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,808 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,808 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,808 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,808 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1222) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,808 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1464
2023-07-11 14:16:26,808 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv603922701=4, srv147651029=0, srv2136239425=2, srv2118521717=1, srv886850468=5, srv233916608=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,808 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,809 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,809 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,809 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,809 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,809 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,809 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,809 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1464) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,809 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table325
2023-07-11 14:16:26,809 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv603922701=4, srv147651029=0, srv2136239425=2, srv2118521717=1, srv886850468=5, srv233916608=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,809 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,809 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,809 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,809 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,809 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,809 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,809 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,809 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table325) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,809 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table567
2023-07-11 14:16:26,809 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv603922701=4, srv147651029=0, srv2136239425=2, srv2118521717=1, srv886850468=5, srv233916608=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,809 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,809 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,809 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,809 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,809 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,809 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,809 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,809 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table567) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,810 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table326
2023-07-11 14:16:26,810 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv603922701=4, srv147651029=0, srv2136239425=2, srv2118521717=1, srv886850468=5, srv233916608=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,810 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,810 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,810 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,810 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,810 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,810 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,810 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,810 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table326) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,810 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table568
2023-07-11 14:16:26,810 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv603922701=4, srv147651029=0, srv2136239425=2, srv2118521717=1, srv886850468=5, srv233916608=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,810 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,810 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,810 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,810 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,810 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,810 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,810 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,810 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table568) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,810 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table327
2023-07-11 14:16:26,810 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv603922701=4, srv147651029=0, srv2136239425=2, srv2118521717=1, srv886850468=5, srv233916608=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,810 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,810 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,810 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,810 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,811 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,811 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,811 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,811 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table327) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,811 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table569
2023-07-11 14:16:26,811 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv603922701=4, srv147651029=0, srv2136239425=2, srv2118521717=1, srv886850468=5, srv233916608=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,811 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,811 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,811 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,811 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,811 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,811 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,811 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,811 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table569) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,811 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table328
2023-07-11 14:16:26,811 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv603922701=4, srv147651029=0, srv2136239425=2, srv2118521717=1, srv886850468=5, srv233916608=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,811 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,811 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,811 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,811 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,811 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,811 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,811 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,811 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table328) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,811 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table329
2023-07-11 14:16:26,811 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv603922701=4, srv147651029=0, srv2136239425=2, srv2118521717=1, srv886850468=5, srv233916608=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,811 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,812 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,812 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,812 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,812 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,812 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,812 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,812 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table329) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,812 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1223
2023-07-11 14:16:26,812 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv603922701=4, srv147651029=0, srv2136239425=2, srv2118521717=1, srv886850468=5, srv233916608=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,812 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,812 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,812 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,812 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,812 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,812 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,812 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,812 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1223) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,812 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1465
2023-07-11 14:16:26,812 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv603922701=4, srv147651029=0, srv2136239425=2, srv2118521717=1, srv886850468=5, srv233916608=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,812 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,812 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,812 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,812 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,812 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,812 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,812 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,813 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1465) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,813 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table50
2023-07-11 14:16:26,813 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv603922701=4, srv147651029=0, srv2136239425=2, srv2118521717=1, srv886850468=5, srv233916608=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,813 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,813 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,813 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,813 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,813 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,813 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,813 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,813 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table50) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,813 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1224
2023-07-11 14:16:26,813 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv603922701=4, srv147651029=0, srv2136239425=2, srv2118521717=1, srv886850468=5, srv233916608=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,813 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,813 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,813 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,813 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,813 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,813 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,813 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,813 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1224) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,813 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1466
2023-07-11 14:16:26,814 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv603922701=4, srv147651029=0, srv2136239425=2, srv2118521717=1, srv886850468=5, srv233916608=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,814 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,814 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,814 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,814 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,814 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,814 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,814 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,814 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1466) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,814 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table51
2023-07-11 14:16:26,814 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv603922701=4, srv147651029=0, srv2136239425=2, srv2118521717=1, srv886850468=5, srv233916608=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,814 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,814 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,814 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,814 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,814 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,814 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,814 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,814 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table51) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,814 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1225
2023-07-11 14:16:26,814 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv603922701=4, srv147651029=0, srv2136239425=2, srv2118521717=1, srv886850468=5, srv233916608=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,814 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,814 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,814 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,814 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,815 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,815 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,815 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,815 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1225) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,815 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1467
2023-07-11 14:16:26,815 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv603922701=4, srv147651029=0, srv2136239425=2, srv2118521717=1, srv886850468=5, srv233916608=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,815 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,815 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,815 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,815 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,815 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,815 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,815 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,815 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1467) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,815 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table52
2023-07-11 14:16:26,815 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv603922701=4, srv147651029=0, srv2136239425=2, srv2118521717=1, srv886850468=5, srv233916608=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,815 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,815 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,815 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,815 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,815 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,815 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,815 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,815 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table52) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,815 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1226
2023-07-11 14:16:26,815 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv603922701=4, srv147651029=0, srv2136239425=2, srv2118521717=1, srv886850468=5, srv233916608=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,815 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,816 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,816 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,816 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,816 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,816 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,816 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,816 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1226) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,816 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1468
2023-07-11 14:16:26,816 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv603922701=4, srv147651029=0, srv2136239425=2, srv2118521717=1, srv886850468=5, srv233916608=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,816 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,816 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,816 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,816 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,816 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,816 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,816 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,816 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1468) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,816 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table53
2023-07-11 14:16:26,816 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv603922701=4, srv147651029=0, srv2136239425=2, srv2118521717=1, srv886850468=5, srv233916608=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,816 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,816 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,816 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,816 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,816 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,816 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,816 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,817 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table53) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,817 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1227
2023-07-11 14:16:26,817 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv603922701=4, srv147651029=0, srv2136239425=2, srv2118521717=1, srv886850468=5, srv233916608=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,817 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,817 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,817 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,817 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,817 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,817 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,817 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,817 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1227) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,817 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1469
2023-07-11 14:16:26,817 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv603922701=4, srv147651029=0, srv2136239425=2, srv2118521717=1, srv886850468=5, srv233916608=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,817 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,817 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,817 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,817 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,817 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,817 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,817 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,817 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1469) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,817 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table54
2023-07-11 14:16:26,817 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv603922701=4, srv147651029=0, srv2136239425=2, srv2118521717=1, srv886850468=5, srv233916608=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,817 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,817 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,817 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,818 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,818 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,818 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,818 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,818 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table54) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,818 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1228
2023-07-11 14:16:26,818 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv603922701=4, srv147651029=0, srv2136239425=2, srv2118521717=1, srv886850468=5, srv233916608=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,818 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,818 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,818 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,818 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,818 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,818 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,818 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,818 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1228) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,818 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table55
2023-07-11 14:16:26,818 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv603922701=4, srv147651029=0, srv2136239425=2, srv2118521717=1, srv886850468=5, srv233916608=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,818 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,818 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,818 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,818 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,818 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,818 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,818 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,818 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table55) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,818 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1229
2023-07-11 14:16:26,818 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv603922701=4, srv147651029=0, srv2136239425=2, srv2118521717=1, srv886850468=5, srv233916608=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,819 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,819 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,819 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,819 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,819 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,819 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,819 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,819 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1229) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,819 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table56
2023-07-11 14:16:26,819 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv603922701=4, srv147651029=0, srv2136239425=2, srv2118521717=1, srv886850468=5, srv233916608=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,819 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,819 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,819 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,819 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,819 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,819 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,819 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,819 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table56) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,819 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table46
2023-07-11 14:16:26,819 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv603922701=4, srv147651029=0, srv2136239425=2, srv2118521717=1, srv886850468=5, srv233916608=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,819 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,819 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,819 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,819 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,819 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,819 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,820 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,820 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table46) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,820 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table790
2023-07-11 14:16:26,820 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv603922701=4, srv147651029=0, srv2136239425=2, srv2118521717=1, srv886850468=5, srv233916608=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,820 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,820 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,820 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,820 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,820 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,820 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,820 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,820 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table790) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,820 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table47
2023-07-11 14:16:26,820 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv603922701=4, srv147651029=0, srv2136239425=2, srv2118521717=1, srv886850468=5, srv233916608=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,820 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,820 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,820 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,820 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,820 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,820 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,820 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,820 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table47) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,820 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table791
2023-07-11 14:16:26,820 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv603922701=4, srv147651029=0, srv2136239425=2, srv2118521717=1, srv886850468=5, srv233916608=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,820 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,820 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,821 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,821 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,821 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,821 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,821 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,821 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table791) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,821 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table48
2023-07-11 14:16:26,821 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv603922701=4, srv147651029=0, srv2136239425=2, srv2118521717=1, srv886850468=5, srv233916608=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,821 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,821 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,821 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,821 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,821 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,821 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,821 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,821 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table48) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,821 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table550
2023-07-11 14:16:26,821 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv603922701=4, srv147651029=0, srv2136239425=2, srv2118521717=1, srv886850468=5, srv233916608=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,821 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,821 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,821 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,821 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,821 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,821 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,821 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,821 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table550) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,822 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table792
2023-07-11 14:16:26,822 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv603922701=4, srv147651029=0, srv2136239425=2, srv2118521717=1, srv886850468=5, srv233916608=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,822 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,822 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,822 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,822 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,822 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,822 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,822 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,822 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table792) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,822 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table49
2023-07-11 14:16:26,822 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv603922701=4, srv147651029=0, srv2136239425=2, srv2118521717=1, srv886850468=5, srv233916608=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,822 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,822 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,822 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,822 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,822 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,822 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,822 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,822 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table49) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,822 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table551
2023-07-11 14:16:26,823 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv603922701=4, srv147651029=0, srv2136239425=2, srv2118521717=1, srv886850468=5, srv233916608=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,823 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,823 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,823 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,823 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,823 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,823 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,823 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,823 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table551) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,823 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table793
2023-07-11 14:16:26,823 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv603922701=4, srv147651029=0, srv2136239425=2, srv2118521717=1, srv886850468=5, srv233916608=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,823 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,823 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,823 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,823 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,823 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,823 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,823 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,823 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table793) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,823 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table310
2023-07-11 14:16:26,823 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv603922701=4, srv147651029=0, srv2136239425=2, srv2118521717=1, srv886850468=5, srv233916608=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,823 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,823 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,823 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,823 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,823 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,823 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,823 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,824 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table310) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,824 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table552
2023-07-11 14:16:26,824 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv603922701=4, srv147651029=0, srv2136239425=2, srv2118521717=1, srv886850468=5, srv233916608=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,824 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,824 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,824 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,824 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,824 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,824 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,824 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,824 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table552) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,824 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table794
2023-07-11 14:16:26,824 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv603922701=4, srv147651029=0, srv2136239425=2, srv2118521717=1, srv886850468=5, srv233916608=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,824 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,824 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,824 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,824 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,824 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,824 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,824 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,824 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table794) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,824 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1450
2023-07-11 14:16:26,824 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv603922701=4, srv147651029=0, srv2136239425=2, srv2118521717=1, srv886850468=5, srv233916608=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,824 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,824 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,824 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,825 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,825 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,825 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,825 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,825 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1450) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,825 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table311
2023-07-11 14:16:26,825 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv603922701=4, srv147651029=0, srv2136239425=2, srv2118521717=1, srv886850468=5, srv233916608=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,825 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,825 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,825 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,825 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,825 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,825 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,825 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,825 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table311) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,825 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table553
2023-07-11 14:16:26,825 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv603922701=4, srv147651029=0, srv2136239425=2, srv2118521717=1, srv886850468=5, srv233916608=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,825 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,825 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,825 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,825 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,825 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,825 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,825 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,825 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table553) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,825 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table795
2023-07-11 14:16:26,826 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv603922701=4, srv147651029=0, srv2136239425=2, srv2118521717=1, srv886850468=5, srv233916608=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,826 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,826 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,826 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,826 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,826 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,826 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,826 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,826 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table795) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,826 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1451
2023-07-11 14:16:26,826 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv603922701=4, srv147651029=0, srv2136239425=2, srv2118521717=1, srv886850468=5, srv233916608=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,826 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,826 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,826 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,826 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,826 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,826 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,826 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,826 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1451) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,826 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table312
2023-07-11 14:16:26,826 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv603922701=4, srv147651029=0, srv2136239425=2, srv2118521717=1, srv886850468=5, srv233916608=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,826 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,826 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,826 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,826 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,826 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,826 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,827 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,827 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table312) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,827 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table554
2023-07-11 14:16:26,827 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv603922701=4, srv147651029=0, srv2136239425=2, srv2118521717=1, srv886850468=5, srv233916608=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,827 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,827 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,827 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,827 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,827 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,827 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,827 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,827 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table554) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,827 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table796
2023-07-11 14:16:26,827 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv603922701=4, srv147651029=0, srv2136239425=2, srv2118521717=1, srv886850468=5, srv233916608=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,827 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,827 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,827 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,827 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,827 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,827 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,827 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,827 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table796) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,827 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1210
2023-07-11 14:16:26,827 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv603922701=4, srv147651029=0, srv2136239425=2, srv2118521717=1, srv886850468=5, srv233916608=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,827 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,827 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,827 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,828 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,828 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,828 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,828 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,828 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1210) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,828 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1452
2023-07-11 14:16:26,828 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv603922701=4, srv147651029=0, srv2136239425=2, srv2118521717=1, srv886850468=5, srv233916608=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,828 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,828 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,828 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,828 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,828 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,828 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,828 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,828 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1452) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,828 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table313
2023-07-11 14:16:26,828 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv603922701=4, srv147651029=0, srv2136239425=2, srv2118521717=1, srv886850468=5, srv233916608=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,828 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,828 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,828 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,828 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,828 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,828 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,828 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,828 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table313) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,828 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table555
2023-07-11 14:16:26,829 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv603922701=4, srv147651029=0, srv2136239425=2, srv2118521717=1, srv886850468=5, srv233916608=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,829 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,829 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,829 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,829 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,829 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,829 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,829 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,829 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table555) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,829 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table797
2023-07-11 14:16:26,829 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv603922701=4, srv147651029=0, srv2136239425=2, srv2118521717=1, srv886850468=5, srv233916608=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,829 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,829 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,829 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,829 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,829 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,829 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,829 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,829 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table797) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,829 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1211
2023-07-11 14:16:26,829 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv603922701=4, srv147651029=0, srv2136239425=2, srv2118521717=1, srv886850468=5, srv233916608=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,829 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,829 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,829 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,829 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,829 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,829 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,830 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,830 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1211) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,830 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1453
2023-07-11 14:16:26,830 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv603922701=4, srv147651029=0, srv2136239425=2, srv2118521717=1, srv886850468=5, srv233916608=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,830 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,830 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,830 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,830 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,830 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,830 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,830 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,830 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1453) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,830 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table314
2023-07-11 14:16:26,830 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv603922701=4, srv147651029=0, srv2136239425=2, srv2118521717=1, srv886850468=5, srv233916608=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,830 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,830 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,830 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,830 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,830 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,830 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,830 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,830 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table314) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,830 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table556
2023-07-11 14:16:26,831 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv603922701=4, srv147651029=0, srv2136239425=2, srv2118521717=1, srv886850468=5, srv233916608=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,831 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,831 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,831 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,831 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,831 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,831 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,831 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,831 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table556) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,831 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table798
2023-07-11 14:16:26,831 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv603922701=4, srv147651029=0, srv2136239425=2, srv2118521717=1, srv886850468=5, srv233916608=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,831 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,831 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,831 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,831 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,831 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,831 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,831 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,831 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table798) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,831 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table315
2023-07-11 14:16:26,831 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv603922701=4, srv147651029=0, srv2136239425=2, srv2118521717=1, srv886850468=5, srv233916608=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,831 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,831 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,831 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,831 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,832 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,832 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,832 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,832 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table315) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,832 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table557
2023-07-11 14:16:26,832 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv603922701=4, srv147651029=0, srv2136239425=2, srv2118521717=1, srv886850468=5, srv233916608=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,832 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,832 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,832 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,832 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,832 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,832 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,832 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,832 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table557) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,832 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table799
2023-07-11 14:16:26,832 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv603922701=4, srv147651029=0, srv2136239425=2, srv2118521717=1, srv886850468=5, srv233916608=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,832 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,832 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,832 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,832 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,832 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,832 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,832 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,832 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table799) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,832 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table316
2023-07-11 14:16:26,832 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv603922701=4, srv147651029=0, srv2136239425=2, srv2118521717=1, srv886850468=5, srv233916608=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,833 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,833 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,833 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,833 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,833 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,833 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,833 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,833 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table316) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,833 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table558
2023-07-11 14:16:26,833 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv603922701=4, srv147651029=0, srv2136239425=2, srv2118521717=1, srv886850468=5, srv233916608=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,833 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,833 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,833 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,833 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,833 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,833 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,833 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,833 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table558) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,833 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table317
2023-07-11 14:16:26,833 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv603922701=4, srv147651029=0, srv2136239425=2, srv2118521717=1, srv886850468=5, srv233916608=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,833 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,833 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,833 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,833 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,833 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,833 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,833 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,834 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table317) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,834 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table559
2023-07-11 14:16:26,834 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv603922701=4, srv147651029=0, srv2136239425=2, srv2118521717=1, srv886850468=5, srv233916608=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,834 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,834 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,834 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,834 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,834 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,834 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,834 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,834 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table559) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,834 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table318
2023-07-11 14:16:26,834 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv603922701=4, srv147651029=0, srv2136239425=2, srv2118521717=1, srv886850468=5, srv233916608=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,834 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,834 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,834 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,834 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,834 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,834 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,834 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,834 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table318) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,834 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table319
2023-07-11 14:16:26,834 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv603922701=4, srv147651029=0, srv2136239425=2, srv2118521717=1, srv886850468=5, srv233916608=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,834 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,834 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,834 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,835 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,835 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,835 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,835 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,835 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table319) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,835 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1212
2023-07-11 14:16:26,835 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv603922701=4, srv147651029=0, srv2136239425=2, srv2118521717=1, srv886850468=5, srv233916608=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,835 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,835 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,835 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,835 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,835 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,835 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,835 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,835 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1212) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,835 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1454
2023-07-11 14:16:26,835 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv603922701=4, srv147651029=0, srv2136239425=2, srv2118521717=1, srv886850468=5, srv233916608=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,835 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,835 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,835 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,835 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,835 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,835 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,835 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,835 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1454) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,835 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1213
2023-07-11 14:16:26,835 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv603922701=4, srv147651029=0, srv2136239425=2, srv2118521717=1, srv886850468=5, srv233916608=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,836 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,836 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,836 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,836 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,836 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,836 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,836 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,836 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1213) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,836 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1455
2023-07-11 14:16:26,836 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv603922701=4, srv147651029=0, srv2136239425=2, srv2118521717=1, srv886850468=5, srv233916608=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,836 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,836 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,836 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,836 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,836 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,836 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,836 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,836 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1455) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,836 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table40
2023-07-11 14:16:26,836 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv603922701=4, srv147651029=0, srv2136239425=2, srv2118521717=1, srv886850468=5, srv233916608=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,836 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,836 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,836 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,836 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,836 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,836 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,836 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,837 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table40) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,837 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1214
2023-07-11 14:16:26,837 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv603922701=4, srv147651029=0, srv2136239425=2, srv2118521717=1, srv886850468=5, srv233916608=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,837 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,837 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,837 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,837 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,837 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,837 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,837 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,837 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1214) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,837 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1456
2023-07-11 14:16:26,837 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv603922701=4, srv147651029=0, srv2136239425=2, srv2118521717=1, srv886850468=5, srv233916608=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,837 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,837 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,837 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,837 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,837 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,837 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,837 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,837 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1456) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,837 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table41
2023-07-11 14:16:26,837 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv603922701=4, srv147651029=0, srv2136239425=2, srv2118521717=1, srv886850468=5, srv233916608=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,837 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,837 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,837 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,838 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,838 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,838 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,838 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,838 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table41) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,838 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1215
2023-07-11 14:16:26,838 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv603922701=4, srv147651029=0, srv2136239425=2, srv2118521717=1, srv886850468=5, srv233916608=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,838 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,838 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,838 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,838 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,838 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,838 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,838 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,838 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1215) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,838 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1457
2023-07-11 14:16:26,838 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv603922701=4, srv147651029=0, srv2136239425=2, srv2118521717=1, srv886850468=5, srv233916608=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,838 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,838 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,838 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,838 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,838 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,838 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,838 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,838 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1457) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,838 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table42
2023-07-11 14:16:26,839 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv603922701=4, srv147651029=0, srv2136239425=2, srv2118521717=1, srv886850468=5, srv233916608=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,839 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,839 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,839 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,839 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,839 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,839 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,839 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,839 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table42) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,839 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1216
2023-07-11 14:16:26,839 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv603922701=4, srv147651029=0, srv2136239425=2, srv2118521717=1, srv886850468=5, srv233916608=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,839 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,839 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,839 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,839 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,839 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,839 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,839 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,839 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1216) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,839 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1458
2023-07-11 14:16:26,839 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv603922701=4, srv147651029=0, srv2136239425=2, srv2118521717=1, srv886850468=5, srv233916608=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,840 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,840 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,840 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,840 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,840 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,840 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,840 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,840 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1458) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,840 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table43
2023-07-11 14:16:26,840 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv603922701=4, srv147651029=0, srv2136239425=2, srv2118521717=1, srv886850468=5, srv233916608=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,840 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,840 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,840 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,840 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,840 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,840 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,840 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,840 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table43) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,840 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1217
2023-07-11 14:16:26,840 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv603922701=4, srv147651029=0, srv2136239425=2, srv2118521717=1, srv886850468=5, srv233916608=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,840 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,840 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,840 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,840 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,840 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,840 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,840 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,841 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1217) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,841 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1459
2023-07-11 14:16:26,841 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv603922701=4, srv147651029=0, srv2136239425=2, srv2118521717=1, srv886850468=5, srv233916608=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,841 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,841 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,841 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,841 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,841 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,841 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,841 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,841 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1459) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,841 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table44
2023-07-11 14:16:26,841 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv603922701=4, srv147651029=0, srv2136239425=2, srv2118521717=1, srv886850468=5, srv233916608=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,841 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,841 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,841 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,841 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,841 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,841 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,841 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,841 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table44) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,841 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1218
2023-07-11 14:16:26,841 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv603922701=4, srv147651029=0, srv2136239425=2, srv2118521717=1, srv886850468=5, srv233916608=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,841 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,841 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,841 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,842 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,842 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,842 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,842 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,842 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1218) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,842 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table45
2023-07-11 14:16:26,842 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv603922701=4, srv147651029=0, srv2136239425=2, srv2118521717=1, srv886850468=5, srv233916608=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,842 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,842 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,842 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,842 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,842 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,842 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,842 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,842 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table45) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,842 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1219
2023-07-11 14:16:26,842 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv603922701=4, srv147651029=0, srv2136239425=2, srv2118521717=1, srv886850468=5, srv233916608=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,842 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,842 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,842 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,842 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,842 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,842 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,842 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,842 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1219) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,842 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table35
2023-07-11 14:16:26,842 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv603922701=4, srv147651029=0, srv2136239425=2, srv2118521717=1, srv886850468=5, srv233916608=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,843 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,843 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,843 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,843 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,843 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,843 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,843 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,843 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table35) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,843 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table581
2023-07-11 14:16:26,843 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv603922701=4, srv147651029=0, srv2136239425=2, srv2118521717=1, srv886850468=5, srv233916608=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,843 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,843 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,843 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,843 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,843 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,843 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,843 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,843 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table581) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,843 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table36
2023-07-11 14:16:26,843 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv603922701=4, srv147651029=0, srv2136239425=2, srv2118521717=1, srv886850468=5, srv233916608=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,843 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,843 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,843 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,843 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,843 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,843 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,843 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,844 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table36) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,844 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table340
2023-07-11 14:16:26,844 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv603922701=4, srv147651029=0, srv2136239425=2, srv2118521717=1, srv886850468=5, srv233916608=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,844 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,844 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,844 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,844 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,844 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,844 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,844 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,844 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table340) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,844 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table582
2023-07-11 14:16:26,844 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv603922701=4, srv147651029=0, srv2136239425=2, srv2118521717=1, srv886850468=5, srv233916608=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,844 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,844 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,844 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,844 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,844 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,844 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,844 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,844 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table582) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,844 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table37
2023-07-11 14:16:26,844 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv603922701=4, srv147651029=0, srv2136239425=2, srv2118521717=1, srv886850468=5, srv233916608=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,844 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,844 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,845 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,845 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,845 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,845 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,845 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,845 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table37) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,845 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table341
2023-07-11 14:16:26,845 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv603922701=4, srv147651029=0, srv2136239425=2, srv2118521717=1, srv886850468=5, srv233916608=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,845 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,845 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,845 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,845 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,845 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,845 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,845 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,845 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table341) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,845 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table583
2023-07-11 14:16:26,845 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv603922701=4, srv147651029=0, srv2136239425=2, srv2118521717=1, srv886850468=5, srv233916608=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,845 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,845 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,845 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,845 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,845 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,845 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,845 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,845 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table583) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,846 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table38
2023-07-11 14:16:26,846 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv603922701=4, srv147651029=0, srv2136239425=2, srv2118521717=1, srv886850468=5, srv233916608=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,846 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,846 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,846 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,846 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,846 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,846 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,846 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,846 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table38) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,846 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table100
2023-07-11 14:16:26,846 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv603922701=4, srv147651029=0, srv2136239425=2, srv2118521717=1, srv886850468=5, srv233916608=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,846 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,846 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,846 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,846 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,846 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,846 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,846 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,846 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table100) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,846 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table342
2023-07-11 14:16:26,846 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv603922701=4, srv147651029=0, srv2136239425=2, srv2118521717=1, srv886850468=5, srv233916608=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,846 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,846 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,846 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,846 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,846 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,847 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,847 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,847 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table342) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,847 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table584
2023-07-11 14:16:26,847 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv603922701=4, srv147651029=0, srv2136239425=2, srv2118521717=1, srv886850468=5, srv233916608=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,847 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,847 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,847 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,847 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,847 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,847 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,847 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,847 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table584) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,847 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table39
2023-07-11 14:16:26,847 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv603922701=4, srv147651029=0, srv2136239425=2, srv2118521717=1, srv886850468=5, srv233916608=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,847 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,847 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,847 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,847 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,847 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,847 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,847 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,847 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table39) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,848 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table101
2023-07-11 14:16:26,848 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv603922701=4, srv147651029=0, srv2136239425=2, srv2118521717=1, srv886850468=5, srv233916608=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,848 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,848 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,848 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,848 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,848 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,848 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,848 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,848 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table101) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,848 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table343
2023-07-11 14:16:26,848 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv603922701=4, srv147651029=0, srv2136239425=2, srv2118521717=1, srv886850468=5, srv233916608=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,848 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,848 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,848 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,848 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,848 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,848 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,848 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,848 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table343) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,848 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table585
2023-07-11 14:16:26,848 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv603922701=4, srv147651029=0, srv2136239425=2, srv2118521717=1, srv886850468=5, srv233916608=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,848 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,848 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,849 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,849 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,849 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,849 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,849 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,849 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table585) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,849 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table102
2023-07-11 14:16:26,849 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv603922701=4, srv147651029=0, srv2136239425=2, srv2118521717=1, srv886850468=5, srv233916608=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,849 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,849 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,849 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,849 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,849 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,849 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,849 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,849 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table102) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,849 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table344
2023-07-11 14:16:26,849 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv603922701=4, srv147651029=0, srv2136239425=2, srv2118521717=1, srv886850468=5, srv233916608=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,849 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,849 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,849 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,849 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,849 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,849 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,849 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,849 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table344) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,850 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table586
2023-07-11 14:16:26,850 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv603922701=4, srv147651029=0, srv2136239425=2, srv2118521717=1, srv886850468=5, srv233916608=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,850 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,850 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,850 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,850 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,850 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,850 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,850 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,850 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table586) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,850 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1440
2023-07-11 14:16:26,850 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv603922701=4, srv147651029=0, srv2136239425=2, srv2118521717=1, srv886850468=5, srv233916608=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,850 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,850 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,850 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,850 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,850 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,850 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,850 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,850 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1440) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,850 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table103
2023-07-11 14:16:26,850 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv603922701=4, srv147651029=0, srv2136239425=2, srv2118521717=1, srv886850468=5, srv233916608=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,850 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,850 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,850 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,850 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,850 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,851 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,851 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,851 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table103) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,851 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table345
2023-07-11 14:16:26,851 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv603922701=4, srv147651029=0, srv2136239425=2, srv2118521717=1, srv886850468=5, srv233916608=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,851 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,851 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,851 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,851 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,851 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,851 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,851 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,851 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table345) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,851 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table587
2023-07-11 14:16:26,851 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv603922701=4, srv147651029=0, srv2136239425=2, srv2118521717=1, srv886850468=5, srv233916608=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,851 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,851 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,851 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,851 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,851 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,851 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,851 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,851 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table587) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,851 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1441
2023-07-11 14:16:26,851 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv603922701=4, srv147651029=0, srv2136239425=2, srv2118521717=1, srv886850468=5, srv233916608=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,851 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,852 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,852 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,852 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,852 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,852 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,852 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,852 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1441) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,852 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table104
2023-07-11 14:16:26,852 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv603922701=4, srv147651029=0, srv2136239425=2, srv2118521717=1, srv886850468=5, srv233916608=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,852 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,852 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,852 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,852 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,852 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,852 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,852 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,852 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table104) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,852 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table346
2023-07-11 14:16:26,852 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv603922701=4, srv147651029=0, srv2136239425=2, srv2118521717=1, srv886850468=5, srv233916608=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,852 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,852 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,852 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,852 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,852 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,852 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,852 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,853 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table346) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,853 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table588
2023-07-11 14:16:26,853 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv603922701=4, srv147651029=0, srv2136239425=2, srv2118521717=1, srv886850468=5, srv233916608=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,853 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,853 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,853 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,853 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,853 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,853 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,853 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,853 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table588) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,853 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1200
2023-07-11 14:16:26,853 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv603922701=4, srv147651029=0, srv2136239425=2, srv2118521717=1, srv886850468=5, srv233916608=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,853 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,853 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,853 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,853 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,853 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,853 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,853 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,853 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1200) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,853 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1442
2023-07-11 14:16:26,853 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv603922701=4, srv147651029=0, srv2136239425=2, srv2118521717=1, srv886850468=5, srv233916608=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,853 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,853 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,853 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,853 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,854 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,854 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,854 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,854 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1442) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,854 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table105
2023-07-11 14:16:26,854 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv603922701=4, srv147651029=0, srv2136239425=2, srv2118521717=1, srv886850468=5, srv233916608=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,854 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,854 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,854 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,854 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,854 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,854 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,854 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,854 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table105) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,854 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table347
2023-07-11 14:16:26,854 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv603922701=4, srv147651029=0, srv2136239425=2, srv2118521717=1, srv886850468=5, srv233916608=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,854 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,854 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,854 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,854 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,854 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,854 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,854 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,854 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table347) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,854 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table589
2023-07-11 14:16:26,854 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv603922701=4, srv147651029=0, srv2136239425=2, srv2118521717=1, srv886850468=5, srv233916608=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,855 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,855 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,855 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,855 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,855 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,855 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,855 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,855 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table589) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,855 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table106
2023-07-11 14:16:26,855 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv603922701=4, srv147651029=0, srv2136239425=2, srv2118521717=1, srv886850468=5, srv233916608=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,855 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,855 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,855 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,855 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,855 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,855 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,855 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,855 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table106) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,855 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table348
2023-07-11 14:16:26,855 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv603922701=4, srv147651029=0, srv2136239425=2, srv2118521717=1, srv886850468=5, srv233916608=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,855 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,855 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,855 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,855 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,855 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,855 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,855 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,856 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table348) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,856 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table107
2023-07-11 14:16:26,856 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv603922701=4, srv147651029=0, srv2136239425=2, srv2118521717=1, srv886850468=5, srv233916608=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,856 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,856 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,856 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,856 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,856 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,856 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,856 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,856 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table107) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,856 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table349
2023-07-11 14:16:26,856 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv603922701=4, srv147651029=0, srv2136239425=2, srv2118521717=1, srv886850468=5, srv233916608=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,856 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,856 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,856 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,856 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,856 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,856 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,856 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,857 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table349) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,857 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table108
2023-07-11 14:16:26,857 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv603922701=4, srv147651029=0, srv2136239425=2, srv2118521717=1, srv886850468=5, srv233916608=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,857 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,857 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,857 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,857 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,857 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,857 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,857 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,857 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table108) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,857 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table109
2023-07-11 14:16:26,857 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv603922701=4, srv147651029=0, srv2136239425=2, srv2118521717=1, srv886850468=5, srv233916608=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,857 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,857 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,857 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,857 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,857 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,857 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,857 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,857 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table109) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,857 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1209
2023-07-11 14:16:26,857 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv603922701=4, srv147651029=0, srv2136239425=2, srv2118521717=1, srv886850468=5, srv233916608=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,857 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,857 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,858 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,858 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,858 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,858 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,858 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,858 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1209) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,858 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1201
2023-07-11 14:16:26,858 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv603922701=4, srv147651029=0, srv2136239425=2, srv2118521717=1, srv886850468=5, srv233916608=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,858 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,858 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,858 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,858 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,858 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,858 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,858 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,858 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1201) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,858 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1443
2023-07-11 14:16:26,858 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv603922701=4, srv147651029=0, srv2136239425=2, srv2118521717=1, srv886850468=5, srv233916608=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,858 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,858 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,858 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,858 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,858 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,858 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,858 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,858 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1443) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,858 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1202
2023-07-11 14:16:26,859 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv603922701=4, srv147651029=0, srv2136239425=2, srv2118521717=1, srv886850468=5, srv233916608=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,859 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,859 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,859 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,859 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,859 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,859 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,859 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,859 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1202) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,859 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1444
2023-07-11 14:16:26,859 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv603922701=4, srv147651029=0, srv2136239425=2, srv2118521717=1, srv886850468=5, srv233916608=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,859 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,859 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,859 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,859 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,859 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,859 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,859 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,859 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1444) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,859 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1203
2023-07-11 14:16:26,859 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv603922701=4, srv147651029=0, srv2136239425=2, srv2118521717=1, srv886850468=5, srv233916608=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,859 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,859 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,859 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,859 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,859 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,859 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,860 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,860 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1203) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,860 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1445
2023-07-11 14:16:26,860 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv603922701=4, srv147651029=0, srv2136239425=2, srv2118521717=1, srv886850468=5, srv233916608=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,860 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,860 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,860 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,860 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,860 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,860 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,860 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,860 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1445) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,860 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table30
2023-07-11 14:16:26,860 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv603922701=4, srv147651029=0, srv2136239425=2, srv2118521717=1, srv886850468=5, srv233916608=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,860 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,860 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,860 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,860 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,860 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,860 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,860 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,860 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table30) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,860 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1204
2023-07-11 14:16:26,860 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv603922701=4, srv147651029=0, srv2136239425=2, srv2118521717=1, srv886850468=5, srv233916608=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,860 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,860 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,861 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,861 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,861 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,861 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,861 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,861 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1204) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,861 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1446
2023-07-11 14:16:26,861 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv603922701=4, srv147651029=0, srv2136239425=2, srv2118521717=1, srv886850468=5, srv233916608=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,861 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,861 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,861 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,861 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,861 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,861 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,861 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,861 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1446) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,861 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table31
2023-07-11 14:16:26,861 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv603922701=4, srv147651029=0, srv2136239425=2, srv2118521717=1, srv886850468=5, srv233916608=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,861 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,861 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,861 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,861 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,861 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,861 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,861 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,861 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table31) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,862 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1205
2023-07-11 14:16:26,862 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv603922701=4, srv147651029=0, srv2136239425=2, srv2118521717=1, srv886850468=5, srv233916608=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,862 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,862 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,862 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,862 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,862 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,862 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,862 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,862 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1205) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,862 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1447
2023-07-11 14:16:26,862 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv603922701=4, srv147651029=0, srv2136239425=2, srv2118521717=1, srv886850468=5, srv233916608=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,862 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,862 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,862 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,862 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,862 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,862 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,862 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,862 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1447) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,862 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table32
2023-07-11 14:16:26,862 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv603922701=4, srv147651029=0, srv2136239425=2, srv2118521717=1, srv886850468=5, srv233916608=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,862 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,862 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,862 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,862 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,862 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,862 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,863 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,863 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table32) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,863 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1206
2023-07-11 14:16:26,863 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv603922701=4, srv147651029=0, srv2136239425=2, srv2118521717=1, srv886850468=5, srv233916608=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,863 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,863 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,863 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,863 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,863 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,863 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,863 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,863 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1206) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,863 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1448
2023-07-11 14:16:26,863 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv603922701=4, srv147651029=0, srv2136239425=2, srv2118521717=1, srv886850468=5, srv233916608=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,863 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,863 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,863 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,863 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,863 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,863 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,863 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,863 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1448) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,863 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table33
2023-07-11 14:16:26,863 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv603922701=4, srv147651029=0, srv2136239425=2, srv2118521717=1, srv886850468=5, srv233916608=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,863 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,863 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,864 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,864 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,864 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,864 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,864 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,864 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table33) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,864 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table590
2023-07-11 14:16:26,864 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv603922701=4, srv147651029=0, srv2136239425=2, srv2118521717=1, srv886850468=5, srv233916608=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,864 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,864 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,864 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,864 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,864 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,864 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,864 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,864 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table590) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,864 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1207
2023-07-11 14:16:26,864 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv603922701=4, srv147651029=0, srv2136239425=2, srv2118521717=1, srv886850468=5, srv233916608=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,864 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,864 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,864 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,864 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,864 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,864 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,864 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,864 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1207) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,865 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1449
2023-07-11 14:16:26,865 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv603922701=4, srv147651029=0, srv2136239425=2, srv2118521717=1, srv886850468=5, srv233916608=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,865 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,865 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,865 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,865 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,865 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,865 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,865 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,865 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1449) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,865 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table34
2023-07-11 14:16:26,865 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv603922701=4, srv147651029=0, srv2136239425=2, srv2118521717=1, srv886850468=5, srv233916608=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,865 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,865 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,865 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,865 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,865 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,865 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,865 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,865 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table34) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,865 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table591
2023-07-11 14:16:26,865 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv603922701=4, srv147651029=0, srv2136239425=2, srv2118521717=1, srv886850468=5, srv233916608=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,866 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,866 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,866 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,866 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,866 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,866 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,866 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,866 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table591) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,866 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1208
2023-07-11 14:16:26,866 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv603922701=4, srv147651029=0, srv2136239425=2, srv2118521717=1, srv886850468=5, srv233916608=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,866 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,866 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,866 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,866 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,866 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,866 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,866 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,866 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1208) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,866 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table24
2023-07-11 14:16:26,866 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv603922701=4, srv147651029=0, srv2136239425=2, srv2118521717=1, srv886850468=5, srv233916608=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,866 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,866 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,866 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,866 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,866 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,866 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,866 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,867 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table24) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,867 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table570
2023-07-11 14:16:26,867 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv603922701=4, srv147651029=0, srv2136239425=2, srv2118521717=1, srv886850468=5, srv233916608=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,867 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,867 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,867 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,867 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,867 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,867 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,867 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,867 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table570) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,867 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table25
2023-07-11 14:16:26,867 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv603922701=4, srv147651029=0, srv2136239425=2, srv2118521717=1, srv886850468=5, srv233916608=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,867 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,867 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,867 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,867 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,867 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,867 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,867 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,867 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table25) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,867 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table571
2023-07-11 14:16:26,867 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv603922701=4, srv147651029=0, srv2136239425=2, srv2118521717=1, srv886850468=5, srv233916608=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,867 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,867 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,867 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,867 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,868 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,868 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,868 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,868 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table571) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,868 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table26
2023-07-11 14:16:26,868 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv603922701=4, srv147651029=0, srv2136239425=2, srv2118521717=1, srv886850468=5, srv233916608=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,868 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,868 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,868 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,868 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,868 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,868 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,868 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,868 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table26) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,868 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table330
2023-07-11 14:16:26,868 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv603922701=4, srv147651029=0, srv2136239425=2, srv2118521717=1, srv886850468=5, srv233916608=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,868 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,868 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,868 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,868 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,868 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,868 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,868 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,868 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table330) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,868 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table572
2023-07-11 14:16:26,868 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv603922701=4, srv147651029=0, srv2136239425=2, srv2118521717=1, srv886850468=5, srv233916608=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,869 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,869 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,869 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,869 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,869 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,869 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,869 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,869 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table572) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,869 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table27
2023-07-11 14:16:26,869 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv603922701=4, srv147651029=0, srv2136239425=2, srv2118521717=1, srv886850468=5, srv233916608=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,869 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,869 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,869 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,869 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,869 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,869 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,869 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,869 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table27) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,869 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table331
2023-07-11 14:16:26,869 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv603922701=4, srv147651029=0, srv2136239425=2, srv2118521717=1, srv886850468=5, srv233916608=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,869 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,869 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,869 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,869 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,869 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,870 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,870 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,870 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table331) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,870 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table573
2023-07-11 14:16:26,870 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv603922701=4, srv147651029=0, srv2136239425=2, srv2118521717=1, srv886850468=5, srv233916608=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,870 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,870 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,870 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,870 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,870 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,870 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,870 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,870 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table573) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,870 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table28
2023-07-11 14:16:26,870 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv603922701=4, srv147651029=0, srv2136239425=2, srv2118521717=1, srv886850468=5, srv233916608=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,870 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,870 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,870 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,870 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,870 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,870 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,870 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,870 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table28) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,870 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table332
2023-07-11 14:16:26,870 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv603922701=4, srv147651029=0, srv2136239425=2, srv2118521717=1, srv886850468=5, srv233916608=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,870 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,871 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,871 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,871 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,871 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,871 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,871 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,871 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table332) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,871 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table574
2023-07-11 14:16:26,871 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv603922701=4, srv147651029=0, srv2136239425=2, srv2118521717=1, srv886850468=5, srv233916608=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,871 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,871 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,871 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,871 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,871 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,871 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,871 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,871 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table574) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,871 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table29
2023-07-11 14:16:26,871 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv603922701=4, srv147651029=0, srv2136239425=2, srv2118521717=1, srv886850468=5, srv233916608=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,871 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,871 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,871 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,871 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,871 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,871 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,871 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,871 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table29) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,872 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table333
2023-07-11 14:16:26,872 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv603922701=4, srv147651029=0, srv2136239425=2, srv2118521717=1, srv886850468=5, srv233916608=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,872 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,872 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,872 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,872 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,872 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,872 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,872 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,872 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table333) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,872 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table575
2023-07-11 14:16:26,872 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv603922701=4, srv147651029=0, srv2136239425=2, srv2118521717=1, srv886850468=5, srv233916608=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,872 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,872 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,872 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,872 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,872 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,872 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,872 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,872 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table575) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,872 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table334
2023-07-11 14:16:26,872 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv603922701=4, srv147651029=0, srv2136239425=2, srv2118521717=1, srv886850468=5, srv233916608=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,872 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,872 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,872 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,872 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,872 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,873 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,873 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,873 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table334) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,873 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table576
2023-07-11 14:16:26,873 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv603922701=4, srv147651029=0, srv2136239425=2, srv2118521717=1, srv886850468=5, srv233916608=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,873 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,873 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,873 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,873 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,873 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,873 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,873 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,873 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table576) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,873 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1430
2023-07-11 14:16:26,873 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv603922701=4, srv147651029=0, srv2136239425=2, srv2118521717=1, srv886850468=5, srv233916608=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,873 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,873 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,873 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,873 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,873 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,873 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,874 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,874 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1430) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,874 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table335
2023-07-11 14:16:26,874 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv603922701=4, srv147651029=0, srv2136239425=2, srv2118521717=1, srv886850468=5, srv233916608=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,874 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,874 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,874 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,874 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,874 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,874 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,874 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,874 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table335) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,874 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table577
2023-07-11 14:16:26,874 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv603922701=4, srv147651029=0, srv2136239425=2, srv2118521717=1, srv886850468=5, srv233916608=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,874 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,874 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,874 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,874 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,874 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,874 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,874 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,874 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table577) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,874 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1431
2023-07-11 14:16:26,874 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv603922701=4, srv147651029=0, srv2136239425=2, srv2118521717=1, srv886850468=5, srv233916608=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,874 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,874 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,875 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,875 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,875 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,875 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,875 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,875 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1431) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,875 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table336
2023-07-11 14:16:26,875 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv603922701=4, srv147651029=0, srv2136239425=2, srv2118521717=1, srv886850468=5, srv233916608=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,875 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,875 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,875 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,875 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,875 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,875 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,875 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,875 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table336) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,875 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table578
2023-07-11 14:16:26,875 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv603922701=4, srv147651029=0, srv2136239425=2, srv2118521717=1, srv886850468=5, srv233916608=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,875 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,875 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,875 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,875 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,875 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,875 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,875 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,875 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table578) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,875 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table337
2023-07-11 14:16:26,876 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv603922701=4, srv147651029=0, srv2136239425=2, srv2118521717=1, srv886850468=5, srv233916608=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,876 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,876 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,876 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,876 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,876 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,876 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,876 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,876 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table337) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,876 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table579
2023-07-11 14:16:26,876 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv603922701=4, srv147651029=0, srv2136239425=2, srv2118521717=1, srv886850468=5, srv233916608=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,876 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,876 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,876 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,876 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,876 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,876 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,876 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,876 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table579) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,876 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table338
2023-07-11 14:16:26,876 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv603922701=4, srv147651029=0, srv2136239425=2, srv2118521717=1, srv886850468=5, srv233916608=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,876 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,876 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,876 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,876 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,876 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,876 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,877 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,877 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table338) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,877 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table339
2023-07-11 14:16:26,877 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv603922701=4, srv147651029=0, srv2136239425=2, srv2118521717=1, srv886850468=5, srv233916608=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,877 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,877 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,877 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,877 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,877 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,877 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,877 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,877 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table339) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,877 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1432
2023-07-11 14:16:26,877 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv603922701=4, srv147651029=0, srv2136239425=2, srv2118521717=1, srv886850468=5, srv233916608=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,877 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,877 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,877 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,877 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,877 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,877 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,877 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,877 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1432) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,877 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1433
2023-07-11 14:16:26,877 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv603922701=4, srv147651029=0, srv2136239425=2, srv2118521717=1, srv886850468=5, srv233916608=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,877 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,878 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,878 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,878 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,878 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,878 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,878 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,878 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1433) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,878 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1434
2023-07-11 14:16:26,878 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv603922701=4, srv147651029=0, srv2136239425=2, srv2118521717=1, srv886850468=5, srv233916608=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,878 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,878 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,878 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,878 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,878 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,878 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,878 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,878 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1434) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,878 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1435
2023-07-11 14:16:26,878 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv603922701=4, srv147651029=0, srv2136239425=2, srv2118521717=1, srv886850468=5, srv233916608=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,878 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,878 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,878 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,878 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,878 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,878 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,878 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,878 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1435) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,879 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table20
2023-07-11 14:16:26,879 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv603922701=4, srv147651029=0, srv2136239425=2, srv2118521717=1, srv886850468=5, srv233916608=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,879 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,879 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,879 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,879 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,879 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,879 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,879 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,879 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table20) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,879 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1436
2023-07-11 14:16:26,879 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv603922701=4, srv147651029=0, srv2136239425=2, srv2118521717=1, srv886850468=5, srv233916608=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,879 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,879 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,879 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,879 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,879 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,879 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,879 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,879 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1436) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,879 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table21
2023-07-11 14:16:26,879 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv603922701=4, srv147651029=0, srv2136239425=2, srv2118521717=1, srv886850468=5, srv233916608=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,879 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,879 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,879 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,879 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,879 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,880 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,880 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,880 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table21) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,880 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1437
2023-07-11 14:16:26,880 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv603922701=4, srv147651029=0, srv2136239425=2, srv2118521717=1, srv886850468=5, srv233916608=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,880 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,880 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,880 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,880 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,880 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,880 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,880 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,880 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1437) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,880 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table22
2023-07-11 14:16:26,880 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv603922701=4, srv147651029=0, srv2136239425=2, srv2118521717=1, srv886850468=5, srv233916608=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,880 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,880 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,880 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,880 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,880 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,880 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,880 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,880 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table22) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,880 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1438
2023-07-11 14:16:26,880 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv603922701=4, srv147651029=0, srv2136239425=2, srv2118521717=1, srv886850468=5, srv233916608=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,880 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,881 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,881 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,881 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,881 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,881 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,881 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,881 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1438) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,881 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table23
2023-07-11 14:16:26,881 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv603922701=4, srv147651029=0, srv2136239425=2, srv2118521717=1, srv886850468=5, srv233916608=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,881 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,881 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,881 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,881 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,881 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,881 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,881 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,881 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table23) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,881 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table580
2023-07-11 14:16:26,881 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv603922701=4, srv147651029=0, srv2136239425=2, srv2118521717=1, srv886850468=5, srv233916608=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,881 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,881 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,881 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,881 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,881 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,881 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,881 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,882 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table580) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,882 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1439
2023-07-11 14:16:26,882 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv603922701=4, srv147651029=0, srv2136239425=2, srv2118521717=1, srv886850468=5, srv233916608=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,882 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,882 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,882 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,882 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,882 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,882 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,882 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,882 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1439) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,882 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table284
2023-07-11 14:16:26,882 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv603922701=4, srv147651029=0, srv2136239425=2, srv2118521717=1, srv886850468=5, srv233916608=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,882 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,882 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,882 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,882 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,882 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,882 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,882 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,882 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table284) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,882 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table285
2023-07-11 14:16:26,883 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv603922701=4, srv147651029=0, srv2136239425=2, srv2118521717=1, srv886850468=5, srv233916608=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,883 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,883 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,883 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,883 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,883 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,883 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,883 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,883 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table285) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,883 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table286
2023-07-11 14:16:26,883 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv603922701=4, srv147651029=0, srv2136239425=2, srv2118521717=1, srv886850468=5, srv233916608=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,883 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,883 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,883 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,883 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,883 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,883 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,883 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,883 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table286) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,883 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table287
2023-07-11 14:16:26,883 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv603922701=4, srv147651029=0, srv2136239425=2, srv2118521717=1, srv886850468=5, srv233916608=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,883 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,883 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,884 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,884 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,884 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,884 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,884 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,884 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table287) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,884 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table288
2023-07-11 14:16:26,884 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv603922701=4, srv147651029=0, srv2136239425=2, srv2118521717=1, srv886850468=5, srv233916608=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,884 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,884 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,884 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,884 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,884 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,884 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,884 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,884 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table288) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,884 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table289
2023-07-11 14:16:26,884 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv603922701=4, srv147651029=0, srv2136239425=2, srv2118521717=1, srv886850468=5, srv233916608=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,884 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,884 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,884 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,884 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,884 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,885 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,885 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,885 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table289) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,885 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table290
2023-07-11 14:16:26,885 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv603922701=4, srv147651029=0, srv2136239425=2, srv2118521717=1, srv886850468=5, srv233916608=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,885 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,885 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,885 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,885 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,885 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,885 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,885 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,885 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table290) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,885 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table291
2023-07-11 14:16:26,885 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv603922701=4, srv147651029=0, srv2136239425=2, srv2118521717=1, srv886850468=5, srv233916608=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,885 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,885 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,885 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,885 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,885 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,885 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,885 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,885 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table291) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,885 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table292
2023-07-11 14:16:26,885 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv603922701=4, srv147651029=0, srv2136239425=2, srv2118521717=1, srv886850468=5, srv233916608=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,886 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,886 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,886 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,886 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,886 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,886 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,886 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,886 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table292) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,886 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table293
2023-07-11 14:16:26,886 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv603922701=4, srv147651029=0, srv2136239425=2, srv2118521717=1, srv886850468=5, srv233916608=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,886 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,886 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,886 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,886 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,886 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,886 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,886 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,886 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table293) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,886 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table294
2023-07-11 14:16:26,886 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv603922701=4, srv147651029=0, srv2136239425=2, srv2118521717=1, srv886850468=5, srv233916608=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,886 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,886 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,886 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,886 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,886 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,886 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,887 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,887 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table294) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,887 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table273
2023-07-11 14:16:26,887 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv603922701=4, srv147651029=0, srv2136239425=2, srv2118521717=1, srv886850468=5, srv233916608=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,887 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,887 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,887 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,887 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,887 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,887 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,887 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,887 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table273) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,887 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table274
2023-07-11 14:16:26,887 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv603922701=4, srv147651029=0, srv2136239425=2, srv2118521717=1, srv886850468=5, srv233916608=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,887 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,887 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,887 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,887 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,887 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,887 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,887 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,887 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table274) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,887 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table275
2023-07-11 14:16:26,887 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv603922701=4, srv147651029=0, srv2136239425=2, srv2118521717=1, srv886850468=5, srv233916608=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,887 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,887 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,888 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,888 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,888 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,888 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,888 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,888 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table275) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,888 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table276
2023-07-11 14:16:26,888 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv603922701=4, srv147651029=0, srv2136239425=2, srv2118521717=1, srv886850468=5, srv233916608=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,888 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,888 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,888 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,888 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,888 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,888 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,888 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,888 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table276) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,888 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table277
2023-07-11 14:16:26,888 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv603922701=4, srv147651029=0, srv2136239425=2, srv2118521717=1, srv886850468=5, srv233916608=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,888 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,888 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,888 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,888 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,888 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,888 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,888 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,888 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table277) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,889 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table278
2023-07-11 14:16:26,889 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv603922701=4, srv147651029=0, srv2136239425=2, srv2118521717=1, srv886850468=5, srv233916608=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,889 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,889 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,889 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,889 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,889 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,889 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,889 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,889 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table278) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,889 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table279
2023-07-11 14:16:26,889 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv603922701=4, srv147651029=0, srv2136239425=2, srv2118521717=1, srv886850468=5, srv233916608=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,889 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,889 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,889 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,889 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,889 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,889 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,889 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,889 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table279) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,889 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table280
2023-07-11 14:16:26,889 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv603922701=4, srv147651029=0, srv2136239425=2, srv2118521717=1, srv886850468=5, srv233916608=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,889 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,889 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,889 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,889 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,889 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,890 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,890 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,890 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table280) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,890 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table281
2023-07-11 14:16:26,890 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv603922701=4, srv147651029=0, srv2136239425=2, srv2118521717=1, srv886850468=5, srv233916608=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,890 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,890 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,890 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,890 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,890 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,890 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,890 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,890 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table281) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,890 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table282
2023-07-11 14:16:26,890 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv603922701=4, srv147651029=0, srv2136239425=2, srv2118521717=1, srv886850468=5, srv233916608=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,890 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,890 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,890 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,890 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,890 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,890 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,890 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,890 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table282) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,891 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table283
2023-07-11 14:16:26,891 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv603922701=4, srv147651029=0, srv2136239425=2, srv2118521717=1, srv886850468=5, srv233916608=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,891 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,891 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,891 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,891 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,891 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,891 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,891 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,891 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table283) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,891 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table295
2023-07-11 14:16:26,891 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv603922701=4, srv147651029=0, srv2136239425=2, srv2118521717=1, srv886850468=5, srv233916608=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,891 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,891 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,891 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,891 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,891 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,891 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,891 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,891 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table295) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,891 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table296
2023-07-11 14:16:26,891 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv603922701=4, srv147651029=0, srv2136239425=2, srv2118521717=1, srv886850468=5, srv233916608=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,891 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,891 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,892 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,892 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,892 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,892 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,892 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,892 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table296) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,892 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table297
2023-07-11 14:16:26,892 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv603922701=4, srv147651029=0, srv2136239425=2, srv2118521717=1, srv886850468=5, srv233916608=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,892 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,892 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,892 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,892 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,892 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,892 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,892 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,892 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table297) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,892 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table298
2023-07-11 14:16:26,892 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv603922701=4, srv147651029=0, srv2136239425=2, srv2118521717=1, srv886850468=5, srv233916608=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,892 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,892 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,892 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,892 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,892 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,892 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,892 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,892 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table298) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,893 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table299
2023-07-11 14:16:26,893 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv603922701=4, srv147651029=0, srv2136239425=2, srv2118521717=1, srv886850468=5, srv233916608=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,893 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,893 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,893 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,893 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,893 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,893 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,893 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,893 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table299) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,893 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table920
2023-07-11 14:16:26,893 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv603922701=4, srv147651029=0, srv2136239425=2, srv2118521717=1, srv886850468=5, srv233916608=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,893 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,893 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,893 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,893 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,893 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,893 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,893 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,893 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table920) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,893 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table921
2023-07-11 14:16:26,893 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv603922701=4, srv147651029=0, srv2136239425=2, srv2118521717=1, srv886850468=5, srv233916608=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,893 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,893 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,893 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,893 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,893 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,894 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,894 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,894 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table921) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,894 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table922
2023-07-11 14:16:26,894 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv603922701=4, srv147651029=0, srv2136239425=2, srv2118521717=1, srv886850468=5, srv233916608=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,894 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,894 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,894 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,894 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,894 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,894 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,894 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,894 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table922) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,894 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table923
2023-07-11 14:16:26,894 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv603922701=4, srv147651029=0, srv2136239425=2, srv2118521717=1, srv886850468=5, srv233916608=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,894 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,894 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,894 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,894 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,894 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,894 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,894 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,894 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table923) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,894 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table924
2023-07-11 14:16:26,894 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv603922701=4, srv147651029=0, srv2136239425=2, srv2118521717=1, srv886850468=5, srv233916608=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,895 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,895 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,895 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,895 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,895 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,895 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,895 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,895 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table924) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,895 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table925
2023-07-11 14:16:26,895 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv603922701=4, srv147651029=0, srv2136239425=2, srv2118521717=1, srv886850468=5, srv233916608=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,895 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,895 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,895 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,895 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,895 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,895 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,895 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,895 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table925) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,895 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table926
2023-07-11 14:16:26,895 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv603922701=4, srv147651029=0, srv2136239425=2, srv2118521717=1, srv886850468=5, srv233916608=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,895 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,895 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,895 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,895 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,895 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,895 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,895 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,895 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table926) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,896 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table927
2023-07-11 14:16:26,896 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv603922701=4, srv147651029=0, srv2136239425=2, srv2118521717=1, srv886850468=5, srv233916608=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,896 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,896 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,896 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,896 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,896 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,896 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,896 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,896 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table927) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,896 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table928
2023-07-11 14:16:26,896 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv603922701=4, srv147651029=0, srv2136239425=2, srv2118521717=1, srv886850468=5, srv233916608=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,896 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,896 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,896 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,896 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,896 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,896 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,896 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,896 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table928) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,896 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table929
2023-07-11 14:16:26,896 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv603922701=4, srv147651029=0, srv2136239425=2, srv2118521717=1, srv886850468=5, srv233916608=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,896 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,896 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,896 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,896 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,897 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,897 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,897 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,897 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table929) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,897 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1094
2023-07-11 14:16:26,897 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv603922701=4, srv147651029=0, srv2136239425=2, srv2118521717=1, srv886850468=5, srv233916608=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,897 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,897 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,897 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,897 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,897 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,897 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,897 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,897 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1094) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,897 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1095
2023-07-11 14:16:26,897 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv603922701=4, srv147651029=0, srv2136239425=2, srv2118521717=1, srv886850468=5, srv233916608=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,897 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,897 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,897 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,897 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,897 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,897 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,897 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,897 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1095) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,897 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1096
2023-07-11 14:16:26,897 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv603922701=4, srv147651029=0, srv2136239425=2, srv2118521717=1, srv886850468=5, srv233916608=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,898 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,898 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,898 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,898 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,898 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,898 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,898 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,898 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1096) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,898 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1097
2023-07-11 14:16:26,898 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv603922701=4, srv147651029=0, srv2136239425=2, srv2118521717=1, srv886850468=5, srv233916608=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,898 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,898 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,898 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,898 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,898 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,898 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,898 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,898 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1097) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,898 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1098
2023-07-11 14:16:26,898 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv603922701=4, srv147651029=0, srv2136239425=2, srv2118521717=1, srv886850468=5, srv233916608=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,898 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,898 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,898 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,898 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,898 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,898 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,898 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,898 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1098) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,899 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1099
2023-07-11 14:16:26,899 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv603922701=4, srv147651029=0, srv2136239425=2, srv2118521717=1, srv886850468=5, srv233916608=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,899 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,899 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,899 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,899 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,899 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,899 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,899 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,899 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1099) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,899 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table910
2023-07-11 14:16:26,899 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv603922701=4, srv147651029=0, srv2136239425=2, srv2118521717=1, srv886850468=5, srv233916608=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,899 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,899 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,899 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,899 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,899 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,899 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,899 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,899 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table910) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,899 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table911
2023-07-11 14:16:26,899 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv603922701=4, srv147651029=0, srv2136239425=2, srv2118521717=1, srv886850468=5, srv233916608=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,900 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,900 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,900 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,900 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,900 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,900 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,900 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,900 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table911) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,900 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table912
2023-07-11 14:16:26,900 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv603922701=4, srv147651029=0, srv2136239425=2, srv2118521717=1, srv886850468=5, srv233916608=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,900 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,900 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,900 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,900 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,900 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,900 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,900 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,900 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table912) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,900 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1090
2023-07-11 14:16:26,900 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv603922701=4, srv147651029=0, srv2136239425=2, srv2118521717=1, srv886850468=5, srv233916608=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,900 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,900 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,900 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,900 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,900 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,900 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,900 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,901 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1090) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,901 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table913
2023-07-11 14:16:26,901 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv603922701=4, srv147651029=0, srv2136239425=2, srv2118521717=1, srv886850468=5, srv233916608=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,901 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,901 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,901 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,901 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,901 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,901 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,901 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,901 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table913) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,901 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1091
2023-07-11 14:16:26,901 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv603922701=4, srv147651029=0, srv2136239425=2, srv2118521717=1, srv886850468=5, srv233916608=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,901 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,901 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,901 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,901 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,901 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,901 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,901 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,901 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1091) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,901 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table914
2023-07-11 14:16:26,901 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv603922701=4, srv147651029=0, srv2136239425=2, srv2118521717=1, srv886850468=5, srv233916608=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,901 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,901 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,901 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,902 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,902 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,902 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,902 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,902 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table914) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,902 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1092
2023-07-11 14:16:26,902 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv603922701=4, srv147651029=0, srv2136239425=2, srv2118521717=1, srv886850468=5, srv233916608=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,902 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,902 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,902 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,902 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,902 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,902 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,902 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,902 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1092) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,902 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table915
2023-07-11 14:16:26,902 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv603922701=4, srv147651029=0, srv2136239425=2, srv2118521717=1, srv886850468=5, srv233916608=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,902 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,902 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,902 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,902 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,902 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,902 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,902 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,902 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table915) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,902 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1093
2023-07-11 14:16:26,902 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv603922701=4, srv147651029=0, srv2136239425=2, srv2118521717=1, srv886850468=5, srv233916608=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,903 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,903 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,903 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,903 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,903 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,903 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,903 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,903 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1093) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,903 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table916
2023-07-11 14:16:26,903 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv603922701=4, srv147651029=0, srv2136239425=2, srv2118521717=1, srv886850468=5, srv233916608=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,903 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,903 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,903 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,903 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,903 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,903 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,903 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,903 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table916) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,903 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table917
2023-07-11 14:16:26,903 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv603922701=4, srv147651029=0, srv2136239425=2, srv2118521717=1, srv886850468=5, srv233916608=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,903 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,903 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,903 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,903 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,903 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,903 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,903 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,904 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table917) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,904 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table918
2023-07-11 14:16:26,904 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv603922701=4, srv147651029=0, srv2136239425=2, srv2118521717=1, srv886850468=5, srv233916608=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,904 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,904 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,904 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,904 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,904 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,904 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,904 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,904 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table918) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,904 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table919
2023-07-11 14:16:26,904 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv603922701=4, srv147651029=0, srv2136239425=2, srv2118521717=1, srv886850468=5, srv233916608=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,904 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,904 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,904 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,904 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,904 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,904 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,904 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,904 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table919) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,904 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1083
2023-07-11 14:16:26,904 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv603922701=4, srv147651029=0, srv2136239425=2, srv2118521717=1, srv886850468=5, srv233916608=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,904 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,904 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,904 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,904 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,905 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,905 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,905 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,905 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1083) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,905 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1084
2023-07-11 14:16:26,905 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv603922701=4, srv147651029=0, srv2136239425=2, srv2118521717=1, srv886850468=5, srv233916608=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,905 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,905 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,905 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,905 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,905 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,905 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,905 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,905 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1084) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,905 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1085
2023-07-11 14:16:26,905 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv603922701=4, srv147651029=0, srv2136239425=2, srv2118521717=1, srv886850468=5, srv233916608=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,905 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,905 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,905 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,905 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,905 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,905 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,905 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,905 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1085) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,905 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1086
2023-07-11 14:16:26,905 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv603922701=4, srv147651029=0, srv2136239425=2, srv2118521717=1, srv886850468=5, srv233916608=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,905 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,906 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,906 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,906 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,906 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,906 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,906 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,906 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1086) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,906 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1087
2023-07-11 14:16:26,906 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv603922701=4, srv147651029=0, srv2136239425=2, srv2118521717=1, srv886850468=5, srv233916608=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,906 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,906 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,906 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,906 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,906 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,906 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,906 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,906 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1087) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,906 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1088
2023-07-11 14:16:26,906 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv603922701=4, srv147651029=0, srv2136239425=2, srv2118521717=1, srv886850468=5, srv233916608=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,906 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,906 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,906 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,906 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,906 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,906 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,906 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,906 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1088) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,907 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1089
2023-07-11 14:16:26,907 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv603922701=4, srv147651029=0, srv2136239425=2, srv2118521717=1, srv886850468=5, srv233916608=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,907 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,907 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,907 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,907 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,907 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,907 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,907 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,907 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1089) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,907 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table940
2023-07-11 14:16:26,907 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv603922701=4, srv147651029=0, srv2136239425=2, srv2118521717=1, srv886850468=5, srv233916608=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,907 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,907 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,907 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,907 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,907 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,907 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,907 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,907 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table940) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,907 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table941
2023-07-11 14:16:26,907 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv603922701=4, srv147651029=0, srv2136239425=2, srv2118521717=1, srv886850468=5, srv233916608=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,907 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,908 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,908 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,908 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,908 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,908 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,908 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,908 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table941) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,908 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table700
2023-07-11 14:16:26,908 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv603922701=4, srv147651029=0, srv2136239425=2, srv2118521717=1, srv886850468=5, srv233916608=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,908 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,908 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,908 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,908 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,908 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,908 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,908 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,908 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table700) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,908 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table942
2023-07-11 14:16:26,908 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv603922701=4, srv147651029=0, srv2136239425=2, srv2118521717=1, srv886850468=5, srv233916608=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,908 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,908 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,908 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,908 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,908 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,908 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,908 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,908 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table942) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,909 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table701
2023-07-11 14:16:26,909 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv603922701=4, srv147651029=0, srv2136239425=2, srv2118521717=1, srv886850468=5, srv233916608=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,909 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,909 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,909 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,909 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,909 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,909 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,909 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,909 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table701) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,909 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table943
2023-07-11 14:16:26,909 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv603922701=4, srv147651029=0, srv2136239425=2, srv2118521717=1, srv886850468=5, srv233916608=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,909 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,909 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,909 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,909 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,909 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,909 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,909 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,909 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table943) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,909 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table702
2023-07-11 14:16:26,909 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv603922701=4, srv147651029=0, srv2136239425=2, srv2118521717=1, srv886850468=5, srv233916608=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,909 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,909 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,909 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,909 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,909 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,910 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,910 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,910 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table702) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,910 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table944
2023-07-11 14:16:26,910 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv603922701=4, srv147651029=0, srv2136239425=2, srv2118521717=1, srv886850468=5, srv233916608=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,910 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,910 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,910 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,910 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,910 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,910 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,910 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,910 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table944) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,910 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table703
2023-07-11 14:16:26,910 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv603922701=4, srv147651029=0, srv2136239425=2, srv2118521717=1, srv886850468=5, srv233916608=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,910 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,910 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,910 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,910 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,910 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,910 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,910 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,910 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table703) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,910 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table945
2023-07-11 14:16:26,910 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv603922701=4, srv147651029=0, srv2136239425=2, srv2118521717=1, srv886850468=5, srv233916608=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,910 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,910 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,911 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,911 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,911 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,911 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,911 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,911 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table945) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,911 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table704
2023-07-11 14:16:26,911 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv603922701=4, srv147651029=0, srv2136239425=2, srv2118521717=1, srv886850468=5, srv233916608=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,911 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,911 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,911 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,911 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,911 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,911 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,911 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,911 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table704) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,911 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table946
2023-07-11 14:16:26,911 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv603922701=4, srv147651029=0, srv2136239425=2, srv2118521717=1, srv886850468=5, srv233916608=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,911 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,911 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,911 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,911 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,911 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,911 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,911 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,911 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table946) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,911 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1080
2023-07-11 14:16:26,912 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv603922701=4, srv147651029=0, srv2136239425=2, srv2118521717=1, srv886850468=5, srv233916608=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,912 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,912 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,912 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,912 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,912 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,912 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,912 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,912 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1080) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,912 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table705
2023-07-11 14:16:26,912 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv603922701=4, srv147651029=0, srv2136239425=2, srv2118521717=1, srv886850468=5, srv233916608=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,912 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,912 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,912 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,912 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,912 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,912 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,912 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,912 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table705) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,912 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table947
2023-07-11 14:16:26,912 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv603922701=4, srv147651029=0, srv2136239425=2, srv2118521717=1, srv886850468=5, srv233916608=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,912 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,912 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,912 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,912 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,912 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,912 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,913 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,913 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table947) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,913 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1081
2023-07-11 14:16:26,913 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv603922701=4, srv147651029=0, srv2136239425=2, srv2118521717=1, srv886850468=5, srv233916608=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,913 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,913 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,913 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,913 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,913 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,913 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,913 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,913 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1081) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,913 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table706
2023-07-11 14:16:26,913 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv603922701=4, srv147651029=0, srv2136239425=2, srv2118521717=1, srv886850468=5, srv233916608=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,913 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,913 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,913 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,913 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,913 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,913 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,913 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,913 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table706) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,913 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table948
2023-07-11 14:16:26,913 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv603922701=4, srv147651029=0, srv2136239425=2, srv2118521717=1, srv886850468=5, srv233916608=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,913 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,913 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,913 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,914 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,914 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,914 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,914 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,914 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table948) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,914 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1082
2023-07-11 14:16:26,914 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv603922701=4, srv147651029=0, srv2136239425=2, srv2118521717=1, srv886850468=5, srv233916608=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,914 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,914 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,914 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,914 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,914 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,914 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,914 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,914 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1082) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,914 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table707
2023-07-11 14:16:26,914 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv603922701=4, srv147651029=0, srv2136239425=2, srv2118521717=1, srv886850468=5, srv233916608=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,914 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,914 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,914 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,914 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,914 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,914 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,914 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,914 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table707) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,914 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table949
2023-07-11 14:16:26,914 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv603922701=4, srv147651029=0, srv2136239425=2, srv2118521717=1, srv886850468=5, srv233916608=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,915 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,915 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,915 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,915 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,915 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,915 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,915 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,915 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table949) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,915 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table708
2023-07-11 14:16:26,915 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv603922701=4, srv147651029=0, srv2136239425=2, srv2118521717=1, srv886850468=5, srv233916608=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,915 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,915 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,915 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,915 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,915 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,915 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,915 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,915 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table708) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,915 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table709
2023-07-11 14:16:26,915 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv603922701=4, srv147651029=0, srv2136239425=2, srv2118521717=1, srv886850468=5, srv233916608=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,915 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,915 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,915 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,915 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,915 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,915 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,915 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,916 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table709) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,916 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1072
2023-07-11 14:16:26,916 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv603922701=4, srv147651029=0, srv2136239425=2, srv2118521717=1, srv886850468=5, srv233916608=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,916 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,916 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,916 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,916 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,916 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,916 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,916 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,916 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1072) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,916 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1073
2023-07-11 14:16:26,916 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv603922701=4, srv147651029=0, srv2136239425=2, srv2118521717=1, srv886850468=5, srv233916608=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,916 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,916 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,916 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,916 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,916 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,916 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,916 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,916 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1073) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,917 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1074
2023-07-11 14:16:26,917 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv603922701=4, srv147651029=0, srv2136239425=2, srv2118521717=1, srv886850468=5, srv233916608=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,917 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,917 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,917 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,917 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,917 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,917 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,917 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,917 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1074) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,917 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1075
2023-07-11 14:16:26,917 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv603922701=4, srv147651029=0, srv2136239425=2, srv2118521717=1, srv886850468=5, srv233916608=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,917 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,917 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,917 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,917 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,917 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,917 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,917 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,917 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1075) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,917 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1076
2023-07-11 14:16:26,917 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv603922701=4, srv147651029=0, srv2136239425=2, srv2118521717=1, srv886850468=5, srv233916608=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,917 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,917 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,917 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,917 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,917 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,918 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,918 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,918 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1076) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,918 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1077
2023-07-11 14:16:26,918 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv603922701=4, srv147651029=0, srv2136239425=2, srv2118521717=1, srv886850468=5, srv233916608=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,918 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,918 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,918 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,918 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,918 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,918 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,918 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,918 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1077) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,918 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1078
2023-07-11 14:16:26,918 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv603922701=4, srv147651029=0, srv2136239425=2, srv2118521717=1, srv886850468=5, srv233916608=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,918 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,918 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,918 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,918 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,918 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,918 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,918 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,918 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1078) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,918 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1079
2023-07-11 14:16:26,918 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv603922701=4, srv147651029=0, srv2136239425=2, srv2118521717=1, srv886850468=5, srv233916608=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,918 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,918 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,919 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,919 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,919 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,919 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,919 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,919 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1079) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,919 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table930
2023-07-11 14:16:26,919 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv603922701=4, srv147651029=0, srv2136239425=2, srv2118521717=1, srv886850468=5, srv233916608=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,919 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,919 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,919 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,919 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,919 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,919 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,919 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,919 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table930) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,919 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table931
2023-07-11 14:16:26,919 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv603922701=4, srv147651029=0, srv2136239425=2, srv2118521717=1, srv886850468=5, srv233916608=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,919 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,919 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,919 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,919 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,919 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,919 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,919 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,919 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table931) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,919 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table932
2023-07-11 14:16:26,920 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv603922701=4, srv147651029=0, srv2136239425=2, srv2118521717=1, srv886850468=5, srv233916608=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,920 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,920 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,920 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,920 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,920 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,920 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,920 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,920 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table932) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,920 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table933
2023-07-11 14:16:26,920 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv603922701=4, srv147651029=0, srv2136239425=2, srv2118521717=1, srv886850468=5, srv233916608=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,920 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,920 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,920 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,920 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,920 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,920 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,920 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,920 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table933) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,920 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table934
2023-07-11 14:16:26,920 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv603922701=4, srv147651029=0, srv2136239425=2, srv2118521717=1, srv886850468=5, srv233916608=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,920 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,920 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,920 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,920 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,920 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,920 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,921 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,921 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table934) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,921 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table935
2023-07-11 14:16:26,921 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv603922701=4, srv147651029=0, srv2136239425=2, srv2118521717=1, srv886850468=5, srv233916608=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,921 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,921 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,921 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,921 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,921 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,921 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,921 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,921 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table935) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,921 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table936
2023-07-11 14:16:26,921 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv603922701=4, srv147651029=0, srv2136239425=2, srv2118521717=1, srv886850468=5, srv233916608=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,921 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,921 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,921 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,921 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,921 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,921 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,921 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,921 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table936) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,921 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1070
2023-07-11 14:16:26,921 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv603922701=4, srv147651029=0, srv2136239425=2, srv2118521717=1, srv886850468=5, srv233916608=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,921 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,921 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,921 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,922 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,922 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,922 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,922 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,922 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1070) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,922 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table937
2023-07-11 14:16:26,922 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv603922701=4, srv147651029=0, srv2136239425=2, srv2118521717=1, srv886850468=5, srv233916608=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,922 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,922 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,922 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,922 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,922 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,922 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,922 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,922 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table937) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,922 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1071
2023-07-11 14:16:26,922 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv603922701=4, srv147651029=0, srv2136239425=2, srv2118521717=1, srv886850468=5, srv233916608=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,922 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,922 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,922 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,922 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,922 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,922 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,922 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,922 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1071) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,922 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table938
2023-07-11 14:16:26,922 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv603922701=4, srv147651029=0, srv2136239425=2, srv2118521717=1, srv886850468=5, srv233916608=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,923 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,923 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,923 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,923 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,923 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,923 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,923 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,923 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table938) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,923 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table939
2023-07-11 14:16:26,923 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv603922701=4, srv147651029=0, srv2136239425=2, srv2118521717=1, srv886850468=5, srv233916608=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,923 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,923 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,923 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,923 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,923 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,923 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,923 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,923 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table939) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,923 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table900
2023-07-11 14:16:26,923 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv603922701=4, srv147651029=0, srv2136239425=2, srv2118521717=1, srv886850468=5, srv233916608=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,923 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,923 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,923 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,923 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,923 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,923 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,923 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,924 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table900) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,924 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table901
2023-07-11 14:16:26,924 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv603922701=4, srv147651029=0, srv2136239425=2, srv2118521717=1, srv886850468=5, srv233916608=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,924 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,924 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,924 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,924 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,924 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,924 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,924 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,924 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table901) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,924 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table902
2023-07-11 14:16:26,924 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv603922701=4, srv147651029=0, srv2136239425=2, srv2118521717=1, srv886850468=5, srv233916608=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,924 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,924 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,924 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,924 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,924 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,924 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,924 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,924 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table902) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,924 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table903
2023-07-11 14:16:26,925 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv603922701=4, srv147651029=0, srv2136239425=2, srv2118521717=1, srv886850468=5, srv233916608=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,925 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,925 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,925 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,925 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,925 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,925 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,925 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,925 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table903) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,925 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table904
2023-07-11 14:16:26,925 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv603922701=4, srv147651029=0, srv2136239425=2, srv2118521717=1, srv886850468=5, srv233916608=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,925 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,925 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,925 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,925 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,925 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,925 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,925 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,925 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table904) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,925 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table905
2023-07-11 14:16:26,925 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv603922701=4, srv147651029=0, srv2136239425=2, srv2118521717=1, srv886850468=5, srv233916608=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,925 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,925 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,925 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,925 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,925 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,925 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,926 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,926 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table905) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,926 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table906
2023-07-11 14:16:26,926 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv603922701=4, srv147651029=0, srv2136239425=2, srv2118521717=1, srv886850468=5, srv233916608=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,926 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,926 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,926 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,926 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,926 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,926 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,926 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,926 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table906) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,926 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table907
2023-07-11 14:16:26,926 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv603922701=4, srv147651029=0, srv2136239425=2, srv2118521717=1, srv886850468=5, srv233916608=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,926 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,926 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,926 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,926 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,926 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,926 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,926 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,926 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table907) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,926 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table908
2023-07-11 14:16:26,926 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv603922701=4, srv147651029=0, srv2136239425=2, srv2118521717=1, srv886850468=5, srv233916608=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,926 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,926 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,927 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,927 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,927 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,927 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,927 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,927 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table908) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,927 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table909
2023-07-11 14:16:26,927 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv603922701=4, srv147651029=0, srv2136239425=2, srv2118521717=1, srv886850468=5, srv233916608=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,927 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,927 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,927 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,927 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,927 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,927 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,927 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,927 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table909) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,928 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table13
2023-07-11 14:16:26,928 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv2094278040=6, srv1515688051=1, srv916162975=14, srv536369470=9, srv855195116=12, srv902228809=13, srv1812187395=4, srv221213601=7, srv547711285=10, srv1326283015=0, srv1790475753=3, srv681058396=11, srv52997480=8, srv1695493682=2, srv182066461=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,928 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,928 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,928 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,928 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,928 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,928 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,929 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-11 14:16:26,929 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-11 14:16:26,929 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-11 14:16:26,929 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-11 14:16:26,929 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 10 is on host 10
2023-07-11 14:16:26,929 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 11 is on host 11
2023-07-11 14:16:26,929 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 12 is on host 12
2023-07-11 14:16:26,929 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 13 is on host 13
2023-07-11 14:16:26,929 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 14 is on host 14
2023-07-11 14:16:26,929 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=15, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,929 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table13) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,929 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table14
2023-07-11 14:16:26,929 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv2094278040=6, srv1515688051=1, srv916162975=14, srv536369470=9, srv855195116=12, srv902228809=13, srv1812187395=4, srv221213601=7, srv547711285=10, srv1326283015=0, srv1790475753=3, srv681058396=11, srv52997480=8, srv1695493682=2, srv182066461=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,929 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,929 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,929 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,929 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,929 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,929 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,929 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-11 14:16:26,929 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-11 14:16:26,929 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-11 14:16:26,929 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-11 14:16:26,929 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 10 is on host 10
2023-07-11 14:16:26,929 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 11 is on host 11
2023-07-11 14:16:26,929 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 12 is on host 12
2023-07-11 14:16:26,930 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 13 is on host 13
2023-07-11 14:16:26,930 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 14 is on host 14
2023-07-11 14:16:26,930 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=15, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,930 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table14) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,930 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,930 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv2094278040=6, srv1515688051=1, srv916162975=14, srv536369470=9, srv855195116=12, srv902228809=13, srv1812187395=4, srv221213601=7, srv547711285=10, srv1326283015=0, srv1790475753=3, srv681058396=11, srv52997480=8, srv1695493682=2, srv182066461=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,930 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,930 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,930 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,930 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,930 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,930 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,930 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-11 14:16:26,930 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-11 14:16:26,930 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-11 14:16:26,930 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-11 14:16:26,930 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 10 is on host 10
2023-07-11 14:16:26,930 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 11 is on host 11
2023-07-11 14:16:26,930 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 12 is on host 12
2023-07-11 14:16:26,930 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 13 is on host 13
2023-07-11 14:16:26,930 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 14 is on host 14
2023-07-11 14:16:26,930 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=15, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,931 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table5) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,931 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,931 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv2094278040=6, srv1515688051=1, srv916162975=14, srv536369470=9, srv855195116=12, srv902228809=13, srv1812187395=4, srv221213601=7, srv547711285=10, srv1326283015=0, srv1790475753=3, srv681058396=11, srv52997480=8, srv1695493682=2, srv182066461=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,931 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,931 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,931 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,931 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,931 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,931 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,931 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-11 14:16:26,931 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-11 14:16:26,931 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-11 14:16:26,931 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-11 14:16:26,931 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 10 is on host 10
2023-07-11 14:16:26,931 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 11 is on host 11
2023-07-11 14:16:26,931 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 12 is on host 12
2023-07-11 14:16:26,931 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 13 is on host 13
2023-07-11 14:16:26,931 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 14 is on host 14
2023-07-11 14:16:26,931 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=15, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,931 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table4) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,931 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,932 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv2094278040=6, srv1515688051=1, srv916162975=14, srv536369470=9, srv855195116=12, srv902228809=13, srv1812187395=4, srv221213601=7, srv547711285=10, srv1326283015=0, srv1790475753=3, srv681058396=11, srv52997480=8, srv1695493682=2, srv182066461=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,932 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,932 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,932 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,932 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,932 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,932 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,932 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-11 14:16:26,932 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-11 14:16:26,932 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-11 14:16:26,932 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-11 14:16:26,932 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 10 is on host 10
2023-07-11 14:16:26,932 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 11 is on host 11
2023-07-11 14:16:26,932 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 12 is on host 12
2023-07-11 14:16:26,932 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 13 is on host 13
2023-07-11 14:16:26,932 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 14 is on host 14
2023-07-11 14:16:26,932 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=15, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,933 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table3) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,933 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,933 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv2094278040=6, srv1515688051=1, srv916162975=14, srv536369470=9, srv855195116=12, srv902228809=13, srv1812187395=4, srv221213601=7, srv547711285=10, srv1326283015=0, srv1790475753=3, srv681058396=11, srv52997480=8, srv1695493682=2, srv182066461=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,933 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,933 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,933 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,933 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,933 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,933 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,933 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-11 14:16:26,933 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-11 14:16:26,933 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-11 14:16:26,933 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-11 14:16:26,933 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 10 is on host 10
2023-07-11 14:16:26,933 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 11 is on host 11
2023-07-11 14:16:26,933 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 12 is on host 12
2023-07-11 14:16:26,933 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 13 is on host 13
2023-07-11 14:16:26,933 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 14 is on host 14
2023-07-11 14:16:26,933 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=15, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,933 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table2) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,933 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,933 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv2094278040=6, srv1515688051=1, srv916162975=14, srv536369470=9, srv855195116=12, srv902228809=13, srv1812187395=4, srv221213601=7, srv547711285=10, srv1326283015=0, srv1790475753=3, srv681058396=11, srv52997480=8, srv1695493682=2, srv182066461=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,933 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,934 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,934 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,934 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,934 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,934 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,934 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-11 14:16:26,934 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-11 14:16:26,934 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-11 14:16:26,934 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-11 14:16:26,934 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 10 is on host 10
2023-07-11 14:16:26,934 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 11 is on host 11
2023-07-11 14:16:26,934 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 12 is on host 12
2023-07-11 14:16:26,934 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 13 is on host 13
2023-07-11 14:16:26,934 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 14 is on host 14
2023-07-11 14:16:26,934 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=15, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,934 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,934 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,934 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv2094278040=6, srv1515688051=1, srv916162975=14, srv536369470=9, srv855195116=12, srv902228809=13, srv1812187395=4, srv221213601=7, srv547711285=10, srv1326283015=0, srv1790475753=3, srv681058396=11, srv52997480=8, srv1695493682=2, srv182066461=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,934 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,934 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,934 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,934 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,934 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,934 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,934 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-11 14:16:26,935 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-11 14:16:26,935 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-11 14:16:26,935 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-11 14:16:26,935 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 10 is on host 10
2023-07-11 14:16:26,935 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 11 is on host 11
2023-07-11 14:16:26,935 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 12 is on host 12
2023-07-11 14:16:26,935 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 13 is on host 13
2023-07-11 14:16:26,935 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 14 is on host 14
2023-07-11 14:16:26,935 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=15, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,935 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table0) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,935 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table9
2023-07-11 14:16:26,935 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv2094278040=6, srv1515688051=1, srv916162975=14, srv536369470=9, srv855195116=12, srv902228809=13, srv1812187395=4, srv221213601=7, srv547711285=10, srv1326283015=0, srv1790475753=3, srv681058396=11, srv52997480=8, srv1695493682=2, srv182066461=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,935 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,935 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,935 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,935 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,935 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,935 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,935 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-11 14:16:26,935 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-11 14:16:26,935 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-11 14:16:26,935 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-11 14:16:26,935 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 10 is on host 10
2023-07-11 14:16:26,936 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 11 is on host 11
2023-07-11 14:16:26,936 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 12 is on host 12
2023-07-11 14:16:26,936 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 13 is on host 13
2023-07-11 14:16:26,936 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 14 is on host 14
2023-07-11 14:16:26,936 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=15, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,936 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table9) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,936 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table8
2023-07-11 14:16:26,936 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv2094278040=6, srv1515688051=1, srv916162975=14, srv536369470=9, srv855195116=12, srv902228809=13, srv1812187395=4, srv221213601=7, srv547711285=10, srv1326283015=0, srv1790475753=3, srv681058396=11, srv52997480=8, srv1695493682=2, srv182066461=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,936 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,936 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,936 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,936 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,936 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,936 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,936 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-11 14:16:26,936 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-11 14:16:26,936 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-11 14:16:26,936 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-11 14:16:26,936 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 10 is on host 10
2023-07-11 14:16:26,936 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 11 is on host 11
2023-07-11 14:16:26,936 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 12 is on host 12
2023-07-11 14:16:26,936 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 13 is on host 13
2023-07-11 14:16:26,936 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 14 is on host 14
2023-07-11 14:16:26,937 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=15, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,937 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table8) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,937 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table10
2023-07-11 14:16:26,937 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv2094278040=6, srv1515688051=1, srv916162975=14, srv536369470=9, srv855195116=12, srv902228809=13, srv1812187395=4, srv221213601=7, srv547711285=10, srv1326283015=0, srv1790475753=3, srv681058396=11, srv52997480=8, srv1695493682=2, srv182066461=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,937 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,937 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,937 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,937 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,937 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,937 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,937 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-11 14:16:26,937 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-11 14:16:26,937 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-11 14:16:26,937 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-11 14:16:26,937 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 10 is on host 10
2023-07-11 14:16:26,937 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 11 is on host 11
2023-07-11 14:16:26,937 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 12 is on host 12
2023-07-11 14:16:26,937 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 13 is on host 13
2023-07-11 14:16:26,937 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 14 is on host 14
2023-07-11 14:16:26,937 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=15, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,937 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table10) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,937 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table7
2023-07-11 14:16:26,937 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv2094278040=6, srv1515688051=1, srv916162975=14, srv536369470=9, srv855195116=12, srv902228809=13, srv1812187395=4, srv221213601=7, srv547711285=10, srv1326283015=0, srv1790475753=3, srv681058396=11, srv52997480=8, srv1695493682=2, srv182066461=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,938 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,938 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,938 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,938 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,938 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,938 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,938 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-11 14:16:26,938 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-11 14:16:26,938 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-11 14:16:26,938 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-11 14:16:26,938 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 10 is on host 10
2023-07-11 14:16:26,938 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 11 is on host 11
2023-07-11 14:16:26,938 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 12 is on host 12
2023-07-11 14:16:26,938 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 13 is on host 13
2023-07-11 14:16:26,938 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 14 is on host 14
2023-07-11 14:16:26,938 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=15, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,938 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table7) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,938 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table11
2023-07-11 14:16:26,938 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv2094278040=6, srv1515688051=1, srv916162975=14, srv536369470=9, srv855195116=12, srv902228809=13, srv1812187395=4, srv221213601=7, srv547711285=10, srv1326283015=0, srv1790475753=3, srv681058396=11, srv52997480=8, srv1695493682=2, srv182066461=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,938 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,938 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,938 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,938 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,938 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,938 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,938 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-11 14:16:26,938 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-11 14:16:26,939 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-11 14:16:26,939 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-11 14:16:26,939 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 10 is on host 10
2023-07-11 14:16:26,939 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 11 is on host 11
2023-07-11 14:16:26,939 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 12 is on host 12
2023-07-11 14:16:26,939 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 13 is on host 13
2023-07-11 14:16:26,939 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 14 is on host 14
2023-07-11 14:16:26,939 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=15, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,939 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table11) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,939 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table6
2023-07-11 14:16:26,939 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv2094278040=6, srv1515688051=1, srv916162975=14, srv536369470=9, srv855195116=12, srv902228809=13, srv1812187395=4, srv221213601=7, srv547711285=10, srv1326283015=0, srv1790475753=3, srv681058396=11, srv52997480=8, srv1695493682=2, srv182066461=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,939 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,939 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,939 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,939 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,939 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,939 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,939 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-11 14:16:26,939 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-11 14:16:26,939 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-11 14:16:26,939 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-11 14:16:26,939 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 10 is on host 10
2023-07-11 14:16:26,939 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 11 is on host 11
2023-07-11 14:16:26,939 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 12 is on host 12
2023-07-11 14:16:26,939 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 13 is on host 13
2023-07-11 14:16:26,939 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 14 is on host 14
2023-07-11 14:16:26,939 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=15, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,940 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table6) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,940 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table12
2023-07-11 14:16:26,940 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv2094278040=6, srv1515688051=1, srv916162975=14, srv536369470=9, srv855195116=12, srv902228809=13, srv1812187395=4, srv221213601=7, srv547711285=10, srv1326283015=0, srv1790475753=3, srv681058396=11, srv52997480=8, srv1695493682=2, srv182066461=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,940 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,940 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,940 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,940 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,940 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,940 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,940 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-11 14:16:26,940 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-11 14:16:26,940 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-11 14:16:26,940 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-11 14:16:26,940 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 10 is on host 10
2023-07-11 14:16:26,940 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 11 is on host 11
2023-07-11 14:16:26,940 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 12 is on host 12
2023-07-11 14:16:26,940 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 13 is on host 13
2023-07-11 14:16:26,940 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 14 is on host 14
2023-07-11 14:16:26,940 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=15, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,940 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table12) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,941 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,941 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv140436665=1, srv810657042=8, srv216379971=3, srv989259728=9, srv636400952=7, srv259351482=4, srv1270609574=0, srv1635282617=2, srv270020185=5, srv580234716=6} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,941 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,941 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,941 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,941 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,941 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,941 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,941 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-11 14:16:26,941 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-11 14:16:26,941 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-11 14:16:26,941 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-11 14:16:26,941 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,941 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table5) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,941 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,941 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv140436665=1, srv810657042=8, srv216379971=3, srv989259728=9, srv636400952=7, srv259351482=4, srv1270609574=0, srv1635282617=2, srv270020185=5, srv580234716=6} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,941 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,941 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,941 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,941 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,941 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,941 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,941 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-11 14:16:26,941 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-11 14:16:26,941 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-11 14:16:26,942 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-11 14:16:26,942 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,942 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table4) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,942 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,942 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv140436665=1, srv810657042=8, srv216379971=3, srv989259728=9, srv636400952=7, srv259351482=4, srv1270609574=0, srv1635282617=2, srv270020185=5, srv580234716=6} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,942 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,942 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,942 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,942 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,942 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,942 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,942 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-11 14:16:26,942 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-11 14:16:26,942 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-11 14:16:26,942 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-11 14:16:26,942 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,942 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table3) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,942 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,942 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv140436665=1, srv810657042=8, srv216379971=3, srv989259728=9, srv636400952=7, srv259351482=4, srv1270609574=0, srv1635282617=2, srv270020185=5, srv580234716=6} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,942 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,942 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,942 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,942 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,942 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,942 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,942 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-11 14:16:26,942 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-11 14:16:26,943 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-11 14:16:26,943 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-11 14:16:26,943 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,943 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table2) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,943 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,943 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv140436665=1, srv810657042=8, srv216379971=3, srv989259728=9, srv636400952=7, srv259351482=4, srv1270609574=0, srv1635282617=2, srv270020185=5, srv580234716=6} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,943 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,943 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,943 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,943 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,943 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,943 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,943 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-11 14:16:26,943 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-11 14:16:26,943 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-11 14:16:26,943 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-11 14:16:26,943 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,943 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,943 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,943 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv140436665=1, srv810657042=8, srv216379971=3, srv989259728=9, srv636400952=7, srv259351482=4, srv1270609574=0, srv1635282617=2, srv270020185=5, srv580234716=6} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,943 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,943 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,943 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,943 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,943 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,943 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,943 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-11 14:16:26,944 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-11 14:16:26,944 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-11 14:16:26,944 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-11 14:16:26,944 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,944 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table0) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,944 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table9
2023-07-11 14:16:26,944 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv140436665=1, srv810657042=8, srv216379971=3, srv989259728=9, srv636400952=7, srv259351482=4, srv1270609574=0, srv1635282617=2, srv270020185=5, srv580234716=6} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,944 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,944 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,944 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,944 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,944 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,944 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,944 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-11 14:16:26,944 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-11 14:16:26,944 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-11 14:16:26,944 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-11 14:16:26,944 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,944 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table9) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,944 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table8
2023-07-11 14:16:26,944 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv140436665=1, srv810657042=8, srv216379971=3, srv989259728=9, srv636400952=7, srv259351482=4, srv1270609574=0, srv1635282617=2, srv270020185=5, srv580234716=6} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,944 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,944 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,944 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,944 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,944 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,944 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,945 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-11 14:16:26,945 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-11 14:16:26,945 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-11 14:16:26,945 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-11 14:16:26,945 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,945 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table8) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,945 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table7
2023-07-11 14:16:26,945 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv140436665=1, srv810657042=8, srv216379971=3, srv989259728=9, srv636400952=7, srv259351482=4, srv1270609574=0, srv1635282617=2, srv270020185=5, srv580234716=6} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,945 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,945 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,945 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,945 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,945 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,945 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,945 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-11 14:16:26,945 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-11 14:16:26,945 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-11 14:16:26,945 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-11 14:16:26,945 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,945 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table7) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,945 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table6
2023-07-11 14:16:26,945 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv140436665=1, srv810657042=8, srv216379971=3, srv989259728=9, srv636400952=7, srv259351482=4, srv1270609574=0, srv1635282617=2, srv270020185=5, srv580234716=6} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,945 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,946 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,946 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,946 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,946 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,946 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,946 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-11 14:16:26,946 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-11 14:16:26,946 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-11 14:16:26,946 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-11 14:16:26,946 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,946 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table6) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,946 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,946 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv105145530=0, srv504800635=6, srv880259094=8, srv2015996706=5, srv536002318=7, srv1465035817=2, srv1894947637=4, srv936699568=9, srv105284630=1, srv1893484147=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,947 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,947 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,947 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,947 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,947 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,947 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,947 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-11 14:16:26,947 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-11 14:16:26,947 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-11 14:16:26,947 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-11 14:16:26,947 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,947 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table5) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,947 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,947 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv105145530=0, srv504800635=6, srv880259094=8, srv2015996706=5, srv536002318=7, srv1465035817=2, srv1894947637=4, srv936699568=9, srv105284630=1, srv1893484147=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,947 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,947 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,947 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,947 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,947 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,948 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,948 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-11 14:16:26,948 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-11 14:16:26,948 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-11 14:16:26,948 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-11 14:16:26,948 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,948 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table4) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,948 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,948 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv105145530=0, srv504800635=6, srv880259094=8, srv2015996706=5, srv536002318=7, srv1465035817=2, srv1894947637=4, srv936699568=9, srv105284630=1, srv1893484147=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,948 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,948 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,948 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,948 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,948 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,948 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,948 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-11 14:16:26,948 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-11 14:16:26,948 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-11 14:16:26,948 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-11 14:16:26,948 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,948 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table3) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,948 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,948 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv105145530=0, srv504800635=6, srv880259094=8, srv2015996706=5, srv536002318=7, srv1465035817=2, srv1894947637=4, srv936699568=9, srv105284630=1, srv1893484147=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,949 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,949 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,949 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,949 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,949 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,949 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,949 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-11 14:16:26,949 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-11 14:16:26,949 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-11 14:16:26,949 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-11 14:16:26,949 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,949 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table2) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,949 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,949 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv105145530=0, srv504800635=6, srv880259094=8, srv2015996706=5, srv536002318=7, srv1465035817=2, srv1894947637=4, srv936699568=9, srv105284630=1, srv1893484147=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,949 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,949 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,949 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,949 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,949 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,949 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,949 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-11 14:16:26,949 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-11 14:16:26,949 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-11 14:16:26,949 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-11 14:16:26,949 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,950 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,950 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,950 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv105145530=0, srv504800635=6, srv880259094=8, srv2015996706=5, srv536002318=7, srv1465035817=2, srv1894947637=4, srv936699568=9, srv105284630=1, srv1893484147=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,950 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,950 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,950 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,950 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,950 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,950 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,950 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-11 14:16:26,950 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-11 14:16:26,950 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-11 14:16:26,950 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-11 14:16:26,950 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,950 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table0) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,951 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table13
2023-07-11 14:16:26,951 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv221039457=7, srv926604471=9, srv1648488467=2, srv1553266464=1, srv2056104948=6, srv1992551958=4, srv2044666685=5, srv1070820673=0, srv1728539475=3, srv562116585=8} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,951 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,951 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,951 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,951 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,951 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,951 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,951 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-11 14:16:26,951 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-11 14:16:26,951 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-11 14:16:26,951 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-11 14:16:26,951 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,951 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table13) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,951 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table14
2023-07-11 14:16:26,951 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv221039457=7, srv926604471=9, srv1648488467=2, srv1553266464=1, srv2056104948=6, srv1992551958=4, srv2044666685=5, srv1070820673=0, srv1728539475=3, srv562116585=8} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,951 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,951 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,951 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,951 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,951 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,951 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,951 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-11 14:16:26,951 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-11 14:16:26,951 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-11 14:16:26,951 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-11 14:16:26,951 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,952 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table14) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,952 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table15
2023-07-11 14:16:26,952 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv221039457=7, srv926604471=9, srv1648488467=2, srv1553266464=1, srv2056104948=6, srv1992551958=4, srv2044666685=5, srv1070820673=0, srv1728539475=3, srv562116585=8} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,952 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,952 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,952 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,952 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,952 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,952 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,952 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-11 14:16:26,952 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-11 14:16:26,952 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-11 14:16:26,952 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-11 14:16:26,952 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,952 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table15) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,952 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table16
2023-07-11 14:16:26,952 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv221039457=7, srv926604471=9, srv1648488467=2, srv1553266464=1, srv2056104948=6, srv1992551958=4, srv2044666685=5, srv1070820673=0, srv1728539475=3, srv562116585=8} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,952 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,952 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,952 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,952 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,952 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,952 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,952 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-11 14:16:26,952 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-11 14:16:26,952 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-11 14:16:26,952 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-11 14:16:26,953 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,953 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table16) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,953 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table17
2023-07-11 14:16:26,953 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv221039457=7, srv926604471=9, srv1648488467=2, srv1553266464=1, srv2056104948=6, srv1992551958=4, srv2044666685=5, srv1070820673=0, srv1728539475=3, srv562116585=8} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,953 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,953 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,953 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,953 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,953 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,953 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,953 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-11 14:16:26,953 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-11 14:16:26,953 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-11 14:16:26,953 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-11 14:16:26,953 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,953 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table17) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,953 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table18
2023-07-11 14:16:26,953 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv221039457=7, srv926604471=9, srv1648488467=2, srv1553266464=1, srv2056104948=6, srv1992551958=4, srv2044666685=5, srv1070820673=0, srv1728539475=3, srv562116585=8} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,953 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,953 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,953 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,953 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,953 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,953 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,953 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-11 14:16:26,953 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-11 14:16:26,954 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-11 14:16:26,954 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-11 14:16:26,954 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,954 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table18) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,954 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table19
2023-07-11 14:16:26,954 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv221039457=7, srv926604471=9, srv1648488467=2, srv1553266464=1, srv2056104948=6, srv1992551958=4, srv2044666685=5, srv1070820673=0, srv1728539475=3, srv562116585=8} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,954 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,954 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,954 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,954 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,954 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,954 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,954 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-11 14:16:26,954 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-11 14:16:26,954 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-11 14:16:26,954 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-11 14:16:26,954 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,954 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table19) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,954 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table50
2023-07-11 14:16:26,954 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv221039457=7, srv926604471=9, srv1648488467=2, srv1553266464=1, srv2056104948=6, srv1992551958=4, srv2044666685=5, srv1070820673=0, srv1728539475=3, srv562116585=8} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,954 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,954 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,954 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,954 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,954 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,954 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,954 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-11 14:16:26,954 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-11 14:16:26,955 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-11 14:16:26,955 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-11 14:16:26,955 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,955 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table50) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,955 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table51
2023-07-11 14:16:26,955 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv221039457=7, srv926604471=9, srv1648488467=2, srv1553266464=1, srv2056104948=6, srv1992551958=4, srv2044666685=5, srv1070820673=0, srv1728539475=3, srv562116585=8} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,955 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,955 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,955 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,955 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,955 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,955 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,955 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-11 14:16:26,955 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-11 14:16:26,955 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-11 14:16:26,955 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-11 14:16:26,955 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,955 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table51) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,955 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table52
2023-07-11 14:16:26,955 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv221039457=7, srv926604471=9, srv1648488467=2, srv1553266464=1, srv2056104948=6, srv1992551958=4, srv2044666685=5, srv1070820673=0, srv1728539475=3, srv562116585=8} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,955 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,955 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,955 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,955 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,955 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,955 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,955 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-11 14:16:26,956 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-11 14:16:26,956 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-11 14:16:26,956 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-11 14:16:26,956 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,956 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table52) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,956 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table53
2023-07-11 14:16:26,956 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv221039457=7, srv926604471=9, srv1648488467=2, srv1553266464=1, srv2056104948=6, srv1992551958=4, srv2044666685=5, srv1070820673=0, srv1728539475=3, srv562116585=8} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,956 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,956 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,956 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,956 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,956 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,956 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,956 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-11 14:16:26,956 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-11 14:16:26,956 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-11 14:16:26,956 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-11 14:16:26,956 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,956 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table53) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,956 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table10
2023-07-11 14:16:26,956 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv221039457=7, srv926604471=9, srv1648488467=2, srv1553266464=1, srv2056104948=6, srv1992551958=4, srv2044666685=5, srv1070820673=0, srv1728539475=3, srv562116585=8} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,956 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,957 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,957 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,957 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,957 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,957 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,957 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-11 14:16:26,957 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-11 14:16:26,957 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-11 14:16:26,957 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-11 14:16:26,957 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,957 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table10) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,957 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table11
2023-07-11 14:16:26,957 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv221039457=7, srv926604471=9, srv1648488467=2, srv1553266464=1, srv2056104948=6, srv1992551958=4, srv2044666685=5, srv1070820673=0, srv1728539475=3, srv562116585=8} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,957 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,957 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,957 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,957 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,957 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,957 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,957 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-11 14:16:26,957 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-11 14:16:26,957 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-11 14:16:26,957 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-11 14:16:26,957 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,957 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table11) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,958 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table12
2023-07-11 14:16:26,958 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv221039457=7, srv926604471=9, srv1648488467=2, srv1553266464=1, srv2056104948=6, srv1992551958=4, srv2044666685=5, srv1070820673=0, srv1728539475=3, srv562116585=8} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,958 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,958 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,958 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,958 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,958 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,958 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,958 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-11 14:16:26,958 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-11 14:16:26,958 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-11 14:16:26,958 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-11 14:16:26,958 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,958 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table12) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,958 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table46
2023-07-11 14:16:26,958 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv221039457=7, srv926604471=9, srv1648488467=2, srv1553266464=1, srv2056104948=6, srv1992551958=4, srv2044666685=5, srv1070820673=0, srv1728539475=3, srv562116585=8} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,958 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,958 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,958 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,958 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,958 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,958 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,958 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-11 14:16:26,959 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-11 14:16:26,959 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-11 14:16:26,959 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-11 14:16:26,959 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,959 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table46) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,959 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table47
2023-07-11 14:16:26,959 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv221039457=7, srv926604471=9, srv1648488467=2, srv1553266464=1, srv2056104948=6, srv1992551958=4, srv2044666685=5, srv1070820673=0, srv1728539475=3, srv562116585=8} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,959 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,959 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,959 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,959 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,959 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,959 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,959 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-11 14:16:26,959 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-11 14:16:26,959 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-11 14:16:26,959 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-11 14:16:26,959 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,959 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table47) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,959 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table48
2023-07-11 14:16:26,959 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv221039457=7, srv926604471=9, srv1648488467=2, srv1553266464=1, srv2056104948=6, srv1992551958=4, srv2044666685=5, srv1070820673=0, srv1728539475=3, srv562116585=8} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,959 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,959 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,959 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,959 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,959 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,959 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,960 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-11 14:16:26,960 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-11 14:16:26,960 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-11 14:16:26,960 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-11 14:16:26,960 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,960 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table48) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,960 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table49
2023-07-11 14:16:26,960 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv221039457=7, srv926604471=9, srv1648488467=2, srv1553266464=1, srv2056104948=6, srv1992551958=4, srv2044666685=5, srv1070820673=0, srv1728539475=3, srv562116585=8} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,960 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,960 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,960 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,960 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,960 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,960 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,960 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-11 14:16:26,960 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-11 14:16:26,960 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-11 14:16:26,960 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-11 14:16:26,960 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,960 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table49) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,960 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table40
2023-07-11 14:16:26,960 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv221039457=7, srv926604471=9, srv1648488467=2, srv1553266464=1, srv2056104948=6, srv1992551958=4, srv2044666685=5, srv1070820673=0, srv1728539475=3, srv562116585=8} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,960 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,960 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,960 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,960 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,960 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,961 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,961 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-11 14:16:26,961 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-11 14:16:26,961 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-11 14:16:26,961 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-11 14:16:26,961 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,961 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table40) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,961 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table41
2023-07-11 14:16:26,961 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv221039457=7, srv926604471=9, srv1648488467=2, srv1553266464=1, srv2056104948=6, srv1992551958=4, srv2044666685=5, srv1070820673=0, srv1728539475=3, srv562116585=8} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,961 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,961 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,961 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,961 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,961 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,961 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,961 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-11 14:16:26,961 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-11 14:16:26,961 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-11 14:16:26,961 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-11 14:16:26,961 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,961 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table41) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,961 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table42
2023-07-11 14:16:26,961 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv221039457=7, srv926604471=9, srv1648488467=2, srv1553266464=1, srv2056104948=6, srv1992551958=4, srv2044666685=5, srv1070820673=0, srv1728539475=3, srv562116585=8} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,961 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,961 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,961 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,962 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,962 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,962 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,962 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-11 14:16:26,962 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-11 14:16:26,962 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-11 14:16:26,962 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-11 14:16:26,962 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,962 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table42) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,962 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table43
2023-07-11 14:16:26,962 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv221039457=7, srv926604471=9, srv1648488467=2, srv1553266464=1, srv2056104948=6, srv1992551958=4, srv2044666685=5, srv1070820673=0, srv1728539475=3, srv562116585=8} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,962 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,962 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,962 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,962 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,962 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,962 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,962 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-11 14:16:26,962 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-11 14:16:26,962 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-11 14:16:26,962 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-11 14:16:26,962 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,962 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table43) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,962 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table44
2023-07-11 14:16:26,962 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv221039457=7, srv926604471=9, srv1648488467=2, srv1553266464=1, srv2056104948=6, srv1992551958=4, srv2044666685=5, srv1070820673=0, srv1728539475=3, srv562116585=8} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,962 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,962 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,963 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,963 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,963 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,963 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,963 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-11 14:16:26,963 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-11 14:16:26,963 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-11 14:16:26,963 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-11 14:16:26,963 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,963 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table44) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,963 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table45
2023-07-11 14:16:26,963 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv221039457=7, srv926604471=9, srv1648488467=2, srv1553266464=1, srv2056104948=6, srv1992551958=4, srv2044666685=5, srv1070820673=0, srv1728539475=3, srv562116585=8} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,963 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,963 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,963 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,963 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,963 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,963 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,963 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-11 14:16:26,963 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-11 14:16:26,963 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-11 14:16:26,963 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-11 14:16:26,963 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,963 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table45) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,963 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table35
2023-07-11 14:16:26,963 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv221039457=7, srv926604471=9, srv1648488467=2, srv1553266464=1, srv2056104948=6, srv1992551958=4, srv2044666685=5, srv1070820673=0, srv1728539475=3, srv562116585=8} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,963 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,963 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,964 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,964 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,964 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,964 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,964 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-11 14:16:26,964 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-11 14:16:26,964 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-11 14:16:26,964 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-11 14:16:26,964 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,964 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table35) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,964 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table36
2023-07-11 14:16:26,964 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv221039457=7, srv926604471=9, srv1648488467=2, srv1553266464=1, srv2056104948=6, srv1992551958=4, srv2044666685=5, srv1070820673=0, srv1728539475=3, srv562116585=8} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,964 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,964 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,964 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,964 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,964 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,964 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,964 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-11 14:16:26,964 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-11 14:16:26,964 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-11 14:16:26,964 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-11 14:16:26,964 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,964 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table36) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,964 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table37
2023-07-11 14:16:26,964 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv221039457=7, srv926604471=9, srv1648488467=2, srv1553266464=1, srv2056104948=6, srv1992551958=4, srv2044666685=5, srv1070820673=0, srv1728539475=3, srv562116585=8} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,965 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,965 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,965 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,965 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,965 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,965 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,965 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-11 14:16:26,965 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-11 14:16:26,965 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-11 14:16:26,965 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-11 14:16:26,965 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,965 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table37) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,965 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table38
2023-07-11 14:16:26,965 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv221039457=7, srv926604471=9, srv1648488467=2, srv1553266464=1, srv2056104948=6, srv1992551958=4, srv2044666685=5, srv1070820673=0, srv1728539475=3, srv562116585=8} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,965 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,965 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,965 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,965 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,965 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,965 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,965 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-11 14:16:26,965 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-11 14:16:26,965 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-11 14:16:26,965 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-11 14:16:26,965 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,965 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table38) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,966 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table39
2023-07-11 14:16:26,966 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv221039457=7, srv926604471=9, srv1648488467=2, srv1553266464=1, srv2056104948=6, srv1992551958=4, srv2044666685=5, srv1070820673=0, srv1728539475=3, srv562116585=8} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,966 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,966 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,966 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,966 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,966 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,966 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,966 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-11 14:16:26,966 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-11 14:16:26,966 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-11 14:16:26,966 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-11 14:16:26,966 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,966 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table39) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,966 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,966 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv221039457=7, srv926604471=9, srv1648488467=2, srv1553266464=1, srv2056104948=6, srv1992551958=4, srv2044666685=5, srv1070820673=0, srv1728539475=3, srv562116585=8} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,966 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,966 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,966 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,966 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,966 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,966 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,966 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-11 14:16:26,966 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-11 14:16:26,966 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-11 14:16:26,967 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-11 14:16:26,967 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,967 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table5) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,967 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,967 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv221039457=7, srv926604471=9, srv1648488467=2, srv1553266464=1, srv2056104948=6, srv1992551958=4, srv2044666685=5, srv1070820673=0, srv1728539475=3, srv562116585=8} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,967 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,967 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,967 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,967 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,967 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,967 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,967 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-11 14:16:26,967 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-11 14:16:26,967 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-11 14:16:26,967 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-11 14:16:26,967 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,967 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table4) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,967 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,967 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv221039457=7, srv926604471=9, srv1648488467=2, srv1553266464=1, srv2056104948=6, srv1992551958=4, srv2044666685=5, srv1070820673=0, srv1728539475=3, srv562116585=8} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,967 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,967 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,967 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,967 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,967 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,967 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,967 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-11 14:16:26,967 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-11 14:16:26,968 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-11 14:16:26,968 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-11 14:16:26,968 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,968 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table3) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,968 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,968 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv221039457=7, srv926604471=9, srv1648488467=2, srv1553266464=1, srv2056104948=6, srv1992551958=4, srv2044666685=5, srv1070820673=0, srv1728539475=3, srv562116585=8} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,968 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,968 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,968 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,968 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,968 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,968 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,968 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-11 14:16:26,968 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-11 14:16:26,968 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-11 14:16:26,968 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-11 14:16:26,968 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,968 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table2) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,968 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,968 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv221039457=7, srv926604471=9, srv1648488467=2, srv1553266464=1, srv2056104948=6, srv1992551958=4, srv2044666685=5, srv1070820673=0, srv1728539475=3, srv562116585=8} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,968 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,968 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,968 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,968 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,968 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,968 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,968 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-11 14:16:26,969 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-11 14:16:26,969 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-11 14:16:26,969 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-11 14:16:26,969 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,969 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,969 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,969 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv221039457=7, srv926604471=9, srv1648488467=2, srv1553266464=1, srv2056104948=6, srv1992551958=4, srv2044666685=5, srv1070820673=0, srv1728539475=3, srv562116585=8} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,969 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,969 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,969 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,969 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,969 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,969 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,969 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-11 14:16:26,969 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-11 14:16:26,969 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-11 14:16:26,969 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-11 14:16:26,969 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,969 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table0) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,969 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table30
2023-07-11 14:16:26,969 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv221039457=7, srv926604471=9, srv1648488467=2, srv1553266464=1, srv2056104948=6, srv1992551958=4, srv2044666685=5, srv1070820673=0, srv1728539475=3, srv562116585=8} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,969 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,969 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,969 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,969 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,969 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,970 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,970 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-11 14:16:26,970 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-11 14:16:26,970 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-11 14:16:26,970 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-11 14:16:26,970 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,970 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table30) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,970 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table9
2023-07-11 14:16:26,970 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv221039457=7, srv926604471=9, srv1648488467=2, srv1553266464=1, srv2056104948=6, srv1992551958=4, srv2044666685=5, srv1070820673=0, srv1728539475=3, srv562116585=8} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,970 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,970 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,970 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,970 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,970 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,970 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,970 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-11 14:16:26,970 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-11 14:16:26,970 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-11 14:16:26,970 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-11 14:16:26,970 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,970 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table9) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,970 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table31
2023-07-11 14:16:26,971 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv221039457=7, srv926604471=9, srv1648488467=2, srv1553266464=1, srv2056104948=6, srv1992551958=4, srv2044666685=5, srv1070820673=0, srv1728539475=3, srv562116585=8} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,971 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,971 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,971 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,971 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,971 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,971 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,971 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-11 14:16:26,971 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-11 14:16:26,971 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-11 14:16:26,971 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-11 14:16:26,971 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,971 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table31) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,971 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table8
2023-07-11 14:16:26,971 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv221039457=7, srv926604471=9, srv1648488467=2, srv1553266464=1, srv2056104948=6, srv1992551958=4, srv2044666685=5, srv1070820673=0, srv1728539475=3, srv562116585=8} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,971 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,971 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,971 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,971 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,971 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,971 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,971 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-11 14:16:26,971 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-11 14:16:26,971 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-11 14:16:26,971 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-11 14:16:26,971 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,971 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table8) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,972 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table32
2023-07-11 14:16:26,972 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv221039457=7, srv926604471=9, srv1648488467=2, srv1553266464=1, srv2056104948=6, srv1992551958=4, srv2044666685=5, srv1070820673=0, srv1728539475=3, srv562116585=8} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,972 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,972 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,972 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,972 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,972 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,972 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,972 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-11 14:16:26,972 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-11 14:16:26,972 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-11 14:16:26,972 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-11 14:16:26,972 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,972 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table32) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,972 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table7
2023-07-11 14:16:26,972 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv221039457=7, srv926604471=9, srv1648488467=2, srv1553266464=1, srv2056104948=6, srv1992551958=4, srv2044666685=5, srv1070820673=0, srv1728539475=3, srv562116585=8} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,972 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,972 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,972 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,972 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,972 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,972 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,972 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-11 14:16:26,972 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-11 14:16:26,972 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-11 14:16:26,972 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-11 14:16:26,972 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,973 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table7) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,973 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table33
2023-07-11 14:16:26,973 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv221039457=7, srv926604471=9, srv1648488467=2, srv1553266464=1, srv2056104948=6, srv1992551958=4, srv2044666685=5, srv1070820673=0, srv1728539475=3, srv562116585=8} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,973 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,973 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,973 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,973 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,973 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,973 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,973 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-11 14:16:26,973 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-11 14:16:26,973 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-11 14:16:26,973 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-11 14:16:26,973 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,973 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table33) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,973 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table6
2023-07-11 14:16:26,973 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv221039457=7, srv926604471=9, srv1648488467=2, srv1553266464=1, srv2056104948=6, srv1992551958=4, srv2044666685=5, srv1070820673=0, srv1728539475=3, srv562116585=8} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,973 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,973 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,973 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,973 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,973 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,973 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,973 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-11 14:16:26,973 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-11 14:16:26,973 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-11 14:16:26,973 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-11 14:16:26,973 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,974 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table6) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,974 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table34
2023-07-11 14:16:26,974 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv221039457=7, srv926604471=9, srv1648488467=2, srv1553266464=1, srv2056104948=6, srv1992551958=4, srv2044666685=5, srv1070820673=0, srv1728539475=3, srv562116585=8} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,974 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,974 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,974 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,974 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,974 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,974 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,974 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-11 14:16:26,974 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-11 14:16:26,974 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-11 14:16:26,974 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-11 14:16:26,974 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,974 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table34) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,974 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table24
2023-07-11 14:16:26,974 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv221039457=7, srv926604471=9, srv1648488467=2, srv1553266464=1, srv2056104948=6, srv1992551958=4, srv2044666685=5, srv1070820673=0, srv1728539475=3, srv562116585=8} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,974 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,974 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,974 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,974 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,974 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,974 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,974 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-11 14:16:26,974 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-11 14:16:26,974 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-11 14:16:26,974 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-11 14:16:26,975 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,975 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table24) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,975 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table25
2023-07-11 14:16:26,975 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv221039457=7, srv926604471=9, srv1648488467=2, srv1553266464=1, srv2056104948=6, srv1992551958=4, srv2044666685=5, srv1070820673=0, srv1728539475=3, srv562116585=8} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,975 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,975 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,975 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,975 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,975 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,975 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,975 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-11 14:16:26,975 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-11 14:16:26,975 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-11 14:16:26,975 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-11 14:16:26,975 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,975 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table25) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,975 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table26
2023-07-11 14:16:26,975 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv221039457=7, srv926604471=9, srv1648488467=2, srv1553266464=1, srv2056104948=6, srv1992551958=4, srv2044666685=5, srv1070820673=0, srv1728539475=3, srv562116585=8} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,975 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,975 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,975 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,975 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,976 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,976 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,976 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-11 14:16:26,976 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-11 14:16:26,976 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-11 14:16:26,976 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-11 14:16:26,976 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,976 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table26) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,976 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table27
2023-07-11 14:16:26,976 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv221039457=7, srv926604471=9, srv1648488467=2, srv1553266464=1, srv2056104948=6, srv1992551958=4, srv2044666685=5, srv1070820673=0, srv1728539475=3, srv562116585=8} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,976 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,976 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,976 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,976 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,976 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,976 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,976 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-11 14:16:26,976 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-11 14:16:26,976 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-11 14:16:26,976 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-11 14:16:26,976 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,976 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table27) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,976 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table28
2023-07-11 14:16:26,976 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv221039457=7, srv926604471=9, srv1648488467=2, srv1553266464=1, srv2056104948=6, srv1992551958=4, srv2044666685=5, srv1070820673=0, srv1728539475=3, srv562116585=8} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,976 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,976 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,976 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,977 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,977 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,977 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,977 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-11 14:16:26,977 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-11 14:16:26,977 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-11 14:16:26,977 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-11 14:16:26,977 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,977 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table28) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,977 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table29
2023-07-11 14:16:26,977 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv221039457=7, srv926604471=9, srv1648488467=2, srv1553266464=1, srv2056104948=6, srv1992551958=4, srv2044666685=5, srv1070820673=0, srv1728539475=3, srv562116585=8} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,977 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,977 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,977 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,977 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,977 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,977 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,977 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-11 14:16:26,977 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-11 14:16:26,977 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-11 14:16:26,977 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-11 14:16:26,977 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,977 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table29) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,977 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table20
2023-07-11 14:16:26,977 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv221039457=7, srv926604471=9, srv1648488467=2, srv1553266464=1, srv2056104948=6, srv1992551958=4, srv2044666685=5, srv1070820673=0, srv1728539475=3, srv562116585=8} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,977 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,978 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,978 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,978 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,978 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,978 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,978 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-11 14:16:26,978 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-11 14:16:26,978 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-11 14:16:26,978 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-11 14:16:26,978 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,978 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table20) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,978 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table21
2023-07-11 14:16:26,978 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv221039457=7, srv926604471=9, srv1648488467=2, srv1553266464=1, srv2056104948=6, srv1992551958=4, srv2044666685=5, srv1070820673=0, srv1728539475=3, srv562116585=8} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,978 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,978 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,978 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,978 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,978 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,978 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,978 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-11 14:16:26,978 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-11 14:16:26,978 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-11 14:16:26,978 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-11 14:16:26,978 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,978 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table21) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,978 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table22
2023-07-11 14:16:26,978 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv221039457=7, srv926604471=9, srv1648488467=2, srv1553266464=1, srv2056104948=6, srv1992551958=4, srv2044666685=5, srv1070820673=0, srv1728539475=3, srv562116585=8} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,978 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,979 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,979 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,979 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,979 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,979 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,979 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-11 14:16:26,979 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-11 14:16:26,979 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-11 14:16:26,979 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-11 14:16:26,979 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,979 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table22) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,979 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table23
2023-07-11 14:16:26,979 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv221039457=7, srv926604471=9, srv1648488467=2, srv1553266464=1, srv2056104948=6, srv1992551958=4, srv2044666685=5, srv1070820673=0, srv1728539475=3, srv562116585=8} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,979 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,979 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,979 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,979 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,979 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,979 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,979 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-11 14:16:26,979 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-11 14:16:26,979 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-11 14:16:26,979 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-11 14:16:26,979 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,979 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table23) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,980 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table13
2023-07-11 14:16:26,980 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1513167137=2, srv879141366=9, srv1437806058=1, srv660403235=7, srv2004031600=5, srv420329444=6, srv1599890026=3, srv1925182918=4, srv114103181=0, srv768111390=8} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,980 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,980 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,980 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,980 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,980 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,980 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,980 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-11 14:16:26,980 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-11 14:16:26,980 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-11 14:16:26,980 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-11 14:16:26,980 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,980 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table13) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,980 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table14
2023-07-11 14:16:26,981 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1513167137=2, srv879141366=9, srv1437806058=1, srv660403235=7, srv2004031600=5, srv420329444=6, srv1599890026=3, srv1925182918=4, srv114103181=0, srv768111390=8} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,981 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,981 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,981 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,981 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,981 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,981 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,981 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-11 14:16:26,981 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-11 14:16:26,981 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-11 14:16:26,981 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-11 14:16:26,981 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,981 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table14) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,981 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table15
2023-07-11 14:16:26,981 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1513167137=2, srv879141366=9, srv1437806058=1, srv660403235=7, srv2004031600=5, srv420329444=6, srv1599890026=3, srv1925182918=4, srv114103181=0, srv768111390=8} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,981 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,981 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,981 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,981 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,981 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,981 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,981 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-11 14:16:26,981 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-11 14:16:26,981 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-11 14:16:26,981 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-11 14:16:26,981 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,981 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table15) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,982 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table16
2023-07-11 14:16:26,982 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1513167137=2, srv879141366=9, srv1437806058=1, srv660403235=7, srv2004031600=5, srv420329444=6, srv1599890026=3, srv1925182918=4, srv114103181=0, srv768111390=8} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,982 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,982 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,982 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,982 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,982 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,982 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,982 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-11 14:16:26,982 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-11 14:16:26,982 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-11 14:16:26,982 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-11 14:16:26,982 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,982 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table16) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,982 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table17
2023-07-11 14:16:26,982 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1513167137=2, srv879141366=9, srv1437806058=1, srv660403235=7, srv2004031600=5, srv420329444=6, srv1599890026=3, srv1925182918=4, srv114103181=0, srv768111390=8} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,982 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,982 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,982 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,982 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,982 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,982 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,982 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-11 14:16:26,982 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-11 14:16:26,982 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-11 14:16:26,982 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-11 14:16:26,982 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,983 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table17) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,983 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table18
2023-07-11 14:16:26,983 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1513167137=2, srv879141366=9, srv1437806058=1, srv660403235=7, srv2004031600=5, srv420329444=6, srv1599890026=3, srv1925182918=4, srv114103181=0, srv768111390=8} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,983 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,983 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,983 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,983 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,983 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,983 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,983 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-11 14:16:26,983 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-11 14:16:26,983 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-11 14:16:26,983 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-11 14:16:26,983 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,983 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table18) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,983 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table19
2023-07-11 14:16:26,983 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1513167137=2, srv879141366=9, srv1437806058=1, srv660403235=7, srv2004031600=5, srv420329444=6, srv1599890026=3, srv1925182918=4, srv114103181=0, srv768111390=8} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,983 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,983 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,983 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,983 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,983 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,983 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,983 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-11 14:16:26,983 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-11 14:16:26,983 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-11 14:16:26,983 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-11 14:16:26,983 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,984 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table19) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,984 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table50
2023-07-11 14:16:26,984 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1513167137=2, srv879141366=9, srv1437806058=1, srv660403235=7, srv2004031600=5, srv420329444=6, srv1599890026=3, srv1925182918=4, srv114103181=0, srv768111390=8} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,984 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,984 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,984 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,984 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,984 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,984 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,984 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-11 14:16:26,984 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-11 14:16:26,984 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-11 14:16:26,984 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-11 14:16:26,984 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,984 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table50) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,984 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table51
2023-07-11 14:16:26,984 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1513167137=2, srv879141366=9, srv1437806058=1, srv660403235=7, srv2004031600=5, srv420329444=6, srv1599890026=3, srv1925182918=4, srv114103181=0, srv768111390=8} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,984 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,984 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,984 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,984 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,984 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,984 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,984 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-11 14:16:26,985 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-11 14:16:26,985 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-11 14:16:26,985 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-11 14:16:26,985 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,985 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table51) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,985 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table52
2023-07-11 14:16:26,985 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1513167137=2, srv879141366=9, srv1437806058=1, srv660403235=7, srv2004031600=5, srv420329444=6, srv1599890026=3, srv1925182918=4, srv114103181=0, srv768111390=8} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,985 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,985 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,985 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,985 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,985 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,985 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,985 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-11 14:16:26,985 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-11 14:16:26,985 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-11 14:16:26,985 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-11 14:16:26,985 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,985 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table52) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,985 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table53
2023-07-11 14:16:26,985 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1513167137=2, srv879141366=9, srv1437806058=1, srv660403235=7, srv2004031600=5, srv420329444=6, srv1599890026=3, srv1925182918=4, srv114103181=0, srv768111390=8} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,985 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,985 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,985 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,986 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,986 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,986 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,986 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-11 14:16:26,986 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-11 14:16:26,986 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-11 14:16:26,986 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-11 14:16:26,986 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,986 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table53) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,986 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table10
2023-07-11 14:16:26,986 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1513167137=2, srv879141366=9, srv1437806058=1, srv660403235=7, srv2004031600=5, srv420329444=6, srv1599890026=3, srv1925182918=4, srv114103181=0, srv768111390=8} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,986 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,986 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,986 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,986 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,986 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,986 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,986 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-11 14:16:26,986 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-11 14:16:26,986 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-11 14:16:26,986 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-11 14:16:26,986 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,986 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table10) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,986 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table54
2023-07-11 14:16:26,986 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1513167137=2, srv879141366=9, srv1437806058=1, srv660403235=7, srv2004031600=5, srv420329444=6, srv1599890026=3, srv1925182918=4, srv114103181=0, srv768111390=8} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,986 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,986 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,987 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,987 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,987 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,987 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,987 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-11 14:16:26,987 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-11 14:16:26,987 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-11 14:16:26,987 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-11 14:16:26,987 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,987 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table54) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,987 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table11
2023-07-11 14:16:26,987 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1513167137=2, srv879141366=9, srv1437806058=1, srv660403235=7, srv2004031600=5, srv420329444=6, srv1599890026=3, srv1925182918=4, srv114103181=0, srv768111390=8} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,987 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,987 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,987 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,987 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,987 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,987 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,987 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-11 14:16:26,987 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-11 14:16:26,987 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-11 14:16:26,987 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-11 14:16:26,987 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,987 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table11) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,987 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table12
2023-07-11 14:16:26,987 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1513167137=2, srv879141366=9, srv1437806058=1, srv660403235=7, srv2004031600=5, srv420329444=6, srv1599890026=3, srv1925182918=4, srv114103181=0, srv768111390=8} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,987 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,987 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,988 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,988 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,988 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,988 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,988 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-11 14:16:26,988 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-11 14:16:26,988 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-11 14:16:26,988 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-11 14:16:26,988 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,988 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table12) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,988 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table46
2023-07-11 14:16:26,988 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1513167137=2, srv879141366=9, srv1437806058=1, srv660403235=7, srv2004031600=5, srv420329444=6, srv1599890026=3, srv1925182918=4, srv114103181=0, srv768111390=8} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,988 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,988 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,988 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,988 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,988 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,988 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,988 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-11 14:16:26,988 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-11 14:16:26,988 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-11 14:16:26,988 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-11 14:16:26,988 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,988 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table46) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,988 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table47
2023-07-11 14:16:26,988 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1513167137=2, srv879141366=9, srv1437806058=1, srv660403235=7, srv2004031600=5, srv420329444=6, srv1599890026=3, srv1925182918=4, srv114103181=0, srv768111390=8} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,988 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,989 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,989 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,989 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,989 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,989 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,989 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-11 14:16:26,989 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-11 14:16:26,989 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-11 14:16:26,989 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-11 14:16:26,989 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,989 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table47) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,989 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table48
2023-07-11 14:16:26,989 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1513167137=2, srv879141366=9, srv1437806058=1, srv660403235=7, srv2004031600=5, srv420329444=6, srv1599890026=3, srv1925182918=4, srv114103181=0, srv768111390=8} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,989 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,989 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,989 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,989 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,989 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,989 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,989 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-11 14:16:26,989 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-11 14:16:26,989 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-11 14:16:26,989 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-11 14:16:26,989 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,989 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table48) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,989 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table49
2023-07-11 14:16:26,989 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1513167137=2, srv879141366=9, srv1437806058=1, srv660403235=7, srv2004031600=5, srv420329444=6, srv1599890026=3, srv1925182918=4, srv114103181=0, srv768111390=8} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,990 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,990 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,990 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,990 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,990 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,990 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,990 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-11 14:16:26,990 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-11 14:16:26,990 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-11 14:16:26,990 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-11 14:16:26,990 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,990 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table49) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,990 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table40
2023-07-11 14:16:26,990 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1513167137=2, srv879141366=9, srv1437806058=1, srv660403235=7, srv2004031600=5, srv420329444=6, srv1599890026=3, srv1925182918=4, srv114103181=0, srv768111390=8} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,990 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,990 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,990 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,990 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,990 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,990 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,990 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-11 14:16:26,990 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-11 14:16:26,990 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-11 14:16:26,990 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-11 14:16:26,990 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,990 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table40) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,990 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table41
2023-07-11 14:16:26,991 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1513167137=2, srv879141366=9, srv1437806058=1, srv660403235=7, srv2004031600=5, srv420329444=6, srv1599890026=3, srv1925182918=4, srv114103181=0, srv768111390=8} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,991 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,991 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,991 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,991 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,991 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,991 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,991 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-11 14:16:26,991 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-11 14:16:26,991 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-11 14:16:26,991 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-11 14:16:26,991 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,991 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table41) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,991 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table42
2023-07-11 14:16:26,991 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1513167137=2, srv879141366=9, srv1437806058=1, srv660403235=7, srv2004031600=5, srv420329444=6, srv1599890026=3, srv1925182918=4, srv114103181=0, srv768111390=8} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,991 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,991 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,991 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,991 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,991 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,991 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,991 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-11 14:16:26,991 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-11 14:16:26,991 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-11 14:16:26,991 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-11 14:16:26,991 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,991 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table42) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,991 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table43
2023-07-11 14:16:26,992 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1513167137=2, srv879141366=9, srv1437806058=1, srv660403235=7, srv2004031600=5, srv420329444=6, srv1599890026=3, srv1925182918=4, srv114103181=0, srv768111390=8} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,992 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,992 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,992 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,992 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,992 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,992 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,992 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-11 14:16:26,992 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-11 14:16:26,992 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-11 14:16:26,992 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-11 14:16:26,992 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,992 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table43) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,992 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table44
2023-07-11 14:16:26,992 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1513167137=2, srv879141366=9, srv1437806058=1, srv660403235=7, srv2004031600=5, srv420329444=6, srv1599890026=3, srv1925182918=4, srv114103181=0, srv768111390=8} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,992 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,992 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,992 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,992 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,992 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,992 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,992 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-11 14:16:26,992 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-11 14:16:26,992 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-11 14:16:26,992 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-11 14:16:26,992 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,992 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table44) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,993 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table45
2023-07-11 14:16:26,993 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1513167137=2, srv879141366=9, srv1437806058=1, srv660403235=7, srv2004031600=5, srv420329444=6, srv1599890026=3, srv1925182918=4, srv114103181=0, srv768111390=8} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,993 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,993 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,993 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,993 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,993 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,993 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,993 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-11 14:16:26,993 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-11 14:16:26,993 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-11 14:16:26,993 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-11 14:16:26,993 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,993 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table45) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,993 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table35
2023-07-11 14:16:26,993 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1513167137=2, srv879141366=9, srv1437806058=1, srv660403235=7, srv2004031600=5, srv420329444=6, srv1599890026=3, srv1925182918=4, srv114103181=0, srv768111390=8} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,993 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,993 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,993 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,993 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,993 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,993 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,993 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-11 14:16:26,993 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-11 14:16:26,993 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-11 14:16:26,993 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-11 14:16:26,993 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,994 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table35) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,994 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table36
2023-07-11 14:16:26,994 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1513167137=2, srv879141366=9, srv1437806058=1, srv660403235=7, srv2004031600=5, srv420329444=6, srv1599890026=3, srv1925182918=4, srv114103181=0, srv768111390=8} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,994 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,994 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,994 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,994 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,994 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,994 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,994 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-11 14:16:26,994 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-11 14:16:26,994 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-11 14:16:26,994 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-11 14:16:26,994 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,994 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table36) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,994 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table37
2023-07-11 14:16:26,994 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1513167137=2, srv879141366=9, srv1437806058=1, srv660403235=7, srv2004031600=5, srv420329444=6, srv1599890026=3, srv1925182918=4, srv114103181=0, srv768111390=8} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,994 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,994 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,994 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,994 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,994 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,995 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,995 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-11 14:16:26,995 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-11 14:16:26,995 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-11 14:16:26,995 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-11 14:16:26,995 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,995 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table37) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,995 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table38
2023-07-11 14:16:26,995 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1513167137=2, srv879141366=9, srv1437806058=1, srv660403235=7, srv2004031600=5, srv420329444=6, srv1599890026=3, srv1925182918=4, srv114103181=0, srv768111390=8} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,995 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,995 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,995 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,995 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,995 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,995 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,995 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-11 14:16:26,995 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-11 14:16:26,995 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-11 14:16:26,995 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-11 14:16:26,995 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,995 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table38) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,995 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table39
2023-07-11 14:16:26,995 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1513167137=2, srv879141366=9, srv1437806058=1, srv660403235=7, srv2004031600=5, srv420329444=6, srv1599890026=3, srv1925182918=4, srv114103181=0, srv768111390=8} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,995 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,995 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,995 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,995 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,996 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,996 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,996 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-11 14:16:26,996 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-11 14:16:26,996 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-11 14:16:26,996 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-11 14:16:26,996 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,996 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table39) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,996 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,996 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1513167137=2, srv879141366=9, srv1437806058=1, srv660403235=7, srv2004031600=5, srv420329444=6, srv1599890026=3, srv1925182918=4, srv114103181=0, srv768111390=8} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,996 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,996 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,996 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,996 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,996 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,996 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,996 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-11 14:16:26,996 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-11 14:16:26,996 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-11 14:16:26,996 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-11 14:16:26,996 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,996 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table5) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,996 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,996 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1513167137=2, srv879141366=9, srv1437806058=1, srv660403235=7, srv2004031600=5, srv420329444=6, srv1599890026=3, srv1925182918=4, srv114103181=0, srv768111390=8} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,996 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,996 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,996 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,997 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,997 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,997 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,997 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-11 14:16:26,997 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-11 14:16:26,997 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-11 14:16:26,997 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-11 14:16:26,997 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,997 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table4) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,997 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,997 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1513167137=2, srv879141366=9, srv1437806058=1, srv660403235=7, srv2004031600=5, srv420329444=6, srv1599890026=3, srv1925182918=4, srv114103181=0, srv768111390=8} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,997 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,997 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,997 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,997 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,997 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,997 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,997 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-11 14:16:26,997 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-11 14:16:26,997 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-11 14:16:26,997 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-11 14:16:26,997 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,997 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table3) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,997 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,997 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1513167137=2, srv879141366=9, srv1437806058=1, srv660403235=7, srv2004031600=5, srv420329444=6, srv1599890026=3, srv1925182918=4, srv114103181=0, srv768111390=8} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,997 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,997 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,998 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,998 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,998 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,998 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,998 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-11 14:16:26,998 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-11 14:16:26,998 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-11 14:16:26,998 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-11 14:16:26,998 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,998 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table2) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,998 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,998 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1513167137=2, srv879141366=9, srv1437806058=1, srv660403235=7, srv2004031600=5, srv420329444=6, srv1599890026=3, srv1925182918=4, srv114103181=0, srv768111390=8} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,998 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,998 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,998 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,998 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,998 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,998 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,998 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-11 14:16:26,998 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-11 14:16:26,998 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-11 14:16:26,998 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-11 14:16:26,998 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,998 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,998 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,998 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1513167137=2, srv879141366=9, srv1437806058=1, srv660403235=7, srv2004031600=5, srv420329444=6, srv1599890026=3, srv1925182918=4, srv114103181=0, srv768111390=8} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,998 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,999 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,999 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,999 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,999 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,999 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,999 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-11 14:16:26,999 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-11 14:16:26,999 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-11 14:16:26,999 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-11 14:16:26,999 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,999 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table0) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,999 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table30
2023-07-11 14:16:26,999 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1513167137=2, srv879141366=9, srv1437806058=1, srv660403235=7, srv2004031600=5, srv420329444=6, srv1599890026=3, srv1925182918=4, srv114103181=0, srv768111390=8} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:26,999 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:26,999 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,999 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:26,999 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:26,999 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:26,999 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:26,999 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-11 14:16:26,999 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-11 14:16:26,999 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-11 14:16:26,999 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-11 14:16:26,999 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:26,999 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table30) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:26,999 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table9
2023-07-11 14:16:27,000 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1513167137=2, srv879141366=9, srv1437806058=1, srv660403235=7, srv2004031600=5, srv420329444=6, srv1599890026=3, srv1925182918=4, srv114103181=0, srv768111390=8} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:27,000 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:27,000 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:27,000 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:27,000 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:27,000 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:27,000 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:27,000 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-11 14:16:27,000 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-11 14:16:27,000 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-11 14:16:27,000 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-11 14:16:27,000 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:27,000 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table9) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:27,000 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table31
2023-07-11 14:16:27,000 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1513167137=2, srv879141366=9, srv1437806058=1, srv660403235=7, srv2004031600=5, srv420329444=6, srv1599890026=3, srv1925182918=4, srv114103181=0, srv768111390=8} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:27,000 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:27,000 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:27,000 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:27,000 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:27,000 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:27,000 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:27,000 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-11 14:16:27,000 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-11 14:16:27,000 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-11 14:16:27,000 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-11 14:16:27,000 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:27,001 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table31) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:27,001 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table8
2023-07-11 14:16:27,001 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1513167137=2, srv879141366=9, srv1437806058=1, srv660403235=7, srv2004031600=5, srv420329444=6, srv1599890026=3, srv1925182918=4, srv114103181=0, srv768111390=8} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:27,001 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:27,001 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:27,001 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:27,001 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:27,001 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:27,001 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:27,001 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-11 14:16:27,001 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-11 14:16:27,001 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-11 14:16:27,001 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-11 14:16:27,001 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:27,001 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table8) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:27,001 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table32
2023-07-11 14:16:27,001 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1513167137=2, srv879141366=9, srv1437806058=1, srv660403235=7, srv2004031600=5, srv420329444=6, srv1599890026=3, srv1925182918=4, srv114103181=0, srv768111390=8} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:27,001 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:27,001 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:27,001 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:27,001 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:27,001 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:27,001 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:27,001 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-11 14:16:27,001 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-11 14:16:27,001 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-11 14:16:27,001 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-11 14:16:27,002 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:27,002 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table32) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:27,002 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table7
2023-07-11 14:16:27,002 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1513167137=2, srv879141366=9, srv1437806058=1, srv660403235=7, srv2004031600=5, srv420329444=6, srv1599890026=3, srv1925182918=4, srv114103181=0, srv768111390=8} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:27,002 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:27,002 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:27,002 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:27,002 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:27,002 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:27,002 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:27,002 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-11 14:16:27,002 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-11 14:16:27,002 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-11 14:16:27,002 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-11 14:16:27,002 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:27,002 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table7) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:27,002 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table33
2023-07-11 14:16:27,002 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1513167137=2, srv879141366=9, srv1437806058=1, srv660403235=7, srv2004031600=5, srv420329444=6, srv1599890026=3, srv1925182918=4, srv114103181=0, srv768111390=8} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:27,002 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:27,002 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:27,002 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:27,002 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:27,002 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:27,002 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:27,002 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-11 14:16:27,002 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-11 14:16:27,002 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-11 14:16:27,003 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-11 14:16:27,003 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:27,003 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table33) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:27,003 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table6
2023-07-11 14:16:27,003 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1513167137=2, srv879141366=9, srv1437806058=1, srv660403235=7, srv2004031600=5, srv420329444=6, srv1599890026=3, srv1925182918=4, srv114103181=0, srv768111390=8} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:27,003 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:27,003 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:27,003 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:27,003 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:27,003 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:27,003 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:27,003 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-11 14:16:27,003 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-11 14:16:27,003 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-11 14:16:27,003 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-11 14:16:27,003 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:27,003 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table6) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:27,003 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table34
2023-07-11 14:16:27,003 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1513167137=2, srv879141366=9, srv1437806058=1, srv660403235=7, srv2004031600=5, srv420329444=6, srv1599890026=3, srv1925182918=4, srv114103181=0, srv768111390=8} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:27,003 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:27,003 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:27,003 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:27,003 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:27,004 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:27,004 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:27,004 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-11 14:16:27,004 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-11 14:16:27,004 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-11 14:16:27,004 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-11 14:16:27,004 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:27,004 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table34) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:27,004 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table24
2023-07-11 14:16:27,004 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1513167137=2, srv879141366=9, srv1437806058=1, srv660403235=7, srv2004031600=5, srv420329444=6, srv1599890026=3, srv1925182918=4, srv114103181=0, srv768111390=8} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:27,004 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:27,004 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:27,004 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:27,004 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:27,004 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:27,004 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:27,004 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-11 14:16:27,004 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-11 14:16:27,004 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-11 14:16:27,004 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-11 14:16:27,004 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:27,004 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table24) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:27,004 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table25
2023-07-11 14:16:27,004 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1513167137=2, srv879141366=9, srv1437806058=1, srv660403235=7, srv2004031600=5, srv420329444=6, srv1599890026=3, srv1925182918=4, srv114103181=0, srv768111390=8} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:27,004 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:27,004 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:27,005 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:27,005 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:27,005 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:27,005 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:27,005 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-11 14:16:27,005 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-11 14:16:27,005 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-11 14:16:27,005 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-11 14:16:27,005 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:27,005 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table25) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:27,005 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table26
2023-07-11 14:16:27,005 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1513167137=2, srv879141366=9, srv1437806058=1, srv660403235=7, srv2004031600=5, srv420329444=6, srv1599890026=3, srv1925182918=4, srv114103181=0, srv768111390=8} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:27,005 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:27,005 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:27,005 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:27,005 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:27,005 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:27,005 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:27,005 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-11 14:16:27,005 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-11 14:16:27,005 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-11 14:16:27,005 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-11 14:16:27,005 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:27,005 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table26) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:27,005 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table27
2023-07-11 14:16:27,005 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1513167137=2, srv879141366=9, srv1437806058=1, srv660403235=7, srv2004031600=5, srv420329444=6, srv1599890026=3, srv1925182918=4, srv114103181=0, srv768111390=8} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:27,005 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:27,006 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:27,006 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:27,006 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:27,006 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:27,006 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:27,006 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-11 14:16:27,006 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-11 14:16:27,006 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-11 14:16:27,006 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-11 14:16:27,006 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:27,006 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table27) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:27,006 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table28
2023-07-11 14:16:27,006 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1513167137=2, srv879141366=9, srv1437806058=1, srv660403235=7, srv2004031600=5, srv420329444=6, srv1599890026=3, srv1925182918=4, srv114103181=0, srv768111390=8} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:27,006 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:27,006 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:27,006 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:27,006 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:27,006 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:27,006 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:27,006 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-11 14:16:27,006 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-11 14:16:27,006 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-11 14:16:27,006 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-11 14:16:27,006 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:27,006 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table28) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:27,006 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table29
2023-07-11 14:16:27,006 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1513167137=2, srv879141366=9, srv1437806058=1, srv660403235=7, srv2004031600=5, srv420329444=6, srv1599890026=3, srv1925182918=4, srv114103181=0, srv768111390=8} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:27,007 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:27,007 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:27,007 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:27,007 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:27,007 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:27,007 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:27,007 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-11 14:16:27,007 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-11 14:16:27,007 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-11 14:16:27,007 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-11 14:16:27,007 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:27,007 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table29) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:27,007 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table20
2023-07-11 14:16:27,007 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1513167137=2, srv879141366=9, srv1437806058=1, srv660403235=7, srv2004031600=5, srv420329444=6, srv1599890026=3, srv1925182918=4, srv114103181=0, srv768111390=8} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:27,007 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:27,007 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:27,007 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:27,007 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:27,007 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:27,007 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:27,007 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-11 14:16:27,007 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-11 14:16:27,007 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-11 14:16:27,007 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-11 14:16:27,007 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:27,007 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table20) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:27,007 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table21
2023-07-11 14:16:27,007 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1513167137=2, srv879141366=9, srv1437806058=1, srv660403235=7, srv2004031600=5, srv420329444=6, srv1599890026=3, srv1925182918=4, srv114103181=0, srv768111390=8} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:27,008 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:27,008 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:27,008 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:27,008 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:27,008 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:27,008 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:27,008 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-11 14:16:27,008 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-11 14:16:27,008 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-11 14:16:27,008 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-11 14:16:27,008 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:27,008 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table21) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:27,008 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table22
2023-07-11 14:16:27,008 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1513167137=2, srv879141366=9, srv1437806058=1, srv660403235=7, srv2004031600=5, srv420329444=6, srv1599890026=3, srv1925182918=4, srv114103181=0, srv768111390=8} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:27,008 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:27,008 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:27,008 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:27,008 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:27,008 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:27,008 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:27,008 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-11 14:16:27,008 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-11 14:16:27,008 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-11 14:16:27,008 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-11 14:16:27,008 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:27,008 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table22) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:27,008 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table23
2023-07-11 14:16:27,009 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1513167137=2, srv879141366=9, srv1437806058=1, srv660403235=7, srv2004031600=5, srv420329444=6, srv1599890026=3, srv1925182918=4, srv114103181=0, srv768111390=8} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:27,009 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:27,009 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:27,009 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:27,009 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:27,009 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:27,009 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:27,009 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-11 14:16:27,009 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-11 14:16:27,009 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-11 14:16:27,009 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-11 14:16:27,009 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:27,009 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table23) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:27,009 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table13
2023-07-11 14:16:27,009 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1435981135=2, srv150627788=3, srv1206281004=1, srv659981640=9, srv648384045=8, srv500531365=7, srv1054908381=0, srv170712623=4, srv422900710=5, srv482644710=6} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:27,010 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:27,010 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:27,010 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:27,010 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:27,010 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:27,010 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:27,010 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-11 14:16:27,010 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-11 14:16:27,010 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-11 14:16:27,010 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-11 14:16:27,010 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:27,010 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table13) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:27,010 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table14
2023-07-11 14:16:27,010 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1435981135=2, srv150627788=3, srv1206281004=1, srv659981640=9, srv648384045=8, srv500531365=7, srv1054908381=0, srv170712623=4, srv422900710=5, srv482644710=6} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:27,010 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:27,010 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:27,010 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:27,010 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:27,010 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:27,010 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:27,010 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-11 14:16:27,010 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-11 14:16:27,010 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-11 14:16:27,010 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-11 14:16:27,010 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:27,010 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table14) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:27,010 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table15
2023-07-11 14:16:27,011 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1435981135=2, srv150627788=3, srv1206281004=1, srv659981640=9, srv648384045=8, srv500531365=7, srv1054908381=0, srv170712623=4, srv422900710=5, srv482644710=6} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:27,011 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:27,011 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:27,011 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:27,011 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:27,011 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:27,011 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:27,011 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-11 14:16:27,011 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-11 14:16:27,011 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-11 14:16:27,011 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-11 14:16:27,011 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:27,011 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table15) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:27,011 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table16
2023-07-11 14:16:27,011 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1435981135=2, srv150627788=3, srv1206281004=1, srv659981640=9, srv648384045=8, srv500531365=7, srv1054908381=0, srv170712623=4, srv422900710=5, srv482644710=6} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:27,011 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:27,011 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:27,011 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:27,011 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:27,011 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:27,011 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:27,011 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-11 14:16:27,011 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-11 14:16:27,011 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-11 14:16:27,011 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-11 14:16:27,011 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:27,011 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table16) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:27,011 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table17
2023-07-11 14:16:27,012 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1435981135=2, srv150627788=3, srv1206281004=1, srv659981640=9, srv648384045=8, srv500531365=7, srv1054908381=0, srv170712623=4, srv422900710=5, srv482644710=6} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:27,012 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:27,012 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:27,012 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:27,012 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:27,012 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:27,012 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:27,012 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-11 14:16:27,012 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-11 14:16:27,012 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-11 14:16:27,012 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-11 14:16:27,012 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:27,012 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table17) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:27,012 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table18
2023-07-11 14:16:27,012 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1435981135=2, srv150627788=3, srv1206281004=1, srv659981640=9, srv648384045=8, srv500531365=7, srv1054908381=0, srv170712623=4, srv422900710=5, srv482644710=6} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:27,012 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:27,012 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:27,012 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:27,012 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:27,012 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:27,012 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:27,012 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-11 14:16:27,012 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-11 14:16:27,013 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-11 14:16:27,013 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-11 14:16:27,013 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:27,013 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table18) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:27,013 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table19
2023-07-11 14:16:27,013 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1435981135=2, srv150627788=3, srv1206281004=1, srv659981640=9, srv648384045=8, srv500531365=7, srv1054908381=0, srv170712623=4, srv422900710=5, srv482644710=6} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:27,013 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:27,013 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:27,013 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:27,013 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:27,013 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:27,013 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:27,013 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-11 14:16:27,013 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-11 14:16:27,013 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-11 14:16:27,013 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-11 14:16:27,013 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:27,013 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table19) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:27,013 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table50
2023-07-11 14:16:27,013 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1435981135=2, srv150627788=3, srv1206281004=1, srv659981640=9, srv648384045=8, srv500531365=7, srv1054908381=0, srv170712623=4, srv422900710=5, srv482644710=6} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:27,013 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:27,013 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:27,013 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:27,013 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:27,013 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:27,014 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:27,014 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-11 14:16:27,014 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-11 14:16:27,014 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-11 14:16:27,014 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-11 14:16:27,014 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:27,014 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table50) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:27,014 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table51
2023-07-11 14:16:27,014 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1435981135=2, srv150627788=3, srv1206281004=1, srv659981640=9, srv648384045=8, srv500531365=7, srv1054908381=0, srv170712623=4, srv422900710=5, srv482644710=6} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:27,014 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:27,014 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:27,014 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:27,014 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:27,014 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:27,014 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:27,014 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-11 14:16:27,014 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-11 14:16:27,014 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-11 14:16:27,014 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-11 14:16:27,014 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:27,014 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table51) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:27,014 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table52
2023-07-11 14:16:27,014 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1435981135=2, srv150627788=3, srv1206281004=1, srv659981640=9, srv648384045=8, srv500531365=7, srv1054908381=0, srv170712623=4, srv422900710=5, srv482644710=6} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:27,014 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:27,014 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:27,014 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:27,014 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:27,015 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:27,015 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:27,015 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-11 14:16:27,015 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-11 14:16:27,015 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-11 14:16:27,015 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-11 14:16:27,015 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:27,015 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table52) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:27,015 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table53
2023-07-11 14:16:27,015 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1435981135=2, srv150627788=3, srv1206281004=1, srv659981640=9, srv648384045=8, srv500531365=7, srv1054908381=0, srv170712623=4, srv422900710=5, srv482644710=6} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:27,015 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:27,015 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:27,015 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:27,015 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:27,015 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:27,015 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:27,015 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-11 14:16:27,015 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-11 14:16:27,015 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-11 14:16:27,015 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-11 14:16:27,015 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:27,015 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table53) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:27,015 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table10
2023-07-11 14:16:27,015 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1435981135=2, srv150627788=3, srv1206281004=1, srv659981640=9, srv648384045=8, srv500531365=7, srv1054908381=0, srv170712623=4, srv422900710=5, srv482644710=6} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:27,015 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:27,015 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:27,015 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:27,015 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:27,016 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:27,016 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:27,016 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-11 14:16:27,016 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-11 14:16:27,016 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-11 14:16:27,016 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-11 14:16:27,016 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:27,016 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table10) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:27,016 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table54
2023-07-11 14:16:27,016 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1435981135=2, srv150627788=3, srv1206281004=1, srv659981640=9, srv648384045=8, srv500531365=7, srv1054908381=0, srv170712623=4, srv422900710=5, srv482644710=6} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:27,016 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:27,016 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:27,016 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:27,016 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:27,016 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:27,016 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:27,016 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-11 14:16:27,016 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-11 14:16:27,016 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-11 14:16:27,016 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-11 14:16:27,016 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:27,016 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table54) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:27,016 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table11
2023-07-11 14:16:27,016 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1435981135=2, srv150627788=3, srv1206281004=1, srv659981640=9, srv648384045=8, srv500531365=7, srv1054908381=0, srv170712623=4, srv422900710=5, srv482644710=6} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:27,016 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:27,016 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:27,016 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:27,017 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:27,017 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:27,017 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:27,017 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-11 14:16:27,017 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-11 14:16:27,017 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-11 14:16:27,017 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-11 14:16:27,017 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:27,017 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table11) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:27,017 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table55
2023-07-11 14:16:27,017 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1435981135=2, srv150627788=3, srv1206281004=1, srv659981640=9, srv648384045=8, srv500531365=7, srv1054908381=0, srv170712623=4, srv422900710=5, srv482644710=6} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:27,017 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:27,017 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:27,017 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:27,017 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:27,017 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:27,017 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:27,017 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-11 14:16:27,017 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-11 14:16:27,017 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-11 14:16:27,017 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-11 14:16:27,017 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:27,017 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table55) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:27,017 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table12
2023-07-11 14:16:27,017 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1435981135=2, srv150627788=3, srv1206281004=1, srv659981640=9, srv648384045=8, srv500531365=7, srv1054908381=0, srv170712623=4, srv422900710=5, srv482644710=6} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:27,017 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:27,017 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:27,018 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:27,018 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:27,018 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:27,018 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:27,018 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-11 14:16:27,018 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-11 14:16:27,018 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-11 14:16:27,018 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-11 14:16:27,018 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:27,018 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table12) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:27,018 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table46
2023-07-11 14:16:27,018 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1435981135=2, srv150627788=3, srv1206281004=1, srv659981640=9, srv648384045=8, srv500531365=7, srv1054908381=0, srv170712623=4, srv422900710=5, srv482644710=6} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:27,018 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:27,018 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:27,018 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:27,018 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:27,018 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:27,018 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:27,018 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-11 14:16:27,018 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-11 14:16:27,018 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-11 14:16:27,018 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-11 14:16:27,018 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:27,018 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table46) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:27,018 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table47
2023-07-11 14:16:27,018 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1435981135=2, srv150627788=3, srv1206281004=1, srv659981640=9, srv648384045=8, srv500531365=7, srv1054908381=0, srv170712623=4, srv422900710=5, srv482644710=6} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:27,018 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:27,019 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:27,019 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:27,019 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:27,019 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:27,019 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:27,019 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-11 14:16:27,019 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-11 14:16:27,019 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-11 14:16:27,019 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-11 14:16:27,019 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:27,019 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table47) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:27,019 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table48
2023-07-11 14:16:27,019 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1435981135=2, srv150627788=3, srv1206281004=1, srv659981640=9, srv648384045=8, srv500531365=7, srv1054908381=0, srv170712623=4, srv422900710=5, srv482644710=6} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:27,019 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:27,019 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:27,019 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:27,019 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:27,019 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:27,019 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:27,019 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-11 14:16:27,019 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-11 14:16:27,019 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-11 14:16:27,019 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-11 14:16:27,019 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:27,019 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table48) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:27,019 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table49
2023-07-11 14:16:27,019 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1435981135=2, srv150627788=3, srv1206281004=1, srv659981640=9, srv648384045=8, srv500531365=7, srv1054908381=0, srv170712623=4, srv422900710=5, srv482644710=6} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:27,020 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:27,020 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:27,020 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:27,020 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:27,020 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:27,020 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:27,020 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-11 14:16:27,020 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-11 14:16:27,020 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-11 14:16:27,020 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-11 14:16:27,020 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:27,020 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table49) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:27,020 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table40
2023-07-11 14:16:27,020 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1435981135=2, srv150627788=3, srv1206281004=1, srv659981640=9, srv648384045=8, srv500531365=7, srv1054908381=0, srv170712623=4, srv422900710=5, srv482644710=6} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:27,020 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:27,020 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:27,020 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:27,020 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:27,020 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:27,020 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:27,020 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-11 14:16:27,020 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-11 14:16:27,020 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-11 14:16:27,020 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-11 14:16:27,020 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:27,020 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table40) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:27,020 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table41
2023-07-11 14:16:27,021 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1435981135=2, srv150627788=3, srv1206281004=1, srv659981640=9, srv648384045=8, srv500531365=7, srv1054908381=0, srv170712623=4, srv422900710=5, srv482644710=6} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:27,021 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:27,021 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:27,021 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:27,021 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:27,021 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:27,021 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:27,021 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-11 14:16:27,021 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-11 14:16:27,021 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-11 14:16:27,021 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-11 14:16:27,021 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:27,021 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table41) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:27,021 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table42
2023-07-11 14:16:27,021 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1435981135=2, srv150627788=3, srv1206281004=1, srv659981640=9, srv648384045=8, srv500531365=7, srv1054908381=0, srv170712623=4, srv422900710=5, srv482644710=6} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:27,021 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:27,021 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:27,021 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:27,021 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:27,021 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:27,021 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:27,021 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-11 14:16:27,021 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-11 14:16:27,021 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-11 14:16:27,021 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-11 14:16:27,021 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:27,021 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table42) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:27,022 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table43
2023-07-11 14:16:27,022 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1435981135=2, srv150627788=3, srv1206281004=1, srv659981640=9, srv648384045=8, srv500531365=7, srv1054908381=0, srv170712623=4, srv422900710=5, srv482644710=6} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:27,022 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:27,022 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:27,022 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:27,022 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:27,022 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:27,022 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:27,022 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-11 14:16:27,022 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-11 14:16:27,022 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-11 14:16:27,022 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-11 14:16:27,022 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:27,022 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table43) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:27,022 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table44
2023-07-11 14:16:27,022 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1435981135=2, srv150627788=3, srv1206281004=1, srv659981640=9, srv648384045=8, srv500531365=7, srv1054908381=0, srv170712623=4, srv422900710=5, srv482644710=6} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:27,022 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:27,022 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:27,022 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:27,022 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:27,022 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:27,022 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:27,023 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-11 14:16:27,023 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-11 14:16:27,023 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-11 14:16:27,023 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-11 14:16:27,023 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:27,023 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table44) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:27,023 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table45
2023-07-11 14:16:27,023 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1435981135=2, srv150627788=3, srv1206281004=1, srv659981640=9, srv648384045=8, srv500531365=7, srv1054908381=0, srv170712623=4, srv422900710=5, srv482644710=6} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:27,023 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:27,023 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:27,023 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:27,023 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:27,023 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:27,023 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:27,023 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-11 14:16:27,023 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-11 14:16:27,023 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-11 14:16:27,023 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-11 14:16:27,023 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:27,023 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table45) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:27,023 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table35
2023-07-11 14:16:27,023 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1435981135=2, srv150627788=3, srv1206281004=1, srv659981640=9, srv648384045=8, srv500531365=7, srv1054908381=0, srv170712623=4, srv422900710=5, srv482644710=6} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:27,023 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:27,023 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:27,023 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:27,023 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:27,023 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:27,023 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:27,024 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-11 14:16:27,024 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-11 14:16:27,024 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-11 14:16:27,024 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-11 14:16:27,024 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:27,024 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table35) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:27,024 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table36
2023-07-11 14:16:27,024 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1435981135=2, srv150627788=3, srv1206281004=1, srv659981640=9, srv648384045=8, srv500531365=7, srv1054908381=0, srv170712623=4, srv422900710=5, srv482644710=6} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:27,024 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:27,024 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:27,024 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:27,024 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:27,024 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:27,024 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:27,024 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-11 14:16:27,024 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-11 14:16:27,024 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-11 14:16:27,024 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-11 14:16:27,024 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:27,024 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table36) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:27,024 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table37
2023-07-11 14:16:27,024 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1435981135=2, srv150627788=3, srv1206281004=1, srv659981640=9, srv648384045=8, srv500531365=7, srv1054908381=0, srv170712623=4, srv422900710=5, srv482644710=6} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:27,024 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:27,024 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:27,024 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:27,024 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:27,024 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:27,025 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:27,025 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-11 14:16:27,025 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-11 14:16:27,025 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-11 14:16:27,025 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-11 14:16:27,025 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:27,025 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table37) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:27,025 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table38
2023-07-11 14:16:27,025 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1435981135=2, srv150627788=3, srv1206281004=1, srv659981640=9, srv648384045=8, srv500531365=7, srv1054908381=0, srv170712623=4, srv422900710=5, srv482644710=6} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:27,025 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:27,025 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:27,025 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:27,025 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:27,025 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:27,025 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:27,025 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-11 14:16:27,025 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-11 14:16:27,025 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-11 14:16:27,025 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-11 14:16:27,025 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:27,025 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table38) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:27,025 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table39
2023-07-11 14:16:27,025 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1435981135=2, srv150627788=3, srv1206281004=1, srv659981640=9, srv648384045=8, srv500531365=7, srv1054908381=0, srv170712623=4, srv422900710=5, srv482644710=6} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:27,025 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:27,025 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:27,025 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:27,026 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:27,026 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:27,026 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:27,026 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-11 14:16:27,026 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-11 14:16:27,026 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-11 14:16:27,026 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-11 14:16:27,026 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:27,026 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table39) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:27,026 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table5
2023-07-11 14:16:27,026 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1435981135=2, srv150627788=3, srv1206281004=1, srv659981640=9, srv648384045=8, srv500531365=7, srv1054908381=0, srv170712623=4, srv422900710=5, srv482644710=6} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:27,026 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:27,026 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:27,026 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:27,026 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:27,026 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:27,026 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:27,026 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-11 14:16:27,026 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-11 14:16:27,026 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-11 14:16:27,026 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-11 14:16:27,026 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:27,026 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table5) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:27,026 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table4
2023-07-11 14:16:27,026 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1435981135=2, srv150627788=3, srv1206281004=1, srv659981640=9, srv648384045=8, srv500531365=7, srv1054908381=0, srv170712623=4, srv422900710=5, srv482644710=6} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:27,026 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:27,026 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:27,027 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:27,027 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:27,027 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:27,027 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:27,027 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-11 14:16:27,027 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-11 14:16:27,027 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-11 14:16:27,027 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-11 14:16:27,027 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:27,027 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table4) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:27,027 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table3
2023-07-11 14:16:27,027 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1435981135=2, srv150627788=3, srv1206281004=1, srv659981640=9, srv648384045=8, srv500531365=7, srv1054908381=0, srv170712623=4, srv422900710=5, srv482644710=6} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:27,027 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:27,027 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:27,027 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:27,027 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:27,027 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:27,027 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:27,027 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-11 14:16:27,027 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-11 14:16:27,027 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-11 14:16:27,027 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-11 14:16:27,027 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:27,027 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table3) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:27,027 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table2
2023-07-11 14:16:27,027 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1435981135=2, srv150627788=3, srv1206281004=1, srv659981640=9, srv648384045=8, srv500531365=7, srv1054908381=0, srv170712623=4, srv422900710=5, srv482644710=6} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:27,027 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:27,028 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:27,028 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:27,028 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:27,028 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:27,028 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:27,028 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-11 14:16:27,028 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-11 14:16:27,028 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-11 14:16:27,028 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-11 14:16:27,028 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:27,028 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table2) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:27,028 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1
2023-07-11 14:16:27,028 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1435981135=2, srv150627788=3, srv1206281004=1, srv659981640=9, srv648384045=8, srv500531365=7, srv1054908381=0, srv170712623=4, srv422900710=5, srv482644710=6} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:27,028 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:27,028 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:27,028 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:27,028 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:27,028 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:27,028 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:27,028 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-11 14:16:27,028 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-11 14:16:27,028 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-11 14:16:27,028 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-11 14:16:27,028 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:27,028 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:27,028 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table0
2023-07-11 14:16:27,029 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1435981135=2, srv150627788=3, srv1206281004=1, srv659981640=9, srv648384045=8, srv500531365=7, srv1054908381=0, srv170712623=4, srv422900710=5, srv482644710=6} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:27,029 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:27,029 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:27,029 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:27,029 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:27,029 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:27,029 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:27,029 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-11 14:16:27,029 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-11 14:16:27,029 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-11 14:16:27,029 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-11 14:16:27,029 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:27,029 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table0) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:27,029 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table30
2023-07-11 14:16:27,029 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1435981135=2, srv150627788=3, srv1206281004=1, srv659981640=9, srv648384045=8, srv500531365=7, srv1054908381=0, srv170712623=4, srv422900710=5, srv482644710=6} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:27,029 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:27,029 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:27,029 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:27,029 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:27,029 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:27,029 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:27,029 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-11 14:16:27,029 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-11 14:16:27,029 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-11 14:16:27,029 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-11 14:16:27,029 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:27,029 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table30) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:27,030 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table9
2023-07-11 14:16:27,030 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1435981135=2, srv150627788=3, srv1206281004=1, srv659981640=9, srv648384045=8, srv500531365=7, srv1054908381=0, srv170712623=4, srv422900710=5, srv482644710=6} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:27,030 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:27,030 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:27,030 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:27,030 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:27,030 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:27,030 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:27,030 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-11 14:16:27,030 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-11 14:16:27,030 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-11 14:16:27,030 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-11 14:16:27,030 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:27,030 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table9) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:27,030 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table31
2023-07-11 14:16:27,030 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1435981135=2, srv150627788=3, srv1206281004=1, srv659981640=9, srv648384045=8, srv500531365=7, srv1054908381=0, srv170712623=4, srv422900710=5, srv482644710=6} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:27,030 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:27,030 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:27,030 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:27,030 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:27,030 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:27,030 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:27,030 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-11 14:16:27,030 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-11 14:16:27,030 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-11 14:16:27,030 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-11 14:16:27,030 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:27,030 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table31) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:27,031 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table8
2023-07-11 14:16:27,031 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1435981135=2, srv150627788=3, srv1206281004=1, srv659981640=9, srv648384045=8, srv500531365=7, srv1054908381=0, srv170712623=4, srv422900710=5, srv482644710=6} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:27,031 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:27,031 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:27,031 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:27,031 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:27,031 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:27,031 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:27,031 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-11 14:16:27,031 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-11 14:16:27,031 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-11 14:16:27,031 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-11 14:16:27,031 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:27,031 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table8) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:27,031 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table32
2023-07-11 14:16:27,031 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1435981135=2, srv150627788=3, srv1206281004=1, srv659981640=9, srv648384045=8, srv500531365=7, srv1054908381=0, srv170712623=4, srv422900710=5, srv482644710=6} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:27,031 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:27,031 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:27,031 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:27,031 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:27,031 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:27,032 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:27,032 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-11 14:16:27,032 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-11 14:16:27,032 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-11 14:16:27,032 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-11 14:16:27,032 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:27,032 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table32) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:27,032 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table7
2023-07-11 14:16:27,032 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1435981135=2, srv150627788=3, srv1206281004=1, srv659981640=9, srv648384045=8, srv500531365=7, srv1054908381=0, srv170712623=4, srv422900710=5, srv482644710=6} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:27,032 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:27,032 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:27,032 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:27,032 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:27,032 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:27,032 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:27,032 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-11 14:16:27,032 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-11 14:16:27,033 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-11 14:16:27,033 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-11 14:16:27,033 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:27,033 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table7) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:27,033 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table33
2023-07-11 14:16:27,033 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1435981135=2, srv150627788=3, srv1206281004=1, srv659981640=9, srv648384045=8, srv500531365=7, srv1054908381=0, srv170712623=4, srv422900710=5, srv482644710=6} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:27,033 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:27,033 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:27,033 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:27,033 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:27,033 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:27,033 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:27,033 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-11 14:16:27,033 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-11 14:16:27,033 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-11 14:16:27,034 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-11 14:16:27,034 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:27,034 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table33) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:27,034 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table6
2023-07-11 14:16:27,034 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1435981135=2, srv150627788=3, srv1206281004=1, srv659981640=9, srv648384045=8, srv500531365=7, srv1054908381=0, srv170712623=4, srv422900710=5, srv482644710=6} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:27,034 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:27,034 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:27,034 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:27,034 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:27,034 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:27,034 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:27,034 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-11 14:16:27,034 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-11 14:16:27,034 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-11 14:16:27,034 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-11 14:16:27,035 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:27,035 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table6) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:27,035 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table34
2023-07-11 14:16:27,035 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1435981135=2, srv150627788=3, srv1206281004=1, srv659981640=9, srv648384045=8, srv500531365=7, srv1054908381=0, srv170712623=4, srv422900710=5, srv482644710=6} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:27,035 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:27,035 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:27,035 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:27,035 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:27,035 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:27,035 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:27,035 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-11 14:16:27,035 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-11 14:16:27,035 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-11 14:16:27,035 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-11 14:16:27,035 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:27,035 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table34) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:27,036 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table24
2023-07-11 14:16:27,036 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1435981135=2, srv150627788=3, srv1206281004=1, srv659981640=9, srv648384045=8, srv500531365=7, srv1054908381=0, srv170712623=4, srv422900710=5, srv482644710=6} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:27,036 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:27,036 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:27,036 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:27,036 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:27,036 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:27,036 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:27,036 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-11 14:16:27,036 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-11 14:16:27,036 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-11 14:16:27,036 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-11 14:16:27,036 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:27,036 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table24) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:27,036 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table25
2023-07-11 14:16:27,036 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1435981135=2, srv150627788=3, srv1206281004=1, srv659981640=9, srv648384045=8, srv500531365=7, srv1054908381=0, srv170712623=4, srv422900710=5, srv482644710=6} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:27,036 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:27,036 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:27,036 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:27,037 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:27,037 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:27,037 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:27,037 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-11 14:16:27,037 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-11 14:16:27,037 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-11 14:16:27,037 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-11 14:16:27,037 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:27,037 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table25) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:27,037 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table26
2023-07-11 14:16:27,037 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1435981135=2, srv150627788=3, srv1206281004=1, srv659981640=9, srv648384045=8, srv500531365=7, srv1054908381=0, srv170712623=4, srv422900710=5, srv482644710=6} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:27,037 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:27,037 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:27,037 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:27,037 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:27,037 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:27,037 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:27,037 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-11 14:16:27,037 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-11 14:16:27,037 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-11 14:16:27,037 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-11 14:16:27,037 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:27,037 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table26) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:27,037 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table27
2023-07-11 14:16:27,037 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1435981135=2, srv150627788=3, srv1206281004=1, srv659981640=9, srv648384045=8, srv500531365=7, srv1054908381=0, srv170712623=4, srv422900710=5, srv482644710=6} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:27,037 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:27,038 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:27,038 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:27,038 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:27,038 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:27,038 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:27,038 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-11 14:16:27,038 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-11 14:16:27,038 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-11 14:16:27,038 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-11 14:16:27,038 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:27,038 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table27) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:27,038 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table28
2023-07-11 14:16:27,038 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1435981135=2, srv150627788=3, srv1206281004=1, srv659981640=9, srv648384045=8, srv500531365=7, srv1054908381=0, srv170712623=4, srv422900710=5, srv482644710=6} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:27,038 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:27,038 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:27,038 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:27,038 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:27,038 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:27,038 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:27,038 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-11 14:16:27,038 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-11 14:16:27,038 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-11 14:16:27,038 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-11 14:16:27,038 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:27,038 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table28) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:27,038 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table29
2023-07-11 14:16:27,038 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1435981135=2, srv150627788=3, srv1206281004=1, srv659981640=9, srv648384045=8, srv500531365=7, srv1054908381=0, srv170712623=4, srv422900710=5, srv482644710=6} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:27,039 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:27,039 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:27,039 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:27,039 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:27,039 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:27,039 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:27,039 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-11 14:16:27,039 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-11 14:16:27,039 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-11 14:16:27,039 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-11 14:16:27,039 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:27,039 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table29) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:27,039 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table20
2023-07-11 14:16:27,039 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1435981135=2, srv150627788=3, srv1206281004=1, srv659981640=9, srv648384045=8, srv500531365=7, srv1054908381=0, srv170712623=4, srv422900710=5, srv482644710=6} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:27,039 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:27,039 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:27,039 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:27,039 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:27,039 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:27,039 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:27,039 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-11 14:16:27,039 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-11 14:16:27,039 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-11 14:16:27,039 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-11 14:16:27,039 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:27,039 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table20) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:27,039 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table21
2023-07-11 14:16:27,039 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1435981135=2, srv150627788=3, srv1206281004=1, srv659981640=9, srv648384045=8, srv500531365=7, srv1054908381=0, srv170712623=4, srv422900710=5, srv482644710=6} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:27,040 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:27,040 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:27,040 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:27,040 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:27,040 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:27,040 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:27,040 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-11 14:16:27,040 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-11 14:16:27,040 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-11 14:16:27,040 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-11 14:16:27,040 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:27,040 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table21) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:27,040 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table22
2023-07-11 14:16:27,040 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1435981135=2, srv150627788=3, srv1206281004=1, srv659981640=9, srv648384045=8, srv500531365=7, srv1054908381=0, srv170712623=4, srv422900710=5, srv482644710=6} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:27,040 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:27,040 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:27,040 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:27,040 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:27,040 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:27,040 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:27,040 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-11 14:16:27,040 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-11 14:16:27,040 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-11 14:16:27,040 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-11 14:16:27,040 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:27,040 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table22) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:27,040 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table23
2023-07-11 14:16:27,041 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1435981135=2, srv150627788=3, srv1206281004=1, srv659981640=9, srv648384045=8, srv500531365=7, srv1054908381=0, srv170712623=4, srv422900710=5, srv482644710=6} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:27,041 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:27,041 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:27,041 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:27,041 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:27,041 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:27,041 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:27,041 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-11 14:16:27,041 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-11 14:16:27,041 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-11 14:16:27,041 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-11 14:16:27,041 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:27,041 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table23) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:27,041 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table13
2023-07-11 14:16:27,041 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv107696142=0, srv2115339012=6, srv1904469654=5, srv150538359=3, srv1644560957=4, srv280699846=7, srv369064611=8, srv1387259853=2, srv694750544=9, srv1382445068=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:27,041 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:27,041 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:27,041 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:27,041 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:27,041 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:27,041 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:27,042 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-11 14:16:27,042 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-11 14:16:27,042 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-11 14:16:27,042 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-11 14:16:27,042 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:27,042 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table13) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:27,042 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table14
2023-07-11 14:16:27,042 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv107696142=0, srv2115339012=6, srv1904469654=5, srv150538359=3, srv1644560957=4, srv280699846=7, srv369064611=8, srv1387259853=2, srv694750544=9, srv1382445068=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:27,042 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:27,042 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:27,042 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:27,042 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:27,042 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:27,042 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:27,042 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-11 14:16:27,042 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-11 14:16:27,042 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-11 14:16:27,042 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-11 14:16:27,042 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:27,042 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table14) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:27,042 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table15
2023-07-11 14:16:27,043 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv107696142=0, srv2115339012=6, srv1904469654=5, srv150538359=3, srv1644560957=4, srv280699846=7, srv369064611=8, srv1387259853=2, srv694750544=9, srv1382445068=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:27,043 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:27,043 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:27,043 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:27,043 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:27,043 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:27,043 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:27,043 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-11 14:16:27,043 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-11 14:16:27,043 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-11 14:16:27,043 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-11 14:16:27,043 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:27,043 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table15) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:27,043 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table5
2023-07-11 14:16:27,043 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv107696142=0, srv2115339012=6, srv1904469654=5, srv150538359=3, srv1644560957=4, srv280699846=7, srv369064611=8, srv1387259853=2, srv694750544=9, srv1382445068=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:27,043 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:27,043 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:27,043 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:27,043 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:27,043 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:27,043 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:27,043 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-11 14:16:27,043 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-11 14:16:27,043 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-11 14:16:27,043 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-11 14:16:27,043 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:27,043 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table5) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:27,044 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table4
2023-07-11 14:16:27,044 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv107696142=0, srv2115339012=6, srv1904469654=5, srv150538359=3, srv1644560957=4, srv280699846=7, srv369064611=8, srv1387259853=2, srv694750544=9, srv1382445068=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:27,044 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:27,044 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:27,044 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:27,044 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:27,044 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:27,044 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:27,044 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-11 14:16:27,044 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-11 14:16:27,044 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-11 14:16:27,044 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-11 14:16:27,044 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:27,044 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table4) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:27,044 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table3
2023-07-11 14:16:27,044 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv107696142=0, srv2115339012=6, srv1904469654=5, srv150538359=3, srv1644560957=4, srv280699846=7, srv369064611=8, srv1387259853=2, srv694750544=9, srv1382445068=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:27,044 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:27,044 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:27,044 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:27,044 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:27,044 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:27,044 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:27,044 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-11 14:16:27,044 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-11 14:16:27,044 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-11 14:16:27,044 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-11 14:16:27,044 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:27,045 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table3) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:27,045 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table2
2023-07-11 14:16:27,045 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv107696142=0, srv2115339012=6, srv1904469654=5, srv150538359=3, srv1644560957=4, srv280699846=7, srv369064611=8, srv1387259853=2, srv694750544=9, srv1382445068=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:27,045 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:27,045 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:27,045 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:27,045 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:27,045 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:27,045 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:27,045 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-11 14:16:27,045 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-11 14:16:27,045 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-11 14:16:27,045 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-11 14:16:27,045 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:27,045 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table2) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:27,045 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1
2023-07-11 14:16:27,045 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv107696142=0, srv2115339012=6, srv1904469654=5, srv150538359=3, srv1644560957=4, srv280699846=7, srv369064611=8, srv1387259853=2, srv694750544=9, srv1382445068=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:27,045 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:27,045 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:27,045 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:27,045 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:27,045 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:27,045 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:27,045 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-11 14:16:27,045 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-11 14:16:27,045 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-11 14:16:27,045 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-11 14:16:27,045 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:27,046 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:27,046 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table0
2023-07-11 14:16:27,046 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv107696142=0, srv2115339012=6, srv1904469654=5, srv150538359=3, srv1644560957=4, srv280699846=7, srv369064611=8, srv1387259853=2, srv694750544=9, srv1382445068=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:27,046 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:27,046 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:27,046 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:27,046 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:27,046 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:27,046 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:27,046 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-11 14:16:27,046 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-11 14:16:27,046 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-11 14:16:27,046 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-11 14:16:27,046 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:27,046 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table0) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:27,046 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table9
2023-07-11 14:16:27,046 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv107696142=0, srv2115339012=6, srv1904469654=5, srv150538359=3, srv1644560957=4, srv280699846=7, srv369064611=8, srv1387259853=2, srv694750544=9, srv1382445068=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:27,046 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:27,046 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:27,046 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:27,046 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:27,046 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:27,046 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:27,046 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-11 14:16:27,046 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-11 14:16:27,046 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-11 14:16:27,046 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-11 14:16:27,047 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:27,047 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table9) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:27,047 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table8
2023-07-11 14:16:27,047 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv107696142=0, srv2115339012=6, srv1904469654=5, srv150538359=3, srv1644560957=4, srv280699846=7, srv369064611=8, srv1387259853=2, srv694750544=9, srv1382445068=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:27,047 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:27,047 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:27,047 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:27,047 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:27,047 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:27,047 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:27,047 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-11 14:16:27,047 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-11 14:16:27,047 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-11 14:16:27,047 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-11 14:16:27,047 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:27,047 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table8) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:27,047 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table10
2023-07-11 14:16:27,047 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv107696142=0, srv2115339012=6, srv1904469654=5, srv150538359=3, srv1644560957=4, srv280699846=7, srv369064611=8, srv1387259853=2, srv694750544=9, srv1382445068=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:27,047 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:27,047 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:27,047 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:27,047 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:27,047 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:27,047 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:27,047 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-11 14:16:27,047 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-11 14:16:27,047 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-11 14:16:27,048 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-11 14:16:27,048 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:27,048 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table10) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:27,048 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table7
2023-07-11 14:16:27,048 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv107696142=0, srv2115339012=6, srv1904469654=5, srv150538359=3, srv1644560957=4, srv280699846=7, srv369064611=8, srv1387259853=2, srv694750544=9, srv1382445068=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:27,048 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:27,048 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:27,048 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:27,048 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:27,048 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:27,048 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:27,048 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-11 14:16:27,048 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-11 14:16:27,048 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-11 14:16:27,048 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-11 14:16:27,048 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:27,048 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table7) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:27,048 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table11
2023-07-11 14:16:27,048 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv107696142=0, srv2115339012=6, srv1904469654=5, srv150538359=3, srv1644560957=4, srv280699846=7, srv369064611=8, srv1387259853=2, srv694750544=9, srv1382445068=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:27,048 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:27,048 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:27,048 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:27,048 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:27,048 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:27,048 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:27,048 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-11 14:16:27,048 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-11 14:16:27,049 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-11 14:16:27,049 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-11 14:16:27,049 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:27,049 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table11) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:27,049 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table6
2023-07-11 14:16:27,049 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv107696142=0, srv2115339012=6, srv1904469654=5, srv150538359=3, srv1644560957=4, srv280699846=7, srv369064611=8, srv1387259853=2, srv694750544=9, srv1382445068=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:27,049 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:27,049 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:27,049 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:27,049 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:27,049 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:27,049 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:27,049 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-11 14:16:27,049 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-11 14:16:27,049 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-11 14:16:27,049 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-11 14:16:27,049 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:27,049 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table6) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:27,049 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table12
2023-07-11 14:16:27,049 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv107696142=0, srv2115339012=6, srv1904469654=5, srv150538359=3, srv1644560957=4, srv280699846=7, srv369064611=8, srv1387259853=2, srv694750544=9, srv1382445068=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:27,049 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:27,049 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:27,049 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:27,049 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:27,049 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:27,049 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:27,049 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-11 14:16:27,050 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-11 14:16:27,050 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-11 14:16:27,050 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-11 14:16:27,050 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:27,050 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table12) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:27,050 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table5
2023-07-11 14:16:27,050 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1194665935=1, srv1276761399=3, srv1734175809=6, srv1921634099=7, srv916845224=9, srv1533028529=5, srv1297890091=4, srv1187945106=0, srv1259859506=2, srv2063552033=8} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:27,050 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:27,050 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:27,050 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:27,050 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:27,050 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:27,050 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:27,050 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-11 14:16:27,050 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-11 14:16:27,050 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-11 14:16:27,050 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-11 14:16:27,050 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:27,050 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table5) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:27,050 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table4
2023-07-11 14:16:27,051 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1194665935=1, srv1276761399=3, srv1734175809=6, srv1921634099=7, srv916845224=9, srv1533028529=5, srv1297890091=4, srv1187945106=0, srv1259859506=2, srv2063552033=8} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:27,051 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:27,051 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:27,051 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:27,051 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:27,051 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:27,051 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:27,051 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-11 14:16:27,051 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-11 14:16:27,051 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-11 14:16:27,051 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-11 14:16:27,051 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:27,051 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table4) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:27,051 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table3
2023-07-11 14:16:27,051 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1194665935=1, srv1276761399=3, srv1734175809=6, srv1921634099=7, srv916845224=9, srv1533028529=5, srv1297890091=4, srv1187945106=0, srv1259859506=2, srv2063552033=8} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:27,051 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:27,051 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:27,051 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:27,051 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:27,051 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:27,051 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:27,051 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-11 14:16:27,051 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-11 14:16:27,051 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-11 14:16:27,051 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-11 14:16:27,051 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:27,051 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table3) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:27,052 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table2
2023-07-11 14:16:27,052 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1194665935=1, srv1276761399=3, srv1734175809=6, srv1921634099=7, srv916845224=9, srv1533028529=5, srv1297890091=4, srv1187945106=0, srv1259859506=2, srv2063552033=8} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:27,052 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:27,052 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:27,052 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:27,052 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:27,052 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:27,052 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:27,052 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-11 14:16:27,052 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-11 14:16:27,052 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-11 14:16:27,052 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-11 14:16:27,052 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:27,052 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table2) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:27,052 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1
2023-07-11 14:16:27,052 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1194665935=1, srv1276761399=3, srv1734175809=6, srv1921634099=7, srv916845224=9, srv1533028529=5, srv1297890091=4, srv1187945106=0, srv1259859506=2, srv2063552033=8} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:27,052 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:27,052 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:27,052 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:27,052 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:27,052 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:27,052 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:27,053 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-11 14:16:27,053 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-11 14:16:27,053 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-11 14:16:27,053 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-11 14:16:27,053 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:27,053 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:27,053 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table0
2023-07-11 14:16:27,053 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1194665935=1, srv1276761399=3, srv1734175809=6, srv1921634099=7, srv916845224=9, srv1533028529=5, srv1297890091=4, srv1187945106=0, srv1259859506=2, srv2063552033=8} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:27,053 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:27,053 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:27,053 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:27,053 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:27,053 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:27,053 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:27,053 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-11 14:16:27,053 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-11 14:16:27,053 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-11 14:16:27,053 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-11 14:16:27,053 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:27,053 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table0) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:27,053 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table7
2023-07-11 14:16:27,053 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1194665935=1, srv1276761399=3, srv1734175809=6, srv1921634099=7, srv916845224=9, srv1533028529=5, srv1297890091=4, srv1187945106=0, srv1259859506=2, srv2063552033=8} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:27,053 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:27,053 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:27,053 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:27,054 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:27,054 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:27,054 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:27,054 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-11 14:16:27,054 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-11 14:16:27,054 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-11 14:16:27,054 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-11 14:16:27,054 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:27,054 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table7) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:27,054 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table6
2023-07-11 14:16:27,054 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1194665935=1, srv1276761399=3, srv1734175809=6, srv1921634099=7, srv916845224=9, srv1533028529=5, srv1297890091=4, srv1187945106=0, srv1259859506=2, srv2063552033=8} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:27,054 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:27,054 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:27,054 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:27,054 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:27,054 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:27,054 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:27,054 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-11 14:16:27,054 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-11 14:16:27,054 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-11 14:16:27,054 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-11 14:16:27,054 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:27,054 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table6) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:27,055 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table5
2023-07-11 14:16:27,055 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1052049491=1, srv1050007805=0, srv1161958990=2, srv1168683333=3, srv1520601164=6, srv398200268=8, srv794663185=9, srv1601934270=7, srv1379746416=4, srv151447104=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:27,055 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:27,055 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:27,055 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:27,055 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:27,055 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:27,055 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:27,055 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-11 14:16:27,055 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-11 14:16:27,055 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-11 14:16:27,055 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-11 14:16:27,055 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:27,055 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table5) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:27,055 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table4
2023-07-11 14:16:27,055 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1052049491=1, srv1050007805=0, srv1161958990=2, srv1168683333=3, srv1520601164=6, srv398200268=8, srv794663185=9, srv1601934270=7, srv1379746416=4, srv151447104=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:27,055 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:27,055 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:27,055 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:27,055 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:27,055 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:27,055 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:27,056 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-11 14:16:27,056 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-11 14:16:27,056 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-11 14:16:27,056 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-11 14:16:27,056 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:27,056 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table4) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:27,056 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table3
2023-07-11 14:16:27,056 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1052049491=1, srv1050007805=0, srv1161958990=2, srv1168683333=3, srv1520601164=6, srv398200268=8, srv794663185=9, srv1601934270=7, srv1379746416=4, srv151447104=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:27,056 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:27,056 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:27,056 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:27,056 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:27,056 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:27,056 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:27,056 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-11 14:16:27,056 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-11 14:16:27,056 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-11 14:16:27,056 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-11 14:16:27,056 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:27,056 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table3) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:27,056 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table2
2023-07-11 14:16:27,056 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1052049491=1, srv1050007805=0, srv1161958990=2, srv1168683333=3, srv1520601164=6, srv398200268=8, srv794663185=9, srv1601934270=7, srv1379746416=4, srv151447104=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:27,056 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:27,056 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:27,056 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:27,056 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:27,056 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:27,057 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:27,057 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-11 14:16:27,057 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-11 14:16:27,057 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-11 14:16:27,057 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-11 14:16:27,057 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:27,057 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table2) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:27,057 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1
2023-07-11 14:16:27,057 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1052049491=1, srv1050007805=0, srv1161958990=2, srv1168683333=3, srv1520601164=6, srv398200268=8, srv794663185=9, srv1601934270=7, srv1379746416=4, srv151447104=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:27,057 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:27,057 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:27,057 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:27,057 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:27,057 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:27,057 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:27,057 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-11 14:16:27,057 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-11 14:16:27,057 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-11 14:16:27,057 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-11 14:16:27,057 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:27,057 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:27,057 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table0
2023-07-11 14:16:27,057 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1052049491=1, srv1050007805=0, srv1161958990=2, srv1168683333=3, srv1520601164=6, srv398200268=8, srv794663185=9, srv1601934270=7, srv1379746416=4, srv151447104=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:27,057 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:27,057 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:27,058 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:27,058 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:27,058 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:27,058 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:27,058 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-11 14:16:27,058 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-11 14:16:27,058 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-11 14:16:27,058 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-11 14:16:27,058 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:27,058 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table0) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:27,058 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table8
2023-07-11 14:16:27,058 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1052049491=1, srv1050007805=0, srv1161958990=2, srv1168683333=3, srv1520601164=6, srv398200268=8, srv794663185=9, srv1601934270=7, srv1379746416=4, srv151447104=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:27,058 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:27,058 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:27,058 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:27,058 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:27,058 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:27,058 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:27,058 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-11 14:16:27,058 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-11 14:16:27,058 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-11 14:16:27,058 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-11 14:16:27,058 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:27,058 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table8) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:27,058 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table7
2023-07-11 14:16:27,058 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1052049491=1, srv1050007805=0, srv1161958990=2, srv1168683333=3, srv1520601164=6, srv398200268=8, srv794663185=9, srv1601934270=7, srv1379746416=4, srv151447104=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:27,058 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:27,059 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:27,059 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:27,059 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:27,059 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:27,059 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:27,059 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-11 14:16:27,059 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-11 14:16:27,059 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-11 14:16:27,059 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-11 14:16:27,059 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:27,059 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table7) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:27,059 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table6
2023-07-11 14:16:27,059 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1052049491=1, srv1050007805=0, srv1161958990=2, srv1168683333=3, srv1520601164=6, srv398200268=8, srv794663185=9, srv1601934270=7, srv1379746416=4, srv151447104=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:27,059 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:27,059 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:27,059 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:27,059 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:27,059 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:27,059 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:27,059 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-11 14:16:27,059 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-11 14:16:27,059 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-11 14:16:27,059 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-11 14:16:27,059 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:27,059 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table6) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:27,060 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table5
2023-07-11 14:16:27,060 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1286045515=1, srv27115362=6, srv465956371=7, srv168817083=2, srv2050226587=5, srv1010691560=0, srv712369436=8, srv782007815=9, srv2012687922=4, srv1849432466=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:27,060 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:27,060 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:27,060 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:27,060 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:27,060 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:27,060 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:27,060 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-11 14:16:27,060 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-11 14:16:27,060 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-11 14:16:27,060 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-11 14:16:27,060 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:27,060 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table5) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:27,060 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table4
2023-07-11 14:16:27,060 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1286045515=1, srv27115362=6, srv465956371=7, srv168817083=2, srv2050226587=5, srv1010691560=0, srv712369436=8, srv782007815=9, srv2012687922=4, srv1849432466=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:27,060 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:27,060 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:27,060 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:27,060 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:27,060 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:27,061 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:27,061 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-11 14:16:27,061 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-11 14:16:27,061 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-11 14:16:27,061 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-11 14:16:27,061 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:27,061 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table4) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:27,061 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table3
2023-07-11 14:16:27,061 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1286045515=1, srv27115362=6, srv465956371=7, srv168817083=2, srv2050226587=5, srv1010691560=0, srv712369436=8, srv782007815=9, srv2012687922=4, srv1849432466=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:27,061 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:27,061 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:27,061 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:27,061 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:27,061 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:27,061 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:27,061 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-11 14:16:27,061 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-11 14:16:27,061 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-11 14:16:27,061 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-11 14:16:27,061 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:27,061 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table3) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:27,061 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table2
2023-07-11 14:16:27,061 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1286045515=1, srv27115362=6, srv465956371=7, srv168817083=2, srv2050226587=5, srv1010691560=0, srv712369436=8, srv782007815=9, srv2012687922=4, srv1849432466=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:27,062 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:27,062 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:27,062 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:27,062 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:27,062 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:27,062 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:27,062 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-11 14:16:27,062 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-11 14:16:27,062 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-11 14:16:27,062 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-11 14:16:27,062 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:27,062 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table2) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:27,062 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1
2023-07-11 14:16:27,062 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1286045515=1, srv27115362=6, srv465956371=7, srv168817083=2, srv2050226587=5, srv1010691560=0, srv712369436=8, srv782007815=9, srv2012687922=4, srv1849432466=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:27,062 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:27,062 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:27,062 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:27,062 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:27,062 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:27,062 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:27,062 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-11 14:16:27,062 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-11 14:16:27,062 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-11 14:16:27,062 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-11 14:16:27,062 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:27,063 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:27,063 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table0
2023-07-11 14:16:27,063 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1286045515=1, srv27115362=6, srv465956371=7, srv168817083=2, srv2050226587=5, srv1010691560=0, srv712369436=8, srv782007815=9, srv2012687922=4, srv1849432466=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:27,063 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:27,063 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:27,063 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:27,063 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:27,063 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:27,063 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:27,063 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-11 14:16:27,063 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-11 14:16:27,063 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-11 14:16:27,063 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-11 14:16:27,063 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:27,063 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table0) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:27,063 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table9
2023-07-11 14:16:27,063 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1286045515=1, srv27115362=6, srv465956371=7, srv168817083=2, srv2050226587=5, srv1010691560=0, srv712369436=8, srv782007815=9, srv2012687922=4, srv1849432466=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:27,063 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:27,063 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:27,063 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:27,063 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:27,063 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:27,063 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:27,063 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-11 14:16:27,063 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-11 14:16:27,063 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-11 14:16:27,063 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-11 14:16:27,064 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:27,064 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table9) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:27,064 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table8
2023-07-11 14:16:27,064 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1286045515=1, srv27115362=6, srv465956371=7, srv168817083=2, srv2050226587=5, srv1010691560=0, srv712369436=8, srv782007815=9, srv2012687922=4, srv1849432466=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:27,064 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:27,064 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:27,064 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:27,064 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:27,064 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:27,064 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:27,064 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-11 14:16:27,064 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-11 14:16:27,064 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-11 14:16:27,064 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-11 14:16:27,064 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:27,064 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table8) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:27,064 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table7
2023-07-11 14:16:27,064 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1286045515=1, srv27115362=6, srv465956371=7, srv168817083=2, srv2050226587=5, srv1010691560=0, srv712369436=8, srv782007815=9, srv2012687922=4, srv1849432466=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:27,064 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:27,064 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:27,064 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:27,064 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:27,064 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:27,064 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:27,064 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-11 14:16:27,064 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-11 14:16:27,064 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-11 14:16:27,065 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-11 14:16:27,065 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:27,065 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table7) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:27,065 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table6
2023-07-11 14:16:27,065 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1286045515=1, srv27115362=6, srv465956371=7, srv168817083=2, srv2050226587=5, srv1010691560=0, srv712369436=8, srv782007815=9, srv2012687922=4, srv1849432466=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:27,065 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:27,065 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:27,065 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:27,065 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:27,065 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:27,065 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:27,065 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-11 14:16:27,065 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-11 14:16:27,065 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-11 14:16:27,065 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-11 14:16:27,065 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:27,065 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table6) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:27,066 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table13
2023-07-11 14:16:27,066 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1176370621=1, srv1610490019=5, srv1321577176=4, srv1025305513=0, srv1288694771=2, srv1296399460=3, srv427006258=7, srv1752567606=6, srv703622251=9, srv594932213=8} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:27,066 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:27,067 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:27,067 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:27,067 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:27,067 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:27,067 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:27,067 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-11 14:16:27,067 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-11 14:16:27,067 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-11 14:16:27,067 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-11 14:16:27,067 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:27,067 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table13) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:27,067 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table14
2023-07-11 14:16:27,067 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1176370621=1, srv1610490019=5, srv1321577176=4, srv1025305513=0, srv1288694771=2, srv1296399460=3, srv427006258=7, srv1752567606=6, srv703622251=9, srv594932213=8} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:27,067 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:27,067 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:27,067 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:27,067 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:27,067 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:27,068 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:27,068 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-11 14:16:27,068 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-11 14:16:27,068 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-11 14:16:27,068 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-11 14:16:27,068 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:27,068 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table14) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:27,068 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table120
2023-07-11 14:16:27,068 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1176370621=1, srv1610490019=5, srv1321577176=4, srv1025305513=0, srv1288694771=2, srv1296399460=3, srv427006258=7, srv1752567606=6, srv703622251=9, srv594932213=8} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:27,068 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:27,068 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:27,068 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:27,068 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:27,068 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:27,068 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:27,068 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-11 14:16:27,068 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-11 14:16:27,068 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-11 14:16:27,068 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-11 14:16:27,068 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:27,068 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table120) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:27,068 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table15
2023-07-11 14:16:27,068 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1176370621=1, srv1610490019=5, srv1321577176=4, srv1025305513=0, srv1288694771=2, srv1296399460=3, srv427006258=7, srv1752567606=6, srv703622251=9, srv594932213=8} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:27,068 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:27,068 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:27,068 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:27,069 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:27,069 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:27,069 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:27,069 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-11 14:16:27,069 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-11 14:16:27,069 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-11 14:16:27,069 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-11 14:16:27,069 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:27,069 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table15) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:27,069 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table121
2023-07-11 14:16:27,069 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1176370621=1, srv1610490019=5, srv1321577176=4, srv1025305513=0, srv1288694771=2, srv1296399460=3, srv427006258=7, srv1752567606=6, srv703622251=9, srv594932213=8} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:27,069 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:27,069 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:27,069 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:27,069 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:27,069 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:27,069 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:27,069 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-11 14:16:27,069 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-11 14:16:27,069 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-11 14:16:27,069 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-11 14:16:27,069 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:27,069 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table121) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:27,069 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table16
2023-07-11 14:16:27,069 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1176370621=1, srv1610490019=5, srv1321577176=4, srv1025305513=0, srv1288694771=2, srv1296399460=3, srv427006258=7, srv1752567606=6, srv703622251=9, srv594932213=8} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:27,069 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:27,070 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:27,070 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:27,070 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:27,070 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:27,070 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:27,070 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-11 14:16:27,070 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-11 14:16:27,070 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-11 14:16:27,070 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-11 14:16:27,070 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:27,070 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table16) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:27,070 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table122
2023-07-11 14:16:27,070 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1176370621=1, srv1610490019=5, srv1321577176=4, srv1025305513=0, srv1288694771=2, srv1296399460=3, srv427006258=7, srv1752567606=6, srv703622251=9, srv594932213=8} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:27,070 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:27,070 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:27,070 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:27,070 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:27,070 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:27,070 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:27,070 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-11 14:16:27,070 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-11 14:16:27,070 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-11 14:16:27,070 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-11 14:16:27,070 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:27,070 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table122) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:27,070 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table17
2023-07-11 14:16:27,070 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1176370621=1, srv1610490019=5, srv1321577176=4, srv1025305513=0, srv1288694771=2, srv1296399460=3, srv427006258=7, srv1752567606=6, srv703622251=9, srv594932213=8} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:27,071 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:27,071 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:27,071 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:27,071 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:27,071 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:27,071 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:27,071 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-11 14:16:27,071 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-11 14:16:27,071 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-11 14:16:27,071 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-11 14:16:27,071 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:27,071 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table17) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:27,071 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table18
2023-07-11 14:16:27,071 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1176370621=1, srv1610490019=5, srv1321577176=4, srv1025305513=0, srv1288694771=2, srv1296399460=3, srv427006258=7, srv1752567606=6, srv703622251=9, srv594932213=8} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:27,071 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:27,071 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:27,071 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:27,071 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:27,071 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:27,071 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:27,071 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-11 14:16:27,071 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-11 14:16:27,071 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-11 14:16:27,071 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-11 14:16:27,071 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:27,071 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table18) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:27,071 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table19
2023-07-11 14:16:27,072 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1176370621=1, srv1610490019=5, srv1321577176=4, srv1025305513=0, srv1288694771=2, srv1296399460=3, srv427006258=7, srv1752567606=6, srv703622251=9, srv594932213=8} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:27,072 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:27,072 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:27,072 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:27,072 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:27,072 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:27,072 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:27,072 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-11 14:16:27,072 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-11 14:16:27,072 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-11 14:16:27,072 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-11 14:16:27,072 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:27,072 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table19) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:27,072 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table90
2023-07-11 14:16:27,072 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1176370621=1, srv1610490019=5, srv1321577176=4, srv1025305513=0, srv1288694771=2, srv1296399460=3, srv427006258=7, srv1752567606=6, srv703622251=9, srv594932213=8} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:27,072 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:27,072 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:27,072 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:27,072 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:27,072 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:27,072 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:27,072 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-11 14:16:27,072 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-11 14:16:27,073 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-11 14:16:27,073 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-11 14:16:27,073 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:27,073 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table90) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:27,073 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table91
2023-07-11 14:16:27,073 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1176370621=1, srv1610490019=5, srv1321577176=4, srv1025305513=0, srv1288694771=2, srv1296399460=3, srv427006258=7, srv1752567606=6, srv703622251=9, srv594932213=8} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:27,073 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:27,073 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:27,073 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:27,073 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:27,073 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:27,073 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:27,073 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-11 14:16:27,073 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-11 14:16:27,073 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-11 14:16:27,073 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-11 14:16:27,073 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:27,073 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table91) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:27,073 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table92
2023-07-11 14:16:27,073 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1176370621=1, srv1610490019=5, srv1321577176=4, srv1025305513=0, srv1288694771=2, srv1296399460=3, srv427006258=7, srv1752567606=6, srv703622251=9, srv594932213=8} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:27,073 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:27,073 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:27,073 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:27,073 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:27,073 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:27,073 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:27,074 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-11 14:16:27,074 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-11 14:16:27,074 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-11 14:16:27,074 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-11 14:16:27,074 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:27,074 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table92) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:27,074 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table93
2023-07-11 14:16:27,074 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1176370621=1, srv1610490019=5, srv1321577176=4, srv1025305513=0, srv1288694771=2, srv1296399460=3, srv427006258=7, srv1752567606=6, srv703622251=9, srv594932213=8} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:27,074 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:27,074 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:27,074 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:27,074 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:27,074 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:27,074 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:27,074 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-11 14:16:27,074 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-11 14:16:27,074 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-11 14:16:27,074 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-11 14:16:27,074 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:27,074 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table93) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:27,074 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table94
2023-07-11 14:16:27,074 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1176370621=1, srv1610490019=5, srv1321577176=4, srv1025305513=0, srv1288694771=2, srv1296399460=3, srv427006258=7, srv1752567606=6, srv703622251=9, srv594932213=8} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:27,074 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:27,074 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:27,074 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:27,074 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:27,074 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:27,075 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:27,075 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-11 14:16:27,075 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-11 14:16:27,075 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-11 14:16:27,075 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-11 14:16:27,075 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:27,075 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table94) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:27,075 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table95
2023-07-11 14:16:27,075 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1176370621=1, srv1610490019=5, srv1321577176=4, srv1025305513=0, srv1288694771=2, srv1296399460=3, srv427006258=7, srv1752567606=6, srv703622251=9, srv594932213=8} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:27,075 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:27,075 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:27,075 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:27,075 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:27,075 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:27,075 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:27,075 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-11 14:16:27,075 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-11 14:16:27,075 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-11 14:16:27,075 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-11 14:16:27,075 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:27,075 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table95) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:27,075 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table96
2023-07-11 14:16:27,075 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1176370621=1, srv1610490019=5, srv1321577176=4, srv1025305513=0, srv1288694771=2, srv1296399460=3, srv427006258=7, srv1752567606=6, srv703622251=9, srv594932213=8} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:27,075 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:27,075 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:27,075 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:27,075 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:27,076 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:27,076 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:27,076 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-11 14:16:27,076 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-11 14:16:27,076 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-11 14:16:27,076 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-11 14:16:27,076 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:27,076 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table96) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:27,076 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table97
2023-07-11 14:16:27,076 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1176370621=1, srv1610490019=5, srv1321577176=4, srv1025305513=0, srv1288694771=2, srv1296399460=3, srv427006258=7, srv1752567606=6, srv703622251=9, srv594932213=8} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:27,076 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:27,076 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:27,076 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:27,076 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:27,076 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:27,076 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:27,076 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-11 14:16:27,076 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-11 14:16:27,076 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-11 14:16:27,076 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-11 14:16:27,076 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:27,076 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table97) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:27,076 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table10
2023-07-11 14:16:27,076 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1176370621=1, srv1610490019=5, srv1321577176=4, srv1025305513=0, srv1288694771=2, srv1296399460=3, srv427006258=7, srv1752567606=6, srv703622251=9, srv594932213=8} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:27,076 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:27,076 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:27,076 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:27,077 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:27,077 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:27,077 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:27,077 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-11 14:16:27,077 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-11 14:16:27,077 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-11 14:16:27,077 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-11 14:16:27,077 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:27,077 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table10) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:27,077 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table98
2023-07-11 14:16:27,077 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1176370621=1, srv1610490019=5, srv1321577176=4, srv1025305513=0, srv1288694771=2, srv1296399460=3, srv427006258=7, srv1752567606=6, srv703622251=9, srv594932213=8} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:27,077 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:27,077 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:27,077 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:27,077 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:27,077 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:27,077 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:27,077 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-11 14:16:27,077 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-11 14:16:27,077 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-11 14:16:27,077 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-11 14:16:27,077 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:27,077 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table98) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:27,077 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table11
2023-07-11 14:16:27,077 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1176370621=1, srv1610490019=5, srv1321577176=4, srv1025305513=0, srv1288694771=2, srv1296399460=3, srv427006258=7, srv1752567606=6, srv703622251=9, srv594932213=8} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:27,077 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:27,077 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:27,078 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:27,078 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:27,078 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:27,078 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:27,078 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-11 14:16:27,078 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-11 14:16:27,078 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-11 14:16:27,078 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-11 14:16:27,078 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:27,078 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table11) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:27,078 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table99
2023-07-11 14:16:27,078 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1176370621=1, srv1610490019=5, srv1321577176=4, srv1025305513=0, srv1288694771=2, srv1296399460=3, srv427006258=7, srv1752567606=6, srv703622251=9, srv594932213=8} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:27,078 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:27,078 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:27,078 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:27,078 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:27,078 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:27,078 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:27,078 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-11 14:16:27,078 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-11 14:16:27,078 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-11 14:16:27,078 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-11 14:16:27,078 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:27,078 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table99) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:27,078 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table12
2023-07-11 14:16:27,078 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1176370621=1, srv1610490019=5, srv1321577176=4, srv1025305513=0, srv1288694771=2, srv1296399460=3, srv427006258=7, srv1752567606=6, srv703622251=9, srv594932213=8} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:27,078 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:27,079 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:27,079 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:27,079 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:27,079 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:27,079 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:27,079 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-11 14:16:27,079 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-11 14:16:27,079 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-11 14:16:27,079 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-11 14:16:27,079 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:27,079 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table12) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:27,079 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table110
2023-07-11 14:16:27,079 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1176370621=1, srv1610490019=5, srv1321577176=4, srv1025305513=0, srv1288694771=2, srv1296399460=3, srv427006258=7, srv1752567606=6, srv703622251=9, srv594932213=8} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:27,079 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:27,079 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:27,079 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:27,079 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:27,079 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:27,079 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:27,079 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-11 14:16:27,079 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-11 14:16:27,079 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-11 14:16:27,079 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-11 14:16:27,079 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:27,079 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table110) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:27,079 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table111
2023-07-11 14:16:27,079 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1176370621=1, srv1610490019=5, srv1321577176=4, srv1025305513=0, srv1288694771=2, srv1296399460=3, srv427006258=7, srv1752567606=6, srv703622251=9, srv594932213=8} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:27,080 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:27,080 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:27,080 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:27,080 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:27,080 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:27,080 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:27,080 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-11 14:16:27,080 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-11 14:16:27,080 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-11 14:16:27,080 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-11 14:16:27,080 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:27,080 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table111) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:27,080 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table112
2023-07-11 14:16:27,080 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1176370621=1, srv1610490019=5, srv1321577176=4, srv1025305513=0, srv1288694771=2, srv1296399460=3, srv427006258=7, srv1752567606=6, srv703622251=9, srv594932213=8} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:27,080 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:27,080 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:27,080 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:27,080 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:27,080 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:27,080 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:27,080 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-11 14:16:27,080 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-11 14:16:27,080 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-11 14:16:27,080 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-11 14:16:27,080 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:27,080 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table112) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:27,080 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table113
2023-07-11 14:16:27,081 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1176370621=1, srv1610490019=5, srv1321577176=4, srv1025305513=0, srv1288694771=2, srv1296399460=3, srv427006258=7, srv1752567606=6, srv703622251=9, srv594932213=8} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:27,081 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:27,081 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:27,081 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:27,081 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:27,081 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:27,081 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:27,081 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-11 14:16:27,081 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-11 14:16:27,081 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-11 14:16:27,081 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-11 14:16:27,081 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:27,081 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table113) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:27,081 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table114
2023-07-11 14:16:27,081 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1176370621=1, srv1610490019=5, srv1321577176=4, srv1025305513=0, srv1288694771=2, srv1296399460=3, srv427006258=7, srv1752567606=6, srv703622251=9, srv594932213=8} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:27,081 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:27,081 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:27,081 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:27,081 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:27,081 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:27,081 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:27,081 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-11 14:16:27,081 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-11 14:16:27,081 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-11 14:16:27,081 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-11 14:16:27,081 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:27,081 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table114) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:27,082 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table115
2023-07-11 14:16:27,082 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1176370621=1, srv1610490019=5, srv1321577176=4, srv1025305513=0, srv1288694771=2, srv1296399460=3, srv427006258=7, srv1752567606=6, srv703622251=9, srv594932213=8} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:27,082 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:27,082 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:27,082 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:27,082 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:27,082 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:27,082 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:27,082 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-11 14:16:27,082 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-11 14:16:27,082 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-11 14:16:27,082 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-11 14:16:27,082 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:27,082 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table115) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:27,082 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table116
2023-07-11 14:16:27,082 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1176370621=1, srv1610490019=5, srv1321577176=4, srv1025305513=0, srv1288694771=2, srv1296399460=3, srv427006258=7, srv1752567606=6, srv703622251=9, srv594932213=8} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:27,082 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:27,082 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:27,082 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:27,082 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:27,082 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:27,082 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:27,083 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-11 14:16:27,083 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-11 14:16:27,083 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-11 14:16:27,083 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-11 14:16:27,083 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:27,083 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table116) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:27,083 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table117
2023-07-11 14:16:27,083 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1176370621=1, srv1610490019=5, srv1321577176=4, srv1025305513=0, srv1288694771=2, srv1296399460=3, srv427006258=7, srv1752567606=6, srv703622251=9, srv594932213=8} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:27,083 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:27,083 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:27,083 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:27,083 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:27,083 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:27,083 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:27,083 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-11 14:16:27,083 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-11 14:16:27,083 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-11 14:16:27,083 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-11 14:16:27,083 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:27,083 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table117) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:27,083 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table118
2023-07-11 14:16:27,083 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1176370621=1, srv1610490019=5, srv1321577176=4, srv1025305513=0, srv1288694771=2, srv1296399460=3, srv427006258=7, srv1752567606=6, srv703622251=9, srv594932213=8} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:27,083 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:27,083 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:27,083 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:27,083 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:27,083 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:27,084 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:27,084 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-11 14:16:27,084 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-11 14:16:27,084 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-11 14:16:27,084 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-11 14:16:27,084 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:27,084 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table118) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:27,084 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table119
2023-07-11 14:16:27,084 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1176370621=1, srv1610490019=5, srv1321577176=4, srv1025305513=0, srv1288694771=2, srv1296399460=3, srv427006258=7, srv1752567606=6, srv703622251=9, srv594932213=8} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:27,084 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:27,084 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:27,084 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:27,084 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:27,084 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:27,084 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:27,084 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-11 14:16:27,084 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-11 14:16:27,084 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-11 14:16:27,084 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-11 14:16:27,084 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:27,084 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table119) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:27,084 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table80
2023-07-11 14:16:27,084 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1176370621=1, srv1610490019=5, srv1321577176=4, srv1025305513=0, srv1288694771=2, srv1296399460=3, srv427006258=7, srv1752567606=6, srv703622251=9, srv594932213=8} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:27,084 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:27,084 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:27,084 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:27,084 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:27,085 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:27,085 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:27,085 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-11 14:16:27,085 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-11 14:16:27,085 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-11 14:16:27,085 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-11 14:16:27,085 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:27,085 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table80) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:27,085 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table81
2023-07-11 14:16:27,085 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1176370621=1, srv1610490019=5, srv1321577176=4, srv1025305513=0, srv1288694771=2, srv1296399460=3, srv427006258=7, srv1752567606=6, srv703622251=9, srv594932213=8} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:27,085 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:27,085 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:27,085 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:27,085 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:27,085 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:27,085 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:27,085 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-11 14:16:27,085 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-11 14:16:27,085 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-11 14:16:27,085 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-11 14:16:27,085 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:27,085 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table81) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:27,085 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table82
2023-07-11 14:16:27,085 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1176370621=1, srv1610490019=5, srv1321577176=4, srv1025305513=0, srv1288694771=2, srv1296399460=3, srv427006258=7, srv1752567606=6, srv703622251=9, srv594932213=8} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:27,085 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:27,085 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:27,086 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:27,086 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:27,086 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:27,086 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:27,086 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-11 14:16:27,086 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-11 14:16:27,086 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-11 14:16:27,086 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-11 14:16:27,086 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:27,086 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table82) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:27,086 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table83
2023-07-11 14:16:27,086 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1176370621=1, srv1610490019=5, srv1321577176=4, srv1025305513=0, srv1288694771=2, srv1296399460=3, srv427006258=7, srv1752567606=6, srv703622251=9, srv594932213=8} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:27,086 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:27,086 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:27,086 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:27,086 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:27,086 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:27,086 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:27,086 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-11 14:16:27,086 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-11 14:16:27,086 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-11 14:16:27,086 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-11 14:16:27,086 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:27,086 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table83) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:27,086 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table84
2023-07-11 14:16:27,086 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1176370621=1, srv1610490019=5, srv1321577176=4, srv1025305513=0, srv1288694771=2, srv1296399460=3, srv427006258=7, srv1752567606=6, srv703622251=9, srv594932213=8} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:27,086 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:27,087 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:27,087 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:27,087 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:27,087 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:27,087 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:27,087 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-11 14:16:27,087 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-11 14:16:27,087 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-11 14:16:27,087 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-11 14:16:27,087 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:27,087 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table84) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:27,087 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table85
2023-07-11 14:16:27,087 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1176370621=1, srv1610490019=5, srv1321577176=4, srv1025305513=0, srv1288694771=2, srv1296399460=3, srv427006258=7, srv1752567606=6, srv703622251=9, srv594932213=8} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:27,087 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:27,087 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:27,087 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:27,087 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:27,087 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:27,087 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:27,087 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-11 14:16:27,087 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-11 14:16:27,087 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-11 14:16:27,087 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-11 14:16:27,087 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:27,087 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table85) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:27,087 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table86
2023-07-11 14:16:27,087 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1176370621=1, srv1610490019=5, srv1321577176=4, srv1025305513=0, srv1288694771=2, srv1296399460=3, srv427006258=7, srv1752567606=6, srv703622251=9, srv594932213=8} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:27,087 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:27,088 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:27,088 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:27,088 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:27,088 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:27,088 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:27,088 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-11 14:16:27,088 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-11 14:16:27,088 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-11 14:16:27,088 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-11 14:16:27,088 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:27,088 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table86) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:27,088 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table87
2023-07-11 14:16:27,088 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1176370621=1, srv1610490019=5, srv1321577176=4, srv1025305513=0, srv1288694771=2, srv1296399460=3, srv427006258=7, srv1752567606=6, srv703622251=9, srv594932213=8} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:27,088 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:27,088 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:27,088 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:27,088 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:27,088 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:27,088 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:27,088 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-11 14:16:27,088 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-11 14:16:27,088 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-11 14:16:27,088 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-11 14:16:27,088 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:27,088 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table87) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:27,088 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table88
2023-07-11 14:16:27,089 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1176370621=1, srv1610490019=5, srv1321577176=4, srv1025305513=0, srv1288694771=2, srv1296399460=3, srv427006258=7, srv1752567606=6, srv703622251=9, srv594932213=8} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:27,089 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:27,089 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:27,089 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:27,089 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:27,089 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:27,089 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:27,089 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-11 14:16:27,089 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-11 14:16:27,089 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-11 14:16:27,089 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-11 14:16:27,089 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:27,089 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table88) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:27,089 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table89
2023-07-11 14:16:27,089 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1176370621=1, srv1610490019=5, srv1321577176=4, srv1025305513=0, srv1288694771=2, srv1296399460=3, srv427006258=7, srv1752567606=6, srv703622251=9, srv594932213=8} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:27,089 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:27,089 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:27,089 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:27,089 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:27,089 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:27,089 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:27,089 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-11 14:16:27,089 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-11 14:16:27,089 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-11 14:16:27,089 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-11 14:16:27,089 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:27,089 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table89) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:27,090 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table79
2023-07-11 14:16:27,090 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1176370621=1, srv1610490019=5, srv1321577176=4, srv1025305513=0, srv1288694771=2, srv1296399460=3, srv427006258=7, srv1752567606=6, srv703622251=9, srv594932213=8} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:27,090 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:27,090 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:27,090 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:27,090 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:27,090 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:27,090 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:27,090 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-11 14:16:27,090 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-11 14:16:27,090 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-11 14:16:27,090 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-11 14:16:27,090 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:27,090 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table79) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:27,090 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table5
2023-07-11 14:16:27,090 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1176370621=1, srv1610490019=5, srv1321577176=4, srv1025305513=0, srv1288694771=2, srv1296399460=3, srv427006258=7, srv1752567606=6, srv703622251=9, srv594932213=8} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:27,090 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:27,090 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:27,090 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:27,090 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:27,090 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:27,090 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:27,090 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-11 14:16:27,090 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-11 14:16:27,090 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-11 14:16:27,090 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-11 14:16:27,090 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:27,091 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table5) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:27,091 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table4
2023-07-11 14:16:27,091 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1176370621=1, srv1610490019=5, srv1321577176=4, srv1025305513=0, srv1288694771=2, srv1296399460=3, srv427006258=7, srv1752567606=6, srv703622251=9, srv594932213=8} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:27,091 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:27,091 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:27,091 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:27,091 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:27,091 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:27,091 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:27,091 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-11 14:16:27,091 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-11 14:16:27,091 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-11 14:16:27,091 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-11 14:16:27,091 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:27,091 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table4) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:27,091 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table3
2023-07-11 14:16:27,091 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1176370621=1, srv1610490019=5, srv1321577176=4, srv1025305513=0, srv1288694771=2, srv1296399460=3, srv427006258=7, srv1752567606=6, srv703622251=9, srv594932213=8} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:27,091 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:27,091 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:27,091 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:27,091 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:27,091 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:27,092 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:27,092 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-11 14:16:27,092 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-11 14:16:27,092 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-11 14:16:27,092 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-11 14:16:27,092 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:27,092 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table3) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:27,092 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table2
2023-07-11 14:16:27,092 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1176370621=1, srv1610490019=5, srv1321577176=4, srv1025305513=0, srv1288694771=2, srv1296399460=3, srv427006258=7, srv1752567606=6, srv703622251=9, srv594932213=8} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:27,092 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:27,092 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:27,092 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:27,092 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:27,092 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:27,092 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:27,092 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-11 14:16:27,092 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-11 14:16:27,092 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-11 14:16:27,092 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-11 14:16:27,092 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:27,092 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table2) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:27,092 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1
2023-07-11 14:16:27,092 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1176370621=1, srv1610490019=5, srv1321577176=4, srv1025305513=0, srv1288694771=2, srv1296399460=3, srv427006258=7, srv1752567606=6, srv703622251=9, srv594932213=8} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:27,092 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:27,092 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:27,092 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:27,092 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:27,093 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:27,093 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:27,093 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-11 14:16:27,093 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-11 14:16:27,093 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-11 14:16:27,093 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-11 14:16:27,093 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:27,093 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:27,093 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table0
2023-07-11 14:16:27,093 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1176370621=1, srv1610490019=5, srv1321577176=4, srv1025305513=0, srv1288694771=2, srv1296399460=3, srv427006258=7, srv1752567606=6, srv703622251=9, srv594932213=8} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:27,093 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:27,093 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:27,093 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:27,093 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:27,093 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:27,093 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:27,093 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-11 14:16:27,093 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-11 14:16:27,093 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-11 14:16:27,093 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-11 14:16:27,093 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:27,093 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table0) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:27,093 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table70
2023-07-11 14:16:27,093 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1176370621=1, srv1610490019=5, srv1321577176=4, srv1025305513=0, srv1288694771=2, srv1296399460=3, srv427006258=7, srv1752567606=6, srv703622251=9, srv594932213=8} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:27,093 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:27,094 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:27,094 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:27,094 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:27,094 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:27,094 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:27,094 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-11 14:16:27,094 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-11 14:16:27,094 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-11 14:16:27,094 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-11 14:16:27,094 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:27,094 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table70) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:27,094 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table71
2023-07-11 14:16:27,094 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1176370621=1, srv1610490019=5, srv1321577176=4, srv1025305513=0, srv1288694771=2, srv1296399460=3, srv427006258=7, srv1752567606=6, srv703622251=9, srv594932213=8} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:27,094 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:27,094 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:27,094 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:27,094 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:27,094 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:27,094 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:27,094 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-11 14:16:27,094 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-11 14:16:27,094 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-11 14:16:27,094 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-11 14:16:27,094 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:27,094 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table71) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:27,094 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table72
2023-07-11 14:16:27,095 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1176370621=1, srv1610490019=5, srv1321577176=4, srv1025305513=0, srv1288694771=2, srv1296399460=3, srv427006258=7, srv1752567606=6, srv703622251=9, srv594932213=8} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:27,095 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:27,095 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:27,095 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:27,095 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:27,095 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:27,095 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:27,095 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-11 14:16:27,095 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-11 14:16:27,095 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-11 14:16:27,095 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-11 14:16:27,095 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:27,095 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table72) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:27,095 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table73
2023-07-11 14:16:27,095 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1176370621=1, srv1610490019=5, srv1321577176=4, srv1025305513=0, srv1288694771=2, srv1296399460=3, srv427006258=7, srv1752567606=6, srv703622251=9, srv594932213=8} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:27,095 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:27,095 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:27,095 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:27,095 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:27,095 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:27,095 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:27,095 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-11 14:16:27,095 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-11 14:16:27,095 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-11 14:16:27,095 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-11 14:16:27,095 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:27,095 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table73) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:27,095 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table74
2023-07-11 14:16:27,096 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1176370621=1, srv1610490019=5, srv1321577176=4, srv1025305513=0, srv1288694771=2, srv1296399460=3, srv427006258=7, srv1752567606=6, srv703622251=9, srv594932213=8} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:27,096 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:27,096 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:27,096 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:27,096 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:27,096 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:27,096 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:27,096 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-11 14:16:27,096 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-11 14:16:27,096 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-11 14:16:27,096 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-11 14:16:27,096 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:27,096 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table74) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:27,096 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table9
2023-07-11 14:16:27,096 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1176370621=1, srv1610490019=5, srv1321577176=4, srv1025305513=0, srv1288694771=2, srv1296399460=3, srv427006258=7, srv1752567606=6, srv703622251=9, srv594932213=8} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:27,096 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:27,096 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:27,096 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:27,096 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:27,096 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:27,096 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:27,096 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-11 14:16:27,096 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-11 14:16:27,096 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-11 14:16:27,096 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-11 14:16:27,096 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:27,096 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table9) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:27,097 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table75
2023-07-11 14:16:27,097 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1176370621=1, srv1610490019=5, srv1321577176=4, srv1025305513=0, srv1288694771=2, srv1296399460=3, srv427006258=7, srv1752567606=6, srv703622251=9, srv594932213=8} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:27,097 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:27,097 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:27,097 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:27,097 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:27,097 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:27,097 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:27,097 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-11 14:16:27,097 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-11 14:16:27,097 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-11 14:16:27,097 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-11 14:16:27,097 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:27,097 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table75) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:27,097 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table8
2023-07-11 14:16:27,097 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1176370621=1, srv1610490019=5, srv1321577176=4, srv1025305513=0, srv1288694771=2, srv1296399460=3, srv427006258=7, srv1752567606=6, srv703622251=9, srv594932213=8} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:27,097 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:27,097 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:27,097 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:27,097 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:27,097 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:27,097 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:27,097 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-11 14:16:27,097 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-11 14:16:27,097 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-11 14:16:27,097 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-11 14:16:27,097 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:27,098 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table8) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:27,098 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table76
2023-07-11 14:16:27,098 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1176370621=1, srv1610490019=5, srv1321577176=4, srv1025305513=0, srv1288694771=2, srv1296399460=3, srv427006258=7, srv1752567606=6, srv703622251=9, srv594932213=8} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:27,098 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:27,098 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:27,098 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:27,098 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:27,098 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:27,098 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:27,098 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-11 14:16:27,098 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-11 14:16:27,098 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-11 14:16:27,098 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-11 14:16:27,098 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:27,098 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table76) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:27,098 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table7
2023-07-11 14:16:27,098 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1176370621=1, srv1610490019=5, srv1321577176=4, srv1025305513=0, srv1288694771=2, srv1296399460=3, srv427006258=7, srv1752567606=6, srv703622251=9, srv594932213=8} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:27,098 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:27,098 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:27,098 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:27,098 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:27,098 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:27,098 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:27,098 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-11 14:16:27,098 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-11 14:16:27,098 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-11 14:16:27,098 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-11 14:16:27,099 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:27,099 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table7) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:27,099 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table77
2023-07-11 14:16:27,099 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1176370621=1, srv1610490019=5, srv1321577176=4, srv1025305513=0, srv1288694771=2, srv1296399460=3, srv427006258=7, srv1752567606=6, srv703622251=9, srv594932213=8} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:27,099 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:27,099 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:27,099 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:27,099 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:27,099 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:27,099 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:27,099 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-11 14:16:27,099 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-11 14:16:27,099 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-11 14:16:27,099 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-11 14:16:27,099 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:27,099 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table77) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:27,099 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table6
2023-07-11 14:16:27,099 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1176370621=1, srv1610490019=5, srv1321577176=4, srv1025305513=0, srv1288694771=2, srv1296399460=3, srv427006258=7, srv1752567606=6, srv703622251=9, srv594932213=8} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:27,099 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:27,099 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:27,099 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:27,099 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:27,099 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:27,099 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:27,099 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-11 14:16:27,099 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-11 14:16:27,099 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-11 14:16:27,100 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-11 14:16:27,100 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:27,100 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table6) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:27,100 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table78
2023-07-11 14:16:27,100 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1176370621=1, srv1610490019=5, srv1321577176=4, srv1025305513=0, srv1288694771=2, srv1296399460=3, srv427006258=7, srv1752567606=6, srv703622251=9, srv594932213=8} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:27,100 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:27,100 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:27,100 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:27,100 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:27,100 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:27,100 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:27,100 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-11 14:16:27,100 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-11 14:16:27,100 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-11 14:16:27,100 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-11 14:16:27,100 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:27,100 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table78) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:27,100 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table68
2023-07-11 14:16:27,100 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1176370621=1, srv1610490019=5, srv1321577176=4, srv1025305513=0, srv1288694771=2, srv1296399460=3, srv427006258=7, srv1752567606=6, srv703622251=9, srv594932213=8} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:27,100 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:27,100 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:27,100 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:27,101 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:27,101 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:27,101 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:27,101 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-11 14:16:27,101 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-11 14:16:27,101 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-11 14:16:27,101 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-11 14:16:27,101 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:27,101 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table68) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:27,101 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table69
2023-07-11 14:16:27,101 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1176370621=1, srv1610490019=5, srv1321577176=4, srv1025305513=0, srv1288694771=2, srv1296399460=3, srv427006258=7, srv1752567606=6, srv703622251=9, srv594932213=8} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:27,101 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:27,101 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:27,101 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:27,101 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:27,101 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:27,101 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:27,101 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-11 14:16:27,101 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-11 14:16:27,101 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-11 14:16:27,101 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-11 14:16:27,101 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:27,101 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table69) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:27,101 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table60
2023-07-11 14:16:27,101 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1176370621=1, srv1610490019=5, srv1321577176=4, srv1025305513=0, srv1288694771=2, srv1296399460=3, srv427006258=7, srv1752567606=6, srv703622251=9, srv594932213=8} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:27,101 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:27,101 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:27,102 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:27,102 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:27,102 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:27,102 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:27,102 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-11 14:16:27,102 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-11 14:16:27,102 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-11 14:16:27,102 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-11 14:16:27,102 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:27,102 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table60) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:27,102 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table61
2023-07-11 14:16:27,102 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1176370621=1, srv1610490019=5, srv1321577176=4, srv1025305513=0, srv1288694771=2, srv1296399460=3, srv427006258=7, srv1752567606=6, srv703622251=9, srv594932213=8} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:27,102 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:27,102 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:27,102 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:27,102 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:27,102 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:27,102 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:27,102 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-11 14:16:27,102 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-11 14:16:27,102 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-11 14:16:27,102 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-11 14:16:27,102 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:27,102 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table61) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:27,102 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table62
2023-07-11 14:16:27,102 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1176370621=1, srv1610490019=5, srv1321577176=4, srv1025305513=0, srv1288694771=2, srv1296399460=3, srv427006258=7, srv1752567606=6, srv703622251=9, srv594932213=8} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:27,102 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:27,103 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:27,103 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:27,103 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:27,103 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:27,103 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:27,103 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-11 14:16:27,103 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-11 14:16:27,103 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-11 14:16:27,103 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-11 14:16:27,103 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:27,103 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table62) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:27,103 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table63
2023-07-11 14:16:27,103 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1176370621=1, srv1610490019=5, srv1321577176=4, srv1025305513=0, srv1288694771=2, srv1296399460=3, srv427006258=7, srv1752567606=6, srv703622251=9, srv594932213=8} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:27,103 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:27,103 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:27,103 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:27,103 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:27,103 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:27,103 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:27,103 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-11 14:16:27,103 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-11 14:16:27,103 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-11 14:16:27,103 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-11 14:16:27,103 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:27,103 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table63) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:27,103 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table64
2023-07-11 14:16:27,103 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1176370621=1, srv1610490019=5, srv1321577176=4, srv1025305513=0, srv1288694771=2, srv1296399460=3, srv427006258=7, srv1752567606=6, srv703622251=9, srv594932213=8} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:27,104 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:27,104 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:27,104 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:27,104 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:27,104 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:27,104 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:27,104 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-11 14:16:27,104 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-11 14:16:27,104 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-11 14:16:27,104 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-11 14:16:27,104 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:27,104 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table64) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:27,104 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table65
2023-07-11 14:16:27,104 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1176370621=1, srv1610490019=5, srv1321577176=4, srv1025305513=0, srv1288694771=2, srv1296399460=3, srv427006258=7, srv1752567606=6, srv703622251=9, srv594932213=8} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:27,104 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:27,104 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:27,104 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:27,104 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:27,104 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:27,104 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:27,104 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-11 14:16:27,104 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-11 14:16:27,104 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-11 14:16:27,104 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-11 14:16:27,104 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:27,104 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table65) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:27,104 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table66
2023-07-11 14:16:27,104 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1176370621=1, srv1610490019=5, srv1321577176=4, srv1025305513=0, srv1288694771=2, srv1296399460=3, srv427006258=7, srv1752567606=6, srv703622251=9, srv594932213=8} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:27,105 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:27,105 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:27,105 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:27,105 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:27,105 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:27,105 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:27,105 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-11 14:16:27,105 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-11 14:16:27,105 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-11 14:16:27,105 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-11 14:16:27,105 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:27,105 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table66) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:27,105 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table67
2023-07-11 14:16:27,105 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1176370621=1, srv1610490019=5, srv1321577176=4, srv1025305513=0, srv1288694771=2, srv1296399460=3, srv427006258=7, srv1752567606=6, srv703622251=9, srv594932213=8} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:27,105 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:27,105 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:27,105 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:27,105 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:27,105 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:27,105 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:27,105 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-11 14:16:27,105 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-11 14:16:27,105 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-11 14:16:27,105 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-11 14:16:27,105 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:27,105 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table67) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:27,105 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table57
2023-07-11 14:16:27,106 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1176370621=1, srv1610490019=5, srv1321577176=4, srv1025305513=0, srv1288694771=2, srv1296399460=3, srv427006258=7, srv1752567606=6, srv703622251=9, srv594932213=8} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:27,106 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:27,106 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:27,106 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:27,106 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:27,106 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:27,106 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:27,106 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-11 14:16:27,106 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-11 14:16:27,106 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-11 14:16:27,106 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-11 14:16:27,106 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:27,106 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table57) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:27,106 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table58
2023-07-11 14:16:27,106 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1176370621=1, srv1610490019=5, srv1321577176=4, srv1025305513=0, srv1288694771=2, srv1296399460=3, srv427006258=7, srv1752567606=6, srv703622251=9, srv594932213=8} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:27,106 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:27,106 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:27,106 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:27,106 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:27,106 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:27,106 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:27,106 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-11 14:16:27,106 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-11 14:16:27,106 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-11 14:16:27,106 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-11 14:16:27,106 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:27,106 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table58) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:27,107 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table59
2023-07-11 14:16:27,107 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1176370621=1, srv1610490019=5, srv1321577176=4, srv1025305513=0, srv1288694771=2, srv1296399460=3, srv427006258=7, srv1752567606=6, srv703622251=9, srv594932213=8} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:27,107 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:27,107 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:27,107 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:27,107 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:27,107 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:27,107 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:27,107 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-11 14:16:27,107 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-11 14:16:27,107 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-11 14:16:27,107 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-11 14:16:27,107 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:27,107 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table59) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:27,107 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table50
2023-07-11 14:16:27,107 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1176370621=1, srv1610490019=5, srv1321577176=4, srv1025305513=0, srv1288694771=2, srv1296399460=3, srv427006258=7, srv1752567606=6, srv703622251=9, srv594932213=8} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:27,107 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:27,107 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:27,107 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:27,107 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:27,107 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:27,107 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:27,107 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-11 14:16:27,107 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-11 14:16:27,107 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-11 14:16:27,107 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-11 14:16:27,107 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:27,107 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table50) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:27,108 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table51
2023-07-11 14:16:27,108 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1176370621=1, srv1610490019=5, srv1321577176=4, srv1025305513=0, srv1288694771=2, srv1296399460=3, srv427006258=7, srv1752567606=6, srv703622251=9, srv594932213=8} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:27,108 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:27,108 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:27,108 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:27,108 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:27,108 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:27,108 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:27,108 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-11 14:16:27,108 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-11 14:16:27,108 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-11 14:16:27,108 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-11 14:16:27,108 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:27,108 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table51) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:27,108 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table52
2023-07-11 14:16:27,108 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1176370621=1, srv1610490019=5, srv1321577176=4, srv1025305513=0, srv1288694771=2, srv1296399460=3, srv427006258=7, srv1752567606=6, srv703622251=9, srv594932213=8} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:27,108 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:27,108 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:27,108 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:27,108 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:27,108 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:27,108 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:27,108 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-11 14:16:27,108 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-11 14:16:27,108 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-11 14:16:27,108 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-11 14:16:27,108 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:27,109 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table52) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:27,109 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table53
2023-07-11 14:16:27,109 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1176370621=1, srv1610490019=5, srv1321577176=4, srv1025305513=0, srv1288694771=2, srv1296399460=3, srv427006258=7, srv1752567606=6, srv703622251=9, srv594932213=8} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:27,109 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:27,109 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:27,109 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:27,109 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:27,109 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:27,109 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:27,109 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-11 14:16:27,109 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-11 14:16:27,109 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-11 14:16:27,109 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-11 14:16:27,109 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:27,109 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table53) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:27,109 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table54
2023-07-11 14:16:27,109 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1176370621=1, srv1610490019=5, srv1321577176=4, srv1025305513=0, srv1288694771=2, srv1296399460=3, srv427006258=7, srv1752567606=6, srv703622251=9, srv594932213=8} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:27,109 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:27,109 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:27,109 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:27,109 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:27,110 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:27,110 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:27,110 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-11 14:16:27,110 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-11 14:16:27,110 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-11 14:16:27,110 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-11 14:16:27,110 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:27,110 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table54) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:27,110 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table55
2023-07-11 14:16:27,110 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1176370621=1, srv1610490019=5, srv1321577176=4, srv1025305513=0, srv1288694771=2, srv1296399460=3, srv427006258=7, srv1752567606=6, srv703622251=9, srv594932213=8} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:27,110 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:27,110 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:27,110 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:27,110 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:27,110 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:27,110 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:27,110 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-11 14:16:27,110 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-11 14:16:27,110 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-11 14:16:27,110 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-11 14:16:27,110 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:27,110 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table55) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:27,110 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table56
2023-07-11 14:16:27,110 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1176370621=1, srv1610490019=5, srv1321577176=4, srv1025305513=0, srv1288694771=2, srv1296399460=3, srv427006258=7, srv1752567606=6, srv703622251=9, srv594932213=8} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:27,110 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:27,110 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:27,111 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:27,111 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:27,111 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:27,111 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:27,111 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-11 14:16:27,111 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-11 14:16:27,111 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-11 14:16:27,111 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-11 14:16:27,111 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:27,111 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table56) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:27,111 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table46
2023-07-11 14:16:27,111 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1176370621=1, srv1610490019=5, srv1321577176=4, srv1025305513=0, srv1288694771=2, srv1296399460=3, srv427006258=7, srv1752567606=6, srv703622251=9, srv594932213=8} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:27,111 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:27,111 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:27,111 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:27,111 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:27,111 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:27,111 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:27,111 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-11 14:16:27,111 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-11 14:16:27,111 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-11 14:16:27,111 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-11 14:16:27,111 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:27,111 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table46) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:27,111 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table47
2023-07-11 14:16:27,111 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1176370621=1, srv1610490019=5, srv1321577176=4, srv1025305513=0, srv1288694771=2, srv1296399460=3, srv427006258=7, srv1752567606=6, srv703622251=9, srv594932213=8} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:27,111 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:27,111 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:27,112 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:27,112 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:27,112 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:27,112 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:27,112 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-11 14:16:27,112 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-11 14:16:27,112 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-11 14:16:27,112 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-11 14:16:27,112 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:27,112 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table47) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:27,112 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table48
2023-07-11 14:16:27,112 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1176370621=1, srv1610490019=5, srv1321577176=4, srv1025305513=0, srv1288694771=2, srv1296399460=3, srv427006258=7, srv1752567606=6, srv703622251=9, srv594932213=8} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:27,112 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:27,112 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:27,112 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:27,112 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:27,112 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:27,112 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:27,112 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-11 14:16:27,112 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-11 14:16:27,112 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-11 14:16:27,112 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-11 14:16:27,112 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:27,112 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table48) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:27,112 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table49
2023-07-11 14:16:27,112 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1176370621=1, srv1610490019=5, srv1321577176=4, srv1025305513=0, srv1288694771=2, srv1296399460=3, srv427006258=7, srv1752567606=6, srv703622251=9, srv594932213=8} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:27,112 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:27,113 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:27,113 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:27,113 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:27,113 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:27,113 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:27,113 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-11 14:16:27,113 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-11 14:16:27,113 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-11 14:16:27,113 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-11 14:16:27,113 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:27,113 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table49) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:27,113 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table40
2023-07-11 14:16:27,113 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1176370621=1, srv1610490019=5, srv1321577176=4, srv1025305513=0, srv1288694771=2, srv1296399460=3, srv427006258=7, srv1752567606=6, srv703622251=9, srv594932213=8} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:27,113 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:27,113 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:27,113 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:27,113 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:27,113 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:27,113 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:27,113 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-11 14:16:27,113 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-11 14:16:27,113 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-11 14:16:27,113 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-11 14:16:27,113 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:27,113 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table40) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:27,113 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table41
2023-07-11 14:16:27,113 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1176370621=1, srv1610490019=5, srv1321577176=4, srv1025305513=0, srv1288694771=2, srv1296399460=3, srv427006258=7, srv1752567606=6, srv703622251=9, srv594932213=8} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:27,114 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:27,114 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:27,114 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:27,114 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:27,114 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:27,114 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:27,114 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-11 14:16:27,114 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-11 14:16:27,114 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-11 14:16:27,114 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-11 14:16:27,114 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:27,114 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table41) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:27,114 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table42
2023-07-11 14:16:27,114 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1176370621=1, srv1610490019=5, srv1321577176=4, srv1025305513=0, srv1288694771=2, srv1296399460=3, srv427006258=7, srv1752567606=6, srv703622251=9, srv594932213=8} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:27,114 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:27,114 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:27,114 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:27,114 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:27,114 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:27,114 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:27,114 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-11 14:16:27,114 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-11 14:16:27,114 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-11 14:16:27,114 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-11 14:16:27,114 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:27,114 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table42) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:27,114 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table43
2023-07-11 14:16:27,115 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1176370621=1, srv1610490019=5, srv1321577176=4, srv1025305513=0, srv1288694771=2, srv1296399460=3, srv427006258=7, srv1752567606=6, srv703622251=9, srv594932213=8} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:27,115 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:27,115 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:27,115 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:27,115 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:27,115 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:27,115 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:27,115 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-11 14:16:27,115 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-11 14:16:27,115 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-11 14:16:27,115 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-11 14:16:27,115 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:27,115 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table43) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:27,115 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table44
2023-07-11 14:16:27,115 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1176370621=1, srv1610490019=5, srv1321577176=4, srv1025305513=0, srv1288694771=2, srv1296399460=3, srv427006258=7, srv1752567606=6, srv703622251=9, srv594932213=8} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:27,115 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:27,115 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:27,115 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:27,115 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:27,115 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:27,115 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:27,115 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-11 14:16:27,115 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-11 14:16:27,115 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-11 14:16:27,115 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-11 14:16:27,115 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:27,115 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table44) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:27,115 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table45
2023-07-11 14:16:27,116 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1176370621=1, srv1610490019=5, srv1321577176=4, srv1025305513=0, srv1288694771=2, srv1296399460=3, srv427006258=7, srv1752567606=6, srv703622251=9, srv594932213=8} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:27,116 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:27,116 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:27,116 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:27,116 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:27,116 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:27,116 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:27,116 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-11 14:16:27,116 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-11 14:16:27,116 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-11 14:16:27,116 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-11 14:16:27,116 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:27,116 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table45) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:27,116 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table35
2023-07-11 14:16:27,116 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1176370621=1, srv1610490019=5, srv1321577176=4, srv1025305513=0, srv1288694771=2, srv1296399460=3, srv427006258=7, srv1752567606=6, srv703622251=9, srv594932213=8} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:27,116 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:27,116 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:27,116 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:27,116 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:27,116 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:27,116 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:27,116 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-11 14:16:27,116 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-11 14:16:27,116 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-11 14:16:27,116 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-11 14:16:27,116 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:27,116 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table35) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:27,117 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table36
2023-07-11 14:16:27,117 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1176370621=1, srv1610490019=5, srv1321577176=4, srv1025305513=0, srv1288694771=2, srv1296399460=3, srv427006258=7, srv1752567606=6, srv703622251=9, srv594932213=8} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:27,117 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:27,117 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:27,117 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:27,117 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:27,117 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:27,117 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:27,117 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-11 14:16:27,117 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-11 14:16:27,117 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-11 14:16:27,117 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-11 14:16:27,117 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:27,117 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table36) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:27,117 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table37
2023-07-11 14:16:27,117 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1176370621=1, srv1610490019=5, srv1321577176=4, srv1025305513=0, srv1288694771=2, srv1296399460=3, srv427006258=7, srv1752567606=6, srv703622251=9, srv594932213=8} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:27,117 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:27,117 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:27,117 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:27,117 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:27,117 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:27,117 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:27,117 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-11 14:16:27,117 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-11 14:16:27,117 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-11 14:16:27,117 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-11 14:16:27,117 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:27,118 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table37) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:27,118 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table38
2023-07-11 14:16:27,118 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1176370621=1, srv1610490019=5, srv1321577176=4, srv1025305513=0, srv1288694771=2, srv1296399460=3, srv427006258=7, srv1752567606=6, srv703622251=9, srv594932213=8} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:27,118 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:27,118 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:27,118 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:27,118 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:27,118 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:27,118 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:27,118 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-11 14:16:27,118 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-11 14:16:27,118 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-11 14:16:27,118 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-11 14:16:27,118 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:27,118 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table38) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:27,118 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table100
2023-07-11 14:16:27,118 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1176370621=1, srv1610490019=5, srv1321577176=4, srv1025305513=0, srv1288694771=2, srv1296399460=3, srv427006258=7, srv1752567606=6, srv703622251=9, srv594932213=8} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:27,118 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:27,118 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:27,118 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:27,118 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:27,118 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:27,118 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:27,119 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-11 14:16:27,119 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-11 14:16:27,119 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-11 14:16:27,119 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-11 14:16:27,119 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:27,119 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table100) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:27,119 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table39
2023-07-11 14:16:27,119 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1176370621=1, srv1610490019=5, srv1321577176=4, srv1025305513=0, srv1288694771=2, srv1296399460=3, srv427006258=7, srv1752567606=6, srv703622251=9, srv594932213=8} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:27,119 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:27,119 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:27,119 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:27,119 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:27,119 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:27,119 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:27,119 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-11 14:16:27,119 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-11 14:16:27,119 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-11 14:16:27,119 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-11 14:16:27,119 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:27,119 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table39) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:27,119 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table101
2023-07-11 14:16:27,119 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1176370621=1, srv1610490019=5, srv1321577176=4, srv1025305513=0, srv1288694771=2, srv1296399460=3, srv427006258=7, srv1752567606=6, srv703622251=9, srv594932213=8} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:27,119 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:27,119 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:27,119 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:27,119 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:27,119 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:27,120 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:27,120 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-11 14:16:27,120 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-11 14:16:27,120 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-11 14:16:27,120 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-11 14:16:27,120 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:27,120 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table101) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:27,120 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table102
2023-07-11 14:16:27,120 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1176370621=1, srv1610490019=5, srv1321577176=4, srv1025305513=0, srv1288694771=2, srv1296399460=3, srv427006258=7, srv1752567606=6, srv703622251=9, srv594932213=8} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:27,120 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:27,120 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:27,120 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:27,120 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:27,120 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:27,120 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:27,120 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-11 14:16:27,120 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-11 14:16:27,120 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-11 14:16:27,120 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-11 14:16:27,120 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:27,120 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table102) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:27,120 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table103
2023-07-11 14:16:27,120 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1176370621=1, srv1610490019=5, srv1321577176=4, srv1025305513=0, srv1288694771=2, srv1296399460=3, srv427006258=7, srv1752567606=6, srv703622251=9, srv594932213=8} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:27,120 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:27,120 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:27,120 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:27,121 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:27,121 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:27,121 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:27,121 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-11 14:16:27,121 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-11 14:16:27,121 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-11 14:16:27,121 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-11 14:16:27,121 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:27,121 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table103) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:27,121 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table104
2023-07-11 14:16:27,121 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1176370621=1, srv1610490019=5, srv1321577176=4, srv1025305513=0, srv1288694771=2, srv1296399460=3, srv427006258=7, srv1752567606=6, srv703622251=9, srv594932213=8} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:27,121 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:27,121 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:27,121 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:27,121 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:27,121 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:27,121 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:27,121 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-11 14:16:27,121 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-11 14:16:27,121 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-11 14:16:27,121 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-11 14:16:27,121 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:27,121 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table104) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:27,121 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table105
2023-07-11 14:16:27,121 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1176370621=1, srv1610490019=5, srv1321577176=4, srv1025305513=0, srv1288694771=2, srv1296399460=3, srv427006258=7, srv1752567606=6, srv703622251=9, srv594932213=8} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:27,121 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:27,121 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:27,122 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:27,122 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:27,122 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:27,122 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:27,122 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-11 14:16:27,122 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-11 14:16:27,122 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-11 14:16:27,122 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-11 14:16:27,122 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:27,122 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table105) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:27,122 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table106
2023-07-11 14:16:27,122 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1176370621=1, srv1610490019=5, srv1321577176=4, srv1025305513=0, srv1288694771=2, srv1296399460=3, srv427006258=7, srv1752567606=6, srv703622251=9, srv594932213=8} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:27,122 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:27,122 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:27,122 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:27,122 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:27,122 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:27,122 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:27,122 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-11 14:16:27,122 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-11 14:16:27,122 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-11 14:16:27,122 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-11 14:16:27,122 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:27,122 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table106) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:27,122 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table107
2023-07-11 14:16:27,122 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1176370621=1, srv1610490019=5, srv1321577176=4, srv1025305513=0, srv1288694771=2, srv1296399460=3, srv427006258=7, srv1752567606=6, srv703622251=9, srv594932213=8} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:27,122 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:27,122 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:27,123 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:27,123 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:27,123 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:27,123 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:27,123 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-11 14:16:27,123 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-11 14:16:27,123 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-11 14:16:27,123 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-11 14:16:27,123 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:27,123 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table107) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:27,123 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table108
2023-07-11 14:16:27,123 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1176370621=1, srv1610490019=5, srv1321577176=4, srv1025305513=0, srv1288694771=2, srv1296399460=3, srv427006258=7, srv1752567606=6, srv703622251=9, srv594932213=8} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:27,123 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:27,123 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:27,123 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:27,123 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:27,123 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:27,123 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:27,123 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-11 14:16:27,123 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-11 14:16:27,123 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-11 14:16:27,123 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-11 14:16:27,123 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:27,123 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table108) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:27,123 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table109
2023-07-11 14:16:27,123 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1176370621=1, srv1610490019=5, srv1321577176=4, srv1025305513=0, srv1288694771=2, srv1296399460=3, srv427006258=7, srv1752567606=6, srv703622251=9, srv594932213=8} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:27,123 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:27,124 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:27,124 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:27,124 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:27,124 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:27,124 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:27,124 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-11 14:16:27,124 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-11 14:16:27,124 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-11 14:16:27,124 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-11 14:16:27,124 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:27,124 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table109) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:27,124 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table30
2023-07-11 14:16:27,124 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1176370621=1, srv1610490019=5, srv1321577176=4, srv1025305513=0, srv1288694771=2, srv1296399460=3, srv427006258=7, srv1752567606=6, srv703622251=9, srv594932213=8} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:27,124 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:27,124 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:27,124 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:27,124 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:27,124 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:27,124 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:27,124 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-11 14:16:27,124 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-11 14:16:27,124 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-11 14:16:27,124 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-11 14:16:27,124 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:27,124 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table30) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:27,124 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table31
2023-07-11 14:16:27,124 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1176370621=1, srv1610490019=5, srv1321577176=4, srv1025305513=0, srv1288694771=2, srv1296399460=3, srv427006258=7, srv1752567606=6, srv703622251=9, srv594932213=8} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:27,125 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:27,125 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:27,125 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:27,125 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:27,125 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:27,125 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:27,125 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-11 14:16:27,125 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-11 14:16:27,125 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-11 14:16:27,125 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-11 14:16:27,125 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:27,125 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table31) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:27,125 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table32
2023-07-11 14:16:27,125 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1176370621=1, srv1610490019=5, srv1321577176=4, srv1025305513=0, srv1288694771=2, srv1296399460=3, srv427006258=7, srv1752567606=6, srv703622251=9, srv594932213=8} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:27,125 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:27,125 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:27,125 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:27,125 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:27,125 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:27,125 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:27,125 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-11 14:16:27,125 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-11 14:16:27,125 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-11 14:16:27,125 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-11 14:16:27,125 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:27,125 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table32) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:27,125 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table33
2023-07-11 14:16:27,126 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1176370621=1, srv1610490019=5, srv1321577176=4, srv1025305513=0, srv1288694771=2, srv1296399460=3, srv427006258=7, srv1752567606=6, srv703622251=9, srv594932213=8} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:27,126 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:27,126 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:27,126 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:27,126 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:27,126 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:27,126 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:27,126 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-11 14:16:27,126 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-11 14:16:27,126 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-11 14:16:27,126 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-11 14:16:27,126 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:27,126 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table33) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:27,126 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table34
2023-07-11 14:16:27,126 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1176370621=1, srv1610490019=5, srv1321577176=4, srv1025305513=0, srv1288694771=2, srv1296399460=3, srv427006258=7, srv1752567606=6, srv703622251=9, srv594932213=8} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:27,126 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:27,126 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:27,126 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:27,126 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:27,126 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:27,126 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:27,126 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-11 14:16:27,126 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-11 14:16:27,126 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-11 14:16:27,126 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-11 14:16:27,126 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:27,126 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table34) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:27,126 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table24
2023-07-11 14:16:27,127 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1176370621=1, srv1610490019=5, srv1321577176=4, srv1025305513=0, srv1288694771=2, srv1296399460=3, srv427006258=7, srv1752567606=6, srv703622251=9, srv594932213=8} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:27,127 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:27,127 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:27,127 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:27,127 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:27,127 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:27,127 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:27,127 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-11 14:16:27,127 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-11 14:16:27,127 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-11 14:16:27,127 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-11 14:16:27,127 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:27,127 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table24) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:27,127 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table25
2023-07-11 14:16:27,127 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1176370621=1, srv1610490019=5, srv1321577176=4, srv1025305513=0, srv1288694771=2, srv1296399460=3, srv427006258=7, srv1752567606=6, srv703622251=9, srv594932213=8} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:27,127 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:27,127 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:27,127 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:27,127 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:27,127 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:27,127 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:27,127 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-11 14:16:27,127 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-11 14:16:27,127 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-11 14:16:27,128 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-11 14:16:27,128 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:27,128 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table25) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:27,128 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table26
2023-07-11 14:16:27,128 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1176370621=1, srv1610490019=5, srv1321577176=4, srv1025305513=0, srv1288694771=2, srv1296399460=3, srv427006258=7, srv1752567606=6, srv703622251=9, srv594932213=8} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:27,128 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:27,128 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:27,128 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:27,128 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:27,128 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:27,128 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:27,128 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-11 14:16:27,128 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-11 14:16:27,128 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-11 14:16:27,128 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-11 14:16:27,128 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:27,128 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table26) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:27,128 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table27
2023-07-11 14:16:27,128 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1176370621=1, srv1610490019=5, srv1321577176=4, srv1025305513=0, srv1288694771=2, srv1296399460=3, srv427006258=7, srv1752567606=6, srv703622251=9, srv594932213=8} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:27,128 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:27,128 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:27,128 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:27,128 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:27,128 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:27,128 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:27,128 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-11 14:16:27,129 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-11 14:16:27,129 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-11 14:16:27,129 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-11 14:16:27,129 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:27,129 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table27) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:27,129 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table28
2023-07-11 14:16:27,129 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1176370621=1, srv1610490019=5, srv1321577176=4, srv1025305513=0, srv1288694771=2, srv1296399460=3, srv427006258=7, srv1752567606=6, srv703622251=9, srv594932213=8} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:27,129 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:27,129 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:27,129 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:27,129 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:27,129 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:27,129 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:27,129 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-11 14:16:27,129 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-11 14:16:27,129 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-11 14:16:27,129 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-11 14:16:27,129 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:27,129 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table28) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:27,129 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table29
2023-07-11 14:16:27,129 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1176370621=1, srv1610490019=5, srv1321577176=4, srv1025305513=0, srv1288694771=2, srv1296399460=3, srv427006258=7, srv1752567606=6, srv703622251=9, srv594932213=8} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:27,129 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:27,129 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:27,129 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:27,129 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:27,129 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:27,129 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:27,130 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-11 14:16:27,130 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-11 14:16:27,130 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-11 14:16:27,130 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-11 14:16:27,130 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:27,130 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table29) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:27,130 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table20
2023-07-11 14:16:27,130 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1176370621=1, srv1610490019=5, srv1321577176=4, srv1025305513=0, srv1288694771=2, srv1296399460=3, srv427006258=7, srv1752567606=6, srv703622251=9, srv594932213=8} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:27,130 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:27,130 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:27,130 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:27,130 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:27,130 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:27,130 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:27,130 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-11 14:16:27,130 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-11 14:16:27,130 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-11 14:16:27,130 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-11 14:16:27,130 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:27,130 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table20) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:27,130 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table21
2023-07-11 14:16:27,130 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1176370621=1, srv1610490019=5, srv1321577176=4, srv1025305513=0, srv1288694771=2, srv1296399460=3, srv427006258=7, srv1752567606=6, srv703622251=9, srv594932213=8} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:27,130 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:27,130 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:27,130 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:27,130 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:27,130 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:27,131 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:27,131 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-11 14:16:27,131 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-11 14:16:27,131 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-11 14:16:27,131 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-11 14:16:27,131 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:27,131 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table21) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:27,131 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table22
2023-07-11 14:16:27,131 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1176370621=1, srv1610490019=5, srv1321577176=4, srv1025305513=0, srv1288694771=2, srv1296399460=3, srv427006258=7, srv1752567606=6, srv703622251=9, srv594932213=8} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:27,131 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:27,131 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:27,131 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:27,131 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:27,131 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:27,131 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:27,131 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-11 14:16:27,131 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-11 14:16:27,131 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-11 14:16:27,131 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-11 14:16:27,131 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:27,131 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table22) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:27,131 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table23
2023-07-11 14:16:27,131 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1176370621=1, srv1610490019=5, srv1321577176=4, srv1025305513=0, srv1288694771=2, srv1296399460=3, srv427006258=7, srv1752567606=6, srv703622251=9, srv594932213=8} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:27,131 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:27,131 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:27,131 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:27,131 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:27,131 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:27,132 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:27,132 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-11 14:16:27,132 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-11 14:16:27,132 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-11 14:16:27,132 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-11 14:16:27,132 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:27,132 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table23) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:27,133 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table13
2023-07-11 14:16:27,133 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1356571555=4, srv1009132316=0, srv1535657390=5, srv1140009640=2, srv1130403343=1, srv361769989=7, srv2055247944=6, srv1184139012=3, srv799865827=8, srv913079707=9} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:27,133 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:27,133 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:27,133 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:27,133 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:27,133 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:27,133 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:27,133 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-11 14:16:27,133 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-11 14:16:27,133 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-11 14:16:27,133 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-11 14:16:27,133 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:27,134 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table13) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:27,134 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table14
2023-07-11 14:16:27,134 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1356571555=4, srv1009132316=0, srv1535657390=5, srv1140009640=2, srv1130403343=1, srv361769989=7, srv2055247944=6, srv1184139012=3, srv799865827=8, srv913079707=9} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:27,134 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:27,134 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:27,134 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:27,134 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:27,134 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:27,134 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:27,134 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-11 14:16:27,134 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-11 14:16:27,134 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-11 14:16:27,134 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-11 14:16:27,134 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:27,134 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table14) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:27,134 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table120
2023-07-11 14:16:27,134 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1356571555=4, srv1009132316=0, srv1535657390=5, srv1140009640=2, srv1130403343=1, srv361769989=7, srv2055247944=6, srv1184139012=3, srv799865827=8, srv913079707=9} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:27,134 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:27,134 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:27,134 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:27,134 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:27,134 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:27,134 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:27,134 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-11 14:16:27,134 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-11 14:16:27,134 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-11 14:16:27,134 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-11 14:16:27,135 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:27,135 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table120) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:27,135 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table15
2023-07-11 14:16:27,135 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1356571555=4, srv1009132316=0, srv1535657390=5, srv1140009640=2, srv1130403343=1, srv361769989=7, srv2055247944=6, srv1184139012=3, srv799865827=8, srv913079707=9} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:27,135 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:27,135 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:27,135 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:27,135 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:27,135 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:27,135 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:27,135 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-11 14:16:27,135 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-11 14:16:27,135 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-11 14:16:27,135 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-11 14:16:27,135 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:27,135 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table15) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:27,135 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table121
2023-07-11 14:16:27,135 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1356571555=4, srv1009132316=0, srv1535657390=5, srv1140009640=2, srv1130403343=1, srv361769989=7, srv2055247944=6, srv1184139012=3, srv799865827=8, srv913079707=9} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:27,135 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:27,135 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:27,135 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:27,135 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:27,135 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:27,135 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:27,135 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-11 14:16:27,135 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-11 14:16:27,135 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-11 14:16:27,135 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-11 14:16:27,136 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:27,136 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table121) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:27,136 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table16
2023-07-11 14:16:27,136 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1356571555=4, srv1009132316=0, srv1535657390=5, srv1140009640=2, srv1130403343=1, srv361769989=7, srv2055247944=6, srv1184139012=3, srv799865827=8, srv913079707=9} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:27,136 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:27,136 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:27,136 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:27,136 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:27,136 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:27,136 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:27,136 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-11 14:16:27,136 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-11 14:16:27,136 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-11 14:16:27,136 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-11 14:16:27,136 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:27,136 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table16) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:27,136 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table122
2023-07-11 14:16:27,136 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1356571555=4, srv1009132316=0, srv1535657390=5, srv1140009640=2, srv1130403343=1, srv361769989=7, srv2055247944=6, srv1184139012=3, srv799865827=8, srv913079707=9} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:27,136 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:27,136 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:27,136 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:27,136 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:27,136 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:27,136 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:27,136 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-11 14:16:27,136 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-11 14:16:27,137 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-11 14:16:27,137 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-11 14:16:27,137 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:27,137 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table122) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:27,137 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table17
2023-07-11 14:16:27,137 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1356571555=4, srv1009132316=0, srv1535657390=5, srv1140009640=2, srv1130403343=1, srv361769989=7, srv2055247944=6, srv1184139012=3, srv799865827=8, srv913079707=9} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:27,137 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:27,137 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:27,137 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:27,137 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:27,137 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:27,137 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:27,137 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-11 14:16:27,137 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-11 14:16:27,137 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-11 14:16:27,137 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-11 14:16:27,137 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:27,137 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table17) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:27,137 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table123
2023-07-11 14:16:27,137 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1356571555=4, srv1009132316=0, srv1535657390=5, srv1140009640=2, srv1130403343=1, srv361769989=7, srv2055247944=6, srv1184139012=3, srv799865827=8, srv913079707=9} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:27,137 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:27,137 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:27,137 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:27,137 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:27,137 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:27,137 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:27,137 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-11 14:16:27,138 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-11 14:16:27,138 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-11 14:16:27,138 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-11 14:16:27,138 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:27,138 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table123) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:27,138 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table18
2023-07-11 14:16:27,138 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1356571555=4, srv1009132316=0, srv1535657390=5, srv1140009640=2, srv1130403343=1, srv361769989=7, srv2055247944=6, srv1184139012=3, srv799865827=8, srv913079707=9} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:27,138 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:27,138 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:27,138 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:27,138 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:27,138 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:27,138 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:27,138 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-11 14:16:27,138 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-11 14:16:27,138 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-11 14:16:27,138 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-11 14:16:27,138 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:27,138 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table18) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:27,138 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table124
2023-07-11 14:16:27,138 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1356571555=4, srv1009132316=0, srv1535657390=5, srv1140009640=2, srv1130403343=1, srv361769989=7, srv2055247944=6, srv1184139012=3, srv799865827=8, srv913079707=9} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:27,138 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:27,139 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:27,139 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:27,139 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:27,139 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:27,139 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:27,139 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-11 14:16:27,139 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-11 14:16:27,139 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-11 14:16:27,139 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-11 14:16:27,139 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:27,139 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table124) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:27,139 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table19
2023-07-11 14:16:27,139 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1356571555=4, srv1009132316=0, srv1535657390=5, srv1140009640=2, srv1130403343=1, srv361769989=7, srv2055247944=6, srv1184139012=3, srv799865827=8, srv913079707=9} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:27,139 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:27,139 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:27,139 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:27,139 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:27,139 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:27,139 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:27,139 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-11 14:16:27,139 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-11 14:16:27,139 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-11 14:16:27,139 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-11 14:16:27,139 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:27,139 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table19) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:27,139 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table125
2023-07-11 14:16:27,139 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1356571555=4, srv1009132316=0, srv1535657390=5, srv1140009640=2, srv1130403343=1, srv361769989=7, srv2055247944=6, srv1184139012=3, srv799865827=8, srv913079707=9} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:27,140 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:27,140 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:27,140 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:27,140 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:27,140 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:27,140 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:27,140 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-11 14:16:27,140 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-11 14:16:27,140 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-11 14:16:27,140 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-11 14:16:27,140 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:27,140 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table125) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:27,140 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table126
2023-07-11 14:16:27,140 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1356571555=4, srv1009132316=0, srv1535657390=5, srv1140009640=2, srv1130403343=1, srv361769989=7, srv2055247944=6, srv1184139012=3, srv799865827=8, srv913079707=9} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:27,140 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:27,140 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:27,140 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:27,140 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:27,140 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:27,140 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:27,140 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-11 14:16:27,140 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-11 14:16:27,140 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-11 14:16:27,140 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-11 14:16:27,140 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:27,140 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table126) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:27,140 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table127
2023-07-11 14:16:27,141 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1356571555=4, srv1009132316=0, srv1535657390=5, srv1140009640=2, srv1130403343=1, srv361769989=7, srv2055247944=6, srv1184139012=3, srv799865827=8, srv913079707=9} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:27,141 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:27,141 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:27,141 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:27,141 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:27,141 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:27,141 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:27,141 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-11 14:16:27,141 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-11 14:16:27,141 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-11 14:16:27,141 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-11 14:16:27,141 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:27,141 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table127) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:27,141 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table128
2023-07-11 14:16:27,141 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1356571555=4, srv1009132316=0, srv1535657390=5, srv1140009640=2, srv1130403343=1, srv361769989=7, srv2055247944=6, srv1184139012=3, srv799865827=8, srv913079707=9} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:27,141 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:27,141 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:27,141 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:27,141 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:27,141 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:27,141 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:27,141 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-11 14:16:27,141 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-11 14:16:27,141 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-11 14:16:27,141 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-11 14:16:27,141 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:27,141 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table128) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:27,142 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table129
2023-07-11 14:16:27,142 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1356571555=4, srv1009132316=0, srv1535657390=5, srv1140009640=2, srv1130403343=1, srv361769989=7, srv2055247944=6, srv1184139012=3, srv799865827=8, srv913079707=9} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:27,142 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:27,142 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:27,142 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:27,142 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:27,142 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:27,142 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:27,142 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-11 14:16:27,142 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-11 14:16:27,142 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-11 14:16:27,142 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-11 14:16:27,142 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:27,142 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table129) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:27,142 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table90
2023-07-11 14:16:27,142 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1356571555=4, srv1009132316=0, srv1535657390=5, srv1140009640=2, srv1130403343=1, srv361769989=7, srv2055247944=6, srv1184139012=3, srv799865827=8, srv913079707=9} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:27,142 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:27,142 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:27,142 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:27,142 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:27,142 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:27,142 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:27,142 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-11 14:16:27,142 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-11 14:16:27,142 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-11 14:16:27,142 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-11 14:16:27,142 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:27,143 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table90) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:27,143 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table91
2023-07-11 14:16:27,143 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1356571555=4, srv1009132316=0, srv1535657390=5, srv1140009640=2, srv1130403343=1, srv361769989=7, srv2055247944=6, srv1184139012=3, srv799865827=8, srv913079707=9} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:27,143 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:27,143 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:27,143 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:27,143 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:27,143 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:27,143 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:27,143 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-11 14:16:27,143 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-11 14:16:27,143 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-11 14:16:27,143 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-11 14:16:27,143 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:27,143 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table91) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:27,143 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table92
2023-07-11 14:16:27,143 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1356571555=4, srv1009132316=0, srv1535657390=5, srv1140009640=2, srv1130403343=1, srv361769989=7, srv2055247944=6, srv1184139012=3, srv799865827=8, srv913079707=9} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:27,143 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:27,143 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:27,143 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:27,143 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:27,143 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:27,143 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:27,143 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-11 14:16:27,143 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-11 14:16:27,143 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-11 14:16:27,143 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-11 14:16:27,143 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:27,144 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table92) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:27,144 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table93
2023-07-11 14:16:27,144 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1356571555=4, srv1009132316=0, srv1535657390=5, srv1140009640=2, srv1130403343=1, srv361769989=7, srv2055247944=6, srv1184139012=3, srv799865827=8, srv913079707=9} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:27,144 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:27,144 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:27,144 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:27,144 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:27,144 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:27,144 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:27,144 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-11 14:16:27,144 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-11 14:16:27,144 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-11 14:16:27,144 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-11 14:16:27,144 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:27,144 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table93) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:27,144 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table94
2023-07-11 14:16:27,144 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1356571555=4, srv1009132316=0, srv1535657390=5, srv1140009640=2, srv1130403343=1, srv361769989=7, srv2055247944=6, srv1184139012=3, srv799865827=8, srv913079707=9} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:27,144 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:27,144 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:27,144 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:27,144 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:27,144 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:27,144 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:27,144 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-11 14:16:27,144 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-11 14:16:27,144 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-11 14:16:27,144 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-11 14:16:27,145 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:27,145 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table94) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:27,145 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table95
2023-07-11 14:16:27,145 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1356571555=4, srv1009132316=0, srv1535657390=5, srv1140009640=2, srv1130403343=1, srv361769989=7, srv2055247944=6, srv1184139012=3, srv799865827=8, srv913079707=9} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:27,145 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:27,145 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:27,145 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:27,145 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:27,145 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:27,145 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:27,145 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-11 14:16:27,145 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-11 14:16:27,145 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-11 14:16:27,145 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-11 14:16:27,145 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:27,145 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table95) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:27,145 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table96
2023-07-11 14:16:27,145 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1356571555=4, srv1009132316=0, srv1535657390=5, srv1140009640=2, srv1130403343=1, srv361769989=7, srv2055247944=6, srv1184139012=3, srv799865827=8, srv913079707=9} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:27,145 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:27,145 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:27,145 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:27,145 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:27,145 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:27,145 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:27,145 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-11 14:16:27,145 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-11 14:16:27,146 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-11 14:16:27,146 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-11 14:16:27,146 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:27,146 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table96) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:27,146 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table97
2023-07-11 14:16:27,146 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1356571555=4, srv1009132316=0, srv1535657390=5, srv1140009640=2, srv1130403343=1, srv361769989=7, srv2055247944=6, srv1184139012=3, srv799865827=8, srv913079707=9} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:27,146 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:27,146 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:27,146 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:27,146 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:27,146 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:27,146 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:27,146 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-11 14:16:27,146 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-11 14:16:27,146 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-11 14:16:27,146 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-11 14:16:27,146 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:27,146 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table97) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:27,146 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table10
2023-07-11 14:16:27,146 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1356571555=4, srv1009132316=0, srv1535657390=5, srv1140009640=2, srv1130403343=1, srv361769989=7, srv2055247944=6, srv1184139012=3, srv799865827=8, srv913079707=9} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:27,146 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:27,146 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:27,146 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:27,146 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:27,146 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:27,146 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:27,146 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-11 14:16:27,146 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-11 14:16:27,147 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-11 14:16:27,147 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-11 14:16:27,147 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:27,147 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table10) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:27,147 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table98
2023-07-11 14:16:27,147 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1356571555=4, srv1009132316=0, srv1535657390=5, srv1140009640=2, srv1130403343=1, srv361769989=7, srv2055247944=6, srv1184139012=3, srv799865827=8, srv913079707=9} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:27,147 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:27,147 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:27,147 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:27,147 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:27,147 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:27,147 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:27,147 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-11 14:16:27,147 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-11 14:16:27,147 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-11 14:16:27,147 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-11 14:16:27,147 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:27,147 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table98) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:27,147 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table11
2023-07-11 14:16:27,147 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1356571555=4, srv1009132316=0, srv1535657390=5, srv1140009640=2, srv1130403343=1, srv361769989=7, srv2055247944=6, srv1184139012=3, srv799865827=8, srv913079707=9} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:27,147 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:27,147 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:27,148 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:27,148 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:27,148 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:27,148 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:27,148 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-11 14:16:27,148 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-11 14:16:27,148 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-11 14:16:27,148 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-11 14:16:27,148 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:27,148 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table11) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:27,148 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table99
2023-07-11 14:16:27,148 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1356571555=4, srv1009132316=0, srv1535657390=5, srv1140009640=2, srv1130403343=1, srv361769989=7, srv2055247944=6, srv1184139012=3, srv799865827=8, srv913079707=9} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:27,148 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:27,148 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:27,148 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:27,148 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:27,148 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:27,148 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:27,148 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-11 14:16:27,148 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-11 14:16:27,148 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-11 14:16:27,148 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-11 14:16:27,148 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:27,148 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table99) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:27,148 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table12
2023-07-11 14:16:27,148 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1356571555=4, srv1009132316=0, srv1535657390=5, srv1140009640=2, srv1130403343=1, srv361769989=7, srv2055247944=6, srv1184139012=3, srv799865827=8, srv913079707=9} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:27,149 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:27,149 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:27,149 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:27,149 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:27,149 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:27,149 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:27,149 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-11 14:16:27,149 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-11 14:16:27,149 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-11 14:16:27,149 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-11 14:16:27,149 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:27,149 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table12) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:27,149 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table110
2023-07-11 14:16:27,149 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1356571555=4, srv1009132316=0, srv1535657390=5, srv1140009640=2, srv1130403343=1, srv361769989=7, srv2055247944=6, srv1184139012=3, srv799865827=8, srv913079707=9} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:27,149 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:27,149 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:27,149 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:27,149 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:27,149 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:27,149 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:27,149 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-11 14:16:27,149 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-11 14:16:27,149 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-11 14:16:27,149 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-11 14:16:27,149 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:27,149 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table110) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:27,150 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table111
2023-07-11 14:16:27,150 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1356571555=4, srv1009132316=0, srv1535657390=5, srv1140009640=2, srv1130403343=1, srv361769989=7, srv2055247944=6, srv1184139012=3, srv799865827=8, srv913079707=9} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:27,150 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:27,150 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:27,150 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:27,150 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:27,150 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:27,150 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:27,150 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-11 14:16:27,150 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-11 14:16:27,150 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-11 14:16:27,150 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-11 14:16:27,150 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:27,150 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table111) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:27,150 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table112
2023-07-11 14:16:27,150 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1356571555=4, srv1009132316=0, srv1535657390=5, srv1140009640=2, srv1130403343=1, srv361769989=7, srv2055247944=6, srv1184139012=3, srv799865827=8, srv913079707=9} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:27,150 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:27,150 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:27,150 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:27,150 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:27,150 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:27,150 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:27,150 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-11 14:16:27,150 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-11 14:16:27,150 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-11 14:16:27,150 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-11 14:16:27,150 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:27,150 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table112) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:27,151 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table113
2023-07-11 14:16:27,151 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1356571555=4, srv1009132316=0, srv1535657390=5, srv1140009640=2, srv1130403343=1, srv361769989=7, srv2055247944=6, srv1184139012=3, srv799865827=8, srv913079707=9} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:27,151 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:27,151 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:27,151 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:27,151 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:27,151 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:27,151 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:27,151 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-11 14:16:27,151 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-11 14:16:27,151 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-11 14:16:27,151 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-11 14:16:27,151 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:27,151 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table113) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:27,151 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table114
2023-07-11 14:16:27,151 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1356571555=4, srv1009132316=0, srv1535657390=5, srv1140009640=2, srv1130403343=1, srv361769989=7, srv2055247944=6, srv1184139012=3, srv799865827=8, srv913079707=9} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:27,151 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:27,151 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:27,151 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:27,151 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:27,151 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:27,151 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:27,151 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-11 14:16:27,151 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-11 14:16:27,151 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-11 14:16:27,151 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-11 14:16:27,151 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:27,152 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table114) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:27,152 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table115
2023-07-11 14:16:27,152 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1356571555=4, srv1009132316=0, srv1535657390=5, srv1140009640=2, srv1130403343=1, srv361769989=7, srv2055247944=6, srv1184139012=3, srv799865827=8, srv913079707=9} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:27,152 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:27,152 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:27,152 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:27,152 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:27,152 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:27,152 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:27,152 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-11 14:16:27,152 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-11 14:16:27,152 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-11 14:16:27,152 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-11 14:16:27,152 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:27,152 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table115) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:27,152 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table116
2023-07-11 14:16:27,152 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1356571555=4, srv1009132316=0, srv1535657390=5, srv1140009640=2, srv1130403343=1, srv361769989=7, srv2055247944=6, srv1184139012=3, srv799865827=8, srv913079707=9} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:27,152 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:27,152 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:27,152 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:27,152 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:27,152 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:27,152 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:27,152 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-11 14:16:27,152 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-11 14:16:27,152 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-11 14:16:27,152 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-11 14:16:27,153 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:27,153 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table116) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:27,153 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table117
2023-07-11 14:16:27,153 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1356571555=4, srv1009132316=0, srv1535657390=5, srv1140009640=2, srv1130403343=1, srv361769989=7, srv2055247944=6, srv1184139012=3, srv799865827=8, srv913079707=9} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:27,153 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:27,153 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:27,153 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:27,153 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:27,153 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:27,153 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:27,153 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-11 14:16:27,153 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-11 14:16:27,153 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-11 14:16:27,153 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-11 14:16:27,153 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:27,153 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table117) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:27,153 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table118
2023-07-11 14:16:27,153 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1356571555=4, srv1009132316=0, srv1535657390=5, srv1140009640=2, srv1130403343=1, srv361769989=7, srv2055247944=6, srv1184139012=3, srv799865827=8, srv913079707=9} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:27,153 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:27,153 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:27,153 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:27,153 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:27,153 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:27,153 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:27,153 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-11 14:16:27,153 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-11 14:16:27,153 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-11 14:16:27,154 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-11 14:16:27,154 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:27,154 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table118) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:27,154 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table119
2023-07-11 14:16:27,154 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1356571555=4, srv1009132316=0, srv1535657390=5, srv1140009640=2, srv1130403343=1, srv361769989=7, srv2055247944=6, srv1184139012=3, srv799865827=8, srv913079707=9} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:27,154 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:27,154 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:27,154 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:27,154 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:27,154 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:27,154 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:27,154 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-11 14:16:27,154 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-11 14:16:27,154 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-11 14:16:27,154 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-11 14:16:27,154 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:27,154 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table119) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:27,154 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table80
2023-07-11 14:16:27,154 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1356571555=4, srv1009132316=0, srv1535657390=5, srv1140009640=2, srv1130403343=1, srv361769989=7, srv2055247944=6, srv1184139012=3, srv799865827=8, srv913079707=9} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:27,154 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:27,154 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:27,154 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:27,154 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:27,154 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:27,154 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:27,154 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-11 14:16:27,154 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-11 14:16:27,155 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-11 14:16:27,155 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-11 14:16:27,155 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:27,155 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table80) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:27,155 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table81
2023-07-11 14:16:27,155 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1356571555=4, srv1009132316=0, srv1535657390=5, srv1140009640=2, srv1130403343=1, srv361769989=7, srv2055247944=6, srv1184139012=3, srv799865827=8, srv913079707=9} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:27,155 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:27,155 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:27,155 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:27,155 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:27,155 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:27,155 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:27,155 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-11 14:16:27,155 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-11 14:16:27,155 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-11 14:16:27,155 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-11 14:16:27,155 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:27,155 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table81) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:27,155 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table82
2023-07-11 14:16:27,155 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1356571555=4, srv1009132316=0, srv1535657390=5, srv1140009640=2, srv1130403343=1, srv361769989=7, srv2055247944=6, srv1184139012=3, srv799865827=8, srv913079707=9} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:27,155 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:27,155 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:27,155 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:27,155 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:27,155 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:27,155 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:27,155 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-11 14:16:27,155 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-11 14:16:27,156 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-11 14:16:27,156 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-11 14:16:27,156 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:27,156 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table82) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:27,156 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table83
2023-07-11 14:16:27,156 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1356571555=4, srv1009132316=0, srv1535657390=5, srv1140009640=2, srv1130403343=1, srv361769989=7, srv2055247944=6, srv1184139012=3, srv799865827=8, srv913079707=9} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:27,156 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:27,156 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:27,156 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:27,156 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:27,156 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:27,156 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:27,156 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-11 14:16:27,156 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-11 14:16:27,156 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-11 14:16:27,156 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-11 14:16:27,156 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:27,156 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table83) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:27,156 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table84
2023-07-11 14:16:27,156 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1356571555=4, srv1009132316=0, srv1535657390=5, srv1140009640=2, srv1130403343=1, srv361769989=7, srv2055247944=6, srv1184139012=3, srv799865827=8, srv913079707=9} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:27,156 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:27,157 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:27,157 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:27,157 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:27,157 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:27,157 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:27,157 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-11 14:16:27,157 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-11 14:16:27,157 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-11 14:16:27,157 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-11 14:16:27,157 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:27,157 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table84) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:27,157 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table85
2023-07-11 14:16:27,157 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1356571555=4, srv1009132316=0, srv1535657390=5, srv1140009640=2, srv1130403343=1, srv361769989=7, srv2055247944=6, srv1184139012=3, srv799865827=8, srv913079707=9} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:27,157 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:27,157 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:27,157 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:27,157 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:27,157 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:27,157 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:27,157 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-11 14:16:27,157 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-11 14:16:27,157 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-11 14:16:27,157 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-11 14:16:27,157 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:27,157 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table85) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:27,157 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table86
2023-07-11 14:16:27,157 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1356571555=4, srv1009132316=0, srv1535657390=5, srv1140009640=2, srv1130403343=1, srv361769989=7, srv2055247944=6, srv1184139012=3, srv799865827=8, srv913079707=9} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:27,158 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:27,158 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:27,158 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:27,158 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:27,158 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:27,158 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:27,158 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-11 14:16:27,158 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-11 14:16:27,158 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-11 14:16:27,158 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-11 14:16:27,158 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:27,158 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table86) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:27,158 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table87
2023-07-11 14:16:27,158 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1356571555=4, srv1009132316=0, srv1535657390=5, srv1140009640=2, srv1130403343=1, srv361769989=7, srv2055247944=6, srv1184139012=3, srv799865827=8, srv913079707=9} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:27,158 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:27,158 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:27,158 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:27,158 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:27,158 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:27,158 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:27,158 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-11 14:16:27,158 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-11 14:16:27,158 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-11 14:16:27,158 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-11 14:16:27,158 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:27,158 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table87) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:27,158 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table88
2023-07-11 14:16:27,158 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1356571555=4, srv1009132316=0, srv1535657390=5, srv1140009640=2, srv1130403343=1, srv361769989=7, srv2055247944=6, srv1184139012=3, srv799865827=8, srv913079707=9} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:27,159 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:27,159 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:27,159 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:27,159 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:27,159 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:27,159 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:27,159 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-11 14:16:27,159 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-11 14:16:27,159 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-11 14:16:27,159 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-11 14:16:27,159 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:27,159 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table88) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:27,159 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table89
2023-07-11 14:16:27,159 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1356571555=4, srv1009132316=0, srv1535657390=5, srv1140009640=2, srv1130403343=1, srv361769989=7, srv2055247944=6, srv1184139012=3, srv799865827=8, srv913079707=9} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:27,159 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:27,159 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:27,159 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:27,159 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:27,159 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:27,159 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:27,159 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-11 14:16:27,159 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-11 14:16:27,159 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-11 14:16:27,159 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-11 14:16:27,159 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:27,159 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table89) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:27,159 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table79
2023-07-11 14:16:27,160 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1356571555=4, srv1009132316=0, srv1535657390=5, srv1140009640=2, srv1130403343=1, srv361769989=7, srv2055247944=6, srv1184139012=3, srv799865827=8, srv913079707=9} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:27,160 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:27,160 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:27,160 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:27,160 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:27,160 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:27,160 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:27,160 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-11 14:16:27,160 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-11 14:16:27,160 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-11 14:16:27,160 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-11 14:16:27,160 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:27,160 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table79) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:27,160 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table141
2023-07-11 14:16:27,160 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1356571555=4, srv1009132316=0, srv1535657390=5, srv1140009640=2, srv1130403343=1, srv361769989=7, srv2055247944=6, srv1184139012=3, srv799865827=8, srv913079707=9} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:27,160 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:27,160 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:27,160 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:27,160 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:27,160 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:27,160 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:27,160 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-11 14:16:27,160 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-11 14:16:27,160 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-11 14:16:27,160 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-11 14:16:27,160 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:27,160 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table141) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:27,161 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table142
2023-07-11 14:16:27,161 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1356571555=4, srv1009132316=0, srv1535657390=5, srv1140009640=2, srv1130403343=1, srv361769989=7, srv2055247944=6, srv1184139012=3, srv799865827=8, srv913079707=9} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:27,161 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:27,161 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:27,161 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:27,161 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:27,161 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:27,161 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:27,161 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-11 14:16:27,161 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-11 14:16:27,161 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-11 14:16:27,161 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-11 14:16:27,161 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:27,161 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table142) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:27,161 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table143
2023-07-11 14:16:27,161 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1356571555=4, srv1009132316=0, srv1535657390=5, srv1140009640=2, srv1130403343=1, srv361769989=7, srv2055247944=6, srv1184139012=3, srv799865827=8, srv913079707=9} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:27,161 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:27,161 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:27,161 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:27,161 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:27,161 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:27,161 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:27,161 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-11 14:16:27,161 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-11 14:16:27,161 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-11 14:16:27,161 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-11 14:16:27,161 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:27,162 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table143) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:27,162 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table144
2023-07-11 14:16:27,162 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1356571555=4, srv1009132316=0, srv1535657390=5, srv1140009640=2, srv1130403343=1, srv361769989=7, srv2055247944=6, srv1184139012=3, srv799865827=8, srv913079707=9} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:27,162 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:27,162 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:27,162 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:27,162 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:27,162 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:27,162 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:27,162 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-11 14:16:27,162 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-11 14:16:27,162 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-11 14:16:27,162 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-11 14:16:27,162 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:27,162 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table144) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:27,162 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table145
2023-07-11 14:16:27,162 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1356571555=4, srv1009132316=0, srv1535657390=5, srv1140009640=2, srv1130403343=1, srv361769989=7, srv2055247944=6, srv1184139012=3, srv799865827=8, srv913079707=9} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:27,162 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:27,162 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:27,162 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:27,162 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:27,162 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:27,162 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:27,162 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-11 14:16:27,162 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-11 14:16:27,162 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-11 14:16:27,162 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-11 14:16:27,162 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:27,163 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table145) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:27,163 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table146
2023-07-11 14:16:27,163 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1356571555=4, srv1009132316=0, srv1535657390=5, srv1140009640=2, srv1130403343=1, srv361769989=7, srv2055247944=6, srv1184139012=3, srv799865827=8, srv913079707=9} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:27,163 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:27,163 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:27,163 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:27,163 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:27,163 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:27,163 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:27,163 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-11 14:16:27,163 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-11 14:16:27,163 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-11 14:16:27,163 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-11 14:16:27,163 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:27,163 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table146) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:27,163 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table147
2023-07-11 14:16:27,163 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1356571555=4, srv1009132316=0, srv1535657390=5, srv1140009640=2, srv1130403343=1, srv361769989=7, srv2055247944=6, srv1184139012=3, srv799865827=8, srv913079707=9} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:27,163 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:27,163 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:27,163 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:27,163 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:27,163 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:27,163 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:27,163 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-11 14:16:27,163 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-11 14:16:27,163 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-11 14:16:27,163 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-11 14:16:27,163 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:27,164 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table147) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:27,164 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table148
2023-07-11 14:16:27,164 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1356571555=4, srv1009132316=0, srv1535657390=5, srv1140009640=2, srv1130403343=1, srv361769989=7, srv2055247944=6, srv1184139012=3, srv799865827=8, srv913079707=9} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:27,164 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:27,164 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:27,164 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:27,164 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:27,164 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:27,164 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:27,164 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-11 14:16:27,164 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-11 14:16:27,164 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-11 14:16:27,164 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-11 14:16:27,164 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:27,164 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table148) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:27,164 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table149
2023-07-11 14:16:27,164 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1356571555=4, srv1009132316=0, srv1535657390=5, srv1140009640=2, srv1130403343=1, srv361769989=7, srv2055247944=6, srv1184139012=3, srv799865827=8, srv913079707=9} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:27,164 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:27,164 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:27,164 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:27,164 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:27,164 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:27,164 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:27,164 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-11 14:16:27,164 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-11 14:16:27,164 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-11 14:16:27,164 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-11 14:16:27,165 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:27,165 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table149) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:27,165 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table5
2023-07-11 14:16:27,165 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1356571555=4, srv1009132316=0, srv1535657390=5, srv1140009640=2, srv1130403343=1, srv361769989=7, srv2055247944=6, srv1184139012=3, srv799865827=8, srv913079707=9} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:27,165 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:27,165 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:27,165 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:27,165 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:27,165 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:27,165 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:27,165 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-11 14:16:27,165 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-11 14:16:27,165 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-11 14:16:27,165 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-11 14:16:27,165 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:27,165 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table5) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:27,165 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table4
2023-07-11 14:16:27,165 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1356571555=4, srv1009132316=0, srv1535657390=5, srv1140009640=2, srv1130403343=1, srv361769989=7, srv2055247944=6, srv1184139012=3, srv799865827=8, srv913079707=9} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:27,165 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:27,165 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:27,165 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:27,165 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:27,166 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:27,166 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:27,166 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-11 14:16:27,166 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-11 14:16:27,166 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-11 14:16:27,166 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-11 14:16:27,166 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:27,166 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table4) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:27,166 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table3
2023-07-11 14:16:27,166 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1356571555=4, srv1009132316=0, srv1535657390=5, srv1140009640=2, srv1130403343=1, srv361769989=7, srv2055247944=6, srv1184139012=3, srv799865827=8, srv913079707=9} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:27,166 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:27,166 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:27,166 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:27,166 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:27,166 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:27,166 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:27,166 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-11 14:16:27,166 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-11 14:16:27,166 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-11 14:16:27,166 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-11 14:16:27,166 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:27,166 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table3) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:27,166 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table2
2023-07-11 14:16:27,166 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1356571555=4, srv1009132316=0, srv1535657390=5, srv1140009640=2, srv1130403343=1, srv361769989=7, srv2055247944=6, srv1184139012=3, srv799865827=8, srv913079707=9} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:27,166 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:27,166 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:27,167 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:27,167 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:27,167 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:27,167 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:27,167 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-11 14:16:27,167 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-11 14:16:27,167 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-11 14:16:27,167 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-11 14:16:27,167 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:27,167 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table2) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:27,167 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1
2023-07-11 14:16:27,167 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1356571555=4, srv1009132316=0, srv1535657390=5, srv1140009640=2, srv1130403343=1, srv361769989=7, srv2055247944=6, srv1184139012=3, srv799865827=8, srv913079707=9} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:27,167 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:27,167 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:27,167 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:27,167 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:27,167 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:27,167 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:27,167 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-11 14:16:27,167 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-11 14:16:27,167 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-11 14:16:27,167 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-11 14:16:27,167 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:27,167 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:27,167 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table0
2023-07-11 14:16:27,167 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1356571555=4, srv1009132316=0, srv1535657390=5, srv1140009640=2, srv1130403343=1, srv361769989=7, srv2055247944=6, srv1184139012=3, srv799865827=8, srv913079707=9} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:27,167 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:27,168 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:27,168 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:27,168 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:27,168 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:27,168 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:27,168 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-11 14:16:27,168 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-11 14:16:27,168 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-11 14:16:27,168 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-11 14:16:27,168 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:27,168 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table0) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:27,168 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table70
2023-07-11 14:16:27,168 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1356571555=4, srv1009132316=0, srv1535657390=5, srv1140009640=2, srv1130403343=1, srv361769989=7, srv2055247944=6, srv1184139012=3, srv799865827=8, srv913079707=9} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:27,168 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:27,168 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:27,168 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:27,168 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:27,168 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:27,168 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:27,168 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-11 14:16:27,168 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-11 14:16:27,168 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-11 14:16:27,168 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-11 14:16:27,168 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:27,168 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table70) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:27,168 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table71
2023-07-11 14:16:27,169 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1356571555=4, srv1009132316=0, srv1535657390=5, srv1140009640=2, srv1130403343=1, srv361769989=7, srv2055247944=6, srv1184139012=3, srv799865827=8, srv913079707=9} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:27,169 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:27,169 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:27,169 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:27,169 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:27,169 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:27,169 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:27,169 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-11 14:16:27,169 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-11 14:16:27,169 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-11 14:16:27,169 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-11 14:16:27,169 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:27,169 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table71) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:27,169 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table72
2023-07-11 14:16:27,169 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1356571555=4, srv1009132316=0, srv1535657390=5, srv1140009640=2, srv1130403343=1, srv361769989=7, srv2055247944=6, srv1184139012=3, srv799865827=8, srv913079707=9} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:27,169 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:27,169 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:27,169 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:27,169 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:27,169 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:27,169 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:27,169 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-11 14:16:27,169 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-11 14:16:27,169 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-11 14:16:27,169 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-11 14:16:27,169 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:27,169 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table72) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:27,170 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table73
2023-07-11 14:16:27,170 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1356571555=4, srv1009132316=0, srv1535657390=5, srv1140009640=2, srv1130403343=1, srv361769989=7, srv2055247944=6, srv1184139012=3, srv799865827=8, srv913079707=9} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:27,170 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:27,170 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:27,170 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:27,170 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:27,170 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:27,170 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:27,170 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-11 14:16:27,170 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-11 14:16:27,170 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-11 14:16:27,170 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-11 14:16:27,170 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:27,170 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table73) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:27,170 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table74
2023-07-11 14:16:27,170 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1356571555=4, srv1009132316=0, srv1535657390=5, srv1140009640=2, srv1130403343=1, srv361769989=7, srv2055247944=6, srv1184139012=3, srv799865827=8, srv913079707=9} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:27,170 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:27,170 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:27,170 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:27,170 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:27,170 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:27,170 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:27,170 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-11 14:16:27,170 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-11 14:16:27,170 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-11 14:16:27,170 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-11 14:16:27,170 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:27,171 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table74) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:27,171 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table9
2023-07-11 14:16:27,171 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1356571555=4, srv1009132316=0, srv1535657390=5, srv1140009640=2, srv1130403343=1, srv361769989=7, srv2055247944=6, srv1184139012=3, srv799865827=8, srv913079707=9} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:27,171 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:27,171 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:27,171 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:27,171 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:27,171 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:27,171 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:27,171 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-11 14:16:27,171 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-11 14:16:27,171 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-11 14:16:27,171 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-11 14:16:27,171 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:27,177 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table9) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:27,177 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table75
2023-07-11 14:16:27,177 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1356571555=4, srv1009132316=0, srv1535657390=5, srv1140009640=2, srv1130403343=1, srv361769989=7, srv2055247944=6, srv1184139012=3, srv799865827=8, srv913079707=9} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:27,177 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:27,177 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:27,177 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:27,177 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:27,177 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:27,177 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:27,177 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-11 14:16:27,177 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-11 14:16:27,177 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-11 14:16:27,177 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-11 14:16:27,177 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:27,177 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table75) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:27,177 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table8
2023-07-11 14:16:27,177 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1356571555=4, srv1009132316=0, srv1535657390=5, srv1140009640=2, srv1130403343=1, srv361769989=7, srv2055247944=6, srv1184139012=3, srv799865827=8, srv913079707=9} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:27,178 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:27,178 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:27,178 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:27,178 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:27,178 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:27,178 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:27,178 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-11 14:16:27,178 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-11 14:16:27,178 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-11 14:16:27,178 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-11 14:16:27,178 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:27,178 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table8) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:27,178 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table76
2023-07-11 14:16:27,178 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1356571555=4, srv1009132316=0, srv1535657390=5, srv1140009640=2, srv1130403343=1, srv361769989=7, srv2055247944=6, srv1184139012=3, srv799865827=8, srv913079707=9} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:27,178 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:27,178 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:27,178 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:27,178 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:27,178 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:27,178 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:27,178 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-11 14:16:27,178 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-11 14:16:27,178 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-11 14:16:27,178 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-11 14:16:27,178 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:27,178 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table76) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:27,178 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table7
2023-07-11 14:16:27,178 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1356571555=4, srv1009132316=0, srv1535657390=5, srv1140009640=2, srv1130403343=1, srv361769989=7, srv2055247944=6, srv1184139012=3, srv799865827=8, srv913079707=9} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:27,179 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:27,179 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:27,179 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:27,179 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:27,179 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:27,179 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:27,179 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-11 14:16:27,179 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-11 14:16:27,179 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-11 14:16:27,179 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-11 14:16:27,179 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:27,179 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table7) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:27,179 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table77
2023-07-11 14:16:27,179 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1356571555=4, srv1009132316=0, srv1535657390=5, srv1140009640=2, srv1130403343=1, srv361769989=7, srv2055247944=6, srv1184139012=3, srv799865827=8, srv913079707=9} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:27,179 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:27,179 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:27,179 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:27,179 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:27,179 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:27,179 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:27,179 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-11 14:16:27,179 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-11 14:16:27,179 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-11 14:16:27,179 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-11 14:16:27,179 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:27,179 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table77) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:27,179 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table150
2023-07-11 14:16:27,180 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1356571555=4, srv1009132316=0, srv1535657390=5, srv1140009640=2, srv1130403343=1, srv361769989=7, srv2055247944=6, srv1184139012=3, srv799865827=8, srv913079707=9} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:27,180 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:27,180 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:27,180 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:27,180 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:27,180 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:27,180 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:27,180 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-11 14:16:27,180 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-11 14:16:27,180 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-11 14:16:27,180 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-11 14:16:27,180 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:27,180 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table150) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:27,180 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table6
2023-07-11 14:16:27,180 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1356571555=4, srv1009132316=0, srv1535657390=5, srv1140009640=2, srv1130403343=1, srv361769989=7, srv2055247944=6, srv1184139012=3, srv799865827=8, srv913079707=9} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:27,180 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:27,180 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:27,180 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:27,180 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:27,180 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:27,180 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:27,180 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-11 14:16:27,181 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-11 14:16:27,181 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-11 14:16:27,181 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-11 14:16:27,181 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:27,181 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table6) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:27,181 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table78
2023-07-11 14:16:27,181 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1356571555=4, srv1009132316=0, srv1535657390=5, srv1140009640=2, srv1130403343=1, srv361769989=7, srv2055247944=6, srv1184139012=3, srv799865827=8, srv913079707=9} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:27,181 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:27,181 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:27,181 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:27,181 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:27,181 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:27,181 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:27,181 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-11 14:16:27,181 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-11 14:16:27,181 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-11 14:16:27,181 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-11 14:16:27,181 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:27,181 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table78) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:27,181 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table151
2023-07-11 14:16:27,181 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1356571555=4, srv1009132316=0, srv1535657390=5, srv1140009640=2, srv1130403343=1, srv361769989=7, srv2055247944=6, srv1184139012=3, srv799865827=8, srv913079707=9} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:27,181 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:27,181 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:27,181 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:27,181 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:27,181 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:27,182 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:27,182 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-11 14:16:27,182 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-11 14:16:27,182 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-11 14:16:27,182 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-11 14:16:27,182 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:27,182 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table151) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:27,182 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table68
2023-07-11 14:16:27,182 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1356571555=4, srv1009132316=0, srv1535657390=5, srv1140009640=2, srv1130403343=1, srv361769989=7, srv2055247944=6, srv1184139012=3, srv799865827=8, srv913079707=9} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:27,182 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:27,182 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:27,182 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:27,182 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:27,182 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:27,182 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:27,182 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-11 14:16:27,182 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-11 14:16:27,182 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-11 14:16:27,182 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-11 14:16:27,182 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:27,182 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table68) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:27,182 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table130
2023-07-11 14:16:27,182 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1356571555=4, srv1009132316=0, srv1535657390=5, srv1140009640=2, srv1130403343=1, srv361769989=7, srv2055247944=6, srv1184139012=3, srv799865827=8, srv913079707=9} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:27,182 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:27,182 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:27,182 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:27,182 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:27,183 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:27,183 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:27,183 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-11 14:16:27,183 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-11 14:16:27,183 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-11 14:16:27,183 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-11 14:16:27,183 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:27,183 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table130) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:27,183 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table69
2023-07-11 14:16:27,183 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1356571555=4, srv1009132316=0, srv1535657390=5, srv1140009640=2, srv1130403343=1, srv361769989=7, srv2055247944=6, srv1184139012=3, srv799865827=8, srv913079707=9} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:27,183 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:27,183 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:27,183 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:27,183 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:27,183 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:27,183 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:27,183 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-11 14:16:27,183 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-11 14:16:27,183 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-11 14:16:27,183 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-11 14:16:27,183 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:27,183 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table69) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:27,183 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table131
2023-07-11 14:16:27,183 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1356571555=4, srv1009132316=0, srv1535657390=5, srv1140009640=2, srv1130403343=1, srv361769989=7, srv2055247944=6, srv1184139012=3, srv799865827=8, srv913079707=9} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:27,183 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:27,183 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:27,183 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:27,184 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:27,184 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:27,184 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:27,184 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-11 14:16:27,184 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-11 14:16:27,184 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-11 14:16:27,184 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-11 14:16:27,184 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:27,184 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table131) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:27,184 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table132
2023-07-11 14:16:27,184 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1356571555=4, srv1009132316=0, srv1535657390=5, srv1140009640=2, srv1130403343=1, srv361769989=7, srv2055247944=6, srv1184139012=3, srv799865827=8, srv913079707=9} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:27,184 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:27,184 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:27,184 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:27,184 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:27,184 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:27,184 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:27,184 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-11 14:16:27,184 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-11 14:16:27,184 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-11 14:16:27,184 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-11 14:16:27,184 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:27,184 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table132) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:27,184 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table133
2023-07-11 14:16:27,184 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1356571555=4, srv1009132316=0, srv1535657390=5, srv1140009640=2, srv1130403343=1, srv361769989=7, srv2055247944=6, srv1184139012=3, srv799865827=8, srv913079707=9} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:27,184 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:27,184 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:27,185 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:27,185 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:27,185 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:27,185 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:27,185 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-11 14:16:27,185 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-11 14:16:27,185 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-11 14:16:27,185 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-11 14:16:27,185 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:27,185 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table133) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:27,185 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table134
2023-07-11 14:16:27,185 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1356571555=4, srv1009132316=0, srv1535657390=5, srv1140009640=2, srv1130403343=1, srv361769989=7, srv2055247944=6, srv1184139012=3, srv799865827=8, srv913079707=9} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:27,185 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:27,185 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:27,185 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:27,185 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:27,185 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:27,185 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:27,185 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-11 14:16:27,185 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-11 14:16:27,185 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-11 14:16:27,185 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-11 14:16:27,185 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:27,185 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table134) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:27,185 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table135
2023-07-11 14:16:27,185 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1356571555=4, srv1009132316=0, srv1535657390=5, srv1140009640=2, srv1130403343=1, srv361769989=7, srv2055247944=6, srv1184139012=3, srv799865827=8, srv913079707=9} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:27,185 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:27,186 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:27,186 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:27,186 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:27,186 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:27,186 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:27,186 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-11 14:16:27,186 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-11 14:16:27,186 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-11 14:16:27,186 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-11 14:16:27,186 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:27,186 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table135) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:27,186 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table136
2023-07-11 14:16:27,186 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1356571555=4, srv1009132316=0, srv1535657390=5, srv1140009640=2, srv1130403343=1, srv361769989=7, srv2055247944=6, srv1184139012=3, srv799865827=8, srv913079707=9} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:27,186 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:27,186 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:27,186 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:27,186 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:27,186 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:27,186 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:27,186 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-11 14:16:27,186 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-11 14:16:27,186 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-11 14:16:27,186 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-11 14:16:27,186 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:27,186 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table136) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:27,186 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table137
2023-07-11 14:16:27,186 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1356571555=4, srv1009132316=0, srv1535657390=5, srv1140009640=2, srv1130403343=1, srv361769989=7, srv2055247944=6, srv1184139012=3, srv799865827=8, srv913079707=9} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:27,187 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:27,187 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:27,187 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:27,187 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:27,187 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:27,187 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:27,187 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-11 14:16:27,187 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-11 14:16:27,187 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-11 14:16:27,187 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-11 14:16:27,187 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:27,187 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table137) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:27,187 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table138
2023-07-11 14:16:27,187 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1356571555=4, srv1009132316=0, srv1535657390=5, srv1140009640=2, srv1130403343=1, srv361769989=7, srv2055247944=6, srv1184139012=3, srv799865827=8, srv913079707=9} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:27,187 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:27,187 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:27,187 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:27,187 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:27,187 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:27,187 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:27,187 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-11 14:16:27,187 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-11 14:16:27,187 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-11 14:16:27,187 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-11 14:16:27,187 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:27,187 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table138) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:27,187 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table139
2023-07-11 14:16:27,187 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1356571555=4, srv1009132316=0, srv1535657390=5, srv1140009640=2, srv1130403343=1, srv361769989=7, srv2055247944=6, srv1184139012=3, srv799865827=8, srv913079707=9} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:27,188 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:27,188 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:27,188 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:27,188 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:27,188 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:27,188 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:27,188 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-11 14:16:27,188 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-11 14:16:27,188 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-11 14:16:27,188 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-11 14:16:27,188 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:27,188 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table139) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:27,188 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table60
2023-07-11 14:16:27,188 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1356571555=4, srv1009132316=0, srv1535657390=5, srv1140009640=2, srv1130403343=1, srv361769989=7, srv2055247944=6, srv1184139012=3, srv799865827=8, srv913079707=9} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:27,188 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:27,188 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:27,188 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:27,188 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:27,188 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:27,188 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:27,188 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-11 14:16:27,188 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-11 14:16:27,188 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-11 14:16:27,188 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-11 14:16:27,188 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:27,188 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table60) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:27,188 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table61
2023-07-11 14:16:27,189 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1356571555=4, srv1009132316=0, srv1535657390=5, srv1140009640=2, srv1130403343=1, srv361769989=7, srv2055247944=6, srv1184139012=3, srv799865827=8, srv913079707=9} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:27,189 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:27,189 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:27,189 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:27,189 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:27,189 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:27,189 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:27,189 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-11 14:16:27,189 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-11 14:16:27,189 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-11 14:16:27,189 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-11 14:16:27,189 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:27,189 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table61) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:27,189 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table62
2023-07-11 14:16:27,189 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1356571555=4, srv1009132316=0, srv1535657390=5, srv1140009640=2, srv1130403343=1, srv361769989=7, srv2055247944=6, srv1184139012=3, srv799865827=8, srv913079707=9} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:27,189 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:27,189 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:27,189 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:27,189 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:27,189 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:27,189 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:27,189 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-11 14:16:27,189 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-11 14:16:27,190 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-11 14:16:27,190 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-11 14:16:27,190 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:27,190 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table62) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:27,190 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table63
2023-07-11 14:16:27,190 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1356571555=4, srv1009132316=0, srv1535657390=5, srv1140009640=2, srv1130403343=1, srv361769989=7, srv2055247944=6, srv1184139012=3, srv799865827=8, srv913079707=9} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:27,190 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:27,190 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:27,190 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:27,190 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:27,190 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:27,190 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:27,190 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-11 14:16:27,190 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-11 14:16:27,190 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-11 14:16:27,190 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-11 14:16:27,190 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:27,190 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table63) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:27,190 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table64
2023-07-11 14:16:27,190 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1356571555=4, srv1009132316=0, srv1535657390=5, srv1140009640=2, srv1130403343=1, srv361769989=7, srv2055247944=6, srv1184139012=3, srv799865827=8, srv913079707=9} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:27,191 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:27,191 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:27,191 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:27,191 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:27,191 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:27,191 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:27,191 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-11 14:16:27,191 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-11 14:16:27,191 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-11 14:16:27,191 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-11 14:16:27,191 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:27,191 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table64) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:27,191 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table65
2023-07-11 14:16:27,191 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1356571555=4, srv1009132316=0, srv1535657390=5, srv1140009640=2, srv1130403343=1, srv361769989=7, srv2055247944=6, srv1184139012=3, srv799865827=8, srv913079707=9} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:27,191 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:27,191 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:27,191 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:27,191 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:27,191 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:27,191 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:27,191 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-11 14:16:27,191 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-11 14:16:27,191 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-11 14:16:27,191 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-11 14:16:27,191 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:27,191 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table65) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:27,191 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table66
2023-07-11 14:16:27,192 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1356571555=4, srv1009132316=0, srv1535657390=5, srv1140009640=2, srv1130403343=1, srv361769989=7, srv2055247944=6, srv1184139012=3, srv799865827=8, srv913079707=9} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:27,192 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:27,192 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:27,192 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:27,192 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:27,192 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:27,192 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:27,192 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-11 14:16:27,192 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-11 14:16:27,192 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-11 14:16:27,192 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-11 14:16:27,192 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:27,192 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table66) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:27,192 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table67
2023-07-11 14:16:27,192 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1356571555=4, srv1009132316=0, srv1535657390=5, srv1140009640=2, srv1130403343=1, srv361769989=7, srv2055247944=6, srv1184139012=3, srv799865827=8, srv913079707=9} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:27,192 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:27,192 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:27,192 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:27,192 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:27,192 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:27,192 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:27,192 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-11 14:16:27,192 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-11 14:16:27,192 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-11 14:16:27,192 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-11 14:16:27,192 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:27,192 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table67) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:27,193 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table140
2023-07-11 14:16:27,193 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1356571555=4, srv1009132316=0, srv1535657390=5, srv1140009640=2, srv1130403343=1, srv361769989=7, srv2055247944=6, srv1184139012=3, srv799865827=8, srv913079707=9} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:27,193 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:27,193 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:27,193 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:27,193 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:27,193 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:27,193 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:27,193 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-11 14:16:27,193 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-11 14:16:27,193 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-11 14:16:27,193 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-11 14:16:27,193 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:27,193 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table140) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:27,193 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table57
2023-07-11 14:16:27,193 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1356571555=4, srv1009132316=0, srv1535657390=5, srv1140009640=2, srv1130403343=1, srv361769989=7, srv2055247944=6, srv1184139012=3, srv799865827=8, srv913079707=9} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:27,193 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:27,193 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:27,193 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:27,193 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:27,193 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:27,193 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:27,193 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-11 14:16:27,193 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-11 14:16:27,193 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-11 14:16:27,193 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-11 14:16:27,193 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:27,194 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table57) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:27,194 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table58
2023-07-11 14:16:27,194 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1356571555=4, srv1009132316=0, srv1535657390=5, srv1140009640=2, srv1130403343=1, srv361769989=7, srv2055247944=6, srv1184139012=3, srv799865827=8, srv913079707=9} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:27,194 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:27,194 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:27,194 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:27,194 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:27,194 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:27,194 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:27,194 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-11 14:16:27,194 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-11 14:16:27,194 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-11 14:16:27,194 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-11 14:16:27,194 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:27,194 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table58) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:27,194 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table59
2023-07-11 14:16:27,194 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1356571555=4, srv1009132316=0, srv1535657390=5, srv1140009640=2, srv1130403343=1, srv361769989=7, srv2055247944=6, srv1184139012=3, srv799865827=8, srv913079707=9} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:27,194 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:27,194 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:27,194 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:27,194 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:27,194 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:27,194 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:27,194 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-11 14:16:27,194 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-11 14:16:27,194 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-11 14:16:27,194 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-11 14:16:27,194 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:27,195 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table59) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:27,195 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table50
2023-07-11 14:16:27,195 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1356571555=4, srv1009132316=0, srv1535657390=5, srv1140009640=2, srv1130403343=1, srv361769989=7, srv2055247944=6, srv1184139012=3, srv799865827=8, srv913079707=9} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:27,195 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:27,195 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:27,195 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:27,195 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:27,195 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:27,195 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:27,195 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-11 14:16:27,195 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-11 14:16:27,195 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-11 14:16:27,195 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-11 14:16:27,195 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:27,195 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table50) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:27,195 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table51
2023-07-11 14:16:27,195 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1356571555=4, srv1009132316=0, srv1535657390=5, srv1140009640=2, srv1130403343=1, srv361769989=7, srv2055247944=6, srv1184139012=3, srv799865827=8, srv913079707=9} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:27,195 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:27,195 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:27,195 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:27,195 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:27,195 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:27,195 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:27,195 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-11 14:16:27,195 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-11 14:16:27,195 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-11 14:16:27,195 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-11 14:16:27,195 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:27,196 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table51) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:27,196 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table52
2023-07-11 14:16:27,196 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1356571555=4, srv1009132316=0, srv1535657390=5, srv1140009640=2, srv1130403343=1, srv361769989=7, srv2055247944=6, srv1184139012=3, srv799865827=8, srv913079707=9} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:27,196 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:27,196 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:27,196 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:27,196 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:27,196 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:27,196 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:27,196 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-11 14:16:27,196 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-11 14:16:27,196 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-11 14:16:27,196 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-11 14:16:27,196 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:27,196 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table52) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:27,196 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table53
2023-07-11 14:16:27,196 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1356571555=4, srv1009132316=0, srv1535657390=5, srv1140009640=2, srv1130403343=1, srv361769989=7, srv2055247944=6, srv1184139012=3, srv799865827=8, srv913079707=9} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:27,196 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:27,196 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:27,196 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:27,196 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:27,196 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:27,196 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:27,196 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-11 14:16:27,196 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-11 14:16:27,197 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-11 14:16:27,197 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-11 14:16:27,197 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:27,197 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table53) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:27,197 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table54
2023-07-11 14:16:27,197 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1356571555=4, srv1009132316=0, srv1535657390=5, srv1140009640=2, srv1130403343=1, srv361769989=7, srv2055247944=6, srv1184139012=3, srv799865827=8, srv913079707=9} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:27,197 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:27,197 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:27,197 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:27,197 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:27,197 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:27,197 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:27,197 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-11 14:16:27,197 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-11 14:16:27,197 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-11 14:16:27,197 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-11 14:16:27,197 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:27,197 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table54) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:27,197 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table55
2023-07-11 14:16:27,197 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1356571555=4, srv1009132316=0, srv1535657390=5, srv1140009640=2, srv1130403343=1, srv361769989=7, srv2055247944=6, srv1184139012=3, srv799865827=8, srv913079707=9} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:27,197 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:27,197 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:27,197 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:27,197 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:27,197 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:27,197 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:27,197 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-11 14:16:27,198 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-11 14:16:27,198 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-11 14:16:27,198 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-11 14:16:27,198 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:27,198 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table55) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:27,198 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table56
2023-07-11 14:16:27,198 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1356571555=4, srv1009132316=0, srv1535657390=5, srv1140009640=2, srv1130403343=1, srv361769989=7, srv2055247944=6, srv1184139012=3, srv799865827=8, srv913079707=9} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:27,198 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:27,198 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:27,198 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:27,198 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:27,198 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:27,198 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:27,198 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-11 14:16:27,198 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-11 14:16:27,198 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-11 14:16:27,198 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-11 14:16:27,198 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:27,198 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table56) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:27,198 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table46
2023-07-11 14:16:27,198 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1356571555=4, srv1009132316=0, srv1535657390=5, srv1140009640=2, srv1130403343=1, srv361769989=7, srv2055247944=6, srv1184139012=3, srv799865827=8, srv913079707=9} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:27,198 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:27,198 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:27,198 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:27,198 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:27,198 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:27,198 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:27,199 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-11 14:16:27,199 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-11 14:16:27,199 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-11 14:16:27,199 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-11 14:16:27,199 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:27,199 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table46) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:27,199 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table152
2023-07-11 14:16:27,199 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1356571555=4, srv1009132316=0, srv1535657390=5, srv1140009640=2, srv1130403343=1, srv361769989=7, srv2055247944=6, srv1184139012=3, srv799865827=8, srv913079707=9} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:27,199 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:27,199 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:27,199 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:27,199 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:27,199 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:27,199 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:27,199 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-11 14:16:27,199 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-11 14:16:27,199 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-11 14:16:27,200 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-11 14:16:27,200 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:27,200 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table152) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:27,200 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table47
2023-07-11 14:16:27,200 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1356571555=4, srv1009132316=0, srv1535657390=5, srv1140009640=2, srv1130403343=1, srv361769989=7, srv2055247944=6, srv1184139012=3, srv799865827=8, srv913079707=9} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:27,200 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:27,200 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:27,200 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:27,200 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:27,200 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:27,200 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:27,200 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-11 14:16:27,200 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-11 14:16:27,200 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-11 14:16:27,200 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-11 14:16:27,200 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:27,200 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table47) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:27,200 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table153
2023-07-11 14:16:27,200 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1356571555=4, srv1009132316=0, srv1535657390=5, srv1140009640=2, srv1130403343=1, srv361769989=7, srv2055247944=6, srv1184139012=3, srv799865827=8, srv913079707=9} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:27,200 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:27,200 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:27,200 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:27,200 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:27,200 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:27,200 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:27,200 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-11 14:16:27,201 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-11 14:16:27,201 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-11 14:16:27,201 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-11 14:16:27,201 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:27,201 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table153) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:27,201 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table48
2023-07-11 14:16:27,201 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1356571555=4, srv1009132316=0, srv1535657390=5, srv1140009640=2, srv1130403343=1, srv361769989=7, srv2055247944=6, srv1184139012=3, srv799865827=8, srv913079707=9} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:27,201 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:27,201 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:27,201 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:27,201 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:27,201 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:27,201 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:27,201 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-11 14:16:27,201 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-11 14:16:27,201 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-11 14:16:27,201 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-11 14:16:27,201 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:27,201 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table48) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:27,201 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table154
2023-07-11 14:16:27,201 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1356571555=4, srv1009132316=0, srv1535657390=5, srv1140009640=2, srv1130403343=1, srv361769989=7, srv2055247944=6, srv1184139012=3, srv799865827=8, srv913079707=9} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:27,201 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:27,201 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:27,201 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:27,201 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:27,201 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:27,201 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:27,202 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-11 14:16:27,202 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-11 14:16:27,202 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-11 14:16:27,202 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-11 14:16:27,202 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:27,202 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table154) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:27,202 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table49
2023-07-11 14:16:27,202 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1356571555=4, srv1009132316=0, srv1535657390=5, srv1140009640=2, srv1130403343=1, srv361769989=7, srv2055247944=6, srv1184139012=3, srv799865827=8, srv913079707=9} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:27,202 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:27,202 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:27,202 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:27,202 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:27,202 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:27,202 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:27,202 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-11 14:16:27,202 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-11 14:16:27,202 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-11 14:16:27,202 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-11 14:16:27,202 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:27,202 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table49) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:27,202 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table40
2023-07-11 14:16:27,202 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1356571555=4, srv1009132316=0, srv1535657390=5, srv1140009640=2, srv1130403343=1, srv361769989=7, srv2055247944=6, srv1184139012=3, srv799865827=8, srv913079707=9} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:27,202 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:27,202 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:27,202 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:27,202 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:27,202 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:27,203 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:27,203 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-11 14:16:27,203 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-11 14:16:27,203 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-11 14:16:27,203 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-11 14:16:27,203 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:27,203 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table40) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:27,203 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table41
2023-07-11 14:16:27,203 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1356571555=4, srv1009132316=0, srv1535657390=5, srv1140009640=2, srv1130403343=1, srv361769989=7, srv2055247944=6, srv1184139012=3, srv799865827=8, srv913079707=9} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:27,203 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:27,203 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:27,203 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:27,203 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:27,203 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:27,203 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:27,203 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-11 14:16:27,203 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-11 14:16:27,203 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-11 14:16:27,203 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-11 14:16:27,203 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:27,203 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table41) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:27,203 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table42
2023-07-11 14:16:27,203 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1356571555=4, srv1009132316=0, srv1535657390=5, srv1140009640=2, srv1130403343=1, srv361769989=7, srv2055247944=6, srv1184139012=3, srv799865827=8, srv913079707=9} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:27,203 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:27,203 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:27,203 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:27,203 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:27,204 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:27,204 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:27,204 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-11 14:16:27,204 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-11 14:16:27,204 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-11 14:16:27,204 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-11 14:16:27,204 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:27,204 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table42) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:27,204 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table43
2023-07-11 14:16:27,204 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1356571555=4, srv1009132316=0, srv1535657390=5, srv1140009640=2, srv1130403343=1, srv361769989=7, srv2055247944=6, srv1184139012=3, srv799865827=8, srv913079707=9} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:27,204 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:27,204 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:27,204 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:27,204 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:27,204 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:27,204 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:27,204 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-11 14:16:27,204 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-11 14:16:27,204 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-11 14:16:27,204 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-11 14:16:27,204 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:27,204 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table43) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:27,204 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table44
2023-07-11 14:16:27,204 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1356571555=4, srv1009132316=0, srv1535657390=5, srv1140009640=2, srv1130403343=1, srv361769989=7, srv2055247944=6, srv1184139012=3, srv799865827=8, srv913079707=9} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:27,204 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:27,204 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:27,204 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:27,205 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:27,205 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:27,205 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:27,205 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-11 14:16:27,205 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-11 14:16:27,205 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-11 14:16:27,205 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-11 14:16:27,205 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:27,205 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table44) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:27,205 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table45
2023-07-11 14:16:27,205 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1356571555=4, srv1009132316=0, srv1535657390=5, srv1140009640=2, srv1130403343=1, srv361769989=7, srv2055247944=6, srv1184139012=3, srv799865827=8, srv913079707=9} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:27,205 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:27,205 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:27,205 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:27,205 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:27,205 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:27,205 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:27,205 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-11 14:16:27,205 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-11 14:16:27,205 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-11 14:16:27,205 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-11 14:16:27,205 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:27,205 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table45) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:27,205 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table35
2023-07-11 14:16:27,205 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1356571555=4, srv1009132316=0, srv1535657390=5, srv1140009640=2, srv1130403343=1, srv361769989=7, srv2055247944=6, srv1184139012=3, srv799865827=8, srv913079707=9} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:27,205 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:27,205 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:27,206 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:27,206 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:27,206 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:27,206 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:27,206 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-11 14:16:27,206 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-11 14:16:27,206 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-11 14:16:27,206 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-11 14:16:27,206 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:27,206 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table35) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:27,206 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table36
2023-07-11 14:16:27,206 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1356571555=4, srv1009132316=0, srv1535657390=5, srv1140009640=2, srv1130403343=1, srv361769989=7, srv2055247944=6, srv1184139012=3, srv799865827=8, srv913079707=9} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:27,206 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:27,206 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:27,206 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:27,206 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:27,206 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:27,206 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:27,206 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-11 14:16:27,206 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-11 14:16:27,206 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-11 14:16:27,206 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-11 14:16:27,206 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:27,206 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table36) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:27,206 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table37
2023-07-11 14:16:27,206 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1356571555=4, srv1009132316=0, srv1535657390=5, srv1140009640=2, srv1130403343=1, srv361769989=7, srv2055247944=6, srv1184139012=3, srv799865827=8, srv913079707=9} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:27,206 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:27,207 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:27,207 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:27,207 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:27,207 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:27,207 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:27,207 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-11 14:16:27,207 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-11 14:16:27,207 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-11 14:16:27,207 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-11 14:16:27,207 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:27,207 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table37) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:27,207 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table38
2023-07-11 14:16:27,207 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1356571555=4, srv1009132316=0, srv1535657390=5, srv1140009640=2, srv1130403343=1, srv361769989=7, srv2055247944=6, srv1184139012=3, srv799865827=8, srv913079707=9} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:27,207 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:27,207 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:27,207 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:27,207 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:27,207 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:27,207 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:27,207 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-11 14:16:27,207 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-11 14:16:27,207 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-11 14:16:27,207 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-11 14:16:27,207 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:27,207 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table38) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:27,207 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table100
2023-07-11 14:16:27,207 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1356571555=4, srv1009132316=0, srv1535657390=5, srv1140009640=2, srv1130403343=1, srv361769989=7, srv2055247944=6, srv1184139012=3, srv799865827=8, srv913079707=9} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:27,208 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:27,208 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:27,208 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:27,208 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:27,208 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:27,208 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:27,208 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-11 14:16:27,208 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-11 14:16:27,208 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-11 14:16:27,208 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-11 14:16:27,208 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:27,208 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table100) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:27,208 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table39
2023-07-11 14:16:27,208 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1356571555=4, srv1009132316=0, srv1535657390=5, srv1140009640=2, srv1130403343=1, srv361769989=7, srv2055247944=6, srv1184139012=3, srv799865827=8, srv913079707=9} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:27,208 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:27,208 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:27,208 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:27,208 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:27,208 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:27,208 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:27,209 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-11 14:16:27,209 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-11 14:16:27,209 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-11 14:16:27,209 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-11 14:16:27,209 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:27,209 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table39) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:27,209 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table101
2023-07-11 14:16:27,209 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1356571555=4, srv1009132316=0, srv1535657390=5, srv1140009640=2, srv1130403343=1, srv361769989=7, srv2055247944=6, srv1184139012=3, srv799865827=8, srv913079707=9} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:27,209 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:27,209 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:27,209 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:27,209 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:27,209 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:27,209 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:27,209 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-11 14:16:27,209 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-11 14:16:27,209 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-11 14:16:27,209 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-11 14:16:27,209 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:27,209 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table101) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:27,209 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table102
2023-07-11 14:16:27,209 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1356571555=4, srv1009132316=0, srv1535657390=5, srv1140009640=2, srv1130403343=1, srv361769989=7, srv2055247944=6, srv1184139012=3, srv799865827=8, srv913079707=9} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:27,209 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:27,209 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:27,210 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:27,210 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:27,210 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:27,210 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:27,210 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-11 14:16:27,210 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-11 14:16:27,210 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-11 14:16:27,210 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-11 14:16:27,210 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:27,210 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table102) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:27,210 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table103
2023-07-11 14:16:27,210 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1356571555=4, srv1009132316=0, srv1535657390=5, srv1140009640=2, srv1130403343=1, srv361769989=7, srv2055247944=6, srv1184139012=3, srv799865827=8, srv913079707=9} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:27,210 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:27,210 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:27,210 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:27,210 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:27,210 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:27,210 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:27,210 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-11 14:16:27,210 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-11 14:16:27,210 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-11 14:16:27,210 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-11 14:16:27,210 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:27,210 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table103) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:27,210 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table104
2023-07-11 14:16:27,210 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1356571555=4, srv1009132316=0, srv1535657390=5, srv1140009640=2, srv1130403343=1, srv361769989=7, srv2055247944=6, srv1184139012=3, srv799865827=8, srv913079707=9} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:27,210 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:27,210 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:27,211 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:27,211 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:27,211 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:27,211 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:27,211 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-11 14:16:27,211 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-11 14:16:27,211 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-11 14:16:27,211 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-11 14:16:27,211 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:27,211 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table104) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:27,211 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table105
2023-07-11 14:16:27,211 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1356571555=4, srv1009132316=0, srv1535657390=5, srv1140009640=2, srv1130403343=1, srv361769989=7, srv2055247944=6, srv1184139012=3, srv799865827=8, srv913079707=9} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:27,211 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:27,211 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:27,211 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:27,211 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:27,211 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:27,211 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:27,211 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-11 14:16:27,211 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-11 14:16:27,211 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-11 14:16:27,211 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-11 14:16:27,211 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:27,211 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table105) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:27,211 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table106
2023-07-11 14:16:27,211 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1356571555=4, srv1009132316=0, srv1535657390=5, srv1140009640=2, srv1130403343=1, srv361769989=7, srv2055247944=6, srv1184139012=3, srv799865827=8, srv913079707=9} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:27,212 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:27,212 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:27,212 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:27,212 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:27,212 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:27,212 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:27,212 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-11 14:16:27,212 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-11 14:16:27,212 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-11 14:16:27,212 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-11 14:16:27,212 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:27,212 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table106) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:27,212 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table107
2023-07-11 14:16:27,212 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1356571555=4, srv1009132316=0, srv1535657390=5, srv1140009640=2, srv1130403343=1, srv361769989=7, srv2055247944=6, srv1184139012=3, srv799865827=8, srv913079707=9} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:27,212 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:27,212 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:27,212 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:27,212 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:27,212 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:27,212 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:27,212 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-11 14:16:27,212 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-11 14:16:27,212 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-11 14:16:27,212 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-11 14:16:27,212 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:27,212 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table107) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:27,213 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table108
2023-07-11 14:16:27,213 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1356571555=4, srv1009132316=0, srv1535657390=5, srv1140009640=2, srv1130403343=1, srv361769989=7, srv2055247944=6, srv1184139012=3, srv799865827=8, srv913079707=9} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:27,213 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:27,213 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:27,213 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:27,213 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:27,213 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:27,213 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:27,213 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-11 14:16:27,213 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-11 14:16:27,213 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-11 14:16:27,213 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-11 14:16:27,213 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:27,213 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table108) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:27,213 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table109
2023-07-11 14:16:27,213 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1356571555=4, srv1009132316=0, srv1535657390=5, srv1140009640=2, srv1130403343=1, srv361769989=7, srv2055247944=6, srv1184139012=3, srv799865827=8, srv913079707=9} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:27,213 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:27,213 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:27,213 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:27,213 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:27,213 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:27,213 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:27,213 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-11 14:16:27,213 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-11 14:16:27,213 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-11 14:16:27,213 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-11 14:16:27,213 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:27,214 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table109) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:27,214 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table30
2023-07-11 14:16:27,214 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1356571555=4, srv1009132316=0, srv1535657390=5, srv1140009640=2, srv1130403343=1, srv361769989=7, srv2055247944=6, srv1184139012=3, srv799865827=8, srv913079707=9} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:27,214 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:27,214 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:27,214 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:27,214 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:27,214 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:27,214 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:27,214 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-11 14:16:27,214 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-11 14:16:27,214 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-11 14:16:27,214 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-11 14:16:27,214 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:27,214 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table30) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:27,214 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table31
2023-07-11 14:16:27,214 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1356571555=4, srv1009132316=0, srv1535657390=5, srv1140009640=2, srv1130403343=1, srv361769989=7, srv2055247944=6, srv1184139012=3, srv799865827=8, srv913079707=9} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:27,214 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:27,214 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:27,214 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:27,214 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:27,214 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:27,214 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:27,214 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-11 14:16:27,214 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-11 14:16:27,214 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-11 14:16:27,214 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-11 14:16:27,215 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:27,215 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table31) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:27,215 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table32
2023-07-11 14:16:27,215 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1356571555=4, srv1009132316=0, srv1535657390=5, srv1140009640=2, srv1130403343=1, srv361769989=7, srv2055247944=6, srv1184139012=3, srv799865827=8, srv913079707=9} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:27,215 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:27,215 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:27,215 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:27,215 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:27,215 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:27,215 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:27,215 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-11 14:16:27,215 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-11 14:16:27,215 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-11 14:16:27,215 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-11 14:16:27,215 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:27,215 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table32) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:27,215 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table33
2023-07-11 14:16:27,215 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1356571555=4, srv1009132316=0, srv1535657390=5, srv1140009640=2, srv1130403343=1, srv361769989=7, srv2055247944=6, srv1184139012=3, srv799865827=8, srv913079707=9} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:27,215 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:27,215 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:27,215 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:27,215 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:27,215 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:27,215 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:27,215 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-11 14:16:27,215 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-11 14:16:27,215 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-11 14:16:27,215 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-11 14:16:27,216 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:27,216 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table33) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:27,216 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table34
2023-07-11 14:16:27,216 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1356571555=4, srv1009132316=0, srv1535657390=5, srv1140009640=2, srv1130403343=1, srv361769989=7, srv2055247944=6, srv1184139012=3, srv799865827=8, srv913079707=9} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:27,216 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:27,216 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:27,216 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:27,216 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:27,216 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:27,216 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:27,216 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-11 14:16:27,216 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-11 14:16:27,216 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-11 14:16:27,216 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-11 14:16:27,216 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:27,216 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table34) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:27,216 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table24
2023-07-11 14:16:27,216 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1356571555=4, srv1009132316=0, srv1535657390=5, srv1140009640=2, srv1130403343=1, srv361769989=7, srv2055247944=6, srv1184139012=3, srv799865827=8, srv913079707=9} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:27,216 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:27,216 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:27,216 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:27,216 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:27,216 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:27,216 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:27,216 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-11 14:16:27,216 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-11 14:16:27,216 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-11 14:16:27,217 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-11 14:16:27,217 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:27,217 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table24) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:27,217 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table25
2023-07-11 14:16:27,217 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1356571555=4, srv1009132316=0, srv1535657390=5, srv1140009640=2, srv1130403343=1, srv361769989=7, srv2055247944=6, srv1184139012=3, srv799865827=8, srv913079707=9} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:27,217 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:27,217 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:27,217 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:27,217 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:27,217 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:27,217 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:27,217 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-11 14:16:27,217 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-11 14:16:27,217 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-11 14:16:27,217 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-11 14:16:27,217 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:27,217 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table25) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:27,217 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table26
2023-07-11 14:16:27,217 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1356571555=4, srv1009132316=0, srv1535657390=5, srv1140009640=2, srv1130403343=1, srv361769989=7, srv2055247944=6, srv1184139012=3, srv799865827=8, srv913079707=9} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:27,217 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:27,217 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:27,217 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:27,217 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:27,217 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:27,217 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:27,217 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-11 14:16:27,218 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-11 14:16:27,218 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-11 14:16:27,218 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-11 14:16:27,218 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:27,218 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table26) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:27,218 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table27
2023-07-11 14:16:27,218 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1356571555=4, srv1009132316=0, srv1535657390=5, srv1140009640=2, srv1130403343=1, srv361769989=7, srv2055247944=6, srv1184139012=3, srv799865827=8, srv913079707=9} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:27,218 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:27,218 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:27,218 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:27,218 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:27,218 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:27,218 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:27,218 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-11 14:16:27,218 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-11 14:16:27,218 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-11 14:16:27,218 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-11 14:16:27,218 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:27,218 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table27) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:27,218 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table28
2023-07-11 14:16:27,219 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1356571555=4, srv1009132316=0, srv1535657390=5, srv1140009640=2, srv1130403343=1, srv361769989=7, srv2055247944=6, srv1184139012=3, srv799865827=8, srv913079707=9} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:27,219 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:27,219 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:27,219 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:27,219 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:27,219 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:27,219 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:27,219 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-11 14:16:27,219 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-11 14:16:27,219 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-11 14:16:27,219 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-11 14:16:27,219 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:27,219 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table28) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:27,219 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table29
2023-07-11 14:16:27,219 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1356571555=4, srv1009132316=0, srv1535657390=5, srv1140009640=2, srv1130403343=1, srv361769989=7, srv2055247944=6, srv1184139012=3, srv799865827=8, srv913079707=9} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:27,219 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:27,219 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:27,219 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:27,219 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:27,219 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:27,219 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:27,219 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-11 14:16:27,219 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-11 14:16:27,219 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-11 14:16:27,219 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-11 14:16:27,219 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:27,219 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table29) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:27,220 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table20
2023-07-11 14:16:27,220 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1356571555=4, srv1009132316=0, srv1535657390=5, srv1140009640=2, srv1130403343=1, srv361769989=7, srv2055247944=6, srv1184139012=3, srv799865827=8, srv913079707=9} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:27,220 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:27,220 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:27,220 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:27,220 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:27,220 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:27,220 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:27,220 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-11 14:16:27,220 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-11 14:16:27,220 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-11 14:16:27,220 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-11 14:16:27,220 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:27,220 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table20) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:27,220 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table21
2023-07-11 14:16:27,220 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1356571555=4, srv1009132316=0, srv1535657390=5, srv1140009640=2, srv1130403343=1, srv361769989=7, srv2055247944=6, srv1184139012=3, srv799865827=8, srv913079707=9} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:27,220 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:27,220 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:27,220 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:27,220 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:27,220 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:27,220 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:27,220 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-11 14:16:27,220 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-11 14:16:27,220 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-11 14:16:27,220 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-11 14:16:27,220 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:27,221 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table21) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:27,221 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table22
2023-07-11 14:16:27,221 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1356571555=4, srv1009132316=0, srv1535657390=5, srv1140009640=2, srv1130403343=1, srv361769989=7, srv2055247944=6, srv1184139012=3, srv799865827=8, srv913079707=9} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:27,221 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:27,221 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:27,221 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:27,221 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:27,221 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:27,221 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:27,221 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-11 14:16:27,221 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-11 14:16:27,221 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-11 14:16:27,221 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-11 14:16:27,221 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:27,221 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table22) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:27,221 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table23
2023-07-11 14:16:27,221 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1356571555=4, srv1009132316=0, srv1535657390=5, srv1140009640=2, srv1130403343=1, srv361769989=7, srv2055247944=6, srv1184139012=3, srv799865827=8, srv913079707=9} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:27,221 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:27,221 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:27,221 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:27,221 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:27,221 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:27,221 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:27,221 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-11 14:16:27,221 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-11 14:16:27,221 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-11 14:16:27,221 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-11 14:16:27,222 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:27,222 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table23) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:27,222 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table13
2023-07-11 14:16:27,222 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1863359002=5, srv1287066904=1, srv1452470698=2, srv1583217752=3, srv1604151993=4, srv1187684755=0, srv421313973=6, srv861718013=7} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:27,222 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:27,222 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:27,222 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:27,222 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:27,222 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:27,222 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:27,222 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-11 14:16:27,222 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-11 14:16:27,222 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=8, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:27,222 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table13) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:27,222 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table5
2023-07-11 14:16:27,222 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1863359002=5, srv1287066904=1, srv1452470698=2, srv1583217752=3, srv1604151993=4, srv1187684755=0, srv421313973=6, srv861718013=7} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:27,222 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:27,223 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:27,223 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:27,223 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:27,223 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:27,223 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:27,223 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-11 14:16:27,223 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-11 14:16:27,223 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=8, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:27,223 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table5) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:27,223 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table4
2023-07-11 14:16:27,223 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1863359002=5, srv1287066904=1, srv1452470698=2, srv1583217752=3, srv1604151993=4, srv1187684755=0, srv421313973=6, srv861718013=7} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:27,223 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:27,223 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:27,223 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:27,223 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:27,223 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:27,223 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:27,223 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-11 14:16:27,223 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-11 14:16:27,223 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=8, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:27,223 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table4) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:27,223 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table3
2023-07-11 14:16:27,223 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1863359002=5, srv1287066904=1, srv1452470698=2, srv1583217752=3, srv1604151993=4, srv1187684755=0, srv421313973=6, srv861718013=7} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:27,223 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:27,223 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:27,224 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:27,224 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:27,224 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:27,224 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:27,224 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-11 14:16:27,224 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-11 14:16:27,224 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=8, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:27,224 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table3) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:27,224 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table2
2023-07-11 14:16:27,224 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1863359002=5, srv1287066904=1, srv1452470698=2, srv1583217752=3, srv1604151993=4, srv1187684755=0, srv421313973=6, srv861718013=7} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:27,224 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:27,224 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:27,224 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:27,224 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:27,224 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:27,224 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:27,224 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-11 14:16:27,224 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-11 14:16:27,224 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=8, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:27,224 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table2) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:27,224 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1
2023-07-11 14:16:27,224 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1863359002=5, srv1287066904=1, srv1452470698=2, srv1583217752=3, srv1604151993=4, srv1187684755=0, srv421313973=6, srv861718013=7} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:27,224 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:27,224 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:27,224 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:27,224 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:27,225 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:27,225 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:27,225 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-11 14:16:27,225 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-11 14:16:27,225 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=8, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:27,225 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:27,225 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table0
2023-07-11 14:16:27,225 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1863359002=5, srv1287066904=1, srv1452470698=2, srv1583217752=3, srv1604151993=4, srv1187684755=0, srv421313973=6, srv861718013=7} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:27,225 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:27,225 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:27,225 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:27,225 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:27,225 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:27,225 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:27,225 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-11 14:16:27,225 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-11 14:16:27,225 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=8, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:27,225 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table0) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:27,225 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table9
2023-07-11 14:16:27,225 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1863359002=5, srv1287066904=1, srv1452470698=2, srv1583217752=3, srv1604151993=4, srv1187684755=0, srv421313973=6, srv861718013=7} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:27,225 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:27,225 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:27,225 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:27,225 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:27,225 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:27,225 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:27,226 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-11 14:16:27,226 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-11 14:16:27,226 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=8, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:27,226 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table9) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:27,226 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table8
2023-07-11 14:16:27,226 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1863359002=5, srv1287066904=1, srv1452470698=2, srv1583217752=3, srv1604151993=4, srv1187684755=0, srv421313973=6, srv861718013=7} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:27,226 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:27,226 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:27,226 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:27,226 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:27,226 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:27,226 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:27,226 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-11 14:16:27,226 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-11 14:16:27,226 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=8, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:27,226 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table8) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:27,226 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table10
2023-07-11 14:16:27,226 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1863359002=5, srv1287066904=1, srv1452470698=2, srv1583217752=3, srv1604151993=4, srv1187684755=0, srv421313973=6, srv861718013=7} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:27,226 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:27,226 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:27,226 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:27,226 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:27,226 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:27,226 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:27,226 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-11 14:16:27,226 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-11 14:16:27,227 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=8, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:27,227 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table10) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:27,227 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table7
2023-07-11 14:16:27,227 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1863359002=5, srv1287066904=1, srv1452470698=2, srv1583217752=3, srv1604151993=4, srv1187684755=0, srv421313973=6, srv861718013=7} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:27,227 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:27,227 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:27,227 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:27,227 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:27,227 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:27,227 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:27,227 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-11 14:16:27,227 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-11 14:16:27,227 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=8, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:27,227 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table7) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:27,227 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table11
2023-07-11 14:16:27,227 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1863359002=5, srv1287066904=1, srv1452470698=2, srv1583217752=3, srv1604151993=4, srv1187684755=0, srv421313973=6, srv861718013=7} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:27,227 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:27,227 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:27,227 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:27,227 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:27,228 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:27,228 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:27,228 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-11 14:16:27,228 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-11 14:16:27,228 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=8, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:27,228 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table11) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:27,228 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table6
2023-07-11 14:16:27,228 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1863359002=5, srv1287066904=1, srv1452470698=2, srv1583217752=3, srv1604151993=4, srv1187684755=0, srv421313973=6, srv861718013=7} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:27,228 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:27,228 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:27,228 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:27,228 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:27,228 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:27,228 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:27,228 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-11 14:16:27,228 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-11 14:16:27,228 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=8, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:27,228 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table6) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:27,228 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table12
2023-07-11 14:16:27,228 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1863359002=5, srv1287066904=1, srv1452470698=2, srv1583217752=3, srv1604151993=4, srv1187684755=0, srv421313973=6, srv861718013=7} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:27,228 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:27,228 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:27,228 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:27,229 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:27,229 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:27,229 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:27,229 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-11 14:16:27,229 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-11 14:16:27,229 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=8, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:27,229 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table12) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:27,229 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table13
2023-07-11 14:16:27,229 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1888880642=5, srv1388904411=2, srv1777487803=4, srv1535891114=3, srv808660541=7, srv50075062=6, srv1009094249=0, srv1094792817=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:27,229 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:27,229 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:27,229 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:27,229 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:27,229 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:27,229 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:27,229 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-11 14:16:27,229 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-11 14:16:27,229 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=8, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:27,230 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table13) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:27,230 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table5
2023-07-11 14:16:27,230 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1888880642=5, srv1388904411=2, srv1777487803=4, srv1535891114=3, srv808660541=7, srv50075062=6, srv1009094249=0, srv1094792817=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:27,230 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:27,230 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:27,230 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:27,230 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:27,230 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:27,230 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:27,230 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-11 14:16:27,230 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-11 14:16:27,230 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=8, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:27,230 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table5) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:27,230 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table4
2023-07-11 14:16:27,230 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1888880642=5, srv1388904411=2, srv1777487803=4, srv1535891114=3, srv808660541=7, srv50075062=6, srv1009094249=0, srv1094792817=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:27,230 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:27,230 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:27,230 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:27,230 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:27,230 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:27,230 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:27,230 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-11 14:16:27,230 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-11 14:16:27,230 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=8, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:27,230 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table4) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:27,231 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table3
2023-07-11 14:16:27,231 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1888880642=5, srv1388904411=2, srv1777487803=4, srv1535891114=3, srv808660541=7, srv50075062=6, srv1009094249=0, srv1094792817=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:27,231 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:27,231 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:27,231 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:27,231 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:27,231 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:27,231 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:27,231 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-11 14:16:27,231 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-11 14:16:27,231 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=8, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:27,231 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table3) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:27,231 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table2
2023-07-11 14:16:27,231 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1888880642=5, srv1388904411=2, srv1777487803=4, srv1535891114=3, srv808660541=7, srv50075062=6, srv1009094249=0, srv1094792817=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:27,231 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:27,231 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:27,231 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:27,231 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:27,231 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:27,231 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:27,231 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-11 14:16:27,231 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-11 14:16:27,231 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=8, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:27,231 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table2) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:27,231 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1
2023-07-11 14:16:27,231 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1888880642=5, srv1388904411=2, srv1777487803=4, srv1535891114=3, srv808660541=7, srv50075062=6, srv1009094249=0, srv1094792817=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:27,232 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:27,232 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:27,232 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:27,232 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:27,232 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:27,232 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:27,232 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-11 14:16:27,232 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-11 14:16:27,232 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=8, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:27,232 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:27,232 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table0
2023-07-11 14:16:27,232 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1888880642=5, srv1388904411=2, srv1777487803=4, srv1535891114=3, srv808660541=7, srv50075062=6, srv1009094249=0, srv1094792817=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:27,232 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:27,232 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:27,232 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:27,232 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:27,232 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:27,232 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:27,232 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-11 14:16:27,232 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-11 14:16:27,232 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=8, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:27,232 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table0) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:27,232 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table9
2023-07-11 14:16:27,232 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1888880642=5, srv1388904411=2, srv1777487803=4, srv1535891114=3, srv808660541=7, srv50075062=6, srv1009094249=0, srv1094792817=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:27,232 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:27,233 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:27,233 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:27,233 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:27,233 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:27,233 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:27,233 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-11 14:16:27,233 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-11 14:16:27,233 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=8, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:27,233 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table9) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:27,233 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table8
2023-07-11 14:16:27,233 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1888880642=5, srv1388904411=2, srv1777487803=4, srv1535891114=3, srv808660541=7, srv50075062=6, srv1009094249=0, srv1094792817=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:27,233 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:27,233 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:27,233 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:27,233 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:27,233 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:27,233 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:27,233 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-11 14:16:27,233 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-11 14:16:27,233 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=8, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:27,233 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table8) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:27,233 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table10
2023-07-11 14:16:27,233 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1888880642=5, srv1388904411=2, srv1777487803=4, srv1535891114=3, srv808660541=7, srv50075062=6, srv1009094249=0, srv1094792817=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:27,233 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:27,233 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:27,233 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:27,234 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:27,234 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:27,234 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:27,234 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-11 14:16:27,234 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-11 14:16:27,234 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=8, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:27,234 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table10) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:27,234 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table7
2023-07-11 14:16:27,234 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1888880642=5, srv1388904411=2, srv1777487803=4, srv1535891114=3, srv808660541=7, srv50075062=6, srv1009094249=0, srv1094792817=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:27,234 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:27,234 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:27,234 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:27,234 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:27,234 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:27,234 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:27,234 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-11 14:16:27,234 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-11 14:16:27,234 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=8, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:27,234 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table7) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:27,234 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table11
2023-07-11 14:16:27,234 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1888880642=5, srv1388904411=2, srv1777487803=4, srv1535891114=3, srv808660541=7, srv50075062=6, srv1009094249=0, srv1094792817=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:27,234 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:27,234 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:27,234 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:27,234 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:27,234 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:27,234 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:27,235 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-11 14:16:27,235 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-11 14:16:27,235 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=8, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:27,235 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table11) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:27,235 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table6
2023-07-11 14:16:27,235 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1888880642=5, srv1388904411=2, srv1777487803=4, srv1535891114=3, srv808660541=7, srv50075062=6, srv1009094249=0, srv1094792817=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:27,235 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:27,235 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:27,235 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:27,235 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:27,235 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:27,235 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:27,235 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-11 14:16:27,235 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-11 14:16:27,235 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=8, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:27,235 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table6) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:27,235 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table12
2023-07-11 14:16:27,235 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1888880642=5, srv1388904411=2, srv1777487803=4, srv1535891114=3, srv808660541=7, srv50075062=6, srv1009094249=0, srv1094792817=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:27,235 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:27,235 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:27,235 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:27,235 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:27,235 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:27,235 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:27,235 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-11 14:16:27,235 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-11 14:16:27,235 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=8, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:27,236 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table12) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:27,237 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table13
2023-07-11 14:16:27,237 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1446145749=0, srv161639880=1, srv1981301497=5, srv1783490001=3, srv784598921=7, srv1941943844=4, srv773014314=6, srv1735768141=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:27,237 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:27,237 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:27,237 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:27,237 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:27,237 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:27,237 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:27,237 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-11 14:16:27,237 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-11 14:16:27,237 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=8, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:27,237 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table13) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:27,237 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table14
2023-07-11 14:16:27,237 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1446145749=0, srv161639880=1, srv1981301497=5, srv1783490001=3, srv784598921=7, srv1941943844=4, srv773014314=6, srv1735768141=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:27,237 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:27,237 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:27,237 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:27,237 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:27,237 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:27,237 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:27,237 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-11 14:16:27,237 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-11 14:16:27,238 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=8, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:27,238 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table14) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:27,238 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table120
2023-07-11 14:16:27,238 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1446145749=0, srv161639880=1, srv1981301497=5, srv1783490001=3, srv784598921=7, srv1941943844=4, srv773014314=6, srv1735768141=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:27,238 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:27,238 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:27,238 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:27,238 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:27,238 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:27,238 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:27,238 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-11 14:16:27,238 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-11 14:16:27,238 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=8, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:27,238 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table120) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:27,238 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table15
2023-07-11 14:16:27,238 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1446145749=0, srv161639880=1, srv1981301497=5, srv1783490001=3, srv784598921=7, srv1941943844=4, srv773014314=6, srv1735768141=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:27,238 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:27,238 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:27,239 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:27,239 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:27,239 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:27,239 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:27,239 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-11 14:16:27,239 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-11 14:16:27,239 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=8, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:27,239 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table15) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:27,239 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table121
2023-07-11 14:16:27,239 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1446145749=0, srv161639880=1, srv1981301497=5, srv1783490001=3, srv784598921=7, srv1941943844=4, srv773014314=6, srv1735768141=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:27,239 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:27,239 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:27,239 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:27,239 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:27,239 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:27,239 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:27,239 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-11 14:16:27,239 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-11 14:16:27,239 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=8, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:27,239 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table121) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:27,239 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table16
2023-07-11 14:16:27,239 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1446145749=0, srv161639880=1, srv1981301497=5, srv1783490001=3, srv784598921=7, srv1941943844=4, srv773014314=6, srv1735768141=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:27,239 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:27,240 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:27,240 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:27,240 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:27,240 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:27,240 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:27,240 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-11 14:16:27,240 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-11 14:16:27,240 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=8, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:27,240 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table16) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:27,240 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table122
2023-07-11 14:16:27,240 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1446145749=0, srv161639880=1, srv1981301497=5, srv1783490001=3, srv784598921=7, srv1941943844=4, srv773014314=6, srv1735768141=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:27,240 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:27,240 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:27,240 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:27,240 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:27,240 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:27,240 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:27,240 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-11 14:16:27,240 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-11 14:16:27,240 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=8, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:27,240 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table122) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:27,240 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table17
2023-07-11 14:16:27,240 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1446145749=0, srv161639880=1, srv1981301497=5, srv1783490001=3, srv784598921=7, srv1941943844=4, srv773014314=6, srv1735768141=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:27,240 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:27,240 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:27,240 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:27,240 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:27,241 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:27,241 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:27,241 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-11 14:16:27,241 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-11 14:16:27,241 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=8, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:27,241 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table17) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:27,241 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table123
2023-07-11 14:16:27,241 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1446145749=0, srv161639880=1, srv1981301497=5, srv1783490001=3, srv784598921=7, srv1941943844=4, srv773014314=6, srv1735768141=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:27,241 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:27,241 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:27,241 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:27,241 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:27,241 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:27,241 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:27,241 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-11 14:16:27,241 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-11 14:16:27,241 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=8, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:27,241 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table123) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:27,241 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table18
2023-07-11 14:16:27,241 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1446145749=0, srv161639880=1, srv1981301497=5, srv1783490001=3, srv784598921=7, srv1941943844=4, srv773014314=6, srv1735768141=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:27,241 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:27,241 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:27,241 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:27,241 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:27,241 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:27,241 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:27,242 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-11 14:16:27,242 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-11 14:16:27,242 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=8, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:27,242 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table18) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:27,242 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table124
2023-07-11 14:16:27,242 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1446145749=0, srv161639880=1, srv1981301497=5, srv1783490001=3, srv784598921=7, srv1941943844=4, srv773014314=6, srv1735768141=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:27,242 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:27,242 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:27,242 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:27,242 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:27,242 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:27,242 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:27,242 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-11 14:16:27,242 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-11 14:16:27,242 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=8, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:27,242 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table124) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:27,242 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table19
2023-07-11 14:16:27,242 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1446145749=0, srv161639880=1, srv1981301497=5, srv1783490001=3, srv784598921=7, srv1941943844=4, srv773014314=6, srv1735768141=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:27,242 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:27,242 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:27,242 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:27,242 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:27,242 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:27,242 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:27,242 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-11 14:16:27,242 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-11 14:16:27,242 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=8, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:27,243 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table19) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:27,243 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table125
2023-07-11 14:16:27,243 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1446145749=0, srv161639880=1, srv1981301497=5, srv1783490001=3, srv784598921=7, srv1941943844=4, srv773014314=6, srv1735768141=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:27,243 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:27,243 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:27,243 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:27,243 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:27,243 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:27,243 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:27,243 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-11 14:16:27,243 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-11 14:16:27,243 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=8, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:27,243 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table125) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:27,243 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table126
2023-07-11 14:16:27,243 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1446145749=0, srv161639880=1, srv1981301497=5, srv1783490001=3, srv784598921=7, srv1941943844=4, srv773014314=6, srv1735768141=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:27,243 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:27,243 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:27,243 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:27,243 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:27,243 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:27,243 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:27,243 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-11 14:16:27,243 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-11 14:16:27,243 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=8, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:27,243 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table126) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:27,243 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table127
2023-07-11 14:16:27,243 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1446145749=0, srv161639880=1, srv1981301497=5, srv1783490001=3, srv784598921=7, srv1941943844=4, srv773014314=6, srv1735768141=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:27,244 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:27,244 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:27,244 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:27,244 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:27,244 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:27,244 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:27,244 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-11 14:16:27,244 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-11 14:16:27,244 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=8, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:27,244 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table127) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:27,244 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table128
2023-07-11 14:16:27,244 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1446145749=0, srv161639880=1, srv1981301497=5, srv1783490001=3, srv784598921=7, srv1941943844=4, srv773014314=6, srv1735768141=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:27,244 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:27,244 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:27,244 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:27,244 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:27,244 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:27,244 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:27,244 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-11 14:16:27,244 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-11 14:16:27,244 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=8, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:27,244 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table128) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:27,244 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table129
2023-07-11 14:16:27,244 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1446145749=0, srv161639880=1, srv1981301497=5, srv1783490001=3, srv784598921=7, srv1941943844=4, srv773014314=6, srv1735768141=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:27,244 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:27,244 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:27,244 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:27,245 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:27,245 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:27,245 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:27,245 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-11 14:16:27,245 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-11 14:16:27,245 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=8, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:27,245 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table129) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:27,245 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table90
2023-07-11 14:16:27,245 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1446145749=0, srv161639880=1, srv1981301497=5, srv1783490001=3, srv784598921=7, srv1941943844=4, srv773014314=6, srv1735768141=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:27,245 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:27,245 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:27,245 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:27,245 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:27,245 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:27,245 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:27,245 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-11 14:16:27,245 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-11 14:16:27,245 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=8, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:27,245 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table90) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:27,245 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table91
2023-07-11 14:16:27,245 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1446145749=0, srv161639880=1, srv1981301497=5, srv1783490001=3, srv784598921=7, srv1941943844=4, srv773014314=6, srv1735768141=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:27,245 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:27,245 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:27,245 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:27,245 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:27,245 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:27,245 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:27,246 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-11 14:16:27,246 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-11 14:16:27,246 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=8, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:27,246 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table91) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:27,246 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table92
2023-07-11 14:16:27,246 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1446145749=0, srv161639880=1, srv1981301497=5, srv1783490001=3, srv784598921=7, srv1941943844=4, srv773014314=6, srv1735768141=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:27,246 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:27,246 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:27,246 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:27,246 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:27,246 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:27,246 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:27,246 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-11 14:16:27,246 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-11 14:16:27,246 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=8, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:27,246 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table92) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:27,246 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table93
2023-07-11 14:16:27,246 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1446145749=0, srv161639880=1, srv1981301497=5, srv1783490001=3, srv784598921=7, srv1941943844=4, srv773014314=6, srv1735768141=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:27,246 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:27,246 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:27,246 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:27,246 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:27,246 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:27,246 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:27,246 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-11 14:16:27,246 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-11 14:16:27,246 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=8, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:27,247 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table93) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:27,247 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table94
2023-07-11 14:16:27,247 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1446145749=0, srv161639880=1, srv1981301497=5, srv1783490001=3, srv784598921=7, srv1941943844=4, srv773014314=6, srv1735768141=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:27,247 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:27,247 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:27,247 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:27,247 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:27,247 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:27,247 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:27,247 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-11 14:16:27,247 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-11 14:16:27,247 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=8, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:27,247 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table94) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:27,247 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table95
2023-07-11 14:16:27,247 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1446145749=0, srv161639880=1, srv1981301497=5, srv1783490001=3, srv784598921=7, srv1941943844=4, srv773014314=6, srv1735768141=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:27,247 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:27,247 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:27,247 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:27,247 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:27,247 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:27,247 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:27,248 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-11 14:16:27,248 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-11 14:16:27,248 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=8, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:27,248 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table95) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:27,248 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table96
2023-07-11 14:16:27,248 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1446145749=0, srv161639880=1, srv1981301497=5, srv1783490001=3, srv784598921=7, srv1941943844=4, srv773014314=6, srv1735768141=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:27,248 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:27,248 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:27,248 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:27,248 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:27,248 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:27,248 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:27,248 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-11 14:16:27,248 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-11 14:16:27,248 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=8, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:27,248 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table96) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:27,248 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table97
2023-07-11 14:16:27,248 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1446145749=0, srv161639880=1, srv1981301497=5, srv1783490001=3, srv784598921=7, srv1941943844=4, srv773014314=6, srv1735768141=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:27,248 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:27,248 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:27,248 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:27,249 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:27,249 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:27,249 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:27,249 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-11 14:16:27,249 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-11 14:16:27,249 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=8, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:27,249 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table97) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:27,249 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table10
2023-07-11 14:16:27,249 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1446145749=0, srv161639880=1, srv1981301497=5, srv1783490001=3, srv784598921=7, srv1941943844=4, srv773014314=6, srv1735768141=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:27,249 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:27,249 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:27,249 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:27,249 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:27,249 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:27,249 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:27,249 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-11 14:16:27,249 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-11 14:16:27,249 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=8, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:27,249 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table10) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:27,249 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table98
2023-07-11 14:16:27,249 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1446145749=0, srv161639880=1, srv1981301497=5, srv1783490001=3, srv784598921=7, srv1941943844=4, srv773014314=6, srv1735768141=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:27,249 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:27,249 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:27,249 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:27,249 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:27,249 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:27,250 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:27,250 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-11 14:16:27,250 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-11 14:16:27,250 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=8, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:27,250 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table98) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:27,250 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table11
2023-07-11 14:16:27,250 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1446145749=0, srv161639880=1, srv1981301497=5, srv1783490001=3, srv784598921=7, srv1941943844=4, srv773014314=6, srv1735768141=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:27,250 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:27,250 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:27,250 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:27,250 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:27,250 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:27,250 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:27,250 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-11 14:16:27,250 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-11 14:16:27,250 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=8, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:27,250 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table11) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:27,250 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table99
2023-07-11 14:16:27,250 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1446145749=0, srv161639880=1, srv1981301497=5, srv1783490001=3, srv784598921=7, srv1941943844=4, srv773014314=6, srv1735768141=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:27,250 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:27,250 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:27,250 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:27,250 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:27,251 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:27,251 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:27,251 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-11 14:16:27,251 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-11 14:16:27,251 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=8, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:27,251 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table99) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:27,251 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table12
2023-07-11 14:16:27,251 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1446145749=0, srv161639880=1, srv1981301497=5, srv1783490001=3, srv784598921=7, srv1941943844=4, srv773014314=6, srv1735768141=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:27,251 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:27,251 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:27,251 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:27,251 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:27,251 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:27,251 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:27,251 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-11 14:16:27,251 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-11 14:16:27,251 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=8, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:27,251 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table12) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:27,251 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table110
2023-07-11 14:16:27,251 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1446145749=0, srv161639880=1, srv1981301497=5, srv1783490001=3, srv784598921=7, srv1941943844=4, srv773014314=6, srv1735768141=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:27,251 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:27,251 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:27,251 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:27,251 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:27,251 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:27,251 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:27,251 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-11 14:16:27,252 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-11 14:16:27,252 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=8, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:27,252 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table110) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:27,252 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table111
2023-07-11 14:16:27,252 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1446145749=0, srv161639880=1, srv1981301497=5, srv1783490001=3, srv784598921=7, srv1941943844=4, srv773014314=6, srv1735768141=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:27,252 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:27,252 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:27,252 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:27,252 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:27,252 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:27,252 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:27,252 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-11 14:16:27,252 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-11 14:16:27,252 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=8, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:27,252 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table111) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:27,252 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table112
2023-07-11 14:16:27,252 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1446145749=0, srv161639880=1, srv1981301497=5, srv1783490001=3, srv784598921=7, srv1941943844=4, srv773014314=6, srv1735768141=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:27,252 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:27,252 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:27,252 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:27,252 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:27,252 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:27,252 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:27,252 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-11 14:16:27,252 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-11 14:16:27,252 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=8, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:27,252 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table112) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:27,253 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table113
2023-07-11 14:16:27,253 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1446145749=0, srv161639880=1, srv1981301497=5, srv1783490001=3, srv784598921=7, srv1941943844=4, srv773014314=6, srv1735768141=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:27,253 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:27,253 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:27,253 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:27,253 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:27,253 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:27,253 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:27,253 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-11 14:16:27,253 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-11 14:16:27,253 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=8, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:27,253 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table113) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:27,253 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table114
2023-07-11 14:16:27,253 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1446145749=0, srv161639880=1, srv1981301497=5, srv1783490001=3, srv784598921=7, srv1941943844=4, srv773014314=6, srv1735768141=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:27,253 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:27,253 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:27,253 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:27,253 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:27,253 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:27,253 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:27,253 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-11 14:16:27,253 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-11 14:16:27,253 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=8, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:27,253 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table114) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:27,253 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table115
2023-07-11 14:16:27,253 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1446145749=0, srv161639880=1, srv1981301497=5, srv1783490001=3, srv784598921=7, srv1941943844=4, srv773014314=6, srv1735768141=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:27,254 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:27,254 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:27,254 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:27,254 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:27,254 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:27,254 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:27,254 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-11 14:16:27,254 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-11 14:16:27,254 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=8, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:27,254 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table115) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:27,254 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table116
2023-07-11 14:16:27,254 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1446145749=0, srv161639880=1, srv1981301497=5, srv1783490001=3, srv784598921=7, srv1941943844=4, srv773014314=6, srv1735768141=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:27,254 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:27,254 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:27,254 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:27,254 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:27,254 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:27,254 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:27,254 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-11 14:16:27,254 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-11 14:16:27,254 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=8, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:27,254 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table116) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:27,254 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table117
2023-07-11 14:16:27,254 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1446145749=0, srv161639880=1, srv1981301497=5, srv1783490001=3, srv784598921=7, srv1941943844=4, srv773014314=6, srv1735768141=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:27,254 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:27,254 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:27,254 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:27,254 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:27,255 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:27,255 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:27,255 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-11 14:16:27,255 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-11 14:16:27,255 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=8, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:27,255 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table117) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:27,255 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table118
2023-07-11 14:16:27,255 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1446145749=0, srv161639880=1, srv1981301497=5, srv1783490001=3, srv784598921=7, srv1941943844=4, srv773014314=6, srv1735768141=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:27,255 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:27,255 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:27,255 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:27,255 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:27,255 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:27,255 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:27,255 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-11 14:16:27,255 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-11 14:16:27,255 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=8, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:27,255 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table118) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:27,255 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table119
2023-07-11 14:16:27,255 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1446145749=0, srv161639880=1, srv1981301497=5, srv1783490001=3, srv784598921=7, srv1941943844=4, srv773014314=6, srv1735768141=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:27,255 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:27,255 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:27,255 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:27,255 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:27,255 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:27,255 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:27,255 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-11 14:16:27,256 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-11 14:16:27,256 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=8, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:27,256 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table119) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:27,256 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table80
2023-07-11 14:16:27,256 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1446145749=0, srv161639880=1, srv1981301497=5, srv1783490001=3, srv784598921=7, srv1941943844=4, srv773014314=6, srv1735768141=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:27,256 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:27,256 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:27,256 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:27,256 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:27,256 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:27,256 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:27,256 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-11 14:16:27,256 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-11 14:16:27,256 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=8, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:27,256 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table80) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:27,256 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table81
2023-07-11 14:16:27,256 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1446145749=0, srv161639880=1, srv1981301497=5, srv1783490001=3, srv784598921=7, srv1941943844=4, srv773014314=6, srv1735768141=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:27,256 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:27,256 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:27,256 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:27,256 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:27,256 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:27,256 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:27,256 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-11 14:16:27,256 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-11 14:16:27,256 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=8, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:27,256 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table81) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:27,257 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table82
2023-07-11 14:16:27,257 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1446145749=0, srv161639880=1, srv1981301497=5, srv1783490001=3, srv784598921=7, srv1941943844=4, srv773014314=6, srv1735768141=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:27,257 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:27,257 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:27,257 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:27,257 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:27,257 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:27,257 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:27,257 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-11 14:16:27,257 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-11 14:16:27,257 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=8, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:27,257 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table82) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:27,257 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table83
2023-07-11 14:16:27,257 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1446145749=0, srv161639880=1, srv1981301497=5, srv1783490001=3, srv784598921=7, srv1941943844=4, srv773014314=6, srv1735768141=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:27,257 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:27,257 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:27,258 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:27,258 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:27,258 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:27,258 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:27,258 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-11 14:16:27,258 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-11 14:16:27,258 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=8, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:27,258 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table83) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:27,258 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table84
2023-07-11 14:16:27,258 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1446145749=0, srv161639880=1, srv1981301497=5, srv1783490001=3, srv784598921=7, srv1941943844=4, srv773014314=6, srv1735768141=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:27,258 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:27,258 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:27,258 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:27,258 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:27,258 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:27,258 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:27,258 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-11 14:16:27,258 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-11 14:16:27,258 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=8, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:27,258 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table84) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:27,258 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table85
2023-07-11 14:16:27,258 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1446145749=0, srv161639880=1, srv1981301497=5, srv1783490001=3, srv784598921=7, srv1941943844=4, srv773014314=6, srv1735768141=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:27,258 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:27,258 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:27,258 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:27,258 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:27,258 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:27,259 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:27,259 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-11 14:16:27,259 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-11 14:16:27,259 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=8, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:27,259 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table85) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:27,259 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table86
2023-07-11 14:16:27,259 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1446145749=0, srv161639880=1, srv1981301497=5, srv1783490001=3, srv784598921=7, srv1941943844=4, srv773014314=6, srv1735768141=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:27,259 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:27,259 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:27,259 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:27,259 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:27,259 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:27,259 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:27,259 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-11 14:16:27,259 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-11 14:16:27,259 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=8, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:27,259 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table86) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:27,259 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table87
2023-07-11 14:16:27,259 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1446145749=0, srv161639880=1, srv1981301497=5, srv1783490001=3, srv784598921=7, srv1941943844=4, srv773014314=6, srv1735768141=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:27,259 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:27,259 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:27,259 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:27,259 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:27,259 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:27,259 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:27,259 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-11 14:16:27,259 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-11 14:16:27,259 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=8, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:27,260 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table87) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:27,260 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table88
2023-07-11 14:16:27,260 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1446145749=0, srv161639880=1, srv1981301497=5, srv1783490001=3, srv784598921=7, srv1941943844=4, srv773014314=6, srv1735768141=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:27,260 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:27,260 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:27,260 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:27,260 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:27,260 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:27,260 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:27,260 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-11 14:16:27,260 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-11 14:16:27,260 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=8, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:27,260 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table88) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:27,260 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table89
2023-07-11 14:16:27,260 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1446145749=0, srv161639880=1, srv1981301497=5, srv1783490001=3, srv784598921=7, srv1941943844=4, srv773014314=6, srv1735768141=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:27,260 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:27,260 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:27,260 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:27,260 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:27,260 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:27,260 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:27,260 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-11 14:16:27,260 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-11 14:16:27,260 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=8, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:27,260 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table89) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:27,260 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table79
2023-07-11 14:16:27,261 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1446145749=0, srv161639880=1, srv1981301497=5, srv1783490001=3, srv784598921=7, srv1941943844=4, srv773014314=6, srv1735768141=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:27,261 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:27,261 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:27,261 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:27,261 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:27,261 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:27,261 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:27,261 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-11 14:16:27,261 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-11 14:16:27,261 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=8, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:27,261 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table79) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:27,261 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table5
2023-07-11 14:16:27,261 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1446145749=0, srv161639880=1, srv1981301497=5, srv1783490001=3, srv784598921=7, srv1941943844=4, srv773014314=6, srv1735768141=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:27,261 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:27,261 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:27,261 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:27,261 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:27,261 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:27,261 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:27,261 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-11 14:16:27,261 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-11 14:16:27,261 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=8, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:27,261 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table5) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:27,261 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table4
2023-07-11 14:16:27,261 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1446145749=0, srv161639880=1, srv1981301497=5, srv1783490001=3, srv784598921=7, srv1941943844=4, srv773014314=6, srv1735768141=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:27,262 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:27,262 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:27,262 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:27,262 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:27,262 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:27,262 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:27,262 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-11 14:16:27,262 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-11 14:16:27,262 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=8, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:27,262 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table4) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:27,262 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table3
2023-07-11 14:16:27,262 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1446145749=0, srv161639880=1, srv1981301497=5, srv1783490001=3, srv784598921=7, srv1941943844=4, srv773014314=6, srv1735768141=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:27,262 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:27,262 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:27,262 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:27,262 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:27,262 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:27,262 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:27,262 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-11 14:16:27,262 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-11 14:16:27,262 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=8, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:27,262 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table3) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:27,262 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table2
2023-07-11 14:16:27,262 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1446145749=0, srv161639880=1, srv1981301497=5, srv1783490001=3, srv784598921=7, srv1941943844=4, srv773014314=6, srv1735768141=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:27,262 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:27,262 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:27,263 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:27,263 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:27,263 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:27,263 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:27,263 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-11 14:16:27,263 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-11 14:16:27,263 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=8, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:27,263 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table2) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:27,263 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1
2023-07-11 14:16:27,263 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1446145749=0, srv161639880=1, srv1981301497=5, srv1783490001=3, srv784598921=7, srv1941943844=4, srv773014314=6, srv1735768141=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:27,263 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:27,263 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:27,263 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:27,263 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:27,263 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:27,263 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:27,263 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-11 14:16:27,263 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-11 14:16:27,263 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=8, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:27,263 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:27,263 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table0
2023-07-11 14:16:27,263 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1446145749=0, srv161639880=1, srv1981301497=5, srv1783490001=3, srv784598921=7, srv1941943844=4, srv773014314=6, srv1735768141=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:27,263 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:27,263 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:27,264 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:27,264 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:27,264 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:27,264 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:27,264 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-11 14:16:27,264 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-11 14:16:27,264 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=8, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:27,264 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table0) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:27,264 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table70
2023-07-11 14:16:27,264 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1446145749=0, srv161639880=1, srv1981301497=5, srv1783490001=3, srv784598921=7, srv1941943844=4, srv773014314=6, srv1735768141=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:27,264 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:27,264 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:27,264 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:27,264 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:27,264 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:27,264 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:27,264 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-11 14:16:27,264 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-11 14:16:27,264 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=8, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:27,264 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table70) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:27,264 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table71
2023-07-11 14:16:27,264 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1446145749=0, srv161639880=1, srv1981301497=5, srv1783490001=3, srv784598921=7, srv1941943844=4, srv773014314=6, srv1735768141=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:27,264 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:27,264 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:27,264 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:27,264 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:27,265 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:27,265 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:27,265 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-11 14:16:27,265 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-11 14:16:27,265 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=8, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:27,265 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table71) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:27,265 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table72
2023-07-11 14:16:27,265 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1446145749=0, srv161639880=1, srv1981301497=5, srv1783490001=3, srv784598921=7, srv1941943844=4, srv773014314=6, srv1735768141=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:27,265 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:27,265 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:27,265 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:27,265 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:27,265 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:27,265 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:27,265 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-11 14:16:27,265 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-11 14:16:27,265 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=8, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:27,265 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table72) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:27,265 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table73
2023-07-11 14:16:27,265 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1446145749=0, srv161639880=1, srv1981301497=5, srv1783490001=3, srv784598921=7, srv1941943844=4, srv773014314=6, srv1735768141=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:27,265 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:27,265 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:27,265 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:27,265 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:27,266 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:27,266 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:27,266 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-11 14:16:27,266 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-11 14:16:27,266 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=8, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:27,266 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table73) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:27,266 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table74
2023-07-11 14:16:27,266 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1446145749=0, srv161639880=1, srv1981301497=5, srv1783490001=3, srv784598921=7, srv1941943844=4, srv773014314=6, srv1735768141=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:27,266 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:27,266 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:27,266 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:27,266 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:27,266 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:27,266 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:27,266 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-11 14:16:27,266 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-11 14:16:27,266 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=8, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:27,266 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table74) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:27,267 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table9
2023-07-11 14:16:27,267 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1446145749=0, srv161639880=1, srv1981301497=5, srv1783490001=3, srv784598921=7, srv1941943844=4, srv773014314=6, srv1735768141=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:27,267 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:27,267 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:27,267 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:27,267 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:27,267 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:27,267 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:27,267 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-11 14:16:27,267 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-11 14:16:27,267 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=8, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:27,267 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table9) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:27,267 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table75
2023-07-11 14:16:27,267 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1446145749=0, srv161639880=1, srv1981301497=5, srv1783490001=3, srv784598921=7, srv1941943844=4, srv773014314=6, srv1735768141=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:27,267 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:27,267 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:27,267 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:27,267 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:27,267 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:27,267 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:27,267 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-11 14:16:27,267 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-11 14:16:27,267 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=8, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:27,267 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table75) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:27,267 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table8
2023-07-11 14:16:27,268 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1446145749=0, srv161639880=1, srv1981301497=5, srv1783490001=3, srv784598921=7, srv1941943844=4, srv773014314=6, srv1735768141=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:27,268 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:27,268 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:27,268 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:27,268 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:27,268 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:27,268 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:27,268 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-11 14:16:27,268 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-11 14:16:27,268 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=8, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:27,268 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table8) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:27,268 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table76
2023-07-11 14:16:27,268 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1446145749=0, srv161639880=1, srv1981301497=5, srv1783490001=3, srv784598921=7, srv1941943844=4, srv773014314=6, srv1735768141=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:27,268 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:27,268 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:27,268 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:27,268 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:27,268 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:27,268 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:27,268 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-11 14:16:27,268 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-11 14:16:27,268 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=8, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:27,268 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table76) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:27,268 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table7
2023-07-11 14:16:27,268 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1446145749=0, srv161639880=1, srv1981301497=5, srv1783490001=3, srv784598921=7, srv1941943844=4, srv773014314=6, srv1735768141=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:27,269 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:27,269 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:27,269 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:27,269 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:27,269 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:27,269 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:27,269 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-11 14:16:27,269 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-11 14:16:27,269 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=8, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:27,269 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table7) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:27,269 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table77
2023-07-11 14:16:27,269 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1446145749=0, srv161639880=1, srv1981301497=5, srv1783490001=3, srv784598921=7, srv1941943844=4, srv773014314=6, srv1735768141=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:27,269 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:27,269 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:27,269 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:27,269 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:27,269 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:27,269 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:27,269 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-11 14:16:27,269 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-11 14:16:27,269 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=8, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:27,269 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table77) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:27,269 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table6
2023-07-11 14:16:27,269 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1446145749=0, srv161639880=1, srv1981301497=5, srv1783490001=3, srv784598921=7, srv1941943844=4, srv773014314=6, srv1735768141=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:27,269 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:27,269 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:27,270 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:27,270 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:27,270 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:27,270 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:27,270 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-11 14:16:27,270 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-11 14:16:27,270 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=8, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:27,270 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table6) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:27,270 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table78
2023-07-11 14:16:27,270 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1446145749=0, srv161639880=1, srv1981301497=5, srv1783490001=3, srv784598921=7, srv1941943844=4, srv773014314=6, srv1735768141=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:27,270 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:27,270 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:27,270 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:27,270 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:27,270 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:27,270 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:27,270 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-11 14:16:27,270 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-11 14:16:27,270 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=8, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:27,270 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table78) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:27,270 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table68
2023-07-11 14:16:27,270 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1446145749=0, srv161639880=1, srv1981301497=5, srv1783490001=3, srv784598921=7, srv1941943844=4, srv773014314=6, srv1735768141=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:27,270 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:27,270 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:27,270 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:27,270 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:27,270 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:27,271 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:27,271 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-11 14:16:27,271 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-11 14:16:27,271 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=8, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:27,271 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table68) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:27,271 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table69
2023-07-11 14:16:27,271 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1446145749=0, srv161639880=1, srv1981301497=5, srv1783490001=3, srv784598921=7, srv1941943844=4, srv773014314=6, srv1735768141=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:27,271 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:27,271 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:27,271 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:27,271 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:27,271 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:27,271 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:27,271 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-11 14:16:27,271 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-11 14:16:27,271 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=8, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:27,271 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table69) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:27,271 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table60
2023-07-11 14:16:27,271 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1446145749=0, srv161639880=1, srv1981301497=5, srv1783490001=3, srv784598921=7, srv1941943844=4, srv773014314=6, srv1735768141=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:27,271 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:27,271 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:27,271 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:27,271 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:27,271 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:27,271 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:27,271 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-11 14:16:27,271 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-11 14:16:27,272 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=8, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:27,272 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table60) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:27,272 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table61
2023-07-11 14:16:27,272 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1446145749=0, srv161639880=1, srv1981301497=5, srv1783490001=3, srv784598921=7, srv1941943844=4, srv773014314=6, srv1735768141=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:27,272 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:27,272 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:27,272 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:27,272 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:27,272 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:27,272 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:27,272 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-11 14:16:27,272 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-11 14:16:27,272 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=8, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:27,272 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table61) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:27,272 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table62
2023-07-11 14:16:27,272 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1446145749=0, srv161639880=1, srv1981301497=5, srv1783490001=3, srv784598921=7, srv1941943844=4, srv773014314=6, srv1735768141=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:27,272 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:27,272 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:27,272 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:27,272 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:27,272 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:27,272 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:27,272 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-11 14:16:27,272 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-11 14:16:27,272 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=8, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:27,272 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table62) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:27,273 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table63
2023-07-11 14:16:27,273 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1446145749=0, srv161639880=1, srv1981301497=5, srv1783490001=3, srv784598921=7, srv1941943844=4, srv773014314=6, srv1735768141=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:27,273 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:27,273 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:27,273 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:27,273 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:27,273 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:27,273 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:27,273 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-11 14:16:27,273 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-11 14:16:27,273 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=8, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:27,273 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table63) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:27,273 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table64
2023-07-11 14:16:27,273 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1446145749=0, srv161639880=1, srv1981301497=5, srv1783490001=3, srv784598921=7, srv1941943844=4, srv773014314=6, srv1735768141=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:27,273 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:27,273 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:27,273 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:27,273 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:27,273 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:27,273 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:27,273 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-11 14:16:27,273 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-11 14:16:27,273 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=8, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:27,273 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table64) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:27,273 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table65
2023-07-11 14:16:27,273 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1446145749=0, srv161639880=1, srv1981301497=5, srv1783490001=3, srv784598921=7, srv1941943844=4, srv773014314=6, srv1735768141=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:27,274 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:27,274 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:27,274 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:27,274 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:27,274 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:27,274 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:27,274 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-11 14:16:27,274 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-11 14:16:27,274 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=8, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:27,274 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table65) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:27,274 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table66
2023-07-11 14:16:27,274 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1446145749=0, srv161639880=1, srv1981301497=5, srv1783490001=3, srv784598921=7, srv1941943844=4, srv773014314=6, srv1735768141=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:27,274 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:27,274 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:27,274 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:27,274 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:27,274 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:27,274 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:27,274 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-11 14:16:27,274 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-11 14:16:27,274 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=8, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:27,274 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table66) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:27,274 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table67
2023-07-11 14:16:27,274 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1446145749=0, srv161639880=1, srv1981301497=5, srv1783490001=3, srv784598921=7, srv1941943844=4, srv773014314=6, srv1735768141=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:27,274 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:27,274 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:27,275 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:27,275 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:27,275 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:27,275 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:27,275 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-11 14:16:27,275 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-11 14:16:27,275 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=8, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:27,275 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table67) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:27,275 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table57
2023-07-11 14:16:27,275 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1446145749=0, srv161639880=1, srv1981301497=5, srv1783490001=3, srv784598921=7, srv1941943844=4, srv773014314=6, srv1735768141=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:27,275 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:27,275 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:27,275 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:27,275 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:27,275 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:27,275 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:27,275 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-11 14:16:27,275 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-11 14:16:27,275 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=8, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:27,275 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table57) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:27,275 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table58
2023-07-11 14:16:27,275 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1446145749=0, srv161639880=1, srv1981301497=5, srv1783490001=3, srv784598921=7, srv1941943844=4, srv773014314=6, srv1735768141=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:27,276 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:27,276 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:27,276 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:27,276 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:27,276 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:27,276 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:27,276 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-11 14:16:27,276 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-11 14:16:27,276 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=8, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:27,276 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table58) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:27,276 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table59
2023-07-11 14:16:27,276 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1446145749=0, srv161639880=1, srv1981301497=5, srv1783490001=3, srv784598921=7, srv1941943844=4, srv773014314=6, srv1735768141=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:27,276 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:27,276 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:27,276 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:27,276 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:27,276 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:27,276 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:27,276 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-11 14:16:27,276 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-11 14:16:27,277 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=8, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:27,277 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table59) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:27,277 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table50
2023-07-11 14:16:27,277 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1446145749=0, srv161639880=1, srv1981301497=5, srv1783490001=3, srv784598921=7, srv1941943844=4, srv773014314=6, srv1735768141=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:27,277 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:27,277 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:27,277 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:27,277 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:27,277 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:27,277 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:27,277 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-11 14:16:27,277 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-11 14:16:27,277 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=8, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:27,277 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table50) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:27,277 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table51
2023-07-11 14:16:27,277 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1446145749=0, srv161639880=1, srv1981301497=5, srv1783490001=3, srv784598921=7, srv1941943844=4, srv773014314=6, srv1735768141=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:27,277 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:27,277 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:27,277 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:27,277 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:27,277 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:27,277 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:27,277 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-11 14:16:27,277 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-11 14:16:27,277 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=8, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:27,278 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table51) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:27,278 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table52
2023-07-11 14:16:27,278 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1446145749=0, srv161639880=1, srv1981301497=5, srv1783490001=3, srv784598921=7, srv1941943844=4, srv773014314=6, srv1735768141=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:27,278 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:27,278 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:27,278 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:27,278 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:27,278 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:27,278 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:27,278 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-11 14:16:27,278 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-11 14:16:27,278 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=8, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:27,278 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table52) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:27,278 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table53
2023-07-11 14:16:27,278 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1446145749=0, srv161639880=1, srv1981301497=5, srv1783490001=3, srv784598921=7, srv1941943844=4, srv773014314=6, srv1735768141=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:27,278 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:27,278 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:27,278 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:27,278 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:27,278 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:27,278 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:27,278 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-11 14:16:27,278 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-11 14:16:27,278 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=8, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:27,278 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table53) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:27,278 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table54
2023-07-11 14:16:27,278 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1446145749=0, srv161639880=1, srv1981301497=5, srv1783490001=3, srv784598921=7, srv1941943844=4, srv773014314=6, srv1735768141=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:27,279 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:27,279 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:27,279 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:27,279 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:27,279 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:27,279 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:27,279 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-11 14:16:27,279 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-11 14:16:27,279 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=8, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:27,279 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table54) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:27,279 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table55
2023-07-11 14:16:27,279 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1446145749=0, srv161639880=1, srv1981301497=5, srv1783490001=3, srv784598921=7, srv1941943844=4, srv773014314=6, srv1735768141=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:27,279 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:27,279 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:27,279 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:27,279 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:27,279 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:27,279 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:27,279 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-11 14:16:27,279 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-11 14:16:27,279 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=8, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:27,279 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table55) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:27,279 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table56
2023-07-11 14:16:27,279 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1446145749=0, srv161639880=1, srv1981301497=5, srv1783490001=3, srv784598921=7, srv1941943844=4, srv773014314=6, srv1735768141=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:27,279 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:27,279 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:27,280 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:27,280 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:27,280 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:27,280 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:27,280 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-11 14:16:27,280 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-11 14:16:27,280 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=8, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:27,280 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table56) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:27,280 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table46
2023-07-11 14:16:27,280 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1446145749=0, srv161639880=1, srv1981301497=5, srv1783490001=3, srv784598921=7, srv1941943844=4, srv773014314=6, srv1735768141=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:27,280 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:27,280 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:27,280 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:27,280 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:27,280 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:27,280 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:27,280 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-11 14:16:27,280 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-11 14:16:27,280 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=8, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:27,280 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table46) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:27,280 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table47
2023-07-11 14:16:27,280 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1446145749=0, srv161639880=1, srv1981301497=5, srv1783490001=3, srv784598921=7, srv1941943844=4, srv773014314=6, srv1735768141=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:27,280 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:27,280 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:27,280 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:27,280 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:27,281 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:27,281 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:27,281 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-11 14:16:27,281 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-11 14:16:27,281 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=8, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:27,281 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table47) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:27,281 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table48
2023-07-11 14:16:27,281 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1446145749=0, srv161639880=1, srv1981301497=5, srv1783490001=3, srv784598921=7, srv1941943844=4, srv773014314=6, srv1735768141=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:27,281 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:27,281 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:27,281 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:27,281 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:27,281 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:27,281 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:27,281 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-11 14:16:27,281 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-11 14:16:27,281 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=8, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:27,281 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table48) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:27,281 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table49
2023-07-11 14:16:27,281 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1446145749=0, srv161639880=1, srv1981301497=5, srv1783490001=3, srv784598921=7, srv1941943844=4, srv773014314=6, srv1735768141=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:27,281 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:27,281 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:27,281 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:27,281 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:27,281 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:27,281 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:27,282 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-11 14:16:27,282 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-11 14:16:27,282 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=8, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:27,282 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table49) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:27,282 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table40
2023-07-11 14:16:27,282 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1446145749=0, srv161639880=1, srv1981301497=5, srv1783490001=3, srv784598921=7, srv1941943844=4, srv773014314=6, srv1735768141=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:27,282 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:27,282 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:27,282 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:27,282 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:27,282 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:27,282 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:27,282 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-11 14:16:27,282 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-11 14:16:27,282 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=8, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:27,282 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table40) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:27,282 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table41
2023-07-11 14:16:27,282 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1446145749=0, srv161639880=1, srv1981301497=5, srv1783490001=3, srv784598921=7, srv1941943844=4, srv773014314=6, srv1735768141=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:27,282 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:27,282 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:27,282 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:27,282 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:27,282 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:27,282 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:27,282 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-11 14:16:27,282 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-11 14:16:27,282 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=8, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:27,283 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table41) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:27,283 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table42
2023-07-11 14:16:27,283 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1446145749=0, srv161639880=1, srv1981301497=5, srv1783490001=3, srv784598921=7, srv1941943844=4, srv773014314=6, srv1735768141=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:27,283 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:27,283 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:27,283 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:27,283 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:27,283 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:27,283 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:27,283 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-11 14:16:27,283 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-11 14:16:27,283 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=8, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:27,283 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table42) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:27,283 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table43
2023-07-11 14:16:27,283 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1446145749=0, srv161639880=1, srv1981301497=5, srv1783490001=3, srv784598921=7, srv1941943844=4, srv773014314=6, srv1735768141=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:27,283 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:27,283 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:27,283 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:27,283 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:27,283 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:27,283 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:27,283 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-11 14:16:27,283 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-11 14:16:27,283 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=8, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:27,283 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table43) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:27,283 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table44
2023-07-11 14:16:27,284 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1446145749=0, srv161639880=1, srv1981301497=5, srv1783490001=3, srv784598921=7, srv1941943844=4, srv773014314=6, srv1735768141=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:27,284 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:27,284 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:27,284 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:27,284 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:27,284 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:27,284 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:27,284 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-11 14:16:27,284 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-11 14:16:27,284 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=8, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:27,284 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table44) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:27,284 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table45
2023-07-11 14:16:27,284 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1446145749=0, srv161639880=1, srv1981301497=5, srv1783490001=3, srv784598921=7, srv1941943844=4, srv773014314=6, srv1735768141=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:27,284 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:27,284 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:27,284 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:27,284 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:27,284 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:27,284 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:27,284 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-11 14:16:27,284 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-11 14:16:27,284 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=8, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:27,284 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table45) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:27,284 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table35
2023-07-11 14:16:27,284 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1446145749=0, srv161639880=1, srv1981301497=5, srv1783490001=3, srv784598921=7, srv1941943844=4, srv773014314=6, srv1735768141=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:27,284 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:27,285 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:27,285 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:27,285 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:27,285 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:27,285 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:27,285 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-11 14:16:27,285 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-11 14:16:27,285 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=8, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:27,285 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table35) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:27,285 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table36
2023-07-11 14:16:27,285 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1446145749=0, srv161639880=1, srv1981301497=5, srv1783490001=3, srv784598921=7, srv1941943844=4, srv773014314=6, srv1735768141=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:27,285 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:27,285 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:27,285 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:27,285 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:27,285 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:27,285 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:27,285 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-11 14:16:27,286 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-11 14:16:27,286 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=8, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:27,286 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table36) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:27,286 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table37
2023-07-11 14:16:27,286 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1446145749=0, srv161639880=1, srv1981301497=5, srv1783490001=3, srv784598921=7, srv1941943844=4, srv773014314=6, srv1735768141=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:27,286 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:27,286 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:27,286 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:27,286 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:27,286 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:27,286 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:27,286 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-11 14:16:27,286 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-11 14:16:27,286 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=8, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:27,286 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table37) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:27,286 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table38
2023-07-11 14:16:27,286 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1446145749=0, srv161639880=1, srv1981301497=5, srv1783490001=3, srv784598921=7, srv1941943844=4, srv773014314=6, srv1735768141=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:27,286 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:27,286 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:27,286 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:27,286 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:27,286 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:27,286 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:27,286 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-11 14:16:27,286 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-11 14:16:27,286 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=8, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:27,287 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table38) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:27,287 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table100
2023-07-11 14:16:27,287 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1446145749=0, srv161639880=1, srv1981301497=5, srv1783490001=3, srv784598921=7, srv1941943844=4, srv773014314=6, srv1735768141=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:27,287 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:27,287 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:27,287 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:27,287 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:27,287 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:27,287 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:27,287 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-11 14:16:27,287 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-11 14:16:27,287 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=8, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:27,287 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table100) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:27,287 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table39
2023-07-11 14:16:27,287 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1446145749=0, srv161639880=1, srv1981301497=5, srv1783490001=3, srv784598921=7, srv1941943844=4, srv773014314=6, srv1735768141=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:27,287 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:27,287 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:27,287 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:27,287 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:27,287 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:27,287 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:27,287 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-11 14:16:27,287 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-11 14:16:27,287 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=8, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:27,287 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table39) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:27,287 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table101
2023-07-11 14:16:27,287 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1446145749=0, srv161639880=1, srv1981301497=5, srv1783490001=3, srv784598921=7, srv1941943844=4, srv773014314=6, srv1735768141=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:27,288 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:27,288 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:27,288 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:27,288 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:27,288 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:27,288 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:27,288 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-11 14:16:27,288 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-11 14:16:27,288 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=8, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:27,288 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table101) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:27,288 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table102
2023-07-11 14:16:27,288 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1446145749=0, srv161639880=1, srv1981301497=5, srv1783490001=3, srv784598921=7, srv1941943844=4, srv773014314=6, srv1735768141=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:27,288 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:27,288 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:27,288 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:27,288 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:27,288 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:27,288 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:27,288 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-11 14:16:27,288 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-11 14:16:27,288 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=8, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:27,288 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table102) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:27,288 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table103
2023-07-11 14:16:27,288 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1446145749=0, srv161639880=1, srv1981301497=5, srv1783490001=3, srv784598921=7, srv1941943844=4, srv773014314=6, srv1735768141=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:27,288 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:27,288 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:27,288 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:27,289 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:27,289 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:27,289 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:27,289 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-11 14:16:27,289 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-11 14:16:27,289 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=8, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:27,289 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table103) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:27,289 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table104
2023-07-11 14:16:27,289 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1446145749=0, srv161639880=1, srv1981301497=5, srv1783490001=3, srv784598921=7, srv1941943844=4, srv773014314=6, srv1735768141=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:27,289 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:27,289 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:27,289 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:27,289 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:27,289 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:27,289 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:27,289 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-11 14:16:27,289 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-11 14:16:27,289 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=8, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:27,289 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table104) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:27,289 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table105
2023-07-11 14:16:27,289 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1446145749=0, srv161639880=1, srv1981301497=5, srv1783490001=3, srv784598921=7, srv1941943844=4, srv773014314=6, srv1735768141=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:27,289 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:27,289 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:27,289 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:27,289 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:27,289 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:27,289 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:27,290 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-11 14:16:27,290 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-11 14:16:27,290 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=8, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:27,290 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table105) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:27,290 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table106
2023-07-11 14:16:27,290 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1446145749=0, srv161639880=1, srv1981301497=5, srv1783490001=3, srv784598921=7, srv1941943844=4, srv773014314=6, srv1735768141=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:27,290 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:27,290 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:27,290 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:27,290 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:27,290 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:27,290 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:27,290 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-11 14:16:27,290 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-11 14:16:27,290 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=8, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:27,290 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table106) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:27,290 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table107
2023-07-11 14:16:27,290 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1446145749=0, srv161639880=1, srv1981301497=5, srv1783490001=3, srv784598921=7, srv1941943844=4, srv773014314=6, srv1735768141=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:27,290 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:27,290 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:27,290 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:27,290 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:27,290 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:27,290 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:27,290 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-11 14:16:27,290 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-11 14:16:27,290 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=8, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:27,291 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table107) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:27,291 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table108
2023-07-11 14:16:27,291 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1446145749=0, srv161639880=1, srv1981301497=5, srv1783490001=3, srv784598921=7, srv1941943844=4, srv773014314=6, srv1735768141=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:27,291 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:27,291 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:27,291 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:27,291 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:27,291 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:27,291 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:27,291 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-11 14:16:27,291 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-11 14:16:27,291 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=8, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:27,291 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table108) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:27,291 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table109
2023-07-11 14:16:27,291 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1446145749=0, srv161639880=1, srv1981301497=5, srv1783490001=3, srv784598921=7, srv1941943844=4, srv773014314=6, srv1735768141=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:27,291 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:27,291 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:27,291 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:27,291 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:27,291 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:27,291 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:27,291 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-11 14:16:27,291 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-11 14:16:27,291 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=8, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:27,291 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table109) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:27,291 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table30
2023-07-11 14:16:27,291 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1446145749=0, srv161639880=1, srv1981301497=5, srv1783490001=3, srv784598921=7, srv1941943844=4, srv773014314=6, srv1735768141=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:27,292 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:27,292 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:27,292 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:27,292 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:27,292 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:27,292 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:27,292 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-11 14:16:27,292 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-11 14:16:27,292 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=8, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:27,292 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table30) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:27,292 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table31
2023-07-11 14:16:27,292 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1446145749=0, srv161639880=1, srv1981301497=5, srv1783490001=3, srv784598921=7, srv1941943844=4, srv773014314=6, srv1735768141=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:27,292 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:27,292 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:27,292 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:27,292 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:27,292 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:27,292 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:27,292 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-11 14:16:27,292 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-11 14:16:27,292 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=8, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:27,292 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table31) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:27,292 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table32
2023-07-11 14:16:27,292 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1446145749=0, srv161639880=1, srv1981301497=5, srv1783490001=3, srv784598921=7, srv1941943844=4, srv773014314=6, srv1735768141=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:27,292 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:27,292 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:27,293 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:27,293 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:27,293 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:27,293 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:27,293 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-11 14:16:27,293 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-11 14:16:27,293 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=8, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:27,293 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table32) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:27,293 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table33
2023-07-11 14:16:27,293 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1446145749=0, srv161639880=1, srv1981301497=5, srv1783490001=3, srv784598921=7, srv1941943844=4, srv773014314=6, srv1735768141=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:27,293 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:27,293 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:27,293 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:27,293 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:27,293 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:27,293 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:27,293 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-11 14:16:27,293 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-11 14:16:27,293 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=8, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:27,293 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table33) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:27,293 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table34
2023-07-11 14:16:27,293 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1446145749=0, srv161639880=1, srv1981301497=5, srv1783490001=3, srv784598921=7, srv1941943844=4, srv773014314=6, srv1735768141=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:27,293 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:27,293 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:27,293 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:27,294 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:27,294 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:27,294 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:27,294 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-11 14:16:27,294 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-11 14:16:27,294 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=8, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:27,294 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table34) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:27,294 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table24
2023-07-11 14:16:27,294 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1446145749=0, srv161639880=1, srv1981301497=5, srv1783490001=3, srv784598921=7, srv1941943844=4, srv773014314=6, srv1735768141=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:27,294 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:27,294 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:27,294 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:27,294 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:27,294 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:27,294 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:27,294 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-11 14:16:27,294 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-11 14:16:27,294 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=8, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:27,294 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table24) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:27,295 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table25
2023-07-11 14:16:27,295 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1446145749=0, srv161639880=1, srv1981301497=5, srv1783490001=3, srv784598921=7, srv1941943844=4, srv773014314=6, srv1735768141=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:27,295 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:27,295 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:27,295 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:27,295 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:27,295 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:27,295 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:27,295 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-11 14:16:27,295 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-11 14:16:27,295 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=8, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:27,295 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table25) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:27,295 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table26
2023-07-11 14:16:27,295 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1446145749=0, srv161639880=1, srv1981301497=5, srv1783490001=3, srv784598921=7, srv1941943844=4, srv773014314=6, srv1735768141=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:27,295 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:27,295 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:27,295 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:27,295 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:27,295 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:27,295 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:27,295 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-11 14:16:27,295 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-11 14:16:27,295 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=8, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:27,295 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table26) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:27,295 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table27
2023-07-11 14:16:27,295 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1446145749=0, srv161639880=1, srv1981301497=5, srv1783490001=3, srv784598921=7, srv1941943844=4, srv773014314=6, srv1735768141=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:27,296 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:27,296 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:27,296 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:27,296 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:27,296 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:27,296 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:27,296 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-11 14:16:27,296 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-11 14:16:27,296 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=8, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:27,296 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table27) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:27,296 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table28
2023-07-11 14:16:27,296 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1446145749=0, srv161639880=1, srv1981301497=5, srv1783490001=3, srv784598921=7, srv1941943844=4, srv773014314=6, srv1735768141=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:27,296 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:27,296 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:27,296 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:27,296 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:27,296 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:27,296 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:27,296 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-11 14:16:27,296 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-11 14:16:27,296 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=8, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:27,296 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table28) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:27,296 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table29
2023-07-11 14:16:27,296 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1446145749=0, srv161639880=1, srv1981301497=5, srv1783490001=3, srv784598921=7, srv1941943844=4, srv773014314=6, srv1735768141=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:27,296 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:27,296 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:27,297 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:27,297 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:27,297 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:27,297 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:27,297 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-11 14:16:27,297 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-11 14:16:27,297 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=8, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:27,297 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table29) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:27,297 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table20
2023-07-11 14:16:27,297 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1446145749=0, srv161639880=1, srv1981301497=5, srv1783490001=3, srv784598921=7, srv1941943844=4, srv773014314=6, srv1735768141=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:27,297 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:27,297 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:27,297 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:27,297 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:27,297 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:27,297 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:27,297 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-11 14:16:27,297 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-11 14:16:27,297 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=8, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:27,297 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table20) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:27,297 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table21
2023-07-11 14:16:27,297 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1446145749=0, srv161639880=1, srv1981301497=5, srv1783490001=3, srv784598921=7, srv1941943844=4, srv773014314=6, srv1735768141=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:27,297 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:27,297 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:27,297 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:27,297 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:27,298 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:27,298 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:27,298 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-11 14:16:27,298 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-11 14:16:27,298 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=8, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:27,298 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table21) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:27,298 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table22
2023-07-11 14:16:27,298 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1446145749=0, srv161639880=1, srv1981301497=5, srv1783490001=3, srv784598921=7, srv1941943844=4, srv773014314=6, srv1735768141=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:27,298 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:27,298 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:27,298 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:27,298 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:27,298 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:27,298 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:27,298 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-11 14:16:27,298 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-11 14:16:27,298 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=8, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:27,298 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table22) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:27,298 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table23
2023-07-11 14:16:27,298 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1446145749=0, srv161639880=1, srv1981301497=5, srv1783490001=3, srv784598921=7, srv1941943844=4, srv773014314=6, srv1735768141=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:27,298 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:27,298 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:27,298 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:27,298 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:27,298 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:27,298 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:27,298 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-11 14:16:27,299 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-11 14:16:27,299 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=8, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:27,299 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table23) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:27,300 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table13
2023-07-11 14:16:27,300 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1602950194=3, srv413692020=5, srv1927124420=4, srv614929528=6, srv1032226509=0, srv1534362281=2, srv1134308631=1, srv682212059=7} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:27,300 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:27,301 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:27,301 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:27,301 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:27,301 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:27,301 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:27,301 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-11 14:16:27,301 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-11 14:16:27,301 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=8, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:27,301 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table13) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:27,301 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table14
2023-07-11 14:16:27,301 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1602950194=3, srv413692020=5, srv1927124420=4, srv614929528=6, srv1032226509=0, srv1534362281=2, srv1134308631=1, srv682212059=7} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:27,301 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:27,301 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:27,301 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:27,301 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:27,301 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:27,301 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:27,301 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-11 14:16:27,301 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-11 14:16:27,301 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=8, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:27,301 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table14) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:27,301 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table120
2023-07-11 14:16:27,301 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1602950194=3, srv413692020=5, srv1927124420=4, srv614929528=6, srv1032226509=0, srv1534362281=2, srv1134308631=1, srv682212059=7} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:27,301 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:27,302 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:27,302 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:27,302 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:27,302 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:27,302 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:27,302 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-11 14:16:27,302 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-11 14:16:27,302 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=8, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:27,302 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table120) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:27,302 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table15
2023-07-11 14:16:27,302 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1602950194=3, srv413692020=5, srv1927124420=4, srv614929528=6, srv1032226509=0, srv1534362281=2, srv1134308631=1, srv682212059=7} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:27,302 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:27,302 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:27,302 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:27,302 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:27,302 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:27,302 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:27,302 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-11 14:16:27,302 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-11 14:16:27,302 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=8, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:27,302 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table15) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:27,302 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table121
2023-07-11 14:16:27,302 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1602950194=3, srv413692020=5, srv1927124420=4, srv614929528=6, srv1032226509=0, srv1534362281=2, srv1134308631=1, srv682212059=7} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:27,302 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:27,302 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:27,302 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:27,302 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:27,303 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:27,303 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:27,303 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-11 14:16:27,303 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-11 14:16:27,303 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=8, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:27,303 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table121) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:27,303 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table16
2023-07-11 14:16:27,303 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1602950194=3, srv413692020=5, srv1927124420=4, srv614929528=6, srv1032226509=0, srv1534362281=2, srv1134308631=1, srv682212059=7} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:27,303 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:27,303 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:27,303 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:27,303 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:27,303 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:27,303 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:27,303 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-11 14:16:27,303 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-11 14:16:27,303 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=8, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:27,303 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table16) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:27,303 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table122
2023-07-11 14:16:27,303 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1602950194=3, srv413692020=5, srv1927124420=4, srv614929528=6, srv1032226509=0, srv1534362281=2, srv1134308631=1, srv682212059=7} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:27,303 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:27,303 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:27,303 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:27,303 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:27,303 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:27,303 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:27,304 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-11 14:16:27,304 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-11 14:16:27,304 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=8, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:27,304 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table122) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:27,304 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table17
2023-07-11 14:16:27,304 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1602950194=3, srv413692020=5, srv1927124420=4, srv614929528=6, srv1032226509=0, srv1534362281=2, srv1134308631=1, srv682212059=7} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:27,304 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:27,304 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:27,304 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:27,304 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:27,304 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:27,304 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:27,304 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-11 14:16:27,304 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-11 14:16:27,304 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=8, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:27,304 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table17) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:27,304 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table123
2023-07-11 14:16:27,304 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1602950194=3, srv413692020=5, srv1927124420=4, srv614929528=6, srv1032226509=0, srv1534362281=2, srv1134308631=1, srv682212059=7} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:27,304 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:27,304 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:27,304 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:27,304 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:27,304 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:27,304 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:27,304 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-11 14:16:27,304 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-11 14:16:27,304 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=8, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:27,305 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table123) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:27,305 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table18
2023-07-11 14:16:27,305 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1602950194=3, srv413692020=5, srv1927124420=4, srv614929528=6, srv1032226509=0, srv1534362281=2, srv1134308631=1, srv682212059=7} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:27,305 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:27,305 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:27,305 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:27,305 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:27,305 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:27,305 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:27,305 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-11 14:16:27,305 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-11 14:16:27,305 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=8, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:27,305 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table18) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:27,305 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table124
2023-07-11 14:16:27,305 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1602950194=3, srv413692020=5, srv1927124420=4, srv614929528=6, srv1032226509=0, srv1534362281=2, srv1134308631=1, srv682212059=7} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:27,306 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:27,306 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:27,306 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:27,306 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:27,306 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:27,306 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:27,306 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-11 14:16:27,306 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-11 14:16:27,306 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=8, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:27,306 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table124) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:27,306 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table19
2023-07-11 14:16:27,306 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1602950194=3, srv413692020=5, srv1927124420=4, srv614929528=6, srv1032226509=0, srv1534362281=2, srv1134308631=1, srv682212059=7} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:27,306 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:27,306 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:27,306 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:27,306 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:27,306 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:27,306 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:27,306 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-11 14:16:27,306 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-11 14:16:27,306 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=8, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:27,306 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table19) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:27,306 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table125
2023-07-11 14:16:27,306 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1602950194=3, srv413692020=5, srv1927124420=4, srv614929528=6, srv1032226509=0, srv1534362281=2, srv1134308631=1, srv682212059=7} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:27,306 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:27,306 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:27,307 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:27,307 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:27,307 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:27,307 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:27,307 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-11 14:16:27,307 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-11 14:16:27,307 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=8, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:27,307 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table125) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:27,307 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table126
2023-07-11 14:16:27,307 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1602950194=3, srv413692020=5, srv1927124420=4, srv614929528=6, srv1032226509=0, srv1534362281=2, srv1134308631=1, srv682212059=7} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:27,307 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:27,307 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:27,307 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:27,307 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:27,307 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:27,307 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:27,307 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-11 14:16:27,307 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-11 14:16:27,307 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=8, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:27,307 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table126) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:27,307 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table127
2023-07-11 14:16:27,307 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1602950194=3, srv413692020=5, srv1927124420=4, srv614929528=6, srv1032226509=0, srv1534362281=2, srv1134308631=1, srv682212059=7} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:27,307 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:27,307 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:27,307 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:27,307 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:27,307 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:27,308 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:27,308 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-11 14:16:27,308 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-11 14:16:27,308 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=8, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:27,308 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table127) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:27,308 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table128
2023-07-11 14:16:27,308 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1602950194=3, srv413692020=5, srv1927124420=4, srv614929528=6, srv1032226509=0, srv1534362281=2, srv1134308631=1, srv682212059=7} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:27,308 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:27,308 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:27,308 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:27,308 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:27,308 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:27,308 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:27,308 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-11 14:16:27,308 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-11 14:16:27,308 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=8, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:27,308 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table128) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:27,308 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table129
2023-07-11 14:16:27,308 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1602950194=3, srv413692020=5, srv1927124420=4, srv614929528=6, srv1032226509=0, srv1534362281=2, srv1134308631=1, srv682212059=7} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:27,308 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:27,308 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:27,308 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:27,308 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:27,308 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:27,308 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:27,308 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-11 14:16:27,308 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-11 14:16:27,309 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=8, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:27,309 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table129) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:27,309 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table90
2023-07-11 14:16:27,309 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1602950194=3, srv413692020=5, srv1927124420=4, srv614929528=6, srv1032226509=0, srv1534362281=2, srv1134308631=1, srv682212059=7} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:27,309 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:27,309 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:27,309 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:27,309 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:27,309 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:27,309 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:27,309 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-11 14:16:27,309 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-11 14:16:27,309 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=8, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:27,309 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table90) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:27,309 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table91
2023-07-11 14:16:27,309 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1602950194=3, srv413692020=5, srv1927124420=4, srv614929528=6, srv1032226509=0, srv1534362281=2, srv1134308631=1, srv682212059=7} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:27,309 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:27,309 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:27,309 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:27,309 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:27,309 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:27,309 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:27,309 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-11 14:16:27,309 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-11 14:16:27,309 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=8, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:27,309 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table91) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:27,310 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table92
2023-07-11 14:16:27,310 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1602950194=3, srv413692020=5, srv1927124420=4, srv614929528=6, srv1032226509=0, srv1534362281=2, srv1134308631=1, srv682212059=7} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:27,310 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:27,310 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:27,310 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:27,310 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:27,310 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:27,310 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:27,310 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-11 14:16:27,310 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-11 14:16:27,310 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=8, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:27,310 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table92) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:27,310 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table93
2023-07-11 14:16:27,310 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1602950194=3, srv413692020=5, srv1927124420=4, srv614929528=6, srv1032226509=0, srv1534362281=2, srv1134308631=1, srv682212059=7} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:27,310 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:27,310 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:27,310 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:27,310 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:27,310 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:27,310 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:27,310 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-11 14:16:27,310 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-11 14:16:27,310 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=8, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:27,310 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table93) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:27,310 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table94
2023-07-11 14:16:27,310 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1602950194=3, srv413692020=5, srv1927124420=4, srv614929528=6, srv1032226509=0, srv1534362281=2, srv1134308631=1, srv682212059=7} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:27,311 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:27,311 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:27,311 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:27,311 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:27,311 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:27,311 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:27,311 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-11 14:16:27,311 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-11 14:16:27,311 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=8, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:27,311 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table94) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:27,311 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table95
2023-07-11 14:16:27,311 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1602950194=3, srv413692020=5, srv1927124420=4, srv614929528=6, srv1032226509=0, srv1534362281=2, srv1134308631=1, srv682212059=7} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:27,311 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:27,311 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:27,311 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:27,311 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:27,311 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:27,311 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:27,311 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-11 14:16:27,311 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-11 14:16:27,311 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=8, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:27,311 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table95) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:27,311 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table96
2023-07-11 14:16:27,311 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1602950194=3, srv413692020=5, srv1927124420=4, srv614929528=6, srv1032226509=0, srv1534362281=2, srv1134308631=1, srv682212059=7} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:27,311 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:27,311 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:27,312 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:27,312 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:27,312 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:27,312 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:27,312 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-11 14:16:27,312 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-11 14:16:27,312 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=8, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:27,312 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table96) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:27,312 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table97
2023-07-11 14:16:27,312 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1602950194=3, srv413692020=5, srv1927124420=4, srv614929528=6, srv1032226509=0, srv1534362281=2, srv1134308631=1, srv682212059=7} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:27,312 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:27,312 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:27,312 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:27,312 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:27,312 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:27,312 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:27,312 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-11 14:16:27,312 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-11 14:16:27,312 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=8, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:27,312 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table97) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:27,312 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table10
2023-07-11 14:16:27,312 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1602950194=3, srv413692020=5, srv1927124420=4, srv614929528=6, srv1032226509=0, srv1534362281=2, srv1134308631=1, srv682212059=7} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:27,312 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:27,312 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:27,312 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:27,312 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:27,313 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:27,313 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:27,313 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-11 14:16:27,313 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-11 14:16:27,313 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=8, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:27,313 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table10) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:27,313 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table98
2023-07-11 14:16:27,313 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1602950194=3, srv413692020=5, srv1927124420=4, srv614929528=6, srv1032226509=0, srv1534362281=2, srv1134308631=1, srv682212059=7} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:27,313 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:27,313 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:27,313 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:27,313 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:27,313 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:27,313 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:27,313 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-11 14:16:27,313 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-11 14:16:27,313 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=8, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:27,313 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table98) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:27,313 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table11
2023-07-11 14:16:27,313 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1602950194=3, srv413692020=5, srv1927124420=4, srv614929528=6, srv1032226509=0, srv1534362281=2, srv1134308631=1, srv682212059=7} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:27,313 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:27,313 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:27,313 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:27,313 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:27,314 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:27,314 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:27,314 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-11 14:16:27,314 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-11 14:16:27,314 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=8, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:27,314 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table11) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:27,314 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table99
2023-07-11 14:16:27,314 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1602950194=3, srv413692020=5, srv1927124420=4, srv614929528=6, srv1032226509=0, srv1534362281=2, srv1134308631=1, srv682212059=7} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:27,314 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:27,314 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:27,314 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:27,314 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:27,314 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:27,314 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:27,314 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-11 14:16:27,314 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-11 14:16:27,314 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=8, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:27,314 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table99) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:27,314 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table12
2023-07-11 14:16:27,314 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1602950194=3, srv413692020=5, srv1927124420=4, srv614929528=6, srv1032226509=0, srv1534362281=2, srv1134308631=1, srv682212059=7} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:27,315 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:27,315 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:27,315 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:27,315 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:27,315 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:27,315 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:27,315 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-11 14:16:27,315 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-11 14:16:27,315 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=8, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:27,315 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table12) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:27,315 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table110
2023-07-11 14:16:27,315 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1602950194=3, srv413692020=5, srv1927124420=4, srv614929528=6, srv1032226509=0, srv1534362281=2, srv1134308631=1, srv682212059=7} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:27,315 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:27,315 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:27,315 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:27,315 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:27,315 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:27,315 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:27,315 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-11 14:16:27,315 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-11 14:16:27,315 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=8, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:27,315 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table110) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:27,315 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table111
2023-07-11 14:16:27,316 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1602950194=3, srv413692020=5, srv1927124420=4, srv614929528=6, srv1032226509=0, srv1534362281=2, srv1134308631=1, srv682212059=7} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:27,316 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:27,316 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:27,316 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:27,316 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:27,316 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:27,316 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:27,316 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-11 14:16:27,316 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-11 14:16:27,316 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=8, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:27,316 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table111) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:27,316 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table112
2023-07-11 14:16:27,316 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1602950194=3, srv413692020=5, srv1927124420=4, srv614929528=6, srv1032226509=0, srv1534362281=2, srv1134308631=1, srv682212059=7} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:27,316 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:27,316 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:27,316 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:27,316 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:27,316 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:27,316 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:27,316 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-11 14:16:27,316 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-11 14:16:27,316 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=8, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:27,316 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table112) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:27,316 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table113
2023-07-11 14:16:27,316 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1602950194=3, srv413692020=5, srv1927124420=4, srv614929528=6, srv1032226509=0, srv1534362281=2, srv1134308631=1, srv682212059=7} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:27,316 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:27,316 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:27,317 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:27,317 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:27,317 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:27,317 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:27,317 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-11 14:16:27,317 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-11 14:16:27,317 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=8, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:27,317 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table113) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:27,317 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table114
2023-07-11 14:16:27,317 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1602950194=3, srv413692020=5, srv1927124420=4, srv614929528=6, srv1032226509=0, srv1534362281=2, srv1134308631=1, srv682212059=7} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:27,317 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:27,317 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:27,317 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:27,317 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:27,317 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:27,317 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:27,317 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-11 14:16:27,317 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-11 14:16:27,317 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=8, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:27,317 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table114) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:27,317 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table115
2023-07-11 14:16:27,317 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1602950194=3, srv413692020=5, srv1927124420=4, srv614929528=6, srv1032226509=0, srv1534362281=2, srv1134308631=1, srv682212059=7} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:27,317 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:27,317 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:27,317 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:27,317 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:27,317 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:27,318 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:27,318 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-11 14:16:27,318 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-11 14:16:27,318 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=8, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:27,318 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table115) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:27,318 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table116
2023-07-11 14:16:27,318 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1602950194=3, srv413692020=5, srv1927124420=4, srv614929528=6, srv1032226509=0, srv1534362281=2, srv1134308631=1, srv682212059=7} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:27,318 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:27,318 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:27,318 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:27,318 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:27,318 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:27,318 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:27,318 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-11 14:16:27,318 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-11 14:16:27,318 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=8, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:27,318 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table116) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:27,318 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table117
2023-07-11 14:16:27,318 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1602950194=3, srv413692020=5, srv1927124420=4, srv614929528=6, srv1032226509=0, srv1534362281=2, srv1134308631=1, srv682212059=7} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:27,318 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:27,318 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:27,318 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:27,318 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:27,318 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:27,318 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:27,318 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-11 14:16:27,318 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-11 14:16:27,319 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=8, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:27,319 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table117) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:27,319 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table118
2023-07-11 14:16:27,319 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1602950194=3, srv413692020=5, srv1927124420=4, srv614929528=6, srv1032226509=0, srv1534362281=2, srv1134308631=1, srv682212059=7} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:27,319 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:27,319 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:27,319 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:27,319 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:27,319 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:27,319 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:27,319 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-11 14:16:27,319 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-11 14:16:27,319 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=8, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:27,319 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table118) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:27,319 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table119
2023-07-11 14:16:27,319 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1602950194=3, srv413692020=5, srv1927124420=4, srv614929528=6, srv1032226509=0, srv1534362281=2, srv1134308631=1, srv682212059=7} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:27,319 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:27,319 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:27,319 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:27,319 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:27,319 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:27,319 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:27,319 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-11 14:16:27,319 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-11 14:16:27,319 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=8, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:27,319 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table119) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:27,319 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table80
2023-07-11 14:16:27,320 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1602950194=3, srv413692020=5, srv1927124420=4, srv614929528=6, srv1032226509=0, srv1534362281=2, srv1134308631=1, srv682212059=7} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:27,320 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:27,320 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:27,320 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:27,320 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:27,320 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:27,320 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:27,320 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-11 14:16:27,320 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-11 14:16:27,320 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=8, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:27,320 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table80) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:27,320 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table81
2023-07-11 14:16:27,320 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1602950194=3, srv413692020=5, srv1927124420=4, srv614929528=6, srv1032226509=0, srv1534362281=2, srv1134308631=1, srv682212059=7} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:27,320 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:27,320 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:27,320 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:27,320 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:27,320 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:27,320 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:27,320 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-11 14:16:27,320 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-11 14:16:27,320 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=8, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:27,320 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table81) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:27,320 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table82
2023-07-11 14:16:27,320 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1602950194=3, srv413692020=5, srv1927124420=4, srv614929528=6, srv1032226509=0, srv1534362281=2, srv1134308631=1, srv682212059=7} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:27,321 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:27,321 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:27,321 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:27,321 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:27,321 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:27,321 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:27,321 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-11 14:16:27,321 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-11 14:16:27,321 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=8, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:27,321 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table82) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:27,321 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table83
2023-07-11 14:16:27,321 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1602950194=3, srv413692020=5, srv1927124420=4, srv614929528=6, srv1032226509=0, srv1534362281=2, srv1134308631=1, srv682212059=7} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:27,321 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:27,321 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:27,321 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:27,321 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:27,321 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:27,321 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:27,321 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-11 14:16:27,321 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-11 14:16:27,321 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=8, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:27,321 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table83) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:27,321 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table84
2023-07-11 14:16:27,321 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1602950194=3, srv413692020=5, srv1927124420=4, srv614929528=6, srv1032226509=0, srv1534362281=2, srv1134308631=1, srv682212059=7} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:27,321 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:27,321 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:27,322 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:27,322 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:27,322 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:27,322 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:27,322 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-11 14:16:27,322 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-11 14:16:27,322 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=8, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:27,322 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table84) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:27,322 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table85
2023-07-11 14:16:27,322 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1602950194=3, srv413692020=5, srv1927124420=4, srv614929528=6, srv1032226509=0, srv1534362281=2, srv1134308631=1, srv682212059=7} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:27,322 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:27,322 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:27,322 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:27,322 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:27,322 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:27,322 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:27,322 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-11 14:16:27,322 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-11 14:16:27,322 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=8, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:27,322 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table85) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:27,322 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table86
2023-07-11 14:16:27,322 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1602950194=3, srv413692020=5, srv1927124420=4, srv614929528=6, srv1032226509=0, srv1534362281=2, srv1134308631=1, srv682212059=7} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:27,322 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:27,322 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:27,322 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:27,322 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:27,323 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:27,323 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:27,323 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-11 14:16:27,323 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-11 14:16:27,323 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=8, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:27,323 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table86) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:27,323 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table87
2023-07-11 14:16:27,323 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1602950194=3, srv413692020=5, srv1927124420=4, srv614929528=6, srv1032226509=0, srv1534362281=2, srv1134308631=1, srv682212059=7} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:27,323 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:27,323 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:27,323 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:27,323 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:27,323 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:27,323 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:27,323 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-11 14:16:27,323 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-11 14:16:27,323 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=8, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:27,323 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table87) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:27,323 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table88
2023-07-11 14:16:27,323 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1602950194=3, srv413692020=5, srv1927124420=4, srv614929528=6, srv1032226509=0, srv1534362281=2, srv1134308631=1, srv682212059=7} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:27,323 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:27,323 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:27,323 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:27,324 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:27,324 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:27,324 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:27,324 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-11 14:16:27,324 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-11 14:16:27,324 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=8, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:27,324 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table88) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:27,324 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table89
2023-07-11 14:16:27,324 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1602950194=3, srv413692020=5, srv1927124420=4, srv614929528=6, srv1032226509=0, srv1534362281=2, srv1134308631=1, srv682212059=7} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:27,324 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:27,324 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:27,324 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:27,324 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:27,324 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:27,324 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:27,324 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-11 14:16:27,324 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-11 14:16:27,324 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=8, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:27,324 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table89) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:27,324 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table79
2023-07-11 14:16:27,324 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1602950194=3, srv413692020=5, srv1927124420=4, srv614929528=6, srv1032226509=0, srv1534362281=2, srv1134308631=1, srv682212059=7} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:27,325 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:27,325 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:27,325 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:27,325 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:27,325 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:27,325 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:27,325 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-11 14:16:27,325 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-11 14:16:27,325 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=8, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:27,325 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table79) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:27,325 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table5
2023-07-11 14:16:27,325 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1602950194=3, srv413692020=5, srv1927124420=4, srv614929528=6, srv1032226509=0, srv1534362281=2, srv1134308631=1, srv682212059=7} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:27,325 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:27,325 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:27,325 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:27,325 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:27,325 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:27,325 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:27,325 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-11 14:16:27,325 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-11 14:16:27,325 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=8, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:27,325 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table5) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:27,325 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table4
2023-07-11 14:16:27,325 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1602950194=3, srv413692020=5, srv1927124420=4, srv614929528=6, srv1032226509=0, srv1534362281=2, srv1134308631=1, srv682212059=7} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:27,326 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:27,326 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:27,326 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:27,326 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:27,326 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:27,326 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:27,326 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-11 14:16:27,326 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-11 14:16:27,326 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=8, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:27,326 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table4) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:27,326 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table3
2023-07-11 14:16:27,326 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1602950194=3, srv413692020=5, srv1927124420=4, srv614929528=6, srv1032226509=0, srv1534362281=2, srv1134308631=1, srv682212059=7} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:27,326 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:27,326 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:27,326 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:27,326 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:27,326 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:27,326 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:27,326 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-11 14:16:27,326 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-11 14:16:27,326 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=8, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:27,326 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table3) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:27,326 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table2
2023-07-11 14:16:27,326 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1602950194=3, srv413692020=5, srv1927124420=4, srv614929528=6, srv1032226509=0, srv1534362281=2, srv1134308631=1, srv682212059=7} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:27,326 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:27,326 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:27,326 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:27,327 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:27,327 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:27,327 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:27,327 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-11 14:16:27,327 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-11 14:16:27,327 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=8, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:27,327 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table2) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:27,327 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1
2023-07-11 14:16:27,327 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1602950194=3, srv413692020=5, srv1927124420=4, srv614929528=6, srv1032226509=0, srv1534362281=2, srv1134308631=1, srv682212059=7} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:27,327 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:27,327 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:27,327 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:27,327 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:27,327 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:27,327 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:27,327 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-11 14:16:27,327 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-11 14:16:27,327 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=8, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:27,327 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:27,327 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table0
2023-07-11 14:16:27,327 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1602950194=3, srv413692020=5, srv1927124420=4, srv614929528=6, srv1032226509=0, srv1534362281=2, srv1134308631=1, srv682212059=7} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:27,327 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:27,327 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:27,327 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:27,327 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:27,327 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:27,328 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:27,328 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-11 14:16:27,328 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-11 14:16:27,328 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=8, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:27,328 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table0) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:27,328 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table70
2023-07-11 14:16:27,328 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1602950194=3, srv413692020=5, srv1927124420=4, srv614929528=6, srv1032226509=0, srv1534362281=2, srv1134308631=1, srv682212059=7} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:27,328 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:27,328 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:27,328 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:27,328 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:27,328 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:27,328 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:27,328 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-11 14:16:27,328 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-11 14:16:27,328 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=8, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:27,328 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table70) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:27,328 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table71
2023-07-11 14:16:27,328 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1602950194=3, srv413692020=5, srv1927124420=4, srv614929528=6, srv1032226509=0, srv1534362281=2, srv1134308631=1, srv682212059=7} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:27,328 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:27,328 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:27,328 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:27,328 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:27,328 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:27,328 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:27,328 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-11 14:16:27,329 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-11 14:16:27,329 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=8, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:27,329 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table71) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:27,329 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table72
2023-07-11 14:16:27,329 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1602950194=3, srv413692020=5, srv1927124420=4, srv614929528=6, srv1032226509=0, srv1534362281=2, srv1134308631=1, srv682212059=7} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:27,329 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:27,329 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:27,329 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:27,329 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:27,329 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:27,329 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:27,329 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-11 14:16:27,329 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-11 14:16:27,329 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=8, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:27,329 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table72) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:27,329 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table73
2023-07-11 14:16:27,329 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1602950194=3, srv413692020=5, srv1927124420=4, srv614929528=6, srv1032226509=0, srv1534362281=2, srv1134308631=1, srv682212059=7} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:27,329 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:27,329 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:27,329 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:27,329 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:27,329 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:27,329 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:27,329 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-11 14:16:27,329 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-11 14:16:27,330 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=8, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:27,330 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table73) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:27,330 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table74
2023-07-11 14:16:27,330 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1602950194=3, srv413692020=5, srv1927124420=4, srv614929528=6, srv1032226509=0, srv1534362281=2, srv1134308631=1, srv682212059=7} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:27,330 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:27,330 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:27,330 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:27,330 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:27,330 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:27,330 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:27,330 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-11 14:16:27,330 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-11 14:16:27,330 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=8, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:27,330 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table74) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:27,330 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table9
2023-07-11 14:16:27,330 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1602950194=3, srv413692020=5, srv1927124420=4, srv614929528=6, srv1032226509=0, srv1534362281=2, srv1134308631=1, srv682212059=7} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:27,330 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:27,330 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:27,330 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:27,330 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:27,330 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:27,330 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:27,330 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-11 14:16:27,330 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-11 14:16:27,330 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=8, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:27,330 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table9) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:27,331 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table75
2023-07-11 14:16:27,331 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1602950194=3, srv413692020=5, srv1927124420=4, srv614929528=6, srv1032226509=0, srv1534362281=2, srv1134308631=1, srv682212059=7} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:27,331 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:27,331 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:27,331 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:27,331 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:27,331 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:27,331 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:27,331 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-11 14:16:27,331 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-11 14:16:27,331 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=8, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:27,331 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table75) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:27,331 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table8
2023-07-11 14:16:27,331 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1602950194=3, srv413692020=5, srv1927124420=4, srv614929528=6, srv1032226509=0, srv1534362281=2, srv1134308631=1, srv682212059=7} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:27,331 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:27,331 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:27,331 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:27,331 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:27,331 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:27,331 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:27,331 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-11 14:16:27,331 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-11 14:16:27,331 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=8, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:27,331 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table8) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:27,331 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table76
2023-07-11 14:16:27,331 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1602950194=3, srv413692020=5, srv1927124420=4, srv614929528=6, srv1032226509=0, srv1534362281=2, srv1134308631=1, srv682212059=7} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:27,332 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:27,332 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:27,332 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:27,332 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:27,332 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:27,332 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:27,332 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-11 14:16:27,332 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-11 14:16:27,332 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=8, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:27,332 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table76) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:27,332 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table7
2023-07-11 14:16:27,332 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1602950194=3, srv413692020=5, srv1927124420=4, srv614929528=6, srv1032226509=0, srv1534362281=2, srv1134308631=1, srv682212059=7} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:27,332 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:27,332 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:27,332 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:27,332 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:27,332 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:27,332 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:27,332 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-11 14:16:27,332 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-11 14:16:27,332 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=8, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:27,332 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table7) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:27,332 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table77
2023-07-11 14:16:27,332 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1602950194=3, srv413692020=5, srv1927124420=4, srv614929528=6, srv1032226509=0, srv1534362281=2, srv1134308631=1, srv682212059=7} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:27,332 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:27,332 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:27,333 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:27,333 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:27,333 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:27,333 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:27,333 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-11 14:16:27,333 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-11 14:16:27,333 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=8, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:27,333 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table77) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:27,333 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table6
2023-07-11 14:16:27,333 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1602950194=3, srv413692020=5, srv1927124420=4, srv614929528=6, srv1032226509=0, srv1534362281=2, srv1134308631=1, srv682212059=7} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:27,333 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:27,333 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:27,333 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:27,333 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:27,333 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:27,333 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:27,333 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-11 14:16:27,334 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-11 14:16:27,334 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=8, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:27,334 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table6) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:27,334 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table78
2023-07-11 14:16:27,334 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1602950194=3, srv413692020=5, srv1927124420=4, srv614929528=6, srv1032226509=0, srv1534362281=2, srv1134308631=1, srv682212059=7} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:27,334 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:27,334 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:27,334 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:27,334 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:27,334 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:27,334 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:27,334 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-11 14:16:27,334 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-11 14:16:27,334 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=8, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:27,334 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table78) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:27,334 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table68
2023-07-11 14:16:27,334 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1602950194=3, srv413692020=5, srv1927124420=4, srv614929528=6, srv1032226509=0, srv1534362281=2, srv1134308631=1, srv682212059=7} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:27,334 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:27,334 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:27,334 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:27,334 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:27,334 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:27,334 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:27,334 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-11 14:16:27,334 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-11 14:16:27,334 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=8, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:27,335 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table68) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:27,335 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table130
2023-07-11 14:16:27,335 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1602950194=3, srv413692020=5, srv1927124420=4, srv614929528=6, srv1032226509=0, srv1534362281=2, srv1134308631=1, srv682212059=7} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:27,335 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:27,335 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:27,335 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:27,335 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:27,335 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:27,335 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:27,335 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-11 14:16:27,335 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-11 14:16:27,335 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=8, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:27,335 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table130) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:27,335 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table69
2023-07-11 14:16:27,335 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1602950194=3, srv413692020=5, srv1927124420=4, srv614929528=6, srv1032226509=0, srv1534362281=2, srv1134308631=1, srv682212059=7} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:27,335 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:27,335 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:27,335 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:27,335 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:27,335 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:27,335 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:27,335 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-11 14:16:27,335 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-11 14:16:27,335 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=8, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:27,335 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table69) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:27,335 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table131
2023-07-11 14:16:27,336 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1602950194=3, srv413692020=5, srv1927124420=4, srv614929528=6, srv1032226509=0, srv1534362281=2, srv1134308631=1, srv682212059=7} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:27,336 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:27,336 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:27,336 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:27,336 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:27,336 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:27,336 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:27,336 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-11 14:16:27,336 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-11 14:16:27,336 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=8, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:27,336 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table131) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:27,336 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table132
2023-07-11 14:16:27,336 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1602950194=3, srv413692020=5, srv1927124420=4, srv614929528=6, srv1032226509=0, srv1534362281=2, srv1134308631=1, srv682212059=7} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:27,336 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:27,336 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:27,336 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:27,336 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:27,336 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:27,336 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:27,336 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-11 14:16:27,336 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-11 14:16:27,336 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=8, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:27,336 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table132) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:27,336 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table133
2023-07-11 14:16:27,336 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1602950194=3, srv413692020=5, srv1927124420=4, srv614929528=6, srv1032226509=0, srv1534362281=2, srv1134308631=1, srv682212059=7} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:27,336 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:27,337 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:27,337 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:27,337 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:27,337 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:27,337 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:27,337 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-11 14:16:27,337 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-11 14:16:27,337 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=8, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:27,337 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table133) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:27,337 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table134
2023-07-11 14:16:27,337 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1602950194=3, srv413692020=5, srv1927124420=4, srv614929528=6, srv1032226509=0, srv1534362281=2, srv1134308631=1, srv682212059=7} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:27,337 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:27,337 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:27,337 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:27,337 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:27,337 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:27,337 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:27,337 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-11 14:16:27,337 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-11 14:16:27,337 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=8, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:27,337 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table134) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:27,337 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table135
2023-07-11 14:16:27,337 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1602950194=3, srv413692020=5, srv1927124420=4, srv614929528=6, srv1032226509=0, srv1534362281=2, srv1134308631=1, srv682212059=7} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:27,337 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:27,337 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:27,337 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:27,337 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:27,337 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:27,338 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:27,338 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-11 14:16:27,338 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-11 14:16:27,338 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=8, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:27,338 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table135) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:27,338 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table136
2023-07-11 14:16:27,338 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1602950194=3, srv413692020=5, srv1927124420=4, srv614929528=6, srv1032226509=0, srv1534362281=2, srv1134308631=1, srv682212059=7} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:27,338 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:27,338 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:27,338 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:27,338 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:27,338 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:27,338 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:27,338 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-11 14:16:27,338 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-11 14:16:27,338 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=8, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:27,338 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table136) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:27,338 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table137
2023-07-11 14:16:27,338 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1602950194=3, srv413692020=5, srv1927124420=4, srv614929528=6, srv1032226509=0, srv1534362281=2, srv1134308631=1, srv682212059=7} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:27,338 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:27,338 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:27,338 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:27,338 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:27,338 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:27,338 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:27,338 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-11 14:16:27,338 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-11 14:16:27,339 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=8, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:27,339 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table137) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:27,339 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table138
2023-07-11 14:16:27,339 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1602950194=3, srv413692020=5, srv1927124420=4, srv614929528=6, srv1032226509=0, srv1534362281=2, srv1134308631=1, srv682212059=7} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:27,339 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:27,339 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:27,339 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:27,339 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:27,339 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:27,339 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:27,339 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-11 14:16:27,339 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-11 14:16:27,339 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=8, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:27,339 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table138) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:27,339 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table139
2023-07-11 14:16:27,339 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1602950194=3, srv413692020=5, srv1927124420=4, srv614929528=6, srv1032226509=0, srv1534362281=2, srv1134308631=1, srv682212059=7} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:27,339 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:27,339 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:27,339 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:27,339 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:27,339 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:27,339 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:27,339 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-11 14:16:27,339 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-11 14:16:27,339 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=8, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:27,339 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table139) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:27,340 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table60
2023-07-11 14:16:27,340 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1602950194=3, srv413692020=5, srv1927124420=4, srv614929528=6, srv1032226509=0, srv1534362281=2, srv1134308631=1, srv682212059=7} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:27,340 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:27,340 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:27,340 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:27,340 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:27,340 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:27,340 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:27,340 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-11 14:16:27,340 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-11 14:16:27,340 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=8, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:27,340 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table60) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:27,340 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table61
2023-07-11 14:16:27,340 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1602950194=3, srv413692020=5, srv1927124420=4, srv614929528=6, srv1032226509=0, srv1534362281=2, srv1134308631=1, srv682212059=7} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:27,340 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:27,340 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:27,340 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:27,340 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:27,340 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:27,340 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:27,340 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-11 14:16:27,340 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-11 14:16:27,340 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=8, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:27,340 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table61) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:27,341 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table62
2023-07-11 14:16:27,341 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1602950194=3, srv413692020=5, srv1927124420=4, srv614929528=6, srv1032226509=0, srv1534362281=2, srv1134308631=1, srv682212059=7} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:27,341 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:27,341 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:27,341 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:27,341 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:27,341 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:27,341 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:27,341 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-11 14:16:27,341 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-11 14:16:27,341 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=8, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:27,341 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table62) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:27,341 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table63
2023-07-11 14:16:27,341 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1602950194=3, srv413692020=5, srv1927124420=4, srv614929528=6, srv1032226509=0, srv1534362281=2, srv1134308631=1, srv682212059=7} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:27,341 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:27,341 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:27,341 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:27,341 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:27,341 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:27,341 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:27,341 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-11 14:16:27,341 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-11 14:16:27,341 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=8, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:27,341 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table63) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:27,341 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table64
2023-07-11 14:16:27,341 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1602950194=3, srv413692020=5, srv1927124420=4, srv614929528=6, srv1032226509=0, srv1534362281=2, srv1134308631=1, srv682212059=7} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:27,342 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:27,342 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:27,342 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:27,342 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:27,342 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:27,342 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:27,342 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-11 14:16:27,342 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-11 14:16:27,342 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=8, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:27,342 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table64) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:27,342 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table65
2023-07-11 14:16:27,342 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1602950194=3, srv413692020=5, srv1927124420=4, srv614929528=6, srv1032226509=0, srv1534362281=2, srv1134308631=1, srv682212059=7} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:27,342 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:27,342 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:27,342 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:27,342 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:27,342 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:27,342 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:27,342 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-11 14:16:27,342 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-11 14:16:27,343 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=8, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:27,343 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table65) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:27,343 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table66
2023-07-11 14:16:27,343 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1602950194=3, srv413692020=5, srv1927124420=4, srv614929528=6, srv1032226509=0, srv1534362281=2, srv1134308631=1, srv682212059=7} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:27,343 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:27,343 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:27,343 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:27,343 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:27,343 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:27,343 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:27,343 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-11 14:16:27,343 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-11 14:16:27,343 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=8, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:27,343 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table66) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:27,344 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table67
2023-07-11 14:16:27,344 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1602950194=3, srv413692020=5, srv1927124420=4, srv614929528=6, srv1032226509=0, srv1534362281=2, srv1134308631=1, srv682212059=7} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:27,344 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:27,344 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:27,344 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:27,344 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:27,344 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:27,344 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:27,344 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-11 14:16:27,344 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-11 14:16:27,344 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=8, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:27,344 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table67) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:27,344 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table57
2023-07-11 14:16:27,344 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1602950194=3, srv413692020=5, srv1927124420=4, srv614929528=6, srv1032226509=0, srv1534362281=2, srv1134308631=1, srv682212059=7} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:27,345 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:27,345 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:27,345 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:27,345 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:27,345 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:27,345 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:27,345 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-11 14:16:27,345 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-11 14:16:27,345 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=8, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:27,345 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table57) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:27,345 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table58
2023-07-11 14:16:27,345 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1602950194=3, srv413692020=5, srv1927124420=4, srv614929528=6, srv1032226509=0, srv1534362281=2, srv1134308631=1, srv682212059=7} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:27,345 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:27,345 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:27,346 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:27,346 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:27,346 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:27,346 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:27,346 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-11 14:16:27,346 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-11 14:16:27,346 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=8, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:27,346 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table58) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:27,346 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table59
2023-07-11 14:16:27,346 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1602950194=3, srv413692020=5, srv1927124420=4, srv614929528=6, srv1032226509=0, srv1534362281=2, srv1134308631=1, srv682212059=7} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:27,346 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:27,346 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:27,346 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:27,346 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:27,346 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:27,347 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:27,347 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-11 14:16:27,347 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-11 14:16:27,347 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=8, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:27,347 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table59) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:27,347 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table50
2023-07-11 14:16:27,347 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1602950194=3, srv413692020=5, srv1927124420=4, srv614929528=6, srv1032226509=0, srv1534362281=2, srv1134308631=1, srv682212059=7} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:27,347 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:27,347 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:27,347 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:27,347 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:27,347 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:27,347 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:27,347 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-11 14:16:27,347 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-11 14:16:27,348 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=8, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:27,348 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table50) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:27,348 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table51
2023-07-11 14:16:27,348 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1602950194=3, srv413692020=5, srv1927124420=4, srv614929528=6, srv1032226509=0, srv1534362281=2, srv1134308631=1, srv682212059=7} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:27,348 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:27,348 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:27,348 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:27,348 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:27,348 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:27,348 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:27,348 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-11 14:16:27,348 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-11 14:16:27,348 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=8, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:27,349 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table51) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:27,349 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table52
2023-07-11 14:16:27,349 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1602950194=3, srv413692020=5, srv1927124420=4, srv614929528=6, srv1032226509=0, srv1534362281=2, srv1134308631=1, srv682212059=7} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:27,349 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:27,349 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:27,349 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:27,349 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:27,349 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:27,349 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:27,349 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-11 14:16:27,349 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-11 14:16:27,349 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=8, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:27,349 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table52) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:27,349 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table53
2023-07-11 14:16:27,349 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1602950194=3, srv413692020=5, srv1927124420=4, srv614929528=6, srv1032226509=0, srv1534362281=2, srv1134308631=1, srv682212059=7} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:27,350 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:27,350 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:27,350 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:27,350 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:27,350 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:27,350 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:27,350 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-11 14:16:27,350 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-11 14:16:27,350 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=8, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:27,350 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table53) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:27,350 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table54
2023-07-11 14:16:27,350 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1602950194=3, srv413692020=5, srv1927124420=4, srv614929528=6, srv1032226509=0, srv1534362281=2, srv1134308631=1, srv682212059=7} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:27,350 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:27,350 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:27,350 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:27,350 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:27,350 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:27,350 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:27,351 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-11 14:16:27,351 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-11 14:16:27,351 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=8, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:27,351 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table54) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:27,351 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table55
2023-07-11 14:16:27,351 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1602950194=3, srv413692020=5, srv1927124420=4, srv614929528=6, srv1032226509=0, srv1534362281=2, srv1134308631=1, srv682212059=7} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:27,351 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:27,351 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:27,351 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:27,351 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:27,351 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:27,351 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:27,351 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-11 14:16:27,351 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-11 14:16:27,351 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=8, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:27,351 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table55) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:27,351 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table56
2023-07-11 14:16:27,351 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1602950194=3, srv413692020=5, srv1927124420=4, srv614929528=6, srv1032226509=0, srv1534362281=2, srv1134308631=1, srv682212059=7} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:27,351 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:27,351 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:27,352 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:27,352 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:27,352 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:27,352 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:27,352 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-11 14:16:27,352 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-11 14:16:27,352 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=8, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:27,352 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table56) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:27,352 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table46
2023-07-11 14:16:27,352 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1602950194=3, srv413692020=5, srv1927124420=4, srv614929528=6, srv1032226509=0, srv1534362281=2, srv1134308631=1, srv682212059=7} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:27,352 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:27,352 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:27,352 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:27,352 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:27,352 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:27,352 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:27,352 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-11 14:16:27,352 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-11 14:16:27,352 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=8, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:27,352 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table46) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:27,352 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table47
2023-07-11 14:16:27,352 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1602950194=3, srv413692020=5, srv1927124420=4, srv614929528=6, srv1032226509=0, srv1534362281=2, srv1134308631=1, srv682212059=7} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:27,352 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:27,352 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:27,352 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:27,353 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:27,353 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:27,353 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:27,353 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-11 14:16:27,353 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-11 14:16:27,353 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=8, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:27,353 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table47) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:27,353 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table48
2023-07-11 14:16:27,353 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1602950194=3, srv413692020=5, srv1927124420=4, srv614929528=6, srv1032226509=0, srv1534362281=2, srv1134308631=1, srv682212059=7} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:27,353 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:27,353 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:27,353 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:27,353 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:27,353 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:27,353 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:27,353 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-11 14:16:27,353 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-11 14:16:27,353 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=8, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:27,353 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table48) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:27,353 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table49
2023-07-11 14:16:27,353 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1602950194=3, srv413692020=5, srv1927124420=4, srv614929528=6, srv1032226509=0, srv1534362281=2, srv1134308631=1, srv682212059=7} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:27,353 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:27,353 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:27,353 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:27,353 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:27,353 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:27,354 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:27,354 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-11 14:16:27,354 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-11 14:16:27,354 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=8, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:27,354 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table49) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:27,354 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table40
2023-07-11 14:16:27,354 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1602950194=3, srv413692020=5, srv1927124420=4, srv614929528=6, srv1032226509=0, srv1534362281=2, srv1134308631=1, srv682212059=7} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:27,354 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:27,354 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:27,354 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:27,354 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:27,354 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:27,354 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:27,354 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-11 14:16:27,354 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-11 14:16:27,354 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=8, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:27,354 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table40) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:27,354 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table41
2023-07-11 14:16:27,354 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1602950194=3, srv413692020=5, srv1927124420=4, srv614929528=6, srv1032226509=0, srv1534362281=2, srv1134308631=1, srv682212059=7} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:27,354 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:27,354 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:27,354 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:27,354 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:27,354 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:27,354 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:27,355 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-11 14:16:27,355 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-11 14:16:27,355 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=8, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:27,355 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table41) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:27,355 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table42
2023-07-11 14:16:27,355 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1602950194=3, srv413692020=5, srv1927124420=4, srv614929528=6, srv1032226509=0, srv1534362281=2, srv1134308631=1, srv682212059=7} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:27,355 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:27,355 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:27,355 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:27,355 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:27,355 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:27,355 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:27,355 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-11 14:16:27,355 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-11 14:16:27,355 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=8, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:27,355 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table42) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:27,355 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table43
2023-07-11 14:16:27,355 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1602950194=3, srv413692020=5, srv1927124420=4, srv614929528=6, srv1032226509=0, srv1534362281=2, srv1134308631=1, srv682212059=7} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:27,355 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:27,355 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:27,356 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:27,356 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:27,356 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:27,356 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:27,356 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-11 14:16:27,356 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-11 14:16:27,356 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=8, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:27,356 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table43) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:27,356 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table44
2023-07-11 14:16:27,356 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1602950194=3, srv413692020=5, srv1927124420=4, srv614929528=6, srv1032226509=0, srv1534362281=2, srv1134308631=1, srv682212059=7} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:27,356 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:27,356 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:27,356 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:27,356 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:27,356 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:27,356 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:27,356 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-11 14:16:27,356 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-11 14:16:27,356 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=8, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:27,356 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table44) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:27,356 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table45
2023-07-11 14:16:27,356 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1602950194=3, srv413692020=5, srv1927124420=4, srv614929528=6, srv1032226509=0, srv1534362281=2, srv1134308631=1, srv682212059=7} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:27,356 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:27,356 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:27,356 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:27,356 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:27,357 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:27,357 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:27,357 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-11 14:16:27,357 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-11 14:16:27,357 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=8, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:27,357 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table45) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:27,357 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table35
2023-07-11 14:16:27,357 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1602950194=3, srv413692020=5, srv1927124420=4, srv614929528=6, srv1032226509=0, srv1534362281=2, srv1134308631=1, srv682212059=7} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:27,357 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:27,357 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:27,357 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:27,357 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:27,357 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:27,357 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:27,357 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-11 14:16:27,357 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-11 14:16:27,357 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=8, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:27,357 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table35) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:27,357 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table36
2023-07-11 14:16:27,357 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1602950194=3, srv413692020=5, srv1927124420=4, srv614929528=6, srv1032226509=0, srv1534362281=2, srv1134308631=1, srv682212059=7} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:27,357 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:27,357 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:27,357 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:27,357 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:27,357 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:27,358 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:27,358 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-11 14:16:27,358 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-11 14:16:27,358 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=8, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:27,358 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table36) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:27,358 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table37
2023-07-11 14:16:27,358 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1602950194=3, srv413692020=5, srv1927124420=4, srv614929528=6, srv1032226509=0, srv1534362281=2, srv1134308631=1, srv682212059=7} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:27,358 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:27,358 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:27,358 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:27,358 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:27,358 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:27,358 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:27,358 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-11 14:16:27,358 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-11 14:16:27,358 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=8, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:27,358 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table37) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:27,358 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table38
2023-07-11 14:16:27,358 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1602950194=3, srv413692020=5, srv1927124420=4, srv614929528=6, srv1032226509=0, srv1534362281=2, srv1134308631=1, srv682212059=7} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:27,358 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:27,358 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:27,358 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:27,358 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:27,358 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:27,358 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:27,358 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-11 14:16:27,359 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-11 14:16:27,359 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=8, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:27,359 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table38) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:27,359 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table100
2023-07-11 14:16:27,359 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1602950194=3, srv413692020=5, srv1927124420=4, srv614929528=6, srv1032226509=0, srv1534362281=2, srv1134308631=1, srv682212059=7} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:27,359 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:27,359 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:27,359 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:27,359 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:27,359 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:27,359 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:27,359 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-11 14:16:27,359 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-11 14:16:27,359 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=8, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:27,359 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table100) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:27,359 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table39
2023-07-11 14:16:27,359 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1602950194=3, srv413692020=5, srv1927124420=4, srv614929528=6, srv1032226509=0, srv1534362281=2, srv1134308631=1, srv682212059=7} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:27,359 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:27,359 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:27,359 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:27,359 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:27,359 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:27,359 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:27,359 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-11 14:16:27,359 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-11 14:16:27,359 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=8, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:27,360 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table39) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:27,360 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table101
2023-07-11 14:16:27,360 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1602950194=3, srv413692020=5, srv1927124420=4, srv614929528=6, srv1032226509=0, srv1534362281=2, srv1134308631=1, srv682212059=7} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:27,360 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:27,360 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:27,360 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:27,360 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:27,360 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:27,360 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:27,360 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-11 14:16:27,360 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-11 14:16:27,360 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=8, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:27,360 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table101) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:27,360 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table102
2023-07-11 14:16:27,360 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1602950194=3, srv413692020=5, srv1927124420=4, srv614929528=6, srv1032226509=0, srv1534362281=2, srv1134308631=1, srv682212059=7} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:27,360 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:27,360 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:27,360 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:27,360 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:27,360 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:27,360 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:27,360 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-11 14:16:27,360 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-11 14:16:27,360 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=8, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:27,360 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table102) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:27,360 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table103
2023-07-11 14:16:27,360 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1602950194=3, srv413692020=5, srv1927124420=4, srv614929528=6, srv1032226509=0, srv1534362281=2, srv1134308631=1, srv682212059=7} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:27,361 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:27,361 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:27,361 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:27,361 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:27,361 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:27,361 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:27,361 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-11 14:16:27,361 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-11 14:16:27,361 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=8, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:27,361 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table103) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:27,361 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table104
2023-07-11 14:16:27,361 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1602950194=3, srv413692020=5, srv1927124420=4, srv614929528=6, srv1032226509=0, srv1534362281=2, srv1134308631=1, srv682212059=7} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:27,361 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:27,361 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:27,361 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:27,361 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:27,361 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:27,361 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:27,361 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-11 14:16:27,361 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-11 14:16:27,361 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=8, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:27,361 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table104) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:27,361 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table105
2023-07-11 14:16:27,361 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1602950194=3, srv413692020=5, srv1927124420=4, srv614929528=6, srv1032226509=0, srv1534362281=2, srv1134308631=1, srv682212059=7} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:27,361 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:27,361 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:27,361 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:27,362 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:27,362 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:27,362 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:27,362 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-11 14:16:27,362 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-11 14:16:27,362 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=8, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:27,362 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table105) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:27,362 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table106
2023-07-11 14:16:27,362 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1602950194=3, srv413692020=5, srv1927124420=4, srv614929528=6, srv1032226509=0, srv1534362281=2, srv1134308631=1, srv682212059=7} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:27,362 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:27,362 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:27,362 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:27,362 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:27,362 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:27,362 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:27,362 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-11 14:16:27,362 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-11 14:16:27,362 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=8, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:27,362 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table106) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:27,362 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table107
2023-07-11 14:16:27,362 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1602950194=3, srv413692020=5, srv1927124420=4, srv614929528=6, srv1032226509=0, srv1534362281=2, srv1134308631=1, srv682212059=7} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:27,362 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:27,362 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:27,362 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:27,362 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:27,362 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:27,362 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:27,363 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-11 14:16:27,363 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-11 14:16:27,363 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=8, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:27,363 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table107) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:27,363 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table108
2023-07-11 14:16:27,363 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1602950194=3, srv413692020=5, srv1927124420=4, srv614929528=6, srv1032226509=0, srv1534362281=2, srv1134308631=1, srv682212059=7} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:27,363 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:27,363 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:27,363 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:27,363 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:27,363 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:27,363 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:27,363 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-11 14:16:27,363 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-11 14:16:27,363 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=8, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:27,363 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table108) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:27,363 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table109
2023-07-11 14:16:27,363 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1602950194=3, srv413692020=5, srv1927124420=4, srv614929528=6, srv1032226509=0, srv1534362281=2, srv1134308631=1, srv682212059=7} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:27,363 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:27,363 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:27,363 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:27,363 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:27,363 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:27,363 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:27,363 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-11 14:16:27,363 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-11 14:16:27,363 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=8, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:27,364 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table109) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:27,364 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table30
2023-07-11 14:16:27,364 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1602950194=3, srv413692020=5, srv1927124420=4, srv614929528=6, srv1032226509=0, srv1534362281=2, srv1134308631=1, srv682212059=7} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:27,364 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:27,364 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:27,364 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:27,364 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:27,364 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:27,364 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:27,364 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-11 14:16:27,364 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-11 14:16:27,364 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=8, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:27,364 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table30) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:27,364 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table31
2023-07-11 14:16:27,364 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1602950194=3, srv413692020=5, srv1927124420=4, srv614929528=6, srv1032226509=0, srv1534362281=2, srv1134308631=1, srv682212059=7} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:27,364 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:27,364 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:27,364 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:27,364 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:27,364 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:27,365 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:27,365 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-11 14:16:27,365 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-11 14:16:27,365 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=8, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:27,365 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table31) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:27,365 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table32
2023-07-11 14:16:27,365 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1602950194=3, srv413692020=5, srv1927124420=4, srv614929528=6, srv1032226509=0, srv1534362281=2, srv1134308631=1, srv682212059=7} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:27,365 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:27,365 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:27,365 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:27,365 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:27,365 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:27,365 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:27,365 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-11 14:16:27,365 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-11 14:16:27,365 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=8, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:27,365 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table32) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:27,365 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table33
2023-07-11 14:16:27,365 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1602950194=3, srv413692020=5, srv1927124420=4, srv614929528=6, srv1032226509=0, srv1534362281=2, srv1134308631=1, srv682212059=7} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:27,365 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:27,365 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:27,365 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:27,365 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:27,366 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:27,366 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:27,366 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-11 14:16:27,366 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-11 14:16:27,366 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=8, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:27,366 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table33) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:27,366 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table34
2023-07-11 14:16:27,366 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1602950194=3, srv413692020=5, srv1927124420=4, srv614929528=6, srv1032226509=0, srv1534362281=2, srv1134308631=1, srv682212059=7} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:27,366 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:27,366 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:27,366 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:27,366 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:27,366 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:27,366 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:27,366 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-11 14:16:27,366 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-11 14:16:27,366 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=8, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:27,366 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table34) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:27,366 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table24
2023-07-11 14:16:27,366 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1602950194=3, srv413692020=5, srv1927124420=4, srv614929528=6, srv1032226509=0, srv1534362281=2, srv1134308631=1, srv682212059=7} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:27,366 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:27,366 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:27,366 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:27,366 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:27,366 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:27,366 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:27,367 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-11 14:16:27,367 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-11 14:16:27,367 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=8, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:27,367 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table24) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:27,367 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table25
2023-07-11 14:16:27,367 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1602950194=3, srv413692020=5, srv1927124420=4, srv614929528=6, srv1032226509=0, srv1534362281=2, srv1134308631=1, srv682212059=7} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:27,367 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:27,367 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:27,367 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:27,367 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:27,367 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:27,367 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:27,367 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-11 14:16:27,367 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-11 14:16:27,367 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=8, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:27,367 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table25) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:27,367 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table26
2023-07-11 14:16:27,367 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1602950194=3, srv413692020=5, srv1927124420=4, srv614929528=6, srv1032226509=0, srv1534362281=2, srv1134308631=1, srv682212059=7} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:27,367 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:27,367 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:27,367 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:27,367 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:27,367 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:27,367 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:27,367 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-11 14:16:27,367 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-11 14:16:27,368 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=8, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:27,368 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table26) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:27,368 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table27
2023-07-11 14:16:27,368 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1602950194=3, srv413692020=5, srv1927124420=4, srv614929528=6, srv1032226509=0, srv1534362281=2, srv1134308631=1, srv682212059=7} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:27,368 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:27,368 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:27,368 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:27,368 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:27,368 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:27,368 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:27,368 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-11 14:16:27,368 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-11 14:16:27,368 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=8, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:27,368 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table27) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:27,368 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table28
2023-07-11 14:16:27,368 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1602950194=3, srv413692020=5, srv1927124420=4, srv614929528=6, srv1032226509=0, srv1534362281=2, srv1134308631=1, srv682212059=7} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:27,368 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:27,368 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:27,368 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:27,368 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:27,368 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:27,368 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:27,368 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-11 14:16:27,368 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-11 14:16:27,368 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=8, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:27,369 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table28) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:27,369 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table29
2023-07-11 14:16:27,369 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1602950194=3, srv413692020=5, srv1927124420=4, srv614929528=6, srv1032226509=0, srv1534362281=2, srv1134308631=1, srv682212059=7} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:27,369 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:27,369 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:27,369 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:27,369 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:27,369 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:27,369 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:27,369 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-11 14:16:27,369 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-11 14:16:27,369 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=8, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:27,369 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table29) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:27,369 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table20
2023-07-11 14:16:27,369 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1602950194=3, srv413692020=5, srv1927124420=4, srv614929528=6, srv1032226509=0, srv1534362281=2, srv1134308631=1, srv682212059=7} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:27,369 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:27,369 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:27,369 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:27,369 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:27,369 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:27,369 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:27,369 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-11 14:16:27,369 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-11 14:16:27,369 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=8, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:27,369 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table20) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:27,370 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table21
2023-07-11 14:16:27,370 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1602950194=3, srv413692020=5, srv1927124420=4, srv614929528=6, srv1032226509=0, srv1534362281=2, srv1134308631=1, srv682212059=7} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:27,370 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:27,370 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:27,370 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:27,370 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:27,370 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:27,370 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:27,370 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-11 14:16:27,370 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-11 14:16:27,370 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=8, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:27,370 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table21) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:27,370 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table22
2023-07-11 14:16:27,370 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1602950194=3, srv413692020=5, srv1927124420=4, srv614929528=6, srv1032226509=0, srv1534362281=2, srv1134308631=1, srv682212059=7} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:27,370 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:27,370 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:27,370 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:27,370 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:27,370 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:27,370 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:27,370 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-11 14:16:27,370 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-11 14:16:27,370 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=8, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:27,370 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table22) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:27,370 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table23
2023-07-11 14:16:27,370 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1602950194=3, srv413692020=5, srv1927124420=4, srv614929528=6, srv1032226509=0, srv1534362281=2, srv1134308631=1, srv682212059=7} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:27,371 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:27,371 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:27,371 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:27,371 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:27,371 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:27,371 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:27,371 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-11 14:16:27,371 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-11 14:16:27,371 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=8, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:27,371 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table23) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:27,371 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table4
2023-07-11 14:16:27,371 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1320279967=0, srv591397032=4, srv144783551=1, srv183983059=2, srv536526445=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:27,371 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:27,371 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:27,371 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:27,371 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:27,371 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:27,371 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=5, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:27,371 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table4) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:27,371 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table3
2023-07-11 14:16:27,371 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1320279967=0, srv591397032=4, srv144783551=1, srv183983059=2, srv536526445=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:27,372 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:27,372 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:27,372 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:27,372 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:27,372 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:27,372 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=5, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:27,372 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table3) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:27,372 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table2
2023-07-11 14:16:27,372 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1320279967=0, srv591397032=4, srv144783551=1, srv183983059=2, srv536526445=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:27,372 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:27,372 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:27,372 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:27,372 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:27,372 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:27,372 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=5, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:27,372 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table2) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:27,372 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1
2023-07-11 14:16:27,372 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1320279967=0, srv591397032=4, srv144783551=1, srv183983059=2, srv536526445=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:27,372 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:27,372 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:27,372 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:27,372 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:27,372 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:27,372 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=5, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:27,372 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:27,372 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table0
2023-07-11 14:16:27,373 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1320279967=0, srv591397032=4, srv144783551=1, srv183983059=2, srv536526445=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:27,373 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:27,373 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:27,373 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:27,373 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:27,373 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:27,373 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=5, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:27,373 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table0) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:27,392 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table13
2023-07-11 14:16:27,393 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv553536953=290, srv1630071126=110, srv1071894870=12, srv23511728=232, srv658346947=323, srv2025338799=204, srv1397994335=64, srv1976766403=195, srv1644629726=118, srv957637734=381, srv2079182457=210, srv1749264468=139, srv2046129126=206, srv1595762596=104, srv603990852=307, srv1973073480=194, srv958856137=382, srv644066832=319, srv557062842=292, srv277765671=235, srv732221418=337, srv1769385567=143, srv224612199=228, srv714752528=334, srv362526040=256, srv581128949=296, srv2133511466=223, srv1144239257=30, srv320603627=245, srv1679952521=126, srv2122867873=222, srv1110067064=24, srv256251994=233, srv63261708=317, srv89837390=371, srv552104598=289, srv508952995=281, srv2096011353=214, srv1770417148=144, srv1246723478=42, srv929436444=378, srv2082192429=211, srv234917297=231, srv405700573=266, srv183644386=166, srv1488378513=85, srv173139715=136, srv1154180352=32, srv355693379=252, srv1407521654=66, srv496848057=275, srv1157975499=33, srv1806731027=162, srv1923102804=184, srv311102455=244, srv450011410=271, srv771515724=348, srv389183508=262, srv1249074416=43, srv2014575201=201, srv640847108=318, srv832363565=356, srv1970882134=192, srv2107358603=218, srv855766065=361, srv1336043388=55, srv29397186=237, srv982792848=390, srv976560524=386, srv101181760=3, srv1093549482=21, srv2018389395=202, srv2113483104=221, srv1778339118=149, srv1968709692=190, srv705221118=333, srv159600090=105, srv1919608486=180, srv981255102=389, srv807899713=353, srv755110395=344, srv1770594519=145, srv739692705=340, srv1076582671=16, srv693869315=330, srv1079048717=17, srv440657532=270, srv1636659280=115, srv2108739257=220, srv668373413=326, srv1003610393=2, srv1054229197=11, srv1868589627=172, srv2103522371=217, srv1000546271=0, srv951670617=380, srv2042909593=205, srv1865656038=171, srv1466355012=78, srv703662406=332, srv1418112884=70, srv1215580291=40, srv71833528=335, srv1580581635=103, srv1021032212=5, srv1080806312=19, srv1985601859=197, srv74471954=343, srv1647472319=119, srv2071553346=208, srv1632855171=112, srv1122009370=27, srv13613992=61, srv1630777154=111, srv301413669=239, srv550697728=288, srv1296023857=53, srv1724550977=133, srv1989290370=198, srv1926417985=185, srv1678097199=125, srv1461034373=76, srv614690415=311, srv2098345381=215, srv310463473=243, srv1011934105=4, srv148627129=84, srv305489318=240, srv1256534903=46, srv1289731445=52, srv1798844587=157, srv567113085=294, srv1119222501=26, srv2055117940=207, srv855898852=362, srv629224816=316, srv1075943554=15, srv625909061=315, srv1705591942=128, srv734225580=339, srv660107924=324, srv1381729938=62, srv1633483173=113, srv408265476=267, srv1776057793=148, srv1360253411=60, srv1511424834=90, srv1414162621=68, srv883343663=370, srv151859222=91, srv349144930=251, srv1991304034=199, srv1825887791=164, srv601657063=305, srv758932951=345, srv1651629087=120, srv1864623584=170, srv682957691=329, srv1500454146=88, srv1725962085=135, srv1659841448=121, srv1253206004=45, srv52354442=284, srv18508093=168, srv1427731921=73, srv561344974=293, srv721668125=336, srv1575482138=100, srv914128771=373, srv961487230=383, srv741332941=342, srv533032466=286, srv1574140987=99, srv2139849097=224, srv503902262=278, srv674807007=327, srv1786829855=153, srv2088727517=213, srv394366966=264, srv980089565=388, srv114594288=31, srv38296437=261, srv214835574=226, srv1887224977=176, srv1025509362=7, srv1577020334=102, srv524466665=285, srv393561021=263, srv759909927=346, srv763556514=347, srv786453030=349, srv2142935488=225, srv618111613=312, srv16254163=108, srv343211061=250, srv476075173=273, srv1269632212=47, srv333589612=246, srv499015361=276, srv836674186=357, srv1799191687=158, srv1446998035=74, srv1571774199=98, srv1115354947=25, srv333860881=247, srv1724152600=132, srv1598699299=106, srv177885829=151, srv472125887=272, srv1101339966=22, srv1424985362=72, srv1945569895=188, srv594128294=300, srv1026739237=8, srv842459828=358, srv878519137=366, srv1921260729=181, srv339110834=249, srv504099471=279, srv814253179=354, srv1643744885=116, srv1793847521=155, srv607234624=309, srv698219051=331, srv1688538732=127, srv666240078=325, srv1079284733=18, srv29210550=236, srv506181748=280, srv881313122=368, srv1945452576=187, srv597307897=303, srv1285120424=51, srv1887943816=177, srv1983604698=196, srv1805465940=161, srv309309336=242, srv1719756294=131, srv1349932676=58, srv1208486369=38, srv1643971570=117, srv1509331489=89, srv334105385=248, srv1400515744=65, srv369984715=259, srv43712162=269, srv842675864=359, srv1803258748=160, srv1022450918=6, srv1775108732=147, srv1766088250=141, srv180150732=159, srv1220857227=41, srv226530501=229, srv362032108=255, srv919715380=377, srv1074935976=14, srv1395030819=63, srv803291569=352, srv1877966766=175, srv220538712=227, srv2021718843=203, srv2107782185=219, srv882216860=369, srv1489137852=86, srv1972328734=193, srv1470759982=79, srv1774824811=146, srv971974774=384, srv1418242791=71, srv1001274196=1, srv909615097=372, srv1537724566=93, srv1165799954=34, srv1724754364=134, srv978173525=387, srv113319438=29, srv578033735=295, srv147931272=80, srv1183635941=35, srv1904215245=178, srv596349756=302, srv880835255=367, srv857544550=364, srv1779729022=152, srv1795612465=156, srv621083045=314, srv917704170=375, srv1351811120=59, srv1316710897=54, srv789820555=350, srv1922580095=183, srv305567304=241, srv1936745425=186, srv1745318024=138, srv1210822057=39, srv645375717=320, srv950628389=379, srv1490199189=87, srv1575919256=101, srv154481102=96, srv359402967=254, srv997716931=391, srv1457224273=75, srv581644449=297, srv1872374768=174, srv363177310=257, srv740327512=341, srv1664227236=123, srv972330517=385, srv1634261306=114, srv1662183707=122, srv1969046891=191, srv1485266211=82, srv1778842262=150, srv588410181=298, srv1921840985=182, srv591279493=299, srv37574565=260, srv1104147458=23, srv1190166330=36, srv652270371=322, srv1484309042=81, srv1560148463=97, srv618569548=313, srv2102708311=216, srv1084873074=20, srv517669556=283, srv918152084=376, srv649714317=321, srv1674484790=124, srv1339239880=56, srv1461073271=77, srv1125312901=28, srv25633292=234, srv516616923=282, srv299721745=238, srv604932433=308, srv1273702855=48, srv792183929=351, srv1042608200=10, srv1276335106=49, srv1486044644=83, srv676101698=328, srv998930892=392, srv200111276=200, srv1863083643=169, srv1737443479=137, srv872997185=365, srv821351126=355, srv852115805=360, srv1074355423=13, srv170952194=130, srv503430005=277, srv153887567=94, srv1415163001=69, srv1032737435=9, srv1840670515=167, srv1961921083=189, srv59745831=304, srv36715747=258, srv431547280=268, srv1524853580=92, srv1870059418=173, srv396010771=265, srv594457792=301, srv1755339428=140, srv1766275429=142, srv5565786=291, srv603898526=306, srv544570223=287, srv856030669=363, srv1542523468=95, srv915785747=374, srv356122213=253, srv1411875499=67, srv2077620970=209, srv1345529444=57, srv232339963=230, srv1250861076=44, srv1914875423=179, srv478619481=274, srv1202435626=37, srv1706089454=129, srv1810631201=163, srv1282644061=50, srv1625945288=109, srv733251129=338, srv2082830831=212, srv1612103540=107, srv612136291=310, srv1790004142=154, srv183394703=165} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:27,393 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:27,393 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:27,393 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:27,393 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:27,393 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:27,393 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:27,393 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-11 14:16:27,393 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-11 14:16:27,393 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-11 14:16:27,394 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-11 14:16:27,394 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 10 is on host 10
2023-07-11 14:16:27,394 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 11 is on host 11
2023-07-11 14:16:27,394 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 12 is on host 12
2023-07-11 14:16:27,394 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 13 is on host 13
2023-07-11 14:16:27,394 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 14 is on host 14
2023-07-11 14:16:27,394 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 15 is on host 15
2023-07-11 14:16:27,394 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 16 is on host 16
2023-07-11 14:16:27,394 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 17 is on host 17
2023-07-11 14:16:27,394 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 18 is on host 18
2023-07-11 14:16:27,394 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 19 is on host 19
2023-07-11 14:16:27,394 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 20 is on host 20
2023-07-11 14:16:27,394 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 21 is on host 21
2023-07-11 14:16:27,394 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 22 is on host 22
2023-07-11 14:16:27,394 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 23 is on host 23
2023-07-11 14:16:27,394 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 24 is on host 24
2023-07-11 14:16:27,394 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 25 is on host 25
2023-07-11 14:16:27,394 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 26 is on host 26
2023-07-11 14:16:27,394 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 27 is on host 27
2023-07-11 14:16:27,394 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 28 is on host 28
2023-07-11 14:16:27,394 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 29 is on host 29
2023-07-11 14:16:27,394 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 30 is on host 30
2023-07-11 14:16:27,394 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 31 is on host 31
2023-07-11 14:16:27,394 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 32 is on host 32
2023-07-11 14:16:27,394 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 33 is on host 33
2023-07-11 14:16:27,394 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 34 is on host 34
2023-07-11 14:16:27,394 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 35 is on host 35
2023-07-11 14:16:27,394 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 36 is on host 36
2023-07-11 14:16:27,394 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 37 is on host 37
2023-07-11 14:16:27,395 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 38 is on host 38
2023-07-11 14:16:27,395 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 39 is on host 39
2023-07-11 14:16:27,395 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 40 is on host 40
2023-07-11 14:16:27,395 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 41 is on host 41
2023-07-11 14:16:27,395 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 42 is on host 42
2023-07-11 14:16:27,395 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 43 is on host 43
2023-07-11 14:16:27,395 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 44 is on host 44
2023-07-11 14:16:27,395 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 45 is on host 45
2023-07-11 14:16:27,395 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 46 is on host 46
2023-07-11 14:16:27,395 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 47 is on host 47
2023-07-11 14:16:27,395 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 48 is on host 48
2023-07-11 14:16:27,395 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 49 is on host 49
2023-07-11 14:16:27,395 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 50 is on host 50
2023-07-11 14:16:27,395 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 51 is on host 51
2023-07-11 14:16:27,395 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 52 is on host 52
2023-07-11 14:16:27,395 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 53 is on host 53
2023-07-11 14:16:27,395 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 54 is on host 54
2023-07-11 14:16:27,395 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 55 is on host 55
2023-07-11 14:16:27,395 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 56 is on host 56
2023-07-11 14:16:27,395 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 57 is on host 57
2023-07-11 14:16:27,395 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 58 is on host 58
2023-07-11 14:16:27,395 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 59 is on host 59
2023-07-11 14:16:27,395 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 60 is on host 60
2023-07-11 14:16:27,395 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 61 is on host 61
2023-07-11 14:16:27,395 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 62 is on host 62
2023-07-11 14:16:27,395 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 63 is on host 63
2023-07-11 14:16:27,395 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 64 is on host 64
2023-07-11 14:16:27,395 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 65 is on host 65
2023-07-11 14:16:27,395 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 66 is on host 66
2023-07-11 14:16:27,396 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 67 is on host 67
2023-07-11 14:16:27,396 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 68 is on host 68
2023-07-11 14:16:27,396 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 69 is on host 69
2023-07-11 14:16:27,396 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 70 is on host 70
2023-07-11 14:16:27,396 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 71 is on host 71
2023-07-11 14:16:27,396 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 72 is on host 72
2023-07-11 14:16:27,396 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 73 is on host 73
2023-07-11 14:16:27,396 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 74 is on host 74
2023-07-11 14:16:27,396 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 75 is on host 75
2023-07-11 14:16:27,396 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 76 is on host 76
2023-07-11 14:16:27,396 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 77 is on host 77
2023-07-11 14:16:27,396 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 78 is on host 78
2023-07-11 14:16:27,396 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 79 is on host 79
2023-07-11 14:16:27,396 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 80 is on host 80
2023-07-11 14:16:27,396 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 81 is on host 81
2023-07-11 14:16:27,396 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 82 is on host 82
2023-07-11 14:16:27,396 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 83 is on host 83
2023-07-11 14:16:27,396 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 84 is on host 84
2023-07-11 14:16:27,396 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 85 is on host 85
2023-07-11 14:16:27,396 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 86 is on host 86
2023-07-11 14:16:27,396 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 87 is on host 87
2023-07-11 14:16:27,396 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 88 is on host 88
2023-07-11 14:16:27,396 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 89 is on host 89
2023-07-11 14:16:27,396 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 90 is on host 90
2023-07-11 14:16:27,396 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 91 is on host 91
2023-07-11 14:16:27,396 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 92 is on host 92
2023-07-11 14:16:27,396 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 93 is on host 93
2023-07-11 14:16:27,396 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 94 is on host 94
2023-07-11 14:16:27,396 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 95 is on host 95
2023-07-11 14:16:27,397 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 96 is on host 96
2023-07-11 14:16:27,397 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 97 is on host 97
2023-07-11 14:16:27,397 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 98 is on host 98
2023-07-11 14:16:27,397 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 99 is on host 99
2023-07-11 14:16:27,397 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 100 is on host 100
2023-07-11 14:16:27,397 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 101 is on host 101
2023-07-11 14:16:27,397 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 102 is on host 102
2023-07-11 14:16:27,397 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 103 is on host 103
2023-07-11 14:16:27,397 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 104 is on host 104
2023-07-11 14:16:27,397 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 105 is on host 105
2023-07-11 14:16:27,397 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 106 is on host 106
2023-07-11 14:16:27,397 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 107 is on host 107
2023-07-11 14:16:27,397 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 108 is on host 108
2023-07-11 14:16:27,397 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 109 is on host 109
2023-07-11 14:16:27,397 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 110 is on host 110
2023-07-11 14:16:27,397 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 111 is on host 111
2023-07-11 14:16:27,397 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 112 is on host 112
2023-07-11 14:16:27,397 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 113 is on host 113
2023-07-11 14:16:27,397 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 114 is on host 114
2023-07-11 14:16:27,397 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 115 is on host 115
2023-07-11 14:16:27,397 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 116 is on host 116
2023-07-11 14:16:27,397 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 117 is on host 117
2023-07-11 14:16:27,397 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 118 is on host 118
2023-07-11 14:16:27,397 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 119 is on host 119
2023-07-11 14:16:27,397 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 120 is on host 120
2023-07-11 14:16:27,397 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 121 is on host 121
2023-07-11 14:16:27,397 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 122 is on host 122
2023-07-11 14:16:27,397 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 123 is on host 123
2023-07-11 14:16:27,397 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 124 is on host 124
2023-07-11 14:16:27,398 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 125 is on host 125
2023-07-11 14:16:27,398 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 126 is on host 126
2023-07-11 14:16:27,398 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 127 is on host 127
2023-07-11 14:16:27,398 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 128 is on host 128
2023-07-11 14:16:27,398 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 129 is on host 129
2023-07-11 14:16:27,398 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 130 is on host 130
2023-07-11 14:16:27,398 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 131 is on host 131
2023-07-11 14:16:27,398 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 132 is on host 132
2023-07-11 14:16:27,398 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 133 is on host 133
2023-07-11 14:16:27,398 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 134 is on host 134
2023-07-11 14:16:27,398 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 135 is on host 135
2023-07-11 14:16:27,398 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 136 is on host 136
2023-07-11 14:16:27,398 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 137 is on host 137
2023-07-11 14:16:27,398 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 138 is on host 138
2023-07-11 14:16:27,398 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 139 is on host 139
2023-07-11 14:16:27,398 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 140 is on host 140
2023-07-11 14:16:27,398 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 141 is on host 141
2023-07-11 14:16:27,398 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 142 is on host 142
2023-07-11 14:16:27,398 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 143 is on host 143
2023-07-11 14:16:27,398 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 144 is on host 144
2023-07-11 14:16:27,398 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 145 is on host 145
2023-07-11 14:16:27,398 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 146 is on host 146
2023-07-11 14:16:27,398 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 147 is on host 147
2023-07-11 14:16:27,398 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 148 is on host 148
2023-07-11 14:16:27,398 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 149 is on host 149
2023-07-11 14:16:27,398 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 150 is on host 150
2023-07-11 14:16:27,398 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 151 is on host 151
2023-07-11 14:16:27,398 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 152 is on host 152
2023-07-11 14:16:27,398 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 153 is on host 153
2023-07-11 14:16:27,399 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 154 is on host 154
2023-07-11 14:16:27,399 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 155 is on host 155
2023-07-11 14:16:27,399 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 156 is on host 156
2023-07-11 14:16:27,399 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 157 is on host 157
2023-07-11 14:16:27,399 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 158 is on host 158
2023-07-11 14:16:27,399 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 159 is on host 159
2023-07-11 14:16:27,399 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 160 is on host 160
2023-07-11 14:16:27,399 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 161 is on host 161
2023-07-11 14:16:27,399 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 162 is on host 162
2023-07-11 14:16:27,399 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 163 is on host 163
2023-07-11 14:16:27,399 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 164 is on host 164
2023-07-11 14:16:27,399 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 165 is on host 165
2023-07-11 14:16:27,399 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 166 is on host 166
2023-07-11 14:16:27,399 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 167 is on host 167
2023-07-11 14:16:27,399 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 168 is on host 168
2023-07-11 14:16:27,399 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 169 is on host 169
2023-07-11 14:16:27,399 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 170 is on host 170
2023-07-11 14:16:27,399 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 171 is on host 171
2023-07-11 14:16:27,399 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 172 is on host 172
2023-07-11 14:16:27,399 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 173 is on host 173
2023-07-11 14:16:27,399 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 174 is on host 174
2023-07-11 14:16:27,399 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 175 is on host 175
2023-07-11 14:16:27,399 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 176 is on host 176
2023-07-11 14:16:27,399 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 177 is on host 177
2023-07-11 14:16:27,399 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 178 is on host 178
2023-07-11 14:16:27,399 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 179 is on host 179
2023-07-11 14:16:27,399 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 180 is on host 180
2023-07-11 14:16:27,399 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 181 is on host 181
2023-07-11 14:16:27,399 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 182 is on host 182
2023-07-11 14:16:27,400 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 183 is on host 183
2023-07-11 14:16:27,400 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 184 is on host 184
2023-07-11 14:16:27,400 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 185 is on host 185
2023-07-11 14:16:27,400 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 186 is on host 186
2023-07-11 14:16:27,400 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 187 is on host 187
2023-07-11 14:16:27,400 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 188 is on host 188
2023-07-11 14:16:27,400 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 189 is on host 189
2023-07-11 14:16:27,400 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 190 is on host 190
2023-07-11 14:16:27,400 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 191 is on host 191
2023-07-11 14:16:27,400 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 192 is on host 192
2023-07-11 14:16:27,400 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 193 is on host 193
2023-07-11 14:16:27,400 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 194 is on host 194
2023-07-11 14:16:27,400 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 195 is on host 195
2023-07-11 14:16:27,400 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 196 is on host 196
2023-07-11 14:16:27,400 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 197 is on host 197
2023-07-11 14:16:27,400 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 198 is on host 198
2023-07-11 14:16:27,400 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 199 is on host 199
2023-07-11 14:16:27,400 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 200 is on host 200
2023-07-11 14:16:27,400 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 201 is on host 201
2023-07-11 14:16:27,400 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 202 is on host 202
2023-07-11 14:16:27,400 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 203 is on host 203
2023-07-11 14:16:27,400 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 204 is on host 204
2023-07-11 14:16:27,400 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 205 is on host 205
2023-07-11 14:16:27,400 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 206 is on host 206
2023-07-11 14:16:27,400 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 207 is on host 207
2023-07-11 14:16:27,400 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 208 is on host 208
2023-07-11 14:16:27,400 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 209 is on host 209
2023-07-11 14:16:27,400 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 210 is on host 210
2023-07-11 14:16:27,400 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 211 is on host 211
2023-07-11 14:16:27,401 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 212 is on host 212
2023-07-11 14:16:27,401 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 213 is on host 213
2023-07-11 14:16:27,401 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 214 is on host 214
2023-07-11 14:16:27,401 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 215 is on host 215
2023-07-11 14:16:27,401 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 216 is on host 216
2023-07-11 14:16:27,401 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 217 is on host 217
2023-07-11 14:16:27,401 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 218 is on host 218
2023-07-11 14:16:27,401 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 219 is on host 219
2023-07-11 14:16:27,401 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 220 is on host 220
2023-07-11 14:16:27,401 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 221 is on host 221
2023-07-11 14:16:27,401 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 222 is on host 222
2023-07-11 14:16:27,401 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 223 is on host 223
2023-07-11 14:16:27,401 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 224 is on host 224
2023-07-11 14:16:27,401 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 225 is on host 225
2023-07-11 14:16:27,401 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 226 is on host 226
2023-07-11 14:16:27,401 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 227 is on host 227
2023-07-11 14:16:27,401 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 228 is on host 228
2023-07-11 14:16:27,401 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 229 is on host 229
2023-07-11 14:16:27,401 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 230 is on host 230
2023-07-11 14:16:27,401 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 231 is on host 231
2023-07-11 14:16:27,401 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 232 is on host 232
2023-07-11 14:16:27,401 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 233 is on host 233
2023-07-11 14:16:27,401 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 234 is on host 234
2023-07-11 14:16:27,401 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 235 is on host 235
2023-07-11 14:16:27,401 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 236 is on host 236
2023-07-11 14:16:27,401 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 237 is on host 237
2023-07-11 14:16:27,401 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 238 is on host 238
2023-07-11 14:16:27,401 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 239 is on host 239
2023-07-11 14:16:27,401 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 240 is on host 240
2023-07-11 14:16:27,402 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 241 is on host 241
2023-07-11 14:16:27,402 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 242 is on host 242
2023-07-11 14:16:27,402 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 243 is on host 243
2023-07-11 14:16:27,402 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 244 is on host 244
2023-07-11 14:16:27,402 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 245 is on host 245
2023-07-11 14:16:27,402 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 246 is on host 246
2023-07-11 14:16:27,402 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 247 is on host 247
2023-07-11 14:16:27,402 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 248 is on host 248
2023-07-11 14:16:27,402 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 249 is on host 249
2023-07-11 14:16:27,402 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 250 is on host 250
2023-07-11 14:16:27,402 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 251 is on host 251
2023-07-11 14:16:27,402 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 252 is on host 252
2023-07-11 14:16:27,402 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 253 is on host 253
2023-07-11 14:16:27,402 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 254 is on host 254
2023-07-11 14:16:27,402 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 255 is on host 255
2023-07-11 14:16:27,402 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 256 is on host 256
2023-07-11 14:16:27,402 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 257 is on host 257
2023-07-11 14:16:27,402 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 258 is on host 258
2023-07-11 14:16:27,402 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 259 is on host 259
2023-07-11 14:16:27,402 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 260 is on host 260
2023-07-11 14:16:27,402 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 261 is on host 261
2023-07-11 14:16:27,402 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 262 is on host 262
2023-07-11 14:16:27,402 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 263 is on host 263
2023-07-11 14:16:27,402 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 264 is on host 264
2023-07-11 14:16:27,402 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 265 is on host 265
2023-07-11 14:16:27,402 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 266 is on host 266
2023-07-11 14:16:27,402 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 267 is on host 267
2023-07-11 14:16:27,402 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 268 is on host 268
2023-07-11 14:16:27,402 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 269 is on host 269
2023-07-11 14:16:27,403 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 270 is on host 270
2023-07-11 14:16:27,403 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 271 is on host 271
2023-07-11 14:16:27,403 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 272 is on host 272
2023-07-11 14:16:27,403 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 273 is on host 273
2023-07-11 14:16:27,403 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 274 is on host 274
2023-07-11 14:16:27,403 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 275 is on host 275
2023-07-11 14:16:27,403 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 276 is on host 276
2023-07-11 14:16:27,403 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 277 is on host 277
2023-07-11 14:16:27,403 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 278 is on host 278
2023-07-11 14:16:27,403 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 279 is on host 279
2023-07-11 14:16:27,403 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 280 is on host 280
2023-07-11 14:16:27,403 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 281 is on host 281
2023-07-11 14:16:27,403 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 282 is on host 282
2023-07-11 14:16:27,403 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 283 is on host 283
2023-07-11 14:16:27,403 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 284 is on host 284
2023-07-11 14:16:27,403 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 285 is on host 285
2023-07-11 14:16:27,403 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 286 is on host 286
2023-07-11 14:16:27,403 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 287 is on host 287
2023-07-11 14:16:27,403 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 288 is on host 288
2023-07-11 14:16:27,403 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 289 is on host 289
2023-07-11 14:16:27,403 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 290 is on host 290
2023-07-11 14:16:27,403 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 291 is on host 291
2023-07-11 14:16:27,403 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 292 is on host 292
2023-07-11 14:16:27,403 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 293 is on host 293
2023-07-11 14:16:27,403 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 294 is on host 294
2023-07-11 14:16:27,403 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 295 is on host 295
2023-07-11 14:16:27,403 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 296 is on host 296
2023-07-11 14:16:27,403 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 297 is on host 297
2023-07-11 14:16:27,403 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 298 is on host 298
2023-07-11 14:16:27,404 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 299 is on host 299
2023-07-11 14:16:27,404 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 300 is on host 300
2023-07-11 14:16:27,404 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 301 is on host 301
2023-07-11 14:16:27,404 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 302 is on host 302
2023-07-11 14:16:27,404 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 303 is on host 303
2023-07-11 14:16:27,404 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 304 is on host 304
2023-07-11 14:16:27,404 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 305 is on host 305
2023-07-11 14:16:27,404 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 306 is on host 306
2023-07-11 14:16:27,404 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 307 is on host 307
2023-07-11 14:16:27,404 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 308 is on host 308
2023-07-11 14:16:27,404 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 309 is on host 309
2023-07-11 14:16:27,404 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 310 is on host 310
2023-07-11 14:16:27,404 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 311 is on host 311
2023-07-11 14:16:27,404 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 312 is on host 312
2023-07-11 14:16:27,404 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 313 is on host 313
2023-07-11 14:16:27,404 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 314 is on host 314
2023-07-11 14:16:27,404 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 315 is on host 315
2023-07-11 14:16:27,404 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 316 is on host 316
2023-07-11 14:16:27,404 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 317 is on host 317
2023-07-11 14:16:27,404 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 318 is on host 318
2023-07-11 14:16:27,404 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 319 is on host 319
2023-07-11 14:16:27,404 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 320 is on host 320
2023-07-11 14:16:27,405 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 321 is on host 321
2023-07-11 14:16:27,405 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 322 is on host 322
2023-07-11 14:16:27,405 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 323 is on host 323
2023-07-11 14:16:27,405 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 324 is on host 324
2023-07-11 14:16:27,405 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 325 is on host 325
2023-07-11 14:16:27,405 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 326 is on host 326
2023-07-11 14:16:27,405 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 327 is on host 327
2023-07-11 14:16:27,405 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 328 is on host 328
2023-07-11 14:16:27,405 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 329 is on host 329
2023-07-11 14:16:27,405 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 330 is on host 330
2023-07-11 14:16:27,405 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 331 is on host 331
2023-07-11 14:16:27,405 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 332 is on host 332
2023-07-11 14:16:27,405 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 333 is on host 333
2023-07-11 14:16:27,405 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 334 is on host 334
2023-07-11 14:16:27,405 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 335 is on host 335
2023-07-11 14:16:27,405 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 336 is on host 336
2023-07-11 14:16:27,405 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 337 is on host 337
2023-07-11 14:16:27,405 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 338 is on host 338
2023-07-11 14:16:27,405 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 339 is on host 339
2023-07-11 14:16:27,405 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 340 is on host 340
2023-07-11 14:16:27,405 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 341 is on host 341
2023-07-11 14:16:27,405 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 342 is on host 342
2023-07-11 14:16:27,405 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 343 is on host 343
2023-07-11 14:16:27,405 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 344 is on host 344
2023-07-11 14:16:27,405 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 345 is on host 345
2023-07-11 14:16:27,405 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 346 is on host 346
2023-07-11 14:16:27,405 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 347 is on host 347
2023-07-11 14:16:27,405 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 348 is on host 348
2023-07-11 14:16:27,405 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 349 is on host 349
2023-07-11 14:16:27,406 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 350 is on host 350
2023-07-11 14:16:27,406 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 351 is on host 351
2023-07-11 14:16:27,406 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 352 is on host 352
2023-07-11 14:16:27,406 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 353 is on host 353
2023-07-11 14:16:27,406 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 354 is on host 354
2023-07-11 14:16:27,406 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 355 is on host 355
2023-07-11 14:16:27,406 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 356 is on host 356
2023-07-11 14:16:27,406 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 357 is on host 357
2023-07-11 14:16:27,406 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 358 is on host 358
2023-07-11 14:16:27,406 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 359 is on host 359
2023-07-11 14:16:27,406 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 360 is on host 360
2023-07-11 14:16:27,406 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 361 is on host 361
2023-07-11 14:16:27,406 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 362 is on host 362
2023-07-11 14:16:27,406 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 363 is on host 363
2023-07-11 14:16:27,406 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 364 is on host 364
2023-07-11 14:16:27,406 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 365 is on host 365
2023-07-11 14:16:27,406 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 366 is on host 366
2023-07-11 14:16:27,406 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 367 is on host 367
2023-07-11 14:16:27,406 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 368 is on host 368
2023-07-11 14:16:27,406 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 369 is on host 369
2023-07-11 14:16:27,406 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 370 is on host 370
2023-07-11 14:16:27,406 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 371 is on host 371
2023-07-11 14:16:27,406 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 372 is on host 372
2023-07-11 14:16:27,406 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 373 is on host 373
2023-07-11 14:16:27,406 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 374 is on host 374
2023-07-11 14:16:27,406 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 375 is on host 375
2023-07-11 14:16:27,406 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 376 is on host 376
2023-07-11 14:16:27,406 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 377 is on host 377
2023-07-11 14:16:27,406 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 378 is on host 378
2023-07-11 14:16:27,407 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 379 is on host 379
2023-07-11 14:16:27,407 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 380 is on host 380
2023-07-11 14:16:27,407 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 381 is on host 381
2023-07-11 14:16:27,407 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 382 is on host 382
2023-07-11 14:16:27,407 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 383 is on host 383
2023-07-11 14:16:27,407 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 384 is on host 384
2023-07-11 14:16:27,407 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 385 is on host 385
2023-07-11 14:16:27,407 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 386 is on host 386
2023-07-11 14:16:27,407 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 387 is on host 387
2023-07-11 14:16:27,407 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 388 is on host 388
2023-07-11 14:16:27,407 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 389 is on host 389
2023-07-11 14:16:27,407 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 390 is on host 390
2023-07-11 14:16:27,407 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 391 is on host 391
2023-07-11 14:16:27,407 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 392 is on host 392
2023-07-11 14:16:27,407 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=393, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:27,407 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table13) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:27,407 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table14
2023-07-11 14:16:27,408 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv553536953=290, srv1630071126=110, srv1071894870=12, srv23511728=232, srv658346947=323, srv2025338799=204, srv1397994335=64, srv1976766403=195, srv1644629726=118, srv957637734=381, srv2079182457=210, srv1749264468=139, srv2046129126=206, srv1595762596=104, srv603990852=307, srv1973073480=194, srv958856137=382, srv644066832=319, srv557062842=292, srv277765671=235, srv732221418=337, srv1769385567=143, srv224612199=228, srv714752528=334, srv362526040=256, srv581128949=296, srv2133511466=223, srv1144239257=30, srv320603627=245, srv1679952521=126, srv2122867873=222, srv1110067064=24, srv256251994=233, srv63261708=317, srv89837390=371, srv552104598=289, srv508952995=281, srv2096011353=214, srv1770417148=144, srv1246723478=42, srv929436444=378, srv2082192429=211, srv234917297=231, srv405700573=266, srv183644386=166, srv1488378513=85, srv173139715=136, srv1154180352=32, srv355693379=252, srv1407521654=66, srv496848057=275, srv1157975499=33, srv1806731027=162, srv1923102804=184, srv311102455=244, srv450011410=271, srv771515724=348, srv389183508=262, srv1249074416=43, srv2014575201=201, srv640847108=318, srv832363565=356, srv1970882134=192, srv2107358603=218, srv855766065=361, srv1336043388=55, srv29397186=237, srv982792848=390, srv976560524=386, srv101181760=3, srv1093549482=21, srv2018389395=202, srv2113483104=221, srv1778339118=149, srv1968709692=190, srv705221118=333, srv159600090=105, srv1919608486=180, srv981255102=389, srv807899713=353, srv755110395=344, srv1770594519=145, srv739692705=340, srv1076582671=16, srv693869315=330, srv1079048717=17, srv440657532=270, srv1636659280=115, srv2108739257=220, srv668373413=326, srv1003610393=2, srv1054229197=11, srv1868589627=172, srv2103522371=217, srv1000546271=0, srv951670617=380, srv2042909593=205, srv1865656038=171, srv1466355012=78, srv703662406=332, srv1418112884=70, srv1215580291=40, srv71833528=335, srv1580581635=103, srv1021032212=5, srv1080806312=19, srv1985601859=197, srv74471954=343, srv1647472319=119, srv2071553346=208, srv1632855171=112, srv1122009370=27, srv13613992=61, srv1630777154=111, srv301413669=239, srv550697728=288, srv1296023857=53, srv1724550977=133, srv1989290370=198, srv1926417985=185, srv1678097199=125, srv1461034373=76, srv614690415=311, srv2098345381=215, srv310463473=243, srv1011934105=4, srv148627129=84, srv305489318=240, srv1256534903=46, srv1289731445=52, srv1798844587=157, srv567113085=294, srv1119222501=26, srv2055117940=207, srv855898852=362, srv629224816=316, srv1075943554=15, srv625909061=315, srv1705591942=128, srv734225580=339, srv660107924=324, srv1381729938=62, srv1633483173=113, srv408265476=267, srv1776057793=148, srv1360253411=60, srv1511424834=90, srv1414162621=68, srv883343663=370, srv151859222=91, srv349144930=251, srv1991304034=199, srv1825887791=164, srv601657063=305, srv758932951=345, srv1651629087=120, srv1864623584=170, srv682957691=329, srv1500454146=88, srv1725962085=135, srv1659841448=121, srv1253206004=45, srv52354442=284, srv18508093=168, srv1427731921=73, srv561344974=293, srv721668125=336, srv1575482138=100, srv914128771=373, srv961487230=383, srv741332941=342, srv533032466=286, srv1574140987=99, srv2139849097=224, srv503902262=278, srv674807007=327, srv1786829855=153, srv2088727517=213, srv394366966=264, srv980089565=388, srv114594288=31, srv38296437=261, srv214835574=226, srv1887224977=176, srv1025509362=7, srv1577020334=102, srv524466665=285, srv393561021=263, srv759909927=346, srv763556514=347, srv786453030=349, srv2142935488=225, srv618111613=312, srv16254163=108, srv343211061=250, srv476075173=273, srv1269632212=47, srv333589612=246, srv499015361=276, srv836674186=357, srv1799191687=158, srv1446998035=74, srv1571774199=98, srv1115354947=25, srv333860881=247, srv1724152600=132, srv1598699299=106, srv177885829=151, srv472125887=272, srv1101339966=22, srv1424985362=72, srv1945569895=188, srv594128294=300, srv1026739237=8, srv842459828=358, srv878519137=366, srv1921260729=181, srv339110834=249, srv504099471=279, srv814253179=354, srv1643744885=116, srv1793847521=155, srv607234624=309, srv698219051=331, srv1688538732=127, srv666240078=325, srv1079284733=18, srv29210550=236, srv506181748=280, srv881313122=368, srv1945452576=187, srv597307897=303, srv1285120424=51, srv1887943816=177, srv1983604698=196, srv1805465940=161, srv309309336=242, srv1719756294=131, srv1349932676=58, srv1208486369=38, srv1643971570=117, srv1509331489=89, srv334105385=248, srv1400515744=65, srv369984715=259, srv43712162=269, srv842675864=359, srv1803258748=160, srv1022450918=6, srv1775108732=147, srv1766088250=141, srv180150732=159, srv1220857227=41, srv226530501=229, srv362032108=255, srv919715380=377, srv1074935976=14, srv1395030819=63, srv803291569=352, srv1877966766=175, srv220538712=227, srv2021718843=203, srv2107782185=219, srv882216860=369, srv1489137852=86, srv1972328734=193, srv1470759982=79, srv1774824811=146, srv971974774=384, srv1418242791=71, srv1001274196=1, srv909615097=372, srv1537724566=93, srv1165799954=34, srv1724754364=134, srv978173525=387, srv113319438=29, srv578033735=295, srv147931272=80, srv1183635941=35, srv1904215245=178, srv596349756=302, srv880835255=367, srv857544550=364, srv1779729022=152, srv1795612465=156, srv621083045=314, srv917704170=375, srv1351811120=59, srv1316710897=54, srv789820555=350, srv1922580095=183, srv305567304=241, srv1936745425=186, srv1745318024=138, srv1210822057=39, srv645375717=320, srv950628389=379, srv1490199189=87, srv1575919256=101, srv154481102=96, srv359402967=254, srv997716931=391, srv1457224273=75, srv581644449=297, srv1872374768=174, srv363177310=257, srv740327512=341, srv1664227236=123, srv972330517=385, srv1634261306=114, srv1662183707=122, srv1969046891=191, srv1485266211=82, srv1778842262=150, srv588410181=298, srv1921840985=182, srv591279493=299, srv37574565=260, srv1104147458=23, srv1190166330=36, srv652270371=322, srv1484309042=81, srv1560148463=97, srv618569548=313, srv2102708311=216, srv1084873074=20, srv517669556=283, srv918152084=376, srv649714317=321, srv1674484790=124, srv1339239880=56, srv1461073271=77, srv1125312901=28, srv25633292=234, srv516616923=282, srv299721745=238, srv604932433=308, srv1273702855=48, srv792183929=351, srv1042608200=10, srv1276335106=49, srv1486044644=83, srv676101698=328, srv998930892=392, srv200111276=200, srv1863083643=169, srv1737443479=137, srv872997185=365, srv821351126=355, srv852115805=360, srv1074355423=13, srv170952194=130, srv503430005=277, srv153887567=94, srv1415163001=69, srv1032737435=9, srv1840670515=167, srv1961921083=189, srv59745831=304, srv36715747=258, srv431547280=268, srv1524853580=92, srv1870059418=173, srv396010771=265, srv594457792=301, srv1755339428=140, srv1766275429=142, srv5565786=291, srv603898526=306, srv544570223=287, srv856030669=363, srv1542523468=95, srv915785747=374, srv356122213=253, srv1411875499=67, srv2077620970=209, srv1345529444=57, srv232339963=230, srv1250861076=44, srv1914875423=179, srv478619481=274, srv1202435626=37, srv1706089454=129, srv1810631201=163, srv1282644061=50, srv1625945288=109, srv733251129=338, srv2082830831=212, srv1612103540=107, srv612136291=310, srv1790004142=154, srv183394703=165} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:27,408 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:27,408 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:27,408 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:27,408 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:27,408 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:27,408 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:27,408 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-11 14:16:27,408 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-11 14:16:27,408 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-11 14:16:27,408 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-11 14:16:27,408 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 10 is on host 10
2023-07-11 14:16:27,408 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 11 is on host 11
2023-07-11 14:16:27,408 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 12 is on host 12
2023-07-11 14:16:27,409 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 13 is on host 13
2023-07-11 14:16:27,409 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 14 is on host 14
2023-07-11 14:16:27,409 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 15 is on host 15
2023-07-11 14:16:27,409 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 16 is on host 16
2023-07-11 14:16:27,409 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 17 is on host 17
2023-07-11 14:16:27,409 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 18 is on host 18
2023-07-11 14:16:27,409 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 19 is on host 19
2023-07-11 14:16:27,409 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 20 is on host 20
2023-07-11 14:16:27,409 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 21 is on host 21
2023-07-11 14:16:27,409 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 22 is on host 22
2023-07-11 14:16:27,409 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 23 is on host 23
2023-07-11 14:16:27,409 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 24 is on host 24
2023-07-11 14:16:27,409 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 25 is on host 25
2023-07-11 14:16:27,409 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 26 is on host 26
2023-07-11 14:16:27,409 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 27 is on host 27
2023-07-11 14:16:27,409 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 28 is on host 28
2023-07-11 14:16:27,409 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 29 is on host 29
2023-07-11 14:16:27,409 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 30 is on host 30
2023-07-11 14:16:27,409 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 31 is on host 31
2023-07-11 14:16:27,409 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 32 is on host 32
2023-07-11 14:16:27,409 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 33 is on host 33
2023-07-11 14:16:27,409 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 34 is on host 34
2023-07-11 14:16:27,409 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 35 is on host 35
2023-07-11 14:16:27,409 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 36 is on host 36
2023-07-11 14:16:27,409 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 37 is on host 37
2023-07-11 14:16:27,409 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 38 is on host 38
2023-07-11 14:16:27,409 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 39 is on host 39
2023-07-11 14:16:27,409 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 40 is on host 40
2023-07-11 14:16:27,409 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 41 is on host 41
2023-07-11 14:16:27,410 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 42 is on host 42
2023-07-11 14:16:27,410 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 43 is on host 43
2023-07-11 14:16:27,410 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 44 is on host 44
2023-07-11 14:16:27,410 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 45 is on host 45
2023-07-11 14:16:27,410 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 46 is on host 46
2023-07-11 14:16:27,410 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 47 is on host 47
2023-07-11 14:16:27,410 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 48 is on host 48
2023-07-11 14:16:27,410 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 49 is on host 49
2023-07-11 14:16:27,410 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 50 is on host 50
2023-07-11 14:16:27,410 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 51 is on host 51
2023-07-11 14:16:27,410 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 52 is on host 52
2023-07-11 14:16:27,410 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 53 is on host 53
2023-07-11 14:16:27,410 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 54 is on host 54
2023-07-11 14:16:27,410 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 55 is on host 55
2023-07-11 14:16:27,410 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 56 is on host 56
2023-07-11 14:16:27,410 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 57 is on host 57
2023-07-11 14:16:27,410 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 58 is on host 58
2023-07-11 14:16:27,410 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 59 is on host 59
2023-07-11 14:16:27,410 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 60 is on host 60
2023-07-11 14:16:27,410 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 61 is on host 61
2023-07-11 14:16:27,410 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 62 is on host 62
2023-07-11 14:16:27,410 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 63 is on host 63
2023-07-11 14:16:27,410 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 64 is on host 64
2023-07-11 14:16:27,410 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 65 is on host 65
2023-07-11 14:16:27,410 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 66 is on host 66
2023-07-11 14:16:27,410 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 67 is on host 67
2023-07-11 14:16:27,410 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 68 is on host 68
2023-07-11 14:16:27,410 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 69 is on host 69
2023-07-11 14:16:27,410 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 70 is on host 70
2023-07-11 14:16:27,411 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 71 is on host 71
2023-07-11 14:16:27,411 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 72 is on host 72
2023-07-11 14:16:27,411 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 73 is on host 73
2023-07-11 14:16:27,411 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 74 is on host 74
2023-07-11 14:16:27,411 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 75 is on host 75
2023-07-11 14:16:27,411 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 76 is on host 76
2023-07-11 14:16:27,411 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 77 is on host 77
2023-07-11 14:16:27,411 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 78 is on host 78
2023-07-11 14:16:27,411 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 79 is on host 79
2023-07-11 14:16:27,411 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 80 is on host 80
2023-07-11 14:16:27,411 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 81 is on host 81
2023-07-11 14:16:27,411 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 82 is on host 82
2023-07-11 14:16:27,411 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 83 is on host 83
2023-07-11 14:16:27,411 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 84 is on host 84
2023-07-11 14:16:27,411 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 85 is on host 85
2023-07-11 14:16:27,411 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 86 is on host 86
2023-07-11 14:16:27,411 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 87 is on host 87
2023-07-11 14:16:27,411 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 88 is on host 88
2023-07-11 14:16:27,411 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 89 is on host 89
2023-07-11 14:16:27,411 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 90 is on host 90
2023-07-11 14:16:27,411 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 91 is on host 91
2023-07-11 14:16:27,411 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 92 is on host 92
2023-07-11 14:16:27,411 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 93 is on host 93
2023-07-11 14:16:27,411 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 94 is on host 94
2023-07-11 14:16:27,411 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 95 is on host 95
2023-07-11 14:16:27,411 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 96 is on host 96
2023-07-11 14:16:27,411 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 97 is on host 97
2023-07-11 14:16:27,411 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 98 is on host 98
2023-07-11 14:16:27,411 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 99 is on host 99
2023-07-11 14:16:27,412 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 100 is on host 100
2023-07-11 14:16:27,412 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 101 is on host 101
2023-07-11 14:16:27,412 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 102 is on host 102
2023-07-11 14:16:27,412 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 103 is on host 103
2023-07-11 14:16:27,412 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 104 is on host 104
2023-07-11 14:16:27,412 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 105 is on host 105
2023-07-11 14:16:27,412 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 106 is on host 106
2023-07-11 14:16:27,412 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 107 is on host 107
2023-07-11 14:16:27,412 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 108 is on host 108
2023-07-11 14:16:27,412 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 109 is on host 109
2023-07-11 14:16:27,412 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 110 is on host 110
2023-07-11 14:16:27,412 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 111 is on host 111
2023-07-11 14:16:27,412 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 112 is on host 112
2023-07-11 14:16:27,412 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 113 is on host 113
2023-07-11 14:16:27,412 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 114 is on host 114
2023-07-11 14:16:27,412 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 115 is on host 115
2023-07-11 14:16:27,412 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 116 is on host 116
2023-07-11 14:16:27,412 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 117 is on host 117
2023-07-11 14:16:27,412 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 118 is on host 118
2023-07-11 14:16:27,412 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 119 is on host 119
2023-07-11 14:16:27,412 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 120 is on host 120
2023-07-11 14:16:27,412 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 121 is on host 121
2023-07-11 14:16:27,412 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 122 is on host 122
2023-07-11 14:16:27,412 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 123 is on host 123
2023-07-11 14:16:27,412 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 124 is on host 124
2023-07-11 14:16:27,412 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 125 is on host 125
2023-07-11 14:16:27,412 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 126 is on host 126
2023-07-11 14:16:27,412 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 127 is on host 127
2023-07-11 14:16:27,412 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 128 is on host 128
2023-07-11 14:16:27,413 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 129 is on host 129
2023-07-11 14:16:27,413 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 130 is on host 130
2023-07-11 14:16:27,413 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 131 is on host 131
2023-07-11 14:16:27,413 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 132 is on host 132
2023-07-11 14:16:27,413 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 133 is on host 133
2023-07-11 14:16:27,413 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 134 is on host 134
2023-07-11 14:16:27,413 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 135 is on host 135
2023-07-11 14:16:27,413 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 136 is on host 136
2023-07-11 14:16:27,413 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 137 is on host 137
2023-07-11 14:16:27,413 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 138 is on host 138
2023-07-11 14:16:27,413 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 139 is on host 139
2023-07-11 14:16:27,413 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 140 is on host 140
2023-07-11 14:16:27,413 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 141 is on host 141
2023-07-11 14:16:27,413 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 142 is on host 142
2023-07-11 14:16:27,413 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 143 is on host 143
2023-07-11 14:16:27,413 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 144 is on host 144
2023-07-11 14:16:27,413 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 145 is on host 145
2023-07-11 14:16:27,413 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 146 is on host 146
2023-07-11 14:16:27,413 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 147 is on host 147
2023-07-11 14:16:27,413 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 148 is on host 148
2023-07-11 14:16:27,413 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 149 is on host 149
2023-07-11 14:16:27,413 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 150 is on host 150
2023-07-11 14:16:27,413 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 151 is on host 151
2023-07-11 14:16:27,413 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 152 is on host 152
2023-07-11 14:16:27,413 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 153 is on host 153
2023-07-11 14:16:27,413 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 154 is on host 154
2023-07-11 14:16:27,413 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 155 is on host 155
2023-07-11 14:16:27,413 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 156 is on host 156
2023-07-11 14:16:27,413 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 157 is on host 157
2023-07-11 14:16:27,414 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 158 is on host 158
2023-07-11 14:16:27,414 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 159 is on host 159
2023-07-11 14:16:27,414 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 160 is on host 160
2023-07-11 14:16:27,414 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 161 is on host 161
2023-07-11 14:16:27,414 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 162 is on host 162
2023-07-11 14:16:27,414 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 163 is on host 163
2023-07-11 14:16:27,414 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 164 is on host 164
2023-07-11 14:16:27,414 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 165 is on host 165
2023-07-11 14:16:27,414 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 166 is on host 166
2023-07-11 14:16:27,414 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 167 is on host 167
2023-07-11 14:16:27,414 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 168 is on host 168
2023-07-11 14:16:27,414 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 169 is on host 169
2023-07-11 14:16:27,414 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 170 is on host 170
2023-07-11 14:16:27,414 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 171 is on host 171
2023-07-11 14:16:27,414 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 172 is on host 172
2023-07-11 14:16:27,414 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 173 is on host 173
2023-07-11 14:16:27,414 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 174 is on host 174
2023-07-11 14:16:27,414 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 175 is on host 175
2023-07-11 14:16:27,414 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 176 is on host 176
2023-07-11 14:16:27,414 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 177 is on host 177
2023-07-11 14:16:27,414 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 178 is on host 178
2023-07-11 14:16:27,414 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 179 is on host 179
2023-07-11 14:16:27,414 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 180 is on host 180
2023-07-11 14:16:27,414 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 181 is on host 181
2023-07-11 14:16:27,414 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 182 is on host 182
2023-07-11 14:16:27,414 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 183 is on host 183
2023-07-11 14:16:27,414 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 184 is on host 184
2023-07-11 14:16:27,414 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 185 is on host 185
2023-07-11 14:16:27,414 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 186 is on host 186
2023-07-11 14:16:27,415 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 187 is on host 187
2023-07-11 14:16:27,415 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 188 is on host 188
2023-07-11 14:16:27,415 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 189 is on host 189
2023-07-11 14:16:27,415 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 190 is on host 190
2023-07-11 14:16:27,415 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 191 is on host 191
2023-07-11 14:16:27,415 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 192 is on host 192
2023-07-11 14:16:27,415 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 193 is on host 193
2023-07-11 14:16:27,415 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 194 is on host 194
2023-07-11 14:16:27,415 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 195 is on host 195
2023-07-11 14:16:27,415 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 196 is on host 196
2023-07-11 14:16:27,415 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 197 is on host 197
2023-07-11 14:16:27,415 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 198 is on host 198
2023-07-11 14:16:27,415 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 199 is on host 199
2023-07-11 14:16:27,415 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 200 is on host 200
2023-07-11 14:16:27,415 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 201 is on host 201
2023-07-11 14:16:27,415 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 202 is on host 202
2023-07-11 14:16:27,415 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 203 is on host 203
2023-07-11 14:16:27,415 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 204 is on host 204
2023-07-11 14:16:27,415 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 205 is on host 205
2023-07-11 14:16:27,415 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 206 is on host 206
2023-07-11 14:16:27,415 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 207 is on host 207
2023-07-11 14:16:27,415 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 208 is on host 208
2023-07-11 14:16:27,415 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 209 is on host 209
2023-07-11 14:16:27,416 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 210 is on host 210
2023-07-11 14:16:27,416 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 211 is on host 211
2023-07-11 14:16:27,416 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 212 is on host 212
2023-07-11 14:16:27,416 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 213 is on host 213
2023-07-11 14:16:27,416 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 214 is on host 214
2023-07-11 14:16:27,416 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 215 is on host 215
2023-07-11 14:16:27,416 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 216 is on host 216
2023-07-11 14:16:27,416 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 217 is on host 217
2023-07-11 14:16:27,416 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 218 is on host 218
2023-07-11 14:16:27,416 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 219 is on host 219
2023-07-11 14:16:27,416 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 220 is on host 220
2023-07-11 14:16:27,416 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 221 is on host 221
2023-07-11 14:16:27,416 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 222 is on host 222
2023-07-11 14:16:27,416 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 223 is on host 223
2023-07-11 14:16:27,416 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 224 is on host 224
2023-07-11 14:16:27,416 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 225 is on host 225
2023-07-11 14:16:27,416 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 226 is on host 226
2023-07-11 14:16:27,416 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 227 is on host 227
2023-07-11 14:16:27,416 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 228 is on host 228
2023-07-11 14:16:27,416 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 229 is on host 229
2023-07-11 14:16:27,416 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 230 is on host 230
2023-07-11 14:16:27,416 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 231 is on host 231
2023-07-11 14:16:27,416 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 232 is on host 232
2023-07-11 14:16:27,416 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 233 is on host 233
2023-07-11 14:16:27,416 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 234 is on host 234
2023-07-11 14:16:27,416 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 235 is on host 235
2023-07-11 14:16:27,416 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 236 is on host 236
2023-07-11 14:16:27,416 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 237 is on host 237
2023-07-11 14:16:27,416 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 238 is on host 238
2023-07-11 14:16:27,417 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 239 is on host 239
2023-07-11 14:16:27,417 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 240 is on host 240
2023-07-11 14:16:27,417 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 241 is on host 241
2023-07-11 14:16:27,417 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 242 is on host 242
2023-07-11 14:16:27,417 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 243 is on host 243
2023-07-11 14:16:27,417 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 244 is on host 244
2023-07-11 14:16:27,417 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 245 is on host 245
2023-07-11 14:16:27,417 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 246 is on host 246
2023-07-11 14:16:27,417 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 247 is on host 247
2023-07-11 14:16:27,417 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 248 is on host 248
2023-07-11 14:16:27,417 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 249 is on host 249
2023-07-11 14:16:27,417 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 250 is on host 250
2023-07-11 14:16:27,417 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 251 is on host 251
2023-07-11 14:16:27,417 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 252 is on host 252
2023-07-11 14:16:27,417 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 253 is on host 253
2023-07-11 14:16:27,417 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 254 is on host 254
2023-07-11 14:16:27,417 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 255 is on host 255
2023-07-11 14:16:27,417 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 256 is on host 256
2023-07-11 14:16:27,417 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 257 is on host 257
2023-07-11 14:16:27,417 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 258 is on host 258
2023-07-11 14:16:27,417 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 259 is on host 259
2023-07-11 14:16:27,417 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 260 is on host 260
2023-07-11 14:16:27,417 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 261 is on host 261
2023-07-11 14:16:27,417 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 262 is on host 262
2023-07-11 14:16:27,417 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 263 is on host 263
2023-07-11 14:16:27,417 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 264 is on host 264
2023-07-11 14:16:27,417 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 265 is on host 265
2023-07-11 14:16:27,417 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 266 is on host 266
2023-07-11 14:16:27,417 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 267 is on host 267
2023-07-11 14:16:27,418 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 268 is on host 268
2023-07-11 14:16:27,418 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 269 is on host 269
2023-07-11 14:16:27,418 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 270 is on host 270
2023-07-11 14:16:27,418 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 271 is on host 271
2023-07-11 14:16:27,418 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 272 is on host 272
2023-07-11 14:16:27,418 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 273 is on host 273
2023-07-11 14:16:27,418 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 274 is on host 274
2023-07-11 14:16:27,418 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 275 is on host 275
2023-07-11 14:16:27,418 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 276 is on host 276
2023-07-11 14:16:27,418 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 277 is on host 277
2023-07-11 14:16:27,418 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 278 is on host 278
2023-07-11 14:16:27,418 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 279 is on host 279
2023-07-11 14:16:27,418 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 280 is on host 280
2023-07-11 14:16:27,418 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 281 is on host 281
2023-07-11 14:16:27,418 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 282 is on host 282
2023-07-11 14:16:27,418 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 283 is on host 283
2023-07-11 14:16:27,418 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 284 is on host 284
2023-07-11 14:16:27,418 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 285 is on host 285
2023-07-11 14:16:27,418 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 286 is on host 286
2023-07-11 14:16:27,418 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 287 is on host 287
2023-07-11 14:16:27,418 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 288 is on host 288
2023-07-11 14:16:27,418 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 289 is on host 289
2023-07-11 14:16:27,418 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 290 is on host 290
2023-07-11 14:16:27,418 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 291 is on host 291
2023-07-11 14:16:27,418 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 292 is on host 292
2023-07-11 14:16:27,418 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 293 is on host 293
2023-07-11 14:16:27,418 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 294 is on host 294
2023-07-11 14:16:27,418 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 295 is on host 295
2023-07-11 14:16:27,418 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 296 is on host 296
2023-07-11 14:16:27,419 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 297 is on host 297
2023-07-11 14:16:27,419 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 298 is on host 298
2023-07-11 14:16:27,419 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 299 is on host 299
2023-07-11 14:16:27,419 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 300 is on host 300
2023-07-11 14:16:27,419 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 301 is on host 301
2023-07-11 14:16:27,419 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 302 is on host 302
2023-07-11 14:16:27,419 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 303 is on host 303
2023-07-11 14:16:27,419 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 304 is on host 304
2023-07-11 14:16:27,419 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 305 is on host 305
2023-07-11 14:16:27,419 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 306 is on host 306
2023-07-11 14:16:27,419 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 307 is on host 307
2023-07-11 14:16:27,419 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 308 is on host 308
2023-07-11 14:16:27,419 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 309 is on host 309
2023-07-11 14:16:27,419 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 310 is on host 310
2023-07-11 14:16:27,419 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 311 is on host 311
2023-07-11 14:16:27,419 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 312 is on host 312
2023-07-11 14:16:27,419 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 313 is on host 313
2023-07-11 14:16:27,419 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 314 is on host 314
2023-07-11 14:16:27,419 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 315 is on host 315
2023-07-11 14:16:27,419 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 316 is on host 316
2023-07-11 14:16:27,419 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 317 is on host 317
2023-07-11 14:16:27,419 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 318 is on host 318
2023-07-11 14:16:27,419 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 319 is on host 319
2023-07-11 14:16:27,419 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 320 is on host 320
2023-07-11 14:16:27,419 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 321 is on host 321
2023-07-11 14:16:27,419 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 322 is on host 322
2023-07-11 14:16:27,419 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 323 is on host 323
2023-07-11 14:16:27,419 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 324 is on host 324
2023-07-11 14:16:27,419 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 325 is on host 325
2023-07-11 14:16:27,420 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 326 is on host 326
2023-07-11 14:16:27,420 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 327 is on host 327
2023-07-11 14:16:27,420 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 328 is on host 328
2023-07-11 14:16:27,420 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 329 is on host 329
2023-07-11 14:16:27,420 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 330 is on host 330
2023-07-11 14:16:27,420 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 331 is on host 331
2023-07-11 14:16:27,420 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 332 is on host 332
2023-07-11 14:16:27,420 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 333 is on host 333
2023-07-11 14:16:27,420 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 334 is on host 334
2023-07-11 14:16:27,420 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 335 is on host 335
2023-07-11 14:16:27,420 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 336 is on host 336
2023-07-11 14:16:27,420 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 337 is on host 337
2023-07-11 14:16:27,420 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 338 is on host 338
2023-07-11 14:16:27,420 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 339 is on host 339
2023-07-11 14:16:27,420 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 340 is on host 340
2023-07-11 14:16:27,420 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 341 is on host 341
2023-07-11 14:16:27,420 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 342 is on host 342
2023-07-11 14:16:27,420 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 343 is on host 343
2023-07-11 14:16:27,420 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 344 is on host 344
2023-07-11 14:16:27,420 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 345 is on host 345
2023-07-11 14:16:27,420 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 346 is on host 346
2023-07-11 14:16:27,420 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 347 is on host 347
2023-07-11 14:16:27,420 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 348 is on host 348
2023-07-11 14:16:27,420 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 349 is on host 349
2023-07-11 14:16:27,420 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 350 is on host 350
2023-07-11 14:16:27,420 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 351 is on host 351
2023-07-11 14:16:27,420 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 352 is on host 352
2023-07-11 14:16:27,420 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 353 is on host 353
2023-07-11 14:16:27,421 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 354 is on host 354
2023-07-11 14:16:27,421 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 355 is on host 355
2023-07-11 14:16:27,421 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 356 is on host 356
2023-07-11 14:16:27,421 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 357 is on host 357
2023-07-11 14:16:27,421 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 358 is on host 358
2023-07-11 14:16:27,421 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 359 is on host 359
2023-07-11 14:16:27,421 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 360 is on host 360
2023-07-11 14:16:27,421 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 361 is on host 361
2023-07-11 14:16:27,421 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 362 is on host 362
2023-07-11 14:16:27,421 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 363 is on host 363
2023-07-11 14:16:27,421 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 364 is on host 364
2023-07-11 14:16:27,421 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 365 is on host 365
2023-07-11 14:16:27,421 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 366 is on host 366
2023-07-11 14:16:27,421 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 367 is on host 367
2023-07-11 14:16:27,421 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 368 is on host 368
2023-07-11 14:16:27,421 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 369 is on host 369
2023-07-11 14:16:27,421 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 370 is on host 370
2023-07-11 14:16:27,421 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 371 is on host 371
2023-07-11 14:16:27,421 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 372 is on host 372
2023-07-11 14:16:27,421 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 373 is on host 373
2023-07-11 14:16:27,421 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 374 is on host 374
2023-07-11 14:16:27,421 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 375 is on host 375
2023-07-11 14:16:27,421 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 376 is on host 376
2023-07-11 14:16:27,421 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 377 is on host 377
2023-07-11 14:16:27,421 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 378 is on host 378
2023-07-11 14:16:27,421 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 379 is on host 379
2023-07-11 14:16:27,421 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 380 is on host 380
2023-07-11 14:16:27,421 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 381 is on host 381
2023-07-11 14:16:27,421 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 382 is on host 382
2023-07-11 14:16:27,422 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 383 is on host 383
2023-07-11 14:16:27,422 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 384 is on host 384
2023-07-11 14:16:27,422 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 385 is on host 385
2023-07-11 14:16:27,422 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 386 is on host 386
2023-07-11 14:16:27,422 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 387 is on host 387
2023-07-11 14:16:27,422 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 388 is on host 388
2023-07-11 14:16:27,422 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 389 is on host 389
2023-07-11 14:16:27,422 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 390 is on host 390
2023-07-11 14:16:27,422 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 391 is on host 391
2023-07-11 14:16:27,422 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 392 is on host 392
2023-07-11 14:16:27,422 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=393, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:27,422 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table14) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:27,422 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table15
2023-07-11 14:16:27,423 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv553536953=290, srv1630071126=110, srv1071894870=12, srv23511728=232, srv658346947=323, srv2025338799=204, srv1397994335=64, srv1976766403=195, srv1644629726=118, srv957637734=381, srv2079182457=210, srv1749264468=139, srv2046129126=206, srv1595762596=104, srv603990852=307, srv1973073480=194, srv958856137=382, srv644066832=319, srv557062842=292, srv277765671=235, srv732221418=337, srv1769385567=143, srv224612199=228, srv714752528=334, srv362526040=256, srv581128949=296, srv2133511466=223, srv1144239257=30, srv320603627=245, srv1679952521=126, srv2122867873=222, srv1110067064=24, srv256251994=233, srv63261708=317, srv89837390=371, srv552104598=289, srv508952995=281, srv2096011353=214, srv1770417148=144, srv1246723478=42, srv929436444=378, srv2082192429=211, srv234917297=231, srv405700573=266, srv183644386=166, srv1488378513=85, srv173139715=136, srv1154180352=32, srv355693379=252, srv1407521654=66, srv496848057=275, srv1157975499=33, srv1806731027=162, srv1923102804=184, srv311102455=244, srv450011410=271, srv771515724=348, srv389183508=262, srv1249074416=43, srv2014575201=201, srv640847108=318, srv832363565=356, srv1970882134=192, srv2107358603=218, srv855766065=361, srv1336043388=55, srv29397186=237, srv982792848=390, srv976560524=386, srv101181760=3, srv1093549482=21, srv2018389395=202, srv2113483104=221, srv1778339118=149, srv1968709692=190, srv705221118=333, srv159600090=105, srv1919608486=180, srv981255102=389, srv807899713=353, srv755110395=344, srv1770594519=145, srv739692705=340, srv1076582671=16, srv693869315=330, srv1079048717=17, srv440657532=270, srv1636659280=115, srv2108739257=220, srv668373413=326, srv1003610393=2, srv1054229197=11, srv1868589627=172, srv2103522371=217, srv1000546271=0, srv951670617=380, srv2042909593=205, srv1865656038=171, srv1466355012=78, srv703662406=332, srv1418112884=70, srv1215580291=40, srv71833528=335, srv1580581635=103, srv1021032212=5, srv1080806312=19, srv1985601859=197, srv74471954=343, srv1647472319=119, srv2071553346=208, srv1632855171=112, srv1122009370=27, srv13613992=61, srv1630777154=111, srv301413669=239, srv550697728=288, srv1296023857=53, srv1724550977=133, srv1989290370=198, srv1926417985=185, srv1678097199=125, srv1461034373=76, srv614690415=311, srv2098345381=215, srv310463473=243, srv1011934105=4, srv148627129=84, srv305489318=240, srv1256534903=46, srv1289731445=52, srv1798844587=157, srv567113085=294, srv1119222501=26, srv2055117940=207, srv855898852=362, srv629224816=316, srv1075943554=15, srv625909061=315, srv1705591942=128, srv734225580=339, srv660107924=324, srv1381729938=62, srv1633483173=113, srv408265476=267, srv1776057793=148, srv1360253411=60, srv1511424834=90, srv1414162621=68, srv883343663=370, srv151859222=91, srv349144930=251, srv1991304034=199, srv1825887791=164, srv601657063=305, srv758932951=345, srv1651629087=120, srv1864623584=170, srv682957691=329, srv1500454146=88, srv1725962085=135, srv1659841448=121, srv1253206004=45, srv52354442=284, srv18508093=168, srv1427731921=73, srv561344974=293, srv721668125=336, srv1575482138=100, srv914128771=373, srv961487230=383, srv741332941=342, srv533032466=286, srv1574140987=99, srv2139849097=224, srv503902262=278, srv674807007=327, srv1786829855=153, srv2088727517=213, srv394366966=264, srv980089565=388, srv114594288=31, srv38296437=261, srv214835574=226, srv1887224977=176, srv1025509362=7, srv1577020334=102, srv524466665=285, srv393561021=263, srv759909927=346, srv763556514=347, srv786453030=349, srv2142935488=225, srv618111613=312, srv16254163=108, srv343211061=250, srv476075173=273, srv1269632212=47, srv333589612=246, srv499015361=276, srv836674186=357, srv1799191687=158, srv1446998035=74, srv1571774199=98, srv1115354947=25, srv333860881=247, srv1724152600=132, srv1598699299=106, srv177885829=151, srv472125887=272, srv1101339966=22, srv1424985362=72, srv1945569895=188, srv594128294=300, srv1026739237=8, srv842459828=358, srv878519137=366, srv1921260729=181, srv339110834=249, srv504099471=279, srv814253179=354, srv1643744885=116, srv1793847521=155, srv607234624=309, srv698219051=331, srv1688538732=127, srv666240078=325, srv1079284733=18, srv29210550=236, srv506181748=280, srv881313122=368, srv1945452576=187, srv597307897=303, srv1285120424=51, srv1887943816=177, srv1983604698=196, srv1805465940=161, srv309309336=242, srv1719756294=131, srv1349932676=58, srv1208486369=38, srv1643971570=117, srv1509331489=89, srv334105385=248, srv1400515744=65, srv369984715=259, srv43712162=269, srv842675864=359, srv1803258748=160, srv1022450918=6, srv1775108732=147, srv1766088250=141, srv180150732=159, srv1220857227=41, srv226530501=229, srv362032108=255, srv919715380=377, srv1074935976=14, srv1395030819=63, srv803291569=352, srv1877966766=175, srv220538712=227, srv2021718843=203, srv2107782185=219, srv882216860=369, srv1489137852=86, srv1972328734=193, srv1470759982=79, srv1774824811=146, srv971974774=384, srv1418242791=71, srv1001274196=1, srv909615097=372, srv1537724566=93, srv1165799954=34, srv1724754364=134, srv978173525=387, srv113319438=29, srv578033735=295, srv147931272=80, srv1183635941=35, srv1904215245=178, srv596349756=302, srv880835255=367, srv857544550=364, srv1779729022=152, srv1795612465=156, srv621083045=314, srv917704170=375, srv1351811120=59, srv1316710897=54, srv789820555=350, srv1922580095=183, srv305567304=241, srv1936745425=186, srv1745318024=138, srv1210822057=39, srv645375717=320, srv950628389=379, srv1490199189=87, srv1575919256=101, srv154481102=96, srv359402967=254, srv997716931=391, srv1457224273=75, srv581644449=297, srv1872374768=174, srv363177310=257, srv740327512=341, srv1664227236=123, srv972330517=385, srv1634261306=114, srv1662183707=122, srv1969046891=191, srv1485266211=82, srv1778842262=150, srv588410181=298, srv1921840985=182, srv591279493=299, srv37574565=260, srv1104147458=23, srv1190166330=36, srv652270371=322, srv1484309042=81, srv1560148463=97, srv618569548=313, srv2102708311=216, srv1084873074=20, srv517669556=283, srv918152084=376, srv649714317=321, srv1674484790=124, srv1339239880=56, srv1461073271=77, srv1125312901=28, srv25633292=234, srv516616923=282, srv299721745=238, srv604932433=308, srv1273702855=48, srv792183929=351, srv1042608200=10, srv1276335106=49, srv1486044644=83, srv676101698=328, srv998930892=392, srv200111276=200, srv1863083643=169, srv1737443479=137, srv872997185=365, srv821351126=355, srv852115805=360, srv1074355423=13, srv170952194=130, srv503430005=277, srv153887567=94, srv1415163001=69, srv1032737435=9, srv1840670515=167, srv1961921083=189, srv59745831=304, srv36715747=258, srv431547280=268, srv1524853580=92, srv1870059418=173, srv396010771=265, srv594457792=301, srv1755339428=140, srv1766275429=142, srv5565786=291, srv603898526=306, srv544570223=287, srv856030669=363, srv1542523468=95, srv915785747=374, srv356122213=253, srv1411875499=67, srv2077620970=209, srv1345529444=57, srv232339963=230, srv1250861076=44, srv1914875423=179, srv478619481=274, srv1202435626=37, srv1706089454=129, srv1810631201=163, srv1282644061=50, srv1625945288=109, srv733251129=338, srv2082830831=212, srv1612103540=107, srv612136291=310, srv1790004142=154, srv183394703=165} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:27,423 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:27,423 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:27,423 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:27,423 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:27,423 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:27,423 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:27,423 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-11 14:16:27,423 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-11 14:16:27,423 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-11 14:16:27,423 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-11 14:16:27,423 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 10 is on host 10
2023-07-11 14:16:27,423 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 11 is on host 11
2023-07-11 14:16:27,423 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 12 is on host 12
2023-07-11 14:16:27,423 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 13 is on host 13
2023-07-11 14:16:27,423 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 14 is on host 14
2023-07-11 14:16:27,423 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 15 is on host 15
2023-07-11 14:16:27,423 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 16 is on host 16
2023-07-11 14:16:27,424 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 17 is on host 17
2023-07-11 14:16:27,424 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 18 is on host 18
2023-07-11 14:16:27,424 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 19 is on host 19
2023-07-11 14:16:27,424 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 20 is on host 20
2023-07-11 14:16:27,424 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 21 is on host 21
2023-07-11 14:16:27,424 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 22 is on host 22
2023-07-11 14:16:27,424 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 23 is on host 23
2023-07-11 14:16:27,424 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 24 is on host 24
2023-07-11 14:16:27,424 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 25 is on host 25
2023-07-11 14:16:27,424 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 26 is on host 26
2023-07-11 14:16:27,424 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 27 is on host 27
2023-07-11 14:16:27,424 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 28 is on host 28
2023-07-11 14:16:27,424 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 29 is on host 29
2023-07-11 14:16:27,424 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 30 is on host 30
2023-07-11 14:16:27,424 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 31 is on host 31
2023-07-11 14:16:27,424 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 32 is on host 32
2023-07-11 14:16:27,424 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 33 is on host 33
2023-07-11 14:16:27,424 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 34 is on host 34
2023-07-11 14:16:27,424 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 35 is on host 35
2023-07-11 14:16:27,424 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 36 is on host 36
2023-07-11 14:16:27,424 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 37 is on host 37
2023-07-11 14:16:27,424 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 38 is on host 38
2023-07-11 14:16:27,424 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 39 is on host 39
2023-07-11 14:16:27,424 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 40 is on host 40
2023-07-11 14:16:27,424 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 41 is on host 41
2023-07-11 14:16:27,424 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 42 is on host 42
2023-07-11 14:16:27,424 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 43 is on host 43
2023-07-11 14:16:27,424 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 44 is on host 44
2023-07-11 14:16:27,424 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 45 is on host 45
2023-07-11 14:16:27,425 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 46 is on host 46
2023-07-11 14:16:27,425 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 47 is on host 47
2023-07-11 14:16:27,425 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 48 is on host 48
2023-07-11 14:16:27,425 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 49 is on host 49
2023-07-11 14:16:27,425 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 50 is on host 50
2023-07-11 14:16:27,425 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 51 is on host 51
2023-07-11 14:16:27,425 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 52 is on host 52
2023-07-11 14:16:27,425 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 53 is on host 53
2023-07-11 14:16:27,425 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 54 is on host 54
2023-07-11 14:16:27,425 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 55 is on host 55
2023-07-11 14:16:27,425 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 56 is on host 56
2023-07-11 14:16:27,425 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 57 is on host 57
2023-07-11 14:16:27,425 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 58 is on host 58
2023-07-11 14:16:27,425 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 59 is on host 59
2023-07-11 14:16:27,425 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 60 is on host 60
2023-07-11 14:16:27,425 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 61 is on host 61
2023-07-11 14:16:27,425 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 62 is on host 62
2023-07-11 14:16:27,425 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 63 is on host 63
2023-07-11 14:16:27,425 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 64 is on host 64
2023-07-11 14:16:27,425 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 65 is on host 65
2023-07-11 14:16:27,425 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 66 is on host 66
2023-07-11 14:16:27,425 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 67 is on host 67
2023-07-11 14:16:27,425 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 68 is on host 68
2023-07-11 14:16:27,425 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 69 is on host 69
2023-07-11 14:16:27,425 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 70 is on host 70
2023-07-11 14:16:27,425 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 71 is on host 71
2023-07-11 14:16:27,425 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 72 is on host 72
2023-07-11 14:16:27,425 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 73 is on host 73
2023-07-11 14:16:27,426 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 74 is on host 74
2023-07-11 14:16:27,426 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 75 is on host 75
2023-07-11 14:16:27,426 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 76 is on host 76
2023-07-11 14:16:27,426 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 77 is on host 77
2023-07-11 14:16:27,426 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 78 is on host 78
2023-07-11 14:16:27,426 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 79 is on host 79
2023-07-11 14:16:27,426 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 80 is on host 80
2023-07-11 14:16:27,426 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 81 is on host 81
2023-07-11 14:16:27,426 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 82 is on host 82
2023-07-11 14:16:27,426 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 83 is on host 83
2023-07-11 14:16:27,426 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 84 is on host 84
2023-07-11 14:16:27,426 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 85 is on host 85
2023-07-11 14:16:27,426 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 86 is on host 86
2023-07-11 14:16:27,426 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 87 is on host 87
2023-07-11 14:16:27,426 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 88 is on host 88
2023-07-11 14:16:27,426 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 89 is on host 89
2023-07-11 14:16:27,426 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 90 is on host 90
2023-07-11 14:16:27,426 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 91 is on host 91
2023-07-11 14:16:27,426 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 92 is on host 92
2023-07-11 14:16:27,426 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 93 is on host 93
2023-07-11 14:16:27,426 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 94 is on host 94
2023-07-11 14:16:27,426 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 95 is on host 95
2023-07-11 14:16:27,426 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 96 is on host 96
2023-07-11 14:16:27,426 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 97 is on host 97
2023-07-11 14:16:27,426 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 98 is on host 98
2023-07-11 14:16:27,426 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 99 is on host 99
2023-07-11 14:16:27,426 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 100 is on host 100
2023-07-11 14:16:27,426 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 101 is on host 101
2023-07-11 14:16:27,426 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 102 is on host 102
2023-07-11 14:16:27,427 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 103 is on host 103
2023-07-11 14:16:27,427 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 104 is on host 104
2023-07-11 14:16:27,427 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 105 is on host 105
2023-07-11 14:16:27,427 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 106 is on host 106
2023-07-11 14:16:27,427 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 107 is on host 107
2023-07-11 14:16:27,427 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 108 is on host 108
2023-07-11 14:16:27,427 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 109 is on host 109
2023-07-11 14:16:27,427 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 110 is on host 110
2023-07-11 14:16:27,427 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 111 is on host 111
2023-07-11 14:16:27,427 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 112 is on host 112
2023-07-11 14:16:27,427 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 113 is on host 113
2023-07-11 14:16:27,427 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 114 is on host 114
2023-07-11 14:16:27,427 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 115 is on host 115
2023-07-11 14:16:27,427 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 116 is on host 116
2023-07-11 14:16:27,427 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 117 is on host 117
2023-07-11 14:16:27,427 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 118 is on host 118
2023-07-11 14:16:27,427 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 119 is on host 119
2023-07-11 14:16:27,427 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 120 is on host 120
2023-07-11 14:16:27,427 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 121 is on host 121
2023-07-11 14:16:27,427 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 122 is on host 122
2023-07-11 14:16:27,427 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 123 is on host 123
2023-07-11 14:16:27,427 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 124 is on host 124
2023-07-11 14:16:27,427 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 125 is on host 125
2023-07-11 14:16:27,428 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 126 is on host 126
2023-07-11 14:16:27,428 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 127 is on host 127
2023-07-11 14:16:27,428 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 128 is on host 128
2023-07-11 14:16:27,428 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 129 is on host 129
2023-07-11 14:16:27,428 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 130 is on host 130
2023-07-11 14:16:27,428 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 131 is on host 131
2023-07-11 14:16:27,428 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 132 is on host 132
2023-07-11 14:16:27,428 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 133 is on host 133
2023-07-11 14:16:27,428 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 134 is on host 134
2023-07-11 14:16:27,428 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 135 is on host 135
2023-07-11 14:16:27,428 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 136 is on host 136
2023-07-11 14:16:27,428 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 137 is on host 137
2023-07-11 14:16:27,428 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 138 is on host 138
2023-07-11 14:16:27,428 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 139 is on host 139
2023-07-11 14:16:27,428 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 140 is on host 140
2023-07-11 14:16:27,428 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 141 is on host 141
2023-07-11 14:16:27,428 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 142 is on host 142
2023-07-11 14:16:27,428 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 143 is on host 143
2023-07-11 14:16:27,428 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 144 is on host 144
2023-07-11 14:16:27,428 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 145 is on host 145
2023-07-11 14:16:27,428 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 146 is on host 146
2023-07-11 14:16:27,428 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 147 is on host 147
2023-07-11 14:16:27,428 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 148 is on host 148
2023-07-11 14:16:27,428 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 149 is on host 149
2023-07-11 14:16:27,428 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 150 is on host 150
2023-07-11 14:16:27,428 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 151 is on host 151
2023-07-11 14:16:27,428 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 152 is on host 152
2023-07-11 14:16:27,428 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 153 is on host 153
2023-07-11 14:16:27,428 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 154 is on host 154
2023-07-11 14:16:27,429 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 155 is on host 155
2023-07-11 14:16:27,429 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 156 is on host 156
2023-07-11 14:16:27,429 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 157 is on host 157
2023-07-11 14:16:27,429 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 158 is on host 158
2023-07-11 14:16:27,429 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 159 is on host 159
2023-07-11 14:16:27,429 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 160 is on host 160
2023-07-11 14:16:27,429 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 161 is on host 161
2023-07-11 14:16:27,429 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 162 is on host 162
2023-07-11 14:16:27,429 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 163 is on host 163
2023-07-11 14:16:27,429 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 164 is on host 164
2023-07-11 14:16:27,429 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 165 is on host 165
2023-07-11 14:16:27,429 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 166 is on host 166
2023-07-11 14:16:27,429 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 167 is on host 167
2023-07-11 14:16:27,429 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 168 is on host 168
2023-07-11 14:16:27,429 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 169 is on host 169
2023-07-11 14:16:27,429 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 170 is on host 170
2023-07-11 14:16:27,429 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 171 is on host 171
2023-07-11 14:16:27,429 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 172 is on host 172
2023-07-11 14:16:27,429 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 173 is on host 173
2023-07-11 14:16:27,429 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 174 is on host 174
2023-07-11 14:16:27,429 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 175 is on host 175
2023-07-11 14:16:27,429 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 176 is on host 176
2023-07-11 14:16:27,429 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 177 is on host 177
2023-07-11 14:16:27,429 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 178 is on host 178
2023-07-11 14:16:27,429 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 179 is on host 179
2023-07-11 14:16:27,429 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 180 is on host 180
2023-07-11 14:16:27,429 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 181 is on host 181
2023-07-11 14:16:27,429 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 182 is on host 182
2023-07-11 14:16:27,429 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 183 is on host 183
2023-07-11 14:16:27,430 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 184 is on host 184
2023-07-11 14:16:27,430 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 185 is on host 185
2023-07-11 14:16:27,430 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 186 is on host 186
2023-07-11 14:16:27,430 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 187 is on host 187
2023-07-11 14:16:27,430 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 188 is on host 188
2023-07-11 14:16:27,430 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 189 is on host 189
2023-07-11 14:16:27,430 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 190 is on host 190
2023-07-11 14:16:27,430 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 191 is on host 191
2023-07-11 14:16:27,430 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 192 is on host 192
2023-07-11 14:16:27,430 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 193 is on host 193
2023-07-11 14:16:27,430 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 194 is on host 194
2023-07-11 14:16:27,430 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 195 is on host 195
2023-07-11 14:16:27,430 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 196 is on host 196
2023-07-11 14:16:27,430 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 197 is on host 197
2023-07-11 14:16:27,430 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 198 is on host 198
2023-07-11 14:16:27,430 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 199 is on host 199
2023-07-11 14:16:27,430 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 200 is on host 200
2023-07-11 14:16:27,430 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 201 is on host 201
2023-07-11 14:16:27,430 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 202 is on host 202
2023-07-11 14:16:27,430 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 203 is on host 203
2023-07-11 14:16:27,430 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 204 is on host 204
2023-07-11 14:16:27,430 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 205 is on host 205
2023-07-11 14:16:27,430 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 206 is on host 206
2023-07-11 14:16:27,430 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 207 is on host 207
2023-07-11 14:16:27,430 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 208 is on host 208
2023-07-11 14:16:27,430 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 209 is on host 209
2023-07-11 14:16:27,430 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 210 is on host 210
2023-07-11 14:16:27,430 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 211 is on host 211
2023-07-11 14:16:27,430 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 212 is on host 212
2023-07-11 14:16:27,431 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 213 is on host 213
2023-07-11 14:16:27,431 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 214 is on host 214
2023-07-11 14:16:27,431 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 215 is on host 215
2023-07-11 14:16:27,431 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 216 is on host 216
2023-07-11 14:16:27,431 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 217 is on host 217
2023-07-11 14:16:27,431 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 218 is on host 218
2023-07-11 14:16:27,431 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 219 is on host 219
2023-07-11 14:16:27,431 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 220 is on host 220
2023-07-11 14:16:27,431 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 221 is on host 221
2023-07-11 14:16:27,431 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 222 is on host 222
2023-07-11 14:16:27,431 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 223 is on host 223
2023-07-11 14:16:27,431 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 224 is on host 224
2023-07-11 14:16:27,431 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 225 is on host 225
2023-07-11 14:16:27,431 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 226 is on host 226
2023-07-11 14:16:27,431 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 227 is on host 227
2023-07-11 14:16:27,431 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 228 is on host 228
2023-07-11 14:16:27,431 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 229 is on host 229
2023-07-11 14:16:27,431 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 230 is on host 230
2023-07-11 14:16:27,431 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 231 is on host 231
2023-07-11 14:16:27,431 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 232 is on host 232
2023-07-11 14:16:27,431 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 233 is on host 233
2023-07-11 14:16:27,431 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 234 is on host 234
2023-07-11 14:16:27,431 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 235 is on host 235
2023-07-11 14:16:27,431 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 236 is on host 236
2023-07-11 14:16:27,431 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 237 is on host 237
2023-07-11 14:16:27,431 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 238 is on host 238
2023-07-11 14:16:27,431 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 239 is on host 239
2023-07-11 14:16:27,431 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 240 is on host 240
2023-07-11 14:16:27,432 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 241 is on host 241
2023-07-11 14:16:27,432 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 242 is on host 242
2023-07-11 14:16:27,432 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 243 is on host 243
2023-07-11 14:16:27,432 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 244 is on host 244
2023-07-11 14:16:27,432 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 245 is on host 245
2023-07-11 14:16:27,432 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 246 is on host 246
2023-07-11 14:16:27,432 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 247 is on host 247
2023-07-11 14:16:27,432 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 248 is on host 248
2023-07-11 14:16:27,432 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 249 is on host 249
2023-07-11 14:16:27,432 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 250 is on host 250
2023-07-11 14:16:27,432 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 251 is on host 251
2023-07-11 14:16:27,432 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 252 is on host 252
2023-07-11 14:16:27,432 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 253 is on host 253
2023-07-11 14:16:27,432 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 254 is on host 254
2023-07-11 14:16:27,432 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 255 is on host 255
2023-07-11 14:16:27,432 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 256 is on host 256
2023-07-11 14:16:27,432 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 257 is on host 257
2023-07-11 14:16:27,432 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 258 is on host 258
2023-07-11 14:16:27,432 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 259 is on host 259
2023-07-11 14:16:27,432 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 260 is on host 260
2023-07-11 14:16:27,432 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 261 is on host 261
2023-07-11 14:16:27,432 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 262 is on host 262
2023-07-11 14:16:27,432 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 263 is on host 263
2023-07-11 14:16:27,432 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 264 is on host 264
2023-07-11 14:16:27,432 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 265 is on host 265
2023-07-11 14:16:27,432 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 266 is on host 266
2023-07-11 14:16:27,432 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 267 is on host 267
2023-07-11 14:16:27,432 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 268 is on host 268
2023-07-11 14:16:27,432 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 269 is on host 269
2023-07-11 14:16:27,433 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 270 is on host 270
2023-07-11 14:16:27,433 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 271 is on host 271
2023-07-11 14:16:27,433 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 272 is on host 272
2023-07-11 14:16:27,433 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 273 is on host 273
2023-07-11 14:16:27,433 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 274 is on host 274
2023-07-11 14:16:27,433 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 275 is on host 275
2023-07-11 14:16:27,433 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 276 is on host 276
2023-07-11 14:16:27,433 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 277 is on host 277
2023-07-11 14:16:27,433 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 278 is on host 278
2023-07-11 14:16:27,433 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 279 is on host 279
2023-07-11 14:16:27,433 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 280 is on host 280
2023-07-11 14:16:27,433 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 281 is on host 281
2023-07-11 14:16:27,433 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 282 is on host 282
2023-07-11 14:16:27,433 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 283 is on host 283
2023-07-11 14:16:27,433 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 284 is on host 284
2023-07-11 14:16:27,433 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 285 is on host 285
2023-07-11 14:16:27,433 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 286 is on host 286
2023-07-11 14:16:27,433 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 287 is on host 287
2023-07-11 14:16:27,433 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 288 is on host 288
2023-07-11 14:16:27,433 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 289 is on host 289
2023-07-11 14:16:27,433 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 290 is on host 290
2023-07-11 14:16:27,433 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 291 is on host 291
2023-07-11 14:16:27,433 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 292 is on host 292
2023-07-11 14:16:27,433 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 293 is on host 293
2023-07-11 14:16:27,433 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 294 is on host 294
2023-07-11 14:16:27,433 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 295 is on host 295
2023-07-11 14:16:27,433 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 296 is on host 296
2023-07-11 14:16:27,433 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 297 is on host 297
2023-07-11 14:16:27,433 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 298 is on host 298
2023-07-11 14:16:27,434 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 299 is on host 299
2023-07-11 14:16:27,434 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 300 is on host 300
2023-07-11 14:16:27,434 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 301 is on host 301
2023-07-11 14:16:27,434 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 302 is on host 302
2023-07-11 14:16:27,434 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 303 is on host 303
2023-07-11 14:16:27,434 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 304 is on host 304
2023-07-11 14:16:27,434 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 305 is on host 305
2023-07-11 14:16:27,434 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 306 is on host 306
2023-07-11 14:16:27,434 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 307 is on host 307
2023-07-11 14:16:27,434 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 308 is on host 308
2023-07-11 14:16:27,434 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 309 is on host 309
2023-07-11 14:16:27,434 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 310 is on host 310
2023-07-11 14:16:27,434 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 311 is on host 311
2023-07-11 14:16:27,434 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 312 is on host 312
2023-07-11 14:16:27,434 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 313 is on host 313
2023-07-11 14:16:27,434 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 314 is on host 314
2023-07-11 14:16:27,434 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 315 is on host 315
2023-07-11 14:16:27,434 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 316 is on host 316
2023-07-11 14:16:27,434 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 317 is on host 317
2023-07-11 14:16:27,434 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 318 is on host 318
2023-07-11 14:16:27,434 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 319 is on host 319
2023-07-11 14:16:27,434 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 320 is on host 320
2023-07-11 14:16:27,434 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 321 is on host 321
2023-07-11 14:16:27,434 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 322 is on host 322
2023-07-11 14:16:27,434 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 323 is on host 323
2023-07-11 14:16:27,434 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 324 is on host 324
2023-07-11 14:16:27,434 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 325 is on host 325
2023-07-11 14:16:27,434 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 326 is on host 326
2023-07-11 14:16:27,434 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 327 is on host 327
2023-07-11 14:16:27,435 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 328 is on host 328
2023-07-11 14:16:27,435 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 329 is on host 329
2023-07-11 14:16:27,435 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 330 is on host 330
2023-07-11 14:16:27,435 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 331 is on host 331
2023-07-11 14:16:27,435 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 332 is on host 332
2023-07-11 14:16:27,435 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 333 is on host 333
2023-07-11 14:16:27,435 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 334 is on host 334
2023-07-11 14:16:27,435 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 335 is on host 335
2023-07-11 14:16:27,435 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 336 is on host 336
2023-07-11 14:16:27,435 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 337 is on host 337
2023-07-11 14:16:27,435 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 338 is on host 338
2023-07-11 14:16:27,435 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 339 is on host 339
2023-07-11 14:16:27,435 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 340 is on host 340
2023-07-11 14:16:27,435 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 341 is on host 341
2023-07-11 14:16:27,435 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 342 is on host 342
2023-07-11 14:16:27,435 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 343 is on host 343
2023-07-11 14:16:27,435 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 344 is on host 344
2023-07-11 14:16:27,435 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 345 is on host 345
2023-07-11 14:16:27,435 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 346 is on host 346
2023-07-11 14:16:27,435 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 347 is on host 347
2023-07-11 14:16:27,435 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 348 is on host 348
2023-07-11 14:16:27,435 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 349 is on host 349
2023-07-11 14:16:27,435 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 350 is on host 350
2023-07-11 14:16:27,435 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 351 is on host 351
2023-07-11 14:16:27,435 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 352 is on host 352
2023-07-11 14:16:27,435 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 353 is on host 353
2023-07-11 14:16:27,435 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 354 is on host 354
2023-07-11 14:16:27,435 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 355 is on host 355
2023-07-11 14:16:27,435 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 356 is on host 356
2023-07-11 14:16:27,436 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 357 is on host 357
2023-07-11 14:16:27,436 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 358 is on host 358
2023-07-11 14:16:27,436 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 359 is on host 359
2023-07-11 14:16:27,436 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 360 is on host 360
2023-07-11 14:16:27,436 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 361 is on host 361
2023-07-11 14:16:27,436 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 362 is on host 362
2023-07-11 14:16:27,436 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 363 is on host 363
2023-07-11 14:16:27,436 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 364 is on host 364
2023-07-11 14:16:27,436 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 365 is on host 365
2023-07-11 14:16:27,436 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 366 is on host 366
2023-07-11 14:16:27,436 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 367 is on host 367
2023-07-11 14:16:27,436 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 368 is on host 368
2023-07-11 14:16:27,436 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 369 is on host 369
2023-07-11 14:16:27,436 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 370 is on host 370
2023-07-11 14:16:27,436 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 371 is on host 371
2023-07-11 14:16:27,436 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 372 is on host 372
2023-07-11 14:16:27,436 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 373 is on host 373
2023-07-11 14:16:27,436 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 374 is on host 374
2023-07-11 14:16:27,436 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 375 is on host 375
2023-07-11 14:16:27,436 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 376 is on host 376
2023-07-11 14:16:27,436 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 377 is on host 377
2023-07-11 14:16:27,436 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 378 is on host 378
2023-07-11 14:16:27,436 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 379 is on host 379
2023-07-11 14:16:27,436 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 380 is on host 380
2023-07-11 14:16:27,436 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 381 is on host 381
2023-07-11 14:16:27,436 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 382 is on host 382
2023-07-11 14:16:27,436 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 383 is on host 383
2023-07-11 14:16:27,436 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 384 is on host 384
2023-07-11 14:16:27,437 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 385 is on host 385
2023-07-11 14:16:27,437 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 386 is on host 386
2023-07-11 14:16:27,437 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 387 is on host 387
2023-07-11 14:16:27,437 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 388 is on host 388
2023-07-11 14:16:27,437 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 389 is on host 389
2023-07-11 14:16:27,437 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 390 is on host 390
2023-07-11 14:16:27,437 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 391 is on host 391
2023-07-11 14:16:27,437 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 392 is on host 392
2023-07-11 14:16:27,437 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=393, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:27,437 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table15) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:27,437 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table16
2023-07-11 14:16:27,438 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv553536953=290, srv1630071126=110, srv1071894870=12, srv23511728=232, srv658346947=323, srv2025338799=204, srv1397994335=64, srv1976766403=195, srv1644629726=118, srv957637734=381, srv2079182457=210, srv1749264468=139, srv2046129126=206, srv1595762596=104, srv603990852=307, srv1973073480=194, srv958856137=382, srv644066832=319, srv557062842=292, srv277765671=235, srv732221418=337, srv1769385567=143, srv224612199=228, srv714752528=334, srv362526040=256, srv581128949=296, srv2133511466=223, srv1144239257=30, srv320603627=245, srv1679952521=126, srv2122867873=222, srv1110067064=24, srv256251994=233, srv63261708=317, srv89837390=371, srv552104598=289, srv508952995=281, srv2096011353=214, srv1770417148=144, srv1246723478=42, srv929436444=378, srv2082192429=211, srv234917297=231, srv405700573=266, srv183644386=166, srv1488378513=85, srv173139715=136, srv1154180352=32, srv355693379=252, srv1407521654=66, srv496848057=275, srv1157975499=33, srv1806731027=162, srv1923102804=184, srv311102455=244, srv450011410=271, srv771515724=348, srv389183508=262, srv1249074416=43, srv2014575201=201, srv640847108=318, srv832363565=356, srv1970882134=192, srv2107358603=218, srv855766065=361, srv1336043388=55, srv29397186=237, srv982792848=390, srv976560524=386, srv101181760=3, srv1093549482=21, srv2018389395=202, srv2113483104=221, srv1778339118=149, srv1968709692=190, srv705221118=333, srv159600090=105, srv1919608486=180, srv981255102=389, srv807899713=353, srv755110395=344, srv1770594519=145, srv739692705=340, srv1076582671=16, srv693869315=330, srv1079048717=17, srv440657532=270, srv1636659280=115, srv2108739257=220, srv668373413=326, srv1003610393=2, srv1054229197=11, srv1868589627=172, srv2103522371=217, srv1000546271=0, srv951670617=380, srv2042909593=205, srv1865656038=171, srv1466355012=78, srv703662406=332, srv1418112884=70, srv1215580291=40, srv71833528=335, srv1580581635=103, srv1021032212=5, srv1080806312=19, srv1985601859=197, srv74471954=343, srv1647472319=119, srv2071553346=208, srv1632855171=112, srv1122009370=27, srv13613992=61, srv1630777154=111, srv301413669=239, srv550697728=288, srv1296023857=53, srv1724550977=133, srv1989290370=198, srv1926417985=185, srv1678097199=125, srv1461034373=76, srv614690415=311, srv2098345381=215, srv310463473=243, srv1011934105=4, srv148627129=84, srv305489318=240, srv1256534903=46, srv1289731445=52, srv1798844587=157, srv567113085=294, srv1119222501=26, srv2055117940=207, srv855898852=362, srv629224816=316, srv1075943554=15, srv625909061=315, srv1705591942=128, srv734225580=339, srv660107924=324, srv1381729938=62, srv1633483173=113, srv408265476=267, srv1776057793=148, srv1360253411=60, srv1511424834=90, srv1414162621=68, srv883343663=370, srv151859222=91, srv349144930=251, srv1991304034=199, srv1825887791=164, srv601657063=305, srv758932951=345, srv1651629087=120, srv1864623584=170, srv682957691=329, srv1500454146=88, srv1725962085=135, srv1659841448=121, srv1253206004=45, srv52354442=284, srv18508093=168, srv1427731921=73, srv561344974=293, srv721668125=336, srv1575482138=100, srv914128771=373, srv961487230=383, srv741332941=342, srv533032466=286, srv1574140987=99, srv2139849097=224, srv503902262=278, srv674807007=327, srv1786829855=153, srv2088727517=213, srv394366966=264, srv980089565=388, srv114594288=31, srv38296437=261, srv214835574=226, srv1887224977=176, srv1025509362=7, srv1577020334=102, srv524466665=285, srv393561021=263, srv759909927=346, srv763556514=347, srv786453030=349, srv2142935488=225, srv618111613=312, srv16254163=108, srv343211061=250, srv476075173=273, srv1269632212=47, srv333589612=246, srv499015361=276, srv836674186=357, srv1799191687=158, srv1446998035=74, srv1571774199=98, srv1115354947=25, srv333860881=247, srv1724152600=132, srv1598699299=106, srv177885829=151, srv472125887=272, srv1101339966=22, srv1424985362=72, srv1945569895=188, srv594128294=300, srv1026739237=8, srv842459828=358, srv878519137=366, srv1921260729=181, srv339110834=249, srv504099471=279, srv814253179=354, srv1643744885=116, srv1793847521=155, srv607234624=309, srv698219051=331, srv1688538732=127, srv666240078=325, srv1079284733=18, srv29210550=236, srv506181748=280, srv881313122=368, srv1945452576=187, srv597307897=303, srv1285120424=51, srv1887943816=177, srv1983604698=196, srv1805465940=161, srv309309336=242, srv1719756294=131, srv1349932676=58, srv1208486369=38, srv1643971570=117, srv1509331489=89, srv334105385=248, srv1400515744=65, srv369984715=259, srv43712162=269, srv842675864=359, srv1803258748=160, srv1022450918=6, srv1775108732=147, srv1766088250=141, srv180150732=159, srv1220857227=41, srv226530501=229, srv362032108=255, srv919715380=377, srv1074935976=14, srv1395030819=63, srv803291569=352, srv1877966766=175, srv220538712=227, srv2021718843=203, srv2107782185=219, srv882216860=369, srv1489137852=86, srv1972328734=193, srv1470759982=79, srv1774824811=146, srv971974774=384, srv1418242791=71, srv1001274196=1, srv909615097=372, srv1537724566=93, srv1165799954=34, srv1724754364=134, srv978173525=387, srv113319438=29, srv578033735=295, srv147931272=80, srv1183635941=35, srv1904215245=178, srv596349756=302, srv880835255=367, srv857544550=364, srv1779729022=152, srv1795612465=156, srv621083045=314, srv917704170=375, srv1351811120=59, srv1316710897=54, srv789820555=350, srv1922580095=183, srv305567304=241, srv1936745425=186, srv1745318024=138, srv1210822057=39, srv645375717=320, srv950628389=379, srv1490199189=87, srv1575919256=101, srv154481102=96, srv359402967=254, srv997716931=391, srv1457224273=75, srv581644449=297, srv1872374768=174, srv363177310=257, srv740327512=341, srv1664227236=123, srv972330517=385, srv1634261306=114, srv1662183707=122, srv1969046891=191, srv1485266211=82, srv1778842262=150, srv588410181=298, srv1921840985=182, srv591279493=299, srv37574565=260, srv1104147458=23, srv1190166330=36, srv652270371=322, srv1484309042=81, srv1560148463=97, srv618569548=313, srv2102708311=216, srv1084873074=20, srv517669556=283, srv918152084=376, srv649714317=321, srv1674484790=124, srv1339239880=56, srv1461073271=77, srv1125312901=28, srv25633292=234, srv516616923=282, srv299721745=238, srv604932433=308, srv1273702855=48, srv792183929=351, srv1042608200=10, srv1276335106=49, srv1486044644=83, srv676101698=328, srv998930892=392, srv200111276=200, srv1863083643=169, srv1737443479=137, srv872997185=365, srv821351126=355, srv852115805=360, srv1074355423=13, srv170952194=130, srv503430005=277, srv153887567=94, srv1415163001=69, srv1032737435=9, srv1840670515=167, srv1961921083=189, srv59745831=304, srv36715747=258, srv431547280=268, srv1524853580=92, srv1870059418=173, srv396010771=265, srv594457792=301, srv1755339428=140, srv1766275429=142, srv5565786=291, srv603898526=306, srv544570223=287, srv856030669=363, srv1542523468=95, srv915785747=374, srv356122213=253, srv1411875499=67, srv2077620970=209, srv1345529444=57, srv232339963=230, srv1250861076=44, srv1914875423=179, srv478619481=274, srv1202435626=37, srv1706089454=129, srv1810631201=163, srv1282644061=50, srv1625945288=109, srv733251129=338, srv2082830831=212, srv1612103540=107, srv612136291=310, srv1790004142=154, srv183394703=165} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:27,438 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:27,438 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:27,438 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:27,438 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:27,438 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:27,438 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:27,438 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-11 14:16:27,438 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-11 14:16:27,438 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-11 14:16:27,438 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-11 14:16:27,438 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 10 is on host 10
2023-07-11 14:16:27,438 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 11 is on host 11
2023-07-11 14:16:27,438 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 12 is on host 12
2023-07-11 14:16:27,438 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 13 is on host 13
2023-07-11 14:16:27,438 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 14 is on host 14
2023-07-11 14:16:27,439 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 15 is on host 15
2023-07-11 14:16:27,439 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 16 is on host 16
2023-07-11 14:16:27,439 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 17 is on host 17
2023-07-11 14:16:27,439 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 18 is on host 18
2023-07-11 14:16:27,439 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 19 is on host 19
2023-07-11 14:16:27,439 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 20 is on host 20
2023-07-11 14:16:27,439 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 21 is on host 21
2023-07-11 14:16:27,439 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 22 is on host 22
2023-07-11 14:16:27,439 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 23 is on host 23
2023-07-11 14:16:27,439 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 24 is on host 24
2023-07-11 14:16:27,439 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 25 is on host 25
2023-07-11 14:16:27,439 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 26 is on host 26
2023-07-11 14:16:27,439 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 27 is on host 27
2023-07-11 14:16:27,439 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 28 is on host 28
2023-07-11 14:16:27,439 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 29 is on host 29
2023-07-11 14:16:27,439 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 30 is on host 30
2023-07-11 14:16:27,439 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 31 is on host 31
2023-07-11 14:16:27,439 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 32 is on host 32
2023-07-11 14:16:27,439 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 33 is on host 33
2023-07-11 14:16:27,439 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 34 is on host 34
2023-07-11 14:16:27,439 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 35 is on host 35
2023-07-11 14:16:27,439 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 36 is on host 36
2023-07-11 14:16:27,439 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 37 is on host 37
2023-07-11 14:16:27,439 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 38 is on host 38
2023-07-11 14:16:27,439 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 39 is on host 39
2023-07-11 14:16:27,439 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 40 is on host 40
2023-07-11 14:16:27,439 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 41 is on host 41
2023-07-11 14:16:27,439 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 42 is on host 42
2023-07-11 14:16:27,440 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 43 is on host 43
2023-07-11 14:16:27,440 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 44 is on host 44
2023-07-11 14:16:27,440 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 45 is on host 45
2023-07-11 14:16:27,440 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 46 is on host 46
2023-07-11 14:16:27,440 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 47 is on host 47
2023-07-11 14:16:27,440 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 48 is on host 48
2023-07-11 14:16:27,440 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 49 is on host 49
2023-07-11 14:16:27,440 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 50 is on host 50
2023-07-11 14:16:27,440 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 51 is on host 51
2023-07-11 14:16:27,440 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 52 is on host 52
2023-07-11 14:16:27,440 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 53 is on host 53
2023-07-11 14:16:27,440 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 54 is on host 54
2023-07-11 14:16:27,440 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 55 is on host 55
2023-07-11 14:16:27,440 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 56 is on host 56
2023-07-11 14:16:27,440 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 57 is on host 57
2023-07-11 14:16:27,440 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 58 is on host 58
2023-07-11 14:16:27,440 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 59 is on host 59
2023-07-11 14:16:27,440 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 60 is on host 60
2023-07-11 14:16:27,440 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 61 is on host 61
2023-07-11 14:16:27,440 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 62 is on host 62
2023-07-11 14:16:27,440 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 63 is on host 63
2023-07-11 14:16:27,440 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 64 is on host 64
2023-07-11 14:16:27,440 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 65 is on host 65
2023-07-11 14:16:27,440 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 66 is on host 66
2023-07-11 14:16:27,440 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 67 is on host 67
2023-07-11 14:16:27,440 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 68 is on host 68
2023-07-11 14:16:27,440 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 69 is on host 69
2023-07-11 14:16:27,440 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 70 is on host 70
2023-07-11 14:16:27,441 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 71 is on host 71
2023-07-11 14:16:27,441 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 72 is on host 72
2023-07-11 14:16:27,441 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 73 is on host 73
2023-07-11 14:16:27,441 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 74 is on host 74
2023-07-11 14:16:27,441 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 75 is on host 75
2023-07-11 14:16:27,441 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 76 is on host 76
2023-07-11 14:16:27,441 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 77 is on host 77
2023-07-11 14:16:27,441 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 78 is on host 78
2023-07-11 14:16:27,441 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 79 is on host 79
2023-07-11 14:16:27,441 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 80 is on host 80
2023-07-11 14:16:27,441 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 81 is on host 81
2023-07-11 14:16:27,441 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 82 is on host 82
2023-07-11 14:16:27,441 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 83 is on host 83
2023-07-11 14:16:27,441 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 84 is on host 84
2023-07-11 14:16:27,441 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 85 is on host 85
2023-07-11 14:16:27,441 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 86 is on host 86
2023-07-11 14:16:27,441 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 87 is on host 87
2023-07-11 14:16:27,441 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 88 is on host 88
2023-07-11 14:16:27,441 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 89 is on host 89
2023-07-11 14:16:27,441 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 90 is on host 90
2023-07-11 14:16:27,441 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 91 is on host 91
2023-07-11 14:16:27,441 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 92 is on host 92
2023-07-11 14:16:27,441 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 93 is on host 93
2023-07-11 14:16:27,441 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 94 is on host 94
2023-07-11 14:16:27,441 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 95 is on host 95
2023-07-11 14:16:27,441 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 96 is on host 96
2023-07-11 14:16:27,441 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 97 is on host 97
2023-07-11 14:16:27,441 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 98 is on host 98
2023-07-11 14:16:27,442 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 99 is on host 99
2023-07-11 14:16:27,442 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 100 is on host 100
2023-07-11 14:16:27,442 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 101 is on host 101
2023-07-11 14:16:27,442 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 102 is on host 102
2023-07-11 14:16:27,442 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 103 is on host 103
2023-07-11 14:16:27,442 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 104 is on host 104
2023-07-11 14:16:27,442 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 105 is on host 105
2023-07-11 14:16:27,442 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 106 is on host 106
2023-07-11 14:16:27,442 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 107 is on host 107
2023-07-11 14:16:27,442 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 108 is on host 108
2023-07-11 14:16:27,442 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 109 is on host 109
2023-07-11 14:16:27,442 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 110 is on host 110
2023-07-11 14:16:27,442 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 111 is on host 111
2023-07-11 14:16:27,442 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 112 is on host 112
2023-07-11 14:16:27,442 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 113 is on host 113
2023-07-11 14:16:27,442 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 114 is on host 114
2023-07-11 14:16:27,442 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 115 is on host 115
2023-07-11 14:16:27,442 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 116 is on host 116
2023-07-11 14:16:27,442 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 117 is on host 117
2023-07-11 14:16:27,442 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 118 is on host 118
2023-07-11 14:16:27,442 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 119 is on host 119
2023-07-11 14:16:27,442 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 120 is on host 120
2023-07-11 14:16:27,442 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 121 is on host 121
2023-07-11 14:16:27,442 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 122 is on host 122
2023-07-11 14:16:27,442 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 123 is on host 123
2023-07-11 14:16:27,442 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 124 is on host 124
2023-07-11 14:16:27,442 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 125 is on host 125
2023-07-11 14:16:27,442 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 126 is on host 126
2023-07-11 14:16:27,442 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 127 is on host 127
2023-07-11 14:16:27,443 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 128 is on host 128
2023-07-11 14:16:27,443 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 129 is on host 129
2023-07-11 14:16:27,443 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 130 is on host 130
2023-07-11 14:16:27,443 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 131 is on host 131
2023-07-11 14:16:27,443 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 132 is on host 132
2023-07-11 14:16:27,443 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 133 is on host 133
2023-07-11 14:16:27,443 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 134 is on host 134
2023-07-11 14:16:27,443 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 135 is on host 135
2023-07-11 14:16:27,443 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 136 is on host 136
2023-07-11 14:16:27,443 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 137 is on host 137
2023-07-11 14:16:27,443 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 138 is on host 138
2023-07-11 14:16:27,443 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 139 is on host 139
2023-07-11 14:16:27,443 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 140 is on host 140
2023-07-11 14:16:27,443 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 141 is on host 141
2023-07-11 14:16:27,443 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 142 is on host 142
2023-07-11 14:16:27,443 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 143 is on host 143
2023-07-11 14:16:27,443 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 144 is on host 144
2023-07-11 14:16:27,443 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 145 is on host 145
2023-07-11 14:16:27,443 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 146 is on host 146
2023-07-11 14:16:27,443 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 147 is on host 147
2023-07-11 14:16:27,443 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 148 is on host 148
2023-07-11 14:16:27,443 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 149 is on host 149
2023-07-11 14:16:27,443 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 150 is on host 150
2023-07-11 14:16:27,443 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 151 is on host 151
2023-07-11 14:16:27,443 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 152 is on host 152
2023-07-11 14:16:27,443 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 153 is on host 153
2023-07-11 14:16:27,443 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 154 is on host 154
2023-07-11 14:16:27,443 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 155 is on host 155
2023-07-11 14:16:27,443 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 156 is on host 156
2023-07-11 14:16:27,444 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 157 is on host 157
2023-07-11 14:16:27,444 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 158 is on host 158
2023-07-11 14:16:27,444 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 159 is on host 159
2023-07-11 14:16:27,444 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 160 is on host 160
2023-07-11 14:16:27,444 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 161 is on host 161
2023-07-11 14:16:27,444 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 162 is on host 162
2023-07-11 14:16:27,444 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 163 is on host 163
2023-07-11 14:16:27,444 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 164 is on host 164
2023-07-11 14:16:27,444 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 165 is on host 165
2023-07-11 14:16:27,444 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 166 is on host 166
2023-07-11 14:16:27,444 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 167 is on host 167
2023-07-11 14:16:27,444 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 168 is on host 168
2023-07-11 14:16:27,444 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 169 is on host 169
2023-07-11 14:16:27,444 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 170 is on host 170
2023-07-11 14:16:27,444 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 171 is on host 171
2023-07-11 14:16:27,444 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 172 is on host 172
2023-07-11 14:16:27,444 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 173 is on host 173
2023-07-11 14:16:27,444 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 174 is on host 174
2023-07-11 14:16:27,444 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 175 is on host 175
2023-07-11 14:16:27,444 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 176 is on host 176
2023-07-11 14:16:27,444 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 177 is on host 177
2023-07-11 14:16:27,444 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 178 is on host 178
2023-07-11 14:16:27,444 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 179 is on host 179
2023-07-11 14:16:27,444 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 180 is on host 180
2023-07-11 14:16:27,444 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 181 is on host 181
2023-07-11 14:16:27,444 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 182 is on host 182
2023-07-11 14:16:27,444 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 183 is on host 183
2023-07-11 14:16:27,444 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 184 is on host 184
2023-07-11 14:16:27,444 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 185 is on host 185
2023-07-11 14:16:27,445 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 186 is on host 186
2023-07-11 14:16:27,445 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 187 is on host 187
2023-07-11 14:16:27,445 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 188 is on host 188
2023-07-11 14:16:27,445 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 189 is on host 189
2023-07-11 14:16:27,445 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 190 is on host 190
2023-07-11 14:16:27,445 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 191 is on host 191
2023-07-11 14:16:27,445 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 192 is on host 192
2023-07-11 14:16:27,445 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 193 is on host 193
2023-07-11 14:16:27,445 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 194 is on host 194
2023-07-11 14:16:27,445 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 195 is on host 195
2023-07-11 14:16:27,445 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 196 is on host 196
2023-07-11 14:16:27,445 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 197 is on host 197
2023-07-11 14:16:27,445 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 198 is on host 198
2023-07-11 14:16:27,445 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 199 is on host 199
2023-07-11 14:16:27,445 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 200 is on host 200
2023-07-11 14:16:27,445 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 201 is on host 201
2023-07-11 14:16:27,445 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 202 is on host 202
2023-07-11 14:16:27,445 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 203 is on host 203
2023-07-11 14:16:27,445 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 204 is on host 204
2023-07-11 14:16:27,445 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 205 is on host 205
2023-07-11 14:16:27,445 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 206 is on host 206
2023-07-11 14:16:27,445 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 207 is on host 207
2023-07-11 14:16:27,445 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 208 is on host 208
2023-07-11 14:16:27,445 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 209 is on host 209
2023-07-11 14:16:27,445 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 210 is on host 210
2023-07-11 14:16:27,445 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 211 is on host 211
2023-07-11 14:16:27,445 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 212 is on host 212
2023-07-11 14:16:27,445 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 213 is on host 213
2023-07-11 14:16:27,446 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 214 is on host 214
2023-07-11 14:16:27,446 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 215 is on host 215
2023-07-11 14:16:27,446 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 216 is on host 216
2023-07-11 14:16:27,446 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 217 is on host 217
2023-07-11 14:16:27,446 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 218 is on host 218
2023-07-11 14:16:27,446 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 219 is on host 219
2023-07-11 14:16:27,446 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 220 is on host 220
2023-07-11 14:16:27,446 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 221 is on host 221
2023-07-11 14:16:27,446 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 222 is on host 222
2023-07-11 14:16:27,446 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 223 is on host 223
2023-07-11 14:16:27,446 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 224 is on host 224
2023-07-11 14:16:27,446 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 225 is on host 225
2023-07-11 14:16:27,446 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 226 is on host 226
2023-07-11 14:16:27,446 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 227 is on host 227
2023-07-11 14:16:27,446 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 228 is on host 228
2023-07-11 14:16:27,446 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 229 is on host 229
2023-07-11 14:16:27,446 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 230 is on host 230
2023-07-11 14:16:27,446 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 231 is on host 231
2023-07-11 14:16:27,446 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 232 is on host 232
2023-07-11 14:16:27,446 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 233 is on host 233
2023-07-11 14:16:27,446 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 234 is on host 234
2023-07-11 14:16:27,446 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 235 is on host 235
2023-07-11 14:16:27,446 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 236 is on host 236
2023-07-11 14:16:27,446 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 237 is on host 237
2023-07-11 14:16:27,446 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 238 is on host 238
2023-07-11 14:16:27,446 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 239 is on host 239
2023-07-11 14:16:27,446 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 240 is on host 240
2023-07-11 14:16:27,446 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 241 is on host 241
2023-07-11 14:16:27,446 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 242 is on host 242
2023-07-11 14:16:27,447 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 243 is on host 243
2023-07-11 14:16:27,447 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 244 is on host 244
2023-07-11 14:16:27,447 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 245 is on host 245
2023-07-11 14:16:27,447 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 246 is on host 246
2023-07-11 14:16:27,447 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 247 is on host 247
2023-07-11 14:16:27,447 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 248 is on host 248
2023-07-11 14:16:27,447 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 249 is on host 249
2023-07-11 14:16:27,447 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 250 is on host 250
2023-07-11 14:16:27,447 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 251 is on host 251
2023-07-11 14:16:27,447 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 252 is on host 252
2023-07-11 14:16:27,447 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 253 is on host 253
2023-07-11 14:16:27,447 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 254 is on host 254
2023-07-11 14:16:27,447 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 255 is on host 255
2023-07-11 14:16:27,447 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 256 is on host 256
2023-07-11 14:16:27,447 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 257 is on host 257
2023-07-11 14:16:27,447 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 258 is on host 258
2023-07-11 14:16:27,447 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 259 is on host 259
2023-07-11 14:16:27,447 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 260 is on host 260
2023-07-11 14:16:27,447 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 261 is on host 261
2023-07-11 14:16:27,447 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 262 is on host 262
2023-07-11 14:16:27,447 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 263 is on host 263
2023-07-11 14:16:27,447 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 264 is on host 264
2023-07-11 14:16:27,447 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 265 is on host 265
2023-07-11 14:16:27,447 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 266 is on host 266
2023-07-11 14:16:27,447 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 267 is on host 267
2023-07-11 14:16:27,447 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 268 is on host 268
2023-07-11 14:16:27,447 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 269 is on host 269
2023-07-11 14:16:27,447 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 270 is on host 270
2023-07-11 14:16:27,447 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 271 is on host 271
2023-07-11 14:16:27,447 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 272 is on host 272
2023-07-11 14:16:27,448 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 273 is on host 273
2023-07-11 14:16:27,448 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 274 is on host 274
2023-07-11 14:16:27,448 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 275 is on host 275
2023-07-11 14:16:27,448 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 276 is on host 276
2023-07-11 14:16:27,448 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 277 is on host 277
2023-07-11 14:16:27,448 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 278 is on host 278
2023-07-11 14:16:27,448 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 279 is on host 279
2023-07-11 14:16:27,448 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 280 is on host 280
2023-07-11 14:16:27,448 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 281 is on host 281
2023-07-11 14:16:27,448 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 282 is on host 282
2023-07-11 14:16:27,448 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 283 is on host 283
2023-07-11 14:16:27,448 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 284 is on host 284
2023-07-11 14:16:27,448 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 285 is on host 285
2023-07-11 14:16:27,448 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 286 is on host 286
2023-07-11 14:16:27,448 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 287 is on host 287
2023-07-11 14:16:27,448 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 288 is on host 288
2023-07-11 14:16:27,448 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 289 is on host 289
2023-07-11 14:16:27,448 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 290 is on host 290
2023-07-11 14:16:27,448 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 291 is on host 291
2023-07-11 14:16:27,448 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 292 is on host 292
2023-07-11 14:16:27,448 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 293 is on host 293
2023-07-11 14:16:27,448 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 294 is on host 294
2023-07-11 14:16:27,448 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 295 is on host 295
2023-07-11 14:16:27,448 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 296 is on host 296
2023-07-11 14:16:27,448 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 297 is on host 297
2023-07-11 14:16:27,448 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 298 is on host 298
2023-07-11 14:16:27,448 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 299 is on host 299
2023-07-11 14:16:27,448 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 300 is on host 300
2023-07-11 14:16:27,449 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 301 is on host 301
2023-07-11 14:16:27,449 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 302 is on host 302
2023-07-11 14:16:27,449 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 303 is on host 303
2023-07-11 14:16:27,449 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 304 is on host 304
2023-07-11 14:16:27,449 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 305 is on host 305
2023-07-11 14:16:27,449 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 306 is on host 306
2023-07-11 14:16:27,449 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 307 is on host 307
2023-07-11 14:16:27,449 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 308 is on host 308
2023-07-11 14:16:27,449 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 309 is on host 309
2023-07-11 14:16:27,449 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 310 is on host 310
2023-07-11 14:16:27,449 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 311 is on host 311
2023-07-11 14:16:27,449 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 312 is on host 312
2023-07-11 14:16:27,449 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 313 is on host 313
2023-07-11 14:16:27,449 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 314 is on host 314
2023-07-11 14:16:27,449 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 315 is on host 315
2023-07-11 14:16:27,449 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 316 is on host 316
2023-07-11 14:16:27,449 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 317 is on host 317
2023-07-11 14:16:27,449 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 318 is on host 318
2023-07-11 14:16:27,449 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 319 is on host 319
2023-07-11 14:16:27,449 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 320 is on host 320
2023-07-11 14:16:27,449 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 321 is on host 321
2023-07-11 14:16:27,449 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 322 is on host 322
2023-07-11 14:16:27,449 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 323 is on host 323
2023-07-11 14:16:27,449 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 324 is on host 324
2023-07-11 14:16:27,449 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 325 is on host 325
2023-07-11 14:16:27,449 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 326 is on host 326
2023-07-11 14:16:27,449 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 327 is on host 327
2023-07-11 14:16:27,449 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 328 is on host 328
2023-07-11 14:16:27,449 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 329 is on host 329
2023-07-11 14:16:27,450 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 330 is on host 330
2023-07-11 14:16:27,450 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 331 is on host 331
2023-07-11 14:16:27,450 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 332 is on host 332
2023-07-11 14:16:27,450 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 333 is on host 333
2023-07-11 14:16:27,450 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 334 is on host 334
2023-07-11 14:16:27,450 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 335 is on host 335
2023-07-11 14:16:27,450 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 336 is on host 336
2023-07-11 14:16:27,450 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 337 is on host 337
2023-07-11 14:16:27,450 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 338 is on host 338
2023-07-11 14:16:27,450 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 339 is on host 339
2023-07-11 14:16:27,450 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 340 is on host 340
2023-07-11 14:16:27,450 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 341 is on host 341
2023-07-11 14:16:27,450 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 342 is on host 342
2023-07-11 14:16:27,450 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 343 is on host 343
2023-07-11 14:16:27,450 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 344 is on host 344
2023-07-11 14:16:27,450 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 345 is on host 345
2023-07-11 14:16:27,450 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 346 is on host 346
2023-07-11 14:16:27,450 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 347 is on host 347
2023-07-11 14:16:27,450 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 348 is on host 348
2023-07-11 14:16:27,450 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 349 is on host 349
2023-07-11 14:16:27,450 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 350 is on host 350
2023-07-11 14:16:27,450 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 351 is on host 351
2023-07-11 14:16:27,450 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 352 is on host 352
2023-07-11 14:16:27,450 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 353 is on host 353
2023-07-11 14:16:27,450 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 354 is on host 354
2023-07-11 14:16:27,451 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 355 is on host 355
2023-07-11 14:16:27,451 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 356 is on host 356
2023-07-11 14:16:27,451 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 357 is on host 357
2023-07-11 14:16:27,451 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 358 is on host 358
2023-07-11 14:16:27,451 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 359 is on host 359
2023-07-11 14:16:27,451 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 360 is on host 360
2023-07-11 14:16:27,451 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 361 is on host 361
2023-07-11 14:16:27,451 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 362 is on host 362
2023-07-11 14:16:27,451 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 363 is on host 363
2023-07-11 14:16:27,451 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 364 is on host 364
2023-07-11 14:16:27,451 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 365 is on host 365
2023-07-11 14:16:27,451 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 366 is on host 366
2023-07-11 14:16:27,451 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 367 is on host 367
2023-07-11 14:16:27,451 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 368 is on host 368
2023-07-11 14:16:27,451 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 369 is on host 369
2023-07-11 14:16:27,451 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 370 is on host 370
2023-07-11 14:16:27,451 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 371 is on host 371
2023-07-11 14:16:27,451 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 372 is on host 372
2023-07-11 14:16:27,451 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 373 is on host 373
2023-07-11 14:16:27,452 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 374 is on host 374
2023-07-11 14:16:27,452 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 375 is on host 375
2023-07-11 14:16:27,452 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 376 is on host 376
2023-07-11 14:16:27,452 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 377 is on host 377
2023-07-11 14:16:27,452 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 378 is on host 378
2023-07-11 14:16:27,452 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 379 is on host 379
2023-07-11 14:16:27,452 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 380 is on host 380
2023-07-11 14:16:27,452 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 381 is on host 381
2023-07-11 14:16:27,452 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 382 is on host 382
2023-07-11 14:16:27,452 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 383 is on host 383
2023-07-11 14:16:27,452 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 384 is on host 384
2023-07-11 14:16:27,452 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 385 is on host 385
2023-07-11 14:16:27,452 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 386 is on host 386
2023-07-11 14:16:27,452 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 387 is on host 387
2023-07-11 14:16:27,452 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 388 is on host 388
2023-07-11 14:16:27,452 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 389 is on host 389
2023-07-11 14:16:27,452 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 390 is on host 390
2023-07-11 14:16:27,452 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 391 is on host 391
2023-07-11 14:16:27,452 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 392 is on host 392
2023-07-11 14:16:27,452 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=393, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:27,453 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table16) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:27,453 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table17
2023-07-11 14:16:27,453 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv553536953=290, srv1630071126=110, srv1071894870=12, srv23511728=232, srv658346947=323, srv2025338799=204, srv1397994335=64, srv1976766403=195, srv1644629726=118, srv957637734=381, srv2079182457=210, srv1749264468=139, srv2046129126=206, srv1595762596=104, srv603990852=307, srv1973073480=194, srv958856137=382, srv644066832=319, srv557062842=292, srv277765671=235, srv732221418=337, srv1769385567=143, srv224612199=228, srv714752528=334, srv362526040=256, srv581128949=296, srv2133511466=223, srv1144239257=30, srv320603627=245, srv1679952521=126, srv2122867873=222, srv1110067064=24, srv256251994=233, srv63261708=317, srv89837390=371, srv552104598=289, srv508952995=281, srv2096011353=214, srv1770417148=144, srv1246723478=42, srv929436444=378, srv2082192429=211, srv234917297=231, srv405700573=266, srv183644386=166, srv1488378513=85, srv173139715=136, srv1154180352=32, srv355693379=252, srv1407521654=66, srv496848057=275, srv1157975499=33, srv1806731027=162, srv1923102804=184, srv311102455=244, srv450011410=271, srv771515724=348, srv389183508=262, srv1249074416=43, srv2014575201=201, srv640847108=318, srv832363565=356, srv1970882134=192, srv2107358603=218, srv855766065=361, srv1336043388=55, srv29397186=237, srv982792848=390, srv976560524=386, srv101181760=3, srv1093549482=21, srv2018389395=202, srv2113483104=221, srv1778339118=149, srv1968709692=190, srv705221118=333, srv159600090=105, srv1919608486=180, srv981255102=389, srv807899713=353, srv755110395=344, srv1770594519=145, srv739692705=340, srv1076582671=16, srv693869315=330, srv1079048717=17, srv440657532=270, srv1636659280=115, srv2108739257=220, srv668373413=326, srv1003610393=2, srv1054229197=11, srv1868589627=172, srv2103522371=217, srv1000546271=0, srv951670617=380, srv2042909593=205, srv1865656038=171, srv1466355012=78, srv703662406=332, srv1418112884=70, srv1215580291=40, srv71833528=335, srv1580581635=103, srv1021032212=5, srv1080806312=19, srv1985601859=197, srv74471954=343, srv1647472319=119, srv2071553346=208, srv1632855171=112, srv1122009370=27, srv13613992=61, srv1630777154=111, srv301413669=239, srv550697728=288, srv1296023857=53, srv1724550977=133, srv1989290370=198, srv1926417985=185, srv1678097199=125, srv1461034373=76, srv614690415=311, srv2098345381=215, srv310463473=243, srv1011934105=4, srv148627129=84, srv305489318=240, srv1256534903=46, srv1289731445=52, srv1798844587=157, srv567113085=294, srv1119222501=26, srv2055117940=207, srv855898852=362, srv629224816=316, srv1075943554=15, srv625909061=315, srv1705591942=128, srv734225580=339, srv660107924=324, srv1381729938=62, srv1633483173=113, srv408265476=267, srv1776057793=148, srv1360253411=60, srv1511424834=90, srv1414162621=68, srv883343663=370, srv151859222=91, srv349144930=251, srv1991304034=199, srv1825887791=164, srv601657063=305, srv758932951=345, srv1651629087=120, srv1864623584=170, srv682957691=329, srv1500454146=88, srv1725962085=135, srv1659841448=121, srv1253206004=45, srv52354442=284, srv18508093=168, srv1427731921=73, srv561344974=293, srv721668125=336, srv1575482138=100, srv914128771=373, srv961487230=383, srv741332941=342, srv533032466=286, srv1574140987=99, srv2139849097=224, srv503902262=278, srv674807007=327, srv1786829855=153, srv2088727517=213, srv394366966=264, srv980089565=388, srv114594288=31, srv38296437=261, srv214835574=226, srv1887224977=176, srv1025509362=7, srv1577020334=102, srv524466665=285, srv393561021=263, srv759909927=346, srv763556514=347, srv786453030=349, srv2142935488=225, srv618111613=312, srv16254163=108, srv343211061=250, srv476075173=273, srv1269632212=47, srv333589612=246, srv499015361=276, srv836674186=357, srv1799191687=158, srv1446998035=74, srv1571774199=98, srv1115354947=25, srv333860881=247, srv1724152600=132, srv1598699299=106, srv177885829=151, srv472125887=272, srv1101339966=22, srv1424985362=72, srv1945569895=188, srv594128294=300, srv1026739237=8, srv842459828=358, srv878519137=366, srv1921260729=181, srv339110834=249, srv504099471=279, srv814253179=354, srv1643744885=116, srv1793847521=155, srv607234624=309, srv698219051=331, srv1688538732=127, srv666240078=325, srv1079284733=18, srv29210550=236, srv506181748=280, srv881313122=368, srv1945452576=187, srv597307897=303, srv1285120424=51, srv1887943816=177, srv1983604698=196, srv1805465940=161, srv309309336=242, srv1719756294=131, srv1349932676=58, srv1208486369=38, srv1643971570=117, srv1509331489=89, srv334105385=248, srv1400515744=65, srv369984715=259, srv43712162=269, srv842675864=359, srv1803258748=160, srv1022450918=6, srv1775108732=147, srv1766088250=141, srv180150732=159, srv1220857227=41, srv226530501=229, srv362032108=255, srv919715380=377, srv1074935976=14, srv1395030819=63, srv803291569=352, srv1877966766=175, srv220538712=227, srv2021718843=203, srv2107782185=219, srv882216860=369, srv1489137852=86, srv1972328734=193, srv1470759982=79, srv1774824811=146, srv971974774=384, srv1418242791=71, srv1001274196=1, srv909615097=372, srv1537724566=93, srv1165799954=34, srv1724754364=134, srv978173525=387, srv113319438=29, srv578033735=295, srv147931272=80, srv1183635941=35, srv1904215245=178, srv596349756=302, srv880835255=367, srv857544550=364, srv1779729022=152, srv1795612465=156, srv621083045=314, srv917704170=375, srv1351811120=59, srv1316710897=54, srv789820555=350, srv1922580095=183, srv305567304=241, srv1936745425=186, srv1745318024=138, srv1210822057=39, srv645375717=320, srv950628389=379, srv1490199189=87, srv1575919256=101, srv154481102=96, srv359402967=254, srv997716931=391, srv1457224273=75, srv581644449=297, srv1872374768=174, srv363177310=257, srv740327512=341, srv1664227236=123, srv972330517=385, srv1634261306=114, srv1662183707=122, srv1969046891=191, srv1485266211=82, srv1778842262=150, srv588410181=298, srv1921840985=182, srv591279493=299, srv37574565=260, srv1104147458=23, srv1190166330=36, srv652270371=322, srv1484309042=81, srv1560148463=97, srv618569548=313, srv2102708311=216, srv1084873074=20, srv517669556=283, srv918152084=376, srv649714317=321, srv1674484790=124, srv1339239880=56, srv1461073271=77, srv1125312901=28, srv25633292=234, srv516616923=282, srv299721745=238, srv604932433=308, srv1273702855=48, srv792183929=351, srv1042608200=10, srv1276335106=49, srv1486044644=83, srv676101698=328, srv998930892=392, srv200111276=200, srv1863083643=169, srv1737443479=137, srv872997185=365, srv821351126=355, srv852115805=360, srv1074355423=13, srv170952194=130, srv503430005=277, srv153887567=94, srv1415163001=69, srv1032737435=9, srv1840670515=167, srv1961921083=189, srv59745831=304, srv36715747=258, srv431547280=268, srv1524853580=92, srv1870059418=173, srv396010771=265, srv594457792=301, srv1755339428=140, srv1766275429=142, srv5565786=291, srv603898526=306, srv544570223=287, srv856030669=363, srv1542523468=95, srv915785747=374, srv356122213=253, srv1411875499=67, srv2077620970=209, srv1345529444=57, srv232339963=230, srv1250861076=44, srv1914875423=179, srv478619481=274, srv1202435626=37, srv1706089454=129, srv1810631201=163, srv1282644061=50, srv1625945288=109, srv733251129=338, srv2082830831=212, srv1612103540=107, srv612136291=310, srv1790004142=154, srv183394703=165} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:27,453 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:27,453 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:27,453 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:27,453 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:27,453 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:27,453 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:27,453 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-11 14:16:27,453 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-11 14:16:27,454 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-11 14:16:27,454 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-11 14:16:27,454 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 10 is on host 10
2023-07-11 14:16:27,454 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 11 is on host 11
2023-07-11 14:16:27,454 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 12 is on host 12
2023-07-11 14:16:27,454 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 13 is on host 13
2023-07-11 14:16:27,454 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 14 is on host 14
2023-07-11 14:16:27,454 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 15 is on host 15
2023-07-11 14:16:27,454 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 16 is on host 16
2023-07-11 14:16:27,454 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 17 is on host 17
2023-07-11 14:16:27,454 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 18 is on host 18
2023-07-11 14:16:27,454 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 19 is on host 19
2023-07-11 14:16:27,454 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 20 is on host 20
2023-07-11 14:16:27,454 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 21 is on host 21
2023-07-11 14:16:27,454 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 22 is on host 22
2023-07-11 14:16:27,454 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 23 is on host 23
2023-07-11 14:16:27,454 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 24 is on host 24
2023-07-11 14:16:27,454 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 25 is on host 25
2023-07-11 14:16:27,454 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 26 is on host 26
2023-07-11 14:16:27,454 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 27 is on host 27
2023-07-11 14:16:27,454 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 28 is on host 28
2023-07-11 14:16:27,454 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 29 is on host 29
2023-07-11 14:16:27,454 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 30 is on host 30
2023-07-11 14:16:27,454 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 31 is on host 31
2023-07-11 14:16:27,454 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 32 is on host 32
2023-07-11 14:16:27,454 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 33 is on host 33
2023-07-11 14:16:27,454 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 34 is on host 34
2023-07-11 14:16:27,454 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 35 is on host 35
2023-07-11 14:16:27,454 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 36 is on host 36
2023-07-11 14:16:27,455 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 37 is on host 37
2023-07-11 14:16:27,455 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 38 is on host 38
2023-07-11 14:16:27,455 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 39 is on host 39
2023-07-11 14:16:27,455 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 40 is on host 40
2023-07-11 14:16:27,455 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 41 is on host 41
2023-07-11 14:16:27,455 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 42 is on host 42
2023-07-11 14:16:27,455 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 43 is on host 43
2023-07-11 14:16:27,455 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 44 is on host 44
2023-07-11 14:16:27,455 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 45 is on host 45
2023-07-11 14:16:27,455 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 46 is on host 46
2023-07-11 14:16:27,455 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 47 is on host 47
2023-07-11 14:16:27,455 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 48 is on host 48
2023-07-11 14:16:27,455 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 49 is on host 49
2023-07-11 14:16:27,455 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 50 is on host 50
2023-07-11 14:16:27,455 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 51 is on host 51
2023-07-11 14:16:27,455 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 52 is on host 52
2023-07-11 14:16:27,455 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 53 is on host 53
2023-07-11 14:16:27,455 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 54 is on host 54
2023-07-11 14:16:27,455 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 55 is on host 55
2023-07-11 14:16:27,455 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 56 is on host 56
2023-07-11 14:16:27,455 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 57 is on host 57
2023-07-11 14:16:27,455 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 58 is on host 58
2023-07-11 14:16:27,455 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 59 is on host 59
2023-07-11 14:16:27,455 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 60 is on host 60
2023-07-11 14:16:27,455 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 61 is on host 61
2023-07-11 14:16:27,455 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 62 is on host 62
2023-07-11 14:16:27,455 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 63 is on host 63
2023-07-11 14:16:27,455 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 64 is on host 64
2023-07-11 14:16:27,455 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 65 is on host 65
2023-07-11 14:16:27,456 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 66 is on host 66
2023-07-11 14:16:27,456 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 67 is on host 67
2023-07-11 14:16:27,456 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 68 is on host 68
2023-07-11 14:16:27,456 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 69 is on host 69
2023-07-11 14:16:27,456 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 70 is on host 70
2023-07-11 14:16:27,456 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 71 is on host 71
2023-07-11 14:16:27,456 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 72 is on host 72
2023-07-11 14:16:27,456 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 73 is on host 73
2023-07-11 14:16:27,456 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 74 is on host 74
2023-07-11 14:16:27,456 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 75 is on host 75
2023-07-11 14:16:27,456 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 76 is on host 76
2023-07-11 14:16:27,456 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 77 is on host 77
2023-07-11 14:16:27,456 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 78 is on host 78
2023-07-11 14:16:27,456 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 79 is on host 79
2023-07-11 14:16:27,456 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 80 is on host 80
2023-07-11 14:16:27,456 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 81 is on host 81
2023-07-11 14:16:27,456 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 82 is on host 82
2023-07-11 14:16:27,456 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 83 is on host 83
2023-07-11 14:16:27,456 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 84 is on host 84
2023-07-11 14:16:27,456 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 85 is on host 85
2023-07-11 14:16:27,456 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 86 is on host 86
2023-07-11 14:16:27,456 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 87 is on host 87
2023-07-11 14:16:27,456 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 88 is on host 88
2023-07-11 14:16:27,456 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 89 is on host 89
2023-07-11 14:16:27,456 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 90 is on host 90
2023-07-11 14:16:27,456 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 91 is on host 91
2023-07-11 14:16:27,456 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 92 is on host 92
2023-07-11 14:16:27,456 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 93 is on host 93
2023-07-11 14:16:27,456 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 94 is on host 94
2023-07-11 14:16:27,457 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 95 is on host 95
2023-07-11 14:16:27,457 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 96 is on host 96
2023-07-11 14:16:27,457 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 97 is on host 97
2023-07-11 14:16:27,457 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 98 is on host 98
2023-07-11 14:16:27,457 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 99 is on host 99
2023-07-11 14:16:27,457 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 100 is on host 100
2023-07-11 14:16:27,457 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 101 is on host 101
2023-07-11 14:16:27,457 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 102 is on host 102
2023-07-11 14:16:27,457 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 103 is on host 103
2023-07-11 14:16:27,457 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 104 is on host 104
2023-07-11 14:16:27,457 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 105 is on host 105
2023-07-11 14:16:27,457 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 106 is on host 106
2023-07-11 14:16:27,457 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 107 is on host 107
2023-07-11 14:16:27,457 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 108 is on host 108
2023-07-11 14:16:27,457 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 109 is on host 109
2023-07-11 14:16:27,457 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 110 is on host 110
2023-07-11 14:16:27,457 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 111 is on host 111
2023-07-11 14:16:27,457 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 112 is on host 112
2023-07-11 14:16:27,457 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 113 is on host 113
2023-07-11 14:16:27,457 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 114 is on host 114
2023-07-11 14:16:27,457 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 115 is on host 115
2023-07-11 14:16:27,457 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 116 is on host 116
2023-07-11 14:16:27,457 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 117 is on host 117
2023-07-11 14:16:27,457 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 118 is on host 118
2023-07-11 14:16:27,457 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 119 is on host 119
2023-07-11 14:16:27,457 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 120 is on host 120
2023-07-11 14:16:27,457 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 121 is on host 121
2023-07-11 14:16:27,457 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 122 is on host 122
2023-07-11 14:16:27,458 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 123 is on host 123
2023-07-11 14:16:27,458 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 124 is on host 124
2023-07-11 14:16:27,458 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 125 is on host 125
2023-07-11 14:16:27,458 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 126 is on host 126
2023-07-11 14:16:27,458 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 127 is on host 127
2023-07-11 14:16:27,458 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 128 is on host 128
2023-07-11 14:16:27,458 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 129 is on host 129
2023-07-11 14:16:27,458 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 130 is on host 130
2023-07-11 14:16:27,458 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 131 is on host 131
2023-07-11 14:16:27,458 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 132 is on host 132
2023-07-11 14:16:27,458 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 133 is on host 133
2023-07-11 14:16:27,458 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 134 is on host 134
2023-07-11 14:16:27,458 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 135 is on host 135
2023-07-11 14:16:27,458 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 136 is on host 136
2023-07-11 14:16:27,458 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 137 is on host 137
2023-07-11 14:16:27,458 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 138 is on host 138
2023-07-11 14:16:27,458 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 139 is on host 139
2023-07-11 14:16:27,458 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 140 is on host 140
2023-07-11 14:16:27,458 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 141 is on host 141
2023-07-11 14:16:27,458 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 142 is on host 142
2023-07-11 14:16:27,458 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 143 is on host 143
2023-07-11 14:16:27,458 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 144 is on host 144
2023-07-11 14:16:27,458 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 145 is on host 145
2023-07-11 14:16:27,458 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 146 is on host 146
2023-07-11 14:16:27,458 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 147 is on host 147
2023-07-11 14:16:27,458 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 148 is on host 148
2023-07-11 14:16:27,458 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 149 is on host 149
2023-07-11 14:16:27,458 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 150 is on host 150
2023-07-11 14:16:27,458 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 151 is on host 151
2023-07-11 14:16:27,458 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 152 is on host 152
2023-07-11 14:16:27,459 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 153 is on host 153
2023-07-11 14:16:27,459 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 154 is on host 154
2023-07-11 14:16:27,459 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 155 is on host 155
2023-07-11 14:16:27,459 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 156 is on host 156
2023-07-11 14:16:27,459 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 157 is on host 157
2023-07-11 14:16:27,459 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 158 is on host 158
2023-07-11 14:16:27,459 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 159 is on host 159
2023-07-11 14:16:27,459 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 160 is on host 160
2023-07-11 14:16:27,459 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 161 is on host 161
2023-07-11 14:16:27,459 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 162 is on host 162
2023-07-11 14:16:27,459 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 163 is on host 163
2023-07-11 14:16:27,459 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 164 is on host 164
2023-07-11 14:16:27,459 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 165 is on host 165
2023-07-11 14:16:27,459 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 166 is on host 166
2023-07-11 14:16:27,459 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 167 is on host 167
2023-07-11 14:16:27,459 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 168 is on host 168
2023-07-11 14:16:27,459 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 169 is on host 169
2023-07-11 14:16:27,459 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 170 is on host 170
2023-07-11 14:16:27,459 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 171 is on host 171
2023-07-11 14:16:27,459 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 172 is on host 172
2023-07-11 14:16:27,459 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 173 is on host 173
2023-07-11 14:16:27,459 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 174 is on host 174
2023-07-11 14:16:27,459 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 175 is on host 175
2023-07-11 14:16:27,459 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 176 is on host 176
2023-07-11 14:16:27,459 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 177 is on host 177
2023-07-11 14:16:27,459 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 178 is on host 178
2023-07-11 14:16:27,459 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 179 is on host 179
2023-07-11 14:16:27,459 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 180 is on host 180
2023-07-11 14:16:27,459 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 181 is on host 181
2023-07-11 14:16:27,460 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 182 is on host 182
2023-07-11 14:16:27,460 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 183 is on host 183
2023-07-11 14:16:27,460 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 184 is on host 184
2023-07-11 14:16:27,460 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 185 is on host 185
2023-07-11 14:16:27,460 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 186 is on host 186
2023-07-11 14:16:27,460 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 187 is on host 187
2023-07-11 14:16:27,460 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 188 is on host 188
2023-07-11 14:16:27,460 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 189 is on host 189
2023-07-11 14:16:27,460 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 190 is on host 190
2023-07-11 14:16:27,460 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 191 is on host 191
2023-07-11 14:16:27,460 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 192 is on host 192
2023-07-11 14:16:27,460 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 193 is on host 193
2023-07-11 14:16:27,460 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 194 is on host 194
2023-07-11 14:16:27,460 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 195 is on host 195
2023-07-11 14:16:27,460 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 196 is on host 196
2023-07-11 14:16:27,460 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 197 is on host 197
2023-07-11 14:16:27,460 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 198 is on host 198
2023-07-11 14:16:27,460 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 199 is on host 199
2023-07-11 14:16:27,460 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 200 is on host 200
2023-07-11 14:16:27,460 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 201 is on host 201
2023-07-11 14:16:27,460 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 202 is on host 202
2023-07-11 14:16:27,460 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 203 is on host 203
2023-07-11 14:16:27,460 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 204 is on host 204
2023-07-11 14:16:27,460 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 205 is on host 205
2023-07-11 14:16:27,460 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 206 is on host 206
2023-07-11 14:16:27,460 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 207 is on host 207
2023-07-11 14:16:27,460 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 208 is on host 208
2023-07-11 14:16:27,460 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 209 is on host 209
2023-07-11 14:16:27,460 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 210 is on host 210
2023-07-11 14:16:27,461 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 211 is on host 211
2023-07-11 14:16:27,461 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 212 is on host 212
2023-07-11 14:16:27,461 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 213 is on host 213
2023-07-11 14:16:27,461 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 214 is on host 214
2023-07-11 14:16:27,461 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 215 is on host 215
2023-07-11 14:16:27,461 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 216 is on host 216
2023-07-11 14:16:27,461 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 217 is on host 217
2023-07-11 14:16:27,461 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 218 is on host 218
2023-07-11 14:16:27,461 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 219 is on host 219
2023-07-11 14:16:27,461 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 220 is on host 220
2023-07-11 14:16:27,461 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 221 is on host 221
2023-07-11 14:16:27,461 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 222 is on host 222
2023-07-11 14:16:27,461 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 223 is on host 223
2023-07-11 14:16:27,461 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 224 is on host 224
2023-07-11 14:16:27,461 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 225 is on host 225
2023-07-11 14:16:27,461 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 226 is on host 226
2023-07-11 14:16:27,461 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 227 is on host 227
2023-07-11 14:16:27,461 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 228 is on host 228
2023-07-11 14:16:27,461 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 229 is on host 229
2023-07-11 14:16:27,461 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 230 is on host 230
2023-07-11 14:16:27,461 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 231 is on host 231
2023-07-11 14:16:27,461 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 232 is on host 232
2023-07-11 14:16:27,461 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 233 is on host 233
2023-07-11 14:16:27,461 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 234 is on host 234
2023-07-11 14:16:27,461 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 235 is on host 235
2023-07-11 14:16:27,461 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 236 is on host 236
2023-07-11 14:16:27,461 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 237 is on host 237
2023-07-11 14:16:27,461 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 238 is on host 238
2023-07-11 14:16:27,462 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 239 is on host 239
2023-07-11 14:16:27,462 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 240 is on host 240
2023-07-11 14:16:27,462 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 241 is on host 241
2023-07-11 14:16:27,462 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 242 is on host 242
2023-07-11 14:16:27,462 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 243 is on host 243
2023-07-11 14:16:27,462 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 244 is on host 244
2023-07-11 14:16:27,462 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 245 is on host 245
2023-07-11 14:16:27,462 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 246 is on host 246
2023-07-11 14:16:27,462 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 247 is on host 247
2023-07-11 14:16:27,462 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 248 is on host 248
2023-07-11 14:16:27,462 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 249 is on host 249
2023-07-11 14:16:27,462 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 250 is on host 250
2023-07-11 14:16:27,462 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 251 is on host 251
2023-07-11 14:16:27,462 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 252 is on host 252
2023-07-11 14:16:27,462 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 253 is on host 253
2023-07-11 14:16:27,462 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 254 is on host 254
2023-07-11 14:16:27,462 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 255 is on host 255
2023-07-11 14:16:27,462 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 256 is on host 256
2023-07-11 14:16:27,462 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 257 is on host 257
2023-07-11 14:16:27,462 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 258 is on host 258
2023-07-11 14:16:27,462 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 259 is on host 259
2023-07-11 14:16:27,462 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 260 is on host 260
2023-07-11 14:16:27,462 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 261 is on host 261
2023-07-11 14:16:27,463 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 262 is on host 262
2023-07-11 14:16:27,463 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 263 is on host 263
2023-07-11 14:16:27,463 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 264 is on host 264
2023-07-11 14:16:27,463 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 265 is on host 265
2023-07-11 14:16:27,463 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 266 is on host 266
2023-07-11 14:16:27,463 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 267 is on host 267
2023-07-11 14:16:27,463 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 268 is on host 268
2023-07-11 14:16:27,463 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 269 is on host 269
2023-07-11 14:16:27,463 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 270 is on host 270
2023-07-11 14:16:27,463 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 271 is on host 271
2023-07-11 14:16:27,463 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 272 is on host 272
2023-07-11 14:16:27,463 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 273 is on host 273
2023-07-11 14:16:27,463 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 274 is on host 274
2023-07-11 14:16:27,463 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 275 is on host 275
2023-07-11 14:16:27,463 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 276 is on host 276
2023-07-11 14:16:27,463 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 277 is on host 277
2023-07-11 14:16:27,463 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 278 is on host 278
2023-07-11 14:16:27,463 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 279 is on host 279
2023-07-11 14:16:27,463 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 280 is on host 280
2023-07-11 14:16:27,463 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 281 is on host 281
2023-07-11 14:16:27,463 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 282 is on host 282
2023-07-11 14:16:27,463 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 283 is on host 283
2023-07-11 14:16:27,463 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 284 is on host 284
2023-07-11 14:16:27,464 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 285 is on host 285
2023-07-11 14:16:27,464 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 286 is on host 286
2023-07-11 14:16:27,464 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 287 is on host 287
2023-07-11 14:16:27,464 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 288 is on host 288
2023-07-11 14:16:27,464 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 289 is on host 289
2023-07-11 14:16:27,464 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 290 is on host 290
2023-07-11 14:16:27,464 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 291 is on host 291
2023-07-11 14:16:27,464 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 292 is on host 292
2023-07-11 14:16:27,464 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 293 is on host 293
2023-07-11 14:16:27,464 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 294 is on host 294
2023-07-11 14:16:27,464 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 295 is on host 295
2023-07-11 14:16:27,464 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 296 is on host 296
2023-07-11 14:16:27,464 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 297 is on host 297
2023-07-11 14:16:27,464 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 298 is on host 298
2023-07-11 14:16:27,464 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 299 is on host 299
2023-07-11 14:16:27,464 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 300 is on host 300
2023-07-11 14:16:27,464 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 301 is on host 301
2023-07-11 14:16:27,464 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 302 is on host 302
2023-07-11 14:16:27,464 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 303 is on host 303
2023-07-11 14:16:27,464 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 304 is on host 304
2023-07-11 14:16:27,464 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 305 is on host 305
2023-07-11 14:16:27,464 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 306 is on host 306
2023-07-11 14:16:27,464 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 307 is on host 307
2023-07-11 14:16:27,464 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 308 is on host 308
2023-07-11 14:16:27,464 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 309 is on host 309
2023-07-11 14:16:27,464 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 310 is on host 310
2023-07-11 14:16:27,464 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 311 is on host 311
2023-07-11 14:16:27,464 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 312 is on host 312
2023-07-11 14:16:27,464 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 313 is on host 313
2023-07-11 14:16:27,465 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 314 is on host 314
2023-07-11 14:16:27,465 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 315 is on host 315
2023-07-11 14:16:27,465 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 316 is on host 316
2023-07-11 14:16:27,465 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 317 is on host 317
2023-07-11 14:16:27,465 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 318 is on host 318
2023-07-11 14:16:27,465 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 319 is on host 319
2023-07-11 14:16:27,465 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 320 is on host 320
2023-07-11 14:16:27,465 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 321 is on host 321
2023-07-11 14:16:27,465 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 322 is on host 322
2023-07-11 14:16:27,465 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 323 is on host 323
2023-07-11 14:16:27,465 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 324 is on host 324
2023-07-11 14:16:27,465 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 325 is on host 325
2023-07-11 14:16:27,465 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 326 is on host 326
2023-07-11 14:16:27,465 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 327 is on host 327
2023-07-11 14:16:27,465 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 328 is on host 328
2023-07-11 14:16:27,465 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 329 is on host 329
2023-07-11 14:16:27,465 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 330 is on host 330
2023-07-11 14:16:27,465 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 331 is on host 331
2023-07-11 14:16:27,465 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 332 is on host 332
2023-07-11 14:16:27,465 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 333 is on host 333
2023-07-11 14:16:27,465 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 334 is on host 334
2023-07-11 14:16:27,465 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 335 is on host 335
2023-07-11 14:16:27,465 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 336 is on host 336
2023-07-11 14:16:27,465 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 337 is on host 337
2023-07-11 14:16:27,465 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 338 is on host 338
2023-07-11 14:16:27,465 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 339 is on host 339
2023-07-11 14:16:27,465 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 340 is on host 340
2023-07-11 14:16:27,465 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 341 is on host 341
2023-07-11 14:16:27,466 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 342 is on host 342
2023-07-11 14:16:27,466 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 343 is on host 343
2023-07-11 14:16:27,466 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 344 is on host 344
2023-07-11 14:16:27,466 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 345 is on host 345
2023-07-11 14:16:27,466 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 346 is on host 346
2023-07-11 14:16:27,466 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 347 is on host 347
2023-07-11 14:16:27,466 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 348 is on host 348
2023-07-11 14:16:27,466 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 349 is on host 349
2023-07-11 14:16:27,466 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 350 is on host 350
2023-07-11 14:16:27,466 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 351 is on host 351
2023-07-11 14:16:27,466 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 352 is on host 352
2023-07-11 14:16:27,466 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 353 is on host 353
2023-07-11 14:16:27,466 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 354 is on host 354
2023-07-11 14:16:27,466 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 355 is on host 355
2023-07-11 14:16:27,466 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 356 is on host 356
2023-07-11 14:16:27,466 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 357 is on host 357
2023-07-11 14:16:27,466 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 358 is on host 358
2023-07-11 14:16:27,466 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 359 is on host 359
2023-07-11 14:16:27,466 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 360 is on host 360
2023-07-11 14:16:27,466 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 361 is on host 361
2023-07-11 14:16:27,466 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 362 is on host 362
2023-07-11 14:16:27,466 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 363 is on host 363
2023-07-11 14:16:27,466 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 364 is on host 364
2023-07-11 14:16:27,466 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 365 is on host 365
2023-07-11 14:16:27,466 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 366 is on host 366
2023-07-11 14:16:27,466 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 367 is on host 367
2023-07-11 14:16:27,466 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 368 is on host 368
2023-07-11 14:16:27,466 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 369 is on host 369
2023-07-11 14:16:27,466 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 370 is on host 370
2023-07-11 14:16:27,467 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 371 is on host 371
2023-07-11 14:16:27,467 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 372 is on host 372
2023-07-11 14:16:27,467 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 373 is on host 373
2023-07-11 14:16:27,467 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 374 is on host 374
2023-07-11 14:16:27,467 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 375 is on host 375
2023-07-11 14:16:27,467 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 376 is on host 376
2023-07-11 14:16:27,467 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 377 is on host 377
2023-07-11 14:16:27,467 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 378 is on host 378
2023-07-11 14:16:27,467 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 379 is on host 379
2023-07-11 14:16:27,467 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 380 is on host 380
2023-07-11 14:16:27,467 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 381 is on host 381
2023-07-11 14:16:27,467 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 382 is on host 382
2023-07-11 14:16:27,467 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 383 is on host 383
2023-07-11 14:16:27,467 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 384 is on host 384
2023-07-11 14:16:27,467 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 385 is on host 385
2023-07-11 14:16:27,467 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 386 is on host 386
2023-07-11 14:16:27,467 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 387 is on host 387
2023-07-11 14:16:27,467 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 388 is on host 388
2023-07-11 14:16:27,467 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 389 is on host 389
2023-07-11 14:16:27,467 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 390 is on host 390
2023-07-11 14:16:27,467 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 391 is on host 391
2023-07-11 14:16:27,467 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 392 is on host 392
2023-07-11 14:16:27,467 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=393, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:27,468 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table17) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:27,468 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table18
2023-07-11 14:16:27,468 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv553536953=290, srv1630071126=110, srv1071894870=12, srv23511728=232, srv658346947=323, srv2025338799=204, srv1397994335=64, srv1976766403=195, srv1644629726=118, srv957637734=381, srv2079182457=210, srv1749264468=139, srv2046129126=206, srv1595762596=104, srv603990852=307, srv1973073480=194, srv958856137=382, srv644066832=319, srv557062842=292, srv277765671=235, srv732221418=337, srv1769385567=143, srv224612199=228, srv714752528=334, srv362526040=256, srv581128949=296, srv2133511466=223, srv1144239257=30, srv320603627=245, srv1679952521=126, srv2122867873=222, srv1110067064=24, srv256251994=233, srv63261708=317, srv89837390=371, srv552104598=289, srv508952995=281, srv2096011353=214, srv1770417148=144, srv1246723478=42, srv929436444=378, srv2082192429=211, srv234917297=231, srv405700573=266, srv183644386=166, srv1488378513=85, srv173139715=136, srv1154180352=32, srv355693379=252, srv1407521654=66, srv496848057=275, srv1157975499=33, srv1806731027=162, srv1923102804=184, srv311102455=244, srv450011410=271, srv771515724=348, srv389183508=262, srv1249074416=43, srv2014575201=201, srv640847108=318, srv832363565=356, srv1970882134=192, srv2107358603=218, srv855766065=361, srv1336043388=55, srv29397186=237, srv982792848=390, srv976560524=386, srv101181760=3, srv1093549482=21, srv2018389395=202, srv2113483104=221, srv1778339118=149, srv1968709692=190, srv705221118=333, srv159600090=105, srv1919608486=180, srv981255102=389, srv807899713=353, srv755110395=344, srv1770594519=145, srv739692705=340, srv1076582671=16, srv693869315=330, srv1079048717=17, srv440657532=270, srv1636659280=115, srv2108739257=220, srv668373413=326, srv1003610393=2, srv1054229197=11, srv1868589627=172, srv2103522371=217, srv1000546271=0, srv951670617=380, srv2042909593=205, srv1865656038=171, srv1466355012=78, srv703662406=332, srv1418112884=70, srv1215580291=40, srv71833528=335, srv1580581635=103, srv1021032212=5, srv1080806312=19, srv1985601859=197, srv74471954=343, srv1647472319=119, srv2071553346=208, srv1632855171=112, srv1122009370=27, srv13613992=61, srv1630777154=111, srv301413669=239, srv550697728=288, srv1296023857=53, srv1724550977=133, srv1989290370=198, srv1926417985=185, srv1678097199=125, srv1461034373=76, srv614690415=311, srv2098345381=215, srv310463473=243, srv1011934105=4, srv148627129=84, srv305489318=240, srv1256534903=46, srv1289731445=52, srv1798844587=157, srv567113085=294, srv1119222501=26, srv2055117940=207, srv855898852=362, srv629224816=316, srv1075943554=15, srv625909061=315, srv1705591942=128, srv734225580=339, srv660107924=324, srv1381729938=62, srv1633483173=113, srv408265476=267, srv1776057793=148, srv1360253411=60, srv1511424834=90, srv1414162621=68, srv883343663=370, srv151859222=91, srv349144930=251, srv1991304034=199, srv1825887791=164, srv601657063=305, srv758932951=345, srv1651629087=120, srv1864623584=170, srv682957691=329, srv1500454146=88, srv1725962085=135, srv1659841448=121, srv1253206004=45, srv52354442=284, srv18508093=168, srv1427731921=73, srv561344974=293, srv721668125=336, srv1575482138=100, srv914128771=373, srv961487230=383, srv741332941=342, srv533032466=286, srv1574140987=99, srv2139849097=224, srv503902262=278, srv674807007=327, srv1786829855=153, srv2088727517=213, srv394366966=264, srv980089565=388, srv114594288=31, srv38296437=261, srv214835574=226, srv1887224977=176, srv1025509362=7, srv1577020334=102, srv524466665=285, srv393561021=263, srv759909927=346, srv763556514=347, srv786453030=349, srv2142935488=225, srv618111613=312, srv16254163=108, srv343211061=250, srv476075173=273, srv1269632212=47, srv333589612=246, srv499015361=276, srv836674186=357, srv1799191687=158, srv1446998035=74, srv1571774199=98, srv1115354947=25, srv333860881=247, srv1724152600=132, srv1598699299=106, srv177885829=151, srv472125887=272, srv1101339966=22, srv1424985362=72, srv1945569895=188, srv594128294=300, srv1026739237=8, srv842459828=358, srv878519137=366, srv1921260729=181, srv339110834=249, srv504099471=279, srv814253179=354, srv1643744885=116, srv1793847521=155, srv607234624=309, srv698219051=331, srv1688538732=127, srv666240078=325, srv1079284733=18, srv29210550=236, srv506181748=280, srv881313122=368, srv1945452576=187, srv597307897=303, srv1285120424=51, srv1887943816=177, srv1983604698=196, srv1805465940=161, srv309309336=242, srv1719756294=131, srv1349932676=58, srv1208486369=38, srv1643971570=117, srv1509331489=89, srv334105385=248, srv1400515744=65, srv369984715=259, srv43712162=269, srv842675864=359, srv1803258748=160, srv1022450918=6, srv1775108732=147, srv1766088250=141, srv180150732=159, srv1220857227=41, srv226530501=229, srv362032108=255, srv919715380=377, srv1074935976=14, srv1395030819=63, srv803291569=352, srv1877966766=175, srv220538712=227, srv2021718843=203, srv2107782185=219, srv882216860=369, srv1489137852=86, srv1972328734=193, srv1470759982=79, srv1774824811=146, srv971974774=384, srv1418242791=71, srv1001274196=1, srv909615097=372, srv1537724566=93, srv1165799954=34, srv1724754364=134, srv978173525=387, srv113319438=29, srv578033735=295, srv147931272=80, srv1183635941=35, srv1904215245=178, srv596349756=302, srv880835255=367, srv857544550=364, srv1779729022=152, srv1795612465=156, srv621083045=314, srv917704170=375, srv1351811120=59, srv1316710897=54, srv789820555=350, srv1922580095=183, srv305567304=241, srv1936745425=186, srv1745318024=138, srv1210822057=39, srv645375717=320, srv950628389=379, srv1490199189=87, srv1575919256=101, srv154481102=96, srv359402967=254, srv997716931=391, srv1457224273=75, srv581644449=297, srv1872374768=174, srv363177310=257, srv740327512=341, srv1664227236=123, srv972330517=385, srv1634261306=114, srv1662183707=122, srv1969046891=191, srv1485266211=82, srv1778842262=150, srv588410181=298, srv1921840985=182, srv591279493=299, srv37574565=260, srv1104147458=23, srv1190166330=36, srv652270371=322, srv1484309042=81, srv1560148463=97, srv618569548=313, srv2102708311=216, srv1084873074=20, srv517669556=283, srv918152084=376, srv649714317=321, srv1674484790=124, srv1339239880=56, srv1461073271=77, srv1125312901=28, srv25633292=234, srv516616923=282, srv299721745=238, srv604932433=308, srv1273702855=48, srv792183929=351, srv1042608200=10, srv1276335106=49, srv1486044644=83, srv676101698=328, srv998930892=392, srv200111276=200, srv1863083643=169, srv1737443479=137, srv872997185=365, srv821351126=355, srv852115805=360, srv1074355423=13, srv170952194=130, srv503430005=277, srv153887567=94, srv1415163001=69, srv1032737435=9, srv1840670515=167, srv1961921083=189, srv59745831=304, srv36715747=258, srv431547280=268, srv1524853580=92, srv1870059418=173, srv396010771=265, srv594457792=301, srv1755339428=140, srv1766275429=142, srv5565786=291, srv603898526=306, srv544570223=287, srv856030669=363, srv1542523468=95, srv915785747=374, srv356122213=253, srv1411875499=67, srv2077620970=209, srv1345529444=57, srv232339963=230, srv1250861076=44, srv1914875423=179, srv478619481=274, srv1202435626=37, srv1706089454=129, srv1810631201=163, srv1282644061=50, srv1625945288=109, srv733251129=338, srv2082830831=212, srv1612103540=107, srv612136291=310, srv1790004142=154, srv183394703=165} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:27,468 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:27,468 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:27,468 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:27,468 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:27,468 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:27,468 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:27,469 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-11 14:16:27,469 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-11 14:16:27,469 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-11 14:16:27,469 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-11 14:16:27,469 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 10 is on host 10
2023-07-11 14:16:27,469 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 11 is on host 11
2023-07-11 14:16:27,469 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 12 is on host 12
2023-07-11 14:16:27,469 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 13 is on host 13
2023-07-11 14:16:27,469 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 14 is on host 14
2023-07-11 14:16:27,469 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 15 is on host 15
2023-07-11 14:16:27,469 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 16 is on host 16
2023-07-11 14:16:27,469 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 17 is on host 17
2023-07-11 14:16:27,469 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 18 is on host 18
2023-07-11 14:16:27,469 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 19 is on host 19
2023-07-11 14:16:27,469 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 20 is on host 20
2023-07-11 14:16:27,469 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 21 is on host 21
2023-07-11 14:16:27,469 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 22 is on host 22
2023-07-11 14:16:27,469 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 23 is on host 23
2023-07-11 14:16:27,469 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 24 is on host 24
2023-07-11 14:16:27,469 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 25 is on host 25
2023-07-11 14:16:27,469 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 26 is on host 26
2023-07-11 14:16:27,469 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 27 is on host 27
2023-07-11 14:16:27,469 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 28 is on host 28
2023-07-11 14:16:27,469 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 29 is on host 29
2023-07-11 14:16:27,469 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 30 is on host 30
2023-07-11 14:16:27,469 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 31 is on host 31
2023-07-11 14:16:27,469 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 32 is on host 32
2023-07-11 14:16:27,469 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 33 is on host 33
2023-07-11 14:16:27,470 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 34 is on host 34
2023-07-11 14:16:27,470 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 35 is on host 35
2023-07-11 14:16:27,470 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 36 is on host 36
2023-07-11 14:16:27,470 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 37 is on host 37
2023-07-11 14:16:27,470 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 38 is on host 38
2023-07-11 14:16:27,470 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 39 is on host 39
2023-07-11 14:16:27,470 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 40 is on host 40
2023-07-11 14:16:27,470 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 41 is on host 41
2023-07-11 14:16:27,470 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 42 is on host 42
2023-07-11 14:16:27,470 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 43 is on host 43
2023-07-11 14:16:27,470 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 44 is on host 44
2023-07-11 14:16:27,470 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 45 is on host 45
2023-07-11 14:16:27,470 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 46 is on host 46
2023-07-11 14:16:27,470 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 47 is on host 47
2023-07-11 14:16:27,470 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 48 is on host 48
2023-07-11 14:16:27,470 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 49 is on host 49
2023-07-11 14:16:27,470 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 50 is on host 50
2023-07-11 14:16:27,470 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 51 is on host 51
2023-07-11 14:16:27,470 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 52 is on host 52
2023-07-11 14:16:27,470 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 53 is on host 53
2023-07-11 14:16:27,470 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 54 is on host 54
2023-07-11 14:16:27,470 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 55 is on host 55
2023-07-11 14:16:27,470 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 56 is on host 56
2023-07-11 14:16:27,470 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 57 is on host 57
2023-07-11 14:16:27,470 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 58 is on host 58
2023-07-11 14:16:27,470 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 59 is on host 59
2023-07-11 14:16:27,470 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 60 is on host 60
2023-07-11 14:16:27,470 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 61 is on host 61
2023-07-11 14:16:27,470 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 62 is on host 62
2023-07-11 14:16:27,471 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 63 is on host 63
2023-07-11 14:16:27,471 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 64 is on host 64
2023-07-11 14:16:27,471 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 65 is on host 65
2023-07-11 14:16:27,471 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 66 is on host 66
2023-07-11 14:16:27,471 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 67 is on host 67
2023-07-11 14:16:27,471 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 68 is on host 68
2023-07-11 14:16:27,471 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 69 is on host 69
2023-07-11 14:16:27,471 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 70 is on host 70
2023-07-11 14:16:27,471 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 71 is on host 71
2023-07-11 14:16:27,471 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 72 is on host 72
2023-07-11 14:16:27,471 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 73 is on host 73
2023-07-11 14:16:27,471 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 74 is on host 74
2023-07-11 14:16:27,471 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 75 is on host 75
2023-07-11 14:16:27,471 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 76 is on host 76
2023-07-11 14:16:27,471 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 77 is on host 77
2023-07-11 14:16:27,471 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 78 is on host 78
2023-07-11 14:16:27,471 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 79 is on host 79
2023-07-11 14:16:27,471 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 80 is on host 80
2023-07-11 14:16:27,471 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 81 is on host 81
2023-07-11 14:16:27,471 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 82 is on host 82
2023-07-11 14:16:27,471 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 83 is on host 83
2023-07-11 14:16:27,471 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 84 is on host 84
2023-07-11 14:16:27,471 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 85 is on host 85
2023-07-11 14:16:27,471 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 86 is on host 86
2023-07-11 14:16:27,471 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 87 is on host 87
2023-07-11 14:16:27,471 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 88 is on host 88
2023-07-11 14:16:27,471 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 89 is on host 89
2023-07-11 14:16:27,471 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 90 is on host 90
2023-07-11 14:16:27,471 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 91 is on host 91
2023-07-11 14:16:27,472 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 92 is on host 92
2023-07-11 14:16:27,472 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 93 is on host 93
2023-07-11 14:16:27,472 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 94 is on host 94
2023-07-11 14:16:27,472 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 95 is on host 95
2023-07-11 14:16:27,472 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 96 is on host 96
2023-07-11 14:16:27,472 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 97 is on host 97
2023-07-11 14:16:27,472 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 98 is on host 98
2023-07-11 14:16:27,472 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 99 is on host 99
2023-07-11 14:16:27,472 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 100 is on host 100
2023-07-11 14:16:27,472 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 101 is on host 101
2023-07-11 14:16:27,472 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 102 is on host 102
2023-07-11 14:16:27,472 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 103 is on host 103
2023-07-11 14:16:27,472 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 104 is on host 104
2023-07-11 14:16:27,472 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 105 is on host 105
2023-07-11 14:16:27,472 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 106 is on host 106
2023-07-11 14:16:27,472 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 107 is on host 107
2023-07-11 14:16:27,472 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 108 is on host 108
2023-07-11 14:16:27,472 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 109 is on host 109
2023-07-11 14:16:27,472 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 110 is on host 110
2023-07-11 14:16:27,472 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 111 is on host 111
2023-07-11 14:16:27,472 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 112 is on host 112
2023-07-11 14:16:27,472 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 113 is on host 113
2023-07-11 14:16:27,472 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 114 is on host 114
2023-07-11 14:16:27,472 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 115 is on host 115
2023-07-11 14:16:27,472 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 116 is on host 116
2023-07-11 14:16:27,472 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 117 is on host 117
2023-07-11 14:16:27,472 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 118 is on host 118
2023-07-11 14:16:27,472 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 119 is on host 119
2023-07-11 14:16:27,472 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 120 is on host 120
2023-07-11 14:16:27,473 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 121 is on host 121
2023-07-11 14:16:27,473 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 122 is on host 122
2023-07-11 14:16:27,473 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 123 is on host 123
2023-07-11 14:16:27,473 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 124 is on host 124
2023-07-11 14:16:27,473 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 125 is on host 125
2023-07-11 14:16:27,473 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 126 is on host 126
2023-07-11 14:16:27,473 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 127 is on host 127
2023-07-11 14:16:27,473 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 128 is on host 128
2023-07-11 14:16:27,473 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 129 is on host 129
2023-07-11 14:16:27,473 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 130 is on host 130
2023-07-11 14:16:27,473 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 131 is on host 131
2023-07-11 14:16:27,473 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 132 is on host 132
2023-07-11 14:16:27,473 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 133 is on host 133
2023-07-11 14:16:27,473 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 134 is on host 134
2023-07-11 14:16:27,473 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 135 is on host 135
2023-07-11 14:16:27,473 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 136 is on host 136
2023-07-11 14:16:27,473 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 137 is on host 137
2023-07-11 14:16:27,473 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 138 is on host 138
2023-07-11 14:16:27,473 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 139 is on host 139
2023-07-11 14:16:27,473 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 140 is on host 140
2023-07-11 14:16:27,473 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 141 is on host 141
2023-07-11 14:16:27,473 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 142 is on host 142
2023-07-11 14:16:27,473 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 143 is on host 143
2023-07-11 14:16:27,473 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 144 is on host 144
2023-07-11 14:16:27,473 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 145 is on host 145
2023-07-11 14:16:27,473 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 146 is on host 146
2023-07-11 14:16:27,473 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 147 is on host 147
2023-07-11 14:16:27,473 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 148 is on host 148
2023-07-11 14:16:27,473 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 149 is on host 149
2023-07-11 14:16:27,474 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 150 is on host 150
2023-07-11 14:16:27,474 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 151 is on host 151
2023-07-11 14:16:27,474 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 152 is on host 152
2023-07-11 14:16:27,474 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 153 is on host 153
2023-07-11 14:16:27,474 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 154 is on host 154
2023-07-11 14:16:27,474 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 155 is on host 155
2023-07-11 14:16:27,474 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 156 is on host 156
2023-07-11 14:16:27,474 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 157 is on host 157
2023-07-11 14:16:27,474 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 158 is on host 158
2023-07-11 14:16:27,474 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 159 is on host 159
2023-07-11 14:16:27,474 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 160 is on host 160
2023-07-11 14:16:27,474 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 161 is on host 161
2023-07-11 14:16:27,474 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 162 is on host 162
2023-07-11 14:16:27,474 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 163 is on host 163
2023-07-11 14:16:27,474 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 164 is on host 164
2023-07-11 14:16:27,474 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 165 is on host 165
2023-07-11 14:16:27,474 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 166 is on host 166
2023-07-11 14:16:27,474 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 167 is on host 167
2023-07-11 14:16:27,474 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 168 is on host 168
2023-07-11 14:16:27,474 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 169 is on host 169
2023-07-11 14:16:27,474 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 170 is on host 170
2023-07-11 14:16:27,475 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 171 is on host 171
2023-07-11 14:16:27,475 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 172 is on host 172
2023-07-11 14:16:27,475 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 173 is on host 173
2023-07-11 14:16:27,475 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 174 is on host 174
2023-07-11 14:16:27,475 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 175 is on host 175
2023-07-11 14:16:27,475 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 176 is on host 176
2023-07-11 14:16:27,475 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 177 is on host 177
2023-07-11 14:16:27,475 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 178 is on host 178
2023-07-11 14:16:27,475 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 179 is on host 179
2023-07-11 14:16:27,475 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 180 is on host 180
2023-07-11 14:16:27,475 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 181 is on host 181
2023-07-11 14:16:27,475 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 182 is on host 182
2023-07-11 14:16:27,475 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 183 is on host 183
2023-07-11 14:16:27,475 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 184 is on host 184
2023-07-11 14:16:27,475 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 185 is on host 185
2023-07-11 14:16:27,475 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 186 is on host 186
2023-07-11 14:16:27,475 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 187 is on host 187
2023-07-11 14:16:27,475 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 188 is on host 188
2023-07-11 14:16:27,475 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 189 is on host 189
2023-07-11 14:16:27,475 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 190 is on host 190
2023-07-11 14:16:27,475 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 191 is on host 191
2023-07-11 14:16:27,475 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 192 is on host 192
2023-07-11 14:16:27,475 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 193 is on host 193
2023-07-11 14:16:27,476 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 194 is on host 194
2023-07-11 14:16:27,476 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 195 is on host 195
2023-07-11 14:16:27,476 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 196 is on host 196
2023-07-11 14:16:27,476 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 197 is on host 197
2023-07-11 14:16:27,476 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 198 is on host 198
2023-07-11 14:16:27,476 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 199 is on host 199
2023-07-11 14:16:27,476 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 200 is on host 200
2023-07-11 14:16:27,476 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 201 is on host 201
2023-07-11 14:16:27,476 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 202 is on host 202
2023-07-11 14:16:27,476 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 203 is on host 203
2023-07-11 14:16:27,476 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 204 is on host 204
2023-07-11 14:16:27,476 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 205 is on host 205
2023-07-11 14:16:27,476 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 206 is on host 206
2023-07-11 14:16:27,476 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 207 is on host 207
2023-07-11 14:16:27,476 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 208 is on host 208
2023-07-11 14:16:27,476 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 209 is on host 209
2023-07-11 14:16:27,476 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 210 is on host 210
2023-07-11 14:16:27,476 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 211 is on host 211
2023-07-11 14:16:27,476 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 212 is on host 212
2023-07-11 14:16:27,476 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 213 is on host 213
2023-07-11 14:16:27,476 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 214 is on host 214
2023-07-11 14:16:27,476 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 215 is on host 215
2023-07-11 14:16:27,476 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 216 is on host 216
2023-07-11 14:16:27,476 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 217 is on host 217
2023-07-11 14:16:27,476 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 218 is on host 218
2023-07-11 14:16:27,476 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 219 is on host 219
2023-07-11 14:16:27,476 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 220 is on host 220
2023-07-11 14:16:27,476 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 221 is on host 221
2023-07-11 14:16:27,476 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 222 is on host 222
2023-07-11 14:16:27,477 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 223 is on host 223
2023-07-11 14:16:27,477 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 224 is on host 224
2023-07-11 14:16:27,477 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 225 is on host 225
2023-07-11 14:16:27,477 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 226 is on host 226
2023-07-11 14:16:27,477 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 227 is on host 227
2023-07-11 14:16:27,477 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 228 is on host 228
2023-07-11 14:16:27,477 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 229 is on host 229
2023-07-11 14:16:27,477 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 230 is on host 230
2023-07-11 14:16:27,477 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 231 is on host 231
2023-07-11 14:16:27,477 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 232 is on host 232
2023-07-11 14:16:27,477 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 233 is on host 233
2023-07-11 14:16:27,477 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 234 is on host 234
2023-07-11 14:16:27,477 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 235 is on host 235
2023-07-11 14:16:27,477 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 236 is on host 236
2023-07-11 14:16:27,477 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 237 is on host 237
2023-07-11 14:16:27,477 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 238 is on host 238
2023-07-11 14:16:27,477 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 239 is on host 239
2023-07-11 14:16:27,477 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 240 is on host 240
2023-07-11 14:16:27,477 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 241 is on host 241
2023-07-11 14:16:27,477 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 242 is on host 242
2023-07-11 14:16:27,477 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 243 is on host 243
2023-07-11 14:16:27,477 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 244 is on host 244
2023-07-11 14:16:27,477 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 245 is on host 245
2023-07-11 14:16:27,477 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 246 is on host 246
2023-07-11 14:16:27,477 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 247 is on host 247
2023-07-11 14:16:27,477 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 248 is on host 248
2023-07-11 14:16:27,477 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 249 is on host 249
2023-07-11 14:16:27,477 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 250 is on host 250
2023-07-11 14:16:27,477 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 251 is on host 251
2023-07-11 14:16:27,478 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 252 is on host 252
2023-07-11 14:16:27,478 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 253 is on host 253
2023-07-11 14:16:27,478 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 254 is on host 254
2023-07-11 14:16:27,478 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 255 is on host 255
2023-07-11 14:16:27,478 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 256 is on host 256
2023-07-11 14:16:27,478 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 257 is on host 257
2023-07-11 14:16:27,478 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 258 is on host 258
2023-07-11 14:16:27,478 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 259 is on host 259
2023-07-11 14:16:27,478 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 260 is on host 260
2023-07-11 14:16:27,478 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 261 is on host 261
2023-07-11 14:16:27,478 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 262 is on host 262
2023-07-11 14:16:27,478 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 263 is on host 263
2023-07-11 14:16:27,478 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 264 is on host 264
2023-07-11 14:16:27,478 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 265 is on host 265
2023-07-11 14:16:27,478 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 266 is on host 266
2023-07-11 14:16:27,478 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 267 is on host 267
2023-07-11 14:16:27,478 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 268 is on host 268
2023-07-11 14:16:27,478 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 269 is on host 269
2023-07-11 14:16:27,478 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 270 is on host 270
2023-07-11 14:16:27,478 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 271 is on host 271
2023-07-11 14:16:27,478 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 272 is on host 272
2023-07-11 14:16:27,478 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 273 is on host 273
2023-07-11 14:16:27,478 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 274 is on host 274
2023-07-11 14:16:27,478 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 275 is on host 275
2023-07-11 14:16:27,478 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 276 is on host 276
2023-07-11 14:16:27,478 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 277 is on host 277
2023-07-11 14:16:27,478 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 278 is on host 278
2023-07-11 14:16:27,478 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 279 is on host 279
2023-07-11 14:16:27,478 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 280 is on host 280
2023-07-11 14:16:27,479 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 281 is on host 281
2023-07-11 14:16:27,479 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 282 is on host 282
2023-07-11 14:16:27,479 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 283 is on host 283
2023-07-11 14:16:27,479 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 284 is on host 284
2023-07-11 14:16:27,479 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 285 is on host 285
2023-07-11 14:16:27,479 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 286 is on host 286
2023-07-11 14:16:27,479 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 287 is on host 287
2023-07-11 14:16:27,479 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 288 is on host 288
2023-07-11 14:16:27,479 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 289 is on host 289
2023-07-11 14:16:27,479 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 290 is on host 290
2023-07-11 14:16:27,479 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 291 is on host 291
2023-07-11 14:16:27,479 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 292 is on host 292
2023-07-11 14:16:27,479 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 293 is on host 293
2023-07-11 14:16:27,479 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 294 is on host 294
2023-07-11 14:16:27,479 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 295 is on host 295
2023-07-11 14:16:27,479 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 296 is on host 296
2023-07-11 14:16:27,479 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 297 is on host 297
2023-07-11 14:16:27,479 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 298 is on host 298
2023-07-11 14:16:27,479 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 299 is on host 299
2023-07-11 14:16:27,479 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 300 is on host 300
2023-07-11 14:16:27,479 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 301 is on host 301
2023-07-11 14:16:27,479 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 302 is on host 302
2023-07-11 14:16:27,479 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 303 is on host 303
2023-07-11 14:16:27,479 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 304 is on host 304
2023-07-11 14:16:27,479 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 305 is on host 305
2023-07-11 14:16:27,479 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 306 is on host 306
2023-07-11 14:16:27,479 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 307 is on host 307
2023-07-11 14:16:27,479 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 308 is on host 308
2023-07-11 14:16:27,479 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 309 is on host 309
2023-07-11 14:16:27,480 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 310 is on host 310
2023-07-11 14:16:27,480 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 311 is on host 311
2023-07-11 14:16:27,480 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 312 is on host 312
2023-07-11 14:16:27,480 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 313 is on host 313
2023-07-11 14:16:27,480 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 314 is on host 314
2023-07-11 14:16:27,480 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 315 is on host 315
2023-07-11 14:16:27,480 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 316 is on host 316
2023-07-11 14:16:27,480 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 317 is on host 317
2023-07-11 14:16:27,480 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 318 is on host 318
2023-07-11 14:16:27,480 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 319 is on host 319
2023-07-11 14:16:27,480 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 320 is on host 320
2023-07-11 14:16:27,480 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 321 is on host 321
2023-07-11 14:16:27,480 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 322 is on host 322
2023-07-11 14:16:27,480 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 323 is on host 323
2023-07-11 14:16:27,480 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 324 is on host 324
2023-07-11 14:16:27,480 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 325 is on host 325
2023-07-11 14:16:27,480 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 326 is on host 326
2023-07-11 14:16:27,480 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 327 is on host 327
2023-07-11 14:16:27,480 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 328 is on host 328
2023-07-11 14:16:27,480 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 329 is on host 329
2023-07-11 14:16:27,480 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 330 is on host 330
2023-07-11 14:16:27,480 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 331 is on host 331
2023-07-11 14:16:27,480 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 332 is on host 332
2023-07-11 14:16:27,480 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 333 is on host 333
2023-07-11 14:16:27,480 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 334 is on host 334
2023-07-11 14:16:27,480 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 335 is on host 335
2023-07-11 14:16:27,480 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 336 is on host 336
2023-07-11 14:16:27,480 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 337 is on host 337
2023-07-11 14:16:27,480 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 338 is on host 338
2023-07-11 14:16:27,481 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 339 is on host 339
2023-07-11 14:16:27,481 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 340 is on host 340
2023-07-11 14:16:27,481 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 341 is on host 341
2023-07-11 14:16:27,481 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 342 is on host 342
2023-07-11 14:16:27,481 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 343 is on host 343
2023-07-11 14:16:27,481 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 344 is on host 344
2023-07-11 14:16:27,481 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 345 is on host 345
2023-07-11 14:16:27,481 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 346 is on host 346
2023-07-11 14:16:27,481 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 347 is on host 347
2023-07-11 14:16:27,481 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 348 is on host 348
2023-07-11 14:16:27,481 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 349 is on host 349
2023-07-11 14:16:27,481 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 350 is on host 350
2023-07-11 14:16:27,481 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 351 is on host 351
2023-07-11 14:16:27,481 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 352 is on host 352
2023-07-11 14:16:27,481 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 353 is on host 353
2023-07-11 14:16:27,481 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 354 is on host 354
2023-07-11 14:16:27,481 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 355 is on host 355
2023-07-11 14:16:27,481 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 356 is on host 356
2023-07-11 14:16:27,481 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 357 is on host 357
2023-07-11 14:16:27,481 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 358 is on host 358
2023-07-11 14:16:27,481 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 359 is on host 359
2023-07-11 14:16:27,481 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 360 is on host 360
2023-07-11 14:16:27,481 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 361 is on host 361
2023-07-11 14:16:27,481 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 362 is on host 362
2023-07-11 14:16:27,481 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 363 is on host 363
2023-07-11 14:16:27,481 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 364 is on host 364
2023-07-11 14:16:27,481 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 365 is on host 365
2023-07-11 14:16:27,481 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 366 is on host 366
2023-07-11 14:16:27,481 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 367 is on host 367
2023-07-11 14:16:27,482 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 368 is on host 368
2023-07-11 14:16:27,482 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 369 is on host 369
2023-07-11 14:16:27,482 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 370 is on host 370
2023-07-11 14:16:27,482 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 371 is on host 371
2023-07-11 14:16:27,482 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 372 is on host 372
2023-07-11 14:16:27,482 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 373 is on host 373
2023-07-11 14:16:27,482 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 374 is on host 374
2023-07-11 14:16:27,482 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 375 is on host 375
2023-07-11 14:16:27,482 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 376 is on host 376
2023-07-11 14:16:27,482 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 377 is on host 377
2023-07-11 14:16:27,482 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 378 is on host 378
2023-07-11 14:16:27,482 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 379 is on host 379
2023-07-11 14:16:27,482 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 380 is on host 380
2023-07-11 14:16:27,482 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 381 is on host 381
2023-07-11 14:16:27,482 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 382 is on host 382
2023-07-11 14:16:27,482 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 383 is on host 383
2023-07-11 14:16:27,482 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 384 is on host 384
2023-07-11 14:16:27,482 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 385 is on host 385
2023-07-11 14:16:27,482 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 386 is on host 386
2023-07-11 14:16:27,482 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 387 is on host 387
2023-07-11 14:16:27,482 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 388 is on host 388
2023-07-11 14:16:27,482 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 389 is on host 389
2023-07-11 14:16:27,482 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 390 is on host 390
2023-07-11 14:16:27,482 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 391 is on host 391
2023-07-11 14:16:27,482 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 392 is on host 392
2023-07-11 14:16:27,482 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=393, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:27,483 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table18) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:27,483 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table19
2023-07-11 14:16:27,483 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv553536953=290, srv1630071126=110, srv1071894870=12, srv23511728=232, srv658346947=323, srv2025338799=204, srv1397994335=64, srv1976766403=195, srv1644629726=118, srv957637734=381, srv2079182457=210, srv1749264468=139, srv2046129126=206, srv1595762596=104, srv603990852=307, srv1973073480=194, srv958856137=382, srv644066832=319, srv557062842=292, srv277765671=235, srv732221418=337, srv1769385567=143, srv224612199=228, srv714752528=334, srv362526040=256, srv581128949=296, srv2133511466=223, srv1144239257=30, srv320603627=245, srv1679952521=126, srv2122867873=222, srv1110067064=24, srv256251994=233, srv63261708=317, srv89837390=371, srv552104598=289, srv508952995=281, srv2096011353=214, srv1770417148=144, srv1246723478=42, srv929436444=378, srv2082192429=211, srv234917297=231, srv405700573=266, srv183644386=166, srv1488378513=85, srv173139715=136, srv1154180352=32, srv355693379=252, srv1407521654=66, srv496848057=275, srv1157975499=33, srv1806731027=162, srv1923102804=184, srv311102455=244, srv450011410=271, srv771515724=348, srv389183508=262, srv1249074416=43, srv2014575201=201, srv640847108=318, srv832363565=356, srv1970882134=192, srv2107358603=218, srv855766065=361, srv1336043388=55, srv29397186=237, srv982792848=390, srv976560524=386, srv101181760=3, srv1093549482=21, srv2018389395=202, srv2113483104=221, srv1778339118=149, srv1968709692=190, srv705221118=333, srv159600090=105, srv1919608486=180, srv981255102=389, srv807899713=353, srv755110395=344, srv1770594519=145, srv739692705=340, srv1076582671=16, srv693869315=330, srv1079048717=17, srv440657532=270, srv1636659280=115, srv2108739257=220, srv668373413=326, srv1003610393=2, srv1054229197=11, srv1868589627=172, srv2103522371=217, srv1000546271=0, srv951670617=380, srv2042909593=205, srv1865656038=171, srv1466355012=78, srv703662406=332, srv1418112884=70, srv1215580291=40, srv71833528=335, srv1580581635=103, srv1021032212=5, srv1080806312=19, srv1985601859=197, srv74471954=343, srv1647472319=119, srv2071553346=208, srv1632855171=112, srv1122009370=27, srv13613992=61, srv1630777154=111, srv301413669=239, srv550697728=288, srv1296023857=53, srv1724550977=133, srv1989290370=198, srv1926417985=185, srv1678097199=125, srv1461034373=76, srv614690415=311, srv2098345381=215, srv310463473=243, srv1011934105=4, srv148627129=84, srv305489318=240, srv1256534903=46, srv1289731445=52, srv1798844587=157, srv567113085=294, srv1119222501=26, srv2055117940=207, srv855898852=362, srv629224816=316, srv1075943554=15, srv625909061=315, srv1705591942=128, srv734225580=339, srv660107924=324, srv1381729938=62, srv1633483173=113, srv408265476=267, srv1776057793=148, srv1360253411=60, srv1511424834=90, srv1414162621=68, srv883343663=370, srv151859222=91, srv349144930=251, srv1991304034=199, srv1825887791=164, srv601657063=305, srv758932951=345, srv1651629087=120, srv1864623584=170, srv682957691=329, srv1500454146=88, srv1725962085=135, srv1659841448=121, srv1253206004=45, srv52354442=284, srv18508093=168, srv1427731921=73, srv561344974=293, srv721668125=336, srv1575482138=100, srv914128771=373, srv961487230=383, srv741332941=342, srv533032466=286, srv1574140987=99, srv2139849097=224, srv503902262=278, srv674807007=327, srv1786829855=153, srv2088727517=213, srv394366966=264, srv980089565=388, srv114594288=31, srv38296437=261, srv214835574=226, srv1887224977=176, srv1025509362=7, srv1577020334=102, srv524466665=285, srv393561021=263, srv759909927=346, srv763556514=347, srv786453030=349, srv2142935488=225, srv618111613=312, srv16254163=108, srv343211061=250, srv476075173=273, srv1269632212=47, srv333589612=246, srv499015361=276, srv836674186=357, srv1799191687=158, srv1446998035=74, srv1571774199=98, srv1115354947=25, srv333860881=247, srv1724152600=132, srv1598699299=106, srv177885829=151, srv472125887=272, srv1101339966=22, srv1424985362=72, srv1945569895=188, srv594128294=300, srv1026739237=8, srv842459828=358, srv878519137=366, srv1921260729=181, srv339110834=249, srv504099471=279, srv814253179=354, srv1643744885=116, srv1793847521=155, srv607234624=309, srv698219051=331, srv1688538732=127, srv666240078=325, srv1079284733=18, srv29210550=236, srv506181748=280, srv881313122=368, srv1945452576=187, srv597307897=303, srv1285120424=51, srv1887943816=177, srv1983604698=196, srv1805465940=161, srv309309336=242, srv1719756294=131, srv1349932676=58, srv1208486369=38, srv1643971570=117, srv1509331489=89, srv334105385=248, srv1400515744=65, srv369984715=259, srv43712162=269, srv842675864=359, srv1803258748=160, srv1022450918=6, srv1775108732=147, srv1766088250=141, srv180150732=159, srv1220857227=41, srv226530501=229, srv362032108=255, srv919715380=377, srv1074935976=14, srv1395030819=63, srv803291569=352, srv1877966766=175, srv220538712=227, srv2021718843=203, srv2107782185=219, srv882216860=369, srv1489137852=86, srv1972328734=193, srv1470759982=79, srv1774824811=146, srv971974774=384, srv1418242791=71, srv1001274196=1, srv909615097=372, srv1537724566=93, srv1165799954=34, srv1724754364=134, srv978173525=387, srv113319438=29, srv578033735=295, srv147931272=80, srv1183635941=35, srv1904215245=178, srv596349756=302, srv880835255=367, srv857544550=364, srv1779729022=152, srv1795612465=156, srv621083045=314, srv917704170=375, srv1351811120=59, srv1316710897=54, srv789820555=350, srv1922580095=183, srv305567304=241, srv1936745425=186, srv1745318024=138, srv1210822057=39, srv645375717=320, srv950628389=379, srv1490199189=87, srv1575919256=101, srv154481102=96, srv359402967=254, srv997716931=391, srv1457224273=75, srv581644449=297, srv1872374768=174, srv363177310=257, srv740327512=341, srv1664227236=123, srv972330517=385, srv1634261306=114, srv1662183707=122, srv1969046891=191, srv1485266211=82, srv1778842262=150, srv588410181=298, srv1921840985=182, srv591279493=299, srv37574565=260, srv1104147458=23, srv1190166330=36, srv652270371=322, srv1484309042=81, srv1560148463=97, srv618569548=313, srv2102708311=216, srv1084873074=20, srv517669556=283, srv918152084=376, srv649714317=321, srv1674484790=124, srv1339239880=56, srv1461073271=77, srv1125312901=28, srv25633292=234, srv516616923=282, srv299721745=238, srv604932433=308, srv1273702855=48, srv792183929=351, srv1042608200=10, srv1276335106=49, srv1486044644=83, srv676101698=328, srv998930892=392, srv200111276=200, srv1863083643=169, srv1737443479=137, srv872997185=365, srv821351126=355, srv852115805=360, srv1074355423=13, srv170952194=130, srv503430005=277, srv153887567=94, srv1415163001=69, srv1032737435=9, srv1840670515=167, srv1961921083=189, srv59745831=304, srv36715747=258, srv431547280=268, srv1524853580=92, srv1870059418=173, srv396010771=265, srv594457792=301, srv1755339428=140, srv1766275429=142, srv5565786=291, srv603898526=306, srv544570223=287, srv856030669=363, srv1542523468=95, srv915785747=374, srv356122213=253, srv1411875499=67, srv2077620970=209, srv1345529444=57, srv232339963=230, srv1250861076=44, srv1914875423=179, srv478619481=274, srv1202435626=37, srv1706089454=129, srv1810631201=163, srv1282644061=50, srv1625945288=109, srv733251129=338, srv2082830831=212, srv1612103540=107, srv612136291=310, srv1790004142=154, srv183394703=165} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:27,483 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:27,483 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:27,484 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:27,484 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:27,484 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:27,484 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:27,484 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-11 14:16:27,484 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-11 14:16:27,484 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-11 14:16:27,484 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-11 14:16:27,484 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 10 is on host 10
2023-07-11 14:16:27,484 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 11 is on host 11
2023-07-11 14:16:27,484 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 12 is on host 12
2023-07-11 14:16:27,484 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 13 is on host 13
2023-07-11 14:16:27,484 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 14 is on host 14
2023-07-11 14:16:27,484 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 15 is on host 15
2023-07-11 14:16:27,484 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 16 is on host 16
2023-07-11 14:16:27,484 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 17 is on host 17
2023-07-11 14:16:27,484 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 18 is on host 18
2023-07-11 14:16:27,484 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 19 is on host 19
2023-07-11 14:16:27,484 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 20 is on host 20
2023-07-11 14:16:27,484 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 21 is on host 21
2023-07-11 14:16:27,484 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 22 is on host 22
2023-07-11 14:16:27,484 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 23 is on host 23
2023-07-11 14:16:27,484 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 24 is on host 24
2023-07-11 14:16:27,484 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 25 is on host 25
2023-07-11 14:16:27,484 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 26 is on host 26
2023-07-11 14:16:27,484 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 27 is on host 27
2023-07-11 14:16:27,484 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 28 is on host 28
2023-07-11 14:16:27,484 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 29 is on host 29
2023-07-11 14:16:27,484 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 30 is on host 30
2023-07-11 14:16:27,485 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 31 is on host 31
2023-07-11 14:16:27,485 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 32 is on host 32
2023-07-11 14:16:27,485 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 33 is on host 33
2023-07-11 14:16:27,485 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 34 is on host 34
2023-07-11 14:16:27,485 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 35 is on host 35
2023-07-11 14:16:27,485 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 36 is on host 36
2023-07-11 14:16:27,485 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 37 is on host 37
2023-07-11 14:16:27,485 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 38 is on host 38
2023-07-11 14:16:27,485 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 39 is on host 39
2023-07-11 14:16:27,485 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 40 is on host 40
2023-07-11 14:16:27,485 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 41 is on host 41
2023-07-11 14:16:27,485 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 42 is on host 42
2023-07-11 14:16:27,485 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 43 is on host 43
2023-07-11 14:16:27,485 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 44 is on host 44
2023-07-11 14:16:27,485 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 45 is on host 45
2023-07-11 14:16:27,485 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 46 is on host 46
2023-07-11 14:16:27,485 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 47 is on host 47
2023-07-11 14:16:27,485 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 48 is on host 48
2023-07-11 14:16:27,485 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 49 is on host 49
2023-07-11 14:16:27,485 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 50 is on host 50
2023-07-11 14:16:27,485 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 51 is on host 51
2023-07-11 14:16:27,485 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 52 is on host 52
2023-07-11 14:16:27,485 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 53 is on host 53
2023-07-11 14:16:27,485 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 54 is on host 54
2023-07-11 14:16:27,485 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 55 is on host 55
2023-07-11 14:16:27,485 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 56 is on host 56
2023-07-11 14:16:27,485 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 57 is on host 57
2023-07-11 14:16:27,485 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 58 is on host 58
2023-07-11 14:16:27,485 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 59 is on host 59
2023-07-11 14:16:27,486 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 60 is on host 60
2023-07-11 14:16:27,486 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 61 is on host 61
2023-07-11 14:16:27,486 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 62 is on host 62
2023-07-11 14:16:27,486 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 63 is on host 63
2023-07-11 14:16:27,486 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 64 is on host 64
2023-07-11 14:16:27,486 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 65 is on host 65
2023-07-11 14:16:27,486 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 66 is on host 66
2023-07-11 14:16:27,486 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 67 is on host 67
2023-07-11 14:16:27,486 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 68 is on host 68
2023-07-11 14:16:27,486 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 69 is on host 69
2023-07-11 14:16:27,486 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 70 is on host 70
2023-07-11 14:16:27,486 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 71 is on host 71
2023-07-11 14:16:27,486 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 72 is on host 72
2023-07-11 14:16:27,486 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 73 is on host 73
2023-07-11 14:16:27,486 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 74 is on host 74
2023-07-11 14:16:27,486 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 75 is on host 75
2023-07-11 14:16:27,487 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 76 is on host 76
2023-07-11 14:16:27,487 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 77 is on host 77
2023-07-11 14:16:27,487 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 78 is on host 78
2023-07-11 14:16:27,487 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 79 is on host 79
2023-07-11 14:16:27,487 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 80 is on host 80
2023-07-11 14:16:27,487 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 81 is on host 81
2023-07-11 14:16:27,487 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 82 is on host 82
2023-07-11 14:16:27,487 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 83 is on host 83
2023-07-11 14:16:27,487 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 84 is on host 84
2023-07-11 14:16:27,487 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 85 is on host 85
2023-07-11 14:16:27,487 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 86 is on host 86
2023-07-11 14:16:27,487 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 87 is on host 87
2023-07-11 14:16:27,487 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 88 is on host 88
2023-07-11 14:16:27,487 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 89 is on host 89
2023-07-11 14:16:27,487 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 90 is on host 90
2023-07-11 14:16:27,487 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 91 is on host 91
2023-07-11 14:16:27,487 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 92 is on host 92
2023-07-11 14:16:27,487 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 93 is on host 93
2023-07-11 14:16:27,487 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 94 is on host 94
2023-07-11 14:16:27,487 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 95 is on host 95
2023-07-11 14:16:27,487 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 96 is on host 96
2023-07-11 14:16:27,487 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 97 is on host 97
2023-07-11 14:16:27,487 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 98 is on host 98
2023-07-11 14:16:27,487 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 99 is on host 99
2023-07-11 14:16:27,487 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 100 is on host 100
2023-07-11 14:16:27,487 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 101 is on host 101
2023-07-11 14:16:27,487 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 102 is on host 102
2023-07-11 14:16:27,487 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 103 is on host 103
2023-07-11 14:16:27,487 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 104 is on host 104
2023-07-11 14:16:27,488 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 105 is on host 105
2023-07-11 14:16:27,488 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 106 is on host 106
2023-07-11 14:16:27,488 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 107 is on host 107
2023-07-11 14:16:27,488 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 108 is on host 108
2023-07-11 14:16:27,488 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 109 is on host 109
2023-07-11 14:16:27,488 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 110 is on host 110
2023-07-11 14:16:27,488 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 111 is on host 111
2023-07-11 14:16:27,488 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 112 is on host 112
2023-07-11 14:16:27,488 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 113 is on host 113
2023-07-11 14:16:27,488 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 114 is on host 114
2023-07-11 14:16:27,488 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 115 is on host 115
2023-07-11 14:16:27,488 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 116 is on host 116
2023-07-11 14:16:27,488 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 117 is on host 117
2023-07-11 14:16:27,488 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 118 is on host 118
2023-07-11 14:16:27,488 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 119 is on host 119
2023-07-11 14:16:27,488 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 120 is on host 120
2023-07-11 14:16:27,488 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 121 is on host 121
2023-07-11 14:16:27,488 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 122 is on host 122
2023-07-11 14:16:27,488 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 123 is on host 123
2023-07-11 14:16:27,488 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 124 is on host 124
2023-07-11 14:16:27,488 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 125 is on host 125
2023-07-11 14:16:27,488 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 126 is on host 126
2023-07-11 14:16:27,488 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 127 is on host 127
2023-07-11 14:16:27,488 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 128 is on host 128
2023-07-11 14:16:27,488 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 129 is on host 129
2023-07-11 14:16:27,488 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 130 is on host 130
2023-07-11 14:16:27,488 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 131 is on host 131
2023-07-11 14:16:27,488 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 132 is on host 132
2023-07-11 14:16:27,488 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 133 is on host 133
2023-07-11 14:16:27,489 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 134 is on host 134
2023-07-11 14:16:27,489 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 135 is on host 135
2023-07-11 14:16:27,489 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 136 is on host 136
2023-07-11 14:16:27,489 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 137 is on host 137
2023-07-11 14:16:27,489 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 138 is on host 138
2023-07-11 14:16:27,489 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 139 is on host 139
2023-07-11 14:16:27,489 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 140 is on host 140
2023-07-11 14:16:27,489 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 141 is on host 141
2023-07-11 14:16:27,489 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 142 is on host 142
2023-07-11 14:16:27,489 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 143 is on host 143
2023-07-11 14:16:27,489 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 144 is on host 144
2023-07-11 14:16:27,489 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 145 is on host 145
2023-07-11 14:16:27,489 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 146 is on host 146
2023-07-11 14:16:27,489 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 147 is on host 147
2023-07-11 14:16:27,489 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 148 is on host 148
2023-07-11 14:16:27,489 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 149 is on host 149
2023-07-11 14:16:27,489 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 150 is on host 150
2023-07-11 14:16:27,489 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 151 is on host 151
2023-07-11 14:16:27,489 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 152 is on host 152
2023-07-11 14:16:27,489 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 153 is on host 153
2023-07-11 14:16:27,489 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 154 is on host 154
2023-07-11 14:16:27,489 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 155 is on host 155
2023-07-11 14:16:27,489 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 156 is on host 156
2023-07-11 14:16:27,489 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 157 is on host 157
2023-07-11 14:16:27,489 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 158 is on host 158
2023-07-11 14:16:27,489 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 159 is on host 159
2023-07-11 14:16:27,489 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 160 is on host 160
2023-07-11 14:16:27,489 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 161 is on host 161
2023-07-11 14:16:27,489 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 162 is on host 162
2023-07-11 14:16:27,490 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 163 is on host 163
2023-07-11 14:16:27,490 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 164 is on host 164
2023-07-11 14:16:27,490 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 165 is on host 165
2023-07-11 14:16:27,490 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 166 is on host 166
2023-07-11 14:16:27,490 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 167 is on host 167
2023-07-11 14:16:27,490 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 168 is on host 168
2023-07-11 14:16:27,490 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 169 is on host 169
2023-07-11 14:16:27,490 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 170 is on host 170
2023-07-11 14:16:27,490 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 171 is on host 171
2023-07-11 14:16:27,490 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 172 is on host 172
2023-07-11 14:16:27,490 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 173 is on host 173
2023-07-11 14:16:27,490 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 174 is on host 174
2023-07-11 14:16:27,490 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 175 is on host 175
2023-07-11 14:16:27,490 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 176 is on host 176
2023-07-11 14:16:27,490 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 177 is on host 177
2023-07-11 14:16:27,490 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 178 is on host 178
2023-07-11 14:16:27,490 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 179 is on host 179
2023-07-11 14:16:27,490 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 180 is on host 180
2023-07-11 14:16:27,490 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 181 is on host 181
2023-07-11 14:16:27,490 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 182 is on host 182
2023-07-11 14:16:27,490 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 183 is on host 183
2023-07-11 14:16:27,490 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 184 is on host 184
2023-07-11 14:16:27,490 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 185 is on host 185
2023-07-11 14:16:27,490 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 186 is on host 186
2023-07-11 14:16:27,490 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 187 is on host 187
2023-07-11 14:16:27,490 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 188 is on host 188
2023-07-11 14:16:27,490 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 189 is on host 189
2023-07-11 14:16:27,490 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 190 is on host 190
2023-07-11 14:16:27,490 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 191 is on host 191
2023-07-11 14:16:27,491 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 192 is on host 192
2023-07-11 14:16:27,491 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 193 is on host 193
2023-07-11 14:16:27,491 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 194 is on host 194
2023-07-11 14:16:27,491 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 195 is on host 195
2023-07-11 14:16:27,491 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 196 is on host 196
2023-07-11 14:16:27,491 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 197 is on host 197
2023-07-11 14:16:27,491 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 198 is on host 198
2023-07-11 14:16:27,491 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 199 is on host 199
2023-07-11 14:16:27,491 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 200 is on host 200
2023-07-11 14:16:27,491 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 201 is on host 201
2023-07-11 14:16:27,491 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 202 is on host 202
2023-07-11 14:16:27,491 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 203 is on host 203
2023-07-11 14:16:27,491 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 204 is on host 204
2023-07-11 14:16:27,491 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 205 is on host 205
2023-07-11 14:16:27,491 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 206 is on host 206
2023-07-11 14:16:27,491 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 207 is on host 207
2023-07-11 14:16:27,491 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 208 is on host 208
2023-07-11 14:16:27,491 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 209 is on host 209
2023-07-11 14:16:27,491 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 210 is on host 210
2023-07-11 14:16:27,491 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 211 is on host 211
2023-07-11 14:16:27,491 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 212 is on host 212
2023-07-11 14:16:27,491 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 213 is on host 213
2023-07-11 14:16:27,491 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 214 is on host 214
2023-07-11 14:16:27,491 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 215 is on host 215
2023-07-11 14:16:27,491 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 216 is on host 216
2023-07-11 14:16:27,491 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 217 is on host 217
2023-07-11 14:16:27,491 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 218 is on host 218
2023-07-11 14:16:27,491 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 219 is on host 219
2023-07-11 14:16:27,491 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 220 is on host 220
2023-07-11 14:16:27,492 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 221 is on host 221
2023-07-11 14:16:27,492 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 222 is on host 222
2023-07-11 14:16:27,492 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 223 is on host 223
2023-07-11 14:16:27,492 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 224 is on host 224
2023-07-11 14:16:27,492 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 225 is on host 225
2023-07-11 14:16:27,492 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 226 is on host 226
2023-07-11 14:16:27,492 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 227 is on host 227
2023-07-11 14:16:27,492 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 228 is on host 228
2023-07-11 14:16:27,492 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 229 is on host 229
2023-07-11 14:16:27,492 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 230 is on host 230
2023-07-11 14:16:27,492 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 231 is on host 231
2023-07-11 14:16:27,492 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 232 is on host 232
2023-07-11 14:16:27,492 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 233 is on host 233
2023-07-11 14:16:27,492 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 234 is on host 234
2023-07-11 14:16:27,492 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 235 is on host 235
2023-07-11 14:16:27,492 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 236 is on host 236
2023-07-11 14:16:27,492 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 237 is on host 237
2023-07-11 14:16:27,492 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 238 is on host 238
2023-07-11 14:16:27,492 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 239 is on host 239
2023-07-11 14:16:27,492 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 240 is on host 240
2023-07-11 14:16:27,492 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 241 is on host 241
2023-07-11 14:16:27,492 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 242 is on host 242
2023-07-11 14:16:27,492 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 243 is on host 243
2023-07-11 14:16:27,492 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 244 is on host 244
2023-07-11 14:16:27,492 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 245 is on host 245
2023-07-11 14:16:27,492 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 246 is on host 246
2023-07-11 14:16:27,492 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 247 is on host 247
2023-07-11 14:16:27,492 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 248 is on host 248
2023-07-11 14:16:27,492 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 249 is on host 249
2023-07-11 14:16:27,493 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 250 is on host 250
2023-07-11 14:16:27,493 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 251 is on host 251
2023-07-11 14:16:27,493 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 252 is on host 252
2023-07-11 14:16:27,493 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 253 is on host 253
2023-07-11 14:16:27,493 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 254 is on host 254
2023-07-11 14:16:27,493 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 255 is on host 255
2023-07-11 14:16:27,493 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 256 is on host 256
2023-07-11 14:16:27,493 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 257 is on host 257
2023-07-11 14:16:27,493 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 258 is on host 258
2023-07-11 14:16:27,493 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 259 is on host 259
2023-07-11 14:16:27,493 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 260 is on host 260
2023-07-11 14:16:27,493 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 261 is on host 261
2023-07-11 14:16:27,493 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 262 is on host 262
2023-07-11 14:16:27,493 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 263 is on host 263
2023-07-11 14:16:27,493 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 264 is on host 264
2023-07-11 14:16:27,493 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 265 is on host 265
2023-07-11 14:16:27,493 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 266 is on host 266
2023-07-11 14:16:27,493 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 267 is on host 267
2023-07-11 14:16:27,493 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 268 is on host 268
2023-07-11 14:16:27,493 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 269 is on host 269
2023-07-11 14:16:27,493 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 270 is on host 270
2023-07-11 14:16:27,493 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 271 is on host 271
2023-07-11 14:16:27,493 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 272 is on host 272
2023-07-11 14:16:27,493 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 273 is on host 273
2023-07-11 14:16:27,493 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 274 is on host 274
2023-07-11 14:16:27,493 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 275 is on host 275
2023-07-11 14:16:27,493 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 276 is on host 276
2023-07-11 14:16:27,493 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 277 is on host 277
2023-07-11 14:16:27,494 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 278 is on host 278
2023-07-11 14:16:27,494 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 279 is on host 279
2023-07-11 14:16:27,494 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 280 is on host 280
2023-07-11 14:16:27,494 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 281 is on host 281
2023-07-11 14:16:27,494 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 282 is on host 282
2023-07-11 14:16:27,494 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 283 is on host 283
2023-07-11 14:16:27,494 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 284 is on host 284
2023-07-11 14:16:27,494 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 285 is on host 285
2023-07-11 14:16:27,494 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 286 is on host 286
2023-07-11 14:16:27,494 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 287 is on host 287
2023-07-11 14:16:27,494 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 288 is on host 288
2023-07-11 14:16:27,494 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 289 is on host 289
2023-07-11 14:16:27,494 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 290 is on host 290
2023-07-11 14:16:27,494 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 291 is on host 291
2023-07-11 14:16:27,494 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 292 is on host 292
2023-07-11 14:16:27,494 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 293 is on host 293
2023-07-11 14:16:27,494 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 294 is on host 294
2023-07-11 14:16:27,494 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 295 is on host 295
2023-07-11 14:16:27,494 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 296 is on host 296
2023-07-11 14:16:27,494 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 297 is on host 297
2023-07-11 14:16:27,494 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 298 is on host 298
2023-07-11 14:16:27,494 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 299 is on host 299
2023-07-11 14:16:27,494 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 300 is on host 300
2023-07-11 14:16:27,494 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 301 is on host 301
2023-07-11 14:16:27,494 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 302 is on host 302
2023-07-11 14:16:27,494 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 303 is on host 303
2023-07-11 14:16:27,494 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 304 is on host 304
2023-07-11 14:16:27,494 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 305 is on host 305
2023-07-11 14:16:27,494 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 306 is on host 306
2023-07-11 14:16:27,494 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 307 is on host 307
2023-07-11 14:16:27,495 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 308 is on host 308
2023-07-11 14:16:27,495 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 309 is on host 309
2023-07-11 14:16:27,495 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 310 is on host 310
2023-07-11 14:16:27,495 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 311 is on host 311
2023-07-11 14:16:27,495 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 312 is on host 312
2023-07-11 14:16:27,495 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 313 is on host 313
2023-07-11 14:16:27,495 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 314 is on host 314
2023-07-11 14:16:27,495 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 315 is on host 315
2023-07-11 14:16:27,495 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 316 is on host 316
2023-07-11 14:16:27,495 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 317 is on host 317
2023-07-11 14:16:27,495 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 318 is on host 318
2023-07-11 14:16:27,495 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 319 is on host 319
2023-07-11 14:16:27,495 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 320 is on host 320
2023-07-11 14:16:27,495 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 321 is on host 321
2023-07-11 14:16:27,495 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 322 is on host 322
2023-07-11 14:16:27,495 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 323 is on host 323
2023-07-11 14:16:27,495 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 324 is on host 324
2023-07-11 14:16:27,495 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 325 is on host 325
2023-07-11 14:16:27,495 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 326 is on host 326
2023-07-11 14:16:27,495 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 327 is on host 327
2023-07-11 14:16:27,495 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 328 is on host 328
2023-07-11 14:16:27,495 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 329 is on host 329
2023-07-11 14:16:27,495 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 330 is on host 330
2023-07-11 14:16:27,495 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 331 is on host 331
2023-07-11 14:16:27,495 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 332 is on host 332
2023-07-11 14:16:27,495 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 333 is on host 333
2023-07-11 14:16:27,495 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 334 is on host 334
2023-07-11 14:16:27,495 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 335 is on host 335
2023-07-11 14:16:27,495 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 336 is on host 336
2023-07-11 14:16:27,496 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 337 is on host 337
2023-07-11 14:16:27,496 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 338 is on host 338
2023-07-11 14:16:27,496 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 339 is on host 339
2023-07-11 14:16:27,496 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 340 is on host 340
2023-07-11 14:16:27,496 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 341 is on host 341
2023-07-11 14:16:27,496 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 342 is on host 342
2023-07-11 14:16:27,496 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 343 is on host 343
2023-07-11 14:16:27,496 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 344 is on host 344
2023-07-11 14:16:27,496 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 345 is on host 345
2023-07-11 14:16:27,496 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 346 is on host 346
2023-07-11 14:16:27,496 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 347 is on host 347
2023-07-11 14:16:27,496 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 348 is on host 348
2023-07-11 14:16:27,496 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 349 is on host 349
2023-07-11 14:16:27,496 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 350 is on host 350
2023-07-11 14:16:27,496 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 351 is on host 351
2023-07-11 14:16:27,496 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 352 is on host 352
2023-07-11 14:16:27,496 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 353 is on host 353
2023-07-11 14:16:27,496 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 354 is on host 354
2023-07-11 14:16:27,496 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 355 is on host 355
2023-07-11 14:16:27,496 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 356 is on host 356
2023-07-11 14:16:27,496 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 357 is on host 357
2023-07-11 14:16:27,496 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 358 is on host 358
2023-07-11 14:16:27,496 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 359 is on host 359
2023-07-11 14:16:27,496 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 360 is on host 360
2023-07-11 14:16:27,496 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 361 is on host 361
2023-07-11 14:16:27,496 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 362 is on host 362
2023-07-11 14:16:27,496 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 363 is on host 363
2023-07-11 14:16:27,496 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 364 is on host 364
2023-07-11 14:16:27,497 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 365 is on host 365
2023-07-11 14:16:27,497 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 366 is on host 366
2023-07-11 14:16:27,497 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 367 is on host 367
2023-07-11 14:16:27,497 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 368 is on host 368
2023-07-11 14:16:27,497 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 369 is on host 369
2023-07-11 14:16:27,497 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 370 is on host 370
2023-07-11 14:16:27,497 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 371 is on host 371
2023-07-11 14:16:27,497 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 372 is on host 372
2023-07-11 14:16:27,497 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 373 is on host 373
2023-07-11 14:16:27,497 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 374 is on host 374
2023-07-11 14:16:27,497 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 375 is on host 375
2023-07-11 14:16:27,497 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 376 is on host 376
2023-07-11 14:16:27,497 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 377 is on host 377
2023-07-11 14:16:27,497 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 378 is on host 378
2023-07-11 14:16:27,497 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 379 is on host 379
2023-07-11 14:16:27,497 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 380 is on host 380
2023-07-11 14:16:27,497 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 381 is on host 381
2023-07-11 14:16:27,497 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 382 is on host 382
2023-07-11 14:16:27,497 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 383 is on host 383
2023-07-11 14:16:27,497 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 384 is on host 384
2023-07-11 14:16:27,497 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 385 is on host 385
2023-07-11 14:16:27,497 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 386 is on host 386
2023-07-11 14:16:27,497 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 387 is on host 387
2023-07-11 14:16:27,497 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 388 is on host 388
2023-07-11 14:16:27,497 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 389 is on host 389
2023-07-11 14:16:27,497 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 390 is on host 390
2023-07-11 14:16:27,497 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 391 is on host 391
2023-07-11 14:16:27,497 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 392 is on host 392
2023-07-11 14:16:27,498 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=393, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:27,498 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table19) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:27,498 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table50
2023-07-11 14:16:27,498 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv553536953=290, srv1630071126=110, srv1071894870=12, srv23511728=232, srv658346947=323, srv2025338799=204, srv1397994335=64, srv1976766403=195, srv1644629726=118, srv957637734=381, srv2079182457=210, srv1749264468=139, srv2046129126=206, srv1595762596=104, srv603990852=307, srv1973073480=194, srv958856137=382, srv644066832=319, srv557062842=292, srv277765671=235, srv732221418=337, srv1769385567=143, srv224612199=228, srv714752528=334, srv362526040=256, srv581128949=296, srv2133511466=223, srv1144239257=30, srv320603627=245, srv1679952521=126, srv2122867873=222, srv1110067064=24, srv256251994=233, srv63261708=317, srv89837390=371, srv552104598=289, srv508952995=281, srv2096011353=214, srv1770417148=144, srv1246723478=42, srv929436444=378, srv2082192429=211, srv234917297=231, srv405700573=266, srv183644386=166, srv1488378513=85, srv173139715=136, srv1154180352=32, srv355693379=252, srv1407521654=66, srv496848057=275, srv1157975499=33, srv1806731027=162, srv1923102804=184, srv311102455=244, srv450011410=271, srv771515724=348, srv389183508=262, srv1249074416=43, srv2014575201=201, srv640847108=318, srv832363565=356, srv1970882134=192, srv2107358603=218, srv855766065=361, srv1336043388=55, srv29397186=237, srv982792848=390, srv976560524=386, srv101181760=3, srv1093549482=21, srv2018389395=202, srv2113483104=221, srv1778339118=149, srv1968709692=190, srv705221118=333, srv159600090=105, srv1919608486=180, srv981255102=389, srv807899713=353, srv755110395=344, srv1770594519=145, srv739692705=340, srv1076582671=16, srv693869315=330, srv1079048717=17, srv440657532=270, srv1636659280=115, srv2108739257=220, srv668373413=326, srv1003610393=2, srv1054229197=11, srv1868589627=172, srv2103522371=217, srv1000546271=0, srv951670617=380, srv2042909593=205, srv1865656038=171, srv1466355012=78, srv703662406=332, srv1418112884=70, srv1215580291=40, srv71833528=335, srv1580581635=103, srv1021032212=5, srv1080806312=19, srv1985601859=197, srv74471954=343, srv1647472319=119, srv2071553346=208, srv1632855171=112, srv1122009370=27, srv13613992=61, srv1630777154=111, srv301413669=239, srv550697728=288, srv1296023857=53, srv1724550977=133, srv1989290370=198, srv1926417985=185, srv1678097199=125, srv1461034373=76, srv614690415=311, srv2098345381=215, srv310463473=243, srv1011934105=4, srv148627129=84, srv305489318=240, srv1256534903=46, srv1289731445=52, srv1798844587=157, srv567113085=294, srv1119222501=26, srv2055117940=207, srv855898852=362, srv629224816=316, srv1075943554=15, srv625909061=315, srv1705591942=128, srv734225580=339, srv660107924=324, srv1381729938=62, srv1633483173=113, srv408265476=267, srv1776057793=148, srv1360253411=60, srv1511424834=90, srv1414162621=68, srv883343663=370, srv151859222=91, srv349144930=251, srv1991304034=199, srv1825887791=164, srv601657063=305, srv758932951=345, srv1651629087=120, srv1864623584=170, srv682957691=329, srv1500454146=88, srv1725962085=135, srv1659841448=121, srv1253206004=45, srv52354442=284, srv18508093=168, srv1427731921=73, srv561344974=293, srv721668125=336, srv1575482138=100, srv914128771=373, srv961487230=383, srv741332941=342, srv533032466=286, srv1574140987=99, srv2139849097=224, srv503902262=278, srv674807007=327, srv1786829855=153, srv2088727517=213, srv394366966=264, srv980089565=388, srv114594288=31, srv38296437=261, srv214835574=226, srv1887224977=176, srv1025509362=7, srv1577020334=102, srv524466665=285, srv393561021=263, srv759909927=346, srv763556514=347, srv786453030=349, srv2142935488=225, srv618111613=312, srv16254163=108, srv343211061=250, srv476075173=273, srv1269632212=47, srv333589612=246, srv499015361=276, srv836674186=357, srv1799191687=158, srv1446998035=74, srv1571774199=98, srv1115354947=25, srv333860881=247, srv1724152600=132, srv1598699299=106, srv177885829=151, srv472125887=272, srv1101339966=22, srv1424985362=72, srv1945569895=188, srv594128294=300, srv1026739237=8, srv842459828=358, srv878519137=366, srv1921260729=181, srv339110834=249, srv504099471=279, srv814253179=354, srv1643744885=116, srv1793847521=155, srv607234624=309, srv698219051=331, srv1688538732=127, srv666240078=325, srv1079284733=18, srv29210550=236, srv506181748=280, srv881313122=368, srv1945452576=187, srv597307897=303, srv1285120424=51, srv1887943816=177, srv1983604698=196, srv1805465940=161, srv309309336=242, srv1719756294=131, srv1349932676=58, srv1208486369=38, srv1643971570=117, srv1509331489=89, srv334105385=248, srv1400515744=65, srv369984715=259, srv43712162=269, srv842675864=359, srv1803258748=160, srv1022450918=6, srv1775108732=147, srv1766088250=141, srv180150732=159, srv1220857227=41, srv226530501=229, srv362032108=255, srv919715380=377, srv1074935976=14, srv1395030819=63, srv803291569=352, srv1877966766=175, srv220538712=227, srv2021718843=203, srv2107782185=219, srv882216860=369, srv1489137852=86, srv1972328734=193, srv1470759982=79, srv1774824811=146, srv971974774=384, srv1418242791=71, srv1001274196=1, srv909615097=372, srv1537724566=93, srv1165799954=34, srv1724754364=134, srv978173525=387, srv113319438=29, srv578033735=295, srv147931272=80, srv1183635941=35, srv1904215245=178, srv596349756=302, srv880835255=367, srv857544550=364, srv1779729022=152, srv1795612465=156, srv621083045=314, srv917704170=375, srv1351811120=59, srv1316710897=54, srv789820555=350, srv1922580095=183, srv305567304=241, srv1936745425=186, srv1745318024=138, srv1210822057=39, srv645375717=320, srv950628389=379, srv1490199189=87, srv1575919256=101, srv154481102=96, srv359402967=254, srv997716931=391, srv1457224273=75, srv581644449=297, srv1872374768=174, srv363177310=257, srv740327512=341, srv1664227236=123, srv972330517=385, srv1634261306=114, srv1662183707=122, srv1969046891=191, srv1485266211=82, srv1778842262=150, srv588410181=298, srv1921840985=182, srv591279493=299, srv37574565=260, srv1104147458=23, srv1190166330=36, srv652270371=322, srv1484309042=81, srv1560148463=97, srv618569548=313, srv2102708311=216, srv1084873074=20, srv517669556=283, srv918152084=376, srv649714317=321, srv1674484790=124, srv1339239880=56, srv1461073271=77, srv1125312901=28, srv25633292=234, srv516616923=282, srv299721745=238, srv604932433=308, srv1273702855=48, srv792183929=351, srv1042608200=10, srv1276335106=49, srv1486044644=83, srv676101698=328, srv998930892=392, srv200111276=200, srv1863083643=169, srv1737443479=137, srv872997185=365, srv821351126=355, srv852115805=360, srv1074355423=13, srv170952194=130, srv503430005=277, srv153887567=94, srv1415163001=69, srv1032737435=9, srv1840670515=167, srv1961921083=189, srv59745831=304, srv36715747=258, srv431547280=268, srv1524853580=92, srv1870059418=173, srv396010771=265, srv594457792=301, srv1755339428=140, srv1766275429=142, srv5565786=291, srv603898526=306, srv544570223=287, srv856030669=363, srv1542523468=95, srv915785747=374, srv356122213=253, srv1411875499=67, srv2077620970=209, srv1345529444=57, srv232339963=230, srv1250861076=44, srv1914875423=179, srv478619481=274, srv1202435626=37, srv1706089454=129, srv1810631201=163, srv1282644061=50, srv1625945288=109, srv733251129=338, srv2082830831=212, srv1612103540=107, srv612136291=310, srv1790004142=154, srv183394703=165} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:27,499 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:27,499 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:27,499 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:27,499 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:27,499 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:27,499 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:27,499 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-11 14:16:27,499 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-11 14:16:27,499 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-11 14:16:27,499 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-11 14:16:27,499 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 10 is on host 10
2023-07-11 14:16:27,499 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 11 is on host 11
2023-07-11 14:16:27,499 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 12 is on host 12
2023-07-11 14:16:27,500 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 13 is on host 13
2023-07-11 14:16:27,500 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 14 is on host 14
2023-07-11 14:16:27,500 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 15 is on host 15
2023-07-11 14:16:27,500 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 16 is on host 16
2023-07-11 14:16:27,500 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 17 is on host 17
2023-07-11 14:16:27,500 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 18 is on host 18
2023-07-11 14:16:27,500 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 19 is on host 19
2023-07-11 14:16:27,500 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 20 is on host 20
2023-07-11 14:16:27,500 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 21 is on host 21
2023-07-11 14:16:27,500 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 22 is on host 22
2023-07-11 14:16:27,500 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 23 is on host 23
2023-07-11 14:16:27,500 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 24 is on host 24
2023-07-11 14:16:27,500 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 25 is on host 25
2023-07-11 14:16:27,500 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 26 is on host 26
2023-07-11 14:16:27,500 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 27 is on host 27
2023-07-11 14:16:27,500 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 28 is on host 28
2023-07-11 14:16:27,500 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 29 is on host 29
2023-07-11 14:16:27,500 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 30 is on host 30
2023-07-11 14:16:27,500 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 31 is on host 31
2023-07-11 14:16:27,500 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 32 is on host 32
2023-07-11 14:16:27,500 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 33 is on host 33
2023-07-11 14:16:27,500 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 34 is on host 34
2023-07-11 14:16:27,500 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 35 is on host 35
2023-07-11 14:16:27,500 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 36 is on host 36
2023-07-11 14:16:27,500 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 37 is on host 37
2023-07-11 14:16:27,500 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 38 is on host 38
2023-07-11 14:16:27,500 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 39 is on host 39
2023-07-11 14:16:27,500 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 40 is on host 40
2023-07-11 14:16:27,500 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 41 is on host 41
2023-07-11 14:16:27,501 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 42 is on host 42
2023-07-11 14:16:27,501 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 43 is on host 43
2023-07-11 14:16:27,501 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 44 is on host 44
2023-07-11 14:16:27,501 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 45 is on host 45
2023-07-11 14:16:27,501 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 46 is on host 46
2023-07-11 14:16:27,501 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 47 is on host 47
2023-07-11 14:16:27,501 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 48 is on host 48
2023-07-11 14:16:27,501 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 49 is on host 49
2023-07-11 14:16:27,501 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 50 is on host 50
2023-07-11 14:16:27,501 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 51 is on host 51
2023-07-11 14:16:27,501 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 52 is on host 52
2023-07-11 14:16:27,501 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 53 is on host 53
2023-07-11 14:16:27,501 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 54 is on host 54
2023-07-11 14:16:27,501 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 55 is on host 55
2023-07-11 14:16:27,501 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 56 is on host 56
2023-07-11 14:16:27,501 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 57 is on host 57
2023-07-11 14:16:27,501 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 58 is on host 58
2023-07-11 14:16:27,501 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 59 is on host 59
2023-07-11 14:16:27,501 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 60 is on host 60
2023-07-11 14:16:27,501 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 61 is on host 61
2023-07-11 14:16:27,501 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 62 is on host 62
2023-07-11 14:16:27,501 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 63 is on host 63
2023-07-11 14:16:27,501 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 64 is on host 64
2023-07-11 14:16:27,501 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 65 is on host 65
2023-07-11 14:16:27,501 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 66 is on host 66
2023-07-11 14:16:27,501 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 67 is on host 67
2023-07-11 14:16:27,501 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 68 is on host 68
2023-07-11 14:16:27,501 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 69 is on host 69
2023-07-11 14:16:27,501 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 70 is on host 70
2023-07-11 14:16:27,502 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 71 is on host 71
2023-07-11 14:16:27,502 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 72 is on host 72
2023-07-11 14:16:27,502 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 73 is on host 73
2023-07-11 14:16:27,502 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 74 is on host 74
2023-07-11 14:16:27,502 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 75 is on host 75
2023-07-11 14:16:27,502 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 76 is on host 76
2023-07-11 14:16:27,502 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 77 is on host 77
2023-07-11 14:16:27,502 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 78 is on host 78
2023-07-11 14:16:27,502 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 79 is on host 79
2023-07-11 14:16:27,502 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 80 is on host 80
2023-07-11 14:16:27,502 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 81 is on host 81
2023-07-11 14:16:27,502 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 82 is on host 82
2023-07-11 14:16:27,502 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 83 is on host 83
2023-07-11 14:16:27,502 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 84 is on host 84
2023-07-11 14:16:27,502 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 85 is on host 85
2023-07-11 14:16:27,502 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 86 is on host 86
2023-07-11 14:16:27,502 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 87 is on host 87
2023-07-11 14:16:27,502 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 88 is on host 88
2023-07-11 14:16:27,502 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 89 is on host 89
2023-07-11 14:16:27,502 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 90 is on host 90
2023-07-11 14:16:27,502 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 91 is on host 91
2023-07-11 14:16:27,502 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 92 is on host 92
2023-07-11 14:16:27,502 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 93 is on host 93
2023-07-11 14:16:27,502 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 94 is on host 94
2023-07-11 14:16:27,502 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 95 is on host 95
2023-07-11 14:16:27,502 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 96 is on host 96
2023-07-11 14:16:27,502 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 97 is on host 97
2023-07-11 14:16:27,502 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 98 is on host 98
2023-07-11 14:16:27,502 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 99 is on host 99
2023-07-11 14:16:27,503 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 100 is on host 100
2023-07-11 14:16:27,503 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 101 is on host 101
2023-07-11 14:16:27,503 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 102 is on host 102
2023-07-11 14:16:27,503 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 103 is on host 103
2023-07-11 14:16:27,503 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 104 is on host 104
2023-07-11 14:16:27,503 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 105 is on host 105
2023-07-11 14:16:27,503 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 106 is on host 106
2023-07-11 14:16:27,503 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 107 is on host 107
2023-07-11 14:16:27,503 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 108 is on host 108
2023-07-11 14:16:27,503 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 109 is on host 109
2023-07-11 14:16:27,503 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 110 is on host 110
2023-07-11 14:16:27,503 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 111 is on host 111
2023-07-11 14:16:27,503 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 112 is on host 112
2023-07-11 14:16:27,503 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 113 is on host 113
2023-07-11 14:16:27,503 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 114 is on host 114
2023-07-11 14:16:27,503 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 115 is on host 115
2023-07-11 14:16:27,503 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 116 is on host 116
2023-07-11 14:16:27,503 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 117 is on host 117
2023-07-11 14:16:27,503 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 118 is on host 118
2023-07-11 14:16:27,503 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 119 is on host 119
2023-07-11 14:16:27,503 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 120 is on host 120
2023-07-11 14:16:27,503 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 121 is on host 121
2023-07-11 14:16:27,503 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 122 is on host 122
2023-07-11 14:16:27,503 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 123 is on host 123
2023-07-11 14:16:27,503 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 124 is on host 124
2023-07-11 14:16:27,503 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 125 is on host 125
2023-07-11 14:16:27,503 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 126 is on host 126
2023-07-11 14:16:27,503 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 127 is on host 127
2023-07-11 14:16:27,503 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 128 is on host 128
2023-07-11 14:16:27,504 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 129 is on host 129
2023-07-11 14:16:27,504 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 130 is on host 130
2023-07-11 14:16:27,504 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 131 is on host 131
2023-07-11 14:16:27,504 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 132 is on host 132
2023-07-11 14:16:27,504 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 133 is on host 133
2023-07-11 14:16:27,504 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 134 is on host 134
2023-07-11 14:16:27,504 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 135 is on host 135
2023-07-11 14:16:27,504 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 136 is on host 136
2023-07-11 14:16:27,504 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 137 is on host 137
2023-07-11 14:16:27,504 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 138 is on host 138
2023-07-11 14:16:27,504 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 139 is on host 139
2023-07-11 14:16:27,504 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 140 is on host 140
2023-07-11 14:16:27,504 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 141 is on host 141
2023-07-11 14:16:27,504 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 142 is on host 142
2023-07-11 14:16:27,504 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 143 is on host 143
2023-07-11 14:16:27,504 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 144 is on host 144
2023-07-11 14:16:27,504 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 145 is on host 145
2023-07-11 14:16:27,504 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 146 is on host 146
2023-07-11 14:16:27,504 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 147 is on host 147
2023-07-11 14:16:27,504 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 148 is on host 148
2023-07-11 14:16:27,504 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 149 is on host 149
2023-07-11 14:16:27,504 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 150 is on host 150
2023-07-11 14:16:27,504 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 151 is on host 151
2023-07-11 14:16:27,504 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 152 is on host 152
2023-07-11 14:16:27,504 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 153 is on host 153
2023-07-11 14:16:27,504 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 154 is on host 154
2023-07-11 14:16:27,504 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 155 is on host 155
2023-07-11 14:16:27,504 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 156 is on host 156
2023-07-11 14:16:27,505 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 157 is on host 157
2023-07-11 14:16:27,505 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 158 is on host 158
2023-07-11 14:16:27,505 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 159 is on host 159
2023-07-11 14:16:27,505 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 160 is on host 160
2023-07-11 14:16:27,505 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 161 is on host 161
2023-07-11 14:16:27,505 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 162 is on host 162
2023-07-11 14:16:27,505 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 163 is on host 163
2023-07-11 14:16:27,505 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 164 is on host 164
2023-07-11 14:16:27,505 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 165 is on host 165
2023-07-11 14:16:27,505 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 166 is on host 166
2023-07-11 14:16:27,505 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 167 is on host 167
2023-07-11 14:16:27,505 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 168 is on host 168
2023-07-11 14:16:27,505 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 169 is on host 169
2023-07-11 14:16:27,505 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 170 is on host 170
2023-07-11 14:16:27,505 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 171 is on host 171
2023-07-11 14:16:27,505 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 172 is on host 172
2023-07-11 14:16:27,505 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 173 is on host 173
2023-07-11 14:16:27,505 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 174 is on host 174
2023-07-11 14:16:27,505 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 175 is on host 175
2023-07-11 14:16:27,505 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 176 is on host 176
2023-07-11 14:16:27,505 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 177 is on host 177
2023-07-11 14:16:27,505 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 178 is on host 178
2023-07-11 14:16:27,505 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 179 is on host 179
2023-07-11 14:16:27,505 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 180 is on host 180
2023-07-11 14:16:27,505 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 181 is on host 181
2023-07-11 14:16:27,505 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 182 is on host 182
2023-07-11 14:16:27,505 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 183 is on host 183
2023-07-11 14:16:27,505 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 184 is on host 184
2023-07-11 14:16:27,505 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 185 is on host 185
2023-07-11 14:16:27,506 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 186 is on host 186
2023-07-11 14:16:27,506 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 187 is on host 187
2023-07-11 14:16:27,506 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 188 is on host 188
2023-07-11 14:16:27,506 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 189 is on host 189
2023-07-11 14:16:27,506 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 190 is on host 190
2023-07-11 14:16:27,506 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 191 is on host 191
2023-07-11 14:16:27,506 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 192 is on host 192
2023-07-11 14:16:27,506 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 193 is on host 193
2023-07-11 14:16:27,506 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 194 is on host 194
2023-07-11 14:16:27,506 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 195 is on host 195
2023-07-11 14:16:27,506 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 196 is on host 196
2023-07-11 14:16:27,506 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 197 is on host 197
2023-07-11 14:16:27,506 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 198 is on host 198
2023-07-11 14:16:27,506 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 199 is on host 199
2023-07-11 14:16:27,506 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 200 is on host 200
2023-07-11 14:16:27,506 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 201 is on host 201
2023-07-11 14:16:27,506 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 202 is on host 202
2023-07-11 14:16:27,506 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 203 is on host 203
2023-07-11 14:16:27,506 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 204 is on host 204
2023-07-11 14:16:27,506 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 205 is on host 205
2023-07-11 14:16:27,506 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 206 is on host 206
2023-07-11 14:16:27,506 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 207 is on host 207
2023-07-11 14:16:27,506 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 208 is on host 208
2023-07-11 14:16:27,506 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 209 is on host 209
2023-07-11 14:16:27,506 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 210 is on host 210
2023-07-11 14:16:27,506 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 211 is on host 211
2023-07-11 14:16:27,506 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 212 is on host 212
2023-07-11 14:16:27,506 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 213 is on host 213
2023-07-11 14:16:27,506 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 214 is on host 214
2023-07-11 14:16:27,507 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 215 is on host 215
2023-07-11 14:16:27,507 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 216 is on host 216
2023-07-11 14:16:27,507 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 217 is on host 217
2023-07-11 14:16:27,507 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 218 is on host 218
2023-07-11 14:16:27,507 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 219 is on host 219
2023-07-11 14:16:27,507 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 220 is on host 220
2023-07-11 14:16:27,507 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 221 is on host 221
2023-07-11 14:16:27,507 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 222 is on host 222
2023-07-11 14:16:27,507 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 223 is on host 223
2023-07-11 14:16:27,507 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 224 is on host 224
2023-07-11 14:16:27,507 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 225 is on host 225
2023-07-11 14:16:27,507 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 226 is on host 226
2023-07-11 14:16:27,507 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 227 is on host 227
2023-07-11 14:16:27,507 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 228 is on host 228
2023-07-11 14:16:27,507 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 229 is on host 229
2023-07-11 14:16:27,507 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 230 is on host 230
2023-07-11 14:16:27,507 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 231 is on host 231
2023-07-11 14:16:27,507 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 232 is on host 232
2023-07-11 14:16:27,507 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 233 is on host 233
2023-07-11 14:16:27,507 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 234 is on host 234
2023-07-11 14:16:27,507 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 235 is on host 235
2023-07-11 14:16:27,507 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 236 is on host 236
2023-07-11 14:16:27,507 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 237 is on host 237
2023-07-11 14:16:27,507 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 238 is on host 238
2023-07-11 14:16:27,507 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 239 is on host 239
2023-07-11 14:16:27,507 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 240 is on host 240
2023-07-11 14:16:27,507 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 241 is on host 241
2023-07-11 14:16:27,507 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 242 is on host 242
2023-07-11 14:16:27,507 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 243 is on host 243
2023-07-11 14:16:27,508 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 244 is on host 244
2023-07-11 14:16:27,508 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 245 is on host 245
2023-07-11 14:16:27,508 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 246 is on host 246
2023-07-11 14:16:27,508 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 247 is on host 247
2023-07-11 14:16:27,508 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 248 is on host 248
2023-07-11 14:16:27,508 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 249 is on host 249
2023-07-11 14:16:27,508 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 250 is on host 250
2023-07-11 14:16:27,508 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 251 is on host 251
2023-07-11 14:16:27,508 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 252 is on host 252
2023-07-11 14:16:27,508 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 253 is on host 253
2023-07-11 14:16:27,508 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 254 is on host 254
2023-07-11 14:16:27,508 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 255 is on host 255
2023-07-11 14:16:27,508 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 256 is on host 256
2023-07-11 14:16:27,508 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 257 is on host 257
2023-07-11 14:16:27,508 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 258 is on host 258
2023-07-11 14:16:27,508 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 259 is on host 259
2023-07-11 14:16:27,508 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 260 is on host 260
2023-07-11 14:16:27,508 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 261 is on host 261
2023-07-11 14:16:27,508 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 262 is on host 262
2023-07-11 14:16:27,508 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 263 is on host 263
2023-07-11 14:16:27,508 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 264 is on host 264
2023-07-11 14:16:27,508 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 265 is on host 265
2023-07-11 14:16:27,508 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 266 is on host 266
2023-07-11 14:16:27,508 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 267 is on host 267
2023-07-11 14:16:27,508 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 268 is on host 268
2023-07-11 14:16:27,508 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 269 is on host 269
2023-07-11 14:16:27,508 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 270 is on host 270
2023-07-11 14:16:27,508 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 271 is on host 271
2023-07-11 14:16:27,508 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 272 is on host 272
2023-07-11 14:16:27,509 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 273 is on host 273
2023-07-11 14:16:27,509 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 274 is on host 274
2023-07-11 14:16:27,509 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 275 is on host 275
2023-07-11 14:16:27,509 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 276 is on host 276
2023-07-11 14:16:27,509 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 277 is on host 277
2023-07-11 14:16:27,509 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 278 is on host 278
2023-07-11 14:16:27,509 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 279 is on host 279
2023-07-11 14:16:27,509 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 280 is on host 280
2023-07-11 14:16:27,509 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 281 is on host 281
2023-07-11 14:16:27,509 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 282 is on host 282
2023-07-11 14:16:27,509 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 283 is on host 283
2023-07-11 14:16:27,509 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 284 is on host 284
2023-07-11 14:16:27,509 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 285 is on host 285
2023-07-11 14:16:27,509 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 286 is on host 286
2023-07-11 14:16:27,509 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 287 is on host 287
2023-07-11 14:16:27,509 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 288 is on host 288
2023-07-11 14:16:27,509 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 289 is on host 289
2023-07-11 14:16:27,509 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 290 is on host 290
2023-07-11 14:16:27,509 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 291 is on host 291
2023-07-11 14:16:27,509 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 292 is on host 292
2023-07-11 14:16:27,509 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 293 is on host 293
2023-07-11 14:16:27,509 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 294 is on host 294
2023-07-11 14:16:27,509 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 295 is on host 295
2023-07-11 14:16:27,509 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 296 is on host 296
2023-07-11 14:16:27,509 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 297 is on host 297
2023-07-11 14:16:27,509 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 298 is on host 298
2023-07-11 14:16:27,509 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 299 is on host 299
2023-07-11 14:16:27,509 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 300 is on host 300
2023-07-11 14:16:27,509 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 301 is on host 301
2023-07-11 14:16:27,510 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 302 is on host 302
2023-07-11 14:16:27,510 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 303 is on host 303
2023-07-11 14:16:27,510 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 304 is on host 304
2023-07-11 14:16:27,510 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 305 is on host 305
2023-07-11 14:16:27,510 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 306 is on host 306
2023-07-11 14:16:27,510 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 307 is on host 307
2023-07-11 14:16:27,510 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 308 is on host 308
2023-07-11 14:16:27,510 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 309 is on host 309
2023-07-11 14:16:27,510 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 310 is on host 310
2023-07-11 14:16:27,510 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 311 is on host 311
2023-07-11 14:16:27,510 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 312 is on host 312
2023-07-11 14:16:27,510 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 313 is on host 313
2023-07-11 14:16:27,510 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 314 is on host 314
2023-07-11 14:16:27,510 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 315 is on host 315
2023-07-11 14:16:27,510 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 316 is on host 316
2023-07-11 14:16:27,510 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 317 is on host 317
2023-07-11 14:16:27,510 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 318 is on host 318
2023-07-11 14:16:27,511 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 319 is on host 319
2023-07-11 14:16:27,511 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 320 is on host 320
2023-07-11 14:16:27,511 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 321 is on host 321
2023-07-11 14:16:27,511 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 322 is on host 322
2023-07-11 14:16:27,511 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 323 is on host 323
2023-07-11 14:16:27,511 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 324 is on host 324
2023-07-11 14:16:27,511 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 325 is on host 325
2023-07-11 14:16:27,511 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 326 is on host 326
2023-07-11 14:16:27,511 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 327 is on host 327
2023-07-11 14:16:27,511 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 328 is on host 328
2023-07-11 14:16:27,511 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 329 is on host 329
2023-07-11 14:16:27,511 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 330 is on host 330
2023-07-11 14:16:27,511 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 331 is on host 331
2023-07-11 14:16:27,511 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 332 is on host 332
2023-07-11 14:16:27,511 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 333 is on host 333
2023-07-11 14:16:27,511 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 334 is on host 334
2023-07-11 14:16:27,511 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 335 is on host 335
2023-07-11 14:16:27,511 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 336 is on host 336
2023-07-11 14:16:27,511 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 337 is on host 337
2023-07-11 14:16:27,511 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 338 is on host 338
2023-07-11 14:16:27,511 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 339 is on host 339
2023-07-11 14:16:27,511 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 340 is on host 340
2023-07-11 14:16:27,511 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 341 is on host 341
2023-07-11 14:16:27,511 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 342 is on host 342
2023-07-11 14:16:27,511 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 343 is on host 343
2023-07-11 14:16:27,511 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 344 is on host 344
2023-07-11 14:16:27,511 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 345 is on host 345
2023-07-11 14:16:27,511 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 346 is on host 346
2023-07-11 14:16:27,511 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 347 is on host 347
2023-07-11 14:16:27,512 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 348 is on host 348
2023-07-11 14:16:27,512 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 349 is on host 349
2023-07-11 14:16:27,512 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 350 is on host 350
2023-07-11 14:16:27,512 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 351 is on host 351
2023-07-11 14:16:27,512 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 352 is on host 352
2023-07-11 14:16:27,512 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 353 is on host 353
2023-07-11 14:16:27,512 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 354 is on host 354
2023-07-11 14:16:27,512 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 355 is on host 355
2023-07-11 14:16:27,512 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 356 is on host 356
2023-07-11 14:16:27,512 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 357 is on host 357
2023-07-11 14:16:27,512 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 358 is on host 358
2023-07-11 14:16:27,512 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 359 is on host 359
2023-07-11 14:16:27,512 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 360 is on host 360
2023-07-11 14:16:27,512 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 361 is on host 361
2023-07-11 14:16:27,512 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 362 is on host 362
2023-07-11 14:16:27,512 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 363 is on host 363
2023-07-11 14:16:27,512 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 364 is on host 364
2023-07-11 14:16:27,512 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 365 is on host 365
2023-07-11 14:16:27,512 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 366 is on host 366
2023-07-11 14:16:27,512 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 367 is on host 367
2023-07-11 14:16:27,512 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 368 is on host 368
2023-07-11 14:16:27,512 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 369 is on host 369
2023-07-11 14:16:27,512 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 370 is on host 370
2023-07-11 14:16:27,512 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 371 is on host 371
2023-07-11 14:16:27,512 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 372 is on host 372
2023-07-11 14:16:27,512 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 373 is on host 373
2023-07-11 14:16:27,512 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 374 is on host 374
2023-07-11 14:16:27,512 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 375 is on host 375
2023-07-11 14:16:27,512 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 376 is on host 376
2023-07-11 14:16:27,513 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 377 is on host 377
2023-07-11 14:16:27,513 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 378 is on host 378
2023-07-11 14:16:27,513 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 379 is on host 379
2023-07-11 14:16:27,513 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 380 is on host 380
2023-07-11 14:16:27,513 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 381 is on host 381
2023-07-11 14:16:27,513 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 382 is on host 382
2023-07-11 14:16:27,513 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 383 is on host 383
2023-07-11 14:16:27,513 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 384 is on host 384
2023-07-11 14:16:27,513 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 385 is on host 385
2023-07-11 14:16:27,513 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 386 is on host 386
2023-07-11 14:16:27,513 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 387 is on host 387
2023-07-11 14:16:27,513 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 388 is on host 388
2023-07-11 14:16:27,513 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 389 is on host 389
2023-07-11 14:16:27,513 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 390 is on host 390
2023-07-11 14:16:27,513 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 391 is on host 391
2023-07-11 14:16:27,513 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 392 is on host 392
2023-07-11 14:16:27,513 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=393, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:27,513 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table50) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:27,514 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table51
2023-07-11 14:16:27,514 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv553536953=290, srv1630071126=110, srv1071894870=12, srv23511728=232, srv658346947=323, srv2025338799=204, srv1397994335=64, srv1976766403=195, srv1644629726=118, srv957637734=381, srv2079182457=210, srv1749264468=139, srv2046129126=206, srv1595762596=104, srv603990852=307, srv1973073480=194, srv958856137=382, srv644066832=319, srv557062842=292, srv277765671=235, srv732221418=337, srv1769385567=143, srv224612199=228, srv714752528=334, srv362526040=256, srv581128949=296, srv2133511466=223, srv1144239257=30, srv320603627=245, srv1679952521=126, srv2122867873=222, srv1110067064=24, srv256251994=233, srv63261708=317, srv89837390=371, srv552104598=289, srv508952995=281, srv2096011353=214, srv1770417148=144, srv1246723478=42, srv929436444=378, srv2082192429=211, srv234917297=231, srv405700573=266, srv183644386=166, srv1488378513=85, srv173139715=136, srv1154180352=32, srv355693379=252, srv1407521654=66, srv496848057=275, srv1157975499=33, srv1806731027=162, srv1923102804=184, srv311102455=244, srv450011410=271, srv771515724=348, srv389183508=262, srv1249074416=43, srv2014575201=201, srv640847108=318, srv832363565=356, srv1970882134=192, srv2107358603=218, srv855766065=361, srv1336043388=55, srv29397186=237, srv982792848=390, srv976560524=386, srv101181760=3, srv1093549482=21, srv2018389395=202, srv2113483104=221, srv1778339118=149, srv1968709692=190, srv705221118=333, srv159600090=105, srv1919608486=180, srv981255102=389, srv807899713=353, srv755110395=344, srv1770594519=145, srv739692705=340, srv1076582671=16, srv693869315=330, srv1079048717=17, srv440657532=270, srv1636659280=115, srv2108739257=220, srv668373413=326, srv1003610393=2, srv1054229197=11, srv1868589627=172, srv2103522371=217, srv1000546271=0, srv951670617=380, srv2042909593=205, srv1865656038=171, srv1466355012=78, srv703662406=332, srv1418112884=70, srv1215580291=40, srv71833528=335, srv1580581635=103, srv1021032212=5, srv1080806312=19, srv1985601859=197, srv74471954=343, srv1647472319=119, srv2071553346=208, srv1632855171=112, srv1122009370=27, srv13613992=61, srv1630777154=111, srv301413669=239, srv550697728=288, srv1296023857=53, srv1724550977=133, srv1989290370=198, srv1926417985=185, srv1678097199=125, srv1461034373=76, srv614690415=311, srv2098345381=215, srv310463473=243, srv1011934105=4, srv148627129=84, srv305489318=240, srv1256534903=46, srv1289731445=52, srv1798844587=157, srv567113085=294, srv1119222501=26, srv2055117940=207, srv855898852=362, srv629224816=316, srv1075943554=15, srv625909061=315, srv1705591942=128, srv734225580=339, srv660107924=324, srv1381729938=62, srv1633483173=113, srv408265476=267, srv1776057793=148, srv1360253411=60, srv1511424834=90, srv1414162621=68, srv883343663=370, srv151859222=91, srv349144930=251, srv1991304034=199, srv1825887791=164, srv601657063=305, srv758932951=345, srv1651629087=120, srv1864623584=170, srv682957691=329, srv1500454146=88, srv1725962085=135, srv1659841448=121, srv1253206004=45, srv52354442=284, srv18508093=168, srv1427731921=73, srv561344974=293, srv721668125=336, srv1575482138=100, srv914128771=373, srv961487230=383, srv741332941=342, srv533032466=286, srv1574140987=99, srv2139849097=224, srv503902262=278, srv674807007=327, srv1786829855=153, srv2088727517=213, srv394366966=264, srv980089565=388, srv114594288=31, srv38296437=261, srv214835574=226, srv1887224977=176, srv1025509362=7, srv1577020334=102, srv524466665=285, srv393561021=263, srv759909927=346, srv763556514=347, srv786453030=349, srv2142935488=225, srv618111613=312, srv16254163=108, srv343211061=250, srv476075173=273, srv1269632212=47, srv333589612=246, srv499015361=276, srv836674186=357, srv1799191687=158, srv1446998035=74, srv1571774199=98, srv1115354947=25, srv333860881=247, srv1724152600=132, srv1598699299=106, srv177885829=151, srv472125887=272, srv1101339966=22, srv1424985362=72, srv1945569895=188, srv594128294=300, srv1026739237=8, srv842459828=358, srv878519137=366, srv1921260729=181, srv339110834=249, srv504099471=279, srv814253179=354, srv1643744885=116, srv1793847521=155, srv607234624=309, srv698219051=331, srv1688538732=127, srv666240078=325, srv1079284733=18, srv29210550=236, srv506181748=280, srv881313122=368, srv1945452576=187, srv597307897=303, srv1285120424=51, srv1887943816=177, srv1983604698=196, srv1805465940=161, srv309309336=242, srv1719756294=131, srv1349932676=58, srv1208486369=38, srv1643971570=117, srv1509331489=89, srv334105385=248, srv1400515744=65, srv369984715=259, srv43712162=269, srv842675864=359, srv1803258748=160, srv1022450918=6, srv1775108732=147, srv1766088250=141, srv180150732=159, srv1220857227=41, srv226530501=229, srv362032108=255, srv919715380=377, srv1074935976=14, srv1395030819=63, srv803291569=352, srv1877966766=175, srv220538712=227, srv2021718843=203, srv2107782185=219, srv882216860=369, srv1489137852=86, srv1972328734=193, srv1470759982=79, srv1774824811=146, srv971974774=384, srv1418242791=71, srv1001274196=1, srv909615097=372, srv1537724566=93, srv1165799954=34, srv1724754364=134, srv978173525=387, srv113319438=29, srv578033735=295, srv147931272=80, srv1183635941=35, srv1904215245=178, srv596349756=302, srv880835255=367, srv857544550=364, srv1779729022=152, srv1795612465=156, srv621083045=314, srv917704170=375, srv1351811120=59, srv1316710897=54, srv789820555=350, srv1922580095=183, srv305567304=241, srv1936745425=186, srv1745318024=138, srv1210822057=39, srv645375717=320, srv950628389=379, srv1490199189=87, srv1575919256=101, srv154481102=96, srv359402967=254, srv997716931=391, srv1457224273=75, srv581644449=297, srv1872374768=174, srv363177310=257, srv740327512=341, srv1664227236=123, srv972330517=385, srv1634261306=114, srv1662183707=122, srv1969046891=191, srv1485266211=82, srv1778842262=150, srv588410181=298, srv1921840985=182, srv591279493=299, srv37574565=260, srv1104147458=23, srv1190166330=36, srv652270371=322, srv1484309042=81, srv1560148463=97, srv618569548=313, srv2102708311=216, srv1084873074=20, srv517669556=283, srv918152084=376, srv649714317=321, srv1674484790=124, srv1339239880=56, srv1461073271=77, srv1125312901=28, srv25633292=234, srv516616923=282, srv299721745=238, srv604932433=308, srv1273702855=48, srv792183929=351, srv1042608200=10, srv1276335106=49, srv1486044644=83, srv676101698=328, srv998930892=392, srv200111276=200, srv1863083643=169, srv1737443479=137, srv872997185=365, srv821351126=355, srv852115805=360, srv1074355423=13, srv170952194=130, srv503430005=277, srv153887567=94, srv1415163001=69, srv1032737435=9, srv1840670515=167, srv1961921083=189, srv59745831=304, srv36715747=258, srv431547280=268, srv1524853580=92, srv1870059418=173, srv396010771=265, srv594457792=301, srv1755339428=140, srv1766275429=142, srv5565786=291, srv603898526=306, srv544570223=287, srv856030669=363, srv1542523468=95, srv915785747=374, srv356122213=253, srv1411875499=67, srv2077620970=209, srv1345529444=57, srv232339963=230, srv1250861076=44, srv1914875423=179, srv478619481=274, srv1202435626=37, srv1706089454=129, srv1810631201=163, srv1282644061=50, srv1625945288=109, srv733251129=338, srv2082830831=212, srv1612103540=107, srv612136291=310, srv1790004142=154, srv183394703=165} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:27,514 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:27,514 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:27,514 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:27,514 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:27,514 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:27,514 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:27,514 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-11 14:16:27,514 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-11 14:16:27,514 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-11 14:16:27,514 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-11 14:16:27,514 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 10 is on host 10
2023-07-11 14:16:27,514 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 11 is on host 11
2023-07-11 14:16:27,515 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 12 is on host 12
2023-07-11 14:16:27,515 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 13 is on host 13
2023-07-11 14:16:27,515 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 14 is on host 14
2023-07-11 14:16:27,515 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 15 is on host 15
2023-07-11 14:16:27,515 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 16 is on host 16
2023-07-11 14:16:27,515 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 17 is on host 17
2023-07-11 14:16:27,515 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 18 is on host 18
2023-07-11 14:16:27,515 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 19 is on host 19
2023-07-11 14:16:27,515 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 20 is on host 20
2023-07-11 14:16:27,515 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 21 is on host 21
2023-07-11 14:16:27,515 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 22 is on host 22
2023-07-11 14:16:27,515 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 23 is on host 23
2023-07-11 14:16:27,515 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 24 is on host 24
2023-07-11 14:16:27,515 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 25 is on host 25
2023-07-11 14:16:27,515 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 26 is on host 26
2023-07-11 14:16:27,515 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 27 is on host 27
2023-07-11 14:16:27,515 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 28 is on host 28
2023-07-11 14:16:27,515 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 29 is on host 29
2023-07-11 14:16:27,515 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 30 is on host 30
2023-07-11 14:16:27,515 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 31 is on host 31
2023-07-11 14:16:27,515 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 32 is on host 32
2023-07-11 14:16:27,515 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 33 is on host 33
2023-07-11 14:16:27,515 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 34 is on host 34
2023-07-11 14:16:27,515 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 35 is on host 35
2023-07-11 14:16:27,515 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 36 is on host 36
2023-07-11 14:16:27,515 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 37 is on host 37
2023-07-11 14:16:27,515 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 38 is on host 38
2023-07-11 14:16:27,515 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 39 is on host 39
2023-07-11 14:16:27,515 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 40 is on host 40
2023-07-11 14:16:27,516 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 41 is on host 41
2023-07-11 14:16:27,516 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 42 is on host 42
2023-07-11 14:16:27,516 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 43 is on host 43
2023-07-11 14:16:27,516 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 44 is on host 44
2023-07-11 14:16:27,516 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 45 is on host 45
2023-07-11 14:16:27,516 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 46 is on host 46
2023-07-11 14:16:27,516 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 47 is on host 47
2023-07-11 14:16:27,516 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 48 is on host 48
2023-07-11 14:16:27,516 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 49 is on host 49
2023-07-11 14:16:27,516 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 50 is on host 50
2023-07-11 14:16:27,516 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 51 is on host 51
2023-07-11 14:16:27,516 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 52 is on host 52
2023-07-11 14:16:27,516 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 53 is on host 53
2023-07-11 14:16:27,516 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 54 is on host 54
2023-07-11 14:16:27,516 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 55 is on host 55
2023-07-11 14:16:27,516 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 56 is on host 56
2023-07-11 14:16:27,516 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 57 is on host 57
2023-07-11 14:16:27,516 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 58 is on host 58
2023-07-11 14:16:27,516 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 59 is on host 59
2023-07-11 14:16:27,516 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 60 is on host 60
2023-07-11 14:16:27,516 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 61 is on host 61
2023-07-11 14:16:27,516 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 62 is on host 62
2023-07-11 14:16:27,516 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 63 is on host 63
2023-07-11 14:16:27,516 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 64 is on host 64
2023-07-11 14:16:27,516 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 65 is on host 65
2023-07-11 14:16:27,516 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 66 is on host 66
2023-07-11 14:16:27,516 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 67 is on host 67
2023-07-11 14:16:27,516 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 68 is on host 68
2023-07-11 14:16:27,516 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 69 is on host 69
2023-07-11 14:16:27,517 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 70 is on host 70
2023-07-11 14:16:27,517 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 71 is on host 71
2023-07-11 14:16:27,517 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 72 is on host 72
2023-07-11 14:16:27,517 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 73 is on host 73
2023-07-11 14:16:27,517 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 74 is on host 74
2023-07-11 14:16:27,517 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 75 is on host 75
2023-07-11 14:16:27,517 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 76 is on host 76
2023-07-11 14:16:27,517 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 77 is on host 77
2023-07-11 14:16:27,517 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 78 is on host 78
2023-07-11 14:16:27,517 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 79 is on host 79
2023-07-11 14:16:27,517 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 80 is on host 80
2023-07-11 14:16:27,517 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 81 is on host 81
2023-07-11 14:16:27,517 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 82 is on host 82
2023-07-11 14:16:27,517 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 83 is on host 83
2023-07-11 14:16:27,517 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 84 is on host 84
2023-07-11 14:16:27,517 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 85 is on host 85
2023-07-11 14:16:27,517 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 86 is on host 86
2023-07-11 14:16:27,517 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 87 is on host 87
2023-07-11 14:16:27,517 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 88 is on host 88
2023-07-11 14:16:27,517 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 89 is on host 89
2023-07-11 14:16:27,517 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 90 is on host 90
2023-07-11 14:16:27,517 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 91 is on host 91
2023-07-11 14:16:27,517 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 92 is on host 92
2023-07-11 14:16:27,517 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 93 is on host 93
2023-07-11 14:16:27,517 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 94 is on host 94
2023-07-11 14:16:27,517 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 95 is on host 95
2023-07-11 14:16:27,517 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 96 is on host 96
2023-07-11 14:16:27,517 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 97 is on host 97
2023-07-11 14:16:27,518 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 98 is on host 98
2023-07-11 14:16:27,518 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 99 is on host 99
2023-07-11 14:16:27,518 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 100 is on host 100
2023-07-11 14:16:27,518 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 101 is on host 101
2023-07-11 14:16:27,518 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 102 is on host 102
2023-07-11 14:16:27,518 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 103 is on host 103
2023-07-11 14:16:27,518 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 104 is on host 104
2023-07-11 14:16:27,518 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 105 is on host 105
2023-07-11 14:16:27,518 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 106 is on host 106
2023-07-11 14:16:27,518 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 107 is on host 107
2023-07-11 14:16:27,518 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 108 is on host 108
2023-07-11 14:16:27,518 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 109 is on host 109
2023-07-11 14:16:27,518 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 110 is on host 110
2023-07-11 14:16:27,518 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 111 is on host 111
2023-07-11 14:16:27,518 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 112 is on host 112
2023-07-11 14:16:27,518 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 113 is on host 113
2023-07-11 14:16:27,518 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 114 is on host 114
2023-07-11 14:16:27,518 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 115 is on host 115
2023-07-11 14:16:27,518 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 116 is on host 116
2023-07-11 14:16:27,518 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 117 is on host 117
2023-07-11 14:16:27,518 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 118 is on host 118
2023-07-11 14:16:27,518 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 119 is on host 119
2023-07-11 14:16:27,518 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 120 is on host 120
2023-07-11 14:16:27,518 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 121 is on host 121
2023-07-11 14:16:27,518 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 122 is on host 122
2023-07-11 14:16:27,518 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 123 is on host 123
2023-07-11 14:16:27,518 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 124 is on host 124
2023-07-11 14:16:27,518 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 125 is on host 125
2023-07-11 14:16:27,518 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 126 is on host 126
2023-07-11 14:16:27,519 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 127 is on host 127
2023-07-11 14:16:27,519 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 128 is on host 128
2023-07-11 14:16:27,519 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 129 is on host 129
2023-07-11 14:16:27,519 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 130 is on host 130
2023-07-11 14:16:27,519 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 131 is on host 131
2023-07-11 14:16:27,519 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 132 is on host 132
2023-07-11 14:16:27,519 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 133 is on host 133
2023-07-11 14:16:27,519 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 134 is on host 134
2023-07-11 14:16:27,519 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 135 is on host 135
2023-07-11 14:16:27,519 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 136 is on host 136
2023-07-11 14:16:27,519 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 137 is on host 137
2023-07-11 14:16:27,519 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 138 is on host 138
2023-07-11 14:16:27,519 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 139 is on host 139
2023-07-11 14:16:27,519 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 140 is on host 140
2023-07-11 14:16:27,519 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 141 is on host 141
2023-07-11 14:16:27,519 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 142 is on host 142
2023-07-11 14:16:27,519 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 143 is on host 143
2023-07-11 14:16:27,519 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 144 is on host 144
2023-07-11 14:16:27,519 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 145 is on host 145
2023-07-11 14:16:27,519 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 146 is on host 146
2023-07-11 14:16:27,519 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 147 is on host 147
2023-07-11 14:16:27,519 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 148 is on host 148
2023-07-11 14:16:27,519 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 149 is on host 149
2023-07-11 14:16:27,519 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 150 is on host 150
2023-07-11 14:16:27,519 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 151 is on host 151
2023-07-11 14:16:27,519 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 152 is on host 152
2023-07-11 14:16:27,519 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 153 is on host 153
2023-07-11 14:16:27,519 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 154 is on host 154
2023-07-11 14:16:27,519 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 155 is on host 155
2023-07-11 14:16:27,520 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 156 is on host 156
2023-07-11 14:16:27,520 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 157 is on host 157
2023-07-11 14:16:27,520 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 158 is on host 158
2023-07-11 14:16:27,520 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 159 is on host 159
2023-07-11 14:16:27,520 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 160 is on host 160
2023-07-11 14:16:27,520 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 161 is on host 161
2023-07-11 14:16:27,520 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 162 is on host 162
2023-07-11 14:16:27,520 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 163 is on host 163
2023-07-11 14:16:27,520 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 164 is on host 164
2023-07-11 14:16:27,520 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 165 is on host 165
2023-07-11 14:16:27,520 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 166 is on host 166
2023-07-11 14:16:27,520 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 167 is on host 167
2023-07-11 14:16:27,520 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 168 is on host 168
2023-07-11 14:16:27,520 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 169 is on host 169
2023-07-11 14:16:27,520 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 170 is on host 170
2023-07-11 14:16:27,520 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 171 is on host 171
2023-07-11 14:16:27,520 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 172 is on host 172
2023-07-11 14:16:27,520 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 173 is on host 173
2023-07-11 14:16:27,520 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 174 is on host 174
2023-07-11 14:16:27,520 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 175 is on host 175
2023-07-11 14:16:27,520 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 176 is on host 176
2023-07-11 14:16:27,520 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 177 is on host 177
2023-07-11 14:16:27,520 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 178 is on host 178
2023-07-11 14:16:27,520 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 179 is on host 179
2023-07-11 14:16:27,520 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 180 is on host 180
2023-07-11 14:16:27,520 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 181 is on host 181
2023-07-11 14:16:27,520 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 182 is on host 182
2023-07-11 14:16:27,520 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 183 is on host 183
2023-07-11 14:16:27,520 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 184 is on host 184
2023-07-11 14:16:27,521 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 185 is on host 185
2023-07-11 14:16:27,521 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 186 is on host 186
2023-07-11 14:16:27,521 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 187 is on host 187
2023-07-11 14:16:27,521 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 188 is on host 188
2023-07-11 14:16:27,521 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 189 is on host 189
2023-07-11 14:16:27,521 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 190 is on host 190
2023-07-11 14:16:27,521 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 191 is on host 191
2023-07-11 14:16:27,521 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 192 is on host 192
2023-07-11 14:16:27,521 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 193 is on host 193
2023-07-11 14:16:27,521 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 194 is on host 194
2023-07-11 14:16:27,521 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 195 is on host 195
2023-07-11 14:16:27,521 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 196 is on host 196
2023-07-11 14:16:27,521 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 197 is on host 197
2023-07-11 14:16:27,521 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 198 is on host 198
2023-07-11 14:16:27,521 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 199 is on host 199
2023-07-11 14:16:27,521 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 200 is on host 200
2023-07-11 14:16:27,521 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 201 is on host 201
2023-07-11 14:16:27,521 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 202 is on host 202
2023-07-11 14:16:27,521 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 203 is on host 203
2023-07-11 14:16:27,521 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 204 is on host 204
2023-07-11 14:16:27,521 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 205 is on host 205
2023-07-11 14:16:27,521 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 206 is on host 206
2023-07-11 14:16:27,521 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 207 is on host 207
2023-07-11 14:16:27,521 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 208 is on host 208
2023-07-11 14:16:27,522 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 209 is on host 209
2023-07-11 14:16:27,522 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 210 is on host 210
2023-07-11 14:16:27,522 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 211 is on host 211
2023-07-11 14:16:27,522 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 212 is on host 212
2023-07-11 14:16:27,522 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 213 is on host 213
2023-07-11 14:16:27,522 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 214 is on host 214
2023-07-11 14:16:27,522 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 215 is on host 215
2023-07-11 14:16:27,522 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 216 is on host 216
2023-07-11 14:16:27,522 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 217 is on host 217
2023-07-11 14:16:27,522 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 218 is on host 218
2023-07-11 14:16:27,522 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 219 is on host 219
2023-07-11 14:16:27,522 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 220 is on host 220
2023-07-11 14:16:27,522 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 221 is on host 221
2023-07-11 14:16:27,522 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 222 is on host 222
2023-07-11 14:16:27,522 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 223 is on host 223
2023-07-11 14:16:27,522 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 224 is on host 224
2023-07-11 14:16:27,522 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 225 is on host 225
2023-07-11 14:16:27,522 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 226 is on host 226
2023-07-11 14:16:27,522 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 227 is on host 227
2023-07-11 14:16:27,522 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 228 is on host 228
2023-07-11 14:16:27,522 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 229 is on host 229
2023-07-11 14:16:27,522 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 230 is on host 230
2023-07-11 14:16:27,522 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 231 is on host 231
2023-07-11 14:16:27,522 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 232 is on host 232
2023-07-11 14:16:27,523 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 233 is on host 233
2023-07-11 14:16:27,523 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 234 is on host 234
2023-07-11 14:16:27,523 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 235 is on host 235
2023-07-11 14:16:27,523 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 236 is on host 236
2023-07-11 14:16:27,523 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 237 is on host 237
2023-07-11 14:16:27,523 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 238 is on host 238
2023-07-11 14:16:27,523 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 239 is on host 239
2023-07-11 14:16:27,523 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 240 is on host 240
2023-07-11 14:16:27,523 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 241 is on host 241
2023-07-11 14:16:27,523 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 242 is on host 242
2023-07-11 14:16:27,523 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 243 is on host 243
2023-07-11 14:16:27,523 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 244 is on host 244
2023-07-11 14:16:27,523 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 245 is on host 245
2023-07-11 14:16:27,523 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 246 is on host 246
2023-07-11 14:16:27,523 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 247 is on host 247
2023-07-11 14:16:27,523 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 248 is on host 248
2023-07-11 14:16:27,523 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 249 is on host 249
2023-07-11 14:16:27,523 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 250 is on host 250
2023-07-11 14:16:27,523 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 251 is on host 251
2023-07-11 14:16:27,523 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 252 is on host 252
2023-07-11 14:16:27,523 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 253 is on host 253
2023-07-11 14:16:27,523 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 254 is on host 254
2023-07-11 14:16:27,523 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 255 is on host 255
2023-07-11 14:16:27,523 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 256 is on host 256
2023-07-11 14:16:27,523 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 257 is on host 257
2023-07-11 14:16:27,523 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 258 is on host 258
2023-07-11 14:16:27,523 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 259 is on host 259
2023-07-11 14:16:27,523 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 260 is on host 260
2023-07-11 14:16:27,523 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 261 is on host 261
2023-07-11 14:16:27,523 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 262 is on host 262
2023-07-11 14:16:27,524 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 263 is on host 263
2023-07-11 14:16:27,524 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 264 is on host 264
2023-07-11 14:16:27,524 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 265 is on host 265
2023-07-11 14:16:27,524 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 266 is on host 266
2023-07-11 14:16:27,524 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 267 is on host 267
2023-07-11 14:16:27,524 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 268 is on host 268
2023-07-11 14:16:27,524 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 269 is on host 269
2023-07-11 14:16:27,524 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 270 is on host 270
2023-07-11 14:16:27,524 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 271 is on host 271
2023-07-11 14:16:27,524 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 272 is on host 272
2023-07-11 14:16:27,524 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 273 is on host 273
2023-07-11 14:16:27,524 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 274 is on host 274
2023-07-11 14:16:27,524 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 275 is on host 275
2023-07-11 14:16:27,524 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 276 is on host 276
2023-07-11 14:16:27,524 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 277 is on host 277
2023-07-11 14:16:27,524 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 278 is on host 278
2023-07-11 14:16:27,524 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 279 is on host 279
2023-07-11 14:16:27,524 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 280 is on host 280
2023-07-11 14:16:27,524 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 281 is on host 281
2023-07-11 14:16:27,524 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 282 is on host 282
2023-07-11 14:16:27,524 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 283 is on host 283
2023-07-11 14:16:27,524 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 284 is on host 284
2023-07-11 14:16:27,524 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 285 is on host 285
2023-07-11 14:16:27,524 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 286 is on host 286
2023-07-11 14:16:27,524 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 287 is on host 287
2023-07-11 14:16:27,524 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 288 is on host 288
2023-07-11 14:16:27,524 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 289 is on host 289
2023-07-11 14:16:27,524 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 290 is on host 290
2023-07-11 14:16:27,525 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 291 is on host 291
2023-07-11 14:16:27,525 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 292 is on host 292
2023-07-11 14:16:27,525 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 293 is on host 293
2023-07-11 14:16:27,525 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 294 is on host 294
2023-07-11 14:16:27,525 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 295 is on host 295
2023-07-11 14:16:27,525 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 296 is on host 296
2023-07-11 14:16:27,525 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 297 is on host 297
2023-07-11 14:16:27,525 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 298 is on host 298
2023-07-11 14:16:27,525 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 299 is on host 299
2023-07-11 14:16:27,525 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 300 is on host 300
2023-07-11 14:16:27,525 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 301 is on host 301
2023-07-11 14:16:27,525 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 302 is on host 302
2023-07-11 14:16:27,525 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 303 is on host 303
2023-07-11 14:16:27,525 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 304 is on host 304
2023-07-11 14:16:27,525 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 305 is on host 305
2023-07-11 14:16:27,525 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 306 is on host 306
2023-07-11 14:16:27,525 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 307 is on host 307
2023-07-11 14:16:27,525 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 308 is on host 308
2023-07-11 14:16:27,525 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 309 is on host 309
2023-07-11 14:16:27,525 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 310 is on host 310
2023-07-11 14:16:27,525 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 311 is on host 311
2023-07-11 14:16:27,525 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 312 is on host 312
2023-07-11 14:16:27,525 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 313 is on host 313
2023-07-11 14:16:27,525 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 314 is on host 314
2023-07-11 14:16:27,525 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 315 is on host 315
2023-07-11 14:16:27,525 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 316 is on host 316
2023-07-11 14:16:27,525 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 317 is on host 317
2023-07-11 14:16:27,525 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 318 is on host 318
2023-07-11 14:16:27,525 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 319 is on host 319
2023-07-11 14:16:27,526 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 320 is on host 320
2023-07-11 14:16:27,526 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 321 is on host 321
2023-07-11 14:16:27,526 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 322 is on host 322
2023-07-11 14:16:27,526 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 323 is on host 323
2023-07-11 14:16:27,526 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 324 is on host 324
2023-07-11 14:16:27,526 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 325 is on host 325
2023-07-11 14:16:27,526 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 326 is on host 326
2023-07-11 14:16:27,526 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 327 is on host 327
2023-07-11 14:16:27,526 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 328 is on host 328
2023-07-11 14:16:27,526 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 329 is on host 329
2023-07-11 14:16:27,526 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 330 is on host 330
2023-07-11 14:16:27,526 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 331 is on host 331
2023-07-11 14:16:27,526 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 332 is on host 332
2023-07-11 14:16:27,526 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 333 is on host 333
2023-07-11 14:16:27,526 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 334 is on host 334
2023-07-11 14:16:27,526 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 335 is on host 335
2023-07-11 14:16:27,526 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 336 is on host 336
2023-07-11 14:16:27,526 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 337 is on host 337
2023-07-11 14:16:27,526 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 338 is on host 338
2023-07-11 14:16:27,526 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 339 is on host 339
2023-07-11 14:16:27,526 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 340 is on host 340
2023-07-11 14:16:27,526 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 341 is on host 341
2023-07-11 14:16:27,526 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 342 is on host 342
2023-07-11 14:16:27,526 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 343 is on host 343
2023-07-11 14:16:27,526 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 344 is on host 344
2023-07-11 14:16:27,526 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 345 is on host 345
2023-07-11 14:16:27,526 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 346 is on host 346
2023-07-11 14:16:27,526 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 347 is on host 347
2023-07-11 14:16:27,526 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 348 is on host 348
2023-07-11 14:16:27,527 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 349 is on host 349
2023-07-11 14:16:27,527 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 350 is on host 350
2023-07-11 14:16:27,527 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 351 is on host 351
2023-07-11 14:16:27,527 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 352 is on host 352
2023-07-11 14:16:27,527 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 353 is on host 353
2023-07-11 14:16:27,527 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 354 is on host 354
2023-07-11 14:16:27,527 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 355 is on host 355
2023-07-11 14:16:27,527 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 356 is on host 356
2023-07-11 14:16:27,527 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 357 is on host 357
2023-07-11 14:16:27,527 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 358 is on host 358
2023-07-11 14:16:27,527 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 359 is on host 359
2023-07-11 14:16:27,527 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 360 is on host 360
2023-07-11 14:16:27,527 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 361 is on host 361
2023-07-11 14:16:27,527 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 362 is on host 362
2023-07-11 14:16:27,527 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 363 is on host 363
2023-07-11 14:16:27,527 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 364 is on host 364
2023-07-11 14:16:27,527 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 365 is on host 365
2023-07-11 14:16:27,527 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 366 is on host 366
2023-07-11 14:16:27,527 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 367 is on host 367
2023-07-11 14:16:27,527 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 368 is on host 368
2023-07-11 14:16:27,527 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 369 is on host 369
2023-07-11 14:16:27,527 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 370 is on host 370
2023-07-11 14:16:27,527 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 371 is on host 371
2023-07-11 14:16:27,527 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 372 is on host 372
2023-07-11 14:16:27,527 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 373 is on host 373
2023-07-11 14:16:27,527 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 374 is on host 374
2023-07-11 14:16:27,527 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 375 is on host 375
2023-07-11 14:16:27,527 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 376 is on host 376
2023-07-11 14:16:27,527 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 377 is on host 377
2023-07-11 14:16:27,528 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 378 is on host 378
2023-07-11 14:16:27,528 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 379 is on host 379
2023-07-11 14:16:27,528 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 380 is on host 380
2023-07-11 14:16:27,528 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 381 is on host 381
2023-07-11 14:16:27,528 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 382 is on host 382
2023-07-11 14:16:27,528 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 383 is on host 383
2023-07-11 14:16:27,528 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 384 is on host 384
2023-07-11 14:16:27,528 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 385 is on host 385
2023-07-11 14:16:27,528 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 386 is on host 386
2023-07-11 14:16:27,528 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 387 is on host 387
2023-07-11 14:16:27,528 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 388 is on host 388
2023-07-11 14:16:27,528 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 389 is on host 389
2023-07-11 14:16:27,528 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 390 is on host 390
2023-07-11 14:16:27,528 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 391 is on host 391
2023-07-11 14:16:27,528 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 392 is on host 392
2023-07-11 14:16:27,528 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=393, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:27,528 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table51) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:27,528 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table52
2023-07-11 14:16:27,529 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv553536953=290, srv1630071126=110, srv1071894870=12, srv23511728=232, srv658346947=323, srv2025338799=204, srv1397994335=64, srv1976766403=195, srv1644629726=118, srv957637734=381, srv2079182457=210, srv1749264468=139, srv2046129126=206, srv1595762596=104, srv603990852=307, srv1973073480=194, srv958856137=382, srv644066832=319, srv557062842=292, srv277765671=235, srv732221418=337, srv1769385567=143, srv224612199=228, srv714752528=334, srv362526040=256, srv581128949=296, srv2133511466=223, srv1144239257=30, srv320603627=245, srv1679952521=126, srv2122867873=222, srv1110067064=24, srv256251994=233, srv63261708=317, srv89837390=371, srv552104598=289, srv508952995=281, srv2096011353=214, srv1770417148=144, srv1246723478=42, srv929436444=378, srv2082192429=211, srv234917297=231, srv405700573=266, srv183644386=166, srv1488378513=85, srv173139715=136, srv1154180352=32, srv355693379=252, srv1407521654=66, srv496848057=275, srv1157975499=33, srv1806731027=162, srv1923102804=184, srv311102455=244, srv450011410=271, srv771515724=348, srv389183508=262, srv1249074416=43, srv2014575201=201, srv640847108=318, srv832363565=356, srv1970882134=192, srv2107358603=218, srv855766065=361, srv1336043388=55, srv29397186=237, srv982792848=390, srv976560524=386, srv101181760=3, srv1093549482=21, srv2018389395=202, srv2113483104=221, srv1778339118=149, srv1968709692=190, srv705221118=333, srv159600090=105, srv1919608486=180, srv981255102=389, srv807899713=353, srv755110395=344, srv1770594519=145, srv739692705=340, srv1076582671=16, srv693869315=330, srv1079048717=17, srv440657532=270, srv1636659280=115, srv2108739257=220, srv668373413=326, srv1003610393=2, srv1054229197=11, srv1868589627=172, srv2103522371=217, srv1000546271=0, srv951670617=380, srv2042909593=205, srv1865656038=171, srv1466355012=78, srv703662406=332, srv1418112884=70, srv1215580291=40, srv71833528=335, srv1580581635=103, srv1021032212=5, srv1080806312=19, srv1985601859=197, srv74471954=343, srv1647472319=119, srv2071553346=208, srv1632855171=112, srv1122009370=27, srv13613992=61, srv1630777154=111, srv301413669=239, srv550697728=288, srv1296023857=53, srv1724550977=133, srv1989290370=198, srv1926417985=185, srv1678097199=125, srv1461034373=76, srv614690415=311, srv2098345381=215, srv310463473=243, srv1011934105=4, srv148627129=84, srv305489318=240, srv1256534903=46, srv1289731445=52, srv1798844587=157, srv567113085=294, srv1119222501=26, srv2055117940=207, srv855898852=362, srv629224816=316, srv1075943554=15, srv625909061=315, srv1705591942=128, srv734225580=339, srv660107924=324, srv1381729938=62, srv1633483173=113, srv408265476=267, srv1776057793=148, srv1360253411=60, srv1511424834=90, srv1414162621=68, srv883343663=370, srv151859222=91, srv349144930=251, srv1991304034=199, srv1825887791=164, srv601657063=305, srv758932951=345, srv1651629087=120, srv1864623584=170, srv682957691=329, srv1500454146=88, srv1725962085=135, srv1659841448=121, srv1253206004=45, srv52354442=284, srv18508093=168, srv1427731921=73, srv561344974=293, srv721668125=336, srv1575482138=100, srv914128771=373, srv961487230=383, srv741332941=342, srv533032466=286, srv1574140987=99, srv2139849097=224, srv503902262=278, srv674807007=327, srv1786829855=153, srv2088727517=213, srv394366966=264, srv980089565=388, srv114594288=31, srv38296437=261, srv214835574=226, srv1887224977=176, srv1025509362=7, srv1577020334=102, srv524466665=285, srv393561021=263, srv759909927=346, srv763556514=347, srv786453030=349, srv2142935488=225, srv618111613=312, srv16254163=108, srv343211061=250, srv476075173=273, srv1269632212=47, srv333589612=246, srv499015361=276, srv836674186=357, srv1799191687=158, srv1446998035=74, srv1571774199=98, srv1115354947=25, srv333860881=247, srv1724152600=132, srv1598699299=106, srv177885829=151, srv472125887=272, srv1101339966=22, srv1424985362=72, srv1945569895=188, srv594128294=300, srv1026739237=8, srv842459828=358, srv878519137=366, srv1921260729=181, srv339110834=249, srv504099471=279, srv814253179=354, srv1643744885=116, srv1793847521=155, srv607234624=309, srv698219051=331, srv1688538732=127, srv666240078=325, srv1079284733=18, srv29210550=236, srv506181748=280, srv881313122=368, srv1945452576=187, srv597307897=303, srv1285120424=51, srv1887943816=177, srv1983604698=196, srv1805465940=161, srv309309336=242, srv1719756294=131, srv1349932676=58, srv1208486369=38, srv1643971570=117, srv1509331489=89, srv334105385=248, srv1400515744=65, srv369984715=259, srv43712162=269, srv842675864=359, srv1803258748=160, srv1022450918=6, srv1775108732=147, srv1766088250=141, srv180150732=159, srv1220857227=41, srv226530501=229, srv362032108=255, srv919715380=377, srv1074935976=14, srv1395030819=63, srv803291569=352, srv1877966766=175, srv220538712=227, srv2021718843=203, srv2107782185=219, srv882216860=369, srv1489137852=86, srv1972328734=193, srv1470759982=79, srv1774824811=146, srv971974774=384, srv1418242791=71, srv1001274196=1, srv909615097=372, srv1537724566=93, srv1165799954=34, srv1724754364=134, srv978173525=387, srv113319438=29, srv578033735=295, srv147931272=80, srv1183635941=35, srv1904215245=178, srv596349756=302, srv880835255=367, srv857544550=364, srv1779729022=152, srv1795612465=156, srv621083045=314, srv917704170=375, srv1351811120=59, srv1316710897=54, srv789820555=350, srv1922580095=183, srv305567304=241, srv1936745425=186, srv1745318024=138, srv1210822057=39, srv645375717=320, srv950628389=379, srv1490199189=87, srv1575919256=101, srv154481102=96, srv359402967=254, srv997716931=391, srv1457224273=75, srv581644449=297, srv1872374768=174, srv363177310=257, srv740327512=341, srv1664227236=123, srv972330517=385, srv1634261306=114, srv1662183707=122, srv1969046891=191, srv1485266211=82, srv1778842262=150, srv588410181=298, srv1921840985=182, srv591279493=299, srv37574565=260, srv1104147458=23, srv1190166330=36, srv652270371=322, srv1484309042=81, srv1560148463=97, srv618569548=313, srv2102708311=216, srv1084873074=20, srv517669556=283, srv918152084=376, srv649714317=321, srv1674484790=124, srv1339239880=56, srv1461073271=77, srv1125312901=28, srv25633292=234, srv516616923=282, srv299721745=238, srv604932433=308, srv1273702855=48, srv792183929=351, srv1042608200=10, srv1276335106=49, srv1486044644=83, srv676101698=328, srv998930892=392, srv200111276=200, srv1863083643=169, srv1737443479=137, srv872997185=365, srv821351126=355, srv852115805=360, srv1074355423=13, srv170952194=130, srv503430005=277, srv153887567=94, srv1415163001=69, srv1032737435=9, srv1840670515=167, srv1961921083=189, srv59745831=304, srv36715747=258, srv431547280=268, srv1524853580=92, srv1870059418=173, srv396010771=265, srv594457792=301, srv1755339428=140, srv1766275429=142, srv5565786=291, srv603898526=306, srv544570223=287, srv856030669=363, srv1542523468=95, srv915785747=374, srv356122213=253, srv1411875499=67, srv2077620970=209, srv1345529444=57, srv232339963=230, srv1250861076=44, srv1914875423=179, srv478619481=274, srv1202435626=37, srv1706089454=129, srv1810631201=163, srv1282644061=50, srv1625945288=109, srv733251129=338, srv2082830831=212, srv1612103540=107, srv612136291=310, srv1790004142=154, srv183394703=165} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:27,529 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:27,529 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:27,529 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:27,529 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:27,529 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:27,529 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:27,529 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-11 14:16:27,529 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-11 14:16:27,529 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-11 14:16:27,529 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-11 14:16:27,529 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 10 is on host 10
2023-07-11 14:16:27,529 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 11 is on host 11
2023-07-11 14:16:27,529 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 12 is on host 12
2023-07-11 14:16:27,530 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 13 is on host 13
2023-07-11 14:16:27,530 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 14 is on host 14
2023-07-11 14:16:27,530 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 15 is on host 15
2023-07-11 14:16:27,530 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 16 is on host 16
2023-07-11 14:16:27,530 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 17 is on host 17
2023-07-11 14:16:27,530 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 18 is on host 18
2023-07-11 14:16:27,530 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 19 is on host 19
2023-07-11 14:16:27,530 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 20 is on host 20
2023-07-11 14:16:27,530 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 21 is on host 21
2023-07-11 14:16:27,530 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 22 is on host 22
2023-07-11 14:16:27,530 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 23 is on host 23
2023-07-11 14:16:27,530 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 24 is on host 24
2023-07-11 14:16:27,530 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 25 is on host 25
2023-07-11 14:16:27,530 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 26 is on host 26
2023-07-11 14:16:27,530 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 27 is on host 27
2023-07-11 14:16:27,530 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 28 is on host 28
2023-07-11 14:16:27,530 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 29 is on host 29
2023-07-11 14:16:27,530 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 30 is on host 30
2023-07-11 14:16:27,530 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 31 is on host 31
2023-07-11 14:16:27,530 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 32 is on host 32
2023-07-11 14:16:27,530 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 33 is on host 33
2023-07-11 14:16:27,530 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 34 is on host 34
2023-07-11 14:16:27,530 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 35 is on host 35
2023-07-11 14:16:27,530 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 36 is on host 36
2023-07-11 14:16:27,530 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 37 is on host 37
2023-07-11 14:16:27,530 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 38 is on host 38
2023-07-11 14:16:27,530 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 39 is on host 39
2023-07-11 14:16:27,530 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 40 is on host 40
2023-07-11 14:16:27,530 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 41 is on host 41
2023-07-11 14:16:27,531 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 42 is on host 42
2023-07-11 14:16:27,531 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 43 is on host 43
2023-07-11 14:16:27,531 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 44 is on host 44
2023-07-11 14:16:27,531 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 45 is on host 45
2023-07-11 14:16:27,531 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 46 is on host 46
2023-07-11 14:16:27,531 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 47 is on host 47
2023-07-11 14:16:27,531 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 48 is on host 48
2023-07-11 14:16:27,531 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 49 is on host 49
2023-07-11 14:16:27,531 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 50 is on host 50
2023-07-11 14:16:27,531 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 51 is on host 51
2023-07-11 14:16:27,531 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 52 is on host 52
2023-07-11 14:16:27,531 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 53 is on host 53
2023-07-11 14:16:27,531 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 54 is on host 54
2023-07-11 14:16:27,531 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 55 is on host 55
2023-07-11 14:16:27,531 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 56 is on host 56
2023-07-11 14:16:27,531 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 57 is on host 57
2023-07-11 14:16:27,531 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 58 is on host 58
2023-07-11 14:16:27,531 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 59 is on host 59
2023-07-11 14:16:27,531 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 60 is on host 60
2023-07-11 14:16:27,531 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 61 is on host 61
2023-07-11 14:16:27,531 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 62 is on host 62
2023-07-11 14:16:27,531 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 63 is on host 63
2023-07-11 14:16:27,531 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 64 is on host 64
2023-07-11 14:16:27,531 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 65 is on host 65
2023-07-11 14:16:27,531 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 66 is on host 66
2023-07-11 14:16:27,531 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 67 is on host 67
2023-07-11 14:16:27,531 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 68 is on host 68
2023-07-11 14:16:27,531 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 69 is on host 69
2023-07-11 14:16:27,531 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 70 is on host 70
2023-07-11 14:16:27,532 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 71 is on host 71
2023-07-11 14:16:27,532 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 72 is on host 72
2023-07-11 14:16:27,532 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 73 is on host 73
2023-07-11 14:16:27,532 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 74 is on host 74
2023-07-11 14:16:27,532 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 75 is on host 75
2023-07-11 14:16:27,532 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 76 is on host 76
2023-07-11 14:16:27,532 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 77 is on host 77
2023-07-11 14:16:27,532 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 78 is on host 78
2023-07-11 14:16:27,532 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 79 is on host 79
2023-07-11 14:16:27,532 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 80 is on host 80
2023-07-11 14:16:27,532 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 81 is on host 81
2023-07-11 14:16:27,532 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 82 is on host 82
2023-07-11 14:16:27,532 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 83 is on host 83
2023-07-11 14:16:27,532 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 84 is on host 84
2023-07-11 14:16:27,532 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 85 is on host 85
2023-07-11 14:16:27,532 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 86 is on host 86
2023-07-11 14:16:27,532 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 87 is on host 87
2023-07-11 14:16:27,532 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 88 is on host 88
2023-07-11 14:16:27,532 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 89 is on host 89
2023-07-11 14:16:27,532 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 90 is on host 90
2023-07-11 14:16:27,532 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 91 is on host 91
2023-07-11 14:16:27,532 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 92 is on host 92
2023-07-11 14:16:27,532 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 93 is on host 93
2023-07-11 14:16:27,532 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 94 is on host 94
2023-07-11 14:16:27,532 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 95 is on host 95
2023-07-11 14:16:27,532 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 96 is on host 96
2023-07-11 14:16:27,532 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 97 is on host 97
2023-07-11 14:16:27,532 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 98 is on host 98
2023-07-11 14:16:27,532 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 99 is on host 99
2023-07-11 14:16:27,533 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 100 is on host 100
2023-07-11 14:16:27,533 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 101 is on host 101
2023-07-11 14:16:27,533 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 102 is on host 102
2023-07-11 14:16:27,533 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 103 is on host 103
2023-07-11 14:16:27,533 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 104 is on host 104
2023-07-11 14:16:27,533 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 105 is on host 105
2023-07-11 14:16:27,533 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 106 is on host 106
2023-07-11 14:16:27,533 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 107 is on host 107
2023-07-11 14:16:27,533 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 108 is on host 108
2023-07-11 14:16:27,533 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 109 is on host 109
2023-07-11 14:16:27,533 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 110 is on host 110
2023-07-11 14:16:27,533 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 111 is on host 111
2023-07-11 14:16:27,533 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 112 is on host 112
2023-07-11 14:16:27,533 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 113 is on host 113
2023-07-11 14:16:27,533 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 114 is on host 114
2023-07-11 14:16:27,533 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 115 is on host 115
2023-07-11 14:16:27,533 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 116 is on host 116
2023-07-11 14:16:27,533 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 117 is on host 117
2023-07-11 14:16:27,533 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 118 is on host 118
2023-07-11 14:16:27,533 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 119 is on host 119
2023-07-11 14:16:27,534 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 120 is on host 120
2023-07-11 14:16:27,534 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 121 is on host 121
2023-07-11 14:16:27,534 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 122 is on host 122
2023-07-11 14:16:27,534 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 123 is on host 123
2023-07-11 14:16:27,534 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 124 is on host 124
2023-07-11 14:16:27,534 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 125 is on host 125
2023-07-11 14:16:27,534 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 126 is on host 126
2023-07-11 14:16:27,534 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 127 is on host 127
2023-07-11 14:16:27,534 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 128 is on host 128
2023-07-11 14:16:27,534 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 129 is on host 129
2023-07-11 14:16:27,534 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 130 is on host 130
2023-07-11 14:16:27,534 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 131 is on host 131
2023-07-11 14:16:27,534 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 132 is on host 132
2023-07-11 14:16:27,534 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 133 is on host 133
2023-07-11 14:16:27,534 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 134 is on host 134
2023-07-11 14:16:27,534 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 135 is on host 135
2023-07-11 14:16:27,534 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 136 is on host 136
2023-07-11 14:16:27,534 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 137 is on host 137
2023-07-11 14:16:27,534 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 138 is on host 138
2023-07-11 14:16:27,534 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 139 is on host 139
2023-07-11 14:16:27,534 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 140 is on host 140
2023-07-11 14:16:27,534 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 141 is on host 141
2023-07-11 14:16:27,534 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 142 is on host 142
2023-07-11 14:16:27,534 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 143 is on host 143
2023-07-11 14:16:27,534 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 144 is on host 144
2023-07-11 14:16:27,534 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 145 is on host 145
2023-07-11 14:16:27,534 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 146 is on host 146
2023-07-11 14:16:27,534 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 147 is on host 147
2023-07-11 14:16:27,535 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 148 is on host 148
2023-07-11 14:16:27,535 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 149 is on host 149
2023-07-11 14:16:27,535 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 150 is on host 150
2023-07-11 14:16:27,535 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 151 is on host 151
2023-07-11 14:16:27,535 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 152 is on host 152
2023-07-11 14:16:27,535 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 153 is on host 153
2023-07-11 14:16:27,535 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 154 is on host 154
2023-07-11 14:16:27,535 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 155 is on host 155
2023-07-11 14:16:27,535 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 156 is on host 156
2023-07-11 14:16:27,535 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 157 is on host 157
2023-07-11 14:16:27,535 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 158 is on host 158
2023-07-11 14:16:27,535 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 159 is on host 159
2023-07-11 14:16:27,535 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 160 is on host 160
2023-07-11 14:16:27,535 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 161 is on host 161
2023-07-11 14:16:27,535 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 162 is on host 162
2023-07-11 14:16:27,535 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 163 is on host 163
2023-07-11 14:16:27,535 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 164 is on host 164
2023-07-11 14:16:27,535 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 165 is on host 165
2023-07-11 14:16:27,535 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 166 is on host 166
2023-07-11 14:16:27,535 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 167 is on host 167
2023-07-11 14:16:27,535 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 168 is on host 168
2023-07-11 14:16:27,535 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 169 is on host 169
2023-07-11 14:16:27,535 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 170 is on host 170
2023-07-11 14:16:27,535 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 171 is on host 171
2023-07-11 14:16:27,535 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 172 is on host 172
2023-07-11 14:16:27,535 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 173 is on host 173
2023-07-11 14:16:27,535 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 174 is on host 174
2023-07-11 14:16:27,535 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 175 is on host 175
2023-07-11 14:16:27,535 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 176 is on host 176
2023-07-11 14:16:27,536 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 177 is on host 177
2023-07-11 14:16:27,536 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 178 is on host 178
2023-07-11 14:16:27,536 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 179 is on host 179
2023-07-11 14:16:27,536 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 180 is on host 180
2023-07-11 14:16:27,536 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 181 is on host 181
2023-07-11 14:16:27,536 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 182 is on host 182
2023-07-11 14:16:27,536 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 183 is on host 183
2023-07-11 14:16:27,536 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 184 is on host 184
2023-07-11 14:16:27,536 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 185 is on host 185
2023-07-11 14:16:27,536 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 186 is on host 186
2023-07-11 14:16:27,536 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 187 is on host 187
2023-07-11 14:16:27,536 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 188 is on host 188
2023-07-11 14:16:27,536 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 189 is on host 189
2023-07-11 14:16:27,536 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 190 is on host 190
2023-07-11 14:16:27,536 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 191 is on host 191
2023-07-11 14:16:27,536 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 192 is on host 192
2023-07-11 14:16:27,536 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 193 is on host 193
2023-07-11 14:16:27,536 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 194 is on host 194
2023-07-11 14:16:27,536 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 195 is on host 195
2023-07-11 14:16:27,536 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 196 is on host 196
2023-07-11 14:16:27,536 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 197 is on host 197
2023-07-11 14:16:27,536 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 198 is on host 198
2023-07-11 14:16:27,536 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 199 is on host 199
2023-07-11 14:16:27,536 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 200 is on host 200
2023-07-11 14:16:27,536 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 201 is on host 201
2023-07-11 14:16:27,536 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 202 is on host 202
2023-07-11 14:16:27,536 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 203 is on host 203
2023-07-11 14:16:27,536 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 204 is on host 204
2023-07-11 14:16:27,536 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 205 is on host 205
2023-07-11 14:16:27,537 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 206 is on host 206
2023-07-11 14:16:27,537 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 207 is on host 207
2023-07-11 14:16:27,537 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 208 is on host 208
2023-07-11 14:16:27,537 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 209 is on host 209
2023-07-11 14:16:27,537 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 210 is on host 210
2023-07-11 14:16:27,537 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 211 is on host 211
2023-07-11 14:16:27,537 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 212 is on host 212
2023-07-11 14:16:27,537 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 213 is on host 213
2023-07-11 14:16:27,537 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 214 is on host 214
2023-07-11 14:16:27,537 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 215 is on host 215
2023-07-11 14:16:27,537 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 216 is on host 216
2023-07-11 14:16:27,537 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 217 is on host 217
2023-07-11 14:16:27,537 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 218 is on host 218
2023-07-11 14:16:27,537 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 219 is on host 219
2023-07-11 14:16:27,537 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 220 is on host 220
2023-07-11 14:16:27,537 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 221 is on host 221
2023-07-11 14:16:27,537 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 222 is on host 222
2023-07-11 14:16:27,537 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 223 is on host 223
2023-07-11 14:16:27,537 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 224 is on host 224
2023-07-11 14:16:27,537 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 225 is on host 225
2023-07-11 14:16:27,537 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 226 is on host 226
2023-07-11 14:16:27,537 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 227 is on host 227
2023-07-11 14:16:27,537 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 228 is on host 228
2023-07-11 14:16:27,537 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 229 is on host 229
2023-07-11 14:16:27,537 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 230 is on host 230
2023-07-11 14:16:27,537 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 231 is on host 231
2023-07-11 14:16:27,537 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 232 is on host 232
2023-07-11 14:16:27,537 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 233 is on host 233
2023-07-11 14:16:27,537 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 234 is on host 234
2023-07-11 14:16:27,538 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 235 is on host 235
2023-07-11 14:16:27,538 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 236 is on host 236
2023-07-11 14:16:27,538 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 237 is on host 237
2023-07-11 14:16:27,538 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 238 is on host 238
2023-07-11 14:16:27,538 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 239 is on host 239
2023-07-11 14:16:27,538 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 240 is on host 240
2023-07-11 14:16:27,538 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 241 is on host 241
2023-07-11 14:16:27,538 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 242 is on host 242
2023-07-11 14:16:27,538 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 243 is on host 243
2023-07-11 14:16:27,538 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 244 is on host 244
2023-07-11 14:16:27,538 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 245 is on host 245
2023-07-11 14:16:27,538 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 246 is on host 246
2023-07-11 14:16:27,538 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 247 is on host 247
2023-07-11 14:16:27,538 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 248 is on host 248
2023-07-11 14:16:27,538 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 249 is on host 249
2023-07-11 14:16:27,538 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 250 is on host 250
2023-07-11 14:16:27,538 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 251 is on host 251
2023-07-11 14:16:27,538 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 252 is on host 252
2023-07-11 14:16:27,538 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 253 is on host 253
2023-07-11 14:16:27,538 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 254 is on host 254
2023-07-11 14:16:27,538 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 255 is on host 255
2023-07-11 14:16:27,538 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 256 is on host 256
2023-07-11 14:16:27,538 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 257 is on host 257
2023-07-11 14:16:27,538 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 258 is on host 258
2023-07-11 14:16:27,538 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 259 is on host 259
2023-07-11 14:16:27,538 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 260 is on host 260
2023-07-11 14:16:27,538 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 261 is on host 261
2023-07-11 14:16:27,538 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 262 is on host 262
2023-07-11 14:16:27,538 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 263 is on host 263
2023-07-11 14:16:27,539 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 264 is on host 264
2023-07-11 14:16:27,539 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 265 is on host 265
2023-07-11 14:16:27,539 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 266 is on host 266
2023-07-11 14:16:27,539 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 267 is on host 267
2023-07-11 14:16:27,539 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 268 is on host 268
2023-07-11 14:16:27,539 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 269 is on host 269
2023-07-11 14:16:27,539 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 270 is on host 270
2023-07-11 14:16:27,539 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 271 is on host 271
2023-07-11 14:16:27,539 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 272 is on host 272
2023-07-11 14:16:27,539 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 273 is on host 273
2023-07-11 14:16:27,539 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 274 is on host 274
2023-07-11 14:16:27,539 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 275 is on host 275
2023-07-11 14:16:27,539 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 276 is on host 276
2023-07-11 14:16:27,539 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 277 is on host 277
2023-07-11 14:16:27,539 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 278 is on host 278
2023-07-11 14:16:27,539 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 279 is on host 279
2023-07-11 14:16:27,539 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 280 is on host 280
2023-07-11 14:16:27,539 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 281 is on host 281
2023-07-11 14:16:27,539 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 282 is on host 282
2023-07-11 14:16:27,539 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 283 is on host 283
2023-07-11 14:16:27,539 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 284 is on host 284
2023-07-11 14:16:27,539 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 285 is on host 285
2023-07-11 14:16:27,539 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 286 is on host 286
2023-07-11 14:16:27,539 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 287 is on host 287
2023-07-11 14:16:27,539 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 288 is on host 288
2023-07-11 14:16:27,539 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 289 is on host 289
2023-07-11 14:16:27,539 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 290 is on host 290
2023-07-11 14:16:27,539 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 291 is on host 291
2023-07-11 14:16:27,539 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 292 is on host 292
2023-07-11 14:16:27,540 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 293 is on host 293
2023-07-11 14:16:27,540 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 294 is on host 294
2023-07-11 14:16:27,540 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 295 is on host 295
2023-07-11 14:16:27,540 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 296 is on host 296
2023-07-11 14:16:27,540 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 297 is on host 297
2023-07-11 14:16:27,540 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 298 is on host 298
2023-07-11 14:16:27,540 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 299 is on host 299
2023-07-11 14:16:27,540 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 300 is on host 300
2023-07-11 14:16:27,540 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 301 is on host 301
2023-07-11 14:16:27,540 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 302 is on host 302
2023-07-11 14:16:27,540 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 303 is on host 303
2023-07-11 14:16:27,540 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 304 is on host 304
2023-07-11 14:16:27,540 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 305 is on host 305
2023-07-11 14:16:27,540 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 306 is on host 306
2023-07-11 14:16:27,540 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 307 is on host 307
2023-07-11 14:16:27,540 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 308 is on host 308
2023-07-11 14:16:27,540 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 309 is on host 309
2023-07-11 14:16:27,540 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 310 is on host 310
2023-07-11 14:16:27,540 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 311 is on host 311
2023-07-11 14:16:27,540 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 312 is on host 312
2023-07-11 14:16:27,540 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 313 is on host 313
2023-07-11 14:16:27,540 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 314 is on host 314
2023-07-11 14:16:27,540 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 315 is on host 315
2023-07-11 14:16:27,540 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 316 is on host 316
2023-07-11 14:16:27,540 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 317 is on host 317
2023-07-11 14:16:27,540 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 318 is on host 318
2023-07-11 14:16:27,540 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 319 is on host 319
2023-07-11 14:16:27,540 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 320 is on host 320
2023-07-11 14:16:27,540 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 321 is on host 321
2023-07-11 14:16:27,541 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 322 is on host 322
2023-07-11 14:16:27,541 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 323 is on host 323
2023-07-11 14:16:27,541 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 324 is on host 324
2023-07-11 14:16:27,541 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 325 is on host 325
2023-07-11 14:16:27,541 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 326 is on host 326
2023-07-11 14:16:27,541 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 327 is on host 327
2023-07-11 14:16:27,541 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 328 is on host 328
2023-07-11 14:16:27,541 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 329 is on host 329
2023-07-11 14:16:27,541 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 330 is on host 330
2023-07-11 14:16:27,541 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 331 is on host 331
2023-07-11 14:16:27,541 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 332 is on host 332
2023-07-11 14:16:27,541 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 333 is on host 333
2023-07-11 14:16:27,541 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 334 is on host 334
2023-07-11 14:16:27,541 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 335 is on host 335
2023-07-11 14:16:27,541 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 336 is on host 336
2023-07-11 14:16:27,541 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 337 is on host 337
2023-07-11 14:16:27,541 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 338 is on host 338
2023-07-11 14:16:27,541 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 339 is on host 339
2023-07-11 14:16:27,541 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 340 is on host 340
2023-07-11 14:16:27,541 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 341 is on host 341
2023-07-11 14:16:27,541 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 342 is on host 342
2023-07-11 14:16:27,541 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 343 is on host 343
2023-07-11 14:16:27,541 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 344 is on host 344
2023-07-11 14:16:27,541 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 345 is on host 345
2023-07-11 14:16:27,541 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 346 is on host 346
2023-07-11 14:16:27,541 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 347 is on host 347
2023-07-11 14:16:27,541 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 348 is on host 348
2023-07-11 14:16:27,541 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 349 is on host 349
2023-07-11 14:16:27,541 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 350 is on host 350
2023-07-11 14:16:27,542 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 351 is on host 351
2023-07-11 14:16:27,542 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 352 is on host 352
2023-07-11 14:16:27,542 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 353 is on host 353
2023-07-11 14:16:27,542 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 354 is on host 354
2023-07-11 14:16:27,542 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 355 is on host 355
2023-07-11 14:16:27,542 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 356 is on host 356
2023-07-11 14:16:27,542 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 357 is on host 357
2023-07-11 14:16:27,542 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 358 is on host 358
2023-07-11 14:16:27,542 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 359 is on host 359
2023-07-11 14:16:27,542 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 360 is on host 360
2023-07-11 14:16:27,542 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 361 is on host 361
2023-07-11 14:16:27,542 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 362 is on host 362
2023-07-11 14:16:27,542 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 363 is on host 363
2023-07-11 14:16:27,542 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 364 is on host 364
2023-07-11 14:16:27,542 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 365 is on host 365
2023-07-11 14:16:27,542 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 366 is on host 366
2023-07-11 14:16:27,542 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 367 is on host 367
2023-07-11 14:16:27,542 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 368 is on host 368
2023-07-11 14:16:27,542 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 369 is on host 369
2023-07-11 14:16:27,542 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 370 is on host 370
2023-07-11 14:16:27,542 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 371 is on host 371
2023-07-11 14:16:27,542 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 372 is on host 372
2023-07-11 14:16:27,542 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 373 is on host 373
2023-07-11 14:16:27,542 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 374 is on host 374
2023-07-11 14:16:27,542 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 375 is on host 375
2023-07-11 14:16:27,542 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 376 is on host 376
2023-07-11 14:16:27,542 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 377 is on host 377
2023-07-11 14:16:27,542 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 378 is on host 378
2023-07-11 14:16:27,542 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 379 is on host 379
2023-07-11 14:16:27,543 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 380 is on host 380
2023-07-11 14:16:27,543 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 381 is on host 381
2023-07-11 14:16:27,543 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 382 is on host 382
2023-07-11 14:16:27,543 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 383 is on host 383
2023-07-11 14:16:27,543 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 384 is on host 384
2023-07-11 14:16:27,543 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 385 is on host 385
2023-07-11 14:16:27,543 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 386 is on host 386
2023-07-11 14:16:27,543 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 387 is on host 387
2023-07-11 14:16:27,543 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 388 is on host 388
2023-07-11 14:16:27,543 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 389 is on host 389
2023-07-11 14:16:27,543 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 390 is on host 390
2023-07-11 14:16:27,543 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 391 is on host 391
2023-07-11 14:16:27,543 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 392 is on host 392
2023-07-11 14:16:27,543 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=393, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:27,543 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table52) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:27,543 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table53
2023-07-11 14:16:27,544 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv553536953=290, srv1630071126=110, srv1071894870=12, srv23511728=232, srv658346947=323, srv2025338799=204, srv1397994335=64, srv1976766403=195, srv1644629726=118, srv957637734=381, srv2079182457=210, srv1749264468=139, srv2046129126=206, srv1595762596=104, srv603990852=307, srv1973073480=194, srv958856137=382, srv644066832=319, srv557062842=292, srv277765671=235, srv732221418=337, srv1769385567=143, srv224612199=228, srv714752528=334, srv362526040=256, srv581128949=296, srv2133511466=223, srv1144239257=30, srv320603627=245, srv1679952521=126, srv2122867873=222, srv1110067064=24, srv256251994=233, srv63261708=317, srv89837390=371, srv552104598=289, srv508952995=281, srv2096011353=214, srv1770417148=144, srv1246723478=42, srv929436444=378, srv2082192429=211, srv234917297=231, srv405700573=266, srv183644386=166, srv1488378513=85, srv173139715=136, srv1154180352=32, srv355693379=252, srv1407521654=66, srv496848057=275, srv1157975499=33, srv1806731027=162, srv1923102804=184, srv311102455=244, srv450011410=271, srv771515724=348, srv389183508=262, srv1249074416=43, srv2014575201=201, srv640847108=318, srv832363565=356, srv1970882134=192, srv2107358603=218, srv855766065=361, srv1336043388=55, srv29397186=237, srv982792848=390, srv976560524=386, srv101181760=3, srv1093549482=21, srv2018389395=202, srv2113483104=221, srv1778339118=149, srv1968709692=190, srv705221118=333, srv159600090=105, srv1919608486=180, srv981255102=389, srv807899713=353, srv755110395=344, srv1770594519=145, srv739692705=340, srv1076582671=16, srv693869315=330, srv1079048717=17, srv440657532=270, srv1636659280=115, srv2108739257=220, srv668373413=326, srv1003610393=2, srv1054229197=11, srv1868589627=172, srv2103522371=217, srv1000546271=0, srv951670617=380, srv2042909593=205, srv1865656038=171, srv1466355012=78, srv703662406=332, srv1418112884=70, srv1215580291=40, srv71833528=335, srv1580581635=103, srv1021032212=5, srv1080806312=19, srv1985601859=197, srv74471954=343, srv1647472319=119, srv2071553346=208, srv1632855171=112, srv1122009370=27, srv13613992=61, srv1630777154=111, srv301413669=239, srv550697728=288, srv1296023857=53, srv1724550977=133, srv1989290370=198, srv1926417985=185, srv1678097199=125, srv1461034373=76, srv614690415=311, srv2098345381=215, srv310463473=243, srv1011934105=4, srv148627129=84, srv305489318=240, srv1256534903=46, srv1289731445=52, srv1798844587=157, srv567113085=294, srv1119222501=26, srv2055117940=207, srv855898852=362, srv629224816=316, srv1075943554=15, srv625909061=315, srv1705591942=128, srv734225580=339, srv660107924=324, srv1381729938=62, srv1633483173=113, srv408265476=267, srv1776057793=148, srv1360253411=60, srv1511424834=90, srv1414162621=68, srv883343663=370, srv151859222=91, srv349144930=251, srv1991304034=199, srv1825887791=164, srv601657063=305, srv758932951=345, srv1651629087=120, srv1864623584=170, srv682957691=329, srv1500454146=88, srv1725962085=135, srv1659841448=121, srv1253206004=45, srv52354442=284, srv18508093=168, srv1427731921=73, srv561344974=293, srv721668125=336, srv1575482138=100, srv914128771=373, srv961487230=383, srv741332941=342, srv533032466=286, srv1574140987=99, srv2139849097=224, srv503902262=278, srv674807007=327, srv1786829855=153, srv2088727517=213, srv394366966=264, srv980089565=388, srv114594288=31, srv38296437=261, srv214835574=226, srv1887224977=176, srv1025509362=7, srv1577020334=102, srv524466665=285, srv393561021=263, srv759909927=346, srv763556514=347, srv786453030=349, srv2142935488=225, srv618111613=312, srv16254163=108, srv343211061=250, srv476075173=273, srv1269632212=47, srv333589612=246, srv499015361=276, srv836674186=357, srv1799191687=158, srv1446998035=74, srv1571774199=98, srv1115354947=25, srv333860881=247, srv1724152600=132, srv1598699299=106, srv177885829=151, srv472125887=272, srv1101339966=22, srv1424985362=72, srv1945569895=188, srv594128294=300, srv1026739237=8, srv842459828=358, srv878519137=366, srv1921260729=181, srv339110834=249, srv504099471=279, srv814253179=354, srv1643744885=116, srv1793847521=155, srv607234624=309, srv698219051=331, srv1688538732=127, srv666240078=325, srv1079284733=18, srv29210550=236, srv506181748=280, srv881313122=368, srv1945452576=187, srv597307897=303, srv1285120424=51, srv1887943816=177, srv1983604698=196, srv1805465940=161, srv309309336=242, srv1719756294=131, srv1349932676=58, srv1208486369=38, srv1643971570=117, srv1509331489=89, srv334105385=248, srv1400515744=65, srv369984715=259, srv43712162=269, srv842675864=359, srv1803258748=160, srv1022450918=6, srv1775108732=147, srv1766088250=141, srv180150732=159, srv1220857227=41, srv226530501=229, srv362032108=255, srv919715380=377, srv1074935976=14, srv1395030819=63, srv803291569=352, srv1877966766=175, srv220538712=227, srv2021718843=203, srv2107782185=219, srv882216860=369, srv1489137852=86, srv1972328734=193, srv1470759982=79, srv1774824811=146, srv971974774=384, srv1418242791=71, srv1001274196=1, srv909615097=372, srv1537724566=93, srv1165799954=34, srv1724754364=134, srv978173525=387, srv113319438=29, srv578033735=295, srv147931272=80, srv1183635941=35, srv1904215245=178, srv596349756=302, srv880835255=367, srv857544550=364, srv1779729022=152, srv1795612465=156, srv621083045=314, srv917704170=375, srv1351811120=59, srv1316710897=54, srv789820555=350, srv1922580095=183, srv305567304=241, srv1936745425=186, srv1745318024=138, srv1210822057=39, srv645375717=320, srv950628389=379, srv1490199189=87, srv1575919256=101, srv154481102=96, srv359402967=254, srv997716931=391, srv1457224273=75, srv581644449=297, srv1872374768=174, srv363177310=257, srv740327512=341, srv1664227236=123, srv972330517=385, srv1634261306=114, srv1662183707=122, srv1969046891=191, srv1485266211=82, srv1778842262=150, srv588410181=298, srv1921840985=182, srv591279493=299, srv37574565=260, srv1104147458=23, srv1190166330=36, srv652270371=322, srv1484309042=81, srv1560148463=97, srv618569548=313, srv2102708311=216, srv1084873074=20, srv517669556=283, srv918152084=376, srv649714317=321, srv1674484790=124, srv1339239880=56, srv1461073271=77, srv1125312901=28, srv25633292=234, srv516616923=282, srv299721745=238, srv604932433=308, srv1273702855=48, srv792183929=351, srv1042608200=10, srv1276335106=49, srv1486044644=83, srv676101698=328, srv998930892=392, srv200111276=200, srv1863083643=169, srv1737443479=137, srv872997185=365, srv821351126=355, srv852115805=360, srv1074355423=13, srv170952194=130, srv503430005=277, srv153887567=94, srv1415163001=69, srv1032737435=9, srv1840670515=167, srv1961921083=189, srv59745831=304, srv36715747=258, srv431547280=268, srv1524853580=92, srv1870059418=173, srv396010771=265, srv594457792=301, srv1755339428=140, srv1766275429=142, srv5565786=291, srv603898526=306, srv544570223=287, srv856030669=363, srv1542523468=95, srv915785747=374, srv356122213=253, srv1411875499=67, srv2077620970=209, srv1345529444=57, srv232339963=230, srv1250861076=44, srv1914875423=179, srv478619481=274, srv1202435626=37, srv1706089454=129, srv1810631201=163, srv1282644061=50, srv1625945288=109, srv733251129=338, srv2082830831=212, srv1612103540=107, srv612136291=310, srv1790004142=154, srv183394703=165} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:27,544 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:27,544 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:27,544 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:27,544 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:27,544 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:27,544 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:27,544 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-11 14:16:27,544 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-11 14:16:27,544 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-11 14:16:27,544 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-11 14:16:27,544 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 10 is on host 10
2023-07-11 14:16:27,544 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 11 is on host 11
2023-07-11 14:16:27,544 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 12 is on host 12
2023-07-11 14:16:27,545 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 13 is on host 13
2023-07-11 14:16:27,545 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 14 is on host 14
2023-07-11 14:16:27,545 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 15 is on host 15
2023-07-11 14:16:27,545 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 16 is on host 16
2023-07-11 14:16:27,545 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 17 is on host 17
2023-07-11 14:16:27,545 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 18 is on host 18
2023-07-11 14:16:27,545 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 19 is on host 19
2023-07-11 14:16:27,545 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 20 is on host 20
2023-07-11 14:16:27,545 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 21 is on host 21
2023-07-11 14:16:27,545 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 22 is on host 22
2023-07-11 14:16:27,545 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 23 is on host 23
2023-07-11 14:16:27,545 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 24 is on host 24
2023-07-11 14:16:27,545 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 25 is on host 25
2023-07-11 14:16:27,545 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 26 is on host 26
2023-07-11 14:16:27,545 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 27 is on host 27
2023-07-11 14:16:27,545 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 28 is on host 28
2023-07-11 14:16:27,545 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 29 is on host 29
2023-07-11 14:16:27,545 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 30 is on host 30
2023-07-11 14:16:27,545 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 31 is on host 31
2023-07-11 14:16:27,545 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 32 is on host 32
2023-07-11 14:16:27,545 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 33 is on host 33
2023-07-11 14:16:27,546 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 34 is on host 34
2023-07-11 14:16:27,546 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 35 is on host 35
2023-07-11 14:16:27,546 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 36 is on host 36
2023-07-11 14:16:27,546 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 37 is on host 37
2023-07-11 14:16:27,546 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 38 is on host 38
2023-07-11 14:16:27,546 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 39 is on host 39
2023-07-11 14:16:27,546 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 40 is on host 40
2023-07-11 14:16:27,546 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 41 is on host 41
2023-07-11 14:16:27,546 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 42 is on host 42
2023-07-11 14:16:27,546 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 43 is on host 43
2023-07-11 14:16:27,546 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 44 is on host 44
2023-07-11 14:16:27,546 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 45 is on host 45
2023-07-11 14:16:27,546 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 46 is on host 46
2023-07-11 14:16:27,546 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 47 is on host 47
2023-07-11 14:16:27,546 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 48 is on host 48
2023-07-11 14:16:27,546 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 49 is on host 49
2023-07-11 14:16:27,546 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 50 is on host 50
2023-07-11 14:16:27,546 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 51 is on host 51
2023-07-11 14:16:27,546 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 52 is on host 52
2023-07-11 14:16:27,546 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 53 is on host 53
2023-07-11 14:16:27,546 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 54 is on host 54
2023-07-11 14:16:27,546 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 55 is on host 55
2023-07-11 14:16:27,546 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 56 is on host 56
2023-07-11 14:16:27,546 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 57 is on host 57
2023-07-11 14:16:27,546 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 58 is on host 58
2023-07-11 14:16:27,546 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 59 is on host 59
2023-07-11 14:16:27,546 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 60 is on host 60
2023-07-11 14:16:27,546 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 61 is on host 61
2023-07-11 14:16:27,546 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 62 is on host 62
2023-07-11 14:16:27,547 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 63 is on host 63
2023-07-11 14:16:27,547 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 64 is on host 64
2023-07-11 14:16:27,547 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 65 is on host 65
2023-07-11 14:16:27,547 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 66 is on host 66
2023-07-11 14:16:27,547 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 67 is on host 67
2023-07-11 14:16:27,547 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 68 is on host 68
2023-07-11 14:16:27,547 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 69 is on host 69
2023-07-11 14:16:27,547 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 70 is on host 70
2023-07-11 14:16:27,547 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 71 is on host 71
2023-07-11 14:16:27,547 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 72 is on host 72
2023-07-11 14:16:27,547 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 73 is on host 73
2023-07-11 14:16:27,547 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 74 is on host 74
2023-07-11 14:16:27,547 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 75 is on host 75
2023-07-11 14:16:27,547 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 76 is on host 76
2023-07-11 14:16:27,547 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 77 is on host 77
2023-07-11 14:16:27,547 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 78 is on host 78
2023-07-11 14:16:27,547 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 79 is on host 79
2023-07-11 14:16:27,547 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 80 is on host 80
2023-07-11 14:16:27,547 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 81 is on host 81
2023-07-11 14:16:27,547 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 82 is on host 82
2023-07-11 14:16:27,547 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 83 is on host 83
2023-07-11 14:16:27,547 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 84 is on host 84
2023-07-11 14:16:27,547 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 85 is on host 85
2023-07-11 14:16:27,547 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 86 is on host 86
2023-07-11 14:16:27,547 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 87 is on host 87
2023-07-11 14:16:27,547 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 88 is on host 88
2023-07-11 14:16:27,547 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 89 is on host 89
2023-07-11 14:16:27,547 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 90 is on host 90
2023-07-11 14:16:27,547 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 91 is on host 91
2023-07-11 14:16:27,548 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 92 is on host 92
2023-07-11 14:16:27,548 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 93 is on host 93
2023-07-11 14:16:27,548 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 94 is on host 94
2023-07-11 14:16:27,548 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 95 is on host 95
2023-07-11 14:16:27,548 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 96 is on host 96
2023-07-11 14:16:27,548 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 97 is on host 97
2023-07-11 14:16:27,548 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 98 is on host 98
2023-07-11 14:16:27,548 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 99 is on host 99
2023-07-11 14:16:27,548 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 100 is on host 100
2023-07-11 14:16:27,548 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 101 is on host 101
2023-07-11 14:16:27,548 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 102 is on host 102
2023-07-11 14:16:27,548 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 103 is on host 103
2023-07-11 14:16:27,548 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 104 is on host 104
2023-07-11 14:16:27,548 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 105 is on host 105
2023-07-11 14:16:27,548 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 106 is on host 106
2023-07-11 14:16:27,548 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 107 is on host 107
2023-07-11 14:16:27,548 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 108 is on host 108
2023-07-11 14:16:27,548 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 109 is on host 109
2023-07-11 14:16:27,548 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 110 is on host 110
2023-07-11 14:16:27,548 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 111 is on host 111
2023-07-11 14:16:27,548 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 112 is on host 112
2023-07-11 14:16:27,548 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 113 is on host 113
2023-07-11 14:16:27,548 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 114 is on host 114
2023-07-11 14:16:27,548 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 115 is on host 115
2023-07-11 14:16:27,548 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 116 is on host 116
2023-07-11 14:16:27,548 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 117 is on host 117
2023-07-11 14:16:27,548 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 118 is on host 118
2023-07-11 14:16:27,548 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 119 is on host 119
2023-07-11 14:16:27,548 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 120 is on host 120
2023-07-11 14:16:27,549 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 121 is on host 121
2023-07-11 14:16:27,549 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 122 is on host 122
2023-07-11 14:16:27,549 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 123 is on host 123
2023-07-11 14:16:27,549 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 124 is on host 124
2023-07-11 14:16:27,549 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 125 is on host 125
2023-07-11 14:16:27,549 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 126 is on host 126
2023-07-11 14:16:27,549 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 127 is on host 127
2023-07-11 14:16:27,549 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 128 is on host 128
2023-07-11 14:16:27,549 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 129 is on host 129
2023-07-11 14:16:27,549 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 130 is on host 130
2023-07-11 14:16:27,549 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 131 is on host 131
2023-07-11 14:16:27,549 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 132 is on host 132
2023-07-11 14:16:27,549 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 133 is on host 133
2023-07-11 14:16:27,549 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 134 is on host 134
2023-07-11 14:16:27,549 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 135 is on host 135
2023-07-11 14:16:27,549 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 136 is on host 136
2023-07-11 14:16:27,549 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 137 is on host 137
2023-07-11 14:16:27,549 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 138 is on host 138
2023-07-11 14:16:27,549 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 139 is on host 139
2023-07-11 14:16:27,549 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 140 is on host 140
2023-07-11 14:16:27,549 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 141 is on host 141
2023-07-11 14:16:27,549 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 142 is on host 142
2023-07-11 14:16:27,549 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 143 is on host 143
2023-07-11 14:16:27,549 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 144 is on host 144
2023-07-11 14:16:27,549 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 145 is on host 145
2023-07-11 14:16:27,549 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 146 is on host 146
2023-07-11 14:16:27,549 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 147 is on host 147
2023-07-11 14:16:27,549 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 148 is on host 148
2023-07-11 14:16:27,550 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 149 is on host 149
2023-07-11 14:16:27,550 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 150 is on host 150
2023-07-11 14:16:27,550 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 151 is on host 151
2023-07-11 14:16:27,550 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 152 is on host 152
2023-07-11 14:16:27,550 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 153 is on host 153
2023-07-11 14:16:27,550 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 154 is on host 154
2023-07-11 14:16:27,550 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 155 is on host 155
2023-07-11 14:16:27,550 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 156 is on host 156
2023-07-11 14:16:27,550 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 157 is on host 157
2023-07-11 14:16:27,550 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 158 is on host 158
2023-07-11 14:16:27,550 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 159 is on host 159
2023-07-11 14:16:27,550 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 160 is on host 160
2023-07-11 14:16:27,550 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 161 is on host 161
2023-07-11 14:16:27,550 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 162 is on host 162
2023-07-11 14:16:27,550 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 163 is on host 163
2023-07-11 14:16:27,550 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 164 is on host 164
2023-07-11 14:16:27,550 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 165 is on host 165
2023-07-11 14:16:27,550 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 166 is on host 166
2023-07-11 14:16:27,550 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 167 is on host 167
2023-07-11 14:16:27,550 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 168 is on host 168
2023-07-11 14:16:27,550 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 169 is on host 169
2023-07-11 14:16:27,550 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 170 is on host 170
2023-07-11 14:16:27,550 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 171 is on host 171
2023-07-11 14:16:27,550 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 172 is on host 172
2023-07-11 14:16:27,550 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 173 is on host 173
2023-07-11 14:16:27,550 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 174 is on host 174
2023-07-11 14:16:27,550 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 175 is on host 175
2023-07-11 14:16:27,550 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 176 is on host 176
2023-07-11 14:16:27,550 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 177 is on host 177
2023-07-11 14:16:27,551 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 178 is on host 178
2023-07-11 14:16:27,551 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 179 is on host 179
2023-07-11 14:16:27,551 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 180 is on host 180
2023-07-11 14:16:27,551 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 181 is on host 181
2023-07-11 14:16:27,551 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 182 is on host 182
2023-07-11 14:16:27,551 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 183 is on host 183
2023-07-11 14:16:27,551 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 184 is on host 184
2023-07-11 14:16:27,551 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 185 is on host 185
2023-07-11 14:16:27,551 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 186 is on host 186
2023-07-11 14:16:27,551 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 187 is on host 187
2023-07-11 14:16:27,551 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 188 is on host 188
2023-07-11 14:16:27,551 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 189 is on host 189
2023-07-11 14:16:27,551 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 190 is on host 190
2023-07-11 14:16:27,551 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 191 is on host 191
2023-07-11 14:16:27,551 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 192 is on host 192
2023-07-11 14:16:27,551 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 193 is on host 193
2023-07-11 14:16:27,551 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 194 is on host 194
2023-07-11 14:16:27,551 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 195 is on host 195
2023-07-11 14:16:27,551 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 196 is on host 196
2023-07-11 14:16:27,551 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 197 is on host 197
2023-07-11 14:16:27,551 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 198 is on host 198
2023-07-11 14:16:27,551 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 199 is on host 199
2023-07-11 14:16:27,551 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 200 is on host 200
2023-07-11 14:16:27,551 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 201 is on host 201
2023-07-11 14:16:27,551 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 202 is on host 202
2023-07-11 14:16:27,551 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 203 is on host 203
2023-07-11 14:16:27,551 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 204 is on host 204
2023-07-11 14:16:27,551 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 205 is on host 205
2023-07-11 14:16:27,551 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 206 is on host 206
2023-07-11 14:16:27,551 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 207 is on host 207
2023-07-11 14:16:27,552 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 208 is on host 208
2023-07-11 14:16:27,552 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 209 is on host 209
2023-07-11 14:16:27,552 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 210 is on host 210
2023-07-11 14:16:27,552 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 211 is on host 211
2023-07-11 14:16:27,552 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 212 is on host 212
2023-07-11 14:16:27,552 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 213 is on host 213
2023-07-11 14:16:27,552 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 214 is on host 214
2023-07-11 14:16:27,552 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 215 is on host 215
2023-07-11 14:16:27,552 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 216 is on host 216
2023-07-11 14:16:27,552 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 217 is on host 217
2023-07-11 14:16:27,552 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 218 is on host 218
2023-07-11 14:16:27,552 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 219 is on host 219
2023-07-11 14:16:27,552 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 220 is on host 220
2023-07-11 14:16:27,552 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 221 is on host 221
2023-07-11 14:16:27,552 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 222 is on host 222
2023-07-11 14:16:27,552 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 223 is on host 223
2023-07-11 14:16:27,552 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 224 is on host 224
2023-07-11 14:16:27,552 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 225 is on host 225
2023-07-11 14:16:27,552 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 226 is on host 226
2023-07-11 14:16:27,552 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 227 is on host 227
2023-07-11 14:16:27,552 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 228 is on host 228
2023-07-11 14:16:27,552 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 229 is on host 229
2023-07-11 14:16:27,552 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 230 is on host 230
2023-07-11 14:16:27,552 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 231 is on host 231
2023-07-11 14:16:27,552 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 232 is on host 232
2023-07-11 14:16:27,552 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 233 is on host 233
2023-07-11 14:16:27,552 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 234 is on host 234
2023-07-11 14:16:27,552 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 235 is on host 235
2023-07-11 14:16:27,553 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 236 is on host 236
2023-07-11 14:16:27,553 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 237 is on host 237
2023-07-11 14:16:27,553 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 238 is on host 238
2023-07-11 14:16:27,553 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 239 is on host 239
2023-07-11 14:16:27,553 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 240 is on host 240
2023-07-11 14:16:27,553 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 241 is on host 241
2023-07-11 14:16:27,553 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 242 is on host 242
2023-07-11 14:16:27,553 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 243 is on host 243
2023-07-11 14:16:27,553 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 244 is on host 244
2023-07-11 14:16:27,553 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 245 is on host 245
2023-07-11 14:16:27,553 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 246 is on host 246
2023-07-11 14:16:27,553 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 247 is on host 247
2023-07-11 14:16:27,553 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 248 is on host 248
2023-07-11 14:16:27,553 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 249 is on host 249
2023-07-11 14:16:27,553 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 250 is on host 250
2023-07-11 14:16:27,553 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 251 is on host 251
2023-07-11 14:16:27,553 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 252 is on host 252
2023-07-11 14:16:27,553 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 253 is on host 253
2023-07-11 14:16:27,553 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 254 is on host 254
2023-07-11 14:16:27,553 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 255 is on host 255
2023-07-11 14:16:27,553 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 256 is on host 256
2023-07-11 14:16:27,553 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 257 is on host 257
2023-07-11 14:16:27,553 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 258 is on host 258
2023-07-11 14:16:27,553 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 259 is on host 259
2023-07-11 14:16:27,553 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 260 is on host 260
2023-07-11 14:16:27,553 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 261 is on host 261
2023-07-11 14:16:27,553 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 262 is on host 262
2023-07-11 14:16:27,553 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 263 is on host 263
2023-07-11 14:16:27,553 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 264 is on host 264
2023-07-11 14:16:27,554 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 265 is on host 265
2023-07-11 14:16:27,554 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 266 is on host 266
2023-07-11 14:16:27,554 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 267 is on host 267
2023-07-11 14:16:27,554 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 268 is on host 268
2023-07-11 14:16:27,554 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 269 is on host 269
2023-07-11 14:16:27,554 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 270 is on host 270
2023-07-11 14:16:27,554 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 271 is on host 271
2023-07-11 14:16:27,554 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 272 is on host 272
2023-07-11 14:16:27,554 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 273 is on host 273
2023-07-11 14:16:27,554 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 274 is on host 274
2023-07-11 14:16:27,554 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 275 is on host 275
2023-07-11 14:16:27,554 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 276 is on host 276
2023-07-11 14:16:27,554 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 277 is on host 277
2023-07-11 14:16:27,554 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 278 is on host 278
2023-07-11 14:16:27,554 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 279 is on host 279
2023-07-11 14:16:27,554 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 280 is on host 280
2023-07-11 14:16:27,554 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 281 is on host 281
2023-07-11 14:16:27,554 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 282 is on host 282
2023-07-11 14:16:27,554 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 283 is on host 283
2023-07-11 14:16:27,554 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 284 is on host 284
2023-07-11 14:16:27,554 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 285 is on host 285
2023-07-11 14:16:27,554 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 286 is on host 286
2023-07-11 14:16:27,554 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 287 is on host 287
2023-07-11 14:16:27,554 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 288 is on host 288
2023-07-11 14:16:27,554 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 289 is on host 289
2023-07-11 14:16:27,554 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 290 is on host 290
2023-07-11 14:16:27,554 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 291 is on host 291
2023-07-11 14:16:27,554 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 292 is on host 292
2023-07-11 14:16:27,554 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 293 is on host 293
2023-07-11 14:16:27,555 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 294 is on host 294
2023-07-11 14:16:27,555 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 295 is on host 295
2023-07-11 14:16:27,555 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 296 is on host 296
2023-07-11 14:16:27,555 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 297 is on host 297
2023-07-11 14:16:27,555 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 298 is on host 298
2023-07-11 14:16:27,555 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 299 is on host 299
2023-07-11 14:16:27,555 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 300 is on host 300
2023-07-11 14:16:27,555 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 301 is on host 301
2023-07-11 14:16:27,555 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 302 is on host 302
2023-07-11 14:16:27,555 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 303 is on host 303
2023-07-11 14:16:27,555 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 304 is on host 304
2023-07-11 14:16:27,555 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 305 is on host 305
2023-07-11 14:16:27,555 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 306 is on host 306
2023-07-11 14:16:27,555 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 307 is on host 307
2023-07-11 14:16:27,555 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 308 is on host 308
2023-07-11 14:16:27,555 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 309 is on host 309
2023-07-11 14:16:27,555 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 310 is on host 310
2023-07-11 14:16:27,555 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 311 is on host 311
2023-07-11 14:16:27,555 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 312 is on host 312
2023-07-11 14:16:27,555 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 313 is on host 313
2023-07-11 14:16:27,555 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 314 is on host 314
2023-07-11 14:16:27,555 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 315 is on host 315
2023-07-11 14:16:27,555 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 316 is on host 316
2023-07-11 14:16:27,555 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 317 is on host 317
2023-07-11 14:16:27,555 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 318 is on host 318
2023-07-11 14:16:27,555 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 319 is on host 319
2023-07-11 14:16:27,555 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 320 is on host 320
2023-07-11 14:16:27,555 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 321 is on host 321
2023-07-11 14:16:27,555 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 322 is on host 322
2023-07-11 14:16:27,556 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 323 is on host 323
2023-07-11 14:16:27,556 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 324 is on host 324
2023-07-11 14:16:27,556 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 325 is on host 325
2023-07-11 14:16:27,556 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 326 is on host 326
2023-07-11 14:16:27,556 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 327 is on host 327
2023-07-11 14:16:27,556 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 328 is on host 328
2023-07-11 14:16:27,556 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 329 is on host 329
2023-07-11 14:16:27,556 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 330 is on host 330
2023-07-11 14:16:27,556 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 331 is on host 331
2023-07-11 14:16:27,556 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 332 is on host 332
2023-07-11 14:16:27,556 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 333 is on host 333
2023-07-11 14:16:27,556 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 334 is on host 334
2023-07-11 14:16:27,556 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 335 is on host 335
2023-07-11 14:16:27,556 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 336 is on host 336
2023-07-11 14:16:27,556 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 337 is on host 337
2023-07-11 14:16:27,556 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 338 is on host 338
2023-07-11 14:16:27,556 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 339 is on host 339
2023-07-11 14:16:27,556 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 340 is on host 340
2023-07-11 14:16:27,556 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 341 is on host 341
2023-07-11 14:16:27,556 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 342 is on host 342
2023-07-11 14:16:27,556 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 343 is on host 343
2023-07-11 14:16:27,556 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 344 is on host 344
2023-07-11 14:16:27,556 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 345 is on host 345
2023-07-11 14:16:27,556 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 346 is on host 346
2023-07-11 14:16:27,556 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 347 is on host 347
2023-07-11 14:16:27,556 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 348 is on host 348
2023-07-11 14:16:27,556 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 349 is on host 349
2023-07-11 14:16:27,556 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 350 is on host 350
2023-07-11 14:16:27,556 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 351 is on host 351
2023-07-11 14:16:27,557 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 352 is on host 352
2023-07-11 14:16:27,557 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 353 is on host 353
2023-07-11 14:16:27,557 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 354 is on host 354
2023-07-11 14:16:27,557 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 355 is on host 355
2023-07-11 14:16:27,557 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 356 is on host 356
2023-07-11 14:16:27,557 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 357 is on host 357
2023-07-11 14:16:27,557 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 358 is on host 358
2023-07-11 14:16:27,557 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 359 is on host 359
2023-07-11 14:16:27,557 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 360 is on host 360
2023-07-11 14:16:27,557 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 361 is on host 361
2023-07-11 14:16:27,557 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 362 is on host 362
2023-07-11 14:16:27,557 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 363 is on host 363
2023-07-11 14:16:27,557 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 364 is on host 364
2023-07-11 14:16:27,557 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 365 is on host 365
2023-07-11 14:16:27,557 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 366 is on host 366
2023-07-11 14:16:27,557 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 367 is on host 367
2023-07-11 14:16:27,557 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 368 is on host 368
2023-07-11 14:16:27,557 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 369 is on host 369
2023-07-11 14:16:27,557 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 370 is on host 370
2023-07-11 14:16:27,558 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 371 is on host 371
2023-07-11 14:16:27,558 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 372 is on host 372
2023-07-11 14:16:27,558 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 373 is on host 373
2023-07-11 14:16:27,558 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 374 is on host 374
2023-07-11 14:16:27,558 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 375 is on host 375
2023-07-11 14:16:27,558 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 376 is on host 376
2023-07-11 14:16:27,558 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 377 is on host 377
2023-07-11 14:16:27,558 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 378 is on host 378
2023-07-11 14:16:27,558 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 379 is on host 379
2023-07-11 14:16:27,558 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 380 is on host 380
2023-07-11 14:16:27,558 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 381 is on host 381
2023-07-11 14:16:27,558 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 382 is on host 382
2023-07-11 14:16:27,558 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 383 is on host 383
2023-07-11 14:16:27,558 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 384 is on host 384
2023-07-11 14:16:27,558 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 385 is on host 385
2023-07-11 14:16:27,558 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 386 is on host 386
2023-07-11 14:16:27,558 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 387 is on host 387
2023-07-11 14:16:27,558 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 388 is on host 388
2023-07-11 14:16:27,558 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 389 is on host 389
2023-07-11 14:16:27,558 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 390 is on host 390
2023-07-11 14:16:27,558 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 391 is on host 391
2023-07-11 14:16:27,558 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 392 is on host 392
2023-07-11 14:16:27,558 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=393, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:27,559 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table53) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:27,559 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table10
2023-07-11 14:16:27,559 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv553536953=290, srv1630071126=110, srv1071894870=12, srv23511728=232, srv658346947=323, srv2025338799=204, srv1397994335=64, srv1976766403=195, srv1644629726=118, srv957637734=381, srv2079182457=210, srv1749264468=139, srv2046129126=206, srv1595762596=104, srv603990852=307, srv1973073480=194, srv958856137=382, srv644066832=319, srv557062842=292, srv277765671=235, srv732221418=337, srv1769385567=143, srv224612199=228, srv714752528=334, srv362526040=256, srv581128949=296, srv2133511466=223, srv1144239257=30, srv320603627=245, srv1679952521=126, srv2122867873=222, srv1110067064=24, srv256251994=233, srv63261708=317, srv89837390=371, srv552104598=289, srv508952995=281, srv2096011353=214, srv1770417148=144, srv1246723478=42, srv929436444=378, srv2082192429=211, srv234917297=231, srv405700573=266, srv183644386=166, srv1488378513=85, srv173139715=136, srv1154180352=32, srv355693379=252, srv1407521654=66, srv496848057=275, srv1157975499=33, srv1806731027=162, srv1923102804=184, srv311102455=244, srv450011410=271, srv771515724=348, srv389183508=262, srv1249074416=43, srv2014575201=201, srv640847108=318, srv832363565=356, srv1970882134=192, srv2107358603=218, srv855766065=361, srv1336043388=55, srv29397186=237, srv982792848=390, srv976560524=386, srv101181760=3, srv1093549482=21, srv2018389395=202, srv2113483104=221, srv1778339118=149, srv1968709692=190, srv705221118=333, srv159600090=105, srv1919608486=180, srv981255102=389, srv807899713=353, srv755110395=344, srv1770594519=145, srv739692705=340, srv1076582671=16, srv693869315=330, srv1079048717=17, srv440657532=270, srv1636659280=115, srv2108739257=220, srv668373413=326, srv1003610393=2, srv1054229197=11, srv1868589627=172, srv2103522371=217, srv1000546271=0, srv951670617=380, srv2042909593=205, srv1865656038=171, srv1466355012=78, srv703662406=332, srv1418112884=70, srv1215580291=40, srv71833528=335, srv1580581635=103, srv1021032212=5, srv1080806312=19, srv1985601859=197, srv74471954=343, srv1647472319=119, srv2071553346=208, srv1632855171=112, srv1122009370=27, srv13613992=61, srv1630777154=111, srv301413669=239, srv550697728=288, srv1296023857=53, srv1724550977=133, srv1989290370=198, srv1926417985=185, srv1678097199=125, srv1461034373=76, srv614690415=311, srv2098345381=215, srv310463473=243, srv1011934105=4, srv148627129=84, srv305489318=240, srv1256534903=46, srv1289731445=52, srv1798844587=157, srv567113085=294, srv1119222501=26, srv2055117940=207, srv855898852=362, srv629224816=316, srv1075943554=15, srv625909061=315, srv1705591942=128, srv734225580=339, srv660107924=324, srv1381729938=62, srv1633483173=113, srv408265476=267, srv1776057793=148, srv1360253411=60, srv1511424834=90, srv1414162621=68, srv883343663=370, srv151859222=91, srv349144930=251, srv1991304034=199, srv1825887791=164, srv601657063=305, srv758932951=345, srv1651629087=120, srv1864623584=170, srv682957691=329, srv1500454146=88, srv1725962085=135, srv1659841448=121, srv1253206004=45, srv52354442=284, srv18508093=168, srv1427731921=73, srv561344974=293, srv721668125=336, srv1575482138=100, srv914128771=373, srv961487230=383, srv741332941=342, srv533032466=286, srv1574140987=99, srv2139849097=224, srv503902262=278, srv674807007=327, srv1786829855=153, srv2088727517=213, srv394366966=264, srv980089565=388, srv114594288=31, srv38296437=261, srv214835574=226, srv1887224977=176, srv1025509362=7, srv1577020334=102, srv524466665=285, srv393561021=263, srv759909927=346, srv763556514=347, srv786453030=349, srv2142935488=225, srv618111613=312, srv16254163=108, srv343211061=250, srv476075173=273, srv1269632212=47, srv333589612=246, srv499015361=276, srv836674186=357, srv1799191687=158, srv1446998035=74, srv1571774199=98, srv1115354947=25, srv333860881=247, srv1724152600=132, srv1598699299=106, srv177885829=151, srv472125887=272, srv1101339966=22, srv1424985362=72, srv1945569895=188, srv594128294=300, srv1026739237=8, srv842459828=358, srv878519137=366, srv1921260729=181, srv339110834=249, srv504099471=279, srv814253179=354, srv1643744885=116, srv1793847521=155, srv607234624=309, srv698219051=331, srv1688538732=127, srv666240078=325, srv1079284733=18, srv29210550=236, srv506181748=280, srv881313122=368, srv1945452576=187, srv597307897=303, srv1285120424=51, srv1887943816=177, srv1983604698=196, srv1805465940=161, srv309309336=242, srv1719756294=131, srv1349932676=58, srv1208486369=38, srv1643971570=117, srv1509331489=89, srv334105385=248, srv1400515744=65, srv369984715=259, srv43712162=269, srv842675864=359, srv1803258748=160, srv1022450918=6, srv1775108732=147, srv1766088250=141, srv180150732=159, srv1220857227=41, srv226530501=229, srv362032108=255, srv919715380=377, srv1074935976=14, srv1395030819=63, srv803291569=352, srv1877966766=175, srv220538712=227, srv2021718843=203, srv2107782185=219, srv882216860=369, srv1489137852=86, srv1972328734=193, srv1470759982=79, srv1774824811=146, srv971974774=384, srv1418242791=71, srv1001274196=1, srv909615097=372, srv1537724566=93, srv1165799954=34, srv1724754364=134, srv978173525=387, srv113319438=29, srv578033735=295, srv147931272=80, srv1183635941=35, srv1904215245=178, srv596349756=302, srv880835255=367, srv857544550=364, srv1779729022=152, srv1795612465=156, srv621083045=314, srv917704170=375, srv1351811120=59, srv1316710897=54, srv789820555=350, srv1922580095=183, srv305567304=241, srv1936745425=186, srv1745318024=138, srv1210822057=39, srv645375717=320, srv950628389=379, srv1490199189=87, srv1575919256=101, srv154481102=96, srv359402967=254, srv997716931=391, srv1457224273=75, srv581644449=297, srv1872374768=174, srv363177310=257, srv740327512=341, srv1664227236=123, srv972330517=385, srv1634261306=114, srv1662183707=122, srv1969046891=191, srv1485266211=82, srv1778842262=150, srv588410181=298, srv1921840985=182, srv591279493=299, srv37574565=260, srv1104147458=23, srv1190166330=36, srv652270371=322, srv1484309042=81, srv1560148463=97, srv618569548=313, srv2102708311=216, srv1084873074=20, srv517669556=283, srv918152084=376, srv649714317=321, srv1674484790=124, srv1339239880=56, srv1461073271=77, srv1125312901=28, srv25633292=234, srv516616923=282, srv299721745=238, srv604932433=308, srv1273702855=48, srv792183929=351, srv1042608200=10, srv1276335106=49, srv1486044644=83, srv676101698=328, srv998930892=392, srv200111276=200, srv1863083643=169, srv1737443479=137, srv872997185=365, srv821351126=355, srv852115805=360, srv1074355423=13, srv170952194=130, srv503430005=277, srv153887567=94, srv1415163001=69, srv1032737435=9, srv1840670515=167, srv1961921083=189, srv59745831=304, srv36715747=258, srv431547280=268, srv1524853580=92, srv1870059418=173, srv396010771=265, srv594457792=301, srv1755339428=140, srv1766275429=142, srv5565786=291, srv603898526=306, srv544570223=287, srv856030669=363, srv1542523468=95, srv915785747=374, srv356122213=253, srv1411875499=67, srv2077620970=209, srv1345529444=57, srv232339963=230, srv1250861076=44, srv1914875423=179, srv478619481=274, srv1202435626=37, srv1706089454=129, srv1810631201=163, srv1282644061=50, srv1625945288=109, srv733251129=338, srv2082830831=212, srv1612103540=107, srv612136291=310, srv1790004142=154, srv183394703=165} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:27,559 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:27,559 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:27,559 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:27,559 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:27,559 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:27,559 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:27,560 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-11 14:16:27,560 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-11 14:16:27,560 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-11 14:16:27,560 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-11 14:16:27,560 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 10 is on host 10
2023-07-11 14:16:27,560 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 11 is on host 11
2023-07-11 14:16:27,560 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 12 is on host 12
2023-07-11 14:16:27,560 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 13 is on host 13
2023-07-11 14:16:27,560 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 14 is on host 14
2023-07-11 14:16:27,560 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 15 is on host 15
2023-07-11 14:16:27,560 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 16 is on host 16
2023-07-11 14:16:27,560 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 17 is on host 17
2023-07-11 14:16:27,560 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 18 is on host 18
2023-07-11 14:16:27,560 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 19 is on host 19
2023-07-11 14:16:27,560 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 20 is on host 20
2023-07-11 14:16:27,560 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 21 is on host 21
2023-07-11 14:16:27,560 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 22 is on host 22
2023-07-11 14:16:27,560 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 23 is on host 23
2023-07-11 14:16:27,560 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 24 is on host 24
2023-07-11 14:16:27,560 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 25 is on host 25
2023-07-11 14:16:27,560 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 26 is on host 26
2023-07-11 14:16:27,560 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 27 is on host 27
2023-07-11 14:16:27,560 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 28 is on host 28
2023-07-11 14:16:27,560 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 29 is on host 29
2023-07-11 14:16:27,560 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 30 is on host 30
2023-07-11 14:16:27,560 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 31 is on host 31
2023-07-11 14:16:27,560 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 32 is on host 32
2023-07-11 14:16:27,560 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 33 is on host 33
2023-07-11 14:16:27,561 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 34 is on host 34
2023-07-11 14:16:27,561 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 35 is on host 35
2023-07-11 14:16:27,561 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 36 is on host 36
2023-07-11 14:16:27,561 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 37 is on host 37
2023-07-11 14:16:27,561 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 38 is on host 38
2023-07-11 14:16:27,561 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 39 is on host 39
2023-07-11 14:16:27,561 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 40 is on host 40
2023-07-11 14:16:27,561 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 41 is on host 41
2023-07-11 14:16:27,561 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 42 is on host 42
2023-07-11 14:16:27,561 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 43 is on host 43
2023-07-11 14:16:27,561 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 44 is on host 44
2023-07-11 14:16:27,561 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 45 is on host 45
2023-07-11 14:16:27,561 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 46 is on host 46
2023-07-11 14:16:27,561 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 47 is on host 47
2023-07-11 14:16:27,561 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 48 is on host 48
2023-07-11 14:16:27,561 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 49 is on host 49
2023-07-11 14:16:27,561 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 50 is on host 50
2023-07-11 14:16:27,561 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 51 is on host 51
2023-07-11 14:16:27,561 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 52 is on host 52
2023-07-11 14:16:27,561 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 53 is on host 53
2023-07-11 14:16:27,561 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 54 is on host 54
2023-07-11 14:16:27,561 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 55 is on host 55
2023-07-11 14:16:27,561 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 56 is on host 56
2023-07-11 14:16:27,561 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 57 is on host 57
2023-07-11 14:16:27,561 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 58 is on host 58
2023-07-11 14:16:27,561 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 59 is on host 59
2023-07-11 14:16:27,561 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 60 is on host 60
2023-07-11 14:16:27,561 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 61 is on host 61
2023-07-11 14:16:27,561 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 62 is on host 62
2023-07-11 14:16:27,562 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 63 is on host 63
2023-07-11 14:16:27,562 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 64 is on host 64
2023-07-11 14:16:27,562 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 65 is on host 65
2023-07-11 14:16:27,562 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 66 is on host 66
2023-07-11 14:16:27,562 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 67 is on host 67
2023-07-11 14:16:27,562 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 68 is on host 68
2023-07-11 14:16:27,562 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 69 is on host 69
2023-07-11 14:16:27,562 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 70 is on host 70
2023-07-11 14:16:27,562 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 71 is on host 71
2023-07-11 14:16:27,562 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 72 is on host 72
2023-07-11 14:16:27,562 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 73 is on host 73
2023-07-11 14:16:27,562 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 74 is on host 74
2023-07-11 14:16:27,562 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 75 is on host 75
2023-07-11 14:16:27,562 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 76 is on host 76
2023-07-11 14:16:27,562 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 77 is on host 77
2023-07-11 14:16:27,562 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 78 is on host 78
2023-07-11 14:16:27,562 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 79 is on host 79
2023-07-11 14:16:27,562 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 80 is on host 80
2023-07-11 14:16:27,562 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 81 is on host 81
2023-07-11 14:16:27,562 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 82 is on host 82
2023-07-11 14:16:27,562 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 83 is on host 83
2023-07-11 14:16:27,562 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 84 is on host 84
2023-07-11 14:16:27,562 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 85 is on host 85
2023-07-11 14:16:27,562 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 86 is on host 86
2023-07-11 14:16:27,562 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 87 is on host 87
2023-07-11 14:16:27,562 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 88 is on host 88
2023-07-11 14:16:27,562 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 89 is on host 89
2023-07-11 14:16:27,562 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 90 is on host 90
2023-07-11 14:16:27,562 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 91 is on host 91
2023-07-11 14:16:27,563 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 92 is on host 92
2023-07-11 14:16:27,563 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 93 is on host 93
2023-07-11 14:16:27,563 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 94 is on host 94
2023-07-11 14:16:27,563 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 95 is on host 95
2023-07-11 14:16:27,563 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 96 is on host 96
2023-07-11 14:16:27,563 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 97 is on host 97
2023-07-11 14:16:27,563 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 98 is on host 98
2023-07-11 14:16:27,563 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 99 is on host 99
2023-07-11 14:16:27,563 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 100 is on host 100
2023-07-11 14:16:27,563 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 101 is on host 101
2023-07-11 14:16:27,563 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 102 is on host 102
2023-07-11 14:16:27,563 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 103 is on host 103
2023-07-11 14:16:27,563 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 104 is on host 104
2023-07-11 14:16:27,563 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 105 is on host 105
2023-07-11 14:16:27,563 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 106 is on host 106
2023-07-11 14:16:27,563 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 107 is on host 107
2023-07-11 14:16:27,563 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 108 is on host 108
2023-07-11 14:16:27,563 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 109 is on host 109
2023-07-11 14:16:27,563 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 110 is on host 110
2023-07-11 14:16:27,563 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 111 is on host 111
2023-07-11 14:16:27,563 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 112 is on host 112
2023-07-11 14:16:27,563 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 113 is on host 113
2023-07-11 14:16:27,563 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 114 is on host 114
2023-07-11 14:16:27,563 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 115 is on host 115
2023-07-11 14:16:27,563 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 116 is on host 116
2023-07-11 14:16:27,563 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 117 is on host 117
2023-07-11 14:16:27,563 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 118 is on host 118
2023-07-11 14:16:27,563 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 119 is on host 119
2023-07-11 14:16:27,563 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 120 is on host 120
2023-07-11 14:16:27,564 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 121 is on host 121
2023-07-11 14:16:27,564 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 122 is on host 122
2023-07-11 14:16:27,564 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 123 is on host 123
2023-07-11 14:16:27,564 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 124 is on host 124
2023-07-11 14:16:27,564 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 125 is on host 125
2023-07-11 14:16:27,564 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 126 is on host 126
2023-07-11 14:16:27,564 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 127 is on host 127
2023-07-11 14:16:27,564 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 128 is on host 128
2023-07-11 14:16:27,564 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 129 is on host 129
2023-07-11 14:16:27,564 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 130 is on host 130
2023-07-11 14:16:27,564 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 131 is on host 131
2023-07-11 14:16:27,564 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 132 is on host 132
2023-07-11 14:16:27,564 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 133 is on host 133
2023-07-11 14:16:27,564 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 134 is on host 134
2023-07-11 14:16:27,564 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 135 is on host 135
2023-07-11 14:16:27,564 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 136 is on host 136
2023-07-11 14:16:27,564 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 137 is on host 137
2023-07-11 14:16:27,564 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 138 is on host 138
2023-07-11 14:16:27,564 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 139 is on host 139
2023-07-11 14:16:27,564 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 140 is on host 140
2023-07-11 14:16:27,564 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 141 is on host 141
2023-07-11 14:16:27,564 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 142 is on host 142
2023-07-11 14:16:27,564 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 143 is on host 143
2023-07-11 14:16:27,564 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 144 is on host 144
2023-07-11 14:16:27,564 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 145 is on host 145
2023-07-11 14:16:27,564 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 146 is on host 146
2023-07-11 14:16:27,564 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 147 is on host 147
2023-07-11 14:16:27,564 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 148 is on host 148
2023-07-11 14:16:27,565 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 149 is on host 149
2023-07-11 14:16:27,565 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 150 is on host 150
2023-07-11 14:16:27,565 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 151 is on host 151
2023-07-11 14:16:27,565 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 152 is on host 152
2023-07-11 14:16:27,565 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 153 is on host 153
2023-07-11 14:16:27,565 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 154 is on host 154
2023-07-11 14:16:27,565 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 155 is on host 155
2023-07-11 14:16:27,565 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 156 is on host 156
2023-07-11 14:16:27,565 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 157 is on host 157
2023-07-11 14:16:27,565 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 158 is on host 158
2023-07-11 14:16:27,565 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 159 is on host 159
2023-07-11 14:16:27,565 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 160 is on host 160
2023-07-11 14:16:27,565 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 161 is on host 161
2023-07-11 14:16:27,565 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 162 is on host 162
2023-07-11 14:16:27,565 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 163 is on host 163
2023-07-11 14:16:27,565 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 164 is on host 164
2023-07-11 14:16:27,565 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 165 is on host 165
2023-07-11 14:16:27,565 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 166 is on host 166
2023-07-11 14:16:27,565 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 167 is on host 167
2023-07-11 14:16:27,565 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 168 is on host 168
2023-07-11 14:16:27,565 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 169 is on host 169
2023-07-11 14:16:27,565 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 170 is on host 170
2023-07-11 14:16:27,565 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 171 is on host 171
2023-07-11 14:16:27,565 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 172 is on host 172
2023-07-11 14:16:27,565 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 173 is on host 173
2023-07-11 14:16:27,565 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 174 is on host 174
2023-07-11 14:16:27,565 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 175 is on host 175
2023-07-11 14:16:27,565 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 176 is on host 176
2023-07-11 14:16:27,565 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 177 is on host 177
2023-07-11 14:16:27,566 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 178 is on host 178
2023-07-11 14:16:27,566 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 179 is on host 179
2023-07-11 14:16:27,566 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 180 is on host 180
2023-07-11 14:16:27,566 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 181 is on host 181
2023-07-11 14:16:27,566 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 182 is on host 182
2023-07-11 14:16:27,566 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 183 is on host 183
2023-07-11 14:16:27,566 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 184 is on host 184
2023-07-11 14:16:27,566 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 185 is on host 185
2023-07-11 14:16:27,566 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 186 is on host 186
2023-07-11 14:16:27,566 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 187 is on host 187
2023-07-11 14:16:27,566 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 188 is on host 188
2023-07-11 14:16:27,566 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 189 is on host 189
2023-07-11 14:16:27,566 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 190 is on host 190
2023-07-11 14:16:27,566 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 191 is on host 191
2023-07-11 14:16:27,566 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 192 is on host 192
2023-07-11 14:16:27,566 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 193 is on host 193
2023-07-11 14:16:27,566 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 194 is on host 194
2023-07-11 14:16:27,566 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 195 is on host 195
2023-07-11 14:16:27,566 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 196 is on host 196
2023-07-11 14:16:27,566 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 197 is on host 197
2023-07-11 14:16:27,566 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 198 is on host 198
2023-07-11 14:16:27,566 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 199 is on host 199
2023-07-11 14:16:27,566 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 200 is on host 200
2023-07-11 14:16:27,566 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 201 is on host 201
2023-07-11 14:16:27,566 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 202 is on host 202
2023-07-11 14:16:27,566 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 203 is on host 203
2023-07-11 14:16:27,566 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 204 is on host 204
2023-07-11 14:16:27,566 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 205 is on host 205
2023-07-11 14:16:27,566 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 206 is on host 206
2023-07-11 14:16:27,567 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 207 is on host 207
2023-07-11 14:16:27,567 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 208 is on host 208
2023-07-11 14:16:27,567 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 209 is on host 209
2023-07-11 14:16:27,567 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 210 is on host 210
2023-07-11 14:16:27,567 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 211 is on host 211
2023-07-11 14:16:27,567 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 212 is on host 212
2023-07-11 14:16:27,567 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 213 is on host 213
2023-07-11 14:16:27,567 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 214 is on host 214
2023-07-11 14:16:27,567 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 215 is on host 215
2023-07-11 14:16:27,567 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 216 is on host 216
2023-07-11 14:16:27,567 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 217 is on host 217
2023-07-11 14:16:27,567 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 218 is on host 218
2023-07-11 14:16:27,567 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 219 is on host 219
2023-07-11 14:16:27,567 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 220 is on host 220
2023-07-11 14:16:27,567 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 221 is on host 221
2023-07-11 14:16:27,567 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 222 is on host 222
2023-07-11 14:16:27,567 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 223 is on host 223
2023-07-11 14:16:27,567 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 224 is on host 224
2023-07-11 14:16:27,567 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 225 is on host 225
2023-07-11 14:16:27,567 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 226 is on host 226
2023-07-11 14:16:27,567 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 227 is on host 227
2023-07-11 14:16:27,567 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 228 is on host 228
2023-07-11 14:16:27,567 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 229 is on host 229
2023-07-11 14:16:27,567 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 230 is on host 230
2023-07-11 14:16:27,567 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 231 is on host 231
2023-07-11 14:16:27,567 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 232 is on host 232
2023-07-11 14:16:27,567 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 233 is on host 233
2023-07-11 14:16:27,567 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 234 is on host 234
2023-07-11 14:16:27,567 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 235 is on host 235
2023-07-11 14:16:27,568 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 236 is on host 236
2023-07-11 14:16:27,568 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 237 is on host 237
2023-07-11 14:16:27,568 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 238 is on host 238
2023-07-11 14:16:27,568 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 239 is on host 239
2023-07-11 14:16:27,568 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 240 is on host 240
2023-07-11 14:16:27,568 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 241 is on host 241
2023-07-11 14:16:27,568 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 242 is on host 242
2023-07-11 14:16:27,568 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 243 is on host 243
2023-07-11 14:16:27,568 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 244 is on host 244
2023-07-11 14:16:27,568 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 245 is on host 245
2023-07-11 14:16:27,568 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 246 is on host 246
2023-07-11 14:16:27,568 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 247 is on host 247
2023-07-11 14:16:27,568 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 248 is on host 248
2023-07-11 14:16:27,568 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 249 is on host 249
2023-07-11 14:16:27,568 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 250 is on host 250
2023-07-11 14:16:27,568 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 251 is on host 251
2023-07-11 14:16:27,568 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 252 is on host 252
2023-07-11 14:16:27,568 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 253 is on host 253
2023-07-11 14:16:27,568 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 254 is on host 254
2023-07-11 14:16:27,568 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 255 is on host 255
2023-07-11 14:16:27,568 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 256 is on host 256
2023-07-11 14:16:27,568 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 257 is on host 257
2023-07-11 14:16:27,568 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 258 is on host 258
2023-07-11 14:16:27,568 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 259 is on host 259
2023-07-11 14:16:27,569 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 260 is on host 260
2023-07-11 14:16:27,569 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 261 is on host 261
2023-07-11 14:16:27,569 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 262 is on host 262
2023-07-11 14:16:27,569 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 263 is on host 263
2023-07-11 14:16:27,569 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 264 is on host 264
2023-07-11 14:16:27,569 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 265 is on host 265
2023-07-11 14:16:27,569 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 266 is on host 266
2023-07-11 14:16:27,569 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 267 is on host 267
2023-07-11 14:16:27,569 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 268 is on host 268
2023-07-11 14:16:27,569 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 269 is on host 269
2023-07-11 14:16:27,569 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 270 is on host 270
2023-07-11 14:16:27,569 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 271 is on host 271
2023-07-11 14:16:27,569 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 272 is on host 272
2023-07-11 14:16:27,569 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 273 is on host 273
2023-07-11 14:16:27,569 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 274 is on host 274
2023-07-11 14:16:27,569 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 275 is on host 275
2023-07-11 14:16:27,569 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 276 is on host 276
2023-07-11 14:16:27,569 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 277 is on host 277
2023-07-11 14:16:27,569 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 278 is on host 278
2023-07-11 14:16:27,569 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 279 is on host 279
2023-07-11 14:16:27,569 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 280 is on host 280
2023-07-11 14:16:27,569 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 281 is on host 281
2023-07-11 14:16:27,569 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 282 is on host 282
2023-07-11 14:16:27,569 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 283 is on host 283
2023-07-11 14:16:27,570 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 284 is on host 284
2023-07-11 14:16:27,570 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 285 is on host 285
2023-07-11 14:16:27,570 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 286 is on host 286
2023-07-11 14:16:27,570 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 287 is on host 287
2023-07-11 14:16:27,570 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 288 is on host 288
2023-07-11 14:16:27,570 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 289 is on host 289
2023-07-11 14:16:27,570 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 290 is on host 290
2023-07-11 14:16:27,570 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 291 is on host 291
2023-07-11 14:16:27,570 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 292 is on host 292
2023-07-11 14:16:27,570 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 293 is on host 293
2023-07-11 14:16:27,570 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 294 is on host 294
2023-07-11 14:16:27,570 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 295 is on host 295
2023-07-11 14:16:27,570 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 296 is on host 296
2023-07-11 14:16:27,570 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 297 is on host 297
2023-07-11 14:16:27,570 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 298 is on host 298
2023-07-11 14:16:27,570 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 299 is on host 299
2023-07-11 14:16:27,570 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 300 is on host 300
2023-07-11 14:16:27,570 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 301 is on host 301
2023-07-11 14:16:27,570 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 302 is on host 302
2023-07-11 14:16:27,570 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 303 is on host 303
2023-07-11 14:16:27,570 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 304 is on host 304
2023-07-11 14:16:27,570 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 305 is on host 305
2023-07-11 14:16:27,570 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 306 is on host 306
2023-07-11 14:16:27,570 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 307 is on host 307
2023-07-11 14:16:27,570 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 308 is on host 308
2023-07-11 14:16:27,570 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 309 is on host 309
2023-07-11 14:16:27,570 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 310 is on host 310
2023-07-11 14:16:27,570 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 311 is on host 311
2023-07-11 14:16:27,570 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 312 is on host 312
2023-07-11 14:16:27,571 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 313 is on host 313
2023-07-11 14:16:27,571 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 314 is on host 314
2023-07-11 14:16:27,571 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 315 is on host 315
2023-07-11 14:16:27,571 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 316 is on host 316
2023-07-11 14:16:27,571 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 317 is on host 317
2023-07-11 14:16:27,571 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 318 is on host 318
2023-07-11 14:16:27,571 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 319 is on host 319
2023-07-11 14:16:27,571 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 320 is on host 320
2023-07-11 14:16:27,571 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 321 is on host 321
2023-07-11 14:16:27,571 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 322 is on host 322
2023-07-11 14:16:27,571 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 323 is on host 323
2023-07-11 14:16:27,571 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 324 is on host 324
2023-07-11 14:16:27,571 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 325 is on host 325
2023-07-11 14:16:27,571 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 326 is on host 326
2023-07-11 14:16:27,571 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 327 is on host 327
2023-07-11 14:16:27,571 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 328 is on host 328
2023-07-11 14:16:27,571 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 329 is on host 329
2023-07-11 14:16:27,571 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 330 is on host 330
2023-07-11 14:16:27,571 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 331 is on host 331
2023-07-11 14:16:27,571 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 332 is on host 332
2023-07-11 14:16:27,571 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 333 is on host 333
2023-07-11 14:16:27,571 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 334 is on host 334
2023-07-11 14:16:27,571 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 335 is on host 335
2023-07-11 14:16:27,571 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 336 is on host 336
2023-07-11 14:16:27,571 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 337 is on host 337
2023-07-11 14:16:27,571 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 338 is on host 338
2023-07-11 14:16:27,571 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 339 is on host 339
2023-07-11 14:16:27,571 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 340 is on host 340
2023-07-11 14:16:27,571 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 341 is on host 341
2023-07-11 14:16:27,572 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 342 is on host 342
2023-07-11 14:16:27,572 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 343 is on host 343
2023-07-11 14:16:27,572 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 344 is on host 344
2023-07-11 14:16:27,572 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 345 is on host 345
2023-07-11 14:16:27,572 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 346 is on host 346
2023-07-11 14:16:27,572 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 347 is on host 347
2023-07-11 14:16:27,572 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 348 is on host 348
2023-07-11 14:16:27,572 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 349 is on host 349
2023-07-11 14:16:27,572 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 350 is on host 350
2023-07-11 14:16:27,572 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 351 is on host 351
2023-07-11 14:16:27,572 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 352 is on host 352
2023-07-11 14:16:27,572 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 353 is on host 353
2023-07-11 14:16:27,572 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 354 is on host 354
2023-07-11 14:16:27,572 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 355 is on host 355
2023-07-11 14:16:27,572 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 356 is on host 356
2023-07-11 14:16:27,572 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 357 is on host 357
2023-07-11 14:16:27,572 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 358 is on host 358
2023-07-11 14:16:27,572 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 359 is on host 359
2023-07-11 14:16:27,572 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 360 is on host 360
2023-07-11 14:16:27,572 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 361 is on host 361
2023-07-11 14:16:27,572 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 362 is on host 362
2023-07-11 14:16:27,572 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 363 is on host 363
2023-07-11 14:16:27,572 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 364 is on host 364
2023-07-11 14:16:27,572 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 365 is on host 365
2023-07-11 14:16:27,572 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 366 is on host 366
2023-07-11 14:16:27,572 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 367 is on host 367
2023-07-11 14:16:27,572 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 368 is on host 368
2023-07-11 14:16:27,572 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 369 is on host 369
2023-07-11 14:16:27,572 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 370 is on host 370
2023-07-11 14:16:27,573 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 371 is on host 371
2023-07-11 14:16:27,573 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 372 is on host 372
2023-07-11 14:16:27,573 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 373 is on host 373
2023-07-11 14:16:27,573 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 374 is on host 374
2023-07-11 14:16:27,573 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 375 is on host 375
2023-07-11 14:16:27,573 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 376 is on host 376
2023-07-11 14:16:27,573 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 377 is on host 377
2023-07-11 14:16:27,573 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 378 is on host 378
2023-07-11 14:16:27,573 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 379 is on host 379
2023-07-11 14:16:27,573 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 380 is on host 380
2023-07-11 14:16:27,573 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 381 is on host 381
2023-07-11 14:16:27,573 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 382 is on host 382
2023-07-11 14:16:27,573 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 383 is on host 383
2023-07-11 14:16:27,573 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 384 is on host 384
2023-07-11 14:16:27,573 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 385 is on host 385
2023-07-11 14:16:27,573 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 386 is on host 386
2023-07-11 14:16:27,573 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 387 is on host 387
2023-07-11 14:16:27,573 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 388 is on host 388
2023-07-11 14:16:27,573 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 389 is on host 389
2023-07-11 14:16:27,573 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 390 is on host 390
2023-07-11 14:16:27,573 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 391 is on host 391
2023-07-11 14:16:27,573 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 392 is on host 392
2023-07-11 14:16:27,573 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=393, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:27,574 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table10) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:27,574 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table54
2023-07-11 14:16:27,574 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv553536953=290, srv1630071126=110, srv1071894870=12, srv23511728=232, srv658346947=323, srv2025338799=204, srv1397994335=64, srv1976766403=195, srv1644629726=118, srv957637734=381, srv2079182457=210, srv1749264468=139, srv2046129126=206, srv1595762596=104, srv603990852=307, srv1973073480=194, srv958856137=382, srv644066832=319, srv557062842=292, srv277765671=235, srv732221418=337, srv1769385567=143, srv224612199=228, srv714752528=334, srv362526040=256, srv581128949=296, srv2133511466=223, srv1144239257=30, srv320603627=245, srv1679952521=126, srv2122867873=222, srv1110067064=24, srv256251994=233, srv63261708=317, srv89837390=371, srv552104598=289, srv508952995=281, srv2096011353=214, srv1770417148=144, srv1246723478=42, srv929436444=378, srv2082192429=211, srv234917297=231, srv405700573=266, srv183644386=166, srv1488378513=85, srv173139715=136, srv1154180352=32, srv355693379=252, srv1407521654=66, srv496848057=275, srv1157975499=33, srv1806731027=162, srv1923102804=184, srv311102455=244, srv450011410=271, srv771515724=348, srv389183508=262, srv1249074416=43, srv2014575201=201, srv640847108=318, srv832363565=356, srv1970882134=192, srv2107358603=218, srv855766065=361, srv1336043388=55, srv29397186=237, srv982792848=390, srv976560524=386, srv101181760=3, srv1093549482=21, srv2018389395=202, srv2113483104=221, srv1778339118=149, srv1968709692=190, srv705221118=333, srv159600090=105, srv1919608486=180, srv981255102=389, srv807899713=353, srv755110395=344, srv1770594519=145, srv739692705=340, srv1076582671=16, srv693869315=330, srv1079048717=17, srv440657532=270, srv1636659280=115, srv2108739257=220, srv668373413=326, srv1003610393=2, srv1054229197=11, srv1868589627=172, srv2103522371=217, srv1000546271=0, srv951670617=380, srv2042909593=205, srv1865656038=171, srv1466355012=78, srv703662406=332, srv1418112884=70, srv1215580291=40, srv71833528=335, srv1580581635=103, srv1021032212=5, srv1080806312=19, srv1985601859=197, srv74471954=343, srv1647472319=119, srv2071553346=208, srv1632855171=112, srv1122009370=27, srv13613992=61, srv1630777154=111, srv301413669=239, srv550697728=288, srv1296023857=53, srv1724550977=133, srv1989290370=198, srv1926417985=185, srv1678097199=125, srv1461034373=76, srv614690415=311, srv2098345381=215, srv310463473=243, srv1011934105=4, srv148627129=84, srv305489318=240, srv1256534903=46, srv1289731445=52, srv1798844587=157, srv567113085=294, srv1119222501=26, srv2055117940=207, srv855898852=362, srv629224816=316, srv1075943554=15, srv625909061=315, srv1705591942=128, srv734225580=339, srv660107924=324, srv1381729938=62, srv1633483173=113, srv408265476=267, srv1776057793=148, srv1360253411=60, srv1511424834=90, srv1414162621=68, srv883343663=370, srv151859222=91, srv349144930=251, srv1991304034=199, srv1825887791=164, srv601657063=305, srv758932951=345, srv1651629087=120, srv1864623584=170, srv682957691=329, srv1500454146=88, srv1725962085=135, srv1659841448=121, srv1253206004=45, srv52354442=284, srv18508093=168, srv1427731921=73, srv561344974=293, srv721668125=336, srv1575482138=100, srv914128771=373, srv961487230=383, srv741332941=342, srv533032466=286, srv1574140987=99, srv2139849097=224, srv503902262=278, srv674807007=327, srv1786829855=153, srv2088727517=213, srv394366966=264, srv980089565=388, srv114594288=31, srv38296437=261, srv214835574=226, srv1887224977=176, srv1025509362=7, srv1577020334=102, srv524466665=285, srv393561021=263, srv759909927=346, srv763556514=347, srv786453030=349, srv2142935488=225, srv618111613=312, srv16254163=108, srv343211061=250, srv476075173=273, srv1269632212=47, srv333589612=246, srv499015361=276, srv836674186=357, srv1799191687=158, srv1446998035=74, srv1571774199=98, srv1115354947=25, srv333860881=247, srv1724152600=132, srv1598699299=106, srv177885829=151, srv472125887=272, srv1101339966=22, srv1424985362=72, srv1945569895=188, srv594128294=300, srv1026739237=8, srv842459828=358, srv878519137=366, srv1921260729=181, srv339110834=249, srv504099471=279, srv814253179=354, srv1643744885=116, srv1793847521=155, srv607234624=309, srv698219051=331, srv1688538732=127, srv666240078=325, srv1079284733=18, srv29210550=236, srv506181748=280, srv881313122=368, srv1945452576=187, srv597307897=303, srv1285120424=51, srv1887943816=177, srv1983604698=196, srv1805465940=161, srv309309336=242, srv1719756294=131, srv1349932676=58, srv1208486369=38, srv1643971570=117, srv1509331489=89, srv334105385=248, srv1400515744=65, srv369984715=259, srv43712162=269, srv842675864=359, srv1803258748=160, srv1022450918=6, srv1775108732=147, srv1766088250=141, srv180150732=159, srv1220857227=41, srv226530501=229, srv362032108=255, srv919715380=377, srv1074935976=14, srv1395030819=63, srv803291569=352, srv1877966766=175, srv220538712=227, srv2021718843=203, srv2107782185=219, srv882216860=369, srv1489137852=86, srv1972328734=193, srv1470759982=79, srv1774824811=146, srv971974774=384, srv1418242791=71, srv1001274196=1, srv909615097=372, srv1537724566=93, srv1165799954=34, srv1724754364=134, srv978173525=387, srv113319438=29, srv578033735=295, srv147931272=80, srv1183635941=35, srv1904215245=178, srv596349756=302, srv880835255=367, srv857544550=364, srv1779729022=152, srv1795612465=156, srv621083045=314, srv917704170=375, srv1351811120=59, srv1316710897=54, srv789820555=350, srv1922580095=183, srv305567304=241, srv1936745425=186, srv1745318024=138, srv1210822057=39, srv645375717=320, srv950628389=379, srv1490199189=87, srv1575919256=101, srv154481102=96, srv359402967=254, srv997716931=391, srv1457224273=75, srv581644449=297, srv1872374768=174, srv363177310=257, srv740327512=341, srv1664227236=123, srv972330517=385, srv1634261306=114, srv1662183707=122, srv1969046891=191, srv1485266211=82, srv1778842262=150, srv588410181=298, srv1921840985=182, srv591279493=299, srv37574565=260, srv1104147458=23, srv1190166330=36, srv652270371=322, srv1484309042=81, srv1560148463=97, srv618569548=313, srv2102708311=216, srv1084873074=20, srv517669556=283, srv918152084=376, srv649714317=321, srv1674484790=124, srv1339239880=56, srv1461073271=77, srv1125312901=28, srv25633292=234, srv516616923=282, srv299721745=238, srv604932433=308, srv1273702855=48, srv792183929=351, srv1042608200=10, srv1276335106=49, srv1486044644=83, srv676101698=328, srv998930892=392, srv200111276=200, srv1863083643=169, srv1737443479=137, srv872997185=365, srv821351126=355, srv852115805=360, srv1074355423=13, srv170952194=130, srv503430005=277, srv153887567=94, srv1415163001=69, srv1032737435=9, srv1840670515=167, srv1961921083=189, srv59745831=304, srv36715747=258, srv431547280=268, srv1524853580=92, srv1870059418=173, srv396010771=265, srv594457792=301, srv1755339428=140, srv1766275429=142, srv5565786=291, srv603898526=306, srv544570223=287, srv856030669=363, srv1542523468=95, srv915785747=374, srv356122213=253, srv1411875499=67, srv2077620970=209, srv1345529444=57, srv232339963=230, srv1250861076=44, srv1914875423=179, srv478619481=274, srv1202435626=37, srv1706089454=129, srv1810631201=163, srv1282644061=50, srv1625945288=109, srv733251129=338, srv2082830831=212, srv1612103540=107, srv612136291=310, srv1790004142=154, srv183394703=165} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:27,574 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:27,574 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:27,574 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:27,574 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:27,574 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:27,575 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:27,575 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-11 14:16:27,575 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-11 14:16:27,575 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-11 14:16:27,575 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-11 14:16:27,575 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 10 is on host 10
2023-07-11 14:16:27,575 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 11 is on host 11
2023-07-11 14:16:27,575 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 12 is on host 12
2023-07-11 14:16:27,575 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 13 is on host 13
2023-07-11 14:16:27,575 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 14 is on host 14
2023-07-11 14:16:27,575 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 15 is on host 15
2023-07-11 14:16:27,575 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 16 is on host 16
2023-07-11 14:16:27,575 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 17 is on host 17
2023-07-11 14:16:27,575 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 18 is on host 18
2023-07-11 14:16:27,575 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 19 is on host 19
2023-07-11 14:16:27,575 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 20 is on host 20
2023-07-11 14:16:27,575 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 21 is on host 21
2023-07-11 14:16:27,575 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 22 is on host 22
2023-07-11 14:16:27,575 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 23 is on host 23
2023-07-11 14:16:27,575 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 24 is on host 24
2023-07-11 14:16:27,575 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 25 is on host 25
2023-07-11 14:16:27,575 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 26 is on host 26
2023-07-11 14:16:27,575 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 27 is on host 27
2023-07-11 14:16:27,575 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 28 is on host 28
2023-07-11 14:16:27,575 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 29 is on host 29
2023-07-11 14:16:27,575 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 30 is on host 30
2023-07-11 14:16:27,575 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 31 is on host 31
2023-07-11 14:16:27,575 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 32 is on host 32
2023-07-11 14:16:27,575 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 33 is on host 33
2023-07-11 14:16:27,576 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 34 is on host 34
2023-07-11 14:16:27,576 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 35 is on host 35
2023-07-11 14:16:27,576 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 36 is on host 36
2023-07-11 14:16:27,576 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 37 is on host 37
2023-07-11 14:16:27,576 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 38 is on host 38
2023-07-11 14:16:27,576 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 39 is on host 39
2023-07-11 14:16:27,576 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 40 is on host 40
2023-07-11 14:16:27,576 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 41 is on host 41
2023-07-11 14:16:27,576 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 42 is on host 42
2023-07-11 14:16:27,576 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 43 is on host 43
2023-07-11 14:16:27,576 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 44 is on host 44
2023-07-11 14:16:27,576 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 45 is on host 45
2023-07-11 14:16:27,576 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 46 is on host 46
2023-07-11 14:16:27,576 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 47 is on host 47
2023-07-11 14:16:27,576 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 48 is on host 48
2023-07-11 14:16:27,576 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 49 is on host 49
2023-07-11 14:16:27,576 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 50 is on host 50
2023-07-11 14:16:27,576 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 51 is on host 51
2023-07-11 14:16:27,576 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 52 is on host 52
2023-07-11 14:16:27,576 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 53 is on host 53
2023-07-11 14:16:27,576 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 54 is on host 54
2023-07-11 14:16:27,576 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 55 is on host 55
2023-07-11 14:16:27,576 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 56 is on host 56
2023-07-11 14:16:27,576 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 57 is on host 57
2023-07-11 14:16:27,576 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 58 is on host 58
2023-07-11 14:16:27,576 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 59 is on host 59
2023-07-11 14:16:27,576 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 60 is on host 60
2023-07-11 14:16:27,576 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 61 is on host 61
2023-07-11 14:16:27,576 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 62 is on host 62
2023-07-11 14:16:27,577 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 63 is on host 63
2023-07-11 14:16:27,577 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 64 is on host 64
2023-07-11 14:16:27,577 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 65 is on host 65
2023-07-11 14:16:27,577 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 66 is on host 66
2023-07-11 14:16:27,577 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 67 is on host 67
2023-07-11 14:16:27,577 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 68 is on host 68
2023-07-11 14:16:27,577 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 69 is on host 69
2023-07-11 14:16:27,577 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 70 is on host 70
2023-07-11 14:16:27,577 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 71 is on host 71
2023-07-11 14:16:27,577 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 72 is on host 72
2023-07-11 14:16:27,577 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 73 is on host 73
2023-07-11 14:16:27,577 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 74 is on host 74
2023-07-11 14:16:27,577 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 75 is on host 75
2023-07-11 14:16:27,577 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 76 is on host 76
2023-07-11 14:16:27,577 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 77 is on host 77
2023-07-11 14:16:27,577 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 78 is on host 78
2023-07-11 14:16:27,577 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 79 is on host 79
2023-07-11 14:16:27,577 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 80 is on host 80
2023-07-11 14:16:27,577 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 81 is on host 81
2023-07-11 14:16:27,577 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 82 is on host 82
2023-07-11 14:16:27,577 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 83 is on host 83
2023-07-11 14:16:27,577 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 84 is on host 84
2023-07-11 14:16:27,577 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 85 is on host 85
2023-07-11 14:16:27,577 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 86 is on host 86
2023-07-11 14:16:27,577 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 87 is on host 87
2023-07-11 14:16:27,577 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 88 is on host 88
2023-07-11 14:16:27,577 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 89 is on host 89
2023-07-11 14:16:27,577 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 90 is on host 90
2023-07-11 14:16:27,578 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 91 is on host 91
2023-07-11 14:16:27,578 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 92 is on host 92
2023-07-11 14:16:27,578 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 93 is on host 93
2023-07-11 14:16:27,578 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 94 is on host 94
2023-07-11 14:16:27,578 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 95 is on host 95
2023-07-11 14:16:27,578 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 96 is on host 96
2023-07-11 14:16:27,578 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 97 is on host 97
2023-07-11 14:16:27,578 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 98 is on host 98
2023-07-11 14:16:27,578 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 99 is on host 99
2023-07-11 14:16:27,578 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 100 is on host 100
2023-07-11 14:16:27,578 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 101 is on host 101
2023-07-11 14:16:27,578 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 102 is on host 102
2023-07-11 14:16:27,578 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 103 is on host 103
2023-07-11 14:16:27,578 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 104 is on host 104
2023-07-11 14:16:27,578 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 105 is on host 105
2023-07-11 14:16:27,578 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 106 is on host 106
2023-07-11 14:16:27,578 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 107 is on host 107
2023-07-11 14:16:27,578 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 108 is on host 108
2023-07-11 14:16:27,578 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 109 is on host 109
2023-07-11 14:16:27,578 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 110 is on host 110
2023-07-11 14:16:27,578 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 111 is on host 111
2023-07-11 14:16:27,578 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 112 is on host 112
2023-07-11 14:16:27,578 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 113 is on host 113
2023-07-11 14:16:27,578 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 114 is on host 114
2023-07-11 14:16:27,578 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 115 is on host 115
2023-07-11 14:16:27,578 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 116 is on host 116
2023-07-11 14:16:27,578 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 117 is on host 117
2023-07-11 14:16:27,578 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 118 is on host 118
2023-07-11 14:16:27,578 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 119 is on host 119
2023-07-11 14:16:27,579 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 120 is on host 120
2023-07-11 14:16:27,579 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 121 is on host 121
2023-07-11 14:16:27,579 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 122 is on host 122
2023-07-11 14:16:27,579 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 123 is on host 123
2023-07-11 14:16:27,579 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 124 is on host 124
2023-07-11 14:16:27,579 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 125 is on host 125
2023-07-11 14:16:27,579 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 126 is on host 126
2023-07-11 14:16:27,579 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 127 is on host 127
2023-07-11 14:16:27,579 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 128 is on host 128
2023-07-11 14:16:27,579 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 129 is on host 129
2023-07-11 14:16:27,579 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 130 is on host 130
2023-07-11 14:16:27,579 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 131 is on host 131
2023-07-11 14:16:27,579 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 132 is on host 132
2023-07-11 14:16:27,579 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 133 is on host 133
2023-07-11 14:16:27,579 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 134 is on host 134
2023-07-11 14:16:27,579 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 135 is on host 135
2023-07-11 14:16:27,579 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 136 is on host 136
2023-07-11 14:16:27,579 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 137 is on host 137
2023-07-11 14:16:27,579 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 138 is on host 138
2023-07-11 14:16:27,579 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 139 is on host 139
2023-07-11 14:16:27,579 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 140 is on host 140
2023-07-11 14:16:27,579 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 141 is on host 141
2023-07-11 14:16:27,579 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 142 is on host 142
2023-07-11 14:16:27,579 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 143 is on host 143
2023-07-11 14:16:27,579 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 144 is on host 144
2023-07-11 14:16:27,579 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 145 is on host 145
2023-07-11 14:16:27,579 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 146 is on host 146
2023-07-11 14:16:27,579 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 147 is on host 147
2023-07-11 14:16:27,579 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 148 is on host 148
2023-07-11 14:16:27,579 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 149 is on host 149
2023-07-11 14:16:27,580 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 150 is on host 150
2023-07-11 14:16:27,580 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 151 is on host 151
2023-07-11 14:16:27,580 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 152 is on host 152
2023-07-11 14:16:27,580 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 153 is on host 153
2023-07-11 14:16:27,580 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 154 is on host 154
2023-07-11 14:16:27,580 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 155 is on host 155
2023-07-11 14:16:27,580 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 156 is on host 156
2023-07-11 14:16:27,580 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 157 is on host 157
2023-07-11 14:16:27,580 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 158 is on host 158
2023-07-11 14:16:27,580 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 159 is on host 159
2023-07-11 14:16:27,580 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 160 is on host 160
2023-07-11 14:16:27,580 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 161 is on host 161
2023-07-11 14:16:27,580 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 162 is on host 162
2023-07-11 14:16:27,580 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 163 is on host 163
2023-07-11 14:16:27,580 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 164 is on host 164
2023-07-11 14:16:27,580 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 165 is on host 165
2023-07-11 14:16:27,580 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 166 is on host 166
2023-07-11 14:16:27,580 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 167 is on host 167
2023-07-11 14:16:27,580 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 168 is on host 168
2023-07-11 14:16:27,581 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 169 is on host 169
2023-07-11 14:16:27,581 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 170 is on host 170
2023-07-11 14:16:27,581 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 171 is on host 171
2023-07-11 14:16:27,581 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 172 is on host 172
2023-07-11 14:16:27,581 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 173 is on host 173
2023-07-11 14:16:27,581 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 174 is on host 174
2023-07-11 14:16:27,581 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 175 is on host 175
2023-07-11 14:16:27,581 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 176 is on host 176
2023-07-11 14:16:27,581 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 177 is on host 177
2023-07-11 14:16:27,581 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 178 is on host 178
2023-07-11 14:16:27,581 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 179 is on host 179
2023-07-11 14:16:27,581 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 180 is on host 180
2023-07-11 14:16:27,581 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 181 is on host 181
2023-07-11 14:16:27,581 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 182 is on host 182
2023-07-11 14:16:27,581 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 183 is on host 183
2023-07-11 14:16:27,581 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 184 is on host 184
2023-07-11 14:16:27,581 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 185 is on host 185
2023-07-11 14:16:27,581 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 186 is on host 186
2023-07-11 14:16:27,581 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 187 is on host 187
2023-07-11 14:16:27,581 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 188 is on host 188
2023-07-11 14:16:27,581 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 189 is on host 189
2023-07-11 14:16:27,581 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 190 is on host 190
2023-07-11 14:16:27,581 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 191 is on host 191
2023-07-11 14:16:27,581 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 192 is on host 192
2023-07-11 14:16:27,581 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 193 is on host 193
2023-07-11 14:16:27,581 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 194 is on host 194
2023-07-11 14:16:27,581 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 195 is on host 195
2023-07-11 14:16:27,581 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 196 is on host 196
2023-07-11 14:16:27,581 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 197 is on host 197
2023-07-11 14:16:27,582 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 198 is on host 198
2023-07-11 14:16:27,582 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 199 is on host 199
2023-07-11 14:16:27,582 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 200 is on host 200
2023-07-11 14:16:27,582 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 201 is on host 201
2023-07-11 14:16:27,582 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 202 is on host 202
2023-07-11 14:16:27,582 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 203 is on host 203
2023-07-11 14:16:27,582 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 204 is on host 204
2023-07-11 14:16:27,582 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 205 is on host 205
2023-07-11 14:16:27,582 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 206 is on host 206
2023-07-11 14:16:27,582 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 207 is on host 207
2023-07-11 14:16:27,582 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 208 is on host 208
2023-07-11 14:16:27,582 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 209 is on host 209
2023-07-11 14:16:27,582 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 210 is on host 210
2023-07-11 14:16:27,582 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 211 is on host 211
2023-07-11 14:16:27,582 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 212 is on host 212
2023-07-11 14:16:27,582 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 213 is on host 213
2023-07-11 14:16:27,582 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 214 is on host 214
2023-07-11 14:16:27,582 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 215 is on host 215
2023-07-11 14:16:27,582 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 216 is on host 216
2023-07-11 14:16:27,582 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 217 is on host 217
2023-07-11 14:16:27,582 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 218 is on host 218
2023-07-11 14:16:27,582 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 219 is on host 219
2023-07-11 14:16:27,582 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 220 is on host 220
2023-07-11 14:16:27,582 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 221 is on host 221
2023-07-11 14:16:27,582 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 222 is on host 222
2023-07-11 14:16:27,582 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 223 is on host 223
2023-07-11 14:16:27,582 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 224 is on host 224
2023-07-11 14:16:27,582 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 225 is on host 225
2023-07-11 14:16:27,582 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 226 is on host 226
2023-07-11 14:16:27,583 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 227 is on host 227
2023-07-11 14:16:27,583 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 228 is on host 228
2023-07-11 14:16:27,583 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 229 is on host 229
2023-07-11 14:16:27,583 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 230 is on host 230
2023-07-11 14:16:27,583 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 231 is on host 231
2023-07-11 14:16:27,583 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 232 is on host 232
2023-07-11 14:16:27,583 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 233 is on host 233
2023-07-11 14:16:27,583 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 234 is on host 234
2023-07-11 14:16:27,583 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 235 is on host 235
2023-07-11 14:16:27,583 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 236 is on host 236
2023-07-11 14:16:27,583 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 237 is on host 237
2023-07-11 14:16:27,583 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 238 is on host 238
2023-07-11 14:16:27,583 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 239 is on host 239
2023-07-11 14:16:27,583 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 240 is on host 240
2023-07-11 14:16:27,583 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 241 is on host 241
2023-07-11 14:16:27,583 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 242 is on host 242
2023-07-11 14:16:27,583 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 243 is on host 243
2023-07-11 14:16:27,583 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 244 is on host 244
2023-07-11 14:16:27,583 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 245 is on host 245
2023-07-11 14:16:27,583 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 246 is on host 246
2023-07-11 14:16:27,583 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 247 is on host 247
2023-07-11 14:16:27,583 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 248 is on host 248
2023-07-11 14:16:27,583 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 249 is on host 249
2023-07-11 14:16:27,583 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 250 is on host 250
2023-07-11 14:16:27,583 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 251 is on host 251
2023-07-11 14:16:27,583 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 252 is on host 252
2023-07-11 14:16:27,583 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 253 is on host 253
2023-07-11 14:16:27,583 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 254 is on host 254
2023-07-11 14:16:27,583 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 255 is on host 255
2023-07-11 14:16:27,584 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 256 is on host 256
2023-07-11 14:16:27,584 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 257 is on host 257
2023-07-11 14:16:27,584 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 258 is on host 258
2023-07-11 14:16:27,584 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 259 is on host 259
2023-07-11 14:16:27,584 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 260 is on host 260
2023-07-11 14:16:27,584 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 261 is on host 261
2023-07-11 14:16:27,584 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 262 is on host 262
2023-07-11 14:16:27,584 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 263 is on host 263
2023-07-11 14:16:27,584 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 264 is on host 264
2023-07-11 14:16:27,584 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 265 is on host 265
2023-07-11 14:16:27,584 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 266 is on host 266
2023-07-11 14:16:27,584 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 267 is on host 267
2023-07-11 14:16:27,584 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 268 is on host 268
2023-07-11 14:16:27,584 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 269 is on host 269
2023-07-11 14:16:27,584 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 270 is on host 270
2023-07-11 14:16:27,584 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 271 is on host 271
2023-07-11 14:16:27,584 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 272 is on host 272
2023-07-11 14:16:27,584 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 273 is on host 273
2023-07-11 14:16:27,584 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 274 is on host 274
2023-07-11 14:16:27,584 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 275 is on host 275
2023-07-11 14:16:27,584 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 276 is on host 276
2023-07-11 14:16:27,584 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 277 is on host 277
2023-07-11 14:16:27,584 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 278 is on host 278
2023-07-11 14:16:27,584 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 279 is on host 279
2023-07-11 14:16:27,584 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 280 is on host 280
2023-07-11 14:16:27,584 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 281 is on host 281
2023-07-11 14:16:27,584 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 282 is on host 282
2023-07-11 14:16:27,584 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 283 is on host 283
2023-07-11 14:16:27,584 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 284 is on host 284
2023-07-11 14:16:27,585 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 285 is on host 285
2023-07-11 14:16:27,585 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 286 is on host 286
2023-07-11 14:16:27,585 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 287 is on host 287
2023-07-11 14:16:27,585 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 288 is on host 288
2023-07-11 14:16:27,585 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 289 is on host 289
2023-07-11 14:16:27,585 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 290 is on host 290
2023-07-11 14:16:27,585 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 291 is on host 291
2023-07-11 14:16:27,585 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 292 is on host 292
2023-07-11 14:16:27,585 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 293 is on host 293
2023-07-11 14:16:27,585 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 294 is on host 294
2023-07-11 14:16:27,585 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 295 is on host 295
2023-07-11 14:16:27,585 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 296 is on host 296
2023-07-11 14:16:27,585 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 297 is on host 297
2023-07-11 14:16:27,585 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 298 is on host 298
2023-07-11 14:16:27,585 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 299 is on host 299
2023-07-11 14:16:27,585 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 300 is on host 300
2023-07-11 14:16:27,585 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 301 is on host 301
2023-07-11 14:16:27,585 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 302 is on host 302
2023-07-11 14:16:27,585 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 303 is on host 303
2023-07-11 14:16:27,585 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 304 is on host 304
2023-07-11 14:16:27,585 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 305 is on host 305
2023-07-11 14:16:27,585 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 306 is on host 306
2023-07-11 14:16:27,585 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 307 is on host 307
2023-07-11 14:16:27,585 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 308 is on host 308
2023-07-11 14:16:27,585 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 309 is on host 309
2023-07-11 14:16:27,585 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 310 is on host 310
2023-07-11 14:16:27,585 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 311 is on host 311
2023-07-11 14:16:27,585 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 312 is on host 312
2023-07-11 14:16:27,585 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 313 is on host 313
2023-07-11 14:16:27,586 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 314 is on host 314
2023-07-11 14:16:27,586 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 315 is on host 315
2023-07-11 14:16:27,586 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 316 is on host 316
2023-07-11 14:16:27,586 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 317 is on host 317
2023-07-11 14:16:27,586 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 318 is on host 318
2023-07-11 14:16:27,586 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 319 is on host 319
2023-07-11 14:16:27,586 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 320 is on host 320
2023-07-11 14:16:27,586 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 321 is on host 321
2023-07-11 14:16:27,586 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 322 is on host 322
2023-07-11 14:16:27,586 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 323 is on host 323
2023-07-11 14:16:27,586 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 324 is on host 324
2023-07-11 14:16:27,586 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 325 is on host 325
2023-07-11 14:16:27,586 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 326 is on host 326
2023-07-11 14:16:27,586 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 327 is on host 327
2023-07-11 14:16:27,586 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 328 is on host 328
2023-07-11 14:16:27,586 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 329 is on host 329
2023-07-11 14:16:27,586 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 330 is on host 330
2023-07-11 14:16:27,586 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 331 is on host 331
2023-07-11 14:16:27,586 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 332 is on host 332
2023-07-11 14:16:27,586 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 333 is on host 333
2023-07-11 14:16:27,586 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 334 is on host 334
2023-07-11 14:16:27,586 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 335 is on host 335
2023-07-11 14:16:27,586 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 336 is on host 336
2023-07-11 14:16:27,586 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 337 is on host 337
2023-07-11 14:16:27,586 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 338 is on host 338
2023-07-11 14:16:27,586 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 339 is on host 339
2023-07-11 14:16:27,586 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 340 is on host 340
2023-07-11 14:16:27,586 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 341 is on host 341
2023-07-11 14:16:27,586 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 342 is on host 342
2023-07-11 14:16:27,587 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 343 is on host 343
2023-07-11 14:16:27,587 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 344 is on host 344
2023-07-11 14:16:27,587 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 345 is on host 345
2023-07-11 14:16:27,587 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 346 is on host 346
2023-07-11 14:16:27,587 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 347 is on host 347
2023-07-11 14:16:27,587 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 348 is on host 348
2023-07-11 14:16:27,587 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 349 is on host 349
2023-07-11 14:16:27,587 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 350 is on host 350
2023-07-11 14:16:27,587 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 351 is on host 351
2023-07-11 14:16:27,587 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 352 is on host 352
2023-07-11 14:16:27,587 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 353 is on host 353
2023-07-11 14:16:27,587 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 354 is on host 354
2023-07-11 14:16:27,587 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 355 is on host 355
2023-07-11 14:16:27,587 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 356 is on host 356
2023-07-11 14:16:27,587 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 357 is on host 357
2023-07-11 14:16:27,587 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 358 is on host 358
2023-07-11 14:16:27,587 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 359 is on host 359
2023-07-11 14:16:27,587 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 360 is on host 360
2023-07-11 14:16:27,587 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 361 is on host 361
2023-07-11 14:16:27,587 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 362 is on host 362
2023-07-11 14:16:27,587 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 363 is on host 363
2023-07-11 14:16:27,587 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 364 is on host 364
2023-07-11 14:16:27,587 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 365 is on host 365
2023-07-11 14:16:27,587 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 366 is on host 366
2023-07-11 14:16:27,587 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 367 is on host 367
2023-07-11 14:16:27,587 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 368 is on host 368
2023-07-11 14:16:27,587 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 369 is on host 369
2023-07-11 14:16:27,587 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 370 is on host 370
2023-07-11 14:16:27,587 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 371 is on host 371
2023-07-11 14:16:27,588 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 372 is on host 372
2023-07-11 14:16:27,588 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 373 is on host 373
2023-07-11 14:16:27,588 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 374 is on host 374
2023-07-11 14:16:27,588 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 375 is on host 375
2023-07-11 14:16:27,588 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 376 is on host 376
2023-07-11 14:16:27,588 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 377 is on host 377
2023-07-11 14:16:27,588 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 378 is on host 378
2023-07-11 14:16:27,588 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 379 is on host 379
2023-07-11 14:16:27,588 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 380 is on host 380
2023-07-11 14:16:27,588 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 381 is on host 381
2023-07-11 14:16:27,588 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 382 is on host 382
2023-07-11 14:16:27,588 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 383 is on host 383
2023-07-11 14:16:27,588 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 384 is on host 384
2023-07-11 14:16:27,588 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 385 is on host 385
2023-07-11 14:16:27,588 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 386 is on host 386
2023-07-11 14:16:27,588 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 387 is on host 387
2023-07-11 14:16:27,588 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 388 is on host 388
2023-07-11 14:16:27,588 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 389 is on host 389
2023-07-11 14:16:27,588 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 390 is on host 390
2023-07-11 14:16:27,588 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 391 is on host 391
2023-07-11 14:16:27,588 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 392 is on host 392
2023-07-11 14:16:27,588 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=393, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:27,589 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table54) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:27,589 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table11
2023-07-11 14:16:27,589 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv553536953=290, srv1630071126=110, srv1071894870=12, srv23511728=232, srv658346947=323, srv2025338799=204, srv1397994335=64, srv1976766403=195, srv1644629726=118, srv957637734=381, srv2079182457=210, srv1749264468=139, srv2046129126=206, srv1595762596=104, srv603990852=307, srv1973073480=194, srv958856137=382, srv644066832=319, srv557062842=292, srv277765671=235, srv732221418=337, srv1769385567=143, srv224612199=228, srv714752528=334, srv362526040=256, srv581128949=296, srv2133511466=223, srv1144239257=30, srv320603627=245, srv1679952521=126, srv2122867873=222, srv1110067064=24, srv256251994=233, srv63261708=317, srv89837390=371, srv552104598=289, srv508952995=281, srv2096011353=214, srv1770417148=144, srv1246723478=42, srv929436444=378, srv2082192429=211, srv234917297=231, srv405700573=266, srv183644386=166, srv1488378513=85, srv173139715=136, srv1154180352=32, srv355693379=252, srv1407521654=66, srv496848057=275, srv1157975499=33, srv1806731027=162, srv1923102804=184, srv311102455=244, srv450011410=271, srv771515724=348, srv389183508=262, srv1249074416=43, srv2014575201=201, srv640847108=318, srv832363565=356, srv1970882134=192, srv2107358603=218, srv855766065=361, srv1336043388=55, srv29397186=237, srv982792848=390, srv976560524=386, srv101181760=3, srv1093549482=21, srv2018389395=202, srv2113483104=221, srv1778339118=149, srv1968709692=190, srv705221118=333, srv159600090=105, srv1919608486=180, srv981255102=389, srv807899713=353, srv755110395=344, srv1770594519=145, srv739692705=340, srv1076582671=16, srv693869315=330, srv1079048717=17, srv440657532=270, srv1636659280=115, srv2108739257=220, srv668373413=326, srv1003610393=2, srv1054229197=11, srv1868589627=172, srv2103522371=217, srv1000546271=0, srv951670617=380, srv2042909593=205, srv1865656038=171, srv1466355012=78, srv703662406=332, srv1418112884=70, srv1215580291=40, srv71833528=335, srv1580581635=103, srv1021032212=5, srv1080806312=19, srv1985601859=197, srv74471954=343, srv1647472319=119, srv2071553346=208, srv1632855171=112, srv1122009370=27, srv13613992=61, srv1630777154=111, srv301413669=239, srv550697728=288, srv1296023857=53, srv1724550977=133, srv1989290370=198, srv1926417985=185, srv1678097199=125, srv1461034373=76, srv614690415=311, srv2098345381=215, srv310463473=243, srv1011934105=4, srv148627129=84, srv305489318=240, srv1256534903=46, srv1289731445=52, srv1798844587=157, srv567113085=294, srv1119222501=26, srv2055117940=207, srv855898852=362, srv629224816=316, srv1075943554=15, srv625909061=315, srv1705591942=128, srv734225580=339, srv660107924=324, srv1381729938=62, srv1633483173=113, srv408265476=267, srv1776057793=148, srv1360253411=60, srv1511424834=90, srv1414162621=68, srv883343663=370, srv151859222=91, srv349144930=251, srv1991304034=199, srv1825887791=164, srv601657063=305, srv758932951=345, srv1651629087=120, srv1864623584=170, srv682957691=329, srv1500454146=88, srv1725962085=135, srv1659841448=121, srv1253206004=45, srv52354442=284, srv18508093=168, srv1427731921=73, srv561344974=293, srv721668125=336, srv1575482138=100, srv914128771=373, srv961487230=383, srv741332941=342, srv533032466=286, srv1574140987=99, srv2139849097=224, srv503902262=278, srv674807007=327, srv1786829855=153, srv2088727517=213, srv394366966=264, srv980089565=388, srv114594288=31, srv38296437=261, srv214835574=226, srv1887224977=176, srv1025509362=7, srv1577020334=102, srv524466665=285, srv393561021=263, srv759909927=346, srv763556514=347, srv786453030=349, srv2142935488=225, srv618111613=312, srv16254163=108, srv343211061=250, srv476075173=273, srv1269632212=47, srv333589612=246, srv499015361=276, srv836674186=357, srv1799191687=158, srv1446998035=74, srv1571774199=98, srv1115354947=25, srv333860881=247, srv1724152600=132, srv1598699299=106, srv177885829=151, srv472125887=272, srv1101339966=22, srv1424985362=72, srv1945569895=188, srv594128294=300, srv1026739237=8, srv842459828=358, srv878519137=366, srv1921260729=181, srv339110834=249, srv504099471=279, srv814253179=354, srv1643744885=116, srv1793847521=155, srv607234624=309, srv698219051=331, srv1688538732=127, srv666240078=325, srv1079284733=18, srv29210550=236, srv506181748=280, srv881313122=368, srv1945452576=187, srv597307897=303, srv1285120424=51, srv1887943816=177, srv1983604698=196, srv1805465940=161, srv309309336=242, srv1719756294=131, srv1349932676=58, srv1208486369=38, srv1643971570=117, srv1509331489=89, srv334105385=248, srv1400515744=65, srv369984715=259, srv43712162=269, srv842675864=359, srv1803258748=160, srv1022450918=6, srv1775108732=147, srv1766088250=141, srv180150732=159, srv1220857227=41, srv226530501=229, srv362032108=255, srv919715380=377, srv1074935976=14, srv1395030819=63, srv803291569=352, srv1877966766=175, srv220538712=227, srv2021718843=203, srv2107782185=219, srv882216860=369, srv1489137852=86, srv1972328734=193, srv1470759982=79, srv1774824811=146, srv971974774=384, srv1418242791=71, srv1001274196=1, srv909615097=372, srv1537724566=93, srv1165799954=34, srv1724754364=134, srv978173525=387, srv113319438=29, srv578033735=295, srv147931272=80, srv1183635941=35, srv1904215245=178, srv596349756=302, srv880835255=367, srv857544550=364, srv1779729022=152, srv1795612465=156, srv621083045=314, srv917704170=375, srv1351811120=59, srv1316710897=54, srv789820555=350, srv1922580095=183, srv305567304=241, srv1936745425=186, srv1745318024=138, srv1210822057=39, srv645375717=320, srv950628389=379, srv1490199189=87, srv1575919256=101, srv154481102=96, srv359402967=254, srv997716931=391, srv1457224273=75, srv581644449=297, srv1872374768=174, srv363177310=257, srv740327512=341, srv1664227236=123, srv972330517=385, srv1634261306=114, srv1662183707=122, srv1969046891=191, srv1485266211=82, srv1778842262=150, srv588410181=298, srv1921840985=182, srv591279493=299, srv37574565=260, srv1104147458=23, srv1190166330=36, srv652270371=322, srv1484309042=81, srv1560148463=97, srv618569548=313, srv2102708311=216, srv1084873074=20, srv517669556=283, srv918152084=376, srv649714317=321, srv1674484790=124, srv1339239880=56, srv1461073271=77, srv1125312901=28, srv25633292=234, srv516616923=282, srv299721745=238, srv604932433=308, srv1273702855=48, srv792183929=351, srv1042608200=10, srv1276335106=49, srv1486044644=83, srv676101698=328, srv998930892=392, srv200111276=200, srv1863083643=169, srv1737443479=137, srv872997185=365, srv821351126=355, srv852115805=360, srv1074355423=13, srv170952194=130, srv503430005=277, srv153887567=94, srv1415163001=69, srv1032737435=9, srv1840670515=167, srv1961921083=189, srv59745831=304, srv36715747=258, srv431547280=268, srv1524853580=92, srv1870059418=173, srv396010771=265, srv594457792=301, srv1755339428=140, srv1766275429=142, srv5565786=291, srv603898526=306, srv544570223=287, srv856030669=363, srv1542523468=95, srv915785747=374, srv356122213=253, srv1411875499=67, srv2077620970=209, srv1345529444=57, srv232339963=230, srv1250861076=44, srv1914875423=179, srv478619481=274, srv1202435626=37, srv1706089454=129, srv1810631201=163, srv1282644061=50, srv1625945288=109, srv733251129=338, srv2082830831=212, srv1612103540=107, srv612136291=310, srv1790004142=154, srv183394703=165} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:27,589 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:27,589 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:27,589 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:27,589 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:27,589 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:27,589 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:27,590 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-11 14:16:27,590 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-11 14:16:27,590 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-11 14:16:27,590 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-11 14:16:27,590 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 10 is on host 10
2023-07-11 14:16:27,590 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 11 is on host 11
2023-07-11 14:16:27,590 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 12 is on host 12
2023-07-11 14:16:27,590 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 13 is on host 13
2023-07-11 14:16:27,590 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 14 is on host 14
2023-07-11 14:16:27,590 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 15 is on host 15
2023-07-11 14:16:27,590 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 16 is on host 16
2023-07-11 14:16:27,590 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 17 is on host 17
2023-07-11 14:16:27,590 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 18 is on host 18
2023-07-11 14:16:27,590 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 19 is on host 19
2023-07-11 14:16:27,590 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 20 is on host 20
2023-07-11 14:16:27,590 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 21 is on host 21
2023-07-11 14:16:27,590 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 22 is on host 22
2023-07-11 14:16:27,590 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 23 is on host 23
2023-07-11 14:16:27,590 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 24 is on host 24
2023-07-11 14:16:27,590 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 25 is on host 25
2023-07-11 14:16:27,590 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 26 is on host 26
2023-07-11 14:16:27,590 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 27 is on host 27
2023-07-11 14:16:27,590 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 28 is on host 28
2023-07-11 14:16:27,590 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 29 is on host 29
2023-07-11 14:16:27,590 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 30 is on host 30
2023-07-11 14:16:27,590 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 31 is on host 31
2023-07-11 14:16:27,590 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 32 is on host 32
2023-07-11 14:16:27,590 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 33 is on host 33
2023-07-11 14:16:27,590 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 34 is on host 34
2023-07-11 14:16:27,591 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 35 is on host 35
2023-07-11 14:16:27,591 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 36 is on host 36
2023-07-11 14:16:27,591 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 37 is on host 37
2023-07-11 14:16:27,591 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 38 is on host 38
2023-07-11 14:16:27,591 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 39 is on host 39
2023-07-11 14:16:27,591 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 40 is on host 40
2023-07-11 14:16:27,591 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 41 is on host 41
2023-07-11 14:16:27,591 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 42 is on host 42
2023-07-11 14:16:27,591 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 43 is on host 43
2023-07-11 14:16:27,591 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 44 is on host 44
2023-07-11 14:16:27,591 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 45 is on host 45
2023-07-11 14:16:27,591 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 46 is on host 46
2023-07-11 14:16:27,591 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 47 is on host 47
2023-07-11 14:16:27,591 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 48 is on host 48
2023-07-11 14:16:27,591 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 49 is on host 49
2023-07-11 14:16:27,591 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 50 is on host 50
2023-07-11 14:16:27,591 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 51 is on host 51
2023-07-11 14:16:27,591 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 52 is on host 52
2023-07-11 14:16:27,591 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 53 is on host 53
2023-07-11 14:16:27,591 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 54 is on host 54
2023-07-11 14:16:27,591 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 55 is on host 55
2023-07-11 14:16:27,591 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 56 is on host 56
2023-07-11 14:16:27,591 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 57 is on host 57
2023-07-11 14:16:27,591 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 58 is on host 58
2023-07-11 14:16:27,591 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 59 is on host 59
2023-07-11 14:16:27,591 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 60 is on host 60
2023-07-11 14:16:27,591 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 61 is on host 61
2023-07-11 14:16:27,591 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 62 is on host 62
2023-07-11 14:16:27,592 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 63 is on host 63
2023-07-11 14:16:27,592 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 64 is on host 64
2023-07-11 14:16:27,592 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 65 is on host 65
2023-07-11 14:16:27,592 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 66 is on host 66
2023-07-11 14:16:27,592 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 67 is on host 67
2023-07-11 14:16:27,592 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 68 is on host 68
2023-07-11 14:16:27,592 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 69 is on host 69
2023-07-11 14:16:27,592 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 70 is on host 70
2023-07-11 14:16:27,592 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 71 is on host 71
2023-07-11 14:16:27,592 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 72 is on host 72
2023-07-11 14:16:27,592 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 73 is on host 73
2023-07-11 14:16:27,592 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 74 is on host 74
2023-07-11 14:16:27,592 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 75 is on host 75
2023-07-11 14:16:27,592 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 76 is on host 76
2023-07-11 14:16:27,592 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 77 is on host 77
2023-07-11 14:16:27,592 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 78 is on host 78
2023-07-11 14:16:27,592 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 79 is on host 79
2023-07-11 14:16:27,592 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 80 is on host 80
2023-07-11 14:16:27,592 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 81 is on host 81
2023-07-11 14:16:27,593 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 82 is on host 82
2023-07-11 14:16:27,593 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 83 is on host 83
2023-07-11 14:16:27,593 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 84 is on host 84
2023-07-11 14:16:27,593 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 85 is on host 85
2023-07-11 14:16:27,593 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 86 is on host 86
2023-07-11 14:16:27,593 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 87 is on host 87
2023-07-11 14:16:27,593 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 88 is on host 88
2023-07-11 14:16:27,593 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 89 is on host 89
2023-07-11 14:16:27,593 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 90 is on host 90
2023-07-11 14:16:27,593 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 91 is on host 91
2023-07-11 14:16:27,593 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 92 is on host 92
2023-07-11 14:16:27,593 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 93 is on host 93
2023-07-11 14:16:27,593 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 94 is on host 94
2023-07-11 14:16:27,593 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 95 is on host 95
2023-07-11 14:16:27,593 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 96 is on host 96
2023-07-11 14:16:27,593 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 97 is on host 97
2023-07-11 14:16:27,593 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 98 is on host 98
2023-07-11 14:16:27,593 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 99 is on host 99
2023-07-11 14:16:27,593 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 100 is on host 100
2023-07-11 14:16:27,593 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 101 is on host 101
2023-07-11 14:16:27,593 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 102 is on host 102
2023-07-11 14:16:27,593 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 103 is on host 103
2023-07-11 14:16:27,593 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 104 is on host 104
2023-07-11 14:16:27,593 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 105 is on host 105
2023-07-11 14:16:27,593 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 106 is on host 106
2023-07-11 14:16:27,593 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 107 is on host 107
2023-07-11 14:16:27,593 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 108 is on host 108
2023-07-11 14:16:27,593 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 109 is on host 109
2023-07-11 14:16:27,593 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 110 is on host 110
2023-07-11 14:16:27,594 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 111 is on host 111
2023-07-11 14:16:27,594 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 112 is on host 112
2023-07-11 14:16:27,594 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 113 is on host 113
2023-07-11 14:16:27,594 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 114 is on host 114
2023-07-11 14:16:27,594 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 115 is on host 115
2023-07-11 14:16:27,594 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 116 is on host 116
2023-07-11 14:16:27,594 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 117 is on host 117
2023-07-11 14:16:27,594 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 118 is on host 118
2023-07-11 14:16:27,594 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 119 is on host 119
2023-07-11 14:16:27,594 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 120 is on host 120
2023-07-11 14:16:27,594 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 121 is on host 121
2023-07-11 14:16:27,594 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 122 is on host 122
2023-07-11 14:16:27,594 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 123 is on host 123
2023-07-11 14:16:27,594 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 124 is on host 124
2023-07-11 14:16:27,594 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 125 is on host 125
2023-07-11 14:16:27,594 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 126 is on host 126
2023-07-11 14:16:27,594 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 127 is on host 127
2023-07-11 14:16:27,594 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 128 is on host 128
2023-07-11 14:16:27,594 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 129 is on host 129
2023-07-11 14:16:27,594 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 130 is on host 130
2023-07-11 14:16:27,594 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 131 is on host 131
2023-07-11 14:16:27,594 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 132 is on host 132
2023-07-11 14:16:27,594 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 133 is on host 133
2023-07-11 14:16:27,594 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 134 is on host 134
2023-07-11 14:16:27,594 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 135 is on host 135
2023-07-11 14:16:27,594 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 136 is on host 136
2023-07-11 14:16:27,594 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 137 is on host 137
2023-07-11 14:16:27,594 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 138 is on host 138
2023-07-11 14:16:27,594 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 139 is on host 139
2023-07-11 14:16:27,595 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 140 is on host 140
2023-07-11 14:16:27,595 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 141 is on host 141
2023-07-11 14:16:27,595 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 142 is on host 142
2023-07-11 14:16:27,595 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 143 is on host 143
2023-07-11 14:16:27,595 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 144 is on host 144
2023-07-11 14:16:27,595 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 145 is on host 145
2023-07-11 14:16:27,595 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 146 is on host 146
2023-07-11 14:16:27,595 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 147 is on host 147
2023-07-11 14:16:27,595 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 148 is on host 148
2023-07-11 14:16:27,595 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 149 is on host 149
2023-07-11 14:16:27,595 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 150 is on host 150
2023-07-11 14:16:27,595 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 151 is on host 151
2023-07-11 14:16:27,595 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 152 is on host 152
2023-07-11 14:16:27,595 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 153 is on host 153
2023-07-11 14:16:27,595 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 154 is on host 154
2023-07-11 14:16:27,595 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 155 is on host 155
2023-07-11 14:16:27,595 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 156 is on host 156
2023-07-11 14:16:27,595 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 157 is on host 157
2023-07-11 14:16:27,595 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 158 is on host 158
2023-07-11 14:16:27,595 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 159 is on host 159
2023-07-11 14:16:27,595 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 160 is on host 160
2023-07-11 14:16:27,595 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 161 is on host 161
2023-07-11 14:16:27,595 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 162 is on host 162
2023-07-11 14:16:27,595 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 163 is on host 163
2023-07-11 14:16:27,595 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 164 is on host 164
2023-07-11 14:16:27,595 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 165 is on host 165
2023-07-11 14:16:27,595 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 166 is on host 166
2023-07-11 14:16:27,595 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 167 is on host 167
2023-07-11 14:16:27,595 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 168 is on host 168
2023-07-11 14:16:27,596 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 169 is on host 169
2023-07-11 14:16:27,596 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 170 is on host 170
2023-07-11 14:16:27,596 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 171 is on host 171
2023-07-11 14:16:27,596 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 172 is on host 172
2023-07-11 14:16:27,596 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 173 is on host 173
2023-07-11 14:16:27,596 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 174 is on host 174
2023-07-11 14:16:27,596 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 175 is on host 175
2023-07-11 14:16:27,596 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 176 is on host 176
2023-07-11 14:16:27,596 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 177 is on host 177
2023-07-11 14:16:27,596 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 178 is on host 178
2023-07-11 14:16:27,596 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 179 is on host 179
2023-07-11 14:16:27,596 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 180 is on host 180
2023-07-11 14:16:27,596 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 181 is on host 181
2023-07-11 14:16:27,596 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 182 is on host 182
2023-07-11 14:16:27,596 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 183 is on host 183
2023-07-11 14:16:27,596 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 184 is on host 184
2023-07-11 14:16:27,596 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 185 is on host 185
2023-07-11 14:16:27,596 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 186 is on host 186
2023-07-11 14:16:27,596 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 187 is on host 187
2023-07-11 14:16:27,596 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 188 is on host 188
2023-07-11 14:16:27,596 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 189 is on host 189
2023-07-11 14:16:27,596 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 190 is on host 190
2023-07-11 14:16:27,596 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 191 is on host 191
2023-07-11 14:16:27,596 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 192 is on host 192
2023-07-11 14:16:27,596 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 193 is on host 193
2023-07-11 14:16:27,596 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 194 is on host 194
2023-07-11 14:16:27,596 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 195 is on host 195
2023-07-11 14:16:27,596 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 196 is on host 196
2023-07-11 14:16:27,596 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 197 is on host 197
2023-07-11 14:16:27,597 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 198 is on host 198
2023-07-11 14:16:27,597 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 199 is on host 199
2023-07-11 14:16:27,597 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 200 is on host 200
2023-07-11 14:16:27,597 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 201 is on host 201
2023-07-11 14:16:27,597 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 202 is on host 202
2023-07-11 14:16:27,597 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 203 is on host 203
2023-07-11 14:16:27,597 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 204 is on host 204
2023-07-11 14:16:27,597 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 205 is on host 205
2023-07-11 14:16:27,597 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 206 is on host 206
2023-07-11 14:16:27,597 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 207 is on host 207
2023-07-11 14:16:27,597 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 208 is on host 208
2023-07-11 14:16:27,597 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 209 is on host 209
2023-07-11 14:16:27,597 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 210 is on host 210
2023-07-11 14:16:27,597 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 211 is on host 211
2023-07-11 14:16:27,597 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 212 is on host 212
2023-07-11 14:16:27,597 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 213 is on host 213
2023-07-11 14:16:27,597 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 214 is on host 214
2023-07-11 14:16:27,597 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 215 is on host 215
2023-07-11 14:16:27,597 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 216 is on host 216
2023-07-11 14:16:27,597 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 217 is on host 217
2023-07-11 14:16:27,597 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 218 is on host 218
2023-07-11 14:16:27,597 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 219 is on host 219
2023-07-11 14:16:27,597 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 220 is on host 220
2023-07-11 14:16:27,597 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 221 is on host 221
2023-07-11 14:16:27,597 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 222 is on host 222
2023-07-11 14:16:27,597 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 223 is on host 223
2023-07-11 14:16:27,597 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 224 is on host 224
2023-07-11 14:16:27,597 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 225 is on host 225
2023-07-11 14:16:27,597 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 226 is on host 226
2023-07-11 14:16:27,598 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 227 is on host 227
2023-07-11 14:16:27,598 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 228 is on host 228
2023-07-11 14:16:27,598 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 229 is on host 229
2023-07-11 14:16:27,598 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 230 is on host 230
2023-07-11 14:16:27,598 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 231 is on host 231
2023-07-11 14:16:27,598 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 232 is on host 232
2023-07-11 14:16:27,598 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 233 is on host 233
2023-07-11 14:16:27,598 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 234 is on host 234
2023-07-11 14:16:27,598 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 235 is on host 235
2023-07-11 14:16:27,598 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 236 is on host 236
2023-07-11 14:16:27,598 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 237 is on host 237
2023-07-11 14:16:27,598 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 238 is on host 238
2023-07-11 14:16:27,598 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 239 is on host 239
2023-07-11 14:16:27,598 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 240 is on host 240
2023-07-11 14:16:27,598 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 241 is on host 241
2023-07-11 14:16:27,598 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 242 is on host 242
2023-07-11 14:16:27,598 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 243 is on host 243
2023-07-11 14:16:27,598 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 244 is on host 244
2023-07-11 14:16:27,598 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 245 is on host 245
2023-07-11 14:16:27,598 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 246 is on host 246
2023-07-11 14:16:27,598 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 247 is on host 247
2023-07-11 14:16:27,598 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 248 is on host 248
2023-07-11 14:16:27,598 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 249 is on host 249
2023-07-11 14:16:27,598 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 250 is on host 250
2023-07-11 14:16:27,598 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 251 is on host 251
2023-07-11 14:16:27,598 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 252 is on host 252
2023-07-11 14:16:27,598 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 253 is on host 253
2023-07-11 14:16:27,598 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 254 is on host 254
2023-07-11 14:16:27,598 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 255 is on host 255
2023-07-11 14:16:27,599 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 256 is on host 256
2023-07-11 14:16:27,599 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 257 is on host 257
2023-07-11 14:16:27,599 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 258 is on host 258
2023-07-11 14:16:27,599 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 259 is on host 259
2023-07-11 14:16:27,599 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 260 is on host 260
2023-07-11 14:16:27,599 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 261 is on host 261
2023-07-11 14:16:27,599 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 262 is on host 262
2023-07-11 14:16:27,599 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 263 is on host 263
2023-07-11 14:16:27,599 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 264 is on host 264
2023-07-11 14:16:27,599 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 265 is on host 265
2023-07-11 14:16:27,599 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 266 is on host 266
2023-07-11 14:16:27,599 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 267 is on host 267
2023-07-11 14:16:27,599 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 268 is on host 268
2023-07-11 14:16:27,599 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 269 is on host 269
2023-07-11 14:16:27,599 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 270 is on host 270
2023-07-11 14:16:27,599 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 271 is on host 271
2023-07-11 14:16:27,599 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 272 is on host 272
2023-07-11 14:16:27,599 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 273 is on host 273
2023-07-11 14:16:27,599 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 274 is on host 274
2023-07-11 14:16:27,599 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 275 is on host 275
2023-07-11 14:16:27,599 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 276 is on host 276
2023-07-11 14:16:27,599 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 277 is on host 277
2023-07-11 14:16:27,599 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 278 is on host 278
2023-07-11 14:16:27,599 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 279 is on host 279
2023-07-11 14:16:27,599 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 280 is on host 280
2023-07-11 14:16:27,599 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 281 is on host 281
2023-07-11 14:16:27,599 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 282 is on host 282
2023-07-11 14:16:27,599 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 283 is on host 283
2023-07-11 14:16:27,600 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 284 is on host 284
2023-07-11 14:16:27,600 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 285 is on host 285
2023-07-11 14:16:27,600 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 286 is on host 286
2023-07-11 14:16:27,600 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 287 is on host 287
2023-07-11 14:16:27,600 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 288 is on host 288
2023-07-11 14:16:27,600 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 289 is on host 289
2023-07-11 14:16:27,600 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 290 is on host 290
2023-07-11 14:16:27,600 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 291 is on host 291
2023-07-11 14:16:27,600 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 292 is on host 292
2023-07-11 14:16:27,600 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 293 is on host 293
2023-07-11 14:16:27,600 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 294 is on host 294
2023-07-11 14:16:27,600 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 295 is on host 295
2023-07-11 14:16:27,600 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 296 is on host 296
2023-07-11 14:16:27,600 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 297 is on host 297
2023-07-11 14:16:27,600 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 298 is on host 298
2023-07-11 14:16:27,600 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 299 is on host 299
2023-07-11 14:16:27,600 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 300 is on host 300
2023-07-11 14:16:27,600 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 301 is on host 301
2023-07-11 14:16:27,600 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 302 is on host 302
2023-07-11 14:16:27,600 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 303 is on host 303
2023-07-11 14:16:27,600 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 304 is on host 304
2023-07-11 14:16:27,600 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 305 is on host 305
2023-07-11 14:16:27,600 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 306 is on host 306
2023-07-11 14:16:27,600 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 307 is on host 307
2023-07-11 14:16:27,600 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 308 is on host 308
2023-07-11 14:16:27,600 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 309 is on host 309
2023-07-11 14:16:27,600 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 310 is on host 310
2023-07-11 14:16:27,600 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 311 is on host 311
2023-07-11 14:16:27,601 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 312 is on host 312
2023-07-11 14:16:27,601 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 313 is on host 313
2023-07-11 14:16:27,601 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 314 is on host 314
2023-07-11 14:16:27,601 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 315 is on host 315
2023-07-11 14:16:27,601 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 316 is on host 316
2023-07-11 14:16:27,601 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 317 is on host 317
2023-07-11 14:16:27,601 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 318 is on host 318
2023-07-11 14:16:27,601 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 319 is on host 319
2023-07-11 14:16:27,601 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 320 is on host 320
2023-07-11 14:16:27,601 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 321 is on host 321
2023-07-11 14:16:27,601 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 322 is on host 322
2023-07-11 14:16:27,601 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 323 is on host 323
2023-07-11 14:16:27,601 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 324 is on host 324
2023-07-11 14:16:27,601 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 325 is on host 325
2023-07-11 14:16:27,601 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 326 is on host 326
2023-07-11 14:16:27,601 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 327 is on host 327
2023-07-11 14:16:27,601 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 328 is on host 328
2023-07-11 14:16:27,601 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 329 is on host 329
2023-07-11 14:16:27,601 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 330 is on host 330
2023-07-11 14:16:27,601 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 331 is on host 331
2023-07-11 14:16:27,601 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 332 is on host 332
2023-07-11 14:16:27,601 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 333 is on host 333
2023-07-11 14:16:27,601 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 334 is on host 334
2023-07-11 14:16:27,601 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 335 is on host 335
2023-07-11 14:16:27,601 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 336 is on host 336
2023-07-11 14:16:27,601 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 337 is on host 337
2023-07-11 14:16:27,601 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 338 is on host 338
2023-07-11 14:16:27,601 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 339 is on host 339
2023-07-11 14:16:27,602 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 340 is on host 340
2023-07-11 14:16:27,602 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 341 is on host 341
2023-07-11 14:16:27,602 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 342 is on host 342
2023-07-11 14:16:27,602 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 343 is on host 343
2023-07-11 14:16:27,602 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 344 is on host 344
2023-07-11 14:16:27,602 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 345 is on host 345
2023-07-11 14:16:27,602 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 346 is on host 346
2023-07-11 14:16:27,602 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 347 is on host 347
2023-07-11 14:16:27,602 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 348 is on host 348
2023-07-11 14:16:27,602 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 349 is on host 349
2023-07-11 14:16:27,602 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 350 is on host 350
2023-07-11 14:16:27,602 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 351 is on host 351
2023-07-11 14:16:27,602 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 352 is on host 352
2023-07-11 14:16:27,602 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 353 is on host 353
2023-07-11 14:16:27,602 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 354 is on host 354
2023-07-11 14:16:27,602 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 355 is on host 355
2023-07-11 14:16:27,602 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 356 is on host 356
2023-07-11 14:16:27,602 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 357 is on host 357
2023-07-11 14:16:27,602 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 358 is on host 358
2023-07-11 14:16:27,602 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 359 is on host 359
2023-07-11 14:16:27,602 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 360 is on host 360
2023-07-11 14:16:27,602 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 361 is on host 361
2023-07-11 14:16:27,602 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 362 is on host 362
2023-07-11 14:16:27,602 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 363 is on host 363
2023-07-11 14:16:27,602 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 364 is on host 364
2023-07-11 14:16:27,602 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 365 is on host 365
2023-07-11 14:16:27,602 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 366 is on host 366
2023-07-11 14:16:27,602 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 367 is on host 367
2023-07-11 14:16:27,602 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 368 is on host 368
2023-07-11 14:16:27,603 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 369 is on host 369
2023-07-11 14:16:27,603 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 370 is on host 370
2023-07-11 14:16:27,603 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 371 is on host 371
2023-07-11 14:16:27,603 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 372 is on host 372
2023-07-11 14:16:27,603 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 373 is on host 373
2023-07-11 14:16:27,603 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 374 is on host 374
2023-07-11 14:16:27,603 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 375 is on host 375
2023-07-11 14:16:27,603 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 376 is on host 376
2023-07-11 14:16:27,603 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 377 is on host 377
2023-07-11 14:16:27,603 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 378 is on host 378
2023-07-11 14:16:27,603 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 379 is on host 379
2023-07-11 14:16:27,603 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 380 is on host 380
2023-07-11 14:16:27,603 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 381 is on host 381
2023-07-11 14:16:27,603 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 382 is on host 382
2023-07-11 14:16:27,603 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 383 is on host 383
2023-07-11 14:16:27,603 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 384 is on host 384
2023-07-11 14:16:27,603 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 385 is on host 385
2023-07-11 14:16:27,603 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 386 is on host 386
2023-07-11 14:16:27,603 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 387 is on host 387
2023-07-11 14:16:27,603 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 388 is on host 388
2023-07-11 14:16:27,603 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 389 is on host 389
2023-07-11 14:16:27,603 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 390 is on host 390
2023-07-11 14:16:27,603 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 391 is on host 391
2023-07-11 14:16:27,603 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 392 is on host 392
2023-07-11 14:16:27,603 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=393, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:27,604 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table11) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:27,604 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table55
2023-07-11 14:16:27,604 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv553536953=290, srv1630071126=110, srv1071894870=12, srv23511728=232, srv658346947=323, srv2025338799=204, srv1397994335=64, srv1976766403=195, srv1644629726=118, srv957637734=381, srv2079182457=210, srv1749264468=139, srv2046129126=206, srv1595762596=104, srv603990852=307, srv1973073480=194, srv958856137=382, srv644066832=319, srv557062842=292, srv277765671=235, srv732221418=337, srv1769385567=143, srv224612199=228, srv714752528=334, srv362526040=256, srv581128949=296, srv2133511466=223, srv1144239257=30, srv320603627=245, srv1679952521=126, srv2122867873=222, srv1110067064=24, srv256251994=233, srv63261708=317, srv89837390=371, srv552104598=289, srv508952995=281, srv2096011353=214, srv1770417148=144, srv1246723478=42, srv929436444=378, srv2082192429=211, srv234917297=231, srv405700573=266, srv183644386=166, srv1488378513=85, srv173139715=136, srv1154180352=32, srv355693379=252, srv1407521654=66, srv496848057=275, srv1157975499=33, srv1806731027=162, srv1923102804=184, srv311102455=244, srv450011410=271, srv771515724=348, srv389183508=262, srv1249074416=43, srv2014575201=201, srv640847108=318, srv832363565=356, srv1970882134=192, srv2107358603=218, srv855766065=361, srv1336043388=55, srv29397186=237, srv982792848=390, srv976560524=386, srv101181760=3, srv1093549482=21, srv2018389395=202, srv2113483104=221, srv1778339118=149, srv1968709692=190, srv705221118=333, srv159600090=105, srv1919608486=180, srv981255102=389, srv807899713=353, srv755110395=344, srv1770594519=145, srv739692705=340, srv1076582671=16, srv693869315=330, srv1079048717=17, srv440657532=270, srv1636659280=115, srv2108739257=220, srv668373413=326, srv1003610393=2, srv1054229197=11, srv1868589627=172, srv2103522371=217, srv1000546271=0, srv951670617=380, srv2042909593=205, srv1865656038=171, srv1466355012=78, srv703662406=332, srv1418112884=70, srv1215580291=40, srv71833528=335, srv1580581635=103, srv1021032212=5, srv1080806312=19, srv1985601859=197, srv74471954=343, srv1647472319=119, srv2071553346=208, srv1632855171=112, srv1122009370=27, srv13613992=61, srv1630777154=111, srv301413669=239, srv550697728=288, srv1296023857=53, srv1724550977=133, srv1989290370=198, srv1926417985=185, srv1678097199=125, srv1461034373=76, srv614690415=311, srv2098345381=215, srv310463473=243, srv1011934105=4, srv148627129=84, srv305489318=240, srv1256534903=46, srv1289731445=52, srv1798844587=157, srv567113085=294, srv1119222501=26, srv2055117940=207, srv855898852=362, srv629224816=316, srv1075943554=15, srv625909061=315, srv1705591942=128, srv734225580=339, srv660107924=324, srv1381729938=62, srv1633483173=113, srv408265476=267, srv1776057793=148, srv1360253411=60, srv1511424834=90, srv1414162621=68, srv883343663=370, srv151859222=91, srv349144930=251, srv1991304034=199, srv1825887791=164, srv601657063=305, srv758932951=345, srv1651629087=120, srv1864623584=170, srv682957691=329, srv1500454146=88, srv1725962085=135, srv1659841448=121, srv1253206004=45, srv52354442=284, srv18508093=168, srv1427731921=73, srv561344974=293, srv721668125=336, srv1575482138=100, srv914128771=373, srv961487230=383, srv741332941=342, srv533032466=286, srv1574140987=99, srv2139849097=224, srv503902262=278, srv674807007=327, srv1786829855=153, srv2088727517=213, srv394366966=264, srv980089565=388, srv114594288=31, srv38296437=261, srv214835574=226, srv1887224977=176, srv1025509362=7, srv1577020334=102, srv524466665=285, srv393561021=263, srv759909927=346, srv763556514=347, srv786453030=349, srv2142935488=225, srv618111613=312, srv16254163=108, srv343211061=250, srv476075173=273, srv1269632212=47, srv333589612=246, srv499015361=276, srv836674186=357, srv1799191687=158, srv1446998035=74, srv1571774199=98, srv1115354947=25, srv333860881=247, srv1724152600=132, srv1598699299=106, srv177885829=151, srv472125887=272, srv1101339966=22, srv1424985362=72, srv1945569895=188, srv594128294=300, srv1026739237=8, srv842459828=358, srv878519137=366, srv1921260729=181, srv339110834=249, srv504099471=279, srv814253179=354, srv1643744885=116, srv1793847521=155, srv607234624=309, srv698219051=331, srv1688538732=127, srv666240078=325, srv1079284733=18, srv29210550=236, srv506181748=280, srv881313122=368, srv1945452576=187, srv597307897=303, srv1285120424=51, srv1887943816=177, srv1983604698=196, srv1805465940=161, srv309309336=242, srv1719756294=131, srv1349932676=58, srv1208486369=38, srv1643971570=117, srv1509331489=89, srv334105385=248, srv1400515744=65, srv369984715=259, srv43712162=269, srv842675864=359, srv1803258748=160, srv1022450918=6, srv1775108732=147, srv1766088250=141, srv180150732=159, srv1220857227=41, srv226530501=229, srv362032108=255, srv919715380=377, srv1074935976=14, srv1395030819=63, srv803291569=352, srv1877966766=175, srv220538712=227, srv2021718843=203, srv2107782185=219, srv882216860=369, srv1489137852=86, srv1972328734=193, srv1470759982=79, srv1774824811=146, srv971974774=384, srv1418242791=71, srv1001274196=1, srv909615097=372, srv1537724566=93, srv1165799954=34, srv1724754364=134, srv978173525=387, srv113319438=29, srv578033735=295, srv147931272=80, srv1183635941=35, srv1904215245=178, srv596349756=302, srv880835255=367, srv857544550=364, srv1779729022=152, srv1795612465=156, srv621083045=314, srv917704170=375, srv1351811120=59, srv1316710897=54, srv789820555=350, srv1922580095=183, srv305567304=241, srv1936745425=186, srv1745318024=138, srv1210822057=39, srv645375717=320, srv950628389=379, srv1490199189=87, srv1575919256=101, srv154481102=96, srv359402967=254, srv997716931=391, srv1457224273=75, srv581644449=297, srv1872374768=174, srv363177310=257, srv740327512=341, srv1664227236=123, srv972330517=385, srv1634261306=114, srv1662183707=122, srv1969046891=191, srv1485266211=82, srv1778842262=150, srv588410181=298, srv1921840985=182, srv591279493=299, srv37574565=260, srv1104147458=23, srv1190166330=36, srv652270371=322, srv1484309042=81, srv1560148463=97, srv618569548=313, srv2102708311=216, srv1084873074=20, srv517669556=283, srv918152084=376, srv649714317=321, srv1674484790=124, srv1339239880=56, srv1461073271=77, srv1125312901=28, srv25633292=234, srv516616923=282, srv299721745=238, srv604932433=308, srv1273702855=48, srv792183929=351, srv1042608200=10, srv1276335106=49, srv1486044644=83, srv676101698=328, srv998930892=392, srv200111276=200, srv1863083643=169, srv1737443479=137, srv872997185=365, srv821351126=355, srv852115805=360, srv1074355423=13, srv170952194=130, srv503430005=277, srv153887567=94, srv1415163001=69, srv1032737435=9, srv1840670515=167, srv1961921083=189, srv59745831=304, srv36715747=258, srv431547280=268, srv1524853580=92, srv1870059418=173, srv396010771=265, srv594457792=301, srv1755339428=140, srv1766275429=142, srv5565786=291, srv603898526=306, srv544570223=287, srv856030669=363, srv1542523468=95, srv915785747=374, srv356122213=253, srv1411875499=67, srv2077620970=209, srv1345529444=57, srv232339963=230, srv1250861076=44, srv1914875423=179, srv478619481=274, srv1202435626=37, srv1706089454=129, srv1810631201=163, srv1282644061=50, srv1625945288=109, srv733251129=338, srv2082830831=212, srv1612103540=107, srv612136291=310, srv1790004142=154, srv183394703=165} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:27,605 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:27,605 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:27,605 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:27,605 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:27,605 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:27,605 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:27,605 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-11 14:16:27,605 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-11 14:16:27,605 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-11 14:16:27,605 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-11 14:16:27,605 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 10 is on host 10
2023-07-11 14:16:27,605 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 11 is on host 11
2023-07-11 14:16:27,605 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 12 is on host 12
2023-07-11 14:16:27,605 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 13 is on host 13
2023-07-11 14:16:27,605 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 14 is on host 14
2023-07-11 14:16:27,605 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 15 is on host 15
2023-07-11 14:16:27,605 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 16 is on host 16
2023-07-11 14:16:27,605 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 17 is on host 17
2023-07-11 14:16:27,605 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 18 is on host 18
2023-07-11 14:16:27,605 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 19 is on host 19
2023-07-11 14:16:27,605 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 20 is on host 20
2023-07-11 14:16:27,606 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 21 is on host 21
2023-07-11 14:16:27,606 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 22 is on host 22
2023-07-11 14:16:27,606 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 23 is on host 23
2023-07-11 14:16:27,606 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 24 is on host 24
2023-07-11 14:16:27,606 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 25 is on host 25
2023-07-11 14:16:27,606 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 26 is on host 26
2023-07-11 14:16:27,606 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 27 is on host 27
2023-07-11 14:16:27,606 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 28 is on host 28
2023-07-11 14:16:27,606 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 29 is on host 29
2023-07-11 14:16:27,606 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 30 is on host 30
2023-07-11 14:16:27,606 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 31 is on host 31
2023-07-11 14:16:27,606 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 32 is on host 32
2023-07-11 14:16:27,606 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 33 is on host 33
2023-07-11 14:16:27,606 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 34 is on host 34
2023-07-11 14:16:27,606 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 35 is on host 35
2023-07-11 14:16:27,606 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 36 is on host 36
2023-07-11 14:16:27,606 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 37 is on host 37
2023-07-11 14:16:27,606 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 38 is on host 38
2023-07-11 14:16:27,606 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 39 is on host 39
2023-07-11 14:16:27,606 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 40 is on host 40
2023-07-11 14:16:27,606 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 41 is on host 41
2023-07-11 14:16:27,606 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 42 is on host 42
2023-07-11 14:16:27,606 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 43 is on host 43
2023-07-11 14:16:27,606 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 44 is on host 44
2023-07-11 14:16:27,606 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 45 is on host 45
2023-07-11 14:16:27,606 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 46 is on host 46
2023-07-11 14:16:27,606 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 47 is on host 47
2023-07-11 14:16:27,606 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 48 is on host 48
2023-07-11 14:16:27,606 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 49 is on host 49
2023-07-11 14:16:27,607 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 50 is on host 50
2023-07-11 14:16:27,607 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 51 is on host 51
2023-07-11 14:16:27,607 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 52 is on host 52
2023-07-11 14:16:27,607 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 53 is on host 53
2023-07-11 14:16:27,607 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 54 is on host 54
2023-07-11 14:16:27,607 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 55 is on host 55
2023-07-11 14:16:27,607 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 56 is on host 56
2023-07-11 14:16:27,607 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 57 is on host 57
2023-07-11 14:16:27,607 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 58 is on host 58
2023-07-11 14:16:27,607 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 59 is on host 59
2023-07-11 14:16:27,607 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 60 is on host 60
2023-07-11 14:16:27,607 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 61 is on host 61
2023-07-11 14:16:27,607 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 62 is on host 62
2023-07-11 14:16:27,607 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 63 is on host 63
2023-07-11 14:16:27,607 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 64 is on host 64
2023-07-11 14:16:27,607 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 65 is on host 65
2023-07-11 14:16:27,607 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 66 is on host 66
2023-07-11 14:16:27,607 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 67 is on host 67
2023-07-11 14:16:27,607 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 68 is on host 68
2023-07-11 14:16:27,607 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 69 is on host 69
2023-07-11 14:16:27,607 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 70 is on host 70
2023-07-11 14:16:27,607 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 71 is on host 71
2023-07-11 14:16:27,607 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 72 is on host 72
2023-07-11 14:16:27,607 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 73 is on host 73
2023-07-11 14:16:27,607 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 74 is on host 74
2023-07-11 14:16:27,607 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 75 is on host 75
2023-07-11 14:16:27,607 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 76 is on host 76
2023-07-11 14:16:27,607 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 77 is on host 77
2023-07-11 14:16:27,607 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 78 is on host 78
2023-07-11 14:16:27,608 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 79 is on host 79
2023-07-11 14:16:27,608 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 80 is on host 80
2023-07-11 14:16:27,608 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 81 is on host 81
2023-07-11 14:16:27,608 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 82 is on host 82
2023-07-11 14:16:27,608 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 83 is on host 83
2023-07-11 14:16:27,608 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 84 is on host 84
2023-07-11 14:16:27,608 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 85 is on host 85
2023-07-11 14:16:27,608 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 86 is on host 86
2023-07-11 14:16:27,608 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 87 is on host 87
2023-07-11 14:16:27,608 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 88 is on host 88
2023-07-11 14:16:27,608 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 89 is on host 89
2023-07-11 14:16:27,608 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 90 is on host 90
2023-07-11 14:16:27,608 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 91 is on host 91
2023-07-11 14:16:27,608 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 92 is on host 92
2023-07-11 14:16:27,608 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 93 is on host 93
2023-07-11 14:16:27,608 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 94 is on host 94
2023-07-11 14:16:27,608 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 95 is on host 95
2023-07-11 14:16:27,608 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 96 is on host 96
2023-07-11 14:16:27,608 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 97 is on host 97
2023-07-11 14:16:27,608 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 98 is on host 98
2023-07-11 14:16:27,608 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 99 is on host 99
2023-07-11 14:16:27,608 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 100 is on host 100
2023-07-11 14:16:27,608 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 101 is on host 101
2023-07-11 14:16:27,608 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 102 is on host 102
2023-07-11 14:16:27,608 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 103 is on host 103
2023-07-11 14:16:27,608 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 104 is on host 104
2023-07-11 14:16:27,608 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 105 is on host 105
2023-07-11 14:16:27,608 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 106 is on host 106
2023-07-11 14:16:27,609 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 107 is on host 107
2023-07-11 14:16:27,609 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 108 is on host 108
2023-07-11 14:16:27,609 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 109 is on host 109
2023-07-11 14:16:27,609 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 110 is on host 110
2023-07-11 14:16:27,609 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 111 is on host 111
2023-07-11 14:16:27,609 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 112 is on host 112
2023-07-11 14:16:27,609 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 113 is on host 113
2023-07-11 14:16:27,609 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 114 is on host 114
2023-07-11 14:16:27,609 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 115 is on host 115
2023-07-11 14:16:27,609 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 116 is on host 116
2023-07-11 14:16:27,609 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 117 is on host 117
2023-07-11 14:16:27,609 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 118 is on host 118
2023-07-11 14:16:27,609 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 119 is on host 119
2023-07-11 14:16:27,609 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 120 is on host 120
2023-07-11 14:16:27,609 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 121 is on host 121
2023-07-11 14:16:27,609 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 122 is on host 122
2023-07-11 14:16:27,609 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 123 is on host 123
2023-07-11 14:16:27,609 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 124 is on host 124
2023-07-11 14:16:27,609 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 125 is on host 125
2023-07-11 14:16:27,609 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 126 is on host 126
2023-07-11 14:16:27,609 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 127 is on host 127
2023-07-11 14:16:27,609 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 128 is on host 128
2023-07-11 14:16:27,609 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 129 is on host 129
2023-07-11 14:16:27,609 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 130 is on host 130
2023-07-11 14:16:27,609 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 131 is on host 131
2023-07-11 14:16:27,609 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 132 is on host 132
2023-07-11 14:16:27,609 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 133 is on host 133
2023-07-11 14:16:27,609 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 134 is on host 134
2023-07-11 14:16:27,609 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 135 is on host 135
2023-07-11 14:16:27,610 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 136 is on host 136
2023-07-11 14:16:27,610 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 137 is on host 137
2023-07-11 14:16:27,610 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 138 is on host 138
2023-07-11 14:16:27,610 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 139 is on host 139
2023-07-11 14:16:27,610 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 140 is on host 140
2023-07-11 14:16:27,610 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 141 is on host 141
2023-07-11 14:16:27,610 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 142 is on host 142
2023-07-11 14:16:27,610 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 143 is on host 143
2023-07-11 14:16:27,610 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 144 is on host 144
2023-07-11 14:16:27,610 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 145 is on host 145
2023-07-11 14:16:27,610 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 146 is on host 146
2023-07-11 14:16:27,610 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 147 is on host 147
2023-07-11 14:16:27,610 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 148 is on host 148
2023-07-11 14:16:27,610 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 149 is on host 149
2023-07-11 14:16:27,610 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 150 is on host 150
2023-07-11 14:16:27,610 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 151 is on host 151
2023-07-11 14:16:27,610 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 152 is on host 152
2023-07-11 14:16:27,610 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 153 is on host 153
2023-07-11 14:16:27,610 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 154 is on host 154
2023-07-11 14:16:27,610 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 155 is on host 155
2023-07-11 14:16:27,610 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 156 is on host 156
2023-07-11 14:16:27,610 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 157 is on host 157
2023-07-11 14:16:27,610 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 158 is on host 158
2023-07-11 14:16:27,610 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 159 is on host 159
2023-07-11 14:16:27,610 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 160 is on host 160
2023-07-11 14:16:27,610 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 161 is on host 161
2023-07-11 14:16:27,610 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 162 is on host 162
2023-07-11 14:16:27,610 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 163 is on host 163
2023-07-11 14:16:27,610 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 164 is on host 164
2023-07-11 14:16:27,611 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 165 is on host 165
2023-07-11 14:16:27,611 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 166 is on host 166
2023-07-11 14:16:27,611 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 167 is on host 167
2023-07-11 14:16:27,611 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 168 is on host 168
2023-07-11 14:16:27,611 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 169 is on host 169
2023-07-11 14:16:27,611 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 170 is on host 170
2023-07-11 14:16:27,611 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 171 is on host 171
2023-07-11 14:16:27,611 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 172 is on host 172
2023-07-11 14:16:27,611 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 173 is on host 173
2023-07-11 14:16:27,611 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 174 is on host 174
2023-07-11 14:16:27,611 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 175 is on host 175
2023-07-11 14:16:27,611 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 176 is on host 176
2023-07-11 14:16:27,611 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 177 is on host 177
2023-07-11 14:16:27,611 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 178 is on host 178
2023-07-11 14:16:27,611 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 179 is on host 179
2023-07-11 14:16:27,611 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 180 is on host 180
2023-07-11 14:16:27,611 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 181 is on host 181
2023-07-11 14:16:27,611 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 182 is on host 182
2023-07-11 14:16:27,611 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 183 is on host 183
2023-07-11 14:16:27,611 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 184 is on host 184
2023-07-11 14:16:27,611 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 185 is on host 185
2023-07-11 14:16:27,611 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 186 is on host 186
2023-07-11 14:16:27,611 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 187 is on host 187
2023-07-11 14:16:27,611 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 188 is on host 188
2023-07-11 14:16:27,611 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 189 is on host 189
2023-07-11 14:16:27,611 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 190 is on host 190
2023-07-11 14:16:27,611 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 191 is on host 191
2023-07-11 14:16:27,611 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 192 is on host 192
2023-07-11 14:16:27,611 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 193 is on host 193
2023-07-11 14:16:27,612 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 194 is on host 194
2023-07-11 14:16:27,612 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 195 is on host 195
2023-07-11 14:16:27,612 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 196 is on host 196
2023-07-11 14:16:27,612 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 197 is on host 197
2023-07-11 14:16:27,612 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 198 is on host 198
2023-07-11 14:16:27,612 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 199 is on host 199
2023-07-11 14:16:27,612 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 200 is on host 200
2023-07-11 14:16:27,612 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 201 is on host 201
2023-07-11 14:16:27,612 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 202 is on host 202
2023-07-11 14:16:27,612 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 203 is on host 203
2023-07-11 14:16:27,612 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 204 is on host 204
2023-07-11 14:16:27,612 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 205 is on host 205
2023-07-11 14:16:27,612 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 206 is on host 206
2023-07-11 14:16:27,612 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 207 is on host 207
2023-07-11 14:16:27,612 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 208 is on host 208
2023-07-11 14:16:27,612 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 209 is on host 209
2023-07-11 14:16:27,612 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 210 is on host 210
2023-07-11 14:16:27,612 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 211 is on host 211
2023-07-11 14:16:27,612 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 212 is on host 212
2023-07-11 14:16:27,612 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 213 is on host 213
2023-07-11 14:16:27,612 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 214 is on host 214
2023-07-11 14:16:27,612 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 215 is on host 215
2023-07-11 14:16:27,612 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 216 is on host 216
2023-07-11 14:16:27,612 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 217 is on host 217
2023-07-11 14:16:27,612 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 218 is on host 218
2023-07-11 14:16:27,612 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 219 is on host 219
2023-07-11 14:16:27,612 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 220 is on host 220
2023-07-11 14:16:27,612 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 221 is on host 221
2023-07-11 14:16:27,612 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 222 is on host 222
2023-07-11 14:16:27,613 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 223 is on host 223
2023-07-11 14:16:27,613 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 224 is on host 224
2023-07-11 14:16:27,613 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 225 is on host 225
2023-07-11 14:16:27,613 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 226 is on host 226
2023-07-11 14:16:27,613 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 227 is on host 227
2023-07-11 14:16:27,613 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 228 is on host 228
2023-07-11 14:16:27,613 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 229 is on host 229
2023-07-11 14:16:27,613 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 230 is on host 230
2023-07-11 14:16:27,613 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 231 is on host 231
2023-07-11 14:16:27,613 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 232 is on host 232
2023-07-11 14:16:27,613 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 233 is on host 233
2023-07-11 14:16:27,613 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 234 is on host 234
2023-07-11 14:16:27,613 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 235 is on host 235
2023-07-11 14:16:27,613 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 236 is on host 236
2023-07-11 14:16:27,613 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 237 is on host 237
2023-07-11 14:16:27,613 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 238 is on host 238
2023-07-11 14:16:27,613 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 239 is on host 239
2023-07-11 14:16:27,613 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 240 is on host 240
2023-07-11 14:16:27,613 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 241 is on host 241
2023-07-11 14:16:27,613 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 242 is on host 242
2023-07-11 14:16:27,613 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 243 is on host 243
2023-07-11 14:16:27,613 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 244 is on host 244
2023-07-11 14:16:27,613 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 245 is on host 245
2023-07-11 14:16:27,613 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 246 is on host 246
2023-07-11 14:16:27,613 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 247 is on host 247
2023-07-11 14:16:27,613 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 248 is on host 248
2023-07-11 14:16:27,613 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 249 is on host 249
2023-07-11 14:16:27,613 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 250 is on host 250
2023-07-11 14:16:27,614 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 251 is on host 251
2023-07-11 14:16:27,614 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 252 is on host 252
2023-07-11 14:16:27,614 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 253 is on host 253
2023-07-11 14:16:27,614 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 254 is on host 254
2023-07-11 14:16:27,614 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 255 is on host 255
2023-07-11 14:16:27,614 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 256 is on host 256
2023-07-11 14:16:27,614 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 257 is on host 257
2023-07-11 14:16:27,614 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 258 is on host 258
2023-07-11 14:16:27,614 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 259 is on host 259
2023-07-11 14:16:27,614 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 260 is on host 260
2023-07-11 14:16:27,614 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 261 is on host 261
2023-07-11 14:16:27,614 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 262 is on host 262
2023-07-11 14:16:27,614 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 263 is on host 263
2023-07-11 14:16:27,614 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 264 is on host 264
2023-07-11 14:16:27,614 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 265 is on host 265
2023-07-11 14:16:27,614 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 266 is on host 266
2023-07-11 14:16:27,614 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 267 is on host 267
2023-07-11 14:16:27,614 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 268 is on host 268
2023-07-11 14:16:27,614 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 269 is on host 269
2023-07-11 14:16:27,614 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 270 is on host 270
2023-07-11 14:16:27,614 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 271 is on host 271
2023-07-11 14:16:27,614 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 272 is on host 272
2023-07-11 14:16:27,614 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 273 is on host 273
2023-07-11 14:16:27,614 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 274 is on host 274
2023-07-11 14:16:27,614 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 275 is on host 275
2023-07-11 14:16:27,614 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 276 is on host 276
2023-07-11 14:16:27,614 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 277 is on host 277
2023-07-11 14:16:27,614 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 278 is on host 278
2023-07-11 14:16:27,614 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 279 is on host 279
2023-07-11 14:16:27,615 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 280 is on host 280
2023-07-11 14:16:27,615 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 281 is on host 281
2023-07-11 14:16:27,615 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 282 is on host 282
2023-07-11 14:16:27,615 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 283 is on host 283
2023-07-11 14:16:27,615 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 284 is on host 284
2023-07-11 14:16:27,615 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 285 is on host 285
2023-07-11 14:16:27,615 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 286 is on host 286
2023-07-11 14:16:27,615 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 287 is on host 287
2023-07-11 14:16:27,615 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 288 is on host 288
2023-07-11 14:16:27,615 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 289 is on host 289
2023-07-11 14:16:27,615 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 290 is on host 290
2023-07-11 14:16:27,615 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 291 is on host 291
2023-07-11 14:16:27,615 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 292 is on host 292
2023-07-11 14:16:27,615 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 293 is on host 293
2023-07-11 14:16:27,615 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 294 is on host 294
2023-07-11 14:16:27,615 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 295 is on host 295
2023-07-11 14:16:27,615 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 296 is on host 296
2023-07-11 14:16:27,615 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 297 is on host 297
2023-07-11 14:16:27,615 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 298 is on host 298
2023-07-11 14:16:27,615 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 299 is on host 299
2023-07-11 14:16:27,615 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 300 is on host 300
2023-07-11 14:16:27,615 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 301 is on host 301
2023-07-11 14:16:27,615 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 302 is on host 302
2023-07-11 14:16:27,615 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 303 is on host 303
2023-07-11 14:16:27,615 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 304 is on host 304
2023-07-11 14:16:27,615 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 305 is on host 305
2023-07-11 14:16:27,616 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 306 is on host 306
2023-07-11 14:16:27,616 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 307 is on host 307
2023-07-11 14:16:27,616 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 308 is on host 308
2023-07-11 14:16:27,616 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 309 is on host 309
2023-07-11 14:16:27,616 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 310 is on host 310
2023-07-11 14:16:27,616 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 311 is on host 311
2023-07-11 14:16:27,616 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 312 is on host 312
2023-07-11 14:16:27,616 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 313 is on host 313
2023-07-11 14:16:27,616 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 314 is on host 314
2023-07-11 14:16:27,616 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 315 is on host 315
2023-07-11 14:16:27,616 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 316 is on host 316
2023-07-11 14:16:27,616 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 317 is on host 317
2023-07-11 14:16:27,616 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 318 is on host 318
2023-07-11 14:16:27,616 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 319 is on host 319
2023-07-11 14:16:27,616 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 320 is on host 320
2023-07-11 14:16:27,616 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 321 is on host 321
2023-07-11 14:16:27,616 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 322 is on host 322
2023-07-11 14:16:27,616 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 323 is on host 323
2023-07-11 14:16:27,616 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 324 is on host 324
2023-07-11 14:16:27,616 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 325 is on host 325
2023-07-11 14:16:27,616 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 326 is on host 326
2023-07-11 14:16:27,616 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 327 is on host 327
2023-07-11 14:16:27,616 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 328 is on host 328
2023-07-11 14:16:27,616 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 329 is on host 329
2023-07-11 14:16:27,617 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 330 is on host 330
2023-07-11 14:16:27,617 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 331 is on host 331
2023-07-11 14:16:27,617 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 332 is on host 332
2023-07-11 14:16:27,617 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 333 is on host 333
2023-07-11 14:16:27,617 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 334 is on host 334
2023-07-11 14:16:27,617 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 335 is on host 335
2023-07-11 14:16:27,617 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 336 is on host 336
2023-07-11 14:16:27,617 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 337 is on host 337
2023-07-11 14:16:27,617 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 338 is on host 338
2023-07-11 14:16:27,617 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 339 is on host 339
2023-07-11 14:16:27,617 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 340 is on host 340
2023-07-11 14:16:27,617 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 341 is on host 341
2023-07-11 14:16:27,617 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 342 is on host 342
2023-07-11 14:16:27,617 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 343 is on host 343
2023-07-11 14:16:27,617 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 344 is on host 344
2023-07-11 14:16:27,617 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 345 is on host 345
2023-07-11 14:16:27,617 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 346 is on host 346
2023-07-11 14:16:27,617 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 347 is on host 347
2023-07-11 14:16:27,617 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 348 is on host 348
2023-07-11 14:16:27,617 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 349 is on host 349
2023-07-11 14:16:27,617 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 350 is on host 350
2023-07-11 14:16:27,617 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 351 is on host 351
2023-07-11 14:16:27,617 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 352 is on host 352
2023-07-11 14:16:27,617 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 353 is on host 353
2023-07-11 14:16:27,617 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 354 is on host 354
2023-07-11 14:16:27,617 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 355 is on host 355
2023-07-11 14:16:27,617 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 356 is on host 356
2023-07-11 14:16:27,617 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 357 is on host 357
2023-07-11 14:16:27,618 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 358 is on host 358
2023-07-11 14:16:27,618 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 359 is on host 359
2023-07-11 14:16:27,618 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 360 is on host 360
2023-07-11 14:16:27,618 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 361 is on host 361
2023-07-11 14:16:27,618 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 362 is on host 362
2023-07-11 14:16:27,618 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 363 is on host 363
2023-07-11 14:16:27,618 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 364 is on host 364
2023-07-11 14:16:27,618 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 365 is on host 365
2023-07-11 14:16:27,618 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 366 is on host 366
2023-07-11 14:16:27,618 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 367 is on host 367
2023-07-11 14:16:27,618 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 368 is on host 368
2023-07-11 14:16:27,618 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 369 is on host 369
2023-07-11 14:16:27,618 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 370 is on host 370
2023-07-11 14:16:27,618 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 371 is on host 371
2023-07-11 14:16:27,618 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 372 is on host 372
2023-07-11 14:16:27,618 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 373 is on host 373
2023-07-11 14:16:27,618 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 374 is on host 374
2023-07-11 14:16:27,618 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 375 is on host 375
2023-07-11 14:16:27,618 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 376 is on host 376
2023-07-11 14:16:27,618 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 377 is on host 377
2023-07-11 14:16:27,618 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 378 is on host 378
2023-07-11 14:16:27,618 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 379 is on host 379
2023-07-11 14:16:27,618 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 380 is on host 380
2023-07-11 14:16:27,618 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 381 is on host 381
2023-07-11 14:16:27,618 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 382 is on host 382
2023-07-11 14:16:27,618 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 383 is on host 383
2023-07-11 14:16:27,618 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 384 is on host 384
2023-07-11 14:16:27,618 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 385 is on host 385
2023-07-11 14:16:27,618 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 386 is on host 386
2023-07-11 14:16:27,618 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 387 is on host 387
2023-07-11 14:16:27,619 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 388 is on host 388
2023-07-11 14:16:27,619 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 389 is on host 389
2023-07-11 14:16:27,619 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 390 is on host 390
2023-07-11 14:16:27,619 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 391 is on host 391
2023-07-11 14:16:27,619 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 392 is on host 392
2023-07-11 14:16:27,619 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=393, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:27,619 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table55) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:27,619 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table12
2023-07-11 14:16:27,619 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv553536953=290, srv1630071126=110, srv1071894870=12, srv23511728=232, srv658346947=323, srv2025338799=204, srv1397994335=64, srv1976766403=195, srv1644629726=118, srv957637734=381, srv2079182457=210, srv1749264468=139, srv2046129126=206, srv1595762596=104, srv603990852=307, srv1973073480=194, srv958856137=382, srv644066832=319, srv557062842=292, srv277765671=235, srv732221418=337, srv1769385567=143, srv224612199=228, srv714752528=334, srv362526040=256, srv581128949=296, srv2133511466=223, srv1144239257=30, srv320603627=245, srv1679952521=126, srv2122867873=222, srv1110067064=24, srv256251994=233, srv63261708=317, srv89837390=371, srv552104598=289, srv508952995=281, srv2096011353=214, srv1770417148=144, srv1246723478=42, srv929436444=378, srv2082192429=211, srv234917297=231, srv405700573=266, srv183644386=166, srv1488378513=85, srv173139715=136, srv1154180352=32, srv355693379=252, srv1407521654=66, srv496848057=275, srv1157975499=33, srv1806731027=162, srv1923102804=184, srv311102455=244, srv450011410=271, srv771515724=348, srv389183508=262, srv1249074416=43, srv2014575201=201, srv640847108=318, srv832363565=356, srv1970882134=192, srv2107358603=218, srv855766065=361, srv1336043388=55, srv29397186=237, srv982792848=390, srv976560524=386, srv101181760=3, srv1093549482=21, srv2018389395=202, srv2113483104=221, srv1778339118=149, srv1968709692=190, srv705221118=333, srv159600090=105, srv1919608486=180, srv981255102=389, srv807899713=353, srv755110395=344, srv1770594519=145, srv739692705=340, srv1076582671=16, srv693869315=330, srv1079048717=17, srv440657532=270, srv1636659280=115, srv2108739257=220, srv668373413=326, srv1003610393=2, srv1054229197=11, srv1868589627=172, srv2103522371=217, srv1000546271=0, srv951670617=380, srv2042909593=205, srv1865656038=171, srv1466355012=78, srv703662406=332, srv1418112884=70, srv1215580291=40, srv71833528=335, srv1580581635=103, srv1021032212=5, srv1080806312=19, srv1985601859=197, srv74471954=343, srv1647472319=119, srv2071553346=208, srv1632855171=112, srv1122009370=27, srv13613992=61, srv1630777154=111, srv301413669=239, srv550697728=288, srv1296023857=53, srv1724550977=133, srv1989290370=198, srv1926417985=185, srv1678097199=125, srv1461034373=76, srv614690415=311, srv2098345381=215, srv310463473=243, srv1011934105=4, srv148627129=84, srv305489318=240, srv1256534903=46, srv1289731445=52, srv1798844587=157, srv567113085=294, srv1119222501=26, srv2055117940=207, srv855898852=362, srv629224816=316, srv1075943554=15, srv625909061=315, srv1705591942=128, srv734225580=339, srv660107924=324, srv1381729938=62, srv1633483173=113, srv408265476=267, srv1776057793=148, srv1360253411=60, srv1511424834=90, srv1414162621=68, srv883343663=370, srv151859222=91, srv349144930=251, srv1991304034=199, srv1825887791=164, srv601657063=305, srv758932951=345, srv1651629087=120, srv1864623584=170, srv682957691=329, srv1500454146=88, srv1725962085=135, srv1659841448=121, srv1253206004=45, srv52354442=284, srv18508093=168, srv1427731921=73, srv561344974=293, srv721668125=336, srv1575482138=100, srv914128771=373, srv961487230=383, srv741332941=342, srv533032466=286, srv1574140987=99, srv2139849097=224, srv503902262=278, srv674807007=327, srv1786829855=153, srv2088727517=213, srv394366966=264, srv980089565=388, srv114594288=31, srv38296437=261, srv214835574=226, srv1887224977=176, srv1025509362=7, srv1577020334=102, srv524466665=285, srv393561021=263, srv759909927=346, srv763556514=347, srv786453030=349, srv2142935488=225, srv618111613=312, srv16254163=108, srv343211061=250, srv476075173=273, srv1269632212=47, srv333589612=246, srv499015361=276, srv836674186=357, srv1799191687=158, srv1446998035=74, srv1571774199=98, srv1115354947=25, srv333860881=247, srv1724152600=132, srv1598699299=106, srv177885829=151, srv472125887=272, srv1101339966=22, srv1424985362=72, srv1945569895=188, srv594128294=300, srv1026739237=8, srv842459828=358, srv878519137=366, srv1921260729=181, srv339110834=249, srv504099471=279, srv814253179=354, srv1643744885=116, srv1793847521=155, srv607234624=309, srv698219051=331, srv1688538732=127, srv666240078=325, srv1079284733=18, srv29210550=236, srv506181748=280, srv881313122=368, srv1945452576=187, srv597307897=303, srv1285120424=51, srv1887943816=177, srv1983604698=196, srv1805465940=161, srv309309336=242, srv1719756294=131, srv1349932676=58, srv1208486369=38, srv1643971570=117, srv1509331489=89, srv334105385=248, srv1400515744=65, srv369984715=259, srv43712162=269, srv842675864=359, srv1803258748=160, srv1022450918=6, srv1775108732=147, srv1766088250=141, srv180150732=159, srv1220857227=41, srv226530501=229, srv362032108=255, srv919715380=377, srv1074935976=14, srv1395030819=63, srv803291569=352, srv1877966766=175, srv220538712=227, srv2021718843=203, srv2107782185=219, srv882216860=369, srv1489137852=86, srv1972328734=193, srv1470759982=79, srv1774824811=146, srv971974774=384, srv1418242791=71, srv1001274196=1, srv909615097=372, srv1537724566=93, srv1165799954=34, srv1724754364=134, srv978173525=387, srv113319438=29, srv578033735=295, srv147931272=80, srv1183635941=35, srv1904215245=178, srv596349756=302, srv880835255=367, srv857544550=364, srv1779729022=152, srv1795612465=156, srv621083045=314, srv917704170=375, srv1351811120=59, srv1316710897=54, srv789820555=350, srv1922580095=183, srv305567304=241, srv1936745425=186, srv1745318024=138, srv1210822057=39, srv645375717=320, srv950628389=379, srv1490199189=87, srv1575919256=101, srv154481102=96, srv359402967=254, srv997716931=391, srv1457224273=75, srv581644449=297, srv1872374768=174, srv363177310=257, srv740327512=341, srv1664227236=123, srv972330517=385, srv1634261306=114, srv1662183707=122, srv1969046891=191, srv1485266211=82, srv1778842262=150, srv588410181=298, srv1921840985=182, srv591279493=299, srv37574565=260, srv1104147458=23, srv1190166330=36, srv652270371=322, srv1484309042=81, srv1560148463=97, srv618569548=313, srv2102708311=216, srv1084873074=20, srv517669556=283, srv918152084=376, srv649714317=321, srv1674484790=124, srv1339239880=56, srv1461073271=77, srv1125312901=28, srv25633292=234, srv516616923=282, srv299721745=238, srv604932433=308, srv1273702855=48, srv792183929=351, srv1042608200=10, srv1276335106=49, srv1486044644=83, srv676101698=328, srv998930892=392, srv200111276=200, srv1863083643=169, srv1737443479=137, srv872997185=365, srv821351126=355, srv852115805=360, srv1074355423=13, srv170952194=130, srv503430005=277, srv153887567=94, srv1415163001=69, srv1032737435=9, srv1840670515=167, srv1961921083=189, srv59745831=304, srv36715747=258, srv431547280=268, srv1524853580=92, srv1870059418=173, srv396010771=265, srv594457792=301, srv1755339428=140, srv1766275429=142, srv5565786=291, srv603898526=306, srv544570223=287, srv856030669=363, srv1542523468=95, srv915785747=374, srv356122213=253, srv1411875499=67, srv2077620970=209, srv1345529444=57, srv232339963=230, srv1250861076=44, srv1914875423=179, srv478619481=274, srv1202435626=37, srv1706089454=129, srv1810631201=163, srv1282644061=50, srv1625945288=109, srv733251129=338, srv2082830831=212, srv1612103540=107, srv612136291=310, srv1790004142=154, srv183394703=165} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:27,620 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:27,620 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:27,620 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:27,620 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:27,620 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:27,620 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:27,620 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-11 14:16:27,620 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-11 14:16:27,620 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-11 14:16:27,620 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-11 14:16:27,620 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 10 is on host 10
2023-07-11 14:16:27,620 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 11 is on host 11
2023-07-11 14:16:27,620 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 12 is on host 12
2023-07-11 14:16:27,620 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 13 is on host 13
2023-07-11 14:16:27,620 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 14 is on host 14
2023-07-11 14:16:27,620 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 15 is on host 15
2023-07-11 14:16:27,620 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 16 is on host 16
2023-07-11 14:16:27,620 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 17 is on host 17
2023-07-11 14:16:27,620 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 18 is on host 18
2023-07-11 14:16:27,620 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 19 is on host 19
2023-07-11 14:16:27,620 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 20 is on host 20
2023-07-11 14:16:27,620 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 21 is on host 21
2023-07-11 14:16:27,620 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 22 is on host 22
2023-07-11 14:16:27,620 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 23 is on host 23
2023-07-11 14:16:27,621 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 24 is on host 24
2023-07-11 14:16:27,621 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 25 is on host 25
2023-07-11 14:16:27,621 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 26 is on host 26
2023-07-11 14:16:27,621 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 27 is on host 27
2023-07-11 14:16:27,621 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 28 is on host 28
2023-07-11 14:16:27,621 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 29 is on host 29
2023-07-11 14:16:27,621 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 30 is on host 30
2023-07-11 14:16:27,621 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 31 is on host 31
2023-07-11 14:16:27,621 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 32 is on host 32
2023-07-11 14:16:27,621 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 33 is on host 33
2023-07-11 14:16:27,621 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 34 is on host 34
2023-07-11 14:16:27,621 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 35 is on host 35
2023-07-11 14:16:27,621 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 36 is on host 36
2023-07-11 14:16:27,621 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 37 is on host 37
2023-07-11 14:16:27,621 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 38 is on host 38
2023-07-11 14:16:27,621 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 39 is on host 39
2023-07-11 14:16:27,621 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 40 is on host 40
2023-07-11 14:16:27,621 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 41 is on host 41
2023-07-11 14:16:27,621 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 42 is on host 42
2023-07-11 14:16:27,621 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 43 is on host 43
2023-07-11 14:16:27,621 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 44 is on host 44
2023-07-11 14:16:27,621 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 45 is on host 45
2023-07-11 14:16:27,621 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 46 is on host 46
2023-07-11 14:16:27,621 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 47 is on host 47
2023-07-11 14:16:27,621 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 48 is on host 48
2023-07-11 14:16:27,621 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 49 is on host 49
2023-07-11 14:16:27,621 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 50 is on host 50
2023-07-11 14:16:27,621 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 51 is on host 51
2023-07-11 14:16:27,621 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 52 is on host 52
2023-07-11 14:16:27,622 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 53 is on host 53
2023-07-11 14:16:27,622 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 54 is on host 54
2023-07-11 14:16:27,622 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 55 is on host 55
2023-07-11 14:16:27,622 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 56 is on host 56
2023-07-11 14:16:27,622 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 57 is on host 57
2023-07-11 14:16:27,622 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 58 is on host 58
2023-07-11 14:16:27,622 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 59 is on host 59
2023-07-11 14:16:27,622 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 60 is on host 60
2023-07-11 14:16:27,622 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 61 is on host 61
2023-07-11 14:16:27,622 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 62 is on host 62
2023-07-11 14:16:27,622 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 63 is on host 63
2023-07-11 14:16:27,622 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 64 is on host 64
2023-07-11 14:16:27,622 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 65 is on host 65
2023-07-11 14:16:27,622 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 66 is on host 66
2023-07-11 14:16:27,622 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 67 is on host 67
2023-07-11 14:16:27,622 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 68 is on host 68
2023-07-11 14:16:27,622 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 69 is on host 69
2023-07-11 14:16:27,622 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 70 is on host 70
2023-07-11 14:16:27,622 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 71 is on host 71
2023-07-11 14:16:27,622 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 72 is on host 72
2023-07-11 14:16:27,622 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 73 is on host 73
2023-07-11 14:16:27,622 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 74 is on host 74
2023-07-11 14:16:27,622 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 75 is on host 75
2023-07-11 14:16:27,622 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 76 is on host 76
2023-07-11 14:16:27,622 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 77 is on host 77
2023-07-11 14:16:27,622 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 78 is on host 78
2023-07-11 14:16:27,622 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 79 is on host 79
2023-07-11 14:16:27,622 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 80 is on host 80
2023-07-11 14:16:27,622 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 81 is on host 81
2023-07-11 14:16:27,623 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 82 is on host 82
2023-07-11 14:16:27,623 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 83 is on host 83
2023-07-11 14:16:27,623 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 84 is on host 84
2023-07-11 14:16:27,623 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 85 is on host 85
2023-07-11 14:16:27,623 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 86 is on host 86
2023-07-11 14:16:27,623 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 87 is on host 87
2023-07-11 14:16:27,623 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 88 is on host 88
2023-07-11 14:16:27,623 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 89 is on host 89
2023-07-11 14:16:27,623 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 90 is on host 90
2023-07-11 14:16:27,623 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 91 is on host 91
2023-07-11 14:16:27,623 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 92 is on host 92
2023-07-11 14:16:27,623 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 93 is on host 93
2023-07-11 14:16:27,623 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 94 is on host 94
2023-07-11 14:16:27,623 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 95 is on host 95
2023-07-11 14:16:27,623 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 96 is on host 96
2023-07-11 14:16:27,623 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 97 is on host 97
2023-07-11 14:16:27,623 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 98 is on host 98
2023-07-11 14:16:27,623 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 99 is on host 99
2023-07-11 14:16:27,623 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 100 is on host 100
2023-07-11 14:16:27,623 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 101 is on host 101
2023-07-11 14:16:27,623 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 102 is on host 102
2023-07-11 14:16:27,623 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 103 is on host 103
2023-07-11 14:16:27,623 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 104 is on host 104
2023-07-11 14:16:27,623 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 105 is on host 105
2023-07-11 14:16:27,623 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 106 is on host 106
2023-07-11 14:16:27,623 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 107 is on host 107
2023-07-11 14:16:27,623 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 108 is on host 108
2023-07-11 14:16:27,623 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 109 is on host 109
2023-07-11 14:16:27,623 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 110 is on host 110
2023-07-11 14:16:27,624 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 111 is on host 111
2023-07-11 14:16:27,624 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 112 is on host 112
2023-07-11 14:16:27,624 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 113 is on host 113
2023-07-11 14:16:27,624 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 114 is on host 114
2023-07-11 14:16:27,624 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 115 is on host 115
2023-07-11 14:16:27,624 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 116 is on host 116
2023-07-11 14:16:27,624 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 117 is on host 117
2023-07-11 14:16:27,624 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 118 is on host 118
2023-07-11 14:16:27,624 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 119 is on host 119
2023-07-11 14:16:27,624 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 120 is on host 120
2023-07-11 14:16:27,624 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 121 is on host 121
2023-07-11 14:16:27,624 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 122 is on host 122
2023-07-11 14:16:27,624 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 123 is on host 123
2023-07-11 14:16:27,624 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 124 is on host 124
2023-07-11 14:16:27,624 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 125 is on host 125
2023-07-11 14:16:27,624 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 126 is on host 126
2023-07-11 14:16:27,624 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 127 is on host 127
2023-07-11 14:16:27,624 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 128 is on host 128
2023-07-11 14:16:27,624 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 129 is on host 129
2023-07-11 14:16:27,624 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 130 is on host 130
2023-07-11 14:16:27,624 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 131 is on host 131
2023-07-11 14:16:27,624 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 132 is on host 132
2023-07-11 14:16:27,624 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 133 is on host 133
2023-07-11 14:16:27,624 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 134 is on host 134
2023-07-11 14:16:27,624 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 135 is on host 135
2023-07-11 14:16:27,624 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 136 is on host 136
2023-07-11 14:16:27,624 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 137 is on host 137
2023-07-11 14:16:27,624 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 138 is on host 138
2023-07-11 14:16:27,624 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 139 is on host 139
2023-07-11 14:16:27,625 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 140 is on host 140
2023-07-11 14:16:27,625 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 141 is on host 141
2023-07-11 14:16:27,625 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 142 is on host 142
2023-07-11 14:16:27,625 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 143 is on host 143
2023-07-11 14:16:27,625 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 144 is on host 144
2023-07-11 14:16:27,625 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 145 is on host 145
2023-07-11 14:16:27,625 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 146 is on host 146
2023-07-11 14:16:27,625 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 147 is on host 147
2023-07-11 14:16:27,625 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 148 is on host 148
2023-07-11 14:16:27,625 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 149 is on host 149
2023-07-11 14:16:27,625 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 150 is on host 150
2023-07-11 14:16:27,625 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 151 is on host 151
2023-07-11 14:16:27,625 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 152 is on host 152
2023-07-11 14:16:27,625 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 153 is on host 153
2023-07-11 14:16:27,625 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 154 is on host 154
2023-07-11 14:16:27,625 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 155 is on host 155
2023-07-11 14:16:27,625 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 156 is on host 156
2023-07-11 14:16:27,625 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 157 is on host 157
2023-07-11 14:16:27,625 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 158 is on host 158
2023-07-11 14:16:27,625 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 159 is on host 159
2023-07-11 14:16:27,625 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 160 is on host 160
2023-07-11 14:16:27,625 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 161 is on host 161
2023-07-11 14:16:27,625 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 162 is on host 162
2023-07-11 14:16:27,625 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 163 is on host 163
2023-07-11 14:16:27,625 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 164 is on host 164
2023-07-11 14:16:27,625 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 165 is on host 165
2023-07-11 14:16:27,625 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 166 is on host 166
2023-07-11 14:16:27,625 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 167 is on host 167
2023-07-11 14:16:27,626 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 168 is on host 168
2023-07-11 14:16:27,626 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 169 is on host 169
2023-07-11 14:16:27,626 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 170 is on host 170
2023-07-11 14:16:27,626 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 171 is on host 171
2023-07-11 14:16:27,626 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 172 is on host 172
2023-07-11 14:16:27,626 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 173 is on host 173
2023-07-11 14:16:27,626 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 174 is on host 174
2023-07-11 14:16:27,626 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 175 is on host 175
2023-07-11 14:16:27,626 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 176 is on host 176
2023-07-11 14:16:27,626 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 177 is on host 177
2023-07-11 14:16:27,626 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 178 is on host 178
2023-07-11 14:16:27,626 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 179 is on host 179
2023-07-11 14:16:27,626 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 180 is on host 180
2023-07-11 14:16:27,626 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 181 is on host 181
2023-07-11 14:16:27,626 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 182 is on host 182
2023-07-11 14:16:27,626 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 183 is on host 183
2023-07-11 14:16:27,626 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 184 is on host 184
2023-07-11 14:16:27,626 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 185 is on host 185
2023-07-11 14:16:27,626 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 186 is on host 186
2023-07-11 14:16:27,626 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 187 is on host 187
2023-07-11 14:16:27,626 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 188 is on host 188
2023-07-11 14:16:27,626 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 189 is on host 189
2023-07-11 14:16:27,626 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 190 is on host 190
2023-07-11 14:16:27,626 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 191 is on host 191
2023-07-11 14:16:27,626 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 192 is on host 192
2023-07-11 14:16:27,626 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 193 is on host 193
2023-07-11 14:16:27,626 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 194 is on host 194
2023-07-11 14:16:27,626 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 195 is on host 195
2023-07-11 14:16:27,626 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 196 is on host 196
2023-07-11 14:16:27,627 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 197 is on host 197
2023-07-11 14:16:27,627 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 198 is on host 198
2023-07-11 14:16:27,627 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 199 is on host 199
2023-07-11 14:16:27,627 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 200 is on host 200
2023-07-11 14:16:27,627 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 201 is on host 201
2023-07-11 14:16:27,627 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 202 is on host 202
2023-07-11 14:16:27,627 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 203 is on host 203
2023-07-11 14:16:27,627 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 204 is on host 204
2023-07-11 14:16:27,627 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 205 is on host 205
2023-07-11 14:16:27,627 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 206 is on host 206
2023-07-11 14:16:27,627 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 207 is on host 207
2023-07-11 14:16:27,627 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 208 is on host 208
2023-07-11 14:16:27,627 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 209 is on host 209
2023-07-11 14:16:27,627 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 210 is on host 210
2023-07-11 14:16:27,627 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 211 is on host 211
2023-07-11 14:16:27,627 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 212 is on host 212
2023-07-11 14:16:27,627 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 213 is on host 213
2023-07-11 14:16:27,627 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 214 is on host 214
2023-07-11 14:16:27,627 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 215 is on host 215
2023-07-11 14:16:27,627 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 216 is on host 216
2023-07-11 14:16:27,627 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 217 is on host 217
2023-07-11 14:16:27,628 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 218 is on host 218
2023-07-11 14:16:27,628 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 219 is on host 219
2023-07-11 14:16:27,628 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 220 is on host 220
2023-07-11 14:16:27,628 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 221 is on host 221
2023-07-11 14:16:27,628 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 222 is on host 222
2023-07-11 14:16:27,628 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 223 is on host 223
2023-07-11 14:16:27,628 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 224 is on host 224
2023-07-11 14:16:27,628 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 225 is on host 225
2023-07-11 14:16:27,628 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 226 is on host 226
2023-07-11 14:16:27,628 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 227 is on host 227
2023-07-11 14:16:27,628 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 228 is on host 228
2023-07-11 14:16:27,628 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 229 is on host 229
2023-07-11 14:16:27,628 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 230 is on host 230
2023-07-11 14:16:27,628 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 231 is on host 231
2023-07-11 14:16:27,628 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 232 is on host 232
2023-07-11 14:16:27,628 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 233 is on host 233
2023-07-11 14:16:27,628 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 234 is on host 234
2023-07-11 14:16:27,628 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 235 is on host 235
2023-07-11 14:16:27,628 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 236 is on host 236
2023-07-11 14:16:27,628 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 237 is on host 237
2023-07-11 14:16:27,628 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 238 is on host 238
2023-07-11 14:16:27,628 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 239 is on host 239
2023-07-11 14:16:27,628 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 240 is on host 240
2023-07-11 14:16:27,628 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 241 is on host 241
2023-07-11 14:16:27,628 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 242 is on host 242
2023-07-11 14:16:27,628 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 243 is on host 243
2023-07-11 14:16:27,628 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 244 is on host 244
2023-07-11 14:16:27,628 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 245 is on host 245
2023-07-11 14:16:27,628 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 246 is on host 246
2023-07-11 14:16:27,629 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 247 is on host 247
2023-07-11 14:16:27,629 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 248 is on host 248
2023-07-11 14:16:27,629 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 249 is on host 249
2023-07-11 14:16:27,629 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 250 is on host 250
2023-07-11 14:16:27,629 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 251 is on host 251
2023-07-11 14:16:27,629 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 252 is on host 252
2023-07-11 14:16:27,629 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 253 is on host 253
2023-07-11 14:16:27,629 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 254 is on host 254
2023-07-11 14:16:27,629 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 255 is on host 255
2023-07-11 14:16:27,629 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 256 is on host 256
2023-07-11 14:16:27,629 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 257 is on host 257
2023-07-11 14:16:27,629 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 258 is on host 258
2023-07-11 14:16:27,629 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 259 is on host 259
2023-07-11 14:16:27,629 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 260 is on host 260
2023-07-11 14:16:27,629 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 261 is on host 261
2023-07-11 14:16:27,629 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 262 is on host 262
2023-07-11 14:16:27,629 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 263 is on host 263
2023-07-11 14:16:27,629 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 264 is on host 264
2023-07-11 14:16:27,629 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 265 is on host 265
2023-07-11 14:16:27,629 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 266 is on host 266
2023-07-11 14:16:27,629 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 267 is on host 267
2023-07-11 14:16:27,629 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 268 is on host 268
2023-07-11 14:16:27,629 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 269 is on host 269
2023-07-11 14:16:27,629 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 270 is on host 270
2023-07-11 14:16:27,629 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 271 is on host 271
2023-07-11 14:16:27,629 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 272 is on host 272
2023-07-11 14:16:27,629 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 273 is on host 273
2023-07-11 14:16:27,629 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 274 is on host 274
2023-07-11 14:16:27,630 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 275 is on host 275
2023-07-11 14:16:27,630 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 276 is on host 276
2023-07-11 14:16:27,630 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 277 is on host 277
2023-07-11 14:16:27,630 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 278 is on host 278
2023-07-11 14:16:27,630 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 279 is on host 279
2023-07-11 14:16:27,630 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 280 is on host 280
2023-07-11 14:16:27,630 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 281 is on host 281
2023-07-11 14:16:27,630 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 282 is on host 282
2023-07-11 14:16:27,630 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 283 is on host 283
2023-07-11 14:16:27,630 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 284 is on host 284
2023-07-11 14:16:27,630 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 285 is on host 285
2023-07-11 14:16:27,630 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 286 is on host 286
2023-07-11 14:16:27,630 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 287 is on host 287
2023-07-11 14:16:27,630 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 288 is on host 288
2023-07-11 14:16:27,630 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 289 is on host 289
2023-07-11 14:16:27,630 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 290 is on host 290
2023-07-11 14:16:27,630 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 291 is on host 291
2023-07-11 14:16:27,630 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 292 is on host 292
2023-07-11 14:16:27,630 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 293 is on host 293
2023-07-11 14:16:27,630 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 294 is on host 294
2023-07-11 14:16:27,630 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 295 is on host 295
2023-07-11 14:16:27,630 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 296 is on host 296
2023-07-11 14:16:27,630 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 297 is on host 297
2023-07-11 14:16:27,630 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 298 is on host 298
2023-07-11 14:16:27,630 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 299 is on host 299
2023-07-11 14:16:27,630 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 300 is on host 300
2023-07-11 14:16:27,630 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 301 is on host 301
2023-07-11 14:16:27,630 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 302 is on host 302
2023-07-11 14:16:27,630 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 303 is on host 303
2023-07-11 14:16:27,630 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 304 is on host 304
2023-07-11 14:16:27,631 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 305 is on host 305
2023-07-11 14:16:27,631 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 306 is on host 306
2023-07-11 14:16:27,631 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 307 is on host 307
2023-07-11 14:16:27,631 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 308 is on host 308
2023-07-11 14:16:27,631 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 309 is on host 309
2023-07-11 14:16:27,631 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 310 is on host 310
2023-07-11 14:16:27,631 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 311 is on host 311
2023-07-11 14:16:27,631 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 312 is on host 312
2023-07-11 14:16:27,631 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 313 is on host 313
2023-07-11 14:16:27,631 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 314 is on host 314
2023-07-11 14:16:27,631 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 315 is on host 315
2023-07-11 14:16:27,631 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 316 is on host 316
2023-07-11 14:16:27,631 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 317 is on host 317
2023-07-11 14:16:27,631 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 318 is on host 318
2023-07-11 14:16:27,631 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 319 is on host 319
2023-07-11 14:16:27,631 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 320 is on host 320
2023-07-11 14:16:27,631 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 321 is on host 321
2023-07-11 14:16:27,631 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 322 is on host 322
2023-07-11 14:16:27,631 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 323 is on host 323
2023-07-11 14:16:27,631 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 324 is on host 324
2023-07-11 14:16:27,631 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 325 is on host 325
2023-07-11 14:16:27,631 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 326 is on host 326
2023-07-11 14:16:27,631 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 327 is on host 327
2023-07-11 14:16:27,631 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 328 is on host 328
2023-07-11 14:16:27,631 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 329 is on host 329
2023-07-11 14:16:27,631 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 330 is on host 330
2023-07-11 14:16:27,631 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 331 is on host 331
2023-07-11 14:16:27,631 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 332 is on host 332
2023-07-11 14:16:27,631 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 333 is on host 333
2023-07-11 14:16:27,632 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 334 is on host 334
2023-07-11 14:16:27,632 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 335 is on host 335
2023-07-11 14:16:27,632 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 336 is on host 336
2023-07-11 14:16:27,632 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 337 is on host 337
2023-07-11 14:16:27,632 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 338 is on host 338
2023-07-11 14:16:27,632 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 339 is on host 339
2023-07-11 14:16:27,632 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 340 is on host 340
2023-07-11 14:16:27,632 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 341 is on host 341
2023-07-11 14:16:27,632 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 342 is on host 342
2023-07-11 14:16:27,632 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 343 is on host 343
2023-07-11 14:16:27,632 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 344 is on host 344
2023-07-11 14:16:27,632 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 345 is on host 345
2023-07-11 14:16:27,632 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 346 is on host 346
2023-07-11 14:16:27,632 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 347 is on host 347
2023-07-11 14:16:27,632 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 348 is on host 348
2023-07-11 14:16:27,632 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 349 is on host 349
2023-07-11 14:16:27,632 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 350 is on host 350
2023-07-11 14:16:27,632 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 351 is on host 351
2023-07-11 14:16:27,632 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 352 is on host 352
2023-07-11 14:16:27,632 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 353 is on host 353
2023-07-11 14:16:27,632 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 354 is on host 354
2023-07-11 14:16:27,632 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 355 is on host 355
2023-07-11 14:16:27,632 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 356 is on host 356
2023-07-11 14:16:27,632 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 357 is on host 357
2023-07-11 14:16:27,632 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 358 is on host 358
2023-07-11 14:16:27,632 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 359 is on host 359
2023-07-11 14:16:27,632 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 360 is on host 360
2023-07-11 14:16:27,632 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 361 is on host 361
2023-07-11 14:16:27,632 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 362 is on host 362
2023-07-11 14:16:27,633 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 363 is on host 363
2023-07-11 14:16:27,633 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 364 is on host 364
2023-07-11 14:16:27,633 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 365 is on host 365
2023-07-11 14:16:27,633 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 366 is on host 366
2023-07-11 14:16:27,633 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 367 is on host 367
2023-07-11 14:16:27,633 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 368 is on host 368
2023-07-11 14:16:27,633 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 369 is on host 369
2023-07-11 14:16:27,633 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 370 is on host 370
2023-07-11 14:16:27,633 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 371 is on host 371
2023-07-11 14:16:27,633 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 372 is on host 372
2023-07-11 14:16:27,633 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 373 is on host 373
2023-07-11 14:16:27,633 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 374 is on host 374
2023-07-11 14:16:27,633 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 375 is on host 375
2023-07-11 14:16:27,633 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 376 is on host 376
2023-07-11 14:16:27,633 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 377 is on host 377
2023-07-11 14:16:27,633 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 378 is on host 378
2023-07-11 14:16:27,633 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 379 is on host 379
2023-07-11 14:16:27,633 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 380 is on host 380
2023-07-11 14:16:27,633 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 381 is on host 381
2023-07-11 14:16:27,633 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 382 is on host 382
2023-07-11 14:16:27,633 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 383 is on host 383
2023-07-11 14:16:27,633 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 384 is on host 384
2023-07-11 14:16:27,633 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 385 is on host 385
2023-07-11 14:16:27,633 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 386 is on host 386
2023-07-11 14:16:27,633 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 387 is on host 387
2023-07-11 14:16:27,633 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 388 is on host 388
2023-07-11 14:16:27,633 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 389 is on host 389
2023-07-11 14:16:27,633 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 390 is on host 390
2023-07-11 14:16:27,634 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 391 is on host 391
2023-07-11 14:16:27,634 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 392 is on host 392
2023-07-11 14:16:27,634 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=393, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:27,634 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table12) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:27,634 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table46
2023-07-11 14:16:27,634 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv553536953=290, srv1630071126=110, srv1071894870=12, srv23511728=232, srv658346947=323, srv2025338799=204, srv1397994335=64, srv1976766403=195, srv1644629726=118, srv957637734=381, srv2079182457=210, srv1749264468=139, srv2046129126=206, srv1595762596=104, srv603990852=307, srv1973073480=194, srv958856137=382, srv644066832=319, srv557062842=292, srv277765671=235, srv732221418=337, srv1769385567=143, srv224612199=228, srv714752528=334, srv362526040=256, srv581128949=296, srv2133511466=223, srv1144239257=30, srv320603627=245, srv1679952521=126, srv2122867873=222, srv1110067064=24, srv256251994=233, srv63261708=317, srv89837390=371, srv552104598=289, srv508952995=281, srv2096011353=214, srv1770417148=144, srv1246723478=42, srv929436444=378, srv2082192429=211, srv234917297=231, srv405700573=266, srv183644386=166, srv1488378513=85, srv173139715=136, srv1154180352=32, srv355693379=252, srv1407521654=66, srv496848057=275, srv1157975499=33, srv1806731027=162, srv1923102804=184, srv311102455=244, srv450011410=271, srv771515724=348, srv389183508=262, srv1249074416=43, srv2014575201=201, srv640847108=318, srv832363565=356, srv1970882134=192, srv2107358603=218, srv855766065=361, srv1336043388=55, srv29397186=237, srv982792848=390, srv976560524=386, srv101181760=3, srv1093549482=21, srv2018389395=202, srv2113483104=221, srv1778339118=149, srv1968709692=190, srv705221118=333, srv159600090=105, srv1919608486=180, srv981255102=389, srv807899713=353, srv755110395=344, srv1770594519=145, srv739692705=340, srv1076582671=16, srv693869315=330, srv1079048717=17, srv440657532=270, srv1636659280=115, srv2108739257=220, srv668373413=326, srv1003610393=2, srv1054229197=11, srv1868589627=172, srv2103522371=217, srv1000546271=0, srv951670617=380, srv2042909593=205, srv1865656038=171, srv1466355012=78, srv703662406=332, srv1418112884=70, srv1215580291=40, srv71833528=335, srv1580581635=103, srv1021032212=5, srv1080806312=19, srv1985601859=197, srv74471954=343, srv1647472319=119, srv2071553346=208, srv1632855171=112, srv1122009370=27, srv13613992=61, srv1630777154=111, srv301413669=239, srv550697728=288, srv1296023857=53, srv1724550977=133, srv1989290370=198, srv1926417985=185, srv1678097199=125, srv1461034373=76, srv614690415=311, srv2098345381=215, srv310463473=243, srv1011934105=4, srv148627129=84, srv305489318=240, srv1256534903=46, srv1289731445=52, srv1798844587=157, srv567113085=294, srv1119222501=26, srv2055117940=207, srv855898852=362, srv629224816=316, srv1075943554=15, srv625909061=315, srv1705591942=128, srv734225580=339, srv660107924=324, srv1381729938=62, srv1633483173=113, srv408265476=267, srv1776057793=148, srv1360253411=60, srv1511424834=90, srv1414162621=68, srv883343663=370, srv151859222=91, srv349144930=251, srv1991304034=199, srv1825887791=164, srv601657063=305, srv758932951=345, srv1651629087=120, srv1864623584=170, srv682957691=329, srv1500454146=88, srv1725962085=135, srv1659841448=121, srv1253206004=45, srv52354442=284, srv18508093=168, srv1427731921=73, srv561344974=293, srv721668125=336, srv1575482138=100, srv914128771=373, srv961487230=383, srv741332941=342, srv533032466=286, srv1574140987=99, srv2139849097=224, srv503902262=278, srv674807007=327, srv1786829855=153, srv2088727517=213, srv394366966=264, srv980089565=388, srv114594288=31, srv38296437=261, srv214835574=226, srv1887224977=176, srv1025509362=7, srv1577020334=102, srv524466665=285, srv393561021=263, srv759909927=346, srv763556514=347, srv786453030=349, srv2142935488=225, srv618111613=312, srv16254163=108, srv343211061=250, srv476075173=273, srv1269632212=47, srv333589612=246, srv499015361=276, srv836674186=357, srv1799191687=158, srv1446998035=74, srv1571774199=98, srv1115354947=25, srv333860881=247, srv1724152600=132, srv1598699299=106, srv177885829=151, srv472125887=272, srv1101339966=22, srv1424985362=72, srv1945569895=188, srv594128294=300, srv1026739237=8, srv842459828=358, srv878519137=366, srv1921260729=181, srv339110834=249, srv504099471=279, srv814253179=354, srv1643744885=116, srv1793847521=155, srv607234624=309, srv698219051=331, srv1688538732=127, srv666240078=325, srv1079284733=18, srv29210550=236, srv506181748=280, srv881313122=368, srv1945452576=187, srv597307897=303, srv1285120424=51, srv1887943816=177, srv1983604698=196, srv1805465940=161, srv309309336=242, srv1719756294=131, srv1349932676=58, srv1208486369=38, srv1643971570=117, srv1509331489=89, srv334105385=248, srv1400515744=65, srv369984715=259, srv43712162=269, srv842675864=359, srv1803258748=160, srv1022450918=6, srv1775108732=147, srv1766088250=141, srv180150732=159, srv1220857227=41, srv226530501=229, srv362032108=255, srv919715380=377, srv1074935976=14, srv1395030819=63, srv803291569=352, srv1877966766=175, srv220538712=227, srv2021718843=203, srv2107782185=219, srv882216860=369, srv1489137852=86, srv1972328734=193, srv1470759982=79, srv1774824811=146, srv971974774=384, srv1418242791=71, srv1001274196=1, srv909615097=372, srv1537724566=93, srv1165799954=34, srv1724754364=134, srv978173525=387, srv113319438=29, srv578033735=295, srv147931272=80, srv1183635941=35, srv1904215245=178, srv596349756=302, srv880835255=367, srv857544550=364, srv1779729022=152, srv1795612465=156, srv621083045=314, srv917704170=375, srv1351811120=59, srv1316710897=54, srv789820555=350, srv1922580095=183, srv305567304=241, srv1936745425=186, srv1745318024=138, srv1210822057=39, srv645375717=320, srv950628389=379, srv1490199189=87, srv1575919256=101, srv154481102=96, srv359402967=254, srv997716931=391, srv1457224273=75, srv581644449=297, srv1872374768=174, srv363177310=257, srv740327512=341, srv1664227236=123, srv972330517=385, srv1634261306=114, srv1662183707=122, srv1969046891=191, srv1485266211=82, srv1778842262=150, srv588410181=298, srv1921840985=182, srv591279493=299, srv37574565=260, srv1104147458=23, srv1190166330=36, srv652270371=322, srv1484309042=81, srv1560148463=97, srv618569548=313, srv2102708311=216, srv1084873074=20, srv517669556=283, srv918152084=376, srv649714317=321, srv1674484790=124, srv1339239880=56, srv1461073271=77, srv1125312901=28, srv25633292=234, srv516616923=282, srv299721745=238, srv604932433=308, srv1273702855=48, srv792183929=351, srv1042608200=10, srv1276335106=49, srv1486044644=83, srv676101698=328, srv998930892=392, srv200111276=200, srv1863083643=169, srv1737443479=137, srv872997185=365, srv821351126=355, srv852115805=360, srv1074355423=13, srv170952194=130, srv503430005=277, srv153887567=94, srv1415163001=69, srv1032737435=9, srv1840670515=167, srv1961921083=189, srv59745831=304, srv36715747=258, srv431547280=268, srv1524853580=92, srv1870059418=173, srv396010771=265, srv594457792=301, srv1755339428=140, srv1766275429=142, srv5565786=291, srv603898526=306, srv544570223=287, srv856030669=363, srv1542523468=95, srv915785747=374, srv356122213=253, srv1411875499=67, srv2077620970=209, srv1345529444=57, srv232339963=230, srv1250861076=44, srv1914875423=179, srv478619481=274, srv1202435626=37, srv1706089454=129, srv1810631201=163, srv1282644061=50, srv1625945288=109, srv733251129=338, srv2082830831=212, srv1612103540=107, srv612136291=310, srv1790004142=154, srv183394703=165} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:27,635 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:27,635 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:27,635 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:27,635 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:27,635 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:27,635 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:27,635 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-11 14:16:27,635 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-11 14:16:27,635 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-11 14:16:27,635 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-11 14:16:27,635 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 10 is on host 10
2023-07-11 14:16:27,635 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 11 is on host 11
2023-07-11 14:16:27,635 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 12 is on host 12
2023-07-11 14:16:27,635 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 13 is on host 13
2023-07-11 14:16:27,635 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 14 is on host 14
2023-07-11 14:16:27,635 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 15 is on host 15
2023-07-11 14:16:27,635 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 16 is on host 16
2023-07-11 14:16:27,635 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 17 is on host 17
2023-07-11 14:16:27,635 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 18 is on host 18
2023-07-11 14:16:27,635 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 19 is on host 19
2023-07-11 14:16:27,635 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 20 is on host 20
2023-07-11 14:16:27,635 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 21 is on host 21
2023-07-11 14:16:27,635 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 22 is on host 22
2023-07-11 14:16:27,635 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 23 is on host 23
2023-07-11 14:16:27,635 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 24 is on host 24
2023-07-11 14:16:27,635 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 25 is on host 25
2023-07-11 14:16:27,636 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 26 is on host 26
2023-07-11 14:16:27,636 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 27 is on host 27
2023-07-11 14:16:27,636 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 28 is on host 28
2023-07-11 14:16:27,636 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 29 is on host 29
2023-07-11 14:16:27,636 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 30 is on host 30
2023-07-11 14:16:27,636 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 31 is on host 31
2023-07-11 14:16:27,636 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 32 is on host 32
2023-07-11 14:16:27,636 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 33 is on host 33
2023-07-11 14:16:27,636 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 34 is on host 34
2023-07-11 14:16:27,636 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 35 is on host 35
2023-07-11 14:16:27,636 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 36 is on host 36
2023-07-11 14:16:27,636 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 37 is on host 37
2023-07-11 14:16:27,636 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 38 is on host 38
2023-07-11 14:16:27,636 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 39 is on host 39
2023-07-11 14:16:27,636 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 40 is on host 40
2023-07-11 14:16:27,636 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 41 is on host 41
2023-07-11 14:16:27,636 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 42 is on host 42
2023-07-11 14:16:27,636 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 43 is on host 43
2023-07-11 14:16:27,636 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 44 is on host 44
2023-07-11 14:16:27,636 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 45 is on host 45
2023-07-11 14:16:27,636 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 46 is on host 46
2023-07-11 14:16:27,636 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 47 is on host 47
2023-07-11 14:16:27,636 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 48 is on host 48
2023-07-11 14:16:27,636 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 49 is on host 49
2023-07-11 14:16:27,636 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 50 is on host 50
2023-07-11 14:16:27,636 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 51 is on host 51
2023-07-11 14:16:27,636 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 52 is on host 52
2023-07-11 14:16:27,636 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 53 is on host 53
2023-07-11 14:16:27,637 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 54 is on host 54
2023-07-11 14:16:27,637 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 55 is on host 55
2023-07-11 14:16:27,637 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 56 is on host 56
2023-07-11 14:16:27,637 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 57 is on host 57
2023-07-11 14:16:27,637 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 58 is on host 58
2023-07-11 14:16:27,637 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 59 is on host 59
2023-07-11 14:16:27,637 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 60 is on host 60
2023-07-11 14:16:27,637 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 61 is on host 61
2023-07-11 14:16:27,637 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 62 is on host 62
2023-07-11 14:16:27,637 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 63 is on host 63
2023-07-11 14:16:27,637 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 64 is on host 64
2023-07-11 14:16:27,637 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 65 is on host 65
2023-07-11 14:16:27,637 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 66 is on host 66
2023-07-11 14:16:27,637 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 67 is on host 67
2023-07-11 14:16:27,637 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 68 is on host 68
2023-07-11 14:16:27,637 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 69 is on host 69
2023-07-11 14:16:27,637 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 70 is on host 70
2023-07-11 14:16:27,637 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 71 is on host 71
2023-07-11 14:16:27,637 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 72 is on host 72
2023-07-11 14:16:27,637 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 73 is on host 73
2023-07-11 14:16:27,637 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 74 is on host 74
2023-07-11 14:16:27,637 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 75 is on host 75
2023-07-11 14:16:27,637 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 76 is on host 76
2023-07-11 14:16:27,637 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 77 is on host 77
2023-07-11 14:16:27,637 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 78 is on host 78
2023-07-11 14:16:27,637 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 79 is on host 79
2023-07-11 14:16:27,637 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 80 is on host 80
2023-07-11 14:16:27,637 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 81 is on host 81
2023-07-11 14:16:27,637 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 82 is on host 82
2023-07-11 14:16:27,638 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 83 is on host 83
2023-07-11 14:16:27,638 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 84 is on host 84
2023-07-11 14:16:27,638 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 85 is on host 85
2023-07-11 14:16:27,638 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 86 is on host 86
2023-07-11 14:16:27,638 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 87 is on host 87
2023-07-11 14:16:27,638 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 88 is on host 88
2023-07-11 14:16:27,638 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 89 is on host 89
2023-07-11 14:16:27,638 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 90 is on host 90
2023-07-11 14:16:27,638 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 91 is on host 91
2023-07-11 14:16:27,638 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 92 is on host 92
2023-07-11 14:16:27,638 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 93 is on host 93
2023-07-11 14:16:27,638 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 94 is on host 94
2023-07-11 14:16:27,638 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 95 is on host 95
2023-07-11 14:16:27,638 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 96 is on host 96
2023-07-11 14:16:27,638 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 97 is on host 97
2023-07-11 14:16:27,638 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 98 is on host 98
2023-07-11 14:16:27,638 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 99 is on host 99
2023-07-11 14:16:27,638 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 100 is on host 100
2023-07-11 14:16:27,638 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 101 is on host 101
2023-07-11 14:16:27,638 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 102 is on host 102
2023-07-11 14:16:27,638 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 103 is on host 103
2023-07-11 14:16:27,638 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 104 is on host 104
2023-07-11 14:16:27,638 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 105 is on host 105
2023-07-11 14:16:27,638 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 106 is on host 106
2023-07-11 14:16:27,638 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 107 is on host 107
2023-07-11 14:16:27,638 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 108 is on host 108
2023-07-11 14:16:27,638 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 109 is on host 109
2023-07-11 14:16:27,638 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 110 is on host 110
2023-07-11 14:16:27,639 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 111 is on host 111
2023-07-11 14:16:27,639 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 112 is on host 112
2023-07-11 14:16:27,639 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 113 is on host 113
2023-07-11 14:16:27,639 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 114 is on host 114
2023-07-11 14:16:27,639 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 115 is on host 115
2023-07-11 14:16:27,639 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 116 is on host 116
2023-07-11 14:16:27,639 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 117 is on host 117
2023-07-11 14:16:27,639 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 118 is on host 118
2023-07-11 14:16:27,639 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 119 is on host 119
2023-07-11 14:16:27,639 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 120 is on host 120
2023-07-11 14:16:27,639 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 121 is on host 121
2023-07-11 14:16:27,639 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 122 is on host 122
2023-07-11 14:16:27,639 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 123 is on host 123
2023-07-11 14:16:27,639 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 124 is on host 124
2023-07-11 14:16:27,639 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 125 is on host 125
2023-07-11 14:16:27,639 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 126 is on host 126
2023-07-11 14:16:27,639 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 127 is on host 127
2023-07-11 14:16:27,639 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 128 is on host 128
2023-07-11 14:16:27,639 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 129 is on host 129
2023-07-11 14:16:27,639 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 130 is on host 130
2023-07-11 14:16:27,639 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 131 is on host 131
2023-07-11 14:16:27,639 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 132 is on host 132
2023-07-11 14:16:27,640 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 133 is on host 133
2023-07-11 14:16:27,640 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 134 is on host 134
2023-07-11 14:16:27,640 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 135 is on host 135
2023-07-11 14:16:27,640 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 136 is on host 136
2023-07-11 14:16:27,640 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 137 is on host 137
2023-07-11 14:16:27,640 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 138 is on host 138
2023-07-11 14:16:27,640 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 139 is on host 139
2023-07-11 14:16:27,640 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 140 is on host 140
2023-07-11 14:16:27,640 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 141 is on host 141
2023-07-11 14:16:27,640 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 142 is on host 142
2023-07-11 14:16:27,640 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 143 is on host 143
2023-07-11 14:16:27,640 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 144 is on host 144
2023-07-11 14:16:27,640 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 145 is on host 145
2023-07-11 14:16:27,640 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 146 is on host 146
2023-07-11 14:16:27,640 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 147 is on host 147
2023-07-11 14:16:27,640 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 148 is on host 148
2023-07-11 14:16:27,640 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 149 is on host 149
2023-07-11 14:16:27,640 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 150 is on host 150
2023-07-11 14:16:27,640 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 151 is on host 151
2023-07-11 14:16:27,640 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 152 is on host 152
2023-07-11 14:16:27,640 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 153 is on host 153
2023-07-11 14:16:27,640 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 154 is on host 154
2023-07-11 14:16:27,640 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 155 is on host 155
2023-07-11 14:16:27,640 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 156 is on host 156
2023-07-11 14:16:27,640 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 157 is on host 157
2023-07-11 14:16:27,640 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 158 is on host 158
2023-07-11 14:16:27,640 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 159 is on host 159
2023-07-11 14:16:27,640 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 160 is on host 160
2023-07-11 14:16:27,641 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 161 is on host 161
2023-07-11 14:16:27,641 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 162 is on host 162
2023-07-11 14:16:27,641 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 163 is on host 163
2023-07-11 14:16:27,641 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 164 is on host 164
2023-07-11 14:16:27,641 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 165 is on host 165
2023-07-11 14:16:27,641 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 166 is on host 166
2023-07-11 14:16:27,641 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 167 is on host 167
2023-07-11 14:16:27,641 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 168 is on host 168
2023-07-11 14:16:27,641 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 169 is on host 169
2023-07-11 14:16:27,641 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 170 is on host 170
2023-07-11 14:16:27,641 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 171 is on host 171
2023-07-11 14:16:27,641 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 172 is on host 172
2023-07-11 14:16:27,641 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 173 is on host 173
2023-07-11 14:16:27,641 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 174 is on host 174
2023-07-11 14:16:27,641 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 175 is on host 175
2023-07-11 14:16:27,641 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 176 is on host 176
2023-07-11 14:16:27,641 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 177 is on host 177
2023-07-11 14:16:27,641 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 178 is on host 178
2023-07-11 14:16:27,641 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 179 is on host 179
2023-07-11 14:16:27,641 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 180 is on host 180
2023-07-11 14:16:27,641 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 181 is on host 181
2023-07-11 14:16:27,641 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 182 is on host 182
2023-07-11 14:16:27,641 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 183 is on host 183
2023-07-11 14:16:27,641 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 184 is on host 184
2023-07-11 14:16:27,641 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 185 is on host 185
2023-07-11 14:16:27,641 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 186 is on host 186
2023-07-11 14:16:27,641 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 187 is on host 187
2023-07-11 14:16:27,641 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 188 is on host 188
2023-07-11 14:16:27,641 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 189 is on host 189
2023-07-11 14:16:27,642 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 190 is on host 190
2023-07-11 14:16:27,642 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 191 is on host 191
2023-07-11 14:16:27,642 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 192 is on host 192
2023-07-11 14:16:27,642 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 193 is on host 193
2023-07-11 14:16:27,642 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 194 is on host 194
2023-07-11 14:16:27,642 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 195 is on host 195
2023-07-11 14:16:27,642 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 196 is on host 196
2023-07-11 14:16:27,642 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 197 is on host 197
2023-07-11 14:16:27,642 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 198 is on host 198
2023-07-11 14:16:27,642 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 199 is on host 199
2023-07-11 14:16:27,642 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 200 is on host 200
2023-07-11 14:16:27,642 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 201 is on host 201
2023-07-11 14:16:27,642 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 202 is on host 202
2023-07-11 14:16:27,642 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 203 is on host 203
2023-07-11 14:16:27,642 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 204 is on host 204
2023-07-11 14:16:27,642 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 205 is on host 205
2023-07-11 14:16:27,642 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 206 is on host 206
2023-07-11 14:16:27,642 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 207 is on host 207
2023-07-11 14:16:27,642 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 208 is on host 208
2023-07-11 14:16:27,642 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 209 is on host 209
2023-07-11 14:16:27,642 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 210 is on host 210
2023-07-11 14:16:27,642 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 211 is on host 211
2023-07-11 14:16:27,642 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 212 is on host 212
2023-07-11 14:16:27,642 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 213 is on host 213
2023-07-11 14:16:27,642 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 214 is on host 214
2023-07-11 14:16:27,642 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 215 is on host 215
2023-07-11 14:16:27,642 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 216 is on host 216
2023-07-11 14:16:27,642 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 217 is on host 217
2023-07-11 14:16:27,642 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 218 is on host 218
2023-07-11 14:16:27,643 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 219 is on host 219
2023-07-11 14:16:27,643 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 220 is on host 220
2023-07-11 14:16:27,643 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 221 is on host 221
2023-07-11 14:16:27,643 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 222 is on host 222
2023-07-11 14:16:27,643 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 223 is on host 223
2023-07-11 14:16:27,643 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 224 is on host 224
2023-07-11 14:16:27,643 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 225 is on host 225
2023-07-11 14:16:27,643 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 226 is on host 226
2023-07-11 14:16:27,643 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 227 is on host 227
2023-07-11 14:16:27,643 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 228 is on host 228
2023-07-11 14:16:27,643 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 229 is on host 229
2023-07-11 14:16:27,643 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 230 is on host 230
2023-07-11 14:16:27,643 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 231 is on host 231
2023-07-11 14:16:27,643 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 232 is on host 232
2023-07-11 14:16:27,643 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 233 is on host 233
2023-07-11 14:16:27,643 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 234 is on host 234
2023-07-11 14:16:27,643 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 235 is on host 235
2023-07-11 14:16:27,643 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 236 is on host 236
2023-07-11 14:16:27,643 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 237 is on host 237
2023-07-11 14:16:27,643 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 238 is on host 238
2023-07-11 14:16:27,643 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 239 is on host 239
2023-07-11 14:16:27,643 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 240 is on host 240
2023-07-11 14:16:27,643 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 241 is on host 241
2023-07-11 14:16:27,643 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 242 is on host 242
2023-07-11 14:16:27,643 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 243 is on host 243
2023-07-11 14:16:27,643 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 244 is on host 244
2023-07-11 14:16:27,643 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 245 is on host 245
2023-07-11 14:16:27,643 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 246 is on host 246
2023-07-11 14:16:27,643 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 247 is on host 247
2023-07-11 14:16:27,644 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 248 is on host 248
2023-07-11 14:16:27,644 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 249 is on host 249
2023-07-11 14:16:27,644 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 250 is on host 250
2023-07-11 14:16:27,644 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 251 is on host 251
2023-07-11 14:16:27,644 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 252 is on host 252
2023-07-11 14:16:27,644 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 253 is on host 253
2023-07-11 14:16:27,644 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 254 is on host 254
2023-07-11 14:16:27,644 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 255 is on host 255
2023-07-11 14:16:27,644 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 256 is on host 256
2023-07-11 14:16:27,644 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 257 is on host 257
2023-07-11 14:16:27,644 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 258 is on host 258
2023-07-11 14:16:27,644 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 259 is on host 259
2023-07-11 14:16:27,644 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 260 is on host 260
2023-07-11 14:16:27,644 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 261 is on host 261
2023-07-11 14:16:27,644 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 262 is on host 262
2023-07-11 14:16:27,644 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 263 is on host 263
2023-07-11 14:16:27,644 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 264 is on host 264
2023-07-11 14:16:27,644 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 265 is on host 265
2023-07-11 14:16:27,644 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 266 is on host 266
2023-07-11 14:16:27,644 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 267 is on host 267
2023-07-11 14:16:27,644 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 268 is on host 268
2023-07-11 14:16:27,644 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 269 is on host 269
2023-07-11 14:16:27,644 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 270 is on host 270
2023-07-11 14:16:27,644 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 271 is on host 271
2023-07-11 14:16:27,644 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 272 is on host 272
2023-07-11 14:16:27,644 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 273 is on host 273
2023-07-11 14:16:27,644 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 274 is on host 274
2023-07-11 14:16:27,644 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 275 is on host 275
2023-07-11 14:16:27,644 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 276 is on host 276
2023-07-11 14:16:27,645 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 277 is on host 277
2023-07-11 14:16:27,645 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 278 is on host 278
2023-07-11 14:16:27,645 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 279 is on host 279
2023-07-11 14:16:27,645 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 280 is on host 280
2023-07-11 14:16:27,645 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 281 is on host 281
2023-07-11 14:16:27,645 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 282 is on host 282
2023-07-11 14:16:27,645 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 283 is on host 283
2023-07-11 14:16:27,645 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 284 is on host 284
2023-07-11 14:16:27,645 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 285 is on host 285
2023-07-11 14:16:27,645 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 286 is on host 286
2023-07-11 14:16:27,645 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 287 is on host 287
2023-07-11 14:16:27,645 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 288 is on host 288
2023-07-11 14:16:27,645 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 289 is on host 289
2023-07-11 14:16:27,645 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 290 is on host 290
2023-07-11 14:16:27,645 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 291 is on host 291
2023-07-11 14:16:27,645 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 292 is on host 292
2023-07-11 14:16:27,645 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 293 is on host 293
2023-07-11 14:16:27,645 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 294 is on host 294
2023-07-11 14:16:27,645 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 295 is on host 295
2023-07-11 14:16:27,645 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 296 is on host 296
2023-07-11 14:16:27,645 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 297 is on host 297
2023-07-11 14:16:27,645 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 298 is on host 298
2023-07-11 14:16:27,645 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 299 is on host 299
2023-07-11 14:16:27,645 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 300 is on host 300
2023-07-11 14:16:27,645 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 301 is on host 301
2023-07-11 14:16:27,645 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 302 is on host 302
2023-07-11 14:16:27,645 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 303 is on host 303
2023-07-11 14:16:27,645 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 304 is on host 304
2023-07-11 14:16:27,645 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 305 is on host 305
2023-07-11 14:16:27,646 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 306 is on host 306
2023-07-11 14:16:27,646 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 307 is on host 307
2023-07-11 14:16:27,646 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 308 is on host 308
2023-07-11 14:16:27,646 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 309 is on host 309
2023-07-11 14:16:27,646 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 310 is on host 310
2023-07-11 14:16:27,646 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 311 is on host 311
2023-07-11 14:16:27,646 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 312 is on host 312
2023-07-11 14:16:27,646 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 313 is on host 313
2023-07-11 14:16:27,646 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 314 is on host 314
2023-07-11 14:16:27,646 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 315 is on host 315
2023-07-11 14:16:27,646 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 316 is on host 316
2023-07-11 14:16:27,646 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 317 is on host 317
2023-07-11 14:16:27,646 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 318 is on host 318
2023-07-11 14:16:27,646 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 319 is on host 319
2023-07-11 14:16:27,646 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 320 is on host 320
2023-07-11 14:16:27,646 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 321 is on host 321
2023-07-11 14:16:27,646 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 322 is on host 322
2023-07-11 14:16:27,646 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 323 is on host 323
2023-07-11 14:16:27,646 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 324 is on host 324
2023-07-11 14:16:27,646 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 325 is on host 325
2023-07-11 14:16:27,646 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 326 is on host 326
2023-07-11 14:16:27,646 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 327 is on host 327
2023-07-11 14:16:27,646 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 328 is on host 328
2023-07-11 14:16:27,646 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 329 is on host 329
2023-07-11 14:16:27,646 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 330 is on host 330
2023-07-11 14:16:27,646 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 331 is on host 331
2023-07-11 14:16:27,646 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 332 is on host 332
2023-07-11 14:16:27,646 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 333 is on host 333
2023-07-11 14:16:27,646 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 334 is on host 334
2023-07-11 14:16:27,647 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 335 is on host 335
2023-07-11 14:16:27,647 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 336 is on host 336
2023-07-11 14:16:27,647 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 337 is on host 337
2023-07-11 14:16:27,647 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 338 is on host 338
2023-07-11 14:16:27,647 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 339 is on host 339
2023-07-11 14:16:27,647 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 340 is on host 340
2023-07-11 14:16:27,647 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 341 is on host 341
2023-07-11 14:16:27,647 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 342 is on host 342
2023-07-11 14:16:27,647 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 343 is on host 343
2023-07-11 14:16:27,647 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 344 is on host 344
2023-07-11 14:16:27,647 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 345 is on host 345
2023-07-11 14:16:27,647 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 346 is on host 346
2023-07-11 14:16:27,647 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 347 is on host 347
2023-07-11 14:16:27,647 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 348 is on host 348
2023-07-11 14:16:27,647 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 349 is on host 349
2023-07-11 14:16:27,647 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 350 is on host 350
2023-07-11 14:16:27,647 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 351 is on host 351
2023-07-11 14:16:27,647 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 352 is on host 352
2023-07-11 14:16:27,647 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 353 is on host 353
2023-07-11 14:16:27,647 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 354 is on host 354
2023-07-11 14:16:27,647 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 355 is on host 355
2023-07-11 14:16:27,647 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 356 is on host 356
2023-07-11 14:16:27,647 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 357 is on host 357
2023-07-11 14:16:27,647 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 358 is on host 358
2023-07-11 14:16:27,647 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 359 is on host 359
2023-07-11 14:16:27,647 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 360 is on host 360
2023-07-11 14:16:27,647 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 361 is on host 361
2023-07-11 14:16:27,647 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 362 is on host 362
2023-07-11 14:16:27,647 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 363 is on host 363
2023-07-11 14:16:27,648 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 364 is on host 364
2023-07-11 14:16:27,648 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 365 is on host 365
2023-07-11 14:16:27,648 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 366 is on host 366
2023-07-11 14:16:27,648 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 367 is on host 367
2023-07-11 14:16:27,648 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 368 is on host 368
2023-07-11 14:16:27,648 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 369 is on host 369
2023-07-11 14:16:27,648 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 370 is on host 370
2023-07-11 14:16:27,648 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 371 is on host 371
2023-07-11 14:16:27,648 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 372 is on host 372
2023-07-11 14:16:27,648 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 373 is on host 373
2023-07-11 14:16:27,648 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 374 is on host 374
2023-07-11 14:16:27,648 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 375 is on host 375
2023-07-11 14:16:27,648 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 376 is on host 376
2023-07-11 14:16:27,648 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 377 is on host 377
2023-07-11 14:16:27,648 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 378 is on host 378
2023-07-11 14:16:27,648 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 379 is on host 379
2023-07-11 14:16:27,648 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 380 is on host 380
2023-07-11 14:16:27,648 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 381 is on host 381
2023-07-11 14:16:27,648 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 382 is on host 382
2023-07-11 14:16:27,648 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 383 is on host 383
2023-07-11 14:16:27,648 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 384 is on host 384
2023-07-11 14:16:27,648 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 385 is on host 385
2023-07-11 14:16:27,648 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 386 is on host 386
2023-07-11 14:16:27,648 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 387 is on host 387
2023-07-11 14:16:27,648 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 388 is on host 388
2023-07-11 14:16:27,648 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 389 is on host 389
2023-07-11 14:16:27,648 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 390 is on host 390
2023-07-11 14:16:27,648 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 391 is on host 391
2023-07-11 14:16:27,648 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 392 is on host 392
2023-07-11 14:16:27,649 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=393, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:27,649 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table46) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:27,649 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table47
2023-07-11 14:16:27,649 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv553536953=290, srv1630071126=110, srv1071894870=12, srv23511728=232, srv658346947=323, srv2025338799=204, srv1397994335=64, srv1976766403=195, srv1644629726=118, srv957637734=381, srv2079182457=210, srv1749264468=139, srv2046129126=206, srv1595762596=104, srv603990852=307, srv1973073480=194, srv958856137=382, srv644066832=319, srv557062842=292, srv277765671=235, srv732221418=337, srv1769385567=143, srv224612199=228, srv714752528=334, srv362526040=256, srv581128949=296, srv2133511466=223, srv1144239257=30, srv320603627=245, srv1679952521=126, srv2122867873=222, srv1110067064=24, srv256251994=233, srv63261708=317, srv89837390=371, srv552104598=289, srv508952995=281, srv2096011353=214, srv1770417148=144, srv1246723478=42, srv929436444=378, srv2082192429=211, srv234917297=231, srv405700573=266, srv183644386=166, srv1488378513=85, srv173139715=136, srv1154180352=32, srv355693379=252, srv1407521654=66, srv496848057=275, srv1157975499=33, srv1806731027=162, srv1923102804=184, srv311102455=244, srv450011410=271, srv771515724=348, srv389183508=262, srv1249074416=43, srv2014575201=201, srv640847108=318, srv832363565=356, srv1970882134=192, srv2107358603=218, srv855766065=361, srv1336043388=55, srv29397186=237, srv982792848=390, srv976560524=386, srv101181760=3, srv1093549482=21, srv2018389395=202, srv2113483104=221, srv1778339118=149, srv1968709692=190, srv705221118=333, srv159600090=105, srv1919608486=180, srv981255102=389, srv807899713=353, srv755110395=344, srv1770594519=145, srv739692705=340, srv1076582671=16, srv693869315=330, srv1079048717=17, srv440657532=270, srv1636659280=115, srv2108739257=220, srv668373413=326, srv1003610393=2, srv1054229197=11, srv1868589627=172, srv2103522371=217, srv1000546271=0, srv951670617=380, srv2042909593=205, srv1865656038=171, srv1466355012=78, srv703662406=332, srv1418112884=70, srv1215580291=40, srv71833528=335, srv1580581635=103, srv1021032212=5, srv1080806312=19, srv1985601859=197, srv74471954=343, srv1647472319=119, srv2071553346=208, srv1632855171=112, srv1122009370=27, srv13613992=61, srv1630777154=111, srv301413669=239, srv550697728=288, srv1296023857=53, srv1724550977=133, srv1989290370=198, srv1926417985=185, srv1678097199=125, srv1461034373=76, srv614690415=311, srv2098345381=215, srv310463473=243, srv1011934105=4, srv148627129=84, srv305489318=240, srv1256534903=46, srv1289731445=52, srv1798844587=157, srv567113085=294, srv1119222501=26, srv2055117940=207, srv855898852=362, srv629224816=316, srv1075943554=15, srv625909061=315, srv1705591942=128, srv734225580=339, srv660107924=324, srv1381729938=62, srv1633483173=113, srv408265476=267, srv1776057793=148, srv1360253411=60, srv1511424834=90, srv1414162621=68, srv883343663=370, srv151859222=91, srv349144930=251, srv1991304034=199, srv1825887791=164, srv601657063=305, srv758932951=345, srv1651629087=120, srv1864623584=170, srv682957691=329, srv1500454146=88, srv1725962085=135, srv1659841448=121, srv1253206004=45, srv52354442=284, srv18508093=168, srv1427731921=73, srv561344974=293, srv721668125=336, srv1575482138=100, srv914128771=373, srv961487230=383, srv741332941=342, srv533032466=286, srv1574140987=99, srv2139849097=224, srv503902262=278, srv674807007=327, srv1786829855=153, srv2088727517=213, srv394366966=264, srv980089565=388, srv114594288=31, srv38296437=261, srv214835574=226, srv1887224977=176, srv1025509362=7, srv1577020334=102, srv524466665=285, srv393561021=263, srv759909927=346, srv763556514=347, srv786453030=349, srv2142935488=225, srv618111613=312, srv16254163=108, srv343211061=250, srv476075173=273, srv1269632212=47, srv333589612=246, srv499015361=276, srv836674186=357, srv1799191687=158, srv1446998035=74, srv1571774199=98, srv1115354947=25, srv333860881=247, srv1724152600=132, srv1598699299=106, srv177885829=151, srv472125887=272, srv1101339966=22, srv1424985362=72, srv1945569895=188, srv594128294=300, srv1026739237=8, srv842459828=358, srv878519137=366, srv1921260729=181, srv339110834=249, srv504099471=279, srv814253179=354, srv1643744885=116, srv1793847521=155, srv607234624=309, srv698219051=331, srv1688538732=127, srv666240078=325, srv1079284733=18, srv29210550=236, srv506181748=280, srv881313122=368, srv1945452576=187, srv597307897=303, srv1285120424=51, srv1887943816=177, srv1983604698=196, srv1805465940=161, srv309309336=242, srv1719756294=131, srv1349932676=58, srv1208486369=38, srv1643971570=117, srv1509331489=89, srv334105385=248, srv1400515744=65, srv369984715=259, srv43712162=269, srv842675864=359, srv1803258748=160, srv1022450918=6, srv1775108732=147, srv1766088250=141, srv180150732=159, srv1220857227=41, srv226530501=229, srv362032108=255, srv919715380=377, srv1074935976=14, srv1395030819=63, srv803291569=352, srv1877966766=175, srv220538712=227, srv2021718843=203, srv2107782185=219, srv882216860=369, srv1489137852=86, srv1972328734=193, srv1470759982=79, srv1774824811=146, srv971974774=384, srv1418242791=71, srv1001274196=1, srv909615097=372, srv1537724566=93, srv1165799954=34, srv1724754364=134, srv978173525=387, srv113319438=29, srv578033735=295, srv147931272=80, srv1183635941=35, srv1904215245=178, srv596349756=302, srv880835255=367, srv857544550=364, srv1779729022=152, srv1795612465=156, srv621083045=314, srv917704170=375, srv1351811120=59, srv1316710897=54, srv789820555=350, srv1922580095=183, srv305567304=241, srv1936745425=186, srv1745318024=138, srv1210822057=39, srv645375717=320, srv950628389=379, srv1490199189=87, srv1575919256=101, srv154481102=96, srv359402967=254, srv997716931=391, srv1457224273=75, srv581644449=297, srv1872374768=174, srv363177310=257, srv740327512=341, srv1664227236=123, srv972330517=385, srv1634261306=114, srv1662183707=122, srv1969046891=191, srv1485266211=82, srv1778842262=150, srv588410181=298, srv1921840985=182, srv591279493=299, srv37574565=260, srv1104147458=23, srv1190166330=36, srv652270371=322, srv1484309042=81, srv1560148463=97, srv618569548=313, srv2102708311=216, srv1084873074=20, srv517669556=283, srv918152084=376, srv649714317=321, srv1674484790=124, srv1339239880=56, srv1461073271=77, srv1125312901=28, srv25633292=234, srv516616923=282, srv299721745=238, srv604932433=308, srv1273702855=48, srv792183929=351, srv1042608200=10, srv1276335106=49, srv1486044644=83, srv676101698=328, srv998930892=392, srv200111276=200, srv1863083643=169, srv1737443479=137, srv872997185=365, srv821351126=355, srv852115805=360, srv1074355423=13, srv170952194=130, srv503430005=277, srv153887567=94, srv1415163001=69, srv1032737435=9, srv1840670515=167, srv1961921083=189, srv59745831=304, srv36715747=258, srv431547280=268, srv1524853580=92, srv1870059418=173, srv396010771=265, srv594457792=301, srv1755339428=140, srv1766275429=142, srv5565786=291, srv603898526=306, srv544570223=287, srv856030669=363, srv1542523468=95, srv915785747=374, srv356122213=253, srv1411875499=67, srv2077620970=209, srv1345529444=57, srv232339963=230, srv1250861076=44, srv1914875423=179, srv478619481=274, srv1202435626=37, srv1706089454=129, srv1810631201=163, srv1282644061=50, srv1625945288=109, srv733251129=338, srv2082830831=212, srv1612103540=107, srv612136291=310, srv1790004142=154, srv183394703=165} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:27,650 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:27,650 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:27,650 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:27,650 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:27,650 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:27,650 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:27,650 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-11 14:16:27,650 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-11 14:16:27,650 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-11 14:16:27,650 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-11 14:16:27,650 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 10 is on host 10
2023-07-11 14:16:27,650 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 11 is on host 11
2023-07-11 14:16:27,650 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 12 is on host 12
2023-07-11 14:16:27,650 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 13 is on host 13
2023-07-11 14:16:27,650 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 14 is on host 14
2023-07-11 14:16:27,650 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 15 is on host 15
2023-07-11 14:16:27,650 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 16 is on host 16
2023-07-11 14:16:27,650 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 17 is on host 17
2023-07-11 14:16:27,650 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 18 is on host 18
2023-07-11 14:16:27,651 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 19 is on host 19
2023-07-11 14:16:27,651 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 20 is on host 20
2023-07-11 14:16:27,651 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 21 is on host 21
2023-07-11 14:16:27,651 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 22 is on host 22
2023-07-11 14:16:27,651 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 23 is on host 23
2023-07-11 14:16:27,651 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 24 is on host 24
2023-07-11 14:16:27,651 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 25 is on host 25
2023-07-11 14:16:27,651 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 26 is on host 26
2023-07-11 14:16:27,651 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 27 is on host 27
2023-07-11 14:16:27,651 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 28 is on host 28
2023-07-11 14:16:27,651 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 29 is on host 29
2023-07-11 14:16:27,651 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 30 is on host 30
2023-07-11 14:16:27,651 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 31 is on host 31
2023-07-11 14:16:27,651 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 32 is on host 32
2023-07-11 14:16:27,651 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 33 is on host 33
2023-07-11 14:16:27,651 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 34 is on host 34
2023-07-11 14:16:27,651 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 35 is on host 35
2023-07-11 14:16:27,651 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 36 is on host 36
2023-07-11 14:16:27,651 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 37 is on host 37
2023-07-11 14:16:27,651 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 38 is on host 38
2023-07-11 14:16:27,651 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 39 is on host 39
2023-07-11 14:16:27,651 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 40 is on host 40
2023-07-11 14:16:27,651 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 41 is on host 41
2023-07-11 14:16:27,651 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 42 is on host 42
2023-07-11 14:16:27,651 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 43 is on host 43
2023-07-11 14:16:27,651 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 44 is on host 44
2023-07-11 14:16:27,651 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 45 is on host 45
2023-07-11 14:16:27,652 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 46 is on host 46
2023-07-11 14:16:27,652 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 47 is on host 47
2023-07-11 14:16:27,652 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 48 is on host 48
2023-07-11 14:16:27,652 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 49 is on host 49
2023-07-11 14:16:27,652 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 50 is on host 50
2023-07-11 14:16:27,652 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 51 is on host 51
2023-07-11 14:16:27,652 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 52 is on host 52
2023-07-11 14:16:27,652 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 53 is on host 53
2023-07-11 14:16:27,652 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 54 is on host 54
2023-07-11 14:16:27,652 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 55 is on host 55
2023-07-11 14:16:27,652 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 56 is on host 56
2023-07-11 14:16:27,652 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 57 is on host 57
2023-07-11 14:16:27,652 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 58 is on host 58
2023-07-11 14:16:27,652 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 59 is on host 59
2023-07-11 14:16:27,652 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 60 is on host 60
2023-07-11 14:16:27,652 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 61 is on host 61
2023-07-11 14:16:27,652 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 62 is on host 62
2023-07-11 14:16:27,652 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 63 is on host 63
2023-07-11 14:16:27,652 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 64 is on host 64
2023-07-11 14:16:27,652 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 65 is on host 65
2023-07-11 14:16:27,652 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 66 is on host 66
2023-07-11 14:16:27,652 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 67 is on host 67
2023-07-11 14:16:27,652 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 68 is on host 68
2023-07-11 14:16:27,652 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 69 is on host 69
2023-07-11 14:16:27,652 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 70 is on host 70
2023-07-11 14:16:27,652 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 71 is on host 71
2023-07-11 14:16:27,652 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 72 is on host 72
2023-07-11 14:16:27,652 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 73 is on host 73
2023-07-11 14:16:27,652 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 74 is on host 74
2023-07-11 14:16:27,653 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 75 is on host 75
2023-07-11 14:16:27,653 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 76 is on host 76
2023-07-11 14:16:27,653 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 77 is on host 77
2023-07-11 14:16:27,653 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 78 is on host 78
2023-07-11 14:16:27,653 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 79 is on host 79
2023-07-11 14:16:27,653 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 80 is on host 80
2023-07-11 14:16:27,653 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 81 is on host 81
2023-07-11 14:16:27,653 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 82 is on host 82
2023-07-11 14:16:27,653 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 83 is on host 83
2023-07-11 14:16:27,653 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 84 is on host 84
2023-07-11 14:16:27,653 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 85 is on host 85
2023-07-11 14:16:27,653 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 86 is on host 86
2023-07-11 14:16:27,653 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 87 is on host 87
2023-07-11 14:16:27,653 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 88 is on host 88
2023-07-11 14:16:27,653 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 89 is on host 89
2023-07-11 14:16:27,653 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 90 is on host 90
2023-07-11 14:16:27,653 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 91 is on host 91
2023-07-11 14:16:27,653 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 92 is on host 92
2023-07-11 14:16:27,653 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 93 is on host 93
2023-07-11 14:16:27,653 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 94 is on host 94
2023-07-11 14:16:27,653 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 95 is on host 95
2023-07-11 14:16:27,653 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 96 is on host 96
2023-07-11 14:16:27,653 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 97 is on host 97
2023-07-11 14:16:27,653 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 98 is on host 98
2023-07-11 14:16:27,653 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 99 is on host 99
2023-07-11 14:16:27,653 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 100 is on host 100
2023-07-11 14:16:27,653 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 101 is on host 101
2023-07-11 14:16:27,654 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 102 is on host 102
2023-07-11 14:16:27,654 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 103 is on host 103
2023-07-11 14:16:27,654 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 104 is on host 104
2023-07-11 14:16:27,654 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 105 is on host 105
2023-07-11 14:16:27,654 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 106 is on host 106
2023-07-11 14:16:27,654 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 107 is on host 107
2023-07-11 14:16:27,654 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 108 is on host 108
2023-07-11 14:16:27,654 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 109 is on host 109
2023-07-11 14:16:27,654 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 110 is on host 110
2023-07-11 14:16:27,654 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 111 is on host 111
2023-07-11 14:16:27,654 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 112 is on host 112
2023-07-11 14:16:27,654 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 113 is on host 113
2023-07-11 14:16:27,654 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 114 is on host 114
2023-07-11 14:16:27,654 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 115 is on host 115
2023-07-11 14:16:27,654 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 116 is on host 116
2023-07-11 14:16:27,654 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 117 is on host 117
2023-07-11 14:16:27,654 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 118 is on host 118
2023-07-11 14:16:27,654 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 119 is on host 119
2023-07-11 14:16:27,654 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 120 is on host 120
2023-07-11 14:16:27,654 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 121 is on host 121
2023-07-11 14:16:27,654 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 122 is on host 122
2023-07-11 14:16:27,654 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 123 is on host 123
2023-07-11 14:16:27,654 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 124 is on host 124
2023-07-11 14:16:27,654 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 125 is on host 125
2023-07-11 14:16:27,654 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 126 is on host 126
2023-07-11 14:16:27,655 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 127 is on host 127
2023-07-11 14:16:27,655 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 128 is on host 128
2023-07-11 14:16:27,655 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 129 is on host 129
2023-07-11 14:16:27,655 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 130 is on host 130
2023-07-11 14:16:27,655 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 131 is on host 131
2023-07-11 14:16:27,655 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 132 is on host 132
2023-07-11 14:16:27,655 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 133 is on host 133
2023-07-11 14:16:27,655 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 134 is on host 134
2023-07-11 14:16:27,655 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 135 is on host 135
2023-07-11 14:16:27,655 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 136 is on host 136
2023-07-11 14:16:27,655 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 137 is on host 137
2023-07-11 14:16:27,655 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 138 is on host 138
2023-07-11 14:16:27,655 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 139 is on host 139
2023-07-11 14:16:27,655 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 140 is on host 140
2023-07-11 14:16:27,655 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 141 is on host 141
2023-07-11 14:16:27,655 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 142 is on host 142
2023-07-11 14:16:27,655 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 143 is on host 143
2023-07-11 14:16:27,655 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 144 is on host 144
2023-07-11 14:16:27,655 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 145 is on host 145
2023-07-11 14:16:27,655 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 146 is on host 146
2023-07-11 14:16:27,655 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 147 is on host 147
2023-07-11 14:16:27,655 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 148 is on host 148
2023-07-11 14:16:27,655 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 149 is on host 149
2023-07-11 14:16:27,655 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 150 is on host 150
2023-07-11 14:16:27,655 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 151 is on host 151
2023-07-11 14:16:27,655 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 152 is on host 152
2023-07-11 14:16:27,655 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 153 is on host 153
2023-07-11 14:16:27,656 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 154 is on host 154
2023-07-11 14:16:27,656 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 155 is on host 155
2023-07-11 14:16:27,656 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 156 is on host 156
2023-07-11 14:16:27,656 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 157 is on host 157
2023-07-11 14:16:27,656 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 158 is on host 158
2023-07-11 14:16:27,656 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 159 is on host 159
2023-07-11 14:16:27,656 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 160 is on host 160
2023-07-11 14:16:27,656 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 161 is on host 161
2023-07-11 14:16:27,656 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 162 is on host 162
2023-07-11 14:16:27,656 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 163 is on host 163
2023-07-11 14:16:27,656 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 164 is on host 164
2023-07-11 14:16:27,656 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 165 is on host 165
2023-07-11 14:16:27,656 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 166 is on host 166
2023-07-11 14:16:27,656 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 167 is on host 167
2023-07-11 14:16:27,656 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 168 is on host 168
2023-07-11 14:16:27,656 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 169 is on host 169
2023-07-11 14:16:27,656 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 170 is on host 170
2023-07-11 14:16:27,656 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 171 is on host 171
2023-07-11 14:16:27,656 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 172 is on host 172
2023-07-11 14:16:27,656 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 173 is on host 173
2023-07-11 14:16:27,656 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 174 is on host 174
2023-07-11 14:16:27,656 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 175 is on host 175
2023-07-11 14:16:27,656 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 176 is on host 176
2023-07-11 14:16:27,656 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 177 is on host 177
2023-07-11 14:16:27,656 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 178 is on host 178
2023-07-11 14:16:27,656 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 179 is on host 179
2023-07-11 14:16:27,656 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 180 is on host 180
2023-07-11 14:16:27,656 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 181 is on host 181
2023-07-11 14:16:27,656 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 182 is on host 182
2023-07-11 14:16:27,657 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 183 is on host 183
2023-07-11 14:16:27,657 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 184 is on host 184
2023-07-11 14:16:27,657 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 185 is on host 185
2023-07-11 14:16:27,657 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 186 is on host 186
2023-07-11 14:16:27,657 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 187 is on host 187
2023-07-11 14:16:27,657 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 188 is on host 188
2023-07-11 14:16:27,657 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 189 is on host 189
2023-07-11 14:16:27,657 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 190 is on host 190
2023-07-11 14:16:27,657 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 191 is on host 191
2023-07-11 14:16:27,657 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 192 is on host 192
2023-07-11 14:16:27,657 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 193 is on host 193
2023-07-11 14:16:27,657 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 194 is on host 194
2023-07-11 14:16:27,657 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 195 is on host 195
2023-07-11 14:16:27,657 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 196 is on host 196
2023-07-11 14:16:27,657 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 197 is on host 197
2023-07-11 14:16:27,657 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 198 is on host 198
2023-07-11 14:16:27,657 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 199 is on host 199
2023-07-11 14:16:27,657 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 200 is on host 200
2023-07-11 14:16:27,657 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 201 is on host 201
2023-07-11 14:16:27,657 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 202 is on host 202
2023-07-11 14:16:27,657 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 203 is on host 203
2023-07-11 14:16:27,657 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 204 is on host 204
2023-07-11 14:16:27,657 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 205 is on host 205
2023-07-11 14:16:27,657 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 206 is on host 206
2023-07-11 14:16:27,657 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 207 is on host 207
2023-07-11 14:16:27,657 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 208 is on host 208
2023-07-11 14:16:27,657 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 209 is on host 209
2023-07-11 14:16:27,657 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 210 is on host 210
2023-07-11 14:16:27,657 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 211 is on host 211
2023-07-11 14:16:27,658 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 212 is on host 212
2023-07-11 14:16:27,658 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 213 is on host 213
2023-07-11 14:16:27,658 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 214 is on host 214
2023-07-11 14:16:27,658 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 215 is on host 215
2023-07-11 14:16:27,658 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 216 is on host 216
2023-07-11 14:16:27,658 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 217 is on host 217
2023-07-11 14:16:27,658 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 218 is on host 218
2023-07-11 14:16:27,658 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 219 is on host 219
2023-07-11 14:16:27,658 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 220 is on host 220
2023-07-11 14:16:27,658 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 221 is on host 221
2023-07-11 14:16:27,658 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 222 is on host 222
2023-07-11 14:16:27,658 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 223 is on host 223
2023-07-11 14:16:27,658 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 224 is on host 224
2023-07-11 14:16:27,658 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 225 is on host 225
2023-07-11 14:16:27,658 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 226 is on host 226
2023-07-11 14:16:27,658 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 227 is on host 227
2023-07-11 14:16:27,658 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 228 is on host 228
2023-07-11 14:16:27,658 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 229 is on host 229
2023-07-11 14:16:27,658 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 230 is on host 230
2023-07-11 14:16:27,658 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 231 is on host 231
2023-07-11 14:16:27,658 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 232 is on host 232
2023-07-11 14:16:27,658 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 233 is on host 233
2023-07-11 14:16:27,658 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 234 is on host 234
2023-07-11 14:16:27,658 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 235 is on host 235
2023-07-11 14:16:27,658 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 236 is on host 236
2023-07-11 14:16:27,658 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 237 is on host 237
2023-07-11 14:16:27,658 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 238 is on host 238
2023-07-11 14:16:27,658 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 239 is on host 239
2023-07-11 14:16:27,658 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 240 is on host 240
2023-07-11 14:16:27,659 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 241 is on host 241
2023-07-11 14:16:27,659 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 242 is on host 242
2023-07-11 14:16:27,659 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 243 is on host 243
2023-07-11 14:16:27,659 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 244 is on host 244
2023-07-11 14:16:27,659 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 245 is on host 245
2023-07-11 14:16:27,659 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 246 is on host 246
2023-07-11 14:16:27,659 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 247 is on host 247
2023-07-11 14:16:27,659 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 248 is on host 248
2023-07-11 14:16:27,659 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 249 is on host 249
2023-07-11 14:16:27,659 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 250 is on host 250
2023-07-11 14:16:27,659 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 251 is on host 251
2023-07-11 14:16:27,659 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 252 is on host 252
2023-07-11 14:16:27,659 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 253 is on host 253
2023-07-11 14:16:27,659 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 254 is on host 254
2023-07-11 14:16:27,659 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 255 is on host 255
2023-07-11 14:16:27,659 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 256 is on host 256
2023-07-11 14:16:27,659 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 257 is on host 257
2023-07-11 14:16:27,659 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 258 is on host 258
2023-07-11 14:16:27,659 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 259 is on host 259
2023-07-11 14:16:27,659 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 260 is on host 260
2023-07-11 14:16:27,659 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 261 is on host 261
2023-07-11 14:16:27,659 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 262 is on host 262
2023-07-11 14:16:27,659 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 263 is on host 263
2023-07-11 14:16:27,659 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 264 is on host 264
2023-07-11 14:16:27,659 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 265 is on host 265
2023-07-11 14:16:27,659 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 266 is on host 266
2023-07-11 14:16:27,659 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 267 is on host 267
2023-07-11 14:16:27,659 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 268 is on host 268
2023-07-11 14:16:27,659 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 269 is on host 269
2023-07-11 14:16:27,660 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 270 is on host 270
2023-07-11 14:16:27,660 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 271 is on host 271
2023-07-11 14:16:27,660 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 272 is on host 272
2023-07-11 14:16:27,660 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 273 is on host 273
2023-07-11 14:16:27,660 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 274 is on host 274
2023-07-11 14:16:27,660 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 275 is on host 275
2023-07-11 14:16:27,660 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 276 is on host 276
2023-07-11 14:16:27,660 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 277 is on host 277
2023-07-11 14:16:27,660 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 278 is on host 278
2023-07-11 14:16:27,660 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 279 is on host 279
2023-07-11 14:16:27,660 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 280 is on host 280
2023-07-11 14:16:27,660 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 281 is on host 281
2023-07-11 14:16:27,660 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 282 is on host 282
2023-07-11 14:16:27,660 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 283 is on host 283
2023-07-11 14:16:27,660 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 284 is on host 284
2023-07-11 14:16:27,660 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 285 is on host 285
2023-07-11 14:16:27,660 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 286 is on host 286
2023-07-11 14:16:27,660 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 287 is on host 287
2023-07-11 14:16:27,660 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 288 is on host 288
2023-07-11 14:16:27,660 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 289 is on host 289
2023-07-11 14:16:27,660 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 290 is on host 290
2023-07-11 14:16:27,660 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 291 is on host 291
2023-07-11 14:16:27,660 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 292 is on host 292
2023-07-11 14:16:27,660 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 293 is on host 293
2023-07-11 14:16:27,660 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 294 is on host 294
2023-07-11 14:16:27,660 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 295 is on host 295
2023-07-11 14:16:27,660 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 296 is on host 296
2023-07-11 14:16:27,660 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 297 is on host 297
2023-07-11 14:16:27,661 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 298 is on host 298
2023-07-11 14:16:27,661 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 299 is on host 299
2023-07-11 14:16:27,661 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 300 is on host 300
2023-07-11 14:16:27,661 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 301 is on host 301
2023-07-11 14:16:27,661 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 302 is on host 302
2023-07-11 14:16:27,661 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 303 is on host 303
2023-07-11 14:16:27,661 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 304 is on host 304
2023-07-11 14:16:27,661 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 305 is on host 305
2023-07-11 14:16:27,661 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 306 is on host 306
2023-07-11 14:16:27,661 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 307 is on host 307
2023-07-11 14:16:27,661 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 308 is on host 308
2023-07-11 14:16:27,661 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 309 is on host 309
2023-07-11 14:16:27,661 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 310 is on host 310
2023-07-11 14:16:27,661 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 311 is on host 311
2023-07-11 14:16:27,661 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 312 is on host 312
2023-07-11 14:16:27,661 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 313 is on host 313
2023-07-11 14:16:27,661 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 314 is on host 314
2023-07-11 14:16:27,661 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 315 is on host 315
2023-07-11 14:16:27,661 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 316 is on host 316
2023-07-11 14:16:27,661 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 317 is on host 317
2023-07-11 14:16:27,661 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 318 is on host 318
2023-07-11 14:16:27,661 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 319 is on host 319
2023-07-11 14:16:27,661 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 320 is on host 320
2023-07-11 14:16:27,661 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 321 is on host 321
2023-07-11 14:16:27,661 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 322 is on host 322
2023-07-11 14:16:27,661 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 323 is on host 323
2023-07-11 14:16:27,661 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 324 is on host 324
2023-07-11 14:16:27,661 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 325 is on host 325
2023-07-11 14:16:27,661 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 326 is on host 326
2023-07-11 14:16:27,662 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 327 is on host 327
2023-07-11 14:16:27,662 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 328 is on host 328
2023-07-11 14:16:27,662 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 329 is on host 329
2023-07-11 14:16:27,662 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 330 is on host 330
2023-07-11 14:16:27,662 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 331 is on host 331
2023-07-11 14:16:27,662 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 332 is on host 332
2023-07-11 14:16:27,662 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 333 is on host 333
2023-07-11 14:16:27,662 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 334 is on host 334
2023-07-11 14:16:27,662 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 335 is on host 335
2023-07-11 14:16:27,662 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 336 is on host 336
2023-07-11 14:16:27,662 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 337 is on host 337
2023-07-11 14:16:27,662 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 338 is on host 338
2023-07-11 14:16:27,662 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 339 is on host 339
2023-07-11 14:16:27,662 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 340 is on host 340
2023-07-11 14:16:27,662 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 341 is on host 341
2023-07-11 14:16:27,662 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 342 is on host 342
2023-07-11 14:16:27,662 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 343 is on host 343
2023-07-11 14:16:27,662 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 344 is on host 344
2023-07-11 14:16:27,662 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 345 is on host 345
2023-07-11 14:16:27,662 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 346 is on host 346
2023-07-11 14:16:27,662 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 347 is on host 347
2023-07-11 14:16:27,662 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 348 is on host 348
2023-07-11 14:16:27,662 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 349 is on host 349
2023-07-11 14:16:27,662 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 350 is on host 350
2023-07-11 14:16:27,662 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 351 is on host 351
2023-07-11 14:16:27,662 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 352 is on host 352
2023-07-11 14:16:27,662 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 353 is on host 353
2023-07-11 14:16:27,662 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 354 is on host 354
2023-07-11 14:16:27,663 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 355 is on host 355
2023-07-11 14:16:27,663 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 356 is on host 356
2023-07-11 14:16:27,663 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 357 is on host 357
2023-07-11 14:16:27,663 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 358 is on host 358
2023-07-11 14:16:27,663 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 359 is on host 359
2023-07-11 14:16:27,663 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 360 is on host 360
2023-07-11 14:16:27,663 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 361 is on host 361
2023-07-11 14:16:27,663 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 362 is on host 362
2023-07-11 14:16:27,663 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 363 is on host 363
2023-07-11 14:16:27,663 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 364 is on host 364
2023-07-11 14:16:27,663 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 365 is on host 365
2023-07-11 14:16:27,663 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 366 is on host 366
2023-07-11 14:16:27,663 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 367 is on host 367
2023-07-11 14:16:27,663 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 368 is on host 368
2023-07-11 14:16:27,663 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 369 is on host 369
2023-07-11 14:16:27,663 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 370 is on host 370
2023-07-11 14:16:27,663 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 371 is on host 371
2023-07-11 14:16:27,664 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 372 is on host 372
2023-07-11 14:16:27,664 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 373 is on host 373
2023-07-11 14:16:27,664 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 374 is on host 374
2023-07-11 14:16:27,664 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 375 is on host 375
2023-07-11 14:16:27,664 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 376 is on host 376
2023-07-11 14:16:27,664 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 377 is on host 377
2023-07-11 14:16:27,664 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 378 is on host 378
2023-07-11 14:16:27,664 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 379 is on host 379
2023-07-11 14:16:27,664 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 380 is on host 380
2023-07-11 14:16:27,664 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 381 is on host 381
2023-07-11 14:16:27,664 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 382 is on host 382
2023-07-11 14:16:27,664 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 383 is on host 383
2023-07-11 14:16:27,664 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 384 is on host 384
2023-07-11 14:16:27,664 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 385 is on host 385
2023-07-11 14:16:27,664 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 386 is on host 386
2023-07-11 14:16:27,664 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 387 is on host 387
2023-07-11 14:16:27,664 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 388 is on host 388
2023-07-11 14:16:27,664 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 389 is on host 389
2023-07-11 14:16:27,664 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 390 is on host 390
2023-07-11 14:16:27,664 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 391 is on host 391
2023-07-11 14:16:27,664 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 392 is on host 392
2023-07-11 14:16:27,664 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=393, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:27,665 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table47) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:27,665 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table48
2023-07-11 14:16:27,665 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv553536953=290, srv1630071126=110, srv1071894870=12, srv23511728=232, srv658346947=323, srv2025338799=204, srv1397994335=64, srv1976766403=195, srv1644629726=118, srv957637734=381, srv2079182457=210, srv1749264468=139, srv2046129126=206, srv1595762596=104, srv603990852=307, srv1973073480=194, srv958856137=382, srv644066832=319, srv557062842=292, srv277765671=235, srv732221418=337, srv1769385567=143, srv224612199=228, srv714752528=334, srv362526040=256, srv581128949=296, srv2133511466=223, srv1144239257=30, srv320603627=245, srv1679952521=126, srv2122867873=222, srv1110067064=24, srv256251994=233, srv63261708=317, srv89837390=371, srv552104598=289, srv508952995=281, srv2096011353=214, srv1770417148=144, srv1246723478=42, srv929436444=378, srv2082192429=211, srv234917297=231, srv405700573=266, srv183644386=166, srv1488378513=85, srv173139715=136, srv1154180352=32, srv355693379=252, srv1407521654=66, srv496848057=275, srv1157975499=33, srv1806731027=162, srv1923102804=184, srv311102455=244, srv450011410=271, srv771515724=348, srv389183508=262, srv1249074416=43, srv2014575201=201, srv640847108=318, srv832363565=356, srv1970882134=192, srv2107358603=218, srv855766065=361, srv1336043388=55, srv29397186=237, srv982792848=390, srv976560524=386, srv101181760=3, srv1093549482=21, srv2018389395=202, srv2113483104=221, srv1778339118=149, srv1968709692=190, srv705221118=333, srv159600090=105, srv1919608486=180, srv981255102=389, srv807899713=353, srv755110395=344, srv1770594519=145, srv739692705=340, srv1076582671=16, srv693869315=330, srv1079048717=17, srv440657532=270, srv1636659280=115, srv2108739257=220, srv668373413=326, srv1003610393=2, srv1054229197=11, srv1868589627=172, srv2103522371=217, srv1000546271=0, srv951670617=380, srv2042909593=205, srv1865656038=171, srv1466355012=78, srv703662406=332, srv1418112884=70, srv1215580291=40, srv71833528=335, srv1580581635=103, srv1021032212=5, srv1080806312=19, srv1985601859=197, srv74471954=343, srv1647472319=119, srv2071553346=208, srv1632855171=112, srv1122009370=27, srv13613992=61, srv1630777154=111, srv301413669=239, srv550697728=288, srv1296023857=53, srv1724550977=133, srv1989290370=198, srv1926417985=185, srv1678097199=125, srv1461034373=76, srv614690415=311, srv2098345381=215, srv310463473=243, srv1011934105=4, srv148627129=84, srv305489318=240, srv1256534903=46, srv1289731445=52, srv1798844587=157, srv567113085=294, srv1119222501=26, srv2055117940=207, srv855898852=362, srv629224816=316, srv1075943554=15, srv625909061=315, srv1705591942=128, srv734225580=339, srv660107924=324, srv1381729938=62, srv1633483173=113, srv408265476=267, srv1776057793=148, srv1360253411=60, srv1511424834=90, srv1414162621=68, srv883343663=370, srv151859222=91, srv349144930=251, srv1991304034=199, srv1825887791=164, srv601657063=305, srv758932951=345, srv1651629087=120, srv1864623584=170, srv682957691=329, srv1500454146=88, srv1725962085=135, srv1659841448=121, srv1253206004=45, srv52354442=284, srv18508093=168, srv1427731921=73, srv561344974=293, srv721668125=336, srv1575482138=100, srv914128771=373, srv961487230=383, srv741332941=342, srv533032466=286, srv1574140987=99, srv2139849097=224, srv503902262=278, srv674807007=327, srv1786829855=153, srv2088727517=213, srv394366966=264, srv980089565=388, srv114594288=31, srv38296437=261, srv214835574=226, srv1887224977=176, srv1025509362=7, srv1577020334=102, srv524466665=285, srv393561021=263, srv759909927=346, srv763556514=347, srv786453030=349, srv2142935488=225, srv618111613=312, srv16254163=108, srv343211061=250, srv476075173=273, srv1269632212=47, srv333589612=246, srv499015361=276, srv836674186=357, srv1799191687=158, srv1446998035=74, srv1571774199=98, srv1115354947=25, srv333860881=247, srv1724152600=132, srv1598699299=106, srv177885829=151, srv472125887=272, srv1101339966=22, srv1424985362=72, srv1945569895=188, srv594128294=300, srv1026739237=8, srv842459828=358, srv878519137=366, srv1921260729=181, srv339110834=249, srv504099471=279, srv814253179=354, srv1643744885=116, srv1793847521=155, srv607234624=309, srv698219051=331, srv1688538732=127, srv666240078=325, srv1079284733=18, srv29210550=236, srv506181748=280, srv881313122=368, srv1945452576=187, srv597307897=303, srv1285120424=51, srv1887943816=177, srv1983604698=196, srv1805465940=161, srv309309336=242, srv1719756294=131, srv1349932676=58, srv1208486369=38, srv1643971570=117, srv1509331489=89, srv334105385=248, srv1400515744=65, srv369984715=259, srv43712162=269, srv842675864=359, srv1803258748=160, srv1022450918=6, srv1775108732=147, srv1766088250=141, srv180150732=159, srv1220857227=41, srv226530501=229, srv362032108=255, srv919715380=377, srv1074935976=14, srv1395030819=63, srv803291569=352, srv1877966766=175, srv220538712=227, srv2021718843=203, srv2107782185=219, srv882216860=369, srv1489137852=86, srv1972328734=193, srv1470759982=79, srv1774824811=146, srv971974774=384, srv1418242791=71, srv1001274196=1, srv909615097=372, srv1537724566=93, srv1165799954=34, srv1724754364=134, srv978173525=387, srv113319438=29, srv578033735=295, srv147931272=80, srv1183635941=35, srv1904215245=178, srv596349756=302, srv880835255=367, srv857544550=364, srv1779729022=152, srv1795612465=156, srv621083045=314, srv917704170=375, srv1351811120=59, srv1316710897=54, srv789820555=350, srv1922580095=183, srv305567304=241, srv1936745425=186, srv1745318024=138, srv1210822057=39, srv645375717=320, srv950628389=379, srv1490199189=87, srv1575919256=101, srv154481102=96, srv359402967=254, srv997716931=391, srv1457224273=75, srv581644449=297, srv1872374768=174, srv363177310=257, srv740327512=341, srv1664227236=123, srv972330517=385, srv1634261306=114, srv1662183707=122, srv1969046891=191, srv1485266211=82, srv1778842262=150, srv588410181=298, srv1921840985=182, srv591279493=299, srv37574565=260, srv1104147458=23, srv1190166330=36, srv652270371=322, srv1484309042=81, srv1560148463=97, srv618569548=313, srv2102708311=216, srv1084873074=20, srv517669556=283, srv918152084=376, srv649714317=321, srv1674484790=124, srv1339239880=56, srv1461073271=77, srv1125312901=28, srv25633292=234, srv516616923=282, srv299721745=238, srv604932433=308, srv1273702855=48, srv792183929=351, srv1042608200=10, srv1276335106=49, srv1486044644=83, srv676101698=328, srv998930892=392, srv200111276=200, srv1863083643=169, srv1737443479=137, srv872997185=365, srv821351126=355, srv852115805=360, srv1074355423=13, srv170952194=130, srv503430005=277, srv153887567=94, srv1415163001=69, srv1032737435=9, srv1840670515=167, srv1961921083=189, srv59745831=304, srv36715747=258, srv431547280=268, srv1524853580=92, srv1870059418=173, srv396010771=265, srv594457792=301, srv1755339428=140, srv1766275429=142, srv5565786=291, srv603898526=306, srv544570223=287, srv856030669=363, srv1542523468=95, srv915785747=374, srv356122213=253, srv1411875499=67, srv2077620970=209, srv1345529444=57, srv232339963=230, srv1250861076=44, srv1914875423=179, srv478619481=274, srv1202435626=37, srv1706089454=129, srv1810631201=163, srv1282644061=50, srv1625945288=109, srv733251129=338, srv2082830831=212, srv1612103540=107, srv612136291=310, srv1790004142=154, srv183394703=165} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:27,665 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:27,665 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:27,665 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:27,665 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:27,665 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:27,666 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:27,666 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-11 14:16:27,666 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-11 14:16:27,666 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-11 14:16:27,666 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-11 14:16:27,666 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 10 is on host 10
2023-07-11 14:16:27,666 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 11 is on host 11
2023-07-11 14:16:27,666 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 12 is on host 12
2023-07-11 14:16:27,666 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 13 is on host 13
2023-07-11 14:16:27,666 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 14 is on host 14
2023-07-11 14:16:27,666 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 15 is on host 15
2023-07-11 14:16:27,666 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 16 is on host 16
2023-07-11 14:16:27,666 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 17 is on host 17
2023-07-11 14:16:27,666 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 18 is on host 18
2023-07-11 14:16:27,666 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 19 is on host 19
2023-07-11 14:16:27,666 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 20 is on host 20
2023-07-11 14:16:27,666 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 21 is on host 21
2023-07-11 14:16:27,666 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 22 is on host 22
2023-07-11 14:16:27,666 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 23 is on host 23
2023-07-11 14:16:27,666 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 24 is on host 24
2023-07-11 14:16:27,666 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 25 is on host 25
2023-07-11 14:16:27,666 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 26 is on host 26
2023-07-11 14:16:27,666 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 27 is on host 27
2023-07-11 14:16:27,666 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 28 is on host 28
2023-07-11 14:16:27,666 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 29 is on host 29
2023-07-11 14:16:27,666 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 30 is on host 30
2023-07-11 14:16:27,666 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 31 is on host 31
2023-07-11 14:16:27,666 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 32 is on host 32
2023-07-11 14:16:27,666 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 33 is on host 33
2023-07-11 14:16:27,667 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 34 is on host 34
2023-07-11 14:16:27,667 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 35 is on host 35
2023-07-11 14:16:27,667 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 36 is on host 36
2023-07-11 14:16:27,667 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 37 is on host 37
2023-07-11 14:16:27,667 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 38 is on host 38
2023-07-11 14:16:27,667 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 39 is on host 39
2023-07-11 14:16:27,667 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 40 is on host 40
2023-07-11 14:16:27,667 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 41 is on host 41
2023-07-11 14:16:27,667 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 42 is on host 42
2023-07-11 14:16:27,667 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 43 is on host 43
2023-07-11 14:16:27,667 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 44 is on host 44
2023-07-11 14:16:27,667 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 45 is on host 45
2023-07-11 14:16:27,667 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 46 is on host 46
2023-07-11 14:16:27,667 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 47 is on host 47
2023-07-11 14:16:27,667 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 48 is on host 48
2023-07-11 14:16:27,667 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 49 is on host 49
2023-07-11 14:16:27,667 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 50 is on host 50
2023-07-11 14:16:27,667 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 51 is on host 51
2023-07-11 14:16:27,667 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 52 is on host 52
2023-07-11 14:16:27,667 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 53 is on host 53
2023-07-11 14:16:27,667 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 54 is on host 54
2023-07-11 14:16:27,667 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 55 is on host 55
2023-07-11 14:16:27,667 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 56 is on host 56
2023-07-11 14:16:27,667 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 57 is on host 57
2023-07-11 14:16:27,667 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 58 is on host 58
2023-07-11 14:16:27,667 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 59 is on host 59
2023-07-11 14:16:27,667 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 60 is on host 60
2023-07-11 14:16:27,667 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 61 is on host 61
2023-07-11 14:16:27,667 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 62 is on host 62
2023-07-11 14:16:27,667 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 63 is on host 63
2023-07-11 14:16:27,668 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 64 is on host 64
2023-07-11 14:16:27,668 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 65 is on host 65
2023-07-11 14:16:27,668 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 66 is on host 66
2023-07-11 14:16:27,668 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 67 is on host 67
2023-07-11 14:16:27,668 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 68 is on host 68
2023-07-11 14:16:27,668 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 69 is on host 69
2023-07-11 14:16:27,668 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 70 is on host 70
2023-07-11 14:16:27,668 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 71 is on host 71
2023-07-11 14:16:27,668 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 72 is on host 72
2023-07-11 14:16:27,668 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 73 is on host 73
2023-07-11 14:16:27,668 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 74 is on host 74
2023-07-11 14:16:27,668 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 75 is on host 75
2023-07-11 14:16:27,668 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 76 is on host 76
2023-07-11 14:16:27,668 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 77 is on host 77
2023-07-11 14:16:27,668 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 78 is on host 78
2023-07-11 14:16:27,668 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 79 is on host 79
2023-07-11 14:16:27,668 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 80 is on host 80
2023-07-11 14:16:27,668 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 81 is on host 81
2023-07-11 14:16:27,668 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 82 is on host 82
2023-07-11 14:16:27,668 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 83 is on host 83
2023-07-11 14:16:27,668 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 84 is on host 84
2023-07-11 14:16:27,668 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 85 is on host 85
2023-07-11 14:16:27,668 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 86 is on host 86
2023-07-11 14:16:27,668 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 87 is on host 87
2023-07-11 14:16:27,668 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 88 is on host 88
2023-07-11 14:16:27,668 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 89 is on host 89
2023-07-11 14:16:27,668 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 90 is on host 90
2023-07-11 14:16:27,668 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 91 is on host 91
2023-07-11 14:16:27,668 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 92 is on host 92
2023-07-11 14:16:27,669 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 93 is on host 93
2023-07-11 14:16:27,669 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 94 is on host 94
2023-07-11 14:16:27,669 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 95 is on host 95
2023-07-11 14:16:27,669 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 96 is on host 96
2023-07-11 14:16:27,669 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 97 is on host 97
2023-07-11 14:16:27,669 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 98 is on host 98
2023-07-11 14:16:27,669 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 99 is on host 99
2023-07-11 14:16:27,669 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 100 is on host 100
2023-07-11 14:16:27,669 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 101 is on host 101
2023-07-11 14:16:27,669 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 102 is on host 102
2023-07-11 14:16:27,669 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 103 is on host 103
2023-07-11 14:16:27,669 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 104 is on host 104
2023-07-11 14:16:27,669 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 105 is on host 105
2023-07-11 14:16:27,669 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 106 is on host 106
2023-07-11 14:16:27,669 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 107 is on host 107
2023-07-11 14:16:27,669 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 108 is on host 108
2023-07-11 14:16:27,669 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 109 is on host 109
2023-07-11 14:16:27,669 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 110 is on host 110
2023-07-11 14:16:27,669 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 111 is on host 111
2023-07-11 14:16:27,669 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 112 is on host 112
2023-07-11 14:16:27,669 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 113 is on host 113
2023-07-11 14:16:27,669 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 114 is on host 114
2023-07-11 14:16:27,669 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 115 is on host 115
2023-07-11 14:16:27,669 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 116 is on host 116
2023-07-11 14:16:27,669 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 117 is on host 117
2023-07-11 14:16:27,669 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 118 is on host 118
2023-07-11 14:16:27,669 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 119 is on host 119
2023-07-11 14:16:27,669 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 120 is on host 120
2023-07-11 14:16:27,670 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 121 is on host 121
2023-07-11 14:16:27,670 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 122 is on host 122
2023-07-11 14:16:27,670 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 123 is on host 123
2023-07-11 14:16:27,670 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 124 is on host 124
2023-07-11 14:16:27,670 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 125 is on host 125
2023-07-11 14:16:27,670 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 126 is on host 126
2023-07-11 14:16:27,670 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 127 is on host 127
2023-07-11 14:16:27,670 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 128 is on host 128
2023-07-11 14:16:27,670 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 129 is on host 129
2023-07-11 14:16:27,670 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 130 is on host 130
2023-07-11 14:16:27,670 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 131 is on host 131
2023-07-11 14:16:27,670 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 132 is on host 132
2023-07-11 14:16:27,670 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 133 is on host 133
2023-07-11 14:16:27,670 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 134 is on host 134
2023-07-11 14:16:27,670 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 135 is on host 135
2023-07-11 14:16:27,670 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 136 is on host 136
2023-07-11 14:16:27,670 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 137 is on host 137
2023-07-11 14:16:27,670 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 138 is on host 138
2023-07-11 14:16:27,670 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 139 is on host 139
2023-07-11 14:16:27,670 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 140 is on host 140
2023-07-11 14:16:27,670 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 141 is on host 141
2023-07-11 14:16:27,670 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 142 is on host 142
2023-07-11 14:16:27,670 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 143 is on host 143
2023-07-11 14:16:27,670 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 144 is on host 144
2023-07-11 14:16:27,670 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 145 is on host 145
2023-07-11 14:16:27,670 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 146 is on host 146
2023-07-11 14:16:27,670 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 147 is on host 147
2023-07-11 14:16:27,670 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 148 is on host 148
2023-07-11 14:16:27,670 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 149 is on host 149
2023-07-11 14:16:27,671 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 150 is on host 150
2023-07-11 14:16:27,671 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 151 is on host 151
2023-07-11 14:16:27,671 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 152 is on host 152
2023-07-11 14:16:27,671 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 153 is on host 153
2023-07-11 14:16:27,671 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 154 is on host 154
2023-07-11 14:16:27,671 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 155 is on host 155
2023-07-11 14:16:27,671 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 156 is on host 156
2023-07-11 14:16:27,671 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 157 is on host 157
2023-07-11 14:16:27,671 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 158 is on host 158
2023-07-11 14:16:27,671 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 159 is on host 159
2023-07-11 14:16:27,671 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 160 is on host 160
2023-07-11 14:16:27,671 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 161 is on host 161
2023-07-11 14:16:27,671 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 162 is on host 162
2023-07-11 14:16:27,671 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 163 is on host 163
2023-07-11 14:16:27,671 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 164 is on host 164
2023-07-11 14:16:27,671 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 165 is on host 165
2023-07-11 14:16:27,671 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 166 is on host 166
2023-07-11 14:16:27,671 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 167 is on host 167
2023-07-11 14:16:27,671 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 168 is on host 168
2023-07-11 14:16:27,671 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 169 is on host 169
2023-07-11 14:16:27,671 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 170 is on host 170
2023-07-11 14:16:27,671 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 171 is on host 171
2023-07-11 14:16:27,671 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 172 is on host 172
2023-07-11 14:16:27,671 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 173 is on host 173
2023-07-11 14:16:27,671 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 174 is on host 174
2023-07-11 14:16:27,671 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 175 is on host 175
2023-07-11 14:16:27,671 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 176 is on host 176
2023-07-11 14:16:27,671 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 177 is on host 177
2023-07-11 14:16:27,671 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 178 is on host 178
2023-07-11 14:16:27,672 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 179 is on host 179
2023-07-11 14:16:27,672 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 180 is on host 180
2023-07-11 14:16:27,672 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 181 is on host 181
2023-07-11 14:16:27,672 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 182 is on host 182
2023-07-11 14:16:27,672 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 183 is on host 183
2023-07-11 14:16:27,672 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 184 is on host 184
2023-07-11 14:16:27,672 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 185 is on host 185
2023-07-11 14:16:27,672 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 186 is on host 186
2023-07-11 14:16:27,672 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 187 is on host 187
2023-07-11 14:16:27,672 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 188 is on host 188
2023-07-11 14:16:27,672 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 189 is on host 189
2023-07-11 14:16:27,672 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 190 is on host 190
2023-07-11 14:16:27,672 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 191 is on host 191
2023-07-11 14:16:27,672 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 192 is on host 192
2023-07-11 14:16:27,672 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 193 is on host 193
2023-07-11 14:16:27,672 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 194 is on host 194
2023-07-11 14:16:27,672 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 195 is on host 195
2023-07-11 14:16:27,672 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 196 is on host 196
2023-07-11 14:16:27,672 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 197 is on host 197
2023-07-11 14:16:27,672 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 198 is on host 198
2023-07-11 14:16:27,672 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 199 is on host 199
2023-07-11 14:16:27,672 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 200 is on host 200
2023-07-11 14:16:27,672 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 201 is on host 201
2023-07-11 14:16:27,672 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 202 is on host 202
2023-07-11 14:16:27,672 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 203 is on host 203
2023-07-11 14:16:27,672 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 204 is on host 204
2023-07-11 14:16:27,672 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 205 is on host 205
2023-07-11 14:16:27,672 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 206 is on host 206
2023-07-11 14:16:27,672 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 207 is on host 207
2023-07-11 14:16:27,673 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 208 is on host 208
2023-07-11 14:16:27,673 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 209 is on host 209
2023-07-11 14:16:27,673 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 210 is on host 210
2023-07-11 14:16:27,673 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 211 is on host 211
2023-07-11 14:16:27,673 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 212 is on host 212
2023-07-11 14:16:27,673 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 213 is on host 213
2023-07-11 14:16:27,673 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 214 is on host 214
2023-07-11 14:16:27,673 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 215 is on host 215
2023-07-11 14:16:27,673 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 216 is on host 216
2023-07-11 14:16:27,673 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 217 is on host 217
2023-07-11 14:16:27,673 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 218 is on host 218
2023-07-11 14:16:27,673 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 219 is on host 219
2023-07-11 14:16:27,673 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 220 is on host 220
2023-07-11 14:16:27,673 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 221 is on host 221
2023-07-11 14:16:27,673 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 222 is on host 222
2023-07-11 14:16:27,673 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 223 is on host 223
2023-07-11 14:16:27,673 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 224 is on host 224
2023-07-11 14:16:27,673 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 225 is on host 225
2023-07-11 14:16:27,673 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 226 is on host 226
2023-07-11 14:16:27,673 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 227 is on host 227
2023-07-11 14:16:27,673 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 228 is on host 228
2023-07-11 14:16:27,673 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 229 is on host 229
2023-07-11 14:16:27,673 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 230 is on host 230
2023-07-11 14:16:27,673 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 231 is on host 231
2023-07-11 14:16:27,673 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 232 is on host 232
2023-07-11 14:16:27,673 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 233 is on host 233
2023-07-11 14:16:27,673 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 234 is on host 234
2023-07-11 14:16:27,673 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 235 is on host 235
2023-07-11 14:16:27,674 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 236 is on host 236
2023-07-11 14:16:27,674 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 237 is on host 237
2023-07-11 14:16:27,674 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 238 is on host 238
2023-07-11 14:16:27,674 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 239 is on host 239
2023-07-11 14:16:27,674 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 240 is on host 240
2023-07-11 14:16:27,674 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 241 is on host 241
2023-07-11 14:16:27,674 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 242 is on host 242
2023-07-11 14:16:27,674 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 243 is on host 243
2023-07-11 14:16:27,674 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 244 is on host 244
2023-07-11 14:16:27,674 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 245 is on host 245
2023-07-11 14:16:27,674 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 246 is on host 246
2023-07-11 14:16:27,674 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 247 is on host 247
2023-07-11 14:16:27,674 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 248 is on host 248
2023-07-11 14:16:27,674 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 249 is on host 249
2023-07-11 14:16:27,674 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 250 is on host 250
2023-07-11 14:16:27,674 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 251 is on host 251
2023-07-11 14:16:27,674 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 252 is on host 252
2023-07-11 14:16:27,674 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 253 is on host 253
2023-07-11 14:16:27,674 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 254 is on host 254
2023-07-11 14:16:27,674 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 255 is on host 255
2023-07-11 14:16:27,674 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 256 is on host 256
2023-07-11 14:16:27,674 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 257 is on host 257
2023-07-11 14:16:27,674 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 258 is on host 258
2023-07-11 14:16:27,674 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 259 is on host 259
2023-07-11 14:16:27,675 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 260 is on host 260
2023-07-11 14:16:27,675 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 261 is on host 261
2023-07-11 14:16:27,675 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 262 is on host 262
2023-07-11 14:16:27,675 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 263 is on host 263
2023-07-11 14:16:27,675 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 264 is on host 264
2023-07-11 14:16:27,675 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 265 is on host 265
2023-07-11 14:16:27,675 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 266 is on host 266
2023-07-11 14:16:27,675 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 267 is on host 267
2023-07-11 14:16:27,675 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 268 is on host 268
2023-07-11 14:16:27,675 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 269 is on host 269
2023-07-11 14:16:27,675 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 270 is on host 270
2023-07-11 14:16:27,675 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 271 is on host 271
2023-07-11 14:16:27,675 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 272 is on host 272
2023-07-11 14:16:27,675 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 273 is on host 273
2023-07-11 14:16:27,675 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 274 is on host 274
2023-07-11 14:16:27,675 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 275 is on host 275
2023-07-11 14:16:27,675 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 276 is on host 276
2023-07-11 14:16:27,675 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 277 is on host 277
2023-07-11 14:16:27,675 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 278 is on host 278
2023-07-11 14:16:27,675 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 279 is on host 279
2023-07-11 14:16:27,675 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 280 is on host 280
2023-07-11 14:16:27,675 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 281 is on host 281
2023-07-11 14:16:27,676 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 282 is on host 282
2023-07-11 14:16:27,676 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 283 is on host 283
2023-07-11 14:16:27,676 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 284 is on host 284
2023-07-11 14:16:27,676 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 285 is on host 285
2023-07-11 14:16:27,676 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 286 is on host 286
2023-07-11 14:16:27,676 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 287 is on host 287
2023-07-11 14:16:27,676 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 288 is on host 288
2023-07-11 14:16:27,676 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 289 is on host 289
2023-07-11 14:16:27,676 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 290 is on host 290
2023-07-11 14:16:27,676 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 291 is on host 291
2023-07-11 14:16:27,676 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 292 is on host 292
2023-07-11 14:16:27,676 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 293 is on host 293
2023-07-11 14:16:27,676 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 294 is on host 294
2023-07-11 14:16:27,676 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 295 is on host 295
2023-07-11 14:16:27,676 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 296 is on host 296
2023-07-11 14:16:27,676 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 297 is on host 297
2023-07-11 14:16:27,676 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 298 is on host 298
2023-07-11 14:16:27,676 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 299 is on host 299
2023-07-11 14:16:27,676 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 300 is on host 300
2023-07-11 14:16:27,676 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 301 is on host 301
2023-07-11 14:16:27,676 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 302 is on host 302
2023-07-11 14:16:27,676 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 303 is on host 303
2023-07-11 14:16:27,676 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 304 is on host 304
2023-07-11 14:16:27,676 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 305 is on host 305
2023-07-11 14:16:27,676 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 306 is on host 306
2023-07-11 14:16:27,676 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 307 is on host 307
2023-07-11 14:16:27,676 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 308 is on host 308
2023-07-11 14:16:27,676 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 309 is on host 309
2023-07-11 14:16:27,676 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 310 is on host 310
2023-07-11 14:16:27,677 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 311 is on host 311
2023-07-11 14:16:27,677 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 312 is on host 312
2023-07-11 14:16:27,677 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 313 is on host 313
2023-07-11 14:16:27,677 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 314 is on host 314
2023-07-11 14:16:27,677 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 315 is on host 315
2023-07-11 14:16:27,677 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 316 is on host 316
2023-07-11 14:16:27,677 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 317 is on host 317
2023-07-11 14:16:27,677 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 318 is on host 318
2023-07-11 14:16:27,677 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 319 is on host 319
2023-07-11 14:16:27,677 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 320 is on host 320
2023-07-11 14:16:27,677 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 321 is on host 321
2023-07-11 14:16:27,677 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 322 is on host 322
2023-07-11 14:16:27,677 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 323 is on host 323
2023-07-11 14:16:27,677 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 324 is on host 324
2023-07-11 14:16:27,677 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 325 is on host 325
2023-07-11 14:16:27,677 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 326 is on host 326
2023-07-11 14:16:27,677 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 327 is on host 327
2023-07-11 14:16:27,677 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 328 is on host 328
2023-07-11 14:16:27,677 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 329 is on host 329
2023-07-11 14:16:27,677 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 330 is on host 330
2023-07-11 14:16:27,677 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 331 is on host 331
2023-07-11 14:16:27,677 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 332 is on host 332
2023-07-11 14:16:27,677 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 333 is on host 333
2023-07-11 14:16:27,677 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 334 is on host 334
2023-07-11 14:16:27,677 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 335 is on host 335
2023-07-11 14:16:27,677 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 336 is on host 336
2023-07-11 14:16:27,677 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 337 is on host 337
2023-07-11 14:16:27,677 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 338 is on host 338
2023-07-11 14:16:27,678 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 339 is on host 339
2023-07-11 14:16:27,678 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 340 is on host 340
2023-07-11 14:16:27,678 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 341 is on host 341
2023-07-11 14:16:27,678 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 342 is on host 342
2023-07-11 14:16:27,678 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 343 is on host 343
2023-07-11 14:16:27,678 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 344 is on host 344
2023-07-11 14:16:27,678 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 345 is on host 345
2023-07-11 14:16:27,678 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 346 is on host 346
2023-07-11 14:16:27,678 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 347 is on host 347
2023-07-11 14:16:27,678 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 348 is on host 348
2023-07-11 14:16:27,678 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 349 is on host 349
2023-07-11 14:16:27,678 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 350 is on host 350
2023-07-11 14:16:27,678 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 351 is on host 351
2023-07-11 14:16:27,678 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 352 is on host 352
2023-07-11 14:16:27,678 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 353 is on host 353
2023-07-11 14:16:27,678 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 354 is on host 354
2023-07-11 14:16:27,678 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 355 is on host 355
2023-07-11 14:16:27,678 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 356 is on host 356
2023-07-11 14:16:27,678 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 357 is on host 357
2023-07-11 14:16:27,678 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 358 is on host 358
2023-07-11 14:16:27,678 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 359 is on host 359
2023-07-11 14:16:27,678 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 360 is on host 360
2023-07-11 14:16:27,678 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 361 is on host 361
2023-07-11 14:16:27,678 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 362 is on host 362
2023-07-11 14:16:27,678 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 363 is on host 363
2023-07-11 14:16:27,678 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 364 is on host 364
2023-07-11 14:16:27,678 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 365 is on host 365
2023-07-11 14:16:27,678 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 366 is on host 366
2023-07-11 14:16:27,678 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 367 is on host 367
2023-07-11 14:16:27,679 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 368 is on host 368
2023-07-11 14:16:27,679 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 369 is on host 369
2023-07-11 14:16:27,679 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 370 is on host 370
2023-07-11 14:16:27,679 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 371 is on host 371
2023-07-11 14:16:27,679 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 372 is on host 372
2023-07-11 14:16:27,679 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 373 is on host 373
2023-07-11 14:16:27,679 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 374 is on host 374
2023-07-11 14:16:27,679 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 375 is on host 375
2023-07-11 14:16:27,679 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 376 is on host 376
2023-07-11 14:16:27,679 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 377 is on host 377
2023-07-11 14:16:27,679 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 378 is on host 378
2023-07-11 14:16:27,679 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 379 is on host 379
2023-07-11 14:16:27,679 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 380 is on host 380
2023-07-11 14:16:27,679 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 381 is on host 381
2023-07-11 14:16:27,679 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 382 is on host 382
2023-07-11 14:16:27,679 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 383 is on host 383
2023-07-11 14:16:27,679 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 384 is on host 384
2023-07-11 14:16:27,679 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 385 is on host 385
2023-07-11 14:16:27,679 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 386 is on host 386
2023-07-11 14:16:27,679 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 387 is on host 387
2023-07-11 14:16:27,679 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 388 is on host 388
2023-07-11 14:16:27,679 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 389 is on host 389
2023-07-11 14:16:27,679 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 390 is on host 390
2023-07-11 14:16:27,679 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 391 is on host 391
2023-07-11 14:16:27,679 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 392 is on host 392
2023-07-11 14:16:27,679 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=393, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:27,680 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table48) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:27,680 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table49
2023-07-11 14:16:27,680 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv553536953=290, srv1630071126=110, srv1071894870=12, srv23511728=232, srv658346947=323, srv2025338799=204, srv1397994335=64, srv1976766403=195, srv1644629726=118, srv957637734=381, srv2079182457=210, srv1749264468=139, srv2046129126=206, srv1595762596=104, srv603990852=307, srv1973073480=194, srv958856137=382, srv644066832=319, srv557062842=292, srv277765671=235, srv732221418=337, srv1769385567=143, srv224612199=228, srv714752528=334, srv362526040=256, srv581128949=296, srv2133511466=223, srv1144239257=30, srv320603627=245, srv1679952521=126, srv2122867873=222, srv1110067064=24, srv256251994=233, srv63261708=317, srv89837390=371, srv552104598=289, srv508952995=281, srv2096011353=214, srv1770417148=144, srv1246723478=42, srv929436444=378, srv2082192429=211, srv234917297=231, srv405700573=266, srv183644386=166, srv1488378513=85, srv173139715=136, srv1154180352=32, srv355693379=252, srv1407521654=66, srv496848057=275, srv1157975499=33, srv1806731027=162, srv1923102804=184, srv311102455=244, srv450011410=271, srv771515724=348, srv389183508=262, srv1249074416=43, srv2014575201=201, srv640847108=318, srv832363565=356, srv1970882134=192, srv2107358603=218, srv855766065=361, srv1336043388=55, srv29397186=237, srv982792848=390, srv976560524=386, srv101181760=3, srv1093549482=21, srv2018389395=202, srv2113483104=221, srv1778339118=149, srv1968709692=190, srv705221118=333, srv159600090=105, srv1919608486=180, srv981255102=389, srv807899713=353, srv755110395=344, srv1770594519=145, srv739692705=340, srv1076582671=16, srv693869315=330, srv1079048717=17, srv440657532=270, srv1636659280=115, srv2108739257=220, srv668373413=326, srv1003610393=2, srv1054229197=11, srv1868589627=172, srv2103522371=217, srv1000546271=0, srv951670617=380, srv2042909593=205, srv1865656038=171, srv1466355012=78, srv703662406=332, srv1418112884=70, srv1215580291=40, srv71833528=335, srv1580581635=103, srv1021032212=5, srv1080806312=19, srv1985601859=197, srv74471954=343, srv1647472319=119, srv2071553346=208, srv1632855171=112, srv1122009370=27, srv13613992=61, srv1630777154=111, srv301413669=239, srv550697728=288, srv1296023857=53, srv1724550977=133, srv1989290370=198, srv1926417985=185, srv1678097199=125, srv1461034373=76, srv614690415=311, srv2098345381=215, srv310463473=243, srv1011934105=4, srv148627129=84, srv305489318=240, srv1256534903=46, srv1289731445=52, srv1798844587=157, srv567113085=294, srv1119222501=26, srv2055117940=207, srv855898852=362, srv629224816=316, srv1075943554=15, srv625909061=315, srv1705591942=128, srv734225580=339, srv660107924=324, srv1381729938=62, srv1633483173=113, srv408265476=267, srv1776057793=148, srv1360253411=60, srv1511424834=90, srv1414162621=68, srv883343663=370, srv151859222=91, srv349144930=251, srv1991304034=199, srv1825887791=164, srv601657063=305, srv758932951=345, srv1651629087=120, srv1864623584=170, srv682957691=329, srv1500454146=88, srv1725962085=135, srv1659841448=121, srv1253206004=45, srv52354442=284, srv18508093=168, srv1427731921=73, srv561344974=293, srv721668125=336, srv1575482138=100, srv914128771=373, srv961487230=383, srv741332941=342, srv533032466=286, srv1574140987=99, srv2139849097=224, srv503902262=278, srv674807007=327, srv1786829855=153, srv2088727517=213, srv394366966=264, srv980089565=388, srv114594288=31, srv38296437=261, srv214835574=226, srv1887224977=176, srv1025509362=7, srv1577020334=102, srv524466665=285, srv393561021=263, srv759909927=346, srv763556514=347, srv786453030=349, srv2142935488=225, srv618111613=312, srv16254163=108, srv343211061=250, srv476075173=273, srv1269632212=47, srv333589612=246, srv499015361=276, srv836674186=357, srv1799191687=158, srv1446998035=74, srv1571774199=98, srv1115354947=25, srv333860881=247, srv1724152600=132, srv1598699299=106, srv177885829=151, srv472125887=272, srv1101339966=22, srv1424985362=72, srv1945569895=188, srv594128294=300, srv1026739237=8, srv842459828=358, srv878519137=366, srv1921260729=181, srv339110834=249, srv504099471=279, srv814253179=354, srv1643744885=116, srv1793847521=155, srv607234624=309, srv698219051=331, srv1688538732=127, srv666240078=325, srv1079284733=18, srv29210550=236, srv506181748=280, srv881313122=368, srv1945452576=187, srv597307897=303, srv1285120424=51, srv1887943816=177, srv1983604698=196, srv1805465940=161, srv309309336=242, srv1719756294=131, srv1349932676=58, srv1208486369=38, srv1643971570=117, srv1509331489=89, srv334105385=248, srv1400515744=65, srv369984715=259, srv43712162=269, srv842675864=359, srv1803258748=160, srv1022450918=6, srv1775108732=147, srv1766088250=141, srv180150732=159, srv1220857227=41, srv226530501=229, srv362032108=255, srv919715380=377, srv1074935976=14, srv1395030819=63, srv803291569=352, srv1877966766=175, srv220538712=227, srv2021718843=203, srv2107782185=219, srv882216860=369, srv1489137852=86, srv1972328734=193, srv1470759982=79, srv1774824811=146, srv971974774=384, srv1418242791=71, srv1001274196=1, srv909615097=372, srv1537724566=93, srv1165799954=34, srv1724754364=134, srv978173525=387, srv113319438=29, srv578033735=295, srv147931272=80, srv1183635941=35, srv1904215245=178, srv596349756=302, srv880835255=367, srv857544550=364, srv1779729022=152, srv1795612465=156, srv621083045=314, srv917704170=375, srv1351811120=59, srv1316710897=54, srv789820555=350, srv1922580095=183, srv305567304=241, srv1936745425=186, srv1745318024=138, srv1210822057=39, srv645375717=320, srv950628389=379, srv1490199189=87, srv1575919256=101, srv154481102=96, srv359402967=254, srv997716931=391, srv1457224273=75, srv581644449=297, srv1872374768=174, srv363177310=257, srv740327512=341, srv1664227236=123, srv972330517=385, srv1634261306=114, srv1662183707=122, srv1969046891=191, srv1485266211=82, srv1778842262=150, srv588410181=298, srv1921840985=182, srv591279493=299, srv37574565=260, srv1104147458=23, srv1190166330=36, srv652270371=322, srv1484309042=81, srv1560148463=97, srv618569548=313, srv2102708311=216, srv1084873074=20, srv517669556=283, srv918152084=376, srv649714317=321, srv1674484790=124, srv1339239880=56, srv1461073271=77, srv1125312901=28, srv25633292=234, srv516616923=282, srv299721745=238, srv604932433=308, srv1273702855=48, srv792183929=351, srv1042608200=10, srv1276335106=49, srv1486044644=83, srv676101698=328, srv998930892=392, srv200111276=200, srv1863083643=169, srv1737443479=137, srv872997185=365, srv821351126=355, srv852115805=360, srv1074355423=13, srv170952194=130, srv503430005=277, srv153887567=94, srv1415163001=69, srv1032737435=9, srv1840670515=167, srv1961921083=189, srv59745831=304, srv36715747=258, srv431547280=268, srv1524853580=92, srv1870059418=173, srv396010771=265, srv594457792=301, srv1755339428=140, srv1766275429=142, srv5565786=291, srv603898526=306, srv544570223=287, srv856030669=363, srv1542523468=95, srv915785747=374, srv356122213=253, srv1411875499=67, srv2077620970=209, srv1345529444=57, srv232339963=230, srv1250861076=44, srv1914875423=179, srv478619481=274, srv1202435626=37, srv1706089454=129, srv1810631201=163, srv1282644061=50, srv1625945288=109, srv733251129=338, srv2082830831=212, srv1612103540=107, srv612136291=310, srv1790004142=154, srv183394703=165} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:27,680 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:27,680 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:27,680 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:27,681 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:27,681 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:27,681 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:27,681 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-11 14:16:27,681 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-11 14:16:27,681 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-11 14:16:27,681 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-11 14:16:27,681 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 10 is on host 10
2023-07-11 14:16:27,681 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 11 is on host 11
2023-07-11 14:16:27,681 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 12 is on host 12
2023-07-11 14:16:27,681 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 13 is on host 13
2023-07-11 14:16:27,681 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 14 is on host 14
2023-07-11 14:16:27,681 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 15 is on host 15
2023-07-11 14:16:27,681 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 16 is on host 16
2023-07-11 14:16:27,681 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 17 is on host 17
2023-07-11 14:16:27,681 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 18 is on host 18
2023-07-11 14:16:27,681 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 19 is on host 19
2023-07-11 14:16:27,681 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 20 is on host 20
2023-07-11 14:16:27,681 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 21 is on host 21
2023-07-11 14:16:27,681 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 22 is on host 22
2023-07-11 14:16:27,681 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 23 is on host 23
2023-07-11 14:16:27,681 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 24 is on host 24
2023-07-11 14:16:27,681 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 25 is on host 25
2023-07-11 14:16:27,681 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 26 is on host 26
2023-07-11 14:16:27,681 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 27 is on host 27
2023-07-11 14:16:27,681 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 28 is on host 28
2023-07-11 14:16:27,681 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 29 is on host 29
2023-07-11 14:16:27,681 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 30 is on host 30
2023-07-11 14:16:27,681 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 31 is on host 31
2023-07-11 14:16:27,682 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 32 is on host 32
2023-07-11 14:16:27,682 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 33 is on host 33
2023-07-11 14:16:27,682 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 34 is on host 34
2023-07-11 14:16:27,682 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 35 is on host 35
2023-07-11 14:16:27,682 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 36 is on host 36
2023-07-11 14:16:27,682 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 37 is on host 37
2023-07-11 14:16:27,682 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 38 is on host 38
2023-07-11 14:16:27,682 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 39 is on host 39
2023-07-11 14:16:27,682 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 40 is on host 40
2023-07-11 14:16:27,682 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 41 is on host 41
2023-07-11 14:16:27,682 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 42 is on host 42
2023-07-11 14:16:27,682 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 43 is on host 43
2023-07-11 14:16:27,682 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 44 is on host 44
2023-07-11 14:16:27,682 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 45 is on host 45
2023-07-11 14:16:27,682 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 46 is on host 46
2023-07-11 14:16:27,682 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 47 is on host 47
2023-07-11 14:16:27,682 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 48 is on host 48
2023-07-11 14:16:27,682 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 49 is on host 49
2023-07-11 14:16:27,682 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 50 is on host 50
2023-07-11 14:16:27,682 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 51 is on host 51
2023-07-11 14:16:27,682 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 52 is on host 52
2023-07-11 14:16:27,682 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 53 is on host 53
2023-07-11 14:16:27,682 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 54 is on host 54
2023-07-11 14:16:27,682 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 55 is on host 55
2023-07-11 14:16:27,682 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 56 is on host 56
2023-07-11 14:16:27,682 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 57 is on host 57
2023-07-11 14:16:27,682 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 58 is on host 58
2023-07-11 14:16:27,682 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 59 is on host 59
2023-07-11 14:16:27,682 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 60 is on host 60
2023-07-11 14:16:27,683 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 61 is on host 61
2023-07-11 14:16:27,683 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 62 is on host 62
2023-07-11 14:16:27,683 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 63 is on host 63
2023-07-11 14:16:27,683 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 64 is on host 64
2023-07-11 14:16:27,683 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 65 is on host 65
2023-07-11 14:16:27,683 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 66 is on host 66
2023-07-11 14:16:27,683 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 67 is on host 67
2023-07-11 14:16:27,683 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 68 is on host 68
2023-07-11 14:16:27,683 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 69 is on host 69
2023-07-11 14:16:27,683 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 70 is on host 70
2023-07-11 14:16:27,683 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 71 is on host 71
2023-07-11 14:16:27,683 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 72 is on host 72
2023-07-11 14:16:27,683 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 73 is on host 73
2023-07-11 14:16:27,683 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 74 is on host 74
2023-07-11 14:16:27,683 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 75 is on host 75
2023-07-11 14:16:27,683 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 76 is on host 76
2023-07-11 14:16:27,683 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 77 is on host 77
2023-07-11 14:16:27,683 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 78 is on host 78
2023-07-11 14:16:27,683 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 79 is on host 79
2023-07-11 14:16:27,683 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 80 is on host 80
2023-07-11 14:16:27,683 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 81 is on host 81
2023-07-11 14:16:27,683 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 82 is on host 82
2023-07-11 14:16:27,683 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 83 is on host 83
2023-07-11 14:16:27,683 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 84 is on host 84
2023-07-11 14:16:27,683 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 85 is on host 85
2023-07-11 14:16:27,683 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 86 is on host 86
2023-07-11 14:16:27,683 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 87 is on host 87
2023-07-11 14:16:27,683 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 88 is on host 88
2023-07-11 14:16:27,683 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 89 is on host 89
2023-07-11 14:16:27,684 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 90 is on host 90
2023-07-11 14:16:27,684 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 91 is on host 91
2023-07-11 14:16:27,684 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 92 is on host 92
2023-07-11 14:16:27,684 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 93 is on host 93
2023-07-11 14:16:27,684 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 94 is on host 94
2023-07-11 14:16:27,684 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 95 is on host 95
2023-07-11 14:16:27,684 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 96 is on host 96
2023-07-11 14:16:27,684 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 97 is on host 97
2023-07-11 14:16:27,684 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 98 is on host 98
2023-07-11 14:16:27,684 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 99 is on host 99
2023-07-11 14:16:27,684 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 100 is on host 100
2023-07-11 14:16:27,684 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 101 is on host 101
2023-07-11 14:16:27,684 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 102 is on host 102
2023-07-11 14:16:27,684 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 103 is on host 103
2023-07-11 14:16:27,684 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 104 is on host 104
2023-07-11 14:16:27,684 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 105 is on host 105
2023-07-11 14:16:27,684 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 106 is on host 106
2023-07-11 14:16:27,684 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 107 is on host 107
2023-07-11 14:16:27,684 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 108 is on host 108
2023-07-11 14:16:27,684 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 109 is on host 109
2023-07-11 14:16:27,684 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 110 is on host 110
2023-07-11 14:16:27,684 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 111 is on host 111
2023-07-11 14:16:27,684 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 112 is on host 112
2023-07-11 14:16:27,684 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 113 is on host 113
2023-07-11 14:16:27,684 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 114 is on host 114
2023-07-11 14:16:27,684 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 115 is on host 115
2023-07-11 14:16:27,684 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 116 is on host 116
2023-07-11 14:16:27,684 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 117 is on host 117
2023-07-11 14:16:27,684 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 118 is on host 118
2023-07-11 14:16:27,685 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 119 is on host 119
2023-07-11 14:16:27,685 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 120 is on host 120
2023-07-11 14:16:27,685 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 121 is on host 121
2023-07-11 14:16:27,685 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 122 is on host 122
2023-07-11 14:16:27,685 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 123 is on host 123
2023-07-11 14:16:27,685 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 124 is on host 124
2023-07-11 14:16:27,685 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 125 is on host 125
2023-07-11 14:16:27,685 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 126 is on host 126
2023-07-11 14:16:27,685 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 127 is on host 127
2023-07-11 14:16:27,685 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 128 is on host 128
2023-07-11 14:16:27,685 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 129 is on host 129
2023-07-11 14:16:27,685 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 130 is on host 130
2023-07-11 14:16:27,685 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 131 is on host 131
2023-07-11 14:16:27,685 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 132 is on host 132
2023-07-11 14:16:27,685 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 133 is on host 133
2023-07-11 14:16:27,685 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 134 is on host 134
2023-07-11 14:16:27,685 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 135 is on host 135
2023-07-11 14:16:27,685 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 136 is on host 136
2023-07-11 14:16:27,685 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 137 is on host 137
2023-07-11 14:16:27,685 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 138 is on host 138
2023-07-11 14:16:27,685 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 139 is on host 139
2023-07-11 14:16:27,685 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 140 is on host 140
2023-07-11 14:16:27,685 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 141 is on host 141
2023-07-11 14:16:27,685 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 142 is on host 142
2023-07-11 14:16:27,685 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 143 is on host 143
2023-07-11 14:16:27,685 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 144 is on host 144
2023-07-11 14:16:27,685 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 145 is on host 145
2023-07-11 14:16:27,685 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 146 is on host 146
2023-07-11 14:16:27,686 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 147 is on host 147
2023-07-11 14:16:27,686 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 148 is on host 148
2023-07-11 14:16:27,686 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 149 is on host 149
2023-07-11 14:16:27,686 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 150 is on host 150
2023-07-11 14:16:27,686 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 151 is on host 151
2023-07-11 14:16:27,686 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 152 is on host 152
2023-07-11 14:16:27,686 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 153 is on host 153
2023-07-11 14:16:27,686 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 154 is on host 154
2023-07-11 14:16:27,686 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 155 is on host 155
2023-07-11 14:16:27,686 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 156 is on host 156
2023-07-11 14:16:27,686 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 157 is on host 157
2023-07-11 14:16:27,686 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 158 is on host 158
2023-07-11 14:16:27,686 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 159 is on host 159
2023-07-11 14:16:27,686 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 160 is on host 160
2023-07-11 14:16:27,686 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 161 is on host 161
2023-07-11 14:16:27,686 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 162 is on host 162
2023-07-11 14:16:27,686 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 163 is on host 163
2023-07-11 14:16:27,686 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 164 is on host 164
2023-07-11 14:16:27,686 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 165 is on host 165
2023-07-11 14:16:27,686 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 166 is on host 166
2023-07-11 14:16:27,686 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 167 is on host 167
2023-07-11 14:16:27,687 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 168 is on host 168
2023-07-11 14:16:27,687 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 169 is on host 169
2023-07-11 14:16:27,687 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 170 is on host 170
2023-07-11 14:16:27,687 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 171 is on host 171
2023-07-11 14:16:27,687 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 172 is on host 172
2023-07-11 14:16:27,687 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 173 is on host 173
2023-07-11 14:16:27,687 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 174 is on host 174
2023-07-11 14:16:27,687 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 175 is on host 175
2023-07-11 14:16:27,687 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 176 is on host 176
2023-07-11 14:16:27,687 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 177 is on host 177
2023-07-11 14:16:27,687 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 178 is on host 178
2023-07-11 14:16:27,687 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 179 is on host 179
2023-07-11 14:16:27,687 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 180 is on host 180
2023-07-11 14:16:27,687 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 181 is on host 181
2023-07-11 14:16:27,687 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 182 is on host 182
2023-07-11 14:16:27,687 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 183 is on host 183
2023-07-11 14:16:27,687 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 184 is on host 184
2023-07-11 14:16:27,687 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 185 is on host 185
2023-07-11 14:16:27,687 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 186 is on host 186
2023-07-11 14:16:27,687 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 187 is on host 187
2023-07-11 14:16:27,687 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 188 is on host 188
2023-07-11 14:16:27,687 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 189 is on host 189
2023-07-11 14:16:27,687 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 190 is on host 190
2023-07-11 14:16:27,687 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 191 is on host 191
2023-07-11 14:16:27,687 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 192 is on host 192
2023-07-11 14:16:27,688 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 193 is on host 193
2023-07-11 14:16:27,688 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 194 is on host 194
2023-07-11 14:16:27,688 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 195 is on host 195
2023-07-11 14:16:27,688 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 196 is on host 196
2023-07-11 14:16:27,688 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 197 is on host 197
2023-07-11 14:16:27,688 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 198 is on host 198
2023-07-11 14:16:27,688 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 199 is on host 199
2023-07-11 14:16:27,688 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 200 is on host 200
2023-07-11 14:16:27,688 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 201 is on host 201
2023-07-11 14:16:27,688 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 202 is on host 202
2023-07-11 14:16:27,688 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 203 is on host 203
2023-07-11 14:16:27,688 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 204 is on host 204
2023-07-11 14:16:27,688 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 205 is on host 205
2023-07-11 14:16:27,688 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 206 is on host 206
2023-07-11 14:16:27,688 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 207 is on host 207
2023-07-11 14:16:27,688 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 208 is on host 208
2023-07-11 14:16:27,688 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 209 is on host 209
2023-07-11 14:16:27,688 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 210 is on host 210
2023-07-11 14:16:27,688 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 211 is on host 211
2023-07-11 14:16:27,688 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 212 is on host 212
2023-07-11 14:16:27,688 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 213 is on host 213
2023-07-11 14:16:27,688 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 214 is on host 214
2023-07-11 14:16:27,688 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 215 is on host 215
2023-07-11 14:16:27,688 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 216 is on host 216
2023-07-11 14:16:27,688 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 217 is on host 217
2023-07-11 14:16:27,688 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 218 is on host 218
2023-07-11 14:16:27,688 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 219 is on host 219
2023-07-11 14:16:27,688 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 220 is on host 220
2023-07-11 14:16:27,688 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 221 is on host 221
2023-07-11 14:16:27,689 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 222 is on host 222
2023-07-11 14:16:27,689 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 223 is on host 223
2023-07-11 14:16:27,689 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 224 is on host 224
2023-07-11 14:16:27,689 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 225 is on host 225
2023-07-11 14:16:27,689 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 226 is on host 226
2023-07-11 14:16:27,689 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 227 is on host 227
2023-07-11 14:16:27,689 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 228 is on host 228
2023-07-11 14:16:27,689 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 229 is on host 229
2023-07-11 14:16:27,689 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 230 is on host 230
2023-07-11 14:16:27,689 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 231 is on host 231
2023-07-11 14:16:27,689 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 232 is on host 232
2023-07-11 14:16:27,689 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 233 is on host 233
2023-07-11 14:16:27,689 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 234 is on host 234
2023-07-11 14:16:27,689 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 235 is on host 235
2023-07-11 14:16:27,689 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 236 is on host 236
2023-07-11 14:16:27,689 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 237 is on host 237
2023-07-11 14:16:27,689 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 238 is on host 238
2023-07-11 14:16:27,689 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 239 is on host 239
2023-07-11 14:16:27,689 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 240 is on host 240
2023-07-11 14:16:27,689 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 241 is on host 241
2023-07-11 14:16:27,689 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 242 is on host 242
2023-07-11 14:16:27,689 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 243 is on host 243
2023-07-11 14:16:27,689 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 244 is on host 244
2023-07-11 14:16:27,689 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 245 is on host 245
2023-07-11 14:16:27,689 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 246 is on host 246
2023-07-11 14:16:27,689 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 247 is on host 247
2023-07-11 14:16:27,689 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 248 is on host 248
2023-07-11 14:16:27,689 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 249 is on host 249
2023-07-11 14:16:27,689 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 250 is on host 250
2023-07-11 14:16:27,690 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 251 is on host 251
2023-07-11 14:16:27,690 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 252 is on host 252
2023-07-11 14:16:27,690 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 253 is on host 253
2023-07-11 14:16:27,690 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 254 is on host 254
2023-07-11 14:16:27,690 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 255 is on host 255
2023-07-11 14:16:27,690 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 256 is on host 256
2023-07-11 14:16:27,690 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 257 is on host 257
2023-07-11 14:16:27,690 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 258 is on host 258
2023-07-11 14:16:27,690 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 259 is on host 259
2023-07-11 14:16:27,690 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 260 is on host 260
2023-07-11 14:16:27,690 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 261 is on host 261
2023-07-11 14:16:27,690 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 262 is on host 262
2023-07-11 14:16:27,690 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 263 is on host 263
2023-07-11 14:16:27,690 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 264 is on host 264
2023-07-11 14:16:27,690 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 265 is on host 265
2023-07-11 14:16:27,690 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 266 is on host 266
2023-07-11 14:16:27,690 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 267 is on host 267
2023-07-11 14:16:27,690 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 268 is on host 268
2023-07-11 14:16:27,690 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 269 is on host 269
2023-07-11 14:16:27,690 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 270 is on host 270
2023-07-11 14:16:27,690 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 271 is on host 271
2023-07-11 14:16:27,690 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 272 is on host 272
2023-07-11 14:16:27,690 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 273 is on host 273
2023-07-11 14:16:27,690 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 274 is on host 274
2023-07-11 14:16:27,690 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 275 is on host 275
2023-07-11 14:16:27,690 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 276 is on host 276
2023-07-11 14:16:27,690 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 277 is on host 277
2023-07-11 14:16:27,690 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 278 is on host 278
2023-07-11 14:16:27,690 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 279 is on host 279
2023-07-11 14:16:27,691 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 280 is on host 280
2023-07-11 14:16:27,691 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 281 is on host 281
2023-07-11 14:16:27,691 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 282 is on host 282
2023-07-11 14:16:27,691 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 283 is on host 283
2023-07-11 14:16:27,691 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 284 is on host 284
2023-07-11 14:16:27,691 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 285 is on host 285
2023-07-11 14:16:27,691 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 286 is on host 286
2023-07-11 14:16:27,691 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 287 is on host 287
2023-07-11 14:16:27,691 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 288 is on host 288
2023-07-11 14:16:27,691 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 289 is on host 289
2023-07-11 14:16:27,691 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 290 is on host 290
2023-07-11 14:16:27,691 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 291 is on host 291
2023-07-11 14:16:27,691 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 292 is on host 292
2023-07-11 14:16:27,691 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 293 is on host 293
2023-07-11 14:16:27,691 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 294 is on host 294
2023-07-11 14:16:27,691 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 295 is on host 295
2023-07-11 14:16:27,691 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 296 is on host 296
2023-07-11 14:16:27,691 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 297 is on host 297
2023-07-11 14:16:27,691 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 298 is on host 298
2023-07-11 14:16:27,691 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 299 is on host 299
2023-07-11 14:16:27,691 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 300 is on host 300
2023-07-11 14:16:27,691 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 301 is on host 301
2023-07-11 14:16:27,691 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 302 is on host 302
2023-07-11 14:16:27,691 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 303 is on host 303
2023-07-11 14:16:27,691 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 304 is on host 304
2023-07-11 14:16:27,691 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 305 is on host 305
2023-07-11 14:16:27,691 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 306 is on host 306
2023-07-11 14:16:27,691 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 307 is on host 307
2023-07-11 14:16:27,691 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 308 is on host 308
2023-07-11 14:16:27,692 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 309 is on host 309
2023-07-11 14:16:27,692 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 310 is on host 310
2023-07-11 14:16:27,692 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 311 is on host 311
2023-07-11 14:16:27,692 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 312 is on host 312
2023-07-11 14:16:27,692 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 313 is on host 313
2023-07-11 14:16:27,692 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 314 is on host 314
2023-07-11 14:16:27,692 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 315 is on host 315
2023-07-11 14:16:27,692 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 316 is on host 316
2023-07-11 14:16:27,692 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 317 is on host 317
2023-07-11 14:16:27,692 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 318 is on host 318
2023-07-11 14:16:27,692 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 319 is on host 319
2023-07-11 14:16:27,692 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 320 is on host 320
2023-07-11 14:16:27,692 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 321 is on host 321
2023-07-11 14:16:27,692 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 322 is on host 322
2023-07-11 14:16:27,692 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 323 is on host 323
2023-07-11 14:16:27,692 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 324 is on host 324
2023-07-11 14:16:27,692 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 325 is on host 325
2023-07-11 14:16:27,692 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 326 is on host 326
2023-07-11 14:16:27,692 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 327 is on host 327
2023-07-11 14:16:27,692 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 328 is on host 328
2023-07-11 14:16:27,692 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 329 is on host 329
2023-07-11 14:16:27,692 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 330 is on host 330
2023-07-11 14:16:27,692 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 331 is on host 331
2023-07-11 14:16:27,692 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 332 is on host 332
2023-07-11 14:16:27,692 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 333 is on host 333
2023-07-11 14:16:27,692 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 334 is on host 334
2023-07-11 14:16:27,692 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 335 is on host 335
2023-07-11 14:16:27,692 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 336 is on host 336
2023-07-11 14:16:27,692 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 337 is on host 337
2023-07-11 14:16:27,693 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 338 is on host 338
2023-07-11 14:16:27,693 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 339 is on host 339
2023-07-11 14:16:27,693 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 340 is on host 340
2023-07-11 14:16:27,693 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 341 is on host 341
2023-07-11 14:16:27,693 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 342 is on host 342
2023-07-11 14:16:27,693 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 343 is on host 343
2023-07-11 14:16:27,693 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 344 is on host 344
2023-07-11 14:16:27,693 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 345 is on host 345
2023-07-11 14:16:27,693 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 346 is on host 346
2023-07-11 14:16:27,693 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 347 is on host 347
2023-07-11 14:16:27,693 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 348 is on host 348
2023-07-11 14:16:27,693 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 349 is on host 349
2023-07-11 14:16:27,693 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 350 is on host 350
2023-07-11 14:16:27,693 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 351 is on host 351
2023-07-11 14:16:27,693 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 352 is on host 352
2023-07-11 14:16:27,693 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 353 is on host 353
2023-07-11 14:16:27,693 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 354 is on host 354
2023-07-11 14:16:27,693 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 355 is on host 355
2023-07-11 14:16:27,693 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 356 is on host 356
2023-07-11 14:16:27,693 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 357 is on host 357
2023-07-11 14:16:27,693 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 358 is on host 358
2023-07-11 14:16:27,693 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 359 is on host 359
2023-07-11 14:16:27,693 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 360 is on host 360
2023-07-11 14:16:27,693 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 361 is on host 361
2023-07-11 14:16:27,693 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 362 is on host 362
2023-07-11 14:16:27,693 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 363 is on host 363
2023-07-11 14:16:27,693 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 364 is on host 364
2023-07-11 14:16:27,693 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 365 is on host 365
2023-07-11 14:16:27,694 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 366 is on host 366
2023-07-11 14:16:27,694 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 367 is on host 367
2023-07-11 14:16:27,694 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 368 is on host 368
2023-07-11 14:16:27,694 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 369 is on host 369
2023-07-11 14:16:27,694 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 370 is on host 370
2023-07-11 14:16:27,694 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 371 is on host 371
2023-07-11 14:16:27,694 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 372 is on host 372
2023-07-11 14:16:27,694 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 373 is on host 373
2023-07-11 14:16:27,694 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 374 is on host 374
2023-07-11 14:16:27,694 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 375 is on host 375
2023-07-11 14:16:27,694 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 376 is on host 376
2023-07-11 14:16:27,694 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 377 is on host 377
2023-07-11 14:16:27,694 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 378 is on host 378
2023-07-11 14:16:27,694 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 379 is on host 379
2023-07-11 14:16:27,694 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 380 is on host 380
2023-07-11 14:16:27,694 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 381 is on host 381
2023-07-11 14:16:27,694 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 382 is on host 382
2023-07-11 14:16:27,694 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 383 is on host 383
2023-07-11 14:16:27,694 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 384 is on host 384
2023-07-11 14:16:27,694 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 385 is on host 385
2023-07-11 14:16:27,694 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 386 is on host 386
2023-07-11 14:16:27,694 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 387 is on host 387
2023-07-11 14:16:27,694 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 388 is on host 388
2023-07-11 14:16:27,694 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 389 is on host 389
2023-07-11 14:16:27,694 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 390 is on host 390
2023-07-11 14:16:27,694 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 391 is on host 391
2023-07-11 14:16:27,694 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 392 is on host 392
2023-07-11 14:16:27,694 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=393, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:27,695 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table49) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:27,695 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table40
2023-07-11 14:16:27,695 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv553536953=290, srv1630071126=110, srv1071894870=12, srv23511728=232, srv658346947=323, srv2025338799=204, srv1397994335=64, srv1976766403=195, srv1644629726=118, srv957637734=381, srv2079182457=210, srv1749264468=139, srv2046129126=206, srv1595762596=104, srv603990852=307, srv1973073480=194, srv958856137=382, srv644066832=319, srv557062842=292, srv277765671=235, srv732221418=337, srv1769385567=143, srv224612199=228, srv714752528=334, srv362526040=256, srv581128949=296, srv2133511466=223, srv1144239257=30, srv320603627=245, srv1679952521=126, srv2122867873=222, srv1110067064=24, srv256251994=233, srv63261708=317, srv89837390=371, srv552104598=289, srv508952995=281, srv2096011353=214, srv1770417148=144, srv1246723478=42, srv929436444=378, srv2082192429=211, srv234917297=231, srv405700573=266, srv183644386=166, srv1488378513=85, srv173139715=136, srv1154180352=32, srv355693379=252, srv1407521654=66, srv496848057=275, srv1157975499=33, srv1806731027=162, srv1923102804=184, srv311102455=244, srv450011410=271, srv771515724=348, srv389183508=262, srv1249074416=43, srv2014575201=201, srv640847108=318, srv832363565=356, srv1970882134=192, srv2107358603=218, srv855766065=361, srv1336043388=55, srv29397186=237, srv982792848=390, srv976560524=386, srv101181760=3, srv1093549482=21, srv2018389395=202, srv2113483104=221, srv1778339118=149, srv1968709692=190, srv705221118=333, srv159600090=105, srv1919608486=180, srv981255102=389, srv807899713=353, srv755110395=344, srv1770594519=145, srv739692705=340, srv1076582671=16, srv693869315=330, srv1079048717=17, srv440657532=270, srv1636659280=115, srv2108739257=220, srv668373413=326, srv1003610393=2, srv1054229197=11, srv1868589627=172, srv2103522371=217, srv1000546271=0, srv951670617=380, srv2042909593=205, srv1865656038=171, srv1466355012=78, srv703662406=332, srv1418112884=70, srv1215580291=40, srv71833528=335, srv1580581635=103, srv1021032212=5, srv1080806312=19, srv1985601859=197, srv74471954=343, srv1647472319=119, srv2071553346=208, srv1632855171=112, srv1122009370=27, srv13613992=61, srv1630777154=111, srv301413669=239, srv550697728=288, srv1296023857=53, srv1724550977=133, srv1989290370=198, srv1926417985=185, srv1678097199=125, srv1461034373=76, srv614690415=311, srv2098345381=215, srv310463473=243, srv1011934105=4, srv148627129=84, srv305489318=240, srv1256534903=46, srv1289731445=52, srv1798844587=157, srv567113085=294, srv1119222501=26, srv2055117940=207, srv855898852=362, srv629224816=316, srv1075943554=15, srv625909061=315, srv1705591942=128, srv734225580=339, srv660107924=324, srv1381729938=62, srv1633483173=113, srv408265476=267, srv1776057793=148, srv1360253411=60, srv1511424834=90, srv1414162621=68, srv883343663=370, srv151859222=91, srv349144930=251, srv1991304034=199, srv1825887791=164, srv601657063=305, srv758932951=345, srv1651629087=120, srv1864623584=170, srv682957691=329, srv1500454146=88, srv1725962085=135, srv1659841448=121, srv1253206004=45, srv52354442=284, srv18508093=168, srv1427731921=73, srv561344974=293, srv721668125=336, srv1575482138=100, srv914128771=373, srv961487230=383, srv741332941=342, srv533032466=286, srv1574140987=99, srv2139849097=224, srv503902262=278, srv674807007=327, srv1786829855=153, srv2088727517=213, srv394366966=264, srv980089565=388, srv114594288=31, srv38296437=261, srv214835574=226, srv1887224977=176, srv1025509362=7, srv1577020334=102, srv524466665=285, srv393561021=263, srv759909927=346, srv763556514=347, srv786453030=349, srv2142935488=225, srv618111613=312, srv16254163=108, srv343211061=250, srv476075173=273, srv1269632212=47, srv333589612=246, srv499015361=276, srv836674186=357, srv1799191687=158, srv1446998035=74, srv1571774199=98, srv1115354947=25, srv333860881=247, srv1724152600=132, srv1598699299=106, srv177885829=151, srv472125887=272, srv1101339966=22, srv1424985362=72, srv1945569895=188, srv594128294=300, srv1026739237=8, srv842459828=358, srv878519137=366, srv1921260729=181, srv339110834=249, srv504099471=279, srv814253179=354, srv1643744885=116, srv1793847521=155, srv607234624=309, srv698219051=331, srv1688538732=127, srv666240078=325, srv1079284733=18, srv29210550=236, srv506181748=280, srv881313122=368, srv1945452576=187, srv597307897=303, srv1285120424=51, srv1887943816=177, srv1983604698=196, srv1805465940=161, srv309309336=242, srv1719756294=131, srv1349932676=58, srv1208486369=38, srv1643971570=117, srv1509331489=89, srv334105385=248, srv1400515744=65, srv369984715=259, srv43712162=269, srv842675864=359, srv1803258748=160, srv1022450918=6, srv1775108732=147, srv1766088250=141, srv180150732=159, srv1220857227=41, srv226530501=229, srv362032108=255, srv919715380=377, srv1074935976=14, srv1395030819=63, srv803291569=352, srv1877966766=175, srv220538712=227, srv2021718843=203, srv2107782185=219, srv882216860=369, srv1489137852=86, srv1972328734=193, srv1470759982=79, srv1774824811=146, srv971974774=384, srv1418242791=71, srv1001274196=1, srv909615097=372, srv1537724566=93, srv1165799954=34, srv1724754364=134, srv978173525=387, srv113319438=29, srv578033735=295, srv147931272=80, srv1183635941=35, srv1904215245=178, srv596349756=302, srv880835255=367, srv857544550=364, srv1779729022=152, srv1795612465=156, srv621083045=314, srv917704170=375, srv1351811120=59, srv1316710897=54, srv789820555=350, srv1922580095=183, srv305567304=241, srv1936745425=186, srv1745318024=138, srv1210822057=39, srv645375717=320, srv950628389=379, srv1490199189=87, srv1575919256=101, srv154481102=96, srv359402967=254, srv997716931=391, srv1457224273=75, srv581644449=297, srv1872374768=174, srv363177310=257, srv740327512=341, srv1664227236=123, srv972330517=385, srv1634261306=114, srv1662183707=122, srv1969046891=191, srv1485266211=82, srv1778842262=150, srv588410181=298, srv1921840985=182, srv591279493=299, srv37574565=260, srv1104147458=23, srv1190166330=36, srv652270371=322, srv1484309042=81, srv1560148463=97, srv618569548=313, srv2102708311=216, srv1084873074=20, srv517669556=283, srv918152084=376, srv649714317=321, srv1674484790=124, srv1339239880=56, srv1461073271=77, srv1125312901=28, srv25633292=234, srv516616923=282, srv299721745=238, srv604932433=308, srv1273702855=48, srv792183929=351, srv1042608200=10, srv1276335106=49, srv1486044644=83, srv676101698=328, srv998930892=392, srv200111276=200, srv1863083643=169, srv1737443479=137, srv872997185=365, srv821351126=355, srv852115805=360, srv1074355423=13, srv170952194=130, srv503430005=277, srv153887567=94, srv1415163001=69, srv1032737435=9, srv1840670515=167, srv1961921083=189, srv59745831=304, srv36715747=258, srv431547280=268, srv1524853580=92, srv1870059418=173, srv396010771=265, srv594457792=301, srv1755339428=140, srv1766275429=142, srv5565786=291, srv603898526=306, srv544570223=287, srv856030669=363, srv1542523468=95, srv915785747=374, srv356122213=253, srv1411875499=67, srv2077620970=209, srv1345529444=57, srv232339963=230, srv1250861076=44, srv1914875423=179, srv478619481=274, srv1202435626=37, srv1706089454=129, srv1810631201=163, srv1282644061=50, srv1625945288=109, srv733251129=338, srv2082830831=212, srv1612103540=107, srv612136291=310, srv1790004142=154, srv183394703=165} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:27,695 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:27,696 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:27,696 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:27,696 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:27,696 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:27,696 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:27,696 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-11 14:16:27,696 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-11 14:16:27,696 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-11 14:16:27,696 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-11 14:16:27,696 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 10 is on host 10
2023-07-11 14:16:27,696 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 11 is on host 11
2023-07-11 14:16:27,696 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 12 is on host 12
2023-07-11 14:16:27,696 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 13 is on host 13
2023-07-11 14:16:27,696 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 14 is on host 14
2023-07-11 14:16:27,696 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 15 is on host 15
2023-07-11 14:16:27,696 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 16 is on host 16
2023-07-11 14:16:27,696 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 17 is on host 17
2023-07-11 14:16:27,696 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 18 is on host 18
2023-07-11 14:16:27,696 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 19 is on host 19
2023-07-11 14:16:27,696 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 20 is on host 20
2023-07-11 14:16:27,696 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 21 is on host 21
2023-07-11 14:16:27,696 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 22 is on host 22
2023-07-11 14:16:27,696 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 23 is on host 23
2023-07-11 14:16:27,696 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 24 is on host 24
2023-07-11 14:16:27,696 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 25 is on host 25
2023-07-11 14:16:27,696 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 26 is on host 26
2023-07-11 14:16:27,696 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 27 is on host 27
2023-07-11 14:16:27,696 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 28 is on host 28
2023-07-11 14:16:27,696 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 29 is on host 29
2023-07-11 14:16:27,697 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 30 is on host 30
2023-07-11 14:16:27,697 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 31 is on host 31
2023-07-11 14:16:27,697 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 32 is on host 32
2023-07-11 14:16:27,697 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 33 is on host 33
2023-07-11 14:16:27,697 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 34 is on host 34
2023-07-11 14:16:27,697 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 35 is on host 35
2023-07-11 14:16:27,697 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 36 is on host 36
2023-07-11 14:16:27,697 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 37 is on host 37
2023-07-11 14:16:27,697 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 38 is on host 38
2023-07-11 14:16:27,697 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 39 is on host 39
2023-07-11 14:16:27,697 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 40 is on host 40
2023-07-11 14:16:27,697 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 41 is on host 41
2023-07-11 14:16:27,697 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 42 is on host 42
2023-07-11 14:16:27,697 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 43 is on host 43
2023-07-11 14:16:27,697 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 44 is on host 44
2023-07-11 14:16:27,697 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 45 is on host 45
2023-07-11 14:16:27,697 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 46 is on host 46
2023-07-11 14:16:27,697 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 47 is on host 47
2023-07-11 14:16:27,697 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 48 is on host 48
2023-07-11 14:16:27,697 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 49 is on host 49
2023-07-11 14:16:27,697 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 50 is on host 50
2023-07-11 14:16:27,697 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 51 is on host 51
2023-07-11 14:16:27,697 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 52 is on host 52
2023-07-11 14:16:27,697 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 53 is on host 53
2023-07-11 14:16:27,697 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 54 is on host 54
2023-07-11 14:16:27,697 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 55 is on host 55
2023-07-11 14:16:27,697 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 56 is on host 56
2023-07-11 14:16:27,697 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 57 is on host 57
2023-07-11 14:16:27,697 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 58 is on host 58
2023-07-11 14:16:27,698 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 59 is on host 59
2023-07-11 14:16:27,698 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 60 is on host 60
2023-07-11 14:16:27,698 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 61 is on host 61
2023-07-11 14:16:27,698 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 62 is on host 62
2023-07-11 14:16:27,698 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 63 is on host 63
2023-07-11 14:16:27,698 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 64 is on host 64
2023-07-11 14:16:27,698 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 65 is on host 65
2023-07-11 14:16:27,698 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 66 is on host 66
2023-07-11 14:16:27,698 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 67 is on host 67
2023-07-11 14:16:27,698 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 68 is on host 68
2023-07-11 14:16:27,698 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 69 is on host 69
2023-07-11 14:16:27,698 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 70 is on host 70
2023-07-11 14:16:27,698 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 71 is on host 71
2023-07-11 14:16:27,698 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 72 is on host 72
2023-07-11 14:16:27,698 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 73 is on host 73
2023-07-11 14:16:27,698 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 74 is on host 74
2023-07-11 14:16:27,698 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 75 is on host 75
2023-07-11 14:16:27,699 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 76 is on host 76
2023-07-11 14:16:27,699 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 77 is on host 77
2023-07-11 14:16:27,699 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 78 is on host 78
2023-07-11 14:16:27,699 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 79 is on host 79
2023-07-11 14:16:27,699 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 80 is on host 80
2023-07-11 14:16:27,699 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 81 is on host 81
2023-07-11 14:16:27,699 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 82 is on host 82
2023-07-11 14:16:27,699 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 83 is on host 83
2023-07-11 14:16:27,699 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 84 is on host 84
2023-07-11 14:16:27,699 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 85 is on host 85
2023-07-11 14:16:27,699 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 86 is on host 86
2023-07-11 14:16:27,699 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 87 is on host 87
2023-07-11 14:16:27,699 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 88 is on host 88
2023-07-11 14:16:27,699 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 89 is on host 89
2023-07-11 14:16:27,699 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 90 is on host 90
2023-07-11 14:16:27,699 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 91 is on host 91
2023-07-11 14:16:27,699 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 92 is on host 92
2023-07-11 14:16:27,699 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 93 is on host 93
2023-07-11 14:16:27,699 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 94 is on host 94
2023-07-11 14:16:27,699 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 95 is on host 95
2023-07-11 14:16:27,699 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 96 is on host 96
2023-07-11 14:16:27,699 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 97 is on host 97
2023-07-11 14:16:27,699 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 98 is on host 98
2023-07-11 14:16:27,699 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 99 is on host 99
2023-07-11 14:16:27,699 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 100 is on host 100
2023-07-11 14:16:27,699 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 101 is on host 101
2023-07-11 14:16:27,699 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 102 is on host 102
2023-07-11 14:16:27,699 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 103 is on host 103
2023-07-11 14:16:27,699 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 104 is on host 104
2023-07-11 14:16:27,700 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 105 is on host 105
2023-07-11 14:16:27,700 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 106 is on host 106
2023-07-11 14:16:27,700 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 107 is on host 107
2023-07-11 14:16:27,700 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 108 is on host 108
2023-07-11 14:16:27,700 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 109 is on host 109
2023-07-11 14:16:27,700 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 110 is on host 110
2023-07-11 14:16:27,700 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 111 is on host 111
2023-07-11 14:16:27,700 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 112 is on host 112
2023-07-11 14:16:27,700 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 113 is on host 113
2023-07-11 14:16:27,700 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 114 is on host 114
2023-07-11 14:16:27,700 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 115 is on host 115
2023-07-11 14:16:27,700 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 116 is on host 116
2023-07-11 14:16:27,700 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 117 is on host 117
2023-07-11 14:16:27,700 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 118 is on host 118
2023-07-11 14:16:27,700 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 119 is on host 119
2023-07-11 14:16:27,700 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 120 is on host 120
2023-07-11 14:16:27,700 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 121 is on host 121
2023-07-11 14:16:27,700 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 122 is on host 122
2023-07-11 14:16:27,700 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 123 is on host 123
2023-07-11 14:16:27,700 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 124 is on host 124
2023-07-11 14:16:27,700 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 125 is on host 125
2023-07-11 14:16:27,700 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 126 is on host 126
2023-07-11 14:16:27,700 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 127 is on host 127
2023-07-11 14:16:27,700 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 128 is on host 128
2023-07-11 14:16:27,700 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 129 is on host 129
2023-07-11 14:16:27,700 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 130 is on host 130
2023-07-11 14:16:27,700 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 131 is on host 131
2023-07-11 14:16:27,700 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 132 is on host 132
2023-07-11 14:16:27,700 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 133 is on host 133
2023-07-11 14:16:27,701 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 134 is on host 134
2023-07-11 14:16:27,701 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 135 is on host 135
2023-07-11 14:16:27,701 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 136 is on host 136
2023-07-11 14:16:27,701 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 137 is on host 137
2023-07-11 14:16:27,701 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 138 is on host 138
2023-07-11 14:16:27,701 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 139 is on host 139
2023-07-11 14:16:27,701 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 140 is on host 140
2023-07-11 14:16:27,701 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 141 is on host 141
2023-07-11 14:16:27,701 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 142 is on host 142
2023-07-11 14:16:27,701 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 143 is on host 143
2023-07-11 14:16:27,701 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 144 is on host 144
2023-07-11 14:16:27,701 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 145 is on host 145
2023-07-11 14:16:27,701 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 146 is on host 146
2023-07-11 14:16:27,701 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 147 is on host 147
2023-07-11 14:16:27,701 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 148 is on host 148
2023-07-11 14:16:27,701 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 149 is on host 149
2023-07-11 14:16:27,701 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 150 is on host 150
2023-07-11 14:16:27,701 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 151 is on host 151
2023-07-11 14:16:27,701 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 152 is on host 152
2023-07-11 14:16:27,701 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 153 is on host 153
2023-07-11 14:16:27,701 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 154 is on host 154
2023-07-11 14:16:27,701 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 155 is on host 155
2023-07-11 14:16:27,701 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 156 is on host 156
2023-07-11 14:16:27,701 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 157 is on host 157
2023-07-11 14:16:27,701 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 158 is on host 158
2023-07-11 14:16:27,701 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 159 is on host 159
2023-07-11 14:16:27,701 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 160 is on host 160
2023-07-11 14:16:27,701 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 161 is on host 161
2023-07-11 14:16:27,701 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 162 is on host 162
2023-07-11 14:16:27,702 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 163 is on host 163
2023-07-11 14:16:27,702 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 164 is on host 164
2023-07-11 14:16:27,702 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 165 is on host 165
2023-07-11 14:16:27,702 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 166 is on host 166
2023-07-11 14:16:27,702 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 167 is on host 167
2023-07-11 14:16:27,702 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 168 is on host 168
2023-07-11 14:16:27,702 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 169 is on host 169
2023-07-11 14:16:27,702 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 170 is on host 170
2023-07-11 14:16:27,702 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 171 is on host 171
2023-07-11 14:16:27,702 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 172 is on host 172
2023-07-11 14:16:27,702 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 173 is on host 173
2023-07-11 14:16:27,702 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 174 is on host 174
2023-07-11 14:16:27,702 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 175 is on host 175
2023-07-11 14:16:27,702 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 176 is on host 176
2023-07-11 14:16:27,702 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 177 is on host 177
2023-07-11 14:16:27,702 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 178 is on host 178
2023-07-11 14:16:27,702 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 179 is on host 179
2023-07-11 14:16:27,702 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 180 is on host 180
2023-07-11 14:16:27,702 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 181 is on host 181
2023-07-11 14:16:27,702 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 182 is on host 182
2023-07-11 14:16:27,702 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 183 is on host 183
2023-07-11 14:16:27,702 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 184 is on host 184
2023-07-11 14:16:27,702 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 185 is on host 185
2023-07-11 14:16:27,702 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 186 is on host 186
2023-07-11 14:16:27,702 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 187 is on host 187
2023-07-11 14:16:27,702 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 188 is on host 188
2023-07-11 14:16:27,702 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 189 is on host 189
2023-07-11 14:16:27,702 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 190 is on host 190
2023-07-11 14:16:27,702 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 191 is on host 191
2023-07-11 14:16:27,703 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 192 is on host 192
2023-07-11 14:16:27,703 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 193 is on host 193
2023-07-11 14:16:27,703 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 194 is on host 194
2023-07-11 14:16:27,703 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 195 is on host 195
2023-07-11 14:16:27,703 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 196 is on host 196
2023-07-11 14:16:27,703 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 197 is on host 197
2023-07-11 14:16:27,703 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 198 is on host 198
2023-07-11 14:16:27,703 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 199 is on host 199
2023-07-11 14:16:27,703 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 200 is on host 200
2023-07-11 14:16:27,703 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 201 is on host 201
2023-07-11 14:16:27,703 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 202 is on host 202
2023-07-11 14:16:27,703 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 203 is on host 203
2023-07-11 14:16:27,703 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 204 is on host 204
2023-07-11 14:16:27,703 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 205 is on host 205
2023-07-11 14:16:27,703 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 206 is on host 206
2023-07-11 14:16:27,703 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 207 is on host 207
2023-07-11 14:16:27,703 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 208 is on host 208
2023-07-11 14:16:27,703 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 209 is on host 209
2023-07-11 14:16:27,703 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 210 is on host 210
2023-07-11 14:16:27,703 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 211 is on host 211
2023-07-11 14:16:27,703 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 212 is on host 212
2023-07-11 14:16:27,703 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 213 is on host 213
2023-07-11 14:16:27,703 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 214 is on host 214
2023-07-11 14:16:27,703 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 215 is on host 215
2023-07-11 14:16:27,703 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 216 is on host 216
2023-07-11 14:16:27,703 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 217 is on host 217
2023-07-11 14:16:27,703 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 218 is on host 218
2023-07-11 14:16:27,703 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 219 is on host 219
2023-07-11 14:16:27,703 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 220 is on host 220
2023-07-11 14:16:27,704 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 221 is on host 221
2023-07-11 14:16:27,704 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 222 is on host 222
2023-07-11 14:16:27,704 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 223 is on host 223
2023-07-11 14:16:27,704 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 224 is on host 224
2023-07-11 14:16:27,704 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 225 is on host 225
2023-07-11 14:16:27,704 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 226 is on host 226
2023-07-11 14:16:27,704 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 227 is on host 227
2023-07-11 14:16:27,704 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 228 is on host 228
2023-07-11 14:16:27,704 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 229 is on host 229
2023-07-11 14:16:27,704 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 230 is on host 230
2023-07-11 14:16:27,704 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 231 is on host 231
2023-07-11 14:16:27,704 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 232 is on host 232
2023-07-11 14:16:27,704 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 233 is on host 233
2023-07-11 14:16:27,704 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 234 is on host 234
2023-07-11 14:16:27,704 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 235 is on host 235
2023-07-11 14:16:27,704 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 236 is on host 236
2023-07-11 14:16:27,704 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 237 is on host 237
2023-07-11 14:16:27,704 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 238 is on host 238
2023-07-11 14:16:27,704 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 239 is on host 239
2023-07-11 14:16:27,704 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 240 is on host 240
2023-07-11 14:16:27,704 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 241 is on host 241
2023-07-11 14:16:27,704 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 242 is on host 242
2023-07-11 14:16:27,704 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 243 is on host 243
2023-07-11 14:16:27,704 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 244 is on host 244
2023-07-11 14:16:27,704 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 245 is on host 245
2023-07-11 14:16:27,704 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 246 is on host 246
2023-07-11 14:16:27,704 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 247 is on host 247
2023-07-11 14:16:27,704 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 248 is on host 248
2023-07-11 14:16:27,705 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 249 is on host 249
2023-07-11 14:16:27,705 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 250 is on host 250
2023-07-11 14:16:27,705 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 251 is on host 251
2023-07-11 14:16:27,705 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 252 is on host 252
2023-07-11 14:16:27,705 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 253 is on host 253
2023-07-11 14:16:27,705 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 254 is on host 254
2023-07-11 14:16:27,705 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 255 is on host 255
2023-07-11 14:16:27,705 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 256 is on host 256
2023-07-11 14:16:27,705 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 257 is on host 257
2023-07-11 14:16:27,705 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 258 is on host 258
2023-07-11 14:16:27,705 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 259 is on host 259
2023-07-11 14:16:27,705 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 260 is on host 260
2023-07-11 14:16:27,705 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 261 is on host 261
2023-07-11 14:16:27,705 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 262 is on host 262
2023-07-11 14:16:27,705 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 263 is on host 263
2023-07-11 14:16:27,705 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 264 is on host 264
2023-07-11 14:16:27,705 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 265 is on host 265
2023-07-11 14:16:27,705 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 266 is on host 266
2023-07-11 14:16:27,705 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 267 is on host 267
2023-07-11 14:16:27,705 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 268 is on host 268
2023-07-11 14:16:27,705 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 269 is on host 269
2023-07-11 14:16:27,705 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 270 is on host 270
2023-07-11 14:16:27,705 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 271 is on host 271
2023-07-11 14:16:27,705 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 272 is on host 272
2023-07-11 14:16:27,705 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 273 is on host 273
2023-07-11 14:16:27,705 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 274 is on host 274
2023-07-11 14:16:27,705 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 275 is on host 275
2023-07-11 14:16:27,705 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 276 is on host 276
2023-07-11 14:16:27,705 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 277 is on host 277
2023-07-11 14:16:27,706 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 278 is on host 278
2023-07-11 14:16:27,706 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 279 is on host 279
2023-07-11 14:16:27,706 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 280 is on host 280
2023-07-11 14:16:27,706 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 281 is on host 281
2023-07-11 14:16:27,706 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 282 is on host 282
2023-07-11 14:16:27,706 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 283 is on host 283
2023-07-11 14:16:27,706 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 284 is on host 284
2023-07-11 14:16:27,706 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 285 is on host 285
2023-07-11 14:16:27,706 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 286 is on host 286
2023-07-11 14:16:27,706 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 287 is on host 287
2023-07-11 14:16:27,706 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 288 is on host 288
2023-07-11 14:16:27,706 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 289 is on host 289
2023-07-11 14:16:27,706 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 290 is on host 290
2023-07-11 14:16:27,706 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 291 is on host 291
2023-07-11 14:16:27,706 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 292 is on host 292
2023-07-11 14:16:27,706 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 293 is on host 293
2023-07-11 14:16:27,706 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 294 is on host 294
2023-07-11 14:16:27,706 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 295 is on host 295
2023-07-11 14:16:27,706 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 296 is on host 296
2023-07-11 14:16:27,706 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 297 is on host 297
2023-07-11 14:16:27,706 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 298 is on host 298
2023-07-11 14:16:27,706 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 299 is on host 299
2023-07-11 14:16:27,706 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 300 is on host 300
2023-07-11 14:16:27,706 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 301 is on host 301
2023-07-11 14:16:27,706 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 302 is on host 302
2023-07-11 14:16:27,706 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 303 is on host 303
2023-07-11 14:16:27,706 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 304 is on host 304
2023-07-11 14:16:27,706 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 305 is on host 305
2023-07-11 14:16:27,706 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 306 is on host 306
2023-07-11 14:16:27,707 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 307 is on host 307
2023-07-11 14:16:27,707 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 308 is on host 308
2023-07-11 14:16:27,707 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 309 is on host 309
2023-07-11 14:16:27,707 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 310 is on host 310
2023-07-11 14:16:27,707 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 311 is on host 311
2023-07-11 14:16:27,707 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 312 is on host 312
2023-07-11 14:16:27,707 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 313 is on host 313
2023-07-11 14:16:27,707 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 314 is on host 314
2023-07-11 14:16:27,707 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 315 is on host 315
2023-07-11 14:16:27,707 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 316 is on host 316
2023-07-11 14:16:27,707 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 317 is on host 317
2023-07-11 14:16:27,707 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 318 is on host 318
2023-07-11 14:16:27,707 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 319 is on host 319
2023-07-11 14:16:27,707 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 320 is on host 320
2023-07-11 14:16:27,707 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 321 is on host 321
2023-07-11 14:16:27,707 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 322 is on host 322
2023-07-11 14:16:27,707 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 323 is on host 323
2023-07-11 14:16:27,707 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 324 is on host 324
2023-07-11 14:16:27,707 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 325 is on host 325
2023-07-11 14:16:27,707 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 326 is on host 326
2023-07-11 14:16:27,707 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 327 is on host 327
2023-07-11 14:16:27,707 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 328 is on host 328
2023-07-11 14:16:27,707 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 329 is on host 329
2023-07-11 14:16:27,707 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 330 is on host 330
2023-07-11 14:16:27,707 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 331 is on host 331
2023-07-11 14:16:27,707 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 332 is on host 332
2023-07-11 14:16:27,707 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 333 is on host 333
2023-07-11 14:16:27,707 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 334 is on host 334
2023-07-11 14:16:27,707 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 335 is on host 335
2023-07-11 14:16:27,708 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 336 is on host 336
2023-07-11 14:16:27,708 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 337 is on host 337
2023-07-11 14:16:27,708 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 338 is on host 338
2023-07-11 14:16:27,708 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 339 is on host 339
2023-07-11 14:16:27,708 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 340 is on host 340
2023-07-11 14:16:27,708 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 341 is on host 341
2023-07-11 14:16:27,708 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 342 is on host 342
2023-07-11 14:16:27,708 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 343 is on host 343
2023-07-11 14:16:27,708 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 344 is on host 344
2023-07-11 14:16:27,708 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 345 is on host 345
2023-07-11 14:16:27,708 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 346 is on host 346
2023-07-11 14:16:27,708 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 347 is on host 347
2023-07-11 14:16:27,708 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 348 is on host 348
2023-07-11 14:16:27,708 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 349 is on host 349
2023-07-11 14:16:27,708 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 350 is on host 350
2023-07-11 14:16:27,708 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 351 is on host 351
2023-07-11 14:16:27,708 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 352 is on host 352
2023-07-11 14:16:27,708 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 353 is on host 353
2023-07-11 14:16:27,708 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 354 is on host 354
2023-07-11 14:16:27,708 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 355 is on host 355
2023-07-11 14:16:27,708 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 356 is on host 356
2023-07-11 14:16:27,708 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 357 is on host 357
2023-07-11 14:16:27,708 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 358 is on host 358
2023-07-11 14:16:27,708 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 359 is on host 359
2023-07-11 14:16:27,708 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 360 is on host 360
2023-07-11 14:16:27,708 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 361 is on host 361
2023-07-11 14:16:27,708 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 362 is on host 362
2023-07-11 14:16:27,708 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 363 is on host 363
2023-07-11 14:16:27,708 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 364 is on host 364
2023-07-11 14:16:27,709 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 365 is on host 365
2023-07-11 14:16:27,709 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 366 is on host 366
2023-07-11 14:16:27,709 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 367 is on host 367
2023-07-11 14:16:27,709 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 368 is on host 368
2023-07-11 14:16:27,709 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 369 is on host 369
2023-07-11 14:16:27,709 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 370 is on host 370
2023-07-11 14:16:27,709 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 371 is on host 371
2023-07-11 14:16:27,709 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 372 is on host 372
2023-07-11 14:16:27,709 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 373 is on host 373
2023-07-11 14:16:27,709 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 374 is on host 374
2023-07-11 14:16:27,709 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 375 is on host 375
2023-07-11 14:16:27,709 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 376 is on host 376
2023-07-11 14:16:27,709 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 377 is on host 377
2023-07-11 14:16:27,709 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 378 is on host 378
2023-07-11 14:16:27,709 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 379 is on host 379
2023-07-11 14:16:27,709 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 380 is on host 380
2023-07-11 14:16:27,709 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 381 is on host 381
2023-07-11 14:16:27,709 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 382 is on host 382
2023-07-11 14:16:27,709 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 383 is on host 383
2023-07-11 14:16:27,709 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 384 is on host 384
2023-07-11 14:16:27,709 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 385 is on host 385
2023-07-11 14:16:27,709 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 386 is on host 386
2023-07-11 14:16:27,709 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 387 is on host 387
2023-07-11 14:16:27,709 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 388 is on host 388
2023-07-11 14:16:27,709 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 389 is on host 389
2023-07-11 14:16:27,709 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 390 is on host 390
2023-07-11 14:16:27,709 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 391 is on host 391
2023-07-11 14:16:27,709 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 392 is on host 392
2023-07-11 14:16:27,710 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=393, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:27,710 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table40) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:27,710 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table41
2023-07-11 14:16:27,710 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv553536953=290, srv1630071126=110, srv1071894870=12, srv23511728=232, srv658346947=323, srv2025338799=204, srv1397994335=64, srv1976766403=195, srv1644629726=118, srv957637734=381, srv2079182457=210, srv1749264468=139, srv2046129126=206, srv1595762596=104, srv603990852=307, srv1973073480=194, srv958856137=382, srv644066832=319, srv557062842=292, srv277765671=235, srv732221418=337, srv1769385567=143, srv224612199=228, srv714752528=334, srv362526040=256, srv581128949=296, srv2133511466=223, srv1144239257=30, srv320603627=245, srv1679952521=126, srv2122867873=222, srv1110067064=24, srv256251994=233, srv63261708=317, srv89837390=371, srv552104598=289, srv508952995=281, srv2096011353=214, srv1770417148=144, srv1246723478=42, srv929436444=378, srv2082192429=211, srv234917297=231, srv405700573=266, srv183644386=166, srv1488378513=85, srv173139715=136, srv1154180352=32, srv355693379=252, srv1407521654=66, srv496848057=275, srv1157975499=33, srv1806731027=162, srv1923102804=184, srv311102455=244, srv450011410=271, srv771515724=348, srv389183508=262, srv1249074416=43, srv2014575201=201, srv640847108=318, srv832363565=356, srv1970882134=192, srv2107358603=218, srv855766065=361, srv1336043388=55, srv29397186=237, srv982792848=390, srv976560524=386, srv101181760=3, srv1093549482=21, srv2018389395=202, srv2113483104=221, srv1778339118=149, srv1968709692=190, srv705221118=333, srv159600090=105, srv1919608486=180, srv981255102=389, srv807899713=353, srv755110395=344, srv1770594519=145, srv739692705=340, srv1076582671=16, srv693869315=330, srv1079048717=17, srv440657532=270, srv1636659280=115, srv2108739257=220, srv668373413=326, srv1003610393=2, srv1054229197=11, srv1868589627=172, srv2103522371=217, srv1000546271=0, srv951670617=380, srv2042909593=205, srv1865656038=171, srv1466355012=78, srv703662406=332, srv1418112884=70, srv1215580291=40, srv71833528=335, srv1580581635=103, srv1021032212=5, srv1080806312=19, srv1985601859=197, srv74471954=343, srv1647472319=119, srv2071553346=208, srv1632855171=112, srv1122009370=27, srv13613992=61, srv1630777154=111, srv301413669=239, srv550697728=288, srv1296023857=53, srv1724550977=133, srv1989290370=198, srv1926417985=185, srv1678097199=125, srv1461034373=76, srv614690415=311, srv2098345381=215, srv310463473=243, srv1011934105=4, srv148627129=84, srv305489318=240, srv1256534903=46, srv1289731445=52, srv1798844587=157, srv567113085=294, srv1119222501=26, srv2055117940=207, srv855898852=362, srv629224816=316, srv1075943554=15, srv625909061=315, srv1705591942=128, srv734225580=339, srv660107924=324, srv1381729938=62, srv1633483173=113, srv408265476=267, srv1776057793=148, srv1360253411=60, srv1511424834=90, srv1414162621=68, srv883343663=370, srv151859222=91, srv349144930=251, srv1991304034=199, srv1825887791=164, srv601657063=305, srv758932951=345, srv1651629087=120, srv1864623584=170, srv682957691=329, srv1500454146=88, srv1725962085=135, srv1659841448=121, srv1253206004=45, srv52354442=284, srv18508093=168, srv1427731921=73, srv561344974=293, srv721668125=336, srv1575482138=100, srv914128771=373, srv961487230=383, srv741332941=342, srv533032466=286, srv1574140987=99, srv2139849097=224, srv503902262=278, srv674807007=327, srv1786829855=153, srv2088727517=213, srv394366966=264, srv980089565=388, srv114594288=31, srv38296437=261, srv214835574=226, srv1887224977=176, srv1025509362=7, srv1577020334=102, srv524466665=285, srv393561021=263, srv759909927=346, srv763556514=347, srv786453030=349, srv2142935488=225, srv618111613=312, srv16254163=108, srv343211061=250, srv476075173=273, srv1269632212=47, srv333589612=246, srv499015361=276, srv836674186=357, srv1799191687=158, srv1446998035=74, srv1571774199=98, srv1115354947=25, srv333860881=247, srv1724152600=132, srv1598699299=106, srv177885829=151, srv472125887=272, srv1101339966=22, srv1424985362=72, srv1945569895=188, srv594128294=300, srv1026739237=8, srv842459828=358, srv878519137=366, srv1921260729=181, srv339110834=249, srv504099471=279, srv814253179=354, srv1643744885=116, srv1793847521=155, srv607234624=309, srv698219051=331, srv1688538732=127, srv666240078=325, srv1079284733=18, srv29210550=236, srv506181748=280, srv881313122=368, srv1945452576=187, srv597307897=303, srv1285120424=51, srv1887943816=177, srv1983604698=196, srv1805465940=161, srv309309336=242, srv1719756294=131, srv1349932676=58, srv1208486369=38, srv1643971570=117, srv1509331489=89, srv334105385=248, srv1400515744=65, srv369984715=259, srv43712162=269, srv842675864=359, srv1803258748=160, srv1022450918=6, srv1775108732=147, srv1766088250=141, srv180150732=159, srv1220857227=41, srv226530501=229, srv362032108=255, srv919715380=377, srv1074935976=14, srv1395030819=63, srv803291569=352, srv1877966766=175, srv220538712=227, srv2021718843=203, srv2107782185=219, srv882216860=369, srv1489137852=86, srv1972328734=193, srv1470759982=79, srv1774824811=146, srv971974774=384, srv1418242791=71, srv1001274196=1, srv909615097=372, srv1537724566=93, srv1165799954=34, srv1724754364=134, srv978173525=387, srv113319438=29, srv578033735=295, srv147931272=80, srv1183635941=35, srv1904215245=178, srv596349756=302, srv880835255=367, srv857544550=364, srv1779729022=152, srv1795612465=156, srv621083045=314, srv917704170=375, srv1351811120=59, srv1316710897=54, srv789820555=350, srv1922580095=183, srv305567304=241, srv1936745425=186, srv1745318024=138, srv1210822057=39, srv645375717=320, srv950628389=379, srv1490199189=87, srv1575919256=101, srv154481102=96, srv359402967=254, srv997716931=391, srv1457224273=75, srv581644449=297, srv1872374768=174, srv363177310=257, srv740327512=341, srv1664227236=123, srv972330517=385, srv1634261306=114, srv1662183707=122, srv1969046891=191, srv1485266211=82, srv1778842262=150, srv588410181=298, srv1921840985=182, srv591279493=299, srv37574565=260, srv1104147458=23, srv1190166330=36, srv652270371=322, srv1484309042=81, srv1560148463=97, srv618569548=313, srv2102708311=216, srv1084873074=20, srv517669556=283, srv918152084=376, srv649714317=321, srv1674484790=124, srv1339239880=56, srv1461073271=77, srv1125312901=28, srv25633292=234, srv516616923=282, srv299721745=238, srv604932433=308, srv1273702855=48, srv792183929=351, srv1042608200=10, srv1276335106=49, srv1486044644=83, srv676101698=328, srv998930892=392, srv200111276=200, srv1863083643=169, srv1737443479=137, srv872997185=365, srv821351126=355, srv852115805=360, srv1074355423=13, srv170952194=130, srv503430005=277, srv153887567=94, srv1415163001=69, srv1032737435=9, srv1840670515=167, srv1961921083=189, srv59745831=304, srv36715747=258, srv431547280=268, srv1524853580=92, srv1870059418=173, srv396010771=265, srv594457792=301, srv1755339428=140, srv1766275429=142, srv5565786=291, srv603898526=306, srv544570223=287, srv856030669=363, srv1542523468=95, srv915785747=374, srv356122213=253, srv1411875499=67, srv2077620970=209, srv1345529444=57, srv232339963=230, srv1250861076=44, srv1914875423=179, srv478619481=274, srv1202435626=37, srv1706089454=129, srv1810631201=163, srv1282644061=50, srv1625945288=109, srv733251129=338, srv2082830831=212, srv1612103540=107, srv612136291=310, srv1790004142=154, srv183394703=165} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:27,711 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:27,711 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:27,711 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:27,711 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:27,711 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:27,711 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:27,711 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-11 14:16:27,711 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-11 14:16:27,711 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-11 14:16:27,711 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-11 14:16:27,711 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 10 is on host 10
2023-07-11 14:16:27,711 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 11 is on host 11
2023-07-11 14:16:27,711 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 12 is on host 12
2023-07-11 14:16:27,711 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 13 is on host 13
2023-07-11 14:16:27,712 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 14 is on host 14
2023-07-11 14:16:27,712 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 15 is on host 15
2023-07-11 14:16:27,712 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 16 is on host 16
2023-07-11 14:16:27,712 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 17 is on host 17
2023-07-11 14:16:27,712 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 18 is on host 18
2023-07-11 14:16:27,712 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 19 is on host 19
2023-07-11 14:16:27,712 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 20 is on host 20
2023-07-11 14:16:27,712 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 21 is on host 21
2023-07-11 14:16:27,712 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 22 is on host 22
2023-07-11 14:16:27,712 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 23 is on host 23
2023-07-11 14:16:27,712 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 24 is on host 24
2023-07-11 14:16:27,712 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 25 is on host 25
2023-07-11 14:16:27,712 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 26 is on host 26
2023-07-11 14:16:27,712 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 27 is on host 27
2023-07-11 14:16:27,712 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 28 is on host 28
2023-07-11 14:16:27,712 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 29 is on host 29
2023-07-11 14:16:27,712 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 30 is on host 30
2023-07-11 14:16:27,712 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 31 is on host 31
2023-07-11 14:16:27,712 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 32 is on host 32
2023-07-11 14:16:27,712 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 33 is on host 33
2023-07-11 14:16:27,712 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 34 is on host 34
2023-07-11 14:16:27,712 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 35 is on host 35
2023-07-11 14:16:27,712 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 36 is on host 36
2023-07-11 14:16:27,712 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 37 is on host 37
2023-07-11 14:16:27,712 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 38 is on host 38
2023-07-11 14:16:27,712 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 39 is on host 39
2023-07-11 14:16:27,712 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 40 is on host 40
2023-07-11 14:16:27,712 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 41 is on host 41
2023-07-11 14:16:27,712 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 42 is on host 42
2023-07-11 14:16:27,713 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 43 is on host 43
2023-07-11 14:16:27,713 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 44 is on host 44
2023-07-11 14:16:27,713 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 45 is on host 45
2023-07-11 14:16:27,713 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 46 is on host 46
2023-07-11 14:16:27,713 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 47 is on host 47
2023-07-11 14:16:27,713 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 48 is on host 48
2023-07-11 14:16:27,713 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 49 is on host 49
2023-07-11 14:16:27,713 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 50 is on host 50
2023-07-11 14:16:27,713 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 51 is on host 51
2023-07-11 14:16:27,713 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 52 is on host 52
2023-07-11 14:16:27,713 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 53 is on host 53
2023-07-11 14:16:27,713 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 54 is on host 54
2023-07-11 14:16:27,713 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 55 is on host 55
2023-07-11 14:16:27,713 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 56 is on host 56
2023-07-11 14:16:27,713 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 57 is on host 57
2023-07-11 14:16:27,713 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 58 is on host 58
2023-07-11 14:16:27,713 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 59 is on host 59
2023-07-11 14:16:27,713 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 60 is on host 60
2023-07-11 14:16:27,713 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 61 is on host 61
2023-07-11 14:16:27,713 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 62 is on host 62
2023-07-11 14:16:27,713 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 63 is on host 63
2023-07-11 14:16:27,713 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 64 is on host 64
2023-07-11 14:16:27,713 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 65 is on host 65
2023-07-11 14:16:27,713 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 66 is on host 66
2023-07-11 14:16:27,713 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 67 is on host 67
2023-07-11 14:16:27,713 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 68 is on host 68
2023-07-11 14:16:27,713 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 69 is on host 69
2023-07-11 14:16:27,713 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 70 is on host 70
2023-07-11 14:16:27,713 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 71 is on host 71
2023-07-11 14:16:27,714 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 72 is on host 72
2023-07-11 14:16:27,714 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 73 is on host 73
2023-07-11 14:16:27,714 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 74 is on host 74
2023-07-11 14:16:27,714 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 75 is on host 75
2023-07-11 14:16:27,714 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 76 is on host 76
2023-07-11 14:16:27,714 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 77 is on host 77
2023-07-11 14:16:27,714 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 78 is on host 78
2023-07-11 14:16:27,714 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 79 is on host 79
2023-07-11 14:16:27,714 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 80 is on host 80
2023-07-11 14:16:27,714 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 81 is on host 81
2023-07-11 14:16:27,714 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 82 is on host 82
2023-07-11 14:16:27,714 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 83 is on host 83
2023-07-11 14:16:27,714 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 84 is on host 84
2023-07-11 14:16:27,714 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 85 is on host 85
2023-07-11 14:16:27,714 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 86 is on host 86
2023-07-11 14:16:27,714 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 87 is on host 87
2023-07-11 14:16:27,714 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 88 is on host 88
2023-07-11 14:16:27,714 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 89 is on host 89
2023-07-11 14:16:27,714 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 90 is on host 90
2023-07-11 14:16:27,714 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 91 is on host 91
2023-07-11 14:16:27,714 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 92 is on host 92
2023-07-11 14:16:27,714 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 93 is on host 93
2023-07-11 14:16:27,714 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 94 is on host 94
2023-07-11 14:16:27,714 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 95 is on host 95
2023-07-11 14:16:27,714 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 96 is on host 96
2023-07-11 14:16:27,714 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 97 is on host 97
2023-07-11 14:16:27,714 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 98 is on host 98
2023-07-11 14:16:27,714 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 99 is on host 99
2023-07-11 14:16:27,714 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 100 is on host 100
2023-07-11 14:16:27,715 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 101 is on host 101
2023-07-11 14:16:27,715 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 102 is on host 102
2023-07-11 14:16:27,715 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 103 is on host 103
2023-07-11 14:16:27,715 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 104 is on host 104
2023-07-11 14:16:27,715 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 105 is on host 105
2023-07-11 14:16:27,715 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 106 is on host 106
2023-07-11 14:16:27,715 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 107 is on host 107
2023-07-11 14:16:27,715 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 108 is on host 108
2023-07-11 14:16:27,715 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 109 is on host 109
2023-07-11 14:16:27,715 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 110 is on host 110
2023-07-11 14:16:27,715 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 111 is on host 111
2023-07-11 14:16:27,715 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 112 is on host 112
2023-07-11 14:16:27,715 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 113 is on host 113
2023-07-11 14:16:27,715 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 114 is on host 114
2023-07-11 14:16:27,715 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 115 is on host 115
2023-07-11 14:16:27,715 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 116 is on host 116
2023-07-11 14:16:27,715 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 117 is on host 117
2023-07-11 14:16:27,715 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 118 is on host 118
2023-07-11 14:16:27,715 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 119 is on host 119
2023-07-11 14:16:27,715 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 120 is on host 120
2023-07-11 14:16:27,715 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 121 is on host 121
2023-07-11 14:16:27,715 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 122 is on host 122
2023-07-11 14:16:27,715 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 123 is on host 123
2023-07-11 14:16:27,715 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 124 is on host 124
2023-07-11 14:16:27,715 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 125 is on host 125
2023-07-11 14:16:27,715 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 126 is on host 126
2023-07-11 14:16:27,715 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 127 is on host 127
2023-07-11 14:16:27,715 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 128 is on host 128
2023-07-11 14:16:27,715 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 129 is on host 129
2023-07-11 14:16:27,716 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 130 is on host 130
2023-07-11 14:16:27,716 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 131 is on host 131
2023-07-11 14:16:27,716 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 132 is on host 132
2023-07-11 14:16:27,716 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 133 is on host 133
2023-07-11 14:16:27,716 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 134 is on host 134
2023-07-11 14:16:27,716 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 135 is on host 135
2023-07-11 14:16:27,716 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 136 is on host 136
2023-07-11 14:16:27,716 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 137 is on host 137
2023-07-11 14:16:27,716 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 138 is on host 138
2023-07-11 14:16:27,716 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 139 is on host 139
2023-07-11 14:16:27,716 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 140 is on host 140
2023-07-11 14:16:27,716 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 141 is on host 141
2023-07-11 14:16:27,716 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 142 is on host 142
2023-07-11 14:16:27,716 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 143 is on host 143
2023-07-11 14:16:27,716 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 144 is on host 144
2023-07-11 14:16:27,716 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 145 is on host 145
2023-07-11 14:16:27,716 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 146 is on host 146
2023-07-11 14:16:27,716 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 147 is on host 147
2023-07-11 14:16:27,716 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 148 is on host 148
2023-07-11 14:16:27,716 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 149 is on host 149
2023-07-11 14:16:27,716 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 150 is on host 150
2023-07-11 14:16:27,716 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 151 is on host 151
2023-07-11 14:16:27,716 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 152 is on host 152
2023-07-11 14:16:27,716 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 153 is on host 153
2023-07-11 14:16:27,716 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 154 is on host 154
2023-07-11 14:16:27,716 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 155 is on host 155
2023-07-11 14:16:27,716 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 156 is on host 156
2023-07-11 14:16:27,716 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 157 is on host 157
2023-07-11 14:16:27,716 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 158 is on host 158
2023-07-11 14:16:27,717 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 159 is on host 159
2023-07-11 14:16:27,717 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 160 is on host 160
2023-07-11 14:16:27,717 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 161 is on host 161
2023-07-11 14:16:27,717 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 162 is on host 162
2023-07-11 14:16:27,717 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 163 is on host 163
2023-07-11 14:16:27,717 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 164 is on host 164
2023-07-11 14:16:27,717 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 165 is on host 165
2023-07-11 14:16:27,717 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 166 is on host 166
2023-07-11 14:16:27,717 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 167 is on host 167
2023-07-11 14:16:27,717 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 168 is on host 168
2023-07-11 14:16:27,717 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 169 is on host 169
2023-07-11 14:16:27,717 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 170 is on host 170
2023-07-11 14:16:27,717 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 171 is on host 171
2023-07-11 14:16:27,717 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 172 is on host 172
2023-07-11 14:16:27,717 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 173 is on host 173
2023-07-11 14:16:27,717 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 174 is on host 174
2023-07-11 14:16:27,717 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 175 is on host 175
2023-07-11 14:16:27,717 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 176 is on host 176
2023-07-11 14:16:27,717 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 177 is on host 177
2023-07-11 14:16:27,717 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 178 is on host 178
2023-07-11 14:16:27,717 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 179 is on host 179
2023-07-11 14:16:27,717 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 180 is on host 180
2023-07-11 14:16:27,717 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 181 is on host 181
2023-07-11 14:16:27,717 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 182 is on host 182
2023-07-11 14:16:27,717 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 183 is on host 183
2023-07-11 14:16:27,717 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 184 is on host 184
2023-07-11 14:16:27,717 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 185 is on host 185
2023-07-11 14:16:27,717 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 186 is on host 186
2023-07-11 14:16:27,717 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 187 is on host 187
2023-07-11 14:16:27,718 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 188 is on host 188
2023-07-11 14:16:27,718 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 189 is on host 189
2023-07-11 14:16:27,718 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 190 is on host 190
2023-07-11 14:16:27,718 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 191 is on host 191
2023-07-11 14:16:27,718 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 192 is on host 192
2023-07-11 14:16:27,718 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 193 is on host 193
2023-07-11 14:16:27,718 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 194 is on host 194
2023-07-11 14:16:27,718 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 195 is on host 195
2023-07-11 14:16:27,718 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 196 is on host 196
2023-07-11 14:16:27,718 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 197 is on host 197
2023-07-11 14:16:27,718 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 198 is on host 198
2023-07-11 14:16:27,718 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 199 is on host 199
2023-07-11 14:16:27,718 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 200 is on host 200
2023-07-11 14:16:27,718 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 201 is on host 201
2023-07-11 14:16:27,718 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 202 is on host 202
2023-07-11 14:16:27,718 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 203 is on host 203
2023-07-11 14:16:27,718 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 204 is on host 204
2023-07-11 14:16:27,718 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 205 is on host 205
2023-07-11 14:16:27,718 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 206 is on host 206
2023-07-11 14:16:27,718 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 207 is on host 207
2023-07-11 14:16:27,718 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 208 is on host 208
2023-07-11 14:16:27,718 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 209 is on host 209
2023-07-11 14:16:27,718 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 210 is on host 210
2023-07-11 14:16:27,718 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 211 is on host 211
2023-07-11 14:16:27,718 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 212 is on host 212
2023-07-11 14:16:27,718 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 213 is on host 213
2023-07-11 14:16:27,718 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 214 is on host 214
2023-07-11 14:16:27,718 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 215 is on host 215
2023-07-11 14:16:27,718 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 216 is on host 216
2023-07-11 14:16:27,719 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 217 is on host 217
2023-07-11 14:16:27,719 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 218 is on host 218
2023-07-11 14:16:27,719 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 219 is on host 219
2023-07-11 14:16:27,719 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 220 is on host 220
2023-07-11 14:16:27,719 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 221 is on host 221
2023-07-11 14:16:27,719 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 222 is on host 222
2023-07-11 14:16:27,719 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 223 is on host 223
2023-07-11 14:16:27,719 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 224 is on host 224
2023-07-11 14:16:27,719 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 225 is on host 225
2023-07-11 14:16:27,719 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 226 is on host 226
2023-07-11 14:16:27,719 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 227 is on host 227
2023-07-11 14:16:27,719 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 228 is on host 228
2023-07-11 14:16:27,719 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 229 is on host 229
2023-07-11 14:16:27,719 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 230 is on host 230
2023-07-11 14:16:27,719 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 231 is on host 231
2023-07-11 14:16:27,719 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 232 is on host 232
2023-07-11 14:16:27,719 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 233 is on host 233
2023-07-11 14:16:27,719 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 234 is on host 234
2023-07-11 14:16:27,719 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 235 is on host 235
2023-07-11 14:16:27,719 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 236 is on host 236
2023-07-11 14:16:27,719 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 237 is on host 237
2023-07-11 14:16:27,719 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 238 is on host 238
2023-07-11 14:16:27,719 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 239 is on host 239
2023-07-11 14:16:27,719 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 240 is on host 240
2023-07-11 14:16:27,719 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 241 is on host 241
2023-07-11 14:16:27,719 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 242 is on host 242
2023-07-11 14:16:27,719 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 243 is on host 243
2023-07-11 14:16:27,719 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 244 is on host 244
2023-07-11 14:16:27,719 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 245 is on host 245
2023-07-11 14:16:27,720 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 246 is on host 246
2023-07-11 14:16:27,720 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 247 is on host 247
2023-07-11 14:16:27,720 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 248 is on host 248
2023-07-11 14:16:27,720 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 249 is on host 249
2023-07-11 14:16:27,720 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 250 is on host 250
2023-07-11 14:16:27,720 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 251 is on host 251
2023-07-11 14:16:27,720 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 252 is on host 252
2023-07-11 14:16:27,720 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 253 is on host 253
2023-07-11 14:16:27,720 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 254 is on host 254
2023-07-11 14:16:27,720 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 255 is on host 255
2023-07-11 14:16:27,720 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 256 is on host 256
2023-07-11 14:16:27,720 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 257 is on host 257
2023-07-11 14:16:27,720 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 258 is on host 258
2023-07-11 14:16:27,720 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 259 is on host 259
2023-07-11 14:16:27,720 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 260 is on host 260
2023-07-11 14:16:27,720 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 261 is on host 261
2023-07-11 14:16:27,720 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 262 is on host 262
2023-07-11 14:16:27,720 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 263 is on host 263
2023-07-11 14:16:27,720 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 264 is on host 264
2023-07-11 14:16:27,720 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 265 is on host 265
2023-07-11 14:16:27,720 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 266 is on host 266
2023-07-11 14:16:27,720 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 267 is on host 267
2023-07-11 14:16:27,720 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 268 is on host 268
2023-07-11 14:16:27,720 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 269 is on host 269
2023-07-11 14:16:27,720 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 270 is on host 270
2023-07-11 14:16:27,720 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 271 is on host 271
2023-07-11 14:16:27,720 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 272 is on host 272
2023-07-11 14:16:27,720 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 273 is on host 273
2023-07-11 14:16:27,721 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 274 is on host 274
2023-07-11 14:16:27,721 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 275 is on host 275
2023-07-11 14:16:27,721 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 276 is on host 276
2023-07-11 14:16:27,721 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 277 is on host 277
2023-07-11 14:16:27,721 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 278 is on host 278
2023-07-11 14:16:27,721 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 279 is on host 279
2023-07-11 14:16:27,721 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 280 is on host 280
2023-07-11 14:16:27,721 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 281 is on host 281
2023-07-11 14:16:27,721 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 282 is on host 282
2023-07-11 14:16:27,721 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 283 is on host 283
2023-07-11 14:16:27,721 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 284 is on host 284
2023-07-11 14:16:27,721 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 285 is on host 285
2023-07-11 14:16:27,721 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 286 is on host 286
2023-07-11 14:16:27,721 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 287 is on host 287
2023-07-11 14:16:27,721 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 288 is on host 288
2023-07-11 14:16:27,721 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 289 is on host 289
2023-07-11 14:16:27,721 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 290 is on host 290
2023-07-11 14:16:27,721 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 291 is on host 291
2023-07-11 14:16:27,721 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 292 is on host 292
2023-07-11 14:16:27,721 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 293 is on host 293
2023-07-11 14:16:27,721 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 294 is on host 294
2023-07-11 14:16:27,721 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 295 is on host 295
2023-07-11 14:16:27,721 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 296 is on host 296
2023-07-11 14:16:27,721 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 297 is on host 297
2023-07-11 14:16:27,721 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 298 is on host 298
2023-07-11 14:16:27,721 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 299 is on host 299
2023-07-11 14:16:27,721 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 300 is on host 300
2023-07-11 14:16:27,721 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 301 is on host 301
2023-07-11 14:16:27,721 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 302 is on host 302
2023-07-11 14:16:27,722 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 303 is on host 303
2023-07-11 14:16:27,722 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 304 is on host 304
2023-07-11 14:16:27,722 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 305 is on host 305
2023-07-11 14:16:27,722 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 306 is on host 306
2023-07-11 14:16:27,722 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 307 is on host 307
2023-07-11 14:16:27,722 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 308 is on host 308
2023-07-11 14:16:27,722 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 309 is on host 309
2023-07-11 14:16:27,722 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 310 is on host 310
2023-07-11 14:16:27,722 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 311 is on host 311
2023-07-11 14:16:27,722 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 312 is on host 312
2023-07-11 14:16:27,722 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 313 is on host 313
2023-07-11 14:16:27,722 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 314 is on host 314
2023-07-11 14:16:27,722 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 315 is on host 315
2023-07-11 14:16:27,722 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 316 is on host 316
2023-07-11 14:16:27,722 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 317 is on host 317
2023-07-11 14:16:27,722 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 318 is on host 318
2023-07-11 14:16:27,722 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 319 is on host 319
2023-07-11 14:16:27,723 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 320 is on host 320
2023-07-11 14:16:27,723 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 321 is on host 321
2023-07-11 14:16:27,723 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 322 is on host 322
2023-07-11 14:16:27,723 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 323 is on host 323
2023-07-11 14:16:27,723 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 324 is on host 324
2023-07-11 14:16:27,723 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 325 is on host 325
2023-07-11 14:16:27,723 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 326 is on host 326
2023-07-11 14:16:27,723 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 327 is on host 327
2023-07-11 14:16:27,723 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 328 is on host 328
2023-07-11 14:16:27,723 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 329 is on host 329
2023-07-11 14:16:27,723 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 330 is on host 330
2023-07-11 14:16:27,723 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 331 is on host 331
2023-07-11 14:16:27,723 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 332 is on host 332
2023-07-11 14:16:27,723 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 333 is on host 333
2023-07-11 14:16:27,723 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 334 is on host 334
2023-07-11 14:16:27,723 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 335 is on host 335
2023-07-11 14:16:27,723 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 336 is on host 336
2023-07-11 14:16:27,723 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 337 is on host 337
2023-07-11 14:16:27,723 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 338 is on host 338
2023-07-11 14:16:27,723 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 339 is on host 339
2023-07-11 14:16:27,723 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 340 is on host 340
2023-07-11 14:16:27,723 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 341 is on host 341
2023-07-11 14:16:27,723 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 342 is on host 342
2023-07-11 14:16:27,723 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 343 is on host 343
2023-07-11 14:16:27,723 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 344 is on host 344
2023-07-11 14:16:27,723 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 345 is on host 345
2023-07-11 14:16:27,723 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 346 is on host 346
2023-07-11 14:16:27,723 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 347 is on host 347
2023-07-11 14:16:27,723 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 348 is on host 348
2023-07-11 14:16:27,724 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 349 is on host 349
2023-07-11 14:16:27,724 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 350 is on host 350
2023-07-11 14:16:27,724 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 351 is on host 351
2023-07-11 14:16:27,724 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 352 is on host 352
2023-07-11 14:16:27,724 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 353 is on host 353
2023-07-11 14:16:27,724 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 354 is on host 354
2023-07-11 14:16:27,724 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 355 is on host 355
2023-07-11 14:16:27,724 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 356 is on host 356
2023-07-11 14:16:27,724 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 357 is on host 357
2023-07-11 14:16:27,724 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 358 is on host 358
2023-07-11 14:16:27,724 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 359 is on host 359
2023-07-11 14:16:27,724 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 360 is on host 360
2023-07-11 14:16:27,724 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 361 is on host 361
2023-07-11 14:16:27,724 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 362 is on host 362
2023-07-11 14:16:27,724 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 363 is on host 363
2023-07-11 14:16:27,724 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 364 is on host 364
2023-07-11 14:16:27,724 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 365 is on host 365
2023-07-11 14:16:27,724 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 366 is on host 366
2023-07-11 14:16:27,724 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 367 is on host 367
2023-07-11 14:16:27,724 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 368 is on host 368
2023-07-11 14:16:27,724 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 369 is on host 369
2023-07-11 14:16:27,724 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 370 is on host 370
2023-07-11 14:16:27,724 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 371 is on host 371
2023-07-11 14:16:27,724 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 372 is on host 372
2023-07-11 14:16:27,724 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 373 is on host 373
2023-07-11 14:16:27,724 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 374 is on host 374
2023-07-11 14:16:27,724 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 375 is on host 375
2023-07-11 14:16:27,724 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 376 is on host 376
2023-07-11 14:16:27,724 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 377 is on host 377
2023-07-11 14:16:27,725 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 378 is on host 378
2023-07-11 14:16:27,725 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 379 is on host 379
2023-07-11 14:16:27,725 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 380 is on host 380
2023-07-11 14:16:27,725 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 381 is on host 381
2023-07-11 14:16:27,725 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 382 is on host 382
2023-07-11 14:16:27,725 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 383 is on host 383
2023-07-11 14:16:27,725 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 384 is on host 384
2023-07-11 14:16:27,725 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 385 is on host 385
2023-07-11 14:16:27,725 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 386 is on host 386
2023-07-11 14:16:27,725 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 387 is on host 387
2023-07-11 14:16:27,725 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 388 is on host 388
2023-07-11 14:16:27,725 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 389 is on host 389
2023-07-11 14:16:27,725 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 390 is on host 390
2023-07-11 14:16:27,725 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 391 is on host 391
2023-07-11 14:16:27,725 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 392 is on host 392
2023-07-11 14:16:27,725 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=393, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:27,725 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table41) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:27,726 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table42
2023-07-11 14:16:27,726 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv553536953=290, srv1630071126=110, srv1071894870=12, srv23511728=232, srv658346947=323, srv2025338799=204, srv1397994335=64, srv1976766403=195, srv1644629726=118, srv957637734=381, srv2079182457=210, srv1749264468=139, srv2046129126=206, srv1595762596=104, srv603990852=307, srv1973073480=194, srv958856137=382, srv644066832=319, srv557062842=292, srv277765671=235, srv732221418=337, srv1769385567=143, srv224612199=228, srv714752528=334, srv362526040=256, srv581128949=296, srv2133511466=223, srv1144239257=30, srv320603627=245, srv1679952521=126, srv2122867873=222, srv1110067064=24, srv256251994=233, srv63261708=317, srv89837390=371, srv552104598=289, srv508952995=281, srv2096011353=214, srv1770417148=144, srv1246723478=42, srv929436444=378, srv2082192429=211, srv234917297=231, srv405700573=266, srv183644386=166, srv1488378513=85, srv173139715=136, srv1154180352=32, srv355693379=252, srv1407521654=66, srv496848057=275, srv1157975499=33, srv1806731027=162, srv1923102804=184, srv311102455=244, srv450011410=271, srv771515724=348, srv389183508=262, srv1249074416=43, srv2014575201=201, srv640847108=318, srv832363565=356, srv1970882134=192, srv2107358603=218, srv855766065=361, srv1336043388=55, srv29397186=237, srv982792848=390, srv976560524=386, srv101181760=3, srv1093549482=21, srv2018389395=202, srv2113483104=221, srv1778339118=149, srv1968709692=190, srv705221118=333, srv159600090=105, srv1919608486=180, srv981255102=389, srv807899713=353, srv755110395=344, srv1770594519=145, srv739692705=340, srv1076582671=16, srv693869315=330, srv1079048717=17, srv440657532=270, srv1636659280=115, srv2108739257=220, srv668373413=326, srv1003610393=2, srv1054229197=11, srv1868589627=172, srv2103522371=217, srv1000546271=0, srv951670617=380, srv2042909593=205, srv1865656038=171, srv1466355012=78, srv703662406=332, srv1418112884=70, srv1215580291=40, srv71833528=335, srv1580581635=103, srv1021032212=5, srv1080806312=19, srv1985601859=197, srv74471954=343, srv1647472319=119, srv2071553346=208, srv1632855171=112, srv1122009370=27, srv13613992=61, srv1630777154=111, srv301413669=239, srv550697728=288, srv1296023857=53, srv1724550977=133, srv1989290370=198, srv1926417985=185, srv1678097199=125, srv1461034373=76, srv614690415=311, srv2098345381=215, srv310463473=243, srv1011934105=4, srv148627129=84, srv305489318=240, srv1256534903=46, srv1289731445=52, srv1798844587=157, srv567113085=294, srv1119222501=26, srv2055117940=207, srv855898852=362, srv629224816=316, srv1075943554=15, srv625909061=315, srv1705591942=128, srv734225580=339, srv660107924=324, srv1381729938=62, srv1633483173=113, srv408265476=267, srv1776057793=148, srv1360253411=60, srv1511424834=90, srv1414162621=68, srv883343663=370, srv151859222=91, srv349144930=251, srv1991304034=199, srv1825887791=164, srv601657063=305, srv758932951=345, srv1651629087=120, srv1864623584=170, srv682957691=329, srv1500454146=88, srv1725962085=135, srv1659841448=121, srv1253206004=45, srv52354442=284, srv18508093=168, srv1427731921=73, srv561344974=293, srv721668125=336, srv1575482138=100, srv914128771=373, srv961487230=383, srv741332941=342, srv533032466=286, srv1574140987=99, srv2139849097=224, srv503902262=278, srv674807007=327, srv1786829855=153, srv2088727517=213, srv394366966=264, srv980089565=388, srv114594288=31, srv38296437=261, srv214835574=226, srv1887224977=176, srv1025509362=7, srv1577020334=102, srv524466665=285, srv393561021=263, srv759909927=346, srv763556514=347, srv786453030=349, srv2142935488=225, srv618111613=312, srv16254163=108, srv343211061=250, srv476075173=273, srv1269632212=47, srv333589612=246, srv499015361=276, srv836674186=357, srv1799191687=158, srv1446998035=74, srv1571774199=98, srv1115354947=25, srv333860881=247, srv1724152600=132, srv1598699299=106, srv177885829=151, srv472125887=272, srv1101339966=22, srv1424985362=72, srv1945569895=188, srv594128294=300, srv1026739237=8, srv842459828=358, srv878519137=366, srv1921260729=181, srv339110834=249, srv504099471=279, srv814253179=354, srv1643744885=116, srv1793847521=155, srv607234624=309, srv698219051=331, srv1688538732=127, srv666240078=325, srv1079284733=18, srv29210550=236, srv506181748=280, srv881313122=368, srv1945452576=187, srv597307897=303, srv1285120424=51, srv1887943816=177, srv1983604698=196, srv1805465940=161, srv309309336=242, srv1719756294=131, srv1349932676=58, srv1208486369=38, srv1643971570=117, srv1509331489=89, srv334105385=248, srv1400515744=65, srv369984715=259, srv43712162=269, srv842675864=359, srv1803258748=160, srv1022450918=6, srv1775108732=147, srv1766088250=141, srv180150732=159, srv1220857227=41, srv226530501=229, srv362032108=255, srv919715380=377, srv1074935976=14, srv1395030819=63, srv803291569=352, srv1877966766=175, srv220538712=227, srv2021718843=203, srv2107782185=219, srv882216860=369, srv1489137852=86, srv1972328734=193, srv1470759982=79, srv1774824811=146, srv971974774=384, srv1418242791=71, srv1001274196=1, srv909615097=372, srv1537724566=93, srv1165799954=34, srv1724754364=134, srv978173525=387, srv113319438=29, srv578033735=295, srv147931272=80, srv1183635941=35, srv1904215245=178, srv596349756=302, srv880835255=367, srv857544550=364, srv1779729022=152, srv1795612465=156, srv621083045=314, srv917704170=375, srv1351811120=59, srv1316710897=54, srv789820555=350, srv1922580095=183, srv305567304=241, srv1936745425=186, srv1745318024=138, srv1210822057=39, srv645375717=320, srv950628389=379, srv1490199189=87, srv1575919256=101, srv154481102=96, srv359402967=254, srv997716931=391, srv1457224273=75, srv581644449=297, srv1872374768=174, srv363177310=257, srv740327512=341, srv1664227236=123, srv972330517=385, srv1634261306=114, srv1662183707=122, srv1969046891=191, srv1485266211=82, srv1778842262=150, srv588410181=298, srv1921840985=182, srv591279493=299, srv37574565=260, srv1104147458=23, srv1190166330=36, srv652270371=322, srv1484309042=81, srv1560148463=97, srv618569548=313, srv2102708311=216, srv1084873074=20, srv517669556=283, srv918152084=376, srv649714317=321, srv1674484790=124, srv1339239880=56, srv1461073271=77, srv1125312901=28, srv25633292=234, srv516616923=282, srv299721745=238, srv604932433=308, srv1273702855=48, srv792183929=351, srv1042608200=10, srv1276335106=49, srv1486044644=83, srv676101698=328, srv998930892=392, srv200111276=200, srv1863083643=169, srv1737443479=137, srv872997185=365, srv821351126=355, srv852115805=360, srv1074355423=13, srv170952194=130, srv503430005=277, srv153887567=94, srv1415163001=69, srv1032737435=9, srv1840670515=167, srv1961921083=189, srv59745831=304, srv36715747=258, srv431547280=268, srv1524853580=92, srv1870059418=173, srv396010771=265, srv594457792=301, srv1755339428=140, srv1766275429=142, srv5565786=291, srv603898526=306, srv544570223=287, srv856030669=363, srv1542523468=95, srv915785747=374, srv356122213=253, srv1411875499=67, srv2077620970=209, srv1345529444=57, srv232339963=230, srv1250861076=44, srv1914875423=179, srv478619481=274, srv1202435626=37, srv1706089454=129, srv1810631201=163, srv1282644061=50, srv1625945288=109, srv733251129=338, srv2082830831=212, srv1612103540=107, srv612136291=310, srv1790004142=154, srv183394703=165} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:27,726 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:27,726 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:27,726 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:27,726 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:27,726 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:27,726 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:27,726 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-11 14:16:27,726 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-11 14:16:27,726 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-11 14:16:27,726 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-11 14:16:27,726 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 10 is on host 10
2023-07-11 14:16:27,726 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 11 is on host 11
2023-07-11 14:16:27,727 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 12 is on host 12
2023-07-11 14:16:27,727 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 13 is on host 13
2023-07-11 14:16:27,727 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 14 is on host 14
2023-07-11 14:16:27,727 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 15 is on host 15
2023-07-11 14:16:27,727 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 16 is on host 16
2023-07-11 14:16:27,727 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 17 is on host 17
2023-07-11 14:16:27,727 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 18 is on host 18
2023-07-11 14:16:27,727 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 19 is on host 19
2023-07-11 14:16:27,727 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 20 is on host 20
2023-07-11 14:16:27,727 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 21 is on host 21
2023-07-11 14:16:27,727 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 22 is on host 22
2023-07-11 14:16:27,727 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 23 is on host 23
2023-07-11 14:16:27,727 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 24 is on host 24
2023-07-11 14:16:27,727 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 25 is on host 25
2023-07-11 14:16:27,727 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 26 is on host 26
2023-07-11 14:16:27,727 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 27 is on host 27
2023-07-11 14:16:27,727 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 28 is on host 28
2023-07-11 14:16:27,727 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 29 is on host 29
2023-07-11 14:16:27,727 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 30 is on host 30
2023-07-11 14:16:27,727 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 31 is on host 31
2023-07-11 14:16:27,727 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 32 is on host 32
2023-07-11 14:16:27,727 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 33 is on host 33
2023-07-11 14:16:27,727 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 34 is on host 34
2023-07-11 14:16:27,727 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 35 is on host 35
2023-07-11 14:16:27,727 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 36 is on host 36
2023-07-11 14:16:27,727 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 37 is on host 37
2023-07-11 14:16:27,727 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 38 is on host 38
2023-07-11 14:16:27,727 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 39 is on host 39
2023-07-11 14:16:27,727 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 40 is on host 40
2023-07-11 14:16:27,728 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 41 is on host 41
2023-07-11 14:16:27,728 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 42 is on host 42
2023-07-11 14:16:27,728 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 43 is on host 43
2023-07-11 14:16:27,728 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 44 is on host 44
2023-07-11 14:16:27,728 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 45 is on host 45
2023-07-11 14:16:27,728 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 46 is on host 46
2023-07-11 14:16:27,728 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 47 is on host 47
2023-07-11 14:16:27,728 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 48 is on host 48
2023-07-11 14:16:27,728 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 49 is on host 49
2023-07-11 14:16:27,728 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 50 is on host 50
2023-07-11 14:16:27,728 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 51 is on host 51
2023-07-11 14:16:27,728 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 52 is on host 52
2023-07-11 14:16:27,728 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 53 is on host 53
2023-07-11 14:16:27,728 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 54 is on host 54
2023-07-11 14:16:27,728 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 55 is on host 55
2023-07-11 14:16:27,728 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 56 is on host 56
2023-07-11 14:16:27,728 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 57 is on host 57
2023-07-11 14:16:27,728 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 58 is on host 58
2023-07-11 14:16:27,728 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 59 is on host 59
2023-07-11 14:16:27,728 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 60 is on host 60
2023-07-11 14:16:27,728 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 61 is on host 61
2023-07-11 14:16:27,728 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 62 is on host 62
2023-07-11 14:16:27,728 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 63 is on host 63
2023-07-11 14:16:27,728 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 64 is on host 64
2023-07-11 14:16:27,728 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 65 is on host 65
2023-07-11 14:16:27,728 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 66 is on host 66
2023-07-11 14:16:27,728 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 67 is on host 67
2023-07-11 14:16:27,728 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 68 is on host 68
2023-07-11 14:16:27,728 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 69 is on host 69
2023-07-11 14:16:27,729 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 70 is on host 70
2023-07-11 14:16:27,729 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 71 is on host 71
2023-07-11 14:16:27,729 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 72 is on host 72
2023-07-11 14:16:27,729 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 73 is on host 73
2023-07-11 14:16:27,729 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 74 is on host 74
2023-07-11 14:16:27,729 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 75 is on host 75
2023-07-11 14:16:27,729 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 76 is on host 76
2023-07-11 14:16:27,729 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 77 is on host 77
2023-07-11 14:16:27,729 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 78 is on host 78
2023-07-11 14:16:27,729 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 79 is on host 79
2023-07-11 14:16:27,729 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 80 is on host 80
2023-07-11 14:16:27,729 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 81 is on host 81
2023-07-11 14:16:27,729 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 82 is on host 82
2023-07-11 14:16:27,729 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 83 is on host 83
2023-07-11 14:16:27,729 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 84 is on host 84
2023-07-11 14:16:27,729 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 85 is on host 85
2023-07-11 14:16:27,729 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 86 is on host 86
2023-07-11 14:16:27,729 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 87 is on host 87
2023-07-11 14:16:27,729 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 88 is on host 88
2023-07-11 14:16:27,729 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 89 is on host 89
2023-07-11 14:16:27,729 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 90 is on host 90
2023-07-11 14:16:27,729 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 91 is on host 91
2023-07-11 14:16:27,729 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 92 is on host 92
2023-07-11 14:16:27,729 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 93 is on host 93
2023-07-11 14:16:27,729 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 94 is on host 94
2023-07-11 14:16:27,729 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 95 is on host 95
2023-07-11 14:16:27,729 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 96 is on host 96
2023-07-11 14:16:27,729 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 97 is on host 97
2023-07-11 14:16:27,729 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 98 is on host 98
2023-07-11 14:16:27,730 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 99 is on host 99
2023-07-11 14:16:27,730 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 100 is on host 100
2023-07-11 14:16:27,730 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 101 is on host 101
2023-07-11 14:16:27,730 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 102 is on host 102
2023-07-11 14:16:27,730 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 103 is on host 103
2023-07-11 14:16:27,730 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 104 is on host 104
2023-07-11 14:16:27,730 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 105 is on host 105
2023-07-11 14:16:27,730 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 106 is on host 106
2023-07-11 14:16:27,730 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 107 is on host 107
2023-07-11 14:16:27,730 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 108 is on host 108
2023-07-11 14:16:27,730 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 109 is on host 109
2023-07-11 14:16:27,730 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 110 is on host 110
2023-07-11 14:16:27,730 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 111 is on host 111
2023-07-11 14:16:27,730 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 112 is on host 112
2023-07-11 14:16:27,730 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 113 is on host 113
2023-07-11 14:16:27,730 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 114 is on host 114
2023-07-11 14:16:27,730 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 115 is on host 115
2023-07-11 14:16:27,730 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 116 is on host 116
2023-07-11 14:16:27,730 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 117 is on host 117
2023-07-11 14:16:27,730 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 118 is on host 118
2023-07-11 14:16:27,730 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 119 is on host 119
2023-07-11 14:16:27,730 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 120 is on host 120
2023-07-11 14:16:27,730 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 121 is on host 121
2023-07-11 14:16:27,730 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 122 is on host 122
2023-07-11 14:16:27,730 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 123 is on host 123
2023-07-11 14:16:27,730 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 124 is on host 124
2023-07-11 14:16:27,730 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 125 is on host 125
2023-07-11 14:16:27,730 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 126 is on host 126
2023-07-11 14:16:27,730 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 127 is on host 127
2023-07-11 14:16:27,731 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 128 is on host 128
2023-07-11 14:16:27,731 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 129 is on host 129
2023-07-11 14:16:27,731 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 130 is on host 130
2023-07-11 14:16:27,731 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 131 is on host 131
2023-07-11 14:16:27,731 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 132 is on host 132
2023-07-11 14:16:27,731 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 133 is on host 133
2023-07-11 14:16:27,731 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 134 is on host 134
2023-07-11 14:16:27,731 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 135 is on host 135
2023-07-11 14:16:27,731 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 136 is on host 136
2023-07-11 14:16:27,731 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 137 is on host 137
2023-07-11 14:16:27,731 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 138 is on host 138
2023-07-11 14:16:27,731 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 139 is on host 139
2023-07-11 14:16:27,731 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 140 is on host 140
2023-07-11 14:16:27,731 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 141 is on host 141
2023-07-11 14:16:27,731 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 142 is on host 142
2023-07-11 14:16:27,731 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 143 is on host 143
2023-07-11 14:16:27,731 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 144 is on host 144
2023-07-11 14:16:27,731 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 145 is on host 145
2023-07-11 14:16:27,731 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 146 is on host 146
2023-07-11 14:16:27,731 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 147 is on host 147
2023-07-11 14:16:27,731 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 148 is on host 148
2023-07-11 14:16:27,731 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 149 is on host 149
2023-07-11 14:16:27,731 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 150 is on host 150
2023-07-11 14:16:27,731 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 151 is on host 151
2023-07-11 14:16:27,731 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 152 is on host 152
2023-07-11 14:16:27,731 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 153 is on host 153
2023-07-11 14:16:27,731 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 154 is on host 154
2023-07-11 14:16:27,731 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 155 is on host 155
2023-07-11 14:16:27,731 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 156 is on host 156
2023-07-11 14:16:27,732 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 157 is on host 157
2023-07-11 14:16:27,732 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 158 is on host 158
2023-07-11 14:16:27,732 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 159 is on host 159
2023-07-11 14:16:27,732 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 160 is on host 160
2023-07-11 14:16:27,732 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 161 is on host 161
2023-07-11 14:16:27,732 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 162 is on host 162
2023-07-11 14:16:27,732 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 163 is on host 163
2023-07-11 14:16:27,732 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 164 is on host 164
2023-07-11 14:16:27,732 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 165 is on host 165
2023-07-11 14:16:27,732 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 166 is on host 166
2023-07-11 14:16:27,732 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 167 is on host 167
2023-07-11 14:16:27,732 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 168 is on host 168
2023-07-11 14:16:27,732 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 169 is on host 169
2023-07-11 14:16:27,732 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 170 is on host 170
2023-07-11 14:16:27,732 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 171 is on host 171
2023-07-11 14:16:27,732 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 172 is on host 172
2023-07-11 14:16:27,732 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 173 is on host 173
2023-07-11 14:16:27,732 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 174 is on host 174
2023-07-11 14:16:27,732 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 175 is on host 175
2023-07-11 14:16:27,732 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 176 is on host 176
2023-07-11 14:16:27,732 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 177 is on host 177
2023-07-11 14:16:27,732 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 178 is on host 178
2023-07-11 14:16:27,732 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 179 is on host 179
2023-07-11 14:16:27,732 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 180 is on host 180
2023-07-11 14:16:27,732 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 181 is on host 181
2023-07-11 14:16:27,732 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 182 is on host 182
2023-07-11 14:16:27,732 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 183 is on host 183
2023-07-11 14:16:27,732 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 184 is on host 184
2023-07-11 14:16:27,732 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 185 is on host 185
2023-07-11 14:16:27,733 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 186 is on host 186
2023-07-11 14:16:27,733 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 187 is on host 187
2023-07-11 14:16:27,733 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 188 is on host 188
2023-07-11 14:16:27,733 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 189 is on host 189
2023-07-11 14:16:27,733 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 190 is on host 190
2023-07-11 14:16:27,733 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 191 is on host 191
2023-07-11 14:16:27,733 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 192 is on host 192
2023-07-11 14:16:27,733 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 193 is on host 193
2023-07-11 14:16:27,733 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 194 is on host 194
2023-07-11 14:16:27,733 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 195 is on host 195
2023-07-11 14:16:27,733 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 196 is on host 196
2023-07-11 14:16:27,733 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 197 is on host 197
2023-07-11 14:16:27,733 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 198 is on host 198
2023-07-11 14:16:27,733 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 199 is on host 199
2023-07-11 14:16:27,733 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 200 is on host 200
2023-07-11 14:16:27,733 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 201 is on host 201
2023-07-11 14:16:27,733 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 202 is on host 202
2023-07-11 14:16:27,733 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 203 is on host 203
2023-07-11 14:16:27,733 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 204 is on host 204
2023-07-11 14:16:27,733 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 205 is on host 205
2023-07-11 14:16:27,733 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 206 is on host 206
2023-07-11 14:16:27,733 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 207 is on host 207
2023-07-11 14:16:27,733 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 208 is on host 208
2023-07-11 14:16:27,733 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 209 is on host 209
2023-07-11 14:16:27,734 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 210 is on host 210
2023-07-11 14:16:27,734 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 211 is on host 211
2023-07-11 14:16:27,734 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 212 is on host 212
2023-07-11 14:16:27,734 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 213 is on host 213
2023-07-11 14:16:27,734 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 214 is on host 214
2023-07-11 14:16:27,734 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 215 is on host 215
2023-07-11 14:16:27,734 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 216 is on host 216
2023-07-11 14:16:27,734 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 217 is on host 217
2023-07-11 14:16:27,734 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 218 is on host 218
2023-07-11 14:16:27,734 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 219 is on host 219
2023-07-11 14:16:27,734 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 220 is on host 220
2023-07-11 14:16:27,734 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 221 is on host 221
2023-07-11 14:16:27,734 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 222 is on host 222
2023-07-11 14:16:27,734 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 223 is on host 223
2023-07-11 14:16:27,734 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 224 is on host 224
2023-07-11 14:16:27,734 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 225 is on host 225
2023-07-11 14:16:27,734 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 226 is on host 226
2023-07-11 14:16:27,734 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 227 is on host 227
2023-07-11 14:16:27,734 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 228 is on host 228
2023-07-11 14:16:27,734 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 229 is on host 229
2023-07-11 14:16:27,734 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 230 is on host 230
2023-07-11 14:16:27,734 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 231 is on host 231
2023-07-11 14:16:27,735 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 232 is on host 232
2023-07-11 14:16:27,735 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 233 is on host 233
2023-07-11 14:16:27,735 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 234 is on host 234
2023-07-11 14:16:27,735 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 235 is on host 235
2023-07-11 14:16:27,735 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 236 is on host 236
2023-07-11 14:16:27,735 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 237 is on host 237
2023-07-11 14:16:27,735 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 238 is on host 238
2023-07-11 14:16:27,735 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 239 is on host 239
2023-07-11 14:16:27,735 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 240 is on host 240
2023-07-11 14:16:27,735 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 241 is on host 241
2023-07-11 14:16:27,735 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 242 is on host 242
2023-07-11 14:16:27,735 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 243 is on host 243
2023-07-11 14:16:27,735 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 244 is on host 244
2023-07-11 14:16:27,735 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 245 is on host 245
2023-07-11 14:16:27,735 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 246 is on host 246
2023-07-11 14:16:27,735 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 247 is on host 247
2023-07-11 14:16:27,735 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 248 is on host 248
2023-07-11 14:16:27,735 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 249 is on host 249
2023-07-11 14:16:27,735 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 250 is on host 250
2023-07-11 14:16:27,735 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 251 is on host 251
2023-07-11 14:16:27,735 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 252 is on host 252
2023-07-11 14:16:27,735 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 253 is on host 253
2023-07-11 14:16:27,735 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 254 is on host 254
2023-07-11 14:16:27,735 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 255 is on host 255
2023-07-11 14:16:27,735 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 256 is on host 256
2023-07-11 14:16:27,735 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 257 is on host 257
2023-07-11 14:16:27,735 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 258 is on host 258
2023-07-11 14:16:27,735 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 259 is on host 259
2023-07-11 14:16:27,735 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 260 is on host 260
2023-07-11 14:16:27,736 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 261 is on host 261
2023-07-11 14:16:27,736 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 262 is on host 262
2023-07-11 14:16:27,736 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 263 is on host 263
2023-07-11 14:16:27,736 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 264 is on host 264
2023-07-11 14:16:27,736 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 265 is on host 265
2023-07-11 14:16:27,736 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 266 is on host 266
2023-07-11 14:16:27,736 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 267 is on host 267
2023-07-11 14:16:27,736 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 268 is on host 268
2023-07-11 14:16:27,736 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 269 is on host 269
2023-07-11 14:16:27,736 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 270 is on host 270
2023-07-11 14:16:27,736 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 271 is on host 271
2023-07-11 14:16:27,736 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 272 is on host 272
2023-07-11 14:16:27,736 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 273 is on host 273
2023-07-11 14:16:27,736 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 274 is on host 274
2023-07-11 14:16:27,736 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 275 is on host 275
2023-07-11 14:16:27,736 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 276 is on host 276
2023-07-11 14:16:27,736 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 277 is on host 277
2023-07-11 14:16:27,736 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 278 is on host 278
2023-07-11 14:16:27,736 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 279 is on host 279
2023-07-11 14:16:27,736 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 280 is on host 280
2023-07-11 14:16:27,736 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 281 is on host 281
2023-07-11 14:16:27,736 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 282 is on host 282
2023-07-11 14:16:27,736 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 283 is on host 283
2023-07-11 14:16:27,736 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 284 is on host 284
2023-07-11 14:16:27,736 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 285 is on host 285
2023-07-11 14:16:27,736 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 286 is on host 286
2023-07-11 14:16:27,736 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 287 is on host 287
2023-07-11 14:16:27,736 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 288 is on host 288
2023-07-11 14:16:27,736 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 289 is on host 289
2023-07-11 14:16:27,737 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 290 is on host 290
2023-07-11 14:16:27,737 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 291 is on host 291
2023-07-11 14:16:27,737 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 292 is on host 292
2023-07-11 14:16:27,737 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 293 is on host 293
2023-07-11 14:16:27,737 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 294 is on host 294
2023-07-11 14:16:27,737 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 295 is on host 295
2023-07-11 14:16:27,737 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 296 is on host 296
2023-07-11 14:16:27,737 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 297 is on host 297
2023-07-11 14:16:27,737 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 298 is on host 298
2023-07-11 14:16:27,737 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 299 is on host 299
2023-07-11 14:16:27,737 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 300 is on host 300
2023-07-11 14:16:27,737 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 301 is on host 301
2023-07-11 14:16:27,737 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 302 is on host 302
2023-07-11 14:16:27,737 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 303 is on host 303
2023-07-11 14:16:27,737 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 304 is on host 304
2023-07-11 14:16:27,737 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 305 is on host 305
2023-07-11 14:16:27,737 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 306 is on host 306
2023-07-11 14:16:27,737 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 307 is on host 307
2023-07-11 14:16:27,737 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 308 is on host 308
2023-07-11 14:16:27,737 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 309 is on host 309
2023-07-11 14:16:27,737 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 310 is on host 310
2023-07-11 14:16:27,737 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 311 is on host 311
2023-07-11 14:16:27,737 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 312 is on host 312
2023-07-11 14:16:27,737 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 313 is on host 313
2023-07-11 14:16:27,737 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 314 is on host 314
2023-07-11 14:16:27,737 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 315 is on host 315
2023-07-11 14:16:27,737 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 316 is on host 316
2023-07-11 14:16:27,737 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 317 is on host 317
2023-07-11 14:16:27,738 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 318 is on host 318
2023-07-11 14:16:27,738 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 319 is on host 319
2023-07-11 14:16:27,738 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 320 is on host 320
2023-07-11 14:16:27,738 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 321 is on host 321
2023-07-11 14:16:27,738 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 322 is on host 322
2023-07-11 14:16:27,738 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 323 is on host 323
2023-07-11 14:16:27,738 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 324 is on host 324
2023-07-11 14:16:27,738 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 325 is on host 325
2023-07-11 14:16:27,738 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 326 is on host 326
2023-07-11 14:16:27,738 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 327 is on host 327
2023-07-11 14:16:27,738 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 328 is on host 328
2023-07-11 14:16:27,738 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 329 is on host 329
2023-07-11 14:16:27,738 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 330 is on host 330
2023-07-11 14:16:27,738 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 331 is on host 331
2023-07-11 14:16:27,738 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 332 is on host 332
2023-07-11 14:16:27,738 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 333 is on host 333
2023-07-11 14:16:27,738 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 334 is on host 334
2023-07-11 14:16:27,738 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 335 is on host 335
2023-07-11 14:16:27,738 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 336 is on host 336
2023-07-11 14:16:27,738 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 337 is on host 337
2023-07-11 14:16:27,738 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 338 is on host 338
2023-07-11 14:16:27,738 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 339 is on host 339
2023-07-11 14:16:27,738 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 340 is on host 340
2023-07-11 14:16:27,738 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 341 is on host 341
2023-07-11 14:16:27,738 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 342 is on host 342
2023-07-11 14:16:27,738 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 343 is on host 343
2023-07-11 14:16:27,738 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 344 is on host 344
2023-07-11 14:16:27,738 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 345 is on host 345
2023-07-11 14:16:27,738 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 346 is on host 346
2023-07-11 14:16:27,739 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 347 is on host 347
2023-07-11 14:16:27,739 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 348 is on host 348
2023-07-11 14:16:27,739 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 349 is on host 349
2023-07-11 14:16:27,739 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 350 is on host 350
2023-07-11 14:16:27,739 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 351 is on host 351
2023-07-11 14:16:27,739 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 352 is on host 352
2023-07-11 14:16:27,739 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 353 is on host 353
2023-07-11 14:16:27,739 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 354 is on host 354
2023-07-11 14:16:27,739 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 355 is on host 355
2023-07-11 14:16:27,739 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 356 is on host 356
2023-07-11 14:16:27,739 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 357 is on host 357
2023-07-11 14:16:27,739 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 358 is on host 358
2023-07-11 14:16:27,739 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 359 is on host 359
2023-07-11 14:16:27,739 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 360 is on host 360
2023-07-11 14:16:27,739 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 361 is on host 361
2023-07-11 14:16:27,739 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 362 is on host 362
2023-07-11 14:16:27,739 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 363 is on host 363
2023-07-11 14:16:27,739 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 364 is on host 364
2023-07-11 14:16:27,739 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 365 is on host 365
2023-07-11 14:16:27,739 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 366 is on host 366
2023-07-11 14:16:27,739 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 367 is on host 367
2023-07-11 14:16:27,739 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 368 is on host 368
2023-07-11 14:16:27,739 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 369 is on host 369
2023-07-11 14:16:27,739 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 370 is on host 370
2023-07-11 14:16:27,739 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 371 is on host 371
2023-07-11 14:16:27,739 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 372 is on host 372
2023-07-11 14:16:27,739 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 373 is on host 373
2023-07-11 14:16:27,739 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 374 is on host 374
2023-07-11 14:16:27,739 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 375 is on host 375
2023-07-11 14:16:27,739 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 376 is on host 376
2023-07-11 14:16:27,740 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 377 is on host 377
2023-07-11 14:16:27,740 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 378 is on host 378
2023-07-11 14:16:27,740 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 379 is on host 379
2023-07-11 14:16:27,740 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 380 is on host 380
2023-07-11 14:16:27,740 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 381 is on host 381
2023-07-11 14:16:27,740 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 382 is on host 382
2023-07-11 14:16:27,740 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 383 is on host 383
2023-07-11 14:16:27,740 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 384 is on host 384
2023-07-11 14:16:27,740 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 385 is on host 385
2023-07-11 14:16:27,740 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 386 is on host 386
2023-07-11 14:16:27,740 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 387 is on host 387
2023-07-11 14:16:27,740 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 388 is on host 388
2023-07-11 14:16:27,740 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 389 is on host 389
2023-07-11 14:16:27,740 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 390 is on host 390
2023-07-11 14:16:27,740 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 391 is on host 391
2023-07-11 14:16:27,740 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 392 is on host 392
2023-07-11 14:16:27,740 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=393, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:27,740 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table42) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:27,741 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table43
2023-07-11 14:16:27,741 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv553536953=290, srv1630071126=110, srv1071894870=12, srv23511728=232, srv658346947=323, srv2025338799=204, srv1397994335=64, srv1976766403=195, srv1644629726=118, srv957637734=381, srv2079182457=210, srv1749264468=139, srv2046129126=206, srv1595762596=104, srv603990852=307, srv1973073480=194, srv958856137=382, srv644066832=319, srv557062842=292, srv277765671=235, srv732221418=337, srv1769385567=143, srv224612199=228, srv714752528=334, srv362526040=256, srv581128949=296, srv2133511466=223, srv1144239257=30, srv320603627=245, srv1679952521=126, srv2122867873=222, srv1110067064=24, srv256251994=233, srv63261708=317, srv89837390=371, srv552104598=289, srv508952995=281, srv2096011353=214, srv1770417148=144, srv1246723478=42, srv929436444=378, srv2082192429=211, srv234917297=231, srv405700573=266, srv183644386=166, srv1488378513=85, srv173139715=136, srv1154180352=32, srv355693379=252, srv1407521654=66, srv496848057=275, srv1157975499=33, srv1806731027=162, srv1923102804=184, srv311102455=244, srv450011410=271, srv771515724=348, srv389183508=262, srv1249074416=43, srv2014575201=201, srv640847108=318, srv832363565=356, srv1970882134=192, srv2107358603=218, srv855766065=361, srv1336043388=55, srv29397186=237, srv982792848=390, srv976560524=386, srv101181760=3, srv1093549482=21, srv2018389395=202, srv2113483104=221, srv1778339118=149, srv1968709692=190, srv705221118=333, srv159600090=105, srv1919608486=180, srv981255102=389, srv807899713=353, srv755110395=344, srv1770594519=145, srv739692705=340, srv1076582671=16, srv693869315=330, srv1079048717=17, srv440657532=270, srv1636659280=115, srv2108739257=220, srv668373413=326, srv1003610393=2, srv1054229197=11, srv1868589627=172, srv2103522371=217, srv1000546271=0, srv951670617=380, srv2042909593=205, srv1865656038=171, srv1466355012=78, srv703662406=332, srv1418112884=70, srv1215580291=40, srv71833528=335, srv1580581635=103, srv1021032212=5, srv1080806312=19, srv1985601859=197, srv74471954=343, srv1647472319=119, srv2071553346=208, srv1632855171=112, srv1122009370=27, srv13613992=61, srv1630777154=111, srv301413669=239, srv550697728=288, srv1296023857=53, srv1724550977=133, srv1989290370=198, srv1926417985=185, srv1678097199=125, srv1461034373=76, srv614690415=311, srv2098345381=215, srv310463473=243, srv1011934105=4, srv148627129=84, srv305489318=240, srv1256534903=46, srv1289731445=52, srv1798844587=157, srv567113085=294, srv1119222501=26, srv2055117940=207, srv855898852=362, srv629224816=316, srv1075943554=15, srv625909061=315, srv1705591942=128, srv734225580=339, srv660107924=324, srv1381729938=62, srv1633483173=113, srv408265476=267, srv1776057793=148, srv1360253411=60, srv1511424834=90, srv1414162621=68, srv883343663=370, srv151859222=91, srv349144930=251, srv1991304034=199, srv1825887791=164, srv601657063=305, srv758932951=345, srv1651629087=120, srv1864623584=170, srv682957691=329, srv1500454146=88, srv1725962085=135, srv1659841448=121, srv1253206004=45, srv52354442=284, srv18508093=168, srv1427731921=73, srv561344974=293, srv721668125=336, srv1575482138=100, srv914128771=373, srv961487230=383, srv741332941=342, srv533032466=286, srv1574140987=99, srv2139849097=224, srv503902262=278, srv674807007=327, srv1786829855=153, srv2088727517=213, srv394366966=264, srv980089565=388, srv114594288=31, srv38296437=261, srv214835574=226, srv1887224977=176, srv1025509362=7, srv1577020334=102, srv524466665=285, srv393561021=263, srv759909927=346, srv763556514=347, srv786453030=349, srv2142935488=225, srv618111613=312, srv16254163=108, srv343211061=250, srv476075173=273, srv1269632212=47, srv333589612=246, srv499015361=276, srv836674186=357, srv1799191687=158, srv1446998035=74, srv1571774199=98, srv1115354947=25, srv333860881=247, srv1724152600=132, srv1598699299=106, srv177885829=151, srv472125887=272, srv1101339966=22, srv1424985362=72, srv1945569895=188, srv594128294=300, srv1026739237=8, srv842459828=358, srv878519137=366, srv1921260729=181, srv339110834=249, srv504099471=279, srv814253179=354, srv1643744885=116, srv1793847521=155, srv607234624=309, srv698219051=331, srv1688538732=127, srv666240078=325, srv1079284733=18, srv29210550=236, srv506181748=280, srv881313122=368, srv1945452576=187, srv597307897=303, srv1285120424=51, srv1887943816=177, srv1983604698=196, srv1805465940=161, srv309309336=242, srv1719756294=131, srv1349932676=58, srv1208486369=38, srv1643971570=117, srv1509331489=89, srv334105385=248, srv1400515744=65, srv369984715=259, srv43712162=269, srv842675864=359, srv1803258748=160, srv1022450918=6, srv1775108732=147, srv1766088250=141, srv180150732=159, srv1220857227=41, srv226530501=229, srv362032108=255, srv919715380=377, srv1074935976=14, srv1395030819=63, srv803291569=352, srv1877966766=175, srv220538712=227, srv2021718843=203, srv2107782185=219, srv882216860=369, srv1489137852=86, srv1972328734=193, srv1470759982=79, srv1774824811=146, srv971974774=384, srv1418242791=71, srv1001274196=1, srv909615097=372, srv1537724566=93, srv1165799954=34, srv1724754364=134, srv978173525=387, srv113319438=29, srv578033735=295, srv147931272=80, srv1183635941=35, srv1904215245=178, srv596349756=302, srv880835255=367, srv857544550=364, srv1779729022=152, srv1795612465=156, srv621083045=314, srv917704170=375, srv1351811120=59, srv1316710897=54, srv789820555=350, srv1922580095=183, srv305567304=241, srv1936745425=186, srv1745318024=138, srv1210822057=39, srv645375717=320, srv950628389=379, srv1490199189=87, srv1575919256=101, srv154481102=96, srv359402967=254, srv997716931=391, srv1457224273=75, srv581644449=297, srv1872374768=174, srv363177310=257, srv740327512=341, srv1664227236=123, srv972330517=385, srv1634261306=114, srv1662183707=122, srv1969046891=191, srv1485266211=82, srv1778842262=150, srv588410181=298, srv1921840985=182, srv591279493=299, srv37574565=260, srv1104147458=23, srv1190166330=36, srv652270371=322, srv1484309042=81, srv1560148463=97, srv618569548=313, srv2102708311=216, srv1084873074=20, srv517669556=283, srv918152084=376, srv649714317=321, srv1674484790=124, srv1339239880=56, srv1461073271=77, srv1125312901=28, srv25633292=234, srv516616923=282, srv299721745=238, srv604932433=308, srv1273702855=48, srv792183929=351, srv1042608200=10, srv1276335106=49, srv1486044644=83, srv676101698=328, srv998930892=392, srv200111276=200, srv1863083643=169, srv1737443479=137, srv872997185=365, srv821351126=355, srv852115805=360, srv1074355423=13, srv170952194=130, srv503430005=277, srv153887567=94, srv1415163001=69, srv1032737435=9, srv1840670515=167, srv1961921083=189, srv59745831=304, srv36715747=258, srv431547280=268, srv1524853580=92, srv1870059418=173, srv396010771=265, srv594457792=301, srv1755339428=140, srv1766275429=142, srv5565786=291, srv603898526=306, srv544570223=287, srv856030669=363, srv1542523468=95, srv915785747=374, srv356122213=253, srv1411875499=67, srv2077620970=209, srv1345529444=57, srv232339963=230, srv1250861076=44, srv1914875423=179, srv478619481=274, srv1202435626=37, srv1706089454=129, srv1810631201=163, srv1282644061=50, srv1625945288=109, srv733251129=338, srv2082830831=212, srv1612103540=107, srv612136291=310, srv1790004142=154, srv183394703=165} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:27,741 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:27,741 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:27,741 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:27,741 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:27,741 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:27,741 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:27,741 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-11 14:16:27,741 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-11 14:16:27,741 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-11 14:16:27,741 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-11 14:16:27,741 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 10 is on host 10
2023-07-11 14:16:27,742 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 11 is on host 11
2023-07-11 14:16:27,742 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 12 is on host 12
2023-07-11 14:16:27,742 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 13 is on host 13
2023-07-11 14:16:27,742 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 14 is on host 14
2023-07-11 14:16:27,742 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 15 is on host 15
2023-07-11 14:16:27,742 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 16 is on host 16
2023-07-11 14:16:27,742 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 17 is on host 17
2023-07-11 14:16:27,742 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 18 is on host 18
2023-07-11 14:16:27,742 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 19 is on host 19
2023-07-11 14:16:27,742 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 20 is on host 20
2023-07-11 14:16:27,742 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 21 is on host 21
2023-07-11 14:16:27,742 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 22 is on host 22
2023-07-11 14:16:27,742 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 23 is on host 23
2023-07-11 14:16:27,742 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 24 is on host 24
2023-07-11 14:16:27,742 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 25 is on host 25
2023-07-11 14:16:27,742 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 26 is on host 26
2023-07-11 14:16:27,742 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 27 is on host 27
2023-07-11 14:16:27,742 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 28 is on host 28
2023-07-11 14:16:27,742 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 29 is on host 29
2023-07-11 14:16:27,742 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 30 is on host 30
2023-07-11 14:16:27,742 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 31 is on host 31
2023-07-11 14:16:27,742 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 32 is on host 32
2023-07-11 14:16:27,742 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 33 is on host 33
2023-07-11 14:16:27,742 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 34 is on host 34
2023-07-11 14:16:27,742 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 35 is on host 35
2023-07-11 14:16:27,742 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 36 is on host 36
2023-07-11 14:16:27,742 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 37 is on host 37
2023-07-11 14:16:27,742 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 38 is on host 38
2023-07-11 14:16:27,742 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 39 is on host 39
2023-07-11 14:16:27,743 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 40 is on host 40
2023-07-11 14:16:27,743 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 41 is on host 41
2023-07-11 14:16:27,743 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 42 is on host 42
2023-07-11 14:16:27,743 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 43 is on host 43
2023-07-11 14:16:27,743 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 44 is on host 44
2023-07-11 14:16:27,743 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 45 is on host 45
2023-07-11 14:16:27,743 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 46 is on host 46
2023-07-11 14:16:27,743 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 47 is on host 47
2023-07-11 14:16:27,743 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 48 is on host 48
2023-07-11 14:16:27,743 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 49 is on host 49
2023-07-11 14:16:27,743 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 50 is on host 50
2023-07-11 14:16:27,743 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 51 is on host 51
2023-07-11 14:16:27,743 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 52 is on host 52
2023-07-11 14:16:27,743 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 53 is on host 53
2023-07-11 14:16:27,743 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 54 is on host 54
2023-07-11 14:16:27,743 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 55 is on host 55
2023-07-11 14:16:27,743 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 56 is on host 56
2023-07-11 14:16:27,743 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 57 is on host 57
2023-07-11 14:16:27,743 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 58 is on host 58
2023-07-11 14:16:27,743 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 59 is on host 59
2023-07-11 14:16:27,743 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 60 is on host 60
2023-07-11 14:16:27,743 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 61 is on host 61
2023-07-11 14:16:27,743 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 62 is on host 62
2023-07-11 14:16:27,743 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 63 is on host 63
2023-07-11 14:16:27,743 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 64 is on host 64
2023-07-11 14:16:27,743 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 65 is on host 65
2023-07-11 14:16:27,743 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 66 is on host 66
2023-07-11 14:16:27,743 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 67 is on host 67
2023-07-11 14:16:27,743 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 68 is on host 68
2023-07-11 14:16:27,744 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 69 is on host 69
2023-07-11 14:16:27,744 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 70 is on host 70
2023-07-11 14:16:27,744 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 71 is on host 71
2023-07-11 14:16:27,744 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 72 is on host 72
2023-07-11 14:16:27,744 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 73 is on host 73
2023-07-11 14:16:27,744 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 74 is on host 74
2023-07-11 14:16:27,744 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 75 is on host 75
2023-07-11 14:16:27,744 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 76 is on host 76
2023-07-11 14:16:27,744 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 77 is on host 77
2023-07-11 14:16:27,744 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 78 is on host 78
2023-07-11 14:16:27,744 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 79 is on host 79
2023-07-11 14:16:27,744 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 80 is on host 80
2023-07-11 14:16:27,744 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 81 is on host 81
2023-07-11 14:16:27,744 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 82 is on host 82
2023-07-11 14:16:27,744 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 83 is on host 83
2023-07-11 14:16:27,744 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 84 is on host 84
2023-07-11 14:16:27,744 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 85 is on host 85
2023-07-11 14:16:27,744 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 86 is on host 86
2023-07-11 14:16:27,744 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 87 is on host 87
2023-07-11 14:16:27,744 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 88 is on host 88
2023-07-11 14:16:27,744 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 89 is on host 89
2023-07-11 14:16:27,744 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 90 is on host 90
2023-07-11 14:16:27,744 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 91 is on host 91
2023-07-11 14:16:27,744 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 92 is on host 92
2023-07-11 14:16:27,744 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 93 is on host 93
2023-07-11 14:16:27,744 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 94 is on host 94
2023-07-11 14:16:27,744 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 95 is on host 95
2023-07-11 14:16:27,744 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 96 is on host 96
2023-07-11 14:16:27,745 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 97 is on host 97
2023-07-11 14:16:27,745 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 98 is on host 98
2023-07-11 14:16:27,745 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 99 is on host 99
2023-07-11 14:16:27,745 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 100 is on host 100
2023-07-11 14:16:27,745 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 101 is on host 101
2023-07-11 14:16:27,745 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 102 is on host 102
2023-07-11 14:16:27,745 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 103 is on host 103
2023-07-11 14:16:27,745 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 104 is on host 104
2023-07-11 14:16:27,745 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 105 is on host 105
2023-07-11 14:16:27,745 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 106 is on host 106
2023-07-11 14:16:27,745 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 107 is on host 107
2023-07-11 14:16:27,745 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 108 is on host 108
2023-07-11 14:16:27,745 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 109 is on host 109
2023-07-11 14:16:27,745 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 110 is on host 110
2023-07-11 14:16:27,745 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 111 is on host 111
2023-07-11 14:16:27,745 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 112 is on host 112
2023-07-11 14:16:27,745 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 113 is on host 113
2023-07-11 14:16:27,745 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 114 is on host 114
2023-07-11 14:16:27,745 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 115 is on host 115
2023-07-11 14:16:27,745 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 116 is on host 116
2023-07-11 14:16:27,745 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 117 is on host 117
2023-07-11 14:16:27,746 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 118 is on host 118
2023-07-11 14:16:27,746 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 119 is on host 119
2023-07-11 14:16:27,746 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 120 is on host 120
2023-07-11 14:16:27,746 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 121 is on host 121
2023-07-11 14:16:27,746 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 122 is on host 122
2023-07-11 14:16:27,746 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 123 is on host 123
2023-07-11 14:16:27,746 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 124 is on host 124
2023-07-11 14:16:27,746 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 125 is on host 125
2023-07-11 14:16:27,746 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 126 is on host 126
2023-07-11 14:16:27,746 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 127 is on host 127
2023-07-11 14:16:27,746 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 128 is on host 128
2023-07-11 14:16:27,746 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 129 is on host 129
2023-07-11 14:16:27,746 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 130 is on host 130
2023-07-11 14:16:27,746 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 131 is on host 131
2023-07-11 14:16:27,746 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 132 is on host 132
2023-07-11 14:16:27,746 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 133 is on host 133
2023-07-11 14:16:27,746 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 134 is on host 134
2023-07-11 14:16:27,746 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 135 is on host 135
2023-07-11 14:16:27,746 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 136 is on host 136
2023-07-11 14:16:27,746 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 137 is on host 137
2023-07-11 14:16:27,746 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 138 is on host 138
2023-07-11 14:16:27,746 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 139 is on host 139
2023-07-11 14:16:27,746 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 140 is on host 140
2023-07-11 14:16:27,746 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 141 is on host 141
2023-07-11 14:16:27,746 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 142 is on host 142
2023-07-11 14:16:27,747 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 143 is on host 143
2023-07-11 14:16:27,747 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 144 is on host 144
2023-07-11 14:16:27,747 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 145 is on host 145
2023-07-11 14:16:27,747 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 146 is on host 146
2023-07-11 14:16:27,747 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 147 is on host 147
2023-07-11 14:16:27,747 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 148 is on host 148
2023-07-11 14:16:27,747 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 149 is on host 149
2023-07-11 14:16:27,747 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 150 is on host 150
2023-07-11 14:16:27,747 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 151 is on host 151
2023-07-11 14:16:27,747 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 152 is on host 152
2023-07-11 14:16:27,747 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 153 is on host 153
2023-07-11 14:16:27,747 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 154 is on host 154
2023-07-11 14:16:27,747 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 155 is on host 155
2023-07-11 14:16:27,747 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 156 is on host 156
2023-07-11 14:16:27,747 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 157 is on host 157
2023-07-11 14:16:27,747 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 158 is on host 158
2023-07-11 14:16:27,747 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 159 is on host 159
2023-07-11 14:16:27,747 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 160 is on host 160
2023-07-11 14:16:27,747 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 161 is on host 161
2023-07-11 14:16:27,747 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 162 is on host 162
2023-07-11 14:16:27,747 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 163 is on host 163
2023-07-11 14:16:27,747 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 164 is on host 164
2023-07-11 14:16:27,747 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 165 is on host 165
2023-07-11 14:16:27,747 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 166 is on host 166
2023-07-11 14:16:27,747 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 167 is on host 167
2023-07-11 14:16:27,747 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 168 is on host 168
2023-07-11 14:16:27,747 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 169 is on host 169
2023-07-11 14:16:27,747 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 170 is on host 170
2023-07-11 14:16:27,747 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 171 is on host 171
2023-07-11 14:16:27,748 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 172 is on host 172
2023-07-11 14:16:27,748 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 173 is on host 173
2023-07-11 14:16:27,748 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 174 is on host 174
2023-07-11 14:16:27,748 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 175 is on host 175
2023-07-11 14:16:27,748 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 176 is on host 176
2023-07-11 14:16:27,748 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 177 is on host 177
2023-07-11 14:16:27,748 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 178 is on host 178
2023-07-11 14:16:27,748 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 179 is on host 179
2023-07-11 14:16:27,748 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 180 is on host 180
2023-07-11 14:16:27,748 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 181 is on host 181
2023-07-11 14:16:27,748 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 182 is on host 182
2023-07-11 14:16:27,748 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 183 is on host 183
2023-07-11 14:16:27,748 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 184 is on host 184
2023-07-11 14:16:27,748 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 185 is on host 185
2023-07-11 14:16:27,748 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 186 is on host 186
2023-07-11 14:16:27,748 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 187 is on host 187
2023-07-11 14:16:27,748 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 188 is on host 188
2023-07-11 14:16:27,748 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 189 is on host 189
2023-07-11 14:16:27,748 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 190 is on host 190
2023-07-11 14:16:27,748 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 191 is on host 191
2023-07-11 14:16:27,748 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 192 is on host 192
2023-07-11 14:16:27,748 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 193 is on host 193
2023-07-11 14:16:27,748 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 194 is on host 194
2023-07-11 14:16:27,748 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 195 is on host 195
2023-07-11 14:16:27,748 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 196 is on host 196
2023-07-11 14:16:27,748 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 197 is on host 197
2023-07-11 14:16:27,748 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 198 is on host 198
2023-07-11 14:16:27,748 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 199 is on host 199
2023-07-11 14:16:27,749 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 200 is on host 200
2023-07-11 14:16:27,749 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 201 is on host 201
2023-07-11 14:16:27,749 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 202 is on host 202
2023-07-11 14:16:27,749 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 203 is on host 203
2023-07-11 14:16:27,749 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 204 is on host 204
2023-07-11 14:16:27,749 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 205 is on host 205
2023-07-11 14:16:27,749 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 206 is on host 206
2023-07-11 14:16:27,749 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 207 is on host 207
2023-07-11 14:16:27,749 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 208 is on host 208
2023-07-11 14:16:27,749 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 209 is on host 209
2023-07-11 14:16:27,749 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 210 is on host 210
2023-07-11 14:16:27,749 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 211 is on host 211
2023-07-11 14:16:27,749 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 212 is on host 212
2023-07-11 14:16:27,749 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 213 is on host 213
2023-07-11 14:16:27,749 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 214 is on host 214
2023-07-11 14:16:27,749 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 215 is on host 215
2023-07-11 14:16:27,749 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 216 is on host 216
2023-07-11 14:16:27,749 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 217 is on host 217
2023-07-11 14:16:27,749 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 218 is on host 218
2023-07-11 14:16:27,749 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 219 is on host 219
2023-07-11 14:16:27,749 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 220 is on host 220
2023-07-11 14:16:27,749 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 221 is on host 221
2023-07-11 14:16:27,749 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 222 is on host 222
2023-07-11 14:16:27,749 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 223 is on host 223
2023-07-11 14:16:27,749 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 224 is on host 224
2023-07-11 14:16:27,749 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 225 is on host 225
2023-07-11 14:16:27,749 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 226 is on host 226
2023-07-11 14:16:27,749 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 227 is on host 227
2023-07-11 14:16:27,750 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 228 is on host 228
2023-07-11 14:16:27,750 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 229 is on host 229
2023-07-11 14:16:27,750 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 230 is on host 230
2023-07-11 14:16:27,750 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 231 is on host 231
2023-07-11 14:16:27,750 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 232 is on host 232
2023-07-11 14:16:27,750 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 233 is on host 233
2023-07-11 14:16:27,750 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 234 is on host 234
2023-07-11 14:16:27,750 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 235 is on host 235
2023-07-11 14:16:27,750 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 236 is on host 236
2023-07-11 14:16:27,750 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 237 is on host 237
2023-07-11 14:16:27,750 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 238 is on host 238
2023-07-11 14:16:27,750 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 239 is on host 239
2023-07-11 14:16:27,750 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 240 is on host 240
2023-07-11 14:16:27,750 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 241 is on host 241
2023-07-11 14:16:27,750 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 242 is on host 242
2023-07-11 14:16:27,750 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 243 is on host 243
2023-07-11 14:16:27,750 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 244 is on host 244
2023-07-11 14:16:27,750 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 245 is on host 245
2023-07-11 14:16:27,750 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 246 is on host 246
2023-07-11 14:16:27,750 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 247 is on host 247
2023-07-11 14:16:27,750 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 248 is on host 248
2023-07-11 14:16:27,750 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 249 is on host 249
2023-07-11 14:16:27,750 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 250 is on host 250
2023-07-11 14:16:27,750 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 251 is on host 251
2023-07-11 14:16:27,750 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 252 is on host 252
2023-07-11 14:16:27,750 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 253 is on host 253
2023-07-11 14:16:27,750 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 254 is on host 254
2023-07-11 14:16:27,750 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 255 is on host 255
2023-07-11 14:16:27,750 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 256 is on host 256
2023-07-11 14:16:27,751 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 257 is on host 257
2023-07-11 14:16:27,751 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 258 is on host 258
2023-07-11 14:16:27,751 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 259 is on host 259
2023-07-11 14:16:27,751 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 260 is on host 260
2023-07-11 14:16:27,751 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 261 is on host 261
2023-07-11 14:16:27,751 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 262 is on host 262
2023-07-11 14:16:27,751 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 263 is on host 263
2023-07-11 14:16:27,751 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 264 is on host 264
2023-07-11 14:16:27,751 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 265 is on host 265
2023-07-11 14:16:27,751 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 266 is on host 266
2023-07-11 14:16:27,751 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 267 is on host 267
2023-07-11 14:16:27,751 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 268 is on host 268
2023-07-11 14:16:27,751 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 269 is on host 269
2023-07-11 14:16:27,751 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 270 is on host 270
2023-07-11 14:16:27,751 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 271 is on host 271
2023-07-11 14:16:27,751 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 272 is on host 272
2023-07-11 14:16:27,751 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 273 is on host 273
2023-07-11 14:16:27,751 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 274 is on host 274
2023-07-11 14:16:27,751 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 275 is on host 275
2023-07-11 14:16:27,751 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 276 is on host 276
2023-07-11 14:16:27,751 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 277 is on host 277
2023-07-11 14:16:27,751 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 278 is on host 278
2023-07-11 14:16:27,751 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 279 is on host 279
2023-07-11 14:16:27,751 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 280 is on host 280
2023-07-11 14:16:27,751 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 281 is on host 281
2023-07-11 14:16:27,751 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 282 is on host 282
2023-07-11 14:16:27,751 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 283 is on host 283
2023-07-11 14:16:27,751 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 284 is on host 284
2023-07-11 14:16:27,751 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 285 is on host 285
2023-07-11 14:16:27,752 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 286 is on host 286
2023-07-11 14:16:27,752 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 287 is on host 287
2023-07-11 14:16:27,752 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 288 is on host 288
2023-07-11 14:16:27,752 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 289 is on host 289
2023-07-11 14:16:27,752 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 290 is on host 290
2023-07-11 14:16:27,752 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 291 is on host 291
2023-07-11 14:16:27,752 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 292 is on host 292
2023-07-11 14:16:27,752 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 293 is on host 293
2023-07-11 14:16:27,752 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 294 is on host 294
2023-07-11 14:16:27,752 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 295 is on host 295
2023-07-11 14:16:27,752 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 296 is on host 296
2023-07-11 14:16:27,752 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 297 is on host 297
2023-07-11 14:16:27,752 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 298 is on host 298
2023-07-11 14:16:27,752 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 299 is on host 299
2023-07-11 14:16:27,752 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 300 is on host 300
2023-07-11 14:16:27,752 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 301 is on host 301
2023-07-11 14:16:27,752 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 302 is on host 302
2023-07-11 14:16:27,752 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 303 is on host 303
2023-07-11 14:16:27,752 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 304 is on host 304
2023-07-11 14:16:27,752 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 305 is on host 305
2023-07-11 14:16:27,752 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 306 is on host 306
2023-07-11 14:16:27,752 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 307 is on host 307
2023-07-11 14:16:27,752 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 308 is on host 308
2023-07-11 14:16:27,752 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 309 is on host 309
2023-07-11 14:16:27,752 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 310 is on host 310
2023-07-11 14:16:27,752 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 311 is on host 311
2023-07-11 14:16:27,752 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 312 is on host 312
2023-07-11 14:16:27,752 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 313 is on host 313
2023-07-11 14:16:27,752 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 314 is on host 314
2023-07-11 14:16:27,753 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 315 is on host 315
2023-07-11 14:16:27,753 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 316 is on host 316
2023-07-11 14:16:27,753 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 317 is on host 317
2023-07-11 14:16:27,753 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 318 is on host 318
2023-07-11 14:16:27,753 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 319 is on host 319
2023-07-11 14:16:27,753 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 320 is on host 320
2023-07-11 14:16:27,753 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 321 is on host 321
2023-07-11 14:16:27,753 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 322 is on host 322
2023-07-11 14:16:27,753 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 323 is on host 323
2023-07-11 14:16:27,753 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 324 is on host 324
2023-07-11 14:16:27,753 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 325 is on host 325
2023-07-11 14:16:27,753 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 326 is on host 326
2023-07-11 14:16:27,753 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 327 is on host 327
2023-07-11 14:16:27,753 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 328 is on host 328
2023-07-11 14:16:27,753 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 329 is on host 329
2023-07-11 14:16:27,753 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 330 is on host 330
2023-07-11 14:16:27,753 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 331 is on host 331
2023-07-11 14:16:27,753 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 332 is on host 332
2023-07-11 14:16:27,753 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 333 is on host 333
2023-07-11 14:16:27,753 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 334 is on host 334
2023-07-11 14:16:27,753 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 335 is on host 335
2023-07-11 14:16:27,753 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 336 is on host 336
2023-07-11 14:16:27,753 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 337 is on host 337
2023-07-11 14:16:27,753 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 338 is on host 338
2023-07-11 14:16:27,753 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 339 is on host 339
2023-07-11 14:16:27,753 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 340 is on host 340
2023-07-11 14:16:27,753 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 341 is on host 341
2023-07-11 14:16:27,753 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 342 is on host 342
2023-07-11 14:16:27,753 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 343 is on host 343
2023-07-11 14:16:27,754 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 344 is on host 344
2023-07-11 14:16:27,754 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 345 is on host 345
2023-07-11 14:16:27,754 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 346 is on host 346
2023-07-11 14:16:27,754 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 347 is on host 347
2023-07-11 14:16:27,754 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 348 is on host 348
2023-07-11 14:16:27,754 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 349 is on host 349
2023-07-11 14:16:27,754 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 350 is on host 350
2023-07-11 14:16:27,754 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 351 is on host 351
2023-07-11 14:16:27,754 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 352 is on host 352
2023-07-11 14:16:27,754 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 353 is on host 353
2023-07-11 14:16:27,754 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 354 is on host 354
2023-07-11 14:16:27,754 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 355 is on host 355
2023-07-11 14:16:27,754 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 356 is on host 356
2023-07-11 14:16:27,754 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 357 is on host 357
2023-07-11 14:16:27,754 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 358 is on host 358
2023-07-11 14:16:27,754 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 359 is on host 359
2023-07-11 14:16:27,754 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 360 is on host 360
2023-07-11 14:16:27,754 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 361 is on host 361
2023-07-11 14:16:27,754 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 362 is on host 362
2023-07-11 14:16:27,754 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 363 is on host 363
2023-07-11 14:16:27,754 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 364 is on host 364
2023-07-11 14:16:27,754 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 365 is on host 365
2023-07-11 14:16:27,754 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 366 is on host 366
2023-07-11 14:16:27,754 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 367 is on host 367
2023-07-11 14:16:27,754 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 368 is on host 368
2023-07-11 14:16:27,754 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 369 is on host 369
2023-07-11 14:16:27,754 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 370 is on host 370
2023-07-11 14:16:27,754 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 371 is on host 371
2023-07-11 14:16:27,754 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 372 is on host 372
2023-07-11 14:16:27,755 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 373 is on host 373
2023-07-11 14:16:27,755 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 374 is on host 374
2023-07-11 14:16:27,755 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 375 is on host 375
2023-07-11 14:16:27,755 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 376 is on host 376
2023-07-11 14:16:27,755 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 377 is on host 377
2023-07-11 14:16:27,755 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 378 is on host 378
2023-07-11 14:16:27,755 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 379 is on host 379
2023-07-11 14:16:27,755 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 380 is on host 380
2023-07-11 14:16:27,755 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 381 is on host 381
2023-07-11 14:16:27,755 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 382 is on host 382
2023-07-11 14:16:27,755 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 383 is on host 383
2023-07-11 14:16:27,755 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 384 is on host 384
2023-07-11 14:16:27,755 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 385 is on host 385
2023-07-11 14:16:27,755 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 386 is on host 386
2023-07-11 14:16:27,755 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 387 is on host 387
2023-07-11 14:16:27,755 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 388 is on host 388
2023-07-11 14:16:27,755 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 389 is on host 389
2023-07-11 14:16:27,755 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 390 is on host 390
2023-07-11 14:16:27,755 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 391 is on host 391
2023-07-11 14:16:27,755 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 392 is on host 392
2023-07-11 14:16:27,755 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=393, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:27,756 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table43) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:27,756 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table44
2023-07-11 14:16:27,756 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv553536953=290, srv1630071126=110, srv1071894870=12, srv23511728=232, srv658346947=323, srv2025338799=204, srv1397994335=64, srv1976766403=195, srv1644629726=118, srv957637734=381, srv2079182457=210, srv1749264468=139, srv2046129126=206, srv1595762596=104, srv603990852=307, srv1973073480=194, srv958856137=382, srv644066832=319, srv557062842=292, srv277765671=235, srv732221418=337, srv1769385567=143, srv224612199=228, srv714752528=334, srv362526040=256, srv581128949=296, srv2133511466=223, srv1144239257=30, srv320603627=245, srv1679952521=126, srv2122867873=222, srv1110067064=24, srv256251994=233, srv63261708=317, srv89837390=371, srv552104598=289, srv508952995=281, srv2096011353=214, srv1770417148=144, srv1246723478=42, srv929436444=378, srv2082192429=211, srv234917297=231, srv405700573=266, srv183644386=166, srv1488378513=85, srv173139715=136, srv1154180352=32, srv355693379=252, srv1407521654=66, srv496848057=275, srv1157975499=33, srv1806731027=162, srv1923102804=184, srv311102455=244, srv450011410=271, srv771515724=348, srv389183508=262, srv1249074416=43, srv2014575201=201, srv640847108=318, srv832363565=356, srv1970882134=192, srv2107358603=218, srv855766065=361, srv1336043388=55, srv29397186=237, srv982792848=390, srv976560524=386, srv101181760=3, srv1093549482=21, srv2018389395=202, srv2113483104=221, srv1778339118=149, srv1968709692=190, srv705221118=333, srv159600090=105, srv1919608486=180, srv981255102=389, srv807899713=353, srv755110395=344, srv1770594519=145, srv739692705=340, srv1076582671=16, srv693869315=330, srv1079048717=17, srv440657532=270, srv1636659280=115, srv2108739257=220, srv668373413=326, srv1003610393=2, srv1054229197=11, srv1868589627=172, srv2103522371=217, srv1000546271=0, srv951670617=380, srv2042909593=205, srv1865656038=171, srv1466355012=78, srv703662406=332, srv1418112884=70, srv1215580291=40, srv71833528=335, srv1580581635=103, srv1021032212=5, srv1080806312=19, srv1985601859=197, srv74471954=343, srv1647472319=119, srv2071553346=208, srv1632855171=112, srv1122009370=27, srv13613992=61, srv1630777154=111, srv301413669=239, srv550697728=288, srv1296023857=53, srv1724550977=133, srv1989290370=198, srv1926417985=185, srv1678097199=125, srv1461034373=76, srv614690415=311, srv2098345381=215, srv310463473=243, srv1011934105=4, srv148627129=84, srv305489318=240, srv1256534903=46, srv1289731445=52, srv1798844587=157, srv567113085=294, srv1119222501=26, srv2055117940=207, srv855898852=362, srv629224816=316, srv1075943554=15, srv625909061=315, srv1705591942=128, srv734225580=339, srv660107924=324, srv1381729938=62, srv1633483173=113, srv408265476=267, srv1776057793=148, srv1360253411=60, srv1511424834=90, srv1414162621=68, srv883343663=370, srv151859222=91, srv349144930=251, srv1991304034=199, srv1825887791=164, srv601657063=305, srv758932951=345, srv1651629087=120, srv1864623584=170, srv682957691=329, srv1500454146=88, srv1725962085=135, srv1659841448=121, srv1253206004=45, srv52354442=284, srv18508093=168, srv1427731921=73, srv561344974=293, srv721668125=336, srv1575482138=100, srv914128771=373, srv961487230=383, srv741332941=342, srv533032466=286, srv1574140987=99, srv2139849097=224, srv503902262=278, srv674807007=327, srv1786829855=153, srv2088727517=213, srv394366966=264, srv980089565=388, srv114594288=31, srv38296437=261, srv214835574=226, srv1887224977=176, srv1025509362=7, srv1577020334=102, srv524466665=285, srv393561021=263, srv759909927=346, srv763556514=347, srv786453030=349, srv2142935488=225, srv618111613=312, srv16254163=108, srv343211061=250, srv476075173=273, srv1269632212=47, srv333589612=246, srv499015361=276, srv836674186=357, srv1799191687=158, srv1446998035=74, srv1571774199=98, srv1115354947=25, srv333860881=247, srv1724152600=132, srv1598699299=106, srv177885829=151, srv472125887=272, srv1101339966=22, srv1424985362=72, srv1945569895=188, srv594128294=300, srv1026739237=8, srv842459828=358, srv878519137=366, srv1921260729=181, srv339110834=249, srv504099471=279, srv814253179=354, srv1643744885=116, srv1793847521=155, srv607234624=309, srv698219051=331, srv1688538732=127, srv666240078=325, srv1079284733=18, srv29210550=236, srv506181748=280, srv881313122=368, srv1945452576=187, srv597307897=303, srv1285120424=51, srv1887943816=177, srv1983604698=196, srv1805465940=161, srv309309336=242, srv1719756294=131, srv1349932676=58, srv1208486369=38, srv1643971570=117, srv1509331489=89, srv334105385=248, srv1400515744=65, srv369984715=259, srv43712162=269, srv842675864=359, srv1803258748=160, srv1022450918=6, srv1775108732=147, srv1766088250=141, srv180150732=159, srv1220857227=41, srv226530501=229, srv362032108=255, srv919715380=377, srv1074935976=14, srv1395030819=63, srv803291569=352, srv1877966766=175, srv220538712=227, srv2021718843=203, srv2107782185=219, srv882216860=369, srv1489137852=86, srv1972328734=193, srv1470759982=79, srv1774824811=146, srv971974774=384, srv1418242791=71, srv1001274196=1, srv909615097=372, srv1537724566=93, srv1165799954=34, srv1724754364=134, srv978173525=387, srv113319438=29, srv578033735=295, srv147931272=80, srv1183635941=35, srv1904215245=178, srv596349756=302, srv880835255=367, srv857544550=364, srv1779729022=152, srv1795612465=156, srv621083045=314, srv917704170=375, srv1351811120=59, srv1316710897=54, srv789820555=350, srv1922580095=183, srv305567304=241, srv1936745425=186, srv1745318024=138, srv1210822057=39, srv645375717=320, srv950628389=379, srv1490199189=87, srv1575919256=101, srv154481102=96, srv359402967=254, srv997716931=391, srv1457224273=75, srv581644449=297, srv1872374768=174, srv363177310=257, srv740327512=341, srv1664227236=123, srv972330517=385, srv1634261306=114, srv1662183707=122, srv1969046891=191, srv1485266211=82, srv1778842262=150, srv588410181=298, srv1921840985=182, srv591279493=299, srv37574565=260, srv1104147458=23, srv1190166330=36, srv652270371=322, srv1484309042=81, srv1560148463=97, srv618569548=313, srv2102708311=216, srv1084873074=20, srv517669556=283, srv918152084=376, srv649714317=321, srv1674484790=124, srv1339239880=56, srv1461073271=77, srv1125312901=28, srv25633292=234, srv516616923=282, srv299721745=238, srv604932433=308, srv1273702855=48, srv792183929=351, srv1042608200=10, srv1276335106=49, srv1486044644=83, srv676101698=328, srv998930892=392, srv200111276=200, srv1863083643=169, srv1737443479=137, srv872997185=365, srv821351126=355, srv852115805=360, srv1074355423=13, srv170952194=130, srv503430005=277, srv153887567=94, srv1415163001=69, srv1032737435=9, srv1840670515=167, srv1961921083=189, srv59745831=304, srv36715747=258, srv431547280=268, srv1524853580=92, srv1870059418=173, srv396010771=265, srv594457792=301, srv1755339428=140, srv1766275429=142, srv5565786=291, srv603898526=306, srv544570223=287, srv856030669=363, srv1542523468=95, srv915785747=374, srv356122213=253, srv1411875499=67, srv2077620970=209, srv1345529444=57, srv232339963=230, srv1250861076=44, srv1914875423=179, srv478619481=274, srv1202435626=37, srv1706089454=129, srv1810631201=163, srv1282644061=50, srv1625945288=109, srv733251129=338, srv2082830831=212, srv1612103540=107, srv612136291=310, srv1790004142=154, srv183394703=165} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:27,756 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:27,756 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:27,756 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:27,756 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:27,756 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:27,756 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:27,756 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-11 14:16:27,757 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-11 14:16:27,757 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-11 14:16:27,757 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-11 14:16:27,757 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 10 is on host 10
2023-07-11 14:16:27,757 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 11 is on host 11
2023-07-11 14:16:27,757 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 12 is on host 12
2023-07-11 14:16:27,757 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 13 is on host 13
2023-07-11 14:16:27,757 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 14 is on host 14
2023-07-11 14:16:27,757 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 15 is on host 15
2023-07-11 14:16:27,757 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 16 is on host 16
2023-07-11 14:16:27,757 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 17 is on host 17
2023-07-11 14:16:27,757 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 18 is on host 18
2023-07-11 14:16:27,757 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 19 is on host 19
2023-07-11 14:16:27,757 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 20 is on host 20
2023-07-11 14:16:27,757 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 21 is on host 21
2023-07-11 14:16:27,757 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 22 is on host 22
2023-07-11 14:16:27,757 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 23 is on host 23
2023-07-11 14:16:27,757 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 24 is on host 24
2023-07-11 14:16:27,758 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 25 is on host 25
2023-07-11 14:16:27,758 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 26 is on host 26
2023-07-11 14:16:27,758 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 27 is on host 27
2023-07-11 14:16:27,758 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 28 is on host 28
2023-07-11 14:16:27,758 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 29 is on host 29
2023-07-11 14:16:27,758 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 30 is on host 30
2023-07-11 14:16:27,758 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 31 is on host 31
2023-07-11 14:16:27,758 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 32 is on host 32
2023-07-11 14:16:27,758 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 33 is on host 33
2023-07-11 14:16:27,758 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 34 is on host 34
2023-07-11 14:16:27,758 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 35 is on host 35
2023-07-11 14:16:27,758 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 36 is on host 36
2023-07-11 14:16:27,758 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 37 is on host 37
2023-07-11 14:16:27,758 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 38 is on host 38
2023-07-11 14:16:27,758 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 39 is on host 39
2023-07-11 14:16:27,758 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 40 is on host 40
2023-07-11 14:16:27,758 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 41 is on host 41
2023-07-11 14:16:27,766 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 42 is on host 42
2023-07-11 14:16:27,766 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 43 is on host 43
2023-07-11 14:16:27,766 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 44 is on host 44
2023-07-11 14:16:27,767 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 45 is on host 45
2023-07-11 14:16:27,767 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 46 is on host 46
2023-07-11 14:16:27,767 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 47 is on host 47
2023-07-11 14:16:27,767 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 48 is on host 48
2023-07-11 14:16:27,767 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 49 is on host 49
2023-07-11 14:16:27,767 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 50 is on host 50
2023-07-11 14:16:27,767 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 51 is on host 51
2023-07-11 14:16:27,767 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 52 is on host 52
2023-07-11 14:16:27,767 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 53 is on host 53
2023-07-11 14:16:27,767 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 54 is on host 54
2023-07-11 14:16:27,767 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 55 is on host 55
2023-07-11 14:16:27,767 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 56 is on host 56
2023-07-11 14:16:27,767 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 57 is on host 57
2023-07-11 14:16:27,767 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 58 is on host 58
2023-07-11 14:16:27,767 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 59 is on host 59
2023-07-11 14:16:27,767 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 60 is on host 60
2023-07-11 14:16:27,767 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 61 is on host 61
2023-07-11 14:16:27,767 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 62 is on host 62
2023-07-11 14:16:27,767 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 63 is on host 63
2023-07-11 14:16:27,767 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 64 is on host 64
2023-07-11 14:16:27,767 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 65 is on host 65
2023-07-11 14:16:27,767 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 66 is on host 66
2023-07-11 14:16:27,767 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 67 is on host 67
2023-07-11 14:16:27,767 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 68 is on host 68
2023-07-11 14:16:27,767 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 69 is on host 69
2023-07-11 14:16:27,767 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 70 is on host 70
2023-07-11 14:16:27,768 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 71 is on host 71
2023-07-11 14:16:27,768 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 72 is on host 72
2023-07-11 14:16:27,768 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 73 is on host 73
2023-07-11 14:16:27,768 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 74 is on host 74
2023-07-11 14:16:27,768 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 75 is on host 75
2023-07-11 14:16:27,768 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 76 is on host 76
2023-07-11 14:16:27,768 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 77 is on host 77
2023-07-11 14:16:27,768 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 78 is on host 78
2023-07-11 14:16:27,768 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 79 is on host 79
2023-07-11 14:16:27,768 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 80 is on host 80
2023-07-11 14:16:27,768 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 81 is on host 81
2023-07-11 14:16:27,768 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 82 is on host 82
2023-07-11 14:16:27,768 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 83 is on host 83
2023-07-11 14:16:27,768 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 84 is on host 84
2023-07-11 14:16:27,768 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 85 is on host 85
2023-07-11 14:16:27,768 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 86 is on host 86
2023-07-11 14:16:27,768 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 87 is on host 87
2023-07-11 14:16:27,768 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 88 is on host 88
2023-07-11 14:16:27,768 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 89 is on host 89
2023-07-11 14:16:27,768 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 90 is on host 90
2023-07-11 14:16:27,768 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 91 is on host 91
2023-07-11 14:16:27,768 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 92 is on host 92
2023-07-11 14:16:27,769 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 93 is on host 93
2023-07-11 14:16:27,769 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 94 is on host 94
2023-07-11 14:16:27,769 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 95 is on host 95
2023-07-11 14:16:27,769 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 96 is on host 96
2023-07-11 14:16:27,769 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 97 is on host 97
2023-07-11 14:16:27,769 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 98 is on host 98
2023-07-11 14:16:27,769 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 99 is on host 99
2023-07-11 14:16:27,769 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 100 is on host 100
2023-07-11 14:16:27,769 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 101 is on host 101
2023-07-11 14:16:27,769 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 102 is on host 102
2023-07-11 14:16:27,769 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 103 is on host 103
2023-07-11 14:16:27,769 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 104 is on host 104
2023-07-11 14:16:27,769 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 105 is on host 105
2023-07-11 14:16:27,769 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 106 is on host 106
2023-07-11 14:16:27,769 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 107 is on host 107
2023-07-11 14:16:27,769 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 108 is on host 108
2023-07-11 14:16:27,769 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 109 is on host 109
2023-07-11 14:16:27,769 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 110 is on host 110
2023-07-11 14:16:27,769 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 111 is on host 111
2023-07-11 14:16:27,769 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 112 is on host 112
2023-07-11 14:16:27,769 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 113 is on host 113
2023-07-11 14:16:27,769 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 114 is on host 114
2023-07-11 14:16:27,769 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 115 is on host 115
2023-07-11 14:16:27,769 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 116 is on host 116
2023-07-11 14:16:27,769 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 117 is on host 117
2023-07-11 14:16:27,769 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 118 is on host 118
2023-07-11 14:16:27,769 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 119 is on host 119
2023-07-11 14:16:27,770 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 120 is on host 120
2023-07-11 14:16:27,770 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 121 is on host 121
2023-07-11 14:16:27,770 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 122 is on host 122
2023-07-11 14:16:27,770 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 123 is on host 123
2023-07-11 14:16:27,770 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 124 is on host 124
2023-07-11 14:16:27,770 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 125 is on host 125
2023-07-11 14:16:27,770 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 126 is on host 126
2023-07-11 14:16:27,770 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 127 is on host 127
2023-07-11 14:16:27,770 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 128 is on host 128
2023-07-11 14:16:27,770 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 129 is on host 129
2023-07-11 14:16:27,770 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 130 is on host 130
2023-07-11 14:16:27,770 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 131 is on host 131
2023-07-11 14:16:27,770 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 132 is on host 132
2023-07-11 14:16:27,770 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 133 is on host 133
2023-07-11 14:16:27,770 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 134 is on host 134
2023-07-11 14:16:27,770 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 135 is on host 135
2023-07-11 14:16:27,770 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 136 is on host 136
2023-07-11 14:16:27,770 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 137 is on host 137
2023-07-11 14:16:27,770 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 138 is on host 138
2023-07-11 14:16:27,770 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 139 is on host 139
2023-07-11 14:16:27,770 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 140 is on host 140
2023-07-11 14:16:27,770 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 141 is on host 141
2023-07-11 14:16:27,770 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 142 is on host 142
2023-07-11 14:16:27,770 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 143 is on host 143
2023-07-11 14:16:27,770 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 144 is on host 144
2023-07-11 14:16:27,770 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 145 is on host 145
2023-07-11 14:16:27,770 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 146 is on host 146
2023-07-11 14:16:27,770 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 147 is on host 147
2023-07-11 14:16:27,770 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 148 is on host 148
2023-07-11 14:16:27,771 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 149 is on host 149
2023-07-11 14:16:27,771 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 150 is on host 150
2023-07-11 14:16:27,771 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 151 is on host 151
2023-07-11 14:16:27,771 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 152 is on host 152
2023-07-11 14:16:27,771 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 153 is on host 153
2023-07-11 14:16:27,771 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 154 is on host 154
2023-07-11 14:16:27,771 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 155 is on host 155
2023-07-11 14:16:27,771 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 156 is on host 156
2023-07-11 14:16:27,771 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 157 is on host 157
2023-07-11 14:16:27,771 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 158 is on host 158
2023-07-11 14:16:27,771 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 159 is on host 159
2023-07-11 14:16:27,771 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 160 is on host 160
2023-07-11 14:16:27,771 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 161 is on host 161
2023-07-11 14:16:27,771 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 162 is on host 162
2023-07-11 14:16:27,771 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 163 is on host 163
2023-07-11 14:16:27,771 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 164 is on host 164
2023-07-11 14:16:27,771 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 165 is on host 165
2023-07-11 14:16:27,771 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 166 is on host 166
2023-07-11 14:16:27,771 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 167 is on host 167
2023-07-11 14:16:27,771 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 168 is on host 168
2023-07-11 14:16:27,771 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 169 is on host 169
2023-07-11 14:16:27,771 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 170 is on host 170
2023-07-11 14:16:27,771 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 171 is on host 171
2023-07-11 14:16:27,771 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 172 is on host 172
2023-07-11 14:16:27,771 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 173 is on host 173
2023-07-11 14:16:27,771 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 174 is on host 174
2023-07-11 14:16:27,771 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 175 is on host 175
2023-07-11 14:16:27,771 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 176 is on host 176
2023-07-11 14:16:27,771 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 177 is on host 177
2023-07-11 14:16:27,772 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 178 is on host 178
2023-07-11 14:16:27,772 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 179 is on host 179
2023-07-11 14:16:27,772 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 180 is on host 180
2023-07-11 14:16:27,772 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 181 is on host 181
2023-07-11 14:16:27,772 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 182 is on host 182
2023-07-11 14:16:27,772 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 183 is on host 183
2023-07-11 14:16:27,772 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 184 is on host 184
2023-07-11 14:16:27,772 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 185 is on host 185
2023-07-11 14:16:27,772 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 186 is on host 186
2023-07-11 14:16:27,772 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 187 is on host 187
2023-07-11 14:16:27,772 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 188 is on host 188
2023-07-11 14:16:27,772 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 189 is on host 189
2023-07-11 14:16:27,772 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 190 is on host 190
2023-07-11 14:16:27,772 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 191 is on host 191
2023-07-11 14:16:27,772 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 192 is on host 192
2023-07-11 14:16:27,772 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 193 is on host 193
2023-07-11 14:16:27,772 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 194 is on host 194
2023-07-11 14:16:27,772 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 195 is on host 195
2023-07-11 14:16:27,772 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 196 is on host 196
2023-07-11 14:16:27,772 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 197 is on host 197
2023-07-11 14:16:27,772 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 198 is on host 198
2023-07-11 14:16:27,772 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 199 is on host 199
2023-07-11 14:16:27,772 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 200 is on host 200
2023-07-11 14:16:27,772 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 201 is on host 201
2023-07-11 14:16:27,772 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 202 is on host 202
2023-07-11 14:16:27,772 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 203 is on host 203
2023-07-11 14:16:27,772 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 204 is on host 204
2023-07-11 14:16:27,772 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 205 is on host 205
2023-07-11 14:16:27,772 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 206 is on host 206
2023-07-11 14:16:27,773 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 207 is on host 207
2023-07-11 14:16:27,773 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 208 is on host 208
2023-07-11 14:16:27,773 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 209 is on host 209
2023-07-11 14:16:27,773 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 210 is on host 210
2023-07-11 14:16:27,773 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 211 is on host 211
2023-07-11 14:16:27,773 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 212 is on host 212
2023-07-11 14:16:27,773 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 213 is on host 213
2023-07-11 14:16:27,773 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 214 is on host 214
2023-07-11 14:16:27,773 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 215 is on host 215
2023-07-11 14:16:27,773 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 216 is on host 216
2023-07-11 14:16:27,773 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 217 is on host 217
2023-07-11 14:16:27,773 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 218 is on host 218
2023-07-11 14:16:27,773 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 219 is on host 219
2023-07-11 14:16:27,773 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 220 is on host 220
2023-07-11 14:16:27,773 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 221 is on host 221
2023-07-11 14:16:27,773 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 222 is on host 222
2023-07-11 14:16:27,773 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 223 is on host 223
2023-07-11 14:16:27,773 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 224 is on host 224
2023-07-11 14:16:27,773 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 225 is on host 225
2023-07-11 14:16:27,773 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 226 is on host 226
2023-07-11 14:16:27,773 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 227 is on host 227
2023-07-11 14:16:27,773 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 228 is on host 228
2023-07-11 14:16:27,773 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 229 is on host 229
2023-07-11 14:16:27,773 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 230 is on host 230
2023-07-11 14:16:27,773 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 231 is on host 231
2023-07-11 14:16:27,773 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 232 is on host 232
2023-07-11 14:16:27,773 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 233 is on host 233
2023-07-11 14:16:27,773 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 234 is on host 234
2023-07-11 14:16:27,773 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 235 is on host 235
2023-07-11 14:16:27,774 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 236 is on host 236
2023-07-11 14:16:27,774 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 237 is on host 237
2023-07-11 14:16:27,774 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 238 is on host 238
2023-07-11 14:16:27,774 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 239 is on host 239
2023-07-11 14:16:27,774 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 240 is on host 240
2023-07-11 14:16:27,774 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 241 is on host 241
2023-07-11 14:16:27,774 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 242 is on host 242
2023-07-11 14:16:27,774 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 243 is on host 243
2023-07-11 14:16:27,774 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 244 is on host 244
2023-07-11 14:16:27,774 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 245 is on host 245
2023-07-11 14:16:27,774 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 246 is on host 246
2023-07-11 14:16:27,774 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 247 is on host 247
2023-07-11 14:16:27,774 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 248 is on host 248
2023-07-11 14:16:27,774 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 249 is on host 249
2023-07-11 14:16:27,774 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 250 is on host 250
2023-07-11 14:16:27,774 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 251 is on host 251
2023-07-11 14:16:27,774 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 252 is on host 252
2023-07-11 14:16:27,774 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 253 is on host 253
2023-07-11 14:16:27,774 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 254 is on host 254
2023-07-11 14:16:27,774 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 255 is on host 255
2023-07-11 14:16:27,774 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 256 is on host 256
2023-07-11 14:16:27,774 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 257 is on host 257
2023-07-11 14:16:27,774 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 258 is on host 258
2023-07-11 14:16:27,774 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 259 is on host 259
2023-07-11 14:16:27,774 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 260 is on host 260
2023-07-11 14:16:27,774 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 261 is on host 261
2023-07-11 14:16:27,774 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 262 is on host 262
2023-07-11 14:16:27,774 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 263 is on host 263
2023-07-11 14:16:27,774 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 264 is on host 264
2023-07-11 14:16:27,775 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 265 is on host 265
2023-07-11 14:16:27,775 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 266 is on host 266
2023-07-11 14:16:27,775 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 267 is on host 267
2023-07-11 14:16:27,775 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 268 is on host 268
2023-07-11 14:16:27,775 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 269 is on host 269
2023-07-11 14:16:27,775 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 270 is on host 270
2023-07-11 14:16:27,775 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 271 is on host 271
2023-07-11 14:16:27,775 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 272 is on host 272
2023-07-11 14:16:27,775 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 273 is on host 273
2023-07-11 14:16:27,775 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 274 is on host 274
2023-07-11 14:16:27,775 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 275 is on host 275
2023-07-11 14:16:27,775 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 276 is on host 276
2023-07-11 14:16:27,775 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 277 is on host 277
2023-07-11 14:16:27,775 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 278 is on host 278
2023-07-11 14:16:27,775 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 279 is on host 279
2023-07-11 14:16:27,775 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 280 is on host 280
2023-07-11 14:16:27,775 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 281 is on host 281
2023-07-11 14:16:27,775 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 282 is on host 282
2023-07-11 14:16:27,775 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 283 is on host 283
2023-07-11 14:16:27,775 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 284 is on host 284
2023-07-11 14:16:27,775 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 285 is on host 285
2023-07-11 14:16:27,775 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 286 is on host 286
2023-07-11 14:16:27,775 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 287 is on host 287
2023-07-11 14:16:27,775 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 288 is on host 288
2023-07-11 14:16:27,775 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 289 is on host 289
2023-07-11 14:16:27,775 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 290 is on host 290
2023-07-11 14:16:27,775 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 291 is on host 291
2023-07-11 14:16:27,775 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 292 is on host 292
2023-07-11 14:16:27,775 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 293 is on host 293
2023-07-11 14:16:27,776 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 294 is on host 294
2023-07-11 14:16:27,776 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 295 is on host 295
2023-07-11 14:16:27,776 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 296 is on host 296
2023-07-11 14:16:27,776 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 297 is on host 297
2023-07-11 14:16:27,776 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 298 is on host 298
2023-07-11 14:16:27,776 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 299 is on host 299
2023-07-11 14:16:27,776 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 300 is on host 300
2023-07-11 14:16:27,776 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 301 is on host 301
2023-07-11 14:16:27,776 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 302 is on host 302
2023-07-11 14:16:27,776 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 303 is on host 303
2023-07-11 14:16:27,776 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 304 is on host 304
2023-07-11 14:16:27,776 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 305 is on host 305
2023-07-11 14:16:27,776 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 306 is on host 306
2023-07-11 14:16:27,776 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 307 is on host 307
2023-07-11 14:16:27,776 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 308 is on host 308
2023-07-11 14:16:27,776 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 309 is on host 309
2023-07-11 14:16:27,776 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 310 is on host 310
2023-07-11 14:16:27,776 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 311 is on host 311
2023-07-11 14:16:27,776 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 312 is on host 312
2023-07-11 14:16:27,776 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 313 is on host 313
2023-07-11 14:16:27,776 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 314 is on host 314
2023-07-11 14:16:27,776 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 315 is on host 315
2023-07-11 14:16:27,776 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 316 is on host 316
2023-07-11 14:16:27,776 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 317 is on host 317
2023-07-11 14:16:27,776 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 318 is on host 318
2023-07-11 14:16:27,776 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 319 is on host 319
2023-07-11 14:16:27,776 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 320 is on host 320
2023-07-11 14:16:27,776 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 321 is on host 321
2023-07-11 14:16:27,776 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 322 is on host 322
2023-07-11 14:16:27,777 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 323 is on host 323
2023-07-11 14:16:27,777 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 324 is on host 324
2023-07-11 14:16:27,777 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 325 is on host 325
2023-07-11 14:16:27,777 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 326 is on host 326
2023-07-11 14:16:27,777 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 327 is on host 327
2023-07-11 14:16:27,777 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 328 is on host 328
2023-07-11 14:16:27,777 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 329 is on host 329
2023-07-11 14:16:27,777 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 330 is on host 330
2023-07-11 14:16:27,777 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 331 is on host 331
2023-07-11 14:16:27,777 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 332 is on host 332
2023-07-11 14:16:27,777 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 333 is on host 333
2023-07-11 14:16:27,777 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 334 is on host 334
2023-07-11 14:16:27,777 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 335 is on host 335
2023-07-11 14:16:27,777 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 336 is on host 336
2023-07-11 14:16:27,777 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 337 is on host 337
2023-07-11 14:16:27,777 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 338 is on host 338
2023-07-11 14:16:27,777 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 339 is on host 339
2023-07-11 14:16:27,777 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 340 is on host 340
2023-07-11 14:16:27,777 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 341 is on host 341
2023-07-11 14:16:27,777 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 342 is on host 342
2023-07-11 14:16:27,777 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 343 is on host 343
2023-07-11 14:16:27,777 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 344 is on host 344
2023-07-11 14:16:27,777 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 345 is on host 345
2023-07-11 14:16:27,777 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 346 is on host 346
2023-07-11 14:16:27,777 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 347 is on host 347
2023-07-11 14:16:27,777 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 348 is on host 348
2023-07-11 14:16:27,777 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 349 is on host 349
2023-07-11 14:16:27,777 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 350 is on host 350
2023-07-11 14:16:27,777 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 351 is on host 351
2023-07-11 14:16:27,778 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 352 is on host 352
2023-07-11 14:16:27,778 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 353 is on host 353
2023-07-11 14:16:27,778 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 354 is on host 354
2023-07-11 14:16:27,778 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 355 is on host 355
2023-07-11 14:16:27,778 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 356 is on host 356
2023-07-11 14:16:27,778 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 357 is on host 357
2023-07-11 14:16:27,778 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 358 is on host 358
2023-07-11 14:16:27,778 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 359 is on host 359
2023-07-11 14:16:27,778 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 360 is on host 360
2023-07-11 14:16:27,778 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 361 is on host 361
2023-07-11 14:16:27,778 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 362 is on host 362
2023-07-11 14:16:27,778 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 363 is on host 363
2023-07-11 14:16:27,778 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 364 is on host 364
2023-07-11 14:16:27,778 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 365 is on host 365
2023-07-11 14:16:27,778 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 366 is on host 366
2023-07-11 14:16:27,778 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 367 is on host 367
2023-07-11 14:16:27,779 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 368 is on host 368
2023-07-11 14:16:27,779 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 369 is on host 369
2023-07-11 14:16:27,779 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 370 is on host 370
2023-07-11 14:16:27,779 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 371 is on host 371
2023-07-11 14:16:27,779 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 372 is on host 372
2023-07-11 14:16:27,779 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 373 is on host 373
2023-07-11 14:16:27,779 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 374 is on host 374
2023-07-11 14:16:27,779 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 375 is on host 375
2023-07-11 14:16:27,779 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 376 is on host 376
2023-07-11 14:16:27,779 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 377 is on host 377
2023-07-11 14:16:27,779 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 378 is on host 378
2023-07-11 14:16:27,779 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 379 is on host 379
2023-07-11 14:16:27,779 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 380 is on host 380
2023-07-11 14:16:27,779 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 381 is on host 381
2023-07-11 14:16:27,779 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 382 is on host 382
2023-07-11 14:16:27,779 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 383 is on host 383
2023-07-11 14:16:27,779 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 384 is on host 384
2023-07-11 14:16:27,779 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 385 is on host 385
2023-07-11 14:16:27,779 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 386 is on host 386
2023-07-11 14:16:27,779 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 387 is on host 387
2023-07-11 14:16:27,779 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 388 is on host 388
2023-07-11 14:16:27,779 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 389 is on host 389
2023-07-11 14:16:27,779 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 390 is on host 390
2023-07-11 14:16:27,779 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 391 is on host 391
2023-07-11 14:16:27,779 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 392 is on host 392
2023-07-11 14:16:27,779 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=393, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:27,780 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table44) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:27,780 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table45
2023-07-11 14:16:27,780 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv553536953=290, srv1630071126=110, srv1071894870=12, srv23511728=232, srv658346947=323, srv2025338799=204, srv1397994335=64, srv1976766403=195, srv1644629726=118, srv957637734=381, srv2079182457=210, srv1749264468=139, srv2046129126=206, srv1595762596=104, srv603990852=307, srv1973073480=194, srv958856137=382, srv644066832=319, srv557062842=292, srv277765671=235, srv732221418=337, srv1769385567=143, srv224612199=228, srv714752528=334, srv362526040=256, srv581128949=296, srv2133511466=223, srv1144239257=30, srv320603627=245, srv1679952521=126, srv2122867873=222, srv1110067064=24, srv256251994=233, srv63261708=317, srv89837390=371, srv552104598=289, srv508952995=281, srv2096011353=214, srv1770417148=144, srv1246723478=42, srv929436444=378, srv2082192429=211, srv234917297=231, srv405700573=266, srv183644386=166, srv1488378513=85, srv173139715=136, srv1154180352=32, srv355693379=252, srv1407521654=66, srv496848057=275, srv1157975499=33, srv1806731027=162, srv1923102804=184, srv311102455=244, srv450011410=271, srv771515724=348, srv389183508=262, srv1249074416=43, srv2014575201=201, srv640847108=318, srv832363565=356, srv1970882134=192, srv2107358603=218, srv855766065=361, srv1336043388=55, srv29397186=237, srv982792848=390, srv976560524=386, srv101181760=3, srv1093549482=21, srv2018389395=202, srv2113483104=221, srv1778339118=149, srv1968709692=190, srv705221118=333, srv159600090=105, srv1919608486=180, srv981255102=389, srv807899713=353, srv755110395=344, srv1770594519=145, srv739692705=340, srv1076582671=16, srv693869315=330, srv1079048717=17, srv440657532=270, srv1636659280=115, srv2108739257=220, srv668373413=326, srv1003610393=2, srv1054229197=11, srv1868589627=172, srv2103522371=217, srv1000546271=0, srv951670617=380, srv2042909593=205, srv1865656038=171, srv1466355012=78, srv703662406=332, srv1418112884=70, srv1215580291=40, srv71833528=335, srv1580581635=103, srv1021032212=5, srv1080806312=19, srv1985601859=197, srv74471954=343, srv1647472319=119, srv2071553346=208, srv1632855171=112, srv1122009370=27, srv13613992=61, srv1630777154=111, srv301413669=239, srv550697728=288, srv1296023857=53, srv1724550977=133, srv1989290370=198, srv1926417985=185, srv1678097199=125, srv1461034373=76, srv614690415=311, srv2098345381=215, srv310463473=243, srv1011934105=4, srv148627129=84, srv305489318=240, srv1256534903=46, srv1289731445=52, srv1798844587=157, srv567113085=294, srv1119222501=26, srv2055117940=207, srv855898852=362, srv629224816=316, srv1075943554=15, srv625909061=315, srv1705591942=128, srv734225580=339, srv660107924=324, srv1381729938=62, srv1633483173=113, srv408265476=267, srv1776057793=148, srv1360253411=60, srv1511424834=90, srv1414162621=68, srv883343663=370, srv151859222=91, srv349144930=251, srv1991304034=199, srv1825887791=164, srv601657063=305, srv758932951=345, srv1651629087=120, srv1864623584=170, srv682957691=329, srv1500454146=88, srv1725962085=135, srv1659841448=121, srv1253206004=45, srv52354442=284, srv18508093=168, srv1427731921=73, srv561344974=293, srv721668125=336, srv1575482138=100, srv914128771=373, srv961487230=383, srv741332941=342, srv533032466=286, srv1574140987=99, srv2139849097=224, srv503902262=278, srv674807007=327, srv1786829855=153, srv2088727517=213, srv394366966=264, srv980089565=388, srv114594288=31, srv38296437=261, srv214835574=226, srv1887224977=176, srv1025509362=7, srv1577020334=102, srv524466665=285, srv393561021=263, srv759909927=346, srv763556514=347, srv786453030=349, srv2142935488=225, srv618111613=312, srv16254163=108, srv343211061=250, srv476075173=273, srv1269632212=47, srv333589612=246, srv499015361=276, srv836674186=357, srv1799191687=158, srv1446998035=74, srv1571774199=98, srv1115354947=25, srv333860881=247, srv1724152600=132, srv1598699299=106, srv177885829=151, srv472125887=272, srv1101339966=22, srv1424985362=72, srv1945569895=188, srv594128294=300, srv1026739237=8, srv842459828=358, srv878519137=366, srv1921260729=181, srv339110834=249, srv504099471=279, srv814253179=354, srv1643744885=116, srv1793847521=155, srv607234624=309, srv698219051=331, srv1688538732=127, srv666240078=325, srv1079284733=18, srv29210550=236, srv506181748=280, srv881313122=368, srv1945452576=187, srv597307897=303, srv1285120424=51, srv1887943816=177, srv1983604698=196, srv1805465940=161, srv309309336=242, srv1719756294=131, srv1349932676=58, srv1208486369=38, srv1643971570=117, srv1509331489=89, srv334105385=248, srv1400515744=65, srv369984715=259, srv43712162=269, srv842675864=359, srv1803258748=160, srv1022450918=6, srv1775108732=147, srv1766088250=141, srv180150732=159, srv1220857227=41, srv226530501=229, srv362032108=255, srv919715380=377, srv1074935976=14, srv1395030819=63, srv803291569=352, srv1877966766=175, srv220538712=227, srv2021718843=203, srv2107782185=219, srv882216860=369, srv1489137852=86, srv1972328734=193, srv1470759982=79, srv1774824811=146, srv971974774=384, srv1418242791=71, srv1001274196=1, srv909615097=372, srv1537724566=93, srv1165799954=34, srv1724754364=134, srv978173525=387, srv113319438=29, srv578033735=295, srv147931272=80, srv1183635941=35, srv1904215245=178, srv596349756=302, srv880835255=367, srv857544550=364, srv1779729022=152, srv1795612465=156, srv621083045=314, srv917704170=375, srv1351811120=59, srv1316710897=54, srv789820555=350, srv1922580095=183, srv305567304=241, srv1936745425=186, srv1745318024=138, srv1210822057=39, srv645375717=320, srv950628389=379, srv1490199189=87, srv1575919256=101, srv154481102=96, srv359402967=254, srv997716931=391, srv1457224273=75, srv581644449=297, srv1872374768=174, srv363177310=257, srv740327512=341, srv1664227236=123, srv972330517=385, srv1634261306=114, srv1662183707=122, srv1969046891=191, srv1485266211=82, srv1778842262=150, srv588410181=298, srv1921840985=182, srv591279493=299, srv37574565=260, srv1104147458=23, srv1190166330=36, srv652270371=322, srv1484309042=81, srv1560148463=97, srv618569548=313, srv2102708311=216, srv1084873074=20, srv517669556=283, srv918152084=376, srv649714317=321, srv1674484790=124, srv1339239880=56, srv1461073271=77, srv1125312901=28, srv25633292=234, srv516616923=282, srv299721745=238, srv604932433=308, srv1273702855=48, srv792183929=351, srv1042608200=10, srv1276335106=49, srv1486044644=83, srv676101698=328, srv998930892=392, srv200111276=200, srv1863083643=169, srv1737443479=137, srv872997185=365, srv821351126=355, srv852115805=360, srv1074355423=13, srv170952194=130, srv503430005=277, srv153887567=94, srv1415163001=69, srv1032737435=9, srv1840670515=167, srv1961921083=189, srv59745831=304, srv36715747=258, srv431547280=268, srv1524853580=92, srv1870059418=173, srv396010771=265, srv594457792=301, srv1755339428=140, srv1766275429=142, srv5565786=291, srv603898526=306, srv544570223=287, srv856030669=363, srv1542523468=95, srv915785747=374, srv356122213=253, srv1411875499=67, srv2077620970=209, srv1345529444=57, srv232339963=230, srv1250861076=44, srv1914875423=179, srv478619481=274, srv1202435626=37, srv1706089454=129, srv1810631201=163, srv1282644061=50, srv1625945288=109, srv733251129=338, srv2082830831=212, srv1612103540=107, srv612136291=310, srv1790004142=154, srv183394703=165} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:27,780 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:27,780 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:27,780 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:27,780 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:27,780 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:27,781 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:27,781 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-11 14:16:27,781 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-11 14:16:27,781 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-11 14:16:27,781 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-11 14:16:27,781 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 10 is on host 10
2023-07-11 14:16:27,781 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 11 is on host 11
2023-07-11 14:16:27,781 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 12 is on host 12
2023-07-11 14:16:27,781 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 13 is on host 13
2023-07-11 14:16:27,781 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 14 is on host 14
2023-07-11 14:16:27,781 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 15 is on host 15
2023-07-11 14:16:27,781 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 16 is on host 16
2023-07-11 14:16:27,781 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 17 is on host 17
2023-07-11 14:16:27,781 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 18 is on host 18
2023-07-11 14:16:27,781 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 19 is on host 19
2023-07-11 14:16:27,781 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 20 is on host 20
2023-07-11 14:16:27,781 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 21 is on host 21
2023-07-11 14:16:27,781 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 22 is on host 22
2023-07-11 14:16:27,781 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 23 is on host 23
2023-07-11 14:16:27,781 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 24 is on host 24
2023-07-11 14:16:27,781 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 25 is on host 25
2023-07-11 14:16:27,781 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 26 is on host 26
2023-07-11 14:16:27,781 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 27 is on host 27
2023-07-11 14:16:27,781 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 28 is on host 28
2023-07-11 14:16:27,781 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 29 is on host 29
2023-07-11 14:16:27,781 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 30 is on host 30
2023-07-11 14:16:27,781 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 31 is on host 31
2023-07-11 14:16:27,781 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 32 is on host 32
2023-07-11 14:16:27,781 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 33 is on host 33
2023-07-11 14:16:27,782 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 34 is on host 34
2023-07-11 14:16:27,782 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 35 is on host 35
2023-07-11 14:16:27,782 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 36 is on host 36
2023-07-11 14:16:27,782 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 37 is on host 37
2023-07-11 14:16:27,782 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 38 is on host 38
2023-07-11 14:16:27,782 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 39 is on host 39
2023-07-11 14:16:27,782 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 40 is on host 40
2023-07-11 14:16:27,782 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 41 is on host 41
2023-07-11 14:16:27,782 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 42 is on host 42
2023-07-11 14:16:27,782 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 43 is on host 43
2023-07-11 14:16:27,782 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 44 is on host 44
2023-07-11 14:16:27,782 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 45 is on host 45
2023-07-11 14:16:27,782 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 46 is on host 46
2023-07-11 14:16:27,782 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 47 is on host 47
2023-07-11 14:16:27,782 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 48 is on host 48
2023-07-11 14:16:27,782 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 49 is on host 49
2023-07-11 14:16:27,782 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 50 is on host 50
2023-07-11 14:16:27,782 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 51 is on host 51
2023-07-11 14:16:27,782 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 52 is on host 52
2023-07-11 14:16:27,782 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 53 is on host 53
2023-07-11 14:16:27,782 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 54 is on host 54
2023-07-11 14:16:27,782 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 55 is on host 55
2023-07-11 14:16:27,782 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 56 is on host 56
2023-07-11 14:16:27,782 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 57 is on host 57
2023-07-11 14:16:27,782 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 58 is on host 58
2023-07-11 14:16:27,782 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 59 is on host 59
2023-07-11 14:16:27,782 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 60 is on host 60
2023-07-11 14:16:27,782 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 61 is on host 61
2023-07-11 14:16:27,782 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 62 is on host 62
2023-07-11 14:16:27,783 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 63 is on host 63
2023-07-11 14:16:27,783 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 64 is on host 64
2023-07-11 14:16:27,783 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 65 is on host 65
2023-07-11 14:16:27,783 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 66 is on host 66
2023-07-11 14:16:27,783 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 67 is on host 67
2023-07-11 14:16:27,783 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 68 is on host 68
2023-07-11 14:16:27,783 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 69 is on host 69
2023-07-11 14:16:27,783 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 70 is on host 70
2023-07-11 14:16:27,783 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 71 is on host 71
2023-07-11 14:16:27,783 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 72 is on host 72
2023-07-11 14:16:27,783 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 73 is on host 73
2023-07-11 14:16:27,783 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 74 is on host 74
2023-07-11 14:16:27,783 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 75 is on host 75
2023-07-11 14:16:27,783 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 76 is on host 76
2023-07-11 14:16:27,783 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 77 is on host 77
2023-07-11 14:16:27,783 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 78 is on host 78
2023-07-11 14:16:27,783 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 79 is on host 79
2023-07-11 14:16:27,783 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 80 is on host 80
2023-07-11 14:16:27,783 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 81 is on host 81
2023-07-11 14:16:27,783 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 82 is on host 82
2023-07-11 14:16:27,783 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 83 is on host 83
2023-07-11 14:16:27,783 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 84 is on host 84
2023-07-11 14:16:27,783 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 85 is on host 85
2023-07-11 14:16:27,783 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 86 is on host 86
2023-07-11 14:16:27,783 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 87 is on host 87
2023-07-11 14:16:27,783 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 88 is on host 88
2023-07-11 14:16:27,783 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 89 is on host 89
2023-07-11 14:16:27,783 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 90 is on host 90
2023-07-11 14:16:27,783 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 91 is on host 91
2023-07-11 14:16:27,784 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 92 is on host 92
2023-07-11 14:16:27,784 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 93 is on host 93
2023-07-11 14:16:27,784 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 94 is on host 94
2023-07-11 14:16:27,784 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 95 is on host 95
2023-07-11 14:16:27,784 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 96 is on host 96
2023-07-11 14:16:27,784 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 97 is on host 97
2023-07-11 14:16:27,784 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 98 is on host 98
2023-07-11 14:16:27,784 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 99 is on host 99
2023-07-11 14:16:27,784 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 100 is on host 100
2023-07-11 14:16:27,784 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 101 is on host 101
2023-07-11 14:16:27,784 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 102 is on host 102
2023-07-11 14:16:27,784 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 103 is on host 103
2023-07-11 14:16:27,784 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 104 is on host 104
2023-07-11 14:16:27,784 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 105 is on host 105
2023-07-11 14:16:27,784 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 106 is on host 106
2023-07-11 14:16:27,784 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 107 is on host 107
2023-07-11 14:16:27,784 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 108 is on host 108
2023-07-11 14:16:27,784 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 109 is on host 109
2023-07-11 14:16:27,784 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 110 is on host 110
2023-07-11 14:16:27,784 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 111 is on host 111
2023-07-11 14:16:27,784 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 112 is on host 112
2023-07-11 14:16:27,784 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 113 is on host 113
2023-07-11 14:16:27,784 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 114 is on host 114
2023-07-11 14:16:27,784 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 115 is on host 115
2023-07-11 14:16:27,784 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 116 is on host 116
2023-07-11 14:16:27,784 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 117 is on host 117
2023-07-11 14:16:27,784 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 118 is on host 118
2023-07-11 14:16:27,784 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 119 is on host 119
2023-07-11 14:16:27,784 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 120 is on host 120
2023-07-11 14:16:27,785 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 121 is on host 121
2023-07-11 14:16:27,785 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 122 is on host 122
2023-07-11 14:16:27,785 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 123 is on host 123
2023-07-11 14:16:27,785 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 124 is on host 124
2023-07-11 14:16:27,785 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 125 is on host 125
2023-07-11 14:16:27,785 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 126 is on host 126
2023-07-11 14:16:27,785 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 127 is on host 127
2023-07-11 14:16:27,785 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 128 is on host 128
2023-07-11 14:16:27,785 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 129 is on host 129
2023-07-11 14:16:27,785 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 130 is on host 130
2023-07-11 14:16:27,785 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 131 is on host 131
2023-07-11 14:16:27,785 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 132 is on host 132
2023-07-11 14:16:27,785 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 133 is on host 133
2023-07-11 14:16:27,785 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 134 is on host 134
2023-07-11 14:16:27,785 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 135 is on host 135
2023-07-11 14:16:27,785 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 136 is on host 136
2023-07-11 14:16:27,785 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 137 is on host 137
2023-07-11 14:16:27,785 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 138 is on host 138
2023-07-11 14:16:27,785 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 139 is on host 139
2023-07-11 14:16:27,785 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 140 is on host 140
2023-07-11 14:16:27,785 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 141 is on host 141
2023-07-11 14:16:27,785 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 142 is on host 142
2023-07-11 14:16:27,785 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 143 is on host 143
2023-07-11 14:16:27,785 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 144 is on host 144
2023-07-11 14:16:27,785 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 145 is on host 145
2023-07-11 14:16:27,785 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 146 is on host 146
2023-07-11 14:16:27,785 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 147 is on host 147
2023-07-11 14:16:27,785 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 148 is on host 148
2023-07-11 14:16:27,785 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 149 is on host 149
2023-07-11 14:16:27,786 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 150 is on host 150
2023-07-11 14:16:27,786 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 151 is on host 151
2023-07-11 14:16:27,786 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 152 is on host 152
2023-07-11 14:16:27,786 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 153 is on host 153
2023-07-11 14:16:27,786 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 154 is on host 154
2023-07-11 14:16:27,786 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 155 is on host 155
2023-07-11 14:16:27,786 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 156 is on host 156
2023-07-11 14:16:27,786 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 157 is on host 157
2023-07-11 14:16:27,786 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 158 is on host 158
2023-07-11 14:16:27,786 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 159 is on host 159
2023-07-11 14:16:27,786 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 160 is on host 160
2023-07-11 14:16:27,786 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 161 is on host 161
2023-07-11 14:16:27,786 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 162 is on host 162
2023-07-11 14:16:27,786 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 163 is on host 163
2023-07-11 14:16:27,786 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 164 is on host 164
2023-07-11 14:16:27,786 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 165 is on host 165
2023-07-11 14:16:27,786 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 166 is on host 166
2023-07-11 14:16:27,786 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 167 is on host 167
2023-07-11 14:16:27,786 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 168 is on host 168
2023-07-11 14:16:27,786 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 169 is on host 169
2023-07-11 14:16:27,786 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 170 is on host 170
2023-07-11 14:16:27,786 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 171 is on host 171
2023-07-11 14:16:27,786 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 172 is on host 172
2023-07-11 14:16:27,786 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 173 is on host 173
2023-07-11 14:16:27,786 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 174 is on host 174
2023-07-11 14:16:27,786 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 175 is on host 175
2023-07-11 14:16:27,786 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 176 is on host 176
2023-07-11 14:16:27,786 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 177 is on host 177
2023-07-11 14:16:27,786 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 178 is on host 178
2023-07-11 14:16:27,787 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 179 is on host 179
2023-07-11 14:16:27,787 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 180 is on host 180
2023-07-11 14:16:27,787 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 181 is on host 181
2023-07-11 14:16:27,787 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 182 is on host 182
2023-07-11 14:16:27,787 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 183 is on host 183
2023-07-11 14:16:27,787 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 184 is on host 184
2023-07-11 14:16:27,787 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 185 is on host 185
2023-07-11 14:16:27,787 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 186 is on host 186
2023-07-11 14:16:27,787 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 187 is on host 187
2023-07-11 14:16:27,787 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 188 is on host 188
2023-07-11 14:16:27,787 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 189 is on host 189
2023-07-11 14:16:27,787 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 190 is on host 190
2023-07-11 14:16:27,787 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 191 is on host 191
2023-07-11 14:16:27,787 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 192 is on host 192
2023-07-11 14:16:27,787 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 193 is on host 193
2023-07-11 14:16:27,787 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 194 is on host 194
2023-07-11 14:16:27,787 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 195 is on host 195
2023-07-11 14:16:27,787 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 196 is on host 196
2023-07-11 14:16:27,787 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 197 is on host 197
2023-07-11 14:16:27,787 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 198 is on host 198
2023-07-11 14:16:27,787 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 199 is on host 199
2023-07-11 14:16:27,787 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 200 is on host 200
2023-07-11 14:16:27,787 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 201 is on host 201
2023-07-11 14:16:27,787 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 202 is on host 202
2023-07-11 14:16:27,787 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 203 is on host 203
2023-07-11 14:16:27,787 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 204 is on host 204
2023-07-11 14:16:27,787 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 205 is on host 205
2023-07-11 14:16:27,787 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 206 is on host 206
2023-07-11 14:16:27,787 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 207 is on host 207
2023-07-11 14:16:27,787 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 208 is on host 208
2023-07-11 14:16:27,788 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 209 is on host 209
2023-07-11 14:16:27,788 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 210 is on host 210
2023-07-11 14:16:27,788 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 211 is on host 211
2023-07-11 14:16:27,788 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 212 is on host 212
2023-07-11 14:16:27,788 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 213 is on host 213
2023-07-11 14:16:27,788 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 214 is on host 214
2023-07-11 14:16:27,788 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 215 is on host 215
2023-07-11 14:16:27,788 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 216 is on host 216
2023-07-11 14:16:27,788 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 217 is on host 217
2023-07-11 14:16:27,788 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 218 is on host 218
2023-07-11 14:16:27,788 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 219 is on host 219
2023-07-11 14:16:27,788 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 220 is on host 220
2023-07-11 14:16:27,788 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 221 is on host 221
2023-07-11 14:16:27,788 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 222 is on host 222
2023-07-11 14:16:27,788 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 223 is on host 223
2023-07-11 14:16:27,788 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 224 is on host 224
2023-07-11 14:16:27,788 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 225 is on host 225
2023-07-11 14:16:27,788 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 226 is on host 226
2023-07-11 14:16:27,788 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 227 is on host 227
2023-07-11 14:16:27,788 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 228 is on host 228
2023-07-11 14:16:27,788 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 229 is on host 229
2023-07-11 14:16:27,788 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 230 is on host 230
2023-07-11 14:16:27,788 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 231 is on host 231
2023-07-11 14:16:27,788 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 232 is on host 232
2023-07-11 14:16:27,788 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 233 is on host 233
2023-07-11 14:16:27,788 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 234 is on host 234
2023-07-11 14:16:27,788 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 235 is on host 235
2023-07-11 14:16:27,788 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 236 is on host 236
2023-07-11 14:16:27,789 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 237 is on host 237
2023-07-11 14:16:27,789 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 238 is on host 238
2023-07-11 14:16:27,789 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 239 is on host 239
2023-07-11 14:16:27,789 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 240 is on host 240
2023-07-11 14:16:27,789 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 241 is on host 241
2023-07-11 14:16:27,789 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 242 is on host 242
2023-07-11 14:16:27,789 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 243 is on host 243
2023-07-11 14:16:27,789 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 244 is on host 244
2023-07-11 14:16:27,789 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 245 is on host 245
2023-07-11 14:16:27,789 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 246 is on host 246
2023-07-11 14:16:27,789 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 247 is on host 247
2023-07-11 14:16:27,789 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 248 is on host 248
2023-07-11 14:16:27,789 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 249 is on host 249
2023-07-11 14:16:27,789 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 250 is on host 250
2023-07-11 14:16:27,789 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 251 is on host 251
2023-07-11 14:16:27,789 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 252 is on host 252
2023-07-11 14:16:27,789 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 253 is on host 253
2023-07-11 14:16:27,789 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 254 is on host 254
2023-07-11 14:16:27,789 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 255 is on host 255
2023-07-11 14:16:27,789 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 256 is on host 256
2023-07-11 14:16:27,789 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 257 is on host 257
2023-07-11 14:16:27,789 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 258 is on host 258
2023-07-11 14:16:27,789 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 259 is on host 259
2023-07-11 14:16:27,789 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 260 is on host 260
2023-07-11 14:16:27,790 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 261 is on host 261
2023-07-11 14:16:27,790 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 262 is on host 262
2023-07-11 14:16:27,790 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 263 is on host 263
2023-07-11 14:16:27,790 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 264 is on host 264
2023-07-11 14:16:27,790 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 265 is on host 265
2023-07-11 14:16:27,790 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 266 is on host 266
2023-07-11 14:16:27,790 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 267 is on host 267
2023-07-11 14:16:27,790 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 268 is on host 268
2023-07-11 14:16:27,790 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 269 is on host 269
2023-07-11 14:16:27,790 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 270 is on host 270
2023-07-11 14:16:27,790 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 271 is on host 271
2023-07-11 14:16:27,790 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 272 is on host 272
2023-07-11 14:16:27,790 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 273 is on host 273
2023-07-11 14:16:27,790 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 274 is on host 274
2023-07-11 14:16:27,790 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 275 is on host 275
2023-07-11 14:16:27,790 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 276 is on host 276
2023-07-11 14:16:27,790 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 277 is on host 277
2023-07-11 14:16:27,790 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 278 is on host 278
2023-07-11 14:16:27,790 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 279 is on host 279
2023-07-11 14:16:27,790 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 280 is on host 280
2023-07-11 14:16:27,790 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 281 is on host 281
2023-07-11 14:16:27,790 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 282 is on host 282
2023-07-11 14:16:27,791 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 283 is on host 283
2023-07-11 14:16:27,791 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 284 is on host 284
2023-07-11 14:16:27,791 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 285 is on host 285
2023-07-11 14:16:27,791 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 286 is on host 286
2023-07-11 14:16:27,791 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 287 is on host 287
2023-07-11 14:16:27,791 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 288 is on host 288
2023-07-11 14:16:27,791 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 289 is on host 289
2023-07-11 14:16:27,791 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 290 is on host 290
2023-07-11 14:16:27,791 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 291 is on host 291
2023-07-11 14:16:27,791 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 292 is on host 292
2023-07-11 14:16:27,791 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 293 is on host 293
2023-07-11 14:16:27,791 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 294 is on host 294
2023-07-11 14:16:27,791 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 295 is on host 295
2023-07-11 14:16:27,791 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 296 is on host 296
2023-07-11 14:16:27,791 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 297 is on host 297
2023-07-11 14:16:27,791 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 298 is on host 298
2023-07-11 14:16:27,791 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 299 is on host 299
2023-07-11 14:16:27,791 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 300 is on host 300
2023-07-11 14:16:27,791 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 301 is on host 301
2023-07-11 14:16:27,791 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 302 is on host 302
2023-07-11 14:16:27,791 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 303 is on host 303
2023-07-11 14:16:27,791 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 304 is on host 304
2023-07-11 14:16:27,791 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 305 is on host 305
2023-07-11 14:16:27,791 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 306 is on host 306
2023-07-11 14:16:27,791 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 307 is on host 307
2023-07-11 14:16:27,791 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 308 is on host 308
2023-07-11 14:16:27,791 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 309 is on host 309
2023-07-11 14:16:27,791 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 310 is on host 310
2023-07-11 14:16:27,791 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 311 is on host 311
2023-07-11 14:16:27,792 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 312 is on host 312
2023-07-11 14:16:27,792 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 313 is on host 313
2023-07-11 14:16:27,792 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 314 is on host 314
2023-07-11 14:16:27,792 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 315 is on host 315
2023-07-11 14:16:27,792 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 316 is on host 316
2023-07-11 14:16:27,792 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 317 is on host 317
2023-07-11 14:16:27,792 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 318 is on host 318
2023-07-11 14:16:27,792 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 319 is on host 319
2023-07-11 14:16:27,792 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 320 is on host 320
2023-07-11 14:16:27,792 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 321 is on host 321
2023-07-11 14:16:27,792 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 322 is on host 322
2023-07-11 14:16:27,792 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 323 is on host 323
2023-07-11 14:16:27,792 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 324 is on host 324
2023-07-11 14:16:27,792 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 325 is on host 325
2023-07-11 14:16:27,792 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 326 is on host 326
2023-07-11 14:16:27,792 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 327 is on host 327
2023-07-11 14:16:27,792 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 328 is on host 328
2023-07-11 14:16:27,792 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 329 is on host 329
2023-07-11 14:16:27,792 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 330 is on host 330
2023-07-11 14:16:27,792 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 331 is on host 331
2023-07-11 14:16:27,792 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 332 is on host 332
2023-07-11 14:16:27,792 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 333 is on host 333
2023-07-11 14:16:27,792 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 334 is on host 334
2023-07-11 14:16:27,792 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 335 is on host 335
2023-07-11 14:16:27,792 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 336 is on host 336
2023-07-11 14:16:27,792 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 337 is on host 337
2023-07-11 14:16:27,792 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 338 is on host 338
2023-07-11 14:16:27,792 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 339 is on host 339
2023-07-11 14:16:27,792 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 340 is on host 340
2023-07-11 14:16:27,793 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 341 is on host 341
2023-07-11 14:16:27,793 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 342 is on host 342
2023-07-11 14:16:27,793 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 343 is on host 343
2023-07-11 14:16:27,793 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 344 is on host 344
2023-07-11 14:16:27,793 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 345 is on host 345
2023-07-11 14:16:27,793 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 346 is on host 346
2023-07-11 14:16:27,793 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 347 is on host 347
2023-07-11 14:16:27,793 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 348 is on host 348
2023-07-11 14:16:27,793 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 349 is on host 349
2023-07-11 14:16:27,793 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 350 is on host 350
2023-07-11 14:16:27,793 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 351 is on host 351
2023-07-11 14:16:27,793 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 352 is on host 352
2023-07-11 14:16:27,793 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 353 is on host 353
2023-07-11 14:16:27,793 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 354 is on host 354
2023-07-11 14:16:27,793 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 355 is on host 355
2023-07-11 14:16:27,793 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 356 is on host 356
2023-07-11 14:16:27,793 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 357 is on host 357
2023-07-11 14:16:27,793 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 358 is on host 358
2023-07-11 14:16:27,793 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 359 is on host 359
2023-07-11 14:16:27,793 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 360 is on host 360
2023-07-11 14:16:27,793 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 361 is on host 361
2023-07-11 14:16:27,793 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 362 is on host 362
2023-07-11 14:16:27,793 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 363 is on host 363
2023-07-11 14:16:27,793 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 364 is on host 364
2023-07-11 14:16:27,793 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 365 is on host 365
2023-07-11 14:16:27,793 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 366 is on host 366
2023-07-11 14:16:27,793 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 367 is on host 367
2023-07-11 14:16:27,793 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 368 is on host 368
2023-07-11 14:16:27,793 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 369 is on host 369
2023-07-11 14:16:27,794 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 370 is on host 370
2023-07-11 14:16:27,794 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 371 is on host 371
2023-07-11 14:16:27,794 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 372 is on host 372
2023-07-11 14:16:27,794 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 373 is on host 373
2023-07-11 14:16:27,794 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 374 is on host 374
2023-07-11 14:16:27,794 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 375 is on host 375
2023-07-11 14:16:27,794 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 376 is on host 376
2023-07-11 14:16:27,794 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 377 is on host 377
2023-07-11 14:16:27,794 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 378 is on host 378
2023-07-11 14:16:27,794 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 379 is on host 379
2023-07-11 14:16:27,794 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 380 is on host 380
2023-07-11 14:16:27,794 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 381 is on host 381
2023-07-11 14:16:27,794 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 382 is on host 382
2023-07-11 14:16:27,794 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 383 is on host 383
2023-07-11 14:16:27,794 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 384 is on host 384
2023-07-11 14:16:27,794 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 385 is on host 385
2023-07-11 14:16:27,794 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 386 is on host 386
2023-07-11 14:16:27,794 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 387 is on host 387
2023-07-11 14:16:27,794 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 388 is on host 388
2023-07-11 14:16:27,794 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 389 is on host 389
2023-07-11 14:16:27,794 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 390 is on host 390
2023-07-11 14:16:27,794 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 391 is on host 391
2023-07-11 14:16:27,794 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 392 is on host 392
2023-07-11 14:16:27,794 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=393, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:27,795 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table45) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:27,795 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table35
2023-07-11 14:16:27,795 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv553536953=290, srv1630071126=110, srv1071894870=12, srv23511728=232, srv658346947=323, srv2025338799=204, srv1397994335=64, srv1976766403=195, srv1644629726=118, srv957637734=381, srv2079182457=210, srv1749264468=139, srv2046129126=206, srv1595762596=104, srv603990852=307, srv1973073480=194, srv958856137=382, srv644066832=319, srv557062842=292, srv277765671=235, srv732221418=337, srv1769385567=143, srv224612199=228, srv714752528=334, srv362526040=256, srv581128949=296, srv2133511466=223, srv1144239257=30, srv320603627=245, srv1679952521=126, srv2122867873=222, srv1110067064=24, srv256251994=233, srv63261708=317, srv89837390=371, srv552104598=289, srv508952995=281, srv2096011353=214, srv1770417148=144, srv1246723478=42, srv929436444=378, srv2082192429=211, srv234917297=231, srv405700573=266, srv183644386=166, srv1488378513=85, srv173139715=136, srv1154180352=32, srv355693379=252, srv1407521654=66, srv496848057=275, srv1157975499=33, srv1806731027=162, srv1923102804=184, srv311102455=244, srv450011410=271, srv771515724=348, srv389183508=262, srv1249074416=43, srv2014575201=201, srv640847108=318, srv832363565=356, srv1970882134=192, srv2107358603=218, srv855766065=361, srv1336043388=55, srv29397186=237, srv982792848=390, srv976560524=386, srv101181760=3, srv1093549482=21, srv2018389395=202, srv2113483104=221, srv1778339118=149, srv1968709692=190, srv705221118=333, srv159600090=105, srv1919608486=180, srv981255102=389, srv807899713=353, srv755110395=344, srv1770594519=145, srv739692705=340, srv1076582671=16, srv693869315=330, srv1079048717=17, srv440657532=270, srv1636659280=115, srv2108739257=220, srv668373413=326, srv1003610393=2, srv1054229197=11, srv1868589627=172, srv2103522371=217, srv1000546271=0, srv951670617=380, srv2042909593=205, srv1865656038=171, srv1466355012=78, srv703662406=332, srv1418112884=70, srv1215580291=40, srv71833528=335, srv1580581635=103, srv1021032212=5, srv1080806312=19, srv1985601859=197, srv74471954=343, srv1647472319=119, srv2071553346=208, srv1632855171=112, srv1122009370=27, srv13613992=61, srv1630777154=111, srv301413669=239, srv550697728=288, srv1296023857=53, srv1724550977=133, srv1989290370=198, srv1926417985=185, srv1678097199=125, srv1461034373=76, srv614690415=311, srv2098345381=215, srv310463473=243, srv1011934105=4, srv148627129=84, srv305489318=240, srv1256534903=46, srv1289731445=52, srv1798844587=157, srv567113085=294, srv1119222501=26, srv2055117940=207, srv855898852=362, srv629224816=316, srv1075943554=15, srv625909061=315, srv1705591942=128, srv734225580=339, srv660107924=324, srv1381729938=62, srv1633483173=113, srv408265476=267, srv1776057793=148, srv1360253411=60, srv1511424834=90, srv1414162621=68, srv883343663=370, srv151859222=91, srv349144930=251, srv1991304034=199, srv1825887791=164, srv601657063=305, srv758932951=345, srv1651629087=120, srv1864623584=170, srv682957691=329, srv1500454146=88, srv1725962085=135, srv1659841448=121, srv1253206004=45, srv52354442=284, srv18508093=168, srv1427731921=73, srv561344974=293, srv721668125=336, srv1575482138=100, srv914128771=373, srv961487230=383, srv741332941=342, srv533032466=286, srv1574140987=99, srv2139849097=224, srv503902262=278, srv674807007=327, srv1786829855=153, srv2088727517=213, srv394366966=264, srv980089565=388, srv114594288=31, srv38296437=261, srv214835574=226, srv1887224977=176, srv1025509362=7, srv1577020334=102, srv524466665=285, srv393561021=263, srv759909927=346, srv763556514=347, srv786453030=349, srv2142935488=225, srv618111613=312, srv16254163=108, srv343211061=250, srv476075173=273, srv1269632212=47, srv333589612=246, srv499015361=276, srv836674186=357, srv1799191687=158, srv1446998035=74, srv1571774199=98, srv1115354947=25, srv333860881=247, srv1724152600=132, srv1598699299=106, srv177885829=151, srv472125887=272, srv1101339966=22, srv1424985362=72, srv1945569895=188, srv594128294=300, srv1026739237=8, srv842459828=358, srv878519137=366, srv1921260729=181, srv339110834=249, srv504099471=279, srv814253179=354, srv1643744885=116, srv1793847521=155, srv607234624=309, srv698219051=331, srv1688538732=127, srv666240078=325, srv1079284733=18, srv29210550=236, srv506181748=280, srv881313122=368, srv1945452576=187, srv597307897=303, srv1285120424=51, srv1887943816=177, srv1983604698=196, srv1805465940=161, srv309309336=242, srv1719756294=131, srv1349932676=58, srv1208486369=38, srv1643971570=117, srv1509331489=89, srv334105385=248, srv1400515744=65, srv369984715=259, srv43712162=269, srv842675864=359, srv1803258748=160, srv1022450918=6, srv1775108732=147, srv1766088250=141, srv180150732=159, srv1220857227=41, srv226530501=229, srv362032108=255, srv919715380=377, srv1074935976=14, srv1395030819=63, srv803291569=352, srv1877966766=175, srv220538712=227, srv2021718843=203, srv2107782185=219, srv882216860=369, srv1489137852=86, srv1972328734=193, srv1470759982=79, srv1774824811=146, srv971974774=384, srv1418242791=71, srv1001274196=1, srv909615097=372, srv1537724566=93, srv1165799954=34, srv1724754364=134, srv978173525=387, srv113319438=29, srv578033735=295, srv147931272=80, srv1183635941=35, srv1904215245=178, srv596349756=302, srv880835255=367, srv857544550=364, srv1779729022=152, srv1795612465=156, srv621083045=314, srv917704170=375, srv1351811120=59, srv1316710897=54, srv789820555=350, srv1922580095=183, srv305567304=241, srv1936745425=186, srv1745318024=138, srv1210822057=39, srv645375717=320, srv950628389=379, srv1490199189=87, srv1575919256=101, srv154481102=96, srv359402967=254, srv997716931=391, srv1457224273=75, srv581644449=297, srv1872374768=174, srv363177310=257, srv740327512=341, srv1664227236=123, srv972330517=385, srv1634261306=114, srv1662183707=122, srv1969046891=191, srv1485266211=82, srv1778842262=150, srv588410181=298, srv1921840985=182, srv591279493=299, srv37574565=260, srv1104147458=23, srv1190166330=36, srv652270371=322, srv1484309042=81, srv1560148463=97, srv618569548=313, srv2102708311=216, srv1084873074=20, srv517669556=283, srv918152084=376, srv649714317=321, srv1674484790=124, srv1339239880=56, srv1461073271=77, srv1125312901=28, srv25633292=234, srv516616923=282, srv299721745=238, srv604932433=308, srv1273702855=48, srv792183929=351, srv1042608200=10, srv1276335106=49, srv1486044644=83, srv676101698=328, srv998930892=392, srv200111276=200, srv1863083643=169, srv1737443479=137, srv872997185=365, srv821351126=355, srv852115805=360, srv1074355423=13, srv170952194=130, srv503430005=277, srv153887567=94, srv1415163001=69, srv1032737435=9, srv1840670515=167, srv1961921083=189, srv59745831=304, srv36715747=258, srv431547280=268, srv1524853580=92, srv1870059418=173, srv396010771=265, srv594457792=301, srv1755339428=140, srv1766275429=142, srv5565786=291, srv603898526=306, srv544570223=287, srv856030669=363, srv1542523468=95, srv915785747=374, srv356122213=253, srv1411875499=67, srv2077620970=209, srv1345529444=57, srv232339963=230, srv1250861076=44, srv1914875423=179, srv478619481=274, srv1202435626=37, srv1706089454=129, srv1810631201=163, srv1282644061=50, srv1625945288=109, srv733251129=338, srv2082830831=212, srv1612103540=107, srv612136291=310, srv1790004142=154, srv183394703=165} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:27,795 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:27,795 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:27,795 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:27,795 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:27,795 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:27,795 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:27,795 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-11 14:16:27,795 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-11 14:16:27,796 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-11 14:16:27,796 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-11 14:16:27,796 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 10 is on host 10
2023-07-11 14:16:27,796 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 11 is on host 11
2023-07-11 14:16:27,796 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 12 is on host 12
2023-07-11 14:16:27,796 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 13 is on host 13
2023-07-11 14:16:27,796 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 14 is on host 14
2023-07-11 14:16:27,796 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 15 is on host 15
2023-07-11 14:16:27,796 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 16 is on host 16
2023-07-11 14:16:27,796 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 17 is on host 17
2023-07-11 14:16:27,796 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 18 is on host 18
2023-07-11 14:16:27,796 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 19 is on host 19
2023-07-11 14:16:27,796 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 20 is on host 20
2023-07-11 14:16:27,796 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 21 is on host 21
2023-07-11 14:16:27,796 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 22 is on host 22
2023-07-11 14:16:27,796 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 23 is on host 23
2023-07-11 14:16:27,796 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 24 is on host 24
2023-07-11 14:16:27,796 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 25 is on host 25
2023-07-11 14:16:27,796 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 26 is on host 26
2023-07-11 14:16:27,796 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 27 is on host 27
2023-07-11 14:16:27,796 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 28 is on host 28
2023-07-11 14:16:27,796 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 29 is on host 29
2023-07-11 14:16:27,796 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 30 is on host 30
2023-07-11 14:16:27,796 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 31 is on host 31
2023-07-11 14:16:27,796 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 32 is on host 32
2023-07-11 14:16:27,796 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 33 is on host 33
2023-07-11 14:16:27,796 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 34 is on host 34
2023-07-11 14:16:27,796 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 35 is on host 35
2023-07-11 14:16:27,796 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 36 is on host 36
2023-07-11 14:16:27,797 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 37 is on host 37
2023-07-11 14:16:27,797 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 38 is on host 38
2023-07-11 14:16:27,797 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 39 is on host 39
2023-07-11 14:16:27,797 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 40 is on host 40
2023-07-11 14:16:27,797 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 41 is on host 41
2023-07-11 14:16:27,797 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 42 is on host 42
2023-07-11 14:16:27,797 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 43 is on host 43
2023-07-11 14:16:27,797 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 44 is on host 44
2023-07-11 14:16:27,797 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 45 is on host 45
2023-07-11 14:16:27,797 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 46 is on host 46
2023-07-11 14:16:27,797 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 47 is on host 47
2023-07-11 14:16:27,797 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 48 is on host 48
2023-07-11 14:16:27,797 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 49 is on host 49
2023-07-11 14:16:27,797 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 50 is on host 50
2023-07-11 14:16:27,797 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 51 is on host 51
2023-07-11 14:16:27,797 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 52 is on host 52
2023-07-11 14:16:27,797 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 53 is on host 53
2023-07-11 14:16:27,797 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 54 is on host 54
2023-07-11 14:16:27,797 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 55 is on host 55
2023-07-11 14:16:27,797 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 56 is on host 56
2023-07-11 14:16:27,797 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 57 is on host 57
2023-07-11 14:16:27,797 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 58 is on host 58
2023-07-11 14:16:27,797 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 59 is on host 59
2023-07-11 14:16:27,797 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 60 is on host 60
2023-07-11 14:16:27,797 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 61 is on host 61
2023-07-11 14:16:27,797 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 62 is on host 62
2023-07-11 14:16:27,797 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 63 is on host 63
2023-07-11 14:16:27,797 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 64 is on host 64
2023-07-11 14:16:27,798 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 65 is on host 65
2023-07-11 14:16:27,798 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 66 is on host 66
2023-07-11 14:16:27,798 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 67 is on host 67
2023-07-11 14:16:27,798 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 68 is on host 68
2023-07-11 14:16:27,798 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 69 is on host 69
2023-07-11 14:16:27,798 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 70 is on host 70
2023-07-11 14:16:27,798 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 71 is on host 71
2023-07-11 14:16:27,798 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 72 is on host 72
2023-07-11 14:16:27,798 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 73 is on host 73
2023-07-11 14:16:27,798 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 74 is on host 74
2023-07-11 14:16:27,798 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 75 is on host 75
2023-07-11 14:16:27,798 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 76 is on host 76
2023-07-11 14:16:27,798 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 77 is on host 77
2023-07-11 14:16:27,798 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 78 is on host 78
2023-07-11 14:16:27,798 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 79 is on host 79
2023-07-11 14:16:27,798 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 80 is on host 80
2023-07-11 14:16:27,798 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 81 is on host 81
2023-07-11 14:16:27,798 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 82 is on host 82
2023-07-11 14:16:27,798 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 83 is on host 83
2023-07-11 14:16:27,798 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 84 is on host 84
2023-07-11 14:16:27,798 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 85 is on host 85
2023-07-11 14:16:27,798 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 86 is on host 86
2023-07-11 14:16:27,798 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 87 is on host 87
2023-07-11 14:16:27,798 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 88 is on host 88
2023-07-11 14:16:27,798 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 89 is on host 89
2023-07-11 14:16:27,798 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 90 is on host 90
2023-07-11 14:16:27,798 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 91 is on host 91
2023-07-11 14:16:27,798 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 92 is on host 92
2023-07-11 14:16:27,798 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 93 is on host 93
2023-07-11 14:16:27,798 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 94 is on host 94
2023-07-11 14:16:27,799 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 95 is on host 95
2023-07-11 14:16:27,799 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 96 is on host 96
2023-07-11 14:16:27,799 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 97 is on host 97
2023-07-11 14:16:27,799 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 98 is on host 98
2023-07-11 14:16:27,799 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 99 is on host 99
2023-07-11 14:16:27,799 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 100 is on host 100
2023-07-11 14:16:27,799 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 101 is on host 101
2023-07-11 14:16:27,799 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 102 is on host 102
2023-07-11 14:16:27,799 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 103 is on host 103
2023-07-11 14:16:27,799 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 104 is on host 104
2023-07-11 14:16:27,799 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 105 is on host 105
2023-07-11 14:16:27,799 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 106 is on host 106
2023-07-11 14:16:27,799 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 107 is on host 107
2023-07-11 14:16:27,799 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 108 is on host 108
2023-07-11 14:16:27,799 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 109 is on host 109
2023-07-11 14:16:27,799 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 110 is on host 110
2023-07-11 14:16:27,799 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 111 is on host 111
2023-07-11 14:16:27,799 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 112 is on host 112
2023-07-11 14:16:27,799 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 113 is on host 113
2023-07-11 14:16:27,799 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 114 is on host 114
2023-07-11 14:16:27,799 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 115 is on host 115
2023-07-11 14:16:27,799 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 116 is on host 116
2023-07-11 14:16:27,799 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 117 is on host 117
2023-07-11 14:16:27,799 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 118 is on host 118
2023-07-11 14:16:27,799 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 119 is on host 119
2023-07-11 14:16:27,799 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 120 is on host 120
2023-07-11 14:16:27,799 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 121 is on host 121
2023-07-11 14:16:27,799 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 122 is on host 122
2023-07-11 14:16:27,799 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 123 is on host 123
2023-07-11 14:16:27,800 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 124 is on host 124
2023-07-11 14:16:27,800 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 125 is on host 125
2023-07-11 14:16:27,800 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 126 is on host 126
2023-07-11 14:16:27,800 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 127 is on host 127
2023-07-11 14:16:27,800 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 128 is on host 128
2023-07-11 14:16:27,800 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 129 is on host 129
2023-07-11 14:16:27,800 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 130 is on host 130
2023-07-11 14:16:27,800 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 131 is on host 131
2023-07-11 14:16:27,800 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 132 is on host 132
2023-07-11 14:16:27,800 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 133 is on host 133
2023-07-11 14:16:27,800 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 134 is on host 134
2023-07-11 14:16:27,800 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 135 is on host 135
2023-07-11 14:16:27,800 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 136 is on host 136
2023-07-11 14:16:27,800 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 137 is on host 137
2023-07-11 14:16:27,800 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 138 is on host 138
2023-07-11 14:16:27,800 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 139 is on host 139
2023-07-11 14:16:27,800 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 140 is on host 140
2023-07-11 14:16:27,800 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 141 is on host 141
2023-07-11 14:16:27,800 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 142 is on host 142
2023-07-11 14:16:27,800 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 143 is on host 143
2023-07-11 14:16:27,800 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 144 is on host 144
2023-07-11 14:16:27,800 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 145 is on host 145
2023-07-11 14:16:27,800 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 146 is on host 146
2023-07-11 14:16:27,800 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 147 is on host 147
2023-07-11 14:16:27,800 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 148 is on host 148
2023-07-11 14:16:27,800 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 149 is on host 149
2023-07-11 14:16:27,800 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 150 is on host 150
2023-07-11 14:16:27,800 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 151 is on host 151
2023-07-11 14:16:27,800 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 152 is on host 152
2023-07-11 14:16:27,801 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 153 is on host 153
2023-07-11 14:16:27,801 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 154 is on host 154
2023-07-11 14:16:27,801 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 155 is on host 155
2023-07-11 14:16:27,801 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 156 is on host 156
2023-07-11 14:16:27,801 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 157 is on host 157
2023-07-11 14:16:27,801 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 158 is on host 158
2023-07-11 14:16:27,801 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 159 is on host 159
2023-07-11 14:16:27,801 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 160 is on host 160
2023-07-11 14:16:27,801 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 161 is on host 161
2023-07-11 14:16:27,801 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 162 is on host 162
2023-07-11 14:16:27,801 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 163 is on host 163
2023-07-11 14:16:27,801 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 164 is on host 164
2023-07-11 14:16:27,801 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 165 is on host 165
2023-07-11 14:16:27,801 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 166 is on host 166
2023-07-11 14:16:27,801 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 167 is on host 167
2023-07-11 14:16:27,801 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 168 is on host 168
2023-07-11 14:16:27,801 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 169 is on host 169
2023-07-11 14:16:27,801 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 170 is on host 170
2023-07-11 14:16:27,801 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 171 is on host 171
2023-07-11 14:16:27,802 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 172 is on host 172
2023-07-11 14:16:27,802 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 173 is on host 173
2023-07-11 14:16:27,802 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 174 is on host 174
2023-07-11 14:16:27,802 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 175 is on host 175
2023-07-11 14:16:27,802 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 176 is on host 176
2023-07-11 14:16:27,802 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 177 is on host 177
2023-07-11 14:16:27,802 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 178 is on host 178
2023-07-11 14:16:27,802 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 179 is on host 179
2023-07-11 14:16:27,802 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 180 is on host 180
2023-07-11 14:16:27,802 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 181 is on host 181
2023-07-11 14:16:27,802 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 182 is on host 182
2023-07-11 14:16:27,802 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 183 is on host 183
2023-07-11 14:16:27,802 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 184 is on host 184
2023-07-11 14:16:27,802 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 185 is on host 185
2023-07-11 14:16:27,802 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 186 is on host 186
2023-07-11 14:16:27,802 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 187 is on host 187
2023-07-11 14:16:27,802 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 188 is on host 188
2023-07-11 14:16:27,802 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 189 is on host 189
2023-07-11 14:16:27,802 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 190 is on host 190
2023-07-11 14:16:27,802 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 191 is on host 191
2023-07-11 14:16:27,802 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 192 is on host 192
2023-07-11 14:16:27,802 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 193 is on host 193
2023-07-11 14:16:27,802 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 194 is on host 194
2023-07-11 14:16:27,802 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 195 is on host 195
2023-07-11 14:16:27,802 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 196 is on host 196
2023-07-11 14:16:27,802 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 197 is on host 197
2023-07-11 14:16:27,803 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 198 is on host 198
2023-07-11 14:16:27,803 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 199 is on host 199
2023-07-11 14:16:27,803 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 200 is on host 200
2023-07-11 14:16:27,803 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 201 is on host 201
2023-07-11 14:16:27,803 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 202 is on host 202
2023-07-11 14:16:27,803 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 203 is on host 203
2023-07-11 14:16:27,803 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 204 is on host 204
2023-07-11 14:16:27,803 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 205 is on host 205
2023-07-11 14:16:27,803 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 206 is on host 206
2023-07-11 14:16:27,803 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 207 is on host 207
2023-07-11 14:16:27,803 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 208 is on host 208
2023-07-11 14:16:27,803 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 209 is on host 209
2023-07-11 14:16:27,803 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 210 is on host 210
2023-07-11 14:16:27,803 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 211 is on host 211
2023-07-11 14:16:27,803 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 212 is on host 212
2023-07-11 14:16:27,803 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 213 is on host 213
2023-07-11 14:16:27,803 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 214 is on host 214
2023-07-11 14:16:27,803 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 215 is on host 215
2023-07-11 14:16:27,803 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 216 is on host 216
2023-07-11 14:16:27,803 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 217 is on host 217
2023-07-11 14:16:27,803 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 218 is on host 218
2023-07-11 14:16:27,803 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 219 is on host 219
2023-07-11 14:16:27,803 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 220 is on host 220
2023-07-11 14:16:27,803 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 221 is on host 221
2023-07-11 14:16:27,803 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 222 is on host 222
2023-07-11 14:16:27,803 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 223 is on host 223
2023-07-11 14:16:27,803 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 224 is on host 224
2023-07-11 14:16:27,803 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 225 is on host 225
2023-07-11 14:16:27,803 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 226 is on host 226
2023-07-11 14:16:27,804 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 227 is on host 227
2023-07-11 14:16:27,804 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 228 is on host 228
2023-07-11 14:16:27,804 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 229 is on host 229
2023-07-11 14:16:27,804 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 230 is on host 230
2023-07-11 14:16:27,804 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 231 is on host 231
2023-07-11 14:16:27,804 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 232 is on host 232
2023-07-11 14:16:27,804 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 233 is on host 233
2023-07-11 14:16:27,804 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 234 is on host 234
2023-07-11 14:16:27,804 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 235 is on host 235
2023-07-11 14:16:27,804 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 236 is on host 236
2023-07-11 14:16:27,804 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 237 is on host 237
2023-07-11 14:16:27,804 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 238 is on host 238
2023-07-11 14:16:27,804 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 239 is on host 239
2023-07-11 14:16:27,804 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 240 is on host 240
2023-07-11 14:16:27,804 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 241 is on host 241
2023-07-11 14:16:27,804 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 242 is on host 242
2023-07-11 14:16:27,804 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 243 is on host 243
2023-07-11 14:16:27,804 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 244 is on host 244
2023-07-11 14:16:27,804 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 245 is on host 245
2023-07-11 14:16:27,804 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 246 is on host 246
2023-07-11 14:16:27,804 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 247 is on host 247
2023-07-11 14:16:27,804 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 248 is on host 248
2023-07-11 14:16:27,804 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 249 is on host 249
2023-07-11 14:16:27,804 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 250 is on host 250
2023-07-11 14:16:27,804 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 251 is on host 251
2023-07-11 14:16:27,804 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 252 is on host 252
2023-07-11 14:16:27,804 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 253 is on host 253
2023-07-11 14:16:27,804 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 254 is on host 254
2023-07-11 14:16:27,804 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 255 is on host 255
2023-07-11 14:16:27,805 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 256 is on host 256
2023-07-11 14:16:27,805 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 257 is on host 257
2023-07-11 14:16:27,805 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 258 is on host 258
2023-07-11 14:16:27,805 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 259 is on host 259
2023-07-11 14:16:27,805 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 260 is on host 260
2023-07-11 14:16:27,805 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 261 is on host 261
2023-07-11 14:16:27,805 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 262 is on host 262
2023-07-11 14:16:27,805 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 263 is on host 263
2023-07-11 14:16:27,805 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 264 is on host 264
2023-07-11 14:16:27,805 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 265 is on host 265
2023-07-11 14:16:27,805 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 266 is on host 266
2023-07-11 14:16:27,805 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 267 is on host 267
2023-07-11 14:16:27,805 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 268 is on host 268
2023-07-11 14:16:27,805 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 269 is on host 269
2023-07-11 14:16:27,805 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 270 is on host 270
2023-07-11 14:16:27,805 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 271 is on host 271
2023-07-11 14:16:27,805 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 272 is on host 272
2023-07-11 14:16:27,805 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 273 is on host 273
2023-07-11 14:16:27,805 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 274 is on host 274
2023-07-11 14:16:27,805 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 275 is on host 275
2023-07-11 14:16:27,805 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 276 is on host 276
2023-07-11 14:16:27,805 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 277 is on host 277
2023-07-11 14:16:27,805 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 278 is on host 278
2023-07-11 14:16:27,805 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 279 is on host 279
2023-07-11 14:16:27,805 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 280 is on host 280
2023-07-11 14:16:27,805 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 281 is on host 281
2023-07-11 14:16:27,805 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 282 is on host 282
2023-07-11 14:16:27,805 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 283 is on host 283
2023-07-11 14:16:27,806 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 284 is on host 284
2023-07-11 14:16:27,806 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 285 is on host 285
2023-07-11 14:16:27,806 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 286 is on host 286
2023-07-11 14:16:27,806 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 287 is on host 287
2023-07-11 14:16:27,806 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 288 is on host 288
2023-07-11 14:16:27,806 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 289 is on host 289
2023-07-11 14:16:27,806 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 290 is on host 290
2023-07-11 14:16:27,806 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 291 is on host 291
2023-07-11 14:16:27,806 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 292 is on host 292
2023-07-11 14:16:27,806 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 293 is on host 293
2023-07-11 14:16:27,806 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 294 is on host 294
2023-07-11 14:16:27,806 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 295 is on host 295
2023-07-11 14:16:27,806 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 296 is on host 296
2023-07-11 14:16:27,806 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 297 is on host 297
2023-07-11 14:16:27,806 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 298 is on host 298
2023-07-11 14:16:27,806 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 299 is on host 299
2023-07-11 14:16:27,806 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 300 is on host 300
2023-07-11 14:16:27,806 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 301 is on host 301
2023-07-11 14:16:27,806 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 302 is on host 302
2023-07-11 14:16:27,806 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 303 is on host 303
2023-07-11 14:16:27,806 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 304 is on host 304
2023-07-11 14:16:27,806 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 305 is on host 305
2023-07-11 14:16:27,806 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 306 is on host 306
2023-07-11 14:16:27,806 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 307 is on host 307
2023-07-11 14:16:27,806 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 308 is on host 308
2023-07-11 14:16:27,806 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 309 is on host 309
2023-07-11 14:16:27,806 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 310 is on host 310
2023-07-11 14:16:27,806 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 311 is on host 311
2023-07-11 14:16:27,806 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 312 is on host 312
2023-07-11 14:16:27,806 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 313 is on host 313
2023-07-11 14:16:27,807 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 314 is on host 314
2023-07-11 14:16:27,807 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 315 is on host 315
2023-07-11 14:16:27,807 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 316 is on host 316
2023-07-11 14:16:27,807 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 317 is on host 317
2023-07-11 14:16:27,807 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 318 is on host 318
2023-07-11 14:16:27,807 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 319 is on host 319
2023-07-11 14:16:27,807 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 320 is on host 320
2023-07-11 14:16:27,807 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 321 is on host 321
2023-07-11 14:16:27,807 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 322 is on host 322
2023-07-11 14:16:27,807 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 323 is on host 323
2023-07-11 14:16:27,807 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 324 is on host 324
2023-07-11 14:16:27,807 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 325 is on host 325
2023-07-11 14:16:27,807 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 326 is on host 326
2023-07-11 14:16:27,807 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 327 is on host 327
2023-07-11 14:16:27,807 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 328 is on host 328
2023-07-11 14:16:27,807 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 329 is on host 329
2023-07-11 14:16:27,807 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 330 is on host 330
2023-07-11 14:16:27,807 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 331 is on host 331
2023-07-11 14:16:27,807 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 332 is on host 332
2023-07-11 14:16:27,807 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 333 is on host 333
2023-07-11 14:16:27,807 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 334 is on host 334
2023-07-11 14:16:27,807 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 335 is on host 335
2023-07-11 14:16:27,807 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 336 is on host 336
2023-07-11 14:16:27,807 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 337 is on host 337
2023-07-11 14:16:27,807 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 338 is on host 338
2023-07-11 14:16:27,807 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 339 is on host 339
2023-07-11 14:16:27,807 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 340 is on host 340
2023-07-11 14:16:27,807 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 341 is on host 341
2023-07-11 14:16:27,807 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 342 is on host 342
2023-07-11 14:16:27,808 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 343 is on host 343
2023-07-11 14:16:27,808 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 344 is on host 344
2023-07-11 14:16:27,808 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 345 is on host 345
2023-07-11 14:16:27,808 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 346 is on host 346
2023-07-11 14:16:27,808 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 347 is on host 347
2023-07-11 14:16:27,808 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 348 is on host 348
2023-07-11 14:16:27,808 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 349 is on host 349
2023-07-11 14:16:27,808 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 350 is on host 350
2023-07-11 14:16:27,808 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 351 is on host 351
2023-07-11 14:16:27,808 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 352 is on host 352
2023-07-11 14:16:27,808 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 353 is on host 353
2023-07-11 14:16:27,808 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 354 is on host 354
2023-07-11 14:16:27,808 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 355 is on host 355
2023-07-11 14:16:27,808 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 356 is on host 356
2023-07-11 14:16:27,808 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 357 is on host 357
2023-07-11 14:16:27,808 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 358 is on host 358
2023-07-11 14:16:27,808 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 359 is on host 359
2023-07-11 14:16:27,808 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 360 is on host 360
2023-07-11 14:16:27,808 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 361 is on host 361
2023-07-11 14:16:27,808 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 362 is on host 362
2023-07-11 14:16:27,808 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 363 is on host 363
2023-07-11 14:16:27,808 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 364 is on host 364
2023-07-11 14:16:27,808 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 365 is on host 365
2023-07-11 14:16:27,808 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 366 is on host 366
2023-07-11 14:16:27,808 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 367 is on host 367
2023-07-11 14:16:27,808 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 368 is on host 368
2023-07-11 14:16:27,808 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 369 is on host 369
2023-07-11 14:16:27,808 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 370 is on host 370
2023-07-11 14:16:27,808 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 371 is on host 371
2023-07-11 14:16:27,809 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 372 is on host 372
2023-07-11 14:16:27,809 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 373 is on host 373
2023-07-11 14:16:27,809 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 374 is on host 374
2023-07-11 14:16:27,809 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 375 is on host 375
2023-07-11 14:16:27,809 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 376 is on host 376
2023-07-11 14:16:27,809 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 377 is on host 377
2023-07-11 14:16:27,809 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 378 is on host 378
2023-07-11 14:16:27,809 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 379 is on host 379
2023-07-11 14:16:27,809 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 380 is on host 380
2023-07-11 14:16:27,809 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 381 is on host 381
2023-07-11 14:16:27,809 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 382 is on host 382
2023-07-11 14:16:27,809 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 383 is on host 383
2023-07-11 14:16:27,809 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 384 is on host 384
2023-07-11 14:16:27,809 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 385 is on host 385
2023-07-11 14:16:27,809 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 386 is on host 386
2023-07-11 14:16:27,809 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 387 is on host 387
2023-07-11 14:16:27,809 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 388 is on host 388
2023-07-11 14:16:27,809 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 389 is on host 389
2023-07-11 14:16:27,809 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 390 is on host 390
2023-07-11 14:16:27,809 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 391 is on host 391
2023-07-11 14:16:27,809 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 392 is on host 392
2023-07-11 14:16:27,809 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=393, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:27,810 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table35) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:27,810 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table36
2023-07-11 14:16:27,810 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv553536953=290, srv1630071126=110, srv1071894870=12, srv23511728=232, srv658346947=323, srv2025338799=204, srv1397994335=64, srv1976766403=195, srv1644629726=118, srv957637734=381, srv2079182457=210, srv1749264468=139, srv2046129126=206, srv1595762596=104, srv603990852=307, srv1973073480=194, srv958856137=382, srv644066832=319, srv557062842=292, srv277765671=235, srv732221418=337, srv1769385567=143, srv224612199=228, srv714752528=334, srv362526040=256, srv581128949=296, srv2133511466=223, srv1144239257=30, srv320603627=245, srv1679952521=126, srv2122867873=222, srv1110067064=24, srv256251994=233, srv63261708=317, srv89837390=371, srv552104598=289, srv508952995=281, srv2096011353=214, srv1770417148=144, srv1246723478=42, srv929436444=378, srv2082192429=211, srv234917297=231, srv405700573=266, srv183644386=166, srv1488378513=85, srv173139715=136, srv1154180352=32, srv355693379=252, srv1407521654=66, srv496848057=275, srv1157975499=33, srv1806731027=162, srv1923102804=184, srv311102455=244, srv450011410=271, srv771515724=348, srv389183508=262, srv1249074416=43, srv2014575201=201, srv640847108=318, srv832363565=356, srv1970882134=192, srv2107358603=218, srv855766065=361, srv1336043388=55, srv29397186=237, srv982792848=390, srv976560524=386, srv101181760=3, srv1093549482=21, srv2018389395=202, srv2113483104=221, srv1778339118=149, srv1968709692=190, srv705221118=333, srv159600090=105, srv1919608486=180, srv981255102=389, srv807899713=353, srv755110395=344, srv1770594519=145, srv739692705=340, srv1076582671=16, srv693869315=330, srv1079048717=17, srv440657532=270, srv1636659280=115, srv2108739257=220, srv668373413=326, srv1003610393=2, srv1054229197=11, srv1868589627=172, srv2103522371=217, srv1000546271=0, srv951670617=380, srv2042909593=205, srv1865656038=171, srv1466355012=78, srv703662406=332, srv1418112884=70, srv1215580291=40, srv71833528=335, srv1580581635=103, srv1021032212=5, srv1080806312=19, srv1985601859=197, srv74471954=343, srv1647472319=119, srv2071553346=208, srv1632855171=112, srv1122009370=27, srv13613992=61, srv1630777154=111, srv301413669=239, srv550697728=288, srv1296023857=53, srv1724550977=133, srv1989290370=198, srv1926417985=185, srv1678097199=125, srv1461034373=76, srv614690415=311, srv2098345381=215, srv310463473=243, srv1011934105=4, srv148627129=84, srv305489318=240, srv1256534903=46, srv1289731445=52, srv1798844587=157, srv567113085=294, srv1119222501=26, srv2055117940=207, srv855898852=362, srv629224816=316, srv1075943554=15, srv625909061=315, srv1705591942=128, srv734225580=339, srv660107924=324, srv1381729938=62, srv1633483173=113, srv408265476=267, srv1776057793=148, srv1360253411=60, srv1511424834=90, srv1414162621=68, srv883343663=370, srv151859222=91, srv349144930=251, srv1991304034=199, srv1825887791=164, srv601657063=305, srv758932951=345, srv1651629087=120, srv1864623584=170, srv682957691=329, srv1500454146=88, srv1725962085=135, srv1659841448=121, srv1253206004=45, srv52354442=284, srv18508093=168, srv1427731921=73, srv561344974=293, srv721668125=336, srv1575482138=100, srv914128771=373, srv961487230=383, srv741332941=342, srv533032466=286, srv1574140987=99, srv2139849097=224, srv503902262=278, srv674807007=327, srv1786829855=153, srv2088727517=213, srv394366966=264, srv980089565=388, srv114594288=31, srv38296437=261, srv214835574=226, srv1887224977=176, srv1025509362=7, srv1577020334=102, srv524466665=285, srv393561021=263, srv759909927=346, srv763556514=347, srv786453030=349, srv2142935488=225, srv618111613=312, srv16254163=108, srv343211061=250, srv476075173=273, srv1269632212=47, srv333589612=246, srv499015361=276, srv836674186=357, srv1799191687=158, srv1446998035=74, srv1571774199=98, srv1115354947=25, srv333860881=247, srv1724152600=132, srv1598699299=106, srv177885829=151, srv472125887=272, srv1101339966=22, srv1424985362=72, srv1945569895=188, srv594128294=300, srv1026739237=8, srv842459828=358, srv878519137=366, srv1921260729=181, srv339110834=249, srv504099471=279, srv814253179=354, srv1643744885=116, srv1793847521=155, srv607234624=309, srv698219051=331, srv1688538732=127, srv666240078=325, srv1079284733=18, srv29210550=236, srv506181748=280, srv881313122=368, srv1945452576=187, srv597307897=303, srv1285120424=51, srv1887943816=177, srv1983604698=196, srv1805465940=161, srv309309336=242, srv1719756294=131, srv1349932676=58, srv1208486369=38, srv1643971570=117, srv1509331489=89, srv334105385=248, srv1400515744=65, srv369984715=259, srv43712162=269, srv842675864=359, srv1803258748=160, srv1022450918=6, srv1775108732=147, srv1766088250=141, srv180150732=159, srv1220857227=41, srv226530501=229, srv362032108=255, srv919715380=377, srv1074935976=14, srv1395030819=63, srv803291569=352, srv1877966766=175, srv220538712=227, srv2021718843=203, srv2107782185=219, srv882216860=369, srv1489137852=86, srv1972328734=193, srv1470759982=79, srv1774824811=146, srv971974774=384, srv1418242791=71, srv1001274196=1, srv909615097=372, srv1537724566=93, srv1165799954=34, srv1724754364=134, srv978173525=387, srv113319438=29, srv578033735=295, srv147931272=80, srv1183635941=35, srv1904215245=178, srv596349756=302, srv880835255=367, srv857544550=364, srv1779729022=152, srv1795612465=156, srv621083045=314, srv917704170=375, srv1351811120=59, srv1316710897=54, srv789820555=350, srv1922580095=183, srv305567304=241, srv1936745425=186, srv1745318024=138, srv1210822057=39, srv645375717=320, srv950628389=379, srv1490199189=87, srv1575919256=101, srv154481102=96, srv359402967=254, srv997716931=391, srv1457224273=75, srv581644449=297, srv1872374768=174, srv363177310=257, srv740327512=341, srv1664227236=123, srv972330517=385, srv1634261306=114, srv1662183707=122, srv1969046891=191, srv1485266211=82, srv1778842262=150, srv588410181=298, srv1921840985=182, srv591279493=299, srv37574565=260, srv1104147458=23, srv1190166330=36, srv652270371=322, srv1484309042=81, srv1560148463=97, srv618569548=313, srv2102708311=216, srv1084873074=20, srv517669556=283, srv918152084=376, srv649714317=321, srv1674484790=124, srv1339239880=56, srv1461073271=77, srv1125312901=28, srv25633292=234, srv516616923=282, srv299721745=238, srv604932433=308, srv1273702855=48, srv792183929=351, srv1042608200=10, srv1276335106=49, srv1486044644=83, srv676101698=328, srv998930892=392, srv200111276=200, srv1863083643=169, srv1737443479=137, srv872997185=365, srv821351126=355, srv852115805=360, srv1074355423=13, srv170952194=130, srv503430005=277, srv153887567=94, srv1415163001=69, srv1032737435=9, srv1840670515=167, srv1961921083=189, srv59745831=304, srv36715747=258, srv431547280=268, srv1524853580=92, srv1870059418=173, srv396010771=265, srv594457792=301, srv1755339428=140, srv1766275429=142, srv5565786=291, srv603898526=306, srv544570223=287, srv856030669=363, srv1542523468=95, srv915785747=374, srv356122213=253, srv1411875499=67, srv2077620970=209, srv1345529444=57, srv232339963=230, srv1250861076=44, srv1914875423=179, srv478619481=274, srv1202435626=37, srv1706089454=129, srv1810631201=163, srv1282644061=50, srv1625945288=109, srv733251129=338, srv2082830831=212, srv1612103540=107, srv612136291=310, srv1790004142=154, srv183394703=165} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:27,810 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:27,810 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:27,810 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:27,810 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:27,810 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:27,810 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:27,810 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-11 14:16:27,811 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-11 14:16:27,811 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-11 14:16:27,811 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-11 14:16:27,811 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 10 is on host 10
2023-07-11 14:16:27,811 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 11 is on host 11
2023-07-11 14:16:27,811 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 12 is on host 12
2023-07-11 14:16:27,811 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 13 is on host 13
2023-07-11 14:16:27,811 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 14 is on host 14
2023-07-11 14:16:27,811 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 15 is on host 15
2023-07-11 14:16:27,811 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 16 is on host 16
2023-07-11 14:16:27,811 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 17 is on host 17
2023-07-11 14:16:27,811 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 18 is on host 18
2023-07-11 14:16:27,811 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 19 is on host 19
2023-07-11 14:16:27,811 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 20 is on host 20
2023-07-11 14:16:27,811 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 21 is on host 21
2023-07-11 14:16:27,811 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 22 is on host 22
2023-07-11 14:16:27,811 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 23 is on host 23
2023-07-11 14:16:27,811 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 24 is on host 24
2023-07-11 14:16:27,811 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 25 is on host 25
2023-07-11 14:16:27,811 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 26 is on host 26
2023-07-11 14:16:27,811 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 27 is on host 27
2023-07-11 14:16:27,811 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 28 is on host 28
2023-07-11 14:16:27,811 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 29 is on host 29
2023-07-11 14:16:27,811 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 30 is on host 30
2023-07-11 14:16:27,811 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 31 is on host 31
2023-07-11 14:16:27,811 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 32 is on host 32
2023-07-11 14:16:27,811 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 33 is on host 33
2023-07-11 14:16:27,811 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 34 is on host 34
2023-07-11 14:16:27,811 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 35 is on host 35
2023-07-11 14:16:27,812 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 36 is on host 36
2023-07-11 14:16:27,812 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 37 is on host 37
2023-07-11 14:16:27,812 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 38 is on host 38
2023-07-11 14:16:27,812 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 39 is on host 39
2023-07-11 14:16:27,812 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 40 is on host 40
2023-07-11 14:16:27,812 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 41 is on host 41
2023-07-11 14:16:27,812 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 42 is on host 42
2023-07-11 14:16:27,812 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 43 is on host 43
2023-07-11 14:16:27,812 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 44 is on host 44
2023-07-11 14:16:27,812 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 45 is on host 45
2023-07-11 14:16:27,812 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 46 is on host 46
2023-07-11 14:16:27,812 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 47 is on host 47
2023-07-11 14:16:27,812 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 48 is on host 48
2023-07-11 14:16:27,812 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 49 is on host 49
2023-07-11 14:16:27,812 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 50 is on host 50
2023-07-11 14:16:27,812 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 51 is on host 51
2023-07-11 14:16:27,812 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 52 is on host 52
2023-07-11 14:16:27,812 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 53 is on host 53
2023-07-11 14:16:27,812 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 54 is on host 54
2023-07-11 14:16:27,812 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 55 is on host 55
2023-07-11 14:16:27,812 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 56 is on host 56
2023-07-11 14:16:27,812 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 57 is on host 57
2023-07-11 14:16:27,812 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 58 is on host 58
2023-07-11 14:16:27,812 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 59 is on host 59
2023-07-11 14:16:27,812 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 60 is on host 60
2023-07-11 14:16:27,812 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 61 is on host 61
2023-07-11 14:16:27,812 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 62 is on host 62
2023-07-11 14:16:27,813 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 63 is on host 63
2023-07-11 14:16:27,813 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 64 is on host 64
2023-07-11 14:16:27,813 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 65 is on host 65
2023-07-11 14:16:27,813 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 66 is on host 66
2023-07-11 14:16:27,813 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 67 is on host 67
2023-07-11 14:16:27,813 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 68 is on host 68
2023-07-11 14:16:27,813 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 69 is on host 69
2023-07-11 14:16:27,813 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 70 is on host 70
2023-07-11 14:16:27,813 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 71 is on host 71
2023-07-11 14:16:27,813 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 72 is on host 72
2023-07-11 14:16:27,813 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 73 is on host 73
2023-07-11 14:16:27,813 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 74 is on host 74
2023-07-11 14:16:27,813 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 75 is on host 75
2023-07-11 14:16:27,813 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 76 is on host 76
2023-07-11 14:16:27,813 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 77 is on host 77
2023-07-11 14:16:27,813 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 78 is on host 78
2023-07-11 14:16:27,813 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 79 is on host 79
2023-07-11 14:16:27,813 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 80 is on host 80
2023-07-11 14:16:27,814 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 81 is on host 81
2023-07-11 14:16:27,814 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 82 is on host 82
2023-07-11 14:16:27,814 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 83 is on host 83
2023-07-11 14:16:27,814 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 84 is on host 84
2023-07-11 14:16:27,814 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 85 is on host 85
2023-07-11 14:16:27,814 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 86 is on host 86
2023-07-11 14:16:27,814 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 87 is on host 87
2023-07-11 14:16:27,814 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 88 is on host 88
2023-07-11 14:16:27,814 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 89 is on host 89
2023-07-11 14:16:27,814 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 90 is on host 90
2023-07-11 14:16:27,814 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 91 is on host 91
2023-07-11 14:16:27,814 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 92 is on host 92
2023-07-11 14:16:27,814 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 93 is on host 93
2023-07-11 14:16:27,814 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 94 is on host 94
2023-07-11 14:16:27,814 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 95 is on host 95
2023-07-11 14:16:27,814 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 96 is on host 96
2023-07-11 14:16:27,814 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 97 is on host 97
2023-07-11 14:16:27,814 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 98 is on host 98
2023-07-11 14:16:27,814 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 99 is on host 99
2023-07-11 14:16:27,814 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 100 is on host 100
2023-07-11 14:16:27,814 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 101 is on host 101
2023-07-11 14:16:27,814 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 102 is on host 102
2023-07-11 14:16:27,814 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 103 is on host 103
2023-07-11 14:16:27,814 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 104 is on host 104
2023-07-11 14:16:27,814 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 105 is on host 105
2023-07-11 14:16:27,814 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 106 is on host 106
2023-07-11 14:16:27,814 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 107 is on host 107
2023-07-11 14:16:27,814 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 108 is on host 108
2023-07-11 14:16:27,814 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 109 is on host 109
2023-07-11 14:16:27,815 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 110 is on host 110
2023-07-11 14:16:27,815 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 111 is on host 111
2023-07-11 14:16:27,815 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 112 is on host 112
2023-07-11 14:16:27,815 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 113 is on host 113
2023-07-11 14:16:27,815 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 114 is on host 114
2023-07-11 14:16:27,815 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 115 is on host 115
2023-07-11 14:16:27,815 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 116 is on host 116
2023-07-11 14:16:27,815 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 117 is on host 117
2023-07-11 14:16:27,815 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 118 is on host 118
2023-07-11 14:16:27,815 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 119 is on host 119
2023-07-11 14:16:27,815 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 120 is on host 120
2023-07-11 14:16:27,815 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 121 is on host 121
2023-07-11 14:16:27,815 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 122 is on host 122
2023-07-11 14:16:27,815 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 123 is on host 123
2023-07-11 14:16:27,815 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 124 is on host 124
2023-07-11 14:16:27,815 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 125 is on host 125
2023-07-11 14:16:27,815 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 126 is on host 126
2023-07-11 14:16:27,815 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 127 is on host 127
2023-07-11 14:16:27,815 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 128 is on host 128
2023-07-11 14:16:27,815 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 129 is on host 129
2023-07-11 14:16:27,815 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 130 is on host 130
2023-07-11 14:16:27,815 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 131 is on host 131
2023-07-11 14:16:27,815 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 132 is on host 132
2023-07-11 14:16:27,815 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 133 is on host 133
2023-07-11 14:16:27,815 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 134 is on host 134
2023-07-11 14:16:27,815 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 135 is on host 135
2023-07-11 14:16:27,815 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 136 is on host 136
2023-07-11 14:16:27,815 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 137 is on host 137
2023-07-11 14:16:27,815 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 138 is on host 138
2023-07-11 14:16:27,815 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 139 is on host 139
2023-07-11 14:16:27,816 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 140 is on host 140
2023-07-11 14:16:27,816 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 141 is on host 141
2023-07-11 14:16:27,816 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 142 is on host 142
2023-07-11 14:16:27,816 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 143 is on host 143
2023-07-11 14:16:27,816 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 144 is on host 144
2023-07-11 14:16:27,816 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 145 is on host 145
2023-07-11 14:16:27,816 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 146 is on host 146
2023-07-11 14:16:27,816 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 147 is on host 147
2023-07-11 14:16:27,816 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 148 is on host 148
2023-07-11 14:16:27,816 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 149 is on host 149
2023-07-11 14:16:27,816 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 150 is on host 150
2023-07-11 14:16:27,816 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 151 is on host 151
2023-07-11 14:16:27,816 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 152 is on host 152
2023-07-11 14:16:27,816 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 153 is on host 153
2023-07-11 14:16:27,816 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 154 is on host 154
2023-07-11 14:16:27,816 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 155 is on host 155
2023-07-11 14:16:27,816 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 156 is on host 156
2023-07-11 14:16:27,816 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 157 is on host 157
2023-07-11 14:16:27,816 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 158 is on host 158
2023-07-11 14:16:27,816 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 159 is on host 159
2023-07-11 14:16:27,816 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 160 is on host 160
2023-07-11 14:16:27,816 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 161 is on host 161
2023-07-11 14:16:27,816 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 162 is on host 162
2023-07-11 14:16:27,816 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 163 is on host 163
2023-07-11 14:16:27,816 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 164 is on host 164
2023-07-11 14:16:27,816 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 165 is on host 165
2023-07-11 14:16:27,816 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 166 is on host 166
2023-07-11 14:16:27,816 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 167 is on host 167
2023-07-11 14:16:27,816 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 168 is on host 168
2023-07-11 14:16:27,817 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 169 is on host 169
2023-07-11 14:16:27,817 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 170 is on host 170
2023-07-11 14:16:27,817 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 171 is on host 171
2023-07-11 14:16:27,817 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 172 is on host 172
2023-07-11 14:16:27,817 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 173 is on host 173
2023-07-11 14:16:27,817 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 174 is on host 174
2023-07-11 14:16:27,817 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 175 is on host 175
2023-07-11 14:16:27,817 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 176 is on host 176
2023-07-11 14:16:27,817 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 177 is on host 177
2023-07-11 14:16:27,817 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 178 is on host 178
2023-07-11 14:16:27,817 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 179 is on host 179
2023-07-11 14:16:27,817 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 180 is on host 180
2023-07-11 14:16:27,817 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 181 is on host 181
2023-07-11 14:16:27,817 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 182 is on host 182
2023-07-11 14:16:27,817 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 183 is on host 183
2023-07-11 14:16:27,817 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 184 is on host 184
2023-07-11 14:16:27,817 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 185 is on host 185
2023-07-11 14:16:27,817 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 186 is on host 186
2023-07-11 14:16:27,817 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 187 is on host 187
2023-07-11 14:16:27,817 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 188 is on host 188
2023-07-11 14:16:27,817 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 189 is on host 189
2023-07-11 14:16:27,817 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 190 is on host 190
2023-07-11 14:16:27,817 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 191 is on host 191
2023-07-11 14:16:27,817 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 192 is on host 192
2023-07-11 14:16:27,817 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 193 is on host 193
2023-07-11 14:16:27,817 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 194 is on host 194
2023-07-11 14:16:27,817 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 195 is on host 195
2023-07-11 14:16:27,817 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 196 is on host 196
2023-07-11 14:16:27,818 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 197 is on host 197
2023-07-11 14:16:27,818 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 198 is on host 198
2023-07-11 14:16:27,818 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 199 is on host 199
2023-07-11 14:16:27,818 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 200 is on host 200
2023-07-11 14:16:27,818 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 201 is on host 201
2023-07-11 14:16:27,818 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 202 is on host 202
2023-07-11 14:16:27,818 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 203 is on host 203
2023-07-11 14:16:27,818 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 204 is on host 204
2023-07-11 14:16:27,818 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 205 is on host 205
2023-07-11 14:16:27,818 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 206 is on host 206
2023-07-11 14:16:27,818 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 207 is on host 207
2023-07-11 14:16:27,818 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 208 is on host 208
2023-07-11 14:16:27,818 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 209 is on host 209
2023-07-11 14:16:27,818 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 210 is on host 210
2023-07-11 14:16:27,818 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 211 is on host 211
2023-07-11 14:16:27,818 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 212 is on host 212
2023-07-11 14:16:27,818 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 213 is on host 213
2023-07-11 14:16:27,818 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 214 is on host 214
2023-07-11 14:16:27,818 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 215 is on host 215
2023-07-11 14:16:27,818 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 216 is on host 216
2023-07-11 14:16:27,818 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 217 is on host 217
2023-07-11 14:16:27,818 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 218 is on host 218
2023-07-11 14:16:27,818 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 219 is on host 219
2023-07-11 14:16:27,818 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 220 is on host 220
2023-07-11 14:16:27,818 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 221 is on host 221
2023-07-11 14:16:27,818 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 222 is on host 222
2023-07-11 14:16:27,818 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 223 is on host 223
2023-07-11 14:16:27,818 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 224 is on host 224
2023-07-11 14:16:27,818 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 225 is on host 225
2023-07-11 14:16:27,818 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 226 is on host 226
2023-07-11 14:16:27,819 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 227 is on host 227
2023-07-11 14:16:27,819 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 228 is on host 228
2023-07-11 14:16:27,819 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 229 is on host 229
2023-07-11 14:16:27,819 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 230 is on host 230
2023-07-11 14:16:27,819 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 231 is on host 231
2023-07-11 14:16:27,819 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 232 is on host 232
2023-07-11 14:16:27,819 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 233 is on host 233
2023-07-11 14:16:27,819 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 234 is on host 234
2023-07-11 14:16:27,819 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 235 is on host 235
2023-07-11 14:16:27,819 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 236 is on host 236
2023-07-11 14:16:27,819 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 237 is on host 237
2023-07-11 14:16:27,819 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 238 is on host 238
2023-07-11 14:16:27,819 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 239 is on host 239
2023-07-11 14:16:27,819 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 240 is on host 240
2023-07-11 14:16:27,819 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 241 is on host 241
2023-07-11 14:16:27,819 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 242 is on host 242
2023-07-11 14:16:27,819 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 243 is on host 243
2023-07-11 14:16:27,819 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 244 is on host 244
2023-07-11 14:16:27,819 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 245 is on host 245
2023-07-11 14:16:27,819 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 246 is on host 246
2023-07-11 14:16:27,819 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 247 is on host 247
2023-07-11 14:16:27,819 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 248 is on host 248
2023-07-11 14:16:27,819 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 249 is on host 249
2023-07-11 14:16:27,819 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 250 is on host 250
2023-07-11 14:16:27,819 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 251 is on host 251
2023-07-11 14:16:27,819 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 252 is on host 252
2023-07-11 14:16:27,819 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 253 is on host 253
2023-07-11 14:16:27,819 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 254 is on host 254
2023-07-11 14:16:27,819 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 255 is on host 255
2023-07-11 14:16:27,820 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 256 is on host 256
2023-07-11 14:16:27,820 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 257 is on host 257
2023-07-11 14:16:27,820 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 258 is on host 258
2023-07-11 14:16:27,820 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 259 is on host 259
2023-07-11 14:16:27,820 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 260 is on host 260
2023-07-11 14:16:27,820 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 261 is on host 261
2023-07-11 14:16:27,820 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 262 is on host 262
2023-07-11 14:16:27,820 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 263 is on host 263
2023-07-11 14:16:27,820 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 264 is on host 264
2023-07-11 14:16:27,820 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 265 is on host 265
2023-07-11 14:16:27,820 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 266 is on host 266
2023-07-11 14:16:27,820 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 267 is on host 267
2023-07-11 14:16:27,820 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 268 is on host 268
2023-07-11 14:16:27,820 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 269 is on host 269
2023-07-11 14:16:27,820 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 270 is on host 270
2023-07-11 14:16:27,820 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 271 is on host 271
2023-07-11 14:16:27,820 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 272 is on host 272
2023-07-11 14:16:27,820 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 273 is on host 273
2023-07-11 14:16:27,820 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 274 is on host 274
2023-07-11 14:16:27,820 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 275 is on host 275
2023-07-11 14:16:27,820 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 276 is on host 276
2023-07-11 14:16:27,820 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 277 is on host 277
2023-07-11 14:16:27,820 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 278 is on host 278
2023-07-11 14:16:27,820 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 279 is on host 279
2023-07-11 14:16:27,820 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 280 is on host 280
2023-07-11 14:16:27,820 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 281 is on host 281
2023-07-11 14:16:27,820 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 282 is on host 282
2023-07-11 14:16:27,820 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 283 is on host 283
2023-07-11 14:16:27,820 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 284 is on host 284
2023-07-11 14:16:27,821 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 285 is on host 285
2023-07-11 14:16:27,821 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 286 is on host 286
2023-07-11 14:16:27,821 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 287 is on host 287
2023-07-11 14:16:27,821 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 288 is on host 288
2023-07-11 14:16:27,821 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 289 is on host 289
2023-07-11 14:16:27,821 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 290 is on host 290
2023-07-11 14:16:27,821 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 291 is on host 291
2023-07-11 14:16:27,821 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 292 is on host 292
2023-07-11 14:16:27,821 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 293 is on host 293
2023-07-11 14:16:27,821 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 294 is on host 294
2023-07-11 14:16:27,821 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 295 is on host 295
2023-07-11 14:16:27,821 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 296 is on host 296
2023-07-11 14:16:27,821 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 297 is on host 297
2023-07-11 14:16:27,821 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 298 is on host 298
2023-07-11 14:16:27,821 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 299 is on host 299
2023-07-11 14:16:27,821 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 300 is on host 300
2023-07-11 14:16:27,821 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 301 is on host 301
2023-07-11 14:16:27,821 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 302 is on host 302
2023-07-11 14:16:27,821 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 303 is on host 303
2023-07-11 14:16:27,821 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 304 is on host 304
2023-07-11 14:16:27,821 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 305 is on host 305
2023-07-11 14:16:27,821 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 306 is on host 306
2023-07-11 14:16:27,821 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 307 is on host 307
2023-07-11 14:16:27,821 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 308 is on host 308
2023-07-11 14:16:27,821 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 309 is on host 309
2023-07-11 14:16:27,821 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 310 is on host 310
2023-07-11 14:16:27,821 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 311 is on host 311
2023-07-11 14:16:27,821 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 312 is on host 312
2023-07-11 14:16:27,821 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 313 is on host 313
2023-07-11 14:16:27,822 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 314 is on host 314
2023-07-11 14:16:27,822 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 315 is on host 315
2023-07-11 14:16:27,822 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 316 is on host 316
2023-07-11 14:16:27,822 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 317 is on host 317
2023-07-11 14:16:27,822 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 318 is on host 318
2023-07-11 14:16:27,822 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 319 is on host 319
2023-07-11 14:16:27,822 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 320 is on host 320
2023-07-11 14:16:27,822 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 321 is on host 321
2023-07-11 14:16:27,822 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 322 is on host 322
2023-07-11 14:16:27,822 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 323 is on host 323
2023-07-11 14:16:27,822 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 324 is on host 324
2023-07-11 14:16:27,822 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 325 is on host 325
2023-07-11 14:16:27,822 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 326 is on host 326
2023-07-11 14:16:27,822 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 327 is on host 327
2023-07-11 14:16:27,822 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 328 is on host 328
2023-07-11 14:16:27,822 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 329 is on host 329
2023-07-11 14:16:27,822 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 330 is on host 330
2023-07-11 14:16:27,822 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 331 is on host 331
2023-07-11 14:16:27,822 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 332 is on host 332
2023-07-11 14:16:27,822 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 333 is on host 333
2023-07-11 14:16:27,822 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 334 is on host 334
2023-07-11 14:16:27,822 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 335 is on host 335
2023-07-11 14:16:27,822 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 336 is on host 336
2023-07-11 14:16:27,822 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 337 is on host 337
2023-07-11 14:16:27,822 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 338 is on host 338
2023-07-11 14:16:27,822 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 339 is on host 339
2023-07-11 14:16:27,822 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 340 is on host 340
2023-07-11 14:16:27,822 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 341 is on host 341
2023-07-11 14:16:27,822 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 342 is on host 342
2023-07-11 14:16:27,823 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 343 is on host 343
2023-07-11 14:16:27,823 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 344 is on host 344
2023-07-11 14:16:27,823 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 345 is on host 345
2023-07-11 14:16:27,823 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 346 is on host 346
2023-07-11 14:16:27,823 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 347 is on host 347
2023-07-11 14:16:27,823 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 348 is on host 348
2023-07-11 14:16:27,823 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 349 is on host 349
2023-07-11 14:16:27,823 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 350 is on host 350
2023-07-11 14:16:27,823 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 351 is on host 351
2023-07-11 14:16:27,823 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 352 is on host 352
2023-07-11 14:16:27,823 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 353 is on host 353
2023-07-11 14:16:27,823 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 354 is on host 354
2023-07-11 14:16:27,823 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 355 is on host 355
2023-07-11 14:16:27,823 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 356 is on host 356
2023-07-11 14:16:27,823 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 357 is on host 357
2023-07-11 14:16:27,823 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 358 is on host 358
2023-07-11 14:16:27,823 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 359 is on host 359
2023-07-11 14:16:27,823 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 360 is on host 360
2023-07-11 14:16:27,823 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 361 is on host 361
2023-07-11 14:16:27,823 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 362 is on host 362
2023-07-11 14:16:27,823 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 363 is on host 363
2023-07-11 14:16:27,823 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 364 is on host 364
2023-07-11 14:16:27,823 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 365 is on host 365
2023-07-11 14:16:27,823 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 366 is on host 366
2023-07-11 14:16:27,823 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 367 is on host 367
2023-07-11 14:16:27,823 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 368 is on host 368
2023-07-11 14:16:27,823 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 369 is on host 369
2023-07-11 14:16:27,823 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 370 is on host 370
2023-07-11 14:16:27,823 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 371 is on host 371
2023-07-11 14:16:27,824 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 372 is on host 372
2023-07-11 14:16:27,824 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 373 is on host 373
2023-07-11 14:16:27,824 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 374 is on host 374
2023-07-11 14:16:27,824 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 375 is on host 375
2023-07-11 14:16:27,824 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 376 is on host 376
2023-07-11 14:16:27,824 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 377 is on host 377
2023-07-11 14:16:27,824 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 378 is on host 378
2023-07-11 14:16:27,824 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 379 is on host 379
2023-07-11 14:16:27,824 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 380 is on host 380
2023-07-11 14:16:27,824 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 381 is on host 381
2023-07-11 14:16:27,824 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 382 is on host 382
2023-07-11 14:16:27,824 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 383 is on host 383
2023-07-11 14:16:27,824 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 384 is on host 384
2023-07-11 14:16:27,824 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 385 is on host 385
2023-07-11 14:16:27,824 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 386 is on host 386
2023-07-11 14:16:27,824 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 387 is on host 387
2023-07-11 14:16:27,824 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 388 is on host 388
2023-07-11 14:16:27,824 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 389 is on host 389
2023-07-11 14:16:27,824 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 390 is on host 390
2023-07-11 14:16:27,824 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 391 is on host 391
2023-07-11 14:16:27,824 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 392 is on host 392
2023-07-11 14:16:27,824 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=393, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:27,825 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table36) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:27,825 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table37
2023-07-11 14:16:27,825 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv553536953=290, srv1630071126=110, srv1071894870=12, srv23511728=232, srv658346947=323, srv2025338799=204, srv1397994335=64, srv1976766403=195, srv1644629726=118, srv957637734=381, srv2079182457=210, srv1749264468=139, srv2046129126=206, srv1595762596=104, srv603990852=307, srv1973073480=194, srv958856137=382, srv644066832=319, srv557062842=292, srv277765671=235, srv732221418=337, srv1769385567=143, srv224612199=228, srv714752528=334, srv362526040=256, srv581128949=296, srv2133511466=223, srv1144239257=30, srv320603627=245, srv1679952521=126, srv2122867873=222, srv1110067064=24, srv256251994=233, srv63261708=317, srv89837390=371, srv552104598=289, srv508952995=281, srv2096011353=214, srv1770417148=144, srv1246723478=42, srv929436444=378, srv2082192429=211, srv234917297=231, srv405700573=266, srv183644386=166, srv1488378513=85, srv173139715=136, srv1154180352=32, srv355693379=252, srv1407521654=66, srv496848057=275, srv1157975499=33, srv1806731027=162, srv1923102804=184, srv311102455=244, srv450011410=271, srv771515724=348, srv389183508=262, srv1249074416=43, srv2014575201=201, srv640847108=318, srv832363565=356, srv1970882134=192, srv2107358603=218, srv855766065=361, srv1336043388=55, srv29397186=237, srv982792848=390, srv976560524=386, srv101181760=3, srv1093549482=21, srv2018389395=202, srv2113483104=221, srv1778339118=149, srv1968709692=190, srv705221118=333, srv159600090=105, srv1919608486=180, srv981255102=389, srv807899713=353, srv755110395=344, srv1770594519=145, srv739692705=340, srv1076582671=16, srv693869315=330, srv1079048717=17, srv440657532=270, srv1636659280=115, srv2108739257=220, srv668373413=326, srv1003610393=2, srv1054229197=11, srv1868589627=172, srv2103522371=217, srv1000546271=0, srv951670617=380, srv2042909593=205, srv1865656038=171, srv1466355012=78, srv703662406=332, srv1418112884=70, srv1215580291=40, srv71833528=335, srv1580581635=103, srv1021032212=5, srv1080806312=19, srv1985601859=197, srv74471954=343, srv1647472319=119, srv2071553346=208, srv1632855171=112, srv1122009370=27, srv13613992=61, srv1630777154=111, srv301413669=239, srv550697728=288, srv1296023857=53, srv1724550977=133, srv1989290370=198, srv1926417985=185, srv1678097199=125, srv1461034373=76, srv614690415=311, srv2098345381=215, srv310463473=243, srv1011934105=4, srv148627129=84, srv305489318=240, srv1256534903=46, srv1289731445=52, srv1798844587=157, srv567113085=294, srv1119222501=26, srv2055117940=207, srv855898852=362, srv629224816=316, srv1075943554=15, srv625909061=315, srv1705591942=128, srv734225580=339, srv660107924=324, srv1381729938=62, srv1633483173=113, srv408265476=267, srv1776057793=148, srv1360253411=60, srv1511424834=90, srv1414162621=68, srv883343663=370, srv151859222=91, srv349144930=251, srv1991304034=199, srv1825887791=164, srv601657063=305, srv758932951=345, srv1651629087=120, srv1864623584=170, srv682957691=329, srv1500454146=88, srv1725962085=135, srv1659841448=121, srv1253206004=45, srv52354442=284, srv18508093=168, srv1427731921=73, srv561344974=293, srv721668125=336, srv1575482138=100, srv914128771=373, srv961487230=383, srv741332941=342, srv533032466=286, srv1574140987=99, srv2139849097=224, srv503902262=278, srv674807007=327, srv1786829855=153, srv2088727517=213, srv394366966=264, srv980089565=388, srv114594288=31, srv38296437=261, srv214835574=226, srv1887224977=176, srv1025509362=7, srv1577020334=102, srv524466665=285, srv393561021=263, srv759909927=346, srv763556514=347, srv786453030=349, srv2142935488=225, srv618111613=312, srv16254163=108, srv343211061=250, srv476075173=273, srv1269632212=47, srv333589612=246, srv499015361=276, srv836674186=357, srv1799191687=158, srv1446998035=74, srv1571774199=98, srv1115354947=25, srv333860881=247, srv1724152600=132, srv1598699299=106, srv177885829=151, srv472125887=272, srv1101339966=22, srv1424985362=72, srv1945569895=188, srv594128294=300, srv1026739237=8, srv842459828=358, srv878519137=366, srv1921260729=181, srv339110834=249, srv504099471=279, srv814253179=354, srv1643744885=116, srv1793847521=155, srv607234624=309, srv698219051=331, srv1688538732=127, srv666240078=325, srv1079284733=18, srv29210550=236, srv506181748=280, srv881313122=368, srv1945452576=187, srv597307897=303, srv1285120424=51, srv1887943816=177, srv1983604698=196, srv1805465940=161, srv309309336=242, srv1719756294=131, srv1349932676=58, srv1208486369=38, srv1643971570=117, srv1509331489=89, srv334105385=248, srv1400515744=65, srv369984715=259, srv43712162=269, srv842675864=359, srv1803258748=160, srv1022450918=6, srv1775108732=147, srv1766088250=141, srv180150732=159, srv1220857227=41, srv226530501=229, srv362032108=255, srv919715380=377, srv1074935976=14, srv1395030819=63, srv803291569=352, srv1877966766=175, srv220538712=227, srv2021718843=203, srv2107782185=219, srv882216860=369, srv1489137852=86, srv1972328734=193, srv1470759982=79, srv1774824811=146, srv971974774=384, srv1418242791=71, srv1001274196=1, srv909615097=372, srv1537724566=93, srv1165799954=34, srv1724754364=134, srv978173525=387, srv113319438=29, srv578033735=295, srv147931272=80, srv1183635941=35, srv1904215245=178, srv596349756=302, srv880835255=367, srv857544550=364, srv1779729022=152, srv1795612465=156, srv621083045=314, srv917704170=375, srv1351811120=59, srv1316710897=54, srv789820555=350, srv1922580095=183, srv305567304=241, srv1936745425=186, srv1745318024=138, srv1210822057=39, srv645375717=320, srv950628389=379, srv1490199189=87, srv1575919256=101, srv154481102=96, srv359402967=254, srv997716931=391, srv1457224273=75, srv581644449=297, srv1872374768=174, srv363177310=257, srv740327512=341, srv1664227236=123, srv972330517=385, srv1634261306=114, srv1662183707=122, srv1969046891=191, srv1485266211=82, srv1778842262=150, srv588410181=298, srv1921840985=182, srv591279493=299, srv37574565=260, srv1104147458=23, srv1190166330=36, srv652270371=322, srv1484309042=81, srv1560148463=97, srv618569548=313, srv2102708311=216, srv1084873074=20, srv517669556=283, srv918152084=376, srv649714317=321, srv1674484790=124, srv1339239880=56, srv1461073271=77, srv1125312901=28, srv25633292=234, srv516616923=282, srv299721745=238, srv604932433=308, srv1273702855=48, srv792183929=351, srv1042608200=10, srv1276335106=49, srv1486044644=83, srv676101698=328, srv998930892=392, srv200111276=200, srv1863083643=169, srv1737443479=137, srv872997185=365, srv821351126=355, srv852115805=360, srv1074355423=13, srv170952194=130, srv503430005=277, srv153887567=94, srv1415163001=69, srv1032737435=9, srv1840670515=167, srv1961921083=189, srv59745831=304, srv36715747=258, srv431547280=268, srv1524853580=92, srv1870059418=173, srv396010771=265, srv594457792=301, srv1755339428=140, srv1766275429=142, srv5565786=291, srv603898526=306, srv544570223=287, srv856030669=363, srv1542523468=95, srv915785747=374, srv356122213=253, srv1411875499=67, srv2077620970=209, srv1345529444=57, srv232339963=230, srv1250861076=44, srv1914875423=179, srv478619481=274, srv1202435626=37, srv1706089454=129, srv1810631201=163, srv1282644061=50, srv1625945288=109, srv733251129=338, srv2082830831=212, srv1612103540=107, srv612136291=310, srv1790004142=154, srv183394703=165} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:27,825 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:27,826 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:27,826 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:27,826 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:27,826 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:27,826 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:27,826 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-11 14:16:27,826 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-11 14:16:27,826 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-11 14:16:27,826 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-11 14:16:27,826 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 10 is on host 10
2023-07-11 14:16:27,826 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 11 is on host 11
2023-07-11 14:16:27,826 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 12 is on host 12
2023-07-11 14:16:27,826 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 13 is on host 13
2023-07-11 14:16:27,826 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 14 is on host 14
2023-07-11 14:16:27,826 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 15 is on host 15
2023-07-11 14:16:27,826 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 16 is on host 16
2023-07-11 14:16:27,826 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 17 is on host 17
2023-07-11 14:16:27,826 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 18 is on host 18
2023-07-11 14:16:27,826 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 19 is on host 19
2023-07-11 14:16:27,826 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 20 is on host 20
2023-07-11 14:16:27,827 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 21 is on host 21
2023-07-11 14:16:27,827 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 22 is on host 22
2023-07-11 14:16:27,827 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 23 is on host 23
2023-07-11 14:16:27,827 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 24 is on host 24
2023-07-11 14:16:27,827 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 25 is on host 25
2023-07-11 14:16:27,827 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 26 is on host 26
2023-07-11 14:16:27,827 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 27 is on host 27
2023-07-11 14:16:27,827 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 28 is on host 28
2023-07-11 14:16:27,827 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 29 is on host 29
2023-07-11 14:16:27,827 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 30 is on host 30
2023-07-11 14:16:27,827 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 31 is on host 31
2023-07-11 14:16:27,827 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 32 is on host 32
2023-07-11 14:16:27,827 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 33 is on host 33
2023-07-11 14:16:27,827 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 34 is on host 34
2023-07-11 14:16:27,827 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 35 is on host 35
2023-07-11 14:16:27,827 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 36 is on host 36
2023-07-11 14:16:27,827 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 37 is on host 37
2023-07-11 14:16:27,827 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 38 is on host 38
2023-07-11 14:16:27,827 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 39 is on host 39
2023-07-11 14:16:27,827 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 40 is on host 40
2023-07-11 14:16:27,827 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 41 is on host 41
2023-07-11 14:16:27,827 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 42 is on host 42
2023-07-11 14:16:27,827 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 43 is on host 43
2023-07-11 14:16:27,827 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 44 is on host 44
2023-07-11 14:16:27,827 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 45 is on host 45
2023-07-11 14:16:27,827 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 46 is on host 46
2023-07-11 14:16:27,827 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 47 is on host 47
2023-07-11 14:16:27,827 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 48 is on host 48
2023-07-11 14:16:27,827 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 49 is on host 49
2023-07-11 14:16:27,828 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 50 is on host 50
2023-07-11 14:16:27,828 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 51 is on host 51
2023-07-11 14:16:27,828 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 52 is on host 52
2023-07-11 14:16:27,828 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 53 is on host 53
2023-07-11 14:16:27,828 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 54 is on host 54
2023-07-11 14:16:27,828 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 55 is on host 55
2023-07-11 14:16:27,828 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 56 is on host 56
2023-07-11 14:16:27,828 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 57 is on host 57
2023-07-11 14:16:27,828 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 58 is on host 58
2023-07-11 14:16:27,828 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 59 is on host 59
2023-07-11 14:16:27,828 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 60 is on host 60
2023-07-11 14:16:27,828 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 61 is on host 61
2023-07-11 14:16:27,828 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 62 is on host 62
2023-07-11 14:16:27,828 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 63 is on host 63
2023-07-11 14:16:27,828 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 64 is on host 64
2023-07-11 14:16:27,828 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 65 is on host 65
2023-07-11 14:16:27,828 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 66 is on host 66
2023-07-11 14:16:27,828 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 67 is on host 67
2023-07-11 14:16:27,828 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 68 is on host 68
2023-07-11 14:16:27,828 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 69 is on host 69
2023-07-11 14:16:27,828 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 70 is on host 70
2023-07-11 14:16:27,828 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 71 is on host 71
2023-07-11 14:16:27,828 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 72 is on host 72
2023-07-11 14:16:27,828 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 73 is on host 73
2023-07-11 14:16:27,828 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 74 is on host 74
2023-07-11 14:16:27,828 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 75 is on host 75
2023-07-11 14:16:27,828 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 76 is on host 76
2023-07-11 14:16:27,828 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 77 is on host 77
2023-07-11 14:16:27,828 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 78 is on host 78
2023-07-11 14:16:27,829 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 79 is on host 79
2023-07-11 14:16:27,829 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 80 is on host 80
2023-07-11 14:16:27,829 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 81 is on host 81
2023-07-11 14:16:27,829 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 82 is on host 82
2023-07-11 14:16:27,829 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 83 is on host 83
2023-07-11 14:16:27,829 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 84 is on host 84
2023-07-11 14:16:27,829 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 85 is on host 85
2023-07-11 14:16:27,829 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 86 is on host 86
2023-07-11 14:16:27,829 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 87 is on host 87
2023-07-11 14:16:27,829 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 88 is on host 88
2023-07-11 14:16:27,829 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 89 is on host 89
2023-07-11 14:16:27,829 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 90 is on host 90
2023-07-11 14:16:27,829 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 91 is on host 91
2023-07-11 14:16:27,829 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 92 is on host 92
2023-07-11 14:16:27,829 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 93 is on host 93
2023-07-11 14:16:27,829 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 94 is on host 94
2023-07-11 14:16:27,829 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 95 is on host 95
2023-07-11 14:16:27,829 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 96 is on host 96
2023-07-11 14:16:27,829 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 97 is on host 97
2023-07-11 14:16:27,829 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 98 is on host 98
2023-07-11 14:16:27,829 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 99 is on host 99
2023-07-11 14:16:27,829 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 100 is on host 100
2023-07-11 14:16:27,829 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 101 is on host 101
2023-07-11 14:16:27,829 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 102 is on host 102
2023-07-11 14:16:27,829 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 103 is on host 103
2023-07-11 14:16:27,829 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 104 is on host 104
2023-07-11 14:16:27,829 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 105 is on host 105
2023-07-11 14:16:27,829 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 106 is on host 106
2023-07-11 14:16:27,830 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 107 is on host 107
2023-07-11 14:16:27,830 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 108 is on host 108
2023-07-11 14:16:27,830 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 109 is on host 109
2023-07-11 14:16:27,830 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 110 is on host 110
2023-07-11 14:16:27,830 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 111 is on host 111
2023-07-11 14:16:27,830 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 112 is on host 112
2023-07-11 14:16:27,830 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 113 is on host 113
2023-07-11 14:16:27,830 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 114 is on host 114
2023-07-11 14:16:27,830 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 115 is on host 115
2023-07-11 14:16:27,830 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 116 is on host 116
2023-07-11 14:16:27,830 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 117 is on host 117
2023-07-11 14:16:27,830 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 118 is on host 118
2023-07-11 14:16:27,830 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 119 is on host 119
2023-07-11 14:16:27,830 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 120 is on host 120
2023-07-11 14:16:27,830 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 121 is on host 121
2023-07-11 14:16:27,830 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 122 is on host 122
2023-07-11 14:16:27,830 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 123 is on host 123
2023-07-11 14:16:27,830 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 124 is on host 124
2023-07-11 14:16:27,830 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 125 is on host 125
2023-07-11 14:16:27,830 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 126 is on host 126
2023-07-11 14:16:27,830 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 127 is on host 127
2023-07-11 14:16:27,830 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 128 is on host 128
2023-07-11 14:16:27,830 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 129 is on host 129
2023-07-11 14:16:27,830 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 130 is on host 130
2023-07-11 14:16:27,830 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 131 is on host 131
2023-07-11 14:16:27,830 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 132 is on host 132
2023-07-11 14:16:27,830 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 133 is on host 133
2023-07-11 14:16:27,830 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 134 is on host 134
2023-07-11 14:16:27,830 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 135 is on host 135
2023-07-11 14:16:27,830 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 136 is on host 136
2023-07-11 14:16:27,831 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 137 is on host 137
2023-07-11 14:16:27,831 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 138 is on host 138
2023-07-11 14:16:27,831 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 139 is on host 139
2023-07-11 14:16:27,831 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 140 is on host 140
2023-07-11 14:16:27,831 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 141 is on host 141
2023-07-11 14:16:27,831 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 142 is on host 142
2023-07-11 14:16:27,831 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 143 is on host 143
2023-07-11 14:16:27,831 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 144 is on host 144
2023-07-11 14:16:27,831 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 145 is on host 145
2023-07-11 14:16:27,831 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 146 is on host 146
2023-07-11 14:16:27,831 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 147 is on host 147
2023-07-11 14:16:27,831 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 148 is on host 148
2023-07-11 14:16:27,831 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 149 is on host 149
2023-07-11 14:16:27,831 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 150 is on host 150
2023-07-11 14:16:27,831 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 151 is on host 151
2023-07-11 14:16:27,831 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 152 is on host 152
2023-07-11 14:16:27,831 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 153 is on host 153
2023-07-11 14:16:27,831 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 154 is on host 154
2023-07-11 14:16:27,831 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 155 is on host 155
2023-07-11 14:16:27,831 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 156 is on host 156
2023-07-11 14:16:27,831 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 157 is on host 157
2023-07-11 14:16:27,831 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 158 is on host 158
2023-07-11 14:16:27,831 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 159 is on host 159
2023-07-11 14:16:27,831 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 160 is on host 160
2023-07-11 14:16:27,831 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 161 is on host 161
2023-07-11 14:16:27,831 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 162 is on host 162
2023-07-11 14:16:27,831 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 163 is on host 163
2023-07-11 14:16:27,831 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 164 is on host 164
2023-07-11 14:16:27,831 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 165 is on host 165
2023-07-11 14:16:27,832 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 166 is on host 166
2023-07-11 14:16:27,832 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 167 is on host 167
2023-07-11 14:16:27,832 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 168 is on host 168
2023-07-11 14:16:27,832 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 169 is on host 169
2023-07-11 14:16:27,832 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 170 is on host 170
2023-07-11 14:16:27,832 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 171 is on host 171
2023-07-11 14:16:27,832 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 172 is on host 172
2023-07-11 14:16:27,832 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 173 is on host 173
2023-07-11 14:16:27,832 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 174 is on host 174
2023-07-11 14:16:27,832 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 175 is on host 175
2023-07-11 14:16:27,832 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 176 is on host 176
2023-07-11 14:16:27,832 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 177 is on host 177
2023-07-11 14:16:27,832 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 178 is on host 178
2023-07-11 14:16:27,832 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 179 is on host 179
2023-07-11 14:16:27,832 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 180 is on host 180
2023-07-11 14:16:27,832 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 181 is on host 181
2023-07-11 14:16:27,832 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 182 is on host 182
2023-07-11 14:16:27,832 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 183 is on host 183
2023-07-11 14:16:27,832 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 184 is on host 184
2023-07-11 14:16:27,832 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 185 is on host 185
2023-07-11 14:16:27,832 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 186 is on host 186
2023-07-11 14:16:27,832 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 187 is on host 187
2023-07-11 14:16:27,832 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 188 is on host 188
2023-07-11 14:16:27,832 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 189 is on host 189
2023-07-11 14:16:27,832 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 190 is on host 190
2023-07-11 14:16:27,832 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 191 is on host 191
2023-07-11 14:16:27,832 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 192 is on host 192
2023-07-11 14:16:27,832 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 193 is on host 193
2023-07-11 14:16:27,832 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 194 is on host 194
2023-07-11 14:16:27,833 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 195 is on host 195
2023-07-11 14:16:27,833 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 196 is on host 196
2023-07-11 14:16:27,833 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 197 is on host 197
2023-07-11 14:16:27,833 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 198 is on host 198
2023-07-11 14:16:27,833 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 199 is on host 199
2023-07-11 14:16:27,833 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 200 is on host 200
2023-07-11 14:16:27,833 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 201 is on host 201
2023-07-11 14:16:27,833 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 202 is on host 202
2023-07-11 14:16:27,833 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 203 is on host 203
2023-07-11 14:16:27,833 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 204 is on host 204
2023-07-11 14:16:27,833 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 205 is on host 205
2023-07-11 14:16:27,833 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 206 is on host 206
2023-07-11 14:16:27,833 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 207 is on host 207
2023-07-11 14:16:27,833 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 208 is on host 208
2023-07-11 14:16:27,833 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 209 is on host 209
2023-07-11 14:16:27,833 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 210 is on host 210
2023-07-11 14:16:27,833 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 211 is on host 211
2023-07-11 14:16:27,833 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 212 is on host 212
2023-07-11 14:16:27,833 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 213 is on host 213
2023-07-11 14:16:27,833 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 214 is on host 214
2023-07-11 14:16:27,833 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 215 is on host 215
2023-07-11 14:16:27,833 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 216 is on host 216
2023-07-11 14:16:27,833 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 217 is on host 217
2023-07-11 14:16:27,833 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 218 is on host 218
2023-07-11 14:16:27,833 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 219 is on host 219
2023-07-11 14:16:27,833 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 220 is on host 220
2023-07-11 14:16:27,833 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 221 is on host 221
2023-07-11 14:16:27,833 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 222 is on host 222
2023-07-11 14:16:27,833 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 223 is on host 223
2023-07-11 14:16:27,834 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 224 is on host 224
2023-07-11 14:16:27,834 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 225 is on host 225
2023-07-11 14:16:27,834 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 226 is on host 226
2023-07-11 14:16:27,834 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 227 is on host 227
2023-07-11 14:16:27,834 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 228 is on host 228
2023-07-11 14:16:27,834 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 229 is on host 229
2023-07-11 14:16:27,834 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 230 is on host 230
2023-07-11 14:16:27,834 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 231 is on host 231
2023-07-11 14:16:27,834 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 232 is on host 232
2023-07-11 14:16:27,834 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 233 is on host 233
2023-07-11 14:16:27,834 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 234 is on host 234
2023-07-11 14:16:27,834 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 235 is on host 235
2023-07-11 14:16:27,834 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 236 is on host 236
2023-07-11 14:16:27,834 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 237 is on host 237
2023-07-11 14:16:27,834 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 238 is on host 238
2023-07-11 14:16:27,834 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 239 is on host 239
2023-07-11 14:16:27,834 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 240 is on host 240
2023-07-11 14:16:27,834 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 241 is on host 241
2023-07-11 14:16:27,834 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 242 is on host 242
2023-07-11 14:16:27,834 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 243 is on host 243
2023-07-11 14:16:27,834 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 244 is on host 244
2023-07-11 14:16:27,834 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 245 is on host 245
2023-07-11 14:16:27,834 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 246 is on host 246
2023-07-11 14:16:27,834 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 247 is on host 247
2023-07-11 14:16:27,834 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 248 is on host 248
2023-07-11 14:16:27,834 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 249 is on host 249
2023-07-11 14:16:27,834 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 250 is on host 250
2023-07-11 14:16:27,834 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 251 is on host 251
2023-07-11 14:16:27,834 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 252 is on host 252
2023-07-11 14:16:27,835 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 253 is on host 253
2023-07-11 14:16:27,835 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 254 is on host 254
2023-07-11 14:16:27,835 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 255 is on host 255
2023-07-11 14:16:27,835 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 256 is on host 256
2023-07-11 14:16:27,835 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 257 is on host 257
2023-07-11 14:16:27,835 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 258 is on host 258
2023-07-11 14:16:27,835 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 259 is on host 259
2023-07-11 14:16:27,835 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 260 is on host 260
2023-07-11 14:16:27,835 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 261 is on host 261
2023-07-11 14:16:27,835 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 262 is on host 262
2023-07-11 14:16:27,835 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 263 is on host 263
2023-07-11 14:16:27,835 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 264 is on host 264
2023-07-11 14:16:27,835 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 265 is on host 265
2023-07-11 14:16:27,835 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 266 is on host 266
2023-07-11 14:16:27,835 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 267 is on host 267
2023-07-11 14:16:27,835 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 268 is on host 268
2023-07-11 14:16:27,835 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 269 is on host 269
2023-07-11 14:16:27,835 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 270 is on host 270
2023-07-11 14:16:27,835 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 271 is on host 271
2023-07-11 14:16:27,835 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 272 is on host 272
2023-07-11 14:16:27,835 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 273 is on host 273
2023-07-11 14:16:27,835 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 274 is on host 274
2023-07-11 14:16:27,835 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 275 is on host 275
2023-07-11 14:16:27,835 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 276 is on host 276
2023-07-11 14:16:27,835 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 277 is on host 277
2023-07-11 14:16:27,835 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 278 is on host 278
2023-07-11 14:16:27,835 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 279 is on host 279
2023-07-11 14:16:27,835 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 280 is on host 280
2023-07-11 14:16:27,835 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 281 is on host 281
2023-07-11 14:16:27,836 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 282 is on host 282
2023-07-11 14:16:27,836 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 283 is on host 283
2023-07-11 14:16:27,836 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 284 is on host 284
2023-07-11 14:16:27,836 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 285 is on host 285
2023-07-11 14:16:27,836 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 286 is on host 286
2023-07-11 14:16:27,836 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 287 is on host 287
2023-07-11 14:16:27,836 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 288 is on host 288
2023-07-11 14:16:27,836 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 289 is on host 289
2023-07-11 14:16:27,836 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 290 is on host 290
2023-07-11 14:16:27,836 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 291 is on host 291
2023-07-11 14:16:27,836 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 292 is on host 292
2023-07-11 14:16:27,836 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 293 is on host 293
2023-07-11 14:16:27,836 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 294 is on host 294
2023-07-11 14:16:27,836 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 295 is on host 295
2023-07-11 14:16:27,836 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 296 is on host 296
2023-07-11 14:16:27,836 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 297 is on host 297
2023-07-11 14:16:27,836 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 298 is on host 298
2023-07-11 14:16:27,836 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 299 is on host 299
2023-07-11 14:16:27,836 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 300 is on host 300
2023-07-11 14:16:27,836 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 301 is on host 301
2023-07-11 14:16:27,836 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 302 is on host 302
2023-07-11 14:16:27,836 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 303 is on host 303
2023-07-11 14:16:27,836 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 304 is on host 304
2023-07-11 14:16:27,836 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 305 is on host 305
2023-07-11 14:16:27,836 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 306 is on host 306
2023-07-11 14:16:27,837 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 307 is on host 307
2023-07-11 14:16:27,837 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 308 is on host 308
2023-07-11 14:16:27,837 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 309 is on host 309
2023-07-11 14:16:27,837 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 310 is on host 310
2023-07-11 14:16:27,837 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 311 is on host 311
2023-07-11 14:16:27,837 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 312 is on host 312
2023-07-11 14:16:27,837 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 313 is on host 313
2023-07-11 14:16:27,837 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 314 is on host 314
2023-07-11 14:16:27,837 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 315 is on host 315
2023-07-11 14:16:27,837 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 316 is on host 316
2023-07-11 14:16:27,837 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 317 is on host 317
2023-07-11 14:16:27,837 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 318 is on host 318
2023-07-11 14:16:27,837 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 319 is on host 319
2023-07-11 14:16:27,837 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 320 is on host 320
2023-07-11 14:16:27,837 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 321 is on host 321
2023-07-11 14:16:27,837 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 322 is on host 322
2023-07-11 14:16:27,837 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 323 is on host 323
2023-07-11 14:16:27,837 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 324 is on host 324
2023-07-11 14:16:27,837 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 325 is on host 325
2023-07-11 14:16:27,837 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 326 is on host 326
2023-07-11 14:16:27,837 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 327 is on host 327
2023-07-11 14:16:27,838 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 328 is on host 328
2023-07-11 14:16:27,838 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 329 is on host 329
2023-07-11 14:16:27,838 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 330 is on host 330
2023-07-11 14:16:27,838 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 331 is on host 331
2023-07-11 14:16:27,838 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 332 is on host 332
2023-07-11 14:16:27,838 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 333 is on host 333
2023-07-11 14:16:27,838 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 334 is on host 334
2023-07-11 14:16:27,838 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 335 is on host 335
2023-07-11 14:16:27,838 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 336 is on host 336
2023-07-11 14:16:27,838 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 337 is on host 337
2023-07-11 14:16:27,838 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 338 is on host 338
2023-07-11 14:16:27,838 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 339 is on host 339
2023-07-11 14:16:27,838 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 340 is on host 340
2023-07-11 14:16:27,838 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 341 is on host 341
2023-07-11 14:16:27,838 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 342 is on host 342
2023-07-11 14:16:27,838 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 343 is on host 343
2023-07-11 14:16:27,838 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 344 is on host 344
2023-07-11 14:16:27,838 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 345 is on host 345
2023-07-11 14:16:27,838 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 346 is on host 346
2023-07-11 14:16:27,838 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 347 is on host 347
2023-07-11 14:16:27,838 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 348 is on host 348
2023-07-11 14:16:27,838 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 349 is on host 349
2023-07-11 14:16:27,838 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 350 is on host 350
2023-07-11 14:16:27,838 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 351 is on host 351
2023-07-11 14:16:27,838 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 352 is on host 352
2023-07-11 14:16:27,838 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 353 is on host 353
2023-07-11 14:16:27,838 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 354 is on host 354
2023-07-11 14:16:27,838 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 355 is on host 355
2023-07-11 14:16:27,838 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 356 is on host 356
2023-07-11 14:16:27,839 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 357 is on host 357
2023-07-11 14:16:27,839 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 358 is on host 358
2023-07-11 14:16:27,839 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 359 is on host 359
2023-07-11 14:16:27,839 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 360 is on host 360
2023-07-11 14:16:27,839 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 361 is on host 361
2023-07-11 14:16:27,839 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 362 is on host 362
2023-07-11 14:16:27,839 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 363 is on host 363
2023-07-11 14:16:27,839 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 364 is on host 364
2023-07-11 14:16:27,839 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 365 is on host 365
2023-07-11 14:16:27,839 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 366 is on host 366
2023-07-11 14:16:27,839 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 367 is on host 367
2023-07-11 14:16:27,839 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 368 is on host 368
2023-07-11 14:16:27,839 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 369 is on host 369
2023-07-11 14:16:27,839 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 370 is on host 370
2023-07-11 14:16:27,839 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 371 is on host 371
2023-07-11 14:16:27,839 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 372 is on host 372
2023-07-11 14:16:27,839 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 373 is on host 373
2023-07-11 14:16:27,839 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 374 is on host 374
2023-07-11 14:16:27,839 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 375 is on host 375
2023-07-11 14:16:27,839 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 376 is on host 376
2023-07-11 14:16:27,839 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 377 is on host 377
2023-07-11 14:16:27,839 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 378 is on host 378
2023-07-11 14:16:27,839 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 379 is on host 379
2023-07-11 14:16:27,839 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 380 is on host 380
2023-07-11 14:16:27,839 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 381 is on host 381
2023-07-11 14:16:27,839 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 382 is on host 382
2023-07-11 14:16:27,839 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 383 is on host 383
2023-07-11 14:16:27,839 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 384 is on host 384
2023-07-11 14:16:27,839 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 385 is on host 385
2023-07-11 14:16:27,839 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 386 is on host 386
2023-07-11 14:16:27,840 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 387 is on host 387
2023-07-11 14:16:27,840 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 388 is on host 388
2023-07-11 14:16:27,840 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 389 is on host 389
2023-07-11 14:16:27,840 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 390 is on host 390
2023-07-11 14:16:27,840 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 391 is on host 391
2023-07-11 14:16:27,840 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 392 is on host 392
2023-07-11 14:16:27,840 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=393, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:27,840 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table37) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:27,840 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table38
2023-07-11 14:16:27,841 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv553536953=290, srv1630071126=110, srv1071894870=12, srv23511728=232, srv658346947=323, srv2025338799=204, srv1397994335=64, srv1976766403=195, srv1644629726=118, srv957637734=381, srv2079182457=210, srv1749264468=139, srv2046129126=206, srv1595762596=104, srv603990852=307, srv1973073480=194, srv958856137=382, srv644066832=319, srv557062842=292, srv277765671=235, srv732221418=337, srv1769385567=143, srv224612199=228, srv714752528=334, srv362526040=256, srv581128949=296, srv2133511466=223, srv1144239257=30, srv320603627=245, srv1679952521=126, srv2122867873=222, srv1110067064=24, srv256251994=233, srv63261708=317, srv89837390=371, srv552104598=289, srv508952995=281, srv2096011353=214, srv1770417148=144, srv1246723478=42, srv929436444=378, srv2082192429=211, srv234917297=231, srv405700573=266, srv183644386=166, srv1488378513=85, srv173139715=136, srv1154180352=32, srv355693379=252, srv1407521654=66, srv496848057=275, srv1157975499=33, srv1806731027=162, srv1923102804=184, srv311102455=244, srv450011410=271, srv771515724=348, srv389183508=262, srv1249074416=43, srv2014575201=201, srv640847108=318, srv832363565=356, srv1970882134=192, srv2107358603=218, srv855766065=361, srv1336043388=55, srv29397186=237, srv982792848=390, srv976560524=386, srv101181760=3, srv1093549482=21, srv2018389395=202, srv2113483104=221, srv1778339118=149, srv1968709692=190, srv705221118=333, srv159600090=105, srv1919608486=180, srv981255102=389, srv807899713=353, srv755110395=344, srv1770594519=145, srv739692705=340, srv1076582671=16, srv693869315=330, srv1079048717=17, srv440657532=270, srv1636659280=115, srv2108739257=220, srv668373413=326, srv1003610393=2, srv1054229197=11, srv1868589627=172, srv2103522371=217, srv1000546271=0, srv951670617=380, srv2042909593=205, srv1865656038=171, srv1466355012=78, srv703662406=332, srv1418112884=70, srv1215580291=40, srv71833528=335, srv1580581635=103, srv1021032212=5, srv1080806312=19, srv1985601859=197, srv74471954=343, srv1647472319=119, srv2071553346=208, srv1632855171=112, srv1122009370=27, srv13613992=61, srv1630777154=111, srv301413669=239, srv550697728=288, srv1296023857=53, srv1724550977=133, srv1989290370=198, srv1926417985=185, srv1678097199=125, srv1461034373=76, srv614690415=311, srv2098345381=215, srv310463473=243, srv1011934105=4, srv148627129=84, srv305489318=240, srv1256534903=46, srv1289731445=52, srv1798844587=157, srv567113085=294, srv1119222501=26, srv2055117940=207, srv855898852=362, srv629224816=316, srv1075943554=15, srv625909061=315, srv1705591942=128, srv734225580=339, srv660107924=324, srv1381729938=62, srv1633483173=113, srv408265476=267, srv1776057793=148, srv1360253411=60, srv1511424834=90, srv1414162621=68, srv883343663=370, srv151859222=91, srv349144930=251, srv1991304034=199, srv1825887791=164, srv601657063=305, srv758932951=345, srv1651629087=120, srv1864623584=170, srv682957691=329, srv1500454146=88, srv1725962085=135, srv1659841448=121, srv1253206004=45, srv52354442=284, srv18508093=168, srv1427731921=73, srv561344974=293, srv721668125=336, srv1575482138=100, srv914128771=373, srv961487230=383, srv741332941=342, srv533032466=286, srv1574140987=99, srv2139849097=224, srv503902262=278, srv674807007=327, srv1786829855=153, srv2088727517=213, srv394366966=264, srv980089565=388, srv114594288=31, srv38296437=261, srv214835574=226, srv1887224977=176, srv1025509362=7, srv1577020334=102, srv524466665=285, srv393561021=263, srv759909927=346, srv763556514=347, srv786453030=349, srv2142935488=225, srv618111613=312, srv16254163=108, srv343211061=250, srv476075173=273, srv1269632212=47, srv333589612=246, srv499015361=276, srv836674186=357, srv1799191687=158, srv1446998035=74, srv1571774199=98, srv1115354947=25, srv333860881=247, srv1724152600=132, srv1598699299=106, srv177885829=151, srv472125887=272, srv1101339966=22, srv1424985362=72, srv1945569895=188, srv594128294=300, srv1026739237=8, srv842459828=358, srv878519137=366, srv1921260729=181, srv339110834=249, srv504099471=279, srv814253179=354, srv1643744885=116, srv1793847521=155, srv607234624=309, srv698219051=331, srv1688538732=127, srv666240078=325, srv1079284733=18, srv29210550=236, srv506181748=280, srv881313122=368, srv1945452576=187, srv597307897=303, srv1285120424=51, srv1887943816=177, srv1983604698=196, srv1805465940=161, srv309309336=242, srv1719756294=131, srv1349932676=58, srv1208486369=38, srv1643971570=117, srv1509331489=89, srv334105385=248, srv1400515744=65, srv369984715=259, srv43712162=269, srv842675864=359, srv1803258748=160, srv1022450918=6, srv1775108732=147, srv1766088250=141, srv180150732=159, srv1220857227=41, srv226530501=229, srv362032108=255, srv919715380=377, srv1074935976=14, srv1395030819=63, srv803291569=352, srv1877966766=175, srv220538712=227, srv2021718843=203, srv2107782185=219, srv882216860=369, srv1489137852=86, srv1972328734=193, srv1470759982=79, srv1774824811=146, srv971974774=384, srv1418242791=71, srv1001274196=1, srv909615097=372, srv1537724566=93, srv1165799954=34, srv1724754364=134, srv978173525=387, srv113319438=29, srv578033735=295, srv147931272=80, srv1183635941=35, srv1904215245=178, srv596349756=302, srv880835255=367, srv857544550=364, srv1779729022=152, srv1795612465=156, srv621083045=314, srv917704170=375, srv1351811120=59, srv1316710897=54, srv789820555=350, srv1922580095=183, srv305567304=241, srv1936745425=186, srv1745318024=138, srv1210822057=39, srv645375717=320, srv950628389=379, srv1490199189=87, srv1575919256=101, srv154481102=96, srv359402967=254, srv997716931=391, srv1457224273=75, srv581644449=297, srv1872374768=174, srv363177310=257, srv740327512=341, srv1664227236=123, srv972330517=385, srv1634261306=114, srv1662183707=122, srv1969046891=191, srv1485266211=82, srv1778842262=150, srv588410181=298, srv1921840985=182, srv591279493=299, srv37574565=260, srv1104147458=23, srv1190166330=36, srv652270371=322, srv1484309042=81, srv1560148463=97, srv618569548=313, srv2102708311=216, srv1084873074=20, srv517669556=283, srv918152084=376, srv649714317=321, srv1674484790=124, srv1339239880=56, srv1461073271=77, srv1125312901=28, srv25633292=234, srv516616923=282, srv299721745=238, srv604932433=308, srv1273702855=48, srv792183929=351, srv1042608200=10, srv1276335106=49, srv1486044644=83, srv676101698=328, srv998930892=392, srv200111276=200, srv1863083643=169, srv1737443479=137, srv872997185=365, srv821351126=355, srv852115805=360, srv1074355423=13, srv170952194=130, srv503430005=277, srv153887567=94, srv1415163001=69, srv1032737435=9, srv1840670515=167, srv1961921083=189, srv59745831=304, srv36715747=258, srv431547280=268, srv1524853580=92, srv1870059418=173, srv396010771=265, srv594457792=301, srv1755339428=140, srv1766275429=142, srv5565786=291, srv603898526=306, srv544570223=287, srv856030669=363, srv1542523468=95, srv915785747=374, srv356122213=253, srv1411875499=67, srv2077620970=209, srv1345529444=57, srv232339963=230, srv1250861076=44, srv1914875423=179, srv478619481=274, srv1202435626=37, srv1706089454=129, srv1810631201=163, srv1282644061=50, srv1625945288=109, srv733251129=338, srv2082830831=212, srv1612103540=107, srv612136291=310, srv1790004142=154, srv183394703=165} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:27,841 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:27,841 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:27,841 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:27,841 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:27,841 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:27,841 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:27,841 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-11 14:16:27,841 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-11 14:16:27,841 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-11 14:16:27,841 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-11 14:16:27,841 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 10 is on host 10
2023-07-11 14:16:27,841 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 11 is on host 11
2023-07-11 14:16:27,841 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 12 is on host 12
2023-07-11 14:16:27,841 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 13 is on host 13
2023-07-11 14:16:27,841 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 14 is on host 14
2023-07-11 14:16:27,841 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 15 is on host 15
2023-07-11 14:16:27,841 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 16 is on host 16
2023-07-11 14:16:27,841 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 17 is on host 17
2023-07-11 14:16:27,841 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 18 is on host 18
2023-07-11 14:16:27,841 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 19 is on host 19
2023-07-11 14:16:27,841 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 20 is on host 20
2023-07-11 14:16:27,841 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 21 is on host 21
2023-07-11 14:16:27,842 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 22 is on host 22
2023-07-11 14:16:27,842 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 23 is on host 23
2023-07-11 14:16:27,842 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 24 is on host 24
2023-07-11 14:16:27,842 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 25 is on host 25
2023-07-11 14:16:27,842 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 26 is on host 26
2023-07-11 14:16:27,842 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 27 is on host 27
2023-07-11 14:16:27,842 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 28 is on host 28
2023-07-11 14:16:27,842 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 29 is on host 29
2023-07-11 14:16:27,842 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 30 is on host 30
2023-07-11 14:16:27,842 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 31 is on host 31
2023-07-11 14:16:27,842 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 32 is on host 32
2023-07-11 14:16:27,842 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 33 is on host 33
2023-07-11 14:16:27,842 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 34 is on host 34
2023-07-11 14:16:27,842 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 35 is on host 35
2023-07-11 14:16:27,842 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 36 is on host 36
2023-07-11 14:16:27,842 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 37 is on host 37
2023-07-11 14:16:27,842 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 38 is on host 38
2023-07-11 14:16:27,842 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 39 is on host 39
2023-07-11 14:16:27,842 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 40 is on host 40
2023-07-11 14:16:27,842 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 41 is on host 41
2023-07-11 14:16:27,842 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 42 is on host 42
2023-07-11 14:16:27,842 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 43 is on host 43
2023-07-11 14:16:27,842 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 44 is on host 44
2023-07-11 14:16:27,842 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 45 is on host 45
2023-07-11 14:16:27,842 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 46 is on host 46
2023-07-11 14:16:27,842 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 47 is on host 47
2023-07-11 14:16:27,842 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 48 is on host 48
2023-07-11 14:16:27,842 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 49 is on host 49
2023-07-11 14:16:27,842 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 50 is on host 50
2023-07-11 14:16:27,843 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 51 is on host 51
2023-07-11 14:16:27,843 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 52 is on host 52
2023-07-11 14:16:27,843 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 53 is on host 53
2023-07-11 14:16:27,843 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 54 is on host 54
2023-07-11 14:16:27,843 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 55 is on host 55
2023-07-11 14:16:27,843 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 56 is on host 56
2023-07-11 14:16:27,843 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 57 is on host 57
2023-07-11 14:16:27,843 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 58 is on host 58
2023-07-11 14:16:27,843 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 59 is on host 59
2023-07-11 14:16:27,843 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 60 is on host 60
2023-07-11 14:16:27,843 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 61 is on host 61
2023-07-11 14:16:27,843 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 62 is on host 62
2023-07-11 14:16:27,843 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 63 is on host 63
2023-07-11 14:16:27,843 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 64 is on host 64
2023-07-11 14:16:27,843 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 65 is on host 65
2023-07-11 14:16:27,843 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 66 is on host 66
2023-07-11 14:16:27,843 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 67 is on host 67
2023-07-11 14:16:27,843 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 68 is on host 68
2023-07-11 14:16:27,843 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 69 is on host 69
2023-07-11 14:16:27,843 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 70 is on host 70
2023-07-11 14:16:27,843 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 71 is on host 71
2023-07-11 14:16:27,843 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 72 is on host 72
2023-07-11 14:16:27,843 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 73 is on host 73
2023-07-11 14:16:27,843 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 74 is on host 74
2023-07-11 14:16:27,843 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 75 is on host 75
2023-07-11 14:16:27,843 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 76 is on host 76
2023-07-11 14:16:27,843 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 77 is on host 77
2023-07-11 14:16:27,843 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 78 is on host 78
2023-07-11 14:16:27,843 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 79 is on host 79
2023-07-11 14:16:27,844 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 80 is on host 80
2023-07-11 14:16:27,844 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 81 is on host 81
2023-07-11 14:16:27,844 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 82 is on host 82
2023-07-11 14:16:27,844 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 83 is on host 83
2023-07-11 14:16:27,844 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 84 is on host 84
2023-07-11 14:16:27,844 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 85 is on host 85
2023-07-11 14:16:27,844 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 86 is on host 86
2023-07-11 14:16:27,844 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 87 is on host 87
2023-07-11 14:16:27,844 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 88 is on host 88
2023-07-11 14:16:27,844 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 89 is on host 89
2023-07-11 14:16:27,844 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 90 is on host 90
2023-07-11 14:16:27,844 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 91 is on host 91
2023-07-11 14:16:27,844 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 92 is on host 92
2023-07-11 14:16:27,844 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 93 is on host 93
2023-07-11 14:16:27,844 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 94 is on host 94
2023-07-11 14:16:27,844 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 95 is on host 95
2023-07-11 14:16:27,844 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 96 is on host 96
2023-07-11 14:16:27,844 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 97 is on host 97
2023-07-11 14:16:27,844 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 98 is on host 98
2023-07-11 14:16:27,844 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 99 is on host 99
2023-07-11 14:16:27,844 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 100 is on host 100
2023-07-11 14:16:27,844 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 101 is on host 101
2023-07-11 14:16:27,844 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 102 is on host 102
2023-07-11 14:16:27,844 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 103 is on host 103
2023-07-11 14:16:27,844 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 104 is on host 104
2023-07-11 14:16:27,844 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 105 is on host 105
2023-07-11 14:16:27,844 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 106 is on host 106
2023-07-11 14:16:27,844 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 107 is on host 107
2023-07-11 14:16:27,844 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 108 is on host 108
2023-07-11 14:16:27,845 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 109 is on host 109
2023-07-11 14:16:27,845 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 110 is on host 110
2023-07-11 14:16:27,845 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 111 is on host 111
2023-07-11 14:16:27,845 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 112 is on host 112
2023-07-11 14:16:27,845 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 113 is on host 113
2023-07-11 14:16:27,845 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 114 is on host 114
2023-07-11 14:16:27,845 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 115 is on host 115
2023-07-11 14:16:27,845 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 116 is on host 116
2023-07-11 14:16:27,845 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 117 is on host 117
2023-07-11 14:16:27,845 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 118 is on host 118
2023-07-11 14:16:27,845 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 119 is on host 119
2023-07-11 14:16:27,845 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 120 is on host 120
2023-07-11 14:16:27,845 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 121 is on host 121
2023-07-11 14:16:27,845 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 122 is on host 122
2023-07-11 14:16:27,845 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 123 is on host 123
2023-07-11 14:16:27,845 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 124 is on host 124
2023-07-11 14:16:27,845 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 125 is on host 125
2023-07-11 14:16:27,845 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 126 is on host 126
2023-07-11 14:16:27,845 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 127 is on host 127
2023-07-11 14:16:27,845 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 128 is on host 128
2023-07-11 14:16:27,845 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 129 is on host 129
2023-07-11 14:16:27,845 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 130 is on host 130
2023-07-11 14:16:27,845 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 131 is on host 131
2023-07-11 14:16:27,845 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 132 is on host 132
2023-07-11 14:16:27,845 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 133 is on host 133
2023-07-11 14:16:27,845 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 134 is on host 134
2023-07-11 14:16:27,845 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 135 is on host 135
2023-07-11 14:16:27,845 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 136 is on host 136
2023-07-11 14:16:27,845 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 137 is on host 137
2023-07-11 14:16:27,846 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 138 is on host 138
2023-07-11 14:16:27,846 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 139 is on host 139
2023-07-11 14:16:27,846 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 140 is on host 140
2023-07-11 14:16:27,846 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 141 is on host 141
2023-07-11 14:16:27,846 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 142 is on host 142
2023-07-11 14:16:27,846 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 143 is on host 143
2023-07-11 14:16:27,846 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 144 is on host 144
2023-07-11 14:16:27,846 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 145 is on host 145
2023-07-11 14:16:27,846 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 146 is on host 146
2023-07-11 14:16:27,846 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 147 is on host 147
2023-07-11 14:16:27,846 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 148 is on host 148
2023-07-11 14:16:27,846 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 149 is on host 149
2023-07-11 14:16:27,846 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 150 is on host 150
2023-07-11 14:16:27,846 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 151 is on host 151
2023-07-11 14:16:27,846 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 152 is on host 152
2023-07-11 14:16:27,846 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 153 is on host 153
2023-07-11 14:16:27,846 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 154 is on host 154
2023-07-11 14:16:27,846 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 155 is on host 155
2023-07-11 14:16:27,846 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 156 is on host 156
2023-07-11 14:16:27,846 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 157 is on host 157
2023-07-11 14:16:27,846 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 158 is on host 158
2023-07-11 14:16:27,846 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 159 is on host 159
2023-07-11 14:16:27,846 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 160 is on host 160
2023-07-11 14:16:27,846 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 161 is on host 161
2023-07-11 14:16:27,846 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 162 is on host 162
2023-07-11 14:16:27,846 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 163 is on host 163
2023-07-11 14:16:27,846 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 164 is on host 164
2023-07-11 14:16:27,846 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 165 is on host 165
2023-07-11 14:16:27,846 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 166 is on host 166
2023-07-11 14:16:27,847 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 167 is on host 167
2023-07-11 14:16:27,847 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 168 is on host 168
2023-07-11 14:16:27,847 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 169 is on host 169
2023-07-11 14:16:27,847 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 170 is on host 170
2023-07-11 14:16:27,847 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 171 is on host 171
2023-07-11 14:16:27,847 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 172 is on host 172
2023-07-11 14:16:27,847 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 173 is on host 173
2023-07-11 14:16:27,847 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 174 is on host 174
2023-07-11 14:16:27,847 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 175 is on host 175
2023-07-11 14:16:27,847 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 176 is on host 176
2023-07-11 14:16:27,847 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 177 is on host 177
2023-07-11 14:16:27,847 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 178 is on host 178
2023-07-11 14:16:27,847 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 179 is on host 179
2023-07-11 14:16:27,847 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 180 is on host 180
2023-07-11 14:16:27,847 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 181 is on host 181
2023-07-11 14:16:27,847 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 182 is on host 182
2023-07-11 14:16:27,847 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 183 is on host 183
2023-07-11 14:16:27,847 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 184 is on host 184
2023-07-11 14:16:27,847 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 185 is on host 185
2023-07-11 14:16:27,847 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 186 is on host 186
2023-07-11 14:16:27,847 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 187 is on host 187
2023-07-11 14:16:27,847 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 188 is on host 188
2023-07-11 14:16:27,847 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 189 is on host 189
2023-07-11 14:16:27,847 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 190 is on host 190
2023-07-11 14:16:27,847 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 191 is on host 191
2023-07-11 14:16:27,847 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 192 is on host 192
2023-07-11 14:16:27,847 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 193 is on host 193
2023-07-11 14:16:27,847 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 194 is on host 194
2023-07-11 14:16:27,847 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 195 is on host 195
2023-07-11 14:16:27,847 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 196 is on host 196
2023-07-11 14:16:27,848 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 197 is on host 197
2023-07-11 14:16:27,848 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 198 is on host 198
2023-07-11 14:16:27,848 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 199 is on host 199
2023-07-11 14:16:27,848 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 200 is on host 200
2023-07-11 14:16:27,848 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 201 is on host 201
2023-07-11 14:16:27,848 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 202 is on host 202
2023-07-11 14:16:27,848 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 203 is on host 203
2023-07-11 14:16:27,848 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 204 is on host 204
2023-07-11 14:16:27,848 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 205 is on host 205
2023-07-11 14:16:27,848 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 206 is on host 206
2023-07-11 14:16:27,848 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 207 is on host 207
2023-07-11 14:16:27,848 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 208 is on host 208
2023-07-11 14:16:27,848 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 209 is on host 209
2023-07-11 14:16:27,848 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 210 is on host 210
2023-07-11 14:16:27,848 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 211 is on host 211
2023-07-11 14:16:27,848 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 212 is on host 212
2023-07-11 14:16:27,848 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 213 is on host 213
2023-07-11 14:16:27,848 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 214 is on host 214
2023-07-11 14:16:27,848 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 215 is on host 215
2023-07-11 14:16:27,848 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 216 is on host 216
2023-07-11 14:16:27,849 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 217 is on host 217
2023-07-11 14:16:27,849 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 218 is on host 218
2023-07-11 14:16:27,849 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 219 is on host 219
2023-07-11 14:16:27,849 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 220 is on host 220
2023-07-11 14:16:27,849 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 221 is on host 221
2023-07-11 14:16:27,849 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 222 is on host 222
2023-07-11 14:16:27,849 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 223 is on host 223
2023-07-11 14:16:27,849 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 224 is on host 224
2023-07-11 14:16:27,849 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 225 is on host 225
2023-07-11 14:16:27,849 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 226 is on host 226
2023-07-11 14:16:27,849 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 227 is on host 227
2023-07-11 14:16:27,849 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 228 is on host 228
2023-07-11 14:16:27,849 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 229 is on host 229
2023-07-11 14:16:27,849 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 230 is on host 230
2023-07-11 14:16:27,849 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 231 is on host 231
2023-07-11 14:16:27,849 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 232 is on host 232
2023-07-11 14:16:27,849 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 233 is on host 233
2023-07-11 14:16:27,849 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 234 is on host 234
2023-07-11 14:16:27,849 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 235 is on host 235
2023-07-11 14:16:27,849 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 236 is on host 236
2023-07-11 14:16:27,849 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 237 is on host 237
2023-07-11 14:16:27,849 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 238 is on host 238
2023-07-11 14:16:27,849 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 239 is on host 239
2023-07-11 14:16:27,849 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 240 is on host 240
2023-07-11 14:16:27,849 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 241 is on host 241
2023-07-11 14:16:27,849 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 242 is on host 242
2023-07-11 14:16:27,850 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 243 is on host 243
2023-07-11 14:16:27,850 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 244 is on host 244
2023-07-11 14:16:27,850 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 245 is on host 245
2023-07-11 14:16:27,850 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 246 is on host 246
2023-07-11 14:16:27,850 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 247 is on host 247
2023-07-11 14:16:27,850 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 248 is on host 248
2023-07-11 14:16:27,850 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 249 is on host 249
2023-07-11 14:16:27,850 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 250 is on host 250
2023-07-11 14:16:27,850 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 251 is on host 251
2023-07-11 14:16:27,850 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 252 is on host 252
2023-07-11 14:16:27,850 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 253 is on host 253
2023-07-11 14:16:27,850 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 254 is on host 254
2023-07-11 14:16:27,850 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 255 is on host 255
2023-07-11 14:16:27,850 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 256 is on host 256
2023-07-11 14:16:27,850 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 257 is on host 257
2023-07-11 14:16:27,850 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 258 is on host 258
2023-07-11 14:16:27,850 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 259 is on host 259
2023-07-11 14:16:27,850 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 260 is on host 260
2023-07-11 14:16:27,850 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 261 is on host 261
2023-07-11 14:16:27,850 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 262 is on host 262
2023-07-11 14:16:27,850 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 263 is on host 263
2023-07-11 14:16:27,850 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 264 is on host 264
2023-07-11 14:16:27,850 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 265 is on host 265
2023-07-11 14:16:27,850 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 266 is on host 266
2023-07-11 14:16:27,850 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 267 is on host 267
2023-07-11 14:16:27,850 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 268 is on host 268
2023-07-11 14:16:27,850 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 269 is on host 269
2023-07-11 14:16:27,850 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 270 is on host 270
2023-07-11 14:16:27,850 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 271 is on host 271
2023-07-11 14:16:27,851 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 272 is on host 272
2023-07-11 14:16:27,851 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 273 is on host 273
2023-07-11 14:16:27,851 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 274 is on host 274
2023-07-11 14:16:27,851 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 275 is on host 275
2023-07-11 14:16:27,851 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 276 is on host 276
2023-07-11 14:16:27,851 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 277 is on host 277
2023-07-11 14:16:27,851 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 278 is on host 278
2023-07-11 14:16:27,851 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 279 is on host 279
2023-07-11 14:16:27,851 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 280 is on host 280
2023-07-11 14:16:27,851 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 281 is on host 281
2023-07-11 14:16:27,851 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 282 is on host 282
2023-07-11 14:16:27,851 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 283 is on host 283
2023-07-11 14:16:27,851 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 284 is on host 284
2023-07-11 14:16:27,851 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 285 is on host 285
2023-07-11 14:16:27,851 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 286 is on host 286
2023-07-11 14:16:27,851 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 287 is on host 287
2023-07-11 14:16:27,851 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 288 is on host 288
2023-07-11 14:16:27,851 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 289 is on host 289
2023-07-11 14:16:27,851 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 290 is on host 290
2023-07-11 14:16:27,851 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 291 is on host 291
2023-07-11 14:16:27,851 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 292 is on host 292
2023-07-11 14:16:27,851 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 293 is on host 293
2023-07-11 14:16:27,851 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 294 is on host 294
2023-07-11 14:16:27,851 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 295 is on host 295
2023-07-11 14:16:27,851 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 296 is on host 296
2023-07-11 14:16:27,851 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 297 is on host 297
2023-07-11 14:16:27,851 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 298 is on host 298
2023-07-11 14:16:27,851 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 299 is on host 299
2023-07-11 14:16:27,851 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 300 is on host 300
2023-07-11 14:16:27,852 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 301 is on host 301
2023-07-11 14:16:27,852 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 302 is on host 302
2023-07-11 14:16:27,852 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 303 is on host 303
2023-07-11 14:16:27,852 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 304 is on host 304
2023-07-11 14:16:27,852 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 305 is on host 305
2023-07-11 14:16:27,852 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 306 is on host 306
2023-07-11 14:16:27,852 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 307 is on host 307
2023-07-11 14:16:27,852 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 308 is on host 308
2023-07-11 14:16:27,852 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 309 is on host 309
2023-07-11 14:16:27,852 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 310 is on host 310
2023-07-11 14:16:27,852 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 311 is on host 311
2023-07-11 14:16:27,852 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 312 is on host 312
2023-07-11 14:16:27,852 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 313 is on host 313
2023-07-11 14:16:27,852 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 314 is on host 314
2023-07-11 14:16:27,852 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 315 is on host 315
2023-07-11 14:16:27,852 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 316 is on host 316
2023-07-11 14:16:27,852 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 317 is on host 317
2023-07-11 14:16:27,852 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 318 is on host 318
2023-07-11 14:16:27,852 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 319 is on host 319
2023-07-11 14:16:27,852 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 320 is on host 320
2023-07-11 14:16:27,852 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 321 is on host 321
2023-07-11 14:16:27,852 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 322 is on host 322
2023-07-11 14:16:27,852 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 323 is on host 323
2023-07-11 14:16:27,852 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 324 is on host 324
2023-07-11 14:16:27,852 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 325 is on host 325
2023-07-11 14:16:27,852 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 326 is on host 326
2023-07-11 14:16:27,852 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 327 is on host 327
2023-07-11 14:16:27,852 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 328 is on host 328
2023-07-11 14:16:27,852 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 329 is on host 329
2023-07-11 14:16:27,853 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 330 is on host 330
2023-07-11 14:16:27,853 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 331 is on host 331
2023-07-11 14:16:27,853 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 332 is on host 332
2023-07-11 14:16:27,853 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 333 is on host 333
2023-07-11 14:16:27,853 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 334 is on host 334
2023-07-11 14:16:27,853 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 335 is on host 335
2023-07-11 14:16:27,853 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 336 is on host 336
2023-07-11 14:16:27,853 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 337 is on host 337
2023-07-11 14:16:27,853 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 338 is on host 338
2023-07-11 14:16:27,853 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 339 is on host 339
2023-07-11 14:16:27,853 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 340 is on host 340
2023-07-11 14:16:27,853 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 341 is on host 341
2023-07-11 14:16:27,853 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 342 is on host 342
2023-07-11 14:16:27,853 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 343 is on host 343
2023-07-11 14:16:27,853 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 344 is on host 344
2023-07-11 14:16:27,853 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 345 is on host 345
2023-07-11 14:16:27,853 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 346 is on host 346
2023-07-11 14:16:27,853 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 347 is on host 347
2023-07-11 14:16:27,853 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 348 is on host 348
2023-07-11 14:16:27,853 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 349 is on host 349
2023-07-11 14:16:27,853 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 350 is on host 350
2023-07-11 14:16:27,853 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 351 is on host 351
2023-07-11 14:16:27,853 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 352 is on host 352
2023-07-11 14:16:27,853 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 353 is on host 353
2023-07-11 14:16:27,853 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 354 is on host 354
2023-07-11 14:16:27,853 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 355 is on host 355
2023-07-11 14:16:27,853 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 356 is on host 356
2023-07-11 14:16:27,853 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 357 is on host 357
2023-07-11 14:16:27,853 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 358 is on host 358
2023-07-11 14:16:27,854 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 359 is on host 359
2023-07-11 14:16:27,854 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 360 is on host 360
2023-07-11 14:16:27,854 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 361 is on host 361
2023-07-11 14:16:27,854 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 362 is on host 362
2023-07-11 14:16:27,854 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 363 is on host 363
2023-07-11 14:16:27,854 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 364 is on host 364
2023-07-11 14:16:27,854 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 365 is on host 365
2023-07-11 14:16:27,854 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 366 is on host 366
2023-07-11 14:16:27,854 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 367 is on host 367
2023-07-11 14:16:27,854 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 368 is on host 368
2023-07-11 14:16:27,854 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 369 is on host 369
2023-07-11 14:16:27,854 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 370 is on host 370
2023-07-11 14:16:27,854 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 371 is on host 371
2023-07-11 14:16:27,854 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 372 is on host 372
2023-07-11 14:16:27,854 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 373 is on host 373
2023-07-11 14:16:27,854 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 374 is on host 374
2023-07-11 14:16:27,854 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 375 is on host 375
2023-07-11 14:16:27,854 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 376 is on host 376
2023-07-11 14:16:27,854 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 377 is on host 377
2023-07-11 14:16:27,854 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 378 is on host 378
2023-07-11 14:16:27,854 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 379 is on host 379
2023-07-11 14:16:27,854 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 380 is on host 380
2023-07-11 14:16:27,854 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 381 is on host 381
2023-07-11 14:16:27,854 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 382 is on host 382
2023-07-11 14:16:27,854 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 383 is on host 383
2023-07-11 14:16:27,854 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 384 is on host 384
2023-07-11 14:16:27,854 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 385 is on host 385
2023-07-11 14:16:27,854 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 386 is on host 386
2023-07-11 14:16:27,854 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 387 is on host 387
2023-07-11 14:16:27,855 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 388 is on host 388
2023-07-11 14:16:27,855 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 389 is on host 389
2023-07-11 14:16:27,855 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 390 is on host 390
2023-07-11 14:16:27,855 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 391 is on host 391
2023-07-11 14:16:27,855 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 392 is on host 392
2023-07-11 14:16:27,855 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=393, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:27,855 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table38) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:27,855 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table39
2023-07-11 14:16:27,855 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv553536953=290, srv1630071126=110, srv1071894870=12, srv23511728=232, srv658346947=323, srv2025338799=204, srv1397994335=64, srv1976766403=195, srv1644629726=118, srv957637734=381, srv2079182457=210, srv1749264468=139, srv2046129126=206, srv1595762596=104, srv603990852=307, srv1973073480=194, srv958856137=382, srv644066832=319, srv557062842=292, srv277765671=235, srv732221418=337, srv1769385567=143, srv224612199=228, srv714752528=334, srv362526040=256, srv581128949=296, srv2133511466=223, srv1144239257=30, srv320603627=245, srv1679952521=126, srv2122867873=222, srv1110067064=24, srv256251994=233, srv63261708=317, srv89837390=371, srv552104598=289, srv508952995=281, srv2096011353=214, srv1770417148=144, srv1246723478=42, srv929436444=378, srv2082192429=211, srv234917297=231, srv405700573=266, srv183644386=166, srv1488378513=85, srv173139715=136, srv1154180352=32, srv355693379=252, srv1407521654=66, srv496848057=275, srv1157975499=33, srv1806731027=162, srv1923102804=184, srv311102455=244, srv450011410=271, srv771515724=348, srv389183508=262, srv1249074416=43, srv2014575201=201, srv640847108=318, srv832363565=356, srv1970882134=192, srv2107358603=218, srv855766065=361, srv1336043388=55, srv29397186=237, srv982792848=390, srv976560524=386, srv101181760=3, srv1093549482=21, srv2018389395=202, srv2113483104=221, srv1778339118=149, srv1968709692=190, srv705221118=333, srv159600090=105, srv1919608486=180, srv981255102=389, srv807899713=353, srv755110395=344, srv1770594519=145, srv739692705=340, srv1076582671=16, srv693869315=330, srv1079048717=17, srv440657532=270, srv1636659280=115, srv2108739257=220, srv668373413=326, srv1003610393=2, srv1054229197=11, srv1868589627=172, srv2103522371=217, srv1000546271=0, srv951670617=380, srv2042909593=205, srv1865656038=171, srv1466355012=78, srv703662406=332, srv1418112884=70, srv1215580291=40, srv71833528=335, srv1580581635=103, srv1021032212=5, srv1080806312=19, srv1985601859=197, srv74471954=343, srv1647472319=119, srv2071553346=208, srv1632855171=112, srv1122009370=27, srv13613992=61, srv1630777154=111, srv301413669=239, srv550697728=288, srv1296023857=53, srv1724550977=133, srv1989290370=198, srv1926417985=185, srv1678097199=125, srv1461034373=76, srv614690415=311, srv2098345381=215, srv310463473=243, srv1011934105=4, srv148627129=84, srv305489318=240, srv1256534903=46, srv1289731445=52, srv1798844587=157, srv567113085=294, srv1119222501=26, srv2055117940=207, srv855898852=362, srv629224816=316, srv1075943554=15, srv625909061=315, srv1705591942=128, srv734225580=339, srv660107924=324, srv1381729938=62, srv1633483173=113, srv408265476=267, srv1776057793=148, srv1360253411=60, srv1511424834=90, srv1414162621=68, srv883343663=370, srv151859222=91, srv349144930=251, srv1991304034=199, srv1825887791=164, srv601657063=305, srv758932951=345, srv1651629087=120, srv1864623584=170, srv682957691=329, srv1500454146=88, srv1725962085=135, srv1659841448=121, srv1253206004=45, srv52354442=284, srv18508093=168, srv1427731921=73, srv561344974=293, srv721668125=336, srv1575482138=100, srv914128771=373, srv961487230=383, srv741332941=342, srv533032466=286, srv1574140987=99, srv2139849097=224, srv503902262=278, srv674807007=327, srv1786829855=153, srv2088727517=213, srv394366966=264, srv980089565=388, srv114594288=31, srv38296437=261, srv214835574=226, srv1887224977=176, srv1025509362=7, srv1577020334=102, srv524466665=285, srv393561021=263, srv759909927=346, srv763556514=347, srv786453030=349, srv2142935488=225, srv618111613=312, srv16254163=108, srv343211061=250, srv476075173=273, srv1269632212=47, srv333589612=246, srv499015361=276, srv836674186=357, srv1799191687=158, srv1446998035=74, srv1571774199=98, srv1115354947=25, srv333860881=247, srv1724152600=132, srv1598699299=106, srv177885829=151, srv472125887=272, srv1101339966=22, srv1424985362=72, srv1945569895=188, srv594128294=300, srv1026739237=8, srv842459828=358, srv878519137=366, srv1921260729=181, srv339110834=249, srv504099471=279, srv814253179=354, srv1643744885=116, srv1793847521=155, srv607234624=309, srv698219051=331, srv1688538732=127, srv666240078=325, srv1079284733=18, srv29210550=236, srv506181748=280, srv881313122=368, srv1945452576=187, srv597307897=303, srv1285120424=51, srv1887943816=177, srv1983604698=196, srv1805465940=161, srv309309336=242, srv1719756294=131, srv1349932676=58, srv1208486369=38, srv1643971570=117, srv1509331489=89, srv334105385=248, srv1400515744=65, srv369984715=259, srv43712162=269, srv842675864=359, srv1803258748=160, srv1022450918=6, srv1775108732=147, srv1766088250=141, srv180150732=159, srv1220857227=41, srv226530501=229, srv362032108=255, srv919715380=377, srv1074935976=14, srv1395030819=63, srv803291569=352, srv1877966766=175, srv220538712=227, srv2021718843=203, srv2107782185=219, srv882216860=369, srv1489137852=86, srv1972328734=193, srv1470759982=79, srv1774824811=146, srv971974774=384, srv1418242791=71, srv1001274196=1, srv909615097=372, srv1537724566=93, srv1165799954=34, srv1724754364=134, srv978173525=387, srv113319438=29, srv578033735=295, srv147931272=80, srv1183635941=35, srv1904215245=178, srv596349756=302, srv880835255=367, srv857544550=364, srv1779729022=152, srv1795612465=156, srv621083045=314, srv917704170=375, srv1351811120=59, srv1316710897=54, srv789820555=350, srv1922580095=183, srv305567304=241, srv1936745425=186, srv1745318024=138, srv1210822057=39, srv645375717=320, srv950628389=379, srv1490199189=87, srv1575919256=101, srv154481102=96, srv359402967=254, srv997716931=391, srv1457224273=75, srv581644449=297, srv1872374768=174, srv363177310=257, srv740327512=341, srv1664227236=123, srv972330517=385, srv1634261306=114, srv1662183707=122, srv1969046891=191, srv1485266211=82, srv1778842262=150, srv588410181=298, srv1921840985=182, srv591279493=299, srv37574565=260, srv1104147458=23, srv1190166330=36, srv652270371=322, srv1484309042=81, srv1560148463=97, srv618569548=313, srv2102708311=216, srv1084873074=20, srv517669556=283, srv918152084=376, srv649714317=321, srv1674484790=124, srv1339239880=56, srv1461073271=77, srv1125312901=28, srv25633292=234, srv516616923=282, srv299721745=238, srv604932433=308, srv1273702855=48, srv792183929=351, srv1042608200=10, srv1276335106=49, srv1486044644=83, srv676101698=328, srv998930892=392, srv200111276=200, srv1863083643=169, srv1737443479=137, srv872997185=365, srv821351126=355, srv852115805=360, srv1074355423=13, srv170952194=130, srv503430005=277, srv153887567=94, srv1415163001=69, srv1032737435=9, srv1840670515=167, srv1961921083=189, srv59745831=304, srv36715747=258, srv431547280=268, srv1524853580=92, srv1870059418=173, srv396010771=265, srv594457792=301, srv1755339428=140, srv1766275429=142, srv5565786=291, srv603898526=306, srv544570223=287, srv856030669=363, srv1542523468=95, srv915785747=374, srv356122213=253, srv1411875499=67, srv2077620970=209, srv1345529444=57, srv232339963=230, srv1250861076=44, srv1914875423=179, srv478619481=274, srv1202435626=37, srv1706089454=129, srv1810631201=163, srv1282644061=50, srv1625945288=109, srv733251129=338, srv2082830831=212, srv1612103540=107, srv612136291=310, srv1790004142=154, srv183394703=165} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:27,856 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:27,856 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:27,856 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:27,856 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:27,856 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:27,856 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:27,856 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-11 14:16:27,856 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-11 14:16:27,856 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-11 14:16:27,856 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-11 14:16:27,856 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 10 is on host 10
2023-07-11 14:16:27,856 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 11 is on host 11
2023-07-11 14:16:27,856 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 12 is on host 12
2023-07-11 14:16:27,856 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 13 is on host 13
2023-07-11 14:16:27,856 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 14 is on host 14
2023-07-11 14:16:27,856 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 15 is on host 15
2023-07-11 14:16:27,856 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 16 is on host 16
2023-07-11 14:16:27,856 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 17 is on host 17
2023-07-11 14:16:27,856 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 18 is on host 18
2023-07-11 14:16:27,856 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 19 is on host 19
2023-07-11 14:16:27,856 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 20 is on host 20
2023-07-11 14:16:27,856 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 21 is on host 21
2023-07-11 14:16:27,856 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 22 is on host 22
2023-07-11 14:16:27,856 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 23 is on host 23
2023-07-11 14:16:27,857 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 24 is on host 24
2023-07-11 14:16:27,857 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 25 is on host 25
2023-07-11 14:16:27,857 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 26 is on host 26
2023-07-11 14:16:27,857 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 27 is on host 27
2023-07-11 14:16:27,857 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 28 is on host 28
2023-07-11 14:16:27,857 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 29 is on host 29
2023-07-11 14:16:27,857 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 30 is on host 30
2023-07-11 14:16:27,857 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 31 is on host 31
2023-07-11 14:16:27,857 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 32 is on host 32
2023-07-11 14:16:27,857 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 33 is on host 33
2023-07-11 14:16:27,857 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 34 is on host 34
2023-07-11 14:16:27,857 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 35 is on host 35
2023-07-11 14:16:27,857 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 36 is on host 36
2023-07-11 14:16:27,857 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 37 is on host 37
2023-07-11 14:16:27,857 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 38 is on host 38
2023-07-11 14:16:27,857 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 39 is on host 39
2023-07-11 14:16:27,857 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 40 is on host 40
2023-07-11 14:16:27,857 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 41 is on host 41
2023-07-11 14:16:27,857 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 42 is on host 42
2023-07-11 14:16:27,857 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 43 is on host 43
2023-07-11 14:16:27,857 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 44 is on host 44
2023-07-11 14:16:27,857 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 45 is on host 45
2023-07-11 14:16:27,857 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 46 is on host 46
2023-07-11 14:16:27,857 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 47 is on host 47
2023-07-11 14:16:27,857 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 48 is on host 48
2023-07-11 14:16:27,857 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 49 is on host 49
2023-07-11 14:16:27,857 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 50 is on host 50
2023-07-11 14:16:27,857 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 51 is on host 51
2023-07-11 14:16:27,857 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 52 is on host 52
2023-07-11 14:16:27,858 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 53 is on host 53
2023-07-11 14:16:27,858 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 54 is on host 54
2023-07-11 14:16:27,858 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 55 is on host 55
2023-07-11 14:16:27,858 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 56 is on host 56
2023-07-11 14:16:27,858 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 57 is on host 57
2023-07-11 14:16:27,858 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 58 is on host 58
2023-07-11 14:16:27,858 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 59 is on host 59
2023-07-11 14:16:27,858 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 60 is on host 60
2023-07-11 14:16:27,858 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 61 is on host 61
2023-07-11 14:16:27,858 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 62 is on host 62
2023-07-11 14:16:27,858 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 63 is on host 63
2023-07-11 14:16:27,858 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 64 is on host 64
2023-07-11 14:16:27,858 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 65 is on host 65
2023-07-11 14:16:27,858 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 66 is on host 66
2023-07-11 14:16:27,858 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 67 is on host 67
2023-07-11 14:16:27,858 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 68 is on host 68
2023-07-11 14:16:27,858 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 69 is on host 69
2023-07-11 14:16:27,858 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 70 is on host 70
2023-07-11 14:16:27,858 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 71 is on host 71
2023-07-11 14:16:27,858 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 72 is on host 72
2023-07-11 14:16:27,858 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 73 is on host 73
2023-07-11 14:16:27,858 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 74 is on host 74
2023-07-11 14:16:27,858 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 75 is on host 75
2023-07-11 14:16:27,858 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 76 is on host 76
2023-07-11 14:16:27,858 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 77 is on host 77
2023-07-11 14:16:27,858 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 78 is on host 78
2023-07-11 14:16:27,858 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 79 is on host 79
2023-07-11 14:16:27,858 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 80 is on host 80
2023-07-11 14:16:27,858 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 81 is on host 81
2023-07-11 14:16:27,859 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 82 is on host 82
2023-07-11 14:16:27,859 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 83 is on host 83
2023-07-11 14:16:27,859 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 84 is on host 84
2023-07-11 14:16:27,859 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 85 is on host 85
2023-07-11 14:16:27,859 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 86 is on host 86
2023-07-11 14:16:27,859 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 87 is on host 87
2023-07-11 14:16:27,859 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 88 is on host 88
2023-07-11 14:16:27,859 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 89 is on host 89
2023-07-11 14:16:27,859 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 90 is on host 90
2023-07-11 14:16:27,859 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 91 is on host 91
2023-07-11 14:16:27,859 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 92 is on host 92
2023-07-11 14:16:27,859 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 93 is on host 93
2023-07-11 14:16:27,859 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 94 is on host 94
2023-07-11 14:16:27,859 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 95 is on host 95
2023-07-11 14:16:27,859 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 96 is on host 96
2023-07-11 14:16:27,859 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 97 is on host 97
2023-07-11 14:16:27,859 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 98 is on host 98
2023-07-11 14:16:27,859 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 99 is on host 99
2023-07-11 14:16:27,859 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 100 is on host 100
2023-07-11 14:16:27,859 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 101 is on host 101
2023-07-11 14:16:27,859 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 102 is on host 102
2023-07-11 14:16:27,859 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 103 is on host 103
2023-07-11 14:16:27,859 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 104 is on host 104
2023-07-11 14:16:27,859 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 105 is on host 105
2023-07-11 14:16:27,859 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 106 is on host 106
2023-07-11 14:16:27,859 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 107 is on host 107
2023-07-11 14:16:27,859 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 108 is on host 108
2023-07-11 14:16:27,859 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 109 is on host 109
2023-07-11 14:16:27,859 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 110 is on host 110
2023-07-11 14:16:27,860 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 111 is on host 111
2023-07-11 14:16:27,860 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 112 is on host 112
2023-07-11 14:16:27,860 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 113 is on host 113
2023-07-11 14:16:27,860 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 114 is on host 114
2023-07-11 14:16:27,860 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 115 is on host 115
2023-07-11 14:16:27,860 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 116 is on host 116
2023-07-11 14:16:27,860 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 117 is on host 117
2023-07-11 14:16:27,860 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 118 is on host 118
2023-07-11 14:16:27,860 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 119 is on host 119
2023-07-11 14:16:27,860 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 120 is on host 120
2023-07-11 14:16:27,860 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 121 is on host 121
2023-07-11 14:16:27,860 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 122 is on host 122
2023-07-11 14:16:27,860 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 123 is on host 123
2023-07-11 14:16:27,860 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 124 is on host 124
2023-07-11 14:16:27,860 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 125 is on host 125
2023-07-11 14:16:27,860 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 126 is on host 126
2023-07-11 14:16:27,861 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 127 is on host 127
2023-07-11 14:16:27,861 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 128 is on host 128
2023-07-11 14:16:27,861 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 129 is on host 129
2023-07-11 14:16:27,861 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 130 is on host 130
2023-07-11 14:16:27,861 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 131 is on host 131
2023-07-11 14:16:27,861 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 132 is on host 132
2023-07-11 14:16:27,861 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 133 is on host 133
2023-07-11 14:16:27,861 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 134 is on host 134
2023-07-11 14:16:27,861 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 135 is on host 135
2023-07-11 14:16:27,861 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 136 is on host 136
2023-07-11 14:16:27,861 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 137 is on host 137
2023-07-11 14:16:27,861 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 138 is on host 138
2023-07-11 14:16:27,861 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 139 is on host 139
2023-07-11 14:16:27,861 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 140 is on host 140
2023-07-11 14:16:27,861 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 141 is on host 141
2023-07-11 14:16:27,861 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 142 is on host 142
2023-07-11 14:16:27,861 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 143 is on host 143
2023-07-11 14:16:27,861 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 144 is on host 144
2023-07-11 14:16:27,861 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 145 is on host 145
2023-07-11 14:16:27,861 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 146 is on host 146
2023-07-11 14:16:27,861 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 147 is on host 147
2023-07-11 14:16:27,861 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 148 is on host 148
2023-07-11 14:16:27,861 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 149 is on host 149
2023-07-11 14:16:27,861 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 150 is on host 150
2023-07-11 14:16:27,861 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 151 is on host 151
2023-07-11 14:16:27,861 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 152 is on host 152
2023-07-11 14:16:27,861 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 153 is on host 153
2023-07-11 14:16:27,861 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 154 is on host 154
2023-07-11 14:16:27,861 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 155 is on host 155
2023-07-11 14:16:27,862 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 156 is on host 156
2023-07-11 14:16:27,862 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 157 is on host 157
2023-07-11 14:16:27,862 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 158 is on host 158
2023-07-11 14:16:27,862 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 159 is on host 159
2023-07-11 14:16:27,862 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 160 is on host 160
2023-07-11 14:16:27,862 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 161 is on host 161
2023-07-11 14:16:27,862 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 162 is on host 162
2023-07-11 14:16:27,862 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 163 is on host 163
2023-07-11 14:16:27,862 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 164 is on host 164
2023-07-11 14:16:27,862 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 165 is on host 165
2023-07-11 14:16:27,862 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 166 is on host 166
2023-07-11 14:16:27,862 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 167 is on host 167
2023-07-11 14:16:27,862 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 168 is on host 168
2023-07-11 14:16:27,862 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 169 is on host 169
2023-07-11 14:16:27,862 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 170 is on host 170
2023-07-11 14:16:27,862 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 171 is on host 171
2023-07-11 14:16:27,862 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 172 is on host 172
2023-07-11 14:16:27,862 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 173 is on host 173
2023-07-11 14:16:27,862 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 174 is on host 174
2023-07-11 14:16:27,862 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 175 is on host 175
2023-07-11 14:16:27,862 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 176 is on host 176
2023-07-11 14:16:27,862 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 177 is on host 177
2023-07-11 14:16:27,862 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 178 is on host 178
2023-07-11 14:16:27,862 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 179 is on host 179
2023-07-11 14:16:27,862 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 180 is on host 180
2023-07-11 14:16:27,862 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 181 is on host 181
2023-07-11 14:16:27,862 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 182 is on host 182
2023-07-11 14:16:27,862 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 183 is on host 183
2023-07-11 14:16:27,862 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 184 is on host 184
2023-07-11 14:16:27,863 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 185 is on host 185
2023-07-11 14:16:27,863 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 186 is on host 186
2023-07-11 14:16:27,863 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 187 is on host 187
2023-07-11 14:16:27,863 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 188 is on host 188
2023-07-11 14:16:27,863 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 189 is on host 189
2023-07-11 14:16:27,863 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 190 is on host 190
2023-07-11 14:16:27,863 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 191 is on host 191
2023-07-11 14:16:27,863 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 192 is on host 192
2023-07-11 14:16:27,863 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 193 is on host 193
2023-07-11 14:16:27,863 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 194 is on host 194
2023-07-11 14:16:27,863 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 195 is on host 195
2023-07-11 14:16:27,863 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 196 is on host 196
2023-07-11 14:16:27,863 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 197 is on host 197
2023-07-11 14:16:27,863 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 198 is on host 198
2023-07-11 14:16:27,863 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 199 is on host 199
2023-07-11 14:16:27,863 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 200 is on host 200
2023-07-11 14:16:27,863 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 201 is on host 201
2023-07-11 14:16:27,863 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 202 is on host 202
2023-07-11 14:16:27,863 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 203 is on host 203
2023-07-11 14:16:27,863 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 204 is on host 204
2023-07-11 14:16:27,863 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 205 is on host 205
2023-07-11 14:16:27,863 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 206 is on host 206
2023-07-11 14:16:27,863 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 207 is on host 207
2023-07-11 14:16:27,863 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 208 is on host 208
2023-07-11 14:16:27,863 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 209 is on host 209
2023-07-11 14:16:27,863 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 210 is on host 210
2023-07-11 14:16:27,863 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 211 is on host 211
2023-07-11 14:16:27,863 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 212 is on host 212
2023-07-11 14:16:27,863 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 213 is on host 213
2023-07-11 14:16:27,864 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 214 is on host 214
2023-07-11 14:16:27,864 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 215 is on host 215
2023-07-11 14:16:27,864 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 216 is on host 216
2023-07-11 14:16:27,864 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 217 is on host 217
2023-07-11 14:16:27,864 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 218 is on host 218
2023-07-11 14:16:27,864 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 219 is on host 219
2023-07-11 14:16:27,864 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 220 is on host 220
2023-07-11 14:16:27,864 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 221 is on host 221
2023-07-11 14:16:27,864 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 222 is on host 222
2023-07-11 14:16:27,864 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 223 is on host 223
2023-07-11 14:16:27,864 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 224 is on host 224
2023-07-11 14:16:27,864 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 225 is on host 225
2023-07-11 14:16:27,864 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 226 is on host 226
2023-07-11 14:16:27,864 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 227 is on host 227
2023-07-11 14:16:27,864 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 228 is on host 228
2023-07-11 14:16:27,864 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 229 is on host 229
2023-07-11 14:16:27,864 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 230 is on host 230
2023-07-11 14:16:27,864 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 231 is on host 231
2023-07-11 14:16:27,864 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 232 is on host 232
2023-07-11 14:16:27,864 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 233 is on host 233
2023-07-11 14:16:27,864 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 234 is on host 234
2023-07-11 14:16:27,864 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 235 is on host 235
2023-07-11 14:16:27,864 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 236 is on host 236
2023-07-11 14:16:27,864 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 237 is on host 237
2023-07-11 14:16:27,864 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 238 is on host 238
2023-07-11 14:16:27,864 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 239 is on host 239
2023-07-11 14:16:27,864 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 240 is on host 240
2023-07-11 14:16:27,864 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 241 is on host 241
2023-07-11 14:16:27,864 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 242 is on host 242
2023-07-11 14:16:27,865 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 243 is on host 243
2023-07-11 14:16:27,865 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 244 is on host 244
2023-07-11 14:16:27,865 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 245 is on host 245
2023-07-11 14:16:27,865 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 246 is on host 246
2023-07-11 14:16:27,865 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 247 is on host 247
2023-07-11 14:16:27,865 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 248 is on host 248
2023-07-11 14:16:27,865 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 249 is on host 249
2023-07-11 14:16:27,865 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 250 is on host 250
2023-07-11 14:16:27,865 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 251 is on host 251
2023-07-11 14:16:27,865 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 252 is on host 252
2023-07-11 14:16:27,865 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 253 is on host 253
2023-07-11 14:16:27,865 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 254 is on host 254
2023-07-11 14:16:27,865 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 255 is on host 255
2023-07-11 14:16:27,865 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 256 is on host 256
2023-07-11 14:16:27,865 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 257 is on host 257
2023-07-11 14:16:27,865 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 258 is on host 258
2023-07-11 14:16:27,865 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 259 is on host 259
2023-07-11 14:16:27,865 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 260 is on host 260
2023-07-11 14:16:27,865 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 261 is on host 261
2023-07-11 14:16:27,865 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 262 is on host 262
2023-07-11 14:16:27,865 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 263 is on host 263
2023-07-11 14:16:27,865 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 264 is on host 264
2023-07-11 14:16:27,865 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 265 is on host 265
2023-07-11 14:16:27,865 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 266 is on host 266
2023-07-11 14:16:27,865 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 267 is on host 267
2023-07-11 14:16:27,865 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 268 is on host 268
2023-07-11 14:16:27,865 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 269 is on host 269
2023-07-11 14:16:27,865 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 270 is on host 270
2023-07-11 14:16:27,866 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 271 is on host 271
2023-07-11 14:16:27,866 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 272 is on host 272
2023-07-11 14:16:27,866 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 273 is on host 273
2023-07-11 14:16:27,866 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 274 is on host 274
2023-07-11 14:16:27,866 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 275 is on host 275
2023-07-11 14:16:27,866 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 276 is on host 276
2023-07-11 14:16:27,866 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 277 is on host 277
2023-07-11 14:16:27,866 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 278 is on host 278
2023-07-11 14:16:27,866 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 279 is on host 279
2023-07-11 14:16:27,866 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 280 is on host 280
2023-07-11 14:16:27,866 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 281 is on host 281
2023-07-11 14:16:27,866 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 282 is on host 282
2023-07-11 14:16:27,866 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 283 is on host 283
2023-07-11 14:16:27,866 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 284 is on host 284
2023-07-11 14:16:27,866 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 285 is on host 285
2023-07-11 14:16:27,866 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 286 is on host 286
2023-07-11 14:16:27,866 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 287 is on host 287
2023-07-11 14:16:27,866 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 288 is on host 288
2023-07-11 14:16:27,866 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 289 is on host 289
2023-07-11 14:16:27,866 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 290 is on host 290
2023-07-11 14:16:27,866 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 291 is on host 291
2023-07-11 14:16:27,866 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 292 is on host 292
2023-07-11 14:16:27,866 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 293 is on host 293
2023-07-11 14:16:27,866 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 294 is on host 294
2023-07-11 14:16:27,866 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 295 is on host 295
2023-07-11 14:16:27,866 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 296 is on host 296
2023-07-11 14:16:27,866 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 297 is on host 297
2023-07-11 14:16:27,866 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 298 is on host 298
2023-07-11 14:16:27,866 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 299 is on host 299
2023-07-11 14:16:27,866 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 300 is on host 300
2023-07-11 14:16:27,867 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 301 is on host 301
2023-07-11 14:16:27,867 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 302 is on host 302
2023-07-11 14:16:27,867 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 303 is on host 303
2023-07-11 14:16:27,867 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 304 is on host 304
2023-07-11 14:16:27,867 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 305 is on host 305
2023-07-11 14:16:27,867 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 306 is on host 306
2023-07-11 14:16:27,867 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 307 is on host 307
2023-07-11 14:16:27,867 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 308 is on host 308
2023-07-11 14:16:27,867 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 309 is on host 309
2023-07-11 14:16:27,867 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 310 is on host 310
2023-07-11 14:16:27,867 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 311 is on host 311
2023-07-11 14:16:27,867 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 312 is on host 312
2023-07-11 14:16:27,867 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 313 is on host 313
2023-07-11 14:16:27,867 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 314 is on host 314
2023-07-11 14:16:27,867 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 315 is on host 315
2023-07-11 14:16:27,867 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 316 is on host 316
2023-07-11 14:16:27,867 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 317 is on host 317
2023-07-11 14:16:27,867 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 318 is on host 318
2023-07-11 14:16:27,867 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 319 is on host 319
2023-07-11 14:16:27,867 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 320 is on host 320
2023-07-11 14:16:27,867 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 321 is on host 321
2023-07-11 14:16:27,867 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 322 is on host 322
2023-07-11 14:16:27,867 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 323 is on host 323
2023-07-11 14:16:27,867 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 324 is on host 324
2023-07-11 14:16:27,867 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 325 is on host 325
2023-07-11 14:16:27,867 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 326 is on host 326
2023-07-11 14:16:27,867 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 327 is on host 327
2023-07-11 14:16:27,867 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 328 is on host 328
2023-07-11 14:16:27,867 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 329 is on host 329
2023-07-11 14:16:27,868 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 330 is on host 330
2023-07-11 14:16:27,868 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 331 is on host 331
2023-07-11 14:16:27,868 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 332 is on host 332
2023-07-11 14:16:27,868 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 333 is on host 333
2023-07-11 14:16:27,868 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 334 is on host 334
2023-07-11 14:16:27,868 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 335 is on host 335
2023-07-11 14:16:27,868 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 336 is on host 336
2023-07-11 14:16:27,868 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 337 is on host 337
2023-07-11 14:16:27,868 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 338 is on host 338
2023-07-11 14:16:27,868 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 339 is on host 339
2023-07-11 14:16:27,868 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 340 is on host 340
2023-07-11 14:16:27,868 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 341 is on host 341
2023-07-11 14:16:27,868 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 342 is on host 342
2023-07-11 14:16:27,868 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 343 is on host 343
2023-07-11 14:16:27,868 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 344 is on host 344
2023-07-11 14:16:27,868 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 345 is on host 345
2023-07-11 14:16:27,868 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 346 is on host 346
2023-07-11 14:16:27,868 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 347 is on host 347
2023-07-11 14:16:27,868 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 348 is on host 348
2023-07-11 14:16:27,868 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 349 is on host 349
2023-07-11 14:16:27,868 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 350 is on host 350
2023-07-11 14:16:27,868 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 351 is on host 351
2023-07-11 14:16:27,868 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 352 is on host 352
2023-07-11 14:16:27,868 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 353 is on host 353
2023-07-11 14:16:27,868 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 354 is on host 354
2023-07-11 14:16:27,868 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 355 is on host 355
2023-07-11 14:16:27,868 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 356 is on host 356
2023-07-11 14:16:27,868 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 357 is on host 357
2023-07-11 14:16:27,868 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 358 is on host 358
2023-07-11 14:16:27,869 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 359 is on host 359
2023-07-11 14:16:27,869 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 360 is on host 360
2023-07-11 14:16:27,869 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 361 is on host 361
2023-07-11 14:16:27,869 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 362 is on host 362
2023-07-11 14:16:27,869 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 363 is on host 363
2023-07-11 14:16:27,869 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 364 is on host 364
2023-07-11 14:16:27,869 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 365 is on host 365
2023-07-11 14:16:27,869 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 366 is on host 366
2023-07-11 14:16:27,869 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 367 is on host 367
2023-07-11 14:16:27,869 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 368 is on host 368
2023-07-11 14:16:27,869 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 369 is on host 369
2023-07-11 14:16:27,869 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 370 is on host 370
2023-07-11 14:16:27,869 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 371 is on host 371
2023-07-11 14:16:27,869 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 372 is on host 372
2023-07-11 14:16:27,869 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 373 is on host 373
2023-07-11 14:16:27,869 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 374 is on host 374
2023-07-11 14:16:27,869 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 375 is on host 375
2023-07-11 14:16:27,869 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 376 is on host 376
2023-07-11 14:16:27,869 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 377 is on host 377
2023-07-11 14:16:27,869 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 378 is on host 378
2023-07-11 14:16:27,869 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 379 is on host 379
2023-07-11 14:16:27,869 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 380 is on host 380
2023-07-11 14:16:27,869 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 381 is on host 381
2023-07-11 14:16:27,869 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 382 is on host 382
2023-07-11 14:16:27,869 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 383 is on host 383
2023-07-11 14:16:27,869 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 384 is on host 384
2023-07-11 14:16:27,869 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 385 is on host 385
2023-07-11 14:16:27,869 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 386 is on host 386
2023-07-11 14:16:27,869 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 387 is on host 387
2023-07-11 14:16:27,870 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 388 is on host 388
2023-07-11 14:16:27,870 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 389 is on host 389
2023-07-11 14:16:27,870 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 390 is on host 390
2023-07-11 14:16:27,870 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 391 is on host 391
2023-07-11 14:16:27,870 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 392 is on host 392
2023-07-11 14:16:27,870 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=393, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:27,870 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table39) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:27,870 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table5
2023-07-11 14:16:27,870 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv553536953=290, srv1630071126=110, srv1071894870=12, srv23511728=232, srv658346947=323, srv2025338799=204, srv1397994335=64, srv1976766403=195, srv1644629726=118, srv957637734=381, srv2079182457=210, srv1749264468=139, srv2046129126=206, srv1595762596=104, srv603990852=307, srv1973073480=194, srv958856137=382, srv644066832=319, srv557062842=292, srv277765671=235, srv732221418=337, srv1769385567=143, srv224612199=228, srv714752528=334, srv362526040=256, srv581128949=296, srv2133511466=223, srv1144239257=30, srv320603627=245, srv1679952521=126, srv2122867873=222, srv1110067064=24, srv256251994=233, srv63261708=317, srv89837390=371, srv552104598=289, srv508952995=281, srv2096011353=214, srv1770417148=144, srv1246723478=42, srv929436444=378, srv2082192429=211, srv234917297=231, srv405700573=266, srv183644386=166, srv1488378513=85, srv173139715=136, srv1154180352=32, srv355693379=252, srv1407521654=66, srv496848057=275, srv1157975499=33, srv1806731027=162, srv1923102804=184, srv311102455=244, srv450011410=271, srv771515724=348, srv389183508=262, srv1249074416=43, srv2014575201=201, srv640847108=318, srv832363565=356, srv1970882134=192, srv2107358603=218, srv855766065=361, srv1336043388=55, srv29397186=237, srv982792848=390, srv976560524=386, srv101181760=3, srv1093549482=21, srv2018389395=202, srv2113483104=221, srv1778339118=149, srv1968709692=190, srv705221118=333, srv159600090=105, srv1919608486=180, srv981255102=389, srv807899713=353, srv755110395=344, srv1770594519=145, srv739692705=340, srv1076582671=16, srv693869315=330, srv1079048717=17, srv440657532=270, srv1636659280=115, srv2108739257=220, srv668373413=326, srv1003610393=2, srv1054229197=11, srv1868589627=172, srv2103522371=217, srv1000546271=0, srv951670617=380, srv2042909593=205, srv1865656038=171, srv1466355012=78, srv703662406=332, srv1418112884=70, srv1215580291=40, srv71833528=335, srv1580581635=103, srv1021032212=5, srv1080806312=19, srv1985601859=197, srv74471954=343, srv1647472319=119, srv2071553346=208, srv1632855171=112, srv1122009370=27, srv13613992=61, srv1630777154=111, srv301413669=239, srv550697728=288, srv1296023857=53, srv1724550977=133, srv1989290370=198, srv1926417985=185, srv1678097199=125, srv1461034373=76, srv614690415=311, srv2098345381=215, srv310463473=243, srv1011934105=4, srv148627129=84, srv305489318=240, srv1256534903=46, srv1289731445=52, srv1798844587=157, srv567113085=294, srv1119222501=26, srv2055117940=207, srv855898852=362, srv629224816=316, srv1075943554=15, srv625909061=315, srv1705591942=128, srv734225580=339, srv660107924=324, srv1381729938=62, srv1633483173=113, srv408265476=267, srv1776057793=148, srv1360253411=60, srv1511424834=90, srv1414162621=68, srv883343663=370, srv151859222=91, srv349144930=251, srv1991304034=199, srv1825887791=164, srv601657063=305, srv758932951=345, srv1651629087=120, srv1864623584=170, srv682957691=329, srv1500454146=88, srv1725962085=135, srv1659841448=121, srv1253206004=45, srv52354442=284, srv18508093=168, srv1427731921=73, srv561344974=293, srv721668125=336, srv1575482138=100, srv914128771=373, srv961487230=383, srv741332941=342, srv533032466=286, srv1574140987=99, srv2139849097=224, srv503902262=278, srv674807007=327, srv1786829855=153, srv2088727517=213, srv394366966=264, srv980089565=388, srv114594288=31, srv38296437=261, srv214835574=226, srv1887224977=176, srv1025509362=7, srv1577020334=102, srv524466665=285, srv393561021=263, srv759909927=346, srv763556514=347, srv786453030=349, srv2142935488=225, srv618111613=312, srv16254163=108, srv343211061=250, srv476075173=273, srv1269632212=47, srv333589612=246, srv499015361=276, srv836674186=357, srv1799191687=158, srv1446998035=74, srv1571774199=98, srv1115354947=25, srv333860881=247, srv1724152600=132, srv1598699299=106, srv177885829=151, srv472125887=272, srv1101339966=22, srv1424985362=72, srv1945569895=188, srv594128294=300, srv1026739237=8, srv842459828=358, srv878519137=366, srv1921260729=181, srv339110834=249, srv504099471=279, srv814253179=354, srv1643744885=116, srv1793847521=155, srv607234624=309, srv698219051=331, srv1688538732=127, srv666240078=325, srv1079284733=18, srv29210550=236, srv506181748=280, srv881313122=368, srv1945452576=187, srv597307897=303, srv1285120424=51, srv1887943816=177, srv1983604698=196, srv1805465940=161, srv309309336=242, srv1719756294=131, srv1349932676=58, srv1208486369=38, srv1643971570=117, srv1509331489=89, srv334105385=248, srv1400515744=65, srv369984715=259, srv43712162=269, srv842675864=359, srv1803258748=160, srv1022450918=6, srv1775108732=147, srv1766088250=141, srv180150732=159, srv1220857227=41, srv226530501=229, srv362032108=255, srv919715380=377, srv1074935976=14, srv1395030819=63, srv803291569=352, srv1877966766=175, srv220538712=227, srv2021718843=203, srv2107782185=219, srv882216860=369, srv1489137852=86, srv1972328734=193, srv1470759982=79, srv1774824811=146, srv971974774=384, srv1418242791=71, srv1001274196=1, srv909615097=372, srv1537724566=93, srv1165799954=34, srv1724754364=134, srv978173525=387, srv113319438=29, srv578033735=295, srv147931272=80, srv1183635941=35, srv1904215245=178, srv596349756=302, srv880835255=367, srv857544550=364, srv1779729022=152, srv1795612465=156, srv621083045=314, srv917704170=375, srv1351811120=59, srv1316710897=54, srv789820555=350, srv1922580095=183, srv305567304=241, srv1936745425=186, srv1745318024=138, srv1210822057=39, srv645375717=320, srv950628389=379, srv1490199189=87, srv1575919256=101, srv154481102=96, srv359402967=254, srv997716931=391, srv1457224273=75, srv581644449=297, srv1872374768=174, srv363177310=257, srv740327512=341, srv1664227236=123, srv972330517=385, srv1634261306=114, srv1662183707=122, srv1969046891=191, srv1485266211=82, srv1778842262=150, srv588410181=298, srv1921840985=182, srv591279493=299, srv37574565=260, srv1104147458=23, srv1190166330=36, srv652270371=322, srv1484309042=81, srv1560148463=97, srv618569548=313, srv2102708311=216, srv1084873074=20, srv517669556=283, srv918152084=376, srv649714317=321, srv1674484790=124, srv1339239880=56, srv1461073271=77, srv1125312901=28, srv25633292=234, srv516616923=282, srv299721745=238, srv604932433=308, srv1273702855=48, srv792183929=351, srv1042608200=10, srv1276335106=49, srv1486044644=83, srv676101698=328, srv998930892=392, srv200111276=200, srv1863083643=169, srv1737443479=137, srv872997185=365, srv821351126=355, srv852115805=360, srv1074355423=13, srv170952194=130, srv503430005=277, srv153887567=94, srv1415163001=69, srv1032737435=9, srv1840670515=167, srv1961921083=189, srv59745831=304, srv36715747=258, srv431547280=268, srv1524853580=92, srv1870059418=173, srv396010771=265, srv594457792=301, srv1755339428=140, srv1766275429=142, srv5565786=291, srv603898526=306, srv544570223=287, srv856030669=363, srv1542523468=95, srv915785747=374, srv356122213=253, srv1411875499=67, srv2077620970=209, srv1345529444=57, srv232339963=230, srv1250861076=44, srv1914875423=179, srv478619481=274, srv1202435626=37, srv1706089454=129, srv1810631201=163, srv1282644061=50, srv1625945288=109, srv733251129=338, srv2082830831=212, srv1612103540=107, srv612136291=310, srv1790004142=154, srv183394703=165} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:27,871 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:27,871 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:27,871 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:27,871 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:27,871 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:27,871 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:27,871 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-11 14:16:27,871 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-11 14:16:27,871 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-11 14:16:27,871 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-11 14:16:27,871 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 10 is on host 10
2023-07-11 14:16:27,871 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 11 is on host 11
2023-07-11 14:16:27,871 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 12 is on host 12
2023-07-11 14:16:27,871 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 13 is on host 13
2023-07-11 14:16:27,871 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 14 is on host 14
2023-07-11 14:16:27,871 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 15 is on host 15
2023-07-11 14:16:27,871 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 16 is on host 16
2023-07-11 14:16:27,872 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 17 is on host 17
2023-07-11 14:16:27,872 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 18 is on host 18
2023-07-11 14:16:27,872 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 19 is on host 19
2023-07-11 14:16:27,872 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 20 is on host 20
2023-07-11 14:16:27,872 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 21 is on host 21
2023-07-11 14:16:27,872 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 22 is on host 22
2023-07-11 14:16:27,872 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 23 is on host 23
2023-07-11 14:16:27,872 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 24 is on host 24
2023-07-11 14:16:27,872 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 25 is on host 25
2023-07-11 14:16:27,872 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 26 is on host 26
2023-07-11 14:16:27,872 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 27 is on host 27
2023-07-11 14:16:27,872 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 28 is on host 28
2023-07-11 14:16:27,872 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 29 is on host 29
2023-07-11 14:16:27,872 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 30 is on host 30
2023-07-11 14:16:27,872 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 31 is on host 31
2023-07-11 14:16:27,872 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 32 is on host 32
2023-07-11 14:16:27,872 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 33 is on host 33
2023-07-11 14:16:27,872 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 34 is on host 34
2023-07-11 14:16:27,872 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 35 is on host 35
2023-07-11 14:16:27,872 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 36 is on host 36
2023-07-11 14:16:27,872 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 37 is on host 37
2023-07-11 14:16:27,872 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 38 is on host 38
2023-07-11 14:16:27,873 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 39 is on host 39
2023-07-11 14:16:27,873 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 40 is on host 40
2023-07-11 14:16:27,873 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 41 is on host 41
2023-07-11 14:16:27,873 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 42 is on host 42
2023-07-11 14:16:27,873 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 43 is on host 43
2023-07-11 14:16:27,873 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 44 is on host 44
2023-07-11 14:16:27,873 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 45 is on host 45
2023-07-11 14:16:27,873 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 46 is on host 46
2023-07-11 14:16:27,873 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 47 is on host 47
2023-07-11 14:16:27,873 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 48 is on host 48
2023-07-11 14:16:27,873 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 49 is on host 49
2023-07-11 14:16:27,873 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 50 is on host 50
2023-07-11 14:16:27,873 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 51 is on host 51
2023-07-11 14:16:27,873 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 52 is on host 52
2023-07-11 14:16:27,873 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 53 is on host 53
2023-07-11 14:16:27,873 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 54 is on host 54
2023-07-11 14:16:27,873 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 55 is on host 55
2023-07-11 14:16:27,873 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 56 is on host 56
2023-07-11 14:16:27,873 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 57 is on host 57
2023-07-11 14:16:27,873 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 58 is on host 58
2023-07-11 14:16:27,873 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 59 is on host 59
2023-07-11 14:16:27,873 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 60 is on host 60
2023-07-11 14:16:27,873 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 61 is on host 61
2023-07-11 14:16:27,873 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 62 is on host 62
2023-07-11 14:16:27,873 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 63 is on host 63
2023-07-11 14:16:27,873 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 64 is on host 64
2023-07-11 14:16:27,874 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 65 is on host 65
2023-07-11 14:16:27,874 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 66 is on host 66
2023-07-11 14:16:27,874 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 67 is on host 67
2023-07-11 14:16:27,874 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 68 is on host 68
2023-07-11 14:16:27,874 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 69 is on host 69
2023-07-11 14:16:27,874 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 70 is on host 70
2023-07-11 14:16:27,874 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 71 is on host 71
2023-07-11 14:16:27,874 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 72 is on host 72
2023-07-11 14:16:27,874 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 73 is on host 73
2023-07-11 14:16:27,874 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 74 is on host 74
2023-07-11 14:16:27,874 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 75 is on host 75
2023-07-11 14:16:27,874 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 76 is on host 76
2023-07-11 14:16:27,874 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 77 is on host 77
2023-07-11 14:16:27,874 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 78 is on host 78
2023-07-11 14:16:27,874 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 79 is on host 79
2023-07-11 14:16:27,874 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 80 is on host 80
2023-07-11 14:16:27,874 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 81 is on host 81
2023-07-11 14:16:27,874 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 82 is on host 82
2023-07-11 14:16:27,874 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 83 is on host 83
2023-07-11 14:16:27,874 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 84 is on host 84
2023-07-11 14:16:27,874 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 85 is on host 85
2023-07-11 14:16:27,874 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 86 is on host 86
2023-07-11 14:16:27,874 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 87 is on host 87
2023-07-11 14:16:27,874 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 88 is on host 88
2023-07-11 14:16:27,874 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 89 is on host 89
2023-07-11 14:16:27,874 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 90 is on host 90
2023-07-11 14:16:27,874 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 91 is on host 91
2023-07-11 14:16:27,874 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 92 is on host 92
2023-07-11 14:16:27,874 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 93 is on host 93
2023-07-11 14:16:27,875 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 94 is on host 94
2023-07-11 14:16:27,875 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 95 is on host 95
2023-07-11 14:16:27,875 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 96 is on host 96
2023-07-11 14:16:27,875 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 97 is on host 97
2023-07-11 14:16:27,875 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 98 is on host 98
2023-07-11 14:16:27,875 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 99 is on host 99
2023-07-11 14:16:27,875 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 100 is on host 100
2023-07-11 14:16:27,875 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 101 is on host 101
2023-07-11 14:16:27,875 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 102 is on host 102
2023-07-11 14:16:27,875 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 103 is on host 103
2023-07-11 14:16:27,875 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 104 is on host 104
2023-07-11 14:16:27,875 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 105 is on host 105
2023-07-11 14:16:27,875 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 106 is on host 106
2023-07-11 14:16:27,875 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 107 is on host 107
2023-07-11 14:16:27,875 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 108 is on host 108
2023-07-11 14:16:27,875 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 109 is on host 109
2023-07-11 14:16:27,875 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 110 is on host 110
2023-07-11 14:16:27,875 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 111 is on host 111
2023-07-11 14:16:27,875 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 112 is on host 112
2023-07-11 14:16:27,875 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 113 is on host 113
2023-07-11 14:16:27,875 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 114 is on host 114
2023-07-11 14:16:27,875 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 115 is on host 115
2023-07-11 14:16:27,875 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 116 is on host 116
2023-07-11 14:16:27,875 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 117 is on host 117
2023-07-11 14:16:27,875 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 118 is on host 118
2023-07-11 14:16:27,875 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 119 is on host 119
2023-07-11 14:16:27,875 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 120 is on host 120
2023-07-11 14:16:27,875 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 121 is on host 121
2023-07-11 14:16:27,876 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 122 is on host 122
2023-07-11 14:16:27,876 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 123 is on host 123
2023-07-11 14:16:27,876 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 124 is on host 124
2023-07-11 14:16:27,876 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 125 is on host 125
2023-07-11 14:16:27,876 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 126 is on host 126
2023-07-11 14:16:27,876 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 127 is on host 127
2023-07-11 14:16:27,876 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 128 is on host 128
2023-07-11 14:16:27,876 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 129 is on host 129
2023-07-11 14:16:27,876 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 130 is on host 130
2023-07-11 14:16:27,876 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 131 is on host 131
2023-07-11 14:16:27,876 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 132 is on host 132
2023-07-11 14:16:27,876 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 133 is on host 133
2023-07-11 14:16:27,876 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 134 is on host 134
2023-07-11 14:16:27,876 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 135 is on host 135
2023-07-11 14:16:27,876 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 136 is on host 136
2023-07-11 14:16:27,876 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 137 is on host 137
2023-07-11 14:16:27,876 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 138 is on host 138
2023-07-11 14:16:27,876 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 139 is on host 139
2023-07-11 14:16:27,876 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 140 is on host 140
2023-07-11 14:16:27,876 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 141 is on host 141
2023-07-11 14:16:27,876 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 142 is on host 142
2023-07-11 14:16:27,876 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 143 is on host 143
2023-07-11 14:16:27,876 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 144 is on host 144
2023-07-11 14:16:27,876 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 145 is on host 145
2023-07-11 14:16:27,876 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 146 is on host 146
2023-07-11 14:16:27,876 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 147 is on host 147
2023-07-11 14:16:27,876 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 148 is on host 148
2023-07-11 14:16:27,876 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 149 is on host 149
2023-07-11 14:16:27,877 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 150 is on host 150
2023-07-11 14:16:27,877 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 151 is on host 151
2023-07-11 14:16:27,877 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 152 is on host 152
2023-07-11 14:16:27,877 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 153 is on host 153
2023-07-11 14:16:27,877 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 154 is on host 154
2023-07-11 14:16:27,877 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 155 is on host 155
2023-07-11 14:16:27,877 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 156 is on host 156
2023-07-11 14:16:27,877 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 157 is on host 157
2023-07-11 14:16:27,877 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 158 is on host 158
2023-07-11 14:16:27,877 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 159 is on host 159
2023-07-11 14:16:27,877 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 160 is on host 160
2023-07-11 14:16:27,877 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 161 is on host 161
2023-07-11 14:16:27,877 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 162 is on host 162
2023-07-11 14:16:27,877 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 163 is on host 163
2023-07-11 14:16:27,877 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 164 is on host 164
2023-07-11 14:16:27,877 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 165 is on host 165
2023-07-11 14:16:27,877 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 166 is on host 166
2023-07-11 14:16:27,877 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 167 is on host 167
2023-07-11 14:16:27,877 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 168 is on host 168
2023-07-11 14:16:27,877 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 169 is on host 169
2023-07-11 14:16:27,877 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 170 is on host 170
2023-07-11 14:16:27,877 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 171 is on host 171
2023-07-11 14:16:27,877 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 172 is on host 172
2023-07-11 14:16:27,877 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 173 is on host 173
2023-07-11 14:16:27,877 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 174 is on host 174
2023-07-11 14:16:27,877 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 175 is on host 175
2023-07-11 14:16:27,877 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 176 is on host 176
2023-07-11 14:16:27,877 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 177 is on host 177
2023-07-11 14:16:27,877 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 178 is on host 178
2023-07-11 14:16:27,878 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 179 is on host 179
2023-07-11 14:16:27,878 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 180 is on host 180
2023-07-11 14:16:27,878 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 181 is on host 181
2023-07-11 14:16:27,878 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 182 is on host 182
2023-07-11 14:16:27,878 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 183 is on host 183
2023-07-11 14:16:27,878 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 184 is on host 184
2023-07-11 14:16:27,878 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 185 is on host 185
2023-07-11 14:16:27,878 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 186 is on host 186
2023-07-11 14:16:27,878 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 187 is on host 187
2023-07-11 14:16:27,878 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 188 is on host 188
2023-07-11 14:16:27,878 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 189 is on host 189
2023-07-11 14:16:27,878 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 190 is on host 190
2023-07-11 14:16:27,878 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 191 is on host 191
2023-07-11 14:16:27,878 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 192 is on host 192
2023-07-11 14:16:27,878 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 193 is on host 193
2023-07-11 14:16:27,878 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 194 is on host 194
2023-07-11 14:16:27,878 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 195 is on host 195
2023-07-11 14:16:27,878 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 196 is on host 196
2023-07-11 14:16:27,878 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 197 is on host 197
2023-07-11 14:16:27,878 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 198 is on host 198
2023-07-11 14:16:27,878 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 199 is on host 199
2023-07-11 14:16:27,878 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 200 is on host 200
2023-07-11 14:16:27,878 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 201 is on host 201
2023-07-11 14:16:27,878 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 202 is on host 202
2023-07-11 14:16:27,878 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 203 is on host 203
2023-07-11 14:16:27,878 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 204 is on host 204
2023-07-11 14:16:27,878 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 205 is on host 205
2023-07-11 14:16:27,878 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 206 is on host 206
2023-07-11 14:16:27,878 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 207 is on host 207
2023-07-11 14:16:27,879 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 208 is on host 208
2023-07-11 14:16:27,879 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 209 is on host 209
2023-07-11 14:16:27,879 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 210 is on host 210
2023-07-11 14:16:27,879 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 211 is on host 211
2023-07-11 14:16:27,879 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 212 is on host 212
2023-07-11 14:16:27,879 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 213 is on host 213
2023-07-11 14:16:27,879 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 214 is on host 214
2023-07-11 14:16:27,879 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 215 is on host 215
2023-07-11 14:16:27,879 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 216 is on host 216
2023-07-11 14:16:27,879 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 217 is on host 217
2023-07-11 14:16:27,879 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 218 is on host 218
2023-07-11 14:16:27,879 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 219 is on host 219
2023-07-11 14:16:27,879 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 220 is on host 220
2023-07-11 14:16:27,879 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 221 is on host 221
2023-07-11 14:16:27,879 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 222 is on host 222
2023-07-11 14:16:27,879 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 223 is on host 223
2023-07-11 14:16:27,879 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 224 is on host 224
2023-07-11 14:16:27,879 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 225 is on host 225
2023-07-11 14:16:27,879 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 226 is on host 226
2023-07-11 14:16:27,879 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 227 is on host 227
2023-07-11 14:16:27,879 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 228 is on host 228
2023-07-11 14:16:27,879 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 229 is on host 229
2023-07-11 14:16:27,879 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 230 is on host 230
2023-07-11 14:16:27,879 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 231 is on host 231
2023-07-11 14:16:27,879 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 232 is on host 232
2023-07-11 14:16:27,879 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 233 is on host 233
2023-07-11 14:16:27,879 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 234 is on host 234
2023-07-11 14:16:27,879 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 235 is on host 235
2023-07-11 14:16:27,879 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 236 is on host 236
2023-07-11 14:16:27,880 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 237 is on host 237
2023-07-11 14:16:27,880 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 238 is on host 238
2023-07-11 14:16:27,880 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 239 is on host 239
2023-07-11 14:16:27,880 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 240 is on host 240
2023-07-11 14:16:27,880 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 241 is on host 241
2023-07-11 14:16:27,880 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 242 is on host 242
2023-07-11 14:16:27,880 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 243 is on host 243
2023-07-11 14:16:27,880 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 244 is on host 244
2023-07-11 14:16:27,880 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 245 is on host 245
2023-07-11 14:16:27,880 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 246 is on host 246
2023-07-11 14:16:27,880 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 247 is on host 247
2023-07-11 14:16:27,880 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 248 is on host 248
2023-07-11 14:16:27,880 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 249 is on host 249
2023-07-11 14:16:27,880 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 250 is on host 250
2023-07-11 14:16:27,880 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 251 is on host 251
2023-07-11 14:16:27,880 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 252 is on host 252
2023-07-11 14:16:27,880 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 253 is on host 253
2023-07-11 14:16:27,880 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 254 is on host 254
2023-07-11 14:16:27,880 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 255 is on host 255
2023-07-11 14:16:27,880 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 256 is on host 256
2023-07-11 14:16:27,880 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 257 is on host 257
2023-07-11 14:16:27,880 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 258 is on host 258
2023-07-11 14:16:27,880 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 259 is on host 259
2023-07-11 14:16:27,880 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 260 is on host 260
2023-07-11 14:16:27,880 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 261 is on host 261
2023-07-11 14:16:27,880 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 262 is on host 262
2023-07-11 14:16:27,880 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 263 is on host 263
2023-07-11 14:16:27,880 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 264 is on host 264
2023-07-11 14:16:27,880 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 265 is on host 265
2023-07-11 14:16:27,881 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 266 is on host 266
2023-07-11 14:16:27,881 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 267 is on host 267
2023-07-11 14:16:27,881 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 268 is on host 268
2023-07-11 14:16:27,881 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 269 is on host 269
2023-07-11 14:16:27,881 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 270 is on host 270
2023-07-11 14:16:27,881 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 271 is on host 271
2023-07-11 14:16:27,881 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 272 is on host 272
2023-07-11 14:16:27,881 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 273 is on host 273
2023-07-11 14:16:27,881 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 274 is on host 274
2023-07-11 14:16:27,881 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 275 is on host 275
2023-07-11 14:16:27,881 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 276 is on host 276
2023-07-11 14:16:27,881 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 277 is on host 277
2023-07-11 14:16:27,881 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 278 is on host 278
2023-07-11 14:16:27,881 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 279 is on host 279
2023-07-11 14:16:27,881 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 280 is on host 280
2023-07-11 14:16:27,881 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 281 is on host 281
2023-07-11 14:16:27,881 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 282 is on host 282
2023-07-11 14:16:27,881 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 283 is on host 283
2023-07-11 14:16:27,881 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 284 is on host 284
2023-07-11 14:16:27,881 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 285 is on host 285
2023-07-11 14:16:27,881 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 286 is on host 286
2023-07-11 14:16:27,881 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 287 is on host 287
2023-07-11 14:16:27,881 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 288 is on host 288
2023-07-11 14:16:27,881 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 289 is on host 289
2023-07-11 14:16:27,881 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 290 is on host 290
2023-07-11 14:16:27,881 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 291 is on host 291
2023-07-11 14:16:27,881 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 292 is on host 292
2023-07-11 14:16:27,881 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 293 is on host 293
2023-07-11 14:16:27,881 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 294 is on host 294
2023-07-11 14:16:27,882 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 295 is on host 295
2023-07-11 14:16:27,882 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 296 is on host 296
2023-07-11 14:16:27,882 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 297 is on host 297
2023-07-11 14:16:27,882 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 298 is on host 298
2023-07-11 14:16:27,882 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 299 is on host 299
2023-07-11 14:16:27,882 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 300 is on host 300
2023-07-11 14:16:27,882 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 301 is on host 301
2023-07-11 14:16:27,882 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 302 is on host 302
2023-07-11 14:16:27,882 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 303 is on host 303
2023-07-11 14:16:27,882 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 304 is on host 304
2023-07-11 14:16:27,882 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 305 is on host 305
2023-07-11 14:16:27,882 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 306 is on host 306
2023-07-11 14:16:27,882 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 307 is on host 307
2023-07-11 14:16:27,882 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 308 is on host 308
2023-07-11 14:16:27,882 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 309 is on host 309
2023-07-11 14:16:27,882 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 310 is on host 310
2023-07-11 14:16:27,882 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 311 is on host 311
2023-07-11 14:16:27,882 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 312 is on host 312
2023-07-11 14:16:27,882 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 313 is on host 313
2023-07-11 14:16:27,882 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 314 is on host 314
2023-07-11 14:16:27,882 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 315 is on host 315
2023-07-11 14:16:27,882 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 316 is on host 316
2023-07-11 14:16:27,882 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 317 is on host 317
2023-07-11 14:16:27,882 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 318 is on host 318
2023-07-11 14:16:27,882 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 319 is on host 319
2023-07-11 14:16:27,882 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 320 is on host 320
2023-07-11 14:16:27,882 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 321 is on host 321
2023-07-11 14:16:27,882 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 322 is on host 322
2023-07-11 14:16:27,882 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 323 is on host 323
2023-07-11 14:16:27,883 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 324 is on host 324
2023-07-11 14:16:27,883 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 325 is on host 325
2023-07-11 14:16:27,883 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 326 is on host 326
2023-07-11 14:16:27,883 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 327 is on host 327
2023-07-11 14:16:27,883 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 328 is on host 328
2023-07-11 14:16:27,883 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 329 is on host 329
2023-07-11 14:16:27,883 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 330 is on host 330
2023-07-11 14:16:27,883 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 331 is on host 331
2023-07-11 14:16:27,883 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 332 is on host 332
2023-07-11 14:16:27,883 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 333 is on host 333
2023-07-11 14:16:27,883 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 334 is on host 334
2023-07-11 14:16:27,883 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 335 is on host 335
2023-07-11 14:16:27,883 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 336 is on host 336
2023-07-11 14:16:27,883 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 337 is on host 337
2023-07-11 14:16:27,883 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 338 is on host 338
2023-07-11 14:16:27,883 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 339 is on host 339
2023-07-11 14:16:27,883 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 340 is on host 340
2023-07-11 14:16:27,883 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 341 is on host 341
2023-07-11 14:16:27,883 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 342 is on host 342
2023-07-11 14:16:27,883 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 343 is on host 343
2023-07-11 14:16:27,883 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 344 is on host 344
2023-07-11 14:16:27,883 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 345 is on host 345
2023-07-11 14:16:27,883 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 346 is on host 346
2023-07-11 14:16:27,883 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 347 is on host 347
2023-07-11 14:16:27,883 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 348 is on host 348
2023-07-11 14:16:27,883 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 349 is on host 349
2023-07-11 14:16:27,883 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 350 is on host 350
2023-07-11 14:16:27,883 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 351 is on host 351
2023-07-11 14:16:27,883 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 352 is on host 352
2023-07-11 14:16:27,883 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 353 is on host 353
2023-07-11 14:16:27,884 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 354 is on host 354
2023-07-11 14:16:27,884 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 355 is on host 355
2023-07-11 14:16:27,884 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 356 is on host 356
2023-07-11 14:16:27,884 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 357 is on host 357
2023-07-11 14:16:27,884 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 358 is on host 358
2023-07-11 14:16:27,884 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 359 is on host 359
2023-07-11 14:16:27,884 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 360 is on host 360
2023-07-11 14:16:27,884 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 361 is on host 361
2023-07-11 14:16:27,884 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 362 is on host 362
2023-07-11 14:16:27,884 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 363 is on host 363
2023-07-11 14:16:27,884 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 364 is on host 364
2023-07-11 14:16:27,884 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 365 is on host 365
2023-07-11 14:16:27,884 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 366 is on host 366
2023-07-11 14:16:27,884 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 367 is on host 367
2023-07-11 14:16:27,884 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 368 is on host 368
2023-07-11 14:16:27,885 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 369 is on host 369
2023-07-11 14:16:27,885 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 370 is on host 370
2023-07-11 14:16:27,885 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 371 is on host 371
2023-07-11 14:16:27,885 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 372 is on host 372
2023-07-11 14:16:27,885 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 373 is on host 373
2023-07-11 14:16:27,885 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 374 is on host 374
2023-07-11 14:16:27,885 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 375 is on host 375
2023-07-11 14:16:27,885 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 376 is on host 376
2023-07-11 14:16:27,885 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 377 is on host 377
2023-07-11 14:16:27,885 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 378 is on host 378
2023-07-11 14:16:27,885 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 379 is on host 379
2023-07-11 14:16:27,885 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 380 is on host 380
2023-07-11 14:16:27,885 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 381 is on host 381
2023-07-11 14:16:27,885 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 382 is on host 382
2023-07-11 14:16:27,885 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 383 is on host 383
2023-07-11 14:16:27,885 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 384 is on host 384
2023-07-11 14:16:27,885 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 385 is on host 385
2023-07-11 14:16:27,885 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 386 is on host 386
2023-07-11 14:16:27,885 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 387 is on host 387
2023-07-11 14:16:27,885 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 388 is on host 388
2023-07-11 14:16:27,885 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 389 is on host 389
2023-07-11 14:16:27,885 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 390 is on host 390
2023-07-11 14:16:27,885 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 391 is on host 391
2023-07-11 14:16:27,885 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 392 is on host 392
2023-07-11 14:16:27,885 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=393, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:27,886 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table5) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:27,886 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table4
2023-07-11 14:16:27,886 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv553536953=290, srv1630071126=110, srv1071894870=12, srv23511728=232, srv658346947=323, srv2025338799=204, srv1397994335=64, srv1976766403=195, srv1644629726=118, srv957637734=381, srv2079182457=210, srv1749264468=139, srv2046129126=206, srv1595762596=104, srv603990852=307, srv1973073480=194, srv958856137=382, srv644066832=319, srv557062842=292, srv277765671=235, srv732221418=337, srv1769385567=143, srv224612199=228, srv714752528=334, srv362526040=256, srv581128949=296, srv2133511466=223, srv1144239257=30, srv320603627=245, srv1679952521=126, srv2122867873=222, srv1110067064=24, srv256251994=233, srv63261708=317, srv89837390=371, srv552104598=289, srv508952995=281, srv2096011353=214, srv1770417148=144, srv1246723478=42, srv929436444=378, srv2082192429=211, srv234917297=231, srv405700573=266, srv183644386=166, srv1488378513=85, srv173139715=136, srv1154180352=32, srv355693379=252, srv1407521654=66, srv496848057=275, srv1157975499=33, srv1806731027=162, srv1923102804=184, srv311102455=244, srv450011410=271, srv771515724=348, srv389183508=262, srv1249074416=43, srv2014575201=201, srv640847108=318, srv832363565=356, srv1970882134=192, srv2107358603=218, srv855766065=361, srv1336043388=55, srv29397186=237, srv982792848=390, srv976560524=386, srv101181760=3, srv1093549482=21, srv2018389395=202, srv2113483104=221, srv1778339118=149, srv1968709692=190, srv705221118=333, srv159600090=105, srv1919608486=180, srv981255102=389, srv807899713=353, srv755110395=344, srv1770594519=145, srv739692705=340, srv1076582671=16, srv693869315=330, srv1079048717=17, srv440657532=270, srv1636659280=115, srv2108739257=220, srv668373413=326, srv1003610393=2, srv1054229197=11, srv1868589627=172, srv2103522371=217, srv1000546271=0, srv951670617=380, srv2042909593=205, srv1865656038=171, srv1466355012=78, srv703662406=332, srv1418112884=70, srv1215580291=40, srv71833528=335, srv1580581635=103, srv1021032212=5, srv1080806312=19, srv1985601859=197, srv74471954=343, srv1647472319=119, srv2071553346=208, srv1632855171=112, srv1122009370=27, srv13613992=61, srv1630777154=111, srv301413669=239, srv550697728=288, srv1296023857=53, srv1724550977=133, srv1989290370=198, srv1926417985=185, srv1678097199=125, srv1461034373=76, srv614690415=311, srv2098345381=215, srv310463473=243, srv1011934105=4, srv148627129=84, srv305489318=240, srv1256534903=46, srv1289731445=52, srv1798844587=157, srv567113085=294, srv1119222501=26, srv2055117940=207, srv855898852=362, srv629224816=316, srv1075943554=15, srv625909061=315, srv1705591942=128, srv734225580=339, srv660107924=324, srv1381729938=62, srv1633483173=113, srv408265476=267, srv1776057793=148, srv1360253411=60, srv1511424834=90, srv1414162621=68, srv883343663=370, srv151859222=91, srv349144930=251, srv1991304034=199, srv1825887791=164, srv601657063=305, srv758932951=345, srv1651629087=120, srv1864623584=170, srv682957691=329, srv1500454146=88, srv1725962085=135, srv1659841448=121, srv1253206004=45, srv52354442=284, srv18508093=168, srv1427731921=73, srv561344974=293, srv721668125=336, srv1575482138=100, srv914128771=373, srv961487230=383, srv741332941=342, srv533032466=286, srv1574140987=99, srv2139849097=224, srv503902262=278, srv674807007=327, srv1786829855=153, srv2088727517=213, srv394366966=264, srv980089565=388, srv114594288=31, srv38296437=261, srv214835574=226, srv1887224977=176, srv1025509362=7, srv1577020334=102, srv524466665=285, srv393561021=263, srv759909927=346, srv763556514=347, srv786453030=349, srv2142935488=225, srv618111613=312, srv16254163=108, srv343211061=250, srv476075173=273, srv1269632212=47, srv333589612=246, srv499015361=276, srv836674186=357, srv1799191687=158, srv1446998035=74, srv1571774199=98, srv1115354947=25, srv333860881=247, srv1724152600=132, srv1598699299=106, srv177885829=151, srv472125887=272, srv1101339966=22, srv1424985362=72, srv1945569895=188, srv594128294=300, srv1026739237=8, srv842459828=358, srv878519137=366, srv1921260729=181, srv339110834=249, srv504099471=279, srv814253179=354, srv1643744885=116, srv1793847521=155, srv607234624=309, srv698219051=331, srv1688538732=127, srv666240078=325, srv1079284733=18, srv29210550=236, srv506181748=280, srv881313122=368, srv1945452576=187, srv597307897=303, srv1285120424=51, srv1887943816=177, srv1983604698=196, srv1805465940=161, srv309309336=242, srv1719756294=131, srv1349932676=58, srv1208486369=38, srv1643971570=117, srv1509331489=89, srv334105385=248, srv1400515744=65, srv369984715=259, srv43712162=269, srv842675864=359, srv1803258748=160, srv1022450918=6, srv1775108732=147, srv1766088250=141, srv180150732=159, srv1220857227=41, srv226530501=229, srv362032108=255, srv919715380=377, srv1074935976=14, srv1395030819=63, srv803291569=352, srv1877966766=175, srv220538712=227, srv2021718843=203, srv2107782185=219, srv882216860=369, srv1489137852=86, srv1972328734=193, srv1470759982=79, srv1774824811=146, srv971974774=384, srv1418242791=71, srv1001274196=1, srv909615097=372, srv1537724566=93, srv1165799954=34, srv1724754364=134, srv978173525=387, srv113319438=29, srv578033735=295, srv147931272=80, srv1183635941=35, srv1904215245=178, srv596349756=302, srv880835255=367, srv857544550=364, srv1779729022=152, srv1795612465=156, srv621083045=314, srv917704170=375, srv1351811120=59, srv1316710897=54, srv789820555=350, srv1922580095=183, srv305567304=241, srv1936745425=186, srv1745318024=138, srv1210822057=39, srv645375717=320, srv950628389=379, srv1490199189=87, srv1575919256=101, srv154481102=96, srv359402967=254, srv997716931=391, srv1457224273=75, srv581644449=297, srv1872374768=174, srv363177310=257, srv740327512=341, srv1664227236=123, srv972330517=385, srv1634261306=114, srv1662183707=122, srv1969046891=191, srv1485266211=82, srv1778842262=150, srv588410181=298, srv1921840985=182, srv591279493=299, srv37574565=260, srv1104147458=23, srv1190166330=36, srv652270371=322, srv1484309042=81, srv1560148463=97, srv618569548=313, srv2102708311=216, srv1084873074=20, srv517669556=283, srv918152084=376, srv649714317=321, srv1674484790=124, srv1339239880=56, srv1461073271=77, srv1125312901=28, srv25633292=234, srv516616923=282, srv299721745=238, srv604932433=308, srv1273702855=48, srv792183929=351, srv1042608200=10, srv1276335106=49, srv1486044644=83, srv676101698=328, srv998930892=392, srv200111276=200, srv1863083643=169, srv1737443479=137, srv872997185=365, srv821351126=355, srv852115805=360, srv1074355423=13, srv170952194=130, srv503430005=277, srv153887567=94, srv1415163001=69, srv1032737435=9, srv1840670515=167, srv1961921083=189, srv59745831=304, srv36715747=258, srv431547280=268, srv1524853580=92, srv1870059418=173, srv396010771=265, srv594457792=301, srv1755339428=140, srv1766275429=142, srv5565786=291, srv603898526=306, srv544570223=287, srv856030669=363, srv1542523468=95, srv915785747=374, srv356122213=253, srv1411875499=67, srv2077620970=209, srv1345529444=57, srv232339963=230, srv1250861076=44, srv1914875423=179, srv478619481=274, srv1202435626=37, srv1706089454=129, srv1810631201=163, srv1282644061=50, srv1625945288=109, srv733251129=338, srv2082830831=212, srv1612103540=107, srv612136291=310, srv1790004142=154, srv183394703=165} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:27,886 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:27,886 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:27,886 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:27,887 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:27,887 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:27,887 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:27,887 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-11 14:16:27,887 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-11 14:16:27,887 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-11 14:16:27,887 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-11 14:16:27,887 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 10 is on host 10
2023-07-11 14:16:27,887 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 11 is on host 11
2023-07-11 14:16:27,887 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 12 is on host 12
2023-07-11 14:16:27,887 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 13 is on host 13
2023-07-11 14:16:27,887 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 14 is on host 14
2023-07-11 14:16:27,887 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 15 is on host 15
2023-07-11 14:16:27,887 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 16 is on host 16
2023-07-11 14:16:27,887 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 17 is on host 17
2023-07-11 14:16:27,887 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 18 is on host 18
2023-07-11 14:16:27,887 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 19 is on host 19
2023-07-11 14:16:27,887 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 20 is on host 20
2023-07-11 14:16:27,887 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 21 is on host 21
2023-07-11 14:16:27,887 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 22 is on host 22
2023-07-11 14:16:27,887 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 23 is on host 23
2023-07-11 14:16:27,887 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 24 is on host 24
2023-07-11 14:16:27,887 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 25 is on host 25
2023-07-11 14:16:27,887 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 26 is on host 26
2023-07-11 14:16:27,887 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 27 is on host 27
2023-07-11 14:16:27,887 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 28 is on host 28
2023-07-11 14:16:27,887 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 29 is on host 29
2023-07-11 14:16:27,887 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 30 is on host 30
2023-07-11 14:16:27,887 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 31 is on host 31
2023-07-11 14:16:27,888 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 32 is on host 32
2023-07-11 14:16:27,888 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 33 is on host 33
2023-07-11 14:16:27,888 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 34 is on host 34
2023-07-11 14:16:27,888 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 35 is on host 35
2023-07-11 14:16:27,888 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 36 is on host 36
2023-07-11 14:16:27,888 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 37 is on host 37
2023-07-11 14:16:27,888 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 38 is on host 38
2023-07-11 14:16:27,888 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 39 is on host 39
2023-07-11 14:16:27,888 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 40 is on host 40
2023-07-11 14:16:27,888 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 41 is on host 41
2023-07-11 14:16:27,888 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 42 is on host 42
2023-07-11 14:16:27,888 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 43 is on host 43
2023-07-11 14:16:27,888 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 44 is on host 44
2023-07-11 14:16:27,888 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 45 is on host 45
2023-07-11 14:16:27,888 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 46 is on host 46
2023-07-11 14:16:27,888 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 47 is on host 47
2023-07-11 14:16:27,888 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 48 is on host 48
2023-07-11 14:16:27,888 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 49 is on host 49
2023-07-11 14:16:27,888 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 50 is on host 50
2023-07-11 14:16:27,888 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 51 is on host 51
2023-07-11 14:16:27,888 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 52 is on host 52
2023-07-11 14:16:27,888 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 53 is on host 53
2023-07-11 14:16:27,888 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 54 is on host 54
2023-07-11 14:16:27,888 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 55 is on host 55
2023-07-11 14:16:27,888 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 56 is on host 56
2023-07-11 14:16:27,888 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 57 is on host 57
2023-07-11 14:16:27,888 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 58 is on host 58
2023-07-11 14:16:27,888 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 59 is on host 59
2023-07-11 14:16:27,888 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 60 is on host 60
2023-07-11 14:16:27,889 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 61 is on host 61
2023-07-11 14:16:27,889 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 62 is on host 62
2023-07-11 14:16:27,889 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 63 is on host 63
2023-07-11 14:16:27,889 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 64 is on host 64
2023-07-11 14:16:27,889 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 65 is on host 65
2023-07-11 14:16:27,889 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 66 is on host 66
2023-07-11 14:16:27,889 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 67 is on host 67
2023-07-11 14:16:27,889 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 68 is on host 68
2023-07-11 14:16:27,889 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 69 is on host 69
2023-07-11 14:16:27,889 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 70 is on host 70
2023-07-11 14:16:27,889 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 71 is on host 71
2023-07-11 14:16:27,889 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 72 is on host 72
2023-07-11 14:16:27,889 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 73 is on host 73
2023-07-11 14:16:27,889 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 74 is on host 74
2023-07-11 14:16:27,889 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 75 is on host 75
2023-07-11 14:16:27,889 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 76 is on host 76
2023-07-11 14:16:27,889 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 77 is on host 77
2023-07-11 14:16:27,889 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 78 is on host 78
2023-07-11 14:16:27,889 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 79 is on host 79
2023-07-11 14:16:27,889 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 80 is on host 80
2023-07-11 14:16:27,889 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 81 is on host 81
2023-07-11 14:16:27,889 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 82 is on host 82
2023-07-11 14:16:27,889 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 83 is on host 83
2023-07-11 14:16:27,889 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 84 is on host 84
2023-07-11 14:16:27,889 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 85 is on host 85
2023-07-11 14:16:27,889 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 86 is on host 86
2023-07-11 14:16:27,889 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 87 is on host 87
2023-07-11 14:16:27,889 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 88 is on host 88
2023-07-11 14:16:27,889 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 89 is on host 89
2023-07-11 14:16:27,890 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 90 is on host 90
2023-07-11 14:16:27,890 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 91 is on host 91
2023-07-11 14:16:27,890 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 92 is on host 92
2023-07-11 14:16:27,890 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 93 is on host 93
2023-07-11 14:16:27,890 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 94 is on host 94
2023-07-11 14:16:27,890 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 95 is on host 95
2023-07-11 14:16:27,890 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 96 is on host 96
2023-07-11 14:16:27,890 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 97 is on host 97
2023-07-11 14:16:27,890 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 98 is on host 98
2023-07-11 14:16:27,890 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 99 is on host 99
2023-07-11 14:16:27,890 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 100 is on host 100
2023-07-11 14:16:27,890 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 101 is on host 101
2023-07-11 14:16:27,890 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 102 is on host 102
2023-07-11 14:16:27,890 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 103 is on host 103
2023-07-11 14:16:27,890 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 104 is on host 104
2023-07-11 14:16:27,890 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 105 is on host 105
2023-07-11 14:16:27,890 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 106 is on host 106
2023-07-11 14:16:27,890 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 107 is on host 107
2023-07-11 14:16:27,890 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 108 is on host 108
2023-07-11 14:16:27,890 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 109 is on host 109
2023-07-11 14:16:27,890 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 110 is on host 110
2023-07-11 14:16:27,890 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 111 is on host 111
2023-07-11 14:16:27,890 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 112 is on host 112
2023-07-11 14:16:27,890 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 113 is on host 113
2023-07-11 14:16:27,890 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 114 is on host 114
2023-07-11 14:16:27,890 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 115 is on host 115
2023-07-11 14:16:27,890 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 116 is on host 116
2023-07-11 14:16:27,890 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 117 is on host 117
2023-07-11 14:16:27,890 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 118 is on host 118
2023-07-11 14:16:27,891 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 119 is on host 119
2023-07-11 14:16:27,891 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 120 is on host 120
2023-07-11 14:16:27,891 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 121 is on host 121
2023-07-11 14:16:27,891 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 122 is on host 122
2023-07-11 14:16:27,891 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 123 is on host 123
2023-07-11 14:16:27,891 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 124 is on host 124
2023-07-11 14:16:27,891 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 125 is on host 125
2023-07-11 14:16:27,891 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 126 is on host 126
2023-07-11 14:16:27,891 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 127 is on host 127
2023-07-11 14:16:27,891 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 128 is on host 128
2023-07-11 14:16:27,891 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 129 is on host 129
2023-07-11 14:16:27,891 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 130 is on host 130
2023-07-11 14:16:27,891 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 131 is on host 131
2023-07-11 14:16:27,891 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 132 is on host 132
2023-07-11 14:16:27,891 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 133 is on host 133
2023-07-11 14:16:27,891 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 134 is on host 134
2023-07-11 14:16:27,891 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 135 is on host 135
2023-07-11 14:16:27,891 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 136 is on host 136
2023-07-11 14:16:27,891 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 137 is on host 137
2023-07-11 14:16:27,891 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 138 is on host 138
2023-07-11 14:16:27,891 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 139 is on host 139
2023-07-11 14:16:27,891 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 140 is on host 140
2023-07-11 14:16:27,891 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 141 is on host 141
2023-07-11 14:16:27,891 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 142 is on host 142
2023-07-11 14:16:27,891 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 143 is on host 143
2023-07-11 14:16:27,891 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 144 is on host 144
2023-07-11 14:16:27,891 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 145 is on host 145
2023-07-11 14:16:27,891 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 146 is on host 146
2023-07-11 14:16:27,891 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 147 is on host 147
2023-07-11 14:16:27,892 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 148 is on host 148
2023-07-11 14:16:27,892 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 149 is on host 149
2023-07-11 14:16:27,892 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 150 is on host 150
2023-07-11 14:16:27,892 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 151 is on host 151
2023-07-11 14:16:27,892 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 152 is on host 152
2023-07-11 14:16:27,892 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 153 is on host 153
2023-07-11 14:16:27,892 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 154 is on host 154
2023-07-11 14:16:27,892 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 155 is on host 155
2023-07-11 14:16:27,892 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 156 is on host 156
2023-07-11 14:16:27,892 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 157 is on host 157
2023-07-11 14:16:27,892 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 158 is on host 158
2023-07-11 14:16:27,892 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 159 is on host 159
2023-07-11 14:16:27,892 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 160 is on host 160
2023-07-11 14:16:27,892 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 161 is on host 161
2023-07-11 14:16:27,892 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 162 is on host 162
2023-07-11 14:16:27,892 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 163 is on host 163
2023-07-11 14:16:27,892 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 164 is on host 164
2023-07-11 14:16:27,892 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 165 is on host 165
2023-07-11 14:16:27,892 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 166 is on host 166
2023-07-11 14:16:27,892 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 167 is on host 167
2023-07-11 14:16:27,892 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 168 is on host 168
2023-07-11 14:16:27,892 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 169 is on host 169
2023-07-11 14:16:27,892 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 170 is on host 170
2023-07-11 14:16:27,892 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 171 is on host 171
2023-07-11 14:16:27,892 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 172 is on host 172
2023-07-11 14:16:27,892 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 173 is on host 173
2023-07-11 14:16:27,892 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 174 is on host 174
2023-07-11 14:16:27,892 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 175 is on host 175
2023-07-11 14:16:27,892 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 176 is on host 176
2023-07-11 14:16:27,893 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 177 is on host 177
2023-07-11 14:16:27,893 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 178 is on host 178
2023-07-11 14:16:27,893 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 179 is on host 179
2023-07-11 14:16:27,893 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 180 is on host 180
2023-07-11 14:16:27,893 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 181 is on host 181
2023-07-11 14:16:27,893 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 182 is on host 182
2023-07-11 14:16:27,893 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 183 is on host 183
2023-07-11 14:16:27,893 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 184 is on host 184
2023-07-11 14:16:27,893 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 185 is on host 185
2023-07-11 14:16:27,893 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 186 is on host 186
2023-07-11 14:16:27,893 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 187 is on host 187
2023-07-11 14:16:27,893 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 188 is on host 188
2023-07-11 14:16:27,893 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 189 is on host 189
2023-07-11 14:16:27,893 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 190 is on host 190
2023-07-11 14:16:27,893 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 191 is on host 191
2023-07-11 14:16:27,893 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 192 is on host 192
2023-07-11 14:16:27,893 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 193 is on host 193
2023-07-11 14:16:27,893 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 194 is on host 194
2023-07-11 14:16:27,893 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 195 is on host 195
2023-07-11 14:16:27,893 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 196 is on host 196
2023-07-11 14:16:27,893 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 197 is on host 197
2023-07-11 14:16:27,893 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 198 is on host 198
2023-07-11 14:16:27,893 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 199 is on host 199
2023-07-11 14:16:27,893 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 200 is on host 200
2023-07-11 14:16:27,893 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 201 is on host 201
2023-07-11 14:16:27,893 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 202 is on host 202
2023-07-11 14:16:27,893 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 203 is on host 203
2023-07-11 14:16:27,893 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 204 is on host 204
2023-07-11 14:16:27,893 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 205 is on host 205
2023-07-11 14:16:27,894 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 206 is on host 206
2023-07-11 14:16:27,894 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 207 is on host 207
2023-07-11 14:16:27,894 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 208 is on host 208
2023-07-11 14:16:27,894 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 209 is on host 209
2023-07-11 14:16:27,894 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 210 is on host 210
2023-07-11 14:16:27,894 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 211 is on host 211
2023-07-11 14:16:27,894 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 212 is on host 212
2023-07-11 14:16:27,894 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 213 is on host 213
2023-07-11 14:16:27,894 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 214 is on host 214
2023-07-11 14:16:27,894 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 215 is on host 215
2023-07-11 14:16:27,894 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 216 is on host 216
2023-07-11 14:16:27,894 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 217 is on host 217
2023-07-11 14:16:27,894 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 218 is on host 218
2023-07-11 14:16:27,894 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 219 is on host 219
2023-07-11 14:16:27,894 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 220 is on host 220
2023-07-11 14:16:27,894 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 221 is on host 221
2023-07-11 14:16:27,894 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 222 is on host 222
2023-07-11 14:16:27,894 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 223 is on host 223
2023-07-11 14:16:27,894 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 224 is on host 224
2023-07-11 14:16:27,894 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 225 is on host 225
2023-07-11 14:16:27,894 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 226 is on host 226
2023-07-11 14:16:27,894 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 227 is on host 227
2023-07-11 14:16:27,894 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 228 is on host 228
2023-07-11 14:16:27,894 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 229 is on host 229
2023-07-11 14:16:27,894 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 230 is on host 230
2023-07-11 14:16:27,894 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 231 is on host 231
2023-07-11 14:16:27,894 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 232 is on host 232
2023-07-11 14:16:27,894 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 233 is on host 233
2023-07-11 14:16:27,895 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 234 is on host 234
2023-07-11 14:16:27,895 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 235 is on host 235
2023-07-11 14:16:27,895 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 236 is on host 236
2023-07-11 14:16:27,895 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 237 is on host 237
2023-07-11 14:16:27,895 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 238 is on host 238
2023-07-11 14:16:27,895 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 239 is on host 239
2023-07-11 14:16:27,895 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 240 is on host 240
2023-07-11 14:16:27,895 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 241 is on host 241
2023-07-11 14:16:27,895 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 242 is on host 242
2023-07-11 14:16:27,895 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 243 is on host 243
2023-07-11 14:16:27,895 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 244 is on host 244
2023-07-11 14:16:27,895 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 245 is on host 245
2023-07-11 14:16:27,895 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 246 is on host 246
2023-07-11 14:16:27,895 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 247 is on host 247
2023-07-11 14:16:27,895 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 248 is on host 248
2023-07-11 14:16:27,895 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 249 is on host 249
2023-07-11 14:16:27,895 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 250 is on host 250
2023-07-11 14:16:27,895 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 251 is on host 251
2023-07-11 14:16:27,895 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 252 is on host 252
2023-07-11 14:16:27,895 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 253 is on host 253
2023-07-11 14:16:27,895 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 254 is on host 254
2023-07-11 14:16:27,895 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 255 is on host 255
2023-07-11 14:16:27,895 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 256 is on host 256
2023-07-11 14:16:27,895 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 257 is on host 257
2023-07-11 14:16:27,895 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 258 is on host 258
2023-07-11 14:16:27,896 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 259 is on host 259
2023-07-11 14:16:27,896 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 260 is on host 260
2023-07-11 14:16:27,896 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 261 is on host 261
2023-07-11 14:16:27,896 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 262 is on host 262
2023-07-11 14:16:27,896 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 263 is on host 263
2023-07-11 14:16:27,896 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 264 is on host 264
2023-07-11 14:16:27,896 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 265 is on host 265
2023-07-11 14:16:27,896 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 266 is on host 266
2023-07-11 14:16:27,896 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 267 is on host 267
2023-07-11 14:16:27,896 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 268 is on host 268
2023-07-11 14:16:27,896 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 269 is on host 269
2023-07-11 14:16:27,896 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 270 is on host 270
2023-07-11 14:16:27,896 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 271 is on host 271
2023-07-11 14:16:27,896 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 272 is on host 272
2023-07-11 14:16:27,896 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 273 is on host 273
2023-07-11 14:16:27,896 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 274 is on host 274
2023-07-11 14:16:27,896 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 275 is on host 275
2023-07-11 14:16:27,896 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 276 is on host 276
2023-07-11 14:16:27,896 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 277 is on host 277
2023-07-11 14:16:27,896 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 278 is on host 278
2023-07-11 14:16:27,897 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 279 is on host 279
2023-07-11 14:16:27,897 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 280 is on host 280
2023-07-11 14:16:27,897 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 281 is on host 281
2023-07-11 14:16:27,897 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 282 is on host 282
2023-07-11 14:16:27,897 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 283 is on host 283
2023-07-11 14:16:27,897 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 284 is on host 284
2023-07-11 14:16:27,897 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 285 is on host 285
2023-07-11 14:16:27,897 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 286 is on host 286
2023-07-11 14:16:27,897 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 287 is on host 287
2023-07-11 14:16:27,897 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 288 is on host 288
2023-07-11 14:16:27,897 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 289 is on host 289
2023-07-11 14:16:27,897 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 290 is on host 290
2023-07-11 14:16:27,897 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 291 is on host 291
2023-07-11 14:16:27,897 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 292 is on host 292
2023-07-11 14:16:27,897 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 293 is on host 293
2023-07-11 14:16:27,897 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 294 is on host 294
2023-07-11 14:16:27,897 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 295 is on host 295
2023-07-11 14:16:27,897 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 296 is on host 296
2023-07-11 14:16:27,897 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 297 is on host 297
2023-07-11 14:16:27,897 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 298 is on host 298
2023-07-11 14:16:27,897 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 299 is on host 299
2023-07-11 14:16:27,897 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 300 is on host 300
2023-07-11 14:16:27,897 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 301 is on host 301
2023-07-11 14:16:27,897 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 302 is on host 302
2023-07-11 14:16:27,897 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 303 is on host 303
2023-07-11 14:16:27,897 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 304 is on host 304
2023-07-11 14:16:27,897 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 305 is on host 305
2023-07-11 14:16:27,897 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 306 is on host 306
2023-07-11 14:16:27,897 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 307 is on host 307
2023-07-11 14:16:27,898 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 308 is on host 308
2023-07-11 14:16:27,898 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 309 is on host 309
2023-07-11 14:16:27,898 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 310 is on host 310
2023-07-11 14:16:27,898 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 311 is on host 311
2023-07-11 14:16:27,898 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 312 is on host 312
2023-07-11 14:16:27,898 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 313 is on host 313
2023-07-11 14:16:27,898 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 314 is on host 314
2023-07-11 14:16:27,898 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 315 is on host 315
2023-07-11 14:16:27,898 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 316 is on host 316
2023-07-11 14:16:27,898 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 317 is on host 317
2023-07-11 14:16:27,898 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 318 is on host 318
2023-07-11 14:16:27,898 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 319 is on host 319
2023-07-11 14:16:27,898 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 320 is on host 320
2023-07-11 14:16:27,898 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 321 is on host 321
2023-07-11 14:16:27,898 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 322 is on host 322
2023-07-11 14:16:27,898 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 323 is on host 323
2023-07-11 14:16:27,898 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 324 is on host 324
2023-07-11 14:16:27,898 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 325 is on host 325
2023-07-11 14:16:27,898 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 326 is on host 326
2023-07-11 14:16:27,898 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 327 is on host 327
2023-07-11 14:16:27,898 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 328 is on host 328
2023-07-11 14:16:27,898 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 329 is on host 329
2023-07-11 14:16:27,898 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 330 is on host 330
2023-07-11 14:16:27,898 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 331 is on host 331
2023-07-11 14:16:27,898 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 332 is on host 332
2023-07-11 14:16:27,898 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 333 is on host 333
2023-07-11 14:16:27,898 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 334 is on host 334
2023-07-11 14:16:27,898 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 335 is on host 335
2023-07-11 14:16:27,898 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 336 is on host 336
2023-07-11 14:16:27,899 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 337 is on host 337
2023-07-11 14:16:27,899 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 338 is on host 338
2023-07-11 14:16:27,899 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 339 is on host 339
2023-07-11 14:16:27,899 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 340 is on host 340
2023-07-11 14:16:27,899 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 341 is on host 341
2023-07-11 14:16:27,899 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 342 is on host 342
2023-07-11 14:16:27,899 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 343 is on host 343
2023-07-11 14:16:27,899 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 344 is on host 344
2023-07-11 14:16:27,899 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 345 is on host 345
2023-07-11 14:16:27,899 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 346 is on host 346
2023-07-11 14:16:27,899 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 347 is on host 347
2023-07-11 14:16:27,899 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 348 is on host 348
2023-07-11 14:16:27,899 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 349 is on host 349
2023-07-11 14:16:27,899 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 350 is on host 350
2023-07-11 14:16:27,899 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 351 is on host 351
2023-07-11 14:16:27,899 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 352 is on host 352
2023-07-11 14:16:27,899 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 353 is on host 353
2023-07-11 14:16:27,899 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 354 is on host 354
2023-07-11 14:16:27,899 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 355 is on host 355
2023-07-11 14:16:27,899 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 356 is on host 356
2023-07-11 14:16:27,899 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 357 is on host 357
2023-07-11 14:16:27,899 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 358 is on host 358
2023-07-11 14:16:27,899 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 359 is on host 359
2023-07-11 14:16:27,899 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 360 is on host 360
2023-07-11 14:16:27,899 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 361 is on host 361
2023-07-11 14:16:27,899 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 362 is on host 362
2023-07-11 14:16:27,899 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 363 is on host 363
2023-07-11 14:16:27,899 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 364 is on host 364
2023-07-11 14:16:27,899 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 365 is on host 365
2023-07-11 14:16:27,900 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 366 is on host 366
2023-07-11 14:16:27,900 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 367 is on host 367
2023-07-11 14:16:27,900 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 368 is on host 368
2023-07-11 14:16:27,900 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 369 is on host 369
2023-07-11 14:16:27,900 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 370 is on host 370
2023-07-11 14:16:27,900 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 371 is on host 371
2023-07-11 14:16:27,900 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 372 is on host 372
2023-07-11 14:16:27,900 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 373 is on host 373
2023-07-11 14:16:27,900 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 374 is on host 374
2023-07-11 14:16:27,900 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 375 is on host 375
2023-07-11 14:16:27,900 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 376 is on host 376
2023-07-11 14:16:27,900 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 377 is on host 377
2023-07-11 14:16:27,900 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 378 is on host 378
2023-07-11 14:16:27,900 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 379 is on host 379
2023-07-11 14:16:27,900 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 380 is on host 380
2023-07-11 14:16:27,900 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 381 is on host 381
2023-07-11 14:16:27,900 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 382 is on host 382
2023-07-11 14:16:27,900 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 383 is on host 383
2023-07-11 14:16:27,900 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 384 is on host 384
2023-07-11 14:16:27,900 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 385 is on host 385
2023-07-11 14:16:27,900 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 386 is on host 386
2023-07-11 14:16:27,900 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 387 is on host 387
2023-07-11 14:16:27,900 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 388 is on host 388
2023-07-11 14:16:27,900 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 389 is on host 389
2023-07-11 14:16:27,900 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 390 is on host 390
2023-07-11 14:16:27,900 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 391 is on host 391
2023-07-11 14:16:27,900 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 392 is on host 392
2023-07-11 14:16:27,900 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=393, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:27,901 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table4) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:27,901 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table3
2023-07-11 14:16:27,901 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv553536953=290, srv1630071126=110, srv1071894870=12, srv23511728=232, srv658346947=323, srv2025338799=204, srv1397994335=64, srv1976766403=195, srv1644629726=118, srv957637734=381, srv2079182457=210, srv1749264468=139, srv2046129126=206, srv1595762596=104, srv603990852=307, srv1973073480=194, srv958856137=382, srv644066832=319, srv557062842=292, srv277765671=235, srv732221418=337, srv1769385567=143, srv224612199=228, srv714752528=334, srv362526040=256, srv581128949=296, srv2133511466=223, srv1144239257=30, srv320603627=245, srv1679952521=126, srv2122867873=222, srv1110067064=24, srv256251994=233, srv63261708=317, srv89837390=371, srv552104598=289, srv508952995=281, srv2096011353=214, srv1770417148=144, srv1246723478=42, srv929436444=378, srv2082192429=211, srv234917297=231, srv405700573=266, srv183644386=166, srv1488378513=85, srv173139715=136, srv1154180352=32, srv355693379=252, srv1407521654=66, srv496848057=275, srv1157975499=33, srv1806731027=162, srv1923102804=184, srv311102455=244, srv450011410=271, srv771515724=348, srv389183508=262, srv1249074416=43, srv2014575201=201, srv640847108=318, srv832363565=356, srv1970882134=192, srv2107358603=218, srv855766065=361, srv1336043388=55, srv29397186=237, srv982792848=390, srv976560524=386, srv101181760=3, srv1093549482=21, srv2018389395=202, srv2113483104=221, srv1778339118=149, srv1968709692=190, srv705221118=333, srv159600090=105, srv1919608486=180, srv981255102=389, srv807899713=353, srv755110395=344, srv1770594519=145, srv739692705=340, srv1076582671=16, srv693869315=330, srv1079048717=17, srv440657532=270, srv1636659280=115, srv2108739257=220, srv668373413=326, srv1003610393=2, srv1054229197=11, srv1868589627=172, srv2103522371=217, srv1000546271=0, srv951670617=380, srv2042909593=205, srv1865656038=171, srv1466355012=78, srv703662406=332, srv1418112884=70, srv1215580291=40, srv71833528=335, srv1580581635=103, srv1021032212=5, srv1080806312=19, srv1985601859=197, srv74471954=343, srv1647472319=119, srv2071553346=208, srv1632855171=112, srv1122009370=27, srv13613992=61, srv1630777154=111, srv301413669=239, srv550697728=288, srv1296023857=53, srv1724550977=133, srv1989290370=198, srv1926417985=185, srv1678097199=125, srv1461034373=76, srv614690415=311, srv2098345381=215, srv310463473=243, srv1011934105=4, srv148627129=84, srv305489318=240, srv1256534903=46, srv1289731445=52, srv1798844587=157, srv567113085=294, srv1119222501=26, srv2055117940=207, srv855898852=362, srv629224816=316, srv1075943554=15, srv625909061=315, srv1705591942=128, srv734225580=339, srv660107924=324, srv1381729938=62, srv1633483173=113, srv408265476=267, srv1776057793=148, srv1360253411=60, srv1511424834=90, srv1414162621=68, srv883343663=370, srv151859222=91, srv349144930=251, srv1991304034=199, srv1825887791=164, srv601657063=305, srv758932951=345, srv1651629087=120, srv1864623584=170, srv682957691=329, srv1500454146=88, srv1725962085=135, srv1659841448=121, srv1253206004=45, srv52354442=284, srv18508093=168, srv1427731921=73, srv561344974=293, srv721668125=336, srv1575482138=100, srv914128771=373, srv961487230=383, srv741332941=342, srv533032466=286, srv1574140987=99, srv2139849097=224, srv503902262=278, srv674807007=327, srv1786829855=153, srv2088727517=213, srv394366966=264, srv980089565=388, srv114594288=31, srv38296437=261, srv214835574=226, srv1887224977=176, srv1025509362=7, srv1577020334=102, srv524466665=285, srv393561021=263, srv759909927=346, srv763556514=347, srv786453030=349, srv2142935488=225, srv618111613=312, srv16254163=108, srv343211061=250, srv476075173=273, srv1269632212=47, srv333589612=246, srv499015361=276, srv836674186=357, srv1799191687=158, srv1446998035=74, srv1571774199=98, srv1115354947=25, srv333860881=247, srv1724152600=132, srv1598699299=106, srv177885829=151, srv472125887=272, srv1101339966=22, srv1424985362=72, srv1945569895=188, srv594128294=300, srv1026739237=8, srv842459828=358, srv878519137=366, srv1921260729=181, srv339110834=249, srv504099471=279, srv814253179=354, srv1643744885=116, srv1793847521=155, srv607234624=309, srv698219051=331, srv1688538732=127, srv666240078=325, srv1079284733=18, srv29210550=236, srv506181748=280, srv881313122=368, srv1945452576=187, srv597307897=303, srv1285120424=51, srv1887943816=177, srv1983604698=196, srv1805465940=161, srv309309336=242, srv1719756294=131, srv1349932676=58, srv1208486369=38, srv1643971570=117, srv1509331489=89, srv334105385=248, srv1400515744=65, srv369984715=259, srv43712162=269, srv842675864=359, srv1803258748=160, srv1022450918=6, srv1775108732=147, srv1766088250=141, srv180150732=159, srv1220857227=41, srv226530501=229, srv362032108=255, srv919715380=377, srv1074935976=14, srv1395030819=63, srv803291569=352, srv1877966766=175, srv220538712=227, srv2021718843=203, srv2107782185=219, srv882216860=369, srv1489137852=86, srv1972328734=193, srv1470759982=79, srv1774824811=146, srv971974774=384, srv1418242791=71, srv1001274196=1, srv909615097=372, srv1537724566=93, srv1165799954=34, srv1724754364=134, srv978173525=387, srv113319438=29, srv578033735=295, srv147931272=80, srv1183635941=35, srv1904215245=178, srv596349756=302, srv880835255=367, srv857544550=364, srv1779729022=152, srv1795612465=156, srv621083045=314, srv917704170=375, srv1351811120=59, srv1316710897=54, srv789820555=350, srv1922580095=183, srv305567304=241, srv1936745425=186, srv1745318024=138, srv1210822057=39, srv645375717=320, srv950628389=379, srv1490199189=87, srv1575919256=101, srv154481102=96, srv359402967=254, srv997716931=391, srv1457224273=75, srv581644449=297, srv1872374768=174, srv363177310=257, srv740327512=341, srv1664227236=123, srv972330517=385, srv1634261306=114, srv1662183707=122, srv1969046891=191, srv1485266211=82, srv1778842262=150, srv588410181=298, srv1921840985=182, srv591279493=299, srv37574565=260, srv1104147458=23, srv1190166330=36, srv652270371=322, srv1484309042=81, srv1560148463=97, srv618569548=313, srv2102708311=216, srv1084873074=20, srv517669556=283, srv918152084=376, srv649714317=321, srv1674484790=124, srv1339239880=56, srv1461073271=77, srv1125312901=28, srv25633292=234, srv516616923=282, srv299721745=238, srv604932433=308, srv1273702855=48, srv792183929=351, srv1042608200=10, srv1276335106=49, srv1486044644=83, srv676101698=328, srv998930892=392, srv200111276=200, srv1863083643=169, srv1737443479=137, srv872997185=365, srv821351126=355, srv852115805=360, srv1074355423=13, srv170952194=130, srv503430005=277, srv153887567=94, srv1415163001=69, srv1032737435=9, srv1840670515=167, srv1961921083=189, srv59745831=304, srv36715747=258, srv431547280=268, srv1524853580=92, srv1870059418=173, srv396010771=265, srv594457792=301, srv1755339428=140, srv1766275429=142, srv5565786=291, srv603898526=306, srv544570223=287, srv856030669=363, srv1542523468=95, srv915785747=374, srv356122213=253, srv1411875499=67, srv2077620970=209, srv1345529444=57, srv232339963=230, srv1250861076=44, srv1914875423=179, srv478619481=274, srv1202435626=37, srv1706089454=129, srv1810631201=163, srv1282644061=50, srv1625945288=109, srv733251129=338, srv2082830831=212, srv1612103540=107, srv612136291=310, srv1790004142=154, srv183394703=165} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:27,901 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:27,902 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:27,902 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:27,902 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:27,902 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:27,902 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:27,902 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-11 14:16:27,902 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-11 14:16:27,902 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-11 14:16:27,902 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-11 14:16:27,902 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 10 is on host 10
2023-07-11 14:16:27,902 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 11 is on host 11
2023-07-11 14:16:27,902 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 12 is on host 12
2023-07-11 14:16:27,902 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 13 is on host 13
2023-07-11 14:16:27,902 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 14 is on host 14
2023-07-11 14:16:27,902 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 15 is on host 15
2023-07-11 14:16:27,902 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 16 is on host 16
2023-07-11 14:16:27,902 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 17 is on host 17
2023-07-11 14:16:27,902 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 18 is on host 18
2023-07-11 14:16:27,902 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 19 is on host 19
2023-07-11 14:16:27,902 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 20 is on host 20
2023-07-11 14:16:27,902 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 21 is on host 21
2023-07-11 14:16:27,902 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 22 is on host 22
2023-07-11 14:16:27,902 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 23 is on host 23
2023-07-11 14:16:27,902 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 24 is on host 24
2023-07-11 14:16:27,902 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 25 is on host 25
2023-07-11 14:16:27,902 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 26 is on host 26
2023-07-11 14:16:27,902 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 27 is on host 27
2023-07-11 14:16:27,902 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 28 is on host 28
2023-07-11 14:16:27,902 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 29 is on host 29
2023-07-11 14:16:27,903 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 30 is on host 30
2023-07-11 14:16:27,903 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 31 is on host 31
2023-07-11 14:16:27,903 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 32 is on host 32
2023-07-11 14:16:27,903 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 33 is on host 33
2023-07-11 14:16:27,903 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 34 is on host 34
2023-07-11 14:16:27,903 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 35 is on host 35
2023-07-11 14:16:27,903 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 36 is on host 36
2023-07-11 14:16:27,903 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 37 is on host 37
2023-07-11 14:16:27,903 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 38 is on host 38
2023-07-11 14:16:27,903 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 39 is on host 39
2023-07-11 14:16:27,903 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 40 is on host 40
2023-07-11 14:16:27,903 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 41 is on host 41
2023-07-11 14:16:27,903 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 42 is on host 42
2023-07-11 14:16:27,903 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 43 is on host 43
2023-07-11 14:16:27,903 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 44 is on host 44
2023-07-11 14:16:27,903 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 45 is on host 45
2023-07-11 14:16:27,903 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 46 is on host 46
2023-07-11 14:16:27,903 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 47 is on host 47
2023-07-11 14:16:27,903 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 48 is on host 48
2023-07-11 14:16:27,903 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 49 is on host 49
2023-07-11 14:16:27,903 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 50 is on host 50
2023-07-11 14:16:27,903 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 51 is on host 51
2023-07-11 14:16:27,903 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 52 is on host 52
2023-07-11 14:16:27,903 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 53 is on host 53
2023-07-11 14:16:27,903 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 54 is on host 54
2023-07-11 14:16:27,903 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 55 is on host 55
2023-07-11 14:16:27,903 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 56 is on host 56
2023-07-11 14:16:27,903 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 57 is on host 57
2023-07-11 14:16:27,903 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 58 is on host 58
2023-07-11 14:16:27,904 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 59 is on host 59
2023-07-11 14:16:27,904 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 60 is on host 60
2023-07-11 14:16:27,904 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 61 is on host 61
2023-07-11 14:16:27,904 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 62 is on host 62
2023-07-11 14:16:27,904 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 63 is on host 63
2023-07-11 14:16:27,904 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 64 is on host 64
2023-07-11 14:16:27,904 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 65 is on host 65
2023-07-11 14:16:27,904 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 66 is on host 66
2023-07-11 14:16:27,904 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 67 is on host 67
2023-07-11 14:16:27,904 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 68 is on host 68
2023-07-11 14:16:27,904 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 69 is on host 69
2023-07-11 14:16:27,904 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 70 is on host 70
2023-07-11 14:16:27,904 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 71 is on host 71
2023-07-11 14:16:27,904 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 72 is on host 72
2023-07-11 14:16:27,904 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 73 is on host 73
2023-07-11 14:16:27,904 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 74 is on host 74
2023-07-11 14:16:27,904 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 75 is on host 75
2023-07-11 14:16:27,904 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 76 is on host 76
2023-07-11 14:16:27,904 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 77 is on host 77
2023-07-11 14:16:27,904 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 78 is on host 78
2023-07-11 14:16:27,904 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 79 is on host 79
2023-07-11 14:16:27,904 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 80 is on host 80
2023-07-11 14:16:27,904 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 81 is on host 81
2023-07-11 14:16:27,904 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 82 is on host 82
2023-07-11 14:16:27,904 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 83 is on host 83
2023-07-11 14:16:27,904 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 84 is on host 84
2023-07-11 14:16:27,904 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 85 is on host 85
2023-07-11 14:16:27,904 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 86 is on host 86
2023-07-11 14:16:27,904 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 87 is on host 87
2023-07-11 14:16:27,905 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 88 is on host 88
2023-07-11 14:16:27,905 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 89 is on host 89
2023-07-11 14:16:27,905 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 90 is on host 90
2023-07-11 14:16:27,905 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 91 is on host 91
2023-07-11 14:16:27,905 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 92 is on host 92
2023-07-11 14:16:27,905 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 93 is on host 93
2023-07-11 14:16:27,905 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 94 is on host 94
2023-07-11 14:16:27,905 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 95 is on host 95
2023-07-11 14:16:27,905 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 96 is on host 96
2023-07-11 14:16:27,905 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 97 is on host 97
2023-07-11 14:16:27,905 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 98 is on host 98
2023-07-11 14:16:27,905 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 99 is on host 99
2023-07-11 14:16:27,905 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 100 is on host 100
2023-07-11 14:16:27,905 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 101 is on host 101
2023-07-11 14:16:27,905 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 102 is on host 102
2023-07-11 14:16:27,905 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 103 is on host 103
2023-07-11 14:16:27,905 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 104 is on host 104
2023-07-11 14:16:27,905 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 105 is on host 105
2023-07-11 14:16:27,905 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 106 is on host 106
2023-07-11 14:16:27,905 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 107 is on host 107
2023-07-11 14:16:27,905 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 108 is on host 108
2023-07-11 14:16:27,905 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 109 is on host 109
2023-07-11 14:16:27,905 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 110 is on host 110
2023-07-11 14:16:27,905 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 111 is on host 111
2023-07-11 14:16:27,905 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 112 is on host 112
2023-07-11 14:16:27,905 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 113 is on host 113
2023-07-11 14:16:27,905 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 114 is on host 114
2023-07-11 14:16:27,905 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 115 is on host 115
2023-07-11 14:16:27,905 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 116 is on host 116
2023-07-11 14:16:27,906 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 117 is on host 117
2023-07-11 14:16:27,906 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 118 is on host 118
2023-07-11 14:16:27,906 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 119 is on host 119
2023-07-11 14:16:27,906 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 120 is on host 120
2023-07-11 14:16:27,906 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 121 is on host 121
2023-07-11 14:16:27,906 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 122 is on host 122
2023-07-11 14:16:27,906 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 123 is on host 123
2023-07-11 14:16:27,906 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 124 is on host 124
2023-07-11 14:16:27,906 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 125 is on host 125
2023-07-11 14:16:27,906 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 126 is on host 126
2023-07-11 14:16:27,906 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 127 is on host 127
2023-07-11 14:16:27,906 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 128 is on host 128
2023-07-11 14:16:27,906 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 129 is on host 129
2023-07-11 14:16:27,906 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 130 is on host 130
2023-07-11 14:16:27,906 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 131 is on host 131
2023-07-11 14:16:27,906 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 132 is on host 132
2023-07-11 14:16:27,906 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 133 is on host 133
2023-07-11 14:16:27,906 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 134 is on host 134
2023-07-11 14:16:27,906 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 135 is on host 135
2023-07-11 14:16:27,906 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 136 is on host 136
2023-07-11 14:16:27,906 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 137 is on host 137
2023-07-11 14:16:27,906 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 138 is on host 138
2023-07-11 14:16:27,906 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 139 is on host 139
2023-07-11 14:16:27,906 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 140 is on host 140
2023-07-11 14:16:27,906 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 141 is on host 141
2023-07-11 14:16:27,906 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 142 is on host 142
2023-07-11 14:16:27,906 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 143 is on host 143
2023-07-11 14:16:27,906 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 144 is on host 144
2023-07-11 14:16:27,906 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 145 is on host 145
2023-07-11 14:16:27,907 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 146 is on host 146
2023-07-11 14:16:27,907 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 147 is on host 147
2023-07-11 14:16:27,907 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 148 is on host 148
2023-07-11 14:16:27,907 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 149 is on host 149
2023-07-11 14:16:27,907 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 150 is on host 150
2023-07-11 14:16:27,907 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 151 is on host 151
2023-07-11 14:16:27,907 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 152 is on host 152
2023-07-11 14:16:27,907 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 153 is on host 153
2023-07-11 14:16:27,907 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 154 is on host 154
2023-07-11 14:16:27,907 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 155 is on host 155
2023-07-11 14:16:27,907 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 156 is on host 156
2023-07-11 14:16:27,907 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 157 is on host 157
2023-07-11 14:16:27,907 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 158 is on host 158
2023-07-11 14:16:27,907 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 159 is on host 159
2023-07-11 14:16:27,907 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 160 is on host 160
2023-07-11 14:16:27,907 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 161 is on host 161
2023-07-11 14:16:27,907 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 162 is on host 162
2023-07-11 14:16:27,907 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 163 is on host 163
2023-07-11 14:16:27,907 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 164 is on host 164
2023-07-11 14:16:27,907 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 165 is on host 165
2023-07-11 14:16:27,907 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 166 is on host 166
2023-07-11 14:16:27,907 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 167 is on host 167
2023-07-11 14:16:27,908 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 168 is on host 168
2023-07-11 14:16:27,908 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 169 is on host 169
2023-07-11 14:16:27,908 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 170 is on host 170
2023-07-11 14:16:27,908 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 171 is on host 171
2023-07-11 14:16:27,908 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 172 is on host 172
2023-07-11 14:16:27,908 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 173 is on host 173
2023-07-11 14:16:27,908 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 174 is on host 174
2023-07-11 14:16:27,908 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 175 is on host 175
2023-07-11 14:16:27,908 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 176 is on host 176
2023-07-11 14:16:27,908 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 177 is on host 177
2023-07-11 14:16:27,908 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 178 is on host 178
2023-07-11 14:16:27,908 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 179 is on host 179
2023-07-11 14:16:27,908 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 180 is on host 180
2023-07-11 14:16:27,908 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 181 is on host 181
2023-07-11 14:16:27,908 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 182 is on host 182
2023-07-11 14:16:27,908 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 183 is on host 183
2023-07-11 14:16:27,908 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 184 is on host 184
2023-07-11 14:16:27,908 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 185 is on host 185
2023-07-11 14:16:27,908 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 186 is on host 186
2023-07-11 14:16:27,908 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 187 is on host 187
2023-07-11 14:16:27,908 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 188 is on host 188
2023-07-11 14:16:27,908 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 189 is on host 189
2023-07-11 14:16:27,908 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 190 is on host 190
2023-07-11 14:16:27,908 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 191 is on host 191
2023-07-11 14:16:27,908 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 192 is on host 192
2023-07-11 14:16:27,909 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 193 is on host 193
2023-07-11 14:16:27,909 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 194 is on host 194
2023-07-11 14:16:27,909 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 195 is on host 195
2023-07-11 14:16:27,909 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 196 is on host 196
2023-07-11 14:16:27,909 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 197 is on host 197
2023-07-11 14:16:27,909 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 198 is on host 198
2023-07-11 14:16:27,909 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 199 is on host 199
2023-07-11 14:16:27,909 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 200 is on host 200
2023-07-11 14:16:27,909 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 201 is on host 201
2023-07-11 14:16:27,909 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 202 is on host 202
2023-07-11 14:16:27,909 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 203 is on host 203
2023-07-11 14:16:27,909 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 204 is on host 204
2023-07-11 14:16:27,909 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 205 is on host 205
2023-07-11 14:16:27,909 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 206 is on host 206
2023-07-11 14:16:27,909 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 207 is on host 207
2023-07-11 14:16:27,909 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 208 is on host 208
2023-07-11 14:16:27,909 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 209 is on host 209
2023-07-11 14:16:27,909 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 210 is on host 210
2023-07-11 14:16:27,909 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 211 is on host 211
2023-07-11 14:16:27,909 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 212 is on host 212
2023-07-11 14:16:27,909 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 213 is on host 213
2023-07-11 14:16:27,909 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 214 is on host 214
2023-07-11 14:16:27,909 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 215 is on host 215
2023-07-11 14:16:27,909 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 216 is on host 216
2023-07-11 14:16:27,909 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 217 is on host 217
2023-07-11 14:16:27,909 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 218 is on host 218
2023-07-11 14:16:27,909 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 219 is on host 219
2023-07-11 14:16:27,909 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 220 is on host 220
2023-07-11 14:16:27,909 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 221 is on host 221
2023-07-11 14:16:27,910 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 222 is on host 222
2023-07-11 14:16:27,910 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 223 is on host 223
2023-07-11 14:16:27,910 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 224 is on host 224
2023-07-11 14:16:27,910 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 225 is on host 225
2023-07-11 14:16:27,910 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 226 is on host 226
2023-07-11 14:16:27,910 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 227 is on host 227
2023-07-11 14:16:27,910 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 228 is on host 228
2023-07-11 14:16:27,910 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 229 is on host 229
2023-07-11 14:16:27,910 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 230 is on host 230
2023-07-11 14:16:27,910 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 231 is on host 231
2023-07-11 14:16:27,910 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 232 is on host 232
2023-07-11 14:16:27,910 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 233 is on host 233
2023-07-11 14:16:27,910 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 234 is on host 234
2023-07-11 14:16:27,910 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 235 is on host 235
2023-07-11 14:16:27,910 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 236 is on host 236
2023-07-11 14:16:27,910 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 237 is on host 237
2023-07-11 14:16:27,910 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 238 is on host 238
2023-07-11 14:16:27,910 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 239 is on host 239
2023-07-11 14:16:27,910 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 240 is on host 240
2023-07-11 14:16:27,910 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 241 is on host 241
2023-07-11 14:16:27,910 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 242 is on host 242
2023-07-11 14:16:27,910 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 243 is on host 243
2023-07-11 14:16:27,910 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 244 is on host 244
2023-07-11 14:16:27,910 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 245 is on host 245
2023-07-11 14:16:27,910 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 246 is on host 246
2023-07-11 14:16:27,910 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 247 is on host 247
2023-07-11 14:16:27,910 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 248 is on host 248
2023-07-11 14:16:27,910 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 249 is on host 249
2023-07-11 14:16:27,910 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 250 is on host 250
2023-07-11 14:16:27,911 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 251 is on host 251
2023-07-11 14:16:27,911 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 252 is on host 252
2023-07-11 14:16:27,911 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 253 is on host 253
2023-07-11 14:16:27,911 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 254 is on host 254
2023-07-11 14:16:27,911 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 255 is on host 255
2023-07-11 14:16:27,911 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 256 is on host 256
2023-07-11 14:16:27,911 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 257 is on host 257
2023-07-11 14:16:27,911 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 258 is on host 258
2023-07-11 14:16:27,911 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 259 is on host 259
2023-07-11 14:16:27,911 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 260 is on host 260
2023-07-11 14:16:27,911 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 261 is on host 261
2023-07-11 14:16:27,911 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 262 is on host 262
2023-07-11 14:16:27,911 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 263 is on host 263
2023-07-11 14:16:27,911 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 264 is on host 264
2023-07-11 14:16:27,911 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 265 is on host 265
2023-07-11 14:16:27,911 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 266 is on host 266
2023-07-11 14:16:27,911 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 267 is on host 267
2023-07-11 14:16:27,911 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 268 is on host 268
2023-07-11 14:16:27,911 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 269 is on host 269
2023-07-11 14:16:27,911 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 270 is on host 270
2023-07-11 14:16:27,911 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 271 is on host 271
2023-07-11 14:16:27,911 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 272 is on host 272
2023-07-11 14:16:27,911 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 273 is on host 273
2023-07-11 14:16:27,911 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 274 is on host 274
2023-07-11 14:16:27,911 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 275 is on host 275
2023-07-11 14:16:27,911 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 276 is on host 276
2023-07-11 14:16:27,911 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 277 is on host 277
2023-07-11 14:16:27,911 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 278 is on host 278
2023-07-11 14:16:27,911 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 279 is on host 279
2023-07-11 14:16:27,912 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 280 is on host 280
2023-07-11 14:16:27,912 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 281 is on host 281
2023-07-11 14:16:27,912 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 282 is on host 282
2023-07-11 14:16:27,912 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 283 is on host 283
2023-07-11 14:16:27,912 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 284 is on host 284
2023-07-11 14:16:27,912 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 285 is on host 285
2023-07-11 14:16:27,912 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 286 is on host 286
2023-07-11 14:16:27,912 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 287 is on host 287
2023-07-11 14:16:27,912 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 288 is on host 288
2023-07-11 14:16:27,912 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 289 is on host 289
2023-07-11 14:16:27,912 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 290 is on host 290
2023-07-11 14:16:27,912 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 291 is on host 291
2023-07-11 14:16:27,912 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 292 is on host 292
2023-07-11 14:16:27,912 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 293 is on host 293
2023-07-11 14:16:27,912 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 294 is on host 294
2023-07-11 14:16:27,912 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 295 is on host 295
2023-07-11 14:16:27,912 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 296 is on host 296
2023-07-11 14:16:27,912 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 297 is on host 297
2023-07-11 14:16:27,912 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 298 is on host 298
2023-07-11 14:16:27,912 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 299 is on host 299
2023-07-11 14:16:27,912 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 300 is on host 300
2023-07-11 14:16:27,912 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 301 is on host 301
2023-07-11 14:16:27,912 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 302 is on host 302
2023-07-11 14:16:27,912 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 303 is on host 303
2023-07-11 14:16:27,912 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 304 is on host 304
2023-07-11 14:16:27,912 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 305 is on host 305
2023-07-11 14:16:27,912 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 306 is on host 306
2023-07-11 14:16:27,912 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 307 is on host 307
2023-07-11 14:16:27,912 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 308 is on host 308
2023-07-11 14:16:27,913 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 309 is on host 309
2023-07-11 14:16:27,913 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 310 is on host 310
2023-07-11 14:16:27,913 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 311 is on host 311
2023-07-11 14:16:27,913 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 312 is on host 312
2023-07-11 14:16:27,913 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 313 is on host 313
2023-07-11 14:16:27,913 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 314 is on host 314
2023-07-11 14:16:27,913 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 315 is on host 315
2023-07-11 14:16:27,913 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 316 is on host 316
2023-07-11 14:16:27,913 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 317 is on host 317
2023-07-11 14:16:27,913 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 318 is on host 318
2023-07-11 14:16:27,913 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 319 is on host 319
2023-07-11 14:16:27,913 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 320 is on host 320
2023-07-11 14:16:27,913 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 321 is on host 321
2023-07-11 14:16:27,913 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 322 is on host 322
2023-07-11 14:16:27,913 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 323 is on host 323
2023-07-11 14:16:27,913 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 324 is on host 324
2023-07-11 14:16:27,913 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 325 is on host 325
2023-07-11 14:16:27,913 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 326 is on host 326
2023-07-11 14:16:27,913 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 327 is on host 327
2023-07-11 14:16:27,913 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 328 is on host 328
2023-07-11 14:16:27,913 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 329 is on host 329
2023-07-11 14:16:27,913 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 330 is on host 330
2023-07-11 14:16:27,913 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 331 is on host 331
2023-07-11 14:16:27,913 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 332 is on host 332
2023-07-11 14:16:27,913 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 333 is on host 333
2023-07-11 14:16:27,913 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 334 is on host 334
2023-07-11 14:16:27,913 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 335 is on host 335
2023-07-11 14:16:27,913 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 336 is on host 336
2023-07-11 14:16:27,913 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 337 is on host 337
2023-07-11 14:16:27,914 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 338 is on host 338
2023-07-11 14:16:27,914 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 339 is on host 339
2023-07-11 14:16:27,914 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 340 is on host 340
2023-07-11 14:16:27,914 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 341 is on host 341
2023-07-11 14:16:27,914 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 342 is on host 342
2023-07-11 14:16:27,914 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 343 is on host 343
2023-07-11 14:16:27,914 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 344 is on host 344
2023-07-11 14:16:27,914 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 345 is on host 345
2023-07-11 14:16:27,914 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 346 is on host 346
2023-07-11 14:16:27,914 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 347 is on host 347
2023-07-11 14:16:27,914 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 348 is on host 348
2023-07-11 14:16:27,914 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 349 is on host 349
2023-07-11 14:16:27,914 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 350 is on host 350
2023-07-11 14:16:27,914 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 351 is on host 351
2023-07-11 14:16:27,914 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 352 is on host 352
2023-07-11 14:16:27,914 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 353 is on host 353
2023-07-11 14:16:27,914 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 354 is on host 354
2023-07-11 14:16:27,914 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 355 is on host 355
2023-07-11 14:16:27,914 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 356 is on host 356
2023-07-11 14:16:27,914 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 357 is on host 357
2023-07-11 14:16:27,914 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 358 is on host 358
2023-07-11 14:16:27,914 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 359 is on host 359
2023-07-11 14:16:27,914 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 360 is on host 360
2023-07-11 14:16:27,914 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 361 is on host 361
2023-07-11 14:16:27,914 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 362 is on host 362
2023-07-11 14:16:27,914 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 363 is on host 363
2023-07-11 14:16:27,914 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 364 is on host 364
2023-07-11 14:16:27,914 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 365 is on host 365
2023-07-11 14:16:27,914 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 366 is on host 366
2023-07-11 14:16:27,915 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 367 is on host 367
2023-07-11 14:16:27,915 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 368 is on host 368
2023-07-11 14:16:27,915 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 369 is on host 369
2023-07-11 14:16:27,915 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 370 is on host 370
2023-07-11 14:16:27,915 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 371 is on host 371
2023-07-11 14:16:27,915 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 372 is on host 372
2023-07-11 14:16:27,915 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 373 is on host 373
2023-07-11 14:16:27,915 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 374 is on host 374
2023-07-11 14:16:27,915 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 375 is on host 375
2023-07-11 14:16:27,915 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 376 is on host 376
2023-07-11 14:16:27,915 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 377 is on host 377
2023-07-11 14:16:27,915 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 378 is on host 378
2023-07-11 14:16:27,915 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 379 is on host 379
2023-07-11 14:16:27,915 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 380 is on host 380
2023-07-11 14:16:27,915 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 381 is on host 381
2023-07-11 14:16:27,915 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 382 is on host 382
2023-07-11 14:16:27,915 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 383 is on host 383
2023-07-11 14:16:27,915 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 384 is on host 384
2023-07-11 14:16:27,915 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 385 is on host 385
2023-07-11 14:16:27,915 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 386 is on host 386
2023-07-11 14:16:27,915 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 387 is on host 387
2023-07-11 14:16:27,915 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 388 is on host 388
2023-07-11 14:16:27,915 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 389 is on host 389
2023-07-11 14:16:27,915 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 390 is on host 390
2023-07-11 14:16:27,915 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 391 is on host 391
2023-07-11 14:16:27,915 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 392 is on host 392
2023-07-11 14:16:27,915 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=393, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:27,916 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table3) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:27,916 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table2
2023-07-11 14:16:27,916 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv553536953=290, srv1630071126=110, srv1071894870=12, srv23511728=232, srv658346947=323, srv2025338799=204, srv1397994335=64, srv1976766403=195, srv1644629726=118, srv957637734=381, srv2079182457=210, srv1749264468=139, srv2046129126=206, srv1595762596=104, srv603990852=307, srv1973073480=194, srv958856137=382, srv644066832=319, srv557062842=292, srv277765671=235, srv732221418=337, srv1769385567=143, srv224612199=228, srv714752528=334, srv362526040=256, srv581128949=296, srv2133511466=223, srv1144239257=30, srv320603627=245, srv1679952521=126, srv2122867873=222, srv1110067064=24, srv256251994=233, srv63261708=317, srv89837390=371, srv552104598=289, srv508952995=281, srv2096011353=214, srv1770417148=144, srv1246723478=42, srv929436444=378, srv2082192429=211, srv234917297=231, srv405700573=266, srv183644386=166, srv1488378513=85, srv173139715=136, srv1154180352=32, srv355693379=252, srv1407521654=66, srv496848057=275, srv1157975499=33, srv1806731027=162, srv1923102804=184, srv311102455=244, srv450011410=271, srv771515724=348, srv389183508=262, srv1249074416=43, srv2014575201=201, srv640847108=318, srv832363565=356, srv1970882134=192, srv2107358603=218, srv855766065=361, srv1336043388=55, srv29397186=237, srv982792848=390, srv976560524=386, srv101181760=3, srv1093549482=21, srv2018389395=202, srv2113483104=221, srv1778339118=149, srv1968709692=190, srv705221118=333, srv159600090=105, srv1919608486=180, srv981255102=389, srv807899713=353, srv755110395=344, srv1770594519=145, srv739692705=340, srv1076582671=16, srv693869315=330, srv1079048717=17, srv440657532=270, srv1636659280=115, srv2108739257=220, srv668373413=326, srv1003610393=2, srv1054229197=11, srv1868589627=172, srv2103522371=217, srv1000546271=0, srv951670617=380, srv2042909593=205, srv1865656038=171, srv1466355012=78, srv703662406=332, srv1418112884=70, srv1215580291=40, srv71833528=335, srv1580581635=103, srv1021032212=5, srv1080806312=19, srv1985601859=197, srv74471954=343, srv1647472319=119, srv2071553346=208, srv1632855171=112, srv1122009370=27, srv13613992=61, srv1630777154=111, srv301413669=239, srv550697728=288, srv1296023857=53, srv1724550977=133, srv1989290370=198, srv1926417985=185, srv1678097199=125, srv1461034373=76, srv614690415=311, srv2098345381=215, srv310463473=243, srv1011934105=4, srv148627129=84, srv305489318=240, srv1256534903=46, srv1289731445=52, srv1798844587=157, srv567113085=294, srv1119222501=26, srv2055117940=207, srv855898852=362, srv629224816=316, srv1075943554=15, srv625909061=315, srv1705591942=128, srv734225580=339, srv660107924=324, srv1381729938=62, srv1633483173=113, srv408265476=267, srv1776057793=148, srv1360253411=60, srv1511424834=90, srv1414162621=68, srv883343663=370, srv151859222=91, srv349144930=251, srv1991304034=199, srv1825887791=164, srv601657063=305, srv758932951=345, srv1651629087=120, srv1864623584=170, srv682957691=329, srv1500454146=88, srv1725962085=135, srv1659841448=121, srv1253206004=45, srv52354442=284, srv18508093=168, srv1427731921=73, srv561344974=293, srv721668125=336, srv1575482138=100, srv914128771=373, srv961487230=383, srv741332941=342, srv533032466=286, srv1574140987=99, srv2139849097=224, srv503902262=278, srv674807007=327, srv1786829855=153, srv2088727517=213, srv394366966=264, srv980089565=388, srv114594288=31, srv38296437=261, srv214835574=226, srv1887224977=176, srv1025509362=7, srv1577020334=102, srv524466665=285, srv393561021=263, srv759909927=346, srv763556514=347, srv786453030=349, srv2142935488=225, srv618111613=312, srv16254163=108, srv343211061=250, srv476075173=273, srv1269632212=47, srv333589612=246, srv499015361=276, srv836674186=357, srv1799191687=158, srv1446998035=74, srv1571774199=98, srv1115354947=25, srv333860881=247, srv1724152600=132, srv1598699299=106, srv177885829=151, srv472125887=272, srv1101339966=22, srv1424985362=72, srv1945569895=188, srv594128294=300, srv1026739237=8, srv842459828=358, srv878519137=366, srv1921260729=181, srv339110834=249, srv504099471=279, srv814253179=354, srv1643744885=116, srv1793847521=155, srv607234624=309, srv698219051=331, srv1688538732=127, srv666240078=325, srv1079284733=18, srv29210550=236, srv506181748=280, srv881313122=368, srv1945452576=187, srv597307897=303, srv1285120424=51, srv1887943816=177, srv1983604698=196, srv1805465940=161, srv309309336=242, srv1719756294=131, srv1349932676=58, srv1208486369=38, srv1643971570=117, srv1509331489=89, srv334105385=248, srv1400515744=65, srv369984715=259, srv43712162=269, srv842675864=359, srv1803258748=160, srv1022450918=6, srv1775108732=147, srv1766088250=141, srv180150732=159, srv1220857227=41, srv226530501=229, srv362032108=255, srv919715380=377, srv1074935976=14, srv1395030819=63, srv803291569=352, srv1877966766=175, srv220538712=227, srv2021718843=203, srv2107782185=219, srv882216860=369, srv1489137852=86, srv1972328734=193, srv1470759982=79, srv1774824811=146, srv971974774=384, srv1418242791=71, srv1001274196=1, srv909615097=372, srv1537724566=93, srv1165799954=34, srv1724754364=134, srv978173525=387, srv113319438=29, srv578033735=295, srv147931272=80, srv1183635941=35, srv1904215245=178, srv596349756=302, srv880835255=367, srv857544550=364, srv1779729022=152, srv1795612465=156, srv621083045=314, srv917704170=375, srv1351811120=59, srv1316710897=54, srv789820555=350, srv1922580095=183, srv305567304=241, srv1936745425=186, srv1745318024=138, srv1210822057=39, srv645375717=320, srv950628389=379, srv1490199189=87, srv1575919256=101, srv154481102=96, srv359402967=254, srv997716931=391, srv1457224273=75, srv581644449=297, srv1872374768=174, srv363177310=257, srv740327512=341, srv1664227236=123, srv972330517=385, srv1634261306=114, srv1662183707=122, srv1969046891=191, srv1485266211=82, srv1778842262=150, srv588410181=298, srv1921840985=182, srv591279493=299, srv37574565=260, srv1104147458=23, srv1190166330=36, srv652270371=322, srv1484309042=81, srv1560148463=97, srv618569548=313, srv2102708311=216, srv1084873074=20, srv517669556=283, srv918152084=376, srv649714317=321, srv1674484790=124, srv1339239880=56, srv1461073271=77, srv1125312901=28, srv25633292=234, srv516616923=282, srv299721745=238, srv604932433=308, srv1273702855=48, srv792183929=351, srv1042608200=10, srv1276335106=49, srv1486044644=83, srv676101698=328, srv998930892=392, srv200111276=200, srv1863083643=169, srv1737443479=137, srv872997185=365, srv821351126=355, srv852115805=360, srv1074355423=13, srv170952194=130, srv503430005=277, srv153887567=94, srv1415163001=69, srv1032737435=9, srv1840670515=167, srv1961921083=189, srv59745831=304, srv36715747=258, srv431547280=268, srv1524853580=92, srv1870059418=173, srv396010771=265, srv594457792=301, srv1755339428=140, srv1766275429=142, srv5565786=291, srv603898526=306, srv544570223=287, srv856030669=363, srv1542523468=95, srv915785747=374, srv356122213=253, srv1411875499=67, srv2077620970=209, srv1345529444=57, srv232339963=230, srv1250861076=44, srv1914875423=179, srv478619481=274, srv1202435626=37, srv1706089454=129, srv1810631201=163, srv1282644061=50, srv1625945288=109, srv733251129=338, srv2082830831=212, srv1612103540=107, srv612136291=310, srv1790004142=154, srv183394703=165} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:27,916 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:27,916 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:27,917 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:27,917 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:27,917 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:27,917 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:27,917 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-11 14:16:27,917 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-11 14:16:27,917 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-11 14:16:27,917 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-11 14:16:27,917 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 10 is on host 10
2023-07-11 14:16:27,917 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 11 is on host 11
2023-07-11 14:16:27,917 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 12 is on host 12
2023-07-11 14:16:27,917 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 13 is on host 13
2023-07-11 14:16:27,917 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 14 is on host 14
2023-07-11 14:16:27,917 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 15 is on host 15
2023-07-11 14:16:27,917 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 16 is on host 16
2023-07-11 14:16:27,917 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 17 is on host 17
2023-07-11 14:16:27,917 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 18 is on host 18
2023-07-11 14:16:27,917 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 19 is on host 19
2023-07-11 14:16:27,917 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 20 is on host 20
2023-07-11 14:16:27,917 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 21 is on host 21
2023-07-11 14:16:27,917 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 22 is on host 22
2023-07-11 14:16:27,917 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 23 is on host 23
2023-07-11 14:16:27,917 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 24 is on host 24
2023-07-11 14:16:27,917 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 25 is on host 25
2023-07-11 14:16:27,917 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 26 is on host 26
2023-07-11 14:16:27,917 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 27 is on host 27
2023-07-11 14:16:27,917 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 28 is on host 28
2023-07-11 14:16:27,917 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 29 is on host 29
2023-07-11 14:16:27,917 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 30 is on host 30
2023-07-11 14:16:27,918 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 31 is on host 31
2023-07-11 14:16:27,918 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 32 is on host 32
2023-07-11 14:16:27,918 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 33 is on host 33
2023-07-11 14:16:27,918 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 34 is on host 34
2023-07-11 14:16:27,918 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 35 is on host 35
2023-07-11 14:16:27,918 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 36 is on host 36
2023-07-11 14:16:27,918 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 37 is on host 37
2023-07-11 14:16:27,918 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 38 is on host 38
2023-07-11 14:16:27,918 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 39 is on host 39
2023-07-11 14:16:27,918 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 40 is on host 40
2023-07-11 14:16:27,918 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 41 is on host 41
2023-07-11 14:16:27,918 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 42 is on host 42
2023-07-11 14:16:27,918 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 43 is on host 43
2023-07-11 14:16:27,918 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 44 is on host 44
2023-07-11 14:16:27,918 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 45 is on host 45
2023-07-11 14:16:27,918 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 46 is on host 46
2023-07-11 14:16:27,918 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 47 is on host 47
2023-07-11 14:16:27,918 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 48 is on host 48
2023-07-11 14:16:27,918 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 49 is on host 49
2023-07-11 14:16:27,918 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 50 is on host 50
2023-07-11 14:16:27,918 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 51 is on host 51
2023-07-11 14:16:27,918 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 52 is on host 52
2023-07-11 14:16:27,918 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 53 is on host 53
2023-07-11 14:16:27,918 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 54 is on host 54
2023-07-11 14:16:27,918 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 55 is on host 55
2023-07-11 14:16:27,918 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 56 is on host 56
2023-07-11 14:16:27,918 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 57 is on host 57
2023-07-11 14:16:27,918 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 58 is on host 58
2023-07-11 14:16:27,918 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 59 is on host 59
2023-07-11 14:16:27,919 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 60 is on host 60
2023-07-11 14:16:27,919 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 61 is on host 61
2023-07-11 14:16:27,919 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 62 is on host 62
2023-07-11 14:16:27,919 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 63 is on host 63
2023-07-11 14:16:27,919 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 64 is on host 64
2023-07-11 14:16:27,919 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 65 is on host 65
2023-07-11 14:16:27,919 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 66 is on host 66
2023-07-11 14:16:27,919 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 67 is on host 67
2023-07-11 14:16:27,919 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 68 is on host 68
2023-07-11 14:16:27,919 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 69 is on host 69
2023-07-11 14:16:27,919 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 70 is on host 70
2023-07-11 14:16:27,919 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 71 is on host 71
2023-07-11 14:16:27,919 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 72 is on host 72
2023-07-11 14:16:27,919 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 73 is on host 73
2023-07-11 14:16:27,919 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 74 is on host 74
2023-07-11 14:16:27,919 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 75 is on host 75
2023-07-11 14:16:27,919 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 76 is on host 76
2023-07-11 14:16:27,919 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 77 is on host 77
2023-07-11 14:16:27,920 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 78 is on host 78
2023-07-11 14:16:27,920 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 79 is on host 79
2023-07-11 14:16:27,920 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 80 is on host 80
2023-07-11 14:16:27,920 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 81 is on host 81
2023-07-11 14:16:27,920 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 82 is on host 82
2023-07-11 14:16:27,920 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 83 is on host 83
2023-07-11 14:16:27,920 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 84 is on host 84
2023-07-11 14:16:27,920 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 85 is on host 85
2023-07-11 14:16:27,920 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 86 is on host 86
2023-07-11 14:16:27,920 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 87 is on host 87
2023-07-11 14:16:27,920 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 88 is on host 88
2023-07-11 14:16:27,920 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 89 is on host 89
2023-07-11 14:16:27,920 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 90 is on host 90
2023-07-11 14:16:27,920 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 91 is on host 91
2023-07-11 14:16:27,920 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 92 is on host 92
2023-07-11 14:16:27,920 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 93 is on host 93
2023-07-11 14:16:27,920 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 94 is on host 94
2023-07-11 14:16:27,920 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 95 is on host 95
2023-07-11 14:16:27,920 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 96 is on host 96
2023-07-11 14:16:27,920 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 97 is on host 97
2023-07-11 14:16:27,920 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 98 is on host 98
2023-07-11 14:16:27,920 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 99 is on host 99
2023-07-11 14:16:27,920 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 100 is on host 100
2023-07-11 14:16:27,920 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 101 is on host 101
2023-07-11 14:16:27,920 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 102 is on host 102
2023-07-11 14:16:27,921 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 103 is on host 103
2023-07-11 14:16:27,921 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 104 is on host 104
2023-07-11 14:16:27,921 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 105 is on host 105
2023-07-11 14:16:27,921 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 106 is on host 106
2023-07-11 14:16:27,921 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 107 is on host 107
2023-07-11 14:16:27,921 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 108 is on host 108
2023-07-11 14:16:27,921 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 109 is on host 109
2023-07-11 14:16:27,921 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 110 is on host 110
2023-07-11 14:16:27,921 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 111 is on host 111
2023-07-11 14:16:27,921 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 112 is on host 112
2023-07-11 14:16:27,921 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 113 is on host 113
2023-07-11 14:16:27,921 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 114 is on host 114
2023-07-11 14:16:27,921 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 115 is on host 115
2023-07-11 14:16:27,921 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 116 is on host 116
2023-07-11 14:16:27,921 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 117 is on host 117
2023-07-11 14:16:27,921 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 118 is on host 118
2023-07-11 14:16:27,921 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 119 is on host 119
2023-07-11 14:16:27,921 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 120 is on host 120
2023-07-11 14:16:27,921 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 121 is on host 121
2023-07-11 14:16:27,921 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 122 is on host 122
2023-07-11 14:16:27,921 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 123 is on host 123
2023-07-11 14:16:27,921 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 124 is on host 124
2023-07-11 14:16:27,921 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 125 is on host 125
2023-07-11 14:16:27,921 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 126 is on host 126
2023-07-11 14:16:27,921 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 127 is on host 127
2023-07-11 14:16:27,921 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 128 is on host 128
2023-07-11 14:16:27,921 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 129 is on host 129
2023-07-11 14:16:27,921 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 130 is on host 130
2023-07-11 14:16:27,922 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 131 is on host 131
2023-07-11 14:16:27,922 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 132 is on host 132
2023-07-11 14:16:27,922 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 133 is on host 133
2023-07-11 14:16:27,922 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 134 is on host 134
2023-07-11 14:16:27,922 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 135 is on host 135
2023-07-11 14:16:27,922 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 136 is on host 136
2023-07-11 14:16:27,922 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 137 is on host 137
2023-07-11 14:16:27,922 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 138 is on host 138
2023-07-11 14:16:27,922 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 139 is on host 139
2023-07-11 14:16:27,922 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 140 is on host 140
2023-07-11 14:16:27,922 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 141 is on host 141
2023-07-11 14:16:27,922 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 142 is on host 142
2023-07-11 14:16:27,922 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 143 is on host 143
2023-07-11 14:16:27,922 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 144 is on host 144
2023-07-11 14:16:27,922 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 145 is on host 145
2023-07-11 14:16:27,922 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 146 is on host 146
2023-07-11 14:16:27,922 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 147 is on host 147
2023-07-11 14:16:27,922 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 148 is on host 148
2023-07-11 14:16:27,922 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 149 is on host 149
2023-07-11 14:16:27,922 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 150 is on host 150
2023-07-11 14:16:27,922 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 151 is on host 151
2023-07-11 14:16:27,922 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 152 is on host 152
2023-07-11 14:16:27,922 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 153 is on host 153
2023-07-11 14:16:27,922 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 154 is on host 154
2023-07-11 14:16:27,922 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 155 is on host 155
2023-07-11 14:16:27,922 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 156 is on host 156
2023-07-11 14:16:27,922 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 157 is on host 157
2023-07-11 14:16:27,922 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 158 is on host 158
2023-07-11 14:16:27,922 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 159 is on host 159
2023-07-11 14:16:27,922 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 160 is on host 160
2023-07-11 14:16:27,923 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 161 is on host 161
2023-07-11 14:16:27,923 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 162 is on host 162
2023-07-11 14:16:27,923 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 163 is on host 163
2023-07-11 14:16:27,923 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 164 is on host 164
2023-07-11 14:16:27,923 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 165 is on host 165
2023-07-11 14:16:27,923 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 166 is on host 166
2023-07-11 14:16:27,923 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 167 is on host 167
2023-07-11 14:16:27,923 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 168 is on host 168
2023-07-11 14:16:27,923 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 169 is on host 169
2023-07-11 14:16:27,923 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 170 is on host 170
2023-07-11 14:16:27,923 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 171 is on host 171
2023-07-11 14:16:27,923 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 172 is on host 172
2023-07-11 14:16:27,923 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 173 is on host 173
2023-07-11 14:16:27,923 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 174 is on host 174
2023-07-11 14:16:27,923 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 175 is on host 175
2023-07-11 14:16:27,923 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 176 is on host 176
2023-07-11 14:16:27,923 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 177 is on host 177
2023-07-11 14:16:27,923 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 178 is on host 178
2023-07-11 14:16:27,923 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 179 is on host 179
2023-07-11 14:16:27,923 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 180 is on host 180
2023-07-11 14:16:27,923 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 181 is on host 181
2023-07-11 14:16:27,923 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 182 is on host 182
2023-07-11 14:16:27,923 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 183 is on host 183
2023-07-11 14:16:27,923 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 184 is on host 184
2023-07-11 14:16:27,923 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 185 is on host 185
2023-07-11 14:16:27,923 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 186 is on host 186
2023-07-11 14:16:27,923 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 187 is on host 187
2023-07-11 14:16:27,923 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 188 is on host 188
2023-07-11 14:16:27,923 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 189 is on host 189
2023-07-11 14:16:27,924 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 190 is on host 190
2023-07-11 14:16:27,924 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 191 is on host 191
2023-07-11 14:16:27,924 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 192 is on host 192
2023-07-11 14:16:27,924 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 193 is on host 193
2023-07-11 14:16:27,924 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 194 is on host 194
2023-07-11 14:16:27,924 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 195 is on host 195
2023-07-11 14:16:27,924 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 196 is on host 196
2023-07-11 14:16:27,924 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 197 is on host 197
2023-07-11 14:16:27,924 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 198 is on host 198
2023-07-11 14:16:27,924 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 199 is on host 199
2023-07-11 14:16:27,924 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 200 is on host 200
2023-07-11 14:16:27,924 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 201 is on host 201
2023-07-11 14:16:27,924 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 202 is on host 202
2023-07-11 14:16:27,924 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 203 is on host 203
2023-07-11 14:16:27,924 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 204 is on host 204
2023-07-11 14:16:27,924 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 205 is on host 205
2023-07-11 14:16:27,924 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 206 is on host 206
2023-07-11 14:16:27,924 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 207 is on host 207
2023-07-11 14:16:27,924 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 208 is on host 208
2023-07-11 14:16:27,924 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 209 is on host 209
2023-07-11 14:16:27,924 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 210 is on host 210
2023-07-11 14:16:27,924 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 211 is on host 211
2023-07-11 14:16:27,924 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 212 is on host 212
2023-07-11 14:16:27,924 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 213 is on host 213
2023-07-11 14:16:27,924 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 214 is on host 214
2023-07-11 14:16:27,924 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 215 is on host 215
2023-07-11 14:16:27,924 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 216 is on host 216
2023-07-11 14:16:27,924 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 217 is on host 217
2023-07-11 14:16:27,925 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 218 is on host 218
2023-07-11 14:16:27,925 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 219 is on host 219
2023-07-11 14:16:27,925 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 220 is on host 220
2023-07-11 14:16:27,925 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 221 is on host 221
2023-07-11 14:16:27,925 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 222 is on host 222
2023-07-11 14:16:27,925 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 223 is on host 223
2023-07-11 14:16:27,925 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 224 is on host 224
2023-07-11 14:16:27,925 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 225 is on host 225
2023-07-11 14:16:27,925 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 226 is on host 226
2023-07-11 14:16:27,925 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 227 is on host 227
2023-07-11 14:16:27,925 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 228 is on host 228
2023-07-11 14:16:27,925 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 229 is on host 229
2023-07-11 14:16:27,925 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 230 is on host 230
2023-07-11 14:16:27,925 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 231 is on host 231
2023-07-11 14:16:27,925 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 232 is on host 232
2023-07-11 14:16:27,925 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 233 is on host 233
2023-07-11 14:16:27,925 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 234 is on host 234
2023-07-11 14:16:27,925 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 235 is on host 235
2023-07-11 14:16:27,925 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 236 is on host 236
2023-07-11 14:16:27,925 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 237 is on host 237
2023-07-11 14:16:27,925 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 238 is on host 238
2023-07-11 14:16:27,925 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 239 is on host 239
2023-07-11 14:16:27,925 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 240 is on host 240
2023-07-11 14:16:27,925 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 241 is on host 241
2023-07-11 14:16:27,925 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 242 is on host 242
2023-07-11 14:16:27,925 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 243 is on host 243
2023-07-11 14:16:27,925 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 244 is on host 244
2023-07-11 14:16:27,925 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 245 is on host 245
2023-07-11 14:16:27,925 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 246 is on host 246
2023-07-11 14:16:27,926 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 247 is on host 247
2023-07-11 14:16:27,926 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 248 is on host 248
2023-07-11 14:16:27,926 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 249 is on host 249
2023-07-11 14:16:27,926 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 250 is on host 250
2023-07-11 14:16:27,926 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 251 is on host 251
2023-07-11 14:16:27,926 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 252 is on host 252
2023-07-11 14:16:27,926 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 253 is on host 253
2023-07-11 14:16:27,926 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 254 is on host 254
2023-07-11 14:16:27,926 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 255 is on host 255
2023-07-11 14:16:27,926 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 256 is on host 256
2023-07-11 14:16:27,926 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 257 is on host 257
2023-07-11 14:16:27,926 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 258 is on host 258
2023-07-11 14:16:27,926 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 259 is on host 259
2023-07-11 14:16:27,926 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 260 is on host 260
2023-07-11 14:16:27,926 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 261 is on host 261
2023-07-11 14:16:27,926 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 262 is on host 262
2023-07-11 14:16:27,926 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 263 is on host 263
2023-07-11 14:16:27,926 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 264 is on host 264
2023-07-11 14:16:27,926 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 265 is on host 265
2023-07-11 14:16:27,926 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 266 is on host 266
2023-07-11 14:16:27,926 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 267 is on host 267
2023-07-11 14:16:27,926 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 268 is on host 268
2023-07-11 14:16:27,926 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 269 is on host 269
2023-07-11 14:16:27,926 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 270 is on host 270
2023-07-11 14:16:27,926 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 271 is on host 271
2023-07-11 14:16:27,926 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 272 is on host 272
2023-07-11 14:16:27,926 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 273 is on host 273
2023-07-11 14:16:27,926 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 274 is on host 274
2023-07-11 14:16:27,926 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 275 is on host 275
2023-07-11 14:16:27,927 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 276 is on host 276
2023-07-11 14:16:27,927 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 277 is on host 277
2023-07-11 14:16:27,927 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 278 is on host 278
2023-07-11 14:16:27,927 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 279 is on host 279
2023-07-11 14:16:27,927 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 280 is on host 280
2023-07-11 14:16:27,927 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 281 is on host 281
2023-07-11 14:16:27,927 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 282 is on host 282
2023-07-11 14:16:27,927 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 283 is on host 283
2023-07-11 14:16:27,927 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 284 is on host 284
2023-07-11 14:16:27,927 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 285 is on host 285
2023-07-11 14:16:27,927 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 286 is on host 286
2023-07-11 14:16:27,927 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 287 is on host 287
2023-07-11 14:16:27,927 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 288 is on host 288
2023-07-11 14:16:27,927 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 289 is on host 289
2023-07-11 14:16:27,927 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 290 is on host 290
2023-07-11 14:16:27,927 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 291 is on host 291
2023-07-11 14:16:27,927 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 292 is on host 292
2023-07-11 14:16:27,927 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 293 is on host 293
2023-07-11 14:16:27,927 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 294 is on host 294
2023-07-11 14:16:27,927 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 295 is on host 295
2023-07-11 14:16:27,927 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 296 is on host 296
2023-07-11 14:16:27,927 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 297 is on host 297
2023-07-11 14:16:27,927 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 298 is on host 298
2023-07-11 14:16:27,927 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 299 is on host 299
2023-07-11 14:16:27,927 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 300 is on host 300
2023-07-11 14:16:27,927 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 301 is on host 301
2023-07-11 14:16:27,927 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 302 is on host 302
2023-07-11 14:16:27,927 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 303 is on host 303
2023-07-11 14:16:27,927 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 304 is on host 304
2023-07-11 14:16:27,928 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 305 is on host 305
2023-07-11 14:16:27,928 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 306 is on host 306
2023-07-11 14:16:27,928 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 307 is on host 307
2023-07-11 14:16:27,928 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 308 is on host 308
2023-07-11 14:16:27,928 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 309 is on host 309
2023-07-11 14:16:27,928 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 310 is on host 310
2023-07-11 14:16:27,928 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 311 is on host 311
2023-07-11 14:16:27,928 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 312 is on host 312
2023-07-11 14:16:27,928 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 313 is on host 313
2023-07-11 14:16:27,928 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 314 is on host 314
2023-07-11 14:16:27,928 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 315 is on host 315
2023-07-11 14:16:27,928 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 316 is on host 316
2023-07-11 14:16:27,928 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 317 is on host 317
2023-07-11 14:16:27,928 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 318 is on host 318
2023-07-11 14:16:27,928 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 319 is on host 319
2023-07-11 14:16:27,928 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 320 is on host 320
2023-07-11 14:16:27,928 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 321 is on host 321
2023-07-11 14:16:27,928 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 322 is on host 322
2023-07-11 14:16:27,928 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 323 is on host 323
2023-07-11 14:16:27,928 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 324 is on host 324
2023-07-11 14:16:27,928 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 325 is on host 325
2023-07-11 14:16:27,928 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 326 is on host 326
2023-07-11 14:16:27,928 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 327 is on host 327
2023-07-11 14:16:27,928 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 328 is on host 328
2023-07-11 14:16:27,928 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 329 is on host 329
2023-07-11 14:16:27,928 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 330 is on host 330
2023-07-11 14:16:27,928 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 331 is on host 331
2023-07-11 14:16:27,928 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 332 is on host 332
2023-07-11 14:16:27,928 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 333 is on host 333
2023-07-11 14:16:27,929 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 334 is on host 334
2023-07-11 14:16:27,929 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 335 is on host 335
2023-07-11 14:16:27,929 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 336 is on host 336
2023-07-11 14:16:27,929 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 337 is on host 337
2023-07-11 14:16:27,929 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 338 is on host 338
2023-07-11 14:16:27,929 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 339 is on host 339
2023-07-11 14:16:27,929 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 340 is on host 340
2023-07-11 14:16:27,929 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 341 is on host 341
2023-07-11 14:16:27,929 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 342 is on host 342
2023-07-11 14:16:27,929 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 343 is on host 343
2023-07-11 14:16:27,929 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 344 is on host 344
2023-07-11 14:16:27,929 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 345 is on host 345
2023-07-11 14:16:27,929 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 346 is on host 346
2023-07-11 14:16:27,929 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 347 is on host 347
2023-07-11 14:16:27,929 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 348 is on host 348
2023-07-11 14:16:27,929 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 349 is on host 349
2023-07-11 14:16:27,929 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 350 is on host 350
2023-07-11 14:16:27,929 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 351 is on host 351
2023-07-11 14:16:27,929 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 352 is on host 352
2023-07-11 14:16:27,929 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 353 is on host 353
2023-07-11 14:16:27,929 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 354 is on host 354
2023-07-11 14:16:27,929 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 355 is on host 355
2023-07-11 14:16:27,929 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 356 is on host 356
2023-07-11 14:16:27,929 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 357 is on host 357
2023-07-11 14:16:27,929 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 358 is on host 358
2023-07-11 14:16:27,929 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 359 is on host 359
2023-07-11 14:16:27,929 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 360 is on host 360
2023-07-11 14:16:27,929 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 361 is on host 361
2023-07-11 14:16:27,929 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 362 is on host 362
2023-07-11 14:16:27,930 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 363 is on host 363
2023-07-11 14:16:27,930 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 364 is on host 364
2023-07-11 14:16:27,930 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 365 is on host 365
2023-07-11 14:16:27,930 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 366 is on host 366
2023-07-11 14:16:27,930 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 367 is on host 367
2023-07-11 14:16:27,930 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 368 is on host 368
2023-07-11 14:16:27,930 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 369 is on host 369
2023-07-11 14:16:27,930 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 370 is on host 370
2023-07-11 14:16:27,930 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 371 is on host 371
2023-07-11 14:16:27,930 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 372 is on host 372
2023-07-11 14:16:27,930 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 373 is on host 373
2023-07-11 14:16:27,930 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 374 is on host 374
2023-07-11 14:16:27,930 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 375 is on host 375
2023-07-11 14:16:27,930 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 376 is on host 376
2023-07-11 14:16:27,930 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 377 is on host 377
2023-07-11 14:16:27,930 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 378 is on host 378
2023-07-11 14:16:27,930 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 379 is on host 379
2023-07-11 14:16:27,930 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 380 is on host 380
2023-07-11 14:16:27,930 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 381 is on host 381
2023-07-11 14:16:27,930 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 382 is on host 382
2023-07-11 14:16:27,930 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 383 is on host 383
2023-07-11 14:16:27,930 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 384 is on host 384
2023-07-11 14:16:27,930 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 385 is on host 385
2023-07-11 14:16:27,930 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 386 is on host 386
2023-07-11 14:16:27,930 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 387 is on host 387
2023-07-11 14:16:27,930 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 388 is on host 388
2023-07-11 14:16:27,930 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 389 is on host 389
2023-07-11 14:16:27,930 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 390 is on host 390
2023-07-11 14:16:27,930 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 391 is on host 391
2023-07-11 14:16:27,931 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 392 is on host 392
2023-07-11 14:16:27,931 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=393, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:27,931 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table2) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:27,931 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1
2023-07-11 14:16:27,931 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv553536953=290, srv1630071126=110, srv1071894870=12, srv23511728=232, srv658346947=323, srv2025338799=204, srv1397994335=64, srv1976766403=195, srv1644629726=118, srv957637734=381, srv2079182457=210, srv1749264468=139, srv2046129126=206, srv1595762596=104, srv603990852=307, srv1973073480=194, srv958856137=382, srv644066832=319, srv557062842=292, srv277765671=235, srv732221418=337, srv1769385567=143, srv224612199=228, srv714752528=334, srv362526040=256, srv581128949=296, srv2133511466=223, srv1144239257=30, srv320603627=245, srv1679952521=126, srv2122867873=222, srv1110067064=24, srv256251994=233, srv63261708=317, srv89837390=371, srv552104598=289, srv508952995=281, srv2096011353=214, srv1770417148=144, srv1246723478=42, srv929436444=378, srv2082192429=211, srv234917297=231, srv405700573=266, srv183644386=166, srv1488378513=85, srv173139715=136, srv1154180352=32, srv355693379=252, srv1407521654=66, srv496848057=275, srv1157975499=33, srv1806731027=162, srv1923102804=184, srv311102455=244, srv450011410=271, srv771515724=348, srv389183508=262, srv1249074416=43, srv2014575201=201, srv640847108=318, srv832363565=356, srv1970882134=192, srv2107358603=218, srv855766065=361, srv1336043388=55, srv29397186=237, srv982792848=390, srv976560524=386, srv101181760=3, srv1093549482=21, srv2018389395=202, srv2113483104=221, srv1778339118=149, srv1968709692=190, srv705221118=333, srv159600090=105, srv1919608486=180, srv981255102=389, srv807899713=353, srv755110395=344, srv1770594519=145, srv739692705=340, srv1076582671=16, srv693869315=330, srv1079048717=17, srv440657532=270, srv1636659280=115, srv2108739257=220, srv668373413=326, srv1003610393=2, srv1054229197=11, srv1868589627=172, srv2103522371=217, srv1000546271=0, srv951670617=380, srv2042909593=205, srv1865656038=171, srv1466355012=78, srv703662406=332, srv1418112884=70, srv1215580291=40, srv71833528=335, srv1580581635=103, srv1021032212=5, srv1080806312=19, srv1985601859=197, srv74471954=343, srv1647472319=119, srv2071553346=208, srv1632855171=112, srv1122009370=27, srv13613992=61, srv1630777154=111, srv301413669=239, srv550697728=288, srv1296023857=53, srv1724550977=133, srv1989290370=198, srv1926417985=185, srv1678097199=125, srv1461034373=76, srv614690415=311, srv2098345381=215, srv310463473=243, srv1011934105=4, srv148627129=84, srv305489318=240, srv1256534903=46, srv1289731445=52, srv1798844587=157, srv567113085=294, srv1119222501=26, srv2055117940=207, srv855898852=362, srv629224816=316, srv1075943554=15, srv625909061=315, srv1705591942=128, srv734225580=339, srv660107924=324, srv1381729938=62, srv1633483173=113, srv408265476=267, srv1776057793=148, srv1360253411=60, srv1511424834=90, srv1414162621=68, srv883343663=370, srv151859222=91, srv349144930=251, srv1991304034=199, srv1825887791=164, srv601657063=305, srv758932951=345, srv1651629087=120, srv1864623584=170, srv682957691=329, srv1500454146=88, srv1725962085=135, srv1659841448=121, srv1253206004=45, srv52354442=284, srv18508093=168, srv1427731921=73, srv561344974=293, srv721668125=336, srv1575482138=100, srv914128771=373, srv961487230=383, srv741332941=342, srv533032466=286, srv1574140987=99, srv2139849097=224, srv503902262=278, srv674807007=327, srv1786829855=153, srv2088727517=213, srv394366966=264, srv980089565=388, srv114594288=31, srv38296437=261, srv214835574=226, srv1887224977=176, srv1025509362=7, srv1577020334=102, srv524466665=285, srv393561021=263, srv759909927=346, srv763556514=347, srv786453030=349, srv2142935488=225, srv618111613=312, srv16254163=108, srv343211061=250, srv476075173=273, srv1269632212=47, srv333589612=246, srv499015361=276, srv836674186=357, srv1799191687=158, srv1446998035=74, srv1571774199=98, srv1115354947=25, srv333860881=247, srv1724152600=132, srv1598699299=106, srv177885829=151, srv472125887=272, srv1101339966=22, srv1424985362=72, srv1945569895=188, srv594128294=300, srv1026739237=8, srv842459828=358, srv878519137=366, srv1921260729=181, srv339110834=249, srv504099471=279, srv814253179=354, srv1643744885=116, srv1793847521=155, srv607234624=309, srv698219051=331, srv1688538732=127, srv666240078=325, srv1079284733=18, srv29210550=236, srv506181748=280, srv881313122=368, srv1945452576=187, srv597307897=303, srv1285120424=51, srv1887943816=177, srv1983604698=196, srv1805465940=161, srv309309336=242, srv1719756294=131, srv1349932676=58, srv1208486369=38, srv1643971570=117, srv1509331489=89, srv334105385=248, srv1400515744=65, srv369984715=259, srv43712162=269, srv842675864=359, srv1803258748=160, srv1022450918=6, srv1775108732=147, srv1766088250=141, srv180150732=159, srv1220857227=41, srv226530501=229, srv362032108=255, srv919715380=377, srv1074935976=14, srv1395030819=63, srv803291569=352, srv1877966766=175, srv220538712=227, srv2021718843=203, srv2107782185=219, srv882216860=369, srv1489137852=86, srv1972328734=193, srv1470759982=79, srv1774824811=146, srv971974774=384, srv1418242791=71, srv1001274196=1, srv909615097=372, srv1537724566=93, srv1165799954=34, srv1724754364=134, srv978173525=387, srv113319438=29, srv578033735=295, srv147931272=80, srv1183635941=35, srv1904215245=178, srv596349756=302, srv880835255=367, srv857544550=364, srv1779729022=152, srv1795612465=156, srv621083045=314, srv917704170=375, srv1351811120=59, srv1316710897=54, srv789820555=350, srv1922580095=183, srv305567304=241, srv1936745425=186, srv1745318024=138, srv1210822057=39, srv645375717=320, srv950628389=379, srv1490199189=87, srv1575919256=101, srv154481102=96, srv359402967=254, srv997716931=391, srv1457224273=75, srv581644449=297, srv1872374768=174, srv363177310=257, srv740327512=341, srv1664227236=123, srv972330517=385, srv1634261306=114, srv1662183707=122, srv1969046891=191, srv1485266211=82, srv1778842262=150, srv588410181=298, srv1921840985=182, srv591279493=299, srv37574565=260, srv1104147458=23, srv1190166330=36, srv652270371=322, srv1484309042=81, srv1560148463=97, srv618569548=313, srv2102708311=216, srv1084873074=20, srv517669556=283, srv918152084=376, srv649714317=321, srv1674484790=124, srv1339239880=56, srv1461073271=77, srv1125312901=28, srv25633292=234, srv516616923=282, srv299721745=238, srv604932433=308, srv1273702855=48, srv792183929=351, srv1042608200=10, srv1276335106=49, srv1486044644=83, srv676101698=328, srv998930892=392, srv200111276=200, srv1863083643=169, srv1737443479=137, srv872997185=365, srv821351126=355, srv852115805=360, srv1074355423=13, srv170952194=130, srv503430005=277, srv153887567=94, srv1415163001=69, srv1032737435=9, srv1840670515=167, srv1961921083=189, srv59745831=304, srv36715747=258, srv431547280=268, srv1524853580=92, srv1870059418=173, srv396010771=265, srv594457792=301, srv1755339428=140, srv1766275429=142, srv5565786=291, srv603898526=306, srv544570223=287, srv856030669=363, srv1542523468=95, srv915785747=374, srv356122213=253, srv1411875499=67, srv2077620970=209, srv1345529444=57, srv232339963=230, srv1250861076=44, srv1914875423=179, srv478619481=274, srv1202435626=37, srv1706089454=129, srv1810631201=163, srv1282644061=50, srv1625945288=109, srv733251129=338, srv2082830831=212, srv1612103540=107, srv612136291=310, srv1790004142=154, srv183394703=165} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:27,932 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:27,932 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:27,932 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:27,932 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:27,932 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:27,932 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:27,932 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-11 14:16:27,932 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-11 14:16:27,932 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-11 14:16:27,932 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-11 14:16:27,932 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 10 is on host 10
2023-07-11 14:16:27,932 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 11 is on host 11
2023-07-11 14:16:27,933 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 12 is on host 12
2023-07-11 14:16:27,933 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 13 is on host 13
2023-07-11 14:16:27,933 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 14 is on host 14
2023-07-11 14:16:27,933 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 15 is on host 15
2023-07-11 14:16:27,933 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 16 is on host 16
2023-07-11 14:16:27,933 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 17 is on host 17
2023-07-11 14:16:27,933 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 18 is on host 18
2023-07-11 14:16:27,933 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 19 is on host 19
2023-07-11 14:16:27,933 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 20 is on host 20
2023-07-11 14:16:27,933 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 21 is on host 21
2023-07-11 14:16:27,933 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 22 is on host 22
2023-07-11 14:16:27,933 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 23 is on host 23
2023-07-11 14:16:27,933 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 24 is on host 24
2023-07-11 14:16:27,933 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 25 is on host 25
2023-07-11 14:16:27,933 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 26 is on host 26
2023-07-11 14:16:27,933 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 27 is on host 27
2023-07-11 14:16:27,933 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 28 is on host 28
2023-07-11 14:16:27,933 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 29 is on host 29
2023-07-11 14:16:27,933 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 30 is on host 30
2023-07-11 14:16:27,933 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 31 is on host 31
2023-07-11 14:16:27,933 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 32 is on host 32
2023-07-11 14:16:27,933 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 33 is on host 33
2023-07-11 14:16:27,933 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 34 is on host 34
2023-07-11 14:16:27,933 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 35 is on host 35
2023-07-11 14:16:27,933 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 36 is on host 36
2023-07-11 14:16:27,933 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 37 is on host 37
2023-07-11 14:16:27,933 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 38 is on host 38
2023-07-11 14:16:27,933 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 39 is on host 39
2023-07-11 14:16:27,933 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 40 is on host 40
2023-07-11 14:16:27,934 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 41 is on host 41
2023-07-11 14:16:27,934 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 42 is on host 42
2023-07-11 14:16:27,934 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 43 is on host 43
2023-07-11 14:16:27,934 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 44 is on host 44
2023-07-11 14:16:27,934 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 45 is on host 45
2023-07-11 14:16:27,934 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 46 is on host 46
2023-07-11 14:16:27,934 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 47 is on host 47
2023-07-11 14:16:27,934 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 48 is on host 48
2023-07-11 14:16:27,934 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 49 is on host 49
2023-07-11 14:16:27,934 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 50 is on host 50
2023-07-11 14:16:27,934 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 51 is on host 51
2023-07-11 14:16:27,934 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 52 is on host 52
2023-07-11 14:16:27,934 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 53 is on host 53
2023-07-11 14:16:27,934 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 54 is on host 54
2023-07-11 14:16:27,934 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 55 is on host 55
2023-07-11 14:16:27,934 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 56 is on host 56
2023-07-11 14:16:27,934 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 57 is on host 57
2023-07-11 14:16:27,934 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 58 is on host 58
2023-07-11 14:16:27,934 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 59 is on host 59
2023-07-11 14:16:27,934 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 60 is on host 60
2023-07-11 14:16:27,934 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 61 is on host 61
2023-07-11 14:16:27,934 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 62 is on host 62
2023-07-11 14:16:27,934 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 63 is on host 63
2023-07-11 14:16:27,934 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 64 is on host 64
2023-07-11 14:16:27,934 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 65 is on host 65
2023-07-11 14:16:27,934 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 66 is on host 66
2023-07-11 14:16:27,934 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 67 is on host 67
2023-07-11 14:16:27,934 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 68 is on host 68
2023-07-11 14:16:27,934 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 69 is on host 69
2023-07-11 14:16:27,935 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 70 is on host 70
2023-07-11 14:16:27,935 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 71 is on host 71
2023-07-11 14:16:27,935 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 72 is on host 72
2023-07-11 14:16:27,935 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 73 is on host 73
2023-07-11 14:16:27,935 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 74 is on host 74
2023-07-11 14:16:27,935 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 75 is on host 75
2023-07-11 14:16:27,935 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 76 is on host 76
2023-07-11 14:16:27,935 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 77 is on host 77
2023-07-11 14:16:27,935 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 78 is on host 78
2023-07-11 14:16:27,935 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 79 is on host 79
2023-07-11 14:16:27,935 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 80 is on host 80
2023-07-11 14:16:27,935 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 81 is on host 81
2023-07-11 14:16:27,935 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 82 is on host 82
2023-07-11 14:16:27,935 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 83 is on host 83
2023-07-11 14:16:27,935 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 84 is on host 84
2023-07-11 14:16:27,935 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 85 is on host 85
2023-07-11 14:16:27,935 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 86 is on host 86
2023-07-11 14:16:27,935 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 87 is on host 87
2023-07-11 14:16:27,935 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 88 is on host 88
2023-07-11 14:16:27,935 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 89 is on host 89
2023-07-11 14:16:27,935 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 90 is on host 90
2023-07-11 14:16:27,935 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 91 is on host 91
2023-07-11 14:16:27,935 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 92 is on host 92
2023-07-11 14:16:27,935 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 93 is on host 93
2023-07-11 14:16:27,935 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 94 is on host 94
2023-07-11 14:16:27,935 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 95 is on host 95
2023-07-11 14:16:27,935 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 96 is on host 96
2023-07-11 14:16:27,935 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 97 is on host 97
2023-07-11 14:16:27,935 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 98 is on host 98
2023-07-11 14:16:27,935 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 99 is on host 99
2023-07-11 14:16:27,936 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 100 is on host 100
2023-07-11 14:16:27,936 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 101 is on host 101
2023-07-11 14:16:27,936 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 102 is on host 102
2023-07-11 14:16:27,936 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 103 is on host 103
2023-07-11 14:16:27,936 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 104 is on host 104
2023-07-11 14:16:27,936 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 105 is on host 105
2023-07-11 14:16:27,936 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 106 is on host 106
2023-07-11 14:16:27,936 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 107 is on host 107
2023-07-11 14:16:27,936 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 108 is on host 108
2023-07-11 14:16:27,936 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 109 is on host 109
2023-07-11 14:16:27,936 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 110 is on host 110
2023-07-11 14:16:27,936 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 111 is on host 111
2023-07-11 14:16:27,936 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 112 is on host 112
2023-07-11 14:16:27,936 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 113 is on host 113
2023-07-11 14:16:27,936 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 114 is on host 114
2023-07-11 14:16:27,936 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 115 is on host 115
2023-07-11 14:16:27,936 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 116 is on host 116
2023-07-11 14:16:27,936 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 117 is on host 117
2023-07-11 14:16:27,936 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 118 is on host 118
2023-07-11 14:16:27,936 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 119 is on host 119
2023-07-11 14:16:27,936 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 120 is on host 120
2023-07-11 14:16:27,936 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 121 is on host 121
2023-07-11 14:16:27,936 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 122 is on host 122
2023-07-11 14:16:27,936 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 123 is on host 123
2023-07-11 14:16:27,936 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 124 is on host 124
2023-07-11 14:16:27,936 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 125 is on host 125
2023-07-11 14:16:27,936 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 126 is on host 126
2023-07-11 14:16:27,936 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 127 is on host 127
2023-07-11 14:16:27,937 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 128 is on host 128
2023-07-11 14:16:27,937 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 129 is on host 129
2023-07-11 14:16:27,937 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 130 is on host 130
2023-07-11 14:16:27,937 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 131 is on host 131
2023-07-11 14:16:27,937 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 132 is on host 132
2023-07-11 14:16:27,937 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 133 is on host 133
2023-07-11 14:16:27,937 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 134 is on host 134
2023-07-11 14:16:27,937 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 135 is on host 135
2023-07-11 14:16:27,937 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 136 is on host 136
2023-07-11 14:16:27,937 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 137 is on host 137
2023-07-11 14:16:27,937 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 138 is on host 138
2023-07-11 14:16:27,937 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 139 is on host 139
2023-07-11 14:16:27,937 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 140 is on host 140
2023-07-11 14:16:27,937 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 141 is on host 141
2023-07-11 14:16:27,937 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 142 is on host 142
2023-07-11 14:16:27,937 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 143 is on host 143
2023-07-11 14:16:27,937 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 144 is on host 144
2023-07-11 14:16:27,937 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 145 is on host 145
2023-07-11 14:16:27,937 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 146 is on host 146
2023-07-11 14:16:27,937 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 147 is on host 147
2023-07-11 14:16:27,937 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 148 is on host 148
2023-07-11 14:16:27,937 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 149 is on host 149
2023-07-11 14:16:27,937 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 150 is on host 150
2023-07-11 14:16:27,937 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 151 is on host 151
2023-07-11 14:16:27,937 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 152 is on host 152
2023-07-11 14:16:27,937 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 153 is on host 153
2023-07-11 14:16:27,938 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 154 is on host 154
2023-07-11 14:16:27,938 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 155 is on host 155
2023-07-11 14:16:27,938 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 156 is on host 156
2023-07-11 14:16:27,938 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 157 is on host 157
2023-07-11 14:16:27,938 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 158 is on host 158
2023-07-11 14:16:27,938 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 159 is on host 159
2023-07-11 14:16:27,938 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 160 is on host 160
2023-07-11 14:16:27,938 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 161 is on host 161
2023-07-11 14:16:27,938 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 162 is on host 162
2023-07-11 14:16:27,938 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 163 is on host 163
2023-07-11 14:16:27,938 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 164 is on host 164
2023-07-11 14:16:27,938 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 165 is on host 165
2023-07-11 14:16:27,938 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 166 is on host 166
2023-07-11 14:16:27,938 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 167 is on host 167
2023-07-11 14:16:27,938 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 168 is on host 168
2023-07-11 14:16:27,938 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 169 is on host 169
2023-07-11 14:16:27,938 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 170 is on host 170
2023-07-11 14:16:27,938 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 171 is on host 171
2023-07-11 14:16:27,938 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 172 is on host 172
2023-07-11 14:16:27,938 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 173 is on host 173
2023-07-11 14:16:27,938 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 174 is on host 174
2023-07-11 14:16:27,938 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 175 is on host 175
2023-07-11 14:16:27,938 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 176 is on host 176
2023-07-11 14:16:27,938 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 177 is on host 177
2023-07-11 14:16:27,938 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 178 is on host 178
2023-07-11 14:16:27,938 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 179 is on host 179
2023-07-11 14:16:27,938 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 180 is on host 180
2023-07-11 14:16:27,938 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 181 is on host 181
2023-07-11 14:16:27,938 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 182 is on host 182
2023-07-11 14:16:27,939 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 183 is on host 183
2023-07-11 14:16:27,939 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 184 is on host 184
2023-07-11 14:16:27,939 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 185 is on host 185
2023-07-11 14:16:27,939 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 186 is on host 186
2023-07-11 14:16:27,939 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 187 is on host 187
2023-07-11 14:16:27,939 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 188 is on host 188
2023-07-11 14:16:27,939 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 189 is on host 189
2023-07-11 14:16:27,939 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 190 is on host 190
2023-07-11 14:16:27,939 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 191 is on host 191
2023-07-11 14:16:27,939 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 192 is on host 192
2023-07-11 14:16:27,939 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 193 is on host 193
2023-07-11 14:16:27,939 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 194 is on host 194
2023-07-11 14:16:27,939 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 195 is on host 195
2023-07-11 14:16:27,939 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 196 is on host 196
2023-07-11 14:16:27,939 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 197 is on host 197
2023-07-11 14:16:27,939 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 198 is on host 198
2023-07-11 14:16:27,939 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 199 is on host 199
2023-07-11 14:16:27,939 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 200 is on host 200
2023-07-11 14:16:27,939 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 201 is on host 201
2023-07-11 14:16:27,939 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 202 is on host 202
2023-07-11 14:16:27,939 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 203 is on host 203
2023-07-11 14:16:27,939 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 204 is on host 204
2023-07-11 14:16:27,939 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 205 is on host 205
2023-07-11 14:16:27,939 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 206 is on host 206
2023-07-11 14:16:27,939 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 207 is on host 207
2023-07-11 14:16:27,939 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 208 is on host 208
2023-07-11 14:16:27,939 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 209 is on host 209
2023-07-11 14:16:27,939 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 210 is on host 210
2023-07-11 14:16:27,939 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 211 is on host 211
2023-07-11 14:16:27,940 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 212 is on host 212
2023-07-11 14:16:27,940 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 213 is on host 213
2023-07-11 14:16:27,940 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 214 is on host 214
2023-07-11 14:16:27,940 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 215 is on host 215
2023-07-11 14:16:27,940 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 216 is on host 216
2023-07-11 14:16:27,940 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 217 is on host 217
2023-07-11 14:16:27,940 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 218 is on host 218
2023-07-11 14:16:27,940 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 219 is on host 219
2023-07-11 14:16:27,940 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 220 is on host 220
2023-07-11 14:16:27,940 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 221 is on host 221
2023-07-11 14:16:27,940 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 222 is on host 222
2023-07-11 14:16:27,940 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 223 is on host 223
2023-07-11 14:16:27,940 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 224 is on host 224
2023-07-11 14:16:27,940 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 225 is on host 225
2023-07-11 14:16:27,940 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 226 is on host 226
2023-07-11 14:16:27,940 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 227 is on host 227
2023-07-11 14:16:27,940 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 228 is on host 228
2023-07-11 14:16:27,940 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 229 is on host 229
2023-07-11 14:16:27,940 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 230 is on host 230
2023-07-11 14:16:27,940 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 231 is on host 231
2023-07-11 14:16:27,940 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 232 is on host 232
2023-07-11 14:16:27,940 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 233 is on host 233
2023-07-11 14:16:27,940 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 234 is on host 234
2023-07-11 14:16:27,940 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 235 is on host 235
2023-07-11 14:16:27,940 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 236 is on host 236
2023-07-11 14:16:27,940 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 237 is on host 237
2023-07-11 14:16:27,940 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 238 is on host 238
2023-07-11 14:16:27,940 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 239 is on host 239
2023-07-11 14:16:27,940 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 240 is on host 240
2023-07-11 14:16:27,941 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 241 is on host 241
2023-07-11 14:16:27,941 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 242 is on host 242
2023-07-11 14:16:27,941 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 243 is on host 243
2023-07-11 14:16:27,941 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 244 is on host 244
2023-07-11 14:16:27,941 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 245 is on host 245
2023-07-11 14:16:27,941 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 246 is on host 246
2023-07-11 14:16:27,941 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 247 is on host 247
2023-07-11 14:16:27,941 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 248 is on host 248
2023-07-11 14:16:27,941 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 249 is on host 249
2023-07-11 14:16:27,941 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 250 is on host 250
2023-07-11 14:16:27,941 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 251 is on host 251
2023-07-11 14:16:27,941 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 252 is on host 252
2023-07-11 14:16:27,941 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 253 is on host 253
2023-07-11 14:16:27,941 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 254 is on host 254
2023-07-11 14:16:27,941 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 255 is on host 255
2023-07-11 14:16:27,941 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 256 is on host 256
2023-07-11 14:16:27,941 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 257 is on host 257
2023-07-11 14:16:27,941 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 258 is on host 258
2023-07-11 14:16:27,941 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 259 is on host 259
2023-07-11 14:16:27,941 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 260 is on host 260
2023-07-11 14:16:27,941 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 261 is on host 261
2023-07-11 14:16:27,941 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 262 is on host 262
2023-07-11 14:16:27,941 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 263 is on host 263
2023-07-11 14:16:27,941 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 264 is on host 264
2023-07-11 14:16:27,941 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 265 is on host 265
2023-07-11 14:16:27,941 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 266 is on host 266
2023-07-11 14:16:27,941 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 267 is on host 267
2023-07-11 14:16:27,941 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 268 is on host 268
2023-07-11 14:16:27,941 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 269 is on host 269
2023-07-11 14:16:27,942 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 270 is on host 270
2023-07-11 14:16:27,942 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 271 is on host 271
2023-07-11 14:16:27,942 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 272 is on host 272
2023-07-11 14:16:27,942 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 273 is on host 273
2023-07-11 14:16:27,942 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 274 is on host 274
2023-07-11 14:16:27,942 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 275 is on host 275
2023-07-11 14:16:27,942 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 276 is on host 276
2023-07-11 14:16:27,942 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 277 is on host 277
2023-07-11 14:16:27,942 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 278 is on host 278
2023-07-11 14:16:27,942 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 279 is on host 279
2023-07-11 14:16:27,942 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 280 is on host 280
2023-07-11 14:16:27,942 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 281 is on host 281
2023-07-11 14:16:27,942 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 282 is on host 282
2023-07-11 14:16:27,942 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 283 is on host 283
2023-07-11 14:16:27,942 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 284 is on host 284
2023-07-11 14:16:27,942 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 285 is on host 285
2023-07-11 14:16:27,942 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 286 is on host 286
2023-07-11 14:16:27,942 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 287 is on host 287
2023-07-11 14:16:27,942 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 288 is on host 288
2023-07-11 14:16:27,942 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 289 is on host 289
2023-07-11 14:16:27,942 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 290 is on host 290
2023-07-11 14:16:27,942 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 291 is on host 291
2023-07-11 14:16:27,942 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 292 is on host 292
2023-07-11 14:16:27,942 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 293 is on host 293
2023-07-11 14:16:27,942 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 294 is on host 294
2023-07-11 14:16:27,942 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 295 is on host 295
2023-07-11 14:16:27,942 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 296 is on host 296
2023-07-11 14:16:27,942 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 297 is on host 297
2023-07-11 14:16:27,942 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 298 is on host 298
2023-07-11 14:16:27,943 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 299 is on host 299
2023-07-11 14:16:27,943 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 300 is on host 300
2023-07-11 14:16:27,943 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 301 is on host 301
2023-07-11 14:16:27,943 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 302 is on host 302
2023-07-11 14:16:27,943 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 303 is on host 303
2023-07-11 14:16:27,943 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 304 is on host 304
2023-07-11 14:16:27,943 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 305 is on host 305
2023-07-11 14:16:27,943 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 306 is on host 306
2023-07-11 14:16:27,943 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 307 is on host 307
2023-07-11 14:16:27,943 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 308 is on host 308
2023-07-11 14:16:27,943 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 309 is on host 309
2023-07-11 14:16:27,943 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 310 is on host 310
2023-07-11 14:16:27,943 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 311 is on host 311
2023-07-11 14:16:27,943 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 312 is on host 312
2023-07-11 14:16:27,943 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 313 is on host 313
2023-07-11 14:16:27,943 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 314 is on host 314
2023-07-11 14:16:27,943 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 315 is on host 315
2023-07-11 14:16:27,943 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 316 is on host 316
2023-07-11 14:16:27,943 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 317 is on host 317
2023-07-11 14:16:27,944 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 318 is on host 318
2023-07-11 14:16:27,944 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 319 is on host 319
2023-07-11 14:16:27,944 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 320 is on host 320
2023-07-11 14:16:27,944 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 321 is on host 321
2023-07-11 14:16:27,944 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 322 is on host 322
2023-07-11 14:16:27,944 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 323 is on host 323
2023-07-11 14:16:27,944 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 324 is on host 324
2023-07-11 14:16:27,944 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 325 is on host 325
2023-07-11 14:16:27,944 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 326 is on host 326
2023-07-11 14:16:27,944 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 327 is on host 327
2023-07-11 14:16:27,944 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 328 is on host 328
2023-07-11 14:16:27,944 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 329 is on host 329
2023-07-11 14:16:27,944 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 330 is on host 330
2023-07-11 14:16:27,944 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 331 is on host 331
2023-07-11 14:16:27,944 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 332 is on host 332
2023-07-11 14:16:27,944 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 333 is on host 333
2023-07-11 14:16:27,944 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 334 is on host 334
2023-07-11 14:16:27,944 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 335 is on host 335
2023-07-11 14:16:27,944 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 336 is on host 336
2023-07-11 14:16:27,944 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 337 is on host 337
2023-07-11 14:16:27,944 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 338 is on host 338
2023-07-11 14:16:27,944 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 339 is on host 339
2023-07-11 14:16:27,944 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 340 is on host 340
2023-07-11 14:16:27,944 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 341 is on host 341
2023-07-11 14:16:27,944 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 342 is on host 342
2023-07-11 14:16:27,944 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 343 is on host 343
2023-07-11 14:16:27,944 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 344 is on host 344
2023-07-11 14:16:27,944 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 345 is on host 345
2023-07-11 14:16:27,945 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 346 is on host 346
2023-07-11 14:16:27,945 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 347 is on host 347
2023-07-11 14:16:27,945 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 348 is on host 348
2023-07-11 14:16:27,945 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 349 is on host 349
2023-07-11 14:16:27,945 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 350 is on host 350
2023-07-11 14:16:27,945 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 351 is on host 351
2023-07-11 14:16:27,945 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 352 is on host 352
2023-07-11 14:16:27,945 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 353 is on host 353
2023-07-11 14:16:27,945 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 354 is on host 354
2023-07-11 14:16:27,945 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 355 is on host 355
2023-07-11 14:16:27,945 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 356 is on host 356
2023-07-11 14:16:27,945 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 357 is on host 357
2023-07-11 14:16:27,945 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 358 is on host 358
2023-07-11 14:16:27,945 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 359 is on host 359
2023-07-11 14:16:27,945 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 360 is on host 360
2023-07-11 14:16:27,945 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 361 is on host 361
2023-07-11 14:16:27,945 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 362 is on host 362
2023-07-11 14:16:27,945 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 363 is on host 363
2023-07-11 14:16:27,945 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 364 is on host 364
2023-07-11 14:16:27,945 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 365 is on host 365
2023-07-11 14:16:27,945 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 366 is on host 366
2023-07-11 14:16:27,945 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 367 is on host 367
2023-07-11 14:16:27,945 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 368 is on host 368
2023-07-11 14:16:27,945 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 369 is on host 369
2023-07-11 14:16:27,945 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 370 is on host 370
2023-07-11 14:16:27,945 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 371 is on host 371
2023-07-11 14:16:27,945 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 372 is on host 372
2023-07-11 14:16:27,945 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 373 is on host 373
2023-07-11 14:16:27,945 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 374 is on host 374
2023-07-11 14:16:27,946 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 375 is on host 375
2023-07-11 14:16:27,946 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 376 is on host 376
2023-07-11 14:16:27,946 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 377 is on host 377
2023-07-11 14:16:27,946 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 378 is on host 378
2023-07-11 14:16:27,946 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 379 is on host 379
2023-07-11 14:16:27,946 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 380 is on host 380
2023-07-11 14:16:27,946 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 381 is on host 381
2023-07-11 14:16:27,946 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 382 is on host 382
2023-07-11 14:16:27,946 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 383 is on host 383
2023-07-11 14:16:27,946 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 384 is on host 384
2023-07-11 14:16:27,946 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 385 is on host 385
2023-07-11 14:16:27,946 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 386 is on host 386
2023-07-11 14:16:27,946 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 387 is on host 387
2023-07-11 14:16:27,946 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 388 is on host 388
2023-07-11 14:16:27,946 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 389 is on host 389
2023-07-11 14:16:27,946 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 390 is on host 390
2023-07-11 14:16:27,946 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 391 is on host 391
2023-07-11 14:16:27,946 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 392 is on host 392
2023-07-11 14:16:27,946 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=393, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:27,946 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:27,947 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table0
2023-07-11 14:16:27,947 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv553536953=290, srv1630071126=110, srv1071894870=12, srv23511728=232, srv658346947=323, srv2025338799=204, srv1397994335=64, srv1976766403=195, srv1644629726=118, srv957637734=381, srv2079182457=210, srv1749264468=139, srv2046129126=206, srv1595762596=104, srv603990852=307, srv1973073480=194, srv958856137=382, srv644066832=319, srv557062842=292, srv277765671=235, srv732221418=337, srv1769385567=143, srv224612199=228, srv714752528=334, srv362526040=256, srv581128949=296, srv2133511466=223, srv1144239257=30, srv320603627=245, srv1679952521=126, srv2122867873=222, srv1110067064=24, srv256251994=233, srv63261708=317, srv89837390=371, srv552104598=289, srv508952995=281, srv2096011353=214, srv1770417148=144, srv1246723478=42, srv929436444=378, srv2082192429=211, srv234917297=231, srv405700573=266, srv183644386=166, srv1488378513=85, srv173139715=136, srv1154180352=32, srv355693379=252, srv1407521654=66, srv496848057=275, srv1157975499=33, srv1806731027=162, srv1923102804=184, srv311102455=244, srv450011410=271, srv771515724=348, srv389183508=262, srv1249074416=43, srv2014575201=201, srv640847108=318, srv832363565=356, srv1970882134=192, srv2107358603=218, srv855766065=361, srv1336043388=55, srv29397186=237, srv982792848=390, srv976560524=386, srv101181760=3, srv1093549482=21, srv2018389395=202, srv2113483104=221, srv1778339118=149, srv1968709692=190, srv705221118=333, srv159600090=105, srv1919608486=180, srv981255102=389, srv807899713=353, srv755110395=344, srv1770594519=145, srv739692705=340, srv1076582671=16, srv693869315=330, srv1079048717=17, srv440657532=270, srv1636659280=115, srv2108739257=220, srv668373413=326, srv1003610393=2, srv1054229197=11, srv1868589627=172, srv2103522371=217, srv1000546271=0, srv951670617=380, srv2042909593=205, srv1865656038=171, srv1466355012=78, srv703662406=332, srv1418112884=70, srv1215580291=40, srv71833528=335, srv1580581635=103, srv1021032212=5, srv1080806312=19, srv1985601859=197, srv74471954=343, srv1647472319=119, srv2071553346=208, srv1632855171=112, srv1122009370=27, srv13613992=61, srv1630777154=111, srv301413669=239, srv550697728=288, srv1296023857=53, srv1724550977=133, srv1989290370=198, srv1926417985=185, srv1678097199=125, srv1461034373=76, srv614690415=311, srv2098345381=215, srv310463473=243, srv1011934105=4, srv148627129=84, srv305489318=240, srv1256534903=46, srv1289731445=52, srv1798844587=157, srv567113085=294, srv1119222501=26, srv2055117940=207, srv855898852=362, srv629224816=316, srv1075943554=15, srv625909061=315, srv1705591942=128, srv734225580=339, srv660107924=324, srv1381729938=62, srv1633483173=113, srv408265476=267, srv1776057793=148, srv1360253411=60, srv1511424834=90, srv1414162621=68, srv883343663=370, srv151859222=91, srv349144930=251, srv1991304034=199, srv1825887791=164, srv601657063=305, srv758932951=345, srv1651629087=120, srv1864623584=170, srv682957691=329, srv1500454146=88, srv1725962085=135, srv1659841448=121, srv1253206004=45, srv52354442=284, srv18508093=168, srv1427731921=73, srv561344974=293, srv721668125=336, srv1575482138=100, srv914128771=373, srv961487230=383, srv741332941=342, srv533032466=286, srv1574140987=99, srv2139849097=224, srv503902262=278, srv674807007=327, srv1786829855=153, srv2088727517=213, srv394366966=264, srv980089565=388, srv114594288=31, srv38296437=261, srv214835574=226, srv1887224977=176, srv1025509362=7, srv1577020334=102, srv524466665=285, srv393561021=263, srv759909927=346, srv763556514=347, srv786453030=349, srv2142935488=225, srv618111613=312, srv16254163=108, srv343211061=250, srv476075173=273, srv1269632212=47, srv333589612=246, srv499015361=276, srv836674186=357, srv1799191687=158, srv1446998035=74, srv1571774199=98, srv1115354947=25, srv333860881=247, srv1724152600=132, srv1598699299=106, srv177885829=151, srv472125887=272, srv1101339966=22, srv1424985362=72, srv1945569895=188, srv594128294=300, srv1026739237=8, srv842459828=358, srv878519137=366, srv1921260729=181, srv339110834=249, srv504099471=279, srv814253179=354, srv1643744885=116, srv1793847521=155, srv607234624=309, srv698219051=331, srv1688538732=127, srv666240078=325, srv1079284733=18, srv29210550=236, srv506181748=280, srv881313122=368, srv1945452576=187, srv597307897=303, srv1285120424=51, srv1887943816=177, srv1983604698=196, srv1805465940=161, srv309309336=242, srv1719756294=131, srv1349932676=58, srv1208486369=38, srv1643971570=117, srv1509331489=89, srv334105385=248, srv1400515744=65, srv369984715=259, srv43712162=269, srv842675864=359, srv1803258748=160, srv1022450918=6, srv1775108732=147, srv1766088250=141, srv180150732=159, srv1220857227=41, srv226530501=229, srv362032108=255, srv919715380=377, srv1074935976=14, srv1395030819=63, srv803291569=352, srv1877966766=175, srv220538712=227, srv2021718843=203, srv2107782185=219, srv882216860=369, srv1489137852=86, srv1972328734=193, srv1470759982=79, srv1774824811=146, srv971974774=384, srv1418242791=71, srv1001274196=1, srv909615097=372, srv1537724566=93, srv1165799954=34, srv1724754364=134, srv978173525=387, srv113319438=29, srv578033735=295, srv147931272=80, srv1183635941=35, srv1904215245=178, srv596349756=302, srv880835255=367, srv857544550=364, srv1779729022=152, srv1795612465=156, srv621083045=314, srv917704170=375, srv1351811120=59, srv1316710897=54, srv789820555=350, srv1922580095=183, srv305567304=241, srv1936745425=186, srv1745318024=138, srv1210822057=39, srv645375717=320, srv950628389=379, srv1490199189=87, srv1575919256=101, srv154481102=96, srv359402967=254, srv997716931=391, srv1457224273=75, srv581644449=297, srv1872374768=174, srv363177310=257, srv740327512=341, srv1664227236=123, srv972330517=385, srv1634261306=114, srv1662183707=122, srv1969046891=191, srv1485266211=82, srv1778842262=150, srv588410181=298, srv1921840985=182, srv591279493=299, srv37574565=260, srv1104147458=23, srv1190166330=36, srv652270371=322, srv1484309042=81, srv1560148463=97, srv618569548=313, srv2102708311=216, srv1084873074=20, srv517669556=283, srv918152084=376, srv649714317=321, srv1674484790=124, srv1339239880=56, srv1461073271=77, srv1125312901=28, srv25633292=234, srv516616923=282, srv299721745=238, srv604932433=308, srv1273702855=48, srv792183929=351, srv1042608200=10, srv1276335106=49, srv1486044644=83, srv676101698=328, srv998930892=392, srv200111276=200, srv1863083643=169, srv1737443479=137, srv872997185=365, srv821351126=355, srv852115805=360, srv1074355423=13, srv170952194=130, srv503430005=277, srv153887567=94, srv1415163001=69, srv1032737435=9, srv1840670515=167, srv1961921083=189, srv59745831=304, srv36715747=258, srv431547280=268, srv1524853580=92, srv1870059418=173, srv396010771=265, srv594457792=301, srv1755339428=140, srv1766275429=142, srv5565786=291, srv603898526=306, srv544570223=287, srv856030669=363, srv1542523468=95, srv915785747=374, srv356122213=253, srv1411875499=67, srv2077620970=209, srv1345529444=57, srv232339963=230, srv1250861076=44, srv1914875423=179, srv478619481=274, srv1202435626=37, srv1706089454=129, srv1810631201=163, srv1282644061=50, srv1625945288=109, srv733251129=338, srv2082830831=212, srv1612103540=107, srv612136291=310, srv1790004142=154, srv183394703=165} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:27,947 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:27,947 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:27,947 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:27,947 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:27,947 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:27,947 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:27,947 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-11 14:16:27,947 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-11 14:16:27,947 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-11 14:16:27,947 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-11 14:16:27,947 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 10 is on host 10
2023-07-11 14:16:27,948 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 11 is on host 11
2023-07-11 14:16:27,948 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 12 is on host 12
2023-07-11 14:16:27,948 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 13 is on host 13
2023-07-11 14:16:27,948 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 14 is on host 14
2023-07-11 14:16:27,948 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 15 is on host 15
2023-07-11 14:16:27,948 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 16 is on host 16
2023-07-11 14:16:27,948 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 17 is on host 17
2023-07-11 14:16:27,948 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 18 is on host 18
2023-07-11 14:16:27,948 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 19 is on host 19
2023-07-11 14:16:27,948 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 20 is on host 20
2023-07-11 14:16:27,948 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 21 is on host 21
2023-07-11 14:16:27,948 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 22 is on host 22
2023-07-11 14:16:27,948 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 23 is on host 23
2023-07-11 14:16:27,948 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 24 is on host 24
2023-07-11 14:16:27,948 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 25 is on host 25
2023-07-11 14:16:27,948 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 26 is on host 26
2023-07-11 14:16:27,948 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 27 is on host 27
2023-07-11 14:16:27,948 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 28 is on host 28
2023-07-11 14:16:27,948 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 29 is on host 29
2023-07-11 14:16:27,948 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 30 is on host 30
2023-07-11 14:16:27,948 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 31 is on host 31
2023-07-11 14:16:27,948 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 32 is on host 32
2023-07-11 14:16:27,948 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 33 is on host 33
2023-07-11 14:16:27,948 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 34 is on host 34
2023-07-11 14:16:27,948 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 35 is on host 35
2023-07-11 14:16:27,948 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 36 is on host 36
2023-07-11 14:16:27,948 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 37 is on host 37
2023-07-11 14:16:27,948 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 38 is on host 38
2023-07-11 14:16:27,948 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 39 is on host 39
2023-07-11 14:16:27,949 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 40 is on host 40
2023-07-11 14:16:27,949 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 41 is on host 41
2023-07-11 14:16:27,949 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 42 is on host 42
2023-07-11 14:16:27,949 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 43 is on host 43
2023-07-11 14:16:27,949 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 44 is on host 44
2023-07-11 14:16:27,949 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 45 is on host 45
2023-07-11 14:16:27,949 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 46 is on host 46
2023-07-11 14:16:27,949 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 47 is on host 47
2023-07-11 14:16:27,949 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 48 is on host 48
2023-07-11 14:16:27,949 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 49 is on host 49
2023-07-11 14:16:27,949 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 50 is on host 50
2023-07-11 14:16:27,949 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 51 is on host 51
2023-07-11 14:16:27,949 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 52 is on host 52
2023-07-11 14:16:27,949 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 53 is on host 53
2023-07-11 14:16:27,949 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 54 is on host 54
2023-07-11 14:16:27,949 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 55 is on host 55
2023-07-11 14:16:27,949 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 56 is on host 56
2023-07-11 14:16:27,949 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 57 is on host 57
2023-07-11 14:16:27,949 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 58 is on host 58
2023-07-11 14:16:27,949 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 59 is on host 59
2023-07-11 14:16:27,949 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 60 is on host 60
2023-07-11 14:16:27,949 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 61 is on host 61
2023-07-11 14:16:27,949 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 62 is on host 62
2023-07-11 14:16:27,949 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 63 is on host 63
2023-07-11 14:16:27,949 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 64 is on host 64
2023-07-11 14:16:27,949 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 65 is on host 65
2023-07-11 14:16:27,949 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 66 is on host 66
2023-07-11 14:16:27,949 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 67 is on host 67
2023-07-11 14:16:27,949 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 68 is on host 68
2023-07-11 14:16:27,950 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 69 is on host 69
2023-07-11 14:16:27,950 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 70 is on host 70
2023-07-11 14:16:27,950 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 71 is on host 71
2023-07-11 14:16:27,950 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 72 is on host 72
2023-07-11 14:16:27,950 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 73 is on host 73
2023-07-11 14:16:27,950 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 74 is on host 74
2023-07-11 14:16:27,950 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 75 is on host 75
2023-07-11 14:16:27,950 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 76 is on host 76
2023-07-11 14:16:27,950 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 77 is on host 77
2023-07-11 14:16:27,950 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 78 is on host 78
2023-07-11 14:16:27,950 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 79 is on host 79
2023-07-11 14:16:27,950 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 80 is on host 80
2023-07-11 14:16:27,950 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 81 is on host 81
2023-07-11 14:16:27,950 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 82 is on host 82
2023-07-11 14:16:27,950 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 83 is on host 83
2023-07-11 14:16:27,950 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 84 is on host 84
2023-07-11 14:16:27,950 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 85 is on host 85
2023-07-11 14:16:27,950 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 86 is on host 86
2023-07-11 14:16:27,950 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 87 is on host 87
2023-07-11 14:16:27,950 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 88 is on host 88
2023-07-11 14:16:27,950 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 89 is on host 89
2023-07-11 14:16:27,950 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 90 is on host 90
2023-07-11 14:16:27,950 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 91 is on host 91
2023-07-11 14:16:27,950 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 92 is on host 92
2023-07-11 14:16:27,950 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 93 is on host 93
2023-07-11 14:16:27,950 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 94 is on host 94
2023-07-11 14:16:27,950 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 95 is on host 95
2023-07-11 14:16:27,950 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 96 is on host 96
2023-07-11 14:16:27,950 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 97 is on host 97
2023-07-11 14:16:27,951 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 98 is on host 98
2023-07-11 14:16:27,951 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 99 is on host 99
2023-07-11 14:16:27,951 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 100 is on host 100
2023-07-11 14:16:27,951 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 101 is on host 101
2023-07-11 14:16:27,951 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 102 is on host 102
2023-07-11 14:16:27,951 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 103 is on host 103
2023-07-11 14:16:27,951 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 104 is on host 104
2023-07-11 14:16:27,951 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 105 is on host 105
2023-07-11 14:16:27,951 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 106 is on host 106
2023-07-11 14:16:27,951 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 107 is on host 107
2023-07-11 14:16:27,951 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 108 is on host 108
2023-07-11 14:16:27,951 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 109 is on host 109
2023-07-11 14:16:27,951 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 110 is on host 110
2023-07-11 14:16:27,951 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 111 is on host 111
2023-07-11 14:16:27,951 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 112 is on host 112
2023-07-11 14:16:27,951 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 113 is on host 113
2023-07-11 14:16:27,951 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 114 is on host 114
2023-07-11 14:16:27,951 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 115 is on host 115
2023-07-11 14:16:27,951 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 116 is on host 116
2023-07-11 14:16:27,951 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 117 is on host 117
2023-07-11 14:16:27,951 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 118 is on host 118
2023-07-11 14:16:27,951 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 119 is on host 119
2023-07-11 14:16:27,951 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 120 is on host 120
2023-07-11 14:16:27,951 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 121 is on host 121
2023-07-11 14:16:27,951 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 122 is on host 122
2023-07-11 14:16:27,951 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 123 is on host 123
2023-07-11 14:16:27,951 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 124 is on host 124
2023-07-11 14:16:27,951 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 125 is on host 125
2023-07-11 14:16:27,951 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 126 is on host 126
2023-07-11 14:16:27,952 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 127 is on host 127
2023-07-11 14:16:27,952 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 128 is on host 128
2023-07-11 14:16:27,952 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 129 is on host 129
2023-07-11 14:16:27,952 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 130 is on host 130
2023-07-11 14:16:27,952 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 131 is on host 131
2023-07-11 14:16:27,952 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 132 is on host 132
2023-07-11 14:16:27,952 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 133 is on host 133
2023-07-11 14:16:27,952 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 134 is on host 134
2023-07-11 14:16:27,952 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 135 is on host 135
2023-07-11 14:16:27,952 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 136 is on host 136
2023-07-11 14:16:27,952 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 137 is on host 137
2023-07-11 14:16:27,952 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 138 is on host 138
2023-07-11 14:16:27,952 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 139 is on host 139
2023-07-11 14:16:27,952 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 140 is on host 140
2023-07-11 14:16:27,952 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 141 is on host 141
2023-07-11 14:16:27,952 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 142 is on host 142
2023-07-11 14:16:27,952 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 143 is on host 143
2023-07-11 14:16:27,952 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 144 is on host 144
2023-07-11 14:16:27,952 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 145 is on host 145
2023-07-11 14:16:27,952 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 146 is on host 146
2023-07-11 14:16:27,952 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 147 is on host 147
2023-07-11 14:16:27,952 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 148 is on host 148
2023-07-11 14:16:27,952 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 149 is on host 149
2023-07-11 14:16:27,952 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 150 is on host 150
2023-07-11 14:16:27,952 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 151 is on host 151
2023-07-11 14:16:27,952 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 152 is on host 152
2023-07-11 14:16:27,952 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 153 is on host 153
2023-07-11 14:16:27,952 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 154 is on host 154
2023-07-11 14:16:27,952 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 155 is on host 155
2023-07-11 14:16:27,953 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 156 is on host 156
2023-07-11 14:16:27,953 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 157 is on host 157
2023-07-11 14:16:27,953 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 158 is on host 158
2023-07-11 14:16:27,953 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 159 is on host 159
2023-07-11 14:16:27,953 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 160 is on host 160
2023-07-11 14:16:27,953 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 161 is on host 161
2023-07-11 14:16:27,953 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 162 is on host 162
2023-07-11 14:16:27,953 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 163 is on host 163
2023-07-11 14:16:27,953 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 164 is on host 164
2023-07-11 14:16:27,953 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 165 is on host 165
2023-07-11 14:16:27,953 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 166 is on host 166
2023-07-11 14:16:27,953 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 167 is on host 167
2023-07-11 14:16:27,953 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 168 is on host 168
2023-07-11 14:16:27,953 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 169 is on host 169
2023-07-11 14:16:27,953 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 170 is on host 170
2023-07-11 14:16:27,953 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 171 is on host 171
2023-07-11 14:16:27,953 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 172 is on host 172
2023-07-11 14:16:27,953 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 173 is on host 173
2023-07-11 14:16:27,953 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 174 is on host 174
2023-07-11 14:16:27,953 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 175 is on host 175
2023-07-11 14:16:27,953 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 176 is on host 176
2023-07-11 14:16:27,953 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 177 is on host 177
2023-07-11 14:16:27,953 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 178 is on host 178
2023-07-11 14:16:27,953 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 179 is on host 179
2023-07-11 14:16:27,953 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 180 is on host 180
2023-07-11 14:16:27,953 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 181 is on host 181
2023-07-11 14:16:27,953 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 182 is on host 182
2023-07-11 14:16:27,953 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 183 is on host 183
2023-07-11 14:16:27,953 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 184 is on host 184
2023-07-11 14:16:27,954 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 185 is on host 185
2023-07-11 14:16:27,954 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 186 is on host 186
2023-07-11 14:16:27,954 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 187 is on host 187
2023-07-11 14:16:27,954 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 188 is on host 188
2023-07-11 14:16:27,954 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 189 is on host 189
2023-07-11 14:16:27,954 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 190 is on host 190
2023-07-11 14:16:27,954 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 191 is on host 191
2023-07-11 14:16:27,954 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 192 is on host 192
2023-07-11 14:16:27,954 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 193 is on host 193
2023-07-11 14:16:27,954 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 194 is on host 194
2023-07-11 14:16:27,954 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 195 is on host 195
2023-07-11 14:16:27,954 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 196 is on host 196
2023-07-11 14:16:27,954 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 197 is on host 197
2023-07-11 14:16:27,954 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 198 is on host 198
2023-07-11 14:16:27,954 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 199 is on host 199
2023-07-11 14:16:27,954 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 200 is on host 200
2023-07-11 14:16:27,954 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 201 is on host 201
2023-07-11 14:16:27,954 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 202 is on host 202
2023-07-11 14:16:27,954 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 203 is on host 203
2023-07-11 14:16:27,954 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 204 is on host 204
2023-07-11 14:16:27,954 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 205 is on host 205
2023-07-11 14:16:27,954 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 206 is on host 206
2023-07-11 14:16:27,954 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 207 is on host 207
2023-07-11 14:16:27,954 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 208 is on host 208
2023-07-11 14:16:27,954 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 209 is on host 209
2023-07-11 14:16:27,955 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 210 is on host 210
2023-07-11 14:16:27,955 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 211 is on host 211
2023-07-11 14:16:27,955 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 212 is on host 212
2023-07-11 14:16:27,955 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 213 is on host 213
2023-07-11 14:16:27,955 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 214 is on host 214
2023-07-11 14:16:27,955 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 215 is on host 215
2023-07-11 14:16:27,955 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 216 is on host 216
2023-07-11 14:16:27,955 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 217 is on host 217
2023-07-11 14:16:27,955 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 218 is on host 218
2023-07-11 14:16:27,955 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 219 is on host 219
2023-07-11 14:16:27,955 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 220 is on host 220
2023-07-11 14:16:27,955 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 221 is on host 221
2023-07-11 14:16:27,955 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 222 is on host 222
2023-07-11 14:16:27,955 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 223 is on host 223
2023-07-11 14:16:27,955 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 224 is on host 224
2023-07-11 14:16:27,955 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 225 is on host 225
2023-07-11 14:16:27,955 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 226 is on host 226
2023-07-11 14:16:27,955 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 227 is on host 227
2023-07-11 14:16:27,955 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 228 is on host 228
2023-07-11 14:16:27,955 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 229 is on host 229
2023-07-11 14:16:27,955 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 230 is on host 230
2023-07-11 14:16:27,956 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 231 is on host 231
2023-07-11 14:16:27,956 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 232 is on host 232
2023-07-11 14:16:27,956 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 233 is on host 233
2023-07-11 14:16:27,956 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 234 is on host 234
2023-07-11 14:16:27,956 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 235 is on host 235
2023-07-11 14:16:27,956 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 236 is on host 236
2023-07-11 14:16:27,956 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 237 is on host 237
2023-07-11 14:16:27,956 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 238 is on host 238
2023-07-11 14:16:27,956 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 239 is on host 239
2023-07-11 14:16:27,956 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 240 is on host 240
2023-07-11 14:16:27,956 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 241 is on host 241
2023-07-11 14:16:27,956 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 242 is on host 242
2023-07-11 14:16:27,956 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 243 is on host 243
2023-07-11 14:16:27,956 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 244 is on host 244
2023-07-11 14:16:27,956 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 245 is on host 245
2023-07-11 14:16:27,956 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 246 is on host 246
2023-07-11 14:16:27,956 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 247 is on host 247
2023-07-11 14:16:27,956 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 248 is on host 248
2023-07-11 14:16:27,956 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 249 is on host 249
2023-07-11 14:16:27,956 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 250 is on host 250
2023-07-11 14:16:27,956 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 251 is on host 251
2023-07-11 14:16:27,956 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 252 is on host 252
2023-07-11 14:16:27,956 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 253 is on host 253
2023-07-11 14:16:27,956 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 254 is on host 254
2023-07-11 14:16:27,956 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 255 is on host 255
2023-07-11 14:16:27,956 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 256 is on host 256
2023-07-11 14:16:27,956 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 257 is on host 257
2023-07-11 14:16:27,956 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 258 is on host 258
2023-07-11 14:16:27,956 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 259 is on host 259
2023-07-11 14:16:27,957 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 260 is on host 260
2023-07-11 14:16:27,957 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 261 is on host 261
2023-07-11 14:16:27,957 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 262 is on host 262
2023-07-11 14:16:27,957 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 263 is on host 263
2023-07-11 14:16:27,957 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 264 is on host 264
2023-07-11 14:16:27,957 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 265 is on host 265
2023-07-11 14:16:27,957 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 266 is on host 266
2023-07-11 14:16:27,957 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 267 is on host 267
2023-07-11 14:16:27,957 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 268 is on host 268
2023-07-11 14:16:27,957 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 269 is on host 269
2023-07-11 14:16:27,957 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 270 is on host 270
2023-07-11 14:16:27,957 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 271 is on host 271
2023-07-11 14:16:27,957 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 272 is on host 272
2023-07-11 14:16:27,957 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 273 is on host 273
2023-07-11 14:16:27,957 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 274 is on host 274
2023-07-11 14:16:27,957 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 275 is on host 275
2023-07-11 14:16:27,957 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 276 is on host 276
2023-07-11 14:16:27,957 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 277 is on host 277
2023-07-11 14:16:27,957 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 278 is on host 278
2023-07-11 14:16:27,957 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 279 is on host 279
2023-07-11 14:16:27,957 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 280 is on host 280
2023-07-11 14:16:27,957 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 281 is on host 281
2023-07-11 14:16:27,957 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 282 is on host 282
2023-07-11 14:16:27,957 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 283 is on host 283
2023-07-11 14:16:27,957 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 284 is on host 284
2023-07-11 14:16:27,957 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 285 is on host 285
2023-07-11 14:16:27,957 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 286 is on host 286
2023-07-11 14:16:27,957 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 287 is on host 287
2023-07-11 14:16:27,958 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 288 is on host 288
2023-07-11 14:16:27,958 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 289 is on host 289
2023-07-11 14:16:27,958 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 290 is on host 290
2023-07-11 14:16:27,958 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 291 is on host 291
2023-07-11 14:16:27,958 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 292 is on host 292
2023-07-11 14:16:27,958 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 293 is on host 293
2023-07-11 14:16:27,958 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 294 is on host 294
2023-07-11 14:16:27,958 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 295 is on host 295
2023-07-11 14:16:27,958 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 296 is on host 296
2023-07-11 14:16:27,958 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 297 is on host 297
2023-07-11 14:16:27,958 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 298 is on host 298
2023-07-11 14:16:27,958 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 299 is on host 299
2023-07-11 14:16:27,958 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 300 is on host 300
2023-07-11 14:16:27,958 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 301 is on host 301
2023-07-11 14:16:27,958 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 302 is on host 302
2023-07-11 14:16:27,958 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 303 is on host 303
2023-07-11 14:16:27,958 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 304 is on host 304
2023-07-11 14:16:27,958 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 305 is on host 305
2023-07-11 14:16:27,958 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 306 is on host 306
2023-07-11 14:16:27,958 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 307 is on host 307
2023-07-11 14:16:27,958 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 308 is on host 308
2023-07-11 14:16:27,958 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 309 is on host 309
2023-07-11 14:16:27,958 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 310 is on host 310
2023-07-11 14:16:27,958 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 311 is on host 311
2023-07-11 14:16:27,958 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 312 is on host 312
2023-07-11 14:16:27,958 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 313 is on host 313
2023-07-11 14:16:27,958 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 314 is on host 314
2023-07-11 14:16:27,958 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 315 is on host 315
2023-07-11 14:16:27,958 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 316 is on host 316
2023-07-11 14:16:27,958 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 317 is on host 317
2023-07-11 14:16:27,959 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 318 is on host 318
2023-07-11 14:16:27,959 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 319 is on host 319
2023-07-11 14:16:27,959 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 320 is on host 320
2023-07-11 14:16:27,959 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 321 is on host 321
2023-07-11 14:16:27,959 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 322 is on host 322
2023-07-11 14:16:27,959 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 323 is on host 323
2023-07-11 14:16:27,959 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 324 is on host 324
2023-07-11 14:16:27,959 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 325 is on host 325
2023-07-11 14:16:27,959 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 326 is on host 326
2023-07-11 14:16:27,959 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 327 is on host 327
2023-07-11 14:16:27,959 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 328 is on host 328
2023-07-11 14:16:27,959 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 329 is on host 329
2023-07-11 14:16:27,959 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 330 is on host 330
2023-07-11 14:16:27,959 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 331 is on host 331
2023-07-11 14:16:27,959 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 332 is on host 332
2023-07-11 14:16:27,959 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 333 is on host 333
2023-07-11 14:16:27,959 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 334 is on host 334
2023-07-11 14:16:27,959 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 335 is on host 335
2023-07-11 14:16:27,959 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 336 is on host 336
2023-07-11 14:16:27,959 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 337 is on host 337
2023-07-11 14:16:27,959 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 338 is on host 338
2023-07-11 14:16:27,959 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 339 is on host 339
2023-07-11 14:16:27,959 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 340 is on host 340
2023-07-11 14:16:27,959 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 341 is on host 341
2023-07-11 14:16:27,959 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 342 is on host 342
2023-07-11 14:16:27,959 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 343 is on host 343
2023-07-11 14:16:27,959 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 344 is on host 344
2023-07-11 14:16:27,959 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 345 is on host 345
2023-07-11 14:16:27,959 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 346 is on host 346
2023-07-11 14:16:27,960 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 347 is on host 347
2023-07-11 14:16:27,960 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 348 is on host 348
2023-07-11 14:16:27,960 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 349 is on host 349
2023-07-11 14:16:27,960 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 350 is on host 350
2023-07-11 14:16:27,960 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 351 is on host 351
2023-07-11 14:16:27,960 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 352 is on host 352
2023-07-11 14:16:27,960 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 353 is on host 353
2023-07-11 14:16:27,960 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 354 is on host 354
2023-07-11 14:16:27,960 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 355 is on host 355
2023-07-11 14:16:27,960 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 356 is on host 356
2023-07-11 14:16:27,960 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 357 is on host 357
2023-07-11 14:16:27,960 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 358 is on host 358
2023-07-11 14:16:27,960 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 359 is on host 359
2023-07-11 14:16:27,960 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 360 is on host 360
2023-07-11 14:16:27,960 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 361 is on host 361
2023-07-11 14:16:27,960 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 362 is on host 362
2023-07-11 14:16:27,960 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 363 is on host 363
2023-07-11 14:16:27,960 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 364 is on host 364
2023-07-11 14:16:27,960 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 365 is on host 365
2023-07-11 14:16:27,960 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 366 is on host 366
2023-07-11 14:16:27,960 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 367 is on host 367
2023-07-11 14:16:27,960 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 368 is on host 368
2023-07-11 14:16:27,960 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 369 is on host 369
2023-07-11 14:16:27,960 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 370 is on host 370
2023-07-11 14:16:27,960 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 371 is on host 371
2023-07-11 14:16:27,960 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 372 is on host 372
2023-07-11 14:16:27,960 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 373 is on host 373
2023-07-11 14:16:27,960 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 374 is on host 374
2023-07-11 14:16:27,960 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 375 is on host 375
2023-07-11 14:16:27,961 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 376 is on host 376
2023-07-11 14:16:27,961 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 377 is on host 377
2023-07-11 14:16:27,961 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 378 is on host 378
2023-07-11 14:16:27,961 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 379 is on host 379
2023-07-11 14:16:27,961 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 380 is on host 380
2023-07-11 14:16:27,961 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 381 is on host 381
2023-07-11 14:16:27,961 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 382 is on host 382
2023-07-11 14:16:27,961 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 383 is on host 383
2023-07-11 14:16:27,961 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 384 is on host 384
2023-07-11 14:16:27,961 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 385 is on host 385
2023-07-11 14:16:27,961 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 386 is on host 386
2023-07-11 14:16:27,961 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 387 is on host 387
2023-07-11 14:16:27,961 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 388 is on host 388
2023-07-11 14:16:27,961 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 389 is on host 389
2023-07-11 14:16:27,961 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 390 is on host 390
2023-07-11 14:16:27,961 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 391 is on host 391
2023-07-11 14:16:27,961 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 392 is on host 392
2023-07-11 14:16:27,961 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=393, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:27,961 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table0) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:27,962 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table30
2023-07-11 14:16:27,962 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv553536953=290, srv1630071126=110, srv1071894870=12, srv23511728=232, srv658346947=323, srv2025338799=204, srv1397994335=64, srv1976766403=195, srv1644629726=118, srv957637734=381, srv2079182457=210, srv1749264468=139, srv2046129126=206, srv1595762596=104, srv603990852=307, srv1973073480=194, srv958856137=382, srv644066832=319, srv557062842=292, srv277765671=235, srv732221418=337, srv1769385567=143, srv224612199=228, srv714752528=334, srv362526040=256, srv581128949=296, srv2133511466=223, srv1144239257=30, srv320603627=245, srv1679952521=126, srv2122867873=222, srv1110067064=24, srv256251994=233, srv63261708=317, srv89837390=371, srv552104598=289, srv508952995=281, srv2096011353=214, srv1770417148=144, srv1246723478=42, srv929436444=378, srv2082192429=211, srv234917297=231, srv405700573=266, srv183644386=166, srv1488378513=85, srv173139715=136, srv1154180352=32, srv355693379=252, srv1407521654=66, srv496848057=275, srv1157975499=33, srv1806731027=162, srv1923102804=184, srv311102455=244, srv450011410=271, srv771515724=348, srv389183508=262, srv1249074416=43, srv2014575201=201, srv640847108=318, srv832363565=356, srv1970882134=192, srv2107358603=218, srv855766065=361, srv1336043388=55, srv29397186=237, srv982792848=390, srv976560524=386, srv101181760=3, srv1093549482=21, srv2018389395=202, srv2113483104=221, srv1778339118=149, srv1968709692=190, srv705221118=333, srv159600090=105, srv1919608486=180, srv981255102=389, srv807899713=353, srv755110395=344, srv1770594519=145, srv739692705=340, srv1076582671=16, srv693869315=330, srv1079048717=17, srv440657532=270, srv1636659280=115, srv2108739257=220, srv668373413=326, srv1003610393=2, srv1054229197=11, srv1868589627=172, srv2103522371=217, srv1000546271=0, srv951670617=380, srv2042909593=205, srv1865656038=171, srv1466355012=78, srv703662406=332, srv1418112884=70, srv1215580291=40, srv71833528=335, srv1580581635=103, srv1021032212=5, srv1080806312=19, srv1985601859=197, srv74471954=343, srv1647472319=119, srv2071553346=208, srv1632855171=112, srv1122009370=27, srv13613992=61, srv1630777154=111, srv301413669=239, srv550697728=288, srv1296023857=53, srv1724550977=133, srv1989290370=198, srv1926417985=185, srv1678097199=125, srv1461034373=76, srv614690415=311, srv2098345381=215, srv310463473=243, srv1011934105=4, srv148627129=84, srv305489318=240, srv1256534903=46, srv1289731445=52, srv1798844587=157, srv567113085=294, srv1119222501=26, srv2055117940=207, srv855898852=362, srv629224816=316, srv1075943554=15, srv625909061=315, srv1705591942=128, srv734225580=339, srv660107924=324, srv1381729938=62, srv1633483173=113, srv408265476=267, srv1776057793=148, srv1360253411=60, srv1511424834=90, srv1414162621=68, srv883343663=370, srv151859222=91, srv349144930=251, srv1991304034=199, srv1825887791=164, srv601657063=305, srv758932951=345, srv1651629087=120, srv1864623584=170, srv682957691=329, srv1500454146=88, srv1725962085=135, srv1659841448=121, srv1253206004=45, srv52354442=284, srv18508093=168, srv1427731921=73, srv561344974=293, srv721668125=336, srv1575482138=100, srv914128771=373, srv961487230=383, srv741332941=342, srv533032466=286, srv1574140987=99, srv2139849097=224, srv503902262=278, srv674807007=327, srv1786829855=153, srv2088727517=213, srv394366966=264, srv980089565=388, srv114594288=31, srv38296437=261, srv214835574=226, srv1887224977=176, srv1025509362=7, srv1577020334=102, srv524466665=285, srv393561021=263, srv759909927=346, srv763556514=347, srv786453030=349, srv2142935488=225, srv618111613=312, srv16254163=108, srv343211061=250, srv476075173=273, srv1269632212=47, srv333589612=246, srv499015361=276, srv836674186=357, srv1799191687=158, srv1446998035=74, srv1571774199=98, srv1115354947=25, srv333860881=247, srv1724152600=132, srv1598699299=106, srv177885829=151, srv472125887=272, srv1101339966=22, srv1424985362=72, srv1945569895=188, srv594128294=300, srv1026739237=8, srv842459828=358, srv878519137=366, srv1921260729=181, srv339110834=249, srv504099471=279, srv814253179=354, srv1643744885=116, srv1793847521=155, srv607234624=309, srv698219051=331, srv1688538732=127, srv666240078=325, srv1079284733=18, srv29210550=236, srv506181748=280, srv881313122=368, srv1945452576=187, srv597307897=303, srv1285120424=51, srv1887943816=177, srv1983604698=196, srv1805465940=161, srv309309336=242, srv1719756294=131, srv1349932676=58, srv1208486369=38, srv1643971570=117, srv1509331489=89, srv334105385=248, srv1400515744=65, srv369984715=259, srv43712162=269, srv842675864=359, srv1803258748=160, srv1022450918=6, srv1775108732=147, srv1766088250=141, srv180150732=159, srv1220857227=41, srv226530501=229, srv362032108=255, srv919715380=377, srv1074935976=14, srv1395030819=63, srv803291569=352, srv1877966766=175, srv220538712=227, srv2021718843=203, srv2107782185=219, srv882216860=369, srv1489137852=86, srv1972328734=193, srv1470759982=79, srv1774824811=146, srv971974774=384, srv1418242791=71, srv1001274196=1, srv909615097=372, srv1537724566=93, srv1165799954=34, srv1724754364=134, srv978173525=387, srv113319438=29, srv578033735=295, srv147931272=80, srv1183635941=35, srv1904215245=178, srv596349756=302, srv880835255=367, srv857544550=364, srv1779729022=152, srv1795612465=156, srv621083045=314, srv917704170=375, srv1351811120=59, srv1316710897=54, srv789820555=350, srv1922580095=183, srv305567304=241, srv1936745425=186, srv1745318024=138, srv1210822057=39, srv645375717=320, srv950628389=379, srv1490199189=87, srv1575919256=101, srv154481102=96, srv359402967=254, srv997716931=391, srv1457224273=75, srv581644449=297, srv1872374768=174, srv363177310=257, srv740327512=341, srv1664227236=123, srv972330517=385, srv1634261306=114, srv1662183707=122, srv1969046891=191, srv1485266211=82, srv1778842262=150, srv588410181=298, srv1921840985=182, srv591279493=299, srv37574565=260, srv1104147458=23, srv1190166330=36, srv652270371=322, srv1484309042=81, srv1560148463=97, srv618569548=313, srv2102708311=216, srv1084873074=20, srv517669556=283, srv918152084=376, srv649714317=321, srv1674484790=124, srv1339239880=56, srv1461073271=77, srv1125312901=28, srv25633292=234, srv516616923=282, srv299721745=238, srv604932433=308, srv1273702855=48, srv792183929=351, srv1042608200=10, srv1276335106=49, srv1486044644=83, srv676101698=328, srv998930892=392, srv200111276=200, srv1863083643=169, srv1737443479=137, srv872997185=365, srv821351126=355, srv852115805=360, srv1074355423=13, srv170952194=130, srv503430005=277, srv153887567=94, srv1415163001=69, srv1032737435=9, srv1840670515=167, srv1961921083=189, srv59745831=304, srv36715747=258, srv431547280=268, srv1524853580=92, srv1870059418=173, srv396010771=265, srv594457792=301, srv1755339428=140, srv1766275429=142, srv5565786=291, srv603898526=306, srv544570223=287, srv856030669=363, srv1542523468=95, srv915785747=374, srv356122213=253, srv1411875499=67, srv2077620970=209, srv1345529444=57, srv232339963=230, srv1250861076=44, srv1914875423=179, srv478619481=274, srv1202435626=37, srv1706089454=129, srv1810631201=163, srv1282644061=50, srv1625945288=109, srv733251129=338, srv2082830831=212, srv1612103540=107, srv612136291=310, srv1790004142=154, srv183394703=165} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:27,962 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:27,962 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:27,962 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:27,962 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:27,962 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:27,962 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:27,962 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-11 14:16:27,962 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-11 14:16:27,962 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-11 14:16:27,962 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-11 14:16:27,962 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 10 is on host 10
2023-07-11 14:16:27,963 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 11 is on host 11
2023-07-11 14:16:27,963 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 12 is on host 12
2023-07-11 14:16:27,963 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 13 is on host 13
2023-07-11 14:16:27,963 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 14 is on host 14
2023-07-11 14:16:27,963 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 15 is on host 15
2023-07-11 14:16:27,963 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 16 is on host 16
2023-07-11 14:16:27,963 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 17 is on host 17
2023-07-11 14:16:27,963 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 18 is on host 18
2023-07-11 14:16:27,963 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 19 is on host 19
2023-07-11 14:16:27,963 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 20 is on host 20
2023-07-11 14:16:27,963 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 21 is on host 21
2023-07-11 14:16:27,963 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 22 is on host 22
2023-07-11 14:16:27,963 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 23 is on host 23
2023-07-11 14:16:27,963 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 24 is on host 24
2023-07-11 14:16:27,963 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 25 is on host 25
2023-07-11 14:16:27,963 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 26 is on host 26
2023-07-11 14:16:27,963 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 27 is on host 27
2023-07-11 14:16:27,963 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 28 is on host 28
2023-07-11 14:16:27,963 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 29 is on host 29
2023-07-11 14:16:27,963 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 30 is on host 30
2023-07-11 14:16:27,963 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 31 is on host 31
2023-07-11 14:16:27,963 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 32 is on host 32
2023-07-11 14:16:27,963 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 33 is on host 33
2023-07-11 14:16:27,963 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 34 is on host 34
2023-07-11 14:16:27,963 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 35 is on host 35
2023-07-11 14:16:27,963 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 36 is on host 36
2023-07-11 14:16:27,963 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 37 is on host 37
2023-07-11 14:16:27,963 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 38 is on host 38
2023-07-11 14:16:27,963 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 39 is on host 39
2023-07-11 14:16:27,964 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 40 is on host 40
2023-07-11 14:16:27,964 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 41 is on host 41
2023-07-11 14:16:27,964 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 42 is on host 42
2023-07-11 14:16:27,964 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 43 is on host 43
2023-07-11 14:16:27,964 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 44 is on host 44
2023-07-11 14:16:27,964 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 45 is on host 45
2023-07-11 14:16:27,964 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 46 is on host 46
2023-07-11 14:16:27,964 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 47 is on host 47
2023-07-11 14:16:27,964 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 48 is on host 48
2023-07-11 14:16:27,964 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 49 is on host 49
2023-07-11 14:16:27,964 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 50 is on host 50
2023-07-11 14:16:27,964 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 51 is on host 51
2023-07-11 14:16:27,964 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 52 is on host 52
2023-07-11 14:16:27,964 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 53 is on host 53
2023-07-11 14:16:27,964 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 54 is on host 54
2023-07-11 14:16:27,964 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 55 is on host 55
2023-07-11 14:16:27,964 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 56 is on host 56
2023-07-11 14:16:27,964 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 57 is on host 57
2023-07-11 14:16:27,964 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 58 is on host 58
2023-07-11 14:16:27,964 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 59 is on host 59
2023-07-11 14:16:27,964 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 60 is on host 60
2023-07-11 14:16:27,964 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 61 is on host 61
2023-07-11 14:16:27,964 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 62 is on host 62
2023-07-11 14:16:27,964 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 63 is on host 63
2023-07-11 14:16:27,964 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 64 is on host 64
2023-07-11 14:16:27,964 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 65 is on host 65
2023-07-11 14:16:27,964 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 66 is on host 66
2023-07-11 14:16:27,964 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 67 is on host 67
2023-07-11 14:16:27,964 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 68 is on host 68
2023-07-11 14:16:27,965 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 69 is on host 69
2023-07-11 14:16:27,965 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 70 is on host 70
2023-07-11 14:16:27,965 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 71 is on host 71
2023-07-11 14:16:27,965 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 72 is on host 72
2023-07-11 14:16:27,965 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 73 is on host 73
2023-07-11 14:16:27,965 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 74 is on host 74
2023-07-11 14:16:27,965 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 75 is on host 75
2023-07-11 14:16:27,965 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 76 is on host 76
2023-07-11 14:16:27,965 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 77 is on host 77
2023-07-11 14:16:27,965 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 78 is on host 78
2023-07-11 14:16:27,965 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 79 is on host 79
2023-07-11 14:16:27,965 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 80 is on host 80
2023-07-11 14:16:27,965 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 81 is on host 81
2023-07-11 14:16:27,965 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 82 is on host 82
2023-07-11 14:16:27,965 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 83 is on host 83
2023-07-11 14:16:27,965 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 84 is on host 84
2023-07-11 14:16:27,965 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 85 is on host 85
2023-07-11 14:16:27,965 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 86 is on host 86
2023-07-11 14:16:27,965 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 87 is on host 87
2023-07-11 14:16:27,965 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 88 is on host 88
2023-07-11 14:16:27,965 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 89 is on host 89
2023-07-11 14:16:27,965 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 90 is on host 90
2023-07-11 14:16:27,965 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 91 is on host 91
2023-07-11 14:16:27,965 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 92 is on host 92
2023-07-11 14:16:27,965 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 93 is on host 93
2023-07-11 14:16:27,965 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 94 is on host 94
2023-07-11 14:16:27,965 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 95 is on host 95
2023-07-11 14:16:27,965 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 96 is on host 96
2023-07-11 14:16:27,965 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 97 is on host 97
2023-07-11 14:16:27,966 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 98 is on host 98
2023-07-11 14:16:27,966 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 99 is on host 99
2023-07-11 14:16:27,966 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 100 is on host 100
2023-07-11 14:16:27,966 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 101 is on host 101
2023-07-11 14:16:27,966 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 102 is on host 102
2023-07-11 14:16:27,966 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 103 is on host 103
2023-07-11 14:16:27,966 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 104 is on host 104
2023-07-11 14:16:27,966 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 105 is on host 105
2023-07-11 14:16:27,966 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 106 is on host 106
2023-07-11 14:16:27,966 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 107 is on host 107
2023-07-11 14:16:27,966 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 108 is on host 108
2023-07-11 14:16:27,966 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 109 is on host 109
2023-07-11 14:16:27,966 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 110 is on host 110
2023-07-11 14:16:27,966 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 111 is on host 111
2023-07-11 14:16:27,966 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 112 is on host 112
2023-07-11 14:16:27,966 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 113 is on host 113
2023-07-11 14:16:27,966 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 114 is on host 114
2023-07-11 14:16:27,966 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 115 is on host 115
2023-07-11 14:16:27,966 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 116 is on host 116
2023-07-11 14:16:27,966 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 117 is on host 117
2023-07-11 14:16:27,966 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 118 is on host 118
2023-07-11 14:16:27,967 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 119 is on host 119
2023-07-11 14:16:27,967 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 120 is on host 120
2023-07-11 14:16:27,967 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 121 is on host 121
2023-07-11 14:16:27,967 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 122 is on host 122
2023-07-11 14:16:27,967 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 123 is on host 123
2023-07-11 14:16:27,967 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 124 is on host 124
2023-07-11 14:16:27,967 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 125 is on host 125
2023-07-11 14:16:27,967 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 126 is on host 126
2023-07-11 14:16:27,967 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 127 is on host 127
2023-07-11 14:16:27,967 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 128 is on host 128
2023-07-11 14:16:27,967 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 129 is on host 129
2023-07-11 14:16:27,967 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 130 is on host 130
2023-07-11 14:16:27,967 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 131 is on host 131
2023-07-11 14:16:27,967 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 132 is on host 132
2023-07-11 14:16:27,967 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 133 is on host 133
2023-07-11 14:16:27,967 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 134 is on host 134
2023-07-11 14:16:27,967 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 135 is on host 135
2023-07-11 14:16:27,967 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 136 is on host 136
2023-07-11 14:16:27,967 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 137 is on host 137
2023-07-11 14:16:27,967 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 138 is on host 138
2023-07-11 14:16:27,967 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 139 is on host 139
2023-07-11 14:16:27,967 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 140 is on host 140
2023-07-11 14:16:27,967 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 141 is on host 141
2023-07-11 14:16:27,967 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 142 is on host 142
2023-07-11 14:16:27,967 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 143 is on host 143
2023-07-11 14:16:27,968 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 144 is on host 144
2023-07-11 14:16:27,968 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 145 is on host 145
2023-07-11 14:16:27,968 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 146 is on host 146
2023-07-11 14:16:27,968 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 147 is on host 147
2023-07-11 14:16:27,968 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 148 is on host 148
2023-07-11 14:16:27,968 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 149 is on host 149
2023-07-11 14:16:27,968 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 150 is on host 150
2023-07-11 14:16:27,968 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 151 is on host 151
2023-07-11 14:16:27,968 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 152 is on host 152
2023-07-11 14:16:27,968 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 153 is on host 153
2023-07-11 14:16:27,968 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 154 is on host 154
2023-07-11 14:16:27,968 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 155 is on host 155
2023-07-11 14:16:27,968 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 156 is on host 156
2023-07-11 14:16:27,968 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 157 is on host 157
2023-07-11 14:16:27,968 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 158 is on host 158
2023-07-11 14:16:27,968 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 159 is on host 159
2023-07-11 14:16:27,968 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 160 is on host 160
2023-07-11 14:16:27,968 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 161 is on host 161
2023-07-11 14:16:27,968 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 162 is on host 162
2023-07-11 14:16:27,968 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 163 is on host 163
2023-07-11 14:16:27,968 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 164 is on host 164
2023-07-11 14:16:27,968 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 165 is on host 165
2023-07-11 14:16:27,968 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 166 is on host 166
2023-07-11 14:16:27,968 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 167 is on host 167
2023-07-11 14:16:27,968 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 168 is on host 168
2023-07-11 14:16:27,968 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 169 is on host 169
2023-07-11 14:16:27,968 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 170 is on host 170
2023-07-11 14:16:27,968 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 171 is on host 171
2023-07-11 14:16:27,968 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 172 is on host 172
2023-07-11 14:16:27,969 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 173 is on host 173
2023-07-11 14:16:27,969 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 174 is on host 174
2023-07-11 14:16:27,969 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 175 is on host 175
2023-07-11 14:16:27,969 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 176 is on host 176
2023-07-11 14:16:27,969 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 177 is on host 177
2023-07-11 14:16:27,969 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 178 is on host 178
2023-07-11 14:16:27,969 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 179 is on host 179
2023-07-11 14:16:27,969 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 180 is on host 180
2023-07-11 14:16:27,969 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 181 is on host 181
2023-07-11 14:16:27,969 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 182 is on host 182
2023-07-11 14:16:27,969 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 183 is on host 183
2023-07-11 14:16:27,969 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 184 is on host 184
2023-07-11 14:16:27,969 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 185 is on host 185
2023-07-11 14:16:27,969 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 186 is on host 186
2023-07-11 14:16:27,969 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 187 is on host 187
2023-07-11 14:16:27,969 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 188 is on host 188
2023-07-11 14:16:27,969 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 189 is on host 189
2023-07-11 14:16:27,969 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 190 is on host 190
2023-07-11 14:16:27,969 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 191 is on host 191
2023-07-11 14:16:27,969 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 192 is on host 192
2023-07-11 14:16:27,969 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 193 is on host 193
2023-07-11 14:16:27,969 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 194 is on host 194
2023-07-11 14:16:27,969 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 195 is on host 195
2023-07-11 14:16:27,969 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 196 is on host 196
2023-07-11 14:16:27,969 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 197 is on host 197
2023-07-11 14:16:27,969 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 198 is on host 198
2023-07-11 14:16:27,969 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 199 is on host 199
2023-07-11 14:16:27,969 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 200 is on host 200
2023-07-11 14:16:27,969 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 201 is on host 201
2023-07-11 14:16:27,970 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 202 is on host 202
2023-07-11 14:16:27,970 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 203 is on host 203
2023-07-11 14:16:27,970 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 204 is on host 204
2023-07-11 14:16:27,970 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 205 is on host 205
2023-07-11 14:16:27,970 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 206 is on host 206
2023-07-11 14:16:27,970 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 207 is on host 207
2023-07-11 14:16:27,970 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 208 is on host 208
2023-07-11 14:16:27,970 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 209 is on host 209
2023-07-11 14:16:27,970 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 210 is on host 210
2023-07-11 14:16:27,970 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 211 is on host 211
2023-07-11 14:16:27,970 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 212 is on host 212
2023-07-11 14:16:27,970 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 213 is on host 213
2023-07-11 14:16:27,970 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 214 is on host 214
2023-07-11 14:16:27,970 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 215 is on host 215
2023-07-11 14:16:27,970 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 216 is on host 216
2023-07-11 14:16:27,970 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 217 is on host 217
2023-07-11 14:16:27,970 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 218 is on host 218
2023-07-11 14:16:27,970 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 219 is on host 219
2023-07-11 14:16:27,970 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 220 is on host 220
2023-07-11 14:16:27,970 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 221 is on host 221
2023-07-11 14:16:27,970 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 222 is on host 222
2023-07-11 14:16:27,970 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 223 is on host 223
2023-07-11 14:16:27,970 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 224 is on host 224
2023-07-11 14:16:27,970 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 225 is on host 225
2023-07-11 14:16:27,970 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 226 is on host 226
2023-07-11 14:16:27,970 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 227 is on host 227
2023-07-11 14:16:27,970 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 228 is on host 228
2023-07-11 14:16:27,970 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 229 is on host 229
2023-07-11 14:16:27,970 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 230 is on host 230
2023-07-11 14:16:27,971 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 231 is on host 231
2023-07-11 14:16:27,971 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 232 is on host 232
2023-07-11 14:16:27,971 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 233 is on host 233
2023-07-11 14:16:27,971 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 234 is on host 234
2023-07-11 14:16:27,971 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 235 is on host 235
2023-07-11 14:16:27,971 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 236 is on host 236
2023-07-11 14:16:27,971 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 237 is on host 237
2023-07-11 14:16:27,971 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 238 is on host 238
2023-07-11 14:16:27,971 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 239 is on host 239
2023-07-11 14:16:27,971 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 240 is on host 240
2023-07-11 14:16:27,971 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 241 is on host 241
2023-07-11 14:16:27,971 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 242 is on host 242
2023-07-11 14:16:27,971 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 243 is on host 243
2023-07-11 14:16:27,971 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 244 is on host 244
2023-07-11 14:16:27,971 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 245 is on host 245
2023-07-11 14:16:27,971 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 246 is on host 246
2023-07-11 14:16:27,971 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 247 is on host 247
2023-07-11 14:16:27,971 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 248 is on host 248
2023-07-11 14:16:27,971 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 249 is on host 249
2023-07-11 14:16:27,971 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 250 is on host 250
2023-07-11 14:16:27,971 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 251 is on host 251
2023-07-11 14:16:27,971 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 252 is on host 252
2023-07-11 14:16:27,971 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 253 is on host 253
2023-07-11 14:16:27,971 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 254 is on host 254
2023-07-11 14:16:27,971 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 255 is on host 255
2023-07-11 14:16:27,971 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 256 is on host 256
2023-07-11 14:16:27,971 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 257 is on host 257
2023-07-11 14:16:27,971 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 258 is on host 258
2023-07-11 14:16:27,971 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 259 is on host 259
2023-07-11 14:16:27,972 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 260 is on host 260
2023-07-11 14:16:27,972 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 261 is on host 261
2023-07-11 14:16:27,972 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 262 is on host 262
2023-07-11 14:16:27,972 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 263 is on host 263
2023-07-11 14:16:27,972 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 264 is on host 264
2023-07-11 14:16:27,972 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 265 is on host 265
2023-07-11 14:16:27,972 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 266 is on host 266
2023-07-11 14:16:27,972 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 267 is on host 267
2023-07-11 14:16:27,972 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 268 is on host 268
2023-07-11 14:16:27,972 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 269 is on host 269
2023-07-11 14:16:27,972 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 270 is on host 270
2023-07-11 14:16:27,972 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 271 is on host 271
2023-07-11 14:16:27,972 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 272 is on host 272
2023-07-11 14:16:27,972 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 273 is on host 273
2023-07-11 14:16:27,972 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 274 is on host 274
2023-07-11 14:16:27,972 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 275 is on host 275
2023-07-11 14:16:27,972 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 276 is on host 276
2023-07-11 14:16:27,972 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 277 is on host 277
2023-07-11 14:16:27,972 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 278 is on host 278
2023-07-11 14:16:27,972 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 279 is on host 279
2023-07-11 14:16:27,972 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 280 is on host 280
2023-07-11 14:16:27,972 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 281 is on host 281
2023-07-11 14:16:27,972 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 282 is on host 282
2023-07-11 14:16:27,972 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 283 is on host 283
2023-07-11 14:16:27,972 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 284 is on host 284
2023-07-11 14:16:27,972 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 285 is on host 285
2023-07-11 14:16:27,972 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 286 is on host 286
2023-07-11 14:16:27,972 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 287 is on host 287
2023-07-11 14:16:27,972 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 288 is on host 288
2023-07-11 14:16:27,973 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 289 is on host 289
2023-07-11 14:16:27,973 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 290 is on host 290
2023-07-11 14:16:27,973 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 291 is on host 291
2023-07-11 14:16:27,973 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 292 is on host 292
2023-07-11 14:16:27,973 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 293 is on host 293
2023-07-11 14:16:27,973 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 294 is on host 294
2023-07-11 14:16:27,973 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 295 is on host 295
2023-07-11 14:16:27,973 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 296 is on host 296
2023-07-11 14:16:27,973 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 297 is on host 297
2023-07-11 14:16:27,973 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 298 is on host 298
2023-07-11 14:16:27,973 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 299 is on host 299
2023-07-11 14:16:27,973 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 300 is on host 300
2023-07-11 14:16:27,973 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 301 is on host 301
2023-07-11 14:16:27,973 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 302 is on host 302
2023-07-11 14:16:27,973 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 303 is on host 303
2023-07-11 14:16:27,973 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 304 is on host 304
2023-07-11 14:16:27,973 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 305 is on host 305
2023-07-11 14:16:27,973 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 306 is on host 306
2023-07-11 14:16:27,973 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 307 is on host 307
2023-07-11 14:16:27,973 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 308 is on host 308
2023-07-11 14:16:27,973 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 309 is on host 309
2023-07-11 14:16:27,973 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 310 is on host 310
2023-07-11 14:16:27,973 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 311 is on host 311
2023-07-11 14:16:27,973 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 312 is on host 312
2023-07-11 14:16:27,973 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 313 is on host 313
2023-07-11 14:16:27,973 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 314 is on host 314
2023-07-11 14:16:27,973 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 315 is on host 315
2023-07-11 14:16:27,973 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 316 is on host 316
2023-07-11 14:16:27,973 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 317 is on host 317
2023-07-11 14:16:27,974 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 318 is on host 318
2023-07-11 14:16:27,974 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 319 is on host 319
2023-07-11 14:16:27,974 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 320 is on host 320
2023-07-11 14:16:27,974 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 321 is on host 321
2023-07-11 14:16:27,974 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 322 is on host 322
2023-07-11 14:16:27,974 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 323 is on host 323
2023-07-11 14:16:27,974 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 324 is on host 324
2023-07-11 14:16:27,974 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 325 is on host 325
2023-07-11 14:16:27,974 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 326 is on host 326
2023-07-11 14:16:27,974 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 327 is on host 327
2023-07-11 14:16:27,974 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 328 is on host 328
2023-07-11 14:16:27,974 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 329 is on host 329
2023-07-11 14:16:27,974 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 330 is on host 330
2023-07-11 14:16:27,974 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 331 is on host 331
2023-07-11 14:16:27,974 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 332 is on host 332
2023-07-11 14:16:27,974 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 333 is on host 333
2023-07-11 14:16:27,974 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 334 is on host 334
2023-07-11 14:16:27,974 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 335 is on host 335
2023-07-11 14:16:27,974 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 336 is on host 336
2023-07-11 14:16:27,974 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 337 is on host 337
2023-07-11 14:16:27,974 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 338 is on host 338
2023-07-11 14:16:27,974 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 339 is on host 339
2023-07-11 14:16:27,974 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 340 is on host 340
2023-07-11 14:16:27,974 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 341 is on host 341
2023-07-11 14:16:27,974 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 342 is on host 342
2023-07-11 14:16:27,974 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 343 is on host 343
2023-07-11 14:16:27,974 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 344 is on host 344
2023-07-11 14:16:27,974 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 345 is on host 345
2023-07-11 14:16:27,974 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 346 is on host 346
2023-07-11 14:16:27,975 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 347 is on host 347
2023-07-11 14:16:27,975 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 348 is on host 348
2023-07-11 14:16:27,975 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 349 is on host 349
2023-07-11 14:16:27,975 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 350 is on host 350
2023-07-11 14:16:27,975 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 351 is on host 351
2023-07-11 14:16:27,975 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 352 is on host 352
2023-07-11 14:16:27,975 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 353 is on host 353
2023-07-11 14:16:27,975 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 354 is on host 354
2023-07-11 14:16:27,975 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 355 is on host 355
2023-07-11 14:16:27,975 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 356 is on host 356
2023-07-11 14:16:27,975 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 357 is on host 357
2023-07-11 14:16:27,975 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 358 is on host 358
2023-07-11 14:16:27,975 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 359 is on host 359
2023-07-11 14:16:27,975 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 360 is on host 360
2023-07-11 14:16:27,975 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 361 is on host 361
2023-07-11 14:16:27,975 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 362 is on host 362
2023-07-11 14:16:27,975 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 363 is on host 363
2023-07-11 14:16:27,975 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 364 is on host 364
2023-07-11 14:16:27,975 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 365 is on host 365
2023-07-11 14:16:27,975 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 366 is on host 366
2023-07-11 14:16:27,975 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 367 is on host 367
2023-07-11 14:16:27,975 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 368 is on host 368
2023-07-11 14:16:27,975 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 369 is on host 369
2023-07-11 14:16:27,975 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 370 is on host 370
2023-07-11 14:16:27,975 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 371 is on host 371
2023-07-11 14:16:27,975 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 372 is on host 372
2023-07-11 14:16:27,975 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 373 is on host 373
2023-07-11 14:16:27,975 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 374 is on host 374
2023-07-11 14:16:27,975 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 375 is on host 375
2023-07-11 14:16:27,975 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 376 is on host 376
2023-07-11 14:16:27,976 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 377 is on host 377
2023-07-11 14:16:27,976 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 378 is on host 378
2023-07-11 14:16:27,976 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 379 is on host 379
2023-07-11 14:16:27,976 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 380 is on host 380
2023-07-11 14:16:27,976 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 381 is on host 381
2023-07-11 14:16:27,976 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 382 is on host 382
2023-07-11 14:16:27,976 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 383 is on host 383
2023-07-11 14:16:27,976 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 384 is on host 384
2023-07-11 14:16:27,976 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 385 is on host 385
2023-07-11 14:16:27,976 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 386 is on host 386
2023-07-11 14:16:27,976 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 387 is on host 387
2023-07-11 14:16:27,976 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 388 is on host 388
2023-07-11 14:16:27,976 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 389 is on host 389
2023-07-11 14:16:27,976 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 390 is on host 390
2023-07-11 14:16:27,976 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 391 is on host 391
2023-07-11 14:16:27,976 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 392 is on host 392
2023-07-11 14:16:27,976 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=393, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:27,976 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table30) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:27,976 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table9
2023-07-11 14:16:27,977 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv553536953=290, srv1630071126=110, srv1071894870=12, srv23511728=232, srv658346947=323, srv2025338799=204, srv1397994335=64, srv1976766403=195, srv1644629726=118, srv957637734=381, srv2079182457=210, srv1749264468=139, srv2046129126=206, srv1595762596=104, srv603990852=307, srv1973073480=194, srv958856137=382, srv644066832=319, srv557062842=292, srv277765671=235, srv732221418=337, srv1769385567=143, srv224612199=228, srv714752528=334, srv362526040=256, srv581128949=296, srv2133511466=223, srv1144239257=30, srv320603627=245, srv1679952521=126, srv2122867873=222, srv1110067064=24, srv256251994=233, srv63261708=317, srv89837390=371, srv552104598=289, srv508952995=281, srv2096011353=214, srv1770417148=144, srv1246723478=42, srv929436444=378, srv2082192429=211, srv234917297=231, srv405700573=266, srv183644386=166, srv1488378513=85, srv173139715=136, srv1154180352=32, srv355693379=252, srv1407521654=66, srv496848057=275, srv1157975499=33, srv1806731027=162, srv1923102804=184, srv311102455=244, srv450011410=271, srv771515724=348, srv389183508=262, srv1249074416=43, srv2014575201=201, srv640847108=318, srv832363565=356, srv1970882134=192, srv2107358603=218, srv855766065=361, srv1336043388=55, srv29397186=237, srv982792848=390, srv976560524=386, srv101181760=3, srv1093549482=21, srv2018389395=202, srv2113483104=221, srv1778339118=149, srv1968709692=190, srv705221118=333, srv159600090=105, srv1919608486=180, srv981255102=389, srv807899713=353, srv755110395=344, srv1770594519=145, srv739692705=340, srv1076582671=16, srv693869315=330, srv1079048717=17, srv440657532=270, srv1636659280=115, srv2108739257=220, srv668373413=326, srv1003610393=2, srv1054229197=11, srv1868589627=172, srv2103522371=217, srv1000546271=0, srv951670617=380, srv2042909593=205, srv1865656038=171, srv1466355012=78, srv703662406=332, srv1418112884=70, srv1215580291=40, srv71833528=335, srv1580581635=103, srv1021032212=5, srv1080806312=19, srv1985601859=197, srv74471954=343, srv1647472319=119, srv2071553346=208, srv1632855171=112, srv1122009370=27, srv13613992=61, srv1630777154=111, srv301413669=239, srv550697728=288, srv1296023857=53, srv1724550977=133, srv1989290370=198, srv1926417985=185, srv1678097199=125, srv1461034373=76, srv614690415=311, srv2098345381=215, srv310463473=243, srv1011934105=4, srv148627129=84, srv305489318=240, srv1256534903=46, srv1289731445=52, srv1798844587=157, srv567113085=294, srv1119222501=26, srv2055117940=207, srv855898852=362, srv629224816=316, srv1075943554=15, srv625909061=315, srv1705591942=128, srv734225580=339, srv660107924=324, srv1381729938=62, srv1633483173=113, srv408265476=267, srv1776057793=148, srv1360253411=60, srv1511424834=90, srv1414162621=68, srv883343663=370, srv151859222=91, srv349144930=251, srv1991304034=199, srv1825887791=164, srv601657063=305, srv758932951=345, srv1651629087=120, srv1864623584=170, srv682957691=329, srv1500454146=88, srv1725962085=135, srv1659841448=121, srv1253206004=45, srv52354442=284, srv18508093=168, srv1427731921=73, srv561344974=293, srv721668125=336, srv1575482138=100, srv914128771=373, srv961487230=383, srv741332941=342, srv533032466=286, srv1574140987=99, srv2139849097=224, srv503902262=278, srv674807007=327, srv1786829855=153, srv2088727517=213, srv394366966=264, srv980089565=388, srv114594288=31, srv38296437=261, srv214835574=226, srv1887224977=176, srv1025509362=7, srv1577020334=102, srv524466665=285, srv393561021=263, srv759909927=346, srv763556514=347, srv786453030=349, srv2142935488=225, srv618111613=312, srv16254163=108, srv343211061=250, srv476075173=273, srv1269632212=47, srv333589612=246, srv499015361=276, srv836674186=357, srv1799191687=158, srv1446998035=74, srv1571774199=98, srv1115354947=25, srv333860881=247, srv1724152600=132, srv1598699299=106, srv177885829=151, srv472125887=272, srv1101339966=22, srv1424985362=72, srv1945569895=188, srv594128294=300, srv1026739237=8, srv842459828=358, srv878519137=366, srv1921260729=181, srv339110834=249, srv504099471=279, srv814253179=354, srv1643744885=116, srv1793847521=155, srv607234624=309, srv698219051=331, srv1688538732=127, srv666240078=325, srv1079284733=18, srv29210550=236, srv506181748=280, srv881313122=368, srv1945452576=187, srv597307897=303, srv1285120424=51, srv1887943816=177, srv1983604698=196, srv1805465940=161, srv309309336=242, srv1719756294=131, srv1349932676=58, srv1208486369=38, srv1643971570=117, srv1509331489=89, srv334105385=248, srv1400515744=65, srv369984715=259, srv43712162=269, srv842675864=359, srv1803258748=160, srv1022450918=6, srv1775108732=147, srv1766088250=141, srv180150732=159, srv1220857227=41, srv226530501=229, srv362032108=255, srv919715380=377, srv1074935976=14, srv1395030819=63, srv803291569=352, srv1877966766=175, srv220538712=227, srv2021718843=203, srv2107782185=219, srv882216860=369, srv1489137852=86, srv1972328734=193, srv1470759982=79, srv1774824811=146, srv971974774=384, srv1418242791=71, srv1001274196=1, srv909615097=372, srv1537724566=93, srv1165799954=34, srv1724754364=134, srv978173525=387, srv113319438=29, srv578033735=295, srv147931272=80, srv1183635941=35, srv1904215245=178, srv596349756=302, srv880835255=367, srv857544550=364, srv1779729022=152, srv1795612465=156, srv621083045=314, srv917704170=375, srv1351811120=59, srv1316710897=54, srv789820555=350, srv1922580095=183, srv305567304=241, srv1936745425=186, srv1745318024=138, srv1210822057=39, srv645375717=320, srv950628389=379, srv1490199189=87, srv1575919256=101, srv154481102=96, srv359402967=254, srv997716931=391, srv1457224273=75, srv581644449=297, srv1872374768=174, srv363177310=257, srv740327512=341, srv1664227236=123, srv972330517=385, srv1634261306=114, srv1662183707=122, srv1969046891=191, srv1485266211=82, srv1778842262=150, srv588410181=298, srv1921840985=182, srv591279493=299, srv37574565=260, srv1104147458=23, srv1190166330=36, srv652270371=322, srv1484309042=81, srv1560148463=97, srv618569548=313, srv2102708311=216, srv1084873074=20, srv517669556=283, srv918152084=376, srv649714317=321, srv1674484790=124, srv1339239880=56, srv1461073271=77, srv1125312901=28, srv25633292=234, srv516616923=282, srv299721745=238, srv604932433=308, srv1273702855=48, srv792183929=351, srv1042608200=10, srv1276335106=49, srv1486044644=83, srv676101698=328, srv998930892=392, srv200111276=200, srv1863083643=169, srv1737443479=137, srv872997185=365, srv821351126=355, srv852115805=360, srv1074355423=13, srv170952194=130, srv503430005=277, srv153887567=94, srv1415163001=69, srv1032737435=9, srv1840670515=167, srv1961921083=189, srv59745831=304, srv36715747=258, srv431547280=268, srv1524853580=92, srv1870059418=173, srv396010771=265, srv594457792=301, srv1755339428=140, srv1766275429=142, srv5565786=291, srv603898526=306, srv544570223=287, srv856030669=363, srv1542523468=95, srv915785747=374, srv356122213=253, srv1411875499=67, srv2077620970=209, srv1345529444=57, srv232339963=230, srv1250861076=44, srv1914875423=179, srv478619481=274, srv1202435626=37, srv1706089454=129, srv1810631201=163, srv1282644061=50, srv1625945288=109, srv733251129=338, srv2082830831=212, srv1612103540=107, srv612136291=310, srv1790004142=154, srv183394703=165} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:27,977 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:27,977 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:27,977 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:27,977 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:27,977 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:27,977 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:27,977 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-11 14:16:27,977 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-11 14:16:27,977 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-11 14:16:27,977 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-11 14:16:27,977 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 10 is on host 10
2023-07-11 14:16:27,977 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 11 is on host 11
2023-07-11 14:16:27,978 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 12 is on host 12
2023-07-11 14:16:27,978 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 13 is on host 13
2023-07-11 14:16:27,978 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 14 is on host 14
2023-07-11 14:16:27,978 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 15 is on host 15
2023-07-11 14:16:27,978 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 16 is on host 16
2023-07-11 14:16:27,978 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 17 is on host 17
2023-07-11 14:16:27,978 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 18 is on host 18
2023-07-11 14:16:27,978 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 19 is on host 19
2023-07-11 14:16:27,978 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 20 is on host 20
2023-07-11 14:16:27,978 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 21 is on host 21
2023-07-11 14:16:27,978 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 22 is on host 22
2023-07-11 14:16:27,978 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 23 is on host 23
2023-07-11 14:16:27,978 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 24 is on host 24
2023-07-11 14:16:27,978 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 25 is on host 25
2023-07-11 14:16:27,978 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 26 is on host 26
2023-07-11 14:16:27,978 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 27 is on host 27
2023-07-11 14:16:27,978 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 28 is on host 28
2023-07-11 14:16:27,979 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 29 is on host 29
2023-07-11 14:16:27,979 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 30 is on host 30
2023-07-11 14:16:27,979 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 31 is on host 31
2023-07-11 14:16:27,979 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 32 is on host 32
2023-07-11 14:16:27,979 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 33 is on host 33
2023-07-11 14:16:27,979 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 34 is on host 34
2023-07-11 14:16:27,979 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 35 is on host 35
2023-07-11 14:16:27,979 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 36 is on host 36
2023-07-11 14:16:27,979 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 37 is on host 37
2023-07-11 14:16:27,979 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 38 is on host 38
2023-07-11 14:16:27,979 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 39 is on host 39
2023-07-11 14:16:27,979 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 40 is on host 40
2023-07-11 14:16:27,979 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 41 is on host 41
2023-07-11 14:16:27,979 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 42 is on host 42
2023-07-11 14:16:27,979 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 43 is on host 43
2023-07-11 14:16:27,979 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 44 is on host 44
2023-07-11 14:16:27,979 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 45 is on host 45
2023-07-11 14:16:27,979 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 46 is on host 46
2023-07-11 14:16:27,979 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 47 is on host 47
2023-07-11 14:16:27,979 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 48 is on host 48
2023-07-11 14:16:27,979 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 49 is on host 49
2023-07-11 14:16:27,979 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 50 is on host 50
2023-07-11 14:16:27,979 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 51 is on host 51
2023-07-11 14:16:27,979 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 52 is on host 52
2023-07-11 14:16:27,979 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 53 is on host 53
2023-07-11 14:16:27,979 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 54 is on host 54
2023-07-11 14:16:27,979 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 55 is on host 55
2023-07-11 14:16:27,979 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 56 is on host 56
2023-07-11 14:16:27,979 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 57 is on host 57
2023-07-11 14:16:27,979 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 58 is on host 58
2023-07-11 14:16:27,980 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 59 is on host 59
2023-07-11 14:16:27,980 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 60 is on host 60
2023-07-11 14:16:27,980 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 61 is on host 61
2023-07-11 14:16:27,980 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 62 is on host 62
2023-07-11 14:16:27,980 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 63 is on host 63
2023-07-11 14:16:27,980 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 64 is on host 64
2023-07-11 14:16:27,980 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 65 is on host 65
2023-07-11 14:16:27,980 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 66 is on host 66
2023-07-11 14:16:27,980 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 67 is on host 67
2023-07-11 14:16:27,980 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 68 is on host 68
2023-07-11 14:16:27,980 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 69 is on host 69
2023-07-11 14:16:27,980 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 70 is on host 70
2023-07-11 14:16:27,980 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 71 is on host 71
2023-07-11 14:16:27,980 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 72 is on host 72
2023-07-11 14:16:27,980 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 73 is on host 73
2023-07-11 14:16:27,980 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 74 is on host 74
2023-07-11 14:16:27,980 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 75 is on host 75
2023-07-11 14:16:27,980 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 76 is on host 76
2023-07-11 14:16:27,980 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 77 is on host 77
2023-07-11 14:16:27,980 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 78 is on host 78
2023-07-11 14:16:27,980 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 79 is on host 79
2023-07-11 14:16:27,980 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 80 is on host 80
2023-07-11 14:16:27,980 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 81 is on host 81
2023-07-11 14:16:27,980 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 82 is on host 82
2023-07-11 14:16:27,980 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 83 is on host 83
2023-07-11 14:16:27,980 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 84 is on host 84
2023-07-11 14:16:27,980 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 85 is on host 85
2023-07-11 14:16:27,980 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 86 is on host 86
2023-07-11 14:16:27,980 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 87 is on host 87
2023-07-11 14:16:27,981 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 88 is on host 88
2023-07-11 14:16:27,981 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 89 is on host 89
2023-07-11 14:16:27,981 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 90 is on host 90
2023-07-11 14:16:27,981 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 91 is on host 91
2023-07-11 14:16:27,981 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 92 is on host 92
2023-07-11 14:16:27,981 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 93 is on host 93
2023-07-11 14:16:27,981 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 94 is on host 94
2023-07-11 14:16:27,981 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 95 is on host 95
2023-07-11 14:16:27,981 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 96 is on host 96
2023-07-11 14:16:27,981 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 97 is on host 97
2023-07-11 14:16:27,981 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 98 is on host 98
2023-07-11 14:16:27,981 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 99 is on host 99
2023-07-11 14:16:27,981 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 100 is on host 100
2023-07-11 14:16:27,981 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 101 is on host 101
2023-07-11 14:16:27,981 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 102 is on host 102
2023-07-11 14:16:27,981 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 103 is on host 103
2023-07-11 14:16:27,981 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 104 is on host 104
2023-07-11 14:16:27,981 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 105 is on host 105
2023-07-11 14:16:27,981 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 106 is on host 106
2023-07-11 14:16:27,981 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 107 is on host 107
2023-07-11 14:16:27,981 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 108 is on host 108
2023-07-11 14:16:27,981 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 109 is on host 109
2023-07-11 14:16:27,981 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 110 is on host 110
2023-07-11 14:16:27,981 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 111 is on host 111
2023-07-11 14:16:27,981 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 112 is on host 112
2023-07-11 14:16:27,981 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 113 is on host 113
2023-07-11 14:16:27,981 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 114 is on host 114
2023-07-11 14:16:27,981 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 115 is on host 115
2023-07-11 14:16:27,982 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 116 is on host 116
2023-07-11 14:16:27,982 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 117 is on host 117
2023-07-11 14:16:27,982 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 118 is on host 118
2023-07-11 14:16:27,982 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 119 is on host 119
2023-07-11 14:16:27,982 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 120 is on host 120
2023-07-11 14:16:27,982 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 121 is on host 121
2023-07-11 14:16:27,982 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 122 is on host 122
2023-07-11 14:16:27,982 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 123 is on host 123
2023-07-11 14:16:27,982 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 124 is on host 124
2023-07-11 14:16:27,982 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 125 is on host 125
2023-07-11 14:16:27,982 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 126 is on host 126
2023-07-11 14:16:27,982 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 127 is on host 127
2023-07-11 14:16:27,982 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 128 is on host 128
2023-07-11 14:16:27,982 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 129 is on host 129
2023-07-11 14:16:27,982 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 130 is on host 130
2023-07-11 14:16:27,982 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 131 is on host 131
2023-07-11 14:16:27,982 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 132 is on host 132
2023-07-11 14:16:27,982 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 133 is on host 133
2023-07-11 14:16:27,982 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 134 is on host 134
2023-07-11 14:16:27,982 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 135 is on host 135
2023-07-11 14:16:27,982 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 136 is on host 136
2023-07-11 14:16:27,982 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 137 is on host 137
2023-07-11 14:16:27,982 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 138 is on host 138
2023-07-11 14:16:27,982 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 139 is on host 139
2023-07-11 14:16:27,982 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 140 is on host 140
2023-07-11 14:16:27,982 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 141 is on host 141
2023-07-11 14:16:27,982 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 142 is on host 142
2023-07-11 14:16:27,982 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 143 is on host 143
2023-07-11 14:16:27,982 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 144 is on host 144
2023-07-11 14:16:27,982 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 145 is on host 145
2023-07-11 14:16:27,983 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 146 is on host 146
2023-07-11 14:16:27,983 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 147 is on host 147
2023-07-11 14:16:27,983 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 148 is on host 148
2023-07-11 14:16:27,983 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 149 is on host 149
2023-07-11 14:16:27,983 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 150 is on host 150
2023-07-11 14:16:27,983 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 151 is on host 151
2023-07-11 14:16:27,983 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 152 is on host 152
2023-07-11 14:16:27,983 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 153 is on host 153
2023-07-11 14:16:27,983 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 154 is on host 154
2023-07-11 14:16:27,983 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 155 is on host 155
2023-07-11 14:16:27,983 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 156 is on host 156
2023-07-11 14:16:27,983 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 157 is on host 157
2023-07-11 14:16:27,983 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 158 is on host 158
2023-07-11 14:16:27,983 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 159 is on host 159
2023-07-11 14:16:27,983 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 160 is on host 160
2023-07-11 14:16:27,983 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 161 is on host 161
2023-07-11 14:16:27,983 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 162 is on host 162
2023-07-11 14:16:27,983 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 163 is on host 163
2023-07-11 14:16:27,983 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 164 is on host 164
2023-07-11 14:16:27,983 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 165 is on host 165
2023-07-11 14:16:27,983 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 166 is on host 166
2023-07-11 14:16:27,983 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 167 is on host 167
2023-07-11 14:16:27,983 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 168 is on host 168
2023-07-11 14:16:27,983 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 169 is on host 169
2023-07-11 14:16:27,983 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 170 is on host 170
2023-07-11 14:16:27,983 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 171 is on host 171
2023-07-11 14:16:27,983 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 172 is on host 172
2023-07-11 14:16:27,983 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 173 is on host 173
2023-07-11 14:16:27,984 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 174 is on host 174
2023-07-11 14:16:27,984 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 175 is on host 175
2023-07-11 14:16:27,984 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 176 is on host 176
2023-07-11 14:16:27,984 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 177 is on host 177
2023-07-11 14:16:27,984 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 178 is on host 178
2023-07-11 14:16:27,984 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 179 is on host 179
2023-07-11 14:16:27,984 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 180 is on host 180
2023-07-11 14:16:27,984 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 181 is on host 181
2023-07-11 14:16:27,984 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 182 is on host 182
2023-07-11 14:16:27,984 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 183 is on host 183
2023-07-11 14:16:27,984 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 184 is on host 184
2023-07-11 14:16:27,984 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 185 is on host 185
2023-07-11 14:16:27,984 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 186 is on host 186
2023-07-11 14:16:27,984 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 187 is on host 187
2023-07-11 14:16:27,984 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 188 is on host 188
2023-07-11 14:16:27,984 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 189 is on host 189
2023-07-11 14:16:27,984 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 190 is on host 190
2023-07-11 14:16:27,984 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 191 is on host 191
2023-07-11 14:16:27,984 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 192 is on host 192
2023-07-11 14:16:27,984 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 193 is on host 193
2023-07-11 14:16:27,984 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 194 is on host 194
2023-07-11 14:16:27,984 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 195 is on host 195
2023-07-11 14:16:27,984 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 196 is on host 196
2023-07-11 14:16:27,984 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 197 is on host 197
2023-07-11 14:16:27,984 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 198 is on host 198
2023-07-11 14:16:27,984 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 199 is on host 199
2023-07-11 14:16:27,984 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 200 is on host 200
2023-07-11 14:16:27,984 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 201 is on host 201
2023-07-11 14:16:27,984 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 202 is on host 202
2023-07-11 14:16:27,985 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 203 is on host 203
2023-07-11 14:16:27,985 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 204 is on host 204
2023-07-11 14:16:27,985 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 205 is on host 205
2023-07-11 14:16:27,985 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 206 is on host 206
2023-07-11 14:16:27,985 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 207 is on host 207
2023-07-11 14:16:27,985 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 208 is on host 208
2023-07-11 14:16:27,985 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 209 is on host 209
2023-07-11 14:16:27,985 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 210 is on host 210
2023-07-11 14:16:27,985 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 211 is on host 211
2023-07-11 14:16:27,985 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 212 is on host 212
2023-07-11 14:16:27,985 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 213 is on host 213
2023-07-11 14:16:27,985 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 214 is on host 214
2023-07-11 14:16:27,985 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 215 is on host 215
2023-07-11 14:16:27,985 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 216 is on host 216
2023-07-11 14:16:27,985 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 217 is on host 217
2023-07-11 14:16:27,985 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 218 is on host 218
2023-07-11 14:16:27,985 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 219 is on host 219
2023-07-11 14:16:27,985 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 220 is on host 220
2023-07-11 14:16:27,985 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 221 is on host 221
2023-07-11 14:16:27,985 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 222 is on host 222
2023-07-11 14:16:27,985 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 223 is on host 223
2023-07-11 14:16:27,985 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 224 is on host 224
2023-07-11 14:16:27,985 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 225 is on host 225
2023-07-11 14:16:27,985 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 226 is on host 226
2023-07-11 14:16:27,985 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 227 is on host 227
2023-07-11 14:16:27,985 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 228 is on host 228
2023-07-11 14:16:27,985 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 229 is on host 229
2023-07-11 14:16:27,985 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 230 is on host 230
2023-07-11 14:16:27,985 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 231 is on host 231
2023-07-11 14:16:27,986 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 232 is on host 232
2023-07-11 14:16:27,986 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 233 is on host 233
2023-07-11 14:16:27,986 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 234 is on host 234
2023-07-11 14:16:27,986 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 235 is on host 235
2023-07-11 14:16:27,986 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 236 is on host 236
2023-07-11 14:16:27,986 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 237 is on host 237
2023-07-11 14:16:27,986 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 238 is on host 238
2023-07-11 14:16:27,986 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 239 is on host 239
2023-07-11 14:16:27,986 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 240 is on host 240
2023-07-11 14:16:27,986 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 241 is on host 241
2023-07-11 14:16:27,986 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 242 is on host 242
2023-07-11 14:16:27,986 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 243 is on host 243
2023-07-11 14:16:27,986 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 244 is on host 244
2023-07-11 14:16:27,986 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 245 is on host 245
2023-07-11 14:16:27,986 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 246 is on host 246
2023-07-11 14:16:27,986 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 247 is on host 247
2023-07-11 14:16:27,986 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 248 is on host 248
2023-07-11 14:16:27,986 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 249 is on host 249
2023-07-11 14:16:27,986 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 250 is on host 250
2023-07-11 14:16:27,986 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 251 is on host 251
2023-07-11 14:16:27,986 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 252 is on host 252
2023-07-11 14:16:27,986 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 253 is on host 253
2023-07-11 14:16:27,986 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 254 is on host 254
2023-07-11 14:16:27,986 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 255 is on host 255
2023-07-11 14:16:27,986 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 256 is on host 256
2023-07-11 14:16:27,986 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 257 is on host 257
2023-07-11 14:16:27,986 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 258 is on host 258
2023-07-11 14:16:27,986 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 259 is on host 259
2023-07-11 14:16:27,986 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 260 is on host 260
2023-07-11 14:16:27,987 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 261 is on host 261
2023-07-11 14:16:27,987 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 262 is on host 262
2023-07-11 14:16:27,987 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 263 is on host 263
2023-07-11 14:16:27,987 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 264 is on host 264
2023-07-11 14:16:27,987 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 265 is on host 265
2023-07-11 14:16:27,987 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 266 is on host 266
2023-07-11 14:16:27,987 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 267 is on host 267
2023-07-11 14:16:27,987 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 268 is on host 268
2023-07-11 14:16:27,987 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 269 is on host 269
2023-07-11 14:16:27,987 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 270 is on host 270
2023-07-11 14:16:27,987 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 271 is on host 271
2023-07-11 14:16:27,987 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 272 is on host 272
2023-07-11 14:16:27,987 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 273 is on host 273
2023-07-11 14:16:27,987 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 274 is on host 274
2023-07-11 14:16:27,987 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 275 is on host 275
2023-07-11 14:16:27,987 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 276 is on host 276
2023-07-11 14:16:27,987 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 277 is on host 277
2023-07-11 14:16:27,987 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 278 is on host 278
2023-07-11 14:16:27,987 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 279 is on host 279
2023-07-11 14:16:27,987 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 280 is on host 280
2023-07-11 14:16:27,987 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 281 is on host 281
2023-07-11 14:16:27,987 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 282 is on host 282
2023-07-11 14:16:27,987 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 283 is on host 283
2023-07-11 14:16:27,987 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 284 is on host 284
2023-07-11 14:16:27,987 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 285 is on host 285
2023-07-11 14:16:27,987 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 286 is on host 286
2023-07-11 14:16:27,987 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 287 is on host 287
2023-07-11 14:16:27,987 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 288 is on host 288
2023-07-11 14:16:27,987 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 289 is on host 289
2023-07-11 14:16:27,988 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 290 is on host 290
2023-07-11 14:16:27,988 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 291 is on host 291
2023-07-11 14:16:27,988 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 292 is on host 292
2023-07-11 14:16:27,988 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 293 is on host 293
2023-07-11 14:16:27,988 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 294 is on host 294
2023-07-11 14:16:27,988 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 295 is on host 295
2023-07-11 14:16:27,988 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 296 is on host 296
2023-07-11 14:16:27,988 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 297 is on host 297
2023-07-11 14:16:27,988 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 298 is on host 298
2023-07-11 14:16:27,988 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 299 is on host 299
2023-07-11 14:16:27,988 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 300 is on host 300
2023-07-11 14:16:27,988 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 301 is on host 301
2023-07-11 14:16:27,988 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 302 is on host 302
2023-07-11 14:16:27,988 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 303 is on host 303
2023-07-11 14:16:27,988 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 304 is on host 304
2023-07-11 14:16:27,988 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 305 is on host 305
2023-07-11 14:16:27,988 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 306 is on host 306
2023-07-11 14:16:27,988 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 307 is on host 307
2023-07-11 14:16:27,988 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 308 is on host 308
2023-07-11 14:16:27,988 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 309 is on host 309
2023-07-11 14:16:27,988 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 310 is on host 310
2023-07-11 14:16:27,988 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 311 is on host 311
2023-07-11 14:16:27,988 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 312 is on host 312
2023-07-11 14:16:27,988 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 313 is on host 313
2023-07-11 14:16:27,988 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 314 is on host 314
2023-07-11 14:16:27,988 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 315 is on host 315
2023-07-11 14:16:27,988 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 316 is on host 316
2023-07-11 14:16:27,988 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 317 is on host 317
2023-07-11 14:16:27,988 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 318 is on host 318
2023-07-11 14:16:27,989 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 319 is on host 319
2023-07-11 14:16:27,989 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 320 is on host 320
2023-07-11 14:16:27,989 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 321 is on host 321
2023-07-11 14:16:27,989 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 322 is on host 322
2023-07-11 14:16:27,989 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 323 is on host 323
2023-07-11 14:16:27,989 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 324 is on host 324
2023-07-11 14:16:27,989 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 325 is on host 325
2023-07-11 14:16:27,989 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 326 is on host 326
2023-07-11 14:16:27,989 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 327 is on host 327
2023-07-11 14:16:27,989 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 328 is on host 328
2023-07-11 14:16:27,989 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 329 is on host 329
2023-07-11 14:16:27,989 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 330 is on host 330
2023-07-11 14:16:27,989 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 331 is on host 331
2023-07-11 14:16:27,989 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 332 is on host 332
2023-07-11 14:16:27,989 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 333 is on host 333
2023-07-11 14:16:27,989 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 334 is on host 334
2023-07-11 14:16:27,989 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 335 is on host 335
2023-07-11 14:16:27,989 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 336 is on host 336
2023-07-11 14:16:27,989 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 337 is on host 337
2023-07-11 14:16:27,989 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 338 is on host 338
2023-07-11 14:16:27,989 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 339 is on host 339
2023-07-11 14:16:27,989 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 340 is on host 340
2023-07-11 14:16:27,989 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 341 is on host 341
2023-07-11 14:16:27,989 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 342 is on host 342
2023-07-11 14:16:27,989 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 343 is on host 343
2023-07-11 14:16:27,989 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 344 is on host 344
2023-07-11 14:16:27,989 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 345 is on host 345
2023-07-11 14:16:27,989 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 346 is on host 346
2023-07-11 14:16:27,989 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 347 is on host 347
2023-07-11 14:16:27,990 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 348 is on host 348
2023-07-11 14:16:27,990 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 349 is on host 349
2023-07-11 14:16:27,990 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 350 is on host 350
2023-07-11 14:16:27,990 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 351 is on host 351
2023-07-11 14:16:27,990 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 352 is on host 352
2023-07-11 14:16:27,990 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 353 is on host 353
2023-07-11 14:16:27,990 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 354 is on host 354
2023-07-11 14:16:27,990 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 355 is on host 355
2023-07-11 14:16:27,990 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 356 is on host 356
2023-07-11 14:16:27,990 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 357 is on host 357
2023-07-11 14:16:27,990 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 358 is on host 358
2023-07-11 14:16:27,990 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 359 is on host 359
2023-07-11 14:16:27,990 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 360 is on host 360
2023-07-11 14:16:27,990 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 361 is on host 361
2023-07-11 14:16:27,990 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 362 is on host 362
2023-07-11 14:16:27,990 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 363 is on host 363
2023-07-11 14:16:27,990 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 364 is on host 364
2023-07-11 14:16:27,990 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 365 is on host 365
2023-07-11 14:16:27,991 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 366 is on host 366
2023-07-11 14:16:27,991 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 367 is on host 367
2023-07-11 14:16:27,991 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 368 is on host 368
2023-07-11 14:16:27,991 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 369 is on host 369
2023-07-11 14:16:27,991 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 370 is on host 370
2023-07-11 14:16:27,991 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 371 is on host 371
2023-07-11 14:16:27,991 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 372 is on host 372
2023-07-11 14:16:27,991 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 373 is on host 373
2023-07-11 14:16:27,991 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 374 is on host 374
2023-07-11 14:16:27,991 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 375 is on host 375
2023-07-11 14:16:27,991 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 376 is on host 376
2023-07-11 14:16:27,991 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 377 is on host 377
2023-07-11 14:16:27,991 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 378 is on host 378
2023-07-11 14:16:27,991 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 379 is on host 379
2023-07-11 14:16:27,991 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 380 is on host 380
2023-07-11 14:16:27,991 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 381 is on host 381
2023-07-11 14:16:27,991 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 382 is on host 382
2023-07-11 14:16:27,991 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 383 is on host 383
2023-07-11 14:16:27,991 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 384 is on host 384
2023-07-11 14:16:27,991 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 385 is on host 385
2023-07-11 14:16:27,991 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 386 is on host 386
2023-07-11 14:16:27,991 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 387 is on host 387
2023-07-11 14:16:27,991 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 388 is on host 388
2023-07-11 14:16:27,991 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 389 is on host 389
2023-07-11 14:16:27,991 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 390 is on host 390
2023-07-11 14:16:27,992 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 391 is on host 391
2023-07-11 14:16:27,992 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 392 is on host 392
2023-07-11 14:16:27,992 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=393, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:27,992 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table9) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:27,992 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table31
2023-07-11 14:16:27,992 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv553536953=290, srv1630071126=110, srv1071894870=12, srv23511728=232, srv658346947=323, srv2025338799=204, srv1397994335=64, srv1976766403=195, srv1644629726=118, srv957637734=381, srv2079182457=210, srv1749264468=139, srv2046129126=206, srv1595762596=104, srv603990852=307, srv1973073480=194, srv958856137=382, srv644066832=319, srv557062842=292, srv277765671=235, srv732221418=337, srv1769385567=143, srv224612199=228, srv714752528=334, srv362526040=256, srv581128949=296, srv2133511466=223, srv1144239257=30, srv320603627=245, srv1679952521=126, srv2122867873=222, srv1110067064=24, srv256251994=233, srv63261708=317, srv89837390=371, srv552104598=289, srv508952995=281, srv2096011353=214, srv1770417148=144, srv1246723478=42, srv929436444=378, srv2082192429=211, srv234917297=231, srv405700573=266, srv183644386=166, srv1488378513=85, srv173139715=136, srv1154180352=32, srv355693379=252, srv1407521654=66, srv496848057=275, srv1157975499=33, srv1806731027=162, srv1923102804=184, srv311102455=244, srv450011410=271, srv771515724=348, srv389183508=262, srv1249074416=43, srv2014575201=201, srv640847108=318, srv832363565=356, srv1970882134=192, srv2107358603=218, srv855766065=361, srv1336043388=55, srv29397186=237, srv982792848=390, srv976560524=386, srv101181760=3, srv1093549482=21, srv2018389395=202, srv2113483104=221, srv1778339118=149, srv1968709692=190, srv705221118=333, srv159600090=105, srv1919608486=180, srv981255102=389, srv807899713=353, srv755110395=344, srv1770594519=145, srv739692705=340, srv1076582671=16, srv693869315=330, srv1079048717=17, srv440657532=270, srv1636659280=115, srv2108739257=220, srv668373413=326, srv1003610393=2, srv1054229197=11, srv1868589627=172, srv2103522371=217, srv1000546271=0, srv951670617=380, srv2042909593=205, srv1865656038=171, srv1466355012=78, srv703662406=332, srv1418112884=70, srv1215580291=40, srv71833528=335, srv1580581635=103, srv1021032212=5, srv1080806312=19, srv1985601859=197, srv74471954=343, srv1647472319=119, srv2071553346=208, srv1632855171=112, srv1122009370=27, srv13613992=61, srv1630777154=111, srv301413669=239, srv550697728=288, srv1296023857=53, srv1724550977=133, srv1989290370=198, srv1926417985=185, srv1678097199=125, srv1461034373=76, srv614690415=311, srv2098345381=215, srv310463473=243, srv1011934105=4, srv148627129=84, srv305489318=240, srv1256534903=46, srv1289731445=52, srv1798844587=157, srv567113085=294, srv1119222501=26, srv2055117940=207, srv855898852=362, srv629224816=316, srv1075943554=15, srv625909061=315, srv1705591942=128, srv734225580=339, srv660107924=324, srv1381729938=62, srv1633483173=113, srv408265476=267, srv1776057793=148, srv1360253411=60, srv1511424834=90, srv1414162621=68, srv883343663=370, srv151859222=91, srv349144930=251, srv1991304034=199, srv1825887791=164, srv601657063=305, srv758932951=345, srv1651629087=120, srv1864623584=170, srv682957691=329, srv1500454146=88, srv1725962085=135, srv1659841448=121, srv1253206004=45, srv52354442=284, srv18508093=168, srv1427731921=73, srv561344974=293, srv721668125=336, srv1575482138=100, srv914128771=373, srv961487230=383, srv741332941=342, srv533032466=286, srv1574140987=99, srv2139849097=224, srv503902262=278, srv674807007=327, srv1786829855=153, srv2088727517=213, srv394366966=264, srv980089565=388, srv114594288=31, srv38296437=261, srv214835574=226, srv1887224977=176, srv1025509362=7, srv1577020334=102, srv524466665=285, srv393561021=263, srv759909927=346, srv763556514=347, srv786453030=349, srv2142935488=225, srv618111613=312, srv16254163=108, srv343211061=250, srv476075173=273, srv1269632212=47, srv333589612=246, srv499015361=276, srv836674186=357, srv1799191687=158, srv1446998035=74, srv1571774199=98, srv1115354947=25, srv333860881=247, srv1724152600=132, srv1598699299=106, srv177885829=151, srv472125887=272, srv1101339966=22, srv1424985362=72, srv1945569895=188, srv594128294=300, srv1026739237=8, srv842459828=358, srv878519137=366, srv1921260729=181, srv339110834=249, srv504099471=279, srv814253179=354, srv1643744885=116, srv1793847521=155, srv607234624=309, srv698219051=331, srv1688538732=127, srv666240078=325, srv1079284733=18, srv29210550=236, srv506181748=280, srv881313122=368, srv1945452576=187, srv597307897=303, srv1285120424=51, srv1887943816=177, srv1983604698=196, srv1805465940=161, srv309309336=242, srv1719756294=131, srv1349932676=58, srv1208486369=38, srv1643971570=117, srv1509331489=89, srv334105385=248, srv1400515744=65, srv369984715=259, srv43712162=269, srv842675864=359, srv1803258748=160, srv1022450918=6, srv1775108732=147, srv1766088250=141, srv180150732=159, srv1220857227=41, srv226530501=229, srv362032108=255, srv919715380=377, srv1074935976=14, srv1395030819=63, srv803291569=352, srv1877966766=175, srv220538712=227, srv2021718843=203, srv2107782185=219, srv882216860=369, srv1489137852=86, srv1972328734=193, srv1470759982=79, srv1774824811=146, srv971974774=384, srv1418242791=71, srv1001274196=1, srv909615097=372, srv1537724566=93, srv1165799954=34, srv1724754364=134, srv978173525=387, srv113319438=29, srv578033735=295, srv147931272=80, srv1183635941=35, srv1904215245=178, srv596349756=302, srv880835255=367, srv857544550=364, srv1779729022=152, srv1795612465=156, srv621083045=314, srv917704170=375, srv1351811120=59, srv1316710897=54, srv789820555=350, srv1922580095=183, srv305567304=241, srv1936745425=186, srv1745318024=138, srv1210822057=39, srv645375717=320, srv950628389=379, srv1490199189=87, srv1575919256=101, srv154481102=96, srv359402967=254, srv997716931=391, srv1457224273=75, srv581644449=297, srv1872374768=174, srv363177310=257, srv740327512=341, srv1664227236=123, srv972330517=385, srv1634261306=114, srv1662183707=122, srv1969046891=191, srv1485266211=82, srv1778842262=150, srv588410181=298, srv1921840985=182, srv591279493=299, srv37574565=260, srv1104147458=23, srv1190166330=36, srv652270371=322, srv1484309042=81, srv1560148463=97, srv618569548=313, srv2102708311=216, srv1084873074=20, srv517669556=283, srv918152084=376, srv649714317=321, srv1674484790=124, srv1339239880=56, srv1461073271=77, srv1125312901=28, srv25633292=234, srv516616923=282, srv299721745=238, srv604932433=308, srv1273702855=48, srv792183929=351, srv1042608200=10, srv1276335106=49, srv1486044644=83, srv676101698=328, srv998930892=392, srv200111276=200, srv1863083643=169, srv1737443479=137, srv872997185=365, srv821351126=355, srv852115805=360, srv1074355423=13, srv170952194=130, srv503430005=277, srv153887567=94, srv1415163001=69, srv1032737435=9, srv1840670515=167, srv1961921083=189, srv59745831=304, srv36715747=258, srv431547280=268, srv1524853580=92, srv1870059418=173, srv396010771=265, srv594457792=301, srv1755339428=140, srv1766275429=142, srv5565786=291, srv603898526=306, srv544570223=287, srv856030669=363, srv1542523468=95, srv915785747=374, srv356122213=253, srv1411875499=67, srv2077620970=209, srv1345529444=57, srv232339963=230, srv1250861076=44, srv1914875423=179, srv478619481=274, srv1202435626=37, srv1706089454=129, srv1810631201=163, srv1282644061=50, srv1625945288=109, srv733251129=338, srv2082830831=212, srv1612103540=107, srv612136291=310, srv1790004142=154, srv183394703=165} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:27,993 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:27,993 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:27,993 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:27,993 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:27,993 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:27,993 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:27,993 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-11 14:16:27,993 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-11 14:16:27,993 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-11 14:16:27,993 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-11 14:16:27,993 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 10 is on host 10
2023-07-11 14:16:27,993 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 11 is on host 11
2023-07-11 14:16:27,993 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 12 is on host 12
2023-07-11 14:16:27,993 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 13 is on host 13
2023-07-11 14:16:27,993 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 14 is on host 14
2023-07-11 14:16:27,993 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 15 is on host 15
2023-07-11 14:16:27,993 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 16 is on host 16
2023-07-11 14:16:27,993 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 17 is on host 17
2023-07-11 14:16:27,993 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 18 is on host 18
2023-07-11 14:16:27,993 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 19 is on host 19
2023-07-11 14:16:27,993 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 20 is on host 20
2023-07-11 14:16:27,993 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 21 is on host 21
2023-07-11 14:16:27,993 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 22 is on host 22
2023-07-11 14:16:27,993 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 23 is on host 23
2023-07-11 14:16:27,993 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 24 is on host 24
2023-07-11 14:16:27,993 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 25 is on host 25
2023-07-11 14:16:27,994 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 26 is on host 26
2023-07-11 14:16:27,994 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 27 is on host 27
2023-07-11 14:16:27,994 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 28 is on host 28
2023-07-11 14:16:27,994 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 29 is on host 29
2023-07-11 14:16:27,994 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 30 is on host 30
2023-07-11 14:16:27,994 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 31 is on host 31
2023-07-11 14:16:27,994 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 32 is on host 32
2023-07-11 14:16:27,994 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 33 is on host 33
2023-07-11 14:16:27,994 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 34 is on host 34
2023-07-11 14:16:27,994 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 35 is on host 35
2023-07-11 14:16:27,994 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 36 is on host 36
2023-07-11 14:16:27,994 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 37 is on host 37
2023-07-11 14:16:27,994 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 38 is on host 38
2023-07-11 14:16:27,994 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 39 is on host 39
2023-07-11 14:16:27,994 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 40 is on host 40
2023-07-11 14:16:27,994 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 41 is on host 41
2023-07-11 14:16:27,994 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 42 is on host 42
2023-07-11 14:16:27,994 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 43 is on host 43
2023-07-11 14:16:27,994 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 44 is on host 44
2023-07-11 14:16:27,994 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 45 is on host 45
2023-07-11 14:16:27,994 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 46 is on host 46
2023-07-11 14:16:27,994 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 47 is on host 47
2023-07-11 14:16:27,994 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 48 is on host 48
2023-07-11 14:16:27,994 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 49 is on host 49
2023-07-11 14:16:27,994 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 50 is on host 50
2023-07-11 14:16:27,994 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 51 is on host 51
2023-07-11 14:16:27,994 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 52 is on host 52
2023-07-11 14:16:27,994 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 53 is on host 53
2023-07-11 14:16:27,994 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 54 is on host 54
2023-07-11 14:16:27,995 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 55 is on host 55
2023-07-11 14:16:27,995 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 56 is on host 56
2023-07-11 14:16:27,995 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 57 is on host 57
2023-07-11 14:16:27,995 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 58 is on host 58
2023-07-11 14:16:27,995 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 59 is on host 59
2023-07-11 14:16:27,995 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 60 is on host 60
2023-07-11 14:16:27,995 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 61 is on host 61
2023-07-11 14:16:27,995 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 62 is on host 62
2023-07-11 14:16:27,995 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 63 is on host 63
2023-07-11 14:16:27,995 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 64 is on host 64
2023-07-11 14:16:27,995 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 65 is on host 65
2023-07-11 14:16:27,995 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 66 is on host 66
2023-07-11 14:16:27,995 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 67 is on host 67
2023-07-11 14:16:27,995 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 68 is on host 68
2023-07-11 14:16:27,995 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 69 is on host 69
2023-07-11 14:16:27,995 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 70 is on host 70
2023-07-11 14:16:27,995 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 71 is on host 71
2023-07-11 14:16:27,995 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 72 is on host 72
2023-07-11 14:16:27,995 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 73 is on host 73
2023-07-11 14:16:27,995 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 74 is on host 74
2023-07-11 14:16:27,995 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 75 is on host 75
2023-07-11 14:16:27,995 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 76 is on host 76
2023-07-11 14:16:27,995 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 77 is on host 77
2023-07-11 14:16:27,995 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 78 is on host 78
2023-07-11 14:16:27,995 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 79 is on host 79
2023-07-11 14:16:27,995 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 80 is on host 80
2023-07-11 14:16:27,995 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 81 is on host 81
2023-07-11 14:16:27,995 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 82 is on host 82
2023-07-11 14:16:27,995 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 83 is on host 83
2023-07-11 14:16:27,996 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 84 is on host 84
2023-07-11 14:16:27,996 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 85 is on host 85
2023-07-11 14:16:27,996 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 86 is on host 86
2023-07-11 14:16:27,996 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 87 is on host 87
2023-07-11 14:16:27,996 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 88 is on host 88
2023-07-11 14:16:27,996 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 89 is on host 89
2023-07-11 14:16:27,996 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 90 is on host 90
2023-07-11 14:16:27,996 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 91 is on host 91
2023-07-11 14:16:27,996 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 92 is on host 92
2023-07-11 14:16:27,996 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 93 is on host 93
2023-07-11 14:16:27,996 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 94 is on host 94
2023-07-11 14:16:27,996 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 95 is on host 95
2023-07-11 14:16:27,996 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 96 is on host 96
2023-07-11 14:16:27,996 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 97 is on host 97
2023-07-11 14:16:27,996 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 98 is on host 98
2023-07-11 14:16:27,996 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 99 is on host 99
2023-07-11 14:16:27,996 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 100 is on host 100
2023-07-11 14:16:27,996 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 101 is on host 101
2023-07-11 14:16:27,996 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 102 is on host 102
2023-07-11 14:16:27,996 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 103 is on host 103
2023-07-11 14:16:27,996 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 104 is on host 104
2023-07-11 14:16:27,996 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 105 is on host 105
2023-07-11 14:16:27,996 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 106 is on host 106
2023-07-11 14:16:27,996 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 107 is on host 107
2023-07-11 14:16:27,996 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 108 is on host 108
2023-07-11 14:16:27,996 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 109 is on host 109
2023-07-11 14:16:27,996 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 110 is on host 110
2023-07-11 14:16:27,996 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 111 is on host 111
2023-07-11 14:16:27,996 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 112 is on host 112
2023-07-11 14:16:27,997 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 113 is on host 113
2023-07-11 14:16:27,997 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 114 is on host 114
2023-07-11 14:16:27,997 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 115 is on host 115
2023-07-11 14:16:27,997 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 116 is on host 116
2023-07-11 14:16:27,997 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 117 is on host 117
2023-07-11 14:16:27,997 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 118 is on host 118
2023-07-11 14:16:27,997 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 119 is on host 119
2023-07-11 14:16:27,997 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 120 is on host 120
2023-07-11 14:16:27,997 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 121 is on host 121
2023-07-11 14:16:27,997 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 122 is on host 122
2023-07-11 14:16:27,997 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 123 is on host 123
2023-07-11 14:16:27,997 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 124 is on host 124
2023-07-11 14:16:27,997 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 125 is on host 125
2023-07-11 14:16:27,997 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 126 is on host 126
2023-07-11 14:16:27,997 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 127 is on host 127
2023-07-11 14:16:27,997 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 128 is on host 128
2023-07-11 14:16:27,997 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 129 is on host 129
2023-07-11 14:16:27,997 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 130 is on host 130
2023-07-11 14:16:27,997 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 131 is on host 131
2023-07-11 14:16:27,997 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 132 is on host 132
2023-07-11 14:16:27,997 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 133 is on host 133
2023-07-11 14:16:27,997 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 134 is on host 134
2023-07-11 14:16:27,997 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 135 is on host 135
2023-07-11 14:16:27,997 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 136 is on host 136
2023-07-11 14:16:27,997 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 137 is on host 137
2023-07-11 14:16:27,997 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 138 is on host 138
2023-07-11 14:16:27,997 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 139 is on host 139
2023-07-11 14:16:27,997 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 140 is on host 140
2023-07-11 14:16:27,997 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 141 is on host 141
2023-07-11 14:16:27,998 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 142 is on host 142
2023-07-11 14:16:27,998 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 143 is on host 143
2023-07-11 14:16:27,998 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 144 is on host 144
2023-07-11 14:16:27,998 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 145 is on host 145
2023-07-11 14:16:27,998 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 146 is on host 146
2023-07-11 14:16:27,998 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 147 is on host 147
2023-07-11 14:16:27,998 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 148 is on host 148
2023-07-11 14:16:27,998 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 149 is on host 149
2023-07-11 14:16:27,998 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 150 is on host 150
2023-07-11 14:16:27,998 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 151 is on host 151
2023-07-11 14:16:27,998 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 152 is on host 152
2023-07-11 14:16:27,998 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 153 is on host 153
2023-07-11 14:16:27,998 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 154 is on host 154
2023-07-11 14:16:27,998 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 155 is on host 155
2023-07-11 14:16:27,998 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 156 is on host 156
2023-07-11 14:16:27,998 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 157 is on host 157
2023-07-11 14:16:27,998 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 158 is on host 158
2023-07-11 14:16:27,998 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 159 is on host 159
2023-07-11 14:16:27,998 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 160 is on host 160
2023-07-11 14:16:27,998 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 161 is on host 161
2023-07-11 14:16:27,998 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 162 is on host 162
2023-07-11 14:16:27,998 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 163 is on host 163
2023-07-11 14:16:27,998 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 164 is on host 164
2023-07-11 14:16:27,998 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 165 is on host 165
2023-07-11 14:16:27,998 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 166 is on host 166
2023-07-11 14:16:27,998 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 167 is on host 167
2023-07-11 14:16:27,998 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 168 is on host 168
2023-07-11 14:16:27,998 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 169 is on host 169
2023-07-11 14:16:27,998 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 170 is on host 170
2023-07-11 14:16:27,999 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 171 is on host 171
2023-07-11 14:16:27,999 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 172 is on host 172
2023-07-11 14:16:27,999 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 173 is on host 173
2023-07-11 14:16:27,999 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 174 is on host 174
2023-07-11 14:16:27,999 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 175 is on host 175
2023-07-11 14:16:27,999 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 176 is on host 176
2023-07-11 14:16:27,999 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 177 is on host 177
2023-07-11 14:16:27,999 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 178 is on host 178
2023-07-11 14:16:27,999 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 179 is on host 179
2023-07-11 14:16:27,999 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 180 is on host 180
2023-07-11 14:16:27,999 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 181 is on host 181
2023-07-11 14:16:27,999 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 182 is on host 182
2023-07-11 14:16:27,999 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 183 is on host 183
2023-07-11 14:16:27,999 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 184 is on host 184
2023-07-11 14:16:27,999 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 185 is on host 185
2023-07-11 14:16:27,999 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 186 is on host 186
2023-07-11 14:16:27,999 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 187 is on host 187
2023-07-11 14:16:27,999 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 188 is on host 188
2023-07-11 14:16:27,999 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 189 is on host 189
2023-07-11 14:16:27,999 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 190 is on host 190
2023-07-11 14:16:27,999 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 191 is on host 191
2023-07-11 14:16:27,999 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 192 is on host 192
2023-07-11 14:16:27,999 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 193 is on host 193
2023-07-11 14:16:27,999 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 194 is on host 194
2023-07-11 14:16:27,999 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 195 is on host 195
2023-07-11 14:16:27,999 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 196 is on host 196
2023-07-11 14:16:27,999 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 197 is on host 197
2023-07-11 14:16:27,999 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 198 is on host 198
2023-07-11 14:16:27,999 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 199 is on host 199
2023-07-11 14:16:28,000 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 200 is on host 200
2023-07-11 14:16:28,000 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 201 is on host 201
2023-07-11 14:16:28,000 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 202 is on host 202
2023-07-11 14:16:28,000 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 203 is on host 203
2023-07-11 14:16:28,000 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 204 is on host 204
2023-07-11 14:16:28,000 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 205 is on host 205
2023-07-11 14:16:28,000 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 206 is on host 206
2023-07-11 14:16:28,000 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 207 is on host 207
2023-07-11 14:16:28,000 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 208 is on host 208
2023-07-11 14:16:28,000 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 209 is on host 209
2023-07-11 14:16:28,000 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 210 is on host 210
2023-07-11 14:16:28,000 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 211 is on host 211
2023-07-11 14:16:28,000 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 212 is on host 212
2023-07-11 14:16:28,000 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 213 is on host 213
2023-07-11 14:16:28,000 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 214 is on host 214
2023-07-11 14:16:28,000 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 215 is on host 215
2023-07-11 14:16:28,000 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 216 is on host 216
2023-07-11 14:16:28,000 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 217 is on host 217
2023-07-11 14:16:28,000 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 218 is on host 218
2023-07-11 14:16:28,000 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 219 is on host 219
2023-07-11 14:16:28,000 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 220 is on host 220
2023-07-11 14:16:28,000 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 221 is on host 221
2023-07-11 14:16:28,000 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 222 is on host 222
2023-07-11 14:16:28,000 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 223 is on host 223
2023-07-11 14:16:28,000 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 224 is on host 224
2023-07-11 14:16:28,000 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 225 is on host 225
2023-07-11 14:16:28,000 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 226 is on host 226
2023-07-11 14:16:28,000 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 227 is on host 227
2023-07-11 14:16:28,001 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 228 is on host 228
2023-07-11 14:16:28,001 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 229 is on host 229
2023-07-11 14:16:28,001 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 230 is on host 230
2023-07-11 14:16:28,001 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 231 is on host 231
2023-07-11 14:16:28,001 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 232 is on host 232
2023-07-11 14:16:28,001 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 233 is on host 233
2023-07-11 14:16:28,001 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 234 is on host 234
2023-07-11 14:16:28,001 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 235 is on host 235
2023-07-11 14:16:28,001 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 236 is on host 236
2023-07-11 14:16:28,001 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 237 is on host 237
2023-07-11 14:16:28,001 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 238 is on host 238
2023-07-11 14:16:28,001 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 239 is on host 239
2023-07-11 14:16:28,001 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 240 is on host 240
2023-07-11 14:16:28,001 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 241 is on host 241
2023-07-11 14:16:28,001 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 242 is on host 242
2023-07-11 14:16:28,001 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 243 is on host 243
2023-07-11 14:16:28,001 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 244 is on host 244
2023-07-11 14:16:28,001 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 245 is on host 245
2023-07-11 14:16:28,001 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 246 is on host 246
2023-07-11 14:16:28,001 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 247 is on host 247
2023-07-11 14:16:28,001 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 248 is on host 248
2023-07-11 14:16:28,001 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 249 is on host 249
2023-07-11 14:16:28,001 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 250 is on host 250
2023-07-11 14:16:28,001 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 251 is on host 251
2023-07-11 14:16:28,001 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 252 is on host 252
2023-07-11 14:16:28,001 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 253 is on host 253
2023-07-11 14:16:28,001 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 254 is on host 254
2023-07-11 14:16:28,001 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 255 is on host 255
2023-07-11 14:16:28,001 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 256 is on host 256
2023-07-11 14:16:28,002 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 257 is on host 257
2023-07-11 14:16:28,002 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 258 is on host 258
2023-07-11 14:16:28,002 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 259 is on host 259
2023-07-11 14:16:28,002 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 260 is on host 260
2023-07-11 14:16:28,002 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 261 is on host 261
2023-07-11 14:16:28,002 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 262 is on host 262
2023-07-11 14:16:28,002 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 263 is on host 263
2023-07-11 14:16:28,002 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 264 is on host 264
2023-07-11 14:16:28,002 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 265 is on host 265
2023-07-11 14:16:28,002 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 266 is on host 266
2023-07-11 14:16:28,002 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 267 is on host 267
2023-07-11 14:16:28,002 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 268 is on host 268
2023-07-11 14:16:28,002 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 269 is on host 269
2023-07-11 14:16:28,002 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 270 is on host 270
2023-07-11 14:16:28,002 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 271 is on host 271
2023-07-11 14:16:28,002 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 272 is on host 272
2023-07-11 14:16:28,002 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 273 is on host 273
2023-07-11 14:16:28,003 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 274 is on host 274
2023-07-11 14:16:28,003 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 275 is on host 275
2023-07-11 14:16:28,003 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 276 is on host 276
2023-07-11 14:16:28,003 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 277 is on host 277
2023-07-11 14:16:28,003 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 278 is on host 278
2023-07-11 14:16:28,003 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 279 is on host 279
2023-07-11 14:16:28,003 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 280 is on host 280
2023-07-11 14:16:28,003 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 281 is on host 281
2023-07-11 14:16:28,003 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 282 is on host 282
2023-07-11 14:16:28,003 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 283 is on host 283
2023-07-11 14:16:28,003 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 284 is on host 284
2023-07-11 14:16:28,003 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 285 is on host 285
2023-07-11 14:16:28,003 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 286 is on host 286
2023-07-11 14:16:28,003 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 287 is on host 287
2023-07-11 14:16:28,003 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 288 is on host 288
2023-07-11 14:16:28,003 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 289 is on host 289
2023-07-11 14:16:28,003 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 290 is on host 290
2023-07-11 14:16:28,003 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 291 is on host 291
2023-07-11 14:16:28,003 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 292 is on host 292
2023-07-11 14:16:28,003 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 293 is on host 293
2023-07-11 14:16:28,003 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 294 is on host 294
2023-07-11 14:16:28,003 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 295 is on host 295
2023-07-11 14:16:28,003 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 296 is on host 296
2023-07-11 14:16:28,003 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 297 is on host 297
2023-07-11 14:16:28,003 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 298 is on host 298
2023-07-11 14:16:28,003 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 299 is on host 299
2023-07-11 14:16:28,003 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 300 is on host 300
2023-07-11 14:16:28,003 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 301 is on host 301
2023-07-11 14:16:28,003 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 302 is on host 302
2023-07-11 14:16:28,004 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 303 is on host 303
2023-07-11 14:16:28,004 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 304 is on host 304
2023-07-11 14:16:28,004 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 305 is on host 305
2023-07-11 14:16:28,004 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 306 is on host 306
2023-07-11 14:16:28,004 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 307 is on host 307
2023-07-11 14:16:28,004 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 308 is on host 308
2023-07-11 14:16:28,004 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 309 is on host 309
2023-07-11 14:16:28,004 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 310 is on host 310
2023-07-11 14:16:28,004 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 311 is on host 311
2023-07-11 14:16:28,004 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 312 is on host 312
2023-07-11 14:16:28,004 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 313 is on host 313
2023-07-11 14:16:28,004 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 314 is on host 314
2023-07-11 14:16:28,004 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 315 is on host 315
2023-07-11 14:16:28,004 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 316 is on host 316
2023-07-11 14:16:28,004 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 317 is on host 317
2023-07-11 14:16:28,004 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 318 is on host 318
2023-07-11 14:16:28,004 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 319 is on host 319
2023-07-11 14:16:28,004 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 320 is on host 320
2023-07-11 14:16:28,004 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 321 is on host 321
2023-07-11 14:16:28,004 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 322 is on host 322
2023-07-11 14:16:28,004 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 323 is on host 323
2023-07-11 14:16:28,004 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 324 is on host 324
2023-07-11 14:16:28,004 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 325 is on host 325
2023-07-11 14:16:28,004 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 326 is on host 326
2023-07-11 14:16:28,004 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 327 is on host 327
2023-07-11 14:16:28,004 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 328 is on host 328
2023-07-11 14:16:28,004 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 329 is on host 329
2023-07-11 14:16:28,004 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 330 is on host 330
2023-07-11 14:16:28,004 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 331 is on host 331
2023-07-11 14:16:28,005 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 332 is on host 332
2023-07-11 14:16:28,005 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 333 is on host 333
2023-07-11 14:16:28,005 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 334 is on host 334
2023-07-11 14:16:28,005 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 335 is on host 335
2023-07-11 14:16:28,005 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 336 is on host 336
2023-07-11 14:16:28,005 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 337 is on host 337
2023-07-11 14:16:28,005 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 338 is on host 338
2023-07-11 14:16:28,005 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 339 is on host 339
2023-07-11 14:16:28,005 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 340 is on host 340
2023-07-11 14:16:28,005 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 341 is on host 341
2023-07-11 14:16:28,005 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 342 is on host 342
2023-07-11 14:16:28,005 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 343 is on host 343
2023-07-11 14:16:28,005 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 344 is on host 344
2023-07-11 14:16:28,005 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 345 is on host 345
2023-07-11 14:16:28,005 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 346 is on host 346
2023-07-11 14:16:28,005 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 347 is on host 347
2023-07-11 14:16:28,005 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 348 is on host 348
2023-07-11 14:16:28,005 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 349 is on host 349
2023-07-11 14:16:28,005 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 350 is on host 350
2023-07-11 14:16:28,005 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 351 is on host 351
2023-07-11 14:16:28,005 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 352 is on host 352
2023-07-11 14:16:28,005 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 353 is on host 353
2023-07-11 14:16:28,005 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 354 is on host 354
2023-07-11 14:16:28,005 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 355 is on host 355
2023-07-11 14:16:28,005 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 356 is on host 356
2023-07-11 14:16:28,005 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 357 is on host 357
2023-07-11 14:16:28,005 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 358 is on host 358
2023-07-11 14:16:28,005 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 359 is on host 359
2023-07-11 14:16:28,005 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 360 is on host 360
2023-07-11 14:16:28,006 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 361 is on host 361
2023-07-11 14:16:28,006 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 362 is on host 362
2023-07-11 14:16:28,006 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 363 is on host 363
2023-07-11 14:16:28,006 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 364 is on host 364
2023-07-11 14:16:28,006 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 365 is on host 365
2023-07-11 14:16:28,006 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 366 is on host 366
2023-07-11 14:16:28,006 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 367 is on host 367
2023-07-11 14:16:28,006 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 368 is on host 368
2023-07-11 14:16:28,006 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 369 is on host 369
2023-07-11 14:16:28,006 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 370 is on host 370
2023-07-11 14:16:28,006 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 371 is on host 371
2023-07-11 14:16:28,006 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 372 is on host 372
2023-07-11 14:16:28,006 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 373 is on host 373
2023-07-11 14:16:28,006 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 374 is on host 374
2023-07-11 14:16:28,006 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 375 is on host 375
2023-07-11 14:16:28,006 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 376 is on host 376
2023-07-11 14:16:28,006 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 377 is on host 377
2023-07-11 14:16:28,006 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 378 is on host 378
2023-07-11 14:16:28,006 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 379 is on host 379
2023-07-11 14:16:28,006 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 380 is on host 380
2023-07-11 14:16:28,006 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 381 is on host 381
2023-07-11 14:16:28,006 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 382 is on host 382
2023-07-11 14:16:28,006 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 383 is on host 383
2023-07-11 14:16:28,006 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 384 is on host 384
2023-07-11 14:16:28,006 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 385 is on host 385
2023-07-11 14:16:28,006 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 386 is on host 386
2023-07-11 14:16:28,006 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 387 is on host 387
2023-07-11 14:16:28,006 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 388 is on host 388
2023-07-11 14:16:28,006 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 389 is on host 389
2023-07-11 14:16:28,007 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 390 is on host 390
2023-07-11 14:16:28,007 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 391 is on host 391
2023-07-11 14:16:28,007 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 392 is on host 392
2023-07-11 14:16:28,007 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=393, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:28,007 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table31) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:28,007 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table8
2023-07-11 14:16:28,007 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv553536953=290, srv1630071126=110, srv1071894870=12, srv23511728=232, srv658346947=323, srv2025338799=204, srv1397994335=64, srv1976766403=195, srv1644629726=118, srv957637734=381, srv2079182457=210, srv1749264468=139, srv2046129126=206, srv1595762596=104, srv603990852=307, srv1973073480=194, srv958856137=382, srv644066832=319, srv557062842=292, srv277765671=235, srv732221418=337, srv1769385567=143, srv224612199=228, srv714752528=334, srv362526040=256, srv581128949=296, srv2133511466=223, srv1144239257=30, srv320603627=245, srv1679952521=126, srv2122867873=222, srv1110067064=24, srv256251994=233, srv63261708=317, srv89837390=371, srv552104598=289, srv508952995=281, srv2096011353=214, srv1770417148=144, srv1246723478=42, srv929436444=378, srv2082192429=211, srv234917297=231, srv405700573=266, srv183644386=166, srv1488378513=85, srv173139715=136, srv1154180352=32, srv355693379=252, srv1407521654=66, srv496848057=275, srv1157975499=33, srv1806731027=162, srv1923102804=184, srv311102455=244, srv450011410=271, srv771515724=348, srv389183508=262, srv1249074416=43, srv2014575201=201, srv640847108=318, srv832363565=356, srv1970882134=192, srv2107358603=218, srv855766065=361, srv1336043388=55, srv29397186=237, srv982792848=390, srv976560524=386, srv101181760=3, srv1093549482=21, srv2018389395=202, srv2113483104=221, srv1778339118=149, srv1968709692=190, srv705221118=333, srv159600090=105, srv1919608486=180, srv981255102=389, srv807899713=353, srv755110395=344, srv1770594519=145, srv739692705=340, srv1076582671=16, srv693869315=330, srv1079048717=17, srv440657532=270, srv1636659280=115, srv2108739257=220, srv668373413=326, srv1003610393=2, srv1054229197=11, srv1868589627=172, srv2103522371=217, srv1000546271=0, srv951670617=380, srv2042909593=205, srv1865656038=171, srv1466355012=78, srv703662406=332, srv1418112884=70, srv1215580291=40, srv71833528=335, srv1580581635=103, srv1021032212=5, srv1080806312=19, srv1985601859=197, srv74471954=343, srv1647472319=119, srv2071553346=208, srv1632855171=112, srv1122009370=27, srv13613992=61, srv1630777154=111, srv301413669=239, srv550697728=288, srv1296023857=53, srv1724550977=133, srv1989290370=198, srv1926417985=185, srv1678097199=125, srv1461034373=76, srv614690415=311, srv2098345381=215, srv310463473=243, srv1011934105=4, srv148627129=84, srv305489318=240, srv1256534903=46, srv1289731445=52, srv1798844587=157, srv567113085=294, srv1119222501=26, srv2055117940=207, srv855898852=362, srv629224816=316, srv1075943554=15, srv625909061=315, srv1705591942=128, srv734225580=339, srv660107924=324, srv1381729938=62, srv1633483173=113, srv408265476=267, srv1776057793=148, srv1360253411=60, srv1511424834=90, srv1414162621=68, srv883343663=370, srv151859222=91, srv349144930=251, srv1991304034=199, srv1825887791=164, srv601657063=305, srv758932951=345, srv1651629087=120, srv1864623584=170, srv682957691=329, srv1500454146=88, srv1725962085=135, srv1659841448=121, srv1253206004=45, srv52354442=284, srv18508093=168, srv1427731921=73, srv561344974=293, srv721668125=336, srv1575482138=100, srv914128771=373, srv961487230=383, srv741332941=342, srv533032466=286, srv1574140987=99, srv2139849097=224, srv503902262=278, srv674807007=327, srv1786829855=153, srv2088727517=213, srv394366966=264, srv980089565=388, srv114594288=31, srv38296437=261, srv214835574=226, srv1887224977=176, srv1025509362=7, srv1577020334=102, srv524466665=285, srv393561021=263, srv759909927=346, srv763556514=347, srv786453030=349, srv2142935488=225, srv618111613=312, srv16254163=108, srv343211061=250, srv476075173=273, srv1269632212=47, srv333589612=246, srv499015361=276, srv836674186=357, srv1799191687=158, srv1446998035=74, srv1571774199=98, srv1115354947=25, srv333860881=247, srv1724152600=132, srv1598699299=106, srv177885829=151, srv472125887=272, srv1101339966=22, srv1424985362=72, srv1945569895=188, srv594128294=300, srv1026739237=8, srv842459828=358, srv878519137=366, srv1921260729=181, srv339110834=249, srv504099471=279, srv814253179=354, srv1643744885=116, srv1793847521=155, srv607234624=309, srv698219051=331, srv1688538732=127, srv666240078=325, srv1079284733=18, srv29210550=236, srv506181748=280, srv881313122=368, srv1945452576=187, srv597307897=303, srv1285120424=51, srv1887943816=177, srv1983604698=196, srv1805465940=161, srv309309336=242, srv1719756294=131, srv1349932676=58, srv1208486369=38, srv1643971570=117, srv1509331489=89, srv334105385=248, srv1400515744=65, srv369984715=259, srv43712162=269, srv842675864=359, srv1803258748=160, srv1022450918=6, srv1775108732=147, srv1766088250=141, srv180150732=159, srv1220857227=41, srv226530501=229, srv362032108=255, srv919715380=377, srv1074935976=14, srv1395030819=63, srv803291569=352, srv1877966766=175, srv220538712=227, srv2021718843=203, srv2107782185=219, srv882216860=369, srv1489137852=86, srv1972328734=193, srv1470759982=79, srv1774824811=146, srv971974774=384, srv1418242791=71, srv1001274196=1, srv909615097=372, srv1537724566=93, srv1165799954=34, srv1724754364=134, srv978173525=387, srv113319438=29, srv578033735=295, srv147931272=80, srv1183635941=35, srv1904215245=178, srv596349756=302, srv880835255=367, srv857544550=364, srv1779729022=152, srv1795612465=156, srv621083045=314, srv917704170=375, srv1351811120=59, srv1316710897=54, srv789820555=350, srv1922580095=183, srv305567304=241, srv1936745425=186, srv1745318024=138, srv1210822057=39, srv645375717=320, srv950628389=379, srv1490199189=87, srv1575919256=101, srv154481102=96, srv359402967=254, srv997716931=391, srv1457224273=75, srv581644449=297, srv1872374768=174, srv363177310=257, srv740327512=341, srv1664227236=123, srv972330517=385, srv1634261306=114, srv1662183707=122, srv1969046891=191, srv1485266211=82, srv1778842262=150, srv588410181=298, srv1921840985=182, srv591279493=299, srv37574565=260, srv1104147458=23, srv1190166330=36, srv652270371=322, srv1484309042=81, srv1560148463=97, srv618569548=313, srv2102708311=216, srv1084873074=20, srv517669556=283, srv918152084=376, srv649714317=321, srv1674484790=124, srv1339239880=56, srv1461073271=77, srv1125312901=28, srv25633292=234, srv516616923=282, srv299721745=238, srv604932433=308, srv1273702855=48, srv792183929=351, srv1042608200=10, srv1276335106=49, srv1486044644=83, srv676101698=328, srv998930892=392, srv200111276=200, srv1863083643=169, srv1737443479=137, srv872997185=365, srv821351126=355, srv852115805=360, srv1074355423=13, srv170952194=130, srv503430005=277, srv153887567=94, srv1415163001=69, srv1032737435=9, srv1840670515=167, srv1961921083=189, srv59745831=304, srv36715747=258, srv431547280=268, srv1524853580=92, srv1870059418=173, srv396010771=265, srv594457792=301, srv1755339428=140, srv1766275429=142, srv5565786=291, srv603898526=306, srv544570223=287, srv856030669=363, srv1542523468=95, srv915785747=374, srv356122213=253, srv1411875499=67, srv2077620970=209, srv1345529444=57, srv232339963=230, srv1250861076=44, srv1914875423=179, srv478619481=274, srv1202435626=37, srv1706089454=129, srv1810631201=163, srv1282644061=50, srv1625945288=109, srv733251129=338, srv2082830831=212, srv1612103540=107, srv612136291=310, srv1790004142=154, srv183394703=165} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:28,008 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:28,008 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:28,008 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:28,008 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:28,008 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:28,008 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:28,008 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-11 14:16:28,008 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-11 14:16:28,008 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-11 14:16:28,008 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-11 14:16:28,008 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 10 is on host 10
2023-07-11 14:16:28,008 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 11 is on host 11
2023-07-11 14:16:28,008 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 12 is on host 12
2023-07-11 14:16:28,008 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 13 is on host 13
2023-07-11 14:16:28,008 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 14 is on host 14
2023-07-11 14:16:28,008 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 15 is on host 15
2023-07-11 14:16:28,008 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 16 is on host 16
2023-07-11 14:16:28,008 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 17 is on host 17
2023-07-11 14:16:28,008 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 18 is on host 18
2023-07-11 14:16:28,008 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 19 is on host 19
2023-07-11 14:16:28,008 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 20 is on host 20
2023-07-11 14:16:28,008 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 21 is on host 21
2023-07-11 14:16:28,008 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 22 is on host 22
2023-07-11 14:16:28,008 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 23 is on host 23
2023-07-11 14:16:28,008 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 24 is on host 24
2023-07-11 14:16:28,009 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 25 is on host 25
2023-07-11 14:16:28,009 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 26 is on host 26
2023-07-11 14:16:28,009 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 27 is on host 27
2023-07-11 14:16:28,009 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 28 is on host 28
2023-07-11 14:16:28,009 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 29 is on host 29
2023-07-11 14:16:28,009 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 30 is on host 30
2023-07-11 14:16:28,009 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 31 is on host 31
2023-07-11 14:16:28,009 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 32 is on host 32
2023-07-11 14:16:28,009 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 33 is on host 33
2023-07-11 14:16:28,009 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 34 is on host 34
2023-07-11 14:16:28,009 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 35 is on host 35
2023-07-11 14:16:28,009 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 36 is on host 36
2023-07-11 14:16:28,009 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 37 is on host 37
2023-07-11 14:16:28,009 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 38 is on host 38
2023-07-11 14:16:28,009 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 39 is on host 39
2023-07-11 14:16:28,009 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 40 is on host 40
2023-07-11 14:16:28,009 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 41 is on host 41
2023-07-11 14:16:28,009 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 42 is on host 42
2023-07-11 14:16:28,009 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 43 is on host 43
2023-07-11 14:16:28,009 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 44 is on host 44
2023-07-11 14:16:28,009 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 45 is on host 45
2023-07-11 14:16:28,009 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 46 is on host 46
2023-07-11 14:16:28,009 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 47 is on host 47
2023-07-11 14:16:28,009 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 48 is on host 48
2023-07-11 14:16:28,009 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 49 is on host 49
2023-07-11 14:16:28,009 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 50 is on host 50
2023-07-11 14:16:28,009 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 51 is on host 51
2023-07-11 14:16:28,009 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 52 is on host 52
2023-07-11 14:16:28,009 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 53 is on host 53
2023-07-11 14:16:28,010 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 54 is on host 54
2023-07-11 14:16:28,010 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 55 is on host 55
2023-07-11 14:16:28,010 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 56 is on host 56
2023-07-11 14:16:28,010 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 57 is on host 57
2023-07-11 14:16:28,010 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 58 is on host 58
2023-07-11 14:16:28,010 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 59 is on host 59
2023-07-11 14:16:28,010 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 60 is on host 60
2023-07-11 14:16:28,010 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 61 is on host 61
2023-07-11 14:16:28,010 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 62 is on host 62
2023-07-11 14:16:28,010 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 63 is on host 63
2023-07-11 14:16:28,010 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 64 is on host 64
2023-07-11 14:16:28,010 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 65 is on host 65
2023-07-11 14:16:28,010 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 66 is on host 66
2023-07-11 14:16:28,010 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 67 is on host 67
2023-07-11 14:16:28,010 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 68 is on host 68
2023-07-11 14:16:28,010 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 69 is on host 69
2023-07-11 14:16:28,010 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 70 is on host 70
2023-07-11 14:16:28,010 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 71 is on host 71
2023-07-11 14:16:28,010 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 72 is on host 72
2023-07-11 14:16:28,010 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 73 is on host 73
2023-07-11 14:16:28,010 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 74 is on host 74
2023-07-11 14:16:28,010 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 75 is on host 75
2023-07-11 14:16:28,010 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 76 is on host 76
2023-07-11 14:16:28,010 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 77 is on host 77
2023-07-11 14:16:28,010 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 78 is on host 78
2023-07-11 14:16:28,010 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 79 is on host 79
2023-07-11 14:16:28,010 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 80 is on host 80
2023-07-11 14:16:28,010 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 81 is on host 81
2023-07-11 14:16:28,011 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 82 is on host 82
2023-07-11 14:16:28,011 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 83 is on host 83
2023-07-11 14:16:28,011 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 84 is on host 84
2023-07-11 14:16:28,011 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 85 is on host 85
2023-07-11 14:16:28,011 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 86 is on host 86
2023-07-11 14:16:28,011 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 87 is on host 87
2023-07-11 14:16:28,011 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 88 is on host 88
2023-07-11 14:16:28,011 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 89 is on host 89
2023-07-11 14:16:28,011 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 90 is on host 90
2023-07-11 14:16:28,011 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 91 is on host 91
2023-07-11 14:16:28,011 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 92 is on host 92
2023-07-11 14:16:28,011 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 93 is on host 93
2023-07-11 14:16:28,011 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 94 is on host 94
2023-07-11 14:16:28,011 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 95 is on host 95
2023-07-11 14:16:28,011 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 96 is on host 96
2023-07-11 14:16:28,011 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 97 is on host 97
2023-07-11 14:16:28,011 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 98 is on host 98
2023-07-11 14:16:28,011 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 99 is on host 99
2023-07-11 14:16:28,011 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 100 is on host 100
2023-07-11 14:16:28,011 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 101 is on host 101
2023-07-11 14:16:28,011 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 102 is on host 102
2023-07-11 14:16:28,011 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 103 is on host 103
2023-07-11 14:16:28,011 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 104 is on host 104
2023-07-11 14:16:28,011 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 105 is on host 105
2023-07-11 14:16:28,011 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 106 is on host 106
2023-07-11 14:16:28,012 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 107 is on host 107
2023-07-11 14:16:28,012 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 108 is on host 108
2023-07-11 14:16:28,012 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 109 is on host 109
2023-07-11 14:16:28,012 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 110 is on host 110
2023-07-11 14:16:28,012 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 111 is on host 111
2023-07-11 14:16:28,012 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 112 is on host 112
2023-07-11 14:16:28,012 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 113 is on host 113
2023-07-11 14:16:28,012 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 114 is on host 114
2023-07-11 14:16:28,012 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 115 is on host 115
2023-07-11 14:16:28,012 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 116 is on host 116
2023-07-11 14:16:28,012 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 117 is on host 117
2023-07-11 14:16:28,012 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 118 is on host 118
2023-07-11 14:16:28,012 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 119 is on host 119
2023-07-11 14:16:28,012 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 120 is on host 120
2023-07-11 14:16:28,012 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 121 is on host 121
2023-07-11 14:16:28,012 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 122 is on host 122
2023-07-11 14:16:28,012 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 123 is on host 123
2023-07-11 14:16:28,012 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 124 is on host 124
2023-07-11 14:16:28,012 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 125 is on host 125
2023-07-11 14:16:28,012 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 126 is on host 126
2023-07-11 14:16:28,012 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 127 is on host 127
2023-07-11 14:16:28,012 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 128 is on host 128
2023-07-11 14:16:28,012 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 129 is on host 129
2023-07-11 14:16:28,012 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 130 is on host 130
2023-07-11 14:16:28,012 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 131 is on host 131
2023-07-11 14:16:28,012 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 132 is on host 132
2023-07-11 14:16:28,012 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 133 is on host 133
2023-07-11 14:16:28,013 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 134 is on host 134
2023-07-11 14:16:28,013 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 135 is on host 135
2023-07-11 14:16:28,013 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 136 is on host 136
2023-07-11 14:16:28,013 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 137 is on host 137
2023-07-11 14:16:28,013 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 138 is on host 138
2023-07-11 14:16:28,013 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 139 is on host 139
2023-07-11 14:16:28,013 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 140 is on host 140
2023-07-11 14:16:28,013 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 141 is on host 141
2023-07-11 14:16:28,013 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 142 is on host 142
2023-07-11 14:16:28,013 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 143 is on host 143
2023-07-11 14:16:28,013 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 144 is on host 144
2023-07-11 14:16:28,013 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 145 is on host 145
2023-07-11 14:16:28,013 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 146 is on host 146
2023-07-11 14:16:28,013 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 147 is on host 147
2023-07-11 14:16:28,013 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 148 is on host 148
2023-07-11 14:16:28,013 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 149 is on host 149
2023-07-11 14:16:28,013 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 150 is on host 150
2023-07-11 14:16:28,013 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 151 is on host 151
2023-07-11 14:16:28,013 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 152 is on host 152
2023-07-11 14:16:28,013 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 153 is on host 153
2023-07-11 14:16:28,013 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 154 is on host 154
2023-07-11 14:16:28,013 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 155 is on host 155
2023-07-11 14:16:28,013 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 156 is on host 156
2023-07-11 14:16:28,013 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 157 is on host 157
2023-07-11 14:16:28,013 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 158 is on host 158
2023-07-11 14:16:28,013 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 159 is on host 159
2023-07-11 14:16:28,013 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 160 is on host 160
2023-07-11 14:16:28,014 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 161 is on host 161
2023-07-11 14:16:28,014 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 162 is on host 162
2023-07-11 14:16:28,014 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 163 is on host 163
2023-07-11 14:16:28,014 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 164 is on host 164
2023-07-11 14:16:28,014 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 165 is on host 165
2023-07-11 14:16:28,014 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 166 is on host 166
2023-07-11 14:16:28,014 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 167 is on host 167
2023-07-11 14:16:28,014 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 168 is on host 168
2023-07-11 14:16:28,014 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 169 is on host 169
2023-07-11 14:16:28,014 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 170 is on host 170
2023-07-11 14:16:28,014 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 171 is on host 171
2023-07-11 14:16:28,014 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 172 is on host 172
2023-07-11 14:16:28,014 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 173 is on host 173
2023-07-11 14:16:28,014 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 174 is on host 174
2023-07-11 14:16:28,014 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 175 is on host 175
2023-07-11 14:16:28,014 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 176 is on host 176
2023-07-11 14:16:28,014 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 177 is on host 177
2023-07-11 14:16:28,014 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 178 is on host 178
2023-07-11 14:16:28,014 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 179 is on host 179
2023-07-11 14:16:28,014 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 180 is on host 180
2023-07-11 14:16:28,014 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 181 is on host 181
2023-07-11 14:16:28,015 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 182 is on host 182
2023-07-11 14:16:28,015 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 183 is on host 183
2023-07-11 14:16:28,015 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 184 is on host 184
2023-07-11 14:16:28,015 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 185 is on host 185
2023-07-11 14:16:28,015 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 186 is on host 186
2023-07-11 14:16:28,015 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 187 is on host 187
2023-07-11 14:16:28,015 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 188 is on host 188
2023-07-11 14:16:28,015 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 189 is on host 189
2023-07-11 14:16:28,015 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 190 is on host 190
2023-07-11 14:16:28,015 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 191 is on host 191
2023-07-11 14:16:28,015 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 192 is on host 192
2023-07-11 14:16:28,015 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 193 is on host 193
2023-07-11 14:16:28,015 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 194 is on host 194
2023-07-11 14:16:28,015 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 195 is on host 195
2023-07-11 14:16:28,015 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 196 is on host 196
2023-07-11 14:16:28,015 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 197 is on host 197
2023-07-11 14:16:28,015 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 198 is on host 198
2023-07-11 14:16:28,015 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 199 is on host 199
2023-07-11 14:16:28,015 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 200 is on host 200
2023-07-11 14:16:28,015 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 201 is on host 201
2023-07-11 14:16:28,015 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 202 is on host 202
2023-07-11 14:16:28,015 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 203 is on host 203
2023-07-11 14:16:28,015 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 204 is on host 204
2023-07-11 14:16:28,015 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 205 is on host 205
2023-07-11 14:16:28,015 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 206 is on host 206
2023-07-11 14:16:28,015 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 207 is on host 207
2023-07-11 14:16:28,015 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 208 is on host 208
2023-07-11 14:16:28,015 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 209 is on host 209
2023-07-11 14:16:28,015 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 210 is on host 210
2023-07-11 14:16:28,015 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 211 is on host 211
2023-07-11 14:16:28,016 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 212 is on host 212
2023-07-11 14:16:28,016 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 213 is on host 213
2023-07-11 14:16:28,016 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 214 is on host 214
2023-07-11 14:16:28,016 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 215 is on host 215
2023-07-11 14:16:28,016 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 216 is on host 216
2023-07-11 14:16:28,016 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 217 is on host 217
2023-07-11 14:16:28,016 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 218 is on host 218
2023-07-11 14:16:28,016 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 219 is on host 219
2023-07-11 14:16:28,016 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 220 is on host 220
2023-07-11 14:16:28,016 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 221 is on host 221
2023-07-11 14:16:28,016 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 222 is on host 222
2023-07-11 14:16:28,016 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 223 is on host 223
2023-07-11 14:16:28,016 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 224 is on host 224
2023-07-11 14:16:28,016 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 225 is on host 225
2023-07-11 14:16:28,016 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 226 is on host 226
2023-07-11 14:16:28,016 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 227 is on host 227
2023-07-11 14:16:28,016 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 228 is on host 228
2023-07-11 14:16:28,016 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 229 is on host 229
2023-07-11 14:16:28,016 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 230 is on host 230
2023-07-11 14:16:28,016 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 231 is on host 231
2023-07-11 14:16:28,016 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 232 is on host 232
2023-07-11 14:16:28,016 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 233 is on host 233
2023-07-11 14:16:28,016 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 234 is on host 234
2023-07-11 14:16:28,016 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 235 is on host 235
2023-07-11 14:16:28,016 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 236 is on host 236
2023-07-11 14:16:28,016 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 237 is on host 237
2023-07-11 14:16:28,016 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 238 is on host 238
2023-07-11 14:16:28,016 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 239 is on host 239
2023-07-11 14:16:28,016 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 240 is on host 240
2023-07-11 14:16:28,017 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 241 is on host 241
2023-07-11 14:16:28,017 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 242 is on host 242
2023-07-11 14:16:28,017 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 243 is on host 243
2023-07-11 14:16:28,017 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 244 is on host 244
2023-07-11 14:16:28,017 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 245 is on host 245
2023-07-11 14:16:28,017 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 246 is on host 246
2023-07-11 14:16:28,017 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 247 is on host 247
2023-07-11 14:16:28,017 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 248 is on host 248
2023-07-11 14:16:28,017 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 249 is on host 249
2023-07-11 14:16:28,017 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 250 is on host 250
2023-07-11 14:16:28,017 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 251 is on host 251
2023-07-11 14:16:28,017 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 252 is on host 252
2023-07-11 14:16:28,017 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 253 is on host 253
2023-07-11 14:16:28,017 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 254 is on host 254
2023-07-11 14:16:28,017 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 255 is on host 255
2023-07-11 14:16:28,017 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 256 is on host 256
2023-07-11 14:16:28,017 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 257 is on host 257
2023-07-11 14:16:28,017 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 258 is on host 258
2023-07-11 14:16:28,017 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 259 is on host 259
2023-07-11 14:16:28,017 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 260 is on host 260
2023-07-11 14:16:28,017 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 261 is on host 261
2023-07-11 14:16:28,017 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 262 is on host 262
2023-07-11 14:16:28,017 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 263 is on host 263
2023-07-11 14:16:28,017 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 264 is on host 264
2023-07-11 14:16:28,017 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 265 is on host 265
2023-07-11 14:16:28,017 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 266 is on host 266
2023-07-11 14:16:28,017 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 267 is on host 267
2023-07-11 14:16:28,017 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 268 is on host 268
2023-07-11 14:16:28,018 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 269 is on host 269
2023-07-11 14:16:28,018 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 270 is on host 270
2023-07-11 14:16:28,018 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 271 is on host 271
2023-07-11 14:16:28,018 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 272 is on host 272
2023-07-11 14:16:28,018 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 273 is on host 273
2023-07-11 14:16:28,018 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 274 is on host 274
2023-07-11 14:16:28,018 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 275 is on host 275
2023-07-11 14:16:28,018 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 276 is on host 276
2023-07-11 14:16:28,018 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 277 is on host 277
2023-07-11 14:16:28,018 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 278 is on host 278
2023-07-11 14:16:28,018 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 279 is on host 279
2023-07-11 14:16:28,018 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 280 is on host 280
2023-07-11 14:16:28,018 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 281 is on host 281
2023-07-11 14:16:28,018 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 282 is on host 282
2023-07-11 14:16:28,018 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 283 is on host 283
2023-07-11 14:16:28,018 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 284 is on host 284
2023-07-11 14:16:28,018 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 285 is on host 285
2023-07-11 14:16:28,018 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 286 is on host 286
2023-07-11 14:16:28,018 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 287 is on host 287
2023-07-11 14:16:28,018 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 288 is on host 288
2023-07-11 14:16:28,018 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 289 is on host 289
2023-07-11 14:16:28,018 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 290 is on host 290
2023-07-11 14:16:28,018 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 291 is on host 291
2023-07-11 14:16:28,018 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 292 is on host 292
2023-07-11 14:16:28,018 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 293 is on host 293
2023-07-11 14:16:28,018 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 294 is on host 294
2023-07-11 14:16:28,018 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 295 is on host 295
2023-07-11 14:16:28,018 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 296 is on host 296
2023-07-11 14:16:28,018 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 297 is on host 297
2023-07-11 14:16:28,018 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 298 is on host 298
2023-07-11 14:16:28,019 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 299 is on host 299
2023-07-11 14:16:28,019 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 300 is on host 300
2023-07-11 14:16:28,019 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 301 is on host 301
2023-07-11 14:16:28,019 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 302 is on host 302
2023-07-11 14:16:28,019 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 303 is on host 303
2023-07-11 14:16:28,019 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 304 is on host 304
2023-07-11 14:16:28,019 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 305 is on host 305
2023-07-11 14:16:28,019 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 306 is on host 306
2023-07-11 14:16:28,019 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 307 is on host 307
2023-07-11 14:16:28,019 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 308 is on host 308
2023-07-11 14:16:28,019 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 309 is on host 309
2023-07-11 14:16:28,019 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 310 is on host 310
2023-07-11 14:16:28,019 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 311 is on host 311
2023-07-11 14:16:28,019 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 312 is on host 312
2023-07-11 14:16:28,019 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 313 is on host 313
2023-07-11 14:16:28,019 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 314 is on host 314
2023-07-11 14:16:28,019 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 315 is on host 315
2023-07-11 14:16:28,019 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 316 is on host 316
2023-07-11 14:16:28,019 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 317 is on host 317
2023-07-11 14:16:28,019 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 318 is on host 318
2023-07-11 14:16:28,019 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 319 is on host 319
2023-07-11 14:16:28,019 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 320 is on host 320
2023-07-11 14:16:28,019 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 321 is on host 321
2023-07-11 14:16:28,019 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 322 is on host 322
2023-07-11 14:16:28,019 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 323 is on host 323
2023-07-11 14:16:28,019 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 324 is on host 324
2023-07-11 14:16:28,019 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 325 is on host 325
2023-07-11 14:16:28,019 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 326 is on host 326
2023-07-11 14:16:28,019 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 327 is on host 327
2023-07-11 14:16:28,020 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 328 is on host 328
2023-07-11 14:16:28,020 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 329 is on host 329
2023-07-11 14:16:28,020 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 330 is on host 330
2023-07-11 14:16:28,020 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 331 is on host 331
2023-07-11 14:16:28,020 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 332 is on host 332
2023-07-11 14:16:28,020 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 333 is on host 333
2023-07-11 14:16:28,020 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 334 is on host 334
2023-07-11 14:16:28,020 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 335 is on host 335
2023-07-11 14:16:28,020 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 336 is on host 336
2023-07-11 14:16:28,020 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 337 is on host 337
2023-07-11 14:16:28,020 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 338 is on host 338
2023-07-11 14:16:28,020 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 339 is on host 339
2023-07-11 14:16:28,020 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 340 is on host 340
2023-07-11 14:16:28,020 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 341 is on host 341
2023-07-11 14:16:28,020 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 342 is on host 342
2023-07-11 14:16:28,020 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 343 is on host 343
2023-07-11 14:16:28,020 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 344 is on host 344
2023-07-11 14:16:28,020 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 345 is on host 345
2023-07-11 14:16:28,020 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 346 is on host 346
2023-07-11 14:16:28,020 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 347 is on host 347
2023-07-11 14:16:28,020 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 348 is on host 348
2023-07-11 14:16:28,020 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 349 is on host 349
2023-07-11 14:16:28,020 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 350 is on host 350
2023-07-11 14:16:28,020 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 351 is on host 351
2023-07-11 14:16:28,020 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 352 is on host 352
2023-07-11 14:16:28,020 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 353 is on host 353
2023-07-11 14:16:28,020 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 354 is on host 354
2023-07-11 14:16:28,020 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 355 is on host 355
2023-07-11 14:16:28,020 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 356 is on host 356
2023-07-11 14:16:28,021 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 357 is on host 357
2023-07-11 14:16:28,021 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 358 is on host 358
2023-07-11 14:16:28,021 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 359 is on host 359
2023-07-11 14:16:28,021 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 360 is on host 360
2023-07-11 14:16:28,021 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 361 is on host 361
2023-07-11 14:16:28,021 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 362 is on host 362
2023-07-11 14:16:28,021 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 363 is on host 363
2023-07-11 14:16:28,021 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 364 is on host 364
2023-07-11 14:16:28,021 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 365 is on host 365
2023-07-11 14:16:28,021 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 366 is on host 366
2023-07-11 14:16:28,021 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 367 is on host 367
2023-07-11 14:16:28,021 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 368 is on host 368
2023-07-11 14:16:28,021 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 369 is on host 369
2023-07-11 14:16:28,021 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 370 is on host 370
2023-07-11 14:16:28,021 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 371 is on host 371
2023-07-11 14:16:28,021 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 372 is on host 372
2023-07-11 14:16:28,021 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 373 is on host 373
2023-07-11 14:16:28,021 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 374 is on host 374
2023-07-11 14:16:28,021 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 375 is on host 375
2023-07-11 14:16:28,021 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 376 is on host 376
2023-07-11 14:16:28,021 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 377 is on host 377
2023-07-11 14:16:28,021 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 378 is on host 378
2023-07-11 14:16:28,021 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 379 is on host 379
2023-07-11 14:16:28,021 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 380 is on host 380
2023-07-11 14:16:28,021 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 381 is on host 381
2023-07-11 14:16:28,021 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 382 is on host 382
2023-07-11 14:16:28,021 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 383 is on host 383
2023-07-11 14:16:28,021 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 384 is on host 384
2023-07-11 14:16:28,022 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 385 is on host 385
2023-07-11 14:16:28,022 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 386 is on host 386
2023-07-11 14:16:28,022 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 387 is on host 387
2023-07-11 14:16:28,022 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 388 is on host 388
2023-07-11 14:16:28,022 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 389 is on host 389
2023-07-11 14:16:28,022 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 390 is on host 390
2023-07-11 14:16:28,022 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 391 is on host 391
2023-07-11 14:16:28,022 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 392 is on host 392
2023-07-11 14:16:28,022 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=393, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:28,022 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table8) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:28,022 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table32
2023-07-11 14:16:28,023 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv553536953=290, srv1630071126=110, srv1071894870=12, srv23511728=232, srv658346947=323, srv2025338799=204, srv1397994335=64, srv1976766403=195, srv1644629726=118, srv957637734=381, srv2079182457=210, srv1749264468=139, srv2046129126=206, srv1595762596=104, srv603990852=307, srv1973073480=194, srv958856137=382, srv644066832=319, srv557062842=292, srv277765671=235, srv732221418=337, srv1769385567=143, srv224612199=228, srv714752528=334, srv362526040=256, srv581128949=296, srv2133511466=223, srv1144239257=30, srv320603627=245, srv1679952521=126, srv2122867873=222, srv1110067064=24, srv256251994=233, srv63261708=317, srv89837390=371, srv552104598=289, srv508952995=281, srv2096011353=214, srv1770417148=144, srv1246723478=42, srv929436444=378, srv2082192429=211, srv234917297=231, srv405700573=266, srv183644386=166, srv1488378513=85, srv173139715=136, srv1154180352=32, srv355693379=252, srv1407521654=66, srv496848057=275, srv1157975499=33, srv1806731027=162, srv1923102804=184, srv311102455=244, srv450011410=271, srv771515724=348, srv389183508=262, srv1249074416=43, srv2014575201=201, srv640847108=318, srv832363565=356, srv1970882134=192, srv2107358603=218, srv855766065=361, srv1336043388=55, srv29397186=237, srv982792848=390, srv976560524=386, srv101181760=3, srv1093549482=21, srv2018389395=202, srv2113483104=221, srv1778339118=149, srv1968709692=190, srv705221118=333, srv159600090=105, srv1919608486=180, srv981255102=389, srv807899713=353, srv755110395=344, srv1770594519=145, srv739692705=340, srv1076582671=16, srv693869315=330, srv1079048717=17, srv440657532=270, srv1636659280=115, srv2108739257=220, srv668373413=326, srv1003610393=2, srv1054229197=11, srv1868589627=172, srv2103522371=217, srv1000546271=0, srv951670617=380, srv2042909593=205, srv1865656038=171, srv1466355012=78, srv703662406=332, srv1418112884=70, srv1215580291=40, srv71833528=335, srv1580581635=103, srv1021032212=5, srv1080806312=19, srv1985601859=197, srv74471954=343, srv1647472319=119, srv2071553346=208, srv1632855171=112, srv1122009370=27, srv13613992=61, srv1630777154=111, srv301413669=239, srv550697728=288, srv1296023857=53, srv1724550977=133, srv1989290370=198, srv1926417985=185, srv1678097199=125, srv1461034373=76, srv614690415=311, srv2098345381=215, srv310463473=243, srv1011934105=4, srv148627129=84, srv305489318=240, srv1256534903=46, srv1289731445=52, srv1798844587=157, srv567113085=294, srv1119222501=26, srv2055117940=207, srv855898852=362, srv629224816=316, srv1075943554=15, srv625909061=315, srv1705591942=128, srv734225580=339, srv660107924=324, srv1381729938=62, srv1633483173=113, srv408265476=267, srv1776057793=148, srv1360253411=60, srv1511424834=90, srv1414162621=68, srv883343663=370, srv151859222=91, srv349144930=251, srv1991304034=199, srv1825887791=164, srv601657063=305, srv758932951=345, srv1651629087=120, srv1864623584=170, srv682957691=329, srv1500454146=88, srv1725962085=135, srv1659841448=121, srv1253206004=45, srv52354442=284, srv18508093=168, srv1427731921=73, srv561344974=293, srv721668125=336, srv1575482138=100, srv914128771=373, srv961487230=383, srv741332941=342, srv533032466=286, srv1574140987=99, srv2139849097=224, srv503902262=278, srv674807007=327, srv1786829855=153, srv2088727517=213, srv394366966=264, srv980089565=388, srv114594288=31, srv38296437=261, srv214835574=226, srv1887224977=176, srv1025509362=7, srv1577020334=102, srv524466665=285, srv393561021=263, srv759909927=346, srv763556514=347, srv786453030=349, srv2142935488=225, srv618111613=312, srv16254163=108, srv343211061=250, srv476075173=273, srv1269632212=47, srv333589612=246, srv499015361=276, srv836674186=357, srv1799191687=158, srv1446998035=74, srv1571774199=98, srv1115354947=25, srv333860881=247, srv1724152600=132, srv1598699299=106, srv177885829=151, srv472125887=272, srv1101339966=22, srv1424985362=72, srv1945569895=188, srv594128294=300, srv1026739237=8, srv842459828=358, srv878519137=366, srv1921260729=181, srv339110834=249, srv504099471=279, srv814253179=354, srv1643744885=116, srv1793847521=155, srv607234624=309, srv698219051=331, srv1688538732=127, srv666240078=325, srv1079284733=18, srv29210550=236, srv506181748=280, srv881313122=368, srv1945452576=187, srv597307897=303, srv1285120424=51, srv1887943816=177, srv1983604698=196, srv1805465940=161, srv309309336=242, srv1719756294=131, srv1349932676=58, srv1208486369=38, srv1643971570=117, srv1509331489=89, srv334105385=248, srv1400515744=65, srv369984715=259, srv43712162=269, srv842675864=359, srv1803258748=160, srv1022450918=6, srv1775108732=147, srv1766088250=141, srv180150732=159, srv1220857227=41, srv226530501=229, srv362032108=255, srv919715380=377, srv1074935976=14, srv1395030819=63, srv803291569=352, srv1877966766=175, srv220538712=227, srv2021718843=203, srv2107782185=219, srv882216860=369, srv1489137852=86, srv1972328734=193, srv1470759982=79, srv1774824811=146, srv971974774=384, srv1418242791=71, srv1001274196=1, srv909615097=372, srv1537724566=93, srv1165799954=34, srv1724754364=134, srv978173525=387, srv113319438=29, srv578033735=295, srv147931272=80, srv1183635941=35, srv1904215245=178, srv596349756=302, srv880835255=367, srv857544550=364, srv1779729022=152, srv1795612465=156, srv621083045=314, srv917704170=375, srv1351811120=59, srv1316710897=54, srv789820555=350, srv1922580095=183, srv305567304=241, srv1936745425=186, srv1745318024=138, srv1210822057=39, srv645375717=320, srv950628389=379, srv1490199189=87, srv1575919256=101, srv154481102=96, srv359402967=254, srv997716931=391, srv1457224273=75, srv581644449=297, srv1872374768=174, srv363177310=257, srv740327512=341, srv1664227236=123, srv972330517=385, srv1634261306=114, srv1662183707=122, srv1969046891=191, srv1485266211=82, srv1778842262=150, srv588410181=298, srv1921840985=182, srv591279493=299, srv37574565=260, srv1104147458=23, srv1190166330=36, srv652270371=322, srv1484309042=81, srv1560148463=97, srv618569548=313, srv2102708311=216, srv1084873074=20, srv517669556=283, srv918152084=376, srv649714317=321, srv1674484790=124, srv1339239880=56, srv1461073271=77, srv1125312901=28, srv25633292=234, srv516616923=282, srv299721745=238, srv604932433=308, srv1273702855=48, srv792183929=351, srv1042608200=10, srv1276335106=49, srv1486044644=83, srv676101698=328, srv998930892=392, srv200111276=200, srv1863083643=169, srv1737443479=137, srv872997185=365, srv821351126=355, srv852115805=360, srv1074355423=13, srv170952194=130, srv503430005=277, srv153887567=94, srv1415163001=69, srv1032737435=9, srv1840670515=167, srv1961921083=189, srv59745831=304, srv36715747=258, srv431547280=268, srv1524853580=92, srv1870059418=173, srv396010771=265, srv594457792=301, srv1755339428=140, srv1766275429=142, srv5565786=291, srv603898526=306, srv544570223=287, srv856030669=363, srv1542523468=95, srv915785747=374, srv356122213=253, srv1411875499=67, srv2077620970=209, srv1345529444=57, srv232339963=230, srv1250861076=44, srv1914875423=179, srv478619481=274, srv1202435626=37, srv1706089454=129, srv1810631201=163, srv1282644061=50, srv1625945288=109, srv733251129=338, srv2082830831=212, srv1612103540=107, srv612136291=310, srv1790004142=154, srv183394703=165} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:28,023 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:28,023 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:28,023 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:28,023 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:28,023 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:28,023 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:28,023 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-11 14:16:28,023 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-11 14:16:28,023 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-11 14:16:28,023 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-11 14:16:28,023 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 10 is on host 10
2023-07-11 14:16:28,023 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 11 is on host 11
2023-07-11 14:16:28,023 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 12 is on host 12
2023-07-11 14:16:28,023 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 13 is on host 13
2023-07-11 14:16:28,023 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 14 is on host 14
2023-07-11 14:16:28,023 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 15 is on host 15
2023-07-11 14:16:28,023 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 16 is on host 16
2023-07-11 14:16:28,023 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 17 is on host 17
2023-07-11 14:16:28,023 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 18 is on host 18
2023-07-11 14:16:28,023 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 19 is on host 19
2023-07-11 14:16:28,023 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 20 is on host 20
2023-07-11 14:16:28,024 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 21 is on host 21
2023-07-11 14:16:28,024 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 22 is on host 22
2023-07-11 14:16:28,024 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 23 is on host 23
2023-07-11 14:16:28,024 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 24 is on host 24
2023-07-11 14:16:28,024 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 25 is on host 25
2023-07-11 14:16:28,024 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 26 is on host 26
2023-07-11 14:16:28,024 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 27 is on host 27
2023-07-11 14:16:28,024 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 28 is on host 28
2023-07-11 14:16:28,024 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 29 is on host 29
2023-07-11 14:16:28,024 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 30 is on host 30
2023-07-11 14:16:28,024 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 31 is on host 31
2023-07-11 14:16:28,024 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 32 is on host 32
2023-07-11 14:16:28,024 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 33 is on host 33
2023-07-11 14:16:28,024 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 34 is on host 34
2023-07-11 14:16:28,024 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 35 is on host 35
2023-07-11 14:16:28,024 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 36 is on host 36
2023-07-11 14:16:28,024 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 37 is on host 37
2023-07-11 14:16:28,024 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 38 is on host 38
2023-07-11 14:16:28,024 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 39 is on host 39
2023-07-11 14:16:28,024 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 40 is on host 40
2023-07-11 14:16:28,024 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 41 is on host 41
2023-07-11 14:16:28,024 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 42 is on host 42
2023-07-11 14:16:28,024 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 43 is on host 43
2023-07-11 14:16:28,024 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 44 is on host 44
2023-07-11 14:16:28,024 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 45 is on host 45
2023-07-11 14:16:28,024 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 46 is on host 46
2023-07-11 14:16:28,024 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 47 is on host 47
2023-07-11 14:16:28,024 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 48 is on host 48
2023-07-11 14:16:28,024 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 49 is on host 49
2023-07-11 14:16:28,025 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 50 is on host 50
2023-07-11 14:16:28,025 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 51 is on host 51
2023-07-11 14:16:28,025 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 52 is on host 52
2023-07-11 14:16:28,025 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 53 is on host 53
2023-07-11 14:16:28,025 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 54 is on host 54
2023-07-11 14:16:28,025 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 55 is on host 55
2023-07-11 14:16:28,025 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 56 is on host 56
2023-07-11 14:16:28,025 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 57 is on host 57
2023-07-11 14:16:28,025 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 58 is on host 58
2023-07-11 14:16:28,025 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 59 is on host 59
2023-07-11 14:16:28,025 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 60 is on host 60
2023-07-11 14:16:28,025 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 61 is on host 61
2023-07-11 14:16:28,025 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 62 is on host 62
2023-07-11 14:16:28,025 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 63 is on host 63
2023-07-11 14:16:28,025 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 64 is on host 64
2023-07-11 14:16:28,025 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 65 is on host 65
2023-07-11 14:16:28,025 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 66 is on host 66
2023-07-11 14:16:28,025 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 67 is on host 67
2023-07-11 14:16:28,025 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 68 is on host 68
2023-07-11 14:16:28,025 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 69 is on host 69
2023-07-11 14:16:28,026 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 70 is on host 70
2023-07-11 14:16:28,026 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 71 is on host 71
2023-07-11 14:16:28,026 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 72 is on host 72
2023-07-11 14:16:28,026 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 73 is on host 73
2023-07-11 14:16:28,026 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 74 is on host 74
2023-07-11 14:16:28,026 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 75 is on host 75
2023-07-11 14:16:28,026 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 76 is on host 76
2023-07-11 14:16:28,026 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 77 is on host 77
2023-07-11 14:16:28,026 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 78 is on host 78
2023-07-11 14:16:28,026 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 79 is on host 79
2023-07-11 14:16:28,026 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 80 is on host 80
2023-07-11 14:16:28,026 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 81 is on host 81
2023-07-11 14:16:28,026 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 82 is on host 82
2023-07-11 14:16:28,026 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 83 is on host 83
2023-07-11 14:16:28,026 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 84 is on host 84
2023-07-11 14:16:28,026 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 85 is on host 85
2023-07-11 14:16:28,026 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 86 is on host 86
2023-07-11 14:16:28,026 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 87 is on host 87
2023-07-11 14:16:28,026 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 88 is on host 88
2023-07-11 14:16:28,026 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 89 is on host 89
2023-07-11 14:16:28,026 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 90 is on host 90
2023-07-11 14:16:28,026 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 91 is on host 91
2023-07-11 14:16:28,026 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 92 is on host 92
2023-07-11 14:16:28,026 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 93 is on host 93
2023-07-11 14:16:28,026 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 94 is on host 94
2023-07-11 14:16:28,026 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 95 is on host 95
2023-07-11 14:16:28,026 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 96 is on host 96
2023-07-11 14:16:28,026 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 97 is on host 97
2023-07-11 14:16:28,026 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 98 is on host 98
2023-07-11 14:16:28,027 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 99 is on host 99
2023-07-11 14:16:28,027 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 100 is on host 100
2023-07-11 14:16:28,027 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 101 is on host 101
2023-07-11 14:16:28,027 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 102 is on host 102
2023-07-11 14:16:28,027 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 103 is on host 103
2023-07-11 14:16:28,027 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 104 is on host 104
2023-07-11 14:16:28,027 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 105 is on host 105
2023-07-11 14:16:28,027 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 106 is on host 106
2023-07-11 14:16:28,027 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 107 is on host 107
2023-07-11 14:16:28,027 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 108 is on host 108
2023-07-11 14:16:28,027 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 109 is on host 109
2023-07-11 14:16:28,027 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 110 is on host 110
2023-07-11 14:16:28,027 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 111 is on host 111
2023-07-11 14:16:28,027 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 112 is on host 112
2023-07-11 14:16:28,027 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 113 is on host 113
2023-07-11 14:16:28,027 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 114 is on host 114
2023-07-11 14:16:28,027 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 115 is on host 115
2023-07-11 14:16:28,027 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 116 is on host 116
2023-07-11 14:16:28,027 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 117 is on host 117
2023-07-11 14:16:28,027 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 118 is on host 118
2023-07-11 14:16:28,027 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 119 is on host 119
2023-07-11 14:16:28,027 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 120 is on host 120
2023-07-11 14:16:28,027 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 121 is on host 121
2023-07-11 14:16:28,027 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 122 is on host 122
2023-07-11 14:16:28,027 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 123 is on host 123
2023-07-11 14:16:28,027 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 124 is on host 124
2023-07-11 14:16:28,027 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 125 is on host 125
2023-07-11 14:16:28,027 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 126 is on host 126
2023-07-11 14:16:28,027 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 127 is on host 127
2023-07-11 14:16:28,027 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 128 is on host 128
2023-07-11 14:16:28,028 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 129 is on host 129
2023-07-11 14:16:28,028 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 130 is on host 130
2023-07-11 14:16:28,028 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 131 is on host 131
2023-07-11 14:16:28,028 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 132 is on host 132
2023-07-11 14:16:28,028 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 133 is on host 133
2023-07-11 14:16:28,028 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 134 is on host 134
2023-07-11 14:16:28,028 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 135 is on host 135
2023-07-11 14:16:28,028 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 136 is on host 136
2023-07-11 14:16:28,028 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 137 is on host 137
2023-07-11 14:16:28,028 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 138 is on host 138
2023-07-11 14:16:28,028 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 139 is on host 139
2023-07-11 14:16:28,028 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 140 is on host 140
2023-07-11 14:16:28,028 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 141 is on host 141
2023-07-11 14:16:28,028 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 142 is on host 142
2023-07-11 14:16:28,028 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 143 is on host 143
2023-07-11 14:16:28,028 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 144 is on host 144
2023-07-11 14:16:28,028 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 145 is on host 145
2023-07-11 14:16:28,028 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 146 is on host 146
2023-07-11 14:16:28,028 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 147 is on host 147
2023-07-11 14:16:28,028 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 148 is on host 148
2023-07-11 14:16:28,028 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 149 is on host 149
2023-07-11 14:16:28,028 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 150 is on host 150
2023-07-11 14:16:28,028 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 151 is on host 151
2023-07-11 14:16:28,028 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 152 is on host 152
2023-07-11 14:16:28,028 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 153 is on host 153
2023-07-11 14:16:28,028 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 154 is on host 154
2023-07-11 14:16:28,028 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 155 is on host 155
2023-07-11 14:16:28,028 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 156 is on host 156
2023-07-11 14:16:28,028 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 157 is on host 157
2023-07-11 14:16:28,029 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 158 is on host 158
2023-07-11 14:16:28,029 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 159 is on host 159
2023-07-11 14:16:28,029 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 160 is on host 160
2023-07-11 14:16:28,029 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 161 is on host 161
2023-07-11 14:16:28,029 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 162 is on host 162
2023-07-11 14:16:28,029 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 163 is on host 163
2023-07-11 14:16:28,029 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 164 is on host 164
2023-07-11 14:16:28,029 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 165 is on host 165
2023-07-11 14:16:28,029 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 166 is on host 166
2023-07-11 14:16:28,029 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 167 is on host 167
2023-07-11 14:16:28,029 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 168 is on host 168
2023-07-11 14:16:28,029 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 169 is on host 169
2023-07-11 14:16:28,029 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 170 is on host 170
2023-07-11 14:16:28,029 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 171 is on host 171
2023-07-11 14:16:28,029 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 172 is on host 172
2023-07-11 14:16:28,029 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 173 is on host 173
2023-07-11 14:16:28,029 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 174 is on host 174
2023-07-11 14:16:28,029 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 175 is on host 175
2023-07-11 14:16:28,029 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 176 is on host 176
2023-07-11 14:16:28,029 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 177 is on host 177
2023-07-11 14:16:28,029 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 178 is on host 178
2023-07-11 14:16:28,029 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 179 is on host 179
2023-07-11 14:16:28,029 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 180 is on host 180
2023-07-11 14:16:28,029 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 181 is on host 181
2023-07-11 14:16:28,029 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 182 is on host 182
2023-07-11 14:16:28,029 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 183 is on host 183
2023-07-11 14:16:28,029 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 184 is on host 184
2023-07-11 14:16:28,029 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 185 is on host 185
2023-07-11 14:16:28,029 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 186 is on host 186
2023-07-11 14:16:28,030 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 187 is on host 187
2023-07-11 14:16:28,030 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 188 is on host 188
2023-07-11 14:16:28,030 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 189 is on host 189
2023-07-11 14:16:28,030 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 190 is on host 190
2023-07-11 14:16:28,030 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 191 is on host 191
2023-07-11 14:16:28,030 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 192 is on host 192
2023-07-11 14:16:28,030 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 193 is on host 193
2023-07-11 14:16:28,030 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 194 is on host 194
2023-07-11 14:16:28,030 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 195 is on host 195
2023-07-11 14:16:28,030 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 196 is on host 196
2023-07-11 14:16:28,030 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 197 is on host 197
2023-07-11 14:16:28,030 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 198 is on host 198
2023-07-11 14:16:28,030 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 199 is on host 199
2023-07-11 14:16:28,030 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 200 is on host 200
2023-07-11 14:16:28,030 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 201 is on host 201
2023-07-11 14:16:28,030 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 202 is on host 202
2023-07-11 14:16:28,030 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 203 is on host 203
2023-07-11 14:16:28,030 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 204 is on host 204
2023-07-11 14:16:28,030 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 205 is on host 205
2023-07-11 14:16:28,030 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 206 is on host 206
2023-07-11 14:16:28,030 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 207 is on host 207
2023-07-11 14:16:28,030 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 208 is on host 208
2023-07-11 14:16:28,030 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 209 is on host 209
2023-07-11 14:16:28,030 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 210 is on host 210
2023-07-11 14:16:28,030 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 211 is on host 211
2023-07-11 14:16:28,030 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 212 is on host 212
2023-07-11 14:16:28,030 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 213 is on host 213
2023-07-11 14:16:28,030 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 214 is on host 214
2023-07-11 14:16:28,030 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 215 is on host 215
2023-07-11 14:16:28,031 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 216 is on host 216
2023-07-11 14:16:28,031 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 217 is on host 217
2023-07-11 14:16:28,031 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 218 is on host 218
2023-07-11 14:16:28,031 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 219 is on host 219
2023-07-11 14:16:28,031 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 220 is on host 220
2023-07-11 14:16:28,031 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 221 is on host 221
2023-07-11 14:16:28,031 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 222 is on host 222
2023-07-11 14:16:28,031 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 223 is on host 223
2023-07-11 14:16:28,031 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 224 is on host 224
2023-07-11 14:16:28,031 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 225 is on host 225
2023-07-11 14:16:28,031 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 226 is on host 226
2023-07-11 14:16:28,031 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 227 is on host 227
2023-07-11 14:16:28,031 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 228 is on host 228
2023-07-11 14:16:28,031 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 229 is on host 229
2023-07-11 14:16:28,031 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 230 is on host 230
2023-07-11 14:16:28,031 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 231 is on host 231
2023-07-11 14:16:28,031 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 232 is on host 232
2023-07-11 14:16:28,031 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 233 is on host 233
2023-07-11 14:16:28,031 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 234 is on host 234
2023-07-11 14:16:28,031 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 235 is on host 235
2023-07-11 14:16:28,031 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 236 is on host 236
2023-07-11 14:16:28,031 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 237 is on host 237
2023-07-11 14:16:28,031 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 238 is on host 238
2023-07-11 14:16:28,031 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 239 is on host 239
2023-07-11 14:16:28,031 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 240 is on host 240
2023-07-11 14:16:28,031 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 241 is on host 241
2023-07-11 14:16:28,031 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 242 is on host 242
2023-07-11 14:16:28,031 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 243 is on host 243
2023-07-11 14:16:28,031 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 244 is on host 244
2023-07-11 14:16:28,032 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 245 is on host 245
2023-07-11 14:16:28,032 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 246 is on host 246
2023-07-11 14:16:28,032 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 247 is on host 247
2023-07-11 14:16:28,032 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 248 is on host 248
2023-07-11 14:16:28,032 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 249 is on host 249
2023-07-11 14:16:28,032 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 250 is on host 250
2023-07-11 14:16:28,032 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 251 is on host 251
2023-07-11 14:16:28,032 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 252 is on host 252
2023-07-11 14:16:28,032 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 253 is on host 253
2023-07-11 14:16:28,032 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 254 is on host 254
2023-07-11 14:16:28,032 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 255 is on host 255
2023-07-11 14:16:28,032 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 256 is on host 256
2023-07-11 14:16:28,032 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 257 is on host 257
2023-07-11 14:16:28,032 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 258 is on host 258
2023-07-11 14:16:28,032 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 259 is on host 259
2023-07-11 14:16:28,032 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 260 is on host 260
2023-07-11 14:16:28,032 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 261 is on host 261
2023-07-11 14:16:28,032 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 262 is on host 262
2023-07-11 14:16:28,032 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 263 is on host 263
2023-07-11 14:16:28,032 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 264 is on host 264
2023-07-11 14:16:28,032 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 265 is on host 265
2023-07-11 14:16:28,032 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 266 is on host 266
2023-07-11 14:16:28,032 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 267 is on host 267
2023-07-11 14:16:28,032 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 268 is on host 268
2023-07-11 14:16:28,032 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 269 is on host 269
2023-07-11 14:16:28,032 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 270 is on host 270
2023-07-11 14:16:28,032 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 271 is on host 271
2023-07-11 14:16:28,032 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 272 is on host 272
2023-07-11 14:16:28,032 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 273 is on host 273
2023-07-11 14:16:28,033 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 274 is on host 274
2023-07-11 14:16:28,033 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 275 is on host 275
2023-07-11 14:16:28,033 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 276 is on host 276
2023-07-11 14:16:28,033 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 277 is on host 277
2023-07-11 14:16:28,033 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 278 is on host 278
2023-07-11 14:16:28,033 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 279 is on host 279
2023-07-11 14:16:28,033 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 280 is on host 280
2023-07-11 14:16:28,033 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 281 is on host 281
2023-07-11 14:16:28,033 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 282 is on host 282
2023-07-11 14:16:28,033 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 283 is on host 283
2023-07-11 14:16:28,033 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 284 is on host 284
2023-07-11 14:16:28,033 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 285 is on host 285
2023-07-11 14:16:28,033 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 286 is on host 286
2023-07-11 14:16:28,033 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 287 is on host 287
2023-07-11 14:16:28,033 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 288 is on host 288
2023-07-11 14:16:28,033 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 289 is on host 289
2023-07-11 14:16:28,033 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 290 is on host 290
2023-07-11 14:16:28,033 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 291 is on host 291
2023-07-11 14:16:28,033 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 292 is on host 292
2023-07-11 14:16:28,033 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 293 is on host 293
2023-07-11 14:16:28,033 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 294 is on host 294
2023-07-11 14:16:28,033 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 295 is on host 295
2023-07-11 14:16:28,033 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 296 is on host 296
2023-07-11 14:16:28,033 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 297 is on host 297
2023-07-11 14:16:28,033 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 298 is on host 298
2023-07-11 14:16:28,033 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 299 is on host 299
2023-07-11 14:16:28,033 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 300 is on host 300
2023-07-11 14:16:28,033 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 301 is on host 301
2023-07-11 14:16:28,033 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 302 is on host 302
2023-07-11 14:16:28,034 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 303 is on host 303
2023-07-11 14:16:28,034 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 304 is on host 304
2023-07-11 14:16:28,034 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 305 is on host 305
2023-07-11 14:16:28,034 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 306 is on host 306
2023-07-11 14:16:28,034 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 307 is on host 307
2023-07-11 14:16:28,034 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 308 is on host 308
2023-07-11 14:16:28,034 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 309 is on host 309
2023-07-11 14:16:28,034 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 310 is on host 310
2023-07-11 14:16:28,034 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 311 is on host 311
2023-07-11 14:16:28,034 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 312 is on host 312
2023-07-11 14:16:28,034 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 313 is on host 313
2023-07-11 14:16:28,034 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 314 is on host 314
2023-07-11 14:16:28,034 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 315 is on host 315
2023-07-11 14:16:28,034 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 316 is on host 316
2023-07-11 14:16:28,034 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 317 is on host 317
2023-07-11 14:16:28,034 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 318 is on host 318
2023-07-11 14:16:28,034 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 319 is on host 319
2023-07-11 14:16:28,034 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 320 is on host 320
2023-07-11 14:16:28,034 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 321 is on host 321
2023-07-11 14:16:28,034 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 322 is on host 322
2023-07-11 14:16:28,034 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 323 is on host 323
2023-07-11 14:16:28,034 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 324 is on host 324
2023-07-11 14:16:28,034 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 325 is on host 325
2023-07-11 14:16:28,034 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 326 is on host 326
2023-07-11 14:16:28,034 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 327 is on host 327
2023-07-11 14:16:28,034 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 328 is on host 328
2023-07-11 14:16:28,034 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 329 is on host 329
2023-07-11 14:16:28,034 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 330 is on host 330
2023-07-11 14:16:28,034 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 331 is on host 331
2023-07-11 14:16:28,035 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 332 is on host 332
2023-07-11 14:16:28,035 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 333 is on host 333
2023-07-11 14:16:28,035 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 334 is on host 334
2023-07-11 14:16:28,035 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 335 is on host 335
2023-07-11 14:16:28,035 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 336 is on host 336
2023-07-11 14:16:28,035 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 337 is on host 337
2023-07-11 14:16:28,035 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 338 is on host 338
2023-07-11 14:16:28,035 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 339 is on host 339
2023-07-11 14:16:28,035 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 340 is on host 340
2023-07-11 14:16:28,035 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 341 is on host 341
2023-07-11 14:16:28,035 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 342 is on host 342
2023-07-11 14:16:28,035 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 343 is on host 343
2023-07-11 14:16:28,035 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 344 is on host 344
2023-07-11 14:16:28,035 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 345 is on host 345
2023-07-11 14:16:28,035 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 346 is on host 346
2023-07-11 14:16:28,035 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 347 is on host 347
2023-07-11 14:16:28,035 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 348 is on host 348
2023-07-11 14:16:28,035 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 349 is on host 349
2023-07-11 14:16:28,035 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 350 is on host 350
2023-07-11 14:16:28,035 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 351 is on host 351
2023-07-11 14:16:28,035 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 352 is on host 352
2023-07-11 14:16:28,035 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 353 is on host 353
2023-07-11 14:16:28,035 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 354 is on host 354
2023-07-11 14:16:28,035 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 355 is on host 355
2023-07-11 14:16:28,035 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 356 is on host 356
2023-07-11 14:16:28,035 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 357 is on host 357
2023-07-11 14:16:28,035 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 358 is on host 358
2023-07-11 14:16:28,035 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 359 is on host 359
2023-07-11 14:16:28,035 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 360 is on host 360
2023-07-11 14:16:28,035 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 361 is on host 361
2023-07-11 14:16:28,036 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 362 is on host 362
2023-07-11 14:16:28,036 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 363 is on host 363
2023-07-11 14:16:28,036 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 364 is on host 364
2023-07-11 14:16:28,036 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 365 is on host 365
2023-07-11 14:16:28,036 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 366 is on host 366
2023-07-11 14:16:28,036 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 367 is on host 367
2023-07-11 14:16:28,036 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 368 is on host 368
2023-07-11 14:16:28,036 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 369 is on host 369
2023-07-11 14:16:28,036 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 370 is on host 370
2023-07-11 14:16:28,036 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 371 is on host 371
2023-07-11 14:16:28,036 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 372 is on host 372
2023-07-11 14:16:28,036 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 373 is on host 373
2023-07-11 14:16:28,036 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 374 is on host 374
2023-07-11 14:16:28,036 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 375 is on host 375
2023-07-11 14:16:28,036 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 376 is on host 376
2023-07-11 14:16:28,036 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 377 is on host 377
2023-07-11 14:16:28,036 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 378 is on host 378
2023-07-11 14:16:28,036 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 379 is on host 379
2023-07-11 14:16:28,036 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 380 is on host 380
2023-07-11 14:16:28,036 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 381 is on host 381
2023-07-11 14:16:28,036 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 382 is on host 382
2023-07-11 14:16:28,036 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 383 is on host 383
2023-07-11 14:16:28,036 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 384 is on host 384
2023-07-11 14:16:28,036 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 385 is on host 385
2023-07-11 14:16:28,036 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 386 is on host 386
2023-07-11 14:16:28,036 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 387 is on host 387
2023-07-11 14:16:28,036 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 388 is on host 388
2023-07-11 14:16:28,036 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 389 is on host 389
2023-07-11 14:16:28,036 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 390 is on host 390
2023-07-11 14:16:28,037 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 391 is on host 391
2023-07-11 14:16:28,037 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 392 is on host 392
2023-07-11 14:16:28,037 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=393, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:28,037 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table32) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:28,037 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table7
2023-07-11 14:16:28,037 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv553536953=290, srv1630071126=110, srv1071894870=12, srv23511728=232, srv658346947=323, srv2025338799=204, srv1397994335=64, srv1976766403=195, srv1644629726=118, srv957637734=381, srv2079182457=210, srv1749264468=139, srv2046129126=206, srv1595762596=104, srv603990852=307, srv1973073480=194, srv958856137=382, srv644066832=319, srv557062842=292, srv277765671=235, srv732221418=337, srv1769385567=143, srv224612199=228, srv714752528=334, srv362526040=256, srv581128949=296, srv2133511466=223, srv1144239257=30, srv320603627=245, srv1679952521=126, srv2122867873=222, srv1110067064=24, srv256251994=233, srv63261708=317, srv89837390=371, srv552104598=289, srv508952995=281, srv2096011353=214, srv1770417148=144, srv1246723478=42, srv929436444=378, srv2082192429=211, srv234917297=231, srv405700573=266, srv183644386=166, srv1488378513=85, srv173139715=136, srv1154180352=32, srv355693379=252, srv1407521654=66, srv496848057=275, srv1157975499=33, srv1806731027=162, srv1923102804=184, srv311102455=244, srv450011410=271, srv771515724=348, srv389183508=262, srv1249074416=43, srv2014575201=201, srv640847108=318, srv832363565=356, srv1970882134=192, srv2107358603=218, srv855766065=361, srv1336043388=55, srv29397186=237, srv982792848=390, srv976560524=386, srv101181760=3, srv1093549482=21, srv2018389395=202, srv2113483104=221, srv1778339118=149, srv1968709692=190, srv705221118=333, srv159600090=105, srv1919608486=180, srv981255102=389, srv807899713=353, srv755110395=344, srv1770594519=145, srv739692705=340, srv1076582671=16, srv693869315=330, srv1079048717=17, srv440657532=270, srv1636659280=115, srv2108739257=220, srv668373413=326, srv1003610393=2, srv1054229197=11, srv1868589627=172, srv2103522371=217, srv1000546271=0, srv951670617=380, srv2042909593=205, srv1865656038=171, srv1466355012=78, srv703662406=332, srv1418112884=70, srv1215580291=40, srv71833528=335, srv1580581635=103, srv1021032212=5, srv1080806312=19, srv1985601859=197, srv74471954=343, srv1647472319=119, srv2071553346=208, srv1632855171=112, srv1122009370=27, srv13613992=61, srv1630777154=111, srv301413669=239, srv550697728=288, srv1296023857=53, srv1724550977=133, srv1989290370=198, srv1926417985=185, srv1678097199=125, srv1461034373=76, srv614690415=311, srv2098345381=215, srv310463473=243, srv1011934105=4, srv148627129=84, srv305489318=240, srv1256534903=46, srv1289731445=52, srv1798844587=157, srv567113085=294, srv1119222501=26, srv2055117940=207, srv855898852=362, srv629224816=316, srv1075943554=15, srv625909061=315, srv1705591942=128, srv734225580=339, srv660107924=324, srv1381729938=62, srv1633483173=113, srv408265476=267, srv1776057793=148, srv1360253411=60, srv1511424834=90, srv1414162621=68, srv883343663=370, srv151859222=91, srv349144930=251, srv1991304034=199, srv1825887791=164, srv601657063=305, srv758932951=345, srv1651629087=120, srv1864623584=170, srv682957691=329, srv1500454146=88, srv1725962085=135, srv1659841448=121, srv1253206004=45, srv52354442=284, srv18508093=168, srv1427731921=73, srv561344974=293, srv721668125=336, srv1575482138=100, srv914128771=373, srv961487230=383, srv741332941=342, srv533032466=286, srv1574140987=99, srv2139849097=224, srv503902262=278, srv674807007=327, srv1786829855=153, srv2088727517=213, srv394366966=264, srv980089565=388, srv114594288=31, srv38296437=261, srv214835574=226, srv1887224977=176, srv1025509362=7, srv1577020334=102, srv524466665=285, srv393561021=263, srv759909927=346, srv763556514=347, srv786453030=349, srv2142935488=225, srv618111613=312, srv16254163=108, srv343211061=250, srv476075173=273, srv1269632212=47, srv333589612=246, srv499015361=276, srv836674186=357, srv1799191687=158, srv1446998035=74, srv1571774199=98, srv1115354947=25, srv333860881=247, srv1724152600=132, srv1598699299=106, srv177885829=151, srv472125887=272, srv1101339966=22, srv1424985362=72, srv1945569895=188, srv594128294=300, srv1026739237=8, srv842459828=358, srv878519137=366, srv1921260729=181, srv339110834=249, srv504099471=279, srv814253179=354, srv1643744885=116, srv1793847521=155, srv607234624=309, srv698219051=331, srv1688538732=127, srv666240078=325, srv1079284733=18, srv29210550=236, srv506181748=280, srv881313122=368, srv1945452576=187, srv597307897=303, srv1285120424=51, srv1887943816=177, srv1983604698=196, srv1805465940=161, srv309309336=242, srv1719756294=131, srv1349932676=58, srv1208486369=38, srv1643971570=117, srv1509331489=89, srv334105385=248, srv1400515744=65, srv369984715=259, srv43712162=269, srv842675864=359, srv1803258748=160, srv1022450918=6, srv1775108732=147, srv1766088250=141, srv180150732=159, srv1220857227=41, srv226530501=229, srv362032108=255, srv919715380=377, srv1074935976=14, srv1395030819=63, srv803291569=352, srv1877966766=175, srv220538712=227, srv2021718843=203, srv2107782185=219, srv882216860=369, srv1489137852=86, srv1972328734=193, srv1470759982=79, srv1774824811=146, srv971974774=384, srv1418242791=71, srv1001274196=1, srv909615097=372, srv1537724566=93, srv1165799954=34, srv1724754364=134, srv978173525=387, srv113319438=29, srv578033735=295, srv147931272=80, srv1183635941=35, srv1904215245=178, srv596349756=302, srv880835255=367, srv857544550=364, srv1779729022=152, srv1795612465=156, srv621083045=314, srv917704170=375, srv1351811120=59, srv1316710897=54, srv789820555=350, srv1922580095=183, srv305567304=241, srv1936745425=186, srv1745318024=138, srv1210822057=39, srv645375717=320, srv950628389=379, srv1490199189=87, srv1575919256=101, srv154481102=96, srv359402967=254, srv997716931=391, srv1457224273=75, srv581644449=297, srv1872374768=174, srv363177310=257, srv740327512=341, srv1664227236=123, srv972330517=385, srv1634261306=114, srv1662183707=122, srv1969046891=191, srv1485266211=82, srv1778842262=150, srv588410181=298, srv1921840985=182, srv591279493=299, srv37574565=260, srv1104147458=23, srv1190166330=36, srv652270371=322, srv1484309042=81, srv1560148463=97, srv618569548=313, srv2102708311=216, srv1084873074=20, srv517669556=283, srv918152084=376, srv649714317=321, srv1674484790=124, srv1339239880=56, srv1461073271=77, srv1125312901=28, srv25633292=234, srv516616923=282, srv299721745=238, srv604932433=308, srv1273702855=48, srv792183929=351, srv1042608200=10, srv1276335106=49, srv1486044644=83, srv676101698=328, srv998930892=392, srv200111276=200, srv1863083643=169, srv1737443479=137, srv872997185=365, srv821351126=355, srv852115805=360, srv1074355423=13, srv170952194=130, srv503430005=277, srv153887567=94, srv1415163001=69, srv1032737435=9, srv1840670515=167, srv1961921083=189, srv59745831=304, srv36715747=258, srv431547280=268, srv1524853580=92, srv1870059418=173, srv396010771=265, srv594457792=301, srv1755339428=140, srv1766275429=142, srv5565786=291, srv603898526=306, srv544570223=287, srv856030669=363, srv1542523468=95, srv915785747=374, srv356122213=253, srv1411875499=67, srv2077620970=209, srv1345529444=57, srv232339963=230, srv1250861076=44, srv1914875423=179, srv478619481=274, srv1202435626=37, srv1706089454=129, srv1810631201=163, srv1282644061=50, srv1625945288=109, srv733251129=338, srv2082830831=212, srv1612103540=107, srv612136291=310, srv1790004142=154, srv183394703=165} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:28,038 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:28,038 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:28,038 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:28,038 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:28,038 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:28,038 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:28,038 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-11 14:16:28,038 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-11 14:16:28,038 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-11 14:16:28,038 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-11 14:16:28,038 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 10 is on host 10
2023-07-11 14:16:28,038 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 11 is on host 11
2023-07-11 14:16:28,038 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 12 is on host 12
2023-07-11 14:16:28,038 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 13 is on host 13
2023-07-11 14:16:28,038 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 14 is on host 14
2023-07-11 14:16:28,039 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 15 is on host 15
2023-07-11 14:16:28,039 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 16 is on host 16
2023-07-11 14:16:28,039 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 17 is on host 17
2023-07-11 14:16:28,039 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 18 is on host 18
2023-07-11 14:16:28,039 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 19 is on host 19
2023-07-11 14:16:28,039 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 20 is on host 20
2023-07-11 14:16:28,039 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 21 is on host 21
2023-07-11 14:16:28,039 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 22 is on host 22
2023-07-11 14:16:28,039 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 23 is on host 23
2023-07-11 14:16:28,039 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 24 is on host 24
2023-07-11 14:16:28,039 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 25 is on host 25
2023-07-11 14:16:28,039 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 26 is on host 26
2023-07-11 14:16:28,039 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 27 is on host 27
2023-07-11 14:16:28,039 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 28 is on host 28
2023-07-11 14:16:28,039 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 29 is on host 29
2023-07-11 14:16:28,039 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 30 is on host 30
2023-07-11 14:16:28,039 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 31 is on host 31
2023-07-11 14:16:28,039 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 32 is on host 32
2023-07-11 14:16:28,039 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 33 is on host 33
2023-07-11 14:16:28,039 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 34 is on host 34
2023-07-11 14:16:28,039 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 35 is on host 35
2023-07-11 14:16:28,039 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 36 is on host 36
2023-07-11 14:16:28,039 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 37 is on host 37
2023-07-11 14:16:28,039 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 38 is on host 38
2023-07-11 14:16:28,039 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 39 is on host 39
2023-07-11 14:16:28,039 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 40 is on host 40
2023-07-11 14:16:28,039 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 41 is on host 41
2023-07-11 14:16:28,039 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 42 is on host 42
2023-07-11 14:16:28,039 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 43 is on host 43
2023-07-11 14:16:28,039 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 44 is on host 44
2023-07-11 14:16:28,040 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 45 is on host 45
2023-07-11 14:16:28,040 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 46 is on host 46
2023-07-11 14:16:28,040 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 47 is on host 47
2023-07-11 14:16:28,040 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 48 is on host 48
2023-07-11 14:16:28,040 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 49 is on host 49
2023-07-11 14:16:28,040 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 50 is on host 50
2023-07-11 14:16:28,040 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 51 is on host 51
2023-07-11 14:16:28,040 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 52 is on host 52
2023-07-11 14:16:28,040 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 53 is on host 53
2023-07-11 14:16:28,040 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 54 is on host 54
2023-07-11 14:16:28,040 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 55 is on host 55
2023-07-11 14:16:28,040 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 56 is on host 56
2023-07-11 14:16:28,040 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 57 is on host 57
2023-07-11 14:16:28,040 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 58 is on host 58
2023-07-11 14:16:28,040 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 59 is on host 59
2023-07-11 14:16:28,040 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 60 is on host 60
2023-07-11 14:16:28,040 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 61 is on host 61
2023-07-11 14:16:28,040 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 62 is on host 62
2023-07-11 14:16:28,040 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 63 is on host 63
2023-07-11 14:16:28,040 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 64 is on host 64
2023-07-11 14:16:28,040 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 65 is on host 65
2023-07-11 14:16:28,040 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 66 is on host 66
2023-07-11 14:16:28,040 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 67 is on host 67
2023-07-11 14:16:28,040 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 68 is on host 68
2023-07-11 14:16:28,040 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 69 is on host 69
2023-07-11 14:16:28,040 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 70 is on host 70
2023-07-11 14:16:28,040 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 71 is on host 71
2023-07-11 14:16:28,040 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 72 is on host 72
2023-07-11 14:16:28,040 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 73 is on host 73
2023-07-11 14:16:28,041 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 74 is on host 74
2023-07-11 14:16:28,041 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 75 is on host 75
2023-07-11 14:16:28,041 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 76 is on host 76
2023-07-11 14:16:28,041 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 77 is on host 77
2023-07-11 14:16:28,041 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 78 is on host 78
2023-07-11 14:16:28,041 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 79 is on host 79
2023-07-11 14:16:28,041 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 80 is on host 80
2023-07-11 14:16:28,041 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 81 is on host 81
2023-07-11 14:16:28,041 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 82 is on host 82
2023-07-11 14:16:28,041 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 83 is on host 83
2023-07-11 14:16:28,041 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 84 is on host 84
2023-07-11 14:16:28,041 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 85 is on host 85
2023-07-11 14:16:28,041 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 86 is on host 86
2023-07-11 14:16:28,041 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 87 is on host 87
2023-07-11 14:16:28,041 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 88 is on host 88
2023-07-11 14:16:28,041 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 89 is on host 89
2023-07-11 14:16:28,041 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 90 is on host 90
2023-07-11 14:16:28,041 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 91 is on host 91
2023-07-11 14:16:28,041 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 92 is on host 92
2023-07-11 14:16:28,041 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 93 is on host 93
2023-07-11 14:16:28,041 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 94 is on host 94
2023-07-11 14:16:28,041 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 95 is on host 95
2023-07-11 14:16:28,041 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 96 is on host 96
2023-07-11 14:16:28,041 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 97 is on host 97
2023-07-11 14:16:28,041 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 98 is on host 98
2023-07-11 14:16:28,041 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 99 is on host 99
2023-07-11 14:16:28,041 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 100 is on host 100
2023-07-11 14:16:28,042 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 101 is on host 101
2023-07-11 14:16:28,042 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 102 is on host 102
2023-07-11 14:16:28,042 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 103 is on host 103
2023-07-11 14:16:28,042 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 104 is on host 104
2023-07-11 14:16:28,042 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 105 is on host 105
2023-07-11 14:16:28,042 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 106 is on host 106
2023-07-11 14:16:28,042 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 107 is on host 107
2023-07-11 14:16:28,042 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 108 is on host 108
2023-07-11 14:16:28,042 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 109 is on host 109
2023-07-11 14:16:28,042 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 110 is on host 110
2023-07-11 14:16:28,042 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 111 is on host 111
2023-07-11 14:16:28,042 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 112 is on host 112
2023-07-11 14:16:28,042 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 113 is on host 113
2023-07-11 14:16:28,042 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 114 is on host 114
2023-07-11 14:16:28,042 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 115 is on host 115
2023-07-11 14:16:28,042 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 116 is on host 116
2023-07-11 14:16:28,042 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 117 is on host 117
2023-07-11 14:16:28,042 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 118 is on host 118
2023-07-11 14:16:28,042 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 119 is on host 119
2023-07-11 14:16:28,042 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 120 is on host 120
2023-07-11 14:16:28,042 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 121 is on host 121
2023-07-11 14:16:28,042 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 122 is on host 122
2023-07-11 14:16:28,042 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 123 is on host 123
2023-07-11 14:16:28,042 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 124 is on host 124
2023-07-11 14:16:28,042 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 125 is on host 125
2023-07-11 14:16:28,042 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 126 is on host 126
2023-07-11 14:16:28,042 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 127 is on host 127
2023-07-11 14:16:28,042 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 128 is on host 128
2023-07-11 14:16:28,043 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 129 is on host 129
2023-07-11 14:16:28,043 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 130 is on host 130
2023-07-11 14:16:28,043 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 131 is on host 131
2023-07-11 14:16:28,043 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 132 is on host 132
2023-07-11 14:16:28,043 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 133 is on host 133
2023-07-11 14:16:28,043 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 134 is on host 134
2023-07-11 14:16:28,043 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 135 is on host 135
2023-07-11 14:16:28,043 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 136 is on host 136
2023-07-11 14:16:28,043 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 137 is on host 137
2023-07-11 14:16:28,043 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 138 is on host 138
2023-07-11 14:16:28,043 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 139 is on host 139
2023-07-11 14:16:28,043 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 140 is on host 140
2023-07-11 14:16:28,043 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 141 is on host 141
2023-07-11 14:16:28,043 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 142 is on host 142
2023-07-11 14:16:28,043 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 143 is on host 143
2023-07-11 14:16:28,043 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 144 is on host 144
2023-07-11 14:16:28,043 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 145 is on host 145
2023-07-11 14:16:28,043 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 146 is on host 146
2023-07-11 14:16:28,043 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 147 is on host 147
2023-07-11 14:16:28,043 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 148 is on host 148
2023-07-11 14:16:28,043 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 149 is on host 149
2023-07-11 14:16:28,043 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 150 is on host 150
2023-07-11 14:16:28,043 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 151 is on host 151
2023-07-11 14:16:28,043 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 152 is on host 152
2023-07-11 14:16:28,043 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 153 is on host 153
2023-07-11 14:16:28,043 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 154 is on host 154
2023-07-11 14:16:28,043 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 155 is on host 155
2023-07-11 14:16:28,043 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 156 is on host 156
2023-07-11 14:16:28,044 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 157 is on host 157
2023-07-11 14:16:28,044 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 158 is on host 158
2023-07-11 14:16:28,044 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 159 is on host 159
2023-07-11 14:16:28,044 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 160 is on host 160
2023-07-11 14:16:28,044 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 161 is on host 161
2023-07-11 14:16:28,044 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 162 is on host 162
2023-07-11 14:16:28,044 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 163 is on host 163
2023-07-11 14:16:28,044 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 164 is on host 164
2023-07-11 14:16:28,044 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 165 is on host 165
2023-07-11 14:16:28,044 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 166 is on host 166
2023-07-11 14:16:28,044 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 167 is on host 167
2023-07-11 14:16:28,044 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 168 is on host 168
2023-07-11 14:16:28,044 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 169 is on host 169
2023-07-11 14:16:28,044 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 170 is on host 170
2023-07-11 14:16:28,044 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 171 is on host 171
2023-07-11 14:16:28,044 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 172 is on host 172
2023-07-11 14:16:28,044 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 173 is on host 173
2023-07-11 14:16:28,044 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 174 is on host 174
2023-07-11 14:16:28,044 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 175 is on host 175
2023-07-11 14:16:28,044 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 176 is on host 176
2023-07-11 14:16:28,044 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 177 is on host 177
2023-07-11 14:16:28,044 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 178 is on host 178
2023-07-11 14:16:28,044 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 179 is on host 179
2023-07-11 14:16:28,044 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 180 is on host 180
2023-07-11 14:16:28,044 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 181 is on host 181
2023-07-11 14:16:28,044 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 182 is on host 182
2023-07-11 14:16:28,044 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 183 is on host 183
2023-07-11 14:16:28,044 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 184 is on host 184
2023-07-11 14:16:28,044 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 185 is on host 185
2023-07-11 14:16:28,045 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 186 is on host 186
2023-07-11 14:16:28,045 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 187 is on host 187
2023-07-11 14:16:28,045 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 188 is on host 188
2023-07-11 14:16:28,045 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 189 is on host 189
2023-07-11 14:16:28,045 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 190 is on host 190
2023-07-11 14:16:28,045 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 191 is on host 191
2023-07-11 14:16:28,045 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 192 is on host 192
2023-07-11 14:16:28,045 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 193 is on host 193
2023-07-11 14:16:28,045 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 194 is on host 194
2023-07-11 14:16:28,045 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 195 is on host 195
2023-07-11 14:16:28,045 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 196 is on host 196
2023-07-11 14:16:28,045 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 197 is on host 197
2023-07-11 14:16:28,045 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 198 is on host 198
2023-07-11 14:16:28,045 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 199 is on host 199
2023-07-11 14:16:28,045 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 200 is on host 200
2023-07-11 14:16:28,045 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 201 is on host 201
2023-07-11 14:16:28,045 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 202 is on host 202
2023-07-11 14:16:28,045 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 203 is on host 203
2023-07-11 14:16:28,045 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 204 is on host 204
2023-07-11 14:16:28,045 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 205 is on host 205
2023-07-11 14:16:28,045 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 206 is on host 206
2023-07-11 14:16:28,045 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 207 is on host 207
2023-07-11 14:16:28,045 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 208 is on host 208
2023-07-11 14:16:28,045 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 209 is on host 209
2023-07-11 14:16:28,045 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 210 is on host 210
2023-07-11 14:16:28,045 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 211 is on host 211
2023-07-11 14:16:28,045 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 212 is on host 212
2023-07-11 14:16:28,045 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 213 is on host 213
2023-07-11 14:16:28,045 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 214 is on host 214
2023-07-11 14:16:28,046 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 215 is on host 215
2023-07-11 14:16:28,046 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 216 is on host 216
2023-07-11 14:16:28,046 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 217 is on host 217
2023-07-11 14:16:28,046 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 218 is on host 218
2023-07-11 14:16:28,046 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 219 is on host 219
2023-07-11 14:16:28,046 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 220 is on host 220
2023-07-11 14:16:28,046 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 221 is on host 221
2023-07-11 14:16:28,046 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 222 is on host 222
2023-07-11 14:16:28,046 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 223 is on host 223
2023-07-11 14:16:28,046 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 224 is on host 224
2023-07-11 14:16:28,046 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 225 is on host 225
2023-07-11 14:16:28,046 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 226 is on host 226
2023-07-11 14:16:28,046 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 227 is on host 227
2023-07-11 14:16:28,046 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 228 is on host 228
2023-07-11 14:16:28,046 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 229 is on host 229
2023-07-11 14:16:28,046 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 230 is on host 230
2023-07-11 14:16:28,046 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 231 is on host 231
2023-07-11 14:16:28,046 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 232 is on host 232
2023-07-11 14:16:28,046 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 233 is on host 233
2023-07-11 14:16:28,046 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 234 is on host 234
2023-07-11 14:16:28,046 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 235 is on host 235
2023-07-11 14:16:28,046 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 236 is on host 236
2023-07-11 14:16:28,046 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 237 is on host 237
2023-07-11 14:16:28,046 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 238 is on host 238
2023-07-11 14:16:28,046 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 239 is on host 239
2023-07-11 14:16:28,046 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 240 is on host 240
2023-07-11 14:16:28,046 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 241 is on host 241
2023-07-11 14:16:28,046 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 242 is on host 242
2023-07-11 14:16:28,046 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 243 is on host 243
2023-07-11 14:16:28,047 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 244 is on host 244
2023-07-11 14:16:28,047 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 245 is on host 245
2023-07-11 14:16:28,047 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 246 is on host 246
2023-07-11 14:16:28,047 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 247 is on host 247
2023-07-11 14:16:28,047 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 248 is on host 248
2023-07-11 14:16:28,047 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 249 is on host 249
2023-07-11 14:16:28,047 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 250 is on host 250
2023-07-11 14:16:28,047 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 251 is on host 251
2023-07-11 14:16:28,047 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 252 is on host 252
2023-07-11 14:16:28,047 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 253 is on host 253
2023-07-11 14:16:28,047 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 254 is on host 254
2023-07-11 14:16:28,047 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 255 is on host 255
2023-07-11 14:16:28,047 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 256 is on host 256
2023-07-11 14:16:28,047 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 257 is on host 257
2023-07-11 14:16:28,047 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 258 is on host 258
2023-07-11 14:16:28,047 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 259 is on host 259
2023-07-11 14:16:28,047 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 260 is on host 260
2023-07-11 14:16:28,047 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 261 is on host 261
2023-07-11 14:16:28,047 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 262 is on host 262
2023-07-11 14:16:28,047 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 263 is on host 263
2023-07-11 14:16:28,047 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 264 is on host 264
2023-07-11 14:16:28,047 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 265 is on host 265
2023-07-11 14:16:28,047 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 266 is on host 266
2023-07-11 14:16:28,047 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 267 is on host 267
2023-07-11 14:16:28,047 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 268 is on host 268
2023-07-11 14:16:28,047 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 269 is on host 269
2023-07-11 14:16:28,047 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 270 is on host 270
2023-07-11 14:16:28,047 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 271 is on host 271
2023-07-11 14:16:28,047 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 272 is on host 272
2023-07-11 14:16:28,048 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 273 is on host 273
2023-07-11 14:16:28,048 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 274 is on host 274
2023-07-11 14:16:28,048 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 275 is on host 275
2023-07-11 14:16:28,048 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 276 is on host 276
2023-07-11 14:16:28,048 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 277 is on host 277
2023-07-11 14:16:28,048 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 278 is on host 278
2023-07-11 14:16:28,048 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 279 is on host 279
2023-07-11 14:16:28,048 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 280 is on host 280
2023-07-11 14:16:28,048 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 281 is on host 281
2023-07-11 14:16:28,048 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 282 is on host 282
2023-07-11 14:16:28,048 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 283 is on host 283
2023-07-11 14:16:28,048 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 284 is on host 284
2023-07-11 14:16:28,048 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 285 is on host 285
2023-07-11 14:16:28,048 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 286 is on host 286
2023-07-11 14:16:28,048 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 287 is on host 287
2023-07-11 14:16:28,048 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 288 is on host 288
2023-07-11 14:16:28,048 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 289 is on host 289
2023-07-11 14:16:28,048 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 290 is on host 290
2023-07-11 14:16:28,048 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 291 is on host 291
2023-07-11 14:16:28,048 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 292 is on host 292
2023-07-11 14:16:28,048 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 293 is on host 293
2023-07-11 14:16:28,048 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 294 is on host 294
2023-07-11 14:16:28,048 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 295 is on host 295
2023-07-11 14:16:28,048 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 296 is on host 296
2023-07-11 14:16:28,048 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 297 is on host 297
2023-07-11 14:16:28,048 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 298 is on host 298
2023-07-11 14:16:28,048 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 299 is on host 299
2023-07-11 14:16:28,048 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 300 is on host 300
2023-07-11 14:16:28,048 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 301 is on host 301
2023-07-11 14:16:28,049 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 302 is on host 302
2023-07-11 14:16:28,049 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 303 is on host 303
2023-07-11 14:16:28,049 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 304 is on host 304
2023-07-11 14:16:28,049 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 305 is on host 305
2023-07-11 14:16:28,049 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 306 is on host 306
2023-07-11 14:16:28,049 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 307 is on host 307
2023-07-11 14:16:28,049 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 308 is on host 308
2023-07-11 14:16:28,049 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 309 is on host 309
2023-07-11 14:16:28,049 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 310 is on host 310
2023-07-11 14:16:28,049 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 311 is on host 311
2023-07-11 14:16:28,049 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 312 is on host 312
2023-07-11 14:16:28,049 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 313 is on host 313
2023-07-11 14:16:28,049 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 314 is on host 314
2023-07-11 14:16:28,049 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 315 is on host 315
2023-07-11 14:16:28,049 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 316 is on host 316
2023-07-11 14:16:28,049 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 317 is on host 317
2023-07-11 14:16:28,049 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 318 is on host 318
2023-07-11 14:16:28,049 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 319 is on host 319
2023-07-11 14:16:28,049 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 320 is on host 320
2023-07-11 14:16:28,050 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 321 is on host 321
2023-07-11 14:16:28,050 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 322 is on host 322
2023-07-11 14:16:28,050 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 323 is on host 323
2023-07-11 14:16:28,050 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 324 is on host 324
2023-07-11 14:16:28,050 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 325 is on host 325
2023-07-11 14:16:28,050 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 326 is on host 326
2023-07-11 14:16:28,050 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 327 is on host 327
2023-07-11 14:16:28,050 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 328 is on host 328
2023-07-11 14:16:28,050 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 329 is on host 329
2023-07-11 14:16:28,050 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 330 is on host 330
2023-07-11 14:16:28,050 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 331 is on host 331
2023-07-11 14:16:28,050 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 332 is on host 332
2023-07-11 14:16:28,050 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 333 is on host 333
2023-07-11 14:16:28,050 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 334 is on host 334
2023-07-11 14:16:28,050 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 335 is on host 335
2023-07-11 14:16:28,050 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 336 is on host 336
2023-07-11 14:16:28,050 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 337 is on host 337
2023-07-11 14:16:28,050 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 338 is on host 338
2023-07-11 14:16:28,050 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 339 is on host 339
2023-07-11 14:16:28,050 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 340 is on host 340
2023-07-11 14:16:28,050 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 341 is on host 341
2023-07-11 14:16:28,050 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 342 is on host 342
2023-07-11 14:16:28,050 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 343 is on host 343
2023-07-11 14:16:28,050 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 344 is on host 344
2023-07-11 14:16:28,050 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 345 is on host 345
2023-07-11 14:16:28,050 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 346 is on host 346
2023-07-11 14:16:28,050 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 347 is on host 347
2023-07-11 14:16:28,050 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 348 is on host 348
2023-07-11 14:16:28,050 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 349 is on host 349
2023-07-11 14:16:28,050 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 350 is on host 350
2023-07-11 14:16:28,051 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 351 is on host 351
2023-07-11 14:16:28,051 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 352 is on host 352
2023-07-11 14:16:28,051 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 353 is on host 353
2023-07-11 14:16:28,051 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 354 is on host 354
2023-07-11 14:16:28,051 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 355 is on host 355
2023-07-11 14:16:28,051 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 356 is on host 356
2023-07-11 14:16:28,051 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 357 is on host 357
2023-07-11 14:16:28,051 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 358 is on host 358
2023-07-11 14:16:28,051 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 359 is on host 359
2023-07-11 14:16:28,051 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 360 is on host 360
2023-07-11 14:16:28,051 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 361 is on host 361
2023-07-11 14:16:28,051 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 362 is on host 362
2023-07-11 14:16:28,051 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 363 is on host 363
2023-07-11 14:16:28,051 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 364 is on host 364
2023-07-11 14:16:28,051 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 365 is on host 365
2023-07-11 14:16:28,051 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 366 is on host 366
2023-07-11 14:16:28,051 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 367 is on host 367
2023-07-11 14:16:28,051 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 368 is on host 368
2023-07-11 14:16:28,051 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 369 is on host 369
2023-07-11 14:16:28,051 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 370 is on host 370
2023-07-11 14:16:28,051 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 371 is on host 371
2023-07-11 14:16:28,051 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 372 is on host 372
2023-07-11 14:16:28,051 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 373 is on host 373
2023-07-11 14:16:28,051 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 374 is on host 374
2023-07-11 14:16:28,051 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 375 is on host 375
2023-07-11 14:16:28,051 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 376 is on host 376
2023-07-11 14:16:28,051 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 377 is on host 377
2023-07-11 14:16:28,051 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 378 is on host 378
2023-07-11 14:16:28,051 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 379 is on host 379
2023-07-11 14:16:28,052 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 380 is on host 380
2023-07-11 14:16:28,052 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 381 is on host 381
2023-07-11 14:16:28,052 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 382 is on host 382
2023-07-11 14:16:28,052 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 383 is on host 383
2023-07-11 14:16:28,052 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 384 is on host 384
2023-07-11 14:16:28,052 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 385 is on host 385
2023-07-11 14:16:28,052 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 386 is on host 386
2023-07-11 14:16:28,052 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 387 is on host 387
2023-07-11 14:16:28,052 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 388 is on host 388
2023-07-11 14:16:28,052 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 389 is on host 389
2023-07-11 14:16:28,052 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 390 is on host 390
2023-07-11 14:16:28,052 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 391 is on host 391
2023-07-11 14:16:28,052 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 392 is on host 392
2023-07-11 14:16:28,052 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=393, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:28,052 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table7) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:28,052 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table33
2023-07-11 14:16:28,053 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv553536953=290, srv1630071126=110, srv1071894870=12, srv23511728=232, srv658346947=323, srv2025338799=204, srv1397994335=64, srv1976766403=195, srv1644629726=118, srv957637734=381, srv2079182457=210, srv1749264468=139, srv2046129126=206, srv1595762596=104, srv603990852=307, srv1973073480=194, srv958856137=382, srv644066832=319, srv557062842=292, srv277765671=235, srv732221418=337, srv1769385567=143, srv224612199=228, srv714752528=334, srv362526040=256, srv581128949=296, srv2133511466=223, srv1144239257=30, srv320603627=245, srv1679952521=126, srv2122867873=222, srv1110067064=24, srv256251994=233, srv63261708=317, srv89837390=371, srv552104598=289, srv508952995=281, srv2096011353=214, srv1770417148=144, srv1246723478=42, srv929436444=378, srv2082192429=211, srv234917297=231, srv405700573=266, srv183644386=166, srv1488378513=85, srv173139715=136, srv1154180352=32, srv355693379=252, srv1407521654=66, srv496848057=275, srv1157975499=33, srv1806731027=162, srv1923102804=184, srv311102455=244, srv450011410=271, srv771515724=348, srv389183508=262, srv1249074416=43, srv2014575201=201, srv640847108=318, srv832363565=356, srv1970882134=192, srv2107358603=218, srv855766065=361, srv1336043388=55, srv29397186=237, srv982792848=390, srv976560524=386, srv101181760=3, srv1093549482=21, srv2018389395=202, srv2113483104=221, srv1778339118=149, srv1968709692=190, srv705221118=333, srv159600090=105, srv1919608486=180, srv981255102=389, srv807899713=353, srv755110395=344, srv1770594519=145, srv739692705=340, srv1076582671=16, srv693869315=330, srv1079048717=17, srv440657532=270, srv1636659280=115, srv2108739257=220, srv668373413=326, srv1003610393=2, srv1054229197=11, srv1868589627=172, srv2103522371=217, srv1000546271=0, srv951670617=380, srv2042909593=205, srv1865656038=171, srv1466355012=78, srv703662406=332, srv1418112884=70, srv1215580291=40, srv71833528=335, srv1580581635=103, srv1021032212=5, srv1080806312=19, srv1985601859=197, srv74471954=343, srv1647472319=119, srv2071553346=208, srv1632855171=112, srv1122009370=27, srv13613992=61, srv1630777154=111, srv301413669=239, srv550697728=288, srv1296023857=53, srv1724550977=133, srv1989290370=198, srv1926417985=185, srv1678097199=125, srv1461034373=76, srv614690415=311, srv2098345381=215, srv310463473=243, srv1011934105=4, srv148627129=84, srv305489318=240, srv1256534903=46, srv1289731445=52, srv1798844587=157, srv567113085=294, srv1119222501=26, srv2055117940=207, srv855898852=362, srv629224816=316, srv1075943554=15, srv625909061=315, srv1705591942=128, srv734225580=339, srv660107924=324, srv1381729938=62, srv1633483173=113, srv408265476=267, srv1776057793=148, srv1360253411=60, srv1511424834=90, srv1414162621=68, srv883343663=370, srv151859222=91, srv349144930=251, srv1991304034=199, srv1825887791=164, srv601657063=305, srv758932951=345, srv1651629087=120, srv1864623584=170, srv682957691=329, srv1500454146=88, srv1725962085=135, srv1659841448=121, srv1253206004=45, srv52354442=284, srv18508093=168, srv1427731921=73, srv561344974=293, srv721668125=336, srv1575482138=100, srv914128771=373, srv961487230=383, srv741332941=342, srv533032466=286, srv1574140987=99, srv2139849097=224, srv503902262=278, srv674807007=327, srv1786829855=153, srv2088727517=213, srv394366966=264, srv980089565=388, srv114594288=31, srv38296437=261, srv214835574=226, srv1887224977=176, srv1025509362=7, srv1577020334=102, srv524466665=285, srv393561021=263, srv759909927=346, srv763556514=347, srv786453030=349, srv2142935488=225, srv618111613=312, srv16254163=108, srv343211061=250, srv476075173=273, srv1269632212=47, srv333589612=246, srv499015361=276, srv836674186=357, srv1799191687=158, srv1446998035=74, srv1571774199=98, srv1115354947=25, srv333860881=247, srv1724152600=132, srv1598699299=106, srv177885829=151, srv472125887=272, srv1101339966=22, srv1424985362=72, srv1945569895=188, srv594128294=300, srv1026739237=8, srv842459828=358, srv878519137=366, srv1921260729=181, srv339110834=249, srv504099471=279, srv814253179=354, srv1643744885=116, srv1793847521=155, srv607234624=309, srv698219051=331, srv1688538732=127, srv666240078=325, srv1079284733=18, srv29210550=236, srv506181748=280, srv881313122=368, srv1945452576=187, srv597307897=303, srv1285120424=51, srv1887943816=177, srv1983604698=196, srv1805465940=161, srv309309336=242, srv1719756294=131, srv1349932676=58, srv1208486369=38, srv1643971570=117, srv1509331489=89, srv334105385=248, srv1400515744=65, srv369984715=259, srv43712162=269, srv842675864=359, srv1803258748=160, srv1022450918=6, srv1775108732=147, srv1766088250=141, srv180150732=159, srv1220857227=41, srv226530501=229, srv362032108=255, srv919715380=377, srv1074935976=14, srv1395030819=63, srv803291569=352, srv1877966766=175, srv220538712=227, srv2021718843=203, srv2107782185=219, srv882216860=369, srv1489137852=86, srv1972328734=193, srv1470759982=79, srv1774824811=146, srv971974774=384, srv1418242791=71, srv1001274196=1, srv909615097=372, srv1537724566=93, srv1165799954=34, srv1724754364=134, srv978173525=387, srv113319438=29, srv578033735=295, srv147931272=80, srv1183635941=35, srv1904215245=178, srv596349756=302, srv880835255=367, srv857544550=364, srv1779729022=152, srv1795612465=156, srv621083045=314, srv917704170=375, srv1351811120=59, srv1316710897=54, srv789820555=350, srv1922580095=183, srv305567304=241, srv1936745425=186, srv1745318024=138, srv1210822057=39, srv645375717=320, srv950628389=379, srv1490199189=87, srv1575919256=101, srv154481102=96, srv359402967=254, srv997716931=391, srv1457224273=75, srv581644449=297, srv1872374768=174, srv363177310=257, srv740327512=341, srv1664227236=123, srv972330517=385, srv1634261306=114, srv1662183707=122, srv1969046891=191, srv1485266211=82, srv1778842262=150, srv588410181=298, srv1921840985=182, srv591279493=299, srv37574565=260, srv1104147458=23, srv1190166330=36, srv652270371=322, srv1484309042=81, srv1560148463=97, srv618569548=313, srv2102708311=216, srv1084873074=20, srv517669556=283, srv918152084=376, srv649714317=321, srv1674484790=124, srv1339239880=56, srv1461073271=77, srv1125312901=28, srv25633292=234, srv516616923=282, srv299721745=238, srv604932433=308, srv1273702855=48, srv792183929=351, srv1042608200=10, srv1276335106=49, srv1486044644=83, srv676101698=328, srv998930892=392, srv200111276=200, srv1863083643=169, srv1737443479=137, srv872997185=365, srv821351126=355, srv852115805=360, srv1074355423=13, srv170952194=130, srv503430005=277, srv153887567=94, srv1415163001=69, srv1032737435=9, srv1840670515=167, srv1961921083=189, srv59745831=304, srv36715747=258, srv431547280=268, srv1524853580=92, srv1870059418=173, srv396010771=265, srv594457792=301, srv1755339428=140, srv1766275429=142, srv5565786=291, srv603898526=306, srv544570223=287, srv856030669=363, srv1542523468=95, srv915785747=374, srv356122213=253, srv1411875499=67, srv2077620970=209, srv1345529444=57, srv232339963=230, srv1250861076=44, srv1914875423=179, srv478619481=274, srv1202435626=37, srv1706089454=129, srv1810631201=163, srv1282644061=50, srv1625945288=109, srv733251129=338, srv2082830831=212, srv1612103540=107, srv612136291=310, srv1790004142=154, srv183394703=165} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:28,053 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:28,053 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:28,053 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:28,053 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:28,053 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:28,053 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:28,053 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-11 14:16:28,053 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-11 14:16:28,053 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-11 14:16:28,053 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-11 14:16:28,053 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 10 is on host 10
2023-07-11 14:16:28,053 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 11 is on host 11
2023-07-11 14:16:28,053 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 12 is on host 12
2023-07-11 14:16:28,053 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 13 is on host 13
2023-07-11 14:16:28,053 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 14 is on host 14
2023-07-11 14:16:28,054 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 15 is on host 15
2023-07-11 14:16:28,054 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 16 is on host 16
2023-07-11 14:16:28,054 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 17 is on host 17
2023-07-11 14:16:28,054 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 18 is on host 18
2023-07-11 14:16:28,054 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 19 is on host 19
2023-07-11 14:16:28,054 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 20 is on host 20
2023-07-11 14:16:28,054 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 21 is on host 21
2023-07-11 14:16:28,054 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 22 is on host 22
2023-07-11 14:16:28,054 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 23 is on host 23
2023-07-11 14:16:28,054 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 24 is on host 24
2023-07-11 14:16:28,054 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 25 is on host 25
2023-07-11 14:16:28,054 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 26 is on host 26
2023-07-11 14:16:28,054 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 27 is on host 27
2023-07-11 14:16:28,054 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 28 is on host 28
2023-07-11 14:16:28,054 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 29 is on host 29
2023-07-11 14:16:28,054 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 30 is on host 30
2023-07-11 14:16:28,054 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 31 is on host 31
2023-07-11 14:16:28,054 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 32 is on host 32
2023-07-11 14:16:28,054 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 33 is on host 33
2023-07-11 14:16:28,054 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 34 is on host 34
2023-07-11 14:16:28,054 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 35 is on host 35
2023-07-11 14:16:28,054 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 36 is on host 36
2023-07-11 14:16:28,054 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 37 is on host 37
2023-07-11 14:16:28,054 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 38 is on host 38
2023-07-11 14:16:28,054 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 39 is on host 39
2023-07-11 14:16:28,054 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 40 is on host 40
2023-07-11 14:16:28,054 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 41 is on host 41
2023-07-11 14:16:28,054 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 42 is on host 42
2023-07-11 14:16:28,054 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 43 is on host 43
2023-07-11 14:16:28,055 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 44 is on host 44
2023-07-11 14:16:28,055 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 45 is on host 45
2023-07-11 14:16:28,055 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 46 is on host 46
2023-07-11 14:16:28,055 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 47 is on host 47
2023-07-11 14:16:28,055 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 48 is on host 48
2023-07-11 14:16:28,055 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 49 is on host 49
2023-07-11 14:16:28,055 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 50 is on host 50
2023-07-11 14:16:28,055 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 51 is on host 51
2023-07-11 14:16:28,055 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 52 is on host 52
2023-07-11 14:16:28,055 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 53 is on host 53
2023-07-11 14:16:28,055 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 54 is on host 54
2023-07-11 14:16:28,055 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 55 is on host 55
2023-07-11 14:16:28,055 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 56 is on host 56
2023-07-11 14:16:28,055 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 57 is on host 57
2023-07-11 14:16:28,055 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 58 is on host 58
2023-07-11 14:16:28,055 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 59 is on host 59
2023-07-11 14:16:28,055 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 60 is on host 60
2023-07-11 14:16:28,055 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 61 is on host 61
2023-07-11 14:16:28,055 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 62 is on host 62
2023-07-11 14:16:28,055 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 63 is on host 63
2023-07-11 14:16:28,055 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 64 is on host 64
2023-07-11 14:16:28,055 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 65 is on host 65
2023-07-11 14:16:28,055 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 66 is on host 66
2023-07-11 14:16:28,055 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 67 is on host 67
2023-07-11 14:16:28,055 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 68 is on host 68
2023-07-11 14:16:28,055 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 69 is on host 69
2023-07-11 14:16:28,055 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 70 is on host 70
2023-07-11 14:16:28,055 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 71 is on host 71
2023-07-11 14:16:28,055 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 72 is on host 72
2023-07-11 14:16:28,056 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 73 is on host 73
2023-07-11 14:16:28,056 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 74 is on host 74
2023-07-11 14:16:28,056 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 75 is on host 75
2023-07-11 14:16:28,056 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 76 is on host 76
2023-07-11 14:16:28,056 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 77 is on host 77
2023-07-11 14:16:28,056 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 78 is on host 78
2023-07-11 14:16:28,056 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 79 is on host 79
2023-07-11 14:16:28,056 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 80 is on host 80
2023-07-11 14:16:28,056 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 81 is on host 81
2023-07-11 14:16:28,056 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 82 is on host 82
2023-07-11 14:16:28,056 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 83 is on host 83
2023-07-11 14:16:28,056 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 84 is on host 84
2023-07-11 14:16:28,056 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 85 is on host 85
2023-07-11 14:16:28,056 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 86 is on host 86
2023-07-11 14:16:28,056 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 87 is on host 87
2023-07-11 14:16:28,056 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 88 is on host 88
2023-07-11 14:16:28,056 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 89 is on host 89
2023-07-11 14:16:28,056 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 90 is on host 90
2023-07-11 14:16:28,056 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 91 is on host 91
2023-07-11 14:16:28,056 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 92 is on host 92
2023-07-11 14:16:28,056 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 93 is on host 93
2023-07-11 14:16:28,056 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 94 is on host 94
2023-07-11 14:16:28,056 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 95 is on host 95
2023-07-11 14:16:28,056 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 96 is on host 96
2023-07-11 14:16:28,056 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 97 is on host 97
2023-07-11 14:16:28,056 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 98 is on host 98
2023-07-11 14:16:28,056 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 99 is on host 99
2023-07-11 14:16:28,056 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 100 is on host 100
2023-07-11 14:16:28,056 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 101 is on host 101
2023-07-11 14:16:28,057 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 102 is on host 102
2023-07-11 14:16:28,057 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 103 is on host 103
2023-07-11 14:16:28,057 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 104 is on host 104
2023-07-11 14:16:28,057 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 105 is on host 105
2023-07-11 14:16:28,057 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 106 is on host 106
2023-07-11 14:16:28,057 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 107 is on host 107
2023-07-11 14:16:28,057 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 108 is on host 108
2023-07-11 14:16:28,057 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 109 is on host 109
2023-07-11 14:16:28,057 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 110 is on host 110
2023-07-11 14:16:28,057 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 111 is on host 111
2023-07-11 14:16:28,057 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 112 is on host 112
2023-07-11 14:16:28,057 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 113 is on host 113
2023-07-11 14:16:28,057 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 114 is on host 114
2023-07-11 14:16:28,057 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 115 is on host 115
2023-07-11 14:16:28,057 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 116 is on host 116
2023-07-11 14:16:28,057 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 117 is on host 117
2023-07-11 14:16:28,057 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 118 is on host 118
2023-07-11 14:16:28,057 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 119 is on host 119
2023-07-11 14:16:28,057 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 120 is on host 120
2023-07-11 14:16:28,057 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 121 is on host 121
2023-07-11 14:16:28,057 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 122 is on host 122
2023-07-11 14:16:28,057 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 123 is on host 123
2023-07-11 14:16:28,057 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 124 is on host 124
2023-07-11 14:16:28,057 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 125 is on host 125
2023-07-11 14:16:28,057 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 126 is on host 126
2023-07-11 14:16:28,057 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 127 is on host 127
2023-07-11 14:16:28,057 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 128 is on host 128
2023-07-11 14:16:28,057 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 129 is on host 129
2023-07-11 14:16:28,057 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 130 is on host 130
2023-07-11 14:16:28,058 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 131 is on host 131
2023-07-11 14:16:28,058 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 132 is on host 132
2023-07-11 14:16:28,058 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 133 is on host 133
2023-07-11 14:16:28,058 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 134 is on host 134
2023-07-11 14:16:28,058 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 135 is on host 135
2023-07-11 14:16:28,058 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 136 is on host 136
2023-07-11 14:16:28,058 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 137 is on host 137
2023-07-11 14:16:28,058 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 138 is on host 138
2023-07-11 14:16:28,058 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 139 is on host 139
2023-07-11 14:16:28,058 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 140 is on host 140
2023-07-11 14:16:28,058 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 141 is on host 141
2023-07-11 14:16:28,058 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 142 is on host 142
2023-07-11 14:16:28,058 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 143 is on host 143
2023-07-11 14:16:28,058 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 144 is on host 144
2023-07-11 14:16:28,058 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 145 is on host 145
2023-07-11 14:16:28,058 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 146 is on host 146
2023-07-11 14:16:28,058 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 147 is on host 147
2023-07-11 14:16:28,058 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 148 is on host 148
2023-07-11 14:16:28,058 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 149 is on host 149
2023-07-11 14:16:28,058 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 150 is on host 150
2023-07-11 14:16:28,058 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 151 is on host 151
2023-07-11 14:16:28,058 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 152 is on host 152
2023-07-11 14:16:28,058 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 153 is on host 153
2023-07-11 14:16:28,058 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 154 is on host 154
2023-07-11 14:16:28,058 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 155 is on host 155
2023-07-11 14:16:28,058 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 156 is on host 156
2023-07-11 14:16:28,058 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 157 is on host 157
2023-07-11 14:16:28,058 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 158 is on host 158
2023-07-11 14:16:28,058 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 159 is on host 159
2023-07-11 14:16:28,059 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 160 is on host 160
2023-07-11 14:16:28,059 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 161 is on host 161
2023-07-11 14:16:28,059 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 162 is on host 162
2023-07-11 14:16:28,059 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 163 is on host 163
2023-07-11 14:16:28,059 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 164 is on host 164
2023-07-11 14:16:28,059 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 165 is on host 165
2023-07-11 14:16:28,059 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 166 is on host 166
2023-07-11 14:16:28,059 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 167 is on host 167
2023-07-11 14:16:28,059 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 168 is on host 168
2023-07-11 14:16:28,059 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 169 is on host 169
2023-07-11 14:16:28,059 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 170 is on host 170
2023-07-11 14:16:28,059 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 171 is on host 171
2023-07-11 14:16:28,059 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 172 is on host 172
2023-07-11 14:16:28,059 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 173 is on host 173
2023-07-11 14:16:28,059 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 174 is on host 174
2023-07-11 14:16:28,059 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 175 is on host 175
2023-07-11 14:16:28,059 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 176 is on host 176
2023-07-11 14:16:28,059 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 177 is on host 177
2023-07-11 14:16:28,059 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 178 is on host 178
2023-07-11 14:16:28,059 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 179 is on host 179
2023-07-11 14:16:28,059 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 180 is on host 180
2023-07-11 14:16:28,059 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 181 is on host 181
2023-07-11 14:16:28,059 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 182 is on host 182
2023-07-11 14:16:28,059 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 183 is on host 183
2023-07-11 14:16:28,059 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 184 is on host 184
2023-07-11 14:16:28,059 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 185 is on host 185
2023-07-11 14:16:28,059 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 186 is on host 186
2023-07-11 14:16:28,059 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 187 is on host 187
2023-07-11 14:16:28,059 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 188 is on host 188
2023-07-11 14:16:28,059 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 189 is on host 189
2023-07-11 14:16:28,060 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 190 is on host 190
2023-07-11 14:16:28,060 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 191 is on host 191
2023-07-11 14:16:28,060 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 192 is on host 192
2023-07-11 14:16:28,060 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 193 is on host 193
2023-07-11 14:16:28,060 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 194 is on host 194
2023-07-11 14:16:28,060 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 195 is on host 195
2023-07-11 14:16:28,060 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 196 is on host 196
2023-07-11 14:16:28,060 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 197 is on host 197
2023-07-11 14:16:28,060 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 198 is on host 198
2023-07-11 14:16:28,060 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 199 is on host 199
2023-07-11 14:16:28,060 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 200 is on host 200
2023-07-11 14:16:28,060 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 201 is on host 201
2023-07-11 14:16:28,060 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 202 is on host 202
2023-07-11 14:16:28,060 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 203 is on host 203
2023-07-11 14:16:28,060 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 204 is on host 204
2023-07-11 14:16:28,060 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 205 is on host 205
2023-07-11 14:16:28,060 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 206 is on host 206
2023-07-11 14:16:28,060 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 207 is on host 207
2023-07-11 14:16:28,060 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 208 is on host 208
2023-07-11 14:16:28,060 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 209 is on host 209
2023-07-11 14:16:28,060 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 210 is on host 210
2023-07-11 14:16:28,060 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 211 is on host 211
2023-07-11 14:16:28,061 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 212 is on host 212
2023-07-11 14:16:28,061 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 213 is on host 213
2023-07-11 14:16:28,061 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 214 is on host 214
2023-07-11 14:16:28,061 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 215 is on host 215
2023-07-11 14:16:28,061 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 216 is on host 216
2023-07-11 14:16:28,061 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 217 is on host 217
2023-07-11 14:16:28,061 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 218 is on host 218
2023-07-11 14:16:28,061 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 219 is on host 219
2023-07-11 14:16:28,061 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 220 is on host 220
2023-07-11 14:16:28,061 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 221 is on host 221
2023-07-11 14:16:28,061 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 222 is on host 222
2023-07-11 14:16:28,061 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 223 is on host 223
2023-07-11 14:16:28,061 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 224 is on host 224
2023-07-11 14:16:28,061 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 225 is on host 225
2023-07-11 14:16:28,061 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 226 is on host 226
2023-07-11 14:16:28,061 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 227 is on host 227
2023-07-11 14:16:28,061 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 228 is on host 228
2023-07-11 14:16:28,061 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 229 is on host 229
2023-07-11 14:16:28,061 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 230 is on host 230
2023-07-11 14:16:28,061 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 231 is on host 231
2023-07-11 14:16:28,061 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 232 is on host 232
2023-07-11 14:16:28,061 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 233 is on host 233
2023-07-11 14:16:28,061 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 234 is on host 234
2023-07-11 14:16:28,061 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 235 is on host 235
2023-07-11 14:16:28,061 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 236 is on host 236
2023-07-11 14:16:28,061 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 237 is on host 237
2023-07-11 14:16:28,061 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 238 is on host 238
2023-07-11 14:16:28,062 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 239 is on host 239
2023-07-11 14:16:28,062 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 240 is on host 240
2023-07-11 14:16:28,062 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 241 is on host 241
2023-07-11 14:16:28,062 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 242 is on host 242
2023-07-11 14:16:28,062 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 243 is on host 243
2023-07-11 14:16:28,062 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 244 is on host 244
2023-07-11 14:16:28,062 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 245 is on host 245
2023-07-11 14:16:28,062 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 246 is on host 246
2023-07-11 14:16:28,062 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 247 is on host 247
2023-07-11 14:16:28,062 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 248 is on host 248
2023-07-11 14:16:28,062 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 249 is on host 249
2023-07-11 14:16:28,062 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 250 is on host 250
2023-07-11 14:16:28,062 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 251 is on host 251
2023-07-11 14:16:28,062 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 252 is on host 252
2023-07-11 14:16:28,062 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 253 is on host 253
2023-07-11 14:16:28,062 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 254 is on host 254
2023-07-11 14:16:28,062 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 255 is on host 255
2023-07-11 14:16:28,062 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 256 is on host 256
2023-07-11 14:16:28,062 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 257 is on host 257
2023-07-11 14:16:28,062 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 258 is on host 258
2023-07-11 14:16:28,062 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 259 is on host 259
2023-07-11 14:16:28,062 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 260 is on host 260
2023-07-11 14:16:28,062 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 261 is on host 261
2023-07-11 14:16:28,062 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 262 is on host 262
2023-07-11 14:16:28,062 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 263 is on host 263
2023-07-11 14:16:28,062 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 264 is on host 264
2023-07-11 14:16:28,062 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 265 is on host 265
2023-07-11 14:16:28,062 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 266 is on host 266
2023-07-11 14:16:28,062 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 267 is on host 267
2023-07-11 14:16:28,063 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 268 is on host 268
2023-07-11 14:16:28,063 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 269 is on host 269
2023-07-11 14:16:28,063 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 270 is on host 270
2023-07-11 14:16:28,063 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 271 is on host 271
2023-07-11 14:16:28,063 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 272 is on host 272
2023-07-11 14:16:28,063 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 273 is on host 273
2023-07-11 14:16:28,063 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 274 is on host 274
2023-07-11 14:16:28,063 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 275 is on host 275
2023-07-11 14:16:28,063 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 276 is on host 276
2023-07-11 14:16:28,063 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 277 is on host 277
2023-07-11 14:16:28,063 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 278 is on host 278
2023-07-11 14:16:28,063 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 279 is on host 279
2023-07-11 14:16:28,063 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 280 is on host 280
2023-07-11 14:16:28,063 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 281 is on host 281
2023-07-11 14:16:28,063 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 282 is on host 282
2023-07-11 14:16:28,063 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 283 is on host 283
2023-07-11 14:16:28,063 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 284 is on host 284
2023-07-11 14:16:28,063 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 285 is on host 285
2023-07-11 14:16:28,063 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 286 is on host 286
2023-07-11 14:16:28,063 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 287 is on host 287
2023-07-11 14:16:28,063 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 288 is on host 288
2023-07-11 14:16:28,063 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 289 is on host 289
2023-07-11 14:16:28,063 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 290 is on host 290
2023-07-11 14:16:28,063 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 291 is on host 291
2023-07-11 14:16:28,063 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 292 is on host 292
2023-07-11 14:16:28,063 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 293 is on host 293
2023-07-11 14:16:28,063 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 294 is on host 294
2023-07-11 14:16:28,063 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 295 is on host 295
2023-07-11 14:16:28,064 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 296 is on host 296
2023-07-11 14:16:28,064 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 297 is on host 297
2023-07-11 14:16:28,064 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 298 is on host 298
2023-07-11 14:16:28,064 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 299 is on host 299
2023-07-11 14:16:28,064 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 300 is on host 300
2023-07-11 14:16:28,064 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 301 is on host 301
2023-07-11 14:16:28,064 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 302 is on host 302
2023-07-11 14:16:28,064 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 303 is on host 303
2023-07-11 14:16:28,064 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 304 is on host 304
2023-07-11 14:16:28,064 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 305 is on host 305
2023-07-11 14:16:28,064 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 306 is on host 306
2023-07-11 14:16:28,064 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 307 is on host 307
2023-07-11 14:16:28,064 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 308 is on host 308
2023-07-11 14:16:28,064 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 309 is on host 309
2023-07-11 14:16:28,064 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 310 is on host 310
2023-07-11 14:16:28,064 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 311 is on host 311
2023-07-11 14:16:28,064 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 312 is on host 312
2023-07-11 14:16:28,064 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 313 is on host 313
2023-07-11 14:16:28,064 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 314 is on host 314
2023-07-11 14:16:28,064 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 315 is on host 315
2023-07-11 14:16:28,064 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 316 is on host 316
2023-07-11 14:16:28,064 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 317 is on host 317
2023-07-11 14:16:28,064 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 318 is on host 318
2023-07-11 14:16:28,064 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 319 is on host 319
2023-07-11 14:16:28,064 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 320 is on host 320
2023-07-11 14:16:28,064 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 321 is on host 321
2023-07-11 14:16:28,064 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 322 is on host 322
2023-07-11 14:16:28,064 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 323 is on host 323
2023-07-11 14:16:28,064 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 324 is on host 324
2023-07-11 14:16:28,065 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 325 is on host 325
2023-07-11 14:16:28,065 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 326 is on host 326
2023-07-11 14:16:28,065 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 327 is on host 327
2023-07-11 14:16:28,065 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 328 is on host 328
2023-07-11 14:16:28,065 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 329 is on host 329
2023-07-11 14:16:28,065 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 330 is on host 330
2023-07-11 14:16:28,065 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 331 is on host 331
2023-07-11 14:16:28,065 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 332 is on host 332
2023-07-11 14:16:28,065 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 333 is on host 333
2023-07-11 14:16:28,065 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 334 is on host 334
2023-07-11 14:16:28,065 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 335 is on host 335
2023-07-11 14:16:28,065 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 336 is on host 336
2023-07-11 14:16:28,065 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 337 is on host 337
2023-07-11 14:16:28,065 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 338 is on host 338
2023-07-11 14:16:28,065 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 339 is on host 339
2023-07-11 14:16:28,065 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 340 is on host 340
2023-07-11 14:16:28,065 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 341 is on host 341
2023-07-11 14:16:28,065 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 342 is on host 342
2023-07-11 14:16:28,065 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 343 is on host 343
2023-07-11 14:16:28,065 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 344 is on host 344
2023-07-11 14:16:28,065 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 345 is on host 345
2023-07-11 14:16:28,065 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 346 is on host 346
2023-07-11 14:16:28,065 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 347 is on host 347
2023-07-11 14:16:28,065 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 348 is on host 348
2023-07-11 14:16:28,065 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 349 is on host 349
2023-07-11 14:16:28,065 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 350 is on host 350
2023-07-11 14:16:28,065 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 351 is on host 351
2023-07-11 14:16:28,065 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 352 is on host 352
2023-07-11 14:16:28,065 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 353 is on host 353
2023-07-11 14:16:28,066 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 354 is on host 354
2023-07-11 14:16:28,066 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 355 is on host 355
2023-07-11 14:16:28,066 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 356 is on host 356
2023-07-11 14:16:28,066 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 357 is on host 357
2023-07-11 14:16:28,066 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 358 is on host 358
2023-07-11 14:16:28,066 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 359 is on host 359
2023-07-11 14:16:28,066 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 360 is on host 360
2023-07-11 14:16:28,066 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 361 is on host 361
2023-07-11 14:16:28,066 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 362 is on host 362
2023-07-11 14:16:28,066 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 363 is on host 363
2023-07-11 14:16:28,066 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 364 is on host 364
2023-07-11 14:16:28,066 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 365 is on host 365
2023-07-11 14:16:28,066 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 366 is on host 366
2023-07-11 14:16:28,066 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 367 is on host 367
2023-07-11 14:16:28,066 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 368 is on host 368
2023-07-11 14:16:28,066 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 369 is on host 369
2023-07-11 14:16:28,066 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 370 is on host 370
2023-07-11 14:16:28,066 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 371 is on host 371
2023-07-11 14:16:28,066 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 372 is on host 372
2023-07-11 14:16:28,066 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 373 is on host 373
2023-07-11 14:16:28,066 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 374 is on host 374
2023-07-11 14:16:28,066 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 375 is on host 375
2023-07-11 14:16:28,066 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 376 is on host 376
2023-07-11 14:16:28,066 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 377 is on host 377
2023-07-11 14:16:28,066 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 378 is on host 378
2023-07-11 14:16:28,066 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 379 is on host 379
2023-07-11 14:16:28,066 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 380 is on host 380
2023-07-11 14:16:28,066 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 381 is on host 381
2023-07-11 14:16:28,066 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 382 is on host 382
2023-07-11 14:16:28,067 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 383 is on host 383
2023-07-11 14:16:28,067 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 384 is on host 384
2023-07-11 14:16:28,067 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 385 is on host 385
2023-07-11 14:16:28,067 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 386 is on host 386
2023-07-11 14:16:28,067 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 387 is on host 387
2023-07-11 14:16:28,067 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 388 is on host 388
2023-07-11 14:16:28,067 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 389 is on host 389
2023-07-11 14:16:28,067 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 390 is on host 390
2023-07-11 14:16:28,067 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 391 is on host 391
2023-07-11 14:16:28,067 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 392 is on host 392
2023-07-11 14:16:28,067 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=393, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:28,067 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table33) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:28,067 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table6
2023-07-11 14:16:28,068 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv553536953=290, srv1630071126=110, srv1071894870=12, srv23511728=232, srv658346947=323, srv2025338799=204, srv1397994335=64, srv1976766403=195, srv1644629726=118, srv957637734=381, srv2079182457=210, srv1749264468=139, srv2046129126=206, srv1595762596=104, srv603990852=307, srv1973073480=194, srv958856137=382, srv644066832=319, srv557062842=292, srv277765671=235, srv732221418=337, srv1769385567=143, srv224612199=228, srv714752528=334, srv362526040=256, srv581128949=296, srv2133511466=223, srv1144239257=30, srv320603627=245, srv1679952521=126, srv2122867873=222, srv1110067064=24, srv256251994=233, srv63261708=317, srv89837390=371, srv552104598=289, srv508952995=281, srv2096011353=214, srv1770417148=144, srv1246723478=42, srv929436444=378, srv2082192429=211, srv234917297=231, srv405700573=266, srv183644386=166, srv1488378513=85, srv173139715=136, srv1154180352=32, srv355693379=252, srv1407521654=66, srv496848057=275, srv1157975499=33, srv1806731027=162, srv1923102804=184, srv311102455=244, srv450011410=271, srv771515724=348, srv389183508=262, srv1249074416=43, srv2014575201=201, srv640847108=318, srv832363565=356, srv1970882134=192, srv2107358603=218, srv855766065=361, srv1336043388=55, srv29397186=237, srv982792848=390, srv976560524=386, srv101181760=3, srv1093549482=21, srv2018389395=202, srv2113483104=221, srv1778339118=149, srv1968709692=190, srv705221118=333, srv159600090=105, srv1919608486=180, srv981255102=389, srv807899713=353, srv755110395=344, srv1770594519=145, srv739692705=340, srv1076582671=16, srv693869315=330, srv1079048717=17, srv440657532=270, srv1636659280=115, srv2108739257=220, srv668373413=326, srv1003610393=2, srv1054229197=11, srv1868589627=172, srv2103522371=217, srv1000546271=0, srv951670617=380, srv2042909593=205, srv1865656038=171, srv1466355012=78, srv703662406=332, srv1418112884=70, srv1215580291=40, srv71833528=335, srv1580581635=103, srv1021032212=5, srv1080806312=19, srv1985601859=197, srv74471954=343, srv1647472319=119, srv2071553346=208, srv1632855171=112, srv1122009370=27, srv13613992=61, srv1630777154=111, srv301413669=239, srv550697728=288, srv1296023857=53, srv1724550977=133, srv1989290370=198, srv1926417985=185, srv1678097199=125, srv1461034373=76, srv614690415=311, srv2098345381=215, srv310463473=243, srv1011934105=4, srv148627129=84, srv305489318=240, srv1256534903=46, srv1289731445=52, srv1798844587=157, srv567113085=294, srv1119222501=26, srv2055117940=207, srv855898852=362, srv629224816=316, srv1075943554=15, srv625909061=315, srv1705591942=128, srv734225580=339, srv660107924=324, srv1381729938=62, srv1633483173=113, srv408265476=267, srv1776057793=148, srv1360253411=60, srv1511424834=90, srv1414162621=68, srv883343663=370, srv151859222=91, srv349144930=251, srv1991304034=199, srv1825887791=164, srv601657063=305, srv758932951=345, srv1651629087=120, srv1864623584=170, srv682957691=329, srv1500454146=88, srv1725962085=135, srv1659841448=121, srv1253206004=45, srv52354442=284, srv18508093=168, srv1427731921=73, srv561344974=293, srv721668125=336, srv1575482138=100, srv914128771=373, srv961487230=383, srv741332941=342, srv533032466=286, srv1574140987=99, srv2139849097=224, srv503902262=278, srv674807007=327, srv1786829855=153, srv2088727517=213, srv394366966=264, srv980089565=388, srv114594288=31, srv38296437=261, srv214835574=226, srv1887224977=176, srv1025509362=7, srv1577020334=102, srv524466665=285, srv393561021=263, srv759909927=346, srv763556514=347, srv786453030=349, srv2142935488=225, srv618111613=312, srv16254163=108, srv343211061=250, srv476075173=273, srv1269632212=47, srv333589612=246, srv499015361=276, srv836674186=357, srv1799191687=158, srv1446998035=74, srv1571774199=98, srv1115354947=25, srv333860881=247, srv1724152600=132, srv1598699299=106, srv177885829=151, srv472125887=272, srv1101339966=22, srv1424985362=72, srv1945569895=188, srv594128294=300, srv1026739237=8, srv842459828=358, srv878519137=366, srv1921260729=181, srv339110834=249, srv504099471=279, srv814253179=354, srv1643744885=116, srv1793847521=155, srv607234624=309, srv698219051=331, srv1688538732=127, srv666240078=325, srv1079284733=18, srv29210550=236, srv506181748=280, srv881313122=368, srv1945452576=187, srv597307897=303, srv1285120424=51, srv1887943816=177, srv1983604698=196, srv1805465940=161, srv309309336=242, srv1719756294=131, srv1349932676=58, srv1208486369=38, srv1643971570=117, srv1509331489=89, srv334105385=248, srv1400515744=65, srv369984715=259, srv43712162=269, srv842675864=359, srv1803258748=160, srv1022450918=6, srv1775108732=147, srv1766088250=141, srv180150732=159, srv1220857227=41, srv226530501=229, srv362032108=255, srv919715380=377, srv1074935976=14, srv1395030819=63, srv803291569=352, srv1877966766=175, srv220538712=227, srv2021718843=203, srv2107782185=219, srv882216860=369, srv1489137852=86, srv1972328734=193, srv1470759982=79, srv1774824811=146, srv971974774=384, srv1418242791=71, srv1001274196=1, srv909615097=372, srv1537724566=93, srv1165799954=34, srv1724754364=134, srv978173525=387, srv113319438=29, srv578033735=295, srv147931272=80, srv1183635941=35, srv1904215245=178, srv596349756=302, srv880835255=367, srv857544550=364, srv1779729022=152, srv1795612465=156, srv621083045=314, srv917704170=375, srv1351811120=59, srv1316710897=54, srv789820555=350, srv1922580095=183, srv305567304=241, srv1936745425=186, srv1745318024=138, srv1210822057=39, srv645375717=320, srv950628389=379, srv1490199189=87, srv1575919256=101, srv154481102=96, srv359402967=254, srv997716931=391, srv1457224273=75, srv581644449=297, srv1872374768=174, srv363177310=257, srv740327512=341, srv1664227236=123, srv972330517=385, srv1634261306=114, srv1662183707=122, srv1969046891=191, srv1485266211=82, srv1778842262=150, srv588410181=298, srv1921840985=182, srv591279493=299, srv37574565=260, srv1104147458=23, srv1190166330=36, srv652270371=322, srv1484309042=81, srv1560148463=97, srv618569548=313, srv2102708311=216, srv1084873074=20, srv517669556=283, srv918152084=376, srv649714317=321, srv1674484790=124, srv1339239880=56, srv1461073271=77, srv1125312901=28, srv25633292=234, srv516616923=282, srv299721745=238, srv604932433=308, srv1273702855=48, srv792183929=351, srv1042608200=10, srv1276335106=49, srv1486044644=83, srv676101698=328, srv998930892=392, srv200111276=200, srv1863083643=169, srv1737443479=137, srv872997185=365, srv821351126=355, srv852115805=360, srv1074355423=13, srv170952194=130, srv503430005=277, srv153887567=94, srv1415163001=69, srv1032737435=9, srv1840670515=167, srv1961921083=189, srv59745831=304, srv36715747=258, srv431547280=268, srv1524853580=92, srv1870059418=173, srv396010771=265, srv594457792=301, srv1755339428=140, srv1766275429=142, srv5565786=291, srv603898526=306, srv544570223=287, srv856030669=363, srv1542523468=95, srv915785747=374, srv356122213=253, srv1411875499=67, srv2077620970=209, srv1345529444=57, srv232339963=230, srv1250861076=44, srv1914875423=179, srv478619481=274, srv1202435626=37, srv1706089454=129, srv1810631201=163, srv1282644061=50, srv1625945288=109, srv733251129=338, srv2082830831=212, srv1612103540=107, srv612136291=310, srv1790004142=154, srv183394703=165} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:28,068 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:28,068 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:28,068 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:28,068 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:28,068 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:28,068 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:28,068 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-11 14:16:28,068 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-11 14:16:28,068 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-11 14:16:28,068 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-11 14:16:28,068 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 10 is on host 10
2023-07-11 14:16:28,068 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 11 is on host 11
2023-07-11 14:16:28,068 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 12 is on host 12
2023-07-11 14:16:28,068 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 13 is on host 13
2023-07-11 14:16:28,068 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 14 is on host 14
2023-07-11 14:16:28,068 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 15 is on host 15
2023-07-11 14:16:28,068 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 16 is on host 16
2023-07-11 14:16:28,068 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 17 is on host 17
2023-07-11 14:16:28,069 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 18 is on host 18
2023-07-11 14:16:28,069 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 19 is on host 19
2023-07-11 14:16:28,069 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 20 is on host 20
2023-07-11 14:16:28,069 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 21 is on host 21
2023-07-11 14:16:28,069 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 22 is on host 22
2023-07-11 14:16:28,069 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 23 is on host 23
2023-07-11 14:16:28,069 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 24 is on host 24
2023-07-11 14:16:28,069 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 25 is on host 25
2023-07-11 14:16:28,069 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 26 is on host 26
2023-07-11 14:16:28,069 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 27 is on host 27
2023-07-11 14:16:28,069 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 28 is on host 28
2023-07-11 14:16:28,069 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 29 is on host 29
2023-07-11 14:16:28,069 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 30 is on host 30
2023-07-11 14:16:28,069 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 31 is on host 31
2023-07-11 14:16:28,069 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 32 is on host 32
2023-07-11 14:16:28,069 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 33 is on host 33
2023-07-11 14:16:28,069 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 34 is on host 34
2023-07-11 14:16:28,069 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 35 is on host 35
2023-07-11 14:16:28,069 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 36 is on host 36
2023-07-11 14:16:28,069 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 37 is on host 37
2023-07-11 14:16:28,069 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 38 is on host 38
2023-07-11 14:16:28,069 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 39 is on host 39
2023-07-11 14:16:28,069 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 40 is on host 40
2023-07-11 14:16:28,069 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 41 is on host 41
2023-07-11 14:16:28,069 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 42 is on host 42
2023-07-11 14:16:28,069 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 43 is on host 43
2023-07-11 14:16:28,069 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 44 is on host 44
2023-07-11 14:16:28,069 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 45 is on host 45
2023-07-11 14:16:28,069 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 46 is on host 46
2023-07-11 14:16:28,070 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 47 is on host 47
2023-07-11 14:16:28,070 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 48 is on host 48
2023-07-11 14:16:28,070 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 49 is on host 49
2023-07-11 14:16:28,070 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 50 is on host 50
2023-07-11 14:16:28,070 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 51 is on host 51
2023-07-11 14:16:28,070 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 52 is on host 52
2023-07-11 14:16:28,070 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 53 is on host 53
2023-07-11 14:16:28,070 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 54 is on host 54
2023-07-11 14:16:28,070 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 55 is on host 55
2023-07-11 14:16:28,070 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 56 is on host 56
2023-07-11 14:16:28,070 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 57 is on host 57
2023-07-11 14:16:28,070 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 58 is on host 58
2023-07-11 14:16:28,070 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 59 is on host 59
2023-07-11 14:16:28,070 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 60 is on host 60
2023-07-11 14:16:28,070 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 61 is on host 61
2023-07-11 14:16:28,070 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 62 is on host 62
2023-07-11 14:16:28,070 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 63 is on host 63
2023-07-11 14:16:28,070 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 64 is on host 64
2023-07-11 14:16:28,070 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 65 is on host 65
2023-07-11 14:16:28,070 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 66 is on host 66
2023-07-11 14:16:28,070 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 67 is on host 67
2023-07-11 14:16:28,070 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 68 is on host 68
2023-07-11 14:16:28,070 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 69 is on host 69
2023-07-11 14:16:28,070 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 70 is on host 70
2023-07-11 14:16:28,070 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 71 is on host 71
2023-07-11 14:16:28,070 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 72 is on host 72
2023-07-11 14:16:28,070 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 73 is on host 73
2023-07-11 14:16:28,070 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 74 is on host 74
2023-07-11 14:16:28,070 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 75 is on host 75
2023-07-11 14:16:28,071 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 76 is on host 76
2023-07-11 14:16:28,071 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 77 is on host 77
2023-07-11 14:16:28,071 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 78 is on host 78
2023-07-11 14:16:28,071 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 79 is on host 79
2023-07-11 14:16:28,071 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 80 is on host 80
2023-07-11 14:16:28,071 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 81 is on host 81
2023-07-11 14:16:28,071 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 82 is on host 82
2023-07-11 14:16:28,071 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 83 is on host 83
2023-07-11 14:16:28,071 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 84 is on host 84
2023-07-11 14:16:28,071 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 85 is on host 85
2023-07-11 14:16:28,071 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 86 is on host 86
2023-07-11 14:16:28,071 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 87 is on host 87
2023-07-11 14:16:28,071 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 88 is on host 88
2023-07-11 14:16:28,071 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 89 is on host 89
2023-07-11 14:16:28,071 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 90 is on host 90
2023-07-11 14:16:28,071 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 91 is on host 91
2023-07-11 14:16:28,071 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 92 is on host 92
2023-07-11 14:16:28,071 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 93 is on host 93
2023-07-11 14:16:28,071 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 94 is on host 94
2023-07-11 14:16:28,071 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 95 is on host 95
2023-07-11 14:16:28,071 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 96 is on host 96
2023-07-11 14:16:28,071 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 97 is on host 97
2023-07-11 14:16:28,071 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 98 is on host 98
2023-07-11 14:16:28,071 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 99 is on host 99
2023-07-11 14:16:28,071 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 100 is on host 100
2023-07-11 14:16:28,071 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 101 is on host 101
2023-07-11 14:16:28,071 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 102 is on host 102
2023-07-11 14:16:28,071 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 103 is on host 103
2023-07-11 14:16:28,071 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 104 is on host 104
2023-07-11 14:16:28,072 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 105 is on host 105
2023-07-11 14:16:28,072 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 106 is on host 106
2023-07-11 14:16:28,072 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 107 is on host 107
2023-07-11 14:16:28,072 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 108 is on host 108
2023-07-11 14:16:28,072 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 109 is on host 109
2023-07-11 14:16:28,072 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 110 is on host 110
2023-07-11 14:16:28,072 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 111 is on host 111
2023-07-11 14:16:28,072 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 112 is on host 112
2023-07-11 14:16:28,072 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 113 is on host 113
2023-07-11 14:16:28,072 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 114 is on host 114
2023-07-11 14:16:28,072 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 115 is on host 115
2023-07-11 14:16:28,072 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 116 is on host 116
2023-07-11 14:16:28,072 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 117 is on host 117
2023-07-11 14:16:28,072 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 118 is on host 118
2023-07-11 14:16:28,072 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 119 is on host 119
2023-07-11 14:16:28,072 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 120 is on host 120
2023-07-11 14:16:28,072 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 121 is on host 121
2023-07-11 14:16:28,072 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 122 is on host 122
2023-07-11 14:16:28,072 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 123 is on host 123
2023-07-11 14:16:28,072 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 124 is on host 124
2023-07-11 14:16:28,073 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 125 is on host 125
2023-07-11 14:16:28,073 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 126 is on host 126
2023-07-11 14:16:28,073 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 127 is on host 127
2023-07-11 14:16:28,073 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 128 is on host 128
2023-07-11 14:16:28,073 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 129 is on host 129
2023-07-11 14:16:28,073 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 130 is on host 130
2023-07-11 14:16:28,073 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 131 is on host 131
2023-07-11 14:16:28,073 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 132 is on host 132
2023-07-11 14:16:28,073 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 133 is on host 133
2023-07-11 14:16:28,073 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 134 is on host 134
2023-07-11 14:16:28,073 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 135 is on host 135
2023-07-11 14:16:28,073 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 136 is on host 136
2023-07-11 14:16:28,073 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 137 is on host 137
2023-07-11 14:16:28,073 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 138 is on host 138
2023-07-11 14:16:28,073 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 139 is on host 139
2023-07-11 14:16:28,073 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 140 is on host 140
2023-07-11 14:16:28,073 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 141 is on host 141
2023-07-11 14:16:28,073 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 142 is on host 142
2023-07-11 14:16:28,073 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 143 is on host 143
2023-07-11 14:16:28,073 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 144 is on host 144
2023-07-11 14:16:28,073 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 145 is on host 145
2023-07-11 14:16:28,073 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 146 is on host 146
2023-07-11 14:16:28,073 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 147 is on host 147
2023-07-11 14:16:28,073 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 148 is on host 148
2023-07-11 14:16:28,073 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 149 is on host 149
2023-07-11 14:16:28,073 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 150 is on host 150
2023-07-11 14:16:28,073 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 151 is on host 151
2023-07-11 14:16:28,073 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 152 is on host 152
2023-07-11 14:16:28,073 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 153 is on host 153
2023-07-11 14:16:28,074 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 154 is on host 154
2023-07-11 14:16:28,074 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 155 is on host 155
2023-07-11 14:16:28,074 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 156 is on host 156
2023-07-11 14:16:28,074 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 157 is on host 157
2023-07-11 14:16:28,074 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 158 is on host 158
2023-07-11 14:16:28,074 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 159 is on host 159
2023-07-11 14:16:28,074 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 160 is on host 160
2023-07-11 14:16:28,074 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 161 is on host 161
2023-07-11 14:16:28,074 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 162 is on host 162
2023-07-11 14:16:28,074 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 163 is on host 163
2023-07-11 14:16:28,074 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 164 is on host 164
2023-07-11 14:16:28,074 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 165 is on host 165
2023-07-11 14:16:28,074 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 166 is on host 166
2023-07-11 14:16:28,074 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 167 is on host 167
2023-07-11 14:16:28,074 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 168 is on host 168
2023-07-11 14:16:28,074 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 169 is on host 169
2023-07-11 14:16:28,074 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 170 is on host 170
2023-07-11 14:16:28,074 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 171 is on host 171
2023-07-11 14:16:28,074 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 172 is on host 172
2023-07-11 14:16:28,074 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 173 is on host 173
2023-07-11 14:16:28,074 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 174 is on host 174
2023-07-11 14:16:28,074 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 175 is on host 175
2023-07-11 14:16:28,074 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 176 is on host 176
2023-07-11 14:16:28,074 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 177 is on host 177
2023-07-11 14:16:28,074 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 178 is on host 178
2023-07-11 14:16:28,074 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 179 is on host 179
2023-07-11 14:16:28,074 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 180 is on host 180
2023-07-11 14:16:28,074 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 181 is on host 181
2023-07-11 14:16:28,074 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 182 is on host 182
2023-07-11 14:16:28,075 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 183 is on host 183
2023-07-11 14:16:28,075 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 184 is on host 184
2023-07-11 14:16:28,075 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 185 is on host 185
2023-07-11 14:16:28,075 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 186 is on host 186
2023-07-11 14:16:28,075 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 187 is on host 187
2023-07-11 14:16:28,075 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 188 is on host 188
2023-07-11 14:16:28,075 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 189 is on host 189
2023-07-11 14:16:28,075 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 190 is on host 190
2023-07-11 14:16:28,075 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 191 is on host 191
2023-07-11 14:16:28,075 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 192 is on host 192
2023-07-11 14:16:28,075 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 193 is on host 193
2023-07-11 14:16:28,075 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 194 is on host 194
2023-07-11 14:16:28,075 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 195 is on host 195
2023-07-11 14:16:28,075 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 196 is on host 196
2023-07-11 14:16:28,075 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 197 is on host 197
2023-07-11 14:16:28,075 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 198 is on host 198
2023-07-11 14:16:28,075 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 199 is on host 199
2023-07-11 14:16:28,075 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 200 is on host 200
2023-07-11 14:16:28,075 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 201 is on host 201
2023-07-11 14:16:28,075 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 202 is on host 202
2023-07-11 14:16:28,075 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 203 is on host 203
2023-07-11 14:16:28,075 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 204 is on host 204
2023-07-11 14:16:28,075 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 205 is on host 205
2023-07-11 14:16:28,075 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 206 is on host 206
2023-07-11 14:16:28,075 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 207 is on host 207
2023-07-11 14:16:28,075 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 208 is on host 208
2023-07-11 14:16:28,075 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 209 is on host 209
2023-07-11 14:16:28,075 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 210 is on host 210
2023-07-11 14:16:28,075 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 211 is on host 211
2023-07-11 14:16:28,076 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 212 is on host 212
2023-07-11 14:16:28,076 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 213 is on host 213
2023-07-11 14:16:28,076 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 214 is on host 214
2023-07-11 14:16:28,076 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 215 is on host 215
2023-07-11 14:16:28,076 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 216 is on host 216
2023-07-11 14:16:28,076 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 217 is on host 217
2023-07-11 14:16:28,076 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 218 is on host 218
2023-07-11 14:16:28,076 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 219 is on host 219
2023-07-11 14:16:28,076 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 220 is on host 220
2023-07-11 14:16:28,076 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 221 is on host 221
2023-07-11 14:16:28,076 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 222 is on host 222
2023-07-11 14:16:28,076 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 223 is on host 223
2023-07-11 14:16:28,076 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 224 is on host 224
2023-07-11 14:16:28,076 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 225 is on host 225
2023-07-11 14:16:28,076 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 226 is on host 226
2023-07-11 14:16:28,076 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 227 is on host 227
2023-07-11 14:16:28,076 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 228 is on host 228
2023-07-11 14:16:28,076 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 229 is on host 229
2023-07-11 14:16:28,076 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 230 is on host 230
2023-07-11 14:16:28,076 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 231 is on host 231
2023-07-11 14:16:28,076 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 232 is on host 232
2023-07-11 14:16:28,076 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 233 is on host 233
2023-07-11 14:16:28,076 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 234 is on host 234
2023-07-11 14:16:28,076 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 235 is on host 235
2023-07-11 14:16:28,076 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 236 is on host 236
2023-07-11 14:16:28,076 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 237 is on host 237
2023-07-11 14:16:28,076 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 238 is on host 238
2023-07-11 14:16:28,076 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 239 is on host 239
2023-07-11 14:16:28,076 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 240 is on host 240
2023-07-11 14:16:28,077 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 241 is on host 241
2023-07-11 14:16:28,077 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 242 is on host 242
2023-07-11 14:16:28,077 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 243 is on host 243
2023-07-11 14:16:28,077 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 244 is on host 244
2023-07-11 14:16:28,077 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 245 is on host 245
2023-07-11 14:16:28,077 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 246 is on host 246
2023-07-11 14:16:28,077 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 247 is on host 247
2023-07-11 14:16:28,077 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 248 is on host 248
2023-07-11 14:16:28,077 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 249 is on host 249
2023-07-11 14:16:28,077 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 250 is on host 250
2023-07-11 14:16:28,077 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 251 is on host 251
2023-07-11 14:16:28,077 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 252 is on host 252
2023-07-11 14:16:28,077 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 253 is on host 253
2023-07-11 14:16:28,077 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 254 is on host 254
2023-07-11 14:16:28,077 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 255 is on host 255
2023-07-11 14:16:28,077 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 256 is on host 256
2023-07-11 14:16:28,077 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 257 is on host 257
2023-07-11 14:16:28,077 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 258 is on host 258
2023-07-11 14:16:28,077 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 259 is on host 259
2023-07-11 14:16:28,077 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 260 is on host 260
2023-07-11 14:16:28,077 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 261 is on host 261
2023-07-11 14:16:28,077 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 262 is on host 262
2023-07-11 14:16:28,077 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 263 is on host 263
2023-07-11 14:16:28,077 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 264 is on host 264
2023-07-11 14:16:28,077 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 265 is on host 265
2023-07-11 14:16:28,077 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 266 is on host 266
2023-07-11 14:16:28,077 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 267 is on host 267
2023-07-11 14:16:28,077 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 268 is on host 268
2023-07-11 14:16:28,077 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 269 is on host 269
2023-07-11 14:16:28,078 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 270 is on host 270
2023-07-11 14:16:28,078 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 271 is on host 271
2023-07-11 14:16:28,078 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 272 is on host 272
2023-07-11 14:16:28,078 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 273 is on host 273
2023-07-11 14:16:28,078 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 274 is on host 274
2023-07-11 14:16:28,078 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 275 is on host 275
2023-07-11 14:16:28,078 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 276 is on host 276
2023-07-11 14:16:28,078 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 277 is on host 277
2023-07-11 14:16:28,078 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 278 is on host 278
2023-07-11 14:16:28,078 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 279 is on host 279
2023-07-11 14:16:28,078 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 280 is on host 280
2023-07-11 14:16:28,078 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 281 is on host 281
2023-07-11 14:16:28,078 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 282 is on host 282
2023-07-11 14:16:28,078 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 283 is on host 283
2023-07-11 14:16:28,078 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 284 is on host 284
2023-07-11 14:16:28,078 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 285 is on host 285
2023-07-11 14:16:28,078 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 286 is on host 286
2023-07-11 14:16:28,078 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 287 is on host 287
2023-07-11 14:16:28,078 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 288 is on host 288
2023-07-11 14:16:28,078 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 289 is on host 289
2023-07-11 14:16:28,078 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 290 is on host 290
2023-07-11 14:16:28,078 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 291 is on host 291
2023-07-11 14:16:28,078 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 292 is on host 292
2023-07-11 14:16:28,078 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 293 is on host 293
2023-07-11 14:16:28,078 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 294 is on host 294
2023-07-11 14:16:28,078 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 295 is on host 295
2023-07-11 14:16:28,078 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 296 is on host 296
2023-07-11 14:16:28,078 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 297 is on host 297
2023-07-11 14:16:28,078 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 298 is on host 298
2023-07-11 14:16:28,079 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 299 is on host 299
2023-07-11 14:16:28,079 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 300 is on host 300
2023-07-11 14:16:28,079 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 301 is on host 301
2023-07-11 14:16:28,079 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 302 is on host 302
2023-07-11 14:16:28,079 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 303 is on host 303
2023-07-11 14:16:28,079 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 304 is on host 304
2023-07-11 14:16:28,079 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 305 is on host 305
2023-07-11 14:16:28,079 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 306 is on host 306
2023-07-11 14:16:28,079 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 307 is on host 307
2023-07-11 14:16:28,079 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 308 is on host 308
2023-07-11 14:16:28,079 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 309 is on host 309
2023-07-11 14:16:28,079 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 310 is on host 310
2023-07-11 14:16:28,079 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 311 is on host 311
2023-07-11 14:16:28,079 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 312 is on host 312
2023-07-11 14:16:28,079 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 313 is on host 313
2023-07-11 14:16:28,079 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 314 is on host 314
2023-07-11 14:16:28,079 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 315 is on host 315
2023-07-11 14:16:28,079 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 316 is on host 316
2023-07-11 14:16:28,079 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 317 is on host 317
2023-07-11 14:16:28,079 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 318 is on host 318
2023-07-11 14:16:28,079 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 319 is on host 319
2023-07-11 14:16:28,079 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 320 is on host 320
2023-07-11 14:16:28,079 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 321 is on host 321
2023-07-11 14:16:28,079 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 322 is on host 322
2023-07-11 14:16:28,079 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 323 is on host 323
2023-07-11 14:16:28,079 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 324 is on host 324
2023-07-11 14:16:28,079 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 325 is on host 325
2023-07-11 14:16:28,079 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 326 is on host 326
2023-07-11 14:16:28,079 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 327 is on host 327
2023-07-11 14:16:28,080 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 328 is on host 328
2023-07-11 14:16:28,080 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 329 is on host 329
2023-07-11 14:16:28,080 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 330 is on host 330
2023-07-11 14:16:28,080 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 331 is on host 331
2023-07-11 14:16:28,080 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 332 is on host 332
2023-07-11 14:16:28,080 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 333 is on host 333
2023-07-11 14:16:28,080 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 334 is on host 334
2023-07-11 14:16:28,080 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 335 is on host 335
2023-07-11 14:16:28,080 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 336 is on host 336
2023-07-11 14:16:28,080 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 337 is on host 337
2023-07-11 14:16:28,080 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 338 is on host 338
2023-07-11 14:16:28,080 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 339 is on host 339
2023-07-11 14:16:28,080 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 340 is on host 340
2023-07-11 14:16:28,080 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 341 is on host 341
2023-07-11 14:16:28,080 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 342 is on host 342
2023-07-11 14:16:28,080 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 343 is on host 343
2023-07-11 14:16:28,080 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 344 is on host 344
2023-07-11 14:16:28,080 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 345 is on host 345
2023-07-11 14:16:28,080 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 346 is on host 346
2023-07-11 14:16:28,080 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 347 is on host 347
2023-07-11 14:16:28,080 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 348 is on host 348
2023-07-11 14:16:28,080 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 349 is on host 349
2023-07-11 14:16:28,080 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 350 is on host 350
2023-07-11 14:16:28,080 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 351 is on host 351
2023-07-11 14:16:28,080 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 352 is on host 352
2023-07-11 14:16:28,080 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 353 is on host 353
2023-07-11 14:16:28,080 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 354 is on host 354
2023-07-11 14:16:28,080 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 355 is on host 355
2023-07-11 14:16:28,080 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 356 is on host 356
2023-07-11 14:16:28,081 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 357 is on host 357
2023-07-11 14:16:28,081 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 358 is on host 358
2023-07-11 14:16:28,081 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 359 is on host 359
2023-07-11 14:16:28,081 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 360 is on host 360
2023-07-11 14:16:28,081 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 361 is on host 361
2023-07-11 14:16:28,081 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 362 is on host 362
2023-07-11 14:16:28,081 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 363 is on host 363
2023-07-11 14:16:28,081 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 364 is on host 364
2023-07-11 14:16:28,081 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 365 is on host 365
2023-07-11 14:16:28,081 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 366 is on host 366
2023-07-11 14:16:28,081 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 367 is on host 367
2023-07-11 14:16:28,081 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 368 is on host 368
2023-07-11 14:16:28,081 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 369 is on host 369
2023-07-11 14:16:28,081 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 370 is on host 370
2023-07-11 14:16:28,081 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 371 is on host 371
2023-07-11 14:16:28,081 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 372 is on host 372
2023-07-11 14:16:28,081 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 373 is on host 373
2023-07-11 14:16:28,081 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 374 is on host 374
2023-07-11 14:16:28,081 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 375 is on host 375
2023-07-11 14:16:28,081 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 376 is on host 376
2023-07-11 14:16:28,081 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 377 is on host 377
2023-07-11 14:16:28,081 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 378 is on host 378
2023-07-11 14:16:28,081 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 379 is on host 379
2023-07-11 14:16:28,081 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 380 is on host 380
2023-07-11 14:16:28,081 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 381 is on host 381
2023-07-11 14:16:28,081 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 382 is on host 382
2023-07-11 14:16:28,081 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 383 is on host 383
2023-07-11 14:16:28,081 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 384 is on host 384
2023-07-11 14:16:28,081 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 385 is on host 385
2023-07-11 14:16:28,082 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 386 is on host 386
2023-07-11 14:16:28,082 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 387 is on host 387
2023-07-11 14:16:28,082 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 388 is on host 388
2023-07-11 14:16:28,082 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 389 is on host 389
2023-07-11 14:16:28,082 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 390 is on host 390
2023-07-11 14:16:28,082 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 391 is on host 391
2023-07-11 14:16:28,082 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 392 is on host 392
2023-07-11 14:16:28,082 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=393, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:28,082 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table6) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:28,082 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table34
2023-07-11 14:16:28,083 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv553536953=290, srv1630071126=110, srv1071894870=12, srv23511728=232, srv658346947=323, srv2025338799=204, srv1397994335=64, srv1976766403=195, srv1644629726=118, srv957637734=381, srv2079182457=210, srv1749264468=139, srv2046129126=206, srv1595762596=104, srv603990852=307, srv1973073480=194, srv958856137=382, srv644066832=319, srv557062842=292, srv277765671=235, srv732221418=337, srv1769385567=143, srv224612199=228, srv714752528=334, srv362526040=256, srv581128949=296, srv2133511466=223, srv1144239257=30, srv320603627=245, srv1679952521=126, srv2122867873=222, srv1110067064=24, srv256251994=233, srv63261708=317, srv89837390=371, srv552104598=289, srv508952995=281, srv2096011353=214, srv1770417148=144, srv1246723478=42, srv929436444=378, srv2082192429=211, srv234917297=231, srv405700573=266, srv183644386=166, srv1488378513=85, srv173139715=136, srv1154180352=32, srv355693379=252, srv1407521654=66, srv496848057=275, srv1157975499=33, srv1806731027=162, srv1923102804=184, srv311102455=244, srv450011410=271, srv771515724=348, srv389183508=262, srv1249074416=43, srv2014575201=201, srv640847108=318, srv832363565=356, srv1970882134=192, srv2107358603=218, srv855766065=361, srv1336043388=55, srv29397186=237, srv982792848=390, srv976560524=386, srv101181760=3, srv1093549482=21, srv2018389395=202, srv2113483104=221, srv1778339118=149, srv1968709692=190, srv705221118=333, srv159600090=105, srv1919608486=180, srv981255102=389, srv807899713=353, srv755110395=344, srv1770594519=145, srv739692705=340, srv1076582671=16, srv693869315=330, srv1079048717=17, srv440657532=270, srv1636659280=115, srv2108739257=220, srv668373413=326, srv1003610393=2, srv1054229197=11, srv1868589627=172, srv2103522371=217, srv1000546271=0, srv951670617=380, srv2042909593=205, srv1865656038=171, srv1466355012=78, srv703662406=332, srv1418112884=70, srv1215580291=40, srv71833528=335, srv1580581635=103, srv1021032212=5, srv1080806312=19, srv1985601859=197, srv74471954=343, srv1647472319=119, srv2071553346=208, srv1632855171=112, srv1122009370=27, srv13613992=61, srv1630777154=111, srv301413669=239, srv550697728=288, srv1296023857=53, srv1724550977=133, srv1989290370=198, srv1926417985=185, srv1678097199=125, srv1461034373=76, srv614690415=311, srv2098345381=215, srv310463473=243, srv1011934105=4, srv148627129=84, srv305489318=240, srv1256534903=46, srv1289731445=52, srv1798844587=157, srv567113085=294, srv1119222501=26, srv2055117940=207, srv855898852=362, srv629224816=316, srv1075943554=15, srv625909061=315, srv1705591942=128, srv734225580=339, srv660107924=324, srv1381729938=62, srv1633483173=113, srv408265476=267, srv1776057793=148, srv1360253411=60, srv1511424834=90, srv1414162621=68, srv883343663=370, srv151859222=91, srv349144930=251, srv1991304034=199, srv1825887791=164, srv601657063=305, srv758932951=345, srv1651629087=120, srv1864623584=170, srv682957691=329, srv1500454146=88, srv1725962085=135, srv1659841448=121, srv1253206004=45, srv52354442=284, srv18508093=168, srv1427731921=73, srv561344974=293, srv721668125=336, srv1575482138=100, srv914128771=373, srv961487230=383, srv741332941=342, srv533032466=286, srv1574140987=99, srv2139849097=224, srv503902262=278, srv674807007=327, srv1786829855=153, srv2088727517=213, srv394366966=264, srv980089565=388, srv114594288=31, srv38296437=261, srv214835574=226, srv1887224977=176, srv1025509362=7, srv1577020334=102, srv524466665=285, srv393561021=263, srv759909927=346, srv763556514=347, srv786453030=349, srv2142935488=225, srv618111613=312, srv16254163=108, srv343211061=250, srv476075173=273, srv1269632212=47, srv333589612=246, srv499015361=276, srv836674186=357, srv1799191687=158, srv1446998035=74, srv1571774199=98, srv1115354947=25, srv333860881=247, srv1724152600=132, srv1598699299=106, srv177885829=151, srv472125887=272, srv1101339966=22, srv1424985362=72, srv1945569895=188, srv594128294=300, srv1026739237=8, srv842459828=358, srv878519137=366, srv1921260729=181, srv339110834=249, srv504099471=279, srv814253179=354, srv1643744885=116, srv1793847521=155, srv607234624=309, srv698219051=331, srv1688538732=127, srv666240078=325, srv1079284733=18, srv29210550=236, srv506181748=280, srv881313122=368, srv1945452576=187, srv597307897=303, srv1285120424=51, srv1887943816=177, srv1983604698=196, srv1805465940=161, srv309309336=242, srv1719756294=131, srv1349932676=58, srv1208486369=38, srv1643971570=117, srv1509331489=89, srv334105385=248, srv1400515744=65, srv369984715=259, srv43712162=269, srv842675864=359, srv1803258748=160, srv1022450918=6, srv1775108732=147, srv1766088250=141, srv180150732=159, srv1220857227=41, srv226530501=229, srv362032108=255, srv919715380=377, srv1074935976=14, srv1395030819=63, srv803291569=352, srv1877966766=175, srv220538712=227, srv2021718843=203, srv2107782185=219, srv882216860=369, srv1489137852=86, srv1972328734=193, srv1470759982=79, srv1774824811=146, srv971974774=384, srv1418242791=71, srv1001274196=1, srv909615097=372, srv1537724566=93, srv1165799954=34, srv1724754364=134, srv978173525=387, srv113319438=29, srv578033735=295, srv147931272=80, srv1183635941=35, srv1904215245=178, srv596349756=302, srv880835255=367, srv857544550=364, srv1779729022=152, srv1795612465=156, srv621083045=314, srv917704170=375, srv1351811120=59, srv1316710897=54, srv789820555=350, srv1922580095=183, srv305567304=241, srv1936745425=186, srv1745318024=138, srv1210822057=39, srv645375717=320, srv950628389=379, srv1490199189=87, srv1575919256=101, srv154481102=96, srv359402967=254, srv997716931=391, srv1457224273=75, srv581644449=297, srv1872374768=174, srv363177310=257, srv740327512=341, srv1664227236=123, srv972330517=385, srv1634261306=114, srv1662183707=122, srv1969046891=191, srv1485266211=82, srv1778842262=150, srv588410181=298, srv1921840985=182, srv591279493=299, srv37574565=260, srv1104147458=23, srv1190166330=36, srv652270371=322, srv1484309042=81, srv1560148463=97, srv618569548=313, srv2102708311=216, srv1084873074=20, srv517669556=283, srv918152084=376, srv649714317=321, srv1674484790=124, srv1339239880=56, srv1461073271=77, srv1125312901=28, srv25633292=234, srv516616923=282, srv299721745=238, srv604932433=308, srv1273702855=48, srv792183929=351, srv1042608200=10, srv1276335106=49, srv1486044644=83, srv676101698=328, srv998930892=392, srv200111276=200, srv1863083643=169, srv1737443479=137, srv872997185=365, srv821351126=355, srv852115805=360, srv1074355423=13, srv170952194=130, srv503430005=277, srv153887567=94, srv1415163001=69, srv1032737435=9, srv1840670515=167, srv1961921083=189, srv59745831=304, srv36715747=258, srv431547280=268, srv1524853580=92, srv1870059418=173, srv396010771=265, srv594457792=301, srv1755339428=140, srv1766275429=142, srv5565786=291, srv603898526=306, srv544570223=287, srv856030669=363, srv1542523468=95, srv915785747=374, srv356122213=253, srv1411875499=67, srv2077620970=209, srv1345529444=57, srv232339963=230, srv1250861076=44, srv1914875423=179, srv478619481=274, srv1202435626=37, srv1706089454=129, srv1810631201=163, srv1282644061=50, srv1625945288=109, srv733251129=338, srv2082830831=212, srv1612103540=107, srv612136291=310, srv1790004142=154, srv183394703=165} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:28,083 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:28,083 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:28,083 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:28,083 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:28,083 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:28,083 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:28,083 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-11 14:16:28,083 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-11 14:16:28,083 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-11 14:16:28,083 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-11 14:16:28,083 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 10 is on host 10
2023-07-11 14:16:28,083 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 11 is on host 11
2023-07-11 14:16:28,083 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 12 is on host 12
2023-07-11 14:16:28,083 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 13 is on host 13
2023-07-11 14:16:28,083 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 14 is on host 14
2023-07-11 14:16:28,083 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 15 is on host 15
2023-07-11 14:16:28,084 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 16 is on host 16
2023-07-11 14:16:28,084 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 17 is on host 17
2023-07-11 14:16:28,084 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 18 is on host 18
2023-07-11 14:16:28,084 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 19 is on host 19
2023-07-11 14:16:28,084 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 20 is on host 20
2023-07-11 14:16:28,084 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 21 is on host 21
2023-07-11 14:16:28,084 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 22 is on host 22
2023-07-11 14:16:28,084 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 23 is on host 23
2023-07-11 14:16:28,084 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 24 is on host 24
2023-07-11 14:16:28,084 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 25 is on host 25
2023-07-11 14:16:28,084 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 26 is on host 26
2023-07-11 14:16:28,084 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 27 is on host 27
2023-07-11 14:16:28,084 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 28 is on host 28
2023-07-11 14:16:28,084 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 29 is on host 29
2023-07-11 14:16:28,084 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 30 is on host 30
2023-07-11 14:16:28,084 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 31 is on host 31
2023-07-11 14:16:28,084 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 32 is on host 32
2023-07-11 14:16:28,084 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 33 is on host 33
2023-07-11 14:16:28,084 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 34 is on host 34
2023-07-11 14:16:28,084 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 35 is on host 35
2023-07-11 14:16:28,084 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 36 is on host 36
2023-07-11 14:16:28,084 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 37 is on host 37
2023-07-11 14:16:28,084 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 38 is on host 38
2023-07-11 14:16:28,084 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 39 is on host 39
2023-07-11 14:16:28,085 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 40 is on host 40
2023-07-11 14:16:28,085 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 41 is on host 41
2023-07-11 14:16:28,085 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 42 is on host 42
2023-07-11 14:16:28,085 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 43 is on host 43
2023-07-11 14:16:28,085 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 44 is on host 44
2023-07-11 14:16:28,085 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 45 is on host 45
2023-07-11 14:16:28,085 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 46 is on host 46
2023-07-11 14:16:28,085 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 47 is on host 47
2023-07-11 14:16:28,085 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 48 is on host 48
2023-07-11 14:16:28,085 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 49 is on host 49
2023-07-11 14:16:28,085 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 50 is on host 50
2023-07-11 14:16:28,085 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 51 is on host 51
2023-07-11 14:16:28,085 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 52 is on host 52
2023-07-11 14:16:28,085 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 53 is on host 53
2023-07-11 14:16:28,085 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 54 is on host 54
2023-07-11 14:16:28,085 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 55 is on host 55
2023-07-11 14:16:28,085 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 56 is on host 56
2023-07-11 14:16:28,085 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 57 is on host 57
2023-07-11 14:16:28,085 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 58 is on host 58
2023-07-11 14:16:28,085 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 59 is on host 59
2023-07-11 14:16:28,085 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 60 is on host 60
2023-07-11 14:16:28,085 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 61 is on host 61
2023-07-11 14:16:28,085 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 62 is on host 62
2023-07-11 14:16:28,085 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 63 is on host 63
2023-07-11 14:16:28,085 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 64 is on host 64
2023-07-11 14:16:28,085 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 65 is on host 65
2023-07-11 14:16:28,085 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 66 is on host 66
2023-07-11 14:16:28,085 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 67 is on host 67
2023-07-11 14:16:28,085 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 68 is on host 68
2023-07-11 14:16:28,086 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 69 is on host 69
2023-07-11 14:16:28,086 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 70 is on host 70
2023-07-11 14:16:28,086 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 71 is on host 71
2023-07-11 14:16:28,086 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 72 is on host 72
2023-07-11 14:16:28,086 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 73 is on host 73
2023-07-11 14:16:28,086 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 74 is on host 74
2023-07-11 14:16:28,086 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 75 is on host 75
2023-07-11 14:16:28,086 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 76 is on host 76
2023-07-11 14:16:28,086 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 77 is on host 77
2023-07-11 14:16:28,086 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 78 is on host 78
2023-07-11 14:16:28,086 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 79 is on host 79
2023-07-11 14:16:28,086 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 80 is on host 80
2023-07-11 14:16:28,086 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 81 is on host 81
2023-07-11 14:16:28,086 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 82 is on host 82
2023-07-11 14:16:28,086 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 83 is on host 83
2023-07-11 14:16:28,086 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 84 is on host 84
2023-07-11 14:16:28,086 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 85 is on host 85
2023-07-11 14:16:28,086 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 86 is on host 86
2023-07-11 14:16:28,086 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 87 is on host 87
2023-07-11 14:16:28,086 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 88 is on host 88
2023-07-11 14:16:28,086 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 89 is on host 89
2023-07-11 14:16:28,086 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 90 is on host 90
2023-07-11 14:16:28,086 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 91 is on host 91
2023-07-11 14:16:28,086 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 92 is on host 92
2023-07-11 14:16:28,086 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 93 is on host 93
2023-07-11 14:16:28,086 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 94 is on host 94
2023-07-11 14:16:28,086 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 95 is on host 95
2023-07-11 14:16:28,086 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 96 is on host 96
2023-07-11 14:16:28,086 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 97 is on host 97
2023-07-11 14:16:28,087 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 98 is on host 98
2023-07-11 14:16:28,087 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 99 is on host 99
2023-07-11 14:16:28,087 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 100 is on host 100
2023-07-11 14:16:28,087 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 101 is on host 101
2023-07-11 14:16:28,087 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 102 is on host 102
2023-07-11 14:16:28,087 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 103 is on host 103
2023-07-11 14:16:28,087 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 104 is on host 104
2023-07-11 14:16:28,087 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 105 is on host 105
2023-07-11 14:16:28,087 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 106 is on host 106
2023-07-11 14:16:28,087 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 107 is on host 107
2023-07-11 14:16:28,087 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 108 is on host 108
2023-07-11 14:16:28,087 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 109 is on host 109
2023-07-11 14:16:28,087 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 110 is on host 110
2023-07-11 14:16:28,087 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 111 is on host 111
2023-07-11 14:16:28,087 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 112 is on host 112
2023-07-11 14:16:28,087 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 113 is on host 113
2023-07-11 14:16:28,087 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 114 is on host 114
2023-07-11 14:16:28,087 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 115 is on host 115
2023-07-11 14:16:28,087 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 116 is on host 116
2023-07-11 14:16:28,087 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 117 is on host 117
2023-07-11 14:16:28,087 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 118 is on host 118
2023-07-11 14:16:28,087 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 119 is on host 119
2023-07-11 14:16:28,087 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 120 is on host 120
2023-07-11 14:16:28,087 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 121 is on host 121
2023-07-11 14:16:28,087 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 122 is on host 122
2023-07-11 14:16:28,087 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 123 is on host 123
2023-07-11 14:16:28,087 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 124 is on host 124
2023-07-11 14:16:28,087 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 125 is on host 125
2023-07-11 14:16:28,087 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 126 is on host 126
2023-07-11 14:16:28,088 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 127 is on host 127
2023-07-11 14:16:28,088 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 128 is on host 128
2023-07-11 14:16:28,088 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 129 is on host 129
2023-07-11 14:16:28,088 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 130 is on host 130
2023-07-11 14:16:28,088 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 131 is on host 131
2023-07-11 14:16:28,088 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 132 is on host 132
2023-07-11 14:16:28,088 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 133 is on host 133
2023-07-11 14:16:28,088 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 134 is on host 134
2023-07-11 14:16:28,088 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 135 is on host 135
2023-07-11 14:16:28,088 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 136 is on host 136
2023-07-11 14:16:28,088 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 137 is on host 137
2023-07-11 14:16:28,088 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 138 is on host 138
2023-07-11 14:16:28,088 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 139 is on host 139
2023-07-11 14:16:28,088 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 140 is on host 140
2023-07-11 14:16:28,088 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 141 is on host 141
2023-07-11 14:16:28,088 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 142 is on host 142
2023-07-11 14:16:28,088 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 143 is on host 143
2023-07-11 14:16:28,088 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 144 is on host 144
2023-07-11 14:16:28,088 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 145 is on host 145
2023-07-11 14:16:28,088 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 146 is on host 146
2023-07-11 14:16:28,088 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 147 is on host 147
2023-07-11 14:16:28,088 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 148 is on host 148
2023-07-11 14:16:28,088 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 149 is on host 149
2023-07-11 14:16:28,088 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 150 is on host 150
2023-07-11 14:16:28,088 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 151 is on host 151
2023-07-11 14:16:28,088 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 152 is on host 152
2023-07-11 14:16:28,088 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 153 is on host 153
2023-07-11 14:16:28,088 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 154 is on host 154
2023-07-11 14:16:28,088 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 155 is on host 155
2023-07-11 14:16:28,089 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 156 is on host 156
2023-07-11 14:16:28,089 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 157 is on host 157
2023-07-11 14:16:28,089 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 158 is on host 158
2023-07-11 14:16:28,089 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 159 is on host 159
2023-07-11 14:16:28,089 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 160 is on host 160
2023-07-11 14:16:28,089 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 161 is on host 161
2023-07-11 14:16:28,089 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 162 is on host 162
2023-07-11 14:16:28,089 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 163 is on host 163
2023-07-11 14:16:28,089 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 164 is on host 164
2023-07-11 14:16:28,089 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 165 is on host 165
2023-07-11 14:16:28,089 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 166 is on host 166
2023-07-11 14:16:28,089 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 167 is on host 167
2023-07-11 14:16:28,089 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 168 is on host 168
2023-07-11 14:16:28,089 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 169 is on host 169
2023-07-11 14:16:28,089 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 170 is on host 170
2023-07-11 14:16:28,089 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 171 is on host 171
2023-07-11 14:16:28,089 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 172 is on host 172
2023-07-11 14:16:28,089 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 173 is on host 173
2023-07-11 14:16:28,089 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 174 is on host 174
2023-07-11 14:16:28,089 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 175 is on host 175
2023-07-11 14:16:28,089 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 176 is on host 176
2023-07-11 14:16:28,089 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 177 is on host 177
2023-07-11 14:16:28,089 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 178 is on host 178
2023-07-11 14:16:28,089 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 179 is on host 179
2023-07-11 14:16:28,089 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 180 is on host 180
2023-07-11 14:16:28,089 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 181 is on host 181
2023-07-11 14:16:28,089 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 182 is on host 182
2023-07-11 14:16:28,089 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 183 is on host 183
2023-07-11 14:16:28,089 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 184 is on host 184
2023-07-11 14:16:28,090 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 185 is on host 185
2023-07-11 14:16:28,090 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 186 is on host 186
2023-07-11 14:16:28,090 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 187 is on host 187
2023-07-11 14:16:28,090 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 188 is on host 188
2023-07-11 14:16:28,090 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 189 is on host 189
2023-07-11 14:16:28,090 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 190 is on host 190
2023-07-11 14:16:28,090 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 191 is on host 191
2023-07-11 14:16:28,090 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 192 is on host 192
2023-07-11 14:16:28,090 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 193 is on host 193
2023-07-11 14:16:28,090 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 194 is on host 194
2023-07-11 14:16:28,090 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 195 is on host 195
2023-07-11 14:16:28,090 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 196 is on host 196
2023-07-11 14:16:28,090 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 197 is on host 197
2023-07-11 14:16:28,090 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 198 is on host 198
2023-07-11 14:16:28,090 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 199 is on host 199
2023-07-11 14:16:28,090 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 200 is on host 200
2023-07-11 14:16:28,090 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 201 is on host 201
2023-07-11 14:16:28,090 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 202 is on host 202
2023-07-11 14:16:28,090 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 203 is on host 203
2023-07-11 14:16:28,090 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 204 is on host 204
2023-07-11 14:16:28,090 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 205 is on host 205
2023-07-11 14:16:28,090 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 206 is on host 206
2023-07-11 14:16:28,090 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 207 is on host 207
2023-07-11 14:16:28,090 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 208 is on host 208
2023-07-11 14:16:28,090 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 209 is on host 209
2023-07-11 14:16:28,090 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 210 is on host 210
2023-07-11 14:16:28,090 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 211 is on host 211
2023-07-11 14:16:28,090 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 212 is on host 212
2023-07-11 14:16:28,090 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 213 is on host 213
2023-07-11 14:16:28,091 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 214 is on host 214
2023-07-11 14:16:28,091 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 215 is on host 215
2023-07-11 14:16:28,091 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 216 is on host 216
2023-07-11 14:16:28,091 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 217 is on host 217
2023-07-11 14:16:28,091 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 218 is on host 218
2023-07-11 14:16:28,091 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 219 is on host 219
2023-07-11 14:16:28,091 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 220 is on host 220
2023-07-11 14:16:28,091 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 221 is on host 221
2023-07-11 14:16:28,091 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 222 is on host 222
2023-07-11 14:16:28,091 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 223 is on host 223
2023-07-11 14:16:28,091 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 224 is on host 224
2023-07-11 14:16:28,091 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 225 is on host 225
2023-07-11 14:16:28,091 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 226 is on host 226
2023-07-11 14:16:28,091 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 227 is on host 227
2023-07-11 14:16:28,091 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 228 is on host 228
2023-07-11 14:16:28,091 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 229 is on host 229
2023-07-11 14:16:28,091 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 230 is on host 230
2023-07-11 14:16:28,091 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 231 is on host 231
2023-07-11 14:16:28,091 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 232 is on host 232
2023-07-11 14:16:28,091 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 233 is on host 233
2023-07-11 14:16:28,091 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 234 is on host 234
2023-07-11 14:16:28,091 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 235 is on host 235
2023-07-11 14:16:28,091 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 236 is on host 236
2023-07-11 14:16:28,091 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 237 is on host 237
2023-07-11 14:16:28,091 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 238 is on host 238
2023-07-11 14:16:28,091 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 239 is on host 239
2023-07-11 14:16:28,091 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 240 is on host 240
2023-07-11 14:16:28,091 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 241 is on host 241
2023-07-11 14:16:28,091 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 242 is on host 242
2023-07-11 14:16:28,091 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 243 is on host 243
2023-07-11 14:16:28,092 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 244 is on host 244
2023-07-11 14:16:28,092 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 245 is on host 245
2023-07-11 14:16:28,092 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 246 is on host 246
2023-07-11 14:16:28,092 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 247 is on host 247
2023-07-11 14:16:28,092 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 248 is on host 248
2023-07-11 14:16:28,092 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 249 is on host 249
2023-07-11 14:16:28,092 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 250 is on host 250
2023-07-11 14:16:28,092 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 251 is on host 251
2023-07-11 14:16:28,092 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 252 is on host 252
2023-07-11 14:16:28,092 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 253 is on host 253
2023-07-11 14:16:28,092 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 254 is on host 254
2023-07-11 14:16:28,092 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 255 is on host 255
2023-07-11 14:16:28,092 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 256 is on host 256
2023-07-11 14:16:28,092 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 257 is on host 257
2023-07-11 14:16:28,092 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 258 is on host 258
2023-07-11 14:16:28,092 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 259 is on host 259
2023-07-11 14:16:28,092 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 260 is on host 260
2023-07-11 14:16:28,092 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 261 is on host 261
2023-07-11 14:16:28,092 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 262 is on host 262
2023-07-11 14:16:28,092 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 263 is on host 263
2023-07-11 14:16:28,092 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 264 is on host 264
2023-07-11 14:16:28,092 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 265 is on host 265
2023-07-11 14:16:28,092 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 266 is on host 266
2023-07-11 14:16:28,092 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 267 is on host 267
2023-07-11 14:16:28,092 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 268 is on host 268
2023-07-11 14:16:28,092 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 269 is on host 269
2023-07-11 14:16:28,092 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 270 is on host 270
2023-07-11 14:16:28,092 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 271 is on host 271
2023-07-11 14:16:28,092 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 272 is on host 272
2023-07-11 14:16:28,093 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 273 is on host 273
2023-07-11 14:16:28,093 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 274 is on host 274
2023-07-11 14:16:28,093 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 275 is on host 275
2023-07-11 14:16:28,093 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 276 is on host 276
2023-07-11 14:16:28,093 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 277 is on host 277
2023-07-11 14:16:28,093 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 278 is on host 278
2023-07-11 14:16:28,093 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 279 is on host 279
2023-07-11 14:16:28,093 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 280 is on host 280
2023-07-11 14:16:28,093 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 281 is on host 281
2023-07-11 14:16:28,093 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 282 is on host 282
2023-07-11 14:16:28,093 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 283 is on host 283
2023-07-11 14:16:28,093 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 284 is on host 284
2023-07-11 14:16:28,093 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 285 is on host 285
2023-07-11 14:16:28,093 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 286 is on host 286
2023-07-11 14:16:28,093 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 287 is on host 287
2023-07-11 14:16:28,093 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 288 is on host 288
2023-07-11 14:16:28,093 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 289 is on host 289
2023-07-11 14:16:28,093 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 290 is on host 290
2023-07-11 14:16:28,093 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 291 is on host 291
2023-07-11 14:16:28,093 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 292 is on host 292
2023-07-11 14:16:28,093 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 293 is on host 293
2023-07-11 14:16:28,093 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 294 is on host 294
2023-07-11 14:16:28,093 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 295 is on host 295
2023-07-11 14:16:28,093 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 296 is on host 296
2023-07-11 14:16:28,093 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 297 is on host 297
2023-07-11 14:16:28,093 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 298 is on host 298
2023-07-11 14:16:28,093 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 299 is on host 299
2023-07-11 14:16:28,093 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 300 is on host 300
2023-07-11 14:16:28,093 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 301 is on host 301
2023-07-11 14:16:28,094 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 302 is on host 302
2023-07-11 14:16:28,094 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 303 is on host 303
2023-07-11 14:16:28,094 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 304 is on host 304
2023-07-11 14:16:28,094 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 305 is on host 305
2023-07-11 14:16:28,094 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 306 is on host 306
2023-07-11 14:16:28,094 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 307 is on host 307
2023-07-11 14:16:28,094 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 308 is on host 308
2023-07-11 14:16:28,094 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 309 is on host 309
2023-07-11 14:16:28,094 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 310 is on host 310
2023-07-11 14:16:28,094 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 311 is on host 311
2023-07-11 14:16:28,094 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 312 is on host 312
2023-07-11 14:16:28,094 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 313 is on host 313
2023-07-11 14:16:28,094 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 314 is on host 314
2023-07-11 14:16:28,094 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 315 is on host 315
2023-07-11 14:16:28,094 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 316 is on host 316
2023-07-11 14:16:28,094 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 317 is on host 317
2023-07-11 14:16:28,094 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 318 is on host 318
2023-07-11 14:16:28,094 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 319 is on host 319
2023-07-11 14:16:28,094 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 320 is on host 320
2023-07-11 14:16:28,094 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 321 is on host 321
2023-07-11 14:16:28,094 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 322 is on host 322
2023-07-11 14:16:28,094 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 323 is on host 323
2023-07-11 14:16:28,094 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 324 is on host 324
2023-07-11 14:16:28,094 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 325 is on host 325
2023-07-11 14:16:28,094 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 326 is on host 326
2023-07-11 14:16:28,094 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 327 is on host 327
2023-07-11 14:16:28,094 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 328 is on host 328
2023-07-11 14:16:28,094 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 329 is on host 329
2023-07-11 14:16:28,094 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 330 is on host 330
2023-07-11 14:16:28,095 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 331 is on host 331
2023-07-11 14:16:28,095 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 332 is on host 332
2023-07-11 14:16:28,095 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 333 is on host 333
2023-07-11 14:16:28,095 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 334 is on host 334
2023-07-11 14:16:28,095 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 335 is on host 335
2023-07-11 14:16:28,095 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 336 is on host 336
2023-07-11 14:16:28,095 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 337 is on host 337
2023-07-11 14:16:28,095 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 338 is on host 338
2023-07-11 14:16:28,095 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 339 is on host 339
2023-07-11 14:16:28,095 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 340 is on host 340
2023-07-11 14:16:28,095 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 341 is on host 341
2023-07-11 14:16:28,095 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 342 is on host 342
2023-07-11 14:16:28,095 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 343 is on host 343
2023-07-11 14:16:28,095 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 344 is on host 344
2023-07-11 14:16:28,095 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 345 is on host 345
2023-07-11 14:16:28,095 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 346 is on host 346
2023-07-11 14:16:28,095 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 347 is on host 347
2023-07-11 14:16:28,095 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 348 is on host 348
2023-07-11 14:16:28,095 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 349 is on host 349
2023-07-11 14:16:28,095 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 350 is on host 350
2023-07-11 14:16:28,095 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 351 is on host 351
2023-07-11 14:16:28,095 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 352 is on host 352
2023-07-11 14:16:28,095 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 353 is on host 353
2023-07-11 14:16:28,095 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 354 is on host 354
2023-07-11 14:16:28,095 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 355 is on host 355
2023-07-11 14:16:28,096 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 356 is on host 356
2023-07-11 14:16:28,096 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 357 is on host 357
2023-07-11 14:16:28,096 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 358 is on host 358
2023-07-11 14:16:28,096 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 359 is on host 359
2023-07-11 14:16:28,096 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 360 is on host 360
2023-07-11 14:16:28,096 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 361 is on host 361
2023-07-11 14:16:28,096 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 362 is on host 362
2023-07-11 14:16:28,096 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 363 is on host 363
2023-07-11 14:16:28,096 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 364 is on host 364
2023-07-11 14:16:28,096 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 365 is on host 365
2023-07-11 14:16:28,096 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 366 is on host 366
2023-07-11 14:16:28,096 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 367 is on host 367
2023-07-11 14:16:28,096 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 368 is on host 368
2023-07-11 14:16:28,096 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 369 is on host 369
2023-07-11 14:16:28,096 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 370 is on host 370
2023-07-11 14:16:28,096 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 371 is on host 371
2023-07-11 14:16:28,096 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 372 is on host 372
2023-07-11 14:16:28,096 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 373 is on host 373
2023-07-11 14:16:28,096 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 374 is on host 374
2023-07-11 14:16:28,096 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 375 is on host 375
2023-07-11 14:16:28,096 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 376 is on host 376
2023-07-11 14:16:28,096 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 377 is on host 377
2023-07-11 14:16:28,096 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 378 is on host 378
2023-07-11 14:16:28,096 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 379 is on host 379
2023-07-11 14:16:28,097 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 380 is on host 380
2023-07-11 14:16:28,097 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 381 is on host 381
2023-07-11 14:16:28,097 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 382 is on host 382
2023-07-11 14:16:28,097 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 383 is on host 383
2023-07-11 14:16:28,097 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 384 is on host 384
2023-07-11 14:16:28,097 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 385 is on host 385
2023-07-11 14:16:28,097 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 386 is on host 386
2023-07-11 14:16:28,097 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 387 is on host 387
2023-07-11 14:16:28,097 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 388 is on host 388
2023-07-11 14:16:28,097 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 389 is on host 389
2023-07-11 14:16:28,097 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 390 is on host 390
2023-07-11 14:16:28,097 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 391 is on host 391
2023-07-11 14:16:28,097 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 392 is on host 392
2023-07-11 14:16:28,097 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=393, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:28,097 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table34) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:28,097 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table24
2023-07-11 14:16:28,098 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv553536953=290, srv1630071126=110, srv1071894870=12, srv23511728=232, srv658346947=323, srv2025338799=204, srv1397994335=64, srv1976766403=195, srv1644629726=118, srv957637734=381, srv2079182457=210, srv1749264468=139, srv2046129126=206, srv1595762596=104, srv603990852=307, srv1973073480=194, srv958856137=382, srv644066832=319, srv557062842=292, srv277765671=235, srv732221418=337, srv1769385567=143, srv224612199=228, srv714752528=334, srv362526040=256, srv581128949=296, srv2133511466=223, srv1144239257=30, srv320603627=245, srv1679952521=126, srv2122867873=222, srv1110067064=24, srv256251994=233, srv63261708=317, srv89837390=371, srv552104598=289, srv508952995=281, srv2096011353=214, srv1770417148=144, srv1246723478=42, srv929436444=378, srv2082192429=211, srv234917297=231, srv405700573=266, srv183644386=166, srv1488378513=85, srv173139715=136, srv1154180352=32, srv355693379=252, srv1407521654=66, srv496848057=275, srv1157975499=33, srv1806731027=162, srv1923102804=184, srv311102455=244, srv450011410=271, srv771515724=348, srv389183508=262, srv1249074416=43, srv2014575201=201, srv640847108=318, srv832363565=356, srv1970882134=192, srv2107358603=218, srv855766065=361, srv1336043388=55, srv29397186=237, srv982792848=390, srv976560524=386, srv101181760=3, srv1093549482=21, srv2018389395=202, srv2113483104=221, srv1778339118=149, srv1968709692=190, srv705221118=333, srv159600090=105, srv1919608486=180, srv981255102=389, srv807899713=353, srv755110395=344, srv1770594519=145, srv739692705=340, srv1076582671=16, srv693869315=330, srv1079048717=17, srv440657532=270, srv1636659280=115, srv2108739257=220, srv668373413=326, srv1003610393=2, srv1054229197=11, srv1868589627=172, srv2103522371=217, srv1000546271=0, srv951670617=380, srv2042909593=205, srv1865656038=171, srv1466355012=78, srv703662406=332, srv1418112884=70, srv1215580291=40, srv71833528=335, srv1580581635=103, srv1021032212=5, srv1080806312=19, srv1985601859=197, srv74471954=343, srv1647472319=119, srv2071553346=208, srv1632855171=112, srv1122009370=27, srv13613992=61, srv1630777154=111, srv301413669=239, srv550697728=288, srv1296023857=53, srv1724550977=133, srv1989290370=198, srv1926417985=185, srv1678097199=125, srv1461034373=76, srv614690415=311, srv2098345381=215, srv310463473=243, srv1011934105=4, srv148627129=84, srv305489318=240, srv1256534903=46, srv1289731445=52, srv1798844587=157, srv567113085=294, srv1119222501=26, srv2055117940=207, srv855898852=362, srv629224816=316, srv1075943554=15, srv625909061=315, srv1705591942=128, srv734225580=339, srv660107924=324, srv1381729938=62, srv1633483173=113, srv408265476=267, srv1776057793=148, srv1360253411=60, srv1511424834=90, srv1414162621=68, srv883343663=370, srv151859222=91, srv349144930=251, srv1991304034=199, srv1825887791=164, srv601657063=305, srv758932951=345, srv1651629087=120, srv1864623584=170, srv682957691=329, srv1500454146=88, srv1725962085=135, srv1659841448=121, srv1253206004=45, srv52354442=284, srv18508093=168, srv1427731921=73, srv561344974=293, srv721668125=336, srv1575482138=100, srv914128771=373, srv961487230=383, srv741332941=342, srv533032466=286, srv1574140987=99, srv2139849097=224, srv503902262=278, srv674807007=327, srv1786829855=153, srv2088727517=213, srv394366966=264, srv980089565=388, srv114594288=31, srv38296437=261, srv214835574=226, srv1887224977=176, srv1025509362=7, srv1577020334=102, srv524466665=285, srv393561021=263, srv759909927=346, srv763556514=347, srv786453030=349, srv2142935488=225, srv618111613=312, srv16254163=108, srv343211061=250, srv476075173=273, srv1269632212=47, srv333589612=246, srv499015361=276, srv836674186=357, srv1799191687=158, srv1446998035=74, srv1571774199=98, srv1115354947=25, srv333860881=247, srv1724152600=132, srv1598699299=106, srv177885829=151, srv472125887=272, srv1101339966=22, srv1424985362=72, srv1945569895=188, srv594128294=300, srv1026739237=8, srv842459828=358, srv878519137=366, srv1921260729=181, srv339110834=249, srv504099471=279, srv814253179=354, srv1643744885=116, srv1793847521=155, srv607234624=309, srv698219051=331, srv1688538732=127, srv666240078=325, srv1079284733=18, srv29210550=236, srv506181748=280, srv881313122=368, srv1945452576=187, srv597307897=303, srv1285120424=51, srv1887943816=177, srv1983604698=196, srv1805465940=161, srv309309336=242, srv1719756294=131, srv1349932676=58, srv1208486369=38, srv1643971570=117, srv1509331489=89, srv334105385=248, srv1400515744=65, srv369984715=259, srv43712162=269, srv842675864=359, srv1803258748=160, srv1022450918=6, srv1775108732=147, srv1766088250=141, srv180150732=159, srv1220857227=41, srv226530501=229, srv362032108=255, srv919715380=377, srv1074935976=14, srv1395030819=63, srv803291569=352, srv1877966766=175, srv220538712=227, srv2021718843=203, srv2107782185=219, srv882216860=369, srv1489137852=86, srv1972328734=193, srv1470759982=79, srv1774824811=146, srv971974774=384, srv1418242791=71, srv1001274196=1, srv909615097=372, srv1537724566=93, srv1165799954=34, srv1724754364=134, srv978173525=387, srv113319438=29, srv578033735=295, srv147931272=80, srv1183635941=35, srv1904215245=178, srv596349756=302, srv880835255=367, srv857544550=364, srv1779729022=152, srv1795612465=156, srv621083045=314, srv917704170=375, srv1351811120=59, srv1316710897=54, srv789820555=350, srv1922580095=183, srv305567304=241, srv1936745425=186, srv1745318024=138, srv1210822057=39, srv645375717=320, srv950628389=379, srv1490199189=87, srv1575919256=101, srv154481102=96, srv359402967=254, srv997716931=391, srv1457224273=75, srv581644449=297, srv1872374768=174, srv363177310=257, srv740327512=341, srv1664227236=123, srv972330517=385, srv1634261306=114, srv1662183707=122, srv1969046891=191, srv1485266211=82, srv1778842262=150, srv588410181=298, srv1921840985=182, srv591279493=299, srv37574565=260, srv1104147458=23, srv1190166330=36, srv652270371=322, srv1484309042=81, srv1560148463=97, srv618569548=313, srv2102708311=216, srv1084873074=20, srv517669556=283, srv918152084=376, srv649714317=321, srv1674484790=124, srv1339239880=56, srv1461073271=77, srv1125312901=28, srv25633292=234, srv516616923=282, srv299721745=238, srv604932433=308, srv1273702855=48, srv792183929=351, srv1042608200=10, srv1276335106=49, srv1486044644=83, srv676101698=328, srv998930892=392, srv200111276=200, srv1863083643=169, srv1737443479=137, srv872997185=365, srv821351126=355, srv852115805=360, srv1074355423=13, srv170952194=130, srv503430005=277, srv153887567=94, srv1415163001=69, srv1032737435=9, srv1840670515=167, srv1961921083=189, srv59745831=304, srv36715747=258, srv431547280=268, srv1524853580=92, srv1870059418=173, srv396010771=265, srv594457792=301, srv1755339428=140, srv1766275429=142, srv5565786=291, srv603898526=306, srv544570223=287, srv856030669=363, srv1542523468=95, srv915785747=374, srv356122213=253, srv1411875499=67, srv2077620970=209, srv1345529444=57, srv232339963=230, srv1250861076=44, srv1914875423=179, srv478619481=274, srv1202435626=37, srv1706089454=129, srv1810631201=163, srv1282644061=50, srv1625945288=109, srv733251129=338, srv2082830831=212, srv1612103540=107, srv612136291=310, srv1790004142=154, srv183394703=165} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:28,098 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:28,098 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:28,098 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:28,098 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:28,098 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:28,098 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:28,098 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-11 14:16:28,098 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-11 14:16:28,098 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-11 14:16:28,098 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-11 14:16:28,098 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 10 is on host 10
2023-07-11 14:16:28,098 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 11 is on host 11
2023-07-11 14:16:28,098 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 12 is on host 12
2023-07-11 14:16:28,098 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 13 is on host 13
2023-07-11 14:16:28,098 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 14 is on host 14
2023-07-11 14:16:28,099 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 15 is on host 15
2023-07-11 14:16:28,099 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 16 is on host 16
2023-07-11 14:16:28,099 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 17 is on host 17
2023-07-11 14:16:28,099 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 18 is on host 18
2023-07-11 14:16:28,099 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 19 is on host 19
2023-07-11 14:16:28,099 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 20 is on host 20
2023-07-11 14:16:28,099 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 21 is on host 21
2023-07-11 14:16:28,099 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 22 is on host 22
2023-07-11 14:16:28,099 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 23 is on host 23
2023-07-11 14:16:28,099 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 24 is on host 24
2023-07-11 14:16:28,099 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 25 is on host 25
2023-07-11 14:16:28,099 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 26 is on host 26
2023-07-11 14:16:28,099 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 27 is on host 27
2023-07-11 14:16:28,099 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 28 is on host 28
2023-07-11 14:16:28,099 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 29 is on host 29
2023-07-11 14:16:28,099 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 30 is on host 30
2023-07-11 14:16:28,099 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 31 is on host 31
2023-07-11 14:16:28,099 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 32 is on host 32
2023-07-11 14:16:28,099 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 33 is on host 33
2023-07-11 14:16:28,099 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 34 is on host 34
2023-07-11 14:16:28,099 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 35 is on host 35
2023-07-11 14:16:28,099 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 36 is on host 36
2023-07-11 14:16:28,099 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 37 is on host 37
2023-07-11 14:16:28,099 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 38 is on host 38
2023-07-11 14:16:28,099 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 39 is on host 39
2023-07-11 14:16:28,099 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 40 is on host 40
2023-07-11 14:16:28,099 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 41 is on host 41
2023-07-11 14:16:28,099 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 42 is on host 42
2023-07-11 14:16:28,099 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 43 is on host 43
2023-07-11 14:16:28,099 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 44 is on host 44
2023-07-11 14:16:28,100 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 45 is on host 45
2023-07-11 14:16:28,100 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 46 is on host 46
2023-07-11 14:16:28,100 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 47 is on host 47
2023-07-11 14:16:28,100 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 48 is on host 48
2023-07-11 14:16:28,100 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 49 is on host 49
2023-07-11 14:16:28,100 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 50 is on host 50
2023-07-11 14:16:28,100 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 51 is on host 51
2023-07-11 14:16:28,100 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 52 is on host 52
2023-07-11 14:16:28,100 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 53 is on host 53
2023-07-11 14:16:28,100 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 54 is on host 54
2023-07-11 14:16:28,100 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 55 is on host 55
2023-07-11 14:16:28,100 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 56 is on host 56
2023-07-11 14:16:28,100 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 57 is on host 57
2023-07-11 14:16:28,100 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 58 is on host 58
2023-07-11 14:16:28,100 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 59 is on host 59
2023-07-11 14:16:28,100 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 60 is on host 60
2023-07-11 14:16:28,100 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 61 is on host 61
2023-07-11 14:16:28,100 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 62 is on host 62
2023-07-11 14:16:28,100 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 63 is on host 63
2023-07-11 14:16:28,100 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 64 is on host 64
2023-07-11 14:16:28,100 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 65 is on host 65
2023-07-11 14:16:28,100 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 66 is on host 66
2023-07-11 14:16:28,100 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 67 is on host 67
2023-07-11 14:16:28,100 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 68 is on host 68
2023-07-11 14:16:28,100 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 69 is on host 69
2023-07-11 14:16:28,100 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 70 is on host 70
2023-07-11 14:16:28,100 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 71 is on host 71
2023-07-11 14:16:28,100 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 72 is on host 72
2023-07-11 14:16:28,100 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 73 is on host 73
2023-07-11 14:16:28,101 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 74 is on host 74
2023-07-11 14:16:28,101 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 75 is on host 75
2023-07-11 14:16:28,101 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 76 is on host 76
2023-07-11 14:16:28,101 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 77 is on host 77
2023-07-11 14:16:28,101 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 78 is on host 78
2023-07-11 14:16:28,101 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 79 is on host 79
2023-07-11 14:16:28,101 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 80 is on host 80
2023-07-11 14:16:28,101 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 81 is on host 81
2023-07-11 14:16:28,101 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 82 is on host 82
2023-07-11 14:16:28,101 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 83 is on host 83
2023-07-11 14:16:28,101 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 84 is on host 84
2023-07-11 14:16:28,101 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 85 is on host 85
2023-07-11 14:16:28,101 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 86 is on host 86
2023-07-11 14:16:28,101 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 87 is on host 87
2023-07-11 14:16:28,101 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 88 is on host 88
2023-07-11 14:16:28,101 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 89 is on host 89
2023-07-11 14:16:28,101 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 90 is on host 90
2023-07-11 14:16:28,101 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 91 is on host 91
2023-07-11 14:16:28,101 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 92 is on host 92
2023-07-11 14:16:28,101 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 93 is on host 93
2023-07-11 14:16:28,101 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 94 is on host 94
2023-07-11 14:16:28,101 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 95 is on host 95
2023-07-11 14:16:28,101 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 96 is on host 96
2023-07-11 14:16:28,101 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 97 is on host 97
2023-07-11 14:16:28,101 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 98 is on host 98
2023-07-11 14:16:28,101 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 99 is on host 99
2023-07-11 14:16:28,101 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 100 is on host 100
2023-07-11 14:16:28,101 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 101 is on host 101
2023-07-11 14:16:28,102 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 102 is on host 102
2023-07-11 14:16:28,102 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 103 is on host 103
2023-07-11 14:16:28,102 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 104 is on host 104
2023-07-11 14:16:28,102 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 105 is on host 105
2023-07-11 14:16:28,102 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 106 is on host 106
2023-07-11 14:16:28,102 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 107 is on host 107
2023-07-11 14:16:28,102 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 108 is on host 108
2023-07-11 14:16:28,102 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 109 is on host 109
2023-07-11 14:16:28,102 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 110 is on host 110
2023-07-11 14:16:28,102 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 111 is on host 111
2023-07-11 14:16:28,102 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 112 is on host 112
2023-07-11 14:16:28,102 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 113 is on host 113
2023-07-11 14:16:28,102 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 114 is on host 114
2023-07-11 14:16:28,102 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 115 is on host 115
2023-07-11 14:16:28,102 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 116 is on host 116
2023-07-11 14:16:28,102 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 117 is on host 117
2023-07-11 14:16:28,102 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 118 is on host 118
2023-07-11 14:16:28,102 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 119 is on host 119
2023-07-11 14:16:28,102 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 120 is on host 120
2023-07-11 14:16:28,102 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 121 is on host 121
2023-07-11 14:16:28,102 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 122 is on host 122
2023-07-11 14:16:28,102 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 123 is on host 123
2023-07-11 14:16:28,102 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 124 is on host 124
2023-07-11 14:16:28,102 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 125 is on host 125
2023-07-11 14:16:28,102 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 126 is on host 126
2023-07-11 14:16:28,102 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 127 is on host 127
2023-07-11 14:16:28,102 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 128 is on host 128
2023-07-11 14:16:28,102 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 129 is on host 129
2023-07-11 14:16:28,102 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 130 is on host 130
2023-07-11 14:16:28,102 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 131 is on host 131
2023-07-11 14:16:28,103 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 132 is on host 132
2023-07-11 14:16:28,103 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 133 is on host 133
2023-07-11 14:16:28,103 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 134 is on host 134
2023-07-11 14:16:28,103 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 135 is on host 135
2023-07-11 14:16:28,103 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 136 is on host 136
2023-07-11 14:16:28,103 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 137 is on host 137
2023-07-11 14:16:28,103 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 138 is on host 138
2023-07-11 14:16:28,103 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 139 is on host 139
2023-07-11 14:16:28,103 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 140 is on host 140
2023-07-11 14:16:28,103 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 141 is on host 141
2023-07-11 14:16:28,103 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 142 is on host 142
2023-07-11 14:16:28,103 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 143 is on host 143
2023-07-11 14:16:28,103 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 144 is on host 144
2023-07-11 14:16:28,103 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 145 is on host 145
2023-07-11 14:16:28,103 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 146 is on host 146
2023-07-11 14:16:28,103 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 147 is on host 147
2023-07-11 14:16:28,103 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 148 is on host 148
2023-07-11 14:16:28,103 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 149 is on host 149
2023-07-11 14:16:28,103 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 150 is on host 150
2023-07-11 14:16:28,103 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 151 is on host 151
2023-07-11 14:16:28,103 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 152 is on host 152
2023-07-11 14:16:28,103 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 153 is on host 153
2023-07-11 14:16:28,103 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 154 is on host 154
2023-07-11 14:16:28,103 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 155 is on host 155
2023-07-11 14:16:28,103 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 156 is on host 156
2023-07-11 14:16:28,103 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 157 is on host 157
2023-07-11 14:16:28,103 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 158 is on host 158
2023-07-11 14:16:28,103 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 159 is on host 159
2023-07-11 14:16:28,103 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 160 is on host 160
2023-07-11 14:16:28,104 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 161 is on host 161
2023-07-11 14:16:28,104 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 162 is on host 162
2023-07-11 14:16:28,104 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 163 is on host 163
2023-07-11 14:16:28,104 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 164 is on host 164
2023-07-11 14:16:28,104 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 165 is on host 165
2023-07-11 14:16:28,104 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 166 is on host 166
2023-07-11 14:16:28,104 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 167 is on host 167
2023-07-11 14:16:28,104 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 168 is on host 168
2023-07-11 14:16:28,104 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 169 is on host 169
2023-07-11 14:16:28,104 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 170 is on host 170
2023-07-11 14:16:28,104 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 171 is on host 171
2023-07-11 14:16:28,104 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 172 is on host 172
2023-07-11 14:16:28,104 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 173 is on host 173
2023-07-11 14:16:28,104 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 174 is on host 174
2023-07-11 14:16:28,104 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 175 is on host 175
2023-07-11 14:16:28,104 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 176 is on host 176
2023-07-11 14:16:28,104 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 177 is on host 177
2023-07-11 14:16:28,104 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 178 is on host 178
2023-07-11 14:16:28,104 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 179 is on host 179
2023-07-11 14:16:28,104 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 180 is on host 180
2023-07-11 14:16:28,104 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 181 is on host 181
2023-07-11 14:16:28,104 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 182 is on host 182
2023-07-11 14:16:28,104 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 183 is on host 183
2023-07-11 14:16:28,104 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 184 is on host 184
2023-07-11 14:16:28,104 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 185 is on host 185
2023-07-11 14:16:28,104 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 186 is on host 186
2023-07-11 14:16:28,104 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 187 is on host 187
2023-07-11 14:16:28,104 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 188 is on host 188
2023-07-11 14:16:28,105 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 189 is on host 189
2023-07-11 14:16:28,105 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 190 is on host 190
2023-07-11 14:16:28,105 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 191 is on host 191
2023-07-11 14:16:28,105 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 192 is on host 192
2023-07-11 14:16:28,105 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 193 is on host 193
2023-07-11 14:16:28,105 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 194 is on host 194
2023-07-11 14:16:28,105 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 195 is on host 195
2023-07-11 14:16:28,105 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 196 is on host 196
2023-07-11 14:16:28,105 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 197 is on host 197
2023-07-11 14:16:28,105 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 198 is on host 198
2023-07-11 14:16:28,105 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 199 is on host 199
2023-07-11 14:16:28,105 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 200 is on host 200
2023-07-11 14:16:28,105 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 201 is on host 201
2023-07-11 14:16:28,105 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 202 is on host 202
2023-07-11 14:16:28,105 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 203 is on host 203
2023-07-11 14:16:28,105 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 204 is on host 204
2023-07-11 14:16:28,105 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 205 is on host 205
2023-07-11 14:16:28,105 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 206 is on host 206
2023-07-11 14:16:28,105 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 207 is on host 207
2023-07-11 14:16:28,105 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 208 is on host 208
2023-07-11 14:16:28,105 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 209 is on host 209
2023-07-11 14:16:28,105 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 210 is on host 210
2023-07-11 14:16:28,105 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 211 is on host 211
2023-07-11 14:16:28,105 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 212 is on host 212
2023-07-11 14:16:28,105 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 213 is on host 213
2023-07-11 14:16:28,105 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 214 is on host 214
2023-07-11 14:16:28,105 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 215 is on host 215
2023-07-11 14:16:28,106 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 216 is on host 216
2023-07-11 14:16:28,106 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 217 is on host 217
2023-07-11 14:16:28,106 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 218 is on host 218
2023-07-11 14:16:28,106 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 219 is on host 219
2023-07-11 14:16:28,106 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 220 is on host 220
2023-07-11 14:16:28,106 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 221 is on host 221
2023-07-11 14:16:28,106 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 222 is on host 222
2023-07-11 14:16:28,106 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 223 is on host 223
2023-07-11 14:16:28,106 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 224 is on host 224
2023-07-11 14:16:28,106 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 225 is on host 225
2023-07-11 14:16:28,106 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 226 is on host 226
2023-07-11 14:16:28,106 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 227 is on host 227
2023-07-11 14:16:28,106 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 228 is on host 228
2023-07-11 14:16:28,106 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 229 is on host 229
2023-07-11 14:16:28,106 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 230 is on host 230
2023-07-11 14:16:28,106 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 231 is on host 231
2023-07-11 14:16:28,106 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 232 is on host 232
2023-07-11 14:16:28,106 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 233 is on host 233
2023-07-11 14:16:28,106 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 234 is on host 234
2023-07-11 14:16:28,106 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 235 is on host 235
2023-07-11 14:16:28,106 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 236 is on host 236
2023-07-11 14:16:28,106 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 237 is on host 237
2023-07-11 14:16:28,106 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 238 is on host 238
2023-07-11 14:16:28,106 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 239 is on host 239
2023-07-11 14:16:28,106 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 240 is on host 240
2023-07-11 14:16:28,106 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 241 is on host 241
2023-07-11 14:16:28,106 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 242 is on host 242
2023-07-11 14:16:28,106 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 243 is on host 243
2023-07-11 14:16:28,106 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 244 is on host 244
2023-07-11 14:16:28,107 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 245 is on host 245
2023-07-11 14:16:28,107 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 246 is on host 246
2023-07-11 14:16:28,107 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 247 is on host 247
2023-07-11 14:16:28,107 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 248 is on host 248
2023-07-11 14:16:28,107 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 249 is on host 249
2023-07-11 14:16:28,107 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 250 is on host 250
2023-07-11 14:16:28,107 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 251 is on host 251
2023-07-11 14:16:28,107 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 252 is on host 252
2023-07-11 14:16:28,107 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 253 is on host 253
2023-07-11 14:16:28,107 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 254 is on host 254
2023-07-11 14:16:28,107 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 255 is on host 255
2023-07-11 14:16:28,107 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 256 is on host 256
2023-07-11 14:16:28,107 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 257 is on host 257
2023-07-11 14:16:28,107 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 258 is on host 258
2023-07-11 14:16:28,107 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 259 is on host 259
2023-07-11 14:16:28,107 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 260 is on host 260
2023-07-11 14:16:28,107 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 261 is on host 261
2023-07-11 14:16:28,107 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 262 is on host 262
2023-07-11 14:16:28,107 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 263 is on host 263
2023-07-11 14:16:28,107 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 264 is on host 264
2023-07-11 14:16:28,107 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 265 is on host 265
2023-07-11 14:16:28,108 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 266 is on host 266
2023-07-11 14:16:28,108 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 267 is on host 267
2023-07-11 14:16:28,108 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 268 is on host 268
2023-07-11 14:16:28,108 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 269 is on host 269
2023-07-11 14:16:28,108 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 270 is on host 270
2023-07-11 14:16:28,108 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 271 is on host 271
2023-07-11 14:16:28,108 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 272 is on host 272
2023-07-11 14:16:28,108 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 273 is on host 273
2023-07-11 14:16:28,108 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 274 is on host 274
2023-07-11 14:16:28,108 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 275 is on host 275
2023-07-11 14:16:28,108 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 276 is on host 276
2023-07-11 14:16:28,108 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 277 is on host 277
2023-07-11 14:16:28,108 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 278 is on host 278
2023-07-11 14:16:28,108 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 279 is on host 279
2023-07-11 14:16:28,108 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 280 is on host 280
2023-07-11 14:16:28,108 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 281 is on host 281
2023-07-11 14:16:28,108 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 282 is on host 282
2023-07-11 14:16:28,108 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 283 is on host 283
2023-07-11 14:16:28,108 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 284 is on host 284
2023-07-11 14:16:28,108 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 285 is on host 285
2023-07-11 14:16:28,108 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 286 is on host 286
2023-07-11 14:16:28,108 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 287 is on host 287
2023-07-11 14:16:28,108 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 288 is on host 288
2023-07-11 14:16:28,108 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 289 is on host 289
2023-07-11 14:16:28,108 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 290 is on host 290
2023-07-11 14:16:28,108 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 291 is on host 291
2023-07-11 14:16:28,108 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 292 is on host 292
2023-07-11 14:16:28,108 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 293 is on host 293
2023-07-11 14:16:28,109 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 294 is on host 294
2023-07-11 14:16:28,109 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 295 is on host 295
2023-07-11 14:16:28,109 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 296 is on host 296
2023-07-11 14:16:28,109 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 297 is on host 297
2023-07-11 14:16:28,109 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 298 is on host 298
2023-07-11 14:16:28,109 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 299 is on host 299
2023-07-11 14:16:28,109 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 300 is on host 300
2023-07-11 14:16:28,109 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 301 is on host 301
2023-07-11 14:16:28,109 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 302 is on host 302
2023-07-11 14:16:28,109 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 303 is on host 303
2023-07-11 14:16:28,109 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 304 is on host 304
2023-07-11 14:16:28,109 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 305 is on host 305
2023-07-11 14:16:28,109 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 306 is on host 306
2023-07-11 14:16:28,109 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 307 is on host 307
2023-07-11 14:16:28,109 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 308 is on host 308
2023-07-11 14:16:28,109 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 309 is on host 309
2023-07-11 14:16:28,109 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 310 is on host 310
2023-07-11 14:16:28,109 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 311 is on host 311
2023-07-11 14:16:28,109 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 312 is on host 312
2023-07-11 14:16:28,109 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 313 is on host 313
2023-07-11 14:16:28,109 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 314 is on host 314
2023-07-11 14:16:28,109 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 315 is on host 315
2023-07-11 14:16:28,109 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 316 is on host 316
2023-07-11 14:16:28,109 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 317 is on host 317
2023-07-11 14:16:28,109 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 318 is on host 318
2023-07-11 14:16:28,109 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 319 is on host 319
2023-07-11 14:16:28,109 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 320 is on host 320
2023-07-11 14:16:28,109 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 321 is on host 321
2023-07-11 14:16:28,109 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 322 is on host 322
2023-07-11 14:16:28,110 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 323 is on host 323
2023-07-11 14:16:28,110 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 324 is on host 324
2023-07-11 14:16:28,110 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 325 is on host 325
2023-07-11 14:16:28,110 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 326 is on host 326
2023-07-11 14:16:28,110 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 327 is on host 327
2023-07-11 14:16:28,110 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 328 is on host 328
2023-07-11 14:16:28,110 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 329 is on host 329
2023-07-11 14:16:28,110 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 330 is on host 330
2023-07-11 14:16:28,110 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 331 is on host 331
2023-07-11 14:16:28,110 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 332 is on host 332
2023-07-11 14:16:28,110 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 333 is on host 333
2023-07-11 14:16:28,110 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 334 is on host 334
2023-07-11 14:16:28,110 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 335 is on host 335
2023-07-11 14:16:28,110 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 336 is on host 336
2023-07-11 14:16:28,110 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 337 is on host 337
2023-07-11 14:16:28,110 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 338 is on host 338
2023-07-11 14:16:28,110 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 339 is on host 339
2023-07-11 14:16:28,110 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 340 is on host 340
2023-07-11 14:16:28,110 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 341 is on host 341
2023-07-11 14:16:28,110 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 342 is on host 342
2023-07-11 14:16:28,110 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 343 is on host 343
2023-07-11 14:16:28,110 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 344 is on host 344
2023-07-11 14:16:28,110 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 345 is on host 345
2023-07-11 14:16:28,110 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 346 is on host 346
2023-07-11 14:16:28,110 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 347 is on host 347
2023-07-11 14:16:28,110 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 348 is on host 348
2023-07-11 14:16:28,110 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 349 is on host 349
2023-07-11 14:16:28,110 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 350 is on host 350
2023-07-11 14:16:28,110 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 351 is on host 351
2023-07-11 14:16:28,111 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 352 is on host 352
2023-07-11 14:16:28,111 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 353 is on host 353
2023-07-11 14:16:28,111 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 354 is on host 354
2023-07-11 14:16:28,111 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 355 is on host 355
2023-07-11 14:16:28,111 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 356 is on host 356
2023-07-11 14:16:28,111 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 357 is on host 357
2023-07-11 14:16:28,111 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 358 is on host 358
2023-07-11 14:16:28,111 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 359 is on host 359
2023-07-11 14:16:28,111 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 360 is on host 360
2023-07-11 14:16:28,111 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 361 is on host 361
2023-07-11 14:16:28,111 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 362 is on host 362
2023-07-11 14:16:28,111 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 363 is on host 363
2023-07-11 14:16:28,111 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 364 is on host 364
2023-07-11 14:16:28,111 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 365 is on host 365
2023-07-11 14:16:28,111 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 366 is on host 366
2023-07-11 14:16:28,111 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 367 is on host 367
2023-07-11 14:16:28,111 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 368 is on host 368
2023-07-11 14:16:28,111 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 369 is on host 369
2023-07-11 14:16:28,111 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 370 is on host 370
2023-07-11 14:16:28,111 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 371 is on host 371
2023-07-11 14:16:28,111 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 372 is on host 372
2023-07-11 14:16:28,111 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 373 is on host 373
2023-07-11 14:16:28,111 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 374 is on host 374
2023-07-11 14:16:28,111 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 375 is on host 375
2023-07-11 14:16:28,111 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 376 is on host 376
2023-07-11 14:16:28,111 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 377 is on host 377
2023-07-11 14:16:28,111 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 378 is on host 378
2023-07-11 14:16:28,111 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 379 is on host 379
2023-07-11 14:16:28,111 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 380 is on host 380
2023-07-11 14:16:28,112 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 381 is on host 381
2023-07-11 14:16:28,112 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 382 is on host 382
2023-07-11 14:16:28,112 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 383 is on host 383
2023-07-11 14:16:28,112 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 384 is on host 384
2023-07-11 14:16:28,112 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 385 is on host 385
2023-07-11 14:16:28,112 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 386 is on host 386
2023-07-11 14:16:28,112 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 387 is on host 387
2023-07-11 14:16:28,112 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 388 is on host 388
2023-07-11 14:16:28,112 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 389 is on host 389
2023-07-11 14:16:28,112 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 390 is on host 390
2023-07-11 14:16:28,112 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 391 is on host 391
2023-07-11 14:16:28,112 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 392 is on host 392
2023-07-11 14:16:28,112 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=393, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:28,112 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table24) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:28,112 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table25
2023-07-11 14:16:28,113 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv553536953=290, srv1630071126=110, srv1071894870=12, srv23511728=232, srv658346947=323, srv2025338799=204, srv1397994335=64, srv1976766403=195, srv1644629726=118, srv957637734=381, srv2079182457=210, srv1749264468=139, srv2046129126=206, srv1595762596=104, srv603990852=307, srv1973073480=194, srv958856137=382, srv644066832=319, srv557062842=292, srv277765671=235, srv732221418=337, srv1769385567=143, srv224612199=228, srv714752528=334, srv362526040=256, srv581128949=296, srv2133511466=223, srv1144239257=30, srv320603627=245, srv1679952521=126, srv2122867873=222, srv1110067064=24, srv256251994=233, srv63261708=317, srv89837390=371, srv552104598=289, srv508952995=281, srv2096011353=214, srv1770417148=144, srv1246723478=42, srv929436444=378, srv2082192429=211, srv234917297=231, srv405700573=266, srv183644386=166, srv1488378513=85, srv173139715=136, srv1154180352=32, srv355693379=252, srv1407521654=66, srv496848057=275, srv1157975499=33, srv1806731027=162, srv1923102804=184, srv311102455=244, srv450011410=271, srv771515724=348, srv389183508=262, srv1249074416=43, srv2014575201=201, srv640847108=318, srv832363565=356, srv1970882134=192, srv2107358603=218, srv855766065=361, srv1336043388=55, srv29397186=237, srv982792848=390, srv976560524=386, srv101181760=3, srv1093549482=21, srv2018389395=202, srv2113483104=221, srv1778339118=149, srv1968709692=190, srv705221118=333, srv159600090=105, srv1919608486=180, srv981255102=389, srv807899713=353, srv755110395=344, srv1770594519=145, srv739692705=340, srv1076582671=16, srv693869315=330, srv1079048717=17, srv440657532=270, srv1636659280=115, srv2108739257=220, srv668373413=326, srv1003610393=2, srv1054229197=11, srv1868589627=172, srv2103522371=217, srv1000546271=0, srv951670617=380, srv2042909593=205, srv1865656038=171, srv1466355012=78, srv703662406=332, srv1418112884=70, srv1215580291=40, srv71833528=335, srv1580581635=103, srv1021032212=5, srv1080806312=19, srv1985601859=197, srv74471954=343, srv1647472319=119, srv2071553346=208, srv1632855171=112, srv1122009370=27, srv13613992=61, srv1630777154=111, srv301413669=239, srv550697728=288, srv1296023857=53, srv1724550977=133, srv1989290370=198, srv1926417985=185, srv1678097199=125, srv1461034373=76, srv614690415=311, srv2098345381=215, srv310463473=243, srv1011934105=4, srv148627129=84, srv305489318=240, srv1256534903=46, srv1289731445=52, srv1798844587=157, srv567113085=294, srv1119222501=26, srv2055117940=207, srv855898852=362, srv629224816=316, srv1075943554=15, srv625909061=315, srv1705591942=128, srv734225580=339, srv660107924=324, srv1381729938=62, srv1633483173=113, srv408265476=267, srv1776057793=148, srv1360253411=60, srv1511424834=90, srv1414162621=68, srv883343663=370, srv151859222=91, srv349144930=251, srv1991304034=199, srv1825887791=164, srv601657063=305, srv758932951=345, srv1651629087=120, srv1864623584=170, srv682957691=329, srv1500454146=88, srv1725962085=135, srv1659841448=121, srv1253206004=45, srv52354442=284, srv18508093=168, srv1427731921=73, srv561344974=293, srv721668125=336, srv1575482138=100, srv914128771=373, srv961487230=383, srv741332941=342, srv533032466=286, srv1574140987=99, srv2139849097=224, srv503902262=278, srv674807007=327, srv1786829855=153, srv2088727517=213, srv394366966=264, srv980089565=388, srv114594288=31, srv38296437=261, srv214835574=226, srv1887224977=176, srv1025509362=7, srv1577020334=102, srv524466665=285, srv393561021=263, srv759909927=346, srv763556514=347, srv786453030=349, srv2142935488=225, srv618111613=312, srv16254163=108, srv343211061=250, srv476075173=273, srv1269632212=47, srv333589612=246, srv499015361=276, srv836674186=357, srv1799191687=158, srv1446998035=74, srv1571774199=98, srv1115354947=25, srv333860881=247, srv1724152600=132, srv1598699299=106, srv177885829=151, srv472125887=272, srv1101339966=22, srv1424985362=72, srv1945569895=188, srv594128294=300, srv1026739237=8, srv842459828=358, srv878519137=366, srv1921260729=181, srv339110834=249, srv504099471=279, srv814253179=354, srv1643744885=116, srv1793847521=155, srv607234624=309, srv698219051=331, srv1688538732=127, srv666240078=325, srv1079284733=18, srv29210550=236, srv506181748=280, srv881313122=368, srv1945452576=187, srv597307897=303, srv1285120424=51, srv1887943816=177, srv1983604698=196, srv1805465940=161, srv309309336=242, srv1719756294=131, srv1349932676=58, srv1208486369=38, srv1643971570=117, srv1509331489=89, srv334105385=248, srv1400515744=65, srv369984715=259, srv43712162=269, srv842675864=359, srv1803258748=160, srv1022450918=6, srv1775108732=147, srv1766088250=141, srv180150732=159, srv1220857227=41, srv226530501=229, srv362032108=255, srv919715380=377, srv1074935976=14, srv1395030819=63, srv803291569=352, srv1877966766=175, srv220538712=227, srv2021718843=203, srv2107782185=219, srv882216860=369, srv1489137852=86, srv1972328734=193, srv1470759982=79, srv1774824811=146, srv971974774=384, srv1418242791=71, srv1001274196=1, srv909615097=372, srv1537724566=93, srv1165799954=34, srv1724754364=134, srv978173525=387, srv113319438=29, srv578033735=295, srv147931272=80, srv1183635941=35, srv1904215245=178, srv596349756=302, srv880835255=367, srv857544550=364, srv1779729022=152, srv1795612465=156, srv621083045=314, srv917704170=375, srv1351811120=59, srv1316710897=54, srv789820555=350, srv1922580095=183, srv305567304=241, srv1936745425=186, srv1745318024=138, srv1210822057=39, srv645375717=320, srv950628389=379, srv1490199189=87, srv1575919256=101, srv154481102=96, srv359402967=254, srv997716931=391, srv1457224273=75, srv581644449=297, srv1872374768=174, srv363177310=257, srv740327512=341, srv1664227236=123, srv972330517=385, srv1634261306=114, srv1662183707=122, srv1969046891=191, srv1485266211=82, srv1778842262=150, srv588410181=298, srv1921840985=182, srv591279493=299, srv37574565=260, srv1104147458=23, srv1190166330=36, srv652270371=322, srv1484309042=81, srv1560148463=97, srv618569548=313, srv2102708311=216, srv1084873074=20, srv517669556=283, srv918152084=376, srv649714317=321, srv1674484790=124, srv1339239880=56, srv1461073271=77, srv1125312901=28, srv25633292=234, srv516616923=282, srv299721745=238, srv604932433=308, srv1273702855=48, srv792183929=351, srv1042608200=10, srv1276335106=49, srv1486044644=83, srv676101698=328, srv998930892=392, srv200111276=200, srv1863083643=169, srv1737443479=137, srv872997185=365, srv821351126=355, srv852115805=360, srv1074355423=13, srv170952194=130, srv503430005=277, srv153887567=94, srv1415163001=69, srv1032737435=9, srv1840670515=167, srv1961921083=189, srv59745831=304, srv36715747=258, srv431547280=268, srv1524853580=92, srv1870059418=173, srv396010771=265, srv594457792=301, srv1755339428=140, srv1766275429=142, srv5565786=291, srv603898526=306, srv544570223=287, srv856030669=363, srv1542523468=95, srv915785747=374, srv356122213=253, srv1411875499=67, srv2077620970=209, srv1345529444=57, srv232339963=230, srv1250861076=44, srv1914875423=179, srv478619481=274, srv1202435626=37, srv1706089454=129, srv1810631201=163, srv1282644061=50, srv1625945288=109, srv733251129=338, srv2082830831=212, srv1612103540=107, srv612136291=310, srv1790004142=154, srv183394703=165} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:28,113 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:28,113 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:28,113 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:28,113 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:28,113 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:28,113 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:28,113 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-11 14:16:28,113 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-11 14:16:28,113 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-11 14:16:28,113 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-11 14:16:28,113 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 10 is on host 10
2023-07-11 14:16:28,113 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 11 is on host 11
2023-07-11 14:16:28,113 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 12 is on host 12
2023-07-11 14:16:28,113 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 13 is on host 13
2023-07-11 14:16:28,113 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 14 is on host 14
2023-07-11 14:16:28,113 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 15 is on host 15
2023-07-11 14:16:28,114 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 16 is on host 16
2023-07-11 14:16:28,114 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 17 is on host 17
2023-07-11 14:16:28,114 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 18 is on host 18
2023-07-11 14:16:28,114 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 19 is on host 19
2023-07-11 14:16:28,114 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 20 is on host 20
2023-07-11 14:16:28,114 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 21 is on host 21
2023-07-11 14:16:28,114 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 22 is on host 22
2023-07-11 14:16:28,114 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 23 is on host 23
2023-07-11 14:16:28,114 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 24 is on host 24
2023-07-11 14:16:28,114 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 25 is on host 25
2023-07-11 14:16:28,114 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 26 is on host 26
2023-07-11 14:16:28,114 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 27 is on host 27
2023-07-11 14:16:28,114 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 28 is on host 28
2023-07-11 14:16:28,114 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 29 is on host 29
2023-07-11 14:16:28,114 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 30 is on host 30
2023-07-11 14:16:28,114 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 31 is on host 31
2023-07-11 14:16:28,114 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 32 is on host 32
2023-07-11 14:16:28,114 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 33 is on host 33
2023-07-11 14:16:28,114 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 34 is on host 34
2023-07-11 14:16:28,114 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 35 is on host 35
2023-07-11 14:16:28,114 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 36 is on host 36
2023-07-11 14:16:28,114 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 37 is on host 37
2023-07-11 14:16:28,114 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 38 is on host 38
2023-07-11 14:16:28,114 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 39 is on host 39
2023-07-11 14:16:28,114 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 40 is on host 40
2023-07-11 14:16:28,114 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 41 is on host 41
2023-07-11 14:16:28,114 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 42 is on host 42
2023-07-11 14:16:28,114 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 43 is on host 43
2023-07-11 14:16:28,114 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 44 is on host 44
2023-07-11 14:16:28,115 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 45 is on host 45
2023-07-11 14:16:28,115 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 46 is on host 46
2023-07-11 14:16:28,115 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 47 is on host 47
2023-07-11 14:16:28,115 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 48 is on host 48
2023-07-11 14:16:28,115 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 49 is on host 49
2023-07-11 14:16:28,115 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 50 is on host 50
2023-07-11 14:16:28,115 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 51 is on host 51
2023-07-11 14:16:28,115 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 52 is on host 52
2023-07-11 14:16:28,115 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 53 is on host 53
2023-07-11 14:16:28,115 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 54 is on host 54
2023-07-11 14:16:28,115 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 55 is on host 55
2023-07-11 14:16:28,115 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 56 is on host 56
2023-07-11 14:16:28,115 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 57 is on host 57
2023-07-11 14:16:28,115 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 58 is on host 58
2023-07-11 14:16:28,115 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 59 is on host 59
2023-07-11 14:16:28,115 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 60 is on host 60
2023-07-11 14:16:28,115 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 61 is on host 61
2023-07-11 14:16:28,115 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 62 is on host 62
2023-07-11 14:16:28,115 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 63 is on host 63
2023-07-11 14:16:28,115 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 64 is on host 64
2023-07-11 14:16:28,115 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 65 is on host 65
2023-07-11 14:16:28,115 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 66 is on host 66
2023-07-11 14:16:28,115 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 67 is on host 67
2023-07-11 14:16:28,115 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 68 is on host 68
2023-07-11 14:16:28,115 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 69 is on host 69
2023-07-11 14:16:28,115 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 70 is on host 70
2023-07-11 14:16:28,115 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 71 is on host 71
2023-07-11 14:16:28,115 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 72 is on host 72
2023-07-11 14:16:28,115 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 73 is on host 73
2023-07-11 14:16:28,116 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 74 is on host 74
2023-07-11 14:16:28,116 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 75 is on host 75
2023-07-11 14:16:28,116 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 76 is on host 76
2023-07-11 14:16:28,116 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 77 is on host 77
2023-07-11 14:16:28,116 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 78 is on host 78
2023-07-11 14:16:28,116 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 79 is on host 79
2023-07-11 14:16:28,116 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 80 is on host 80
2023-07-11 14:16:28,116 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 81 is on host 81
2023-07-11 14:16:28,116 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 82 is on host 82
2023-07-11 14:16:28,116 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 83 is on host 83
2023-07-11 14:16:28,116 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 84 is on host 84
2023-07-11 14:16:28,116 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 85 is on host 85
2023-07-11 14:16:28,116 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 86 is on host 86
2023-07-11 14:16:28,116 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 87 is on host 87
2023-07-11 14:16:28,116 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 88 is on host 88
2023-07-11 14:16:28,116 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 89 is on host 89
2023-07-11 14:16:28,116 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 90 is on host 90
2023-07-11 14:16:28,116 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 91 is on host 91
2023-07-11 14:16:28,116 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 92 is on host 92
2023-07-11 14:16:28,116 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 93 is on host 93
2023-07-11 14:16:28,116 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 94 is on host 94
2023-07-11 14:16:28,116 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 95 is on host 95
2023-07-11 14:16:28,116 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 96 is on host 96
2023-07-11 14:16:28,116 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 97 is on host 97
2023-07-11 14:16:28,116 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 98 is on host 98
2023-07-11 14:16:28,116 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 99 is on host 99
2023-07-11 14:16:28,116 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 100 is on host 100
2023-07-11 14:16:28,116 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 101 is on host 101
2023-07-11 14:16:28,116 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 102 is on host 102
2023-07-11 14:16:28,117 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 103 is on host 103
2023-07-11 14:16:28,117 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 104 is on host 104
2023-07-11 14:16:28,117 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 105 is on host 105
2023-07-11 14:16:28,117 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 106 is on host 106
2023-07-11 14:16:28,117 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 107 is on host 107
2023-07-11 14:16:28,117 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 108 is on host 108
2023-07-11 14:16:28,117 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 109 is on host 109
2023-07-11 14:16:28,117 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 110 is on host 110
2023-07-11 14:16:28,117 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 111 is on host 111
2023-07-11 14:16:28,117 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 112 is on host 112
2023-07-11 14:16:28,117 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 113 is on host 113
2023-07-11 14:16:28,117 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 114 is on host 114
2023-07-11 14:16:28,117 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 115 is on host 115
2023-07-11 14:16:28,117 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 116 is on host 116
2023-07-11 14:16:28,117 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 117 is on host 117
2023-07-11 14:16:28,117 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 118 is on host 118
2023-07-11 14:16:28,117 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 119 is on host 119
2023-07-11 14:16:28,117 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 120 is on host 120
2023-07-11 14:16:28,117 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 121 is on host 121
2023-07-11 14:16:28,117 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 122 is on host 122
2023-07-11 14:16:28,117 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 123 is on host 123
2023-07-11 14:16:28,117 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 124 is on host 124
2023-07-11 14:16:28,117 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 125 is on host 125
2023-07-11 14:16:28,117 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 126 is on host 126
2023-07-11 14:16:28,117 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 127 is on host 127
2023-07-11 14:16:28,117 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 128 is on host 128
2023-07-11 14:16:28,117 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 129 is on host 129
2023-07-11 14:16:28,117 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 130 is on host 130
2023-07-11 14:16:28,117 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 131 is on host 131
2023-07-11 14:16:28,118 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 132 is on host 132
2023-07-11 14:16:28,118 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 133 is on host 133
2023-07-11 14:16:28,118 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 134 is on host 134
2023-07-11 14:16:28,118 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 135 is on host 135
2023-07-11 14:16:28,118 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 136 is on host 136
2023-07-11 14:16:28,118 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 137 is on host 137
2023-07-11 14:16:28,118 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 138 is on host 138
2023-07-11 14:16:28,118 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 139 is on host 139
2023-07-11 14:16:28,118 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 140 is on host 140
2023-07-11 14:16:28,118 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 141 is on host 141
2023-07-11 14:16:28,118 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 142 is on host 142
2023-07-11 14:16:28,118 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 143 is on host 143
2023-07-11 14:16:28,118 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 144 is on host 144
2023-07-11 14:16:28,118 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 145 is on host 145
2023-07-11 14:16:28,118 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 146 is on host 146
2023-07-11 14:16:28,118 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 147 is on host 147
2023-07-11 14:16:28,118 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 148 is on host 148
2023-07-11 14:16:28,118 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 149 is on host 149
2023-07-11 14:16:28,118 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 150 is on host 150
2023-07-11 14:16:28,118 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 151 is on host 151
2023-07-11 14:16:28,118 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 152 is on host 152
2023-07-11 14:16:28,118 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 153 is on host 153
2023-07-11 14:16:28,118 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 154 is on host 154
2023-07-11 14:16:28,118 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 155 is on host 155
2023-07-11 14:16:28,118 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 156 is on host 156
2023-07-11 14:16:28,118 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 157 is on host 157
2023-07-11 14:16:28,118 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 158 is on host 158
2023-07-11 14:16:28,118 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 159 is on host 159
2023-07-11 14:16:28,118 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 160 is on host 160
2023-07-11 14:16:28,119 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 161 is on host 161
2023-07-11 14:16:28,119 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 162 is on host 162
2023-07-11 14:16:28,119 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 163 is on host 163
2023-07-11 14:16:28,119 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 164 is on host 164
2023-07-11 14:16:28,119 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 165 is on host 165
2023-07-11 14:16:28,119 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 166 is on host 166
2023-07-11 14:16:28,119 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 167 is on host 167
2023-07-11 14:16:28,119 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 168 is on host 168
2023-07-11 14:16:28,119 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 169 is on host 169
2023-07-11 14:16:28,119 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 170 is on host 170
2023-07-11 14:16:28,119 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 171 is on host 171
2023-07-11 14:16:28,119 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 172 is on host 172
2023-07-11 14:16:28,119 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 173 is on host 173
2023-07-11 14:16:28,119 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 174 is on host 174
2023-07-11 14:16:28,119 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 175 is on host 175
2023-07-11 14:16:28,119 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 176 is on host 176
2023-07-11 14:16:28,119 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 177 is on host 177
2023-07-11 14:16:28,119 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 178 is on host 178
2023-07-11 14:16:28,119 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 179 is on host 179
2023-07-11 14:16:28,120 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 180 is on host 180
2023-07-11 14:16:28,120 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 181 is on host 181
2023-07-11 14:16:28,120 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 182 is on host 182
2023-07-11 14:16:28,120 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 183 is on host 183
2023-07-11 14:16:28,120 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 184 is on host 184
2023-07-11 14:16:28,120 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 185 is on host 185
2023-07-11 14:16:28,120 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 186 is on host 186
2023-07-11 14:16:28,120 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 187 is on host 187
2023-07-11 14:16:28,120 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 188 is on host 188
2023-07-11 14:16:28,120 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 189 is on host 189
2023-07-11 14:16:28,120 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 190 is on host 190
2023-07-11 14:16:28,120 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 191 is on host 191
2023-07-11 14:16:28,120 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 192 is on host 192
2023-07-11 14:16:28,120 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 193 is on host 193
2023-07-11 14:16:28,120 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 194 is on host 194
2023-07-11 14:16:28,120 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 195 is on host 195
2023-07-11 14:16:28,120 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 196 is on host 196
2023-07-11 14:16:28,120 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 197 is on host 197
2023-07-11 14:16:28,120 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 198 is on host 198
2023-07-11 14:16:28,120 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 199 is on host 199
2023-07-11 14:16:28,120 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 200 is on host 200
2023-07-11 14:16:28,120 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 201 is on host 201
2023-07-11 14:16:28,120 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 202 is on host 202
2023-07-11 14:16:28,120 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 203 is on host 203
2023-07-11 14:16:28,120 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 204 is on host 204
2023-07-11 14:16:28,120 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 205 is on host 205
2023-07-11 14:16:28,120 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 206 is on host 206
2023-07-11 14:16:28,120 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 207 is on host 207
2023-07-11 14:16:28,120 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 208 is on host 208
2023-07-11 14:16:28,121 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 209 is on host 209
2023-07-11 14:16:28,121 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 210 is on host 210
2023-07-11 14:16:28,121 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 211 is on host 211
2023-07-11 14:16:28,121 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 212 is on host 212
2023-07-11 14:16:28,121 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 213 is on host 213
2023-07-11 14:16:28,121 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 214 is on host 214
2023-07-11 14:16:28,121 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 215 is on host 215
2023-07-11 14:16:28,121 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 216 is on host 216
2023-07-11 14:16:28,121 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 217 is on host 217
2023-07-11 14:16:28,121 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 218 is on host 218
2023-07-11 14:16:28,121 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 219 is on host 219
2023-07-11 14:16:28,121 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 220 is on host 220
2023-07-11 14:16:28,121 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 221 is on host 221
2023-07-11 14:16:28,121 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 222 is on host 222
2023-07-11 14:16:28,121 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 223 is on host 223
2023-07-11 14:16:28,121 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 224 is on host 224
2023-07-11 14:16:28,121 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 225 is on host 225
2023-07-11 14:16:28,121 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 226 is on host 226
2023-07-11 14:16:28,121 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 227 is on host 227
2023-07-11 14:16:28,121 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 228 is on host 228
2023-07-11 14:16:28,121 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 229 is on host 229
2023-07-11 14:16:28,121 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 230 is on host 230
2023-07-11 14:16:28,121 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 231 is on host 231
2023-07-11 14:16:28,121 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 232 is on host 232
2023-07-11 14:16:28,121 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 233 is on host 233
2023-07-11 14:16:28,121 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 234 is on host 234
2023-07-11 14:16:28,121 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 235 is on host 235
2023-07-11 14:16:28,121 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 236 is on host 236
2023-07-11 14:16:28,122 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 237 is on host 237
2023-07-11 14:16:28,122 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 238 is on host 238
2023-07-11 14:16:28,122 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 239 is on host 239
2023-07-11 14:16:28,122 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 240 is on host 240
2023-07-11 14:16:28,122 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 241 is on host 241
2023-07-11 14:16:28,122 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 242 is on host 242
2023-07-11 14:16:28,122 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 243 is on host 243
2023-07-11 14:16:28,122 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 244 is on host 244
2023-07-11 14:16:28,122 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 245 is on host 245
2023-07-11 14:16:28,122 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 246 is on host 246
2023-07-11 14:16:28,122 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 247 is on host 247
2023-07-11 14:16:28,122 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 248 is on host 248
2023-07-11 14:16:28,122 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 249 is on host 249
2023-07-11 14:16:28,122 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 250 is on host 250
2023-07-11 14:16:28,122 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 251 is on host 251
2023-07-11 14:16:28,122 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 252 is on host 252
2023-07-11 14:16:28,122 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 253 is on host 253
2023-07-11 14:16:28,122 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 254 is on host 254
2023-07-11 14:16:28,122 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 255 is on host 255
2023-07-11 14:16:28,122 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 256 is on host 256
2023-07-11 14:16:28,122 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 257 is on host 257
2023-07-11 14:16:28,122 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 258 is on host 258
2023-07-11 14:16:28,122 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 259 is on host 259
2023-07-11 14:16:28,122 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 260 is on host 260
2023-07-11 14:16:28,122 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 261 is on host 261
2023-07-11 14:16:28,122 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 262 is on host 262
2023-07-11 14:16:28,122 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 263 is on host 263
2023-07-11 14:16:28,122 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 264 is on host 264
2023-07-11 14:16:28,122 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 265 is on host 265
2023-07-11 14:16:28,123 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 266 is on host 266
2023-07-11 14:16:28,123 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 267 is on host 267
2023-07-11 14:16:28,123 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 268 is on host 268
2023-07-11 14:16:28,123 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 269 is on host 269
2023-07-11 14:16:28,123 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 270 is on host 270
2023-07-11 14:16:28,123 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 271 is on host 271
2023-07-11 14:16:28,123 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 272 is on host 272
2023-07-11 14:16:28,123 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 273 is on host 273
2023-07-11 14:16:28,123 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 274 is on host 274
2023-07-11 14:16:28,123 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 275 is on host 275
2023-07-11 14:16:28,123 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 276 is on host 276
2023-07-11 14:16:28,123 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 277 is on host 277
2023-07-11 14:16:28,123 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 278 is on host 278
2023-07-11 14:16:28,123 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 279 is on host 279
2023-07-11 14:16:28,123 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 280 is on host 280
2023-07-11 14:16:28,123 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 281 is on host 281
2023-07-11 14:16:28,123 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 282 is on host 282
2023-07-11 14:16:28,123 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 283 is on host 283
2023-07-11 14:16:28,123 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 284 is on host 284
2023-07-11 14:16:28,123 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 285 is on host 285
2023-07-11 14:16:28,123 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 286 is on host 286
2023-07-11 14:16:28,123 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 287 is on host 287
2023-07-11 14:16:28,123 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 288 is on host 288
2023-07-11 14:16:28,123 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 289 is on host 289
2023-07-11 14:16:28,123 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 290 is on host 290
2023-07-11 14:16:28,123 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 291 is on host 291
2023-07-11 14:16:28,123 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 292 is on host 292
2023-07-11 14:16:28,123 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 293 is on host 293
2023-07-11 14:16:28,123 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 294 is on host 294
2023-07-11 14:16:28,123 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 295 is on host 295
2023-07-11 14:16:28,124 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 296 is on host 296
2023-07-11 14:16:28,124 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 297 is on host 297
2023-07-11 14:16:28,124 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 298 is on host 298
2023-07-11 14:16:28,124 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 299 is on host 299
2023-07-11 14:16:28,124 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 300 is on host 300
2023-07-11 14:16:28,124 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 301 is on host 301
2023-07-11 14:16:28,124 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 302 is on host 302
2023-07-11 14:16:28,124 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 303 is on host 303
2023-07-11 14:16:28,124 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 304 is on host 304
2023-07-11 14:16:28,124 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 305 is on host 305
2023-07-11 14:16:28,124 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 306 is on host 306
2023-07-11 14:16:28,124 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 307 is on host 307
2023-07-11 14:16:28,124 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 308 is on host 308
2023-07-11 14:16:28,124 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 309 is on host 309
2023-07-11 14:16:28,124 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 310 is on host 310
2023-07-11 14:16:28,124 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 311 is on host 311
2023-07-11 14:16:28,124 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 312 is on host 312
2023-07-11 14:16:28,124 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 313 is on host 313
2023-07-11 14:16:28,124 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 314 is on host 314
2023-07-11 14:16:28,124 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 315 is on host 315
2023-07-11 14:16:28,124 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 316 is on host 316
2023-07-11 14:16:28,124 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 317 is on host 317
2023-07-11 14:16:28,124 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 318 is on host 318
2023-07-11 14:16:28,124 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 319 is on host 319
2023-07-11 14:16:28,124 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 320 is on host 320
2023-07-11 14:16:28,124 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 321 is on host 321
2023-07-11 14:16:28,124 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 322 is on host 322
2023-07-11 14:16:28,124 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 323 is on host 323
2023-07-11 14:16:28,124 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 324 is on host 324
2023-07-11 14:16:28,125 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 325 is on host 325
2023-07-11 14:16:28,125 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 326 is on host 326
2023-07-11 14:16:28,125 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 327 is on host 327
2023-07-11 14:16:28,125 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 328 is on host 328
2023-07-11 14:16:28,125 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 329 is on host 329
2023-07-11 14:16:28,125 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 330 is on host 330
2023-07-11 14:16:28,125 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 331 is on host 331
2023-07-11 14:16:28,125 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 332 is on host 332
2023-07-11 14:16:28,125 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 333 is on host 333
2023-07-11 14:16:28,125 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 334 is on host 334
2023-07-11 14:16:28,125 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 335 is on host 335
2023-07-11 14:16:28,125 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 336 is on host 336
2023-07-11 14:16:28,125 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 337 is on host 337
2023-07-11 14:16:28,125 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 338 is on host 338
2023-07-11 14:16:28,125 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 339 is on host 339
2023-07-11 14:16:28,125 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 340 is on host 340
2023-07-11 14:16:28,125 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 341 is on host 341
2023-07-11 14:16:28,125 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 342 is on host 342
2023-07-11 14:16:28,125 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 343 is on host 343
2023-07-11 14:16:28,125 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 344 is on host 344
2023-07-11 14:16:28,125 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 345 is on host 345
2023-07-11 14:16:28,125 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 346 is on host 346
2023-07-11 14:16:28,125 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 347 is on host 347
2023-07-11 14:16:28,125 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 348 is on host 348
2023-07-11 14:16:28,125 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 349 is on host 349
2023-07-11 14:16:28,125 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 350 is on host 350
2023-07-11 14:16:28,125 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 351 is on host 351
2023-07-11 14:16:28,125 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 352 is on host 352
2023-07-11 14:16:28,125 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 353 is on host 353
2023-07-11 14:16:28,126 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 354 is on host 354
2023-07-11 14:16:28,126 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 355 is on host 355
2023-07-11 14:16:28,126 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 356 is on host 356
2023-07-11 14:16:28,126 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 357 is on host 357
2023-07-11 14:16:28,126 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 358 is on host 358
2023-07-11 14:16:28,126 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 359 is on host 359
2023-07-11 14:16:28,126 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 360 is on host 360
2023-07-11 14:16:28,126 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 361 is on host 361
2023-07-11 14:16:28,126 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 362 is on host 362
2023-07-11 14:16:28,126 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 363 is on host 363
2023-07-11 14:16:28,126 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 364 is on host 364
2023-07-11 14:16:28,126 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 365 is on host 365
2023-07-11 14:16:28,126 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 366 is on host 366
2023-07-11 14:16:28,126 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 367 is on host 367
2023-07-11 14:16:28,126 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 368 is on host 368
2023-07-11 14:16:28,126 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 369 is on host 369
2023-07-11 14:16:28,126 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 370 is on host 370
2023-07-11 14:16:28,126 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 371 is on host 371
2023-07-11 14:16:28,126 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 372 is on host 372
2023-07-11 14:16:28,126 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 373 is on host 373
2023-07-11 14:16:28,126 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 374 is on host 374
2023-07-11 14:16:28,126 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 375 is on host 375
2023-07-11 14:16:28,126 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 376 is on host 376
2023-07-11 14:16:28,126 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 377 is on host 377
2023-07-11 14:16:28,126 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 378 is on host 378
2023-07-11 14:16:28,126 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 379 is on host 379
2023-07-11 14:16:28,126 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 380 is on host 380
2023-07-11 14:16:28,126 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 381 is on host 381
2023-07-11 14:16:28,126 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 382 is on host 382
2023-07-11 14:16:28,127 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 383 is on host 383
2023-07-11 14:16:28,127 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 384 is on host 384
2023-07-11 14:16:28,127 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 385 is on host 385
2023-07-11 14:16:28,127 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 386 is on host 386
2023-07-11 14:16:28,127 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 387 is on host 387
2023-07-11 14:16:28,127 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 388 is on host 388
2023-07-11 14:16:28,127 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 389 is on host 389
2023-07-11 14:16:28,127 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 390 is on host 390
2023-07-11 14:16:28,127 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 391 is on host 391
2023-07-11 14:16:28,127 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 392 is on host 392
2023-07-11 14:16:28,127 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=393, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:28,127 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table25) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:28,127 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table26
2023-07-11 14:16:28,128 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv553536953=290, srv1630071126=110, srv1071894870=12, srv23511728=232, srv658346947=323, srv2025338799=204, srv1397994335=64, srv1976766403=195, srv1644629726=118, srv957637734=381, srv2079182457=210, srv1749264468=139, srv2046129126=206, srv1595762596=104, srv603990852=307, srv1973073480=194, srv958856137=382, srv644066832=319, srv557062842=292, srv277765671=235, srv732221418=337, srv1769385567=143, srv224612199=228, srv714752528=334, srv362526040=256, srv581128949=296, srv2133511466=223, srv1144239257=30, srv320603627=245, srv1679952521=126, srv2122867873=222, srv1110067064=24, srv256251994=233, srv63261708=317, srv89837390=371, srv552104598=289, srv508952995=281, srv2096011353=214, srv1770417148=144, srv1246723478=42, srv929436444=378, srv2082192429=211, srv234917297=231, srv405700573=266, srv183644386=166, srv1488378513=85, srv173139715=136, srv1154180352=32, srv355693379=252, srv1407521654=66, srv496848057=275, srv1157975499=33, srv1806731027=162, srv1923102804=184, srv311102455=244, srv450011410=271, srv771515724=348, srv389183508=262, srv1249074416=43, srv2014575201=201, srv640847108=318, srv832363565=356, srv1970882134=192, srv2107358603=218, srv855766065=361, srv1336043388=55, srv29397186=237, srv982792848=390, srv976560524=386, srv101181760=3, srv1093549482=21, srv2018389395=202, srv2113483104=221, srv1778339118=149, srv1968709692=190, srv705221118=333, srv159600090=105, srv1919608486=180, srv981255102=389, srv807899713=353, srv755110395=344, srv1770594519=145, srv739692705=340, srv1076582671=16, srv693869315=330, srv1079048717=17, srv440657532=270, srv1636659280=115, srv2108739257=220, srv668373413=326, srv1003610393=2, srv1054229197=11, srv1868589627=172, srv2103522371=217, srv1000546271=0, srv951670617=380, srv2042909593=205, srv1865656038=171, srv1466355012=78, srv703662406=332, srv1418112884=70, srv1215580291=40, srv71833528=335, srv1580581635=103, srv1021032212=5, srv1080806312=19, srv1985601859=197, srv74471954=343, srv1647472319=119, srv2071553346=208, srv1632855171=112, srv1122009370=27, srv13613992=61, srv1630777154=111, srv301413669=239, srv550697728=288, srv1296023857=53, srv1724550977=133, srv1989290370=198, srv1926417985=185, srv1678097199=125, srv1461034373=76, srv614690415=311, srv2098345381=215, srv310463473=243, srv1011934105=4, srv148627129=84, srv305489318=240, srv1256534903=46, srv1289731445=52, srv1798844587=157, srv567113085=294, srv1119222501=26, srv2055117940=207, srv855898852=362, srv629224816=316, srv1075943554=15, srv625909061=315, srv1705591942=128, srv734225580=339, srv660107924=324, srv1381729938=62, srv1633483173=113, srv408265476=267, srv1776057793=148, srv1360253411=60, srv1511424834=90, srv1414162621=68, srv883343663=370, srv151859222=91, srv349144930=251, srv1991304034=199, srv1825887791=164, srv601657063=305, srv758932951=345, srv1651629087=120, srv1864623584=170, srv682957691=329, srv1500454146=88, srv1725962085=135, srv1659841448=121, srv1253206004=45, srv52354442=284, srv18508093=168, srv1427731921=73, srv561344974=293, srv721668125=336, srv1575482138=100, srv914128771=373, srv961487230=383, srv741332941=342, srv533032466=286, srv1574140987=99, srv2139849097=224, srv503902262=278, srv674807007=327, srv1786829855=153, srv2088727517=213, srv394366966=264, srv980089565=388, srv114594288=31, srv38296437=261, srv214835574=226, srv1887224977=176, srv1025509362=7, srv1577020334=102, srv524466665=285, srv393561021=263, srv759909927=346, srv763556514=347, srv786453030=349, srv2142935488=225, srv618111613=312, srv16254163=108, srv343211061=250, srv476075173=273, srv1269632212=47, srv333589612=246, srv499015361=276, srv836674186=357, srv1799191687=158, srv1446998035=74, srv1571774199=98, srv1115354947=25, srv333860881=247, srv1724152600=132, srv1598699299=106, srv177885829=151, srv472125887=272, srv1101339966=22, srv1424985362=72, srv1945569895=188, srv594128294=300, srv1026739237=8, srv842459828=358, srv878519137=366, srv1921260729=181, srv339110834=249, srv504099471=279, srv814253179=354, srv1643744885=116, srv1793847521=155, srv607234624=309, srv698219051=331, srv1688538732=127, srv666240078=325, srv1079284733=18, srv29210550=236, srv506181748=280, srv881313122=368, srv1945452576=187, srv597307897=303, srv1285120424=51, srv1887943816=177, srv1983604698=196, srv1805465940=161, srv309309336=242, srv1719756294=131, srv1349932676=58, srv1208486369=38, srv1643971570=117, srv1509331489=89, srv334105385=248, srv1400515744=65, srv369984715=259, srv43712162=269, srv842675864=359, srv1803258748=160, srv1022450918=6, srv1775108732=147, srv1766088250=141, srv180150732=159, srv1220857227=41, srv226530501=229, srv362032108=255, srv919715380=377, srv1074935976=14, srv1395030819=63, srv803291569=352, srv1877966766=175, srv220538712=227, srv2021718843=203, srv2107782185=219, srv882216860=369, srv1489137852=86, srv1972328734=193, srv1470759982=79, srv1774824811=146, srv971974774=384, srv1418242791=71, srv1001274196=1, srv909615097=372, srv1537724566=93, srv1165799954=34, srv1724754364=134, srv978173525=387, srv113319438=29, srv578033735=295, srv147931272=80, srv1183635941=35, srv1904215245=178, srv596349756=302, srv880835255=367, srv857544550=364, srv1779729022=152, srv1795612465=156, srv621083045=314, srv917704170=375, srv1351811120=59, srv1316710897=54, srv789820555=350, srv1922580095=183, srv305567304=241, srv1936745425=186, srv1745318024=138, srv1210822057=39, srv645375717=320, srv950628389=379, srv1490199189=87, srv1575919256=101, srv154481102=96, srv359402967=254, srv997716931=391, srv1457224273=75, srv581644449=297, srv1872374768=174, srv363177310=257, srv740327512=341, srv1664227236=123, srv972330517=385, srv1634261306=114, srv1662183707=122, srv1969046891=191, srv1485266211=82, srv1778842262=150, srv588410181=298, srv1921840985=182, srv591279493=299, srv37574565=260, srv1104147458=23, srv1190166330=36, srv652270371=322, srv1484309042=81, srv1560148463=97, srv618569548=313, srv2102708311=216, srv1084873074=20, srv517669556=283, srv918152084=376, srv649714317=321, srv1674484790=124, srv1339239880=56, srv1461073271=77, srv1125312901=28, srv25633292=234, srv516616923=282, srv299721745=238, srv604932433=308, srv1273702855=48, srv792183929=351, srv1042608200=10, srv1276335106=49, srv1486044644=83, srv676101698=328, srv998930892=392, srv200111276=200, srv1863083643=169, srv1737443479=137, srv872997185=365, srv821351126=355, srv852115805=360, srv1074355423=13, srv170952194=130, srv503430005=277, srv153887567=94, srv1415163001=69, srv1032737435=9, srv1840670515=167, srv1961921083=189, srv59745831=304, srv36715747=258, srv431547280=268, srv1524853580=92, srv1870059418=173, srv396010771=265, srv594457792=301, srv1755339428=140, srv1766275429=142, srv5565786=291, srv603898526=306, srv544570223=287, srv856030669=363, srv1542523468=95, srv915785747=374, srv356122213=253, srv1411875499=67, srv2077620970=209, srv1345529444=57, srv232339963=230, srv1250861076=44, srv1914875423=179, srv478619481=274, srv1202435626=37, srv1706089454=129, srv1810631201=163, srv1282644061=50, srv1625945288=109, srv733251129=338, srv2082830831=212, srv1612103540=107, srv612136291=310, srv1790004142=154, srv183394703=165} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:28,128 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:28,128 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:28,128 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:28,128 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:28,128 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:28,128 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:28,128 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-11 14:16:28,128 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-11 14:16:28,128 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-11 14:16:28,128 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-11 14:16:28,128 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 10 is on host 10
2023-07-11 14:16:28,129 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 11 is on host 11
2023-07-11 14:16:28,129 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 12 is on host 12
2023-07-11 14:16:28,129 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 13 is on host 13
2023-07-11 14:16:28,129 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 14 is on host 14
2023-07-11 14:16:28,129 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 15 is on host 15
2023-07-11 14:16:28,129 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 16 is on host 16
2023-07-11 14:16:28,129 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 17 is on host 17
2023-07-11 14:16:28,129 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 18 is on host 18
2023-07-11 14:16:28,129 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 19 is on host 19
2023-07-11 14:16:28,129 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 20 is on host 20
2023-07-11 14:16:28,129 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 21 is on host 21
2023-07-11 14:16:28,129 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 22 is on host 22
2023-07-11 14:16:28,129 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 23 is on host 23
2023-07-11 14:16:28,129 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 24 is on host 24
2023-07-11 14:16:28,129 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 25 is on host 25
2023-07-11 14:16:28,129 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 26 is on host 26
2023-07-11 14:16:28,129 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 27 is on host 27
2023-07-11 14:16:28,129 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 28 is on host 28
2023-07-11 14:16:28,129 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 29 is on host 29
2023-07-11 14:16:28,129 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 30 is on host 30
2023-07-11 14:16:28,129 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 31 is on host 31
2023-07-11 14:16:28,129 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 32 is on host 32
2023-07-11 14:16:28,129 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 33 is on host 33
2023-07-11 14:16:28,129 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 34 is on host 34
2023-07-11 14:16:28,129 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 35 is on host 35
2023-07-11 14:16:28,129 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 36 is on host 36
2023-07-11 14:16:28,129 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 37 is on host 37
2023-07-11 14:16:28,129 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 38 is on host 38
2023-07-11 14:16:28,129 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 39 is on host 39
2023-07-11 14:16:28,130 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 40 is on host 40
2023-07-11 14:16:28,130 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 41 is on host 41
2023-07-11 14:16:28,130 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 42 is on host 42
2023-07-11 14:16:28,130 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 43 is on host 43
2023-07-11 14:16:28,130 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 44 is on host 44
2023-07-11 14:16:28,130 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 45 is on host 45
2023-07-11 14:16:28,130 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 46 is on host 46
2023-07-11 14:16:28,130 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 47 is on host 47
2023-07-11 14:16:28,130 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 48 is on host 48
2023-07-11 14:16:28,130 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 49 is on host 49
2023-07-11 14:16:28,130 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 50 is on host 50
2023-07-11 14:16:28,130 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 51 is on host 51
2023-07-11 14:16:28,130 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 52 is on host 52
2023-07-11 14:16:28,130 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 53 is on host 53
2023-07-11 14:16:28,130 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 54 is on host 54
2023-07-11 14:16:28,130 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 55 is on host 55
2023-07-11 14:16:28,130 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 56 is on host 56
2023-07-11 14:16:28,130 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 57 is on host 57
2023-07-11 14:16:28,130 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 58 is on host 58
2023-07-11 14:16:28,130 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 59 is on host 59
2023-07-11 14:16:28,130 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 60 is on host 60
2023-07-11 14:16:28,130 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 61 is on host 61
2023-07-11 14:16:28,130 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 62 is on host 62
2023-07-11 14:16:28,130 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 63 is on host 63
2023-07-11 14:16:28,131 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 64 is on host 64
2023-07-11 14:16:28,131 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 65 is on host 65
2023-07-11 14:16:28,131 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 66 is on host 66
2023-07-11 14:16:28,131 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 67 is on host 67
2023-07-11 14:16:28,131 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 68 is on host 68
2023-07-11 14:16:28,131 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 69 is on host 69
2023-07-11 14:16:28,131 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 70 is on host 70
2023-07-11 14:16:28,131 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 71 is on host 71
2023-07-11 14:16:28,131 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 72 is on host 72
2023-07-11 14:16:28,131 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 73 is on host 73
2023-07-11 14:16:28,131 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 74 is on host 74
2023-07-11 14:16:28,131 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 75 is on host 75
2023-07-11 14:16:28,131 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 76 is on host 76
2023-07-11 14:16:28,131 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 77 is on host 77
2023-07-11 14:16:28,131 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 78 is on host 78
2023-07-11 14:16:28,131 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 79 is on host 79
2023-07-11 14:16:28,131 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 80 is on host 80
2023-07-11 14:16:28,131 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 81 is on host 81
2023-07-11 14:16:28,131 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 82 is on host 82
2023-07-11 14:16:28,131 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 83 is on host 83
2023-07-11 14:16:28,131 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 84 is on host 84
2023-07-11 14:16:28,131 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 85 is on host 85
2023-07-11 14:16:28,131 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 86 is on host 86
2023-07-11 14:16:28,131 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 87 is on host 87
2023-07-11 14:16:28,131 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 88 is on host 88
2023-07-11 14:16:28,132 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 89 is on host 89
2023-07-11 14:16:28,132 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 90 is on host 90
2023-07-11 14:16:28,132 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 91 is on host 91
2023-07-11 14:16:28,132 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 92 is on host 92
2023-07-11 14:16:28,132 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 93 is on host 93
2023-07-11 14:16:28,132 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 94 is on host 94
2023-07-11 14:16:28,132 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 95 is on host 95
2023-07-11 14:16:28,132 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 96 is on host 96
2023-07-11 14:16:28,132 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 97 is on host 97
2023-07-11 14:16:28,132 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 98 is on host 98
2023-07-11 14:16:28,132 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 99 is on host 99
2023-07-11 14:16:28,132 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 100 is on host 100
2023-07-11 14:16:28,132 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 101 is on host 101
2023-07-11 14:16:28,132 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 102 is on host 102
2023-07-11 14:16:28,132 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 103 is on host 103
2023-07-11 14:16:28,132 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 104 is on host 104
2023-07-11 14:16:28,132 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 105 is on host 105
2023-07-11 14:16:28,132 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 106 is on host 106
2023-07-11 14:16:28,132 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 107 is on host 107
2023-07-11 14:16:28,132 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 108 is on host 108
2023-07-11 14:16:28,132 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 109 is on host 109
2023-07-11 14:16:28,132 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 110 is on host 110
2023-07-11 14:16:28,132 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 111 is on host 111
2023-07-11 14:16:28,132 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 112 is on host 112
2023-07-11 14:16:28,132 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 113 is on host 113
2023-07-11 14:16:28,132 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 114 is on host 114
2023-07-11 14:16:28,132 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 115 is on host 115
2023-07-11 14:16:28,132 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 116 is on host 116
2023-07-11 14:16:28,132 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 117 is on host 117
2023-07-11 14:16:28,133 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 118 is on host 118
2023-07-11 14:16:28,133 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 119 is on host 119
2023-07-11 14:16:28,133 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 120 is on host 120
2023-07-11 14:16:28,133 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 121 is on host 121
2023-07-11 14:16:28,133 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 122 is on host 122
2023-07-11 14:16:28,133 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 123 is on host 123
2023-07-11 14:16:28,133 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 124 is on host 124
2023-07-11 14:16:28,133 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 125 is on host 125
2023-07-11 14:16:28,133 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 126 is on host 126
2023-07-11 14:16:28,133 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 127 is on host 127
2023-07-11 14:16:28,133 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 128 is on host 128
2023-07-11 14:16:28,133 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 129 is on host 129
2023-07-11 14:16:28,133 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 130 is on host 130
2023-07-11 14:16:28,133 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 131 is on host 131
2023-07-11 14:16:28,133 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 132 is on host 132
2023-07-11 14:16:28,133 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 133 is on host 133
2023-07-11 14:16:28,133 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 134 is on host 134
2023-07-11 14:16:28,133 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 135 is on host 135
2023-07-11 14:16:28,133 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 136 is on host 136
2023-07-11 14:16:28,133 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 137 is on host 137
2023-07-11 14:16:28,133 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 138 is on host 138
2023-07-11 14:16:28,133 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 139 is on host 139
2023-07-11 14:16:28,133 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 140 is on host 140
2023-07-11 14:16:28,133 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 141 is on host 141
2023-07-11 14:16:28,133 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 142 is on host 142
2023-07-11 14:16:28,133 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 143 is on host 143
2023-07-11 14:16:28,133 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 144 is on host 144
2023-07-11 14:16:28,133 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 145 is on host 145
2023-07-11 14:16:28,133 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 146 is on host 146
2023-07-11 14:16:28,134 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 147 is on host 147
2023-07-11 14:16:28,134 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 148 is on host 148
2023-07-11 14:16:28,134 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 149 is on host 149
2023-07-11 14:16:28,134 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 150 is on host 150
2023-07-11 14:16:28,134 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 151 is on host 151
2023-07-11 14:16:28,134 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 152 is on host 152
2023-07-11 14:16:28,134 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 153 is on host 153
2023-07-11 14:16:28,134 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 154 is on host 154
2023-07-11 14:16:28,134 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 155 is on host 155
2023-07-11 14:16:28,134 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 156 is on host 156
2023-07-11 14:16:28,134 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 157 is on host 157
2023-07-11 14:16:28,134 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 158 is on host 158
2023-07-11 14:16:28,134 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 159 is on host 159
2023-07-11 14:16:28,134 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 160 is on host 160
2023-07-11 14:16:28,134 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 161 is on host 161
2023-07-11 14:16:28,134 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 162 is on host 162
2023-07-11 14:16:28,134 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 163 is on host 163
2023-07-11 14:16:28,134 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 164 is on host 164
2023-07-11 14:16:28,134 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 165 is on host 165
2023-07-11 14:16:28,134 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 166 is on host 166
2023-07-11 14:16:28,134 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 167 is on host 167
2023-07-11 14:16:28,134 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 168 is on host 168
2023-07-11 14:16:28,134 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 169 is on host 169
2023-07-11 14:16:28,134 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 170 is on host 170
2023-07-11 14:16:28,134 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 171 is on host 171
2023-07-11 14:16:28,134 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 172 is on host 172
2023-07-11 14:16:28,134 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 173 is on host 173
2023-07-11 14:16:28,134 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 174 is on host 174
2023-07-11 14:16:28,134 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 175 is on host 175
2023-07-11 14:16:28,135 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 176 is on host 176
2023-07-11 14:16:28,135 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 177 is on host 177
2023-07-11 14:16:28,135 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 178 is on host 178
2023-07-11 14:16:28,135 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 179 is on host 179
2023-07-11 14:16:28,135 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 180 is on host 180
2023-07-11 14:16:28,135 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 181 is on host 181
2023-07-11 14:16:28,135 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 182 is on host 182
2023-07-11 14:16:28,135 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 183 is on host 183
2023-07-11 14:16:28,135 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 184 is on host 184
2023-07-11 14:16:28,135 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 185 is on host 185
2023-07-11 14:16:28,135 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 186 is on host 186
2023-07-11 14:16:28,135 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 187 is on host 187
2023-07-11 14:16:28,135 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 188 is on host 188
2023-07-11 14:16:28,135 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 189 is on host 189
2023-07-11 14:16:28,135 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 190 is on host 190
2023-07-11 14:16:28,135 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 191 is on host 191
2023-07-11 14:16:28,135 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 192 is on host 192
2023-07-11 14:16:28,135 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 193 is on host 193
2023-07-11 14:16:28,135 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 194 is on host 194
2023-07-11 14:16:28,135 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 195 is on host 195
2023-07-11 14:16:28,135 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 196 is on host 196
2023-07-11 14:16:28,135 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 197 is on host 197
2023-07-11 14:16:28,135 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 198 is on host 198
2023-07-11 14:16:28,135 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 199 is on host 199
2023-07-11 14:16:28,135 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 200 is on host 200
2023-07-11 14:16:28,135 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 201 is on host 201
2023-07-11 14:16:28,135 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 202 is on host 202
2023-07-11 14:16:28,135 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 203 is on host 203
2023-07-11 14:16:28,135 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 204 is on host 204
2023-07-11 14:16:28,136 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 205 is on host 205
2023-07-11 14:16:28,136 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 206 is on host 206
2023-07-11 14:16:28,136 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 207 is on host 207
2023-07-11 14:16:28,136 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 208 is on host 208
2023-07-11 14:16:28,136 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 209 is on host 209
2023-07-11 14:16:28,136 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 210 is on host 210
2023-07-11 14:16:28,136 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 211 is on host 211
2023-07-11 14:16:28,136 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 212 is on host 212
2023-07-11 14:16:28,136 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 213 is on host 213
2023-07-11 14:16:28,136 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 214 is on host 214
2023-07-11 14:16:28,136 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 215 is on host 215
2023-07-11 14:16:28,136 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 216 is on host 216
2023-07-11 14:16:28,136 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 217 is on host 217
2023-07-11 14:16:28,136 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 218 is on host 218
2023-07-11 14:16:28,136 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 219 is on host 219
2023-07-11 14:16:28,136 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 220 is on host 220
2023-07-11 14:16:28,136 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 221 is on host 221
2023-07-11 14:16:28,136 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 222 is on host 222
2023-07-11 14:16:28,136 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 223 is on host 223
2023-07-11 14:16:28,136 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 224 is on host 224
2023-07-11 14:16:28,136 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 225 is on host 225
2023-07-11 14:16:28,136 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 226 is on host 226
2023-07-11 14:16:28,136 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 227 is on host 227
2023-07-11 14:16:28,136 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 228 is on host 228
2023-07-11 14:16:28,136 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 229 is on host 229
2023-07-11 14:16:28,136 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 230 is on host 230
2023-07-11 14:16:28,136 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 231 is on host 231
2023-07-11 14:16:28,136 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 232 is on host 232
2023-07-11 14:16:28,136 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 233 is on host 233
2023-07-11 14:16:28,137 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 234 is on host 234
2023-07-11 14:16:28,137 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 235 is on host 235
2023-07-11 14:16:28,137 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 236 is on host 236
2023-07-11 14:16:28,137 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 237 is on host 237
2023-07-11 14:16:28,137 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 238 is on host 238
2023-07-11 14:16:28,137 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 239 is on host 239
2023-07-11 14:16:28,137 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 240 is on host 240
2023-07-11 14:16:28,137 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 241 is on host 241
2023-07-11 14:16:28,137 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 242 is on host 242
2023-07-11 14:16:28,137 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 243 is on host 243
2023-07-11 14:16:28,137 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 244 is on host 244
2023-07-11 14:16:28,137 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 245 is on host 245
2023-07-11 14:16:28,137 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 246 is on host 246
2023-07-11 14:16:28,137 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 247 is on host 247
2023-07-11 14:16:28,137 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 248 is on host 248
2023-07-11 14:16:28,137 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 249 is on host 249
2023-07-11 14:16:28,137 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 250 is on host 250
2023-07-11 14:16:28,137 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 251 is on host 251
2023-07-11 14:16:28,137 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 252 is on host 252
2023-07-11 14:16:28,137 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 253 is on host 253
2023-07-11 14:16:28,137 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 254 is on host 254
2023-07-11 14:16:28,137 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 255 is on host 255
2023-07-11 14:16:28,137 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 256 is on host 256
2023-07-11 14:16:28,137 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 257 is on host 257
2023-07-11 14:16:28,137 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 258 is on host 258
2023-07-11 14:16:28,137 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 259 is on host 259
2023-07-11 14:16:28,137 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 260 is on host 260
2023-07-11 14:16:28,137 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 261 is on host 261
2023-07-11 14:16:28,137 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 262 is on host 262
2023-07-11 14:16:28,138 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 263 is on host 263
2023-07-11 14:16:28,138 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 264 is on host 264
2023-07-11 14:16:28,138 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 265 is on host 265
2023-07-11 14:16:28,138 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 266 is on host 266
2023-07-11 14:16:28,138 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 267 is on host 267
2023-07-11 14:16:28,138 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 268 is on host 268
2023-07-11 14:16:28,138 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 269 is on host 269
2023-07-11 14:16:28,138 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 270 is on host 270
2023-07-11 14:16:28,138 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 271 is on host 271
2023-07-11 14:16:28,138 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 272 is on host 272
2023-07-11 14:16:28,138 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 273 is on host 273
2023-07-11 14:16:28,138 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 274 is on host 274
2023-07-11 14:16:28,138 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 275 is on host 275
2023-07-11 14:16:28,138 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 276 is on host 276
2023-07-11 14:16:28,138 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 277 is on host 277
2023-07-11 14:16:28,138 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 278 is on host 278
2023-07-11 14:16:28,138 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 279 is on host 279
2023-07-11 14:16:28,138 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 280 is on host 280
2023-07-11 14:16:28,138 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 281 is on host 281
2023-07-11 14:16:28,138 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 282 is on host 282
2023-07-11 14:16:28,138 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 283 is on host 283
2023-07-11 14:16:28,138 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 284 is on host 284
2023-07-11 14:16:28,138 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 285 is on host 285
2023-07-11 14:16:28,138 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 286 is on host 286
2023-07-11 14:16:28,138 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 287 is on host 287
2023-07-11 14:16:28,138 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 288 is on host 288
2023-07-11 14:16:28,138 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 289 is on host 289
2023-07-11 14:16:28,138 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 290 is on host 290
2023-07-11 14:16:28,138 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 291 is on host 291
2023-07-11 14:16:28,139 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 292 is on host 292
2023-07-11 14:16:28,139 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 293 is on host 293
2023-07-11 14:16:28,139 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 294 is on host 294
2023-07-11 14:16:28,139 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 295 is on host 295
2023-07-11 14:16:28,139 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 296 is on host 296
2023-07-11 14:16:28,139 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 297 is on host 297
2023-07-11 14:16:28,139 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 298 is on host 298
2023-07-11 14:16:28,139 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 299 is on host 299
2023-07-11 14:16:28,139 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 300 is on host 300
2023-07-11 14:16:28,139 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 301 is on host 301
2023-07-11 14:16:28,139 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 302 is on host 302
2023-07-11 14:16:28,139 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 303 is on host 303
2023-07-11 14:16:28,139 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 304 is on host 304
2023-07-11 14:16:28,139 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 305 is on host 305
2023-07-11 14:16:28,139 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 306 is on host 306
2023-07-11 14:16:28,139 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 307 is on host 307
2023-07-11 14:16:28,139 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 308 is on host 308
2023-07-11 14:16:28,139 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 309 is on host 309
2023-07-11 14:16:28,139 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 310 is on host 310
2023-07-11 14:16:28,139 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 311 is on host 311
2023-07-11 14:16:28,139 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 312 is on host 312
2023-07-11 14:16:28,139 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 313 is on host 313
2023-07-11 14:16:28,139 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 314 is on host 314
2023-07-11 14:16:28,139 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 315 is on host 315
2023-07-11 14:16:28,139 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 316 is on host 316
2023-07-11 14:16:28,139 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 317 is on host 317
2023-07-11 14:16:28,139 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 318 is on host 318
2023-07-11 14:16:28,139 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 319 is on host 319
2023-07-11 14:16:28,139 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 320 is on host 320
2023-07-11 14:16:28,139 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 321 is on host 321
2023-07-11 14:16:28,140 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 322 is on host 322
2023-07-11 14:16:28,140 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 323 is on host 323
2023-07-11 14:16:28,140 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 324 is on host 324
2023-07-11 14:16:28,140 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 325 is on host 325
2023-07-11 14:16:28,140 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 326 is on host 326
2023-07-11 14:16:28,140 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 327 is on host 327
2023-07-11 14:16:28,140 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 328 is on host 328
2023-07-11 14:16:28,140 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 329 is on host 329
2023-07-11 14:16:28,140 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 330 is on host 330
2023-07-11 14:16:28,140 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 331 is on host 331
2023-07-11 14:16:28,140 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 332 is on host 332
2023-07-11 14:16:28,140 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 333 is on host 333
2023-07-11 14:16:28,140 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 334 is on host 334
2023-07-11 14:16:28,140 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 335 is on host 335
2023-07-11 14:16:28,140 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 336 is on host 336
2023-07-11 14:16:28,140 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 337 is on host 337
2023-07-11 14:16:28,140 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 338 is on host 338
2023-07-11 14:16:28,140 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 339 is on host 339
2023-07-11 14:16:28,140 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 340 is on host 340
2023-07-11 14:16:28,140 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 341 is on host 341
2023-07-11 14:16:28,140 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 342 is on host 342
2023-07-11 14:16:28,140 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 343 is on host 343
2023-07-11 14:16:28,140 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 344 is on host 344
2023-07-11 14:16:28,140 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 345 is on host 345
2023-07-11 14:16:28,140 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 346 is on host 346
2023-07-11 14:16:28,140 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 347 is on host 347
2023-07-11 14:16:28,140 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 348 is on host 348
2023-07-11 14:16:28,140 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 349 is on host 349
2023-07-11 14:16:28,140 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 350 is on host 350
2023-07-11 14:16:28,141 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 351 is on host 351
2023-07-11 14:16:28,141 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 352 is on host 352
2023-07-11 14:16:28,141 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 353 is on host 353
2023-07-11 14:16:28,141 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 354 is on host 354
2023-07-11 14:16:28,141 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 355 is on host 355
2023-07-11 14:16:28,141 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 356 is on host 356
2023-07-11 14:16:28,141 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 357 is on host 357
2023-07-11 14:16:28,141 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 358 is on host 358
2023-07-11 14:16:28,141 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 359 is on host 359
2023-07-11 14:16:28,141 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 360 is on host 360
2023-07-11 14:16:28,141 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 361 is on host 361
2023-07-11 14:16:28,141 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 362 is on host 362
2023-07-11 14:16:28,141 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 363 is on host 363
2023-07-11 14:16:28,141 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 364 is on host 364
2023-07-11 14:16:28,141 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 365 is on host 365
2023-07-11 14:16:28,141 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 366 is on host 366
2023-07-11 14:16:28,141 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 367 is on host 367
2023-07-11 14:16:28,141 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 368 is on host 368
2023-07-11 14:16:28,141 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 369 is on host 369
2023-07-11 14:16:28,141 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 370 is on host 370
2023-07-11 14:16:28,141 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 371 is on host 371
2023-07-11 14:16:28,141 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 372 is on host 372
2023-07-11 14:16:28,141 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 373 is on host 373
2023-07-11 14:16:28,141 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 374 is on host 374
2023-07-11 14:16:28,141 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 375 is on host 375
2023-07-11 14:16:28,141 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 376 is on host 376
2023-07-11 14:16:28,141 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 377 is on host 377
2023-07-11 14:16:28,141 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 378 is on host 378
2023-07-11 14:16:28,142 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 379 is on host 379
2023-07-11 14:16:28,142 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 380 is on host 380
2023-07-11 14:16:28,142 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 381 is on host 381
2023-07-11 14:16:28,142 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 382 is on host 382
2023-07-11 14:16:28,142 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 383 is on host 383
2023-07-11 14:16:28,142 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 384 is on host 384
2023-07-11 14:16:28,142 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 385 is on host 385
2023-07-11 14:16:28,142 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 386 is on host 386
2023-07-11 14:16:28,142 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 387 is on host 387
2023-07-11 14:16:28,142 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 388 is on host 388
2023-07-11 14:16:28,142 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 389 is on host 389
2023-07-11 14:16:28,142 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 390 is on host 390
2023-07-11 14:16:28,142 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 391 is on host 391
2023-07-11 14:16:28,142 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 392 is on host 392
2023-07-11 14:16:28,142 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=393, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:28,142 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table26) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:28,142 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table27
2023-07-11 14:16:28,143 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv553536953=290, srv1630071126=110, srv1071894870=12, srv23511728=232, srv658346947=323, srv2025338799=204, srv1397994335=64, srv1976766403=195, srv1644629726=118, srv957637734=381, srv2079182457=210, srv1749264468=139, srv2046129126=206, srv1595762596=104, srv603990852=307, srv1973073480=194, srv958856137=382, srv644066832=319, srv557062842=292, srv277765671=235, srv732221418=337, srv1769385567=143, srv224612199=228, srv714752528=334, srv362526040=256, srv581128949=296, srv2133511466=223, srv1144239257=30, srv320603627=245, srv1679952521=126, srv2122867873=222, srv1110067064=24, srv256251994=233, srv63261708=317, srv89837390=371, srv552104598=289, srv508952995=281, srv2096011353=214, srv1770417148=144, srv1246723478=42, srv929436444=378, srv2082192429=211, srv234917297=231, srv405700573=266, srv183644386=166, srv1488378513=85, srv173139715=136, srv1154180352=32, srv355693379=252, srv1407521654=66, srv496848057=275, srv1157975499=33, srv1806731027=162, srv1923102804=184, srv311102455=244, srv450011410=271, srv771515724=348, srv389183508=262, srv1249074416=43, srv2014575201=201, srv640847108=318, srv832363565=356, srv1970882134=192, srv2107358603=218, srv855766065=361, srv1336043388=55, srv29397186=237, srv982792848=390, srv976560524=386, srv101181760=3, srv1093549482=21, srv2018389395=202, srv2113483104=221, srv1778339118=149, srv1968709692=190, srv705221118=333, srv159600090=105, srv1919608486=180, srv981255102=389, srv807899713=353, srv755110395=344, srv1770594519=145, srv739692705=340, srv1076582671=16, srv693869315=330, srv1079048717=17, srv440657532=270, srv1636659280=115, srv2108739257=220, srv668373413=326, srv1003610393=2, srv1054229197=11, srv1868589627=172, srv2103522371=217, srv1000546271=0, srv951670617=380, srv2042909593=205, srv1865656038=171, srv1466355012=78, srv703662406=332, srv1418112884=70, srv1215580291=40, srv71833528=335, srv1580581635=103, srv1021032212=5, srv1080806312=19, srv1985601859=197, srv74471954=343, srv1647472319=119, srv2071553346=208, srv1632855171=112, srv1122009370=27, srv13613992=61, srv1630777154=111, srv301413669=239, srv550697728=288, srv1296023857=53, srv1724550977=133, srv1989290370=198, srv1926417985=185, srv1678097199=125, srv1461034373=76, srv614690415=311, srv2098345381=215, srv310463473=243, srv1011934105=4, srv148627129=84, srv305489318=240, srv1256534903=46, srv1289731445=52, srv1798844587=157, srv567113085=294, srv1119222501=26, srv2055117940=207, srv855898852=362, srv629224816=316, srv1075943554=15, srv625909061=315, srv1705591942=128, srv734225580=339, srv660107924=324, srv1381729938=62, srv1633483173=113, srv408265476=267, srv1776057793=148, srv1360253411=60, srv1511424834=90, srv1414162621=68, srv883343663=370, srv151859222=91, srv349144930=251, srv1991304034=199, srv1825887791=164, srv601657063=305, srv758932951=345, srv1651629087=120, srv1864623584=170, srv682957691=329, srv1500454146=88, srv1725962085=135, srv1659841448=121, srv1253206004=45, srv52354442=284, srv18508093=168, srv1427731921=73, srv561344974=293, srv721668125=336, srv1575482138=100, srv914128771=373, srv961487230=383, srv741332941=342, srv533032466=286, srv1574140987=99, srv2139849097=224, srv503902262=278, srv674807007=327, srv1786829855=153, srv2088727517=213, srv394366966=264, srv980089565=388, srv114594288=31, srv38296437=261, srv214835574=226, srv1887224977=176, srv1025509362=7, srv1577020334=102, srv524466665=285, srv393561021=263, srv759909927=346, srv763556514=347, srv786453030=349, srv2142935488=225, srv618111613=312, srv16254163=108, srv343211061=250, srv476075173=273, srv1269632212=47, srv333589612=246, srv499015361=276, srv836674186=357, srv1799191687=158, srv1446998035=74, srv1571774199=98, srv1115354947=25, srv333860881=247, srv1724152600=132, srv1598699299=106, srv177885829=151, srv472125887=272, srv1101339966=22, srv1424985362=72, srv1945569895=188, srv594128294=300, srv1026739237=8, srv842459828=358, srv878519137=366, srv1921260729=181, srv339110834=249, srv504099471=279, srv814253179=354, srv1643744885=116, srv1793847521=155, srv607234624=309, srv698219051=331, srv1688538732=127, srv666240078=325, srv1079284733=18, srv29210550=236, srv506181748=280, srv881313122=368, srv1945452576=187, srv597307897=303, srv1285120424=51, srv1887943816=177, srv1983604698=196, srv1805465940=161, srv309309336=242, srv1719756294=131, srv1349932676=58, srv1208486369=38, srv1643971570=117, srv1509331489=89, srv334105385=248, srv1400515744=65, srv369984715=259, srv43712162=269, srv842675864=359, srv1803258748=160, srv1022450918=6, srv1775108732=147, srv1766088250=141, srv180150732=159, srv1220857227=41, srv226530501=229, srv362032108=255, srv919715380=377, srv1074935976=14, srv1395030819=63, srv803291569=352, srv1877966766=175, srv220538712=227, srv2021718843=203, srv2107782185=219, srv882216860=369, srv1489137852=86, srv1972328734=193, srv1470759982=79, srv1774824811=146, srv971974774=384, srv1418242791=71, srv1001274196=1, srv909615097=372, srv1537724566=93, srv1165799954=34, srv1724754364=134, srv978173525=387, srv113319438=29, srv578033735=295, srv147931272=80, srv1183635941=35, srv1904215245=178, srv596349756=302, srv880835255=367, srv857544550=364, srv1779729022=152, srv1795612465=156, srv621083045=314, srv917704170=375, srv1351811120=59, srv1316710897=54, srv789820555=350, srv1922580095=183, srv305567304=241, srv1936745425=186, srv1745318024=138, srv1210822057=39, srv645375717=320, srv950628389=379, srv1490199189=87, srv1575919256=101, srv154481102=96, srv359402967=254, srv997716931=391, srv1457224273=75, srv581644449=297, srv1872374768=174, srv363177310=257, srv740327512=341, srv1664227236=123, srv972330517=385, srv1634261306=114, srv1662183707=122, srv1969046891=191, srv1485266211=82, srv1778842262=150, srv588410181=298, srv1921840985=182, srv591279493=299, srv37574565=260, srv1104147458=23, srv1190166330=36, srv652270371=322, srv1484309042=81, srv1560148463=97, srv618569548=313, srv2102708311=216, srv1084873074=20, srv517669556=283, srv918152084=376, srv649714317=321, srv1674484790=124, srv1339239880=56, srv1461073271=77, srv1125312901=28, srv25633292=234, srv516616923=282, srv299721745=238, srv604932433=308, srv1273702855=48, srv792183929=351, srv1042608200=10, srv1276335106=49, srv1486044644=83, srv676101698=328, srv998930892=392, srv200111276=200, srv1863083643=169, srv1737443479=137, srv872997185=365, srv821351126=355, srv852115805=360, srv1074355423=13, srv170952194=130, srv503430005=277, srv153887567=94, srv1415163001=69, srv1032737435=9, srv1840670515=167, srv1961921083=189, srv59745831=304, srv36715747=258, srv431547280=268, srv1524853580=92, srv1870059418=173, srv396010771=265, srv594457792=301, srv1755339428=140, srv1766275429=142, srv5565786=291, srv603898526=306, srv544570223=287, srv856030669=363, srv1542523468=95, srv915785747=374, srv356122213=253, srv1411875499=67, srv2077620970=209, srv1345529444=57, srv232339963=230, srv1250861076=44, srv1914875423=179, srv478619481=274, srv1202435626=37, srv1706089454=129, srv1810631201=163, srv1282644061=50, srv1625945288=109, srv733251129=338, srv2082830831=212, srv1612103540=107, srv612136291=310, srv1790004142=154, srv183394703=165} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:28,143 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:28,143 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:28,143 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:28,143 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:28,143 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:28,144 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:28,144 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-11 14:16:28,144 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-11 14:16:28,144 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-11 14:16:28,144 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-11 14:16:28,144 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 10 is on host 10
2023-07-11 14:16:28,144 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 11 is on host 11
2023-07-11 14:16:28,144 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 12 is on host 12
2023-07-11 14:16:28,144 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 13 is on host 13
2023-07-11 14:16:28,144 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 14 is on host 14
2023-07-11 14:16:28,144 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 15 is on host 15
2023-07-11 14:16:28,144 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 16 is on host 16
2023-07-11 14:16:28,144 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 17 is on host 17
2023-07-11 14:16:28,144 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 18 is on host 18
2023-07-11 14:16:28,144 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 19 is on host 19
2023-07-11 14:16:28,144 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 20 is on host 20
2023-07-11 14:16:28,144 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 21 is on host 21
2023-07-11 14:16:28,144 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 22 is on host 22
2023-07-11 14:16:28,144 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 23 is on host 23
2023-07-11 14:16:28,144 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 24 is on host 24
2023-07-11 14:16:28,144 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 25 is on host 25
2023-07-11 14:16:28,144 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 26 is on host 26
2023-07-11 14:16:28,144 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 27 is on host 27
2023-07-11 14:16:28,144 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 28 is on host 28
2023-07-11 14:16:28,144 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 29 is on host 29
2023-07-11 14:16:28,144 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 30 is on host 30
2023-07-11 14:16:28,144 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 31 is on host 31
2023-07-11 14:16:28,145 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 32 is on host 32
2023-07-11 14:16:28,145 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 33 is on host 33
2023-07-11 14:16:28,145 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 34 is on host 34
2023-07-11 14:16:28,145 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 35 is on host 35
2023-07-11 14:16:28,145 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 36 is on host 36
2023-07-11 14:16:28,145 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 37 is on host 37
2023-07-11 14:16:28,145 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 38 is on host 38
2023-07-11 14:16:28,145 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 39 is on host 39
2023-07-11 14:16:28,145 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 40 is on host 40
2023-07-11 14:16:28,145 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 41 is on host 41
2023-07-11 14:16:28,145 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 42 is on host 42
2023-07-11 14:16:28,145 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 43 is on host 43
2023-07-11 14:16:28,145 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 44 is on host 44
2023-07-11 14:16:28,145 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 45 is on host 45
2023-07-11 14:16:28,145 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 46 is on host 46
2023-07-11 14:16:28,145 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 47 is on host 47
2023-07-11 14:16:28,145 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 48 is on host 48
2023-07-11 14:16:28,145 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 49 is on host 49
2023-07-11 14:16:28,145 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 50 is on host 50
2023-07-11 14:16:28,145 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 51 is on host 51
2023-07-11 14:16:28,145 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 52 is on host 52
2023-07-11 14:16:28,145 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 53 is on host 53
2023-07-11 14:16:28,145 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 54 is on host 54
2023-07-11 14:16:28,145 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 55 is on host 55
2023-07-11 14:16:28,145 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 56 is on host 56
2023-07-11 14:16:28,145 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 57 is on host 57
2023-07-11 14:16:28,145 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 58 is on host 58
2023-07-11 14:16:28,145 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 59 is on host 59
2023-07-11 14:16:28,145 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 60 is on host 60
2023-07-11 14:16:28,146 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 61 is on host 61
2023-07-11 14:16:28,146 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 62 is on host 62
2023-07-11 14:16:28,146 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 63 is on host 63
2023-07-11 14:16:28,146 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 64 is on host 64
2023-07-11 14:16:28,146 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 65 is on host 65
2023-07-11 14:16:28,146 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 66 is on host 66
2023-07-11 14:16:28,146 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 67 is on host 67
2023-07-11 14:16:28,146 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 68 is on host 68
2023-07-11 14:16:28,146 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 69 is on host 69
2023-07-11 14:16:28,146 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 70 is on host 70
2023-07-11 14:16:28,146 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 71 is on host 71
2023-07-11 14:16:28,146 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 72 is on host 72
2023-07-11 14:16:28,146 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 73 is on host 73
2023-07-11 14:16:28,146 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 74 is on host 74
2023-07-11 14:16:28,146 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 75 is on host 75
2023-07-11 14:16:28,146 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 76 is on host 76
2023-07-11 14:16:28,146 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 77 is on host 77
2023-07-11 14:16:28,146 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 78 is on host 78
2023-07-11 14:16:28,146 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 79 is on host 79
2023-07-11 14:16:28,146 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 80 is on host 80
2023-07-11 14:16:28,146 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 81 is on host 81
2023-07-11 14:16:28,146 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 82 is on host 82
2023-07-11 14:16:28,146 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 83 is on host 83
2023-07-11 14:16:28,146 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 84 is on host 84
2023-07-11 14:16:28,146 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 85 is on host 85
2023-07-11 14:16:28,146 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 86 is on host 86
2023-07-11 14:16:28,146 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 87 is on host 87
2023-07-11 14:16:28,146 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 88 is on host 88
2023-07-11 14:16:28,146 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 89 is on host 89
2023-07-11 14:16:28,147 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 90 is on host 90
2023-07-11 14:16:28,147 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 91 is on host 91
2023-07-11 14:16:28,147 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 92 is on host 92
2023-07-11 14:16:28,147 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 93 is on host 93
2023-07-11 14:16:28,147 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 94 is on host 94
2023-07-11 14:16:28,147 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 95 is on host 95
2023-07-11 14:16:28,147 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 96 is on host 96
2023-07-11 14:16:28,147 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 97 is on host 97
2023-07-11 14:16:28,147 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 98 is on host 98
2023-07-11 14:16:28,147 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 99 is on host 99
2023-07-11 14:16:28,147 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 100 is on host 100
2023-07-11 14:16:28,147 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 101 is on host 101
2023-07-11 14:16:28,147 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 102 is on host 102
2023-07-11 14:16:28,147 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 103 is on host 103
2023-07-11 14:16:28,147 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 104 is on host 104
2023-07-11 14:16:28,147 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 105 is on host 105
2023-07-11 14:16:28,147 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 106 is on host 106
2023-07-11 14:16:28,147 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 107 is on host 107
2023-07-11 14:16:28,147 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 108 is on host 108
2023-07-11 14:16:28,147 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 109 is on host 109
2023-07-11 14:16:28,147 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 110 is on host 110
2023-07-11 14:16:28,147 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 111 is on host 111
2023-07-11 14:16:28,147 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 112 is on host 112
2023-07-11 14:16:28,147 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 113 is on host 113
2023-07-11 14:16:28,147 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 114 is on host 114
2023-07-11 14:16:28,147 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 115 is on host 115
2023-07-11 14:16:28,147 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 116 is on host 116
2023-07-11 14:16:28,147 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 117 is on host 117
2023-07-11 14:16:28,147 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 118 is on host 118
2023-07-11 14:16:28,147 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 119 is on host 119
2023-07-11 14:16:28,148 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 120 is on host 120
2023-07-11 14:16:28,148 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 121 is on host 121
2023-07-11 14:16:28,148 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 122 is on host 122
2023-07-11 14:16:28,148 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 123 is on host 123
2023-07-11 14:16:28,148 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 124 is on host 124
2023-07-11 14:16:28,148 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 125 is on host 125
2023-07-11 14:16:28,148 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 126 is on host 126
2023-07-11 14:16:28,148 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 127 is on host 127
2023-07-11 14:16:28,148 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 128 is on host 128
2023-07-11 14:16:28,148 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 129 is on host 129
2023-07-11 14:16:28,148 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 130 is on host 130
2023-07-11 14:16:28,148 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 131 is on host 131
2023-07-11 14:16:28,148 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 132 is on host 132
2023-07-11 14:16:28,148 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 133 is on host 133
2023-07-11 14:16:28,148 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 134 is on host 134
2023-07-11 14:16:28,148 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 135 is on host 135
2023-07-11 14:16:28,148 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 136 is on host 136
2023-07-11 14:16:28,148 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 137 is on host 137
2023-07-11 14:16:28,148 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 138 is on host 138
2023-07-11 14:16:28,148 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 139 is on host 139
2023-07-11 14:16:28,148 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 140 is on host 140
2023-07-11 14:16:28,148 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 141 is on host 141
2023-07-11 14:16:28,148 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 142 is on host 142
2023-07-11 14:16:28,148 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 143 is on host 143
2023-07-11 14:16:28,148 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 144 is on host 144
2023-07-11 14:16:28,148 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 145 is on host 145
2023-07-11 14:16:28,148 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 146 is on host 146
2023-07-11 14:16:28,148 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 147 is on host 147
2023-07-11 14:16:28,148 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 148 is on host 148
2023-07-11 14:16:28,149 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 149 is on host 149
2023-07-11 14:16:28,149 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 150 is on host 150
2023-07-11 14:16:28,149 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 151 is on host 151
2023-07-11 14:16:28,149 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 152 is on host 152
2023-07-11 14:16:28,149 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 153 is on host 153
2023-07-11 14:16:28,149 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 154 is on host 154
2023-07-11 14:16:28,149 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 155 is on host 155
2023-07-11 14:16:28,149 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 156 is on host 156
2023-07-11 14:16:28,149 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 157 is on host 157
2023-07-11 14:16:28,149 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 158 is on host 158
2023-07-11 14:16:28,149 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 159 is on host 159
2023-07-11 14:16:28,149 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 160 is on host 160
2023-07-11 14:16:28,149 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 161 is on host 161
2023-07-11 14:16:28,149 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 162 is on host 162
2023-07-11 14:16:28,149 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 163 is on host 163
2023-07-11 14:16:28,149 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 164 is on host 164
2023-07-11 14:16:28,149 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 165 is on host 165
2023-07-11 14:16:28,149 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 166 is on host 166
2023-07-11 14:16:28,149 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 167 is on host 167
2023-07-11 14:16:28,149 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 168 is on host 168
2023-07-11 14:16:28,149 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 169 is on host 169
2023-07-11 14:16:28,149 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 170 is on host 170
2023-07-11 14:16:28,149 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 171 is on host 171
2023-07-11 14:16:28,149 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 172 is on host 172
2023-07-11 14:16:28,149 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 173 is on host 173
2023-07-11 14:16:28,149 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 174 is on host 174
2023-07-11 14:16:28,149 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 175 is on host 175
2023-07-11 14:16:28,149 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 176 is on host 176
2023-07-11 14:16:28,149 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 177 is on host 177
2023-07-11 14:16:28,150 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 178 is on host 178
2023-07-11 14:16:28,150 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 179 is on host 179
2023-07-11 14:16:28,150 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 180 is on host 180
2023-07-11 14:16:28,150 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 181 is on host 181
2023-07-11 14:16:28,150 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 182 is on host 182
2023-07-11 14:16:28,150 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 183 is on host 183
2023-07-11 14:16:28,150 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 184 is on host 184
2023-07-11 14:16:28,150 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 185 is on host 185
2023-07-11 14:16:28,150 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 186 is on host 186
2023-07-11 14:16:28,150 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 187 is on host 187
2023-07-11 14:16:28,150 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 188 is on host 188
2023-07-11 14:16:28,150 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 189 is on host 189
2023-07-11 14:16:28,150 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 190 is on host 190
2023-07-11 14:16:28,150 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 191 is on host 191
2023-07-11 14:16:28,150 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 192 is on host 192
2023-07-11 14:16:28,150 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 193 is on host 193
2023-07-11 14:16:28,150 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 194 is on host 194
2023-07-11 14:16:28,150 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 195 is on host 195
2023-07-11 14:16:28,150 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 196 is on host 196
2023-07-11 14:16:28,150 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 197 is on host 197
2023-07-11 14:16:28,150 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 198 is on host 198
2023-07-11 14:16:28,150 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 199 is on host 199
2023-07-11 14:16:28,150 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 200 is on host 200
2023-07-11 14:16:28,150 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 201 is on host 201
2023-07-11 14:16:28,150 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 202 is on host 202
2023-07-11 14:16:28,150 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 203 is on host 203
2023-07-11 14:16:28,150 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 204 is on host 204
2023-07-11 14:16:28,150 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 205 is on host 205
2023-07-11 14:16:28,150 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 206 is on host 206
2023-07-11 14:16:28,151 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 207 is on host 207
2023-07-11 14:16:28,151 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 208 is on host 208
2023-07-11 14:16:28,151 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 209 is on host 209
2023-07-11 14:16:28,151 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 210 is on host 210
2023-07-11 14:16:28,151 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 211 is on host 211
2023-07-11 14:16:28,151 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 212 is on host 212
2023-07-11 14:16:28,151 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 213 is on host 213
2023-07-11 14:16:28,151 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 214 is on host 214
2023-07-11 14:16:28,151 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 215 is on host 215
2023-07-11 14:16:28,151 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 216 is on host 216
2023-07-11 14:16:28,151 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 217 is on host 217
2023-07-11 14:16:28,151 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 218 is on host 218
2023-07-11 14:16:28,151 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 219 is on host 219
2023-07-11 14:16:28,151 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 220 is on host 220
2023-07-11 14:16:28,151 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 221 is on host 221
2023-07-11 14:16:28,151 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 222 is on host 222
2023-07-11 14:16:28,151 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 223 is on host 223
2023-07-11 14:16:28,151 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 224 is on host 224
2023-07-11 14:16:28,151 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 225 is on host 225
2023-07-11 14:16:28,151 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 226 is on host 226
2023-07-11 14:16:28,151 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 227 is on host 227
2023-07-11 14:16:28,151 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 228 is on host 228
2023-07-11 14:16:28,151 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 229 is on host 229
2023-07-11 14:16:28,151 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 230 is on host 230
2023-07-11 14:16:28,151 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 231 is on host 231
2023-07-11 14:16:28,151 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 232 is on host 232
2023-07-11 14:16:28,151 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 233 is on host 233
2023-07-11 14:16:28,151 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 234 is on host 234
2023-07-11 14:16:28,151 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 235 is on host 235
2023-07-11 14:16:28,152 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 236 is on host 236
2023-07-11 14:16:28,152 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 237 is on host 237
2023-07-11 14:16:28,152 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 238 is on host 238
2023-07-11 14:16:28,152 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 239 is on host 239
2023-07-11 14:16:28,152 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 240 is on host 240
2023-07-11 14:16:28,152 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 241 is on host 241
2023-07-11 14:16:28,152 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 242 is on host 242
2023-07-11 14:16:28,152 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 243 is on host 243
2023-07-11 14:16:28,152 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 244 is on host 244
2023-07-11 14:16:28,152 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 245 is on host 245
2023-07-11 14:16:28,152 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 246 is on host 246
2023-07-11 14:16:28,152 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 247 is on host 247
2023-07-11 14:16:28,152 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 248 is on host 248
2023-07-11 14:16:28,152 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 249 is on host 249
2023-07-11 14:16:28,152 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 250 is on host 250
2023-07-11 14:16:28,152 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 251 is on host 251
2023-07-11 14:16:28,152 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 252 is on host 252
2023-07-11 14:16:28,152 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 253 is on host 253
2023-07-11 14:16:28,152 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 254 is on host 254
2023-07-11 14:16:28,152 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 255 is on host 255
2023-07-11 14:16:28,152 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 256 is on host 256
2023-07-11 14:16:28,152 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 257 is on host 257
2023-07-11 14:16:28,152 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 258 is on host 258
2023-07-11 14:16:28,152 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 259 is on host 259
2023-07-11 14:16:28,152 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 260 is on host 260
2023-07-11 14:16:28,152 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 261 is on host 261
2023-07-11 14:16:28,152 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 262 is on host 262
2023-07-11 14:16:28,152 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 263 is on host 263
2023-07-11 14:16:28,152 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 264 is on host 264
2023-07-11 14:16:28,153 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 265 is on host 265
2023-07-11 14:16:28,153 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 266 is on host 266
2023-07-11 14:16:28,153 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 267 is on host 267
2023-07-11 14:16:28,153 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 268 is on host 268
2023-07-11 14:16:28,153 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 269 is on host 269
2023-07-11 14:16:28,153 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 270 is on host 270
2023-07-11 14:16:28,153 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 271 is on host 271
2023-07-11 14:16:28,153 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 272 is on host 272
2023-07-11 14:16:28,153 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 273 is on host 273
2023-07-11 14:16:28,153 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 274 is on host 274
2023-07-11 14:16:28,153 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 275 is on host 275
2023-07-11 14:16:28,153 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 276 is on host 276
2023-07-11 14:16:28,153 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 277 is on host 277
2023-07-11 14:16:28,153 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 278 is on host 278
2023-07-11 14:16:28,153 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 279 is on host 279
2023-07-11 14:16:28,153 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 280 is on host 280
2023-07-11 14:16:28,153 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 281 is on host 281
2023-07-11 14:16:28,153 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 282 is on host 282
2023-07-11 14:16:28,153 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 283 is on host 283
2023-07-11 14:16:28,153 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 284 is on host 284
2023-07-11 14:16:28,153 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 285 is on host 285
2023-07-11 14:16:28,153 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 286 is on host 286
2023-07-11 14:16:28,153 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 287 is on host 287
2023-07-11 14:16:28,153 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 288 is on host 288
2023-07-11 14:16:28,153 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 289 is on host 289
2023-07-11 14:16:28,153 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 290 is on host 290
2023-07-11 14:16:28,153 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 291 is on host 291
2023-07-11 14:16:28,153 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 292 is on host 292
2023-07-11 14:16:28,153 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 293 is on host 293
2023-07-11 14:16:28,154 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 294 is on host 294
2023-07-11 14:16:28,154 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 295 is on host 295
2023-07-11 14:16:28,154 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 296 is on host 296
2023-07-11 14:16:28,154 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 297 is on host 297
2023-07-11 14:16:28,154 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 298 is on host 298
2023-07-11 14:16:28,154 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 299 is on host 299
2023-07-11 14:16:28,154 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 300 is on host 300
2023-07-11 14:16:28,154 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 301 is on host 301
2023-07-11 14:16:28,154 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 302 is on host 302
2023-07-11 14:16:28,154 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 303 is on host 303
2023-07-11 14:16:28,154 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 304 is on host 304
2023-07-11 14:16:28,154 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 305 is on host 305
2023-07-11 14:16:28,154 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 306 is on host 306
2023-07-11 14:16:28,154 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 307 is on host 307
2023-07-11 14:16:28,154 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 308 is on host 308
2023-07-11 14:16:28,154 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 309 is on host 309
2023-07-11 14:16:28,154 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 310 is on host 310
2023-07-11 14:16:28,154 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 311 is on host 311
2023-07-11 14:16:28,154 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 312 is on host 312
2023-07-11 14:16:28,154 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 313 is on host 313
2023-07-11 14:16:28,154 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 314 is on host 314
2023-07-11 14:16:28,155 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 315 is on host 315
2023-07-11 14:16:28,155 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 316 is on host 316
2023-07-11 14:16:28,155 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 317 is on host 317
2023-07-11 14:16:28,155 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 318 is on host 318
2023-07-11 14:16:28,155 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 319 is on host 319
2023-07-11 14:16:28,155 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 320 is on host 320
2023-07-11 14:16:28,155 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 321 is on host 321
2023-07-11 14:16:28,155 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 322 is on host 322
2023-07-11 14:16:28,155 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 323 is on host 323
2023-07-11 14:16:28,155 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 324 is on host 324
2023-07-11 14:16:28,155 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 325 is on host 325
2023-07-11 14:16:28,155 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 326 is on host 326
2023-07-11 14:16:28,155 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 327 is on host 327
2023-07-11 14:16:28,155 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 328 is on host 328
2023-07-11 14:16:28,155 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 329 is on host 329
2023-07-11 14:16:28,155 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 330 is on host 330
2023-07-11 14:16:28,155 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 331 is on host 331
2023-07-11 14:16:28,155 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 332 is on host 332
2023-07-11 14:16:28,155 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 333 is on host 333
2023-07-11 14:16:28,155 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 334 is on host 334
2023-07-11 14:16:28,155 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 335 is on host 335
2023-07-11 14:16:28,155 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 336 is on host 336
2023-07-11 14:16:28,155 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 337 is on host 337
2023-07-11 14:16:28,155 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 338 is on host 338
2023-07-11 14:16:28,155 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 339 is on host 339
2023-07-11 14:16:28,155 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 340 is on host 340
2023-07-11 14:16:28,155 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 341 is on host 341
2023-07-11 14:16:28,155 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 342 is on host 342
2023-07-11 14:16:28,155 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 343 is on host 343
2023-07-11 14:16:28,155 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 344 is on host 344
2023-07-11 14:16:28,156 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 345 is on host 345
2023-07-11 14:16:28,156 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 346 is on host 346
2023-07-11 14:16:28,156 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 347 is on host 347
2023-07-11 14:16:28,156 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 348 is on host 348
2023-07-11 14:16:28,156 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 349 is on host 349
2023-07-11 14:16:28,156 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 350 is on host 350
2023-07-11 14:16:28,156 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 351 is on host 351
2023-07-11 14:16:28,156 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 352 is on host 352
2023-07-11 14:16:28,156 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 353 is on host 353
2023-07-11 14:16:28,156 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 354 is on host 354
2023-07-11 14:16:28,156 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 355 is on host 355
2023-07-11 14:16:28,156 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 356 is on host 356
2023-07-11 14:16:28,156 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 357 is on host 357
2023-07-11 14:16:28,156 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 358 is on host 358
2023-07-11 14:16:28,156 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 359 is on host 359
2023-07-11 14:16:28,156 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 360 is on host 360
2023-07-11 14:16:28,156 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 361 is on host 361
2023-07-11 14:16:28,156 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 362 is on host 362
2023-07-11 14:16:28,156 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 363 is on host 363
2023-07-11 14:16:28,156 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 364 is on host 364
2023-07-11 14:16:28,156 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 365 is on host 365
2023-07-11 14:16:28,156 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 366 is on host 366
2023-07-11 14:16:28,156 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 367 is on host 367
2023-07-11 14:16:28,156 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 368 is on host 368
2023-07-11 14:16:28,156 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 369 is on host 369
2023-07-11 14:16:28,156 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 370 is on host 370
2023-07-11 14:16:28,156 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 371 is on host 371
2023-07-11 14:16:28,156 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 372 is on host 372
2023-07-11 14:16:28,156 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 373 is on host 373
2023-07-11 14:16:28,157 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 374 is on host 374
2023-07-11 14:16:28,157 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 375 is on host 375
2023-07-11 14:16:28,157 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 376 is on host 376
2023-07-11 14:16:28,157 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 377 is on host 377
2023-07-11 14:16:28,157 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 378 is on host 378
2023-07-11 14:16:28,157 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 379 is on host 379
2023-07-11 14:16:28,157 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 380 is on host 380
2023-07-11 14:16:28,157 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 381 is on host 381
2023-07-11 14:16:28,157 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 382 is on host 382
2023-07-11 14:16:28,157 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 383 is on host 383
2023-07-11 14:16:28,157 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 384 is on host 384
2023-07-11 14:16:28,157 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 385 is on host 385
2023-07-11 14:16:28,157 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 386 is on host 386
2023-07-11 14:16:28,157 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 387 is on host 387
2023-07-11 14:16:28,157 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 388 is on host 388
2023-07-11 14:16:28,157 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 389 is on host 389
2023-07-11 14:16:28,157 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 390 is on host 390
2023-07-11 14:16:28,157 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 391 is on host 391
2023-07-11 14:16:28,157 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 392 is on host 392
2023-07-11 14:16:28,157 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=393, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:28,158 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table27) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:28,158 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table28
2023-07-11 14:16:28,158 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv553536953=290, srv1630071126=110, srv1071894870=12, srv23511728=232, srv658346947=323, srv2025338799=204, srv1397994335=64, srv1976766403=195, srv1644629726=118, srv957637734=381, srv2079182457=210, srv1749264468=139, srv2046129126=206, srv1595762596=104, srv603990852=307, srv1973073480=194, srv958856137=382, srv644066832=319, srv557062842=292, srv277765671=235, srv732221418=337, srv1769385567=143, srv224612199=228, srv714752528=334, srv362526040=256, srv581128949=296, srv2133511466=223, srv1144239257=30, srv320603627=245, srv1679952521=126, srv2122867873=222, srv1110067064=24, srv256251994=233, srv63261708=317, srv89837390=371, srv552104598=289, srv508952995=281, srv2096011353=214, srv1770417148=144, srv1246723478=42, srv929436444=378, srv2082192429=211, srv234917297=231, srv405700573=266, srv183644386=166, srv1488378513=85, srv173139715=136, srv1154180352=32, srv355693379=252, srv1407521654=66, srv496848057=275, srv1157975499=33, srv1806731027=162, srv1923102804=184, srv311102455=244, srv450011410=271, srv771515724=348, srv389183508=262, srv1249074416=43, srv2014575201=201, srv640847108=318, srv832363565=356, srv1970882134=192, srv2107358603=218, srv855766065=361, srv1336043388=55, srv29397186=237, srv982792848=390, srv976560524=386, srv101181760=3, srv1093549482=21, srv2018389395=202, srv2113483104=221, srv1778339118=149, srv1968709692=190, srv705221118=333, srv159600090=105, srv1919608486=180, srv981255102=389, srv807899713=353, srv755110395=344, srv1770594519=145, srv739692705=340, srv1076582671=16, srv693869315=330, srv1079048717=17, srv440657532=270, srv1636659280=115, srv2108739257=220, srv668373413=326, srv1003610393=2, srv1054229197=11, srv1868589627=172, srv2103522371=217, srv1000546271=0, srv951670617=380, srv2042909593=205, srv1865656038=171, srv1466355012=78, srv703662406=332, srv1418112884=70, srv1215580291=40, srv71833528=335, srv1580581635=103, srv1021032212=5, srv1080806312=19, srv1985601859=197, srv74471954=343, srv1647472319=119, srv2071553346=208, srv1632855171=112, srv1122009370=27, srv13613992=61, srv1630777154=111, srv301413669=239, srv550697728=288, srv1296023857=53, srv1724550977=133, srv1989290370=198, srv1926417985=185, srv1678097199=125, srv1461034373=76, srv614690415=311, srv2098345381=215, srv310463473=243, srv1011934105=4, srv148627129=84, srv305489318=240, srv1256534903=46, srv1289731445=52, srv1798844587=157, srv567113085=294, srv1119222501=26, srv2055117940=207, srv855898852=362, srv629224816=316, srv1075943554=15, srv625909061=315, srv1705591942=128, srv734225580=339, srv660107924=324, srv1381729938=62, srv1633483173=113, srv408265476=267, srv1776057793=148, srv1360253411=60, srv1511424834=90, srv1414162621=68, srv883343663=370, srv151859222=91, srv349144930=251, srv1991304034=199, srv1825887791=164, srv601657063=305, srv758932951=345, srv1651629087=120, srv1864623584=170, srv682957691=329, srv1500454146=88, srv1725962085=135, srv1659841448=121, srv1253206004=45, srv52354442=284, srv18508093=168, srv1427731921=73, srv561344974=293, srv721668125=336, srv1575482138=100, srv914128771=373, srv961487230=383, srv741332941=342, srv533032466=286, srv1574140987=99, srv2139849097=224, srv503902262=278, srv674807007=327, srv1786829855=153, srv2088727517=213, srv394366966=264, srv980089565=388, srv114594288=31, srv38296437=261, srv214835574=226, srv1887224977=176, srv1025509362=7, srv1577020334=102, srv524466665=285, srv393561021=263, srv759909927=346, srv763556514=347, srv786453030=349, srv2142935488=225, srv618111613=312, srv16254163=108, srv343211061=250, srv476075173=273, srv1269632212=47, srv333589612=246, srv499015361=276, srv836674186=357, srv1799191687=158, srv1446998035=74, srv1571774199=98, srv1115354947=25, srv333860881=247, srv1724152600=132, srv1598699299=106, srv177885829=151, srv472125887=272, srv1101339966=22, srv1424985362=72, srv1945569895=188, srv594128294=300, srv1026739237=8, srv842459828=358, srv878519137=366, srv1921260729=181, srv339110834=249, srv504099471=279, srv814253179=354, srv1643744885=116, srv1793847521=155, srv607234624=309, srv698219051=331, srv1688538732=127, srv666240078=325, srv1079284733=18, srv29210550=236, srv506181748=280, srv881313122=368, srv1945452576=187, srv597307897=303, srv1285120424=51, srv1887943816=177, srv1983604698=196, srv1805465940=161, srv309309336=242, srv1719756294=131, srv1349932676=58, srv1208486369=38, srv1643971570=117, srv1509331489=89, srv334105385=248, srv1400515744=65, srv369984715=259, srv43712162=269, srv842675864=359, srv1803258748=160, srv1022450918=6, srv1775108732=147, srv1766088250=141, srv180150732=159, srv1220857227=41, srv226530501=229, srv362032108=255, srv919715380=377, srv1074935976=14, srv1395030819=63, srv803291569=352, srv1877966766=175, srv220538712=227, srv2021718843=203, srv2107782185=219, srv882216860=369, srv1489137852=86, srv1972328734=193, srv1470759982=79, srv1774824811=146, srv971974774=384, srv1418242791=71, srv1001274196=1, srv909615097=372, srv1537724566=93, srv1165799954=34, srv1724754364=134, srv978173525=387, srv113319438=29, srv578033735=295, srv147931272=80, srv1183635941=35, srv1904215245=178, srv596349756=302, srv880835255=367, srv857544550=364, srv1779729022=152, srv1795612465=156, srv621083045=314, srv917704170=375, srv1351811120=59, srv1316710897=54, srv789820555=350, srv1922580095=183, srv305567304=241, srv1936745425=186, srv1745318024=138, srv1210822057=39, srv645375717=320, srv950628389=379, srv1490199189=87, srv1575919256=101, srv154481102=96, srv359402967=254, srv997716931=391, srv1457224273=75, srv581644449=297, srv1872374768=174, srv363177310=257, srv740327512=341, srv1664227236=123, srv972330517=385, srv1634261306=114, srv1662183707=122, srv1969046891=191, srv1485266211=82, srv1778842262=150, srv588410181=298, srv1921840985=182, srv591279493=299, srv37574565=260, srv1104147458=23, srv1190166330=36, srv652270371=322, srv1484309042=81, srv1560148463=97, srv618569548=313, srv2102708311=216, srv1084873074=20, srv517669556=283, srv918152084=376, srv649714317=321, srv1674484790=124, srv1339239880=56, srv1461073271=77, srv1125312901=28, srv25633292=234, srv516616923=282, srv299721745=238, srv604932433=308, srv1273702855=48, srv792183929=351, srv1042608200=10, srv1276335106=49, srv1486044644=83, srv676101698=328, srv998930892=392, srv200111276=200, srv1863083643=169, srv1737443479=137, srv872997185=365, srv821351126=355, srv852115805=360, srv1074355423=13, srv170952194=130, srv503430005=277, srv153887567=94, srv1415163001=69, srv1032737435=9, srv1840670515=167, srv1961921083=189, srv59745831=304, srv36715747=258, srv431547280=268, srv1524853580=92, srv1870059418=173, srv396010771=265, srv594457792=301, srv1755339428=140, srv1766275429=142, srv5565786=291, srv603898526=306, srv544570223=287, srv856030669=363, srv1542523468=95, srv915785747=374, srv356122213=253, srv1411875499=67, srv2077620970=209, srv1345529444=57, srv232339963=230, srv1250861076=44, srv1914875423=179, srv478619481=274, srv1202435626=37, srv1706089454=129, srv1810631201=163, srv1282644061=50, srv1625945288=109, srv733251129=338, srv2082830831=212, srv1612103540=107, srv612136291=310, srv1790004142=154, srv183394703=165} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:28,158 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:28,158 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:28,158 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:28,158 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:28,158 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:28,158 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:28,158 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-11 14:16:28,158 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-11 14:16:28,158 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-11 14:16:28,159 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-11 14:16:28,159 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 10 is on host 10
2023-07-11 14:16:28,159 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 11 is on host 11
2023-07-11 14:16:28,159 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 12 is on host 12
2023-07-11 14:16:28,159 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 13 is on host 13
2023-07-11 14:16:28,159 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 14 is on host 14
2023-07-11 14:16:28,159 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 15 is on host 15
2023-07-11 14:16:28,159 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 16 is on host 16
2023-07-11 14:16:28,159 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 17 is on host 17
2023-07-11 14:16:28,159 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 18 is on host 18
2023-07-11 14:16:28,159 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 19 is on host 19
2023-07-11 14:16:28,159 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 20 is on host 20
2023-07-11 14:16:28,159 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 21 is on host 21
2023-07-11 14:16:28,159 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 22 is on host 22
2023-07-11 14:16:28,159 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 23 is on host 23
2023-07-11 14:16:28,159 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 24 is on host 24
2023-07-11 14:16:28,159 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 25 is on host 25
2023-07-11 14:16:28,159 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 26 is on host 26
2023-07-11 14:16:28,159 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 27 is on host 27
2023-07-11 14:16:28,159 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 28 is on host 28
2023-07-11 14:16:28,159 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 29 is on host 29
2023-07-11 14:16:28,159 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 30 is on host 30
2023-07-11 14:16:28,159 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 31 is on host 31
2023-07-11 14:16:28,159 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 32 is on host 32
2023-07-11 14:16:28,159 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 33 is on host 33
2023-07-11 14:16:28,159 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 34 is on host 34
2023-07-11 14:16:28,159 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 35 is on host 35
2023-07-11 14:16:28,159 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 36 is on host 36
2023-07-11 14:16:28,159 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 37 is on host 37
2023-07-11 14:16:28,160 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 38 is on host 38
2023-07-11 14:16:28,160 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 39 is on host 39
2023-07-11 14:16:28,160 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 40 is on host 40
2023-07-11 14:16:28,160 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 41 is on host 41
2023-07-11 14:16:28,160 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 42 is on host 42
2023-07-11 14:16:28,160 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 43 is on host 43
2023-07-11 14:16:28,160 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 44 is on host 44
2023-07-11 14:16:28,160 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 45 is on host 45
2023-07-11 14:16:28,160 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 46 is on host 46
2023-07-11 14:16:28,160 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 47 is on host 47
2023-07-11 14:16:28,160 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 48 is on host 48
2023-07-11 14:16:28,160 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 49 is on host 49
2023-07-11 14:16:28,160 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 50 is on host 50
2023-07-11 14:16:28,160 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 51 is on host 51
2023-07-11 14:16:28,160 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 52 is on host 52
2023-07-11 14:16:28,160 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 53 is on host 53
2023-07-11 14:16:28,160 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 54 is on host 54
2023-07-11 14:16:28,160 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 55 is on host 55
2023-07-11 14:16:28,160 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 56 is on host 56
2023-07-11 14:16:28,160 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 57 is on host 57
2023-07-11 14:16:28,160 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 58 is on host 58
2023-07-11 14:16:28,160 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 59 is on host 59
2023-07-11 14:16:28,160 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 60 is on host 60
2023-07-11 14:16:28,160 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 61 is on host 61
2023-07-11 14:16:28,160 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 62 is on host 62
2023-07-11 14:16:28,160 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 63 is on host 63
2023-07-11 14:16:28,160 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 64 is on host 64
2023-07-11 14:16:28,160 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 65 is on host 65
2023-07-11 14:16:28,160 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 66 is on host 66
2023-07-11 14:16:28,161 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 67 is on host 67
2023-07-11 14:16:28,161 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 68 is on host 68
2023-07-11 14:16:28,161 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 69 is on host 69
2023-07-11 14:16:28,161 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 70 is on host 70
2023-07-11 14:16:28,161 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 71 is on host 71
2023-07-11 14:16:28,161 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 72 is on host 72
2023-07-11 14:16:28,161 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 73 is on host 73
2023-07-11 14:16:28,161 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 74 is on host 74
2023-07-11 14:16:28,161 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 75 is on host 75
2023-07-11 14:16:28,161 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 76 is on host 76
2023-07-11 14:16:28,161 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 77 is on host 77
2023-07-11 14:16:28,161 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 78 is on host 78
2023-07-11 14:16:28,161 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 79 is on host 79
2023-07-11 14:16:28,161 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 80 is on host 80
2023-07-11 14:16:28,161 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 81 is on host 81
2023-07-11 14:16:28,161 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 82 is on host 82
2023-07-11 14:16:28,161 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 83 is on host 83
2023-07-11 14:16:28,161 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 84 is on host 84
2023-07-11 14:16:28,161 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 85 is on host 85
2023-07-11 14:16:28,161 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 86 is on host 86
2023-07-11 14:16:28,161 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 87 is on host 87
2023-07-11 14:16:28,161 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 88 is on host 88
2023-07-11 14:16:28,161 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 89 is on host 89
2023-07-11 14:16:28,161 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 90 is on host 90
2023-07-11 14:16:28,161 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 91 is on host 91
2023-07-11 14:16:28,161 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 92 is on host 92
2023-07-11 14:16:28,161 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 93 is on host 93
2023-07-11 14:16:28,161 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 94 is on host 94
2023-07-11 14:16:28,161 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 95 is on host 95
2023-07-11 14:16:28,162 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 96 is on host 96
2023-07-11 14:16:28,162 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 97 is on host 97
2023-07-11 14:16:28,162 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 98 is on host 98
2023-07-11 14:16:28,162 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 99 is on host 99
2023-07-11 14:16:28,162 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 100 is on host 100
2023-07-11 14:16:28,162 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 101 is on host 101
2023-07-11 14:16:28,162 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 102 is on host 102
2023-07-11 14:16:28,162 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 103 is on host 103
2023-07-11 14:16:28,162 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 104 is on host 104
2023-07-11 14:16:28,162 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 105 is on host 105
2023-07-11 14:16:28,162 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 106 is on host 106
2023-07-11 14:16:28,162 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 107 is on host 107
2023-07-11 14:16:28,162 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 108 is on host 108
2023-07-11 14:16:28,162 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 109 is on host 109
2023-07-11 14:16:28,162 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 110 is on host 110
2023-07-11 14:16:28,162 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 111 is on host 111
2023-07-11 14:16:28,162 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 112 is on host 112
2023-07-11 14:16:28,162 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 113 is on host 113
2023-07-11 14:16:28,162 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 114 is on host 114
2023-07-11 14:16:28,162 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 115 is on host 115
2023-07-11 14:16:28,162 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 116 is on host 116
2023-07-11 14:16:28,162 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 117 is on host 117
2023-07-11 14:16:28,162 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 118 is on host 118
2023-07-11 14:16:28,162 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 119 is on host 119
2023-07-11 14:16:28,162 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 120 is on host 120
2023-07-11 14:16:28,162 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 121 is on host 121
2023-07-11 14:16:28,162 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 122 is on host 122
2023-07-11 14:16:28,162 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 123 is on host 123
2023-07-11 14:16:28,162 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 124 is on host 124
2023-07-11 14:16:28,163 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 125 is on host 125
2023-07-11 14:16:28,163 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 126 is on host 126
2023-07-11 14:16:28,163 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 127 is on host 127
2023-07-11 14:16:28,163 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 128 is on host 128
2023-07-11 14:16:28,163 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 129 is on host 129
2023-07-11 14:16:28,163 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 130 is on host 130
2023-07-11 14:16:28,163 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 131 is on host 131
2023-07-11 14:16:28,163 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 132 is on host 132
2023-07-11 14:16:28,163 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 133 is on host 133
2023-07-11 14:16:28,163 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 134 is on host 134
2023-07-11 14:16:28,163 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 135 is on host 135
2023-07-11 14:16:28,163 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 136 is on host 136
2023-07-11 14:16:28,163 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 137 is on host 137
2023-07-11 14:16:28,163 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 138 is on host 138
2023-07-11 14:16:28,163 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 139 is on host 139
2023-07-11 14:16:28,163 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 140 is on host 140
2023-07-11 14:16:28,163 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 141 is on host 141
2023-07-11 14:16:28,163 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 142 is on host 142
2023-07-11 14:16:28,163 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 143 is on host 143
2023-07-11 14:16:28,163 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 144 is on host 144
2023-07-11 14:16:28,163 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 145 is on host 145
2023-07-11 14:16:28,163 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 146 is on host 146
2023-07-11 14:16:28,163 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 147 is on host 147
2023-07-11 14:16:28,163 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 148 is on host 148
2023-07-11 14:16:28,163 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 149 is on host 149
2023-07-11 14:16:28,163 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 150 is on host 150
2023-07-11 14:16:28,163 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 151 is on host 151
2023-07-11 14:16:28,163 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 152 is on host 152
2023-07-11 14:16:28,163 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 153 is on host 153
2023-07-11 14:16:28,163 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 154 is on host 154
2023-07-11 14:16:28,164 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 155 is on host 155
2023-07-11 14:16:28,164 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 156 is on host 156
2023-07-11 14:16:28,164 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 157 is on host 157
2023-07-11 14:16:28,164 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 158 is on host 158
2023-07-11 14:16:28,164 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 159 is on host 159
2023-07-11 14:16:28,164 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 160 is on host 160
2023-07-11 14:16:28,164 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 161 is on host 161
2023-07-11 14:16:28,164 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 162 is on host 162
2023-07-11 14:16:28,164 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 163 is on host 163
2023-07-11 14:16:28,164 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 164 is on host 164
2023-07-11 14:16:28,164 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 165 is on host 165
2023-07-11 14:16:28,164 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 166 is on host 166
2023-07-11 14:16:28,164 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 167 is on host 167
2023-07-11 14:16:28,164 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 168 is on host 168
2023-07-11 14:16:28,164 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 169 is on host 169
2023-07-11 14:16:28,164 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 170 is on host 170
2023-07-11 14:16:28,164 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 171 is on host 171
2023-07-11 14:16:28,164 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 172 is on host 172
2023-07-11 14:16:28,164 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 173 is on host 173
2023-07-11 14:16:28,164 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 174 is on host 174
2023-07-11 14:16:28,164 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 175 is on host 175
2023-07-11 14:16:28,164 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 176 is on host 176
2023-07-11 14:16:28,164 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 177 is on host 177
2023-07-11 14:16:28,164 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 178 is on host 178
2023-07-11 14:16:28,164 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 179 is on host 179
2023-07-11 14:16:28,164 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 180 is on host 180
2023-07-11 14:16:28,164 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 181 is on host 181
2023-07-11 14:16:28,164 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 182 is on host 182
2023-07-11 14:16:28,164 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 183 is on host 183
2023-07-11 14:16:28,165 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 184 is on host 184
2023-07-11 14:16:28,165 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 185 is on host 185
2023-07-11 14:16:28,165 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 186 is on host 186
2023-07-11 14:16:28,165 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 187 is on host 187
2023-07-11 14:16:28,165 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 188 is on host 188
2023-07-11 14:16:28,165 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 189 is on host 189
2023-07-11 14:16:28,165 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 190 is on host 190
2023-07-11 14:16:28,165 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 191 is on host 191
2023-07-11 14:16:28,165 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 192 is on host 192
2023-07-11 14:16:28,165 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 193 is on host 193
2023-07-11 14:16:28,165 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 194 is on host 194
2023-07-11 14:16:28,165 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 195 is on host 195
2023-07-11 14:16:28,165 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 196 is on host 196
2023-07-11 14:16:28,165 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 197 is on host 197
2023-07-11 14:16:28,165 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 198 is on host 198
2023-07-11 14:16:28,165 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 199 is on host 199
2023-07-11 14:16:28,165 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 200 is on host 200
2023-07-11 14:16:28,165 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 201 is on host 201
2023-07-11 14:16:28,165 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 202 is on host 202
2023-07-11 14:16:28,165 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 203 is on host 203
2023-07-11 14:16:28,165 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 204 is on host 204
2023-07-11 14:16:28,165 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 205 is on host 205
2023-07-11 14:16:28,165 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 206 is on host 206
2023-07-11 14:16:28,165 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 207 is on host 207
2023-07-11 14:16:28,165 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 208 is on host 208
2023-07-11 14:16:28,166 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 209 is on host 209
2023-07-11 14:16:28,166 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 210 is on host 210
2023-07-11 14:16:28,166 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 211 is on host 211
2023-07-11 14:16:28,166 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 212 is on host 212
2023-07-11 14:16:28,166 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 213 is on host 213
2023-07-11 14:16:28,166 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 214 is on host 214
2023-07-11 14:16:28,166 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 215 is on host 215
2023-07-11 14:16:28,166 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 216 is on host 216
2023-07-11 14:16:28,166 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 217 is on host 217
2023-07-11 14:16:28,166 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 218 is on host 218
2023-07-11 14:16:28,166 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 219 is on host 219
2023-07-11 14:16:28,166 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 220 is on host 220
2023-07-11 14:16:28,166 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 221 is on host 221
2023-07-11 14:16:28,166 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 222 is on host 222
2023-07-11 14:16:28,166 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 223 is on host 223
2023-07-11 14:16:28,166 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 224 is on host 224
2023-07-11 14:16:28,166 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 225 is on host 225
2023-07-11 14:16:28,166 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 226 is on host 226
2023-07-11 14:16:28,166 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 227 is on host 227
2023-07-11 14:16:28,166 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 228 is on host 228
2023-07-11 14:16:28,166 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 229 is on host 229
2023-07-11 14:16:28,166 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 230 is on host 230
2023-07-11 14:16:28,167 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 231 is on host 231
2023-07-11 14:16:28,167 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 232 is on host 232
2023-07-11 14:16:28,167 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 233 is on host 233
2023-07-11 14:16:28,167 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 234 is on host 234
2023-07-11 14:16:28,167 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 235 is on host 235
2023-07-11 14:16:28,167 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 236 is on host 236
2023-07-11 14:16:28,167 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 237 is on host 237
2023-07-11 14:16:28,167 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 238 is on host 238
2023-07-11 14:16:28,167 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 239 is on host 239
2023-07-11 14:16:28,167 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 240 is on host 240
2023-07-11 14:16:28,167 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 241 is on host 241
2023-07-11 14:16:28,167 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 242 is on host 242
2023-07-11 14:16:28,167 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 243 is on host 243
2023-07-11 14:16:28,167 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 244 is on host 244
2023-07-11 14:16:28,167 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 245 is on host 245
2023-07-11 14:16:28,167 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 246 is on host 246
2023-07-11 14:16:28,167 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 247 is on host 247
2023-07-11 14:16:28,167 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 248 is on host 248
2023-07-11 14:16:28,167 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 249 is on host 249
2023-07-11 14:16:28,167 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 250 is on host 250
2023-07-11 14:16:28,167 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 251 is on host 251
2023-07-11 14:16:28,167 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 252 is on host 252
2023-07-11 14:16:28,167 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 253 is on host 253
2023-07-11 14:16:28,167 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 254 is on host 254
2023-07-11 14:16:28,167 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 255 is on host 255
2023-07-11 14:16:28,167 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 256 is on host 256
2023-07-11 14:16:28,167 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 257 is on host 257
2023-07-11 14:16:28,167 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 258 is on host 258
2023-07-11 14:16:28,167 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 259 is on host 259
2023-07-11 14:16:28,167 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 260 is on host 260
2023-07-11 14:16:28,168 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 261 is on host 261
2023-07-11 14:16:28,168 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 262 is on host 262
2023-07-11 14:16:28,168 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 263 is on host 263
2023-07-11 14:16:28,168 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 264 is on host 264
2023-07-11 14:16:28,168 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 265 is on host 265
2023-07-11 14:16:28,168 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 266 is on host 266
2023-07-11 14:16:28,168 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 267 is on host 267
2023-07-11 14:16:28,168 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 268 is on host 268
2023-07-11 14:16:28,168 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 269 is on host 269
2023-07-11 14:16:28,168 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 270 is on host 270
2023-07-11 14:16:28,168 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 271 is on host 271
2023-07-11 14:16:28,168 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 272 is on host 272
2023-07-11 14:16:28,168 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 273 is on host 273
2023-07-11 14:16:28,168 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 274 is on host 274
2023-07-11 14:16:28,168 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 275 is on host 275
2023-07-11 14:16:28,168 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 276 is on host 276
2023-07-11 14:16:28,168 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 277 is on host 277
2023-07-11 14:16:28,168 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 278 is on host 278
2023-07-11 14:16:28,168 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 279 is on host 279
2023-07-11 14:16:28,168 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 280 is on host 280
2023-07-11 14:16:28,168 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 281 is on host 281
2023-07-11 14:16:28,168 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 282 is on host 282
2023-07-11 14:16:28,168 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 283 is on host 283
2023-07-11 14:16:28,168 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 284 is on host 284
2023-07-11 14:16:28,168 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 285 is on host 285
2023-07-11 14:16:28,168 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 286 is on host 286
2023-07-11 14:16:28,168 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 287 is on host 287
2023-07-11 14:16:28,168 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 288 is on host 288
2023-07-11 14:16:28,168 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 289 is on host 289
2023-07-11 14:16:28,169 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 290 is on host 290
2023-07-11 14:16:28,169 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 291 is on host 291
2023-07-11 14:16:28,169 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 292 is on host 292
2023-07-11 14:16:28,169 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 293 is on host 293
2023-07-11 14:16:28,169 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 294 is on host 294
2023-07-11 14:16:28,169 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 295 is on host 295
2023-07-11 14:16:28,169 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 296 is on host 296
2023-07-11 14:16:28,169 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 297 is on host 297
2023-07-11 14:16:28,169 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 298 is on host 298
2023-07-11 14:16:28,169 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 299 is on host 299
2023-07-11 14:16:28,169 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 300 is on host 300
2023-07-11 14:16:28,169 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 301 is on host 301
2023-07-11 14:16:28,169 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 302 is on host 302
2023-07-11 14:16:28,169 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 303 is on host 303
2023-07-11 14:16:28,169 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 304 is on host 304
2023-07-11 14:16:28,169 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 305 is on host 305
2023-07-11 14:16:28,169 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 306 is on host 306
2023-07-11 14:16:28,169 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 307 is on host 307
2023-07-11 14:16:28,169 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 308 is on host 308
2023-07-11 14:16:28,169 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 309 is on host 309
2023-07-11 14:16:28,169 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 310 is on host 310
2023-07-11 14:16:28,169 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 311 is on host 311
2023-07-11 14:16:28,169 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 312 is on host 312
2023-07-11 14:16:28,169 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 313 is on host 313
2023-07-11 14:16:28,169 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 314 is on host 314
2023-07-11 14:16:28,169 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 315 is on host 315
2023-07-11 14:16:28,169 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 316 is on host 316
2023-07-11 14:16:28,169 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 317 is on host 317
2023-07-11 14:16:28,169 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 318 is on host 318
2023-07-11 14:16:28,170 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 319 is on host 319
2023-07-11 14:16:28,170 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 320 is on host 320
2023-07-11 14:16:28,170 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 321 is on host 321
2023-07-11 14:16:28,170 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 322 is on host 322
2023-07-11 14:16:28,170 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 323 is on host 323
2023-07-11 14:16:28,170 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 324 is on host 324
2023-07-11 14:16:28,170 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 325 is on host 325
2023-07-11 14:16:28,170 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 326 is on host 326
2023-07-11 14:16:28,170 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 327 is on host 327
2023-07-11 14:16:28,170 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 328 is on host 328
2023-07-11 14:16:28,170 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 329 is on host 329
2023-07-11 14:16:28,170 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 330 is on host 330
2023-07-11 14:16:28,170 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 331 is on host 331
2023-07-11 14:16:28,170 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 332 is on host 332
2023-07-11 14:16:28,170 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 333 is on host 333
2023-07-11 14:16:28,170 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 334 is on host 334
2023-07-11 14:16:28,170 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 335 is on host 335
2023-07-11 14:16:28,170 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 336 is on host 336
2023-07-11 14:16:28,170 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 337 is on host 337
2023-07-11 14:16:28,170 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 338 is on host 338
2023-07-11 14:16:28,170 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 339 is on host 339
2023-07-11 14:16:28,170 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 340 is on host 340
2023-07-11 14:16:28,170 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 341 is on host 341
2023-07-11 14:16:28,170 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 342 is on host 342
2023-07-11 14:16:28,170 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 343 is on host 343
2023-07-11 14:16:28,170 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 344 is on host 344
2023-07-11 14:16:28,170 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 345 is on host 345
2023-07-11 14:16:28,170 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 346 is on host 346
2023-07-11 14:16:28,170 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 347 is on host 347
2023-07-11 14:16:28,171 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 348 is on host 348
2023-07-11 14:16:28,171 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 349 is on host 349
2023-07-11 14:16:28,171 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 350 is on host 350
2023-07-11 14:16:28,171 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 351 is on host 351
2023-07-11 14:16:28,171 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 352 is on host 352
2023-07-11 14:16:28,171 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 353 is on host 353
2023-07-11 14:16:28,171 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 354 is on host 354
2023-07-11 14:16:28,171 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 355 is on host 355
2023-07-11 14:16:28,171 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 356 is on host 356
2023-07-11 14:16:28,171 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 357 is on host 357
2023-07-11 14:16:28,171 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 358 is on host 358
2023-07-11 14:16:28,171 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 359 is on host 359
2023-07-11 14:16:28,171 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 360 is on host 360
2023-07-11 14:16:28,171 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 361 is on host 361
2023-07-11 14:16:28,171 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 362 is on host 362
2023-07-11 14:16:28,171 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 363 is on host 363
2023-07-11 14:16:28,171 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 364 is on host 364
2023-07-11 14:16:28,171 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 365 is on host 365
2023-07-11 14:16:28,171 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 366 is on host 366
2023-07-11 14:16:28,171 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 367 is on host 367
2023-07-11 14:16:28,171 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 368 is on host 368
2023-07-11 14:16:28,171 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 369 is on host 369
2023-07-11 14:16:28,171 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 370 is on host 370
2023-07-11 14:16:28,171 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 371 is on host 371
2023-07-11 14:16:28,171 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 372 is on host 372
2023-07-11 14:16:28,171 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 373 is on host 373
2023-07-11 14:16:28,171 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 374 is on host 374
2023-07-11 14:16:28,171 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 375 is on host 375
2023-07-11 14:16:28,171 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 376 is on host 376
2023-07-11 14:16:28,172 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 377 is on host 377
2023-07-11 14:16:28,172 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 378 is on host 378
2023-07-11 14:16:28,172 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 379 is on host 379
2023-07-11 14:16:28,172 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 380 is on host 380
2023-07-11 14:16:28,172 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 381 is on host 381
2023-07-11 14:16:28,172 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 382 is on host 382
2023-07-11 14:16:28,172 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 383 is on host 383
2023-07-11 14:16:28,172 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 384 is on host 384
2023-07-11 14:16:28,172 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 385 is on host 385
2023-07-11 14:16:28,172 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 386 is on host 386
2023-07-11 14:16:28,172 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 387 is on host 387
2023-07-11 14:16:28,172 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 388 is on host 388
2023-07-11 14:16:28,172 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 389 is on host 389
2023-07-11 14:16:28,172 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 390 is on host 390
2023-07-11 14:16:28,172 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 391 is on host 391
2023-07-11 14:16:28,172 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 392 is on host 392
2023-07-11 14:16:28,172 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=393, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:28,172 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table28) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:28,172 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table29
2023-07-11 14:16:28,173 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv553536953=290, srv1630071126=110, srv1071894870=12, srv23511728=232, srv658346947=323, srv2025338799=204, srv1397994335=64, srv1976766403=195, srv1644629726=118, srv957637734=381, srv2079182457=210, srv1749264468=139, srv2046129126=206, srv1595762596=104, srv603990852=307, srv1973073480=194, srv958856137=382, srv644066832=319, srv557062842=292, srv277765671=235, srv732221418=337, srv1769385567=143, srv224612199=228, srv714752528=334, srv362526040=256, srv581128949=296, srv2133511466=223, srv1144239257=30, srv320603627=245, srv1679952521=126, srv2122867873=222, srv1110067064=24, srv256251994=233, srv63261708=317, srv89837390=371, srv552104598=289, srv508952995=281, srv2096011353=214, srv1770417148=144, srv1246723478=42, srv929436444=378, srv2082192429=211, srv234917297=231, srv405700573=266, srv183644386=166, srv1488378513=85, srv173139715=136, srv1154180352=32, srv355693379=252, srv1407521654=66, srv496848057=275, srv1157975499=33, srv1806731027=162, srv1923102804=184, srv311102455=244, srv450011410=271, srv771515724=348, srv389183508=262, srv1249074416=43, srv2014575201=201, srv640847108=318, srv832363565=356, srv1970882134=192, srv2107358603=218, srv855766065=361, srv1336043388=55, srv29397186=237, srv982792848=390, srv976560524=386, srv101181760=3, srv1093549482=21, srv2018389395=202, srv2113483104=221, srv1778339118=149, srv1968709692=190, srv705221118=333, srv159600090=105, srv1919608486=180, srv981255102=389, srv807899713=353, srv755110395=344, srv1770594519=145, srv739692705=340, srv1076582671=16, srv693869315=330, srv1079048717=17, srv440657532=270, srv1636659280=115, srv2108739257=220, srv668373413=326, srv1003610393=2, srv1054229197=11, srv1868589627=172, srv2103522371=217, srv1000546271=0, srv951670617=380, srv2042909593=205, srv1865656038=171, srv1466355012=78, srv703662406=332, srv1418112884=70, srv1215580291=40, srv71833528=335, srv1580581635=103, srv1021032212=5, srv1080806312=19, srv1985601859=197, srv74471954=343, srv1647472319=119, srv2071553346=208, srv1632855171=112, srv1122009370=27, srv13613992=61, srv1630777154=111, srv301413669=239, srv550697728=288, srv1296023857=53, srv1724550977=133, srv1989290370=198, srv1926417985=185, srv1678097199=125, srv1461034373=76, srv614690415=311, srv2098345381=215, srv310463473=243, srv1011934105=4, srv148627129=84, srv305489318=240, srv1256534903=46, srv1289731445=52, srv1798844587=157, srv567113085=294, srv1119222501=26, srv2055117940=207, srv855898852=362, srv629224816=316, srv1075943554=15, srv625909061=315, srv1705591942=128, srv734225580=339, srv660107924=324, srv1381729938=62, srv1633483173=113, srv408265476=267, srv1776057793=148, srv1360253411=60, srv1511424834=90, srv1414162621=68, srv883343663=370, srv151859222=91, srv349144930=251, srv1991304034=199, srv1825887791=164, srv601657063=305, srv758932951=345, srv1651629087=120, srv1864623584=170, srv682957691=329, srv1500454146=88, srv1725962085=135, srv1659841448=121, srv1253206004=45, srv52354442=284, srv18508093=168, srv1427731921=73, srv561344974=293, srv721668125=336, srv1575482138=100, srv914128771=373, srv961487230=383, srv741332941=342, srv533032466=286, srv1574140987=99, srv2139849097=224, srv503902262=278, srv674807007=327, srv1786829855=153, srv2088727517=213, srv394366966=264, srv980089565=388, srv114594288=31, srv38296437=261, srv214835574=226, srv1887224977=176, srv1025509362=7, srv1577020334=102, srv524466665=285, srv393561021=263, srv759909927=346, srv763556514=347, srv786453030=349, srv2142935488=225, srv618111613=312, srv16254163=108, srv343211061=250, srv476075173=273, srv1269632212=47, srv333589612=246, srv499015361=276, srv836674186=357, srv1799191687=158, srv1446998035=74, srv1571774199=98, srv1115354947=25, srv333860881=247, srv1724152600=132, srv1598699299=106, srv177885829=151, srv472125887=272, srv1101339966=22, srv1424985362=72, srv1945569895=188, srv594128294=300, srv1026739237=8, srv842459828=358, srv878519137=366, srv1921260729=181, srv339110834=249, srv504099471=279, srv814253179=354, srv1643744885=116, srv1793847521=155, srv607234624=309, srv698219051=331, srv1688538732=127, srv666240078=325, srv1079284733=18, srv29210550=236, srv506181748=280, srv881313122=368, srv1945452576=187, srv597307897=303, srv1285120424=51, srv1887943816=177, srv1983604698=196, srv1805465940=161, srv309309336=242, srv1719756294=131, srv1349932676=58, srv1208486369=38, srv1643971570=117, srv1509331489=89, srv334105385=248, srv1400515744=65, srv369984715=259, srv43712162=269, srv842675864=359, srv1803258748=160, srv1022450918=6, srv1775108732=147, srv1766088250=141, srv180150732=159, srv1220857227=41, srv226530501=229, srv362032108=255, srv919715380=377, srv1074935976=14, srv1395030819=63, srv803291569=352, srv1877966766=175, srv220538712=227, srv2021718843=203, srv2107782185=219, srv882216860=369, srv1489137852=86, srv1972328734=193, srv1470759982=79, srv1774824811=146, srv971974774=384, srv1418242791=71, srv1001274196=1, srv909615097=372, srv1537724566=93, srv1165799954=34, srv1724754364=134, srv978173525=387, srv113319438=29, srv578033735=295, srv147931272=80, srv1183635941=35, srv1904215245=178, srv596349756=302, srv880835255=367, srv857544550=364, srv1779729022=152, srv1795612465=156, srv621083045=314, srv917704170=375, srv1351811120=59, srv1316710897=54, srv789820555=350, srv1922580095=183, srv305567304=241, srv1936745425=186, srv1745318024=138, srv1210822057=39, srv645375717=320, srv950628389=379, srv1490199189=87, srv1575919256=101, srv154481102=96, srv359402967=254, srv997716931=391, srv1457224273=75, srv581644449=297, srv1872374768=174, srv363177310=257, srv740327512=341, srv1664227236=123, srv972330517=385, srv1634261306=114, srv1662183707=122, srv1969046891=191, srv1485266211=82, srv1778842262=150, srv588410181=298, srv1921840985=182, srv591279493=299, srv37574565=260, srv1104147458=23, srv1190166330=36, srv652270371=322, srv1484309042=81, srv1560148463=97, srv618569548=313, srv2102708311=216, srv1084873074=20, srv517669556=283, srv918152084=376, srv649714317=321, srv1674484790=124, srv1339239880=56, srv1461073271=77, srv1125312901=28, srv25633292=234, srv516616923=282, srv299721745=238, srv604932433=308, srv1273702855=48, srv792183929=351, srv1042608200=10, srv1276335106=49, srv1486044644=83, srv676101698=328, srv998930892=392, srv200111276=200, srv1863083643=169, srv1737443479=137, srv872997185=365, srv821351126=355, srv852115805=360, srv1074355423=13, srv170952194=130, srv503430005=277, srv153887567=94, srv1415163001=69, srv1032737435=9, srv1840670515=167, srv1961921083=189, srv59745831=304, srv36715747=258, srv431547280=268, srv1524853580=92, srv1870059418=173, srv396010771=265, srv594457792=301, srv1755339428=140, srv1766275429=142, srv5565786=291, srv603898526=306, srv544570223=287, srv856030669=363, srv1542523468=95, srv915785747=374, srv356122213=253, srv1411875499=67, srv2077620970=209, srv1345529444=57, srv232339963=230, srv1250861076=44, srv1914875423=179, srv478619481=274, srv1202435626=37, srv1706089454=129, srv1810631201=163, srv1282644061=50, srv1625945288=109, srv733251129=338, srv2082830831=212, srv1612103540=107, srv612136291=310, srv1790004142=154, srv183394703=165} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:28,173 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:28,173 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:28,173 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:28,173 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:28,173 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:28,173 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:28,173 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-11 14:16:28,173 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-11 14:16:28,173 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-11 14:16:28,173 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-11 14:16:28,173 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 10 is on host 10
2023-07-11 14:16:28,173 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 11 is on host 11
2023-07-11 14:16:28,174 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 12 is on host 12
2023-07-11 14:16:28,174 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 13 is on host 13
2023-07-11 14:16:28,174 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 14 is on host 14
2023-07-11 14:16:28,174 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 15 is on host 15
2023-07-11 14:16:28,174 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 16 is on host 16
2023-07-11 14:16:28,174 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 17 is on host 17
2023-07-11 14:16:28,174 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 18 is on host 18
2023-07-11 14:16:28,174 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 19 is on host 19
2023-07-11 14:16:28,174 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 20 is on host 20
2023-07-11 14:16:28,174 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 21 is on host 21
2023-07-11 14:16:28,174 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 22 is on host 22
2023-07-11 14:16:28,174 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 23 is on host 23
2023-07-11 14:16:28,174 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 24 is on host 24
2023-07-11 14:16:28,174 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 25 is on host 25
2023-07-11 14:16:28,174 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 26 is on host 26
2023-07-11 14:16:28,174 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 27 is on host 27
2023-07-11 14:16:28,174 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 28 is on host 28
2023-07-11 14:16:28,174 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 29 is on host 29
2023-07-11 14:16:28,174 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 30 is on host 30
2023-07-11 14:16:28,174 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 31 is on host 31
2023-07-11 14:16:28,174 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 32 is on host 32
2023-07-11 14:16:28,174 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 33 is on host 33
2023-07-11 14:16:28,174 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 34 is on host 34
2023-07-11 14:16:28,174 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 35 is on host 35
2023-07-11 14:16:28,174 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 36 is on host 36
2023-07-11 14:16:28,174 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 37 is on host 37
2023-07-11 14:16:28,174 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 38 is on host 38
2023-07-11 14:16:28,174 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 39 is on host 39
2023-07-11 14:16:28,174 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 40 is on host 40
2023-07-11 14:16:28,175 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 41 is on host 41
2023-07-11 14:16:28,175 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 42 is on host 42
2023-07-11 14:16:28,175 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 43 is on host 43
2023-07-11 14:16:28,175 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 44 is on host 44
2023-07-11 14:16:28,175 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 45 is on host 45
2023-07-11 14:16:28,175 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 46 is on host 46
2023-07-11 14:16:28,175 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 47 is on host 47
2023-07-11 14:16:28,175 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 48 is on host 48
2023-07-11 14:16:28,175 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 49 is on host 49
2023-07-11 14:16:28,175 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 50 is on host 50
2023-07-11 14:16:28,175 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 51 is on host 51
2023-07-11 14:16:28,175 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 52 is on host 52
2023-07-11 14:16:28,175 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 53 is on host 53
2023-07-11 14:16:28,175 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 54 is on host 54
2023-07-11 14:16:28,175 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 55 is on host 55
2023-07-11 14:16:28,175 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 56 is on host 56
2023-07-11 14:16:28,175 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 57 is on host 57
2023-07-11 14:16:28,175 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 58 is on host 58
2023-07-11 14:16:28,175 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 59 is on host 59
2023-07-11 14:16:28,175 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 60 is on host 60
2023-07-11 14:16:28,175 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 61 is on host 61
2023-07-11 14:16:28,175 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 62 is on host 62
2023-07-11 14:16:28,175 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 63 is on host 63
2023-07-11 14:16:28,175 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 64 is on host 64
2023-07-11 14:16:28,175 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 65 is on host 65
2023-07-11 14:16:28,175 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 66 is on host 66
2023-07-11 14:16:28,175 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 67 is on host 67
2023-07-11 14:16:28,175 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 68 is on host 68
2023-07-11 14:16:28,175 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 69 is on host 69
2023-07-11 14:16:28,176 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 70 is on host 70
2023-07-11 14:16:28,176 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 71 is on host 71
2023-07-11 14:16:28,176 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 72 is on host 72
2023-07-11 14:16:28,176 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 73 is on host 73
2023-07-11 14:16:28,176 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 74 is on host 74
2023-07-11 14:16:28,176 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 75 is on host 75
2023-07-11 14:16:28,176 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 76 is on host 76
2023-07-11 14:16:28,176 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 77 is on host 77
2023-07-11 14:16:28,176 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 78 is on host 78
2023-07-11 14:16:28,176 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 79 is on host 79
2023-07-11 14:16:28,176 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 80 is on host 80
2023-07-11 14:16:28,176 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 81 is on host 81
2023-07-11 14:16:28,176 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 82 is on host 82
2023-07-11 14:16:28,176 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 83 is on host 83
2023-07-11 14:16:28,176 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 84 is on host 84
2023-07-11 14:16:28,176 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 85 is on host 85
2023-07-11 14:16:28,176 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 86 is on host 86
2023-07-11 14:16:28,176 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 87 is on host 87
2023-07-11 14:16:28,176 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 88 is on host 88
2023-07-11 14:16:28,176 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 89 is on host 89
2023-07-11 14:16:28,176 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 90 is on host 90
2023-07-11 14:16:28,176 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 91 is on host 91
2023-07-11 14:16:28,176 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 92 is on host 92
2023-07-11 14:16:28,176 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 93 is on host 93
2023-07-11 14:16:28,176 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 94 is on host 94
2023-07-11 14:16:28,176 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 95 is on host 95
2023-07-11 14:16:28,176 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 96 is on host 96
2023-07-11 14:16:28,176 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 97 is on host 97
2023-07-11 14:16:28,176 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 98 is on host 98
2023-07-11 14:16:28,177 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 99 is on host 99
2023-07-11 14:16:28,177 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 100 is on host 100
2023-07-11 14:16:28,177 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 101 is on host 101
2023-07-11 14:16:28,177 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 102 is on host 102
2023-07-11 14:16:28,177 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 103 is on host 103
2023-07-11 14:16:28,177 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 104 is on host 104
2023-07-11 14:16:28,177 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 105 is on host 105
2023-07-11 14:16:28,177 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 106 is on host 106
2023-07-11 14:16:28,177 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 107 is on host 107
2023-07-11 14:16:28,177 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 108 is on host 108
2023-07-11 14:16:28,177 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 109 is on host 109
2023-07-11 14:16:28,177 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 110 is on host 110
2023-07-11 14:16:28,177 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 111 is on host 111
2023-07-11 14:16:28,177 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 112 is on host 112
2023-07-11 14:16:28,177 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 113 is on host 113
2023-07-11 14:16:28,177 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 114 is on host 114
2023-07-11 14:16:28,177 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 115 is on host 115
2023-07-11 14:16:28,177 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 116 is on host 116
2023-07-11 14:16:28,177 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 117 is on host 117
2023-07-11 14:16:28,177 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 118 is on host 118
2023-07-11 14:16:28,178 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 119 is on host 119
2023-07-11 14:16:28,178 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 120 is on host 120
2023-07-11 14:16:28,178 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 121 is on host 121
2023-07-11 14:16:28,178 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 122 is on host 122
2023-07-11 14:16:28,178 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 123 is on host 123
2023-07-11 14:16:28,178 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 124 is on host 124
2023-07-11 14:16:28,178 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 125 is on host 125
2023-07-11 14:16:28,178 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 126 is on host 126
2023-07-11 14:16:28,178 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 127 is on host 127
2023-07-11 14:16:28,178 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 128 is on host 128
2023-07-11 14:16:28,178 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 129 is on host 129
2023-07-11 14:16:28,178 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 130 is on host 130
2023-07-11 14:16:28,178 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 131 is on host 131
2023-07-11 14:16:28,178 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 132 is on host 132
2023-07-11 14:16:28,178 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 133 is on host 133
2023-07-11 14:16:28,178 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 134 is on host 134
2023-07-11 14:16:28,178 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 135 is on host 135
2023-07-11 14:16:28,178 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 136 is on host 136
2023-07-11 14:16:28,178 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 137 is on host 137
2023-07-11 14:16:28,178 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 138 is on host 138
2023-07-11 14:16:28,178 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 139 is on host 139
2023-07-11 14:16:28,178 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 140 is on host 140
2023-07-11 14:16:28,178 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 141 is on host 141
2023-07-11 14:16:28,178 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 142 is on host 142
2023-07-11 14:16:28,178 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 143 is on host 143
2023-07-11 14:16:28,178 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 144 is on host 144
2023-07-11 14:16:28,178 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 145 is on host 145
2023-07-11 14:16:28,178 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 146 is on host 146
2023-07-11 14:16:28,179 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 147 is on host 147
2023-07-11 14:16:28,179 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 148 is on host 148
2023-07-11 14:16:28,179 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 149 is on host 149
2023-07-11 14:16:28,179 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 150 is on host 150
2023-07-11 14:16:28,179 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 151 is on host 151
2023-07-11 14:16:28,179 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 152 is on host 152
2023-07-11 14:16:28,179 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 153 is on host 153
2023-07-11 14:16:28,179 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 154 is on host 154
2023-07-11 14:16:28,179 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 155 is on host 155
2023-07-11 14:16:28,179 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 156 is on host 156
2023-07-11 14:16:28,179 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 157 is on host 157
2023-07-11 14:16:28,179 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 158 is on host 158
2023-07-11 14:16:28,179 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 159 is on host 159
2023-07-11 14:16:28,179 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 160 is on host 160
2023-07-11 14:16:28,179 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 161 is on host 161
2023-07-11 14:16:28,179 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 162 is on host 162
2023-07-11 14:16:28,179 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 163 is on host 163
2023-07-11 14:16:28,179 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 164 is on host 164
2023-07-11 14:16:28,179 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 165 is on host 165
2023-07-11 14:16:28,179 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 166 is on host 166
2023-07-11 14:16:28,179 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 167 is on host 167
2023-07-11 14:16:28,179 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 168 is on host 168
2023-07-11 14:16:28,179 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 169 is on host 169
2023-07-11 14:16:28,179 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 170 is on host 170
2023-07-11 14:16:28,179 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 171 is on host 171
2023-07-11 14:16:28,179 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 172 is on host 172
2023-07-11 14:16:28,179 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 173 is on host 173
2023-07-11 14:16:28,179 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 174 is on host 174
2023-07-11 14:16:28,179 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 175 is on host 175
2023-07-11 14:16:28,179 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 176 is on host 176
2023-07-11 14:16:28,180 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 177 is on host 177
2023-07-11 14:16:28,180 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 178 is on host 178
2023-07-11 14:16:28,180 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 179 is on host 179
2023-07-11 14:16:28,180 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 180 is on host 180
2023-07-11 14:16:28,180 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 181 is on host 181
2023-07-11 14:16:28,180 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 182 is on host 182
2023-07-11 14:16:28,180 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 183 is on host 183
2023-07-11 14:16:28,180 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 184 is on host 184
2023-07-11 14:16:28,180 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 185 is on host 185
2023-07-11 14:16:28,180 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 186 is on host 186
2023-07-11 14:16:28,180 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 187 is on host 187
2023-07-11 14:16:28,180 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 188 is on host 188
2023-07-11 14:16:28,180 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 189 is on host 189
2023-07-11 14:16:28,180 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 190 is on host 190
2023-07-11 14:16:28,180 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 191 is on host 191
2023-07-11 14:16:28,180 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 192 is on host 192
2023-07-11 14:16:28,180 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 193 is on host 193
2023-07-11 14:16:28,180 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 194 is on host 194
2023-07-11 14:16:28,180 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 195 is on host 195
2023-07-11 14:16:28,180 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 196 is on host 196
2023-07-11 14:16:28,180 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 197 is on host 197
2023-07-11 14:16:28,180 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 198 is on host 198
2023-07-11 14:16:28,180 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 199 is on host 199
2023-07-11 14:16:28,180 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 200 is on host 200
2023-07-11 14:16:28,180 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 201 is on host 201
2023-07-11 14:16:28,180 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 202 is on host 202
2023-07-11 14:16:28,180 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 203 is on host 203
2023-07-11 14:16:28,180 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 204 is on host 204
2023-07-11 14:16:28,180 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 205 is on host 205
2023-07-11 14:16:28,181 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 206 is on host 206
2023-07-11 14:16:28,181 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 207 is on host 207
2023-07-11 14:16:28,181 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 208 is on host 208
2023-07-11 14:16:28,181 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 209 is on host 209
2023-07-11 14:16:28,181 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 210 is on host 210
2023-07-11 14:16:28,181 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 211 is on host 211
2023-07-11 14:16:28,181 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 212 is on host 212
2023-07-11 14:16:28,181 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 213 is on host 213
2023-07-11 14:16:28,181 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 214 is on host 214
2023-07-11 14:16:28,181 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 215 is on host 215
2023-07-11 14:16:28,181 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 216 is on host 216
2023-07-11 14:16:28,181 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 217 is on host 217
2023-07-11 14:16:28,181 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 218 is on host 218
2023-07-11 14:16:28,181 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 219 is on host 219
2023-07-11 14:16:28,181 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 220 is on host 220
2023-07-11 14:16:28,181 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 221 is on host 221
2023-07-11 14:16:28,181 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 222 is on host 222
2023-07-11 14:16:28,181 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 223 is on host 223
2023-07-11 14:16:28,181 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 224 is on host 224
2023-07-11 14:16:28,181 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 225 is on host 225
2023-07-11 14:16:28,181 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 226 is on host 226
2023-07-11 14:16:28,181 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 227 is on host 227
2023-07-11 14:16:28,181 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 228 is on host 228
2023-07-11 14:16:28,181 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 229 is on host 229
2023-07-11 14:16:28,181 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 230 is on host 230
2023-07-11 14:16:28,181 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 231 is on host 231
2023-07-11 14:16:28,181 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 232 is on host 232
2023-07-11 14:16:28,181 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 233 is on host 233
2023-07-11 14:16:28,182 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 234 is on host 234
2023-07-11 14:16:28,182 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 235 is on host 235
2023-07-11 14:16:28,182 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 236 is on host 236
2023-07-11 14:16:28,182 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 237 is on host 237
2023-07-11 14:16:28,182 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 238 is on host 238
2023-07-11 14:16:28,182 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 239 is on host 239
2023-07-11 14:16:28,182 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 240 is on host 240
2023-07-11 14:16:28,182 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 241 is on host 241
2023-07-11 14:16:28,182 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 242 is on host 242
2023-07-11 14:16:28,182 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 243 is on host 243
2023-07-11 14:16:28,182 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 244 is on host 244
2023-07-11 14:16:28,182 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 245 is on host 245
2023-07-11 14:16:28,182 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 246 is on host 246
2023-07-11 14:16:28,182 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 247 is on host 247
2023-07-11 14:16:28,182 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 248 is on host 248
2023-07-11 14:16:28,182 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 249 is on host 249
2023-07-11 14:16:28,182 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 250 is on host 250
2023-07-11 14:16:28,182 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 251 is on host 251
2023-07-11 14:16:28,182 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 252 is on host 252
2023-07-11 14:16:28,182 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 253 is on host 253
2023-07-11 14:16:28,182 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 254 is on host 254
2023-07-11 14:16:28,182 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 255 is on host 255
2023-07-11 14:16:28,182 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 256 is on host 256
2023-07-11 14:16:28,182 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 257 is on host 257
2023-07-11 14:16:28,182 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 258 is on host 258
2023-07-11 14:16:28,182 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 259 is on host 259
2023-07-11 14:16:28,182 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 260 is on host 260
2023-07-11 14:16:28,182 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 261 is on host 261
2023-07-11 14:16:28,182 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 262 is on host 262
2023-07-11 14:16:28,182 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 263 is on host 263
2023-07-11 14:16:28,183 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 264 is on host 264
2023-07-11 14:16:28,183 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 265 is on host 265
2023-07-11 14:16:28,183 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 266 is on host 266
2023-07-11 14:16:28,183 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 267 is on host 267
2023-07-11 14:16:28,183 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 268 is on host 268
2023-07-11 14:16:28,183 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 269 is on host 269
2023-07-11 14:16:28,183 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 270 is on host 270
2023-07-11 14:16:28,183 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 271 is on host 271
2023-07-11 14:16:28,183 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 272 is on host 272
2023-07-11 14:16:28,183 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 273 is on host 273
2023-07-11 14:16:28,183 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 274 is on host 274
2023-07-11 14:16:28,183 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 275 is on host 275
2023-07-11 14:16:28,183 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 276 is on host 276
2023-07-11 14:16:28,183 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 277 is on host 277
2023-07-11 14:16:28,183 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 278 is on host 278
2023-07-11 14:16:28,183 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 279 is on host 279
2023-07-11 14:16:28,183 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 280 is on host 280
2023-07-11 14:16:28,183 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 281 is on host 281
2023-07-11 14:16:28,183 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 282 is on host 282
2023-07-11 14:16:28,183 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 283 is on host 283
2023-07-11 14:16:28,183 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 284 is on host 284
2023-07-11 14:16:28,183 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 285 is on host 285
2023-07-11 14:16:28,183 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 286 is on host 286
2023-07-11 14:16:28,183 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 287 is on host 287
2023-07-11 14:16:28,183 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 288 is on host 288
2023-07-11 14:16:28,183 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 289 is on host 289
2023-07-11 14:16:28,183 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 290 is on host 290
2023-07-11 14:16:28,183 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 291 is on host 291
2023-07-11 14:16:28,183 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 292 is on host 292
2023-07-11 14:16:28,184 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 293 is on host 293
2023-07-11 14:16:28,184 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 294 is on host 294
2023-07-11 14:16:28,184 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 295 is on host 295
2023-07-11 14:16:28,184 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 296 is on host 296
2023-07-11 14:16:28,184 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 297 is on host 297
2023-07-11 14:16:28,184 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 298 is on host 298
2023-07-11 14:16:28,184 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 299 is on host 299
2023-07-11 14:16:28,184 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 300 is on host 300
2023-07-11 14:16:28,184 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 301 is on host 301
2023-07-11 14:16:28,184 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 302 is on host 302
2023-07-11 14:16:28,184 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 303 is on host 303
2023-07-11 14:16:28,184 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 304 is on host 304
2023-07-11 14:16:28,184 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 305 is on host 305
2023-07-11 14:16:28,184 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 306 is on host 306
2023-07-11 14:16:28,184 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 307 is on host 307
2023-07-11 14:16:28,184 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 308 is on host 308
2023-07-11 14:16:28,184 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 309 is on host 309
2023-07-11 14:16:28,184 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 310 is on host 310
2023-07-11 14:16:28,184 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 311 is on host 311
2023-07-11 14:16:28,184 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 312 is on host 312
2023-07-11 14:16:28,184 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 313 is on host 313
2023-07-11 14:16:28,184 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 314 is on host 314
2023-07-11 14:16:28,184 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 315 is on host 315
2023-07-11 14:16:28,184 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 316 is on host 316
2023-07-11 14:16:28,184 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 317 is on host 317
2023-07-11 14:16:28,184 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 318 is on host 318
2023-07-11 14:16:28,184 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 319 is on host 319
2023-07-11 14:16:28,184 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 320 is on host 320
2023-07-11 14:16:28,184 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 321 is on host 321
2023-07-11 14:16:28,185 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 322 is on host 322
2023-07-11 14:16:28,185 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 323 is on host 323
2023-07-11 14:16:28,185 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 324 is on host 324
2023-07-11 14:16:28,185 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 325 is on host 325
2023-07-11 14:16:28,185 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 326 is on host 326
2023-07-11 14:16:28,185 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 327 is on host 327
2023-07-11 14:16:28,185 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 328 is on host 328
2023-07-11 14:16:28,185 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 329 is on host 329
2023-07-11 14:16:28,185 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 330 is on host 330
2023-07-11 14:16:28,185 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 331 is on host 331
2023-07-11 14:16:28,185 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 332 is on host 332
2023-07-11 14:16:28,185 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 333 is on host 333
2023-07-11 14:16:28,185 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 334 is on host 334
2023-07-11 14:16:28,185 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 335 is on host 335
2023-07-11 14:16:28,185 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 336 is on host 336
2023-07-11 14:16:28,185 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 337 is on host 337
2023-07-11 14:16:28,185 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 338 is on host 338
2023-07-11 14:16:28,185 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 339 is on host 339
2023-07-11 14:16:28,185 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 340 is on host 340
2023-07-11 14:16:28,185 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 341 is on host 341
2023-07-11 14:16:28,185 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 342 is on host 342
2023-07-11 14:16:28,185 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 343 is on host 343
2023-07-11 14:16:28,185 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 344 is on host 344
2023-07-11 14:16:28,185 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 345 is on host 345
2023-07-11 14:16:28,185 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 346 is on host 346
2023-07-11 14:16:28,185 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 347 is on host 347
2023-07-11 14:16:28,185 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 348 is on host 348
2023-07-11 14:16:28,185 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 349 is on host 349
2023-07-11 14:16:28,185 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 350 is on host 350
2023-07-11 14:16:28,186 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 351 is on host 351
2023-07-11 14:16:28,186 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 352 is on host 352
2023-07-11 14:16:28,186 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 353 is on host 353
2023-07-11 14:16:28,186 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 354 is on host 354
2023-07-11 14:16:28,186 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 355 is on host 355
2023-07-11 14:16:28,186 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 356 is on host 356
2023-07-11 14:16:28,186 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 357 is on host 357
2023-07-11 14:16:28,186 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 358 is on host 358
2023-07-11 14:16:28,186 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 359 is on host 359
2023-07-11 14:16:28,186 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 360 is on host 360
2023-07-11 14:16:28,186 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 361 is on host 361
2023-07-11 14:16:28,186 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 362 is on host 362
2023-07-11 14:16:28,186 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 363 is on host 363
2023-07-11 14:16:28,186 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 364 is on host 364
2023-07-11 14:16:28,186 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 365 is on host 365
2023-07-11 14:16:28,186 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 366 is on host 366
2023-07-11 14:16:28,186 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 367 is on host 367
2023-07-11 14:16:28,186 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 368 is on host 368
2023-07-11 14:16:28,186 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 369 is on host 369
2023-07-11 14:16:28,186 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 370 is on host 370
2023-07-11 14:16:28,186 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 371 is on host 371
2023-07-11 14:16:28,186 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 372 is on host 372
2023-07-11 14:16:28,186 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 373 is on host 373
2023-07-11 14:16:28,186 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 374 is on host 374
2023-07-11 14:16:28,186 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 375 is on host 375
2023-07-11 14:16:28,186 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 376 is on host 376
2023-07-11 14:16:28,186 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 377 is on host 377
2023-07-11 14:16:28,186 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 378 is on host 378
2023-07-11 14:16:28,186 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 379 is on host 379
2023-07-11 14:16:28,187 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 380 is on host 380
2023-07-11 14:16:28,187 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 381 is on host 381
2023-07-11 14:16:28,187 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 382 is on host 382
2023-07-11 14:16:28,187 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 383 is on host 383
2023-07-11 14:16:28,187 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 384 is on host 384
2023-07-11 14:16:28,187 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 385 is on host 385
2023-07-11 14:16:28,187 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 386 is on host 386
2023-07-11 14:16:28,187 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 387 is on host 387
2023-07-11 14:16:28,187 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 388 is on host 388
2023-07-11 14:16:28,187 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 389 is on host 389
2023-07-11 14:16:28,187 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 390 is on host 390
2023-07-11 14:16:28,187 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 391 is on host 391
2023-07-11 14:16:28,187 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 392 is on host 392
2023-07-11 14:16:28,187 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=393, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:28,187 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table29) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:28,187 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table20
2023-07-11 14:16:28,188 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv553536953=290, srv1630071126=110, srv1071894870=12, srv23511728=232, srv658346947=323, srv2025338799=204, srv1397994335=64, srv1976766403=195, srv1644629726=118, srv957637734=381, srv2079182457=210, srv1749264468=139, srv2046129126=206, srv1595762596=104, srv603990852=307, srv1973073480=194, srv958856137=382, srv644066832=319, srv557062842=292, srv277765671=235, srv732221418=337, srv1769385567=143, srv224612199=228, srv714752528=334, srv362526040=256, srv581128949=296, srv2133511466=223, srv1144239257=30, srv320603627=245, srv1679952521=126, srv2122867873=222, srv1110067064=24, srv256251994=233, srv63261708=317, srv89837390=371, srv552104598=289, srv508952995=281, srv2096011353=214, srv1770417148=144, srv1246723478=42, srv929436444=378, srv2082192429=211, srv234917297=231, srv405700573=266, srv183644386=166, srv1488378513=85, srv173139715=136, srv1154180352=32, srv355693379=252, srv1407521654=66, srv496848057=275, srv1157975499=33, srv1806731027=162, srv1923102804=184, srv311102455=244, srv450011410=271, srv771515724=348, srv389183508=262, srv1249074416=43, srv2014575201=201, srv640847108=318, srv832363565=356, srv1970882134=192, srv2107358603=218, srv855766065=361, srv1336043388=55, srv29397186=237, srv982792848=390, srv976560524=386, srv101181760=3, srv1093549482=21, srv2018389395=202, srv2113483104=221, srv1778339118=149, srv1968709692=190, srv705221118=333, srv159600090=105, srv1919608486=180, srv981255102=389, srv807899713=353, srv755110395=344, srv1770594519=145, srv739692705=340, srv1076582671=16, srv693869315=330, srv1079048717=17, srv440657532=270, srv1636659280=115, srv2108739257=220, srv668373413=326, srv1003610393=2, srv1054229197=11, srv1868589627=172, srv2103522371=217, srv1000546271=0, srv951670617=380, srv2042909593=205, srv1865656038=171, srv1466355012=78, srv703662406=332, srv1418112884=70, srv1215580291=40, srv71833528=335, srv1580581635=103, srv1021032212=5, srv1080806312=19, srv1985601859=197, srv74471954=343, srv1647472319=119, srv2071553346=208, srv1632855171=112, srv1122009370=27, srv13613992=61, srv1630777154=111, srv301413669=239, srv550697728=288, srv1296023857=53, srv1724550977=133, srv1989290370=198, srv1926417985=185, srv1678097199=125, srv1461034373=76, srv614690415=311, srv2098345381=215, srv310463473=243, srv1011934105=4, srv148627129=84, srv305489318=240, srv1256534903=46, srv1289731445=52, srv1798844587=157, srv567113085=294, srv1119222501=26, srv2055117940=207, srv855898852=362, srv629224816=316, srv1075943554=15, srv625909061=315, srv1705591942=128, srv734225580=339, srv660107924=324, srv1381729938=62, srv1633483173=113, srv408265476=267, srv1776057793=148, srv1360253411=60, srv1511424834=90, srv1414162621=68, srv883343663=370, srv151859222=91, srv349144930=251, srv1991304034=199, srv1825887791=164, srv601657063=305, srv758932951=345, srv1651629087=120, srv1864623584=170, srv682957691=329, srv1500454146=88, srv1725962085=135, srv1659841448=121, srv1253206004=45, srv52354442=284, srv18508093=168, srv1427731921=73, srv561344974=293, srv721668125=336, srv1575482138=100, srv914128771=373, srv961487230=383, srv741332941=342, srv533032466=286, srv1574140987=99, srv2139849097=224, srv503902262=278, srv674807007=327, srv1786829855=153, srv2088727517=213, srv394366966=264, srv980089565=388, srv114594288=31, srv38296437=261, srv214835574=226, srv1887224977=176, srv1025509362=7, srv1577020334=102, srv524466665=285, srv393561021=263, srv759909927=346, srv763556514=347, srv786453030=349, srv2142935488=225, srv618111613=312, srv16254163=108, srv343211061=250, srv476075173=273, srv1269632212=47, srv333589612=246, srv499015361=276, srv836674186=357, srv1799191687=158, srv1446998035=74, srv1571774199=98, srv1115354947=25, srv333860881=247, srv1724152600=132, srv1598699299=106, srv177885829=151, srv472125887=272, srv1101339966=22, srv1424985362=72, srv1945569895=188, srv594128294=300, srv1026739237=8, srv842459828=358, srv878519137=366, srv1921260729=181, srv339110834=249, srv504099471=279, srv814253179=354, srv1643744885=116, srv1793847521=155, srv607234624=309, srv698219051=331, srv1688538732=127, srv666240078=325, srv1079284733=18, srv29210550=236, srv506181748=280, srv881313122=368, srv1945452576=187, srv597307897=303, srv1285120424=51, srv1887943816=177, srv1983604698=196, srv1805465940=161, srv309309336=242, srv1719756294=131, srv1349932676=58, srv1208486369=38, srv1643971570=117, srv1509331489=89, srv334105385=248, srv1400515744=65, srv369984715=259, srv43712162=269, srv842675864=359, srv1803258748=160, srv1022450918=6, srv1775108732=147, srv1766088250=141, srv180150732=159, srv1220857227=41, srv226530501=229, srv362032108=255, srv919715380=377, srv1074935976=14, srv1395030819=63, srv803291569=352, srv1877966766=175, srv220538712=227, srv2021718843=203, srv2107782185=219, srv882216860=369, srv1489137852=86, srv1972328734=193, srv1470759982=79, srv1774824811=146, srv971974774=384, srv1418242791=71, srv1001274196=1, srv909615097=372, srv1537724566=93, srv1165799954=34, srv1724754364=134, srv978173525=387, srv113319438=29, srv578033735=295, srv147931272=80, srv1183635941=35, srv1904215245=178, srv596349756=302, srv880835255=367, srv857544550=364, srv1779729022=152, srv1795612465=156, srv621083045=314, srv917704170=375, srv1351811120=59, srv1316710897=54, srv789820555=350, srv1922580095=183, srv305567304=241, srv1936745425=186, srv1745318024=138, srv1210822057=39, srv645375717=320, srv950628389=379, srv1490199189=87, srv1575919256=101, srv154481102=96, srv359402967=254, srv997716931=391, srv1457224273=75, srv581644449=297, srv1872374768=174, srv363177310=257, srv740327512=341, srv1664227236=123, srv972330517=385, srv1634261306=114, srv1662183707=122, srv1969046891=191, srv1485266211=82, srv1778842262=150, srv588410181=298, srv1921840985=182, srv591279493=299, srv37574565=260, srv1104147458=23, srv1190166330=36, srv652270371=322, srv1484309042=81, srv1560148463=97, srv618569548=313, srv2102708311=216, srv1084873074=20, srv517669556=283, srv918152084=376, srv649714317=321, srv1674484790=124, srv1339239880=56, srv1461073271=77, srv1125312901=28, srv25633292=234, srv516616923=282, srv299721745=238, srv604932433=308, srv1273702855=48, srv792183929=351, srv1042608200=10, srv1276335106=49, srv1486044644=83, srv676101698=328, srv998930892=392, srv200111276=200, srv1863083643=169, srv1737443479=137, srv872997185=365, srv821351126=355, srv852115805=360, srv1074355423=13, srv170952194=130, srv503430005=277, srv153887567=94, srv1415163001=69, srv1032737435=9, srv1840670515=167, srv1961921083=189, srv59745831=304, srv36715747=258, srv431547280=268, srv1524853580=92, srv1870059418=173, srv396010771=265, srv594457792=301, srv1755339428=140, srv1766275429=142, srv5565786=291, srv603898526=306, srv544570223=287, srv856030669=363, srv1542523468=95, srv915785747=374, srv356122213=253, srv1411875499=67, srv2077620970=209, srv1345529444=57, srv232339963=230, srv1250861076=44, srv1914875423=179, srv478619481=274, srv1202435626=37, srv1706089454=129, srv1810631201=163, srv1282644061=50, srv1625945288=109, srv733251129=338, srv2082830831=212, srv1612103540=107, srv612136291=310, srv1790004142=154, srv183394703=165} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:28,188 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:28,188 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:28,188 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:28,188 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:28,188 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:28,188 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:28,188 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-11 14:16:28,188 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-11 14:16:28,188 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-11 14:16:28,188 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-11 14:16:28,188 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 10 is on host 10
2023-07-11 14:16:28,188 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 11 is on host 11
2023-07-11 14:16:28,188 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 12 is on host 12
2023-07-11 14:16:28,188 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 13 is on host 13
2023-07-11 14:16:28,189 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 14 is on host 14
2023-07-11 14:16:28,189 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 15 is on host 15
2023-07-11 14:16:28,189 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 16 is on host 16
2023-07-11 14:16:28,189 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 17 is on host 17
2023-07-11 14:16:28,189 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 18 is on host 18
2023-07-11 14:16:28,189 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 19 is on host 19
2023-07-11 14:16:28,189 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 20 is on host 20
2023-07-11 14:16:28,189 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 21 is on host 21
2023-07-11 14:16:28,189 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 22 is on host 22
2023-07-11 14:16:28,189 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 23 is on host 23
2023-07-11 14:16:28,189 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 24 is on host 24
2023-07-11 14:16:28,189 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 25 is on host 25
2023-07-11 14:16:28,189 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 26 is on host 26
2023-07-11 14:16:28,189 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 27 is on host 27
2023-07-11 14:16:28,189 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 28 is on host 28
2023-07-11 14:16:28,189 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 29 is on host 29
2023-07-11 14:16:28,189 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 30 is on host 30
2023-07-11 14:16:28,189 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 31 is on host 31
2023-07-11 14:16:28,189 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 32 is on host 32
2023-07-11 14:16:28,190 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 33 is on host 33
2023-07-11 14:16:28,190 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 34 is on host 34
2023-07-11 14:16:28,190 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 35 is on host 35
2023-07-11 14:16:28,190 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 36 is on host 36
2023-07-11 14:16:28,190 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 37 is on host 37
2023-07-11 14:16:28,190 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 38 is on host 38
2023-07-11 14:16:28,190 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 39 is on host 39
2023-07-11 14:16:28,190 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 40 is on host 40
2023-07-11 14:16:28,190 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 41 is on host 41
2023-07-11 14:16:28,190 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 42 is on host 42
2023-07-11 14:16:28,190 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 43 is on host 43
2023-07-11 14:16:28,190 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 44 is on host 44
2023-07-11 14:16:28,190 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 45 is on host 45
2023-07-11 14:16:28,190 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 46 is on host 46
2023-07-11 14:16:28,190 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 47 is on host 47
2023-07-11 14:16:28,190 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 48 is on host 48
2023-07-11 14:16:28,190 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 49 is on host 49
2023-07-11 14:16:28,190 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 50 is on host 50
2023-07-11 14:16:28,190 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 51 is on host 51
2023-07-11 14:16:28,190 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 52 is on host 52
2023-07-11 14:16:28,190 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 53 is on host 53
2023-07-11 14:16:28,190 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 54 is on host 54
2023-07-11 14:16:28,190 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 55 is on host 55
2023-07-11 14:16:28,190 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 56 is on host 56
2023-07-11 14:16:28,190 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 57 is on host 57
2023-07-11 14:16:28,190 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 58 is on host 58
2023-07-11 14:16:28,190 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 59 is on host 59
2023-07-11 14:16:28,190 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 60 is on host 60
2023-07-11 14:16:28,190 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 61 is on host 61
2023-07-11 14:16:28,191 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 62 is on host 62
2023-07-11 14:16:28,191 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 63 is on host 63
2023-07-11 14:16:28,191 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 64 is on host 64
2023-07-11 14:16:28,191 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 65 is on host 65
2023-07-11 14:16:28,191 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 66 is on host 66
2023-07-11 14:16:28,191 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 67 is on host 67
2023-07-11 14:16:28,191 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 68 is on host 68
2023-07-11 14:16:28,191 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 69 is on host 69
2023-07-11 14:16:28,191 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 70 is on host 70
2023-07-11 14:16:28,191 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 71 is on host 71
2023-07-11 14:16:28,191 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 72 is on host 72
2023-07-11 14:16:28,191 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 73 is on host 73
2023-07-11 14:16:28,191 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 74 is on host 74
2023-07-11 14:16:28,191 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 75 is on host 75
2023-07-11 14:16:28,191 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 76 is on host 76
2023-07-11 14:16:28,191 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 77 is on host 77
2023-07-11 14:16:28,191 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 78 is on host 78
2023-07-11 14:16:28,191 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 79 is on host 79
2023-07-11 14:16:28,191 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 80 is on host 80
2023-07-11 14:16:28,191 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 81 is on host 81
2023-07-11 14:16:28,191 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 82 is on host 82
2023-07-11 14:16:28,191 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 83 is on host 83
2023-07-11 14:16:28,191 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 84 is on host 84
2023-07-11 14:16:28,191 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 85 is on host 85
2023-07-11 14:16:28,191 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 86 is on host 86
2023-07-11 14:16:28,191 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 87 is on host 87
2023-07-11 14:16:28,191 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 88 is on host 88
2023-07-11 14:16:28,191 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 89 is on host 89
2023-07-11 14:16:28,191 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 90 is on host 90
2023-07-11 14:16:28,191 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 91 is on host 91
2023-07-11 14:16:28,192 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 92 is on host 92
2023-07-11 14:16:28,192 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 93 is on host 93
2023-07-11 14:16:28,192 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 94 is on host 94
2023-07-11 14:16:28,192 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 95 is on host 95
2023-07-11 14:16:28,192 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 96 is on host 96
2023-07-11 14:16:28,192 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 97 is on host 97
2023-07-11 14:16:28,192 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 98 is on host 98
2023-07-11 14:16:28,192 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 99 is on host 99
2023-07-11 14:16:28,192 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 100 is on host 100
2023-07-11 14:16:28,192 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 101 is on host 101
2023-07-11 14:16:28,192 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 102 is on host 102
2023-07-11 14:16:28,192 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 103 is on host 103
2023-07-11 14:16:28,192 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 104 is on host 104
2023-07-11 14:16:28,192 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 105 is on host 105
2023-07-11 14:16:28,192 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 106 is on host 106
2023-07-11 14:16:28,192 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 107 is on host 107
2023-07-11 14:16:28,192 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 108 is on host 108
2023-07-11 14:16:28,192 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 109 is on host 109
2023-07-11 14:16:28,192 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 110 is on host 110
2023-07-11 14:16:28,192 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 111 is on host 111
2023-07-11 14:16:28,192 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 112 is on host 112
2023-07-11 14:16:28,192 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 113 is on host 113
2023-07-11 14:16:28,192 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 114 is on host 114
2023-07-11 14:16:28,192 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 115 is on host 115
2023-07-11 14:16:28,192 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 116 is on host 116
2023-07-11 14:16:28,192 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 117 is on host 117
2023-07-11 14:16:28,192 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 118 is on host 118
2023-07-11 14:16:28,192 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 119 is on host 119
2023-07-11 14:16:28,192 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 120 is on host 120
2023-07-11 14:16:28,193 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 121 is on host 121
2023-07-11 14:16:28,193 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 122 is on host 122
2023-07-11 14:16:28,193 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 123 is on host 123
2023-07-11 14:16:28,193 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 124 is on host 124
2023-07-11 14:16:28,193 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 125 is on host 125
2023-07-11 14:16:28,193 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 126 is on host 126
2023-07-11 14:16:28,193 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 127 is on host 127
2023-07-11 14:16:28,193 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 128 is on host 128
2023-07-11 14:16:28,193 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 129 is on host 129
2023-07-11 14:16:28,193 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 130 is on host 130
2023-07-11 14:16:28,193 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 131 is on host 131
2023-07-11 14:16:28,193 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 132 is on host 132
2023-07-11 14:16:28,193 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 133 is on host 133
2023-07-11 14:16:28,193 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 134 is on host 134
2023-07-11 14:16:28,193 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 135 is on host 135
2023-07-11 14:16:28,193 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 136 is on host 136
2023-07-11 14:16:28,193 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 137 is on host 137
2023-07-11 14:16:28,193 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 138 is on host 138
2023-07-11 14:16:28,193 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 139 is on host 139
2023-07-11 14:16:28,193 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 140 is on host 140
2023-07-11 14:16:28,193 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 141 is on host 141
2023-07-11 14:16:28,193 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 142 is on host 142
2023-07-11 14:16:28,193 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 143 is on host 143
2023-07-11 14:16:28,193 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 144 is on host 144
2023-07-11 14:16:28,193 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 145 is on host 145
2023-07-11 14:16:28,193 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 146 is on host 146
2023-07-11 14:16:28,193 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 147 is on host 147
2023-07-11 14:16:28,193 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 148 is on host 148
2023-07-11 14:16:28,193 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 149 is on host 149
2023-07-11 14:16:28,194 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 150 is on host 150
2023-07-11 14:16:28,194 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 151 is on host 151
2023-07-11 14:16:28,194 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 152 is on host 152
2023-07-11 14:16:28,194 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 153 is on host 153
2023-07-11 14:16:28,194 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 154 is on host 154
2023-07-11 14:16:28,194 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 155 is on host 155
2023-07-11 14:16:28,194 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 156 is on host 156
2023-07-11 14:16:28,194 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 157 is on host 157
2023-07-11 14:16:28,194 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 158 is on host 158
2023-07-11 14:16:28,194 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 159 is on host 159
2023-07-11 14:16:28,194 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 160 is on host 160
2023-07-11 14:16:28,194 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 161 is on host 161
2023-07-11 14:16:28,194 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 162 is on host 162
2023-07-11 14:16:28,194 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 163 is on host 163
2023-07-11 14:16:28,194 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 164 is on host 164
2023-07-11 14:16:28,194 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 165 is on host 165
2023-07-11 14:16:28,194 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 166 is on host 166
2023-07-11 14:16:28,194 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 167 is on host 167
2023-07-11 14:16:28,194 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 168 is on host 168
2023-07-11 14:16:28,194 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 169 is on host 169
2023-07-11 14:16:28,194 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 170 is on host 170
2023-07-11 14:16:28,194 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 171 is on host 171
2023-07-11 14:16:28,194 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 172 is on host 172
2023-07-11 14:16:28,194 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 173 is on host 173
2023-07-11 14:16:28,194 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 174 is on host 174
2023-07-11 14:16:28,194 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 175 is on host 175
2023-07-11 14:16:28,194 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 176 is on host 176
2023-07-11 14:16:28,194 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 177 is on host 177
2023-07-11 14:16:28,194 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 178 is on host 178
2023-07-11 14:16:28,195 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 179 is on host 179
2023-07-11 14:16:28,195 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 180 is on host 180
2023-07-11 14:16:28,195 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 181 is on host 181
2023-07-11 14:16:28,195 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 182 is on host 182
2023-07-11 14:16:28,195 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 183 is on host 183
2023-07-11 14:16:28,195 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 184 is on host 184
2023-07-11 14:16:28,195 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 185 is on host 185
2023-07-11 14:16:28,195 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 186 is on host 186
2023-07-11 14:16:28,195 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 187 is on host 187
2023-07-11 14:16:28,195 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 188 is on host 188
2023-07-11 14:16:28,195 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 189 is on host 189
2023-07-11 14:16:28,195 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 190 is on host 190
2023-07-11 14:16:28,195 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 191 is on host 191
2023-07-11 14:16:28,195 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 192 is on host 192
2023-07-11 14:16:28,195 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 193 is on host 193
2023-07-11 14:16:28,195 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 194 is on host 194
2023-07-11 14:16:28,195 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 195 is on host 195
2023-07-11 14:16:28,195 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 196 is on host 196
2023-07-11 14:16:28,195 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 197 is on host 197
2023-07-11 14:16:28,195 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 198 is on host 198
2023-07-11 14:16:28,195 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 199 is on host 199
2023-07-11 14:16:28,195 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 200 is on host 200
2023-07-11 14:16:28,195 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 201 is on host 201
2023-07-11 14:16:28,195 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 202 is on host 202
2023-07-11 14:16:28,195 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 203 is on host 203
2023-07-11 14:16:28,195 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 204 is on host 204
2023-07-11 14:16:28,195 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 205 is on host 205
2023-07-11 14:16:28,195 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 206 is on host 206
2023-07-11 14:16:28,195 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 207 is on host 207
2023-07-11 14:16:28,196 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 208 is on host 208
2023-07-11 14:16:28,196 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 209 is on host 209
2023-07-11 14:16:28,196 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 210 is on host 210
2023-07-11 14:16:28,196 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 211 is on host 211
2023-07-11 14:16:28,196 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 212 is on host 212
2023-07-11 14:16:28,196 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 213 is on host 213
2023-07-11 14:16:28,196 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 214 is on host 214
2023-07-11 14:16:28,196 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 215 is on host 215
2023-07-11 14:16:28,196 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 216 is on host 216
2023-07-11 14:16:28,196 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 217 is on host 217
2023-07-11 14:16:28,196 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 218 is on host 218
2023-07-11 14:16:28,196 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 219 is on host 219
2023-07-11 14:16:28,196 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 220 is on host 220
2023-07-11 14:16:28,196 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 221 is on host 221
2023-07-11 14:16:28,196 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 222 is on host 222
2023-07-11 14:16:28,196 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 223 is on host 223
2023-07-11 14:16:28,196 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 224 is on host 224
2023-07-11 14:16:28,196 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 225 is on host 225
2023-07-11 14:16:28,196 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 226 is on host 226
2023-07-11 14:16:28,196 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 227 is on host 227
2023-07-11 14:16:28,196 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 228 is on host 228
2023-07-11 14:16:28,196 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 229 is on host 229
2023-07-11 14:16:28,196 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 230 is on host 230
2023-07-11 14:16:28,196 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 231 is on host 231
2023-07-11 14:16:28,196 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 232 is on host 232
2023-07-11 14:16:28,196 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 233 is on host 233
2023-07-11 14:16:28,196 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 234 is on host 234
2023-07-11 14:16:28,196 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 235 is on host 235
2023-07-11 14:16:28,196 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 236 is on host 236
2023-07-11 14:16:28,197 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 237 is on host 237
2023-07-11 14:16:28,197 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 238 is on host 238
2023-07-11 14:16:28,197 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 239 is on host 239
2023-07-11 14:16:28,197 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 240 is on host 240
2023-07-11 14:16:28,197 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 241 is on host 241
2023-07-11 14:16:28,197 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 242 is on host 242
2023-07-11 14:16:28,197 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 243 is on host 243
2023-07-11 14:16:28,197 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 244 is on host 244
2023-07-11 14:16:28,197 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 245 is on host 245
2023-07-11 14:16:28,197 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 246 is on host 246
2023-07-11 14:16:28,197 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 247 is on host 247
2023-07-11 14:16:28,197 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 248 is on host 248
2023-07-11 14:16:28,197 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 249 is on host 249
2023-07-11 14:16:28,197 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 250 is on host 250
2023-07-11 14:16:28,197 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 251 is on host 251
2023-07-11 14:16:28,197 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 252 is on host 252
2023-07-11 14:16:28,197 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 253 is on host 253
2023-07-11 14:16:28,197 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 254 is on host 254
2023-07-11 14:16:28,197 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 255 is on host 255
2023-07-11 14:16:28,197 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 256 is on host 256
2023-07-11 14:16:28,197 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 257 is on host 257
2023-07-11 14:16:28,197 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 258 is on host 258
2023-07-11 14:16:28,197 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 259 is on host 259
2023-07-11 14:16:28,197 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 260 is on host 260
2023-07-11 14:16:28,197 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 261 is on host 261
2023-07-11 14:16:28,197 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 262 is on host 262
2023-07-11 14:16:28,197 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 263 is on host 263
2023-07-11 14:16:28,197 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 264 is on host 264
2023-07-11 14:16:28,197 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 265 is on host 265
2023-07-11 14:16:28,198 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 266 is on host 266
2023-07-11 14:16:28,198 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 267 is on host 267
2023-07-11 14:16:28,198 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 268 is on host 268
2023-07-11 14:16:28,198 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 269 is on host 269
2023-07-11 14:16:28,198 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 270 is on host 270
2023-07-11 14:16:28,198 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 271 is on host 271
2023-07-11 14:16:28,198 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 272 is on host 272
2023-07-11 14:16:28,198 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 273 is on host 273
2023-07-11 14:16:28,198 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 274 is on host 274
2023-07-11 14:16:28,198 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 275 is on host 275
2023-07-11 14:16:28,198 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 276 is on host 276
2023-07-11 14:16:28,198 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 277 is on host 277
2023-07-11 14:16:28,198 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 278 is on host 278
2023-07-11 14:16:28,198 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 279 is on host 279
2023-07-11 14:16:28,198 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 280 is on host 280
2023-07-11 14:16:28,198 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 281 is on host 281
2023-07-11 14:16:28,198 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 282 is on host 282
2023-07-11 14:16:28,198 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 283 is on host 283
2023-07-11 14:16:28,198 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 284 is on host 284
2023-07-11 14:16:28,198 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 285 is on host 285
2023-07-11 14:16:28,198 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 286 is on host 286
2023-07-11 14:16:28,198 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 287 is on host 287
2023-07-11 14:16:28,198 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 288 is on host 288
2023-07-11 14:16:28,198 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 289 is on host 289
2023-07-11 14:16:28,198 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 290 is on host 290
2023-07-11 14:16:28,198 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 291 is on host 291
2023-07-11 14:16:28,198 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 292 is on host 292
2023-07-11 14:16:28,198 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 293 is on host 293
2023-07-11 14:16:28,198 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 294 is on host 294
2023-07-11 14:16:28,199 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 295 is on host 295
2023-07-11 14:16:28,199 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 296 is on host 296
2023-07-11 14:16:28,199 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 297 is on host 297
2023-07-11 14:16:28,199 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 298 is on host 298
2023-07-11 14:16:28,199 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 299 is on host 299
2023-07-11 14:16:28,199 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 300 is on host 300
2023-07-11 14:16:28,199 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 301 is on host 301
2023-07-11 14:16:28,199 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 302 is on host 302
2023-07-11 14:16:28,199 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 303 is on host 303
2023-07-11 14:16:28,199 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 304 is on host 304
2023-07-11 14:16:28,199 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 305 is on host 305
2023-07-11 14:16:28,199 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 306 is on host 306
2023-07-11 14:16:28,199 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 307 is on host 307
2023-07-11 14:16:28,199 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 308 is on host 308
2023-07-11 14:16:28,199 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 309 is on host 309
2023-07-11 14:16:28,199 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 310 is on host 310
2023-07-11 14:16:28,199 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 311 is on host 311
2023-07-11 14:16:28,199 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 312 is on host 312
2023-07-11 14:16:28,199 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 313 is on host 313
2023-07-11 14:16:28,199 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 314 is on host 314
2023-07-11 14:16:28,199 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 315 is on host 315
2023-07-11 14:16:28,199 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 316 is on host 316
2023-07-11 14:16:28,199 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 317 is on host 317
2023-07-11 14:16:28,199 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 318 is on host 318
2023-07-11 14:16:28,199 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 319 is on host 319
2023-07-11 14:16:28,199 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 320 is on host 320
2023-07-11 14:16:28,199 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 321 is on host 321
2023-07-11 14:16:28,199 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 322 is on host 322
2023-07-11 14:16:28,199 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 323 is on host 323
2023-07-11 14:16:28,199 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 324 is on host 324
2023-07-11 14:16:28,200 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 325 is on host 325
2023-07-11 14:16:28,200 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 326 is on host 326
2023-07-11 14:16:28,200 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 327 is on host 327
2023-07-11 14:16:28,200 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 328 is on host 328
2023-07-11 14:16:28,200 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 329 is on host 329
2023-07-11 14:16:28,200 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 330 is on host 330
2023-07-11 14:16:28,200 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 331 is on host 331
2023-07-11 14:16:28,200 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 332 is on host 332
2023-07-11 14:16:28,200 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 333 is on host 333
2023-07-11 14:16:28,200 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 334 is on host 334
2023-07-11 14:16:28,200 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 335 is on host 335
2023-07-11 14:16:28,200 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 336 is on host 336
2023-07-11 14:16:28,200 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 337 is on host 337
2023-07-11 14:16:28,200 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 338 is on host 338
2023-07-11 14:16:28,200 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 339 is on host 339
2023-07-11 14:16:28,200 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 340 is on host 340
2023-07-11 14:16:28,200 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 341 is on host 341
2023-07-11 14:16:28,200 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 342 is on host 342
2023-07-11 14:16:28,200 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 343 is on host 343
2023-07-11 14:16:28,200 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 344 is on host 344
2023-07-11 14:16:28,200 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 345 is on host 345
2023-07-11 14:16:28,200 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 346 is on host 346
2023-07-11 14:16:28,200 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 347 is on host 347
2023-07-11 14:16:28,200 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 348 is on host 348
2023-07-11 14:16:28,200 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 349 is on host 349
2023-07-11 14:16:28,200 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 350 is on host 350
2023-07-11 14:16:28,200 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 351 is on host 351
2023-07-11 14:16:28,200 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 352 is on host 352
2023-07-11 14:16:28,201 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 353 is on host 353
2023-07-11 14:16:28,201 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 354 is on host 354
2023-07-11 14:16:28,201 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 355 is on host 355
2023-07-11 14:16:28,201 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 356 is on host 356
2023-07-11 14:16:28,201 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 357 is on host 357
2023-07-11 14:16:28,201 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 358 is on host 358
2023-07-11 14:16:28,201 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 359 is on host 359
2023-07-11 14:16:28,201 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 360 is on host 360
2023-07-11 14:16:28,201 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 361 is on host 361
2023-07-11 14:16:28,201 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 362 is on host 362
2023-07-11 14:16:28,201 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 363 is on host 363
2023-07-11 14:16:28,201 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 364 is on host 364
2023-07-11 14:16:28,201 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 365 is on host 365
2023-07-11 14:16:28,201 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 366 is on host 366
2023-07-11 14:16:28,201 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 367 is on host 367
2023-07-11 14:16:28,201 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 368 is on host 368
2023-07-11 14:16:28,202 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 369 is on host 369
2023-07-11 14:16:28,202 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 370 is on host 370
2023-07-11 14:16:28,202 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 371 is on host 371
2023-07-11 14:16:28,202 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 372 is on host 372
2023-07-11 14:16:28,202 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 373 is on host 373
2023-07-11 14:16:28,202 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 374 is on host 374
2023-07-11 14:16:28,202 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 375 is on host 375
2023-07-11 14:16:28,202 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 376 is on host 376
2023-07-11 14:16:28,202 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 377 is on host 377
2023-07-11 14:16:28,202 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 378 is on host 378
2023-07-11 14:16:28,202 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 379 is on host 379
2023-07-11 14:16:28,202 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 380 is on host 380
2023-07-11 14:16:28,202 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 381 is on host 381
2023-07-11 14:16:28,202 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 382 is on host 382
2023-07-11 14:16:28,202 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 383 is on host 383
2023-07-11 14:16:28,202 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 384 is on host 384
2023-07-11 14:16:28,202 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 385 is on host 385
2023-07-11 14:16:28,202 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 386 is on host 386
2023-07-11 14:16:28,202 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 387 is on host 387
2023-07-11 14:16:28,202 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 388 is on host 388
2023-07-11 14:16:28,202 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 389 is on host 389
2023-07-11 14:16:28,202 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 390 is on host 390
2023-07-11 14:16:28,202 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 391 is on host 391
2023-07-11 14:16:28,202 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 392 is on host 392
2023-07-11 14:16:28,202 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=393, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:28,203 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table20) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:28,203 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table21
2023-07-11 14:16:28,203 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv553536953=290, srv1630071126=110, srv1071894870=12, srv23511728=232, srv658346947=323, srv2025338799=204, srv1397994335=64, srv1976766403=195, srv1644629726=118, srv957637734=381, srv2079182457=210, srv1749264468=139, srv2046129126=206, srv1595762596=104, srv603990852=307, srv1973073480=194, srv958856137=382, srv644066832=319, srv557062842=292, srv277765671=235, srv732221418=337, srv1769385567=143, srv224612199=228, srv714752528=334, srv362526040=256, srv581128949=296, srv2133511466=223, srv1144239257=30, srv320603627=245, srv1679952521=126, srv2122867873=222, srv1110067064=24, srv256251994=233, srv63261708=317, srv89837390=371, srv552104598=289, srv508952995=281, srv2096011353=214, srv1770417148=144, srv1246723478=42, srv929436444=378, srv2082192429=211, srv234917297=231, srv405700573=266, srv183644386=166, srv1488378513=85, srv173139715=136, srv1154180352=32, srv355693379=252, srv1407521654=66, srv496848057=275, srv1157975499=33, srv1806731027=162, srv1923102804=184, srv311102455=244, srv450011410=271, srv771515724=348, srv389183508=262, srv1249074416=43, srv2014575201=201, srv640847108=318, srv832363565=356, srv1970882134=192, srv2107358603=218, srv855766065=361, srv1336043388=55, srv29397186=237, srv982792848=390, srv976560524=386, srv101181760=3, srv1093549482=21, srv2018389395=202, srv2113483104=221, srv1778339118=149, srv1968709692=190, srv705221118=333, srv159600090=105, srv1919608486=180, srv981255102=389, srv807899713=353, srv755110395=344, srv1770594519=145, srv739692705=340, srv1076582671=16, srv693869315=330, srv1079048717=17, srv440657532=270, srv1636659280=115, srv2108739257=220, srv668373413=326, srv1003610393=2, srv1054229197=11, srv1868589627=172, srv2103522371=217, srv1000546271=0, srv951670617=380, srv2042909593=205, srv1865656038=171, srv1466355012=78, srv703662406=332, srv1418112884=70, srv1215580291=40, srv71833528=335, srv1580581635=103, srv1021032212=5, srv1080806312=19, srv1985601859=197, srv74471954=343, srv1647472319=119, srv2071553346=208, srv1632855171=112, srv1122009370=27, srv13613992=61, srv1630777154=111, srv301413669=239, srv550697728=288, srv1296023857=53, srv1724550977=133, srv1989290370=198, srv1926417985=185, srv1678097199=125, srv1461034373=76, srv614690415=311, srv2098345381=215, srv310463473=243, srv1011934105=4, srv148627129=84, srv305489318=240, srv1256534903=46, srv1289731445=52, srv1798844587=157, srv567113085=294, srv1119222501=26, srv2055117940=207, srv855898852=362, srv629224816=316, srv1075943554=15, srv625909061=315, srv1705591942=128, srv734225580=339, srv660107924=324, srv1381729938=62, srv1633483173=113, srv408265476=267, srv1776057793=148, srv1360253411=60, srv1511424834=90, srv1414162621=68, srv883343663=370, srv151859222=91, srv349144930=251, srv1991304034=199, srv1825887791=164, srv601657063=305, srv758932951=345, srv1651629087=120, srv1864623584=170, srv682957691=329, srv1500454146=88, srv1725962085=135, srv1659841448=121, srv1253206004=45, srv52354442=284, srv18508093=168, srv1427731921=73, srv561344974=293, srv721668125=336, srv1575482138=100, srv914128771=373, srv961487230=383, srv741332941=342, srv533032466=286, srv1574140987=99, srv2139849097=224, srv503902262=278, srv674807007=327, srv1786829855=153, srv2088727517=213, srv394366966=264, srv980089565=388, srv114594288=31, srv38296437=261, srv214835574=226, srv1887224977=176, srv1025509362=7, srv1577020334=102, srv524466665=285, srv393561021=263, srv759909927=346, srv763556514=347, srv786453030=349, srv2142935488=225, srv618111613=312, srv16254163=108, srv343211061=250, srv476075173=273, srv1269632212=47, srv333589612=246, srv499015361=276, srv836674186=357, srv1799191687=158, srv1446998035=74, srv1571774199=98, srv1115354947=25, srv333860881=247, srv1724152600=132, srv1598699299=106, srv177885829=151, srv472125887=272, srv1101339966=22, srv1424985362=72, srv1945569895=188, srv594128294=300, srv1026739237=8, srv842459828=358, srv878519137=366, srv1921260729=181, srv339110834=249, srv504099471=279, srv814253179=354, srv1643744885=116, srv1793847521=155, srv607234624=309, srv698219051=331, srv1688538732=127, srv666240078=325, srv1079284733=18, srv29210550=236, srv506181748=280, srv881313122=368, srv1945452576=187, srv597307897=303, srv1285120424=51, srv1887943816=177, srv1983604698=196, srv1805465940=161, srv309309336=242, srv1719756294=131, srv1349932676=58, srv1208486369=38, srv1643971570=117, srv1509331489=89, srv334105385=248, srv1400515744=65, srv369984715=259, srv43712162=269, srv842675864=359, srv1803258748=160, srv1022450918=6, srv1775108732=147, srv1766088250=141, srv180150732=159, srv1220857227=41, srv226530501=229, srv362032108=255, srv919715380=377, srv1074935976=14, srv1395030819=63, srv803291569=352, srv1877966766=175, srv220538712=227, srv2021718843=203, srv2107782185=219, srv882216860=369, srv1489137852=86, srv1972328734=193, srv1470759982=79, srv1774824811=146, srv971974774=384, srv1418242791=71, srv1001274196=1, srv909615097=372, srv1537724566=93, srv1165799954=34, srv1724754364=134, srv978173525=387, srv113319438=29, srv578033735=295, srv147931272=80, srv1183635941=35, srv1904215245=178, srv596349756=302, srv880835255=367, srv857544550=364, srv1779729022=152, srv1795612465=156, srv621083045=314, srv917704170=375, srv1351811120=59, srv1316710897=54, srv789820555=350, srv1922580095=183, srv305567304=241, srv1936745425=186, srv1745318024=138, srv1210822057=39, srv645375717=320, srv950628389=379, srv1490199189=87, srv1575919256=101, srv154481102=96, srv359402967=254, srv997716931=391, srv1457224273=75, srv581644449=297, srv1872374768=174, srv363177310=257, srv740327512=341, srv1664227236=123, srv972330517=385, srv1634261306=114, srv1662183707=122, srv1969046891=191, srv1485266211=82, srv1778842262=150, srv588410181=298, srv1921840985=182, srv591279493=299, srv37574565=260, srv1104147458=23, srv1190166330=36, srv652270371=322, srv1484309042=81, srv1560148463=97, srv618569548=313, srv2102708311=216, srv1084873074=20, srv517669556=283, srv918152084=376, srv649714317=321, srv1674484790=124, srv1339239880=56, srv1461073271=77, srv1125312901=28, srv25633292=234, srv516616923=282, srv299721745=238, srv604932433=308, srv1273702855=48, srv792183929=351, srv1042608200=10, srv1276335106=49, srv1486044644=83, srv676101698=328, srv998930892=392, srv200111276=200, srv1863083643=169, srv1737443479=137, srv872997185=365, srv821351126=355, srv852115805=360, srv1074355423=13, srv170952194=130, srv503430005=277, srv153887567=94, srv1415163001=69, srv1032737435=9, srv1840670515=167, srv1961921083=189, srv59745831=304, srv36715747=258, srv431547280=268, srv1524853580=92, srv1870059418=173, srv396010771=265, srv594457792=301, srv1755339428=140, srv1766275429=142, srv5565786=291, srv603898526=306, srv544570223=287, srv856030669=363, srv1542523468=95, srv915785747=374, srv356122213=253, srv1411875499=67, srv2077620970=209, srv1345529444=57, srv232339963=230, srv1250861076=44, srv1914875423=179, srv478619481=274, srv1202435626=37, srv1706089454=129, srv1810631201=163, srv1282644061=50, srv1625945288=109, srv733251129=338, srv2082830831=212, srv1612103540=107, srv612136291=310, srv1790004142=154, srv183394703=165} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:28,203 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:28,203 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:28,203 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:28,204 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:28,204 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:28,204 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:28,204 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-11 14:16:28,204 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-11 14:16:28,204 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-11 14:16:28,204 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-11 14:16:28,204 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 10 is on host 10
2023-07-11 14:16:28,204 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 11 is on host 11
2023-07-11 14:16:28,204 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 12 is on host 12
2023-07-11 14:16:28,204 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 13 is on host 13
2023-07-11 14:16:28,204 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 14 is on host 14
2023-07-11 14:16:28,204 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 15 is on host 15
2023-07-11 14:16:28,204 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 16 is on host 16
2023-07-11 14:16:28,204 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 17 is on host 17
2023-07-11 14:16:28,204 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 18 is on host 18
2023-07-11 14:16:28,204 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 19 is on host 19
2023-07-11 14:16:28,204 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 20 is on host 20
2023-07-11 14:16:28,204 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 21 is on host 21
2023-07-11 14:16:28,204 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 22 is on host 22
2023-07-11 14:16:28,204 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 23 is on host 23
2023-07-11 14:16:28,204 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 24 is on host 24
2023-07-11 14:16:28,204 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 25 is on host 25
2023-07-11 14:16:28,204 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 26 is on host 26
2023-07-11 14:16:28,204 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 27 is on host 27
2023-07-11 14:16:28,204 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 28 is on host 28
2023-07-11 14:16:28,204 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 29 is on host 29
2023-07-11 14:16:28,204 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 30 is on host 30
2023-07-11 14:16:28,204 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 31 is on host 31
2023-07-11 14:16:28,205 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 32 is on host 32
2023-07-11 14:16:28,205 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 33 is on host 33
2023-07-11 14:16:28,205 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 34 is on host 34
2023-07-11 14:16:28,205 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 35 is on host 35
2023-07-11 14:16:28,205 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 36 is on host 36
2023-07-11 14:16:28,205 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 37 is on host 37
2023-07-11 14:16:28,205 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 38 is on host 38
2023-07-11 14:16:28,205 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 39 is on host 39
2023-07-11 14:16:28,205 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 40 is on host 40
2023-07-11 14:16:28,205 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 41 is on host 41
2023-07-11 14:16:28,205 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 42 is on host 42
2023-07-11 14:16:28,205 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 43 is on host 43
2023-07-11 14:16:28,205 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 44 is on host 44
2023-07-11 14:16:28,205 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 45 is on host 45
2023-07-11 14:16:28,205 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 46 is on host 46
2023-07-11 14:16:28,205 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 47 is on host 47
2023-07-11 14:16:28,205 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 48 is on host 48
2023-07-11 14:16:28,205 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 49 is on host 49
2023-07-11 14:16:28,205 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 50 is on host 50
2023-07-11 14:16:28,205 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 51 is on host 51
2023-07-11 14:16:28,205 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 52 is on host 52
2023-07-11 14:16:28,205 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 53 is on host 53
2023-07-11 14:16:28,205 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 54 is on host 54
2023-07-11 14:16:28,205 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 55 is on host 55
2023-07-11 14:16:28,205 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 56 is on host 56
2023-07-11 14:16:28,205 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 57 is on host 57
2023-07-11 14:16:28,205 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 58 is on host 58
2023-07-11 14:16:28,205 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 59 is on host 59
2023-07-11 14:16:28,205 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 60 is on host 60
2023-07-11 14:16:28,206 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 61 is on host 61
2023-07-11 14:16:28,206 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 62 is on host 62
2023-07-11 14:16:28,206 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 63 is on host 63
2023-07-11 14:16:28,206 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 64 is on host 64
2023-07-11 14:16:28,206 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 65 is on host 65
2023-07-11 14:16:28,206 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 66 is on host 66
2023-07-11 14:16:28,206 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 67 is on host 67
2023-07-11 14:16:28,206 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 68 is on host 68
2023-07-11 14:16:28,206 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 69 is on host 69
2023-07-11 14:16:28,206 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 70 is on host 70
2023-07-11 14:16:28,206 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 71 is on host 71
2023-07-11 14:16:28,206 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 72 is on host 72
2023-07-11 14:16:28,206 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 73 is on host 73
2023-07-11 14:16:28,206 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 74 is on host 74
2023-07-11 14:16:28,206 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 75 is on host 75
2023-07-11 14:16:28,206 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 76 is on host 76
2023-07-11 14:16:28,206 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 77 is on host 77
2023-07-11 14:16:28,206 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 78 is on host 78
2023-07-11 14:16:28,206 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 79 is on host 79
2023-07-11 14:16:28,206 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 80 is on host 80
2023-07-11 14:16:28,206 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 81 is on host 81
2023-07-11 14:16:28,206 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 82 is on host 82
2023-07-11 14:16:28,206 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 83 is on host 83
2023-07-11 14:16:28,206 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 84 is on host 84
2023-07-11 14:16:28,206 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 85 is on host 85
2023-07-11 14:16:28,206 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 86 is on host 86
2023-07-11 14:16:28,206 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 87 is on host 87
2023-07-11 14:16:28,206 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 88 is on host 88
2023-07-11 14:16:28,206 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 89 is on host 89
2023-07-11 14:16:28,207 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 90 is on host 90
2023-07-11 14:16:28,207 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 91 is on host 91
2023-07-11 14:16:28,207 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 92 is on host 92
2023-07-11 14:16:28,207 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 93 is on host 93
2023-07-11 14:16:28,207 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 94 is on host 94
2023-07-11 14:16:28,207 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 95 is on host 95
2023-07-11 14:16:28,207 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 96 is on host 96
2023-07-11 14:16:28,207 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 97 is on host 97
2023-07-11 14:16:28,207 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 98 is on host 98
2023-07-11 14:16:28,207 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 99 is on host 99
2023-07-11 14:16:28,207 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 100 is on host 100
2023-07-11 14:16:28,207 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 101 is on host 101
2023-07-11 14:16:28,207 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 102 is on host 102
2023-07-11 14:16:28,207 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 103 is on host 103
2023-07-11 14:16:28,207 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 104 is on host 104
2023-07-11 14:16:28,207 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 105 is on host 105
2023-07-11 14:16:28,207 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 106 is on host 106
2023-07-11 14:16:28,207 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 107 is on host 107
2023-07-11 14:16:28,207 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 108 is on host 108
2023-07-11 14:16:28,207 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 109 is on host 109
2023-07-11 14:16:28,207 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 110 is on host 110
2023-07-11 14:16:28,207 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 111 is on host 111
2023-07-11 14:16:28,207 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 112 is on host 112
2023-07-11 14:16:28,207 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 113 is on host 113
2023-07-11 14:16:28,207 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 114 is on host 114
2023-07-11 14:16:28,207 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 115 is on host 115
2023-07-11 14:16:28,207 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 116 is on host 116
2023-07-11 14:16:28,207 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 117 is on host 117
2023-07-11 14:16:28,207 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 118 is on host 118
2023-07-11 14:16:28,208 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 119 is on host 119
2023-07-11 14:16:28,208 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 120 is on host 120
2023-07-11 14:16:28,208 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 121 is on host 121
2023-07-11 14:16:28,208 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 122 is on host 122
2023-07-11 14:16:28,208 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 123 is on host 123
2023-07-11 14:16:28,208 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 124 is on host 124
2023-07-11 14:16:28,208 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 125 is on host 125
2023-07-11 14:16:28,208 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 126 is on host 126
2023-07-11 14:16:28,208 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 127 is on host 127
2023-07-11 14:16:28,208 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 128 is on host 128
2023-07-11 14:16:28,208 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 129 is on host 129
2023-07-11 14:16:28,208 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 130 is on host 130
2023-07-11 14:16:28,208 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 131 is on host 131
2023-07-11 14:16:28,208 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 132 is on host 132
2023-07-11 14:16:28,208 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 133 is on host 133
2023-07-11 14:16:28,208 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 134 is on host 134
2023-07-11 14:16:28,208 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 135 is on host 135
2023-07-11 14:16:28,208 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 136 is on host 136
2023-07-11 14:16:28,208 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 137 is on host 137
2023-07-11 14:16:28,208 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 138 is on host 138
2023-07-11 14:16:28,208 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 139 is on host 139
2023-07-11 14:16:28,208 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 140 is on host 140
2023-07-11 14:16:28,208 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 141 is on host 141
2023-07-11 14:16:28,208 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 142 is on host 142
2023-07-11 14:16:28,208 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 143 is on host 143
2023-07-11 14:16:28,208 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 144 is on host 144
2023-07-11 14:16:28,208 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 145 is on host 145
2023-07-11 14:16:28,208 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 146 is on host 146
2023-07-11 14:16:28,208 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 147 is on host 147
2023-07-11 14:16:28,209 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 148 is on host 148
2023-07-11 14:16:28,209 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 149 is on host 149
2023-07-11 14:16:28,209 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 150 is on host 150
2023-07-11 14:16:28,209 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 151 is on host 151
2023-07-11 14:16:28,209 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 152 is on host 152
2023-07-11 14:16:28,209 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 153 is on host 153
2023-07-11 14:16:28,209 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 154 is on host 154
2023-07-11 14:16:28,209 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 155 is on host 155
2023-07-11 14:16:28,209 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 156 is on host 156
2023-07-11 14:16:28,209 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 157 is on host 157
2023-07-11 14:16:28,209 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 158 is on host 158
2023-07-11 14:16:28,209 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 159 is on host 159
2023-07-11 14:16:28,209 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 160 is on host 160
2023-07-11 14:16:28,209 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 161 is on host 161
2023-07-11 14:16:28,209 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 162 is on host 162
2023-07-11 14:16:28,209 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 163 is on host 163
2023-07-11 14:16:28,209 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 164 is on host 164
2023-07-11 14:16:28,209 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 165 is on host 165
2023-07-11 14:16:28,209 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 166 is on host 166
2023-07-11 14:16:28,209 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 167 is on host 167
2023-07-11 14:16:28,209 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 168 is on host 168
2023-07-11 14:16:28,209 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 169 is on host 169
2023-07-11 14:16:28,209 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 170 is on host 170
2023-07-11 14:16:28,209 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 171 is on host 171
2023-07-11 14:16:28,209 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 172 is on host 172
2023-07-11 14:16:28,209 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 173 is on host 173
2023-07-11 14:16:28,209 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 174 is on host 174
2023-07-11 14:16:28,209 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 175 is on host 175
2023-07-11 14:16:28,210 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 176 is on host 176
2023-07-11 14:16:28,210 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 177 is on host 177
2023-07-11 14:16:28,210 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 178 is on host 178
2023-07-11 14:16:28,210 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 179 is on host 179
2023-07-11 14:16:28,210 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 180 is on host 180
2023-07-11 14:16:28,210 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 181 is on host 181
2023-07-11 14:16:28,210 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 182 is on host 182
2023-07-11 14:16:28,210 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 183 is on host 183
2023-07-11 14:16:28,210 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 184 is on host 184
2023-07-11 14:16:28,210 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 185 is on host 185
2023-07-11 14:16:28,210 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 186 is on host 186
2023-07-11 14:16:28,210 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 187 is on host 187
2023-07-11 14:16:28,210 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 188 is on host 188
2023-07-11 14:16:28,210 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 189 is on host 189
2023-07-11 14:16:28,210 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 190 is on host 190
2023-07-11 14:16:28,210 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 191 is on host 191
2023-07-11 14:16:28,210 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 192 is on host 192
2023-07-11 14:16:28,210 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 193 is on host 193
2023-07-11 14:16:28,210 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 194 is on host 194
2023-07-11 14:16:28,210 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 195 is on host 195
2023-07-11 14:16:28,210 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 196 is on host 196
2023-07-11 14:16:28,210 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 197 is on host 197
2023-07-11 14:16:28,210 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 198 is on host 198
2023-07-11 14:16:28,210 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 199 is on host 199
2023-07-11 14:16:28,210 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 200 is on host 200
2023-07-11 14:16:28,210 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 201 is on host 201
2023-07-11 14:16:28,210 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 202 is on host 202
2023-07-11 14:16:28,210 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 203 is on host 203
2023-07-11 14:16:28,210 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 204 is on host 204
2023-07-11 14:16:28,211 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 205 is on host 205
2023-07-11 14:16:28,211 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 206 is on host 206
2023-07-11 14:16:28,211 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 207 is on host 207
2023-07-11 14:16:28,211 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 208 is on host 208
2023-07-11 14:16:28,211 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 209 is on host 209
2023-07-11 14:16:28,211 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 210 is on host 210
2023-07-11 14:16:28,211 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 211 is on host 211
2023-07-11 14:16:28,211 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 212 is on host 212
2023-07-11 14:16:28,211 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 213 is on host 213
2023-07-11 14:16:28,211 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 214 is on host 214
2023-07-11 14:16:28,211 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 215 is on host 215
2023-07-11 14:16:28,211 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 216 is on host 216
2023-07-11 14:16:28,211 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 217 is on host 217
2023-07-11 14:16:28,211 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 218 is on host 218
2023-07-11 14:16:28,211 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 219 is on host 219
2023-07-11 14:16:28,211 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 220 is on host 220
2023-07-11 14:16:28,211 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 221 is on host 221
2023-07-11 14:16:28,211 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 222 is on host 222
2023-07-11 14:16:28,211 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 223 is on host 223
2023-07-11 14:16:28,211 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 224 is on host 224
2023-07-11 14:16:28,211 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 225 is on host 225
2023-07-11 14:16:28,211 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 226 is on host 226
2023-07-11 14:16:28,211 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 227 is on host 227
2023-07-11 14:16:28,211 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 228 is on host 228
2023-07-11 14:16:28,212 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 229 is on host 229
2023-07-11 14:16:28,212 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 230 is on host 230
2023-07-11 14:16:28,212 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 231 is on host 231
2023-07-11 14:16:28,212 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 232 is on host 232
2023-07-11 14:16:28,212 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 233 is on host 233
2023-07-11 14:16:28,212 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 234 is on host 234
2023-07-11 14:16:28,212 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 235 is on host 235
2023-07-11 14:16:28,212 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 236 is on host 236
2023-07-11 14:16:28,212 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 237 is on host 237
2023-07-11 14:16:28,212 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 238 is on host 238
2023-07-11 14:16:28,212 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 239 is on host 239
2023-07-11 14:16:28,212 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 240 is on host 240
2023-07-11 14:16:28,212 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 241 is on host 241
2023-07-11 14:16:28,212 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 242 is on host 242
2023-07-11 14:16:28,212 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 243 is on host 243
2023-07-11 14:16:28,212 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 244 is on host 244
2023-07-11 14:16:28,212 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 245 is on host 245
2023-07-11 14:16:28,212 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 246 is on host 246
2023-07-11 14:16:28,212 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 247 is on host 247
2023-07-11 14:16:28,212 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 248 is on host 248
2023-07-11 14:16:28,212 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 249 is on host 249
2023-07-11 14:16:28,212 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 250 is on host 250
2023-07-11 14:16:28,212 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 251 is on host 251
2023-07-11 14:16:28,212 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 252 is on host 252
2023-07-11 14:16:28,212 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 253 is on host 253
2023-07-11 14:16:28,212 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 254 is on host 254
2023-07-11 14:16:28,212 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 255 is on host 255
2023-07-11 14:16:28,212 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 256 is on host 256
2023-07-11 14:16:28,212 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 257 is on host 257
2023-07-11 14:16:28,213 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 258 is on host 258
2023-07-11 14:16:28,213 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 259 is on host 259
2023-07-11 14:16:28,213 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 260 is on host 260
2023-07-11 14:16:28,213 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 261 is on host 261
2023-07-11 14:16:28,213 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 262 is on host 262
2023-07-11 14:16:28,213 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 263 is on host 263
2023-07-11 14:16:28,213 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 264 is on host 264
2023-07-11 14:16:28,213 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 265 is on host 265
2023-07-11 14:16:28,213 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 266 is on host 266
2023-07-11 14:16:28,213 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 267 is on host 267
2023-07-11 14:16:28,213 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 268 is on host 268
2023-07-11 14:16:28,213 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 269 is on host 269
2023-07-11 14:16:28,213 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 270 is on host 270
2023-07-11 14:16:28,213 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 271 is on host 271
2023-07-11 14:16:28,213 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 272 is on host 272
2023-07-11 14:16:28,214 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 273 is on host 273
2023-07-11 14:16:28,214 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 274 is on host 274
2023-07-11 14:16:28,214 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 275 is on host 275
2023-07-11 14:16:28,214 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 276 is on host 276
2023-07-11 14:16:28,214 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 277 is on host 277
2023-07-11 14:16:28,214 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 278 is on host 278
2023-07-11 14:16:28,214 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 279 is on host 279
2023-07-11 14:16:28,214 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 280 is on host 280
2023-07-11 14:16:28,214 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 281 is on host 281
2023-07-11 14:16:28,214 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 282 is on host 282
2023-07-11 14:16:28,214 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 283 is on host 283
2023-07-11 14:16:28,214 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 284 is on host 284
2023-07-11 14:16:28,214 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 285 is on host 285
2023-07-11 14:16:28,214 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 286 is on host 286
2023-07-11 14:16:28,214 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 287 is on host 287
2023-07-11 14:16:28,214 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 288 is on host 288
2023-07-11 14:16:28,214 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 289 is on host 289
2023-07-11 14:16:28,214 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 290 is on host 290
2023-07-11 14:16:28,214 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 291 is on host 291
2023-07-11 14:16:28,214 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 292 is on host 292
2023-07-11 14:16:28,214 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 293 is on host 293
2023-07-11 14:16:28,214 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 294 is on host 294
2023-07-11 14:16:28,214 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 295 is on host 295
2023-07-11 14:16:28,214 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 296 is on host 296
2023-07-11 14:16:28,214 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 297 is on host 297
2023-07-11 14:16:28,214 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 298 is on host 298
2023-07-11 14:16:28,214 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 299 is on host 299
2023-07-11 14:16:28,214 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 300 is on host 300
2023-07-11 14:16:28,214 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 301 is on host 301
2023-07-11 14:16:28,215 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 302 is on host 302
2023-07-11 14:16:28,215 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 303 is on host 303
2023-07-11 14:16:28,215 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 304 is on host 304
2023-07-11 14:16:28,215 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 305 is on host 305
2023-07-11 14:16:28,215 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 306 is on host 306
2023-07-11 14:16:28,215 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 307 is on host 307
2023-07-11 14:16:28,215 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 308 is on host 308
2023-07-11 14:16:28,215 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 309 is on host 309
2023-07-11 14:16:28,215 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 310 is on host 310
2023-07-11 14:16:28,215 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 311 is on host 311
2023-07-11 14:16:28,215 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 312 is on host 312
2023-07-11 14:16:28,215 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 313 is on host 313
2023-07-11 14:16:28,215 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 314 is on host 314
2023-07-11 14:16:28,215 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 315 is on host 315
2023-07-11 14:16:28,215 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 316 is on host 316
2023-07-11 14:16:28,215 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 317 is on host 317
2023-07-11 14:16:28,215 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 318 is on host 318
2023-07-11 14:16:28,215 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 319 is on host 319
2023-07-11 14:16:28,215 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 320 is on host 320
2023-07-11 14:16:28,215 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 321 is on host 321
2023-07-11 14:16:28,215 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 322 is on host 322
2023-07-11 14:16:28,215 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 323 is on host 323
2023-07-11 14:16:28,215 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 324 is on host 324
2023-07-11 14:16:28,215 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 325 is on host 325
2023-07-11 14:16:28,215 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 326 is on host 326
2023-07-11 14:16:28,215 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 327 is on host 327
2023-07-11 14:16:28,215 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 328 is on host 328
2023-07-11 14:16:28,215 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 329 is on host 329
2023-07-11 14:16:28,215 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 330 is on host 330
2023-07-11 14:16:28,215 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 331 is on host 331
2023-07-11 14:16:28,216 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 332 is on host 332
2023-07-11 14:16:28,216 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 333 is on host 333
2023-07-11 14:16:28,216 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 334 is on host 334
2023-07-11 14:16:28,216 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 335 is on host 335
2023-07-11 14:16:28,216 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 336 is on host 336
2023-07-11 14:16:28,216 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 337 is on host 337
2023-07-11 14:16:28,216 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 338 is on host 338
2023-07-11 14:16:28,216 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 339 is on host 339
2023-07-11 14:16:28,216 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 340 is on host 340
2023-07-11 14:16:28,216 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 341 is on host 341
2023-07-11 14:16:28,216 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 342 is on host 342
2023-07-11 14:16:28,216 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 343 is on host 343
2023-07-11 14:16:28,216 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 344 is on host 344
2023-07-11 14:16:28,216 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 345 is on host 345
2023-07-11 14:16:28,216 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 346 is on host 346
2023-07-11 14:16:28,216 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 347 is on host 347
2023-07-11 14:16:28,216 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 348 is on host 348
2023-07-11 14:16:28,216 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 349 is on host 349
2023-07-11 14:16:28,216 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 350 is on host 350
2023-07-11 14:16:28,216 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 351 is on host 351
2023-07-11 14:16:28,216 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 352 is on host 352
2023-07-11 14:16:28,216 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 353 is on host 353
2023-07-11 14:16:28,216 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 354 is on host 354
2023-07-11 14:16:28,216 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 355 is on host 355
2023-07-11 14:16:28,216 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 356 is on host 356
2023-07-11 14:16:28,216 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 357 is on host 357
2023-07-11 14:16:28,216 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 358 is on host 358
2023-07-11 14:16:28,216 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 359 is on host 359
2023-07-11 14:16:28,216 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 360 is on host 360
2023-07-11 14:16:28,217 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 361 is on host 361
2023-07-11 14:16:28,217 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 362 is on host 362
2023-07-11 14:16:28,217 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 363 is on host 363
2023-07-11 14:16:28,217 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 364 is on host 364
2023-07-11 14:16:28,217 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 365 is on host 365
2023-07-11 14:16:28,217 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 366 is on host 366
2023-07-11 14:16:28,217 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 367 is on host 367
2023-07-11 14:16:28,217 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 368 is on host 368
2023-07-11 14:16:28,217 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 369 is on host 369
2023-07-11 14:16:28,217 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 370 is on host 370
2023-07-11 14:16:28,217 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 371 is on host 371
2023-07-11 14:16:28,217 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 372 is on host 372
2023-07-11 14:16:28,217 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 373 is on host 373
2023-07-11 14:16:28,217 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 374 is on host 374
2023-07-11 14:16:28,217 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 375 is on host 375
2023-07-11 14:16:28,217 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 376 is on host 376
2023-07-11 14:16:28,217 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 377 is on host 377
2023-07-11 14:16:28,217 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 378 is on host 378
2023-07-11 14:16:28,217 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 379 is on host 379
2023-07-11 14:16:28,217 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 380 is on host 380
2023-07-11 14:16:28,217 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 381 is on host 381
2023-07-11 14:16:28,217 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 382 is on host 382
2023-07-11 14:16:28,217 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 383 is on host 383
2023-07-11 14:16:28,217 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 384 is on host 384
2023-07-11 14:16:28,217 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 385 is on host 385
2023-07-11 14:16:28,217 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 386 is on host 386
2023-07-11 14:16:28,217 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 387 is on host 387
2023-07-11 14:16:28,217 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 388 is on host 388
2023-07-11 14:16:28,218 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 389 is on host 389
2023-07-11 14:16:28,218 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 390 is on host 390
2023-07-11 14:16:28,218 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 391 is on host 391
2023-07-11 14:16:28,218 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 392 is on host 392
2023-07-11 14:16:28,218 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=393, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:28,218 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table21) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:28,218 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table22
2023-07-11 14:16:28,218 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv553536953=290, srv1630071126=110, srv1071894870=12, srv23511728=232, srv658346947=323, srv2025338799=204, srv1397994335=64, srv1976766403=195, srv1644629726=118, srv957637734=381, srv2079182457=210, srv1749264468=139, srv2046129126=206, srv1595762596=104, srv603990852=307, srv1973073480=194, srv958856137=382, srv644066832=319, srv557062842=292, srv277765671=235, srv732221418=337, srv1769385567=143, srv224612199=228, srv714752528=334, srv362526040=256, srv581128949=296, srv2133511466=223, srv1144239257=30, srv320603627=245, srv1679952521=126, srv2122867873=222, srv1110067064=24, srv256251994=233, srv63261708=317, srv89837390=371, srv552104598=289, srv508952995=281, srv2096011353=214, srv1770417148=144, srv1246723478=42, srv929436444=378, srv2082192429=211, srv234917297=231, srv405700573=266, srv183644386=166, srv1488378513=85, srv173139715=136, srv1154180352=32, srv355693379=252, srv1407521654=66, srv496848057=275, srv1157975499=33, srv1806731027=162, srv1923102804=184, srv311102455=244, srv450011410=271, srv771515724=348, srv389183508=262, srv1249074416=43, srv2014575201=201, srv640847108=318, srv832363565=356, srv1970882134=192, srv2107358603=218, srv855766065=361, srv1336043388=55, srv29397186=237, srv982792848=390, srv976560524=386, srv101181760=3, srv1093549482=21, srv2018389395=202, srv2113483104=221, srv1778339118=149, srv1968709692=190, srv705221118=333, srv159600090=105, srv1919608486=180, srv981255102=389, srv807899713=353, srv755110395=344, srv1770594519=145, srv739692705=340, srv1076582671=16, srv693869315=330, srv1079048717=17, srv440657532=270, srv1636659280=115, srv2108739257=220, srv668373413=326, srv1003610393=2, srv1054229197=11, srv1868589627=172, srv2103522371=217, srv1000546271=0, srv951670617=380, srv2042909593=205, srv1865656038=171, srv1466355012=78, srv703662406=332, srv1418112884=70, srv1215580291=40, srv71833528=335, srv1580581635=103, srv1021032212=5, srv1080806312=19, srv1985601859=197, srv74471954=343, srv1647472319=119, srv2071553346=208, srv1632855171=112, srv1122009370=27, srv13613992=61, srv1630777154=111, srv301413669=239, srv550697728=288, srv1296023857=53, srv1724550977=133, srv1989290370=198, srv1926417985=185, srv1678097199=125, srv1461034373=76, srv614690415=311, srv2098345381=215, srv310463473=243, srv1011934105=4, srv148627129=84, srv305489318=240, srv1256534903=46, srv1289731445=52, srv1798844587=157, srv567113085=294, srv1119222501=26, srv2055117940=207, srv855898852=362, srv629224816=316, srv1075943554=15, srv625909061=315, srv1705591942=128, srv734225580=339, srv660107924=324, srv1381729938=62, srv1633483173=113, srv408265476=267, srv1776057793=148, srv1360253411=60, srv1511424834=90, srv1414162621=68, srv883343663=370, srv151859222=91, srv349144930=251, srv1991304034=199, srv1825887791=164, srv601657063=305, srv758932951=345, srv1651629087=120, srv1864623584=170, srv682957691=329, srv1500454146=88, srv1725962085=135, srv1659841448=121, srv1253206004=45, srv52354442=284, srv18508093=168, srv1427731921=73, srv561344974=293, srv721668125=336, srv1575482138=100, srv914128771=373, srv961487230=383, srv741332941=342, srv533032466=286, srv1574140987=99, srv2139849097=224, srv503902262=278, srv674807007=327, srv1786829855=153, srv2088727517=213, srv394366966=264, srv980089565=388, srv114594288=31, srv38296437=261, srv214835574=226, srv1887224977=176, srv1025509362=7, srv1577020334=102, srv524466665=285, srv393561021=263, srv759909927=346, srv763556514=347, srv786453030=349, srv2142935488=225, srv618111613=312, srv16254163=108, srv343211061=250, srv476075173=273, srv1269632212=47, srv333589612=246, srv499015361=276, srv836674186=357, srv1799191687=158, srv1446998035=74, srv1571774199=98, srv1115354947=25, srv333860881=247, srv1724152600=132, srv1598699299=106, srv177885829=151, srv472125887=272, srv1101339966=22, srv1424985362=72, srv1945569895=188, srv594128294=300, srv1026739237=8, srv842459828=358, srv878519137=366, srv1921260729=181, srv339110834=249, srv504099471=279, srv814253179=354, srv1643744885=116, srv1793847521=155, srv607234624=309, srv698219051=331, srv1688538732=127, srv666240078=325, srv1079284733=18, srv29210550=236, srv506181748=280, srv881313122=368, srv1945452576=187, srv597307897=303, srv1285120424=51, srv1887943816=177, srv1983604698=196, srv1805465940=161, srv309309336=242, srv1719756294=131, srv1349932676=58, srv1208486369=38, srv1643971570=117, srv1509331489=89, srv334105385=248, srv1400515744=65, srv369984715=259, srv43712162=269, srv842675864=359, srv1803258748=160, srv1022450918=6, srv1775108732=147, srv1766088250=141, srv180150732=159, srv1220857227=41, srv226530501=229, srv362032108=255, srv919715380=377, srv1074935976=14, srv1395030819=63, srv803291569=352, srv1877966766=175, srv220538712=227, srv2021718843=203, srv2107782185=219, srv882216860=369, srv1489137852=86, srv1972328734=193, srv1470759982=79, srv1774824811=146, srv971974774=384, srv1418242791=71, srv1001274196=1, srv909615097=372, srv1537724566=93, srv1165799954=34, srv1724754364=134, srv978173525=387, srv113319438=29, srv578033735=295, srv147931272=80, srv1183635941=35, srv1904215245=178, srv596349756=302, srv880835255=367, srv857544550=364, srv1779729022=152, srv1795612465=156, srv621083045=314, srv917704170=375, srv1351811120=59, srv1316710897=54, srv789820555=350, srv1922580095=183, srv305567304=241, srv1936745425=186, srv1745318024=138, srv1210822057=39, srv645375717=320, srv950628389=379, srv1490199189=87, srv1575919256=101, srv154481102=96, srv359402967=254, srv997716931=391, srv1457224273=75, srv581644449=297, srv1872374768=174, srv363177310=257, srv740327512=341, srv1664227236=123, srv972330517=385, srv1634261306=114, srv1662183707=122, srv1969046891=191, srv1485266211=82, srv1778842262=150, srv588410181=298, srv1921840985=182, srv591279493=299, srv37574565=260, srv1104147458=23, srv1190166330=36, srv652270371=322, srv1484309042=81, srv1560148463=97, srv618569548=313, srv2102708311=216, srv1084873074=20, srv517669556=283, srv918152084=376, srv649714317=321, srv1674484790=124, srv1339239880=56, srv1461073271=77, srv1125312901=28, srv25633292=234, srv516616923=282, srv299721745=238, srv604932433=308, srv1273702855=48, srv792183929=351, srv1042608200=10, srv1276335106=49, srv1486044644=83, srv676101698=328, srv998930892=392, srv200111276=200, srv1863083643=169, srv1737443479=137, srv872997185=365, srv821351126=355, srv852115805=360, srv1074355423=13, srv170952194=130, srv503430005=277, srv153887567=94, srv1415163001=69, srv1032737435=9, srv1840670515=167, srv1961921083=189, srv59745831=304, srv36715747=258, srv431547280=268, srv1524853580=92, srv1870059418=173, srv396010771=265, srv594457792=301, srv1755339428=140, srv1766275429=142, srv5565786=291, srv603898526=306, srv544570223=287, srv856030669=363, srv1542523468=95, srv915785747=374, srv356122213=253, srv1411875499=67, srv2077620970=209, srv1345529444=57, srv232339963=230, srv1250861076=44, srv1914875423=179, srv478619481=274, srv1202435626=37, srv1706089454=129, srv1810631201=163, srv1282644061=50, srv1625945288=109, srv733251129=338, srv2082830831=212, srv1612103540=107, srv612136291=310, srv1790004142=154, srv183394703=165} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:28,219 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:28,219 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:28,219 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:28,219 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:28,219 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:28,219 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:28,219 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-11 14:16:28,219 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-11 14:16:28,219 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-11 14:16:28,219 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-11 14:16:28,219 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 10 is on host 10
2023-07-11 14:16:28,219 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 11 is on host 11
2023-07-11 14:16:28,219 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 12 is on host 12
2023-07-11 14:16:28,219 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 13 is on host 13
2023-07-11 14:16:28,219 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 14 is on host 14
2023-07-11 14:16:28,219 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 15 is on host 15
2023-07-11 14:16:28,219 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 16 is on host 16
2023-07-11 14:16:28,219 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 17 is on host 17
2023-07-11 14:16:28,219 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 18 is on host 18
2023-07-11 14:16:28,219 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 19 is on host 19
2023-07-11 14:16:28,219 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 20 is on host 20
2023-07-11 14:16:28,219 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 21 is on host 21
2023-07-11 14:16:28,219 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 22 is on host 22
2023-07-11 14:16:28,219 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 23 is on host 23
2023-07-11 14:16:28,220 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 24 is on host 24
2023-07-11 14:16:28,220 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 25 is on host 25
2023-07-11 14:16:28,220 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 26 is on host 26
2023-07-11 14:16:28,220 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 27 is on host 27
2023-07-11 14:16:28,220 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 28 is on host 28
2023-07-11 14:16:28,220 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 29 is on host 29
2023-07-11 14:16:28,220 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 30 is on host 30
2023-07-11 14:16:28,220 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 31 is on host 31
2023-07-11 14:16:28,220 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 32 is on host 32
2023-07-11 14:16:28,220 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 33 is on host 33
2023-07-11 14:16:28,220 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 34 is on host 34
2023-07-11 14:16:28,220 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 35 is on host 35
2023-07-11 14:16:28,220 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 36 is on host 36
2023-07-11 14:16:28,220 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 37 is on host 37
2023-07-11 14:16:28,220 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 38 is on host 38
2023-07-11 14:16:28,220 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 39 is on host 39
2023-07-11 14:16:28,220 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 40 is on host 40
2023-07-11 14:16:28,220 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 41 is on host 41
2023-07-11 14:16:28,220 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 42 is on host 42
2023-07-11 14:16:28,220 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 43 is on host 43
2023-07-11 14:16:28,220 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 44 is on host 44
2023-07-11 14:16:28,220 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 45 is on host 45
2023-07-11 14:16:28,220 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 46 is on host 46
2023-07-11 14:16:28,220 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 47 is on host 47
2023-07-11 14:16:28,220 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 48 is on host 48
2023-07-11 14:16:28,220 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 49 is on host 49
2023-07-11 14:16:28,220 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 50 is on host 50
2023-07-11 14:16:28,220 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 51 is on host 51
2023-07-11 14:16:28,220 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 52 is on host 52
2023-07-11 14:16:28,221 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 53 is on host 53
2023-07-11 14:16:28,221 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 54 is on host 54
2023-07-11 14:16:28,221 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 55 is on host 55
2023-07-11 14:16:28,221 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 56 is on host 56
2023-07-11 14:16:28,221 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 57 is on host 57
2023-07-11 14:16:28,221 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 58 is on host 58
2023-07-11 14:16:28,221 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 59 is on host 59
2023-07-11 14:16:28,221 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 60 is on host 60
2023-07-11 14:16:28,221 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 61 is on host 61
2023-07-11 14:16:28,221 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 62 is on host 62
2023-07-11 14:16:28,221 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 63 is on host 63
2023-07-11 14:16:28,221 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 64 is on host 64
2023-07-11 14:16:28,221 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 65 is on host 65
2023-07-11 14:16:28,221 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 66 is on host 66
2023-07-11 14:16:28,221 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 67 is on host 67
2023-07-11 14:16:28,221 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 68 is on host 68
2023-07-11 14:16:28,221 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 69 is on host 69
2023-07-11 14:16:28,221 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 70 is on host 70
2023-07-11 14:16:28,221 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 71 is on host 71
2023-07-11 14:16:28,221 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 72 is on host 72
2023-07-11 14:16:28,221 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 73 is on host 73
2023-07-11 14:16:28,221 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 74 is on host 74
2023-07-11 14:16:28,221 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 75 is on host 75
2023-07-11 14:16:28,221 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 76 is on host 76
2023-07-11 14:16:28,221 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 77 is on host 77
2023-07-11 14:16:28,221 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 78 is on host 78
2023-07-11 14:16:28,221 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 79 is on host 79
2023-07-11 14:16:28,221 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 80 is on host 80
2023-07-11 14:16:28,221 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 81 is on host 81
2023-07-11 14:16:28,222 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 82 is on host 82
2023-07-11 14:16:28,222 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 83 is on host 83
2023-07-11 14:16:28,222 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 84 is on host 84
2023-07-11 14:16:28,222 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 85 is on host 85
2023-07-11 14:16:28,222 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 86 is on host 86
2023-07-11 14:16:28,222 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 87 is on host 87
2023-07-11 14:16:28,222 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 88 is on host 88
2023-07-11 14:16:28,222 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 89 is on host 89
2023-07-11 14:16:28,222 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 90 is on host 90
2023-07-11 14:16:28,222 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 91 is on host 91
2023-07-11 14:16:28,222 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 92 is on host 92
2023-07-11 14:16:28,222 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 93 is on host 93
2023-07-11 14:16:28,222 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 94 is on host 94
2023-07-11 14:16:28,222 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 95 is on host 95
2023-07-11 14:16:28,222 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 96 is on host 96
2023-07-11 14:16:28,222 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 97 is on host 97
2023-07-11 14:16:28,222 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 98 is on host 98
2023-07-11 14:16:28,222 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 99 is on host 99
2023-07-11 14:16:28,222 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 100 is on host 100
2023-07-11 14:16:28,222 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 101 is on host 101
2023-07-11 14:16:28,222 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 102 is on host 102
2023-07-11 14:16:28,222 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 103 is on host 103
2023-07-11 14:16:28,222 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 104 is on host 104
2023-07-11 14:16:28,222 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 105 is on host 105
2023-07-11 14:16:28,222 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 106 is on host 106
2023-07-11 14:16:28,222 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 107 is on host 107
2023-07-11 14:16:28,222 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 108 is on host 108
2023-07-11 14:16:28,222 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 109 is on host 109
2023-07-11 14:16:28,222 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 110 is on host 110
2023-07-11 14:16:28,223 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 111 is on host 111
2023-07-11 14:16:28,223 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 112 is on host 112
2023-07-11 14:16:28,223 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 113 is on host 113
2023-07-11 14:16:28,223 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 114 is on host 114
2023-07-11 14:16:28,223 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 115 is on host 115
2023-07-11 14:16:28,223 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 116 is on host 116
2023-07-11 14:16:28,223 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 117 is on host 117
2023-07-11 14:16:28,223 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 118 is on host 118
2023-07-11 14:16:28,223 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 119 is on host 119
2023-07-11 14:16:28,223 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 120 is on host 120
2023-07-11 14:16:28,223 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 121 is on host 121
2023-07-11 14:16:28,223 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 122 is on host 122
2023-07-11 14:16:28,223 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 123 is on host 123
2023-07-11 14:16:28,223 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 124 is on host 124
2023-07-11 14:16:28,223 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 125 is on host 125
2023-07-11 14:16:28,223 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 126 is on host 126
2023-07-11 14:16:28,223 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 127 is on host 127
2023-07-11 14:16:28,223 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 128 is on host 128
2023-07-11 14:16:28,223 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 129 is on host 129
2023-07-11 14:16:28,223 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 130 is on host 130
2023-07-11 14:16:28,223 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 131 is on host 131
2023-07-11 14:16:28,223 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 132 is on host 132
2023-07-11 14:16:28,223 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 133 is on host 133
2023-07-11 14:16:28,223 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 134 is on host 134
2023-07-11 14:16:28,223 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 135 is on host 135
2023-07-11 14:16:28,223 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 136 is on host 136
2023-07-11 14:16:28,223 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 137 is on host 137
2023-07-11 14:16:28,223 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 138 is on host 138
2023-07-11 14:16:28,223 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 139 is on host 139
2023-07-11 14:16:28,224 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 140 is on host 140
2023-07-11 14:16:28,224 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 141 is on host 141
2023-07-11 14:16:28,224 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 142 is on host 142
2023-07-11 14:16:28,224 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 143 is on host 143
2023-07-11 14:16:28,224 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 144 is on host 144
2023-07-11 14:16:28,224 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 145 is on host 145
2023-07-11 14:16:28,224 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 146 is on host 146
2023-07-11 14:16:28,224 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 147 is on host 147
2023-07-11 14:16:28,224 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 148 is on host 148
2023-07-11 14:16:28,224 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 149 is on host 149
2023-07-11 14:16:28,224 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 150 is on host 150
2023-07-11 14:16:28,224 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 151 is on host 151
2023-07-11 14:16:28,224 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 152 is on host 152
2023-07-11 14:16:28,224 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 153 is on host 153
2023-07-11 14:16:28,224 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 154 is on host 154
2023-07-11 14:16:28,224 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 155 is on host 155
2023-07-11 14:16:28,224 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 156 is on host 156
2023-07-11 14:16:28,224 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 157 is on host 157
2023-07-11 14:16:28,224 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 158 is on host 158
2023-07-11 14:16:28,224 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 159 is on host 159
2023-07-11 14:16:28,224 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 160 is on host 160
2023-07-11 14:16:28,224 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 161 is on host 161
2023-07-11 14:16:28,224 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 162 is on host 162
2023-07-11 14:16:28,225 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 163 is on host 163
2023-07-11 14:16:28,225 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 164 is on host 164
2023-07-11 14:16:28,225 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 165 is on host 165
2023-07-11 14:16:28,225 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 166 is on host 166
2023-07-11 14:16:28,225 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 167 is on host 167
2023-07-11 14:16:28,225 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 168 is on host 168
2023-07-11 14:16:28,225 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 169 is on host 169
2023-07-11 14:16:28,225 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 170 is on host 170
2023-07-11 14:16:28,225 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 171 is on host 171
2023-07-11 14:16:28,225 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 172 is on host 172
2023-07-11 14:16:28,225 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 173 is on host 173
2023-07-11 14:16:28,225 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 174 is on host 174
2023-07-11 14:16:28,225 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 175 is on host 175
2023-07-11 14:16:28,225 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 176 is on host 176
2023-07-11 14:16:28,225 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 177 is on host 177
2023-07-11 14:16:28,225 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 178 is on host 178
2023-07-11 14:16:28,225 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 179 is on host 179
2023-07-11 14:16:28,225 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 180 is on host 180
2023-07-11 14:16:28,225 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 181 is on host 181
2023-07-11 14:16:28,225 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 182 is on host 182
2023-07-11 14:16:28,225 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 183 is on host 183
2023-07-11 14:16:28,226 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 184 is on host 184
2023-07-11 14:16:28,226 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 185 is on host 185
2023-07-11 14:16:28,226 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 186 is on host 186
2023-07-11 14:16:28,226 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 187 is on host 187
2023-07-11 14:16:28,226 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 188 is on host 188
2023-07-11 14:16:28,226 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 189 is on host 189
2023-07-11 14:16:28,226 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 190 is on host 190
2023-07-11 14:16:28,226 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 191 is on host 191
2023-07-11 14:16:28,226 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 192 is on host 192
2023-07-11 14:16:28,226 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 193 is on host 193
2023-07-11 14:16:28,226 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 194 is on host 194
2023-07-11 14:16:28,226 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 195 is on host 195
2023-07-11 14:16:28,226 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 196 is on host 196
2023-07-11 14:16:28,226 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 197 is on host 197
2023-07-11 14:16:28,226 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 198 is on host 198
2023-07-11 14:16:28,226 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 199 is on host 199
2023-07-11 14:16:28,226 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 200 is on host 200
2023-07-11 14:16:28,226 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 201 is on host 201
2023-07-11 14:16:28,226 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 202 is on host 202
2023-07-11 14:16:28,226 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 203 is on host 203
2023-07-11 14:16:28,226 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 204 is on host 204
2023-07-11 14:16:28,226 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 205 is on host 205
2023-07-11 14:16:28,226 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 206 is on host 206
2023-07-11 14:16:28,226 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 207 is on host 207
2023-07-11 14:16:28,226 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 208 is on host 208
2023-07-11 14:16:28,226 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 209 is on host 209
2023-07-11 14:16:28,226 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 210 is on host 210
2023-07-11 14:16:28,226 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 211 is on host 211
2023-07-11 14:16:28,226 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 212 is on host 212
2023-07-11 14:16:28,227 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 213 is on host 213
2023-07-11 14:16:28,227 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 214 is on host 214
2023-07-11 14:16:28,227 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 215 is on host 215
2023-07-11 14:16:28,227 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 216 is on host 216
2023-07-11 14:16:28,227 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 217 is on host 217
2023-07-11 14:16:28,227 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 218 is on host 218
2023-07-11 14:16:28,227 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 219 is on host 219
2023-07-11 14:16:28,227 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 220 is on host 220
2023-07-11 14:16:28,227 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 221 is on host 221
2023-07-11 14:16:28,227 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 222 is on host 222
2023-07-11 14:16:28,227 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 223 is on host 223
2023-07-11 14:16:28,227 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 224 is on host 224
2023-07-11 14:16:28,227 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 225 is on host 225
2023-07-11 14:16:28,227 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 226 is on host 226
2023-07-11 14:16:28,227 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 227 is on host 227
2023-07-11 14:16:28,227 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 228 is on host 228
2023-07-11 14:16:28,227 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 229 is on host 229
2023-07-11 14:16:28,227 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 230 is on host 230
2023-07-11 14:16:28,227 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 231 is on host 231
2023-07-11 14:16:28,227 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 232 is on host 232
2023-07-11 14:16:28,227 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 233 is on host 233
2023-07-11 14:16:28,227 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 234 is on host 234
2023-07-11 14:16:28,227 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 235 is on host 235
2023-07-11 14:16:28,227 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 236 is on host 236
2023-07-11 14:16:28,227 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 237 is on host 237
2023-07-11 14:16:28,227 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 238 is on host 238
2023-07-11 14:16:28,227 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 239 is on host 239
2023-07-11 14:16:28,227 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 240 is on host 240
2023-07-11 14:16:28,227 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 241 is on host 241
2023-07-11 14:16:28,228 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 242 is on host 242
2023-07-11 14:16:28,228 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 243 is on host 243
2023-07-11 14:16:28,228 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 244 is on host 244
2023-07-11 14:16:28,228 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 245 is on host 245
2023-07-11 14:16:28,228 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 246 is on host 246
2023-07-11 14:16:28,228 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 247 is on host 247
2023-07-11 14:16:28,228 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 248 is on host 248
2023-07-11 14:16:28,228 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 249 is on host 249
2023-07-11 14:16:28,228 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 250 is on host 250
2023-07-11 14:16:28,228 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 251 is on host 251
2023-07-11 14:16:28,228 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 252 is on host 252
2023-07-11 14:16:28,228 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 253 is on host 253
2023-07-11 14:16:28,228 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 254 is on host 254
2023-07-11 14:16:28,228 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 255 is on host 255
2023-07-11 14:16:28,228 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 256 is on host 256
2023-07-11 14:16:28,228 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 257 is on host 257
2023-07-11 14:16:28,228 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 258 is on host 258
2023-07-11 14:16:28,228 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 259 is on host 259
2023-07-11 14:16:28,228 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 260 is on host 260
2023-07-11 14:16:28,228 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 261 is on host 261
2023-07-11 14:16:28,228 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 262 is on host 262
2023-07-11 14:16:28,228 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 263 is on host 263
2023-07-11 14:16:28,228 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 264 is on host 264
2023-07-11 14:16:28,228 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 265 is on host 265
2023-07-11 14:16:28,228 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 266 is on host 266
2023-07-11 14:16:28,228 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 267 is on host 267
2023-07-11 14:16:28,228 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 268 is on host 268
2023-07-11 14:16:28,228 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 269 is on host 269
2023-07-11 14:16:28,228 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 270 is on host 270
2023-07-11 14:16:28,229 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 271 is on host 271
2023-07-11 14:16:28,229 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 272 is on host 272
2023-07-11 14:16:28,229 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 273 is on host 273
2023-07-11 14:16:28,229 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 274 is on host 274
2023-07-11 14:16:28,229 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 275 is on host 275
2023-07-11 14:16:28,229 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 276 is on host 276
2023-07-11 14:16:28,229 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 277 is on host 277
2023-07-11 14:16:28,229 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 278 is on host 278
2023-07-11 14:16:28,229 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 279 is on host 279
2023-07-11 14:16:28,229 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 280 is on host 280
2023-07-11 14:16:28,229 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 281 is on host 281
2023-07-11 14:16:28,229 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 282 is on host 282
2023-07-11 14:16:28,229 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 283 is on host 283
2023-07-11 14:16:28,229 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 284 is on host 284
2023-07-11 14:16:28,229 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 285 is on host 285
2023-07-11 14:16:28,229 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 286 is on host 286
2023-07-11 14:16:28,229 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 287 is on host 287
2023-07-11 14:16:28,229 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 288 is on host 288
2023-07-11 14:16:28,229 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 289 is on host 289
2023-07-11 14:16:28,229 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 290 is on host 290
2023-07-11 14:16:28,229 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 291 is on host 291
2023-07-11 14:16:28,229 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 292 is on host 292
2023-07-11 14:16:28,229 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 293 is on host 293
2023-07-11 14:16:28,229 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 294 is on host 294
2023-07-11 14:16:28,229 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 295 is on host 295
2023-07-11 14:16:28,229 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 296 is on host 296
2023-07-11 14:16:28,229 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 297 is on host 297
2023-07-11 14:16:28,229 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 298 is on host 298
2023-07-11 14:16:28,229 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 299 is on host 299
2023-07-11 14:16:28,230 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 300 is on host 300
2023-07-11 14:16:28,230 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 301 is on host 301
2023-07-11 14:16:28,230 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 302 is on host 302
2023-07-11 14:16:28,230 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 303 is on host 303
2023-07-11 14:16:28,230 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 304 is on host 304
2023-07-11 14:16:28,230 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 305 is on host 305
2023-07-11 14:16:28,230 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 306 is on host 306
2023-07-11 14:16:28,230 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 307 is on host 307
2023-07-11 14:16:28,230 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 308 is on host 308
2023-07-11 14:16:28,230 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 309 is on host 309
2023-07-11 14:16:28,230 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 310 is on host 310
2023-07-11 14:16:28,230 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 311 is on host 311
2023-07-11 14:16:28,230 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 312 is on host 312
2023-07-11 14:16:28,230 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 313 is on host 313
2023-07-11 14:16:28,230 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 314 is on host 314
2023-07-11 14:16:28,230 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 315 is on host 315
2023-07-11 14:16:28,230 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 316 is on host 316
2023-07-11 14:16:28,230 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 317 is on host 317
2023-07-11 14:16:28,230 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 318 is on host 318
2023-07-11 14:16:28,230 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 319 is on host 319
2023-07-11 14:16:28,230 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 320 is on host 320
2023-07-11 14:16:28,230 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 321 is on host 321
2023-07-11 14:16:28,230 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 322 is on host 322
2023-07-11 14:16:28,230 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 323 is on host 323
2023-07-11 14:16:28,230 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 324 is on host 324
2023-07-11 14:16:28,230 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 325 is on host 325
2023-07-11 14:16:28,230 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 326 is on host 326
2023-07-11 14:16:28,230 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 327 is on host 327
2023-07-11 14:16:28,230 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 328 is on host 328
2023-07-11 14:16:28,231 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 329 is on host 329
2023-07-11 14:16:28,231 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 330 is on host 330
2023-07-11 14:16:28,231 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 331 is on host 331
2023-07-11 14:16:28,231 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 332 is on host 332
2023-07-11 14:16:28,231 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 333 is on host 333
2023-07-11 14:16:28,231 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 334 is on host 334
2023-07-11 14:16:28,231 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 335 is on host 335
2023-07-11 14:16:28,231 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 336 is on host 336
2023-07-11 14:16:28,231 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 337 is on host 337
2023-07-11 14:16:28,231 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 338 is on host 338
2023-07-11 14:16:28,231 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 339 is on host 339
2023-07-11 14:16:28,231 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 340 is on host 340
2023-07-11 14:16:28,231 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 341 is on host 341
2023-07-11 14:16:28,231 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 342 is on host 342
2023-07-11 14:16:28,231 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 343 is on host 343
2023-07-11 14:16:28,231 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 344 is on host 344
2023-07-11 14:16:28,231 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 345 is on host 345
2023-07-11 14:16:28,231 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 346 is on host 346
2023-07-11 14:16:28,231 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 347 is on host 347
2023-07-11 14:16:28,231 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 348 is on host 348
2023-07-11 14:16:28,231 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 349 is on host 349
2023-07-11 14:16:28,231 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 350 is on host 350
2023-07-11 14:16:28,231 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 351 is on host 351
2023-07-11 14:16:28,231 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 352 is on host 352
2023-07-11 14:16:28,231 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 353 is on host 353
2023-07-11 14:16:28,231 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 354 is on host 354
2023-07-11 14:16:28,231 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 355 is on host 355
2023-07-11 14:16:28,231 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 356 is on host 356
2023-07-11 14:16:28,231 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 357 is on host 357
2023-07-11 14:16:28,232 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 358 is on host 358
2023-07-11 14:16:28,232 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 359 is on host 359
2023-07-11 14:16:28,232 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 360 is on host 360
2023-07-11 14:16:28,232 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 361 is on host 361
2023-07-11 14:16:28,232 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 362 is on host 362
2023-07-11 14:16:28,232 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 363 is on host 363
2023-07-11 14:16:28,232 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 364 is on host 364
2023-07-11 14:16:28,232 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 365 is on host 365
2023-07-11 14:16:28,232 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 366 is on host 366
2023-07-11 14:16:28,232 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 367 is on host 367
2023-07-11 14:16:28,232 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 368 is on host 368
2023-07-11 14:16:28,232 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 369 is on host 369
2023-07-11 14:16:28,232 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 370 is on host 370
2023-07-11 14:16:28,232 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 371 is on host 371
2023-07-11 14:16:28,232 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 372 is on host 372
2023-07-11 14:16:28,232 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 373 is on host 373
2023-07-11 14:16:28,232 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 374 is on host 374
2023-07-11 14:16:28,232 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 375 is on host 375
2023-07-11 14:16:28,232 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 376 is on host 376
2023-07-11 14:16:28,232 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 377 is on host 377
2023-07-11 14:16:28,232 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 378 is on host 378
2023-07-11 14:16:28,232 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 379 is on host 379
2023-07-11 14:16:28,232 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 380 is on host 380
2023-07-11 14:16:28,232 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 381 is on host 381
2023-07-11 14:16:28,232 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 382 is on host 382
2023-07-11 14:16:28,232 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 383 is on host 383
2023-07-11 14:16:28,232 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 384 is on host 384
2023-07-11 14:16:28,232 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 385 is on host 385
2023-07-11 14:16:28,232 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 386 is on host 386
2023-07-11 14:16:28,233 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 387 is on host 387
2023-07-11 14:16:28,233 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 388 is on host 388
2023-07-11 14:16:28,233 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 389 is on host 389
2023-07-11 14:16:28,233 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 390 is on host 390
2023-07-11 14:16:28,233 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 391 is on host 391
2023-07-11 14:16:28,233 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 392 is on host 392
2023-07-11 14:16:28,233 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=393, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:28,233 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table22) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:28,233 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table23
2023-07-11 14:16:28,234 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv553536953=290, srv1630071126=110, srv1071894870=12, srv23511728=232, srv658346947=323, srv2025338799=204, srv1397994335=64, srv1976766403=195, srv1644629726=118, srv957637734=381, srv2079182457=210, srv1749264468=139, srv2046129126=206, srv1595762596=104, srv603990852=307, srv1973073480=194, srv958856137=382, srv644066832=319, srv557062842=292, srv277765671=235, srv732221418=337, srv1769385567=143, srv224612199=228, srv714752528=334, srv362526040=256, srv581128949=296, srv2133511466=223, srv1144239257=30, srv320603627=245, srv1679952521=126, srv2122867873=222, srv1110067064=24, srv256251994=233, srv63261708=317, srv89837390=371, srv552104598=289, srv508952995=281, srv2096011353=214, srv1770417148=144, srv1246723478=42, srv929436444=378, srv2082192429=211, srv234917297=231, srv405700573=266, srv183644386=166, srv1488378513=85, srv173139715=136, srv1154180352=32, srv355693379=252, srv1407521654=66, srv496848057=275, srv1157975499=33, srv1806731027=162, srv1923102804=184, srv311102455=244, srv450011410=271, srv771515724=348, srv389183508=262, srv1249074416=43, srv2014575201=201, srv640847108=318, srv832363565=356, srv1970882134=192, srv2107358603=218, srv855766065=361, srv1336043388=55, srv29397186=237, srv982792848=390, srv976560524=386, srv101181760=3, srv1093549482=21, srv2018389395=202, srv2113483104=221, srv1778339118=149, srv1968709692=190, srv705221118=333, srv159600090=105, srv1919608486=180, srv981255102=389, srv807899713=353, srv755110395=344, srv1770594519=145, srv739692705=340, srv1076582671=16, srv693869315=330, srv1079048717=17, srv440657532=270, srv1636659280=115, srv2108739257=220, srv668373413=326, srv1003610393=2, srv1054229197=11, srv1868589627=172, srv2103522371=217, srv1000546271=0, srv951670617=380, srv2042909593=205, srv1865656038=171, srv1466355012=78, srv703662406=332, srv1418112884=70, srv1215580291=40, srv71833528=335, srv1580581635=103, srv1021032212=5, srv1080806312=19, srv1985601859=197, srv74471954=343, srv1647472319=119, srv2071553346=208, srv1632855171=112, srv1122009370=27, srv13613992=61, srv1630777154=111, srv301413669=239, srv550697728=288, srv1296023857=53, srv1724550977=133, srv1989290370=198, srv1926417985=185, srv1678097199=125, srv1461034373=76, srv614690415=311, srv2098345381=215, srv310463473=243, srv1011934105=4, srv148627129=84, srv305489318=240, srv1256534903=46, srv1289731445=52, srv1798844587=157, srv567113085=294, srv1119222501=26, srv2055117940=207, srv855898852=362, srv629224816=316, srv1075943554=15, srv625909061=315, srv1705591942=128, srv734225580=339, srv660107924=324, srv1381729938=62, srv1633483173=113, srv408265476=267, srv1776057793=148, srv1360253411=60, srv1511424834=90, srv1414162621=68, srv883343663=370, srv151859222=91, srv349144930=251, srv1991304034=199, srv1825887791=164, srv601657063=305, srv758932951=345, srv1651629087=120, srv1864623584=170, srv682957691=329, srv1500454146=88, srv1725962085=135, srv1659841448=121, srv1253206004=45, srv52354442=284, srv18508093=168, srv1427731921=73, srv561344974=293, srv721668125=336, srv1575482138=100, srv914128771=373, srv961487230=383, srv741332941=342, srv533032466=286, srv1574140987=99, srv2139849097=224, srv503902262=278, srv674807007=327, srv1786829855=153, srv2088727517=213, srv394366966=264, srv980089565=388, srv114594288=31, srv38296437=261, srv214835574=226, srv1887224977=176, srv1025509362=7, srv1577020334=102, srv524466665=285, srv393561021=263, srv759909927=346, srv763556514=347, srv786453030=349, srv2142935488=225, srv618111613=312, srv16254163=108, srv343211061=250, srv476075173=273, srv1269632212=47, srv333589612=246, srv499015361=276, srv836674186=357, srv1799191687=158, srv1446998035=74, srv1571774199=98, srv1115354947=25, srv333860881=247, srv1724152600=132, srv1598699299=106, srv177885829=151, srv472125887=272, srv1101339966=22, srv1424985362=72, srv1945569895=188, srv594128294=300, srv1026739237=8, srv842459828=358, srv878519137=366, srv1921260729=181, srv339110834=249, srv504099471=279, srv814253179=354, srv1643744885=116, srv1793847521=155, srv607234624=309, srv698219051=331, srv1688538732=127, srv666240078=325, srv1079284733=18, srv29210550=236, srv506181748=280, srv881313122=368, srv1945452576=187, srv597307897=303, srv1285120424=51, srv1887943816=177, srv1983604698=196, srv1805465940=161, srv309309336=242, srv1719756294=131, srv1349932676=58, srv1208486369=38, srv1643971570=117, srv1509331489=89, srv334105385=248, srv1400515744=65, srv369984715=259, srv43712162=269, srv842675864=359, srv1803258748=160, srv1022450918=6, srv1775108732=147, srv1766088250=141, srv180150732=159, srv1220857227=41, srv226530501=229, srv362032108=255, srv919715380=377, srv1074935976=14, srv1395030819=63, srv803291569=352, srv1877966766=175, srv220538712=227, srv2021718843=203, srv2107782185=219, srv882216860=369, srv1489137852=86, srv1972328734=193, srv1470759982=79, srv1774824811=146, srv971974774=384, srv1418242791=71, srv1001274196=1, srv909615097=372, srv1537724566=93, srv1165799954=34, srv1724754364=134, srv978173525=387, srv113319438=29, srv578033735=295, srv147931272=80, srv1183635941=35, srv1904215245=178, srv596349756=302, srv880835255=367, srv857544550=364, srv1779729022=152, srv1795612465=156, srv621083045=314, srv917704170=375, srv1351811120=59, srv1316710897=54, srv789820555=350, srv1922580095=183, srv305567304=241, srv1936745425=186, srv1745318024=138, srv1210822057=39, srv645375717=320, srv950628389=379, srv1490199189=87, srv1575919256=101, srv154481102=96, srv359402967=254, srv997716931=391, srv1457224273=75, srv581644449=297, srv1872374768=174, srv363177310=257, srv740327512=341, srv1664227236=123, srv972330517=385, srv1634261306=114, srv1662183707=122, srv1969046891=191, srv1485266211=82, srv1778842262=150, srv588410181=298, srv1921840985=182, srv591279493=299, srv37574565=260, srv1104147458=23, srv1190166330=36, srv652270371=322, srv1484309042=81, srv1560148463=97, srv618569548=313, srv2102708311=216, srv1084873074=20, srv517669556=283, srv918152084=376, srv649714317=321, srv1674484790=124, srv1339239880=56, srv1461073271=77, srv1125312901=28, srv25633292=234, srv516616923=282, srv299721745=238, srv604932433=308, srv1273702855=48, srv792183929=351, srv1042608200=10, srv1276335106=49, srv1486044644=83, srv676101698=328, srv998930892=392, srv200111276=200, srv1863083643=169, srv1737443479=137, srv872997185=365, srv821351126=355, srv852115805=360, srv1074355423=13, srv170952194=130, srv503430005=277, srv153887567=94, srv1415163001=69, srv1032737435=9, srv1840670515=167, srv1961921083=189, srv59745831=304, srv36715747=258, srv431547280=268, srv1524853580=92, srv1870059418=173, srv396010771=265, srv594457792=301, srv1755339428=140, srv1766275429=142, srv5565786=291, srv603898526=306, srv544570223=287, srv856030669=363, srv1542523468=95, srv915785747=374, srv356122213=253, srv1411875499=67, srv2077620970=209, srv1345529444=57, srv232339963=230, srv1250861076=44, srv1914875423=179, srv478619481=274, srv1202435626=37, srv1706089454=129, srv1810631201=163, srv1282644061=50, srv1625945288=109, srv733251129=338, srv2082830831=212, srv1612103540=107, srv612136291=310, srv1790004142=154, srv183394703=165} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:28,234 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:28,234 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:28,234 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:28,234 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:28,234 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:28,234 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:28,234 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-11 14:16:28,234 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-11 14:16:28,234 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-11 14:16:28,234 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-11 14:16:28,234 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 10 is on host 10
2023-07-11 14:16:28,234 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 11 is on host 11
2023-07-11 14:16:28,234 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 12 is on host 12
2023-07-11 14:16:28,234 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 13 is on host 13
2023-07-11 14:16:28,234 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 14 is on host 14
2023-07-11 14:16:28,234 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 15 is on host 15
2023-07-11 14:16:28,234 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 16 is on host 16
2023-07-11 14:16:28,234 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 17 is on host 17
2023-07-11 14:16:28,234 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 18 is on host 18
2023-07-11 14:16:28,234 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 19 is on host 19
2023-07-11 14:16:28,234 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 20 is on host 20
2023-07-11 14:16:28,234 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 21 is on host 21
2023-07-11 14:16:28,235 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 22 is on host 22
2023-07-11 14:16:28,235 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 23 is on host 23
2023-07-11 14:16:28,235 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 24 is on host 24
2023-07-11 14:16:28,235 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 25 is on host 25
2023-07-11 14:16:28,235 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 26 is on host 26
2023-07-11 14:16:28,235 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 27 is on host 27
2023-07-11 14:16:28,235 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 28 is on host 28
2023-07-11 14:16:28,235 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 29 is on host 29
2023-07-11 14:16:28,235 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 30 is on host 30
2023-07-11 14:16:28,235 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 31 is on host 31
2023-07-11 14:16:28,235 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 32 is on host 32
2023-07-11 14:16:28,235 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 33 is on host 33
2023-07-11 14:16:28,235 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 34 is on host 34
2023-07-11 14:16:28,235 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 35 is on host 35
2023-07-11 14:16:28,235 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 36 is on host 36
2023-07-11 14:16:28,235 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 37 is on host 37
2023-07-11 14:16:28,235 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 38 is on host 38
2023-07-11 14:16:28,235 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 39 is on host 39
2023-07-11 14:16:28,235 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 40 is on host 40
2023-07-11 14:16:28,235 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 41 is on host 41
2023-07-11 14:16:28,235 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 42 is on host 42
2023-07-11 14:16:28,235 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 43 is on host 43
2023-07-11 14:16:28,235 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 44 is on host 44
2023-07-11 14:16:28,235 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 45 is on host 45
2023-07-11 14:16:28,235 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 46 is on host 46
2023-07-11 14:16:28,235 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 47 is on host 47
2023-07-11 14:16:28,235 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 48 is on host 48
2023-07-11 14:16:28,235 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 49 is on host 49
2023-07-11 14:16:28,235 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 50 is on host 50
2023-07-11 14:16:28,236 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 51 is on host 51
2023-07-11 14:16:28,236 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 52 is on host 52
2023-07-11 14:16:28,236 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 53 is on host 53
2023-07-11 14:16:28,236 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 54 is on host 54
2023-07-11 14:16:28,236 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 55 is on host 55
2023-07-11 14:16:28,236 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 56 is on host 56
2023-07-11 14:16:28,236 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 57 is on host 57
2023-07-11 14:16:28,236 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 58 is on host 58
2023-07-11 14:16:28,236 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 59 is on host 59
2023-07-11 14:16:28,236 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 60 is on host 60
2023-07-11 14:16:28,236 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 61 is on host 61
2023-07-11 14:16:28,236 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 62 is on host 62
2023-07-11 14:16:28,236 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 63 is on host 63
2023-07-11 14:16:28,236 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 64 is on host 64
2023-07-11 14:16:28,236 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 65 is on host 65
2023-07-11 14:16:28,236 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 66 is on host 66
2023-07-11 14:16:28,236 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 67 is on host 67
2023-07-11 14:16:28,236 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 68 is on host 68
2023-07-11 14:16:28,236 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 69 is on host 69
2023-07-11 14:16:28,237 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 70 is on host 70
2023-07-11 14:16:28,237 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 71 is on host 71
2023-07-11 14:16:28,237 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 72 is on host 72
2023-07-11 14:16:28,237 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 73 is on host 73
2023-07-11 14:16:28,237 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 74 is on host 74
2023-07-11 14:16:28,237 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 75 is on host 75
2023-07-11 14:16:28,237 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 76 is on host 76
2023-07-11 14:16:28,237 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 77 is on host 77
2023-07-11 14:16:28,237 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 78 is on host 78
2023-07-11 14:16:28,237 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 79 is on host 79
2023-07-11 14:16:28,237 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 80 is on host 80
2023-07-11 14:16:28,237 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 81 is on host 81
2023-07-11 14:16:28,237 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 82 is on host 82
2023-07-11 14:16:28,237 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 83 is on host 83
2023-07-11 14:16:28,237 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 84 is on host 84
2023-07-11 14:16:28,237 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 85 is on host 85
2023-07-11 14:16:28,237 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 86 is on host 86
2023-07-11 14:16:28,237 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 87 is on host 87
2023-07-11 14:16:28,237 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 88 is on host 88
2023-07-11 14:16:28,237 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 89 is on host 89
2023-07-11 14:16:28,237 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 90 is on host 90
2023-07-11 14:16:28,237 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 91 is on host 91
2023-07-11 14:16:28,237 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 92 is on host 92
2023-07-11 14:16:28,237 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 93 is on host 93
2023-07-11 14:16:28,237 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 94 is on host 94
2023-07-11 14:16:28,237 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 95 is on host 95
2023-07-11 14:16:28,238 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 96 is on host 96
2023-07-11 14:16:28,238 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 97 is on host 97
2023-07-11 14:16:28,238 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 98 is on host 98
2023-07-11 14:16:28,238 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 99 is on host 99
2023-07-11 14:16:28,238 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 100 is on host 100
2023-07-11 14:16:28,238 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 101 is on host 101
2023-07-11 14:16:28,238 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 102 is on host 102
2023-07-11 14:16:28,238 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 103 is on host 103
2023-07-11 14:16:28,238 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 104 is on host 104
2023-07-11 14:16:28,238 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 105 is on host 105
2023-07-11 14:16:28,238 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 106 is on host 106
2023-07-11 14:16:28,238 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 107 is on host 107
2023-07-11 14:16:28,238 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 108 is on host 108
2023-07-11 14:16:28,238 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 109 is on host 109
2023-07-11 14:16:28,238 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 110 is on host 110
2023-07-11 14:16:28,238 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 111 is on host 111
2023-07-11 14:16:28,238 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 112 is on host 112
2023-07-11 14:16:28,238 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 113 is on host 113
2023-07-11 14:16:28,238 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 114 is on host 114
2023-07-11 14:16:28,238 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 115 is on host 115
2023-07-11 14:16:28,238 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 116 is on host 116
2023-07-11 14:16:28,238 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 117 is on host 117
2023-07-11 14:16:28,238 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 118 is on host 118
2023-07-11 14:16:28,238 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 119 is on host 119
2023-07-11 14:16:28,238 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 120 is on host 120
2023-07-11 14:16:28,238 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 121 is on host 121
2023-07-11 14:16:28,238 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 122 is on host 122
2023-07-11 14:16:28,238 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 123 is on host 123
2023-07-11 14:16:28,238 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 124 is on host 124
2023-07-11 14:16:28,239 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 125 is on host 125
2023-07-11 14:16:28,239 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 126 is on host 126
2023-07-11 14:16:28,239 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 127 is on host 127
2023-07-11 14:16:28,239 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 128 is on host 128
2023-07-11 14:16:28,239 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 129 is on host 129
2023-07-11 14:16:28,239 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 130 is on host 130
2023-07-11 14:16:28,239 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 131 is on host 131
2023-07-11 14:16:28,239 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 132 is on host 132
2023-07-11 14:16:28,239 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 133 is on host 133
2023-07-11 14:16:28,239 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 134 is on host 134
2023-07-11 14:16:28,239 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 135 is on host 135
2023-07-11 14:16:28,239 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 136 is on host 136
2023-07-11 14:16:28,239 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 137 is on host 137
2023-07-11 14:16:28,239 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 138 is on host 138
2023-07-11 14:16:28,239 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 139 is on host 139
2023-07-11 14:16:28,239 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 140 is on host 140
2023-07-11 14:16:28,239 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 141 is on host 141
2023-07-11 14:16:28,239 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 142 is on host 142
2023-07-11 14:16:28,239 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 143 is on host 143
2023-07-11 14:16:28,239 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 144 is on host 144
2023-07-11 14:16:28,239 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 145 is on host 145
2023-07-11 14:16:28,239 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 146 is on host 146
2023-07-11 14:16:28,239 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 147 is on host 147
2023-07-11 14:16:28,239 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 148 is on host 148
2023-07-11 14:16:28,239 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 149 is on host 149
2023-07-11 14:16:28,239 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 150 is on host 150
2023-07-11 14:16:28,239 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 151 is on host 151
2023-07-11 14:16:28,239 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 152 is on host 152
2023-07-11 14:16:28,239 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 153 is on host 153
2023-07-11 14:16:28,240 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 154 is on host 154
2023-07-11 14:16:28,240 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 155 is on host 155
2023-07-11 14:16:28,240 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 156 is on host 156
2023-07-11 14:16:28,240 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 157 is on host 157
2023-07-11 14:16:28,240 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 158 is on host 158
2023-07-11 14:16:28,240 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 159 is on host 159
2023-07-11 14:16:28,240 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 160 is on host 160
2023-07-11 14:16:28,240 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 161 is on host 161
2023-07-11 14:16:28,240 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 162 is on host 162
2023-07-11 14:16:28,240 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 163 is on host 163
2023-07-11 14:16:28,240 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 164 is on host 164
2023-07-11 14:16:28,240 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 165 is on host 165
2023-07-11 14:16:28,240 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 166 is on host 166
2023-07-11 14:16:28,240 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 167 is on host 167
2023-07-11 14:16:28,240 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 168 is on host 168
2023-07-11 14:16:28,240 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 169 is on host 169
2023-07-11 14:16:28,240 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 170 is on host 170
2023-07-11 14:16:28,240 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 171 is on host 171
2023-07-11 14:16:28,240 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 172 is on host 172
2023-07-11 14:16:28,240 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 173 is on host 173
2023-07-11 14:16:28,240 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 174 is on host 174
2023-07-11 14:16:28,240 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 175 is on host 175
2023-07-11 14:16:28,240 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 176 is on host 176
2023-07-11 14:16:28,240 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 177 is on host 177
2023-07-11 14:16:28,240 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 178 is on host 178
2023-07-11 14:16:28,240 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 179 is on host 179
2023-07-11 14:16:28,240 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 180 is on host 180
2023-07-11 14:16:28,240 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 181 is on host 181
2023-07-11 14:16:28,240 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 182 is on host 182
2023-07-11 14:16:28,241 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 183 is on host 183
2023-07-11 14:16:28,241 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 184 is on host 184
2023-07-11 14:16:28,241 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 185 is on host 185
2023-07-11 14:16:28,241 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 186 is on host 186
2023-07-11 14:16:28,241 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 187 is on host 187
2023-07-11 14:16:28,241 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 188 is on host 188
2023-07-11 14:16:28,241 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 189 is on host 189
2023-07-11 14:16:28,241 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 190 is on host 190
2023-07-11 14:16:28,241 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 191 is on host 191
2023-07-11 14:16:28,241 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 192 is on host 192
2023-07-11 14:16:28,241 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 193 is on host 193
2023-07-11 14:16:28,241 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 194 is on host 194
2023-07-11 14:16:28,241 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 195 is on host 195
2023-07-11 14:16:28,241 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 196 is on host 196
2023-07-11 14:16:28,241 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 197 is on host 197
2023-07-11 14:16:28,241 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 198 is on host 198
2023-07-11 14:16:28,241 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 199 is on host 199
2023-07-11 14:16:28,241 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 200 is on host 200
2023-07-11 14:16:28,241 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 201 is on host 201
2023-07-11 14:16:28,241 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 202 is on host 202
2023-07-11 14:16:28,241 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 203 is on host 203
2023-07-11 14:16:28,241 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 204 is on host 204
2023-07-11 14:16:28,241 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 205 is on host 205
2023-07-11 14:16:28,241 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 206 is on host 206
2023-07-11 14:16:28,241 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 207 is on host 207
2023-07-11 14:16:28,241 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 208 is on host 208
2023-07-11 14:16:28,241 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 209 is on host 209
2023-07-11 14:16:28,241 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 210 is on host 210
2023-07-11 14:16:28,241 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 211 is on host 211
2023-07-11 14:16:28,242 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 212 is on host 212
2023-07-11 14:16:28,242 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 213 is on host 213
2023-07-11 14:16:28,242 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 214 is on host 214
2023-07-11 14:16:28,242 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 215 is on host 215
2023-07-11 14:16:28,242 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 216 is on host 216
2023-07-11 14:16:28,242 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 217 is on host 217
2023-07-11 14:16:28,242 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 218 is on host 218
2023-07-11 14:16:28,242 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 219 is on host 219
2023-07-11 14:16:28,242 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 220 is on host 220
2023-07-11 14:16:28,242 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 221 is on host 221
2023-07-11 14:16:28,242 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 222 is on host 222
2023-07-11 14:16:28,242 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 223 is on host 223
2023-07-11 14:16:28,242 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 224 is on host 224
2023-07-11 14:16:28,242 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 225 is on host 225
2023-07-11 14:16:28,242 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 226 is on host 226
2023-07-11 14:16:28,242 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 227 is on host 227
2023-07-11 14:16:28,242 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 228 is on host 228
2023-07-11 14:16:28,242 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 229 is on host 229
2023-07-11 14:16:28,242 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 230 is on host 230
2023-07-11 14:16:28,242 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 231 is on host 231
2023-07-11 14:16:28,242 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 232 is on host 232
2023-07-11 14:16:28,242 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 233 is on host 233
2023-07-11 14:16:28,242 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 234 is on host 234
2023-07-11 14:16:28,242 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 235 is on host 235
2023-07-11 14:16:28,242 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 236 is on host 236
2023-07-11 14:16:28,242 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 237 is on host 237
2023-07-11 14:16:28,242 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 238 is on host 238
2023-07-11 14:16:28,242 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 239 is on host 239
2023-07-11 14:16:28,242 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 240 is on host 240
2023-07-11 14:16:28,243 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 241 is on host 241
2023-07-11 14:16:28,243 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 242 is on host 242
2023-07-11 14:16:28,243 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 243 is on host 243
2023-07-11 14:16:28,243 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 244 is on host 244
2023-07-11 14:16:28,243 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 245 is on host 245
2023-07-11 14:16:28,243 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 246 is on host 246
2023-07-11 14:16:28,243 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 247 is on host 247
2023-07-11 14:16:28,243 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 248 is on host 248
2023-07-11 14:16:28,243 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 249 is on host 249
2023-07-11 14:16:28,243 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 250 is on host 250
2023-07-11 14:16:28,243 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 251 is on host 251
2023-07-11 14:16:28,243 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 252 is on host 252
2023-07-11 14:16:28,243 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 253 is on host 253
2023-07-11 14:16:28,243 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 254 is on host 254
2023-07-11 14:16:28,243 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 255 is on host 255
2023-07-11 14:16:28,243 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 256 is on host 256
2023-07-11 14:16:28,243 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 257 is on host 257
2023-07-11 14:16:28,243 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 258 is on host 258
2023-07-11 14:16:28,243 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 259 is on host 259
2023-07-11 14:16:28,243 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 260 is on host 260
2023-07-11 14:16:28,243 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 261 is on host 261
2023-07-11 14:16:28,243 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 262 is on host 262
2023-07-11 14:16:28,243 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 263 is on host 263
2023-07-11 14:16:28,243 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 264 is on host 264
2023-07-11 14:16:28,243 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 265 is on host 265
2023-07-11 14:16:28,243 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 266 is on host 266
2023-07-11 14:16:28,243 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 267 is on host 267
2023-07-11 14:16:28,243 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 268 is on host 268
2023-07-11 14:16:28,243 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 269 is on host 269
2023-07-11 14:16:28,243 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 270 is on host 270
2023-07-11 14:16:28,244 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 271 is on host 271
2023-07-11 14:16:28,244 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 272 is on host 272
2023-07-11 14:16:28,244 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 273 is on host 273
2023-07-11 14:16:28,244 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 274 is on host 274
2023-07-11 14:16:28,244 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 275 is on host 275
2023-07-11 14:16:28,244 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 276 is on host 276
2023-07-11 14:16:28,244 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 277 is on host 277
2023-07-11 14:16:28,244 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 278 is on host 278
2023-07-11 14:16:28,244 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 279 is on host 279
2023-07-11 14:16:28,244 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 280 is on host 280
2023-07-11 14:16:28,244 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 281 is on host 281
2023-07-11 14:16:28,244 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 282 is on host 282
2023-07-11 14:16:28,244 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 283 is on host 283
2023-07-11 14:16:28,244 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 284 is on host 284
2023-07-11 14:16:28,244 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 285 is on host 285
2023-07-11 14:16:28,244 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 286 is on host 286
2023-07-11 14:16:28,244 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 287 is on host 287
2023-07-11 14:16:28,244 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 288 is on host 288
2023-07-11 14:16:28,244 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 289 is on host 289
2023-07-11 14:16:28,244 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 290 is on host 290
2023-07-11 14:16:28,244 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 291 is on host 291
2023-07-11 14:16:28,244 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 292 is on host 292
2023-07-11 14:16:28,244 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 293 is on host 293
2023-07-11 14:16:28,244 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 294 is on host 294
2023-07-11 14:16:28,244 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 295 is on host 295
2023-07-11 14:16:28,244 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 296 is on host 296
2023-07-11 14:16:28,244 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 297 is on host 297
2023-07-11 14:16:28,244 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 298 is on host 298
2023-07-11 14:16:28,244 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 299 is on host 299
2023-07-11 14:16:28,245 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 300 is on host 300
2023-07-11 14:16:28,245 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 301 is on host 301
2023-07-11 14:16:28,245 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 302 is on host 302
2023-07-11 14:16:28,245 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 303 is on host 303
2023-07-11 14:16:28,245 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 304 is on host 304
2023-07-11 14:16:28,245 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 305 is on host 305
2023-07-11 14:16:28,245 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 306 is on host 306
2023-07-11 14:16:28,245 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 307 is on host 307
2023-07-11 14:16:28,245 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 308 is on host 308
2023-07-11 14:16:28,245 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 309 is on host 309
2023-07-11 14:16:28,245 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 310 is on host 310
2023-07-11 14:16:28,245 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 311 is on host 311
2023-07-11 14:16:28,245 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 312 is on host 312
2023-07-11 14:16:28,245 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 313 is on host 313
2023-07-11 14:16:28,245 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 314 is on host 314
2023-07-11 14:16:28,245 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 315 is on host 315
2023-07-11 14:16:28,245 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 316 is on host 316
2023-07-11 14:16:28,245 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 317 is on host 317
2023-07-11 14:16:28,245 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 318 is on host 318
2023-07-11 14:16:28,245 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 319 is on host 319
2023-07-11 14:16:28,245 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 320 is on host 320
2023-07-11 14:16:28,245 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 321 is on host 321
2023-07-11 14:16:28,245 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 322 is on host 322
2023-07-11 14:16:28,245 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 323 is on host 323
2023-07-11 14:16:28,245 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 324 is on host 324
2023-07-11 14:16:28,245 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 325 is on host 325
2023-07-11 14:16:28,245 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 326 is on host 326
2023-07-11 14:16:28,245 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 327 is on host 327
2023-07-11 14:16:28,245 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 328 is on host 328
2023-07-11 14:16:28,246 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 329 is on host 329
2023-07-11 14:16:28,246 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 330 is on host 330
2023-07-11 14:16:28,246 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 331 is on host 331
2023-07-11 14:16:28,246 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 332 is on host 332
2023-07-11 14:16:28,246 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 333 is on host 333
2023-07-11 14:16:28,246 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 334 is on host 334
2023-07-11 14:16:28,246 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 335 is on host 335
2023-07-11 14:16:28,246 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 336 is on host 336
2023-07-11 14:16:28,246 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 337 is on host 337
2023-07-11 14:16:28,246 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 338 is on host 338
2023-07-11 14:16:28,246 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 339 is on host 339
2023-07-11 14:16:28,246 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 340 is on host 340
2023-07-11 14:16:28,246 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 341 is on host 341
2023-07-11 14:16:28,246 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 342 is on host 342
2023-07-11 14:16:28,246 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 343 is on host 343
2023-07-11 14:16:28,246 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 344 is on host 344
2023-07-11 14:16:28,246 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 345 is on host 345
2023-07-11 14:16:28,246 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 346 is on host 346
2023-07-11 14:16:28,246 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 347 is on host 347
2023-07-11 14:16:28,246 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 348 is on host 348
2023-07-11 14:16:28,246 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 349 is on host 349
2023-07-11 14:16:28,246 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 350 is on host 350
2023-07-11 14:16:28,246 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 351 is on host 351
2023-07-11 14:16:28,246 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 352 is on host 352
2023-07-11 14:16:28,246 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 353 is on host 353
2023-07-11 14:16:28,246 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 354 is on host 354
2023-07-11 14:16:28,246 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 355 is on host 355
2023-07-11 14:16:28,246 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 356 is on host 356
2023-07-11 14:16:28,246 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 357 is on host 357
2023-07-11 14:16:28,247 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 358 is on host 358
2023-07-11 14:16:28,247 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 359 is on host 359
2023-07-11 14:16:28,247 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 360 is on host 360
2023-07-11 14:16:28,247 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 361 is on host 361
2023-07-11 14:16:28,247 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 362 is on host 362
2023-07-11 14:16:28,247 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 363 is on host 363
2023-07-11 14:16:28,247 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 364 is on host 364
2023-07-11 14:16:28,247 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 365 is on host 365
2023-07-11 14:16:28,247 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 366 is on host 366
2023-07-11 14:16:28,247 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 367 is on host 367
2023-07-11 14:16:28,247 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 368 is on host 368
2023-07-11 14:16:28,247 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 369 is on host 369
2023-07-11 14:16:28,247 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 370 is on host 370
2023-07-11 14:16:28,247 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 371 is on host 371
2023-07-11 14:16:28,247 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 372 is on host 372
2023-07-11 14:16:28,247 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 373 is on host 373
2023-07-11 14:16:28,247 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 374 is on host 374
2023-07-11 14:16:28,247 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 375 is on host 375
2023-07-11 14:16:28,247 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 376 is on host 376
2023-07-11 14:16:28,247 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 377 is on host 377
2023-07-11 14:16:28,247 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 378 is on host 378
2023-07-11 14:16:28,247 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 379 is on host 379
2023-07-11 14:16:28,247 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 380 is on host 380
2023-07-11 14:16:28,247 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 381 is on host 381
2023-07-11 14:16:28,247 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 382 is on host 382
2023-07-11 14:16:28,247 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 383 is on host 383
2023-07-11 14:16:28,247 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 384 is on host 384
2023-07-11 14:16:28,247 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 385 is on host 385
2023-07-11 14:16:28,247 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 386 is on host 386
2023-07-11 14:16:28,248 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 387 is on host 387
2023-07-11 14:16:28,248 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 388 is on host 388
2023-07-11 14:16:28,248 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 389 is on host 389
2023-07-11 14:16:28,248 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 390 is on host 390
2023-07-11 14:16:28,248 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 391 is on host 391
2023-07-11 14:16:28,248 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 392 is on host 392
2023-07-11 14:16:28,248 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=393, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:28,248 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table23) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:28,249 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1082): slop=0.0, systemTablesOnMaster=false
2023-07-11 14:16:28,249 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(253): Loaded config; maxSteps=1000000, runMaxSteps=false, stepsPerRegion=800, maxRunningTime=30000, isByTable=false, CostFunctions=[RegionCountSkewCostFunction, PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction, MoveCostFunction, RackLocalityCostFunction, TableSkewCostFunction, RegionReplicaHostCostFunction, RegionReplicaRackCostFunction, ReadRequestCostFunction, WriteRequestCostFunction, MemStoreSizeCostFunction, StoreFileCostFunction] , sum of multiplier of cost functions = 577.0 etc.
2023-07-11 14:16:28,249 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1718): Start Generate Balance plan for cluster.
2023-07-11 14:16:28,250 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1718): Start Generate Balance plan for cluster.
2023-07-11 14:16:28,251 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1718): Start Generate Balance plan for cluster.
2023-07-11 14:16:28,251 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1718): Start Generate Balance plan for cluster.
2023-07-11 14:16:28,251 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1718): Start Generate Balance plan for cluster.
2023-07-11 14:16:28,251 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv130094457=0, srv1374258947=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:28,251 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:28,251 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:28,251 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=2, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:28,252 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(351): Running balancer because cluster has idle server(s). function cost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=1.0, need balance); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:28,252 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(505): Start StochasticLoadBalancer.balancer, initial weighted average imbalance=0.8665511265164645, functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=1.0, need balance); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0);  computedMaxSteps=3200
2023-07-11 14:16:28,282 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(553): Finished computing new moving plan. Computation took 30 ms to try 3200 different iterations.  Found a solution that moves 1 regions; Going from a computed imbalance of 0.8665511265164645 to a new imbalance of 0.006065857885615251. funtionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.5); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:28,345 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1718): Start Generate Balance plan for cluster.
2023-07-11 14:16:28,345 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1104710999=0, srv1678565530=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:28,345 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:28,346 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:28,346 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=2, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:28,346 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Cluster wide - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:28,346 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1718): Start Generate Balance plan for cluster.
2023-07-11 14:16:28,346 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1145062223=0, srv419041440=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:28,346 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:28,346 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:28,346 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=2, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:28,346 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Cluster wide - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:28,346 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1718): Start Generate Balance plan for cluster.
2023-07-11 14:16:28,346 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv319145710=0, srv839784074=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:28,346 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:28,347 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:28,347 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=3, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:28,347 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Cluster wide - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:28,347 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1718): Start Generate Balance plan for cluster.
2023-07-11 14:16:28,347 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1558684663=0, srv704323169=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:28,347 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:28,347 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:28,347 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=4, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:28,347 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Cluster wide - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.2888503755054882 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.33333333333333337); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:28,347 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1718): Start Generate Balance plan for cluster.
2023-07-11 14:16:28,347 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1866756210=0, srv497615545=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:28,347 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:28,347 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:28,347 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:28,347 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Cluster wide - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:28,348 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1718): Start Generate Balance plan for cluster.
2023-07-11 14:16:28,348 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv887538601=1, srv1188457697=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:28,348 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:28,348 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:28,348 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:28,348 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Cluster wide - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:28,348 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1718): Start Generate Balance plan for cluster.
2023-07-11 14:16:28,348 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv223323602=0, srv956024338=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:28,348 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:28,348 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:28,348 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=10, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:28,348 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Cluster wide - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.6932409012131716 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.8); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:28,357 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1718): Start Generate Balance plan for cluster.
2023-07-11 14:16:28,360 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1905056438=0, srv876844643=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:28,368 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:28,368 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:28,368 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1432, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:28,370 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Cluster wide - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.40878413881917497 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.4717368961973279); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:28,370 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1718): Start Generate Balance plan for cluster.
2023-07-11 14:16:28,370 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1981680425=0, srv656202140=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:28,370 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:28,370 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:28,370 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=53, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:28,371 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Cluster wide - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.034662045060658585 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.04000000000000001); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:28,371 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1718): Start Generate Balance plan for cluster.
2023-07-11 14:16:28,371 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv2003140820=1, srv1528804467=0, srv225730945=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:28,371 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:28,371 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:28,371 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:28,371 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=2, number of hosts=3, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:28,371 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(351): Running balancer because cluster has idle server(s). function cost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.5773502691896258); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:28,371 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(505): Start StochasticLoadBalancer.balancer, initial weighted average imbalance=0.5003035261608543, functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.5773502691896258); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0);  computedMaxSteps=7200
2023-07-11 14:16:28,386 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(553): Finished computing new moving plan. Computation took 15 ms to try 7200 different iterations.  Found a solution that moves 1 regions; Going from a computed imbalance of 0.5003035261608543 to a new imbalance of 0.004043905257076833. funtionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.3333333333333333); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:28,387 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1718): Start Generate Balance plan for cluster.
2023-07-11 14:16:28,387 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1343727905=0, srv1572713798=1, srv825552133=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:28,387 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:28,387 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:28,387 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:28,387 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=3, number of hosts=3, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:28,387 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Cluster wide - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.25015176308042714 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.2886751345948129); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:28,387 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1718): Start Generate Balance plan for cluster.
2023-07-11 14:16:28,387 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1619696207=2, srv1471921929=1, srv1302434454=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:28,387 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:28,387 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:28,387 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:28,387 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=2, number of hosts=3, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:28,387 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(351): Running balancer because cluster has idle server(s). function cost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.33333333333333337); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:28,387 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(505): Start StochasticLoadBalancer.balancer, initial weighted average imbalance=0.2888503755054882, functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.33333333333333337); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0);  computedMaxSteps=9600
2023-07-11 14:16:28,403 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(553): Finished computing new moving plan. Computation took 16 ms to try 9600 different iterations.  Found a solution that moves 1 regions; Going from a computed imbalance of 0.2888503755054882 to a new imbalance of 0.0030329289428076256. funtionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.25); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:28,403 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1718): Start Generate Balance plan for cluster.
2023-07-11 14:16:28,403 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv2132251125=0, srv64570742=1, srv683325141=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:28,403 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:28,403 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:28,403 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:28,403 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=3, number of hosts=3, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:28,403 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(351): Running balancer because cluster has idle server(s). function cost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=1.0, need balance); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:28,403 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(505): Start StochasticLoadBalancer.balancer, initial weighted average imbalance=0.8665511265164645, functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=1.0, need balance); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0);  computedMaxSteps=7200
2023-07-11 14:16:28,413 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(553): Finished computing new moving plan. Computation took 10 ms to try 7200 different iterations.  Found a solution that moves 2 regions; Going from a computed imbalance of 0.8665511265164645 to a new imbalance of 0.008087810514153667. funtionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.6666666666666666); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:28,414 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1718): Start Generate Balance plan for cluster.
2023-07-11 14:16:28,414 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv184591897=1, srv742093260=2, srv1209364928=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:28,414 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:28,414 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:28,414 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:28,414 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=4, number of hosts=3, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:28,414 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(351): Running balancer because cluster has idle server(s). function cost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=1.0, need balance); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:28,414 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(505): Start StochasticLoadBalancer.balancer, initial weighted average imbalance=0.8665511265164645, functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=1.0, need balance); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0);  computedMaxSteps=9600
2023-07-11 14:16:28,426 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(553): Finished computing new moving plan. Computation took 12 ms to try 9600 different iterations.  Found a solution that moves 2 regions; Going from a computed imbalance of 0.8665511265164645 to a new imbalance of 0.006065857885615251. funtionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.5); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:28,427 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1718): Start Generate Balance plan for cluster.
2023-07-11 14:16:28,427 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv32165259=1, srv720961054=2, srv1532932698=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:28,427 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:28,427 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:28,427 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:28,427 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=20, number of hosts=3, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:28,427 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(351): Running balancer because cluster has idle server(s). function cost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.4871794871794873); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:28,427 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(505): Start StochasticLoadBalancer.balancer, initial weighted average imbalance=0.42216593343109815, functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.4871794871794873); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0);  computedMaxSteps=96000
2023-07-11 14:16:28,623 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(553): Finished computing new moving plan. Computation took 195 ms to try 96000 different iterations.  Found a solution that moves 13 regions; Going from a computed imbalance of 0.42216593343109815 to a new imbalance of 0.003942807625649913. funtionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.325); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:28,623 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1718): Start Generate Balance plan for cluster.
2023-07-11 14:16:28,623 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv2072641246=2, srv2144947752=3, srv1034631054=0, srv1379579419=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:28,624 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:28,624 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:28,624 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:28,624 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:28,624 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=3, number of hosts=4, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:28,624 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(351): Running balancer because cluster has idle server(s). function cost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.29457175359290033); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:28,624 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(505): Start StochasticLoadBalancer.balancer, initial weighted average imbalance=0.25526148491585815, functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.29457175359290033); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0);  computedMaxSteps=19200
2023-07-11 14:16:28,651 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(553): Finished computing new moving plan. Computation took 27 ms to try 19200 different iterations.  Found a solution that moves 1 regions; Going from a computed imbalance of 0.25526148491585815 to a new imbalance of 0.0020219526285384167. funtionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.16666666666666666); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:28,651 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1718): Start Generate Balance plan for cluster.
2023-07-11 14:16:28,651 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1143460910=0, srv2086713514=3, srv17919828=2, srv1552553611=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:28,651 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:28,652 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:28,652 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:28,652 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:28,652 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=4, number of hosts=4, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:28,652 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(351): Running balancer because cluster has idle server(s). function cost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=1.0, need balance); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:28,652 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(505): Start StochasticLoadBalancer.balancer, initial weighted average imbalance=0.8665511265164645, functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=1.0, need balance); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0);  computedMaxSteps=12800
2023-07-11 14:16:28,670 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(553): Finished computing new moving plan. Computation took 17 ms to try 12800 different iterations.  Found a solution that moves 3 regions; Going from a computed imbalance of 0.8665511265164645 to a new imbalance of 0.009098786828422877. funtionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.75); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:28,670 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1718): Start Generate Balance plan for cluster.
2023-07-11 14:16:28,670 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv131274075=1, srv1237093384=0, srv1594210135=2, srv547874327=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:28,670 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:28,670 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:28,670 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:28,670 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:28,670 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=5, number of hosts=4, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:28,670 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(351): Running balancer because cluster has idle server(s). function cost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=1.0, need balance); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:28,670 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(505): Start StochasticLoadBalancer.balancer, initial weighted average imbalance=0.8665511265164645, functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=1.0, need balance); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0);  computedMaxSteps=16000
2023-07-11 14:16:28,693 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(553): Finished computing new moving plan. Computation took 23 ms to try 16000 different iterations.  Found a solution that moves 3 regions; Going from a computed imbalance of 0.8665511265164645 to a new imbalance of 0.007279029462738302. funtionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.6); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:28,693 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1718): Start Generate Balance plan for cluster.
2023-07-11 14:16:28,694 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1562787852=0, srv284426423=2, srv1674132283=1, srv309606248=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:28,694 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:28,694 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:28,694 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:28,694 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:28,694 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=6, number of hosts=4, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:28,694 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(351): Running balancer because cluster has idle server(s). function cost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.5773502691896257); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:28,694 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(505): Start StochasticLoadBalancer.balancer, initial weighted average imbalance=0.5003035261608542, functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.5773502691896257); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0);  computedMaxSteps=38400
2023-07-11 14:16:28,753 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(553): Finished computing new moving plan. Computation took 59 ms to try 38400 different iterations.  Found a solution that moves 6 regions; Going from a computed imbalance of 0.5003035261608542 to a new imbalance of 0.006065857885615251. funtionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.5); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:28,753 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1718): Start Generate Balance plan for cluster.
2023-07-11 14:16:28,753 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv523020474=1, srv562073857=2, srv977599268=3, srv375158196=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:28,753 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:28,754 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:28,754 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:28,754 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:28,754 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=6, number of hosts=4, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:28,754 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(351): Running balancer because cluster has idle server(s). function cost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.7071067811865475); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:28,754 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(505): Start StochasticLoadBalancer.balancer, initial weighted average imbalance=0.6127441778046339, functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.7071067811865475); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0);  computedMaxSteps=25600
2023-07-11 14:16:28,791 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(553): Finished computing new moving plan. Computation took 37 ms to try 25600 different iterations.  Found a solution that moves 4 regions; Going from a computed imbalance of 0.6127441778046339 to a new imbalance of 0.006065857885615251. funtionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.5); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:28,791 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1718): Start Generate Balance plan for cluster.
2023-07-11 14:16:28,791 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1887207360=1, srv99375204=3, srv291441346=2, srv1585141633=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:28,792 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:28,792 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:28,792 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:28,792 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:28,792 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=6, number of hosts=4, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:28,792 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(351): Running balancer because cluster has idle server(s). function cost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.7907604410896715); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:28,792 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(505): Start StochasticLoadBalancer.balancer, initial weighted average imbalance=0.6852343510309111, functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.7907604410896715); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0);  computedMaxSteps=22400
2023-07-11 14:16:28,825 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(553): Finished computing new moving plan. Computation took 33 ms to try 22400 different iterations.  Found a solution that moves 4 regions; Going from a computed imbalance of 0.6852343510309111 to a new imbalance of 0.006932409012131715. funtionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.5714285714285714); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:28,826 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1718): Start Generate Balance plan for cluster.
2023-07-11 14:16:28,826 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1273299529=1, srv706457319=3, srv2134280052=2, srv114833143=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:28,826 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:28,826 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:28,826 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:28,826 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:28,826 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=6, number of hosts=4, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:28,826 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(351): Running balancer because cluster has idle server(s). function cost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=1.0, need balance); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:28,826 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(505): Start StochasticLoadBalancer.balancer, initial weighted average imbalance=0.8665511265164645, functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=1.0, need balance); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0);  computedMaxSteps=19200
2023-07-11 14:16:28,855 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(553): Finished computing new moving plan. Computation took 29 ms to try 19200 different iterations.  Found a solution that moves 4 regions; Going from a computed imbalance of 0.8665511265164645 to a new imbalance of 0.008087810514153667. funtionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.6666666666666666); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:28,855 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1718): Start Generate Balance plan for cluster.
2023-07-11 14:16:28,855 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv2073802243=2, srv307682995=3, srv1675560050=1, srv1625928703=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:28,855 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:28,855 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:28,855 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:28,855 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:28,855 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=7, number of hosts=4, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:28,855 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Cluster wide - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0962834585018294 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.11111111111111113); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:28,856 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1718): Start Generate Balance plan for cluster.
2023-07-11 14:16:28,856 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1591907089=1, srv1761935290=2, srv1223166975=0, srv1992075375=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:28,856 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:28,856 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:28,856 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:28,856 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:28,856 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=8, number of hosts=4, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:28,856 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Cluster wide - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.17331022530329285 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.19999999999999996); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:28,856 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1718): Start Generate Balance plan for cluster.
2023-07-11 14:16:28,856 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1618868003=1, srv328112028=2, srv1390931224=0, srv446997687=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:28,856 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:28,856 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:28,856 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:28,856 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:28,856 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=7, number of hosts=4, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:28,856 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(351): Running balancer because cluster has idle server(s). function cost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=1.0, need balance); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:28,857 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(505): Start StochasticLoadBalancer.balancer, initial weighted average imbalance=0.8665511265164645, functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=1.0, need balance); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0);  computedMaxSteps=22400
2023-07-11 14:16:28,890 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(553): Finished computing new moving plan. Computation took 34 ms to try 22400 different iterations.  Found a solution that moves 5 regions; Going from a computed imbalance of 0.8665511265164645 to a new imbalance of 0.008665511265164644. funtionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.7142857142857143); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:28,891 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1718): Start Generate Balance plan for cluster.
2023-07-11 14:16:28,891 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1327078242=1, srv535833604=4, srv2085322103=2, srv107329183=0, srv522437976=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:28,891 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:28,891 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:28,891 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:28,891 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:28,891 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:28,891 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=4, number of hosts=5, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:28,891 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Cluster wide - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.22705408170595567 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.26202041028867284); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:28,906 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1718): Start Generate Balance plan for cluster.
2023-07-11 14:16:28,908 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv699822018=5, srv1088705185=1, srv2052259609=4, srv1593226267=2, srv105037969=0, srv1917568353=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:28,932 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:28,932 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:28,932 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:28,932 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:28,932 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:28,932 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:28,932 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1500, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:28,935 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(351): Running balancer because cluster has idle server(s). function cost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.4440183710462697); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:28,935 WARN  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(497): calculatedMaxSteps:14448000 for loadbalancer's stochastic walk is larger than maxSteps:1000000. Hence load balancing may not work well. Setting parameter "hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.runMaxSteps" to true can overcome this issue.(This config change does not require service restart)
2023-07-11 14:16:28,935 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(505): Start StochasticLoadBalancer.balancer, initial weighted average imbalance=0.38476461962415054, functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.4440183710462697); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0);  computedMaxSteps=1000000
2023-07-11 14:16:49,129 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(553): Finished computing new moving plan. Computation took 20196 ms to try 1000000 different iterations.  Found a solution that moves 1015 regions; Going from a computed imbalance of 0.38476461962415054 to a new imbalance of 0.00409092741122889. funtionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.3372093023255814); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:49,146 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1718): Start Generate Balance plan for cluster.
2023-07-11 14:16:49,149 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1428390844=2, srv1674502330=3, srv1016102646=0, srv118612834=1, srv538606430=5, srv1950448620=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:16:49,163 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:16:49,163 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:16:49,163 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:16:49,163 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:16:49,163 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:16:49,163 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:16:49,163 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1500, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:16:49,166 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(351): Running balancer because cluster has idle server(s). function cost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.3438084096789955); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:16:49,167 WARN  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(497): calculatedMaxSteps:16800000 for loadbalancer's stochastic walk is larger than maxSteps:1000000. Hence load balancing may not work well. Setting parameter "hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.runMaxSteps" to true can overcome this issue.(This config change does not require service restart)
2023-07-11 14:16:49,167 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(505): Start StochasticLoadBalancer.balancer, initial weighted average imbalance=0.2979275647131677, functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.3438084096789955); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0);  computedMaxSteps=1000000
2023-07-11 14:17:11,539 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(553): Finished computing new moving plan. Computation took 22375 ms to try 1000000 different iterations.  Found a solution that moves 920 regions; Going from a computed imbalance of 0.2979275647131677 to a new imbalance of 0.003188908145580589. funtionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.26285714285714284); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:17:11,540 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1718): Start Generate Balance plan for cluster.
2023-07-11 14:17:11,540 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1740953225=8, srv1614512676=7, srv341465510=10, srv1423227673=5, srv2049801266=9, srv1237792032=3, srv1061525203=0, srv644646268=13, srv139099419=4, srv1461836587=6, srv455507393=11, srv817012998=14, srv477877820=12, srv1129973289=1, srv1214105491=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:17:11,541 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:17:11,541 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:17:11,541 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:17:11,541 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:17:11,541 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:17:11,541 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:17:11,541 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-11 14:17:11,541 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-11 14:17:11,541 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-11 14:17:11,541 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-11 14:17:11,541 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 10 is on host 10
2023-07-11 14:17:11,541 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 11 is on host 11
2023-07-11 14:17:11,541 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 12 is on host 12
2023-07-11 14:17:11,541 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 13 is on host 13
2023-07-11 14:17:11,541 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 14 is on host 14
2023-07-11 14:17:11,541 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=15, number of hosts=15, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:17:11,542 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Cluster wide - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.12507588154021357 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.14433756729740646); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:17:11,542 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1718): Start Generate Balance plan for cluster.
2023-07-11 14:17:11,542 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv82864127=9, srv1773565072=3, srv1031737223=0, srv1920896042=4, srv497500307=6, srv591311342=7, srv603905108=8, srv1186933283=1, srv1216844350=2, srv1958086150=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:17:11,542 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:17:11,542 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:17:11,542 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:17:11,542 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:17:11,542 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:17:11,542 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:17:11,542 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-11 14:17:11,542 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-11 14:17:11,542 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-11 14:17:11,542 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-11 14:17:11,542 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=10, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:17:11,542 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(351): Running balancer because cluster has idle server(s). function cost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=1.0, need balance); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:17:11,543 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(505): Start StochasticLoadBalancer.balancer, initial weighted average imbalance=0.8665511265164645, functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=1.0, need balance); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0);  computedMaxSteps=80000
2023-07-11 14:17:11,655 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(553): Finished computing new moving plan. Computation took 113 ms to try 80000 different iterations.  Found a solution that moves 9 regions; Going from a computed imbalance of 0.8665511265164645 to a new imbalance of 0.010918544194107453. funtionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.9); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:17:11,655 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1718): Start Generate Balance plan for cluster.
2023-07-11 14:17:11,655 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1301571482=0, srv1817267529=4, srv269914567=7, srv617908058=8, srv1997875326=6, srv658271480=9, srv1830913018=5, srv1345054442=1, srv1550744419=2, srv1767648202=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:17:11,655 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:17:11,656 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:17:11,656 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:17:11,656 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:17:11,656 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:17:11,656 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:17:11,656 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-11 14:17:11,656 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-11 14:17:11,656 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-11 14:17:11,656 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-11 14:17:11,656 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=6, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:17:11,656 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Cluster wide - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.055531997651093117 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.06408392528936147); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:17:11,656 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1718): Start Generate Balance plan for cluster.
2023-07-11 14:17:11,656 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1585908674=3, srv1409299112=2, srv129370685=1, srv243137070=7, srv990008710=9, srv1027108453=0, srv237713457=6, srv2031084365=5, srv1891147209=4, srv567295165=8} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:17:11,657 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:17:11,657 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:17:11,657 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:17:11,657 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:17:11,657 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:17:11,657 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:17:11,657 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-11 14:17:11,657 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-11 14:17:11,657 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-11 14:17:11,657 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-11 14:17:11,657 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=54, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:17:11,657 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(351): Running balancer because cluster has idle server(s). function cost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.9999999999999999); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:17:11,657 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(505): Start StochasticLoadBalancer.balancer, initial weighted average imbalance=0.8665511265164644, functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.9999999999999999); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0);  computedMaxSteps=432000
2023-07-11 14:17:12,450 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(553): Finished computing new moving plan. Computation took 793 ms to try 432000 different iterations.  Found a solution that moves 48 regions; Going from a computed imbalance of 0.8665511265164644 to a new imbalance of 0.01078374735220489. funtionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.8888888888888888); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:17:12,450 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1718): Start Generate Balance plan for cluster.
2023-07-11 14:17:12,451 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv61556389=8, srv1257341794=2, srv1271833107=3, srv1976439024=6, srv508843204=7, srv1170981341=0, srv1208907618=1, srv127797266=5, srv702552193=9, srv1277117066=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:17:12,451 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:17:12,451 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:17:12,451 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:17:12,451 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:17:12,451 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:17:12,451 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:17:12,451 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-11 14:17:12,451 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-11 14:17:12,451 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-11 14:17:12,451 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-11 14:17:12,451 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=55, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:17:12,451 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(351): Running balancer because cluster has idle server(s). function cost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=1.0, need balance); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:17:12,451 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(505): Start StochasticLoadBalancer.balancer, initial weighted average imbalance=0.8665511265164645, functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=1.0, need balance); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0);  computedMaxSteps=440000
2023-07-11 14:17:13,264 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(553): Finished computing new moving plan. Computation took 813 ms to try 440000 different iterations.  Found a solution that moves 49 regions; Going from a computed imbalance of 0.8665511265164645 to a new imbalance of 0.010808255868914448. funtionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.8909090909090909); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:17:13,265 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1718): Start Generate Balance plan for cluster.
2023-07-11 14:17:13,265 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1367722987=2, srv1595749472=3, srv1193134041=0, srv2021010531=4, srv232651228=5, srv826173739=9, srv670202609=7, srv729522498=8, srv1274242021=1, srv567549475=6} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:17:13,265 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:17:13,265 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:17:13,265 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:17:13,265 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:17:13,265 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:17:13,265 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:17:13,265 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-11 14:17:13,265 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-11 14:17:13,265 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-11 14:17:13,266 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-11 14:17:13,266 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=56, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:17:13,266 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(351): Running balancer because cluster has idle server(s). function cost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=1.0, need balance); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:17:13,266 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(505): Start StochasticLoadBalancer.balancer, initial weighted average imbalance=0.8665511265164645, functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=1.0, need balance); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0);  computedMaxSteps=448000
2023-07-11 14:17:14,094 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(553): Finished computing new moving plan. Computation took 828 ms to try 448000 different iterations.  Found a solution that moves 50 regions; Going from a computed imbalance of 0.8665511265164645 to a new imbalance of 0.010831889081455806. funtionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.8928571428571429); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:17:14,094 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1718): Start Generate Balance plan for cluster.
2023-07-11 14:17:14,094 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1442939373=0, srv2096329483=4, srv592772478=8, srv1886507156=1, srv36083336=6, srv91475751=9, srv1905356664=2, srv1926645770=3, srv219808841=5, srv558154081=7} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:17:14,094 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:17:14,094 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:17:14,094 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:17:14,094 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:17:14,094 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:17:14,095 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:17:14,095 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-11 14:17:14,095 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-11 14:17:14,095 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-11 14:17:14,095 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-11 14:17:14,095 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=16, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:17:14,095 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(351): Running balancer because cluster has idle server(s). function cost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=1.0, need balance); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:17:14,095 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(505): Start StochasticLoadBalancer.balancer, initial weighted average imbalance=0.8665511265164645, functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=1.0, need balance); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0);  computedMaxSteps=128000
2023-07-11 14:17:14,293 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(553): Finished computing new moving plan. Computation took 198 ms to try 128000 different iterations.  Found a solution that moves 14 regions; Going from a computed imbalance of 0.8665511265164645 to a new imbalance of 0.01061525129982669. funtionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.875); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:17:14,293 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1718): Start Generate Balance plan for cluster.
2023-07-11 14:17:14,293 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1486929397=1, srv1579107400=2, srv1102559245=0, srv1792591682=3, srv294017869=6, srv550172628=9, srv292977834=5, srv495438383=8, srv315072012=7, srv210413624=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:17:14,294 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:17:14,294 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:17:14,294 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:17:14,294 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:17:14,294 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:17:14,294 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:17:14,294 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-11 14:17:14,294 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-11 14:17:14,294 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-11 14:17:14,294 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-11 14:17:14,294 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=8, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:17:14,294 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Cluster wide - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.30649131741006164 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.35369098029121115); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:17:14,294 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1718): Start Generate Balance plan for cluster.
2023-07-11 14:17:14,294 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv778808538=7, srv732906493=6, srv1716806949=3, srv872396085=9, srv1171330662=1, srv574520742=5, srv856394351=8, srv1037251741=0, srv1631430438=2, srv2104643530=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:17:14,294 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:17:14,294 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:17:14,294 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:17:14,294 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:17:14,294 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:17:14,294 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:17:14,295 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-11 14:17:14,295 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-11 14:17:14,295 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-11 14:17:14,295 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-11 14:17:14,295 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=9, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:17:14,295 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Cluster wide - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.34662045060658575 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.39999999999999997); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:17:14,295 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1718): Start Generate Balance plan for cluster.
2023-07-11 14:17:14,295 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1725724842=1, srv667769923=7, srv812873854=8, srv824893730=9, srv637706823=6, srv611373558=5, srv610222625=4, srv1020466322=0, srv1904795072=2, srv583503700=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:17:14,295 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:17:14,295 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:17:14,295 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:17:14,295 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:17:14,295 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:17:14,295 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:17:14,295 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-11 14:17:14,295 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-11 14:17:14,295 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-11 14:17:14,295 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-11 14:17:14,295 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=10, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:17:14,295 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Cluster wide - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.3851338340073176 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.44444444444444453); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:17:14,296 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1718): Start Generate Balance plan for cluster.
2023-07-11 14:17:14,296 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1616661053=3, srv1944303802=5, srv1662686753=4, srv730389034=8, srv157594416=2, srv1434607070=1, srv1996298211=6, srv213126140=7, srv124679838=0, srv982963593=9} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:17:14,296 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:17:14,296 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:17:14,296 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:17:14,296 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:17:14,297 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:17:14,297 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:17:14,297 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-11 14:17:14,297 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-11 14:17:14,297 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-11 14:17:14,297 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-11 14:17:14,297 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=123, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:17:14,297 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Cluster wide - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.8002334382626535 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.923469387755102); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:17:14,298 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1718): Start Generate Balance plan for cluster.
2023-07-11 14:17:14,298 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv2133026415=5, srv506550949=7, srv1245904498=0, srv1928899605=3, srv1557312760=1, srv2140522387=6, srv791603204=9, srv611772277=8, srv1781213180=2, srv2122039987=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:17:14,298 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:17:14,298 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:17:14,298 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:17:14,298 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:17:14,298 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:17:14,298 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:17:14,298 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-11 14:17:14,298 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-11 14:17:14,298 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-11 14:17:14,298 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-11 14:17:14,299 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=155, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:17:14,299 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Cluster wide - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.8131812243798632 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.9384111329343621); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:17:14,299 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1718): Start Generate Balance plan for cluster.
2023-07-11 14:17:14,299 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1304729600=1, srv1664154644=4, srv1608805907=3, srv733781721=7, srv271895194=6, srv1259980517=0, srv231676348=5, srv1527528131=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:17:14,299 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:17:14,299 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:17:14,299 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:17:14,299 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:17:14,299 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:17:14,299 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:17:14,300 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-11 14:17:14,300 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-11 14:17:14,300 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=14, number of hosts=8, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:17:14,300 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Cluster wide - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.05755254949858986 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0664156421213727); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:17:14,300 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1718): Start Generate Balance plan for cluster.
2023-07-11 14:17:14,300 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv867422455=6, srv1393513284=1, srv1423580826=2, srv1204698383=0, srv359286858=3, srv995474661=7, srv479909060=5, srv393488295=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:17:14,300 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:17:14,300 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:17:14,300 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:17:14,300 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:17:14,300 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:17:14,300 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:17:14,300 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-11 14:17:14,300 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-11 14:17:14,300 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=14, number of hosts=8, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:17:14,301 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Cluster wide - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.06673965003400768 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.07701755613924488); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:17:14,301 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1718): Start Generate Balance plan for cluster.
2023-07-11 14:17:14,302 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1408738080=2, srv796750701=6, srv503333901=4, srv861933034=7, srv1186287677=0, srv1485778668=3, srv545448017=5, srv1371868894=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:17:14,302 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:17:14,302 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:17:14,302 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:17:14,302 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:17:14,302 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:17:14,303 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:17:14,303 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-11 14:17:14,303 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-11 14:17:14,303 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=130, number of hosts=8, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:17:14,303 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Cluster wide - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.28093705674099306 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.32420136347910594); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:17:14,305 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1718): Start Generate Balance plan for cluster.
2023-07-11 14:17:14,305 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv909164836=6, srv595653765=4, srv259998871=2, srv724409511=5, srv313218831=3, srv1009760987=0, srv967588342=7, srv1187636661=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:17:14,306 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:17:14,306 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:17:14,306 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:17:14,306 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:17:14,306 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:17:14,306 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:17:14,306 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-11 14:17:14,306 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-11 14:17:14,307 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=140, number of hosts=8, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:17:14,307 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Cluster wide - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.07533492111851356 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.08693649897076465); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:17:14,307 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1718): Start Generate Balance plan for cluster.
2023-07-11 14:17:14,308 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv42149963=4, srv108736272=1, srv1042845361=0, srv1232300796=2, srv1673225674=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:17:14,308 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:17:14,308 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:17:14,308 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:17:14,308 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:17:14,308 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:17:14,308 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=5, number of hosts=5, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:17:14,308 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(351): Running balancer because cluster has idle server(s). function cost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.25); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:17:14,308 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(505): Start StochasticLoadBalancer.balancer, initial weighted average imbalance=0.21663778162911612, functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.25); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0);  computedMaxSteps=80000
2023-07-11 14:17:14,416 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(553): Finished computing new moving plan. Computation took 108 ms to try 80000 different iterations.  Found a solution that moves 4 regions; Going from a computed imbalance of 0.21663778162911612 to a new imbalance of 0.0024263431542461008. funtionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.2); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:17:14,432 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1718): Start Generate Balance plan for cluster.
2023-07-11 14:17:14,440 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1913386180=214, srv459639526=298, srv1255806383=69, srv255075889=265, srv1324526297=90, srv121655218=56, srv1982208909=222, srv1359935788=98, srv1424140083=112, srv2005712753=228, srv1486170465=122, srv1847141399=194, srv1324870063=91, srv14382733=115, srv1912766932=213, srv1617062284=144, srv1980101009=221, srv985263314=389, srv919618063=379, srv1165827501=43, srv1792376364=183, srv852999782=371, srv1826585925=190, srv1195291526=51, srv1542202740=129, srv2063320818=239, srv1950491521=217, srv626364361=327, srv910579106=378, srv1654270312=154, srv1599915190=138, srv243264952=263, srv1047448551=13, srv1861653701=196, srv1846631698=193, srv1796893715=184, srv1003068092=0, srv813714033=363, srv1420743215=111, srv2060810862=238, srv1200111782=52, srv747239214=346, srv751474882=347, srv2105105274=250, srv948058773=383, srv2019284723=232, srv1053014447=14, srv2037058889=234, srv362503265=284, srv932730184=380, srv222851985=259, srv87833559=375, srv787105681=353, srv1332060760=94, srv813667118=362, srv857280532=372, srv660580650=331, srv1994631395=225, srv467742547=299, srv287719963=270, srv1102718930=29, srv2081408629=246, srv1773766138=179, srv597585335=318, srv787597769=354, srv1400003139=107, srv1424186014=113, srv1608257828=140, srv1651737773=152, srv1386662449=104, srv346511700=279, srv685402764=334, srv176022128=177, srv1678421212=159, srv1047402713=12, srv1532514998=126, srv638658206=330, srv1908505148=208, srv796609202=357, srv1678784016=160, srv1241037200=62, srv1039346416=9, srv1511805851=124, srv1962289449=218, srv1018727956=6, srv1295455315=82, srv1586785961=135, srv1544871286=130, srv1260717873=73, srv1788796339=181, srv1708936952=166, srv406482526=288, srv709295060=337, srv1250558578=65, srv1174474320=46, srv483116111=301, srv1072417215=22, srv1852760701=195, srv1995237879=226, srv1113722017=33, srv315182483=276, srv1185749089=49, srv1824955039=189, srv1443535144=116, srv2140334634=256, srv1664584696=156, srv515337247=304, srv826297867=367, srv1391033014=106, srv1126732063=36, srv1086744651=25, srv2055737932=236, srv242559772=262, srv1591010742=136, srv1249991190=64, srv1702611242=165, srv731244177=341, srv768018257=350, srv270996370=267, srv1255440405=68, srv1211452864=54, srv324646071=277, srv1045990269=11, srv1612468311=141, srv1009231073=4, srv1654177635=153, srv1844202980=192, srv290561272=271, srv2008583910=230, srv814085372=364, srv1308206240=83, srv629979546=329, srv1402697594=108, srv271918970=268, srv1273794746=78, srv1387933260=105, srv1068240263=20, srv1240947956=61, srv410772721=289, srv836707982=370, srv1984136921=223, srv1405625041=109, srv1076448080=23, srv692395646=336, srv2129892969=254, srv957330604=384, srv163943914=150, srv995841365=391, srv2124117719=253, srv424394642=292, srv187380035=197, srv1695522408=164, srv455638093=296, srv157218329=133, srv1745160745=173, srv1716326022=168, srv1534822794=127, srv785361235=352, srv132196031=88, srv216626621=258, srv788223582=355, srv2084975908=248, srv860922426=373, srv2071356550=242, srv1894301039=201, srv295153647=273, srv1479389758=121, srv2064722965=240, srv714077855=339, srv488008438=302, srv746628320=345, srv1478187028=120, srv2073603534=243, srv1139022960=38, srv1174299024=45, srv1370553108=100, srv1123558225=35, srv1817727308=187, srv192350320=215, srv1112025372=32, srv1586345765=134, srv1618590009=147, srv1265145417=76, srv307699704=275, srv1231374525=58, srv685396754=333, srv1907824690=207, srv1625944747=148, srv1549561784=131, srv162911907=149, srv538395134=307, srv1806638657=186, srv17401729=171, srv2113871602=251, srv449485248=295, srv1331014323=93, srv1255107707=67, srv1280497307=81, srv744452881=344, srv609708393=324, srv1749108355=175, srv83330801=369, srv1694009463=163, srv1005682146=3, srv364960610=285, srv712815115=338, srv104005410=10, srv1599775213=137, srv1692000002=162, srv19107149=210, srv204054229=235, srv1275463384=79, srv819522403=365, srv1766138944=178, srv1234793220=59, srv1668287048=157, srv7410996=343, srv1753193204=176, srv2131480929=255, srv292829394=272, srv1783940445=180, srv587045546=315, srv142638742=114, srv389391448=286, srv810443566=360, srv565193760=310, srv992306266=390, srv1407206975=110, srv1159620282=42, srv1323344049=89, srv1317675172=86, srv57775044=313, srv1268847015=77, srv420275135=291, srv354385178=280, srv1823760807=188, srv1669630730=158, srv1989300887=224, srv566204254=311, srv1106921665=31, srv1177266525=47, srv1308425603=84, srv1378397919=103, srv1372844411=102, srv1969720553=220, srv1059769238=17, srv1260088566=72, srv831455107=368, srv1036697821=8, srv2145937004=257, srv11449792=39, srv1464552451=119, srv598794441=320, srv586115078=314, srv1878841271=198, srv2082977235=247, srv1157590073=41, srv1797335237=185, srv2066613738=241, srv1071381790=21, srv997974974=392, srv518274234=305, srv523926617=306, srv1004393553=2, srv2079501943=245, srv2077228907=244, srv614995451=325, srv123796337=60, srv629946342=328, srv1056992482=15, srv1900980673=202, srv1081851312=24, srv1901948298=203, srv1841940909=191, srv538970585=308, srv599658151=322, srv1194396603=50, srv802697043=358, srv902335828=377, srv958994738=385, srv1138964126=37, srv1746270100=174, srv1222881202=57, srv1254367093=66, srv690476195=335, srv1104857450=30, srv1351176022=97, srv194055812=216, srv2006361383=229, srv2026392557=233, srv23737297=261, srv1065646591=18, srv359665462=283, srv1180779825=48, srv572858323=312, srv1309250952=85, srv1724506466=170, srv131944963=87, srv1903972806=204, srv427142661=293, srv813102500=361, srv1723010771=169, srv1614659367=143, srv1093499658=28, srv341581790=278, srv1714964767=167, srv945138332=382, srv446094625=294, srv1910946400=211, srv1329874833=92, srv1264646075=75, srv599012006=321, srv356827714=282, srv1999737295=227, srv597337468=317, srv1456902025=118, srv1258569995=70, srv1258734229=71, srv1341322356=96, srv1614269055=142, srv1215460247=55, srv1600703876=139, srv2114760385=252, srv300018345=274, srv161833869=145, srv355783593=281, srv803216235=359, srv941022562=381, srv1535055466=128, srv1884393752=199, srv274841432=269, srv2059701213=237, srv1057352284=16, srv2085525523=249, srv76224491=348, srv1491231497=123, srv1203619364=53, srv883528736=376, srv457204082=297, srv1448332411=117, srv1004062139=1, srv1741597505=172, srv1243415643=63, srv270082240=266, srv868279222=374, srv417922044=290, srv478677229=300, srv726295182=340, srv137094482=101, srv1091141657=26, srv1618440906=146, srv1066743816=19, srv791066443=356, srv235161968=260, srv66334108=332, srv979549315=388, srv826207043=366, srv1660879137=155, srv1276087115=80, srv766543089=349, srv1648900867=151, srv1892252538=200, srv1689956652=161, srv1789827040=182, srv1091687217=27, srv1911587727=212, srv403801387=287, srv1367503431=99, srv1170554221=44, srv1909107671=209, srv544396316=309, srv1339867667=95, srv1532099087=125, srv1033754089=7, srv200948007=231, srv1906724265=206, srv1967139498=219, srv964819271=387, srv1565584264=132, srv605055175=323, srv73181527=342, srv1146985192=40, srv959725063=386, srv490186463=303, srv1123310332=34, srv597225736=316, srv1905886466=205, srv597875765=319, srv776391369=351, srv24920907=264, srv622565380=326, srv1261799047=74, srv1011507381=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-11 14:17:14,440 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-11 14:17:14,440 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-11 14:17:14,440 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-11 14:17:14,440 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-11 14:17:14,440 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-11 14:17:14,440 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-11 14:17:14,440 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-11 14:17:14,440 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-11 14:17:14,440 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-11 14:17:14,440 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-11 14:17:14,440 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 10 is on host 10
2023-07-11 14:17:14,440 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 11 is on host 11
2023-07-11 14:17:14,440 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 12 is on host 12
2023-07-11 14:17:14,440 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 13 is on host 13
2023-07-11 14:17:14,441 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 14 is on host 14
2023-07-11 14:17:14,441 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 15 is on host 15
2023-07-11 14:17:14,441 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 16 is on host 16
2023-07-11 14:17:14,441 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 17 is on host 17
2023-07-11 14:17:14,441 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 18 is on host 18
2023-07-11 14:17:14,441 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 19 is on host 19
2023-07-11 14:17:14,441 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 20 is on host 20
2023-07-11 14:17:14,441 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 21 is on host 21
2023-07-11 14:17:14,441 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 22 is on host 22
2023-07-11 14:17:14,441 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 23 is on host 23
2023-07-11 14:17:14,441 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 24 is on host 24
2023-07-11 14:17:14,441 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 25 is on host 25
2023-07-11 14:17:14,441 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 26 is on host 26
2023-07-11 14:17:14,441 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 27 is on host 27
2023-07-11 14:17:14,441 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 28 is on host 28
2023-07-11 14:17:14,441 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 29 is on host 29
2023-07-11 14:17:14,441 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 30 is on host 30
2023-07-11 14:17:14,441 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 31 is on host 31
2023-07-11 14:17:14,441 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 32 is on host 32
2023-07-11 14:17:14,441 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 33 is on host 33
2023-07-11 14:17:14,441 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 34 is on host 34
2023-07-11 14:17:14,441 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 35 is on host 35
2023-07-11 14:17:14,441 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 36 is on host 36
2023-07-11 14:17:14,441 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 37 is on host 37
2023-07-11 14:17:14,441 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 38 is on host 38
2023-07-11 14:17:14,441 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 39 is on host 39
2023-07-11 14:17:14,441 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 40 is on host 40
2023-07-11 14:17:14,441 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 41 is on host 41
2023-07-11 14:17:14,441 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 42 is on host 42
2023-07-11 14:17:14,441 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 43 is on host 43
2023-07-11 14:17:14,441 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 44 is on host 44
2023-07-11 14:17:14,442 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 45 is on host 45
2023-07-11 14:17:14,442 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 46 is on host 46
2023-07-11 14:17:14,442 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 47 is on host 47
2023-07-11 14:17:14,442 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 48 is on host 48
2023-07-11 14:17:14,442 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 49 is on host 49
2023-07-11 14:17:14,442 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 50 is on host 50
2023-07-11 14:17:14,442 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 51 is on host 51
2023-07-11 14:17:14,442 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 52 is on host 52
2023-07-11 14:17:14,442 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 53 is on host 53
2023-07-11 14:17:14,442 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 54 is on host 54
2023-07-11 14:17:14,442 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 55 is on host 55
2023-07-11 14:17:14,442 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 56 is on host 56
2023-07-11 14:17:14,442 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 57 is on host 57
2023-07-11 14:17:14,442 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 58 is on host 58
2023-07-11 14:17:14,442 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 59 is on host 59
2023-07-11 14:17:14,442 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 60 is on host 60
2023-07-11 14:17:14,442 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 61 is on host 61
2023-07-11 14:17:14,442 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 62 is on host 62
2023-07-11 14:17:14,442 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 63 is on host 63
2023-07-11 14:17:14,442 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 64 is on host 64
2023-07-11 14:17:14,442 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 65 is on host 65
2023-07-11 14:17:14,442 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 66 is on host 66
2023-07-11 14:17:14,442 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 67 is on host 67
2023-07-11 14:17:14,442 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 68 is on host 68
2023-07-11 14:17:14,442 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 69 is on host 69
2023-07-11 14:17:14,442 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 70 is on host 70
2023-07-11 14:17:14,442 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 71 is on host 71
2023-07-11 14:17:14,442 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 72 is on host 72
2023-07-11 14:17:14,442 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 73 is on host 73
2023-07-11 14:17:14,442 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 74 is on host 74
2023-07-11 14:17:14,443 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 75 is on host 75
2023-07-11 14:17:14,443 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 76 is on host 76
2023-07-11 14:17:14,443 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 77 is on host 77
2023-07-11 14:17:14,443 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 78 is on host 78
2023-07-11 14:17:14,443 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 79 is on host 79
2023-07-11 14:17:14,443 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 80 is on host 80
2023-07-11 14:17:14,443 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 81 is on host 81
2023-07-11 14:17:14,443 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 82 is on host 82
2023-07-11 14:17:14,443 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 83 is on host 83
2023-07-11 14:17:14,443 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 84 is on host 84
2023-07-11 14:17:14,443 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 85 is on host 85
2023-07-11 14:17:14,443 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 86 is on host 86
2023-07-11 14:17:14,443 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 87 is on host 87
2023-07-11 14:17:14,443 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 88 is on host 88
2023-07-11 14:17:14,443 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 89 is on host 89
2023-07-11 14:17:14,443 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 90 is on host 90
2023-07-11 14:17:14,443 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 91 is on host 91
2023-07-11 14:17:14,443 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 92 is on host 92
2023-07-11 14:17:14,443 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 93 is on host 93
2023-07-11 14:17:14,443 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 94 is on host 94
2023-07-11 14:17:14,443 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 95 is on host 95
2023-07-11 14:17:14,443 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 96 is on host 96
2023-07-11 14:17:14,443 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 97 is on host 97
2023-07-11 14:17:14,443 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 98 is on host 98
2023-07-11 14:17:14,443 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 99 is on host 99
2023-07-11 14:17:14,443 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 100 is on host 100
2023-07-11 14:17:14,443 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 101 is on host 101
2023-07-11 14:17:14,443 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 102 is on host 102
2023-07-11 14:17:14,443 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 103 is on host 103
2023-07-11 14:17:14,443 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 104 is on host 104
2023-07-11 14:17:14,443 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 105 is on host 105
2023-07-11 14:17:14,444 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 106 is on host 106
2023-07-11 14:17:14,444 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 107 is on host 107
2023-07-11 14:17:14,444 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 108 is on host 108
2023-07-11 14:17:14,444 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 109 is on host 109
2023-07-11 14:17:14,444 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 110 is on host 110
2023-07-11 14:17:14,444 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 111 is on host 111
2023-07-11 14:17:14,444 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 112 is on host 112
2023-07-11 14:17:14,444 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 113 is on host 113
2023-07-11 14:17:14,444 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 114 is on host 114
2023-07-11 14:17:14,444 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 115 is on host 115
2023-07-11 14:17:14,444 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 116 is on host 116
2023-07-11 14:17:14,444 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 117 is on host 117
2023-07-11 14:17:14,444 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 118 is on host 118
2023-07-11 14:17:14,444 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 119 is on host 119
2023-07-11 14:17:14,444 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 120 is on host 120
2023-07-11 14:17:14,444 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 121 is on host 121
2023-07-11 14:17:14,444 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 122 is on host 122
2023-07-11 14:17:14,444 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 123 is on host 123
2023-07-11 14:17:14,444 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 124 is on host 124
2023-07-11 14:17:14,444 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 125 is on host 125
2023-07-11 14:17:14,444 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 126 is on host 126
2023-07-11 14:17:14,444 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 127 is on host 127
2023-07-11 14:17:14,444 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 128 is on host 128
2023-07-11 14:17:14,444 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 129 is on host 129
2023-07-11 14:17:14,444 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 130 is on host 130
2023-07-11 14:17:14,444 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 131 is on host 131
2023-07-11 14:17:14,444 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 132 is on host 132
2023-07-11 14:17:14,444 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 133 is on host 133
2023-07-11 14:17:14,444 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 134 is on host 134
2023-07-11 14:17:14,444 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 135 is on host 135
2023-07-11 14:17:14,445 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 136 is on host 136
2023-07-11 14:17:14,445 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 137 is on host 137
2023-07-11 14:17:14,445 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 138 is on host 138
2023-07-11 14:17:14,445 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 139 is on host 139
2023-07-11 14:17:14,445 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 140 is on host 140
2023-07-11 14:17:14,445 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 141 is on host 141
2023-07-11 14:17:14,445 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 142 is on host 142
2023-07-11 14:17:14,445 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 143 is on host 143
2023-07-11 14:17:14,445 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 144 is on host 144
2023-07-11 14:17:14,445 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 145 is on host 145
2023-07-11 14:17:14,445 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 146 is on host 146
2023-07-11 14:17:14,445 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 147 is on host 147
2023-07-11 14:17:14,445 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 148 is on host 148
2023-07-11 14:17:14,445 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 149 is on host 149
2023-07-11 14:17:14,445 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 150 is on host 150
2023-07-11 14:17:14,445 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 151 is on host 151
2023-07-11 14:17:14,445 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 152 is on host 152
2023-07-11 14:17:14,445 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 153 is on host 153
2023-07-11 14:17:14,445 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 154 is on host 154
2023-07-11 14:17:14,445 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 155 is on host 155
2023-07-11 14:17:14,445 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 156 is on host 156
2023-07-11 14:17:14,445 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 157 is on host 157
2023-07-11 14:17:14,445 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 158 is on host 158
2023-07-11 14:17:14,445 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 159 is on host 159
2023-07-11 14:17:14,445 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 160 is on host 160
2023-07-11 14:17:14,445 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 161 is on host 161
2023-07-11 14:17:14,445 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 162 is on host 162
2023-07-11 14:17:14,445 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 163 is on host 163
2023-07-11 14:17:14,445 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 164 is on host 164
2023-07-11 14:17:14,445 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 165 is on host 165
2023-07-11 14:17:14,446 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 166 is on host 166
2023-07-11 14:17:14,446 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 167 is on host 167
2023-07-11 14:17:14,446 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 168 is on host 168
2023-07-11 14:17:14,446 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 169 is on host 169
2023-07-11 14:17:14,446 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 170 is on host 170
2023-07-11 14:17:14,446 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 171 is on host 171
2023-07-11 14:17:14,446 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 172 is on host 172
2023-07-11 14:17:14,446 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 173 is on host 173
2023-07-11 14:17:14,446 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 174 is on host 174
2023-07-11 14:17:14,446 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 175 is on host 175
2023-07-11 14:17:14,446 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 176 is on host 176
2023-07-11 14:17:14,446 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 177 is on host 177
2023-07-11 14:17:14,446 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 178 is on host 178
2023-07-11 14:17:14,446 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 179 is on host 179
2023-07-11 14:17:14,446 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 180 is on host 180
2023-07-11 14:17:14,446 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 181 is on host 181
2023-07-11 14:17:14,446 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 182 is on host 182
2023-07-11 14:17:14,446 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 183 is on host 183
2023-07-11 14:17:14,446 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 184 is on host 184
2023-07-11 14:17:14,446 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 185 is on host 185
2023-07-11 14:17:14,446 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 186 is on host 186
2023-07-11 14:17:14,446 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 187 is on host 187
2023-07-11 14:17:14,446 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 188 is on host 188
2023-07-11 14:17:14,446 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 189 is on host 189
2023-07-11 14:17:14,446 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 190 is on host 190
2023-07-11 14:17:14,446 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 191 is on host 191
2023-07-11 14:17:14,446 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 192 is on host 192
2023-07-11 14:17:14,446 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 193 is on host 193
2023-07-11 14:17:14,446 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 194 is on host 194
2023-07-11 14:17:14,446 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 195 is on host 195
2023-07-11 14:17:14,446 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 196 is on host 196
2023-07-11 14:17:14,447 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 197 is on host 197
2023-07-11 14:17:14,447 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 198 is on host 198
2023-07-11 14:17:14,447 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 199 is on host 199
2023-07-11 14:17:14,447 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 200 is on host 200
2023-07-11 14:17:14,447 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 201 is on host 201
2023-07-11 14:17:14,447 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 202 is on host 202
2023-07-11 14:17:14,447 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 203 is on host 203
2023-07-11 14:17:14,447 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 204 is on host 204
2023-07-11 14:17:14,447 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 205 is on host 205
2023-07-11 14:17:14,447 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 206 is on host 206
2023-07-11 14:17:14,447 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 207 is on host 207
2023-07-11 14:17:14,447 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 208 is on host 208
2023-07-11 14:17:14,447 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 209 is on host 209
2023-07-11 14:17:14,447 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 210 is on host 210
2023-07-11 14:17:14,447 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 211 is on host 211
2023-07-11 14:17:14,447 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 212 is on host 212
2023-07-11 14:17:14,447 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 213 is on host 213
2023-07-11 14:17:14,447 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 214 is on host 214
2023-07-11 14:17:14,447 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 215 is on host 215
2023-07-11 14:17:14,447 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 216 is on host 216
2023-07-11 14:17:14,447 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 217 is on host 217
2023-07-11 14:17:14,447 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 218 is on host 218
2023-07-11 14:17:14,447 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 219 is on host 219
2023-07-11 14:17:14,447 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 220 is on host 220
2023-07-11 14:17:14,447 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 221 is on host 221
2023-07-11 14:17:14,447 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 222 is on host 222
2023-07-11 14:17:14,447 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 223 is on host 223
2023-07-11 14:17:14,447 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 224 is on host 224
2023-07-11 14:17:14,447 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 225 is on host 225
2023-07-11 14:17:14,447 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 226 is on host 226
2023-07-11 14:17:14,448 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 227 is on host 227
2023-07-11 14:17:14,448 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 228 is on host 228
2023-07-11 14:17:14,448 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 229 is on host 229
2023-07-11 14:17:14,448 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 230 is on host 230
2023-07-11 14:17:14,448 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 231 is on host 231
2023-07-11 14:17:14,448 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 232 is on host 232
2023-07-11 14:17:14,448 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 233 is on host 233
2023-07-11 14:17:14,448 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 234 is on host 234
2023-07-11 14:17:14,448 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 235 is on host 235
2023-07-11 14:17:14,448 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 236 is on host 236
2023-07-11 14:17:14,448 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 237 is on host 237
2023-07-11 14:17:14,448 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 238 is on host 238
2023-07-11 14:17:14,448 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 239 is on host 239
2023-07-11 14:17:14,448 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 240 is on host 240
2023-07-11 14:17:14,448 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 241 is on host 241
2023-07-11 14:17:14,448 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 242 is on host 242
2023-07-11 14:17:14,448 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 243 is on host 243
2023-07-11 14:17:14,448 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 244 is on host 244
2023-07-11 14:17:14,448 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 245 is on host 245
2023-07-11 14:17:14,448 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 246 is on host 246
2023-07-11 14:17:14,448 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 247 is on host 247
2023-07-11 14:17:14,448 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 248 is on host 248
2023-07-11 14:17:14,448 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 249 is on host 249
2023-07-11 14:17:14,448 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 250 is on host 250
2023-07-11 14:17:14,448 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 251 is on host 251
2023-07-11 14:17:14,448 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 252 is on host 252
2023-07-11 14:17:14,448 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 253 is on host 253
2023-07-11 14:17:14,448 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 254 is on host 254
2023-07-11 14:17:14,448 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 255 is on host 255
2023-07-11 14:17:14,448 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 256 is on host 256
2023-07-11 14:17:14,449 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 257 is on host 257
2023-07-11 14:17:14,449 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 258 is on host 258
2023-07-11 14:17:14,449 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 259 is on host 259
2023-07-11 14:17:14,449 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 260 is on host 260
2023-07-11 14:17:14,449 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 261 is on host 261
2023-07-11 14:17:14,449 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 262 is on host 262
2023-07-11 14:17:14,449 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 263 is on host 263
2023-07-11 14:17:14,449 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 264 is on host 264
2023-07-11 14:17:14,449 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 265 is on host 265
2023-07-11 14:17:14,449 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 266 is on host 266
2023-07-11 14:17:14,449 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 267 is on host 267
2023-07-11 14:17:14,449 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 268 is on host 268
2023-07-11 14:17:14,449 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 269 is on host 269
2023-07-11 14:17:14,449 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 270 is on host 270
2023-07-11 14:17:14,449 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 271 is on host 271
2023-07-11 14:17:14,449 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 272 is on host 272
2023-07-11 14:17:14,449 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 273 is on host 273
2023-07-11 14:17:14,449 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 274 is on host 274
2023-07-11 14:17:14,449 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 275 is on host 275
2023-07-11 14:17:14,449 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 276 is on host 276
2023-07-11 14:17:14,449 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 277 is on host 277
2023-07-11 14:17:14,449 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 278 is on host 278
2023-07-11 14:17:14,449 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 279 is on host 279
2023-07-11 14:17:14,449 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 280 is on host 280
2023-07-11 14:17:14,449 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 281 is on host 281
2023-07-11 14:17:14,449 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 282 is on host 282
2023-07-11 14:17:14,449 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 283 is on host 283
2023-07-11 14:17:14,449 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 284 is on host 284
2023-07-11 14:17:14,449 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 285 is on host 285
2023-07-11 14:17:14,449 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 286 is on host 286
2023-07-11 14:17:14,450 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 287 is on host 287
2023-07-11 14:17:14,450 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 288 is on host 288
2023-07-11 14:17:14,450 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 289 is on host 289
2023-07-11 14:17:14,450 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 290 is on host 290
2023-07-11 14:17:14,450 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 291 is on host 291
2023-07-11 14:17:14,450 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 292 is on host 292
2023-07-11 14:17:14,450 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 293 is on host 293
2023-07-11 14:17:14,450 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 294 is on host 294
2023-07-11 14:17:14,450 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 295 is on host 295
2023-07-11 14:17:14,450 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 296 is on host 296
2023-07-11 14:17:14,450 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 297 is on host 297
2023-07-11 14:17:14,450 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 298 is on host 298
2023-07-11 14:17:14,450 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 299 is on host 299
2023-07-11 14:17:14,450 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 300 is on host 300
2023-07-11 14:17:14,450 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 301 is on host 301
2023-07-11 14:17:14,450 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 302 is on host 302
2023-07-11 14:17:14,450 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 303 is on host 303
2023-07-11 14:17:14,450 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 304 is on host 304
2023-07-11 14:17:14,450 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 305 is on host 305
2023-07-11 14:17:14,450 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 306 is on host 306
2023-07-11 14:17:14,450 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 307 is on host 307
2023-07-11 14:17:14,450 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 308 is on host 308
2023-07-11 14:17:14,450 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 309 is on host 309
2023-07-11 14:17:14,450 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 310 is on host 310
2023-07-11 14:17:14,451 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 311 is on host 311
2023-07-11 14:17:14,451 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 312 is on host 312
2023-07-11 14:17:14,451 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 313 is on host 313
2023-07-11 14:17:14,451 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 314 is on host 314
2023-07-11 14:17:14,451 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 315 is on host 315
2023-07-11 14:17:14,451 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 316 is on host 316
2023-07-11 14:17:14,451 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 317 is on host 317
2023-07-11 14:17:14,451 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 318 is on host 318
2023-07-11 14:17:14,451 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 319 is on host 319
2023-07-11 14:17:14,451 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 320 is on host 320
2023-07-11 14:17:14,451 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 321 is on host 321
2023-07-11 14:17:14,451 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 322 is on host 322
2023-07-11 14:17:14,451 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 323 is on host 323
2023-07-11 14:17:14,451 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 324 is on host 324
2023-07-11 14:17:14,451 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 325 is on host 325
2023-07-11 14:17:14,451 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 326 is on host 326
2023-07-11 14:17:14,451 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 327 is on host 327
2023-07-11 14:17:14,451 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 328 is on host 328
2023-07-11 14:17:14,451 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 329 is on host 329
2023-07-11 14:17:14,451 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 330 is on host 330
2023-07-11 14:17:14,451 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 331 is on host 331
2023-07-11 14:17:14,451 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 332 is on host 332
2023-07-11 14:17:14,451 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 333 is on host 333
2023-07-11 14:17:14,451 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 334 is on host 334
2023-07-11 14:17:14,451 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 335 is on host 335
2023-07-11 14:17:14,451 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 336 is on host 336
2023-07-11 14:17:14,451 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 337 is on host 337
2023-07-11 14:17:14,451 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 338 is on host 338
2023-07-11 14:17:14,451 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 339 is on host 339
2023-07-11 14:17:14,451 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 340 is on host 340
2023-07-11 14:17:14,452 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 341 is on host 341
2023-07-11 14:17:14,452 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 342 is on host 342
2023-07-11 14:17:14,452 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 343 is on host 343
2023-07-11 14:17:14,452 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 344 is on host 344
2023-07-11 14:17:14,452 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 345 is on host 345
2023-07-11 14:17:14,452 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 346 is on host 346
2023-07-11 14:17:14,452 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 347 is on host 347
2023-07-11 14:17:14,452 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 348 is on host 348
2023-07-11 14:17:14,452 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 349 is on host 349
2023-07-11 14:17:14,452 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 350 is on host 350
2023-07-11 14:17:14,452 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 351 is on host 351
2023-07-11 14:17:14,452 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 352 is on host 352
2023-07-11 14:17:14,452 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 353 is on host 353
2023-07-11 14:17:14,452 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 354 is on host 354
2023-07-11 14:17:14,452 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 355 is on host 355
2023-07-11 14:17:14,452 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 356 is on host 356
2023-07-11 14:17:14,452 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 357 is on host 357
2023-07-11 14:17:14,452 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 358 is on host 358
2023-07-11 14:17:14,452 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 359 is on host 359
2023-07-11 14:17:14,452 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 360 is on host 360
2023-07-11 14:17:14,452 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 361 is on host 361
2023-07-11 14:17:14,452 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 362 is on host 362
2023-07-11 14:17:14,452 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 363 is on host 363
2023-07-11 14:17:14,452 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 364 is on host 364
2023-07-11 14:17:14,452 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 365 is on host 365
2023-07-11 14:17:14,452 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 366 is on host 366
2023-07-11 14:17:14,452 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 367 is on host 367
2023-07-11 14:17:14,452 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 368 is on host 368
2023-07-11 14:17:14,452 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 369 is on host 369
2023-07-11 14:17:14,452 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 370 is on host 370
2023-07-11 14:17:14,452 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 371 is on host 371
2023-07-11 14:17:14,453 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 372 is on host 372
2023-07-11 14:17:14,453 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 373 is on host 373
2023-07-11 14:17:14,453 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 374 is on host 374
2023-07-11 14:17:14,453 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 375 is on host 375
2023-07-11 14:17:14,453 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 376 is on host 376
2023-07-11 14:17:14,453 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 377 is on host 377
2023-07-11 14:17:14,453 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 378 is on host 378
2023-07-11 14:17:14,453 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 379 is on host 379
2023-07-11 14:17:14,453 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 380 is on host 380
2023-07-11 14:17:14,453 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 381 is on host 381
2023-07-11 14:17:14,453 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 382 is on host 382
2023-07-11 14:17:14,453 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 383 is on host 383
2023-07-11 14:17:14,453 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 384 is on host 384
2023-07-11 14:17:14,453 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 385 is on host 385
2023-07-11 14:17:14,453 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 386 is on host 386
2023-07-11 14:17:14,453 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 387 is on host 387
2023-07-11 14:17:14,453 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 388 is on host 388
2023-07-11 14:17:14,453 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 389 is on host 389
2023-07-11 14:17:14,453 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 390 is on host 390
2023-07-11 14:17:14,453 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 391 is on host 391
2023-07-11 14:17:14,453 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 392 is on host 392
2023-07-11 14:17:14,453 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=56, number of hosts=393, number of racks=1
2023-07-11 14:17:14,456 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(351): Running balancer because cluster has idle server(s). function cost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.9999999999999926); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:17:14,456 WARN  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(497): calculatedMaxSteps:17606400 for loadbalancer's stochastic walk is larger than maxSteps:1000000. Hence load balancing may not work well. Setting parameter "hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.runMaxSteps" to true can overcome this issue.(This config change does not require service restart)
2023-07-11 14:17:14,456 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(505): Start StochasticLoadBalancer.balancer, initial weighted average imbalance=0.866551126516458, functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.9999999999999926); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0);  computedMaxSteps=1000000
2023-07-11 14:17:21,456 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(553): Finished computing new moving plan. Computation took 7003 ms to try 1000000 different iterations.  Found a solution that moves 55 regions; Going from a computed imbalance of 0.866551126516458 to a new imbalance of 0.011915077989601387. funtionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.9821428571428571); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-11 14:17:21,483 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1082): slop=0.0, systemTablesOnMaster=false
2023-07-11 14:17:21,483 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(253): Loaded config; maxSteps=1000000, runMaxSteps=false, stepsPerRegion=800, maxRunningTime=30000, isByTable=false, CostFunctions=[RegionCountSkewCostFunction, PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction, MoveCostFunction, RackLocalityCostFunction, TableSkewCostFunction, RegionReplicaHostCostFunction, RegionReplicaRackCostFunction, ReadRequestCostFunction, WriteRequestCostFunction, MemStoreSizeCostFunction, StoreFileCostFunction] , sum of multiplier of cost functions = 577.0 etc.
2023-07-11 14:17:21,493 INFO  [Time-limited test] hbase.ResourceChecker(175): after: master.balancer.TestBalancerDecision#testBalancerDecisions Thread=13 (was 12)
Potentially hanging thread: Time-limited test.slowlog.append-pool-0
	sun.misc.Unsafe.park(Native Method)
	java.util.concurrent.locks.LockSupport.park(LockSupport.java:175)
	java.util.concurrent.locks.AbstractQueuedSynchronizer$ConditionObject.await(AbstractQueuedSynchronizer.java:2039)
	com.lmax.disruptor.BlockingWaitStrategy.waitFor(BlockingWaitStrategy.java:47)
	com.lmax.disruptor.ProcessingSequenceBarrier.waitFor(ProcessingSequenceBarrier.java:56)
	com.lmax.disruptor.BatchEventProcessor.processEvents(BatchEventProcessor.java:159)
	com.lmax.disruptor.BatchEventProcessor.run(BatchEventProcessor.java:125)
	java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:750)
 - Thread LEAK? -, OpenFileDescriptor=263 (was 263), MaxFileDescriptor=60000 (was 60000), SystemLoadAverage=345 (was 544), ProcessCount=170 (was 170), AvailableMemoryMB=7923 (was 8352)